All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 31, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:50
December 31, 2010, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome back.
It's great to have you with us, my friends, L. Rushball, the all-knowing, all-caring, all-sensing, all feeling, all concerned Maharashi, also known as America's Real.
Anchorman, the Doctor of Democracy.
Sitting here behind the prestigious golden EIB microphone, the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
And we are going to get to your phone calls quickly in this hour.
800-282-2882 is the number if you're on hold.
Hang in there and be tough.
All right.
Two things here.
A new ABC news poll states that only half of American citizens still believe in the American dream.
Or, depending on the type person you are, half of Americans no longer believe in the American dream.
The poll's results indicate that when asked, do you think the American dream, and if you worked hard, you'll get ahead, still holds true, never held true, or once held true but doesn't anymore.
50% of Americans said still true.
And 4% said it was never true.
But the numbers within the numbers are just as revealing.
57% of those who make $75,000 or more a year said it's still true.
Or as only 46% of those making 25,000 and under answered the same way.
Geography also played a role.
Fifty-eight percent of the American West still believed in the American dream compared to 46% of those in the so-called rust belt.
The poll also broke down the numbers along racial lines, saying that 57% of whites still believe in a dream.
Only 48% of non-whites agreed.
Other revelations from the poll, when asked if they'd rather have Obama or Bush in charge of economic policy, 52% reported Obama, 35% said Bush.
Now that you can look at that in a number of ways, I think it's pretty high given how much hatred and negative PR have been drummed up about George Bush.
The poll's final question might be the most damning to those in Washington.
On another subject, if you had children, would you want your own son or daughter to grow up to be a candidate for U.S. Congress?
Or would you rather see them pick another line of work?
Only 25% wished a congressional future for their children.
Only 25%.
Well, I mean, when such options as heading up the National Organization for Circumcision Information Resource Centers exists out there, why would you want to go to Congress?
I mean, when you can join the President's Commission on Fairness for Pacific Islanders and Asian Americans, why would you want to go to Congress?
But let's go back before addressing this.
June 16th of 2009, a little over a year ago.
ABC News, again.
Is the American dream dead or just in hiding?
Cutting back on the excess of the boom years might not be so bad, some families discover.
So here we have the throes of the depression.
And it was one of these stories.
Hey, you know what?
Being out of work, why it's not that bad.
Well, it's not, it's not that bad a deal.
My uh my uh family, we're gonna know each other a little bit more.
Oh, we're not so selfish.
We're not so obsessed with consuming.
Remember all of those stories.
This was a little over a year ago in ABC.
As the recession grinds on, and we take stock of our country's lost jobs, foreclosed homes, decimated 401ks, many Americans are lamenting the loss of something that can't be captured in statistics and data points, the American dream.
Commenting on the state of the economy shortly after taking orifice, President Obama equated the economic downturn with nothing less than the American dream in reverse.
But what exactly is this elusive American dream?
It seems to be slipping away.
Vanity Fair writer David Camp notes the American dream is not A static concept.
The evolution of this idea is reflected in popular television in the 50s.
Ralph and Alice Cramden lived in a grubby New York tenement on the honeymooners.
Just a few years later, the American viewing audience could set its sights higher by watching the cleavers in their modest suburban home on Leave It to Beaver.
By the 70s, the Brady Bunch lived in an even bigger home and could afford a Hawaiian vacation.
The families of Dynasty in Dallas played out their decadent dramas in mansions during the 80s, all of which led inactionably to the spoiled brats of Gossip Girl and the Hills.
So to many, the American dream seemed to evolve into something more like a nightmare.
Really?
The boom grossed me out, said Professor Richard Florida of the University of Toronto.
I mean, I just thought it was gauche and horrible and over the top, you know, Hummerville and conspicuous consumptionville.
I never liked it.
Of course not, he's a professor.
Florida said America is now in the midst of what he calls the Great Reset, a time when our entire way of life will be reimagined.
I think many, many Americans felt that they were on this kind of treadmill they couldn't keep up, and they actually felt empty.
You can't just buy yourself into self-worth, Florida said.
During the boom, Holly and Keith Berkeley of San Diego were definitely on that treadmill.
35-year-old Holly's internet marketing consulting company was thriving.
She was driven, she says, to the extreme.
They go on and get to see these examples of people who really didn't like progressing.
Who really didn't like advancing?
