All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 13, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:44
October 13, 2010, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of The Rush 24-7 podcast.
Folks, I don't know where we're going here today, but this is one of these weird days.
I don't know if you have these days.
Everything I look at in the news appears weird, odd or irrelevant to me.
But the only thing I can relate to out there today is these miners.
They've been trapped down there for 70 days.
Mix Minus is all bad here, guys.
I can barely hear the theme music.
I can relate to these miners.
I feel like I've been in that hole for 120 months or 20 months or whatever it is, ever since Obama was immaculated.
And I wish I were coming out of a hole like they're coming out of their hole down there, using American technology and equipment.
Anyway, can you imagine how my day starts?
I get up and I find out that some ancestry group claims that I am a tenth cousin of Barack Obama, which means I also have a half-tenth cousin brother living in a hut.
I haven't sent him anything.
And then I then I find out that not only am I related to Obama, so's Palin.
And so is George W. Bush.
This is in the New York Daily News.
And it's all over the place here.
Listen to the paragraph on me.
As for Limbaugh's link, Obama's link to Limbaugh, Richmond Terrell was a prominent land baron in Virginia whose history is a little more nebulous.
And that's all it says about my link.
Palin and Obama connected through John Smith, a pastor and settler in Massachusetts.
President Bush is related to Palin Obama too through Samuel Hinckley, who was John Smith's father-in-law.
As for Obama's link to Limbaugh, Richmond Terrell was a prominent land baron in Virginia whose history is a little more nebulous.
So that's all I know.
I didn't know I was ready at anybody, Virginia.
My people came from a town in Germany, Limbach, uh, through North Carolina is what my grandfather did a huge genealogical trace.
Uh found out everything there is, and at no point, and at no point was it unearthed that uh I was related to Barry Sotero, uh Barack Obama, or anybody else, but there you go.
What are you gonna do?
And that you know, that that just sets the table for the rest of the day.
I I'm not kidding.
I everything I look at, I'm tempted to throw in the trash.
Every bit of news show prep I last night during the day today.
I look at it and I say, eh, eh.
Doesn't get my heart racing, doesn't uh doesn't excite the brain neurons, trash, trash, trash.
Wait a minute.
By the time I finished, everything was in the trash.
So I had to go back to the trash and bring the stuff back out and read, reread the stack of stuff.
So I've got I've got three of them here.
Three stacks of stuff uh made up of trash.
All right.
This uh foreign money business, you know.
Yesterday on this program, I got rather serious about the president of the United States getting down the gutter and accusing Chamber of Commerce and Rove and all these other people of uh of being corrupted by foreign money.
And so this is the kind of thing, you know, leave that to Carville and Bagala.
Leave that to the political hacks.
Well, it turns out the LA Times today, Tom Hamburger is the reporter.
Headline, Democrat strategist criticizes foreign money campaign.
This is Joe Trippy.
Joe Trippie says, get on to talking about the issues.
I mean, he he disagrees with having Obama personally criticize the Chamber of Commerce.
Trippy says, so what I see, there's no violation of the law here.
Let some political hack consultant make the charge.
That's his quote.
Well, that's you're on the cutting edge.
That was my suggestion yesterday.
It's weird to have a Democrat.
Uh echo.
He probably didn't know I said it.
If he did, he's stealing.
My reaction said Trippy get out of talking about the issues.
It's not going to do much.
From what I see, there isn't a violation of the law.
Trippy said that it wasn't right to have the president personally involved in attacking the Chamber of Commerce for receiving foreign money.
It would be better to have A hack consultant like me complain about that than having the president do it.
So Trippy is at least honestly assessed himself as a hack consultant, along with Carville and Begala.
So audio sound bites on this.
Obama continues.
The Foreign Money Lie last night in Washington, George Washington University, and this is also on the organizing for America website, Barack Obama.com, held a town hall meeting out there, and they're making a big deal out of this because he took a couple questions via Skype.
Never before had a president ever taken questions from Skype.
But one of the, I mean, that they were really softball questions, and they even embarrassed Obama, they were such softball.
One of them was um was was it was a woman, oh, speaking of which.
I don't know how many of you tried to find a picture we were talking about yesterday of Crystal Ball.
I'm wondering how many of you did.
I'm wondering how many of you, and now the that she's reacted to it.
Uh and what she's trying to say is that she is the first person in this wired age where everybody puts everything about themselves on websites to have embarrassing pictures of her during and she's mad about it.
And she's really, really angry about it.
And the reaction that she's got getting to that is not is not good.
