All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 8, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:34
November 8, 2011, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Everybody ready now?
Greetings and welcome, ladies and gentlemen.
Rush Limbaugh, the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, and the Limboy Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Well, this is going to be a weird day.
Everything tastes horrible.
The coffee tastes horrible.
The electronic cigarettes taste horrible.
Food tastes horrible.
Everything tastes horrible.
I got three rotten days ahead of me.
I ought to just quit.
It just, yeah, what a rotten day.
Then you got this.
Bill Clinton was on MSNBC this morning, and he says that he thinks that presidents should be allowed to serve three terms.
And this is obviously because all this talk about sexual harassment must have him wishing he was back in the White House.
And he's seeing how well Kane's doing in the polls for accusers.
One of them works in the Obama regime now.
One of Kane's accusers works in the Obama regime.
Four accusers and Kane's numbers aren't down.
Clinton has got to be, can you imagine the ecstasy he's thinking would be ahead of him?
In fact, Gallup has a story.
I think it's Gallup.
Somebody says that some polling group says that the Kane scandal is being ignored.
That people aren't paying that much attention to it.
Gallup says the Kane allegations have attracted a level of attention that is lower than the average attention all Americans have paid to news stories Gallup has tracked over the last decades.
You believe that?
That is incredible.
A level of attention lower than the average attention all Americans have paid to news stories Gallup has tracked over the last several decades.
In other words, nobody, figuratively speaking, comparatively speaking, is paying any attention to all of this, which can only mean one thing.
The news media is going to ratchet it up even more.
When you tell the news media that their number one story is not connecting, that it's not hitting that many people, it's not interesting that many people, they're only going to redouble their efforts.
All of this stuff, folks, I'm telling you, it's just leaving an absolute rotten taste in my mouth.
And it's real.
This stuff out there.
By the way, random acts of journalism are breaking out all over the place, too.
There is a report out today in the New York Times.
I'm not going to be sidetracked by this.
There's a lot of stuff out there besides this Kane business.
The Kane business is what it is, but there's other stuff out there like Sarkozy and Obama and Israel.
And people have forgotten Obama went to a Jew bash party in L.A. before he was elected president where this Rashid Khalidi guy or Khalidi Rashid, whatever, was bashing Israel all over the place.
The LA Times has the video of that and they won't release it.
So everything is in character here as far as Obama and Sarkozy.
I think this is good.
You know, let people find out what's really going on.
They hate Netanyahu.
They don't like Israel.
They're ticked off.
They have to deal with it.
Meanwhile, the Iranians are nuking up and Netanyahu is the only guy who cares.
Then I was going to say here, the New York Times, there's a story out today that claims that all these bans of soda pop in the schools, guess what, folks?
They aren't working.
The students are drinking just as many soft drinks as they were drinking before the government bans.
And if that isn't bad enough, there's another report out that says higher wage earners eat more fast food than the poor.
Who would have thought that?
That's exactly right.
You tell me how it's possible.
I am your humble servant reporter here, just passing along what the drive-bys are telling us.
Do I eat more fast food?
No, I don't.
Well, wait a minute now.
It depends on how you define fast food.
My chef cooks fast.
But as far as fast food restaurants, no.
I don't go to fast food.
I can't do anything in private.
There's not one thing I can do in private.
So my whole life has lived in a shroud.
So no, I don't go to fast food joints.
It'd be all over the newspapers.
I walk into a drugstore.
It's going to be in the newspapers.
That's why I don't go anywhere.
So anyway, I want to know what is going on.
The soda pop ban isn't working because the kids are figuring a way around it.
Of course, this was predictable.
And then higher wage earners eat more fast food than the poor.
What is going on here?
What are we going to be told next?
That raising taxes won't help the economy?
That man-made global warming doesn't exist?
Are we getting ready here for a flood of truth, the likes of which the American people may not be able to deal with it?
What's the New York Times going to have a story tomorrow saying, guess what?
Herman Kaine's lead in the polls is skyrocketing so much that Obama may not get re-elected.
Now, world media tried to cover up this business of Sarkozy and Obama.
It was the old proverbial microphones were left open.
And so the suck-up media, oh my gosh, we can't report this.
It took about how many days?
Four or five days for this to hit?
So no random acts of journalism there.
Here's the New York Times story on the soda bans.