ABC turned over every rock, and they went out there and they found every human example of people who did not like the fruits of their labors and working harder.
He didn't like the whole concept of a better car, nicer car, larger house.
He didn't like the concept of having to keep up with people who could afford bigger houses or go on vacations.
They wanted an excuse to settle in to have nothing.
And the recession gave them the perfect opportunity to settle in and feel guiltless over being lazy and having nothing.
Because when everybody had nothing, then it was okay to have nothing.
When everybody was perceived to be hurting, it was okay to be lazy and lackadaisical.
So then you might ask yourself, well, then if it became comfortable during the Obama years to sit there with no advancement, to not be on that treadmill, to not feel any pressure to get better, to improve yourself, then why resent people who still do it?
Why resent those who still do it?
Snerdley, did your father talk to you about the American dream?
Your parents, they talked to you about the American dream at all.
That didn't come up in your lived it.
You lived the American, but it was not no, but it's important.
Well, well, all right, you lived it.
It was always important to do better.
It was always important.
Yeah, I think back my dad was obsessed with my going to college for one reason.
That was the only way to improve myself.
My dad was not comfortable with me stagnating.
And he thought stagnating was bad.
You know, why wind up in the basement?
He wanted me out of the house as soon as I get out of the house.
I accommodated.
I don't, I don't this this whole notion of the American dream's dead.
Only 50% of the American people think it's worth striving for.
It's even possible.
I think that my parents, they didn't verbalize the concept of the American dream, but damn well they wanted us to live it.
I mean, I were never sat down.
Son, I want to tell you about the American dream.
But I'll tell you what my dad did do, my parents.
They extoled the virtues of this country.
Why do I care about it so much?
My parents did.
We were told we could be the best.
We were told we could be anything.
In fact, we were expected to be.
I don't know about you, but in our family, we were expected to make something of ourselves.
We were expected to matter.
We were expected to do better than our parents did.
It was not issued in such challenging language, but that was their purpose of being parents.
you to see to it that we had the best and that we were able to provide the best for ourselves.
So when is when did all this talk start that yeah, it's fun to get off the treadmill.
You know, I really I didn't like the pressure of being on the I didn't like having to go out and work every day and measure myself against the Joneses and try to keep up with these uh metrosexuals who are getting pedicures and manicares and having all their hair done all this and driving their beamers.
I didn't like that at all.
I I'm content to sit home with my wife who doesn't do anything either, and we'll sit here and we'll just count our lucky stars that we're average.
When did when did this set in?
I'll tell you when this set in.
It has always been the objective of the American left to wipe out success.
It's always been the American, the objective of the American left to wipe out people who do better than others, because that's intrinsically in their view, unfair.
It's simply not fair that somebody should have any more than anybody else, no matter how they get it, unless you're a Kennedy.
If you inherit it, you're a Democrat, fine and then you can have it.
But it's simply unjust and immoral.
It's what it's what animates and motivates, inspires Obama to this day.
So we come a year later, ABC, only half of Americans believe in the American dream.
Well, let me ask you a question.
How many of you in this audience, how many of your parents were like mine?
And how many of you as parents today are like your parents?
How many of you have great expectations for your kids and hopes for them?
How many of you have chucked it though?
How many of you tossed in the towels, you know what?
America's finished.
America's best days are behind it.
How many of you are doing this?
I think when you get a poll, but we'll just for the sake of this discussion, uh, we will grant that the poll is accurate for the sake of this discussion.
You know how I feel about polls, you can get whatever result you want in them.
But to the extent that half the people in the country think the American dream's dead, that means half the American people are being told it's dead.
That means, and this is very sad, it means that way too many people are not being reminded by leaders of the greatness of this country.
Thomas Sowell, where is this?
He has a great, great quote.
Tom, let me see if I can paraphrase it.
Well, I'm I I'm gonna botch it if I paraphrase it.
But he it's essentially the uh how much ahead of the game you are being born in America.
And what a crime it is that so many people in this country do not understand that.
Our leaders today, and by that I mean the Democrat Party, the American left from Obama on down, do nothing but attack the American people.
They beat us up every day.
We get nothing but criticism from this administration and from the Democrat Party.
Greedy, selfish.
We consume too much energy, we have more than our fair share of everything, from salt to food to trans fats, we drive the wrong cars, we use the wrong kind of light bulbs, we don't pay enough in taxes, we use too much health care.
