We don't stop researching, and we don't stop the show prep when the show is going on.
We keep it up.
We found a website.
The plot thickens.
We found a website, madeinchina.com.
Who do you think one of the largest manufacturers in the world of shovels is?
Yes, right.
The Chikoms.
The communist Chinese manufacture shovels out the wazoo, and they export them all over the world.
Now, Obama has said he now learns there aren't any shovel-ready jobs.
Senior citizens' health care costs are going to go up because of his health care bill.
So somebody's shovel-ready, as far as Obama's concerned, is the seasoned citizens.
I mean, this is just one page from madeinchina.com, trustworthy shovel supplier.
Our company established in 1989, which is one of the largest farm tools and hand tools factories in China.
Galaxy Tools have only one export branch located in Wuxi City.
LinuxLink, professional supplier of shovel, Lin Li Fing Tel Hardware Company, LTD, and in Professional Exporter Shop.
I mean, you can buy a shovel.
I don't care.
All kinds of shovels for jobs that are shovel-ready and jobs that aren't shovel-ready from the Chikoms.
Who are funding United States presidential salaries, congressional salaries, and who knows how many policy initiatives?
Here's the story on the ChiCom General speaking up saying America's an enemy.
It's from the New York Times, and it was a couple days ago, Beijing, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, met his Chinese counterpart, Lang Guangli, in Vietnam on Monday for the first time since their two military suspended talks with each other last winter, calling for the two countries to prevent mistrust, miscalculations, and mistakes.
His message seemed directly directed mainly at officers like Lieutenant Commander Tony Ko of the Chinese Navy.
Days before Mr. Gates arrived in Asia, Commander Koh was aboard a frigate in the Yellow Sea conducting Chikom first war games with the Australian Navy.
The Americans were not invited.
The Americans are our enemy.
And Gates was alarmed that this new Chikom commander would make such a statement.
So it all fits here, folks.
It all fits.
While Obama is accusing the Chamber of Commerce of accepting foreign money that's destroying and polluting American politics, the truth of the matter is that communist Chinese money is paying his salary, funding his policy initiatives.
I mean, I don't even know where his teleprompter was made, but I wouldn't be surprised if the teleprompter was manufactured in China.
Have we heard Obama say much about China's first winner of the Nobel Peace Prize?
No, we haven't.
Obama has won the Nobel Peace Prize, so did a Chikom guy, but we haven't heard much about it from Obama.
Now, here is this next story.
This is from Jim Garrity at National Review Online at his blog.
And the headline, bailout recipient, gave Barney Frank a free ride on a private jet.
Representative Barney Frank, immersed in one of the toughest political fights of his career, took a free private jet to the Virgin Islands, courtesy of a Maine congresswoman's billionaire fiancé, whose company received a $200 million federal bailout.
Now, this is from the Boston Herald.
Now, let's put all this together.
Barney Frank took a free private jet ride to the Virgin Islands, courtesy of a Maine Congresswoman's billionaire fiancé, a billionaire whose company received a $200 million federal bailout.
Barney Frank, who's facing feisty Republican challenger Sean Bielat, hope I'm pronouncing that right.
Oh, ladies and gentlemen, a minor error committed by me in the first hour.
There were some SR-71s that had two seats.
The SR-71 trainer.
So conceivably, George H.W. Bush could have been on one.
He wasn't, but he could have been on one.
There are some or were some.
They've been mothballed now.
The SR-71 was a magnificent airplane.
Just state of the art.
I'm sorry they mothballed the things.
You can see one at the Intrepid Air and Sea Museum up in New York if you want to brave the high taxes to go there and take a tour.
So I wanted to correct that mistake.
So here's Barney Frank.
Flew to the Virgin Islands for a vacation in 2009 on a $25 million jet owned by Paloma Partners Honcho S. Donald Sussman, the fiancé of U.S. Representative Shelly Pingree, a Democrat from Maine.
Paloma Securities, a subsidiary of Sussman's Greenwich, Connecticut-based hedge fund, got $200 million in 2009 as part of the $180 billion federal bailout of troubled insurance grant or giant AIG.
Now, Barney Frank, Garrity has a great question here.
Is there a member of Congress more sanctimonious about the greed and avarice of the private sector than Barney Frank?
Now, here's the thing that interests me.