State laws that ban soda in schools but not other sweetened beverages have virtually no impact on the amount of sugary drinks that middle school students buy and consume at SCRUL.
According to a new study, the study which looked at thousands of public scruple students across 40 states found that removing soda from cafeterias and school vending machines only prompted students to buy sports drinks, sweetened fruit drinks, and other sugar-laden beverages instead.
In states that banned only soda, students bought and consumed sugary drinks just as frequently at Skruel as their peers in states where there were no bans at all.
Kids are not stupid, just like the rich find a way around tax increases.
Here, the kids, they want their sugar, they're going to get their sugar, and they find a way around it.
I'm thinking, I had an interview with Donald Trump yesterday.
He's got a new book coming out on America and greatness and what's going to be required.
And I asked him about the protesters down at Occupy Wall Street and all over the place and what he thought that meant, vis-a-vis America's future.
Are we raising a bunch of wimps and whiners?
Or are the Occupy Wall Street people just a small sampling of what this country has to offer?
But you know, you compare this bunch of protesters to the 60s crowd.
I was thinking about that.
In the 60s, those were real guys.
In the 60s, those panty wastes were being snatched up against their will and drafted to fight in a war that they didn't like.
And that's why one of the many reasons they were protesting.
They were being snatched up and they were sent off to Vietnam or Laos or wherever.
And in many cases, it was people's boyfriends and brothers and classmates who were being sent off to a far-off land to be shot and killed.
Okay, now, whatever you think about that, protesting that does make some sense.
But what are these kids?
These losers at Occupy Wall Street.
What are they protesting?
Student loans.
They're upset because they have student loans to pay off.
And banks want to charge them $5 a month to use a debit card.
So they form these little tent cities.
The women get raped.
I saw that Graham Nash and is it Stills or Crosby?
One of those two from Crosby, Crosby and Nash, they're going to go down to Occupy Wall Street.
They're going to do a concert.
Just like everybody's reliving the 60s, except back then they're protesting, being sent off to a war.
These kids are protesting.
Actually, these kids are not protesting anything.
They're just down there at the direction of White House.
Obama's fingerprints are all over this.
I mean, there's a lot of people pretending this is the 60s all over again, but it actually isn't.
All right, let's take a break.
We'll do that and come back and we'll talk a little bit about who the Sharon Bialik is, how the media doesn't like the way I was pronouncing her name yesterday and other noises I was making with my mouth all coming up.
Don't go away.
We are back.
El Rushmo serving humanity, excellence in broadcasting network.
By the way, folks, we have a really, really cool promotion for Two If Buy Tea, the greatest, the best tasting iced tea in the country, or is it mine?
And we have, we'll be announcing it soon, the greatest promotion yet.
Oh, by the way, a lot of people have been asking, who won the tea that you personally delivered it to?
A woman's name is Gladys, but I'm not going to tell you where she lives, and I'm not going to tell you her last name because she doesn't deserve the hassle.
She's the sweetest lady.
And Catherine and I delivered the tea Friday night to her house.
She had some family and friends there, eight people.
We were in there for about an hour and a half, had just a blast, a terrific good time with Gladys and her family and friends.
And we posted a couple of pictures on our Facebook page and at rushlimbaugh.com of me with Gladys, who was the winner of a year's supply of Two If By Tea personally delivered by Catherine and me.
So the pictures are up there.
Gladys, I know she listens every day.
She's just a pistol.
She was terrifically good time with her and her family.
And thank you for opening your house to us.
She was amazed.
I probably should admit this, but she told me that she knew we were coming on Friday, but we didn't tell her exactly when.
Security reasons, I'm sure you all understand.
But she told me that she kept waiting all day for Secret Service types to show up, to go through the house, to pat her down, to pat down her family, to ask who all was showing up, do a search and all that.
And that didn't happen.
Stalin didn't show up.
No, no, we just walked in there.
We called her 15 minutes before we were due.
She knew we were going that day, but she had no clue what time.
We told her only 15 minutes.
And we drove up.
She waiting outside for us.
We got out of the SUV cap tonight.
We walked in there.
We had a couple cases of tea with us.
We walked inside, met everybody, sat down for an hour and a half and left.
And she couldn't believe it.
She couldn't believe it.
And so we were talking, Catherine and I were talking later.
You know what?