This is people run for office.
What happens in your past is going to be dredged up.
Uh, you laugh about it, you ignore it, or you say, Yeah, that's what I did in my youth, and blah, blah, blah.
Palin's had this stuff happen to her.
Every politician has.
And most of them just laugh it off, but they don't act truly outraged and angry about it like she apparently is.
And even among Democrats, her reaction to this is said to be unbecoming.
So, anyway, she's uh how she we those she's 30 years old now, right?
And those those pictures were four, five, six years ago.
So, I mean, she's running as a Democrat.
I don't understand the big deal anyway.
I mean, this stuff is resume enhancement uh for for Democrats.
I I don't understand the controversy here at all.
Anyway, one of these women on Skype asks Obama a question can you tell people what can we do to get people to turn out?
Can we say um uh yes we can?
Can we change that to yes we can, but we can't do it all in 21 months?
And Obama was even embarrassed at that, but he's keeping up this this I mean this is if in a serious sense, this is a huge abuse of power, what he is doing here.
The baseless allegations with the point where will you prove that you're not taking foreign money.
He kept it up last night during this town hall meeting he had.
What's happening in this election is unprecedented because what we're seeing, partly as a consequence of a Supreme Court decision called Citizens United, is the ability of special interests to mobilize millions of dollars from donors who are undisclosed to run negative ads at levels that are outspending in some cases the candidates themselves or the parties.
We don't know if it's being paid for by oil companies who don't like some of our environmental positions.
We don't know if they're being run by banks who are frustrated by some of our financial positions.
We don't know if they're being funded by foreign corporations because they're not disclosed.
Now, this is in front of a stacked crowd uh on a webcast to supporters on his on his website, and this is unseemly.
I mean, I guess it's not surprising.
He's a leftist and an authoritarian narcissist and everything else.
Everything that he's accusing the Republicans of could be said about him and his party.
While there's no evidence, there's nothing.
All there is is a baseless charge that has been dreamed up in the White House by Axelrod, trotted out Sunday on Face the Nation to the disappointment of Bob Schiefer and most others in the state-controlled media, and they continue this, and now you have other Democrats, you know, this this is not resonating with people.
They're about jobs, the recession, unemployment, the debt, The future.
This is not resonating.
People are starting to say, wait a minute.
Why can't you run?
Why can't the Democrats run for re-election on your agenda?
All we're hearing in the news media is how you're not getting credit for all of your achievements.
You're getting all these wonderful legislative victories.
Obamacare, and your party is not willing to run on any of it.
In fact, there are some Democrats, a couple of them now, running ads saying they voted against Obamacare.
But have you noticed no Democrat is running on the agenda that Obama has put forth or on any of the achievements?
They're not out there bragging.
And who was it?
Somewhere here in the um Walter Mondel.
Get this.
This is another this is why this is a weird day.
Walter Mondel said that the big Democrat everybody wants to come campaign for him is Joe Bitney.
Now I read this, and it's not this is a twilight zone.
Nobody could, nobody could be serious.
They can't be trying to convince us that every Democrat running for re-election wants Biden.
They won't even send Biden into Delaware to deal with Christine O'Donnell.
So it's just, folks, it's weird out there.
We continue on this theme.
The Chamber has responded.
Yesterday afternoon on Fox News, Megyn Kelly, she talked with Bruce Justin, who is the Chamber of Commerce executive VP.
She said, Look, the vice president, this is Joe Bite me, put it directly to you, saying, I challenge a chamber to tell us how much of the money they're investing in some foreign sources.
I challenge him.
If I'm wrong, I will stand corrected.
What do you say to that?
The administration is acting out of desperation, choosing not to run a campaign running up to the elections on their accomplishments, and instead seems to have gone from a campaign of hope and change to fear and smear.
Look, we've been around nearly a hundred years.
We know what the federal laws are.
We are audited annually.
We comply rigorously with all federal laws.
This begins with a liberal blog, a subset of John Pedesta, who interestingly was largely funded as a startup by George Soros and doesn't divulge its own donors.
And the administration didn't even disclose all of its donors in the 08 election cycle in the run-up to the campaign.
So this is changing the subject because they don't want to talk about their legislative accomplishments.
Right.
So Megan Kelly said, well, then why don't you just go ahead and disclose the names of all your donors?
What they want is us to divulge, yes, who our contributors are.
Why?
What we saw last year, Megan, when some of the contributors to our health care issue ads got out in the public domain, is they were confronted by move on, SEIU and others with protest at their corporate headquarters, threats and intimidation and harassment against them, on and on and on.