I have talked to a number of Republican congressmen, and they come down here, and I have sometimes meet with them.
And I ask them, how do you get down here?
They have to fly commercial.
They tell me, all these Republicans have told me it is against new House rules to accept flights on private jets.
Now, I don't know if this restriction is for business related or like if you can take a private jet on a vacation to the Virgin Islands if that's permitted.
My impression was from what I've been told by Republicans that it's not permitted anymore.
New ethics rules, and they're pretty recent, prohibit even leadership.
Now, Pelosi, you know, the speaker, she gets government-provided jets.
Well, she demands it for her family, even though her husband and her could afford their own several times over.
So I'm going to have to make a couple calls and find out about this because my first reaction was that this is not allowed.
And secondly, this, I mean, a guy that gets a bailout via AIG who's already a billionaire, a hedge fund guy, is the fiancé of some Democrat congressman from Maine, and Barney gets a trip on this jet to the Virgin Islands for vacation in 2009, all the while devising policies, making speeches,
comments and so forth from various committees that he's on denouncing the private sector and these greedy capitalists all day long.
By the way, Carl Rove, the GOP-aligned American Crossroads, said Wednesday it has raised over $13 million since coming under attack from Barack Obama.
This is from the Hills blog briefing room.
The group and its campaign affiliate, Crossroads GPS, said that it had easily surpassed its initial fundraising goal of $50 million to spend on behalf of Republicans.
They've increased their target now to $65 million, according to the spokesman.
These BAFO numbers come after a week in which Obama led the Democrats in attacks on the group.
This is the Ed Gillespie and Rove group.
They also accused of taking foreign money along with a chamber.
And Rove went on TV today and he had a big graphic display showing that he didn't take anybody, but just a white piece of paper with a big zero on it.
No money from foreign interests.
And all the while, his group raised $13 million.
So good news and bad news on the Chamber of Commerce smeared by Obama.
The good news, Obama's rallying the base with his smears.
The bad news, it's a wrong base.
He's motivating Republicans and other anti-Democrats with all of this.
We'll be back.
Don't go away.
Your calls are next.
There's some more evidence here that the CHICOMs have much more influence in this administration than otherwise would be known.
You know, all these little events, I remember them.
It's like connecting the dots.
The Dalai Lama went to the White House once.
The CHICOMs hate the Dalai Lama.
They despise him.
The Dalai Lama, if you recall, Obama made him leave the White House essentially through the back door because he didn't want the CHICOMs to be offended by seeing the Dalai Lama afforded, accorded any kind of meaningful reception.
So the Dalai Lama in the robe and everything, he had to walk, and it was wintertime, had to walk out there through the back door of the White House, all to appease the CHICOMs.
Of course he didn't bow to the Dalai Lama.
And if he did bow to the Dalai Lama, there wouldn't be a photo of it taken.
All right, to the phones we go.
Youngstown, Ohio.
This is Mary.
I'm glad you called.
It's great to have you on the program.
And what an honor it is for me, too.
I do have to say real quick, hello, from a congressional district that is, and I don't know how many decades has an incumbent Democrat Tim Ryan fearing for his seat from a gentleman that's never even been in the world of politics.
So we're very proud and hoping for the best, Harry.
Well, I think it's going to happen.
If you look throughout the state of Ohio, Obama's approval numbers in Ohio are plummeting.
Oh, yes.
So it's entirely likely that this sweep could be huge.
It could be bigger than even some of the most optimistic forecasts.
We'll just have to see.
We're hoping.
And real quick, too, I hope you don't mind, but I have to say three hellos to a real good friend of mine, Andrea, my daughter, who is a sophomore at college, who joined the Republican group there, and my son, who is a sophomore at high school.
And that school truly comes to him whenever some kind of misinformation about Republicans and conservatism is expressed in the classroom.
He's the first one to raise his hand and mark on the truth on it and put everybody straight, I guess.
I'm very proud of both of them for not being misled.
What about your husband?
Him, too.
Very much conservative and married 27 years.
Very good.
He's a great supporter.
I didn't want to leave out all you've got to include all the important people here.
Yes, we do.
And I'm going to throw that back at you also.
I thank you to you, too, for keeping us straight up.
Thank you.
Thank you very much.
I'm happy to be on your list.
What I wanted to talk about was your discussion regarding the reason why the Republican Party is hesitant to release their name of donors due to the fact they're concerned that they will be on a hit list of protests and such and repercussions where they shouldn't be.
