All Episodes
Previous Next
July 27, 2010 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:30
July 27, 2010, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I am a household name in all four corners of the world.
And it is demonstrated by a story today out of New Delhi, India.
The Global Post.com.
The headline, it's Rush Limbaugh's India.
It's what it says here.
It's Rush Limbaugh's India, the subhead, a liberal guru cannot compete with India's new televangelists.
Dressed in a long orange kerta, orange pajamas, and a bright orange turban, Swami Agnivish, looks every bit the haranguing phonetic.
But India's latest televist is cut from a different cloth and a forest of Rush Limbaugh style conservatives.
Agnivish is the sole voice of India's fast fading social liberalism on TV.
Or was he just been canceled.
So the last liberal on TV has been canceled in India.
And are writing about it at the global India.
It's a it's a newspaper, global global post, it's Rush Limbaugh's India.
And the whole article here is bemoaning how India has been taken over by Rush Limbaugh types, and the last liberal talker has been canned.
A household name in all four corners of the world.
I was thinking about something last night.
I mean I happen to mention to uh to Catherine, you know, if if I was everything the left says I am, I would be one of them.
If I was everything they say I am, I'd be one of them.
Let's let's take the template.
All right, follow me on this.
Let's take the template at face value that the partisan political hacks spew at me.
I am, according to them, anti-women's rights.
Equal rights for women, no concern of mine, right?
I'm the guy that came up with the name Feminazi.
I am not a friend of women's rights, they say.
If that were true, I would be pushing for the mosque at ground zero.
If I were anti-women's rights, I would be all for Sharia law.
Sharia law not so stealth way to undermine women's rights in this country.
It'd be a perfect cause if I was who they say I am.
Anti-women's rights is a cause of the left.
That's who's pushing Sharia in this country.
The left.
It's the left that wants a mosque at ground zero.
It's the left who thinks America's chickens came home to roost on 9-11.
It's the American left that thinks we got what we deserved on 9-11.
It's the American left that wants the mosque at ground zero.
No one can be pro women's rights and remain silent about the metastasizing cancer that Sharia law is on women's rights.
They say that I am anti-equal rights for the races.
I'm accused of racism every day of the week by the left.
Yet what do we see out of the NAA LCP?
We have videos at official NAA LCP functions that are racist, that are divisive, filled with rage and anger.
We have the new Black Panthers.
We have La Raza, the race.
We have heartfelt eulogies for clan members like Robert Sheets Byrd from Bill Clinton.
Yeah, we came from the hills in the Hollers.
West Virginia.
He did some things he regretted later in life.
He made amends for him, but he had to do what he had to do, because he had to get elected for you.
So the excuse a clansman.
He had to get elected.
Who applauds organizations that divide us by race?
It's not I. It's not I that divide people into groups.
It's not I that see, ah, there's a black, ah, there's a black woman, there's an Hispanic woman, there's an Hispanic, there's a I don't see people that way, they do.
So if If I were the man they say that I am, I would be one of them.
Who divides this nation into tribes?
Who divides this nation into Jews, Indians, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, women, male ancestors of slave owners?
Who is it that says a black is not authentic if there's no slave blood in the genealogy?
It's not I. It's the left.
Who is it that writes columns that there's not enough real genuine blackness in the Obama White House?
Not I, it's Maureen Dowd.
Who's looking at the Obama White House and not black enough, not I?
Maureen Dowd of the New York Times.
Who wrote a column called Barack the Magic Negroes saying he's only gonna get the support of whites because they're guilty and they think they can assuage their guilt by voting for a black guy they don't even know wasn't I?
It was a leftist black guy named David Erinstein or whatever his name is from the Los Angeles Times.
It wasn't I. No big tent from these people.
Lots of little tents to accommodate all the tribes, but you gotta stay in your tent.
You Hispanics, you gotta you gotta stay there.
We'll keep you, you know, you're gonna stay there.
You can't join us in the ruling class.
The left is there to keep them all angry, to make sure that they all have common enemies, and to sell them snake all to make it all better.
It's not I. I don't do any of that.
Nor do you, nor do any conservative.
And they say of all of us concerned, it's a bunch of Nazis.
Bush Hitler.
Well, who is the Nazi?
Wouldn't that be a person who was a national socialist and anti-Israel?
Well, I'm not a socialist, and I certainly am not anti-Israel.
How in the world can I be a Nazi?
The left, closer to the politics of Nazis than I will ever be.
The person who was a national socialist and anti-Israel would be an anti-capitalist, pro-nationalization of health care, banks, education, car companies, pro-central planning, and tries to force Israel against its will and history to divide its capital Jerusalem and a cave in to all of its enemies.