The people who lead this country are dumping on us, the achievers in this country each and every day, and blaming us, blaming you, blaming the achievers for all the problems, not only in this country, but in the world.
So it's totally understandable to me, but unacceptable that half the people of this country think the American dream is dead when We don't have political leaders extolling the whole concept of American exceptionalism anymore.
You know what I remember about the 80s and the Reagan years, there's one thing that stands out.
Everybody, you you, you who weren't alive or who are too young, you don't realize the misery of the late 70s.
I mean, it was as bad as it is today.
It was horrible.
Add gasoline lines, add all kinds of skyrocketing energy prices to everything else that was going on, to the incompetence of a peanut farmer in the White House.
I mean, it was there was a misery index to describe it.
Even our own president described the country as being in a malaise.
It was bad.
And there were people talking about the end of America's salad days even then.
Then Reagan got elected.
And there was immediately, even in the midst of a recession, the 8182 recession, there was an immediate transformation.
People all of a sudden were up and happy and were saying, you know what, we've got to go through this.
This is a much needed corrective measure, this economic mess that we're in, because a bunch of stuff was been going on that was fraudulent and phony.
This correction has to happen.
And I remember maybe it was I don't remember where it was.
Television show, I don't even remember who it was.
But some people were analyzing, well, what has Reagan done for the country?
I mean the tax cuts had happened, but they really hadn't kicked in.
The Reagan economic boom was just beginning, but it hadn't started.
What what what's Reagan done?
And the very simple answer he's made people feel good about the country again.
Ronald Reagan made people feel good about their country again.
Made them proud to feel Americans.
Is Obama making you proud to feel Americans?
Make an is anybody in the Democratic Party making you proud of being an American?
No.
They're blaming you.
You're destroying the climate.
You're destroying the polar bear habitat.
You doing this, you're doing that.
You're eating too much.
You're too fat.
You're driving the wrong kind of car.
You don't care enough about the disadvantaged.
You're a racist, you're a sexist, you're a bigot, and you're a homophobe.
And half the people who hear this happen to agree with it.
Half the people are already down on themselves anyway, and so when Obama says we're no longer going to be a country that leads the world economically, thank God.
Now I don't have to work hard.
So to the extent that we have economic stagnation in this country, it's not just because of the destructive policies of this regime.
It's because of their attitudes.
It is their purpose.
They are they are seeking to create this defeatist attitude.
And the Democrats hated Reagan.
Oh, yeah, Reagan sees everything through rose-colored glasses.
What Reagan sees is unreal.
That's not that America can exist anymore.
Frankly, I'm fed up with this view of America that they have.
Snurley, I want you to remind me the next segment to talk about this Denver Broncos player committed suicide.
Um, you know, I follow cultural things, and it dovetails exactly what we're talking about here.
Let me grab by here's the soul quote.
Here's a Tom Sowell quote.
When you consider what an enormous windfall gain it is to be born in America, it is painful to hear some people complain bitterly that someone else got a bigger windfall gain that they did.
You're already ahead of the game when you're born here, and to start complaining, BI itching about people who have more than you is sickening.
When you could be that person tomorrow if you wanted to be in this country.
To the phones to Los Angeles.
Scott, thank you for waiting.
I appreciate your patience.
Hello, sir.
Hi, right.
How are you?
Very well.
Thank you.
Hey, with uh the business is sitting on the money that the the government of the left keeps talking about.
Now, if the company makes the money and then goes and spends it, wouldn't they be spending it to make more money, which is the evil that they've pointed out that these corporations do is they try to make more money for themselves.
I've made money, it's in my company, and I don't want to spend it.
You know, because like I could.
I want to spend it because I could either make more money or or not with it.
Right now, I need a customer.
I don't need a loan, and I don't need somebody upset at me for making this money.
The The idea of of making money is I need a customer to buy the products that I'm selling.
So when I make money, I pay the employees and all my bills.
And if I see more customers and I decide to grow.
Okay, well, why are you sitting on the money?
I'm not.
I just I I like well, what would I do with it?
Well, see, this is the point.
No, no, here's let me let me put this because you're exactly right.
Let me put this in context.
It is Democrats complaining about all the cash that businesses large and small are sitting on.
And they cite Apple.
You know, Apple sitting 45 million dollars or billion dollars, whatever it is in cash, you're sitting on it.