I mean, this is their God-given American right to do this.
Proof of that is, again, here in Youngstown, the president of our local chamber of Congress is supportive of the Republican gubernatorial race, and he had a fundraiser dinner at his private residence.
This has hit the news how horrible this is, how they've put the Chamber of Commerce in a bad situation, how they've put our whole Youngstown-Mahony Valley bad situation.
And it's a situation that this is his right to do this.
He did not use the chamber.
I'm a member of the chamber.
I personally didn't get an invite to this.
Well, I didn't.
This is exactly the point.
This is exactly the point.
This is his right to do this.
And these Democrats are attacking him on the radio and in the newspaper for him doing what is his First Amendment right to do.
The point here is that you're right.
All of these people, if their names are divulged, they just become targets.
That's the only reason the Democrats are demanding these names so they can send thug ink to intimidate them and try to make life miserable for them so that they don't do it again.
The Democrats can't win anything on policy.
They can't win a thing on policy.
They can't campaign with one shred of honesty about their agenda.
And now look, they've had remarkable achievements from their perspective, and they can't run on them.
They cannot say, look what we did.
You need to re-elect us.
The exact opposite.
Never before in my life has one political party been structured in such a way that its success is entirely based on governing against the will of the people.
But that's the modern Democrat Party.
Sherry in Quad Cities, Illinois.
Welcome to the EIB network.
And are you on a cell phone?
I am.
Okay.
Pause now and then so I can get a word in because when you're on a cell phone, for some reason, our phone system here made in the 1890s, you can't hear me when I'm speaking if you're talking at the same time.
Okay.
I'll make my question brief.
This moratorium for offshore drilling has been lifted now.
What did the Obama administration accomplish by putting the ban on in the first place?
Do you want the truth?
I know the truth, but I would like to hear you elaborate on it.
Okay, but you're okay.
Well, before I elaborate on it, you tell me what you think the truth is.
If there was a purpose to it, it was only to put in some ridiculous requirements to make it prohibitive and not cost-effective for people to do that job.
You are very close, and you are very shrewd.
Let me, as you request, it's a very, very smart thing of you to request this.
Let me elaborate.
People ask often, why is he doing this?
Almost about every policy, smart people scratch their heads.
Why is he doing this?
Which causes lots of people to start searching for answers.
Now, the oil question, why is there a moratorium on Americans drilling for oil, while at the same time, we are funding and paying the Brazilians to drill.
$10 billion we gave their company.
We don't stand in the way of Mexico drilling.
The ChaiComs, the Vietnamese, want to have lease arrangements with the Cubans.
And they want to drill very close to American soil.
And we're making no effort to stop it.
And yet, he puts a moratorium on the American oil drilling industry.
Now, the stated reason was safety.
Well, that's right.
We had that terrible explosion out there, Mr. Limbaugh, and the president wants to make sure that no other people die in the dangerous business of drilling for oil authority moratorium to make sure all the other hundredths and hundreds of wealth of the government were safe.
Oh, okay, fine.
Having the government get involved in safety inspections of oil rigs has about as much effect on safety as putting a stop sign at an intersection does in preventing automobile accidents.
Not very much.
So why does Obama put limits on the United States?
I believe, and I don't think there's any doubt about this, Obama believes the United States is the problem in the world, that we have had an unfair advantage.
That we have gotten wealthy, exploiting poor people, the third world, minorities, people of color the world over.
The Brazilians are people of color.
The Cubans are people of color.
Mexicans are people of color.
The Cheikoms, the Asians were just scared to death of them.
I mean, they're paying Obama's salary, so whatever they want, they get.
So part of it is cutting the United States down to size, making sure that we do not have an advantage like we have had, an unfair, in his mind, advantage.
It's about leveling the playing field.
It's about evening.
I talked to Dinesh D'Souza yesterday.
I interviewed Dinesh D'Souza for the next issue of the Limbaugh Letter.
He's written a book and an article in Forbes about what it is that has shaped Obama.
His theory is his father, very staunch communist Barack Obama Sr., anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist.
And D'Souza makes a great case.
See, one of the examples he gave me, Obama wants to limit nuclear weapons.
And of course, a lot of idealists on the left swoon at the idea of getting rid of nuclear weapons.