They're telling each other that they're telling Gladys, you might have thought there wasn't any security here, but believe me, there were people scouting in the neighborhood all day.
Don't believe they just walk in there with no clue what's inside that.
But we did.
Because we know the kind of people that are in the audience.
We know.
And we didn't, I mean, it's just, it was just, it was just a great time.
And when you see Gladys' picture, if you go to rushlimbaugh.com or our Facebook page, you will understand that the antithesis of a threat is Gladys.
So, Gladys, thanks again and congratulations to you.
We might do something like this again down the road.
But today's promotion, which I will be announcing in due course, involves trips to Hawaii, trips to Hawaii, four of them.
And we are having a price break on cases of tea if you use the offer code Rush and tours of Pearl Harbor.
It's all see our sponsor is the Marine.
Well, we sponsor the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
It's their birthday, and it's Veterans Day this week.
So that's what we're doing.
I have all the, yeah, I did.
Four trips to Hawaii.
And it's all up right there at 2fbit.com.
You go see it right now if you want.
You have to wait for me to tell you about it, but I'm going to be doing a whole big spread as the program unfolds.
No, go there.
We're going to get people there in fine order.
And one Waikiki.
We're not putting people on a deserted North Shore little motel.
No, we're not going to, they're not doing the show there.
I might do the show there at some point, but you aren't.
No, no, no.
Well, he doesn't want to fly to Hawaii.
You know, he certainly doesn't care about going to Hawaii.
He just can't believe we're giving trips to it.
Four of them, folks.
So you can see it at 2fbit.com right now.
Now, I will put my own verve and touch to this when the official mention hits.
Who's giving me static about what I speaking of that?
Who's giving me static?
Carol Costello at CNN.
But in fact, I think that's somebody one.
I'm trying to find it.
Yeah.
Cookie, I need you to do something for me because I started pronouncing this woman's name Biolik because that's how Gloria Allred told people to pronounce it.
I got people out there who told me that that was how Gloria Allred suggested that her name is pronounced.
There ought to be a clip where Allred tells the press how to pronounce her name, just as I was told.
So if Biolik is not how you pronounce the name, then you need to go after Allred, not me.
Here's Carol.
Grab somebody one.
This is Carol Costello this morning on CNN's American Harassment talking to Sharon Biolik.
You said yesterday that you are ready for this media onslaught and it has already begun.
Rush Limbaugh in his program yesterday said some not-so-nice things about you.
He mispronounced your name and he made this not very attractive sound with his mouth.
And I won't explain it to you because it's not really worth it.
But how is that sort of thing feeling to you now?
I expected it and I still knew I had to come forward.
My biggest concern and my biggest fan is my son.
And actually the night before that I was about to do this, I called him.
He was with his dad.
And I said, Nick, what do you think I should do?
He knew about this.
He had heard me speaking to Gloria and he said, what do you think I should do?
He's 13.
He said, Mom, you have to do the right thing.
I think you need to tell on him.
So that confirmed it for me.
Do you think Obama doesn't love hearing this, a 13-year-old tattletale?
I mean, there's a brown shirt preview here.
Exactly what big government types like.
13-year-old.
You tell on him, mom.
You go tell on him.
So that, that is Carol Costello, who's my own stalker, by the way.
I think the CNN's assigned her to me.
In a media sense, she stalks me.
And so that's that.
Now, here is, let's go back to Soundbite 8.
This is Chuck Goody.
I think it's how he pronounces his name.
At WLS-TV, Eyeball News 7 in Chicago.
Actually, ABC 7 News at 6.
Not at 5.30, but at 6.
This is a portion of his report about Sharon Bialik.
Changing jobs has been a regular occurrence for the Chicagoan.
She has worked for at least nine different employers the past 17 years and appears to have struggled financially.
The public record on Biolek begins in 1991 when she filed personal bankruptcy for the first time.
Wait a minute!
Stop that!
Take it back to the time.
Did you hear how he pronounced it?
Biolik!
And that's how Gloria Alred said to pronounce it yesterday.
And yet here's Carol Costello getting all over me.
I'm used to it, folks.
I can handle it.
Everybody's always all over me.
Here, replay this thing from the time.
Now we know that's how he was pronouncing it.
Biolik.
Okay, next thing you know, we're going to know she was at Penn State at some point.