Why?
The Democrats want you to believe it's somehow unfair that these are greedy people hoarding that money and buying themselves jets with it, or which is silly.
Uh a corporation holding on to money is different than an individual holding on the money.
There are a lot of people believe right now that cash is the safest place to be if you've got some rather than invest it in something simply because you don't know what the future holds given who's running the country.
And if you have the cash, the objective is preservation of principle right now.
The objective is not losing it.
And even if you put it in a bank where you get one or two percent interest, you're at least not losing it.
And people's attitudes right now, well, I'm not gonna lose this.
And they don't they don't want to invest it because they don't know how much of it is gonna be wasted investing it, given what policies await them.
Talent on loan from God.
I am Rush Limboa, and I am right.
Documented to be almost always right, 99.6% of the time.
Ladies and gentlemen, there are some Charles Crowdhammer, for one, suggesting that uh it might have been an incorrect strategy for the Republicans to release the pledge.
Now, this thinking says that the Democrats, the Obama agenda has been so disastrous.
Let them lose the election on their own.
Don't put anything out there that the Democrats can point to and make a target out of, as the Republicans have done with their pledge.
All it's gonna do, maybe confuse people.
Um people are saying that the pledge is giving Democrats ammunition to attack something of ours that they didn't have before.
Up until now, all they had to do was run on their failed agenda.
And now they can run against the Republican pledge.
Now, when I mention it, what is your knee-jerk reaction to that?
That the Democrats only had their own agenda to run on and therefore run from that the the pledge now provides the Democrats with something to run against.
A target.
Uh see.
I I well.
Snerdley is shouting at me in the IFB, it's already over for the Democrats.
We're just waiting on the date to see the actual triage damage.
Uh this is a fundamental point to me.
When did the Democrats stop calling us racist bigots homophobes?
When did the Democrats stop accusing us of wanting tax cuts for the rich?
Even before the pledge was released today and leaked yesterday.
For years.
Well, let's forget years, the last several weeks.
I've been hearing Democrats in this debate about whether or not to extend the Bush tax cuts.
It's just it's just tax cuts for the rich.
When is you mean the Democrats were not attacking us before the pledge came out?
The Democrats were not attacking Republicans before the pledge was published.
Is that right?
Do I understand that right?
The Democrats only had their own agenda to run on before the pledge.
Now that when did the Democrats stop impugning and maligning Republicans?
When did that stop?
I don't think it did, is my point.
Now let's move on to Victor Davis Hansen, because the dovetail here with the is the American dreamover from ABC.
A nation of peasants?
The U.S. has returned to deriding trickle-down economics?
Yes.
America is willing to become collectively poorer so that some will not become wealthier.
Traditional peasant societies believe in only a limited amount of good.
The more your neighbor earns, the less somebody else gets.
Profits are seen as a sort of theft.
They must be either hidden or redistributed.
Envy rather than admiration of success reigns in a peasant society.
Envy, jealousy rather than admiration.
In contrast, Western civilization began with a very different ancient Greek idea of an autonomous citizen, not an indentured serf or subsistence peasant.
The small independent landowner, if he was left to his own talents, and if his success was protected by and from government would create new sources of wealth for everyone.
The resulting greater bounty for the poor soon trumped their old jealousy of the better off.
Citizens of ancient Greece and Italy soon proved more prosperous and free than either the tribal folk to the North and the West or the imperial subjects to the South and the East.
The success of later Western civilization in general, and America in particular, is a testament to this legacy of the freedom of the individual in the widest political and economic sense.
Yet we seem to be forgetting that lately.
Though Mao Zetong's redistributive failures in China or present-day bankrupt Greece should warn us about what happens when government tries to enforce an equality of result rather than equality of opportunity.
Even after the failure of statism at the end of the Cold War, the disasters of socialism in Venezuela and Cuba, and the recent financial meltdowns in the European Union, America seems to be returning to a peasant mentality of a limited good that redistributes wealth rather than creates it.
Candidate Obama's spread the wealth slip to Joe the Plumber simply was upgraded to Obama's, I do think at a certain point you've made enough money.
The more his administration castigates insurers, businesses, and doctors, raises taxes on the upper income brackets, and imposes additional regulations, the more those who create wealth are deciding to sit out, neither hiring nor lending.
