All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 10, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:52
January 10, 2011, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Okay, there you have it.
The evidence is in.
Democrats are soon going to be moving on from the Sarah Palin did it.
Motif, the Fox Radio, Fox News, Talk Radio did it.
is now they're really ramping up gun control talk.
That's the...
All of this is so predictable.
These people are so utterly shameless and predictable.
They didn't get away with blaming me for the Oklahoma City bombing, but they don't stop trying.
They're going to keep on trying, and I'm going to tell you why again.
Greetings and welcome back.
It's Rush Limbaugh, brand new week of broadcast excellence here on the EIB network.
Telephone number 800-282-2882.
Do not kid yourself.
What this is all about is shutting down conservative media.
That's what this is all about.
Shutting down any and all political opposition.
That's what the objective of the left and the Democrats is.
Criminalizing policy differences, at least when they differ from the Democrat agenda.
One of the more disturbing things about this incident is that someday the left will finally get their wish.
Somebody who really can be identified as a conservative is going to commit some terrible atrocity.
Now, it already happens.
The leftists already do it, and nobody cares.
Lee Harvey Oswald was a leftist.
Timothy McVeigh, you know, Clinton talks on and on about talk radio, the angry voices on the radio, and that led to the Oklahoma City bombing.
That's not at all what led to the Oklahoma City bombing.
McVay has said what led to the Oklahoma City bombing, and that was the Waco invasion.
McVeigh claimed the bombing was revenge for what the U.S. government did at Waco and at Ruby Ridge.
McVay was, he visited Waco during the standoff.
He spoke to a news reporter about his anger over what was happening there.
So the perp himself said why he did it.
So how come Clinton nor Janet Reno got any blame for McVeigh's actions?
He himself said that their actions motivated him.
Janet Reno led the Waco invasion, the Branch Davidian compound.
It burned it to the ground.
Kids died.
It was a government-led effort to protect the children.
And Ruby Ridge, McVeigh was ticked off at both of them.
He said so.
And yet somehow, to this day, to this day, Oklahoma City was this, as far as the media is concerned, was the result of angry voices on the right.
And now this.
So what's going to happen?
Every large group of people contains some mentally unstable members.
Folks, as I mentioned in the first hour of the program, we had two different artists, a movie maker and an author, do a movie and books on assassinating George W. Bush.
There was no condemnation.
There was only a request that we not overreact, that we be restrained.
Art, but we should try to understand the rage that drove these people because they were artists.
So the left already has their guilty.
Lee Harvey Oswald came back from Moscow.
He's a communist, blows away John F. Kennedy.
Sirhan Sirhan, Robert Kennedy, leftist.
James Earl Ray, if anything, a leftist, assassin of Martin Luther King.
It's not right-wingers doing any of this.
But even after JFK, they tried to say that the unstable conservatives of Dallas got together and assassinated the president.
There was no such thing.
It was a communist-trained former Marine sharpshooter, Lee Harvey Oswald.
Every large group contains some mentally unstable members.
So statistically, it's inevitable that somebody identifiably is going to commit some atrocity.
Now, when that happens, all the government machinery will be in place to take away as many political freedoms as the left can manage.
That's the objective.
And every time there is an event like this, they give it a trial run.
They trot out the narratives in the templates, and they say it was Sarah Palin.
Whoever, you know, two years ago, would they have said this was Sarah Palin?
Whoever they think is the biggest threat of the moment is who's responsible for this.
Sarah Palin.
When I heard over the weekend, Sarah Palin, I mean, I almost started laughing.
How utterly irresponsible and predictable Sarah Palin responsible for murder.
They say Sarah Palin's too stupid to put two sentences together.
Now all of a sudden, Sarah Palin has all this ability at mind control.
Sarah Palin?
Talk radio?
People ought to be dropping like flies if that's the case.
I'm in my 23rd year here, folks.
People ought to be dropping like flies, but they're not.
These are isolated incidents.
And in practically every one of them, you're dealing with somebody who's insane or deranged or a schizophrenic or something.
Something's wrong with them, dramatically, terribly wrong with them.
And I also am always amused at how it's never socioeconomic causes or other influential items that cause behavior except when conservatives do it.
So believe me, I wouldn't be surprised, folks, if somebody in the Obama regime or some FCC bureaucrat or some Democrat congressperson has already written up legislation to stifle and eliminate conservative speech, and that legislation's sitting in a desk drawer somewhere just waiting for the right event to clamp down because that's what all this is.
