All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 31, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:31
October 31, 2011, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So we had a caller in the last hour who wanted to know what the likelihood would be that the political story on Herman Cain was planted, laked by a Republican.
And it's entirely possible.
I have no idea where it came from.
I also don't know this.
You have I I think were these white women.
Do we know that?
Well, if they were white women, if the women involved here.
Let's look at this way.
Suppose Herman Cain were white, would the women have felt the same way about whatever he did.
What is this gesture that was not overtly sexual?
It still offended them.
If a white guy did it, would it have bothered white women?
Or did it bother them because a black guy did whatever he did?
I'm just speculating here, folks, because we don't know.
And we also don't know who leaked this.
Uh anything's possible.
It it could come from anywhere.
In the uh hell, it could have been leaked by by the Oakland Raiders.
Who the hell knows?
I mean, it could it could come from the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, could it come from the Republican Party, a Republican candidate?
The risk to a Republican, though.
What if it ever came out?
What would happen to that Republican's candidacy?
Pick your favorite Republican candidate.
I don't want to mention a name, but you fill one in.
Fill the fill a blank in.
X is the source for this.
And he's going to tell Politico about it.
A has got to trust that politico is going to keep his name out of it.
He's going to trust that politico is going to keep his secret.
And if they don't, or if they do, and somebody else finds out that it was Republican X who leaked this, what then becomes of that person's candidacy?
Plus just the way the thing is written.
The details of the story.
Great to have you back here, Rush Limbaugh.
This is the Excellence and Broadcasting Network of the most listened to radio talk show in America and the world, serving humanity simply by being here, showing up.
Telephone numbers 800-282-2882.
If you want to be on the program, your phone calls are coming up Ilquico.
Little Spanish lingo there.
And uh email address L Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
Grab somebody's four and five.
This is Herman Kane this morning on Fox.
He was on with Jenna Lee, and uh she asked him, have you have you ever been accused at any time of sexual misconduct or sexual harassment?
Yes.
I have never sexually harassed anyone.
Let's say that.
Secondly, I've never sexually harassed anyone.
And yes, I was falsely accused while I was at the National Restaurant Association, and I say falsely because it turned out after the investigation to be baseless.
The people close, the people mentioned in that article were the ones who would be aware of any misdoings, uh, and they have attested to my integrity and my character.
It is totally baseless and totally false.
Never have I committed any sort of sexual harassment.
And then uh she said, Well, have you ever had to settle a claim?
Uh falsely accused or not.
Sometimes a settlement happens when a false accusation is made.
Have you ever had to settle a claim, given money, or paid someone because of a claim of sexual harassment or sexual misconduct?
At the restaurant associate.
Now, outside of the restaurant association, absolutely not.
If the restaurant association did a settlement, I am not even I wasn't even aware of it, and I hope it wasn't for much, because nothing happened.
So if that was a settlement, it was ha handled by some of the other officers that worked for me at the association.
So the answer is absolutely not.
But if there was, I hope it wasn't much because nothing happened.
I love that.
Well, I hope if there was a payment, it wasn't much.
Well, you know, people will pay people off just to shut them up.
Whether I mean this is legion.
It is uh it's well known.
This, by the way, folks, this appears to be, could be a twofer for the Democrats.
It takes Herman Cain down a notch and it reminds everybody about the charges against Clarence Thomas.
Uh Just in time for the Supreme Court to hear the Obama case, Obamacare case.
You know, they're out there trying to get Clarence Thomas to recuse himself for a bunch of uh trumped up reasons.
I I read the political story.
I I'm I'm not even convinced that the politico talked to any of these women.
There aren't any quotes from them.
There are to be Yeah, I know he's at the press club today, and I said last hour you're out there screening calls.
I wonder the coincidence here of this coming out last night, the night before Herman Cain addresses the National Press Club.
There aren't any coincidences in politics.
There are no coincidences in uh in politics at all.
Here we've got a it's now grab number four, sorry, number three.
This is Jonathan Martin, he's one of the reporters on the political piece.
He was he was on the morning show today on uh PMS NBC.
And uh let's see, Willie Geist, the co-host said, uh, what are the allegations specifically as you understand them?
There's obviously a wide range in sexual harassment.
What did he do?
Well, we have to be careful about that, obviously, because we're we're sensitive to uh the sourcing involved here, and also uh what actually happened to these women as well.
