Get this headline from the Politico: Democrats guess wrong on healthcare.
Democrats guess wrong on healthcare.
Hi, welcome back.
I am Rush Limbaugh.
You know who I am, and you know why you're here.
Telephone numbers 800-282-2882.
Email address, LRushbow at EIBnet.com.
I'll say something else about Christine O'Donnell.
You ready?
I'd rather look at her than Mike Castle.
I think she's kind of cute.
I think she's kind of refreshing.
She's a conservative.
What's the problem?
Telling me, Robert Byrd, Castle, what if it?
You know, it's just, and now you got James Clyburn out there calling the pledger a plague on America, just like Clinton called a contract with America contract on America.
And it backfired on him, then it's going to backfire on them this year.
And look at this.
Democrats guess wrong on health care.
Rarely have so many political strategists been so wrong about something so big.
And I saw that and I said, what did they guess on?
What were they guessing?
When it comes to the health care bill, everyone from former President Clinton on down whiffed on some of the more significant predictions.
Democrats would run aggressively on the legislation?
No.
Voters would forget about the sausage-making aspects of the process?
Doesn't seem that way, as the process contributed to the sense that the bill was deeply flawed.
And Clinton's own promise to jittery Democrats that their poll numbers would skyrocket after the bill finally passed also didn't plan out as the party's fighting for its life in the midterms.
This is Bill Clinton at Roots Nation Convention, August 2009.
I'm telling you, I don't care how low they draft support for this with misinformation.
The minute the president signs that health care reform bill, approval is going to go up because Americans are inherently optimistic.
And Clinton was wrong.
And Clint said, yeah, you know, I was wrong about that.
I was.
I told him on me at the press why I was wrong.
I don't remember what I said why I was wrong, but I misread that.
There's an answer.
There's a reason why I was wrong.
I just don't recall what it was.
So when the headline says, Democrats guess wrong, they weren't guessing.
You know, this insults me.
They knew full well nobody wanted this.
They were ramming it down to any orifice of ours they could find.
They weren't guessing.
They were going to town halls.
They knew nobody wanted this.
Guessing?
They didn't have any idea what was in it.
They hadn't read it.
They didn't care.
All they knew was government was going to end up being in charge of everybody's health care.
That's what they wanted.
They didn't care what people's reaction to it.
And they don't really care now.
They knew this was going to happen.
They're prepared for these losses.
This is just the politico, you know, trying to wring some tears out of this and make it palatable for the Democrats.
I'm telling you, I don't care how long they drive support this down.
The minute the president signs his health care reform bill, approval is going to go up because Americans are inherently optimistic.
And it says here when Clinton spoke to Democrat lawmakers, listening, why shouldn't they?
Clinton's a party elder who battled back from his own defeat over health care reform.
His sunny longer-term outlook came at a time when Democrats were increasingly anxious about the protracted negotiations on Capitol Hill, the lack of focus on the economy, the mounting backlash from voters, and they believed Clinton anyway.
And why wouldn't they?
They believe a known liar over the American people.
The American people are dunces.
They're idiots.
No respect for the American people.
And they believe Clinton because they believe that Clinton had socked it to the conservatives once before.
Clinton had defeated the Republicans once before.
He had to be right.
But I don't even buy this premise.
Sorry, folks.
This is a sob story.
Democrats guess wrong on the health.
It's more like they bet wrong, but it's not even that.
They knew full well what they were doing.
They know at this moment in time they're governing against the will of the people.
They know full well what they're doing.
At the time this was going on, you know what we were hearing?
It was worth losing seats.
I'm going to get to the Broncos guy.
We were hearing that they were falling on the sword.
This is an act of courage.
Pelosi was saying these are heroes.
Once he passed the bill, people find out what's in it.
These people are going to be loved.
They knew full well.
This is the thing about them, folks.
They know damn well we don't want anything of their agenda.
They know it.
And yet they persist in ramming it down our throats.
They're Stalinists.
They're statists.
I don't care what you call them.
I mean, this is, they are fully, totally aware that a majority of the American people don't support anything they're doing.
The fact that they continue to do it is all we need to know about them.
Let's go back.
This is from a, you could say, a history challenge politico.
Echoes of 1991 health care upset.
Alex Eisenstadt, January 17, 2010.
Let me read this to you.