The result is that traditional self-interested profit makers are locking up trillions of dollars in unspent cash rather than using it to take risks, since they'll likely either lose the money due to new red tape or see much of their profit confiscated through higher taxes.
And thus we have the explanation of why individuals and businesses are holding on to their cash.
Not spending it.
Not investing it.
It's very simple.
They see nothing but a country that wants to take it from them.
Traditional self-interested profit makers are locking up trillions of dollars in unspent cash rather than using it to take risks, i.e.
invest, be entrepreneurial, since they will likely either lose money due to new red tape regulations taxes or see much of their profit confiscated.
No wonder that in such a climate of fear and suspicion, unemployment remains near 10%.
Deficits chronically exceed one trillion dollars per annum, and now the poverty rate has hit a historic high.
We're all getting poorer in hopes that a few will not get richer.
Hence a peasant society.
We're all getting poorer in hopes that a few won't get richer.
The public is seldom told that one percent of taxpayers already pay 40% of the income taxes collected, while 40% of income earners are exempt from federal income tax, or that present entitlements like Medicare and Social Security are financially unsustainable.
Instead, they hear more often that those who manage to make over $250,000 a year have obligations to the rest of us to give back about 60% of what they earn in higher health care and income taxes, together with payroll and rising state income taxes, and along with increased capital gains and inheritance taxes.
That limited good mindset expects that businesses will agree that they now make enough money, and so they have no need to pursue any more profits at the expense of others.
Therefore, they will gladly still hire the unemployed, buyer new and buy new equipment as they pay higher health care or income.
We we expect all this.
We expect this is traditional Democrat thing.
We're going to punish the hell out of you and expect you to still behave the same.
We're going to spank you and we're going to beat you and we're going to rob you.
We're going to take everything you got.
We still expect you to run your business so that we can keep stealing from you.
This peasant approach to commerce also assumes that businesses either cannot understand administration signals or can do nothing about them.
So who cares that in the Chrysler bankruptcy settlement, the government quite arbitrarily put the unions in front of the legally entitled lenders.
Health insurers shouldn't mind that Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sibelius just warned them to keep their profits down and their mouths shut or face exclusion from health care markets.
I suppose that no corporation should worry that the government arbitrarily announced, without benefit of a law or court ruling, that it wanted BP to put up $20 billion in cleanup costs for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.
What optimistic Americans used to call a rising tide of lifts all boats is now once again derided as trickle-down economics.
In other words, a newly peasant-minded America is willing to become collectively poorer so that some will not become wealthier.
The present economy suggests that it is surely getting its wish.
Peasant economy.
What Victor Davis Hansen is suggesting here is that class envy politics has succeeded.
He is suggesting that the American people have decided they're going to be happy not by having their own lives improve, but by seeing somebody else's get punished.
He's suggesting that enough Americans have finally arrived to the point where they don't give a ranch rear end if they earn another dollar just so long as the people who have more than they do lose it.
He is suggesting that Americans'happiness is now based on others experiencing misery.
We Because that leads to equality.
Why would they?
And it's no wonder that half the American people think the American dream is dead.
Now, the optimist in me would say, don't worry.
Because the stuff that liberal socialists stick us with will never trickle down.
Solids don't trickle.
Back in just a moment.
And we're back to the phones now to Wilmington, Delaware.
Which I practically flew over going into Philadelphia last week.
In fact, our the arrival route took us right by Lincoln Financial Field and Citizens Bank Park where the Phillies play.
And I notice they've taken down a big picture of Donovan McNabb on the end zone at uh at Lincoln Financial Field.
They got Jeff Macklin, the number 10, a wide receiver up there.
Lights were all off.
And we had a we had almost an hour and a half ground delay getting out of Philadelphia last night because of lightning and thunder in the area.
So rolled in here about uh about 2 a.m.
But it was fine.
It was okay.
Always have things to do on the on the airplane.
Anyway, Rocky in Wilmington, great to have you here on the EIB network.
Hello, sir.
Hey, Rush, thanks a lot.
Listen, super mega dittoes from the home state of brain dead Joe Biden.
Thank you, sir.
Pleasure to speak with it.
Uh Rush, I just wanted to say uh just a few things concerning Mike Castle and the RNC here in Wilmington, Delaware.
Uh you're right.
Mike Castle is fanning the flames of running as an independent.
You know, there's rumors going around.