We want to be sensitive to that too.
Um it includes both verbal and physical gestures.
Um these women felt fell uncomfortable, they were unhappy about their treatment, and they complained to both colleagues and senior officials.
In one case, it involved, I think, um, inviting a woman up to a hotel room of canes on the road.
Um, but we're we're we're just not gonna get into the details of exactly what happened with these women uh besides what's in the story.
Okay, so uh we're not gonna tell you what we know or don't know.
That's it.
We're not gonna tell you anymore.
And they know they don't have to.
Look at the look at the storm they've created.
We're just and keep in mind whatever happened, it was not overtly sexual.
They were talking about sexual harassment.
Now I still don't know what that is.
Could inviting somebody up to your room in a hotel be sexual harassment, but not an overtly sexual gesture.
Well, many, many unanswered questions in uh involved in all this.
But it it's it appears to be somewhat uh somewhat flimsy.
But it's just very not just very all of this is just very, very convenient.
We're just not gonna get into the details of exactly what happened.
Well, isn't that convenient?
Is that journalism?
We're not going to get into the details of what happened.
We're just gonna put out unfocused charges from unnamed sources, and we're gonna leave it at that, and you guys can have at it.
That's what I'm hearing here.
We're not.
We're just not gonna get well, we don't know that it was asking him up to the hotel.
We that's the point here.
Politico is saying that we are just not going to get into the details of exactly what happened.
Well, that's the way they're treating Fast and Furious.
It's the way they treated John Edwards.
It's the way they treated Anthony Wiener, except they used that to say nothing here, nothing to see here.
Let's let's move on.
In this case, we're not gonna talk about anything that happened.
Very convenient for us.
We're just gonna put out a bunch of unfocused charges from unnamed sources and let you have at it.
Which is what's happening.
Here's that Michelle Obama piece of it's actually an opinion piece by Joseph Curl in the Washington Times, and it's entitled The Very Angry First Lady Muchell Obama.
Michelle's back, and she's madder than ever.
She was already pretty angry, seemingly unhappy with just about everything.
As her husband wrapped up the Democrat nomination in 2008, she let fly Her real feelings.
For the first time in my adult lifetime, I'm really proud of my country.
A few months into her job as first lady, her French counterpart asked how she liked the job.
Don't ask, she said, It's hell.
I can't stand it.
She even seems to be mad at her husband.
When the two were set off on a luxurious ten day vacation of Martha's Vineyard, she left early, four hours early, flew up alone on her own government plane, and in those private vacations.
She's traveled to some of the world's most plush resorts.
She's taken forty-two days off in the past year.
That would be eight weeks of vacation time if she held down a normal job.
Now she's ready to spew her bilious disgust with America on the campaign trail.
A dignified transcendent first lady, no chance.
Michelle is going to break with a hundred years of tradition and play the role of a tack dog, heaping derision on her husband's political opponents like no other first lady before her.
And it's already begun.
Mad Michelle this week popped down to Davis Island, Florida to hobknob with the very people her husband despises.
The one percent at a massive mansion on the bay filled with the wealthiest of the wealthy.
America's first lady launched into a tirade about them.
They're Republicans.
Yes, Republicans hope to regain the White House so they can install Supreme Court justices who will trample Americans' privacy, ignore the nation's security, crush free speech, and persecute the religious.
That's what she said.
Oh, and they're rich and they're racist to boot, she added.
Will we be a country where opportunity is limited to just the few at the top?
Who are we?
Or will we give every child a chance to succeed no matter where they're from or what they look like or how much money their parents have?
Who are we?
I'll tell you who your base is, Miss Obama.
The nation's losers.
The nation's takers.
The people riding in the cart, being pulled by everybody else.
Your base is the group of forty seven percent of Americans that pays no income taxes.
Every person in this country who is seeking success.
Every person in this country who is working, every person who is doing everything they can to see to it that this country works has been targeted by you and your husband and your party, Miss Obama.
Those are the people not paying their fair share, you say.
People not paying fair share are the people who vote for your husband.
The nation's losers, the nation's takers.
Just as her husband's reelection strategy is insanely simplistic.
Blame the Republicans for thwarting his brilliant economy saving policy, so too is the first ladies.
She will go to the opulent homes of rich people across the country to tell them how rich people are to blame for America's woes and guilt them into giving millions for her husband's campaign.