Well, that's wonderful.
Wonderful.
Let's do it.
Well, Obama knows he can't make any other nation get rid of theirs.
All he can do is reduce our stockpile.
So he'll do it, thinking he's making the world safer.
While at the same time, following through on this idealistic notion of reducing nuclear stockpiles.
And if there is any damage, punishment to the United States in the process, then fine, we deserve it.
Because we have an unfair advantage already with so many nuclear weapons and missiles that the rest of the world doesn't have.
For example, the Middle East doesn't have one except for Israel.
That's just not fair the way Obama looks at it.
The Israelis have a nuclear bomb, but the Iranians don't.
They might soon, but that's good because that's fair.
If the Israelis have one, the Iranians should.
If we have a lot, then other people should have them too.
He's just the way he looks at it.
United States is guilty and must pay a price.
That's his mission.
You're guiding light, El Rushbaugh, half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
I want to go back to this private jet business in Barney Frank because I have been told by a number of ranking Republicans in the House that they're not permitted to fly on private jets.
They're not permitted.
Here's a story from September 23rd by Jack Fowler, and this is not sure the source here.
But it's about this same woman, Shelly Pingree, who is the fiancé is this billionaire hedge fund guy who got a $180 billion bailout via AIG.
She's engaged with this guy.
He has a private jet.
This jet flew Barney Frank in 2009 to the Virgin Islands on a vacation.
Turns out that this woman, Shelly Pingree, led the charge against congressmen and congresswomen flying on private jets.
Back in September, she criticized congressmen who fly on private jets.
This is the same woman whose husband owns the corporate jet that Barney Frank flew on.
And this post by Jack Fowler, and apparently there's a bunch of blogs that have this.
And let me read just a couple of excerpts.
In the aftermath of the Abramoff scandal, Shelly Pingree, who, by the way, she's the CEO, former CEO of Common Cause, she's a huge leftist.
In the aftermath of the Abramoff scandal, Pingree lobbied for a tough ethics reform law that would have completely banned privately funded travel.
When a weaker bill was introduced, she called the drafted bill window dressing.
Now, it's not clear whether Pingree's use of her fiancé's aircraft was limited to the incident on September 17th.
Apparently, there are examples of her flying all over the country on this man's jet.
She's a member of Congress.
This is expressly forbidden.
The Waterville Morning Sentinel reports the House rules.
The flights may be afoul with House ethics rules according to a summary of the travel rules found on the website of the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct.
While expenses for officially connected travel may be accepted, members and staff may not accept expenses from a private source for travel, the primary purpose of which is to conduct official business.
Clauses 1 and 3 of House Rule 124 prohibit the acceptance of private support, both monetary and in kind, for official House activities.
Thus, when the primary purpose of a trip is to conduct official business, such as general oversight activities within the committee's jurisdiction, the expenses must be paid with official house funds.
So this is being interpreted by people who don't run afoul of house rules and ethics regulations that they can't fly on corporate jets.
It isn't permitted.
Yet there's Barney Frank out there and this woman, Pingree, flying around in her fiancé's corporate jet all over the place, official business and not.
And she's leading, this is typical ruling class stuff.
She's leading the charge and has led the charge against it.
So she has rules for everybody else.
Somehow she ends up being exempted from her very own rules.
Here's Rick in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
It is Rush from Tar Hill Country.
Thank you very much, sir.
And I'd like to say hi over the air to your brother David Limbaugh and congratulate him on his great recent book.
Thank you very much, sir.
Rush, I think all this stuff about the illegal foreign money is the Obama people engaging in the common psychological phenomenon of projection.
They assume that their opponent is cheating the same way they are and use that assumption to rationalize and justify their own conduct.
Well, I think it's there's no question.
Democrats accuse you of something.
It's because they're doing it themselves, be it projection or not.
But it's more insidious than that.
I mean, this is pure abuse of power.
The president of the United States leading this charge.
We supposedly have gazillions of people out of work, and this president focused like a laser on it, right?
Meanwhile, he's got time to meet with George Clooney, who apparently has given up on Darfur and is now all concerned about Sudan.
That's right.
a meeting with Obama in the Oval Office about the horrible situation in Sudan.
So Obama's got time to do that.
He's played his 52nd round of golf this past weekend since being immulated.
He's playing more golf than I do.