So much like we've seen out in California when ballot initiative supporters' names become public, threats, harassment, and intimidation then becomes the norm.
That has little to do with speech.
So that's Bruce Johnston, uh, who is the uh Chamber of Commerce executive vice president of government affairs, and he's right.
We release the donors, and they're gonna I mean, union thugs will show up on the front yard, uh and and pedestrial organize a bunch of other protests and the intimidation will begin.
So they're not letting up on this, and it's uh even Democrats are starting to wonder what in the world are they trying to accomplish here?
They this is not this is not going to turn up or or gin up turnout that the theory many people have is that going negative like this will energize the Democrat base, which is now pretty dead.
Uh negative advertising gin up the base.
Oh, really?
Foreign money?
Really?
Oh, well, we're gonna go vote then, Mabel.
And it's not gonna work that way.
They can't run on their agenda.
They refuse to run on their agenda.
And uh by the way, you know, I I keep I keep going back to the conversation I had with a ranking Republican last week.
I've I've talked to more Republicans, and they fully expect Obama after this election to move to the center.
They expect a Clinton-like triangulation to move to the center on the theory that he'll have to do that to get re-elected.
And I I scratched my head and I heard this from another ranking Republican.
I said, if you believe this to be true, why didn't he do that to get health care passed?
After Scott Brown was elected, everybody said, That's it.
Health care is over.
There's not a prayer in the world.
He doesn't have 60 votes in the Senate.
Can't go.
What did he do?
He came back stronger than ever with Scott Brown in the Senate, and he didn't try to get one Republican vote.
He didn't move in the Republicans' direction, and this is a signature issue.
And everybody knows, folks, that if he would have just done two or three things, he could have peeled off three Republicans.
He could have gotten snow.
He could have gotten uh Olympia Snow or Susan Collins.
There's some rhinos that were wanting to vote for this health care bill.
All he had to do was just a couple of minor little compromises, and he would have had his bipartisan bill.
He didn't.
Now, if he's not willing to move to the center or to move to the Republicans to get something like that passed, I don't know why they think he's going to moderate and move to the Senate to get re-elected.
There's no evidence that he's going to do that.
And if you look at his life, if you look at his past, if you find out what it is that inspires him and motivates him, uh it's not anything that traditional U.S. politicians can relate to.
So it's going to be interesting to see.
He's doubling down now.
You know, this business of foreign money.
He's in the New York Times.
There's a story in the New York Times saying he expects the Republicans to move to him after this election.
They're going to have to go to where the power is.
They're going to have to move to him because they're going to then have the responsibility of governance.
I'll find it, I'll give you the exact quote.
Only a narcissist could think the way he is thinking and do the things he's doing.
So sit tight.
Lots to do on this really, really weird day.
Obama even promised to listen more, you know, after the Brown victory.
He promised to listen more.
He's not moving.
He's constitutionally, I'm talking about his own constitution.
He's incapable of moving to the center or moving to the right.
Incapable of it.
Ain't gonna happen.
Be right back.
Don't go away.
All right, on this on this foreign money business, uh, ladies and gentlemen, this much.
This much we know for a fact.
There is all kinds of foreign money propping up Obama's spending policies.
All kinds of foreign money propping up his spending policies.
Obama is borrowing money from the Chicoms.
He is using that money to pay off his union buddies.
I mean, let's be straight here.
The communist Chinese are funding Obama's political operation.
The communist Chinese are funding his slush funds.
Union buddies, community activist buddies, massively expand the federal bureaucracy.
This is not an empty accusation.
This is demonstrably true.
We are using money from communists to pay for Obama's spending.
Everybody knows that they're one of the largest underwriters of our debt.
And how has that debt been run up on what is it being spent?
Left-wing activists, left-wing activist causes, and on people who do not have the best interests of this nation at heart.
Now that's a fact.
It's not an empty accusation.
Obama ought to explain it and defend it.
If he's going to run out there and I mean, if you go after the Chamber of Commerce, you're going after the Boy Scouts for crying out loud.
You're going after people who have America's best interest in their hearts.
So he needs to come clean about this.
Explain it.
He needs to defend using Chinese communist money to expand his view of life in America.
We don't set aside the communist Chinese money in separate accounts.
The Chikau money goes into the general fund, a budget fund.
It's used to pay Obama's salary.
It's used to pay for our State Departments.
And it's not just Red China.
Has Obama banned foreign governments and foreign companies and foreign individuals from buying government bonds or notes.