The uncertainty surrounding the suddenly too close to call Massachusetts Senate special election, as well as its high stakes, has political handicappers and strategists wondering if maybe they've seen this one before in 1991 when long-shot Democrat Harris Wofford seized on the health care issue to pull off a shocking Pennsylvania special election victory that sent tremors across the political landscape.
It's hard not to notice the similarities between the 91 Senate special election and the current Massachusetts Senate contest.
Back in January, the Politico claimed that the only echo was to a 1991 election in Massachusetts, not 1994.
I mean, because what this does, this puts the lie, the media claim that Democrats lost in 94 because they didn't pass health care.
And that's what Clinton was trying to tell them.
But they knew, going into the Scott Brown, Martha Coakley race, they knew what was at stake.
They knew Brown was going to win because of health care because he was opposed to it.
So they're openly trying to rewrite history.
Now, that's what this story is all about.
Democrats guess wrong on health care.
They guess wrong, period.
Now, a companion story, ladies and gentlemen.
And this is, let's see, not sure the source of this, but it's about the new breast cancer drug, Avastin.
Have you heard about this drug?
All right.
Drugmaker Roche said Friday, the story's from September 17th.
Drug maker Roche said Friday, U.S. health regulators will take more time to review the drug Avastin for breast cancer, a use that has generated vigorous debate among cancer specialists and patients.
The company said in a statement that the FDA extended its review of the drug by 90 days or until December 17th.
The FDA granted Avastin accelerated approval for breast cancer in 2008 based on a study suggesting it halted the progression of breast cancer for more than five months.
That study paired Avastin with the chemotherapy drug Paclixitel or whatever, it's a peclidaxel.
Anyway, Roach submitted two additional studies last year designed to win full approval for the drug, combining Avastin with four other chemotherapies.
However, these studies showed a delay.
The bottom line is this: the Democrats are out today touting that due to Obamacare, insurance companies cannot cancel you if you're sick.
And they use the figure of millions of women dropped due to breast cancer diagnosis.
And they say that's not going to happen anymore because of Obamacare.
You can't be dropped.
Evil insurance companies cannot cancel you if you're sick.
However, the Democrats run the FDA.
And the FDA is now threatening to ban this drug, Avastin, that can help women with breast cancer and shrink the tumor and extend life.
And the reason they're doing it is because the drug's too expensive.
Pure and simple.
The results of this drug have been excellent.
Any ban is due to the high cost of the regimen of the treatment.
So this to me is a little ironic.
They're running around saying, evil insurance, evil insurance.
Hey can't cancel you if you're sick.
But we in the government are going to make sure you don't get this drug if you have breast cancer because we think it's too expensive.
Now it is costly.
Avastin was Roach's top-selling cancer drug last year with sales of $5.9 billion.
And they use it for more than just breast cancer.
It's used for colon cancer, lung cancer, kidney cancer, and breast cancer, half-dozen forms.
And it's a blockbuster drug.
If the FDA vote, if they do revoke approval to use the drug, doctors would still have the option to describe it off-label, prescribe it off-label, for breast cancer.
But many insurers don't reimburse drugs that don't have the FDA stamp of approval.
And they're only overruling it based on cost.
The drug is not dangerous.
It's a miracle blockbuster drug, particularly on breast cancer, but they're going to ban it because of cost.
And if a doctor prescribes the generic off-label, then insurers will not reimburse it because the FDA has not stamped the approval of the generic use.
Without insurance coverage, Avastin's enormous cost would put the treatment out of reach in most patients, meaning without insurance coverage and without the FDA approving the drug, it's out of reach of most people.
So why they sit there and complain about the evil insurance companies denying you the drug, the Clinton, well, sorry, Obama administration is doing it themselves by banning the drug because it's too expensive.
The Roach company, Roach sells the drug at a wholesale price of $7,700 a month.
Now, it is that's the wholesale price: $7,700 a month.
Now, Snerdley is saying, oh, Rush, you're probably going to try to defend that, knowing you.
I could, I could, I could defend it easily.
I could defend you.
I'll defend the price.
Uh, I'm gonna do this this.
This Denver Bronco player ostensibly committing a suicide story too.
We've got phone calls, we've got sound bites and lots of stuff still to get to, but I have to take a brief um uh, obscene profit break timeout, which I'll do now.
Come back and continue right after this.
Now I'm getting all kinds of people telling me, rush, be on a lookout.
