All Episodes
Previous Next
April 1, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:53
April 1, 2011, Friday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Yes, America's anchorman is away today, and this is your undocumented anchorman sitting in, Mark Stein.
Honored to be here.
No supporting paperwork whatsoever.
I'm a foreign exchange student at the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
It's a great program.
Guys like me get to study here, and in return, Janet Napolitano gets to defect to Libya.
So it all works out.
Rush is not here.
He's transferred operational control to a Canadian general and the international community.
Don't worry about it.
You won't notice a thing.
It's April the 1st, April the 1st, April Fool's Day, a day when the papers are full of lame, pathetic stories that purport to be true, but are obviously just pathetically, limply amusing spoofs.
Papers are full of them.
Today, New York University is hosting a conference of Stalinists.
Well, no, that actually is bound to be true, and so it is.
Hillary Clinton calls Basher Assad a reformer.
True or just an April Fool's story?
In Libya, the United States and its allies are thinking of arming al-Qaeda.
True or just an April Fool story?
According to the Wall Street Journal, twice as many Americans work in government as in manufacturing.
True or just a pathetically obvious April Fool's spoof.
And here's my favorite from today's Washington Post headline: Pressure grows to rein in compensation at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
These government interventions in the property market are artificial entities interfering in the property market, distorting the property market.
Two years ago, two years ago, they came close to taking down the entire global economy.
They had a piece of over half the mortgages issued in the United States of America, and they came close to collapsing the entire global economy.
But only now, in April 2011, is pressure growing to rein in compensation at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
The company's six top executives earned a combined $35.4 million.
That's great, isn't it?
But don't worry, it's those fat cats on Wall Street you need to know about.
What's her name?
Jamie Gorellic.
She's on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and she's now being brought back to head up the FBI.
She was the one who was responsible for the wall, the so-called wall, the cone of silence or whatever it is between whatever it's called, between U.S. agencies, which meant that if you hear there's like income, if on the morning of September 11th you hear there's incoming toward the World Trade Center at the FBI, you're not allowed to alert the CIA or the new or the Air Transportation Safety Board or whatever.
Jamie Ghorelik, she went from building the wall, walling off all these separate government agencies, to a big-time job.
I can't remember whether it was Freddie Mae, Fannie Mac, one of them, which of them.
And now she's going to be.
After doing a couple of years of light work at Fannie Mac, Freddie Mae, she's made enough that she can afford to return to government again.
So Barack Obama is going to make a head of the FBI.
Quote: Pressure grows to rein in compensation at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
There shouldn't be a Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
And the idea that only now, two and a half years after these people came close to taking out the global economy, pressure is growing to rein in compensation.
I wish it were an April Fool's story, but sadly, it is the glum reality of the world we live in.
It's the end of the week, and you know what that means.
Live from New York City, it's open live Friday.
Yes, don't forget, Monday to Thursday, the highly trained broadcast specialist determines what topics are discussed on the Rush Limbaugh Show.
But we no longer have a highly trained broadcast specialist behind the microphone, so anything goes today.
1-800-282-2882.
Anything that is on your mind.
If you are one of the freedom fighters in eastern Libya, now being funded and armed by the government of the United States, call us up and let us know what it's like to simultaneously shout death to the great Satan as you cash your big check from the U.S. Treasury.
Give us a call.
We'd love to hear from you.
1-800-282-2882.
If you are one of these people cheered by the news that the U.S. unemployment rate has officially gone down below 9%, the so-called real unemployment rate apparently is 16%.
I don't know why the official unemployment rate, why should we have an official unemployment rate and then a real unemployment rate?
I mean, that's a slightly surreal thing right there.
But if you're one of those impacted by the unemployment rate, if you're enjoying the benefits of this new gangbusters economy, if you've managed to, if you aren't employed, but you now got a brand new job because of this gangbusters economy, because of the recovery summer we had last summer and the recovery spring we're enjoying now, give us a call.
1-800-282-2882.
We will talk about anything you want to talk about except cowboy poetry.
It's always the things you mention as an aside that come back to haunt you.
I ended the show yesterday at 3 p.m. Eastern, and an hour later, my inbox was full of emails from cowboy poetry seminar callers.
I was flamed by cowboy poetry seminar callers regurgitating cowboy poetry talking points.
What has this country come to when cowboy poets have talking points?