Why didn't he issue an executive order and do that?
You know there's all kinds of quote unquote foreigners.
I remember back in the day where Ted Turner, when he ran CNN, wouldn't even allow the word foreigner.
Because it was intimidating or was insulting and demeaning or some such thing.
Couldn't use the word foreigner on CNN if you worked there.
But we know that all kinds of foreigners and companies, individuals, are buying government bonds, investing in this country.
You want to talk about you want to talk about who's influencing national policy, who's buying our government, then let's talk about it.
You want to sit there and throw these little slime balls at the United States Chamber of Commerce, which is the equivalent in business of the Boy Scouts.
Let's get real about this.
Let's get real and let's hope have Obama disclose exactly who it is, foreigners, communists, and others, propping up his expansion of this country's government.
Try this quote from a um a blog, the caucus blog, New York Times.
The politics and government blog called the Caucus Michael Scheer.
Here's a pull quote in the magazine article, Mr. Obama reflects on his presidency, admitting that he let himself look too much like the same old tax and spend Democrat and realized too late that there's no such thing as shovel-ready projects.
He realized too late that there's no such thing as shovel-ready jobs.
And perhaps he should have let the Republicans insist on the tax cuts in the stimulus.
Hmm.
Now, if you Google Obama's stimulus shovel ready 2009, you'll find all kinds of mentions where he talks about shovel-ready jobs.
But I'd say let's let's follow his logic on this foreign money business.
I don't want to let this go quite yet.
Obama's salary is being paid for by the Chicoms, Red Chinese government.
Unless Obama can prove that the money from the Chicoms is segregated and not used to pay him or his czars or anybody else.
And thus far he's not demonstrated that.
The ChICOMs are paying the salaries of his entire cabinet, Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, the Red Chinese have lent the United States around one trillion dollars.
Give or take a few hundred billion.
That money's commingled with all the rest.
There's not a lockbox of comedy's Chinese money, or Chaicom money, there's no lockbox of social security money.
So let's play his game, folks.
Let's let's continue to ask who is paying Obama's government salary.
Where's the evidence that it's not the Red Chinese or some other foreign government?
That's what he's doing here.
I mean, that the Chamber of Commerce is small business.
It's the heart of America.
And there's a story from these guys out today, small business.
You know, our project is not financing.
We don't, it's not loans.
We don't have any customers.
Where are the customers?
That's what small business is saying.
And the Chamber of Commerce is their representative in Washington.
And now all of a sudden the Chamber of Commerce, which is as folks, this is as American apple pie Chevrolet as you can get.
And he's going after this bunch with no evidence whatsoever.
It's up to them to prove that there isn't any foreign money coming into their shop.
And they have to prove it just because John Podesta at the Center for American Progress of a Democrat front group just happens to make the charge.
Because they rely on this whole philosophy.
It's not the nature of the evidence that matters in politics, it's the seriousness of the charge.
And it goes back, illustrate this best with Clarence Thomas.
He's sailing along.
The last thing the civil rights coalitions want is for Clarence Thomas to become the only African American on the U.S. Supreme Court as a conservative, somebody who did not follow the prescriptions of the civil rights movement, the Reverend Jackson affirmative action, all this sort of stuff.
So he's sailing through, and they got to do something.
And as best we know, the wife of then Senator Paul Simon, Senator from Illinois, floated this notion that he had sexually harassed Anita Hill.
They dragged her into this, kicking and screaming, and you you know the story.
Pubic hair on a Coke can, uh, porno movies and so forth.
And then the whole, the whole chorus, the echo chamber of the left and the media got involved, and there was no evidence to ever support any of this.
But the seriousness of the charge, they said, required that it be looked into.
I'll tell you another example of this.
Those of you who are regular longtime listeners of this program will remember, Gary Sick, and that was his last name or is a professor at Columbia, I believe, wrote a book or wrote a column claiming that George H.W. Bush took a secret flight to Paris in the 1980 presidential campaign aboard an SR-71 spy plane.
Only one pilot fits in one of those, by the way, but he was on board to have a secret meeting with members of the Iranian government, and he had made a deal, the Iranians would keep the hostages until after the 1980 election.
And then announced that they're being released.
So as to make it look like Carter was ineffective, but the election of Reagan, Mr. Cowboy, Mr. Tough Guy, the Iranians didn't want to deal with him.
Gary Sick makes this charge.
The then Speaker of the House, Thomas Foley.
Now this happened in the 90s.
This is 12 years after the fact.