Go.
Changing jobs has been a regular occurrence for the Chicagoan.
She has worked for at least nine different employers the past 17 years and appears to have struggled financially.
The public record on Biolek begins in 1991 when she filed personal bankruptcy for the first time while living in Displains.
Between 93 and 96, she worked for four different companies in promotion and marketing positions.
In 96 and part of 97, she was at the National Restaurant Association.
In 1999, her son Nicholas was born and a paternity lawsuit was filed by the father, a media executive.
2001 came her second personal bankruptcy filing after sizable legal bills.
Now, does any of this matter to anybody?
I'm still, folks, again, Gallup, the polling bunch, Gallup says the Kane allegations have attracted a level of attention that is lower than the average attention all Americans have paid to news stories Gallup has tracked over the last several decades.
In other words, nobody is paying attention to all this.
And Kane, by the way, he's going to do a press conference this afternoon at 5 o'clock Phoenix, 5 o'clock Eastern Time in Phoenix, which that shows he's becoming a little bit more media savvy.
Doing it so late guarantees it'll get covered on the evening news, but it doesn't give the media enough time to chop it up and find a whole bunch of ways to tear it apart.
Brief timeout.
We'll be back and continue after this.
It's just getting laughable now.
Now we have the Washington Examiner.
A fifth woman is coming forward and suggesting Herman Kane sexually, well, is raising questions about Kane's behavior.
Former employee of the United States Agency for International Development, USAID, says that Herman Kane asked her to help arrange a dinner date for him with a female audience member following a speech that he delivered nine years ago.
Donna Donella 40 of Arlington said the U.S. aide paid Kane to deliver a speech to businessmen and women in Egypt in 2002, during which an Egyptian businesswoman in her 30s asked Kane a question.
And after the seminar was over, Donella told the Washington Examiner Kane came over to me and a colleague and said, Could you put me in touch with that lovely young lady who asked the question so I give her a more thorough answer over dinner?
Donella, who no longer works at USAID, said that they were suspicious of Kane's motives and declined to set up the date.
Kane responded, Well, okay, then you and I can have dinner.
And that's when two female colleagues intervened and suggested that they all go to dinner together.
And so they did.
Kane exhibited no inappropriate sexual behavior during the dinner, though he did order two $400 bottles of wine and stuck the women with the bill.
You know, folks, I got to tell you something.
I have to tell you something.
We've had liberalism roaring through our culture for 50 years.
At times, it has been sneaky, slow, deliberate.
At other times, it has roared its way through.
And as I listen to earnest journalists in their 30s and 40s describe what Herman Cain is said to have done.
No, no, sorry.
When I listen to journalists in their 30s and 40s, unable to explain what Kane has done, but treating it as though it is reprehensible, I sadly conclude we're losing this.
Political correctness, which is censorship, has now spread to behavior, not just speech.
It's spread to behavior.
And sexual harassment now is a political weapon, and it's anything anybody wants it to be.
You don't need a specific allegation.
All you need is the appearance of impropriety.
And that's where this gets dicey because with this roaring liberalism through our culture, what appears to be inappropriate in the old days was nothing.
I remember when Blake Edwards, he was married to Julie Andrews.
He got an award during the Oscars one.
This is just in the last, well, time flies, I think it's the last 10 years.
And he praised his wife, Julie Andrews.
He called her the best damn broad that there ever was.
And the place was outraged.
It was a term of endearment to him.
It wasn't a put-down.
The way Blake Edwards and his, he's the guy that did the Pink Panther movie.
It's the way he and his buds, Peter Falk, that's the way they talked.
They can't do that anymore.
Can't call a woman abroad, even if it's infection.
You can't even say, hey, baby, oh, can't even do that.
What the hell did Herman Kane do here?
He goes up and says, can maybe go to dinner and answer the question?
And that means that we've got a predator on our hands.
Now, you know, and I know that during the 90s, and you guys who have lost your kids in custody fights, you know exactly what I'm talking about.
The feminists and the feminazis went out there.
There was a period of time in this country where every man and every husband was a predator by virtue of his existence alone, by virtue of just being a man.
This is what the feminazis taught.
And I think this is its legacy in part.
It's absurd here.
And everybody that goes into journalism has been treated to this in formal education.
All of these alleged acts of impropriety are whatever the accuser thinks.