The forecast is a hurricane near South Florida the end of next week and I monitor these things every day.
I'm looking at every investigated storm out there and all the models, and I don't see one of them that's tracking a hurricane anywhere near Florida.
There must be one.
I'm missing out there.
But I mean, I'm an expert on this.
I track this stuff constantly.
I know the local media is going nuts about it, hoping and praying there's a hurricane and once and no, we don't do it.
Did at least squat for the turtles.
Nobody even cares a whit about the turtles during the hurricanes.
All they care about is destruction of human beings and their property, so they have something to report on, devastation and destruction and disaster.
Now this is.
This is really.
I've been hearing about this for two days.
Rush, be on the lookout.
I can't find it, and I looked every site that there is that tracks hurricanes and everyone.
I have them going to Central America, the southern Gulf.
I don't see one of them turning into Florida, but obviously there's one out there because i'm missing.
It is all these people are telling me about.
Ladies and gentlemen, as an experienced entrepreneur, I know that running a small business takes a lot of blood, a lot of sweat, a lot of tears.
If you run a small business, please allow me to help you avoid the tears.
Get Carbonite PRO automatically back up the files on all of your pcs in the orifice now.
We all know that computers are going to crash at any time, that servers fail, so do external hard drives, and that can bring anybody to tears, depending on what's on your computer or your server or your hard drive.
But but, but but.
With Carbonite Pro, your business files will be backed up to a safe off-site location automatically, no matter how many pcs you have and no matter where they're located, and it's all on just one account.
That's the great thing, one account, one monthly bill, and you can track the backup status across all your pcs with the easy to use Carbonite Pro Central Dashboard.
Carbonite Pro, each person can access their own backed up files from any computer, even on their Iphone or Blackberry, with a free app and it's just 10 bucks a month and you only pay for the amount of backup that you need.
All the details and a free one month trial are at carbonitepro.com carbonitepro.com.
All right.
Where's the second part of this?
Um well, let me, let me.
Let me put off this Broncos player thing.
I'm gonna get some phone calls in.
People have been patiently waiting.
Oh, I was gonna explain the 7700.
Let me put that off too.
I'm not brooming it, i'm just gonna move it.
You think i'm.
You think i'm welching out on it snurdly?
No, i'm not welshing out on it.
I mean, this is perfect, made to order for me.
Roach sells the drug at a wholesale price, 7700 a month.
The feds are going to ban it because it costs.
What about for people who can't afford it?
And what about charitable organizations who would like to buy the drug for people and donate it to them?
It's not going to be available because somebody goes, it's too expensive.
This is classic.
It's too expensive.
Only a few can have it, so none can get it, discounting the idea that we have a charitable country that people Filled with people who might, as a charitable donation, make the drug available to people who have breast cancer, who want to use it.
But the fact that it costs $7,700 a month, what, it should automatically be what-free?
Since it's a great drug, it should automatically, what, $100 a month?
What should it cost?
They just making it up?
Are they just evil, greedy SOBs are just charging the wholesale price of $7,700 a month because they think they can?
Is there no basis in economics for this price?
They're just greedy and they're just making it up and charging it because they think they can.
And the FDA is really on our side here because the FDA knows that Roach is just ripping people off and say, okay, Roach, if you're going to charge that much money and make that much profit, we're going to make sure you can't sell it to anybody.
Is that what's going on here?
Is that what our peasant culture is being led to believe?
That Roach could really give this stuff away and still make a profit?
Well, it's not hard.
If that's what people think, that's easy to defend.
Anyway, Don in Punta, Gorda, Florida.
Great to have you on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Hello, sir.
Thank you very much for taking my call.
You bet.
I recently moved from Connecticut to Florida in pursuit of work.
And after having no luck, I went back to college to complete my degree in business management.
With Obama's policies and agenda, I'm losing faith extremely in the chance of getting a decent job at all.
And I'm college-educated.
I'm hardworking.
I would love an opportunity.
But if I fear if conservatives do not take over the House or Senate or hopefully both of them, the traditional American goals will slip away.
I feel the liberal agenda is crippling.
And my biggest fear is that my generation is losing faith, considering a large government is possibly the only solution since things are going so badly.
And I keep trying to convince my friends to vote and register to vote, but the most common thing I get back from is Obama needs more time, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Wait, wait, wait.
Let me stop you.
Did you, I want to make sure I heard you correctly.