Yes, only Michelle and her husband can truly understand, although she often tells those uninformed people that when the president returns from one of his campaign trips, he says you won't believe what folks are going through.
So maybe she is the only person in America who understands.
So America's first lady will travel the country this election season to tell her fellow Americans just how bad it is out there between her lavish vacations.
Of course.
This is when's the last time you uh heard of, read a piece like that that was a direct hit on the first lady.
I don't even think the left went after Barbara Bush that badly.
And because she had a uh what does she have a psychic astrologer, yeah.
Anyway, folks, your phone calls are coming up.
I've got a quick break.
Coca-Cola, by the way.
So sad, it's so sad, but it's great for my tea company.
Well, they're they're they're changing their their packaging.
They're uh they're going to white cans.
They've aligned with the World Wildlife Fund.
They're gonna repackage Coke over the holiday season to go to white cans featuring an image of a mother polar bear and her cubs on the side.
They're going to try to sell Coke and Diet Coke on the basis that we're killing polar bears.
Kid you not.
Kid you not.
Each purchase of a white Coca-Cola can supports false testimony on global warming perpetration of the myth about endangered polar bears.
It's a hoax.
And they are raising money for a hoax through the holidays by way of the sale of coke products in white polar bear cans.
Who got to them?
You know, any more I'm thinking nobody would have had to get to them.
There are plenty of stupid people in this country, in fact, running corporations and working, and they look out there and they, okay, the rest of the stupid people think that the polar bears are dying, so I want to sell coke.
So I'll market to the stupid people.
I'll market to people who believe Algore.
So I'll change the marketing of my company and my and my product, and I'll just I'll just aim for the lowest stupid common denominator I can find.
I'll do with the polar bear hoax.
We'll be back.
Don't go away.
Who was it that had the car commercial?
Was it Nissan?
This polar bear.
Polar bear um goes traveling from the North Pole down to Chicago or somewhere and keeps encountering people destroying his habitat, finally runs across some guy with an electric car in the driveway and waits for him and hugs him.
Now Coke is in on it.
For years, Coca-Cola has given millions of dollars to the eco-extreme group, the World Wildlife Fund, whose alarmism and perpetration of falsehoods are unmatched among its cohorts in climate activism, and now Coke has initiated a new campaign with the World Wildlife Fund that features its iconic advertising species in an effort to drive more funding to the World Wildlife Fund to protect the polar bear's Arctic home.
Promotion will include a new packaging of Coke for the holiday season, changing its familiar red cans to white, and featuring an image of a mother polar bear and her cubs on the side.
Coke says it'll donate two million dollars over five years to the World Wildlife Fund for polar bear conservation efforts.
It'll also match donations made at iCoke.ca.
Last year Coke gave the World Wildlife Fund 1.64 million for his various activities globally.
The planet changing very quickly, nowhere more quickly than in the Arctic at Gerald Butts, president of the World Wildlife Fund in Canada.
He said, really important out there that we all understand that we need that they, the polar bears need our help.
Climate change is changing livelihoods.
It's changing migration patterns for species, and we want to plan ahead.
We want a future for the Arctic.
Where the communities of people who live there are vibrant and sustainable, and the iconic species, particularly the polar bear, has a long-term future on the planet.
Now there's nothing about this that's true.
Even according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the estimated numbers of polar bears have increased by somewhere between double and quintuple.
That is growing from between 5,000 and 10,000 to 20 to 25,000 from the 1950s until now.
They're also known to be tremendously resilient, and in some areas where they have declined, the reason has been attributed to too much ice.
Not too little.
Anyway, it's all a hoax, but Coca-Cola.
See, what they're figuring is here that there's enough idiots in our society that buy products.
That's GE too.
You know, all these companies that go green and have these sales promotions that go green, they figure it's enough idiots out there that think that buying the product will help save a polar bear of the planet that they'll do it.
Even if they don't happen to personally believe in the politics of it, they'll still do it.
So I have to continually laugh at this notion that big business people are Republicans.
Who's next?
Carrie in uh Lavonia, Michigan.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Hello.
Yeah, Ken from Lavonia, Michigan.
Yeah, Rush.
I just wanted to comment that when we see the attack against Herman Cain by those on the left.
Yeah.
It's uh pretty obvious their reasoning is that they know that the only reason that the only way that Barack Obama can uh win against any Republican candidate is uh he's got to pull out the race card.
He's got to divert people's attention from the real issues.