And every time this event, an event like this happens, they get into a trial run in hopes that this is the one that they can succeed in shutting us all down.
They can't beat us.
We still have the Constitution.
They can't beat us.
And so they're going to do what they can to shut us down.
And even if they don't have popular public political support for it, they will still try it.
That's what this is all about.
Now, some of the most insane, incendiary, lunatic rhetoric that you can find in American politics today is found on a website called The Daily Cause.
What I'm about to read to you from that website has been pulled, but it was there as of late Saturday afternoon.
It was submitted by somebody identifying himself as Boy Blue at 11.07 Pacific time on Thursday of last week.
The headline of the post is, my congresswoman voted against Nancy Pelosi and is now dead to me.
This woman, Gabrielle Giffords, doesn't even have, I mean, she's pro-Second Amendment.
She was the only thing that she was really, she's good on immigration.
She's good on, well, the only thing that about her Tea Party really disagrees with is Obamacare.
She's for it, but she voted against Pelosi last week when the Democrats voted on who their leader was going to be after the Republicans had elected Boehner.
So here's this guy, boy Blue, last Thursday at 11.07 in the morning Pacific time.
I am from the Tucson area.
I live in Congresswoman Gabrielle Gifford's district.
I worked like a dog for her elections when she was in the Arizona House surrounded by right-wing nutcases.
When Arizona redistricted in 2002, a seat opened up and she was right smack in the middle of it.
So was I, because I live in Oral Valley, Arizona, which is at the heart of that new congressional district.
I was one of several people to talk her into running and pledging complete loyalty and pledging to raise as much money as possible for her.
She ended up running for the first time against a fellow Arizona House member, Randy Graff, who was a right-wing wacko who advocated guns and bars and was the Russell Pierce before Russell Pierce vis-a-vis border issues.
With a lot of hard work and plenty of money, Gabby won.
Easier than thought, too.
I never like to throw money in people's faces, but I have given Gabrielle Giffords thousands and thousands of dollars in both good times and bad times for me financially.
Fast forward to this election season.
A weirdo named Jesse Kelly, who advocated eliminating Social Security and was a teabagger favorite, got the GOP nomination to run against her.
I'm gay.
I had been married.
My spouse left me January 15th, 2010.
I shut my...
I'm listening to this now.
Let me start this again, because this has been pulled from the Daily Coast website.
You won't find it there.
But we've got screenshots of it.
A weirdo named Jesse Kelly, who advocated eliminating Social Security, was a teabagger favorite, got the GOP nomination to run against her.
I'm gay.
I had been married.
My spouse left me January 15th, 2010.
I shot myself in the mouth in a serious suicide attempt because of that.
Barely surviving, I spent two months in the hospital, and I still have some paralysis.
I did receive a severance from my employer as I had been laid off December 2009.
They may have been part of the reason my spouse left me.
Anyway, after months of physical and mental rehab, I got back into the political scene.
I started working for Gabby once again.
I raised over $100,000 for her.
I maxed her out myself out of my severance, even though I still don't have work and could not qualify for state aid because of my severance.
She wins her re-election.
She told me she still had a supporter of Speaker Pelosi at her victory party.
We talked about how Pelosi was a successful woman and accomplished oh so much in just four years as speaker.
Today, just a little while ago, I saw an Andrea Mitchell reports out of the one eye I can still see out of that Giffords voted against Pelosi as our minority leader.
Rhetorical question.
I fought back for my condition.
I jumped in with both feet to help Gabrielle Giffords for this crap.
Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords is dead to me now.
I won't lift a finger.
I won't make one phone call, nor will I ever vote for her in the future.
And why did she do this?
Giffords never told me she was a conservative Democrat and her voting record's okay.
This is tame compared to what you'll find at this website.
And they've pulled it.
My congresswoman voted against Pelosi and is now dead to me.
You think the sheriff might want to try to find this guy?
I doubt it because the sheriff probably agrees with this guy.
Boy blue.
And here's another thing.
Some leftists tried to create a Facebook page, a phony online record for the Arizona shooter.
The person who, you know, it's trumped up because Palin's name is misspelled and the shooter's name is misspelled on his own Facebook page.