Cowboy, I objected to federal funding for Cowboy Poetry Festival, and I got all these lame talking points saying, well, no, only 52% of the funding for the Cowboy Poetry Festival comes from the federal government.
I'm not interested in getting into the weeds or into the cacti of the cowboy poetry, cowboy poetry situation.
That's your problem right there when cowboy poets have talking points.
Cowboys used to represent the self-reliance and resilience of the lone hero riding out, riding out onto the distant horizon under lonesome skies.
Now we've got cowboy poetry talking points.
So 1-800-282-2882 will talk about anything except cowboy poetry.
Update, update from Al-Qaeda, our new Al-Qaeda allies in Libya, because this is the sophisticated new development in the war on terror.
In Libya, there are, don't worry, they're not all al-Qaeda.
The freedom fighters aren't all al-Qaeda.
There are just al-Qaeda elements.
And now they're on our side.
And it's great.
It's great development in the war on terror.
Remember the way it used to be under Bush?
Bush said, you're either with us or you're with the terrorists.
This time around, we're with us and we're with the terrorists.
I mean, how fair is that?
You couldn't improve on that.
But apparently, Al-Qaeda haven't got the memo because the al-Qaeda spokesman, Abu Yahya Al-Liby, I got my Yahya working, baby.
Abu Yahya Al-Libi has called Hillary Clinton, quote, the old lady of malice.
Maybe it sounds funnier in Arabic, or maybe Al-Qaeda needs some new writers.
I don't know.
But Hillary Clinton is the old lady of malice, according to Al-Qaeda spokesman Abu Yahya Al-Libby.
Hillary Clinton is the old lady of malice from Friday at selected theaters nationwide.
There was an old lady of malice who bombed Colonel Gaddafi's palace.
The old lady of malice, we had a bit of unfinished business yesterday, Re Musa Kusa, who defected to the United, the Libyan foreign minister who defected to the United Kingdom.
He's known as the envoy of death.
So I guess basically this new, this, the old lady of malice versus the envoy of death.
It's like Godzilla versus King Kong.
Hillary Clinton's the old lady of malice.
Moussa Kusa is the envoy of death.
You can't tell the players without a scorecard.
Moussa Kusa is not a nice guy.
Not a nice guy at all.
I mentioned yesterday that he'd been, had to leave, he was Libya's ambassador in London, had to leave after he openly called, openly announced that a couple of Libyan dissidents in Britain he was going to have gunned down and killed.
He's alleged to be part of a bombing of a French aircraft in 1989 and possibly also the Lockerbie bombing at the same time.
This is a man who is head of Libyan intelligence.
He was the head torturer of Gaddafi's regime, basically, for about 15 years.
This is a guy with a lot of blood on his hands.
He's now making a big fuss about him because he's now defected to the UK.
And who knows, the way things are going, he could easily end up as the free democratic president of free democratic Libya.
But we were talking yesterday about Musa Kusa.
And someone, HR actually said he thought he'd ordered Musa Kusa in a restaurant.
And I poo-pooed it.
And a lady then called up and gave us the recipe for Kusa, which she said was a kind of stuffed squash.
And I had several emails pointing out that Kusa, in fact, in Arabic, just means squash.
It's just the vegetable.
It's not a specific variety of the vegetable.
Kusa is a type of squash, but it's also Egyptian slang for bribery, cronyism, and favoritism.
So Musa Kusa is well named.
If you go to the website, I think it's Closet Conservative.
The Closet Conservative actually says that she likes the recipe.
This is what HR maybe did order, not Kusa Musa, but Kusa Masi, which is really a delicious Arabic dish in the Middle East and is full of delicious ingredients.
That's like stuffed zucchini with, I believe, seven ounces of ground beef or turkey meat, a cup of short grain brown rice, one 32-ounce can of chopped tomato.
Preheat your oven to 375 degrees and then insert your Libyan foreign minister and you'll just have a perfect, perfect dish.
That's, I think, Kusa Masi.
Kusa Kusa Masi.
What wine goes with that?
Mike wants to know.
The best wine to have with that is the Secretary General of the Arab League whining that the United States Air Force is not complying with the UN security resolution.
That's the best wine that goes with Musa Casi.
Anyway, that's your update on that.
