All Episodes
Previous Next
May 3, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:50
May 3, 2011, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
I'm Rush Limbaugh, and this is the EIB network.
Stands for Excellence in Broadcasting.
A network named after the performance, talents, capabilities of the host.
Telephone numbers 800-282.
What are you so mad about in there?
It's not worth getting mad at him on the phone.
How many times do I have to tell you, Snerdley, ratchet it down in there?
Plus, it's a distraction.
Here I am in the midst of saying having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
I look at you in there.
You look like Barney Frank on CNBC.
Here's the telephone number if you want to be on the program 800-282-2882, the email address, lrushball at EIBnet.com.
CNN says Obama just got a point, a bump of one point in the polls.
They're clearly unhappy about this.
There's a Washington Post pew poll out now.
Now get this.
This is quite telling.
Washington Post Pew Poll out now that says it's P-E-U, P-E-W.
It says that Obama has had his approval for the way he handles terrorism boosted to an all-time high of 69%.
Washington Post Pew Poll.
Obama, all-time high in approval of how he handles terrorism, 69%.
So SEAL Team 6 will be ecstatic to hear that it all worked out.
It was worth it.
Weirdly, though, on the economy, Obama still sits at 40% approval.
A career low.
How is that possible?
Way up to, it's because you can't put Osama bin Laden's blood in your gas tank.
It's because you can't take Osama bin Laden's turban to Walmart and exchange it for a box of Krispies.
But why is the media going crazy running all these polls?
Wasn't killing Obama, Osama, a good thing?
It was a bipartisan thing.
Why are they running all these approval polls anyway?
I thought this was simply the right thing to do to kill Osama bin Laden.
Even if it didn't help Obama in the polls, this was just the right thing to do.
Or if they're still running all these questions, all this polling.
So let me ask it this way.
When did we land on the moon?
When did Neil Armstrong take the first step out there on the moon?
Remember the year, Snerdley?
So that's 1969.
June, sometime in this, July, 1969.
Who was president?
Richard Nixon.
Did the country celebrate Richard Nixon after the moon landing?
They didn't celebrate Nixon.
They didn't?
We didn't celebrate Nixon, but Nixon was in the White House when we landed on the moon.
Why didn't Nixon get the credit for it?
Because it was JFK's baby, right?
It was JFK's objective.
Something a man on the moon in the next decade.
Well, the country came together on Sunday night over the takedown of Osama bin Laden.
The country instantly unified around that singular event.
Now, the media wants everybody to think we unified around Obama.
The White House thinks, they want us to think we unified around Obama.
Do they not?
That's exactly what they want us to.
Even Obama last night, I felt bad for Ted Baxter.
His show was interrupted.
Fox cut away from the O'Reilly factor last night to go to the White House to show Obama getting a standing ovation from members of the congressional leadership for unifying the country.
Obama was talking about how, yep, well, okay, finally had some unity here.
But what was the unity about?
Unity was about the country coming together over an achieved objective.
The killing or the capture of bin Laden was something this country solemnly dedicated itself to for the past decade, just like the moon mission.
JFK gets a lion's share of the credit for America's putting a first man on the moon, even though it was not accomplished on his watch.
But he set the whole thing in motion.
The country didn't celebrate Richard Nixon after the moon landing.
Why would we?
We were celebrating the accomplishments of NASA, the astronauts, those that saw the vision through.
We know who was responsible.
We didn't need to be told by a political opportunist or a political class who was responsible.
And now we're cutting NASA.
Then we got the final shuttle launch coming up.
What was today at the earliest?
Well, yesterday at the earliest.
They scrubbed it.
I know they scrubbed it, but I don't know when they've scheduled it.
They haven't rescheduled it.
Well, the point is we come together on issues we all agree on.
We are not unifying around liberalism here, folks.
We are not unifying around Obama.
Every narcissist's dream is to have the world agree with them and adore them, but that's not our dream here.
That's not what this unity is all about.
No, the American dream concerns our families, our life goals, jobs, homes, those that still have them, our disposable income, those that still have that, and the liberty, those that still have that.
I mean, there's really nothing to leverage here.
The celebration over Osama's assassination isn't transferable to a domestic political agenda, but they're trying.
You see, the American people know what to celebrate.
We did that.
We know what not to celebrate to, and that's liberalism.