All you have to do is be offended by somebody.
And you can be accused of sexual harassment and the crowd will pick up the charge and start yelling it and shit.
And yet, looky, I keep going back to Gallup.
And Gallup says nobody relatively, comparatively, is paying any attention.
And maybe that is because there is a majority and a large section of the country thinks all of this is just a bunch of bogus left-wing claptrap.
Efforts to control not just thoughts, but behavior and votes and all of that.
The number of people who walk around today in abject fear of being themselves would stun you a bit.
And the number of people that walk around today, afraid to tell you what they really think about something.
How often does it happen to you?
You're in a group of people and you want to say what you really think, but you whisper it to one person that you think you can trust because you're afraid that there's some busybody in the group.
Doesn't have to be a woman.
It could be any liberal, any panty-waist liberal is going to take great offense and get holier than now on you and start preaching to you.
And who the hell wants that?
Well, no, because I don't care.
No, it doesn't happen to me.
I don't care.
That's the whole point.
I don't care what people say.
I don't care what they think.
That's a very liberating thing.
But most people aren't that way.
Hell, people whisper things to me all the time.
I can't hear them because I'm deaf.
And they know it.
They still won't raise their voice so I can hear it because they're afraid of what people might say when they want to comment about something going on within a group of people.
That's just, I'll tell you, the left has everybody running around in straitjackets, handcuffs, and gags.
Everybody gagged, blindfolded, you name it.
That's what they want.
A fifth woman now in a period of two weeks.
Herman Kane's been alive how many years?
65 years.
And in two weeks of his life, bamo, five women from out of nowhere.
When he takes a lead in the polls for the press.
You know, I'll tell you, you women, why don't you just make it official, put on some burqas, and I'll guarantee them to you, nobody will touch you.
You put on a burqa and everybody will leave you alone if that's what you want.
You can't, I can remember, folks, and I've told you this.
Early 70s.
I'm away from home, my early 20s, first time in my life.
And it coincided with the modern era of feminazism.
You couldn't tell a woman that she looked attractive without arousing some sort of suspicion about what you intended.
On a date?
I don't mean it work.
On a date, I got grief for opening a car door.
I can do that myself.
Thank you.
You praise a woman's attractiveness and they get a sermon here on how you don't respect her brain.
That stuff happened to me and a lot of people in the early 70s.
And it's just built and built and built.
Kane ran for the Senate in 2004.
Where were all these women then?
He ran for the Republican nomination for president in 2000.
He ran for the Senate in Georgia 2004.
Where were all these women then?
This one, Biolik, not that this means anything, but she lives in Axelrod's building in Chicago.
They see each other in the gym and they wink.
How come she's not after his sexual harassment?
Everybody knows what a guy means when he winks at a girl in a gym.
This is maddening stuff.
People can't be who they are anymore, particularly men.
But it's not just men.
Everybody's walking around in some form of trepidation or another.
But I'm not because I don't care.
But most everybody else does.
And I just, well, I don't, I can't say with a full 100% blanket that I don't care.
Obviously, you have discretion in certain things, places, because I have got no anonymity.
I mean, even with people who have total anonymity, I mean, I'm so famous, doesn't it really matter?
I'm the kind of guy that people make things up about, in addition to whatever they hear that might be true.
But people that have anonymity are still running around scared of everything because of crap like this.
And I always said that the biggest problem with the feminazis, the biggest problem with militant feminism was that its basic goal was to structurally alter human nature.
How many of you know, parents, who bought into the silliness that if you raised your little girl baby with G.I. Joe dolls and painted the room blue, that you're going to raise a tomboy.
And if you put your little boy with Barbie dolls in a pink bedroom, that you're going to raise...
I know people that actually tried that.
And I will never forget the Time magazine cover in the 90s.
Cover story, which meant that to the editors at time, it was big news.
A shocking study that proved men and women were born different.
That was so earth-shattering to the Nambi-Pambi Nimrods at Time Magazine at the time that it rated a cover story.
Now, what must you think if men and women are born different is news to you?
Well, you must have been totally infected with all that claptrap liberalism feminazzism in your young, formative, impressionable years.
Oh, well, a brief time out here, folks, and we'll continue on the EIB network right after this.
I got that time cover here.
I just don't know the date of it, but I do know it's in the 90s.