And itsy bitsy teeny weeny loosey-juicy Musa Cousa that you at for the first time today.
Mark Stein, infra rush, open line Friday.
We will talk about anything you want to talk about.
The non-war, new developments in the non-war in the Middle East, where NATO has threatened, after bombing Colonel Gaddafi's side for killing civilians, is now threatening to bomb our allies, the rebels, the al-Qaeda guys, who also apparently have been killing civilians.
So we're on both sides of this war.
So we've got a sporting chance of coming out on the winning side.
That's how sound U.S. foreign policy is.
1-800-282-2882.
We will also talk about developments in the looming government shutdown and the budget battles for this year and the budget battles over the 2012 budget.
1-800-282-2882.
Mark Stein, infra rush.
Got a little distracted by the heavy breathing there.
Guy sounded like he'd got a touch of heartburn from eating too much Musa Cousa.
1-800-282-2882.
Open line Friday on the Rush Limbaugh show.
I was over at Fox News yesterday, and I was like standing there watching the monitor, and they had a Democrat congressman on.
And he was asked about all the proposed budget cuts that the Republicans are making, which are really, you know, incredibly feeble cuts in the scheme of things, extremely modest cuts.
But nonetheless, this guy was saying that these cuts were brutal and heartless and savage.
And they would mean that children being kicked out of Head Start and no help for seniors.
And there would be fewer students attending college.
And the fascinating thing to be, I was just standing there saying, yes, yes.
And what's wrong with that is we send too many students to college.
We divert too much money into worthless college education.
I made this point, I think, a couple of weeks ago.
When you look at Obama's own, Obama had a million-dollar education.
He went to Occidental, he went to Columbia, and he went to Harvard, and then he became a community organizer.
There's no return on investment there.
His wife is a graduate of Princeton and she became a $350,000 a year diversity consultant.
Actually, just the first couple are a very good example of the structural defects of U.S. education in that respect.
But, but, what was interesting to me is that what this Democrat was doing, what Barney Frank was doing when he said Republicans were in cloud cuckoo land, what these guys are saying, that there is no way you are going to get bipartisan reform.
The Democratic Party does not accept that the United States of America is broke, that it is, in fact, the brokest country in history.
No country has been as broke as the United States of America.
Michael Moore says we're not broke.
Barney Frank says we're not broke.
This Democrat congressman I caught on the monitor at Fox yesterday says we're not broke.
They think the richest 1%, the richest 1%.
And by the time they're through actually identifying the richest 1%, you'll be stunned at how many of you fall into that percentage.
The richest 1%.
Michael Moore thinks the richest 1% have got all the money, but they're keeping it somewhere.
They're keeping it under the table.
They're keeping it under the bed.
And that if you can just access it, then we can pay for all these things.
We can put everybody in Head Start.
Not just every child in Head Start, but you can be in Head Start too.
You're 48, you're 49.
Maybe you'd like to be in a Head Start program.
Why not?
We can afford to have even more $350,000 a year diversity consultants once we send everybody to college until they're 28 years old.
The Democratic Party is not serious about this.
So the Republicans have to take all this accusations that they're heartless, that they're just going to savagely cut everything.
And what they have to demonstrate is that you can cut this stuff and it doesn't actually make any difference.
You want a $100 billion cut?
Federal Department of Education.
That's $100 billion right there.
No one's going to miss it.
No one's going to notice it.
This country spends more per capita, more per student on any other developed nation on education than any country except Luxembourg, and it has nothing to show for it.
You could abolish the entire federal Department of Education, $100 billion right there, which isn't a federal department of education.
It's actually the education union, the teachers' union's own cabinet department.
You could abolish that.
Nobody would miss it.
It would not impact U.S. educational performance one whit.
And you've got $100 billion worth of savings right there.
The Republicans, what's necessary for the debate, is for the Republicans to big it up to take all the accusations of savage cuts, savage cuts, because most of this stuff is unnecessary to our lives.
Most of this stuff is unnecessary to most Americans' lives, and the programs that are modestly beneficial would be much better handled at state and municipal level where they can respond to particular local variations.
I rejoice.
I think Republicans should learn to wear these accusations of extremism with pride.
As I said yesterday, the real extremists are guys like Chuck Schumer.
The real extremists are the lunatics, the lunatics who spend $4 trillion, want to spend $4 trillion a year, $2 trillion of which is borrowed in perpetuity.