And he's leading the charge in this foreign money business.
And they're doubling down on it.
Every time they're asked to prove it, they're doubling down the other way.
So I think what they're trying to do with this, Rick, it's not just something psychological.
They are trying to gin up support among their base.
This is strictly class envy.
Their base is as depressed as it's ever been.
I mean, there is no enthusiasm or excitement on Obama's side of the aisle in any constituency, to black vote, minority vote, illegal immigrant vote.
It's just not there.
And they're trying to get people to show up, and they're not doing so.
This theory is that negative accusations like, oh, yeah, Republicans are using foreign money.
The theory is that Obama's base will get mad about that and show up and vote for Democrats and against Democrats, against Republicans in November.
More on this, but this is from the New York Times caucus blog.
President Obama said he's expecting, and I hope these ranking Republicans that have told me that they expect Obama to moderate and move in their direction, I hope they read this.
President Obama said that he's expecting Republicans to offer him more cooperation after November's elections, no matter the outcome.
And this is in the House organ, the New York Times.
Now, only an authoritarian narcissist would say that the people swept into power must bow down to him.
Republicans will have to offer Obama more cooperation.
That's how he's looking at it.
He's not looking at it.
You know what?
The American people have rejected me, my policies.
They've elected these guys.
I better work with these guys a little bit more.
That's what Clinton said.
That's what most people, that's the rule of thumb in politics.
But that's not what Obama's going to do, and he's admitting it here.
It's up to the Republicans now to offer him more cooperation.
In an hour-long interview with the New York Times, White House correspondent Peter Baker, Mr. Obama predicted that his political rivals will either be chastened by falling short of their electoral goals or burdened with the new responsibility that comes from achieving them.
You know, is Obama actually living in the White House or has he moved into Neverland Ranch?
Has he taken over Michael James?
This is so, so unreal.
He said it may be that regardless of what happens after this election, the Republicans feel more responsible, either because they didn't do as well as they anticipated, and so the strategy of just saying no to everything and sitting on the sidelines and throwing bombs didn't work for them, or they did reasonably well, in which case the American people are going to be looking to them to offer serious proposals and work with me in a serious way.
Now, the American people in November will be voting against Democrats.
They will be voting against Obama.
They'll be voting for Republicans because they don't want anyone working with Obama.
They want working with Obama stopped.
They want Obama's policy stopped.
This is, I mean, this is not right.
There's something psychologically not right here.
The voters of this country want Obama stopped.
They don't want Republicans working with him.
The idea that Republicans win in a repudiation of Democrats means the voters want Republicans to finally get off the sidelines and work with Obama.
What the voters will be saying is they want Republicans to get off the sidelines and stop this.
Do their best to stop it and then start repealing as much of this as possible.
Now, when Clinton watched the Democrats get thumped in 94, what did he do?
He went out, he said the era of big government is over.
I know he said it, and for a while, a couple years later, we got welfare reform.
Clinton saw the handwriting on the wall.
Plenty of Lewinsky thing happened.
And that was the handwriting was on the wall pretty much.
Clinton watched Democrats get thumped.
He says the era of big government is over.
Obama is predicting the American people and Republicans will cower before him after this victory and say, please, Mr. President, how can we move your immensely unpopular agenda forward?
Okay, Mr. President, we, the Republicans, we finally won.
We got some power.
We know the American people now want us to work with you instead of the Democrats.
What can we do to help you?
But then just last week, Obama said if the Republicans win, he told some group it would be hand-to-hand combat.
Remember last week, he said it would be hand-to-hand combat.
Now he says what it means is Republicans are going to have to work with him.
Michael Shearer, New York Times, writes, the president's comments are reported in an in-depth assessment of Obama's first two years in orifice, which appears in the Times magazine this coming Sunday.
In the article, based on interviews with nearly two dozen of the president's advisors, Mr. Baker offers a series of inside details about Obama's time in the White House, including the following.
According to his wife, First Lady Muchel Obama, Mr. Obama, not particularly fond of Camp David.
Mrs. Obama reports her husband, a longtime resident of Chicago, is more at ease in an urban setting.
Let's see.
Let's start tallying this up.
The president doesn't like the Chamber of Commerce.
He doesn't like Mother Nature, because that's where Camp David is.
He doesn't like balanced budgets.
He doesn't like low taxes.