And that's the whole reason behind it.
Well, you mean they don't want to run against another black guy because that takes one of Obama's strengths away?
You got it.
Being the only black on the ticket.
That's it.
Well, that could be.
Because uh it's the whole issue of uh Barack Obama's ideology, uh Barack Obama's uh being able to point to his presidency.
Uh he'll lose against uh any candidate.
So he's gotta pull out the race card.
He's gotta attack the Tea Party, he's gotta attack the.
So if the Republic, your thinking goes, if the Republicans nominate a Republican, it's be very hard to say that the Republicans are racist.
And you got to elect Obama to save the country from a bunch of racists.
Okay.
Appreciate the call.
Got a quick timeout, we'll take it and be right back.
Don't go away.
Surely I could not have heard what I just heard.
Jonathan Martin of the Politico, who I know, is on MSNBC blaming Herman Cain for not explaining what these charges are.
I wish I could remember exactly what he said.
It was just 10 seconds before we started this segment, so I was uh he just caught the last 10 seconds.
He's got some real explaining to do.
He's not being forthcoming on what these charges are.
I thought that was your job.
I I thought Politico had the story of the charges.
I thought Politico had the details.
I thought Politico knew what went on.
I thought Politico knew what ever it was that upset the women.
Kane is supposed to go to the press club today and explain what the charges are against him.
Is surely I cannot have heard this.
I cannot have.
The politico is saying, okay, we've run this story, we don't know anything.
It's now up to Herman Cain to tell everybody what he did or what he was accused of.
That can't be.
Can't be.
That's the job of political ran the story.
They're the ones who have the women, maybe they don't.
They're the ones who uh giving the impression they know what went on.
They're the ones saying, well, we got to be very careful.
We can't tell what happened here.
Uh uh, this is uh very, very curious.
Okay, so the politico runs a story with vague allegations that aren't detailed.
Herman Cain, some hours later shows up at the National Press Club and doesn't provide the details of what he was what he did or what he was charged with, and it's his problem.
Has anybody forgotten?
Well, sure a lot of people have.
Coco, go back to our archives for the website this afternoon.
Find every story that we did that we put up on all these people who said that the Obama White House was hostile to women.
Remember those stories?
Do you?
I'm sure you do now that I'm mentioning them.
They kind of got swept aside.
And there were excuses offered, but yeah, the Obama administration, it was tough for women, hostile workplace for women.
And we didn't really get any details as to why.
Who's next?
Elizabeth in uh in Acton, Massachusetts.
I'm glad you waited.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Thank you for taking my call, Russ.
It's an honor to talk to you, and forgive me if I'm nervous.
I just want to tell you, you know, I'm a huge Cain supporter, so is my husband.
This really upsets me.
This guy is a is a brilliant man.
I heard him on the radio a year ago, and I was so impressed with him.
You know, um and I look at the liberals and what they've done to the black community in general, and it just breaks my heart.
You know, uh they they enslaved them in the eighteen hundreds and the Republicans fought to freedom.
Then, you know, th they they uh you know, the black community was Republican until the Kennedys, according to Shriver, you were supposed to go shake their hands and offer them sympathy when that church was blown up in bur Birmingham.
And now and then they enslaved them to welfare handouts, they demoralize them, take away their education, take away their faith.
So they they you know, and then this great guy comes up, and what are they doing?
They're saying, well, he's a black guy, he can't control himself.
Look at him.
They're doing the same thing to him they did to um to Clarence Thomas, you know, that same racist narrative high-tech lynching, yep.
Yeah, just because he's a black guy, he can't control himself.
He can't control his urges.
If I were Herman Cain, I would just say to them, you know, this has nothing to do with what's going on in the country right now.
And if you are really concerned with what's going on in the country, since obviously if this were a true thing, you know, I wouldn't be here right now.
I would be I would have been demoted, I would have lost my job.
So since this wasn't true, let's focus on what's going on in the country, or are you just doing this to me because you feel threatened by me.
You don't sound nervous, by the way, I just want you to know.
Oh, you're really nice to say that.
No, you don't sound you sound fired up.
You sound passionate.
Well, I am, because I love this country and you know, and all the people in it.
And you're born here, it doesn't matter what color you are, you're an American.