Michael Moore is an economic illiterate.
He doesn't understand that whatever the tax rates, you max out revenue at about 19% of GDP.
In other words, no matter how punitively you tax, you can't make it go above that figure.
Because once you get to about that figure, sensible people realize it isn't actually worth working.
So you've got to live with those means.
And if you're spending twice those means, you're just driving a great republic off the cliff.
The extremists here, the extremists, are the men like Barney Frank and Chuck Schumer wedded to that model.
Open line Friday on the Rush Limbaugh Show, 1-800-282-2882.
Fascinating report from Talking Point's memo, which is a liberal website, Liberal website.
But I like the way it just reports this thing deadpan.
The White House would forge ahead with military action in Libya even if Congress passed a resolution constraining the mission.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said during a classified briefing to House members Wednesday afternoon.
Clinton was responding to a question from Representative Brad Sherman, Democrat of California, about the administration's response to any effort by Congress to exercise its war powers.
The answer surprised many in the room because Clinton plainly admitted the administration would ignore any and all attempts by Congress to shackle President Obama's power.
What is interesting about this is that these are all the same people who complained about President Bush's warmongering in the first eight years of the century.
Obama and Clinton are basically flipping off their own Congress and just saying they're going to ignore them anyway, even when their Democratic Party would in the end support them on this thing anyway, because Democrats always go to the wall for their guys, just like they stuck with, as Hillary well knows, just like they stuck with her husband through thin and thick on the moniker business.
In the end, the Democratic Party will always vote in locked step except for one or two fellas like Kucinich and all the rest of it.
The Democratic Party would support the administration on Libya.
Basically, Obama could say he'd like Congress to pass a resolution saying this, this, this, and this, and they do it.
They do it for him.
But Obama and Clinton say, hey, we don't care.
You can vote how you like.
We're going to ignore it anyway.
We've got the support of the Arab League.
We have been authorized by the Arab League.
What do we need authorization from the United States Congress for?
We've got the Arab League to legitimize our war.
We don't need the United States Congress to legitimize our war.
That is how impeccably transnational and multilateral the Obama administration is.
The justification for this war comes from the Arab League, not from the United States Congress.
Let's go to Roe in Silver Spring, Maryland.
Rowe, you're first up on the Rush Limbaugh show on Open Line Friday.
Great to have you with us.
Thank you so much, Mark.
The comment I wanted to make this afternoon is about the budget.
Right.
I'm not happy with a $33 billion budget cut.
I would like to see more.
But here's my point.
No matter how small this is, if they don't do something about it, all they're going to do is win a budget battle.
And they're going to lose the White House war.
Here's my point.
We cannot let that happen because you know darn well that the media will have a field day with this.
They're going to come out and say, oh, those darn Republicans, they can't even pass a budget.
We get to November, the elections, it's all going to be used against us.
Our voices are never heard in the media, as we all well know.
So let's take what we can get, move on and say, look, we're willing to work.
See what we did?
And then come November, you've got fuel for your fire.
I'm really, really concerned that if we don't do something, we will end up losing the White House war.
And by the White House war, you mean that Obama will be elected to a second term in the Commission?
I do believe that.
I'm sad to say that, but my golly, I hear people out there.
It's very concerning.
You have to, I would say, if you're looking at the path ahead for the United States in the next couple of years, what worked in the last two years was that a Republican Party establishment that finds the Tea Party movement and all the rest vaguely distasteful And doesn't care for them personally at all, was nevertheless dragged along by them, dragged along by them.
And all the squishiest senators, the nice ladies in Maine, the reach across the aisle types, stayed on the reservation simply because there was so much anger out there among the electorate.
And you make the point about the media that the Tea Party were demonized as racists.
Bill Clinton compared them to terrorists.
Bill Clinton compared the Tea Party movement to the Oklahoma City bomber.
Bill Clinton compared them to terrorists.
They were compared to racists.
Joe Klein in Newsweek said they were treasonous, they were seditious.
And yet, in the end, none of it made any difference because those people held together and forced the Republican Party, the Republican Party establishment, to stick with them.
And I think there's a big lesson there.
I mean, I think your scenario for 2012, that Obama gets elected to a second term, no one should count that out, in part because of the Republican Party's ability to just shoot itself in the foot and nominate the wrong guy.