Thomas Foley, the U.S. Speaker of the House, says, well, we don't have any evidence of this, but the seriousness of the charge requires us to investigate it.
And this happened to be, I think, in uh 1990, which should have been a midterm election year or 1992, forget which.
But it was an election year.
And now we're back to this again.
There's no evidence whatsoever.
But the seriousness of the charge requires that this be looked into.
In fact, that Gary Sick charge, that was the original October surprise.
That's where the whole thing originated.
George H. W. Bush took an SR 71 to Paris to meet the Iranians.
That was the October surprise.
That the Iranians had made a deal with Reagan.
The hostages would not be released while Carter was president before the election of 1980.
So let's play this out.
The Red Chinese underwrite this government.
One trillion dollars, give or take a couple hundred billion on either side.
and Who is paying Obama's salary?
It is up to Obama to prove to us that he is not being paid with ChICOM money.
It's up to Obama.
But Rush, but Rush, there's no evidence.
Folks, there is more evidence of this than there is a foreign money finding its way into the Chamber of Commerce and being used for whatever nefarious purposes that come out of there.
There is great evidence, a great deal of evidence, over a trillion dollars worth of evidence that ChICOM money is underwriting our government.
How much of that's going to pay Obama?
Let's level the charge.
Communists pay presidential salary.
Let me just make the charge right here.
I, El Rushbo, am making the charge.
I allege that Imam Obama's salary is being paid for by the communist Chinese.
Also the salaries of his czars and of many of his cabinet secretaries, as well as select Democrats in the Senate and the House of Representatives.
Salaries and health care benefits are being paid for by funds collected from the communist Chinese.
We know that Charlie Tree, John Wang, and some shady ChICOM interests were funding the Clinton reelection campaign, both openly and secretly at the these White House coffees.
So using the game and the strategy here the way Obama plays is now up to him to prove that the ChICOMs are not paying his salary, and that therefore he is in debt to them.
It's up to him to prove that Chinese communist money is not influencing Policy decisions made at the highest levels of our government.
Let's play his game.
Rather than sit here and be on defense about this.
Let's just take their premise and turn it right back around on them.
Just jam it right back down their little socialist Marxist throats.
Little berry gang of commie Marxists running around up here trying to be belittle the Chamber of Commerce, which offends my sensibilities to no end.
Why do you think Obama bowed to the president and premier of China?
You all saw it.
He is in debt to them.
They're paying him.
There's proof.
He bowed to them.
Not only that, how much money the Royal Family of Saudi Arabia contributing to Obama's government.
He bowed to them too.
So there it is.
I have leveled the charge.
Communist Chinese money is funding the policy decisions of the United States government from the top, from the White House.
Not only that, funds from the Red Chinese government are funding the salaries of President Obama, Vice President Bightney, select members of Congress, members of the cabinet, and Obama's czars.
It's up to him to prove that I'm wrong.
It's up to him to release the names of people who are paying his salary so as to prove to us that it's not the Chikoms.
All right, I have a picture.
I have dug it up from our archives.
I'm gonna put it at rushlimbaugh.com and our Facebook page.
I have a photo, numerous photos, of our president Barack Obama bowing to the Chikoms.
I have pictures.
I want to see Obama's pictures of foreign money at the Chamber of Commerce.
I want to see chamber executives shaking hands and bowing to the Premier of China.
And a king of Saudi Arabia, because I've seen and I have pictures of Obama doing that too.
Obama is saying, as since the Chamber of Commerce has some foreign members and they contribute a few hundred thousand dollars to the chamber in membership fees, therefore the money the chamber uses in campaign ads is paid for by foreigners, unless a chamber can prove otherwise.
Well, the ChICOMs loan the U.S. Treasury hundreds of billions.
That money is commingled with all the other funds in the general fund, along with money printed by the U.S. Treasury, therefore ChICOM money is being used to pay salaries, grants, contracts, and is flowing throughout the federal government, including Obama's salary.
And that's exactly what Obama is saying is happening at the Chamber.
Well, this is nuts.
Because it works both ways.
If foreign money taints all of the chamber's money and all of its activities, including political activities, which is what Obama's saying, then the same can be said of foreign money coming into the federal government, and more and more of it is coming into the government because of Obama's spending and deficits.
Everybody knows this.
You are fully aware of it.
It's one of the reasons why the Tea Party is taking off.
It's one of the reasons why people are donating in record amounts to Tea Party candidates directly, not through the Republican National Committee or other such venues.
They are donating it directly.
And everybody's stunned, everybody shocked.