You know, up until the time of uh up until 40 years ago when the Democrats took over, the Liberals took over the lives of black people in this country, you know, they were uh famous people, they were strong, they were powerful, they had their own uh their own um you know famous scientists and inventors and teachers and writers, and it's like they're they're being demoralized.
You know, they're being reduced to look at you guys can't really do anything.
We'll ha give you a handout and a hand up because you're gonna be able to do it.
Yeah, I know.
Well, well, look what this kind of government policy's done to Native Americans.
My grandfather was Native American, and his parents left Maine, moved to Rhode Island, got a job, and said, We are not living this way.
And my grandfather said to me, you know, he said, but we're here today, and so you know, you be the best person you can today and forgive people, you know, for whatever happened that's made you unhappy.
But history is what it is, and you know, if white people hadn't come to this country, we'd be living in a bark hut and go into the bathroom in the woods.
So just be grateful for what you've got.
Don't complain and work hard.
And you know, I just I think as a group of people, any time you depend on the government, any time the government takes over, they ruin your life.
Yeah.
Well, they certainly limit your potential.
They do.
I I let me tell you something.
I I can't uh I want to try to uh uh uh uh uh I doubt that I can make you feel better because this is outrageous.
But I am folks, I'm sitting here and I really cookie.
If you're rolling on MSNBC, I've got to hear this.
You you you've got to give me audio on M SNBC of Jonathan Martin from like one thirty to one thirty.
I need you to listen to it, because I I am convinced I heard him say.
And it's up to Herman Cain to explain all the details in the political story.
Now, folks.
Uh if I heard that right.
Uh Jonathan Martin was talking about the problem Herman Cain has, and he still hasn't told us what the allegations are.
Well, that's right, because he denied anything happened.
But I'm I'm sitting here and I'm wondering what if this is why I want to hear it.
I ought to withhold all speculation till I hear it.
But what if this is just a fishing expedition?
What if they don't have half as much as they're suggesting they've got I find it hard to comprehend you you report a story and you contain in the story, you have in the in the story women uh sexual harassment, but they really weren't overtly sexual gestures, but they found it very offensive and very um uh uncomfortable.
They weren't overtly sexual.
The people who publish the story do not give us any details and then go on TV and say it's up to Herman Cain to explain what the charges are.
And until he does, he's got a big problem.
So now if I it was it happened in a flash, and if I didn't hear this properly, then of course this is all kaput.
So we'll wait until Cookie produces that uh and we'll go from there.
Uh Elizabeth, thanks much for the call.
I appreciate it.
Here's Carolyn Buffalo, you're next on the Rush Limbaugh program.
Hi.
Hi, Russ, how are you today?
Good, thank you.
I'm fired up.
You think the lady before me was fired up?
I'm even more fired up.
Because I like Herman Cain also, and I still do, and I think it's about time for people to start start supporting him uh with their money to more or less make his work test as big as everybody else's, because he seems to be the only one that I could even think of voting for right now, especially after all the stuff that's gone on, and they're trying to bury him.
And my mom keeps saying, Oh, it's gonna be Mitt Romney, and I said, yeah, if we take the people that they give us.
I said that's the biggest problem I see right now, is that um the Democrats are feeding us Mitt Romney.
Hey, it's not just the Democrats that are feeding us Romney, but there's some Republicans trying to feed you Romney, too.
Well, yeah, but it seems like, you know, the newspapers and everything else are just constantly, you know, mid this.
I said, Who wants a uh president named Mitt in the first place?
But I'm telling you right now, I'm not drinking coke anymore.
This is the last one.
Well, you know, it's tough for me to say what you ought to drink, since I have a competing beverage out there, but I would suggest two if by tea.
Uh we don't get involved in the phony baloney, plastic banana, good time, rock and roller, feel good, liberal, do good or crap issues.
Our sponsor is the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
That's who we provide for.
That's who we donate to.
From the from the proceeds of the sale of our product.
Polar bear garbage, all this environmental wacko fraud.
You know, I love polar bears too, what are rugs.
This is just uh I just I I I just cringe at the ease with which all of these hoaxes and fraudulent beliefs worm their way into the popular belief uh structure of so many people, this country.
Carol, I appreciate the call, I really do.
I gotta take a brief time out here, folks.
We'll uh we'll do that and be back before you know it.
Don't go away.
All right, here's that sound by Jonathan Martin, and I I did misunderstand it a little bit.
Here's what he said uh on Enrique and Mitchell, NBC News program about 20 minutes ago.