Now, the person who posted this was in such a hurry to create a connection to the Tea Party and Sarah Palin that they ran with the first erroneous spelling of his name as reported by the Huffington Post and other outlets.
And they tried to create a Facebook page as though it was this guy's.
Somebody, no doubt a leftist and maybe even a daily cozer.
Who knows?
I don't know that posts a phony Facebook page trying to tie it to the shooter.
Jared Loch Lafner likes Tea Party Patriots, Sarah Palin.
It says he doesn't know the first thing about him.
He likes heavy metal and the occult.
He's a marijuana junkie and a lunatic.
So here is a guy on Daily Cause who shot himself.
A guy who shot himself in the mouth trying to commit suicide survives and can now see out of only one eye, posting that Giffords was dead to him.
This guy's been playing, I found it.
Anybody could have found it as of Saturday before they scrubbed it.
Have you heard about this anywhere at MSNBC, Emerson, or CBS, ABC, NBC?
You heard about this guy anywhere but us?
No, you haven't.
Because it doesn't fit the template.
Look around the world.
Who is doing the violence in Europe, for instance, right now?
Who is it that's causing all the mayhem there?
Leftists.
Wherever there is mass violence, wherever there is mass murder, civil unrest or what have you, it's leftists.
They're the ones who don't have jobs and who thus have the time.
Yeah, we're back, El Rushbo, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have, and as usual, half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
Philadelphia, this is John.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
The American media hasn't changed in the last 47 years.
Nope, they have not.
I remember when I was on a flight from Chicago to Philadelphia in the afternoon Kennedy was shot.
The pilot told us of the tragedy.
I also mentioned that Mr. Conley still survived, and that was, and by the time we arrived in Philadelphia, that's all we knew.
So I immediately went to the car where I parked the car, turned on the radio to find out what else was going on, and they, of course, telling various things, but then they said it was believed he was shot by a right-wing sympathizer.
That was back in 1963, and they haven't changed since.
Yeah, and the theory back in 1963 was Kennedy was in trouble.
And according to re-elect polls back in 63, he was losing.
He was going to lose re-election.
And one of the problems was a Republican conservative insurgency in Texas and elsewhere.
And so it just figured the Democrat president's assassin just had to be one of these wacko right-wingers that was bubbling.
Who needs evidence?
The right-wing obviously did this.
And then we later learned it was Lee Harvey Oswald, a communist agent.
And, Rush, I don't mean to impugn Mrs. Kennedy, but when she found out that he was shot by Lee Harvey Oswald, she says to think, and these are her words, he was shot by a silly little communist.
That was the thinking in those days.
Yeah, silly little communist.
Well, her husband didn't think of him as silly.
No way.
I don't know what she did, but her husband took him seriously.
He was so seriously he was shot by one.
So, yeah, you're right.
They haven't changed.
They are who they are, and they don't report news.
They shape it into what they want you to think was the news.
The scary thing is, they used to have the power to get away with this.
Scary thing is, for quite a while, it took a while for this right-wing nutcase theory in Dallas to be disabused for the truth of Oswald to come out and who he was.
Anyway, John, I appreciate the call.
Thanks much, Steve Sterling, Illinois.
You're next on the EIB network.
Hello, sir.
Good morning, Rush.
Thanks for taking my call.
Yeah, I had to work over the weekend, so I really didn't have, I wasn't attached to the news very much, so I had to do a lot of catching up Sunday night.
And I looked and I looked and I looked because I heard everybody talking about this guy.
Oh, he's influenced by Sarah Palin.
He's influenced by this kind of rhetoric.
But nobody ever said anything about his possible political leanings.
And that made me curious right then and there, because every time, like what they did with Kaczynski, the Unabomber, whenever you hear the media be very silent about those kinds of things, it usually doesn't mean that they were a right-wing kind of person, because if they were, if they found a dog, if it was the opposite of what happened to Kaczynski, if they found a dog-eared copy of Sarah Palin's book in his room at his house, you would have heard about it within a couple hours.
But I had to search and search, and I finally found, I think it was the Tucson paper, Phoenix Paper, I'm not sure which one it was, made a report about former classmates of his that were sending her tweets.
And she was Twittering about his very left-leaning rhetoric and that he was a very liberal, angry young man.
And you don't hear about that.
I'm not hearing about that anywhere.
No, what you are seeing if you look carefully on the blogs and other leftist websites, they're doing their best to destroy that female student, friend of his.