You say that a lot of your generation is losing faith and beginning to think that a large government is possibly the only solution to, say, unemployment?
Right.
Yeah.
Most of my friends.
How does that work?
How does a large government help with them?
We've got one now.
Right.
No, personally, I don't understand that at all.
But I mean, they've been out of college graduating.
They're looking for jobs for two, three years, and they're currently working at McDonald's right now.
And they're getting really depressed.
You know, I mean, 80, 90 grand going to college and making seven bucks an hour.
Yeah.
It's really going down.
I'm trying to convince them that, you know.
Did you ever tell them the problem might be Obama?
Did you ever tell them the problem might be Harry Reid, Barney Frank, Nancy?
Did you ever tell them the problem might be Democrats?
I'm not yelling at you.
But did you ever tell them the problem might be themselves that they're using as a crutch that they went to college?
I got a degree.
Have they ever stopped to consider maybe they were lied to, that getting a degree was automatically going to get them a $300,000 house and a $250,000 car?
Did you ever tell them to consider maybe they've been lied to by everybody and it's not just handed to them?
Did you ever tell them to think maybe they're actually going to have to do some work and that flipping burgers as a first job is nothing wrong with that?
It gets you into the market.
You learn how things work.
Did you ever stop to think that maybe they're not going to let you make any money when you're 35 or 40?
Did you ever stop to tell them maybe this is natural?
Oh, absolutely.
This infuriates me totally, but I just try to explain this to them.
And I'm just looking to any advice you have to tell them that, you know, you look, you got to relax and you got to vote.
And, you know, you got to make a change if you're not happy with what you're going to do.
I would love to talk to these dunderheads.
I don't want to.
You know, I'm all for great expectations.
I'm all for having high of yourself.
I'm all for expecting great things of yourself.
But these people need to be talked to if they think there's magic at the end of a college degree.
The only place, the only place in the world where success comes before work is the dictionary.
It's the only place where success, unless you don't need work, you inherit it, but that's not most people.
The kid probably said, no, I'm not mad at the caller.
I'm not mad at the young man.
I just, I'm sorry.
There are parts of me today that are on edge.
I don't know if you've been able to tell, but some of these states, it doesn't take much to ring my bell to light my fire.
And when I hear, I don't have a college degree either.
And I have a job.
I started working years before I got my college.
I'm not putting down college degrees, don't misunderstand, but they're not a ticket.
We've been told, you know, this is part of this is all this talk about all this education, all these years.
We had educational opportunities.
Education is, we're not spending enough money on education.
It's gotten to a point people think they get a college degree in education and the world just opens its doors and says, please come save us, the rest of the world says to college graduates.
And how demeaning it must be to have to start out flipping burgers in McDonald's or something because you went to college.
Well, you who are just graduating from college, get in the line.
There's 10% of the workforce ahead of you that's unemployed because of Democrats and because of President Obama.
There are people 35 and 40 years age who have lost their jobs, who also went to college, and they're out there competing and they already have families and they're trying to get work too.
Nobody is owed anything.
The country doesn't owe you anything because you're an American or especially because you have a college degree.
Now, if you think, if you are a college student and you've got a degree and you're out there and you can't find a job, and if you think, if you agree with Obama that the Bush tax cuts ought to sunset, if you think $700 billion ought to be taken out of the private sector and sent to Obama, then you deserve to be out of work for the rest of your life because that $700 billion taken out of the private sector could be used to grow businesses and hire people.
If you support Obama in raising taxes on everybody, taking money out of private sector, giving it to unions and giving it to government workers and giving it to himself and to Acorn, you deserve to be unemployed.
If you voted for Obama, you deserve to be unemployed.
If you voted for Obama, you deserve to be in misery because that's what he has in mind for every one of us.
You're out there thinking Obama is going to give you a new kitchen, a new car, a new house, pay off your student loan, and you have to go flip burgers.
Maybe Burger King instead of McDonald's.
I don't know.
Maybe you're working at a Taco Bell.
You deserve it.
Until you start voting the right way, including voting for yourself, you deserve to suffer the consequences of your actions.
If you're going to vote for a bunch of socialists who believe all money need to reside in the state and they only decide who gets what, and they decide when you get a job, then live with it.
Life has consequences.
College degree got Larry Summers a job, college.
You know, there's a fine line these days between education and subsidized ignorance.