Last time around, we nominated the guy that the mainstream media wanted, you know, Mr. Maverick, Mr. Reach Across the Aisle, John McCain.
The minute the Republican Party nominated Mr. Maverick, Mr. Independent, Mr. Reach Across the Aisle, they decided he was yesterday's man and threw their weight behind Obama.
The Republican Party nominated the wrong guy in 1996 because it was Bob Dole's turn.
They nominated the wrong guy in 2008 because it was John McCain's turn.
They're just as likely to nominate the wrong guy in 2012.
What's important, I think, is to change the facts on the ground so that even if the Republicans do the usual thing and nominate the wrong guy,
the broader conditions, as in 2010, the broader conditions out there in America have been so transformed that even the Republican Party's unerring instinct for blowing its left foot off can't actually disrupt the reality of what's out there at the moment.
And so I think in that sense, Roe, it's important to keep this stuff in really hardcore, basic terms.
Even if you're forced to concede, even if you don't have the votes on this stuff, you've got to be talking about it in really basic primal language.
I mean, this country is, as I said, it's the brokest country in history.
It's astonishing that we've done that to ourselves, Roe.
Can't agree with you more.
I'm just saying I'm very, very concerned that we will be demonized as we always are, even more so.
Yeah, but you know, you're demonized for 33 billion of cuts.
You'll be demonized for 3 billion of cuts.
You'll be demonized for 1 billion of cuts.
But the demonization for the 33 billion will not last forever.
The demonization of not passing a budget will.
That's the difference.
So you think we're in 1995 territory here?
Close to it.
I think we've got to be very, very careful.
I am so I have really good gut instincts.
That's all I'm saying.
And this one is really hitting me in the gut.
Okay, well, we'll put your gut instincts out there, Roe, and see what the rest of America makes of that.
Does Roe have a point there that if we shut down the government, if Republicans stand firm and the government is shut down, that this will be hung around their neck and they will be blamed.
There's a dishonesty.
There's a level of dishonesty about the reporting of these stories.
I love the way, I always love the way that people say, oh, you know, Americans want the parties to work together to get things done.
No, that's actually not what Americans want.
The message from November was that you've done too much.
Stop doing stuff.
You did all this stuff.
You passed Obamacare.
Nobody knew what was in it.
In the back of it are all kinds of little itsy-bitsy minor things nobody paid any attention to, like the extension of the 1099, the stupid 1099 form, by which the state presumes to regulate the right of one American citizen to contract services from another American citizen.
The scope of the 1099 is just expanded massively, and small businesses and independent contractors are just supposed to suck up the costs of that.
And not just that, by the way, but even landlords, landlords who get a certain amount of rental income are going to fall under this 1099 business.
All this stuff sucks up time out of the productive economy.
There was a story today that certain banks are now going to be charging $5.
If you bank with the First National Bank of Dead Skunk, Nebraska, and you want to withdraw some money out of another bank's cash machine, the charge is going to be $5.
And if you think, well, hang on a minute, doesn't that sound rather a lot for just like a basic service charge on taking $100 cash out of a machine in the wall?
The reason the banks are doing that is because of new regulatory burdens imposed on them by the federal government.
They're passing those costs on to you.
They're passing those costs onto you.
That's what's going on.
Every time we have 2,000-page legislation, more and more of that gets passed down and imposed on us.
And the idea that somehow out there is a vast mass of Americans panting for the parties to work together to do more.
No, they've done too much.
We need to throw this stuff out.
There shouldn't be a 1099.
Small businesses shouldn't even know the name of stupid government forms like that.
It's embarrassing that in a republic of free citizens, there are millions of us marching around with all this meaningless government mumbo-jumbo numbers stuck in our head because we know that tax season, tax season, and that's another problem right there, by the way, baseball should have a season.
Tax shouldn't have a season.
Tax should be a day.
But there we, but tax season, so we all think, oh, have I got my 1099 for this?
I've got my W9.
Have I got my Z. Have I filled in my RU12?
This, we shouldn't know this.
This is supposed to be a republic of free citizens.
November was not about people saying, oh, I want the parties to work together to get things done.
No, they want the parties to sit on opposite sides of the aisle and do less and undo a lot of what they've done in the last two years and the decades before that.
That was the message of November, and Republicans should understand that.