Bloggers are out there saying, you know, the Tea Party's finally arrived.
They have to be taken seriously now because they are raising millions of dollars.
That's what gives them street cred.
All of a sudden now they're generating revenue.
Political contributions.
Well, everybody knows from the Tea Party on down, that is why we're in trouble.
We are in debt and going more so.
We're spending money we don't have, therefore borrowing it from people, and among the biggest lenders are the Chicoms.
If foreign money taints all the chamber's money and all of its activities, including political activities, which is what Obama is saying, the same thing can be said of ChICOM money in the U.S. government.
And the f The foreign money, the foreign money, unlike the chamber, is not segregated by the federal government.
Hence, Obama is being paid by the ChICOMs and every other foreign investor in this country.
In fact, I have, I think we reported yesterday that the Federal Reserve says there's not enough inflation.
They've decided there isn't enough inflation.
They're openly going to start printing more money.
And that people are fit to be tied over this.
Our future is being printed away and borrowed in debt.
The opportunities for people's children, grandchildren to achieve prosperity.
They can see flittering out the window.
And whether it's being done on purpose or due to incompetence is irrelevant.
Why else would Obama be destroying our country unless he's in the pay of the communist Chinese?
We've all been looking for a reason that we can understand why in the world is Obama doing this.
Why are his policies purposely destructive?
Well, if he is in the pay of the communist Chinese, and there was a story yesterday that a rising member of the ChICOM government says the United States is their enemy.
We are their enemy.
Well, they're running the president of the United States.
They're paying his salary.
So there's one explanation for why Obama would be destroying our country, our economy.
The Chicoms are paying him to do it.
On the other hand, there's no evidence that the Chamber of Commerce is trying to destroy the U.S. economy.
Quite the contrary.
U.S. Chamber of Commerce is all about strengthening the U.S. economy, strengthening and protecting American small business.
You know that Obama also bowed to the Japanese emperor.
And they're the second biggest holder of U.S. debt after the ChICOMs.
So a lot of things can be explained away.
And now we learn that Obama says, yeah, there never really were any shovel ready jobs.
We'll try this from the politico.
The Obama administration concedes that some senior citizens are going to have to dig deeper into their wallets next year thanks to the health care law.
A new analysis obtained by Politico finds a health care overhaul will result in increased higher out of pocket expenses for seasoned citizens on Medicare Advantage.
Well, Shazam, who knew?
Now they tell us.
So there never were any shovel ready jobs, and now the White House says that seasoned citizens' health care costs on Medicare Advantage may go up.
Snerdley, I'm dead serious.
We have all been asking why in the world.
It's a sensible question because everybody knows this is not how you grow an economy.
Obama's policies are destroying the very foundation of American exceptionalism.
And where's is he is he is he is it father influenced him?
Is it because it's Frank Marshall Davis?
Is it Jeremiah Wright?
All of his professors, he's got a chip on his shoulder.
No, because the communist Chinese are paying his salary.
We finally have the answer.
The ChICOMs are behind it.
It is a dead serious allegation.
The seriousness of this charge is paramount.
And I'm not retracting this until I have evidence from them that they can prove the Chikoms are not paying his salary.
And the ChICOMs are not dictating U.S. economic policy.
Hell, the Chicoms had a leader.
I gotta find the story.
I didn't print it out yesterday because it's already, it's no secret that Chicoms look at us as an enemy.
But some new ChICOM leader came out and actually said so.
Well, so the ChICOMs admit we're an enemy, maybe running our president to paying his salary, and the salaries of Democrats and Congress and his czars and the cabinet.
Now it all makes sense.
Now, every bit of now we wonder why we can't drill for oil, but the Chiccoms can?
The Chikoms can drill with the Brazilians and the Cubans, but we can't.
And by the way, that lifted that much moratorium.
That's a big bunch of drivel because they still haven't granted any new permits.
Well now we know the ChICOMs can drill for oil and we can't.
The Chicoms are paying Obama's salary.
And his czars and Democrat leaders in the House of Representatives.
And a lot of grant money going to Obama causes.
Community organ, Acorn also from the ChICOMS.
No question about it.
So who knew?
Obama says there are no shovel ready jobs, and now the White House says that the Obamacare Health Law may cause senior health care costs Medicare Advantage to go up.
What can we learn from this?
Very simple.
Obama sees seasoned citizens as shovel-ready jobs.
The way Obama looks at it, seasoned citizens on Medicare Advantage are essentially shovel ready.
▲
Export Selection