We don't do that no matter how it's positioned.
And asking us to set aside our principles as a means of showing unity is absurd, transparently absurd.
But that's what they're doing.
Now, I realized that my first hour, oh, I have made an executive decision.
We're going to post 45 minutes of the audio the first hour on our Facebook page as an added bonus.
Normally, you've got to be a subscriber at rushlimbaugh.com together.
We're going to put the first 45 minutes out on our Facebook page, Coco at the website working on that even now.
The Associated Press.
Monday, May 2nd, 11.26 yesterday morning.
Officials, CIA interrogators at secret prisons developed first strands that led to bin Laden.
And our buddies at Newsbusters have captured this in the cash in case AP pulls this off their site.
Officials say that CIA interrogators in secret overseas prisons developed the first strands of information that ultimately led to the killing of Osama bin Laden.
Current and former U.S. officials say that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of the attacks, provided the name of one of bin Laden's most trusted aides, the courier.
The CIA got similar information from Mohammed's successor, Abu Faraj Alibi.
Both were subjected to harsh interrogation tactics inside CIA prisons in Poland and Romania.
The news is sure to reignite debate over whether the now closed interrogation and detention program was successful.
Former President George W. Bush authorized the CIA to use the harshest interrogation tactics in U.S. history.
Obama closed the prison system.
So they want to know if this is going to reignite the debate.
I think it closes it.
It ends the debate.
This is how it worked.
And this regime, having nothing to do with it other than trying to shut it down, utilized this and a lot of other policies put in place by the Bush administration.
Policies they opposed.
Policies they tried to get rid of.
Policies they campaigned against.
And yet there it is, right there on AP.
CIA interrogators at secret prisons developed first strands that led to bin Laden.
It doesn't say Obama.
Interrogators at secret prisons.
It doesn't say Obama developed first strands.
Obama's not even in the story.
Audio soundbite.
Number two, F. Chuck Todd this morning, daily rundown, MSNBC.
George W. Bush got a bump for 105 weeks after 9-11.
Roosevelt got a 46-week bump after Pearl Harbor.
The most recent one is the capture of Saddam, a 15% bump for George W. Bush that lasted seven weeks.
The question is, do we live in a country that does political bumps anymore?
That is because their internal polling is showing that there's no big bump for Obama.
CNN, a one-point bump.
This is in his approval number.
Now, the Washington Post poll is how he's dealing with terrorism.
That's an all-time high.
But his overall approval numbers are not moving.
And the media can't believe it.
And so now, well, maybe the country just doesn't do it anymore.
It's over for everybody.
It's over for you.
I mean, if Obama can't get a bump out of it, nobody could.
And then, of course, yes, that's right, Snirdly.
Then the F. Chuck Todds of the world said, okay, who's to blame for this?
Who is to blame for the fact that there is no bump?
Who is to blame that maybe nobody gets a bump anymore?
The country gets a bump.
We are unifying around the killing of a terrorist, a specific terrorist, Osama bin Laden.
And Obama and the Democrats don't want to kill terrorists.
They don't even want to call them terrorists.
And yet they want a bump.
And they want all the credit.
They employed policies they steadfastly tried to dismantle.
And they want credit for it.
David Rodham Gergen with a limbo echo.
Beware what happened to George H.W. Bush.
He was on in the arena last night with client number nine.
Question, enormous stature boost for the president at every level, said client number nine.
Of course, the question is, will it carry forward into the debate?
The debate over the debt ceiling, which is going to be very contentious.
Oh, is this?
So client number nine wants to know if this will have any effect on the debt ceiling debate.
Here's the answer from David Rodham Gergen.
It's important to remember the cautionary note of President George H.W. Bush.
President Bush, along with Secretary Baker, organized this massive alliance, sent in 500,000 troops, and kicked Saddam the hell out of Kuwait.
Did it masterfully his approval rating spiked up to 89%.
But the economy was lousy.
In the year and a half that followed, he went down 60% in the polls, and he lost re-election.
So it's way too early.
This economy is a big, big question on that.
Yeah.
Client number nine did not want to hear that.
That was not the answer.
We got to take a brief time out.
We will come back.
We'll get to your phone calls when we return.
Okay, back to the phones we go to Tom Ball, Texas.
And Tony, Tony, thank you for waiting.
Great to have you with us on the EIB Network.