It's a very, very fine line.
Now, I have nothing else, but I'm going to tell you something.
The one area of life that's getting expensive out at the wazoo, and it's never, nobody ever criticizes it, is tuition, right?
Tuition every year goes up.
Do you ever hear Democrats complain about it, like the cost of a cancer drug, or the cost of oil, or the cost of a stamp, or the cost of anything else?
No, no, the cost of Walmart, no.
But college tuition, nobody ever complains about tuition costs going up and up and up.
Nobody complains about student loan.
No, nobody complains about that.
Why?
I wonder why that is.
Are we getting our bang for the buck?
You're paying for a college degree for your kid?
Are you getting your bang for the buck?
College is fine for some people, but it's not an elixir.
It's not a guarantee.
So you get a college degree.
Let's say you major in what's your average?
I'm even stunned at some of the majors you can get in college these days.
Like major in the mating habits of the Australian rabid bet.
Major in leisure studies.
Okay, I got a journalism major.
Okay, education major, journalism major.
Philosophy major.
Right.
Archaeology major.
Major in what?
I don't know what it ever is.
Major in ballroom dance, of course.
It doesn't replace work.
How about a major in film studies?
How about a major in black studies?
How about a major in women's studies?
How about a major in home ec?
Oops, sorry.
No such thing.
The Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies makes free men out of the children of the regime.
EIB is the great emancipator of the mind.
Now, you might be hearing me as a typical fuddy-dutty parent here from the old days.
Well, that may have been how it was for you, Limbaugh.
You had to go to work to get somewhere in the world, but it ain't the way it is these days.
And it's never going to change.
And it isn't fuddy-dutyism.
Now, $7,700 for a drug.
Okay, we've got a disease called cancer.
It's incurable.
We have been working since the creation of time to try to figure it out, drugs to arrest it, to cure it, to stop it, but there isn't any.
We've gotten close.
We have tremendous progress is being made in all kinds of illnesses and drugs, cancers to extend life expectancy, quality of life, and so forth.
But a pure unadulterated cure is not there.
But nevertheless, companies are investing in this because this is what they do.
Everybody is searching for the answer to everything.
So Roach happens to come up with this drug called Avastin that cost them an arm and a leg in research and development regulatory just dealing with the government to move every step of the way along the process here is expensive.
At some point, Once the drug is approved, they have to be able to make back what it cost them or there's no reason to stay in business.
Roach is not in business so that you may live.
You may live because Roach is in business, but that's not why they started up.
What's wrong with that, Snerdly?
No, Roach is not in business so that you live.
McDonald's is not in business so that you don't starve.
General Motors is not in business so that you don't have to walk.
Roach has to pay for the drugs they tried to bring to market that didn't make the cut that didn't work.
We're not talking about curing a hangnail or coagulating blood or the equivalent of stitching up a cut here.
We're talking about a drug that might extend a breast cancer life by five months.
We ought to expect that that's going to cost money.
But in our peasant society, it has now been assumed that if one person can't have it, nobody should have it.
I know this is a tough one to combat.
Why should only the rich be able to have the drugs that could extend their lives?
Well, it's not just the rich that do.
Nobody talks about the charitable donations that Roach makes of the drug, and nobody talks about all the medical foundations that buy the drug and make it available for people at less cost because of the charitable nature of the American people.
But what we do know is that we have a government led by a bunch of people who want to make you think that everybody trying to improve your life is your enemy.
Be it Roach, be it BP, be it big oil, be it big whatever.
For me, I'm simply fed up with dealing with a political bunch of people who want to tell me the people who improve our lives and our standard of living is our enemy.
I'm tired of their enemies list.
Nobody alive ever gets everything they want.
I don't know.
I'm guessing, but I'll bet you there's some people who have an allergy that if they could afford Abaston can't take it.
I'm just guessing, but I think I'm on pretty firm ground when I say that there's not one person alive, not even David Rockefeller, who gets everything he wants, because someday he's going to die, and I'm sure he doesn't want to.
I know Sinatra didn't want to die, but he did.
We're all going to, including the polar bears.
They're going to die too, no matter what we do.
Dawn's saying, you don't have to bring them into it.
You're really sounding mean.
No, I'm just telling you, sometimes being realistic sounds, I just, I told the people in Philadelphia, as I get older, as I get older, I'm more and more in awe of humanity and life and all that is.