1-800-282-2882.
Mark Stein in for Rush on the EIB network.
Rush returns live Monday.
But don't forget if you go to rushlimbore.com, it's like he's never been away.
You'll find tons of new stuff there.
And if you're a Rush 24-7 subscriber, you will not be discombobulated by sinister foreign guest hosts because you can access all Rush content to your heart's content whenever you want to.
Just to go back to Rose's point, that this thing is going to be hung around Republican necks like an albatross come election season.
Today's Rasmussen survey finds that 57% of likely U.S. voters think making deeper spending cuts in the federal budget for 2011 is more important than avoiding a partial government shutdown.
31% disagree and say avoiding a shutdown is more important.
And 12% are not sure.
Now, this is interesting because 2011 isn't, in case you haven't noticed, it is 2011.
It's April.
So quite a lot of 2011 is gone.
And 2011 in federal accounting terms starts preemptively back in the fall of 2010.
So this is something that the Democrats, this is a Democrat budget.
This is something the Democrats should have done.
And the Democrats didn't pass it because they didn't want to pass this thing before the November election.
This is the Democrats' budget.
It's not the Republicans' fault that the Democrats couldn't pass a budget when they controlled the House, when they controlled the Senate, when they controlled the White House, when it was Democrat, Democrat, Democrat, and they had no compunction about taking the huge mallet of federal power and hammering Obamacare down the gullet of the American people, even when the American people didn't want it.
They chose not.
They chose not to pass a budget.
This Rasmussen survey today says that 50% of likely U.S. voters think making deeper spending cuts in the federal budget for 2011 is more important than avoiding a partial government shutdown.
31% disagree.
That's a big catch-up.
Now, maybe you can transform.
Maybe once the media get on board with this thing and start peddling the line about heartless Republicans cutting seniors out of head start programs and not sending kindergartners to college and all the other heartless things that the Republicans are doing.
They'll be polluting our water.
They'll be doing all the other stuff that heartless Republicans do.
Maybe they can make up those 26 points.
But the fact that 57% of likely U.S. voters think spending cuts are more important than avoiding a government shutdown shows that actually every day more and more Americans understand the reality of where being the brokest country in history leads if you don't do anything about it.
At a certain level, at a certain level, what is propping up this country is the dollar as global reserve currency.
But ordinary American citizens understand the reality that if you have, there's no point, if you've got a serious drinking problem, there's no point saying, well, I'm just going to increase my alcohol intake until 2020 with a view to reducing alcohol intake in the years between 2020 and 2040.
And I'm going to set up a panel to look into means by which I could reduce my alcohol intake in the third, fourth, fifth, or sixth decades of this century.
Ordinary American citizens understand that the crisis is now and the time to solve it is now.
And they're not interested.
They're not interested in falling for the old school demonization.
Ooh, cuts in head start programs.
Ooh, who cares about head start programs?
This country is going headfirst off the cliff.
It's heading for the end.
Head start is irrelevant when you're heading for the end.
Let's go to Rich in White Plains, New York.
Rich, it's great to have you on the Russlinbaugh show.
Thank you for having me, Mark.
Mark, whenever we discuss changes to budgets, whether it be local school budgets or municipalities, we always refer to those changes in terms of percentages.
And I find it amazing that the information coming from the Democrats and Republicans and the people reporting them, even Fox News, refused to use those terms of percentages.
I don't understand if your average viewer understands what $30 billion is versus $60 billion without having to ask the question, what's the total budget?
And it seems like a, I don't know, neglectful to try to make it simpler for the viewer or the people to understand what these budget cuts really represent.
And I've only heard it once, and I watch a lot of news, and I listen to a lot of radio.
And my understanding is that the Democrats want something like three-quarters of a percent cut, and the Republicans are screaming about a whopping two and a quarter percent, something like that.
That's right, Rich.
I've got to stop you there because we've got to take a break.
But you're right.
That's what Democrats want.
Three quarters of a cent on the dollar cut.
Mark Stein in for Rush.
We've got more straight ahead.
Mark Stein, Infra Rush on the EIB network.
It's Open Line Friday.
That means that we talk about anything you want to talk about.
Monday to Thursday, a highly trained broadcast specialist determines the content of this show, but no such person is available today.
So there is only me.
1-800-282-2882.
▲
Export Selection