There are more questions here for him to answer.
He has not yet explained what exactly he was accused of.
He just said that he didn't do it.
Um but these are serious charges.
Uh again, we spent weeks on this story, talked to folks all over the country, current and former employees, current and former board members, sources close to this organization, a powerful trade group here, Andrea in Washington, D.C. Um, and uh we concluded, based upon our reporting, that that Mr. Kane wasn't in fact accused of sexually harassing two female employees, and those female employees left the organization with five-figure cash payouts.
All right.
But we don't know what he did.
They weren't overtly sexual uh gestures.
But what he said here at the top, there are more questions for him to answer.
He's not yet explained what he's accused of.
That's what I heard.
I thought, what the hell is that?
He hadn't explained what he's accused of.
I think what this is there are he's out there saying that he didn't do anything and and he's denied all these charges, and uh, and and I don't think Jonathan Martin's talking specifically about their allegations here.
He's talking about what Herman Cain has denied.
Uh he hasn't yet explained exactly what he was accused of.
He just said he didn't do it.
But even at that, if you say you don't do something, he's not, he's not telling us what he's accused of, but isn't that the job of the media reporting all this to find out what he was accused of?
And if you don't have that, does it maybe look like the story is a little doubtful?
Or is that just me?
And uh five-figure cash payout could be ten grand.
Why not just say how much?
Five-figure cash payout.
Here's Tony in Edmonds, Washington.
I'm glad you waited.
You're next in the program, sir.
Hello.
Hi, Rush, thanks for having me on.
You bet.
Stay, I was hoping to hear your vanished point on uh my my belief that the reason why Romney has not caught on is the sense that that conservatives have of him is that he doesn't have these core feelings.
Now, you know, we all think back of Reagan and and what he did for this country, that the fact is Reagan uh back in the 70s uh believed that communists could be defeated could be defeated.
You know, Detente was not working out, and and it was a loser for the U.S. And he had this opinion that we could beat these guys by going after them head on, and and uh nobody believed that.
The guy they was out in the left field and uh was nuts, and supply side economics was another issue.
And so he had a couple of core issues that he was able to focus on.
Oh, yeah, three.
He had three that he never waited from beating the Soviets, rebuilding U.S. military, and cutting taxes, which would rebuild the U.S. economy.
Those are the three legs of the stool of Reaganism, and they and he never wavered from them.
Romney is dealing now with charges that he flip-flops and that he changes his mind on on uh on core issues as uh as needed.
Anyway, uh I really I would like to know.
You know, Herman Cain says he was cleared by the restaurant association investigation.
And that the politico is saying it's up to him to tell us what he was charged with.
Why don't they go find out?
They've been doing all this reporting.
Why couldn't they go find out what he was accused of?
Why is it his job to explain that?
And then the five-figure payouts.
How much for the payouts could be 10,000.
Five figures could be 99,000.
Why not just tell us what the figure is?
Yeah, well, maybe they wouldn't be that no, they wouldn't be able to identify the leak because of the amount.
Is that what you said?
No, I don't think that they would they would uh but if it's 10 or 12,000 um, you know, it costs a lot of money just to hire lawyers to deal with even frivolous complaints.
And so if this we're being led to believe this is a big bad awful stuff.
And if the two women walked away with ten thousand dollars, it's not big bad awful stuff.
Now, why should the amount be secret?
The only thing I can think of is five-figure payouts sound much more ominous than ten thousand dollars.
Or twenty thousand dollars.
Or even fifty thousand dollars.
Ladies and gentlemen, snurdly, how how long is it that I uh Il Rushbo.
How long has it been that I have been explaining in Detail the subprime mortgage crisis.
From the standpoint that the government was responsible for it, that it was not the banks and not these vicious Wall Street people, but it was the government demanding that these banks make loans to people who could not pay them back.
Three years.
Minimum minimum two years, more like three.com.
A smoking gun document has been found which ties policy to the housing crisis.
And this editorial asks this question but what if government encouraged or even invented those abusive practices?
Can I tell you how frustrating this is?
And I love the people at investors.com.
But this is classic cutting edge stuff for three, four years.
We've known what went on here.
Now there's a smoking gun document that proves it.
Another exciting excursion into broadcast excellence.
At least another hour of it is finished.
In the can, on the way over to the warehouse, housing artifacts for the Limbaugh Broadcast Museum.
▲
Export Selection