And I also become less and less able to suffer fools.
No, I'm not becoming a grumpy old man.
I'm an inspiring old man.
I submit to you that what I'm saying today is inspiring to people.
Sadly, a lot of people hearing this, why I never thought of it that way before.
Yeah, well, that's why you're here.
We expand mental horizons here.
So to take it back to the beginning, if you're just out of college and you've got a degree, I don't care what it's in, and you can't find work, well, join a crowd.
There's about 10 to 15% of the workforce that can't either.
And they may have already had jobs.
They got college degrees years before you did.
And they're trying to find jobs too.
So you got a lot of competition.
And maybe, maybe if you have to take it, I mean, my first job, you know, this is going to sound old fuddy-duddy.
My first job, I shine shoes in a barbershop, made $50 in three months.
Now, granted, I was 13, I lived at home.
But I wanted to do it.
I always wanted to work.
I hated being stuck at home and the student thing.
I always wanted to work.
And nothing wrong with it.
So if you take what you can get, and you know, this, well, that's beneath me.
I have a degree, but put it aside for a while because reality is what it is.
There are a lot of people here that are doing a lot of things that they think are beneath them right now.
Because McDonald's is not open to make sure you don't starve.
That's your job.
Your responsibility to make sure you don't starve.
And your kids don't starve.
And all the rest of it.
Hell's bells, folks.
Obama.
He had to start at the bottom and work his way up.
And he can change sea levels for crying out loud.
It's not just handed to you on a silver platter.
Okay, here's the story about Kenny McKinley.
Now, for some reason, this interests me culturally.
Kenny McKinley found dead this week in Denver on injured reserve, Denver Broncos.
Police say it was a suicide, but one of his former teammates, a defensive back for the Giants, DJ Johnson, says he can't believe it's true.
He says, I don't think it happened the way they're saying it happened.
I don't think it was a suicide.
That's just my personal opinion on the situation.
I think there's something fishy about the situation.
DJ Johnson says, I know what the environment is.
Now, this is where it gets interesting.
I know what the environment is like in Denver.
I knew Kenny, and I knew the type of people that we all hung around with.
You just never know.
You can't trust nobody.
He's not from there.
I wasn't from there.
DJ Johnson says that Kenny McKinley may have been involved in a situation similar to the incident that led to Darren Williams, the Broncos cornerback, being killed in a drive-by shooting on New Year's Day, 2007.
And listen to this.
Kenny McKinley said, in any environment, when you have guys in our position who are out having fun, professional athletes, and we're going to the same environments as normal people and some convicts, meaning we're going to the same clubs.
We're going to the same environments as normal people and some convicts.
We're going to the same clubs as normal people in conflict.
However it may happen, it's going to be an issue.
We athletes, we have the financial backing to be able to go in there and have a good time, meaning we're rich.
We have a lot of money.
I find it fascinating, the language.
We go to the environment, the club.
We have the financial backing to be able to go in there, meaning our income.
We're rich.
And we have the, you know, we go in there, have a good time.
We can buy some bottles and stuff like that.
They're going to bottles only clubs.
You don't buy with a drink.
You got to buy the bottle.
And then there are going to be others that are going to look at it.
They're going to see the women gravitate to us because we have the financial backing to buy all the bottles.
And you're going to have convicts in there.
And they're going to try to match you.
All these other people who do not have as much money as we, they're going to get mad that all the women are attracted to us.
And they're going to start trying to match us.
And then you get into a peeing contest.
And when you get into a peeing contest, people get upset.
And that's when you get shot.
So, what DJ Johnson's saying here, you go to clubs with convicts and normal people who don't have the money we have.
And we go in there, we start spreading the money around, buying bottles, and the women start attracting us.
All these convicts and stuff are going to get jealous and they follow us out of there and they shoot us.
That's what happened to Darrett Williams, they think.
And that's why this guy doesn't think that it's a suicide.
And I read this and I just go, My God, the cultural divide.
This is a shame.
This is just unbelievable.
It sounds to me like class envy.
If DJ Johnson, the New York Giants, is right, it sounds like class envy is taking place in these environments, these clubs.
The guys with the big financial backing, the backers, they walk in there with the bling and they start buying the bottles.
And the convicts who can't afford it get jealous and say, it ain't fair.
You should get the broads and have the bottles in the bling and we're going to take care of it outside.