She described herself as back and forth, liberal to libertarian, but they're doing their best to destroy her as a source because she's describing this guy as if he was anything politically, he was a leftist.
I mean, anybody comes out with anything that, like you say, it doesn't fit their template, you have to destroy them.
Doesn't matter whether she's telling the truth or not.
That doesn't even enter into the equation.
Exactly right.
Exactly right.
Was there a time, Steve, how many years ago were you would have believed that Sarah Palin was behind this, that you would have believed all the media is saying?
Oh, me myself?
No.
No.
Well, see, that's what I was saying.
During the whole Unabomber thing, I remember following that very closely than when the Brown turned him in.
Even years later, unless it's somebody like you or Sean Hannity, if you don't listen to your show, you never know.
That's right.
Hi, how are you?
Welcome back.
Great to have you here.
It's El Rush Bo serving humanity simply by showing up.
Our telephone number is 800-282-2882.
Here's Ruth in Virginia Beach.
Nice to have you on the program, Ruth.
Welcome.
Thank you, Rush.
20 years of waiting and waiting and trying to call.
But today, I wanted to say yesterday I was listening very intently to what the sheriff was saying concerning the right-wing in radio talk, etc.
And I thought, you know, let me check something.
And I went to the computer and I put in, when they bring a knife, we bring a gun.
Because I thought that was something that I had heard then Senator Obama say when he was campaigning in Philadelphia.
And lo and behold, that was exactly what I saw.
You are exactly right out there.
President Obama's been full of that kind of rhetoric.
In fact, do you remember back during the days of the controversy over the bonuses at AIG?
Some of his support stormtroopers from Acorn were protesting on the yards, front yards of the homes of AIG executives.
And Obama told those guys, I'm the only guy between you and the pitchforks.
Remember that?
President Obama has said a number.
We have three soundbites of President Obama.
If graphics on Palin's Facebook page can incite violence, then what about stuff like this?
This Obama, September 17th, in 2008, during a campaign event in El Co, Nevada.
I need you to go out and talk to your friends and talk to your neighbors.
I want you to talk to them whether they're independent or whether they are Republican.
I want you to argue with them and get in their face.
Argue with them and get in their face.
March 18th, 2009, Washington, after Obama delivered remarks on the South lawn about bonuses on Wall Street.
A reporter said, Mr. President, a new round of bonuses from these contracts are coming out.
What could you say to the American public to quell the anger?
Because people are angry about this new round of bonuses.
There's more bonuses.
It's said to be coming for AIG executives.
I don't want to quell anger.
I think people are right to be angry.
I'm angry.
What I want us to do, though, is channel our anger in a constructive way.
I don't want to quell anger.
I think people are right to be angry.
I'm angry.
But the movement.
And just a few weeks ago, October 25th, the syndicated host on a Univision show said, Mr. President, you were able to pass a health care plan and you worked a lot for that.
And most of my listeners, they haven't seen that.
Same way you work for health care immigration reform, same effort.
If Latinos sit out the election, instead of saying we're going to punish our enemies and we're going to reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us, if they don't see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election, then I think it's going to be harder.
And that's why I think it's so important that people focus on voting on November 2nd.
Punish our enemies.
Spoken like a true community organizer.
Hand-to-hand combat.
Get in your neighbor's face.
He also said, find an ass to kick.
I mean, President Obama is a lifelong political agitator.
What do political agitators do but get people angry?
That's what a community organizer is.
And that is what he did.
We have more of the sheriff, by the way.
Audio soundbite number eight.
And in order Saturday night, this is before he appeared with Megan Kelly on Fox on Sunday.
This is Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnick held a press conference to talk about the mass shooting.
And we have three soundbites from that press conference.
It's time as a country that we need to do a little soul searching.
Because I think the vitriolic rhetoric that we hear day in and day out from people in the radio business and some people in the TV business and what we see on TV and how our youngsters are being raised, that this has not become the nice United States of America that most of us grew up in.
And I think it's time that we do the soul searching.
So here you had an unfortunate event.
Many people shot, killed, wounded.
And people in the radio business, some people in the TV business, see what on TV, our youngsters are being raised.
You mean like the shooter, Sheriff?
How was the shooter being raised, Sheriff?
In your community, Sheriff.
The shooter did what he did in your community.