Hi.
What I want to talk about, I want to thank you for staying on Target with this Obama deal.
I've been able to keep my radio on for you.
A lot of channels I'm switching off.
I'll tell you a story.
I called a radio talk show this morning, and they told me that's off topic.
What was off topic?
Obama talking about Obama.
They're celebrating.
And I said, well, here's the deal.
Obama has done more damage to my family, me, my fellow citizens, and America more than 10,000 bin Ladens could ever do.
And if you think everything this man does is political, he came out on May 1st, which is May Day, to make this announcement, which is Commie Day.
So they didn't want to let you on the air on this show because you said that Osama bin Laden has created much less damage than Obama has.
Yes, exactly.
And look at the fuel prices right now.
They're going through the roof.
My food bill, I ain't going to be able to afford my food pretty soon.
I'm not going to be able to afford to do anything, take a trip.
This country's fixing to come to its knees, and we're celebrating with Obama.
Give me a break.
Give me a break.
This is why there's not going to be a bump.
This is exactly why there's not going to be a bump.
And this is exactly why the people in Washington, the drive-bys, are totally missing this.
It's like I say, you can't put Osama bin Laden in your gas tank.
You just can't.
And even if you could, what good would it do you?
Sue in Boone, North Carolina.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Thank you, Rush.
I have been steaming ever since this news came out.
I didn't even watch Obama's speech because I knew that he would take full credit for it.
And I'm just.
Wait a minute.
What about all the unity that was happening?
Oh, right.
I'll tell you what.
I love George Bush, and I love Texans, and I love that guy that was on before me.
And when I think of all that Bush endured and Cheney and his administration, and then everything that he despised about Bush and berated Bush for was used to take down Osama.
And I'll tell you what, when they start using this as a re-election tool, I mean, what a hypocrite.
I'm just furious.
Well, you should be.
I'm glad you stuck it out listening today.
It was a very important program today, I thought, with a very important first hour, a show open to have this stuff said.
It's amazing, too.
You know, I've gone from being hated to being loved to being really hated in 24 hours.
And it's not over because of today.
Let's audio Soundbite 5.
Let's start there in order.
Let's review what happened in the drive-by media yesterday.
First, Cameron Hall, MSNBC's news nation.
Rush Limbaugh opened his show praising the president, even thanking God for the moves, this decision made by President Obama.
Bill Ritter, WABC Channel 7, Eyewitness News in New York from ground zero.
Consider this.
Even Rush Limbaugh today, and there is no bigger critic of President Obama than Mr. Limbaugh.
He said today, I'm quoting now, thank God for President Obama.
That from Rush Limbaugh.
Are the times changing or what?
And Mara Lyason last night.
NPR, all things considered, last night, these bites, the last two, are five hours, four hours after this program ended yesterday.
Here's Mara Lyason.
Rush Limbaugh was congratulating Obama today.
So this is a moment of unity.
This is what the president's whole brand is about.
But they weren't fooled over at CNN.
Well, they were fooled at CNN earlier, but the reporterte that they've assigned to essentially stalk me, a woman by the name of Carol Costello, this morning on CNN's newsroom.
Rush Limbaugh came out with a line saying, thank God for the President Obama, but he meant it very sarcastically.
If you take a look at his website, he actually meant, congratulations, Mr. President, for continuing the Bush anti-terror policy.
So a reporter who works this beat got the story correct.
It's a little inside baseball, but during the program yesterday, actually during the third hour, if you were listening, I shared with you a piece from thehill.com.
I was kind of incredulous.
I was reading these pieces.
And I hoped to get through these pieces, maintaining full composure, but I was unable to.
I had moments of silent laughter during the piece.
I frankly was stunned.
And all candor, folks, I was surprised.
And I started asking Snerdley, did I somehow not pull this off?
He said, no way.
So we concluded these people had to want to believe this so badly that they did.
They wanted to believe.
Thank God for Obama.
Only Obama was capable of it.
The military, a bunch of warmongering hawks, they were going to go in and obliterate them.
But only Obama.
Obama alone knew the right way to do this.
So after the program, I got an email from H.R., my trusty and trusted chief of staff.
Look, we just got a call from a guy at Reuters who read their original story.
He said, this doesn't sound right.
And wanted to listen to the program because he didn't believe what other media people were writing about my original comments yesterday.