He doesn't like the American private sector.
He doesn't like the oil industry.
He doesn't like the drug industry.
He doesn't like big tobacco.
He doesn't like big auto.
He doesn't like much that is considered traditionally American.
He says he's the green president, and yet he can't stand to be out there among natural beauty at Camp David.
He's the green president, but don't get him anywhere near the actual chlorophyll.
Don't get him near the leaves.
How does a man grow up in Hawaii and prefer an urban setting?
I know, he's my cousin.
I'm supposed to have these answers.
That's right, my friends.
That's how this day began for your host.
I awoke.
In fact, I'm sitting here doing due diligence, show prep, and I get a text message from Catherine.
She says, what is this about you being related to Obama?
I said, what are you talking about?
You're more informed than I.
So I started scrounging around.
I couldn't find anything on.
There was nothing on Drudge and nothing on the TV.
And finally, make the rounds.
I got the New York Daily News website, and there it is.
Not only am I related to Obama, so is Palin and George W. Bush.
So, when I have a 10th cousin once removed living in a hut, as it turns out, I'm supposed to be able to have the answers.
He's part of my family, but folks, I don't understand how you can be green and not want to be in the woods.
All I know is he doesn't like much.
What's America?
That's admitted to in the Times magazine article.
Pete Rouse, Obama's new chief of staff, Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina, 400 bucks, that he would be gone from the White House by the end of this year.
Mr. Messina predicted that Mr. Rouse would stay well beyond that date.
Obama, unlike most of his senior staff, does not have an iPad.
Asked why, he said, because I have an iReggie, which is a reference to his body double, a body aid or personal aid, Reggie Love.
Are you listening to this, Silicon Valley?
The president's not interested in technology.
I mean, he's got his BlackBerry out there, but that's it.
Doesn't have an iPad.
Same guy, he says he's all about the environment, except the fact he's more comfortable in urban settings.
Anyway, I got to take a break here because we're a little long.
Sit tight.
We'll be right back and continue.
The New York Times is saying the recession never ended.
Right here, my formerly nicotine-stained fingers.
Headline across the U.S., long recovery looks like recession.
This is not what a recovery is supposed to look like.
In Atlanta, the Bank of America Tower, the tallest in the Southeast, is nearly one-fifth vacant.
Bank officials just wrestled a rent cut from the developer.
In Cherry Hill, New Jersey, 10% of the houses on the market are so-called short sales, in which sellers ask for less than they owe.
And in Arizona, in sun-blasted desert subdivisions, owners speak of hours cut, jobs lost, and meals at soup kitchens.
Guy who sent me this, the email says, Rush, I am devastated to learn of your retirement.
Apparently, every American agrees with you now.
And when the New York Times says that there is no recovery, just as you've said there is no recovery, I mean, can it be long before every American agrees with you about everything else?
My friend is seriously worried I'm going to retire and quit.
Fear not.
Lots still left to do.
By the way, I got a note from a staffer.
You better be ready, Rush.
You're going to get about 500,000 emails from people telling you you are an idiot when you said that George Clooney had shifted his attentions from Darfur to Sudan because Darfur is a region of Sudan.
I said, you know what?
I knew that when I said it, but I decided to stick with it.
So I checked the email.
About 10 minutes ago, I made that statement.
Not one email from anybody in any account telling me that I goofed up or that I'm an idiot for not knowing that Darfur is a region of Sudan.
Wonder why that is.
Russ Feingold, my name came up in his debate Monday night in Wassaw, Wisconsin, audio soundbite number eight.
Here it is.
Well, damn it, Feingold, he...
Every time anybody else wants him to talk, he comes through.
He invoked my name.
Too late now because it'll run us past the break.
So I'll save it for the next hour.
But he was asked why he didn't condemn moveon.org for the General Betraeus ad.
And in his answer, he invoked my name.
All that and much more.
Plus, your phone calls coming up.
Sit tight.
Much more to do.
I wonder if Obama was able to tell George Clooney the truth about what's going on over there in Darfur in the Sudan, because the truth is the war is really about the Muslim North trying to wipe out the non-Muslim South.
The Northern Muslims call the Southern residents slaves, literally.
But what you got over there is a race war.
The Northerners consider themselves to be racially superior Arabs, and the Southerners are racially inferior African slaves.
And that's what the contrephon in Darfur is all about.