You're in charge of keeping that community safe, Sheriff.
Well, what did you do?
Was this the first time you heard about the shooter, or did you have knowledge of the shooter before this?
I would wager that the sheriff knew of this shooter long before this event.
The sheriff's gone ahead now with these comments, and he's given the defense a case.
My guess sheriff wouldn't mind if the shooter's acquitted.
After all, it's not the shooter's fault if you carry the sheriff's logic all the way out.
Well, what do you mean, H.R.?
If the sheriff's going to speculate, I'm going to speculate.
But how does it feel?
Hey, Sheriff, I'll bet you hope he's acquitted, right?
What do you know about it, Limba?
I don't know anything.
I just know how liberals are, Sheriff.
You would probably have a tough time putting the guilty behind bars because it's always somebody else's fault, right, Sheriff?
It's never the guilty's fault.
They didn't do it.
Somebody made them do it, right, Sheriff?
Oh, what a great son it would send to have this guy acquitted.
That would be good, wouldn't it?
That'd make people stand up.
Limbo, do you have any proof what you're saying about this?
No, I don't have any proof.
And the sheriff doesn't either.
The difference is I'm just a guy on the radio.
I can't do one thing to people.
Sheriff can.
Although he didn't in this case.
So a reporter said, hey, Sheriff, can you say anything about a possible motive for this?
When you look at unbalanced people, how they respond to the vitriol that comes out of certain mouths about tearing down the government, the anger, the hatred, the bigotry that goes on in this country is getting to be outrageous.
Stop the tape a second.
Who is it that's tearing down the country and tearing down the government?
Who is it that's running around apologizing for the country all over the world, Sheriff?
Who is this running around admitting to dictators and thugs around the world the U.S. is guilty?
Who's doing that, Sheriff?
President of the United States is, Sheriff.
American Democrats during the presidential campaign, I couldn't tell the difference between what they were saying about this country and what the Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinezad, was saying about this country, Sheriff.
When I hear an American hater in Europe or Asia or the Middle East talk, sounds to me like your average Democrat running a campaign.
I can't tell a difference, Sheriff.
Who is it, Sheriff?
It's tearing down the government.
Who is it, Sheriff, turn down the country?
Who is it, Sheriff, doesn't like the Constitution?
Who is it saying people like the Constitution have a fetish?
Who's saying that, Sheriff?
And by contrast, Sheriff, who's defending the country?
Who's trying to save the country from people, from destroying it the way it was not?
Who's doing that, Sheriff?
What really is the source of all this vitriol, Sheriff?
You think people should just sit around and let their futures be stolen with all this debt and all this spending?
You think people ought to just sit around and accept the fact that their opportunity for prosperity is whittling away because a political party sees fit to destroy political and economic opportunity, Sheriff?
I mean, we should just sit around here, Sheriff, and watch all this destruction of our country and economy take place.
Who's doing it, Sheriff?
The Republicans haven't had any power for two years, Sheriff.
For two years, the Republicans have not been able to stop one thing that has led to the erosion and destruction of the U.S. economy, Sheriff.
The Republicans concerned haven't been able to do one thing.
If anybody's unhappy out there, Sheriff, it can't be Republicans.
They haven't done anything.
They haven't been able.
They haven't had the political power to do a damn thing, Sheriff.
You might want to look again at this, Sheriff.
Because you're indicting your own side here.
By the way, Sheriff, your words here are pretty vitriolic.
I mean, are you prepared for whatever might result from these words of yours?
Tearing down the government, the anger, the hatred, the bigotry.
You're calling a lot of people a lot of names here, Sheriff.
You're supposed to be a nonpartisan lawman.
You're calling a lot of people names here.
Can you be sure that you're not going to inspire another lunatic to pick up a gun?
Here's the rest of the sheriff's conversation.
And unfortunately, Arizona, I think, has become sort of the capital.
We have become the mecca for prejudice and bigotry.
Pardon?
All I can tell you is that there's reason to believe that this individual may have a mental issue.
And I think that people who are unbalanced are especially susceptible to vitriol.
Yeah.
Vitriol.
What about real life?
What's more harmful, President, Mr. Sheriff?
An economy being destroyed and people losing their jobs, no hope of getting them back, or a bunch of people talking about it.
What really, Sheriff, is having more impact on people's lives?