And the actual, why are men and women different?
It isn't just upbringing.
New studies show.
They are born that way.
As a Time magazine cover.
Here.
Hang on just a second, folks.
I'm going to zoom in on this so you can see it.
It's in the 90s.
I'll never forget this piece of whatever crap it was.
All right, here we go.
There's the cover.
Time magazine.
Why are men and women different?
There you have it.
So you know that I'm not making this up.
Why are men and women different?
It isn't just upbringing.
New studies show that they are born that way.
Now I'm telling you, if you think that, if that's worthy of cover story news at your Time Magazine, what must you think?
It was January 20th, 1992.
That's when it was, January 20th, 1992.
Karina in Slydell, Louisiana, as we go to the phones, welcome to the program.
It's terrific to have you here.
She's 16 years old.
Great to have you here.
Hello.
Hey, Rush.
It's an honor to talk to you.
Thank you very much.
I just wanted to testify that that college graduate last week that you talked to might not have heard anything you had to say about the 1%, but I definitely did.
And it was so inspiring because, you know, as a student who wants to work hard and make her way in the world, I don't know what's going to happen.
But everything you said about how no one can decide who's going to succeed and who's not, and only we can decide that, it was so inspiring.
And I just can't thank you enough for that.
Well, that is, I appreciate that.
I really do.
I remember this guy.
I forget his name, but he was being provocative without contentious with no reason.
Yeah.
But he wasn't, I could tell, talk to you.
He was not hearing a single thing.
That's not why he called, but he provided a great opportunity because I was hoping that there would be people like you that would hear what I was saying and that it would make sense.
So you've made my day here.
And I'll tell you something else, Karina.
As more and more people, I don't know about your age, your generation would be a little bit, but that guy's in his late 20s.
More and more people like him and Occupy Wall Street who decide to just tune out.
More opportunity for you, less competition.
The only problem is they're going to be expecting to feed off of you as you succeed.
Yeah.
What are you interested in studying?
What are you interested in doing with your life?
Do you know yet?
Do you have a passion?
I've always loved the arts, but I'm thinking that I might major in business, especially marketing.
That's really, I'm attracted to that.
So, yeah, that's what I'm hoping for.
So I skipped a grade when I was younger.
I'm homeschooled.
I skipped a grade when I was younger, so I'm probably going to take some classes at a community college first for a year, and then when I'm 18, go for my four-year degree after that.
Wait a second.
You skipped a grade or you were promoted through a grade?
You could say promoted.
I was going to say, you didn't quit for a year.
No, I didn't quit.
No, yeah.
Okay.
You got promoted.
I can tell.
Some people just sound intimate.
If you hadn't said that you were 16, I'd have a tough time believing it, just the way you articulate.
Oh, thank you.
You're more than welcome, just the way you speak.
Well, good.
I'm honored that you're in the audience, Karina.
I'm glad you called.
Thank you very much.
I appreciate it.
Thank you.
Have a good day and a good week and everything else.
Again, Herman Kane's press conference, folks, this afternoon at 5 o'clock.
Joshua was that guy's name last week, Joshua.
And he's the guy that was just mouthing all of this stuff straight out of Wall Street, Occupy Wall Street.
The 1% is his point was that there made no sense for him to get a job because there wasn't any money that the top 1% had it all and they weren't spending it or giving it is what he meant to anybody.
They weren't letting anybody else have it.
So there wasn't any money.
They have it all.
And he was in his 20s.
So he's been taught this stuff and believes it.
Either that or he was just calling, as I say, to be contentious with basically no reason.
But see, for every one of those Joshuas out there, there's a whole lot more Karinas who just called us from Slidell, Louisiana.
Well, may have gotten through to Joshua.
I don't know.
He didn't.
Even if I did, the kid was so obstinate he would never admit it.
That's why I have evolved the theories I have on persuasion.
Even when you persuade people, most people have so much pride, they're never going to admit to you that you did it.
They're always going to want to claim they came to a conclusion themselves, which is fine.
You know, however it happens.
From the New York Times, Penn State said to be planning Joe Paterno's exit amid scandal.
Joe Paterno's tenure as coach of the Penn State football team will soon be over, perhaps within days or weeks.
In the wake of a sex abuse scandal, it's implicated university officials.
Holy sm what?
▲
Export Selection