So he listened.
So he did listen.
He called H.R. back and said, it sounds to me like there's a little sarcasm here.
And HR said, well, don't quote me, but I don't think I could disagree with you on that.
So it was late in the day yesterday.
finally started correcting themselves.
Greetings and welcome back.
As usual, half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
Question, when will this president and the attorney general Eric Holder, when will the trial for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed be?
It took him two years to abandon the civilian trial idea.
They're going to have a trial in New York.
$200 million a year just for security.
Nobody wanted that trial in New York.
We all knew what a trial in New York would be.
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his lawyers with no obstacles in their way, they just ripped this country to shreds didn't fly.
So when now will the trial be?
Took him two years to abandon the trial in New York.
Now he's supposed to be tried at a military tribunal in Club Gitmo.
What's up with that?
When is the trial?
Don't forget now, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was captured during the Bush administration.
And by the way, if you recall, at that time, there were all kinds of challenges by the Libs to military commissions.
Didn't want military commissions.
No military tribunals.
They weren't fair.
They denied civil rights.
But is not the road clear now?
I mean, we've got bin Laden.
We've murdered bin Laden.
Why don't we proceed with the trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed?
Maybe they can put him on trial in October of 2012 and get a bump.
Hey, there's an idea.
Put Khalid Sheikh Mohammed on trial in October of 2012 and then wait for a bump.
See if that helps Obama.
Oh, what?
You don't think this is all about Obama?
USA Today.
Susan Page, bin Laden demise boosts Obama, but doesn't ensure re-election.
That's exactly how they look at virtually everything.
These are the moments that presidents hope to be remembered for.
The operation to get Osama bin Laden, a goal that eluded George W. Bush, brought Barack Obama a triumphant achievement in the most unifying episode of a presidency held during sharply partisan times.
Democrat pollster Mark Millman said there's no question it'll be seen by history as a critical accomplishment of his regime and of his.
When you say quick name one thing Obama has done, this is going to be the first thing on the list.
Hey, Melman, are you proud of that?
Look at all the things that you are so happy and proud Obama's done, and this is it.
When you say quick, name one thing Obama's done, this is going to be the first thing on the list, and it's not going to have one shred of impact on his reelection.
And I tried to provide aid and comfort to all of you yesterday who feared.
Remember, you had a call from a guy.
That's it, Rush.
The election's over.
No way.
Who's next?
New Orleans.
Debbie, wonderful to have you with us here on the EIB network.
Hi.
Well, thank you.
I appreciate it.
This is the first time I'm calling.
I have a little scenario here.
I don't think Obama had anything to do with ordering the strike on Obama.
I really don't.
I think he thought the CIA would never come up with a plan to get him.
I know I was, after 10 years, it's like if you don't have him yet, when you're going to get him.
Wait a second.
Now, wait, wait.
Let's go back.
Did you just say you don't think Obama had anything to do with ordering the strike on Osama?
Well, who did?
Well, I think the CIA came to him with a plan.
I think they came to him and told him, look, we have him.
Okay, now there is a story out there on a website that I've never heard of.
I probably shouldn't mention this.
I don't know if it's a kook site or not.
I don't, I don't know.
It says that the real story is that Panetta ordered this.
This isn't why I'm giving this any, because her theory is the CIA did it.
And Panetta runs CIA.
This website claims that they couldn't get Obama to stop dithering about this, and somebody had to pull a trigger.
And the reason Obama went out to play golf on Sunday was for appearances, to continue the charade that nothing special was up.
No, I think he did finally order it, but his back was to the wall.
Either he agreed to do what the CIA presented to him, or if he didn't, he ran the risk of Osama slipping through his fingers like Clinton, and then that would just ruin his reputation forever while history regarded him.
I think he didn't have a choice.
I think he did.
Okay, all right.
Well, see, here again, regardless, you know, at this point, it doesn't matter why people think what they think.
It's just he doesn't get any credit.
That's why there's no bump.
You know, they look at, folks, there's some really hard-scrabble reality out there.
This country's economy has been destroyed.
It's in the process of going down the tubes.
And this is not anything that's changing people's lives.
You know, the real, I mentioned this mere moments ago.
The real telling aspect of this is to listen to 9-11 families talk about it.
There's no euphoria.
There's no joy.
There's no closure.
There's no administration is reflecting itself.