The fact they can't get a job, the fact that every so-called effort to create jobs destroys more jobs.
What really is causing people to have some angst out there, Sheriff?
You really, did you say this, Sheriff?
Arizona is the mecca for prejudice and bigotry?
You're a lawman there, Sheriff.
Supposed to be able to do something about putting away people that behave in a criminal way because of prejudice or bigotry.
You live in the capital of it?
You live in the capital?
Obviously, the sheriff's talking here about illegal immigration.
Sheriff, have you seen the movie Machete?
Dawn, you don't want to watch Machete.
You don't want your daughters to watch Machete.
You've seen it, Brian?
Brian, you'd like it.
Sheriff, you ought to go watch Machete.
I think it's a fictional story takes place in your state, Sheriff.
If not, your state's Texas, but you might want to take a look at the movie.
And ask yourself, did the shooter ever see the movie, Sheriff?
Machete.
Well, it'll be worth it, Sheriff.
It's all about the issue you claim is leading to prejudice and bigotry in your state.
If you go watch this movie, folks, be very careful.
This is blood and gore guts like you've never seen before.
Well, not never seen before, but it's up there in the top 10.
Be careful.
Sheriff, you ought to go watch the movie.
Who knows?
You might agree with it.
Sheriff, for all I know, listening to you speak, brief time out.
We'll be back after this.
Last but not least, Senator, former Senator Bob Kerry.
Former Senator Bob Kerry, Arizona shooter angry over GOP repealing of Obamacare.
I mean, this is right out of the page of Mayor Bloomberg.
This is what Bob Kerry said.
Tomorrow they're going to vote, or they were going to vote, actually for Wednesday.
They were going to vote to repeal the health care bill.
It's not going to go anywhere in the Senate.
It's one of the reasons this guy was angry.
It's laughable, folks.
It is utterly laughable.
In one of his last MySpace posts, the shooter blamed the economy right before going out to kill people.
And here's a question.
If the murderer, if the shooter, just ask yourself this, if the shooter had been a 22-year-old named Muhammad, would we be hearing that Muslim talk radio and the Muslim internet's blamed for it?
Would we?
No, we'd have been told that we can't blame Muslims for the action of one kook.
This is what we're always telling you.
You can't blame Islam for the actions of one kook.
Limbo, what do you kill you?
I never have anyway.
We can't do that.
It's all just surreal.
These people are making abject fools of themselves in open public now.
Folks, we have had a lot of positive feedback and a lot of interest with regard to a new EIB sponsor, the Esteem Hearing Restoration Method.
Every time I mention this, I get people asking me about it.
I met with and spoke to a person just got one, and she said hearing aids are just that an aid, but with the Esteem, my doctor was able to treat my hearing loss, and now I feel cured.
This is a brand new technology.
It works.
It's a prosthetic inner ear stimulator.
It doesn't use a speaker, doesn't use a microphone.
It eliminates the need for hearing aids because it uses the natural eardrum.
After the surgical implant, which is invisible, nobody will know you've got it.
Your hearing is restored as well as anything can restore it.
Now, you have to have some residual hearing for this to work.
If you're totally deaf, it won't help.
You have to have some residual hearing, and this thing works miraculously.
Esteem is the only approved method of effectively replacing and eliminating hearing aids.
Here's a number to call.
It's 800-518-7320, 800-518-7320.
Or if you want to visit the website, it's envoymedical.com, E-N-V-O-Y, envoymedical.com.
I have had people who only think they have hearing problems want to try this.
I have been amazed at the number of people who are giving me details about what sounds like 10 to 20, 30% hearing loss.
I know about these things because I have 100% hearing loss in both ears.
Sadly, the esteem, it's too late for me.
At one time, it would have helped, but you have to have some residual hearing.
Envoymedical.com or 1-800-518-7320.
Finally, folks, I want you to notice the constant effort to demonize conservatism when, in fact, conservatism is the very foundation of America.
Lower taxes, limited government, personal responsibility, that's about as old-fashioned and traditional as you can get.
The media, the hardcore left, are trying their best to convince us that the very values that built this country, they go all the way back to the framers in the American Revolution, are radical.
When in fact, our beliefs and principles are the oldest, most central core values of this country.
Radical conservative is an oxymoron, simply an impossibility.
That's why they fear what we are and what we say, and why they're trying to shut us up.
And they will not stop.
▲
Export Selection