What I would what I would say he has to do with best for the people of Delaware.
He's got to get up to everyone that supported him and thank them for their support.
He's got to get up there and say, now's the time to stand with me and vote for Christine O'Donnell.
That's the only way that this woman's gonna get elected.
Two, the other party.
No, it's not.
Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
That is not the only I know what you're saying.
That's not the only way she's going to get elected.
Well, you know, the problem is uh if you go down to the RNC headquarters, I went down a couple days ago and I got a few signs.
In front of RNC, they have Mike Castle signs still up.
Yeah.
When you walk inside, they have Mike Castle stickers and propaganda all over.
Now I asked, you know, aren't you going to take these down and put up?
Now wait a second.
RNC, you mean Republican National Committee, or do you mean the Delaware Republican Party?
The Delaware National Committee.
The Delaware Republican Party.
Okay.
Yes.
And I walked in there and I, you know, I got my O'Donnell signs and my ERCAR signs.
And they have Castle propaganda all over the place.
And I asked, aren't you going to take that down and put up O'Donnell?
And their response was, well, uh he's still governor.
I'm sorry, he's still Congress Congressman Castle.
I said, that may be correct, but he's not running for Congress.
So, you know, it right now, everything is against Christine O'Donnell as far as Mike Castle goes.
You know, he he's called her on the phone.
He hasn't endorsed her.
I'm hoping he would do the right thing by endorsing her.
And if I may say one other thing, sir, about uh Chris Koons.
Yeah, uh two times he ran in the state of Delaware, he won both times.
Both times he ran, he pledged not to raise taxes.
Both times he raised taxes.
So, you know, this is someone that Christine O'Donnell is running against, and uh I would put her record up against his any day.
And with that, I'll sit back and listen to your show.
Thank you for taking me.
Okay, Rocky, uh, you you bet I think all this is just it's to me it's axiomatic.
Anybody with a D next to their name, you vote against them.
It's it's really and people talk about making things too simplistic.
No, we make the complex understandable.
I don't care if this guy has stood for tax cuts and opposed them two times.
I don't care about that.
He's the Democrat.
He's a liberal Democrat.
We don't need any more of them.
What about the conservative Democrats?
What about a blue dog Democrats?
Conservative Democrats um.
I I uh it's you know, we're we're not pussyfooting around here.
They got a D next to the name, it's history.
If you're conservative, come out and say you're conservative first and put a C by your name or join a Republican Party or whatever.
But Rush, but Rush, what about the Reagan Democrat?
Well, Reagan Democrats had an R in front of D. They weren't making any bones about it.
This if you know, if Mike Castle is so beloved by the liberals of Delaware, wouldn't wouldn't his running as a third party help O'Donnell?
Wouldn't he siphon votes away from what's his face is Kuhn's guy?
If Mike Castle's so beloved, why why is anybody worried about him having a write-in campaign?
He's gonna siphon votes away from all the liberals, right?
If he's so beloved.
So go ahead, Mike, do your write-in campaign.
Take votes away from this Kuhn's clown.
You guys have an argument who's gonna raise taxes faster, who's gonna raise them higher?
You guys get into a little shouting match over how rotten Christine O'Donnell is.
I told the people in the audience in Philadelphia last night, this this escapes me.
All this on people on our side telling me, you know, I Russ, I'm I don't know about Sarah Palin.
I I don't worry.
What, you want four more years of this?
You want four more years of Obama and Biden and all the rest of it?
You want four more years of assaults on the United States?
Where is the question here?
I don't know, Russ.
This is Christine O'Donnell.
You know, she's got some baggage.
She's a little real you want an Obama clone?
You want more of Obama?
I don't I don't understand this.
Six more years of this.
Who wants to s who wants to even try to survive that?
I really I don't think this is complicated at all.
You know, I've seen Christine O'Donnell.
I've watched her on television.
She's bright, she's smart, she's conservative.
I I don't see the problem here.
I really look around at all of the dead beat, worthless human debris candidates on the Democrat side of we want to start splitting hairs about genuine conservatives who can beat these people.
Somehow I missed this train, and I'm glad I did.
Robert Sheets Byrd was in the United States Senate for 40 years.
We have people on our side worried about Christine O'Donnell somehow doing damage to the country, to the party.
We get it's amazing to listen to all this.
If they've got a D next to their name, their history.
▲
Export Selection