There's no, well, we don't feel unified.
I don't feel there's any closure here.
You know, the people who are the closest to this event are not at all feeling anything like the regime and the media are hoping to make everybody feel.
So it's fascinating to listen to this, I think, to you know, the people and their reactions to this.
And I, I, you know, I have to tell you, this, this, this Mark Melman quote, the Democrat pollster, when you say, quick, name one thing Obama has done, this is going to be the first thing on the list.
You realize here's a Democrat pollster who thinks that killing Osama bin Laden is bigger than Obamacare.
That will tell you how much people hate Obamacare.
That will tell you how much these Democrats know how much people dislike Obamacare.
That this is going to be the first thing people mention when they're asked to name something Obama's done.
It means they know that there is universal opposition to Obamacare.
Note also when Mark Melman, the Democrat pollster, and he's involved, he ranks.
Name one thing President Obama has done.
He doesn't list any domestic achievement.
Stimulus, creating the jobs, saving the economy, whatever, all this rigamarole that they come out with each and every one.
No, no, no, no.
Killing Obama.
That's the achievement.
Osama, killing Osama.
That's the achievement.
I'm going to start using last names here.
People think I'm doing this on purpose, and I'm not.
Honestly, I'm not.
Here's Doug in Jasper, Indiana.
Great to have you up next, sir, on the EIB network.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
Thanks for taking the call.
You know, following up on your last call, I think if people want a glimpse into what people in the administration really think about the military and this kind of operation, you should.
I don't know if you have any clips of Brennan or Brenner, the Brennan, yeah, I got him right here.
And in fact, they were next up in the rotation, coincidentally.
He referred to the SEAL Team 6 folks this morning on Fox News to those, you know, these heroes as assaulters.
That was his term multiple times, used that word, assaulters.
I don't have that one.
Could not bring himself to say, you know, soldiers, you know, heroes, you know, SEAL members, special ops.
Are you saying, wait a minute, wait a minute.
Are you saying he called them assaulters?
Assaulters, yeah.
Our soldiers, our special ops folks.
Well, look, this guy's lame-brained anyway, but I expect that.
Oh, I know.
He's like a Joe Biden in training or something.
Well, no, he's like the other guy.
They said the Muslim Brotherhood's basically a bunch of Mother Teresas.
I didn't hear that one.
Oh, well, he didn't say Mother Teresa, but he said the Muslim Brothers.
Oh, they're not secular.
No, no, no.
This guy's at one piece.
Moderate.
I forget what his name is, but he's another one of the national security people in the regime.
We'll come back after the break.
We got a couple of John Brennan soundbites.
One from CNN this morning and the other from the CBS early show.
He had some, you know, they've had to back off a couple things he said yesterday at the White House briefing.
They said, no, Obama's wife didn't shield him.
No, Obama, Osama's wife didn't shield him.
Osama didn't have a gun.
They've had to walk back a bunch of stuff that Brennan said yesterday afternoon.
Anyway, take a break.
Come back.
Continue right after this.
Wow, that was fast.
All right, we got it.
And we're back.
Great to have you, Rush Limbaugh and the EIB network.
Let me go back in time, checking the email, which I always do.
My first hour, I made the claim that all of these policies that the regime is now heralding and celebrating are policies they campaigned against and opposed.
And the usual suspects of the left.
You're just making it up, Mr. Limbaugh.
You can't prove it.
You don't know what they're talking about.
It's just typical of what the...
All right, let's review some things.
Here's Mark Hemingway at a blog at the Weekly Standard.
Reminder: It's been reported that bin Laden was killed by SEAL Team 6, officially known as Naval Special Warfare Development Group, or DevGru.
The bottom line is that SEAL Team 6 had a different name when they were discussed by Democrats during the Bush administration.
They were called Cheney's assassination ring.
SEAL Team 6, which Obama and the Democrats now celebrate, now herald, they were called Dick Cheney's assassination ring.
Here is CNN's story from December 26th of 2003.
Democrat presidential candidate Howard Dean will not pronounce Osama bin Laden guilty before a trial.
Said that I've resisted pronouncing a sentence before a guild is found.
I have this old-fashioned notion that even with people like Osama, who is very likely to be found guilty, we should do our best not to in positions of executive power, not to prejudge jury trials.
So theoretically, Howard Dean ought to be angry as hell.
We just assassinated somebody before they had a trial.
He said Osama was innocent until proven guilty.
Here's another example, typical kind of story we've gotten for years from the media.
This is via the Washington Post by Peter Finn and Joby Warwick.
Headline, detainees, harsh treatment foiled, no plots.
Waterboarding, rough interrogation of Abu Zubaida produced false leads.
Peter Finn and Joby Warwick.
That's the Washington Post of March 29th of 2009.
March 29th, 2009, the Washington Post quoting Democrat officials, waterboarding doesn't work.
It produces lies.
It produces false leads.
Jennifer Lovin, AP, April 29th, 2009, President Barack Obama said Wednesday night that waterboarding authorized by former President George W. Bush was torture and that the information it gained from terror suspects could have been obtained by other means.
In some cases, it may be harder, he conceded, at a White House news conference, capping a whirlwind first 100 days in office.
Yeah, so remember that everything we were doing was torture.
We had to stop it.
It was destroying our values.
It was destroying our reputation.
We had to shut down Guantanamo Bay.
George Bush should be embarrassed.
All of this stuff.
It was remarkable, folks, if you go back and remember, this is what they owe us an apology.
They are now heralding and celebrating everything they opposed, which led to this successful mission on Sunday night.
Meanwhile, the media, I mean, this is kind of humorous.
Everybody and their brother seems to have gone out of their way to misunderstand my opening monologue yesterday.
You know, I've always heard it said that the ability to detect sarcasm and satire is a sign of mental acuity.
And the media's reaction would seem to prove once and for all that that's true.
They didn't get it.
Jerk meet me.
We're sitting here.
We're in stunned disbelief over this.
We can't believe it.
I'm even asking, you should have been here.
I'm asking during a commercial break.
I'm asking Dawn and Brian Snurdy.
Have I lost it?
This does.
We were struggling here yesterday.
By the way, the latest guidance is that the White House is going to release the death photo of Bin Laden close to 2 o'clock.
Close, which is now.
We are close to 2 o'clock now.
That's the latest guidance.
Haven't seen anything yet.
Here's Ahmet in Buffalo.
Great to have you on the program.
Welcome to the EIB Network.
Good afternoon, sir.
Rush, how are you?
Very well, sir.
Thank you.
Thank you for making my call.
You bet.
Listen to it every day.
Appreciate that.
Rush, quick question, sir.
I am from India, and I'm a legal immigrant, and I'm a U.S. citizen now.
And we are so close to Pakistan that we always have fights with them.
Here's my question, Rush.
What kind of information and how many years does this guy know the Pakistan knew?
And what kind of hell are they to us that he's living in their backyard and they didn't say a word about it?
You know, I don't know about the Pakistanis.
I think they're in a precarious situation.
I think these guys have to play a double game.
They're on the, I'm not making excuses for them, but Al-Qaeda would just as soon wipe them out as they'd wipe us out.
They have nukes, don't forget.
Pakistan has nuclear weapons.
And they've got to play a double game.
What you want to know is what did Pakistan know and when did they know it?
It seems logical to conclude.
I mean, he's living in an enlarged hut that's basically 100 yards from a military training center.
How can they not know he's there?
And supposedly, he's been there for five or six years.
So you have to conclude that he was there.
And now people say, well, we got to stop giving him money.
This is crazy.
Four and a half for Pakistan.
This is nuts.
We can't do it.
And then other people are.
Yeah.
Sorry to interrupt you.
I just want to make a quick point.
Now, the other thing, even if your staff, like I said, I listen to you every day, even to your staff on what you do, you are good and you're very good about it.
And you still say we here at the EIB network to try to give credit to each one of them.
I want to know: did Mr. Obama, Mrs. Obama, or any Democrat out from the Senate, did anyone come out and say, hey, let's give some credit to the Bush or Chinese people?
No, no, no.
No, no.
No, that's the point.
Nobody was capable, other than Obama, of seeing this in the proper light, the right way to do it.
No, that's an excellent, excellent point.
Could not have said it better myself, even though I did.
Okay, audio of the first hour of today's program is now on our Facebook page.
It was requested by a listener who wanted to send it to her liberal buddies.
So we put it up there.
Audio from the first hour now at our Facebook page.
One big, exciting broadcast hour remains.
▲
Export Selection