None of that describes me.
It describes them.
It describes the left.
Meaning if I were all that they say I am, I'd be one of them.
Here is a leftist statist liberal, a person who believes that people should be treated differently, according to their gender, the color of their skin, and their religion.
Such as, let's use NASA to help Muslims feel better about themselves in math and science.
And let's let Muslims build Sharia law shrines anywhere they want and pretend that we don't know what that means.
Those are all important factors to the left on how to interact with others.
The Sherids believe all this.
I mentioned yesterday, but they these people vanished from the headlines overnight, did they not?
The Sherids are gone.
Because Andrew Breitbart was right.
These people are racists.
They on videotape.
It's conclusive.
Eric Holder believes.
Go ahead and build a mosque.
Not only build a mosque, build a sharia mosque.
And not only that, let's give Khalid Sheikh Muhammad a trial in New York City to spew his hatred for this country for years, and let's spend a couple hundred million dollars a year on security to make it happen.
Ah.
That's a leftist.
That's not me.
The NAA LCP believes in using NASA to reach out to Muslims.
The NAALCP got no problem with a mosque in ground zero.
Their leader, Barack Obama believes all that they believe.
Barack Obama and his right-hand man Eric Holder believe that the new Black Panthers should not be prosecuted for violating the Voting Civil Rights Act of white people.
But white people should be prosecuted for violating the civil rights of blacks.
I don't think that.
They do.
Obama wants Jerusalem cut up by Israel's factions and given to the Muslims.
And he has no problem with the mosque at ground zero or mosques that preach the virtues of Sharia law.
In fact, we have to reach out to them.
We have to um we have to show them that we uh mean them no harm.
That's why.
Race, religion, gender, dividing us into tribes, preventing the United States from becoming a true melting pot, with the left as the chef here, folks.
We're just a bunch of different ingredients, never meant to blend together in the same recipe to become one fantastic dish.
It's an incredibly backwards, nonprogressive, destructive way to view and manipulate people.
Either we are equal under the law or we are not.
Either character is more important in skin color, or it isn't.
Either they've come a long way, baby, or they haven't.
But that's who the left is.
Their policies, their organizations, their behavior all define them and all defy their self-descriptions.
That's why if I was the person they say I am, I would be a liberal.
If you, as a conservative, believed what you believed, if you were the person they say you are, we would all be among them.
We would all be liberals.
They're the ones who divide.
They're the racists, they're the bigots, they're the sexists.
Back after this.
Your calls are next.
Executing assigned host duties flawlessly.
I am L. Rushball, America's real anchor man, America's truth detector, and the doctor of democracy.
To the Fawns' promise to Traverse City, Michigan, Austin.
Welcome, sir.
Nice to have you with us today.
Rush, it's an honor to be on your program.
Thank you.
Um, I wanted to expound on your point earlier about uh why so many people in this country now seem to grow up with the impression that that they hate this country and and and they and they have this uh they seem to have this impression of the country from from early on.
And I think the uh the the way you answer that question is you have to look at how people in this country look at rich people.
Um people in our country now are taught that you need to be jealous of rich people.
Uh rich people acquire their wealth through dishonest means, whether it means that they take something from a poor person or they inherit it.
Right, you mean like the Kennedys.
Exactly.
And I think what's happened is that this age-old opinion of rich people has now extended itself and evolved into a hatred of the quote, richest country in the world.
You look at the United States, it's still the richest country in the world, and the opinion towards the United States then should be the same opinion that we have towards a rich person.
The United States is rich because we took our resources from the Indians, or we we imported slaves from Africa, or we get involved in wars and we take oil from other countries.
And I think it's it's sad, but it's it's been an educational problem, and it's unfortunately now it's a cultural problem where we have too many people that look at success, and they want to they basically want to punish success and they want to reward failure, and it's now extended to country beyond rich people.
Well, there's no question that there's an inbred uh or uh uh uh a learned hatred for achievement, wealth, and what have you.
But this goes deeper than that.
Uh that that's a symptom of it.
But the I mean, there's general hatred for the Constitution.
There is hatred for the notion of freedom.
There's hatred for the notion of liberty.
Uh there is a genuine hatred for the way the country was founded.
And it's taught.
You don't grow up that way.
You know, you know, hate.
Yeah, I do.
I think I love of course they hate freedom.
Uh uh damn right people hate freedom, Snerby.
You think Obama likes freedom?
Freedom's The biggest threat to Obama's agenda that there is.
What is Obama's agenda really all about?
It's taking people's freedom away.
You take away their economic opportunity, you take away their educational opportunity, and bye by freedom.
If you if you keep harping on the fact that cell phones are going to call you cause cancer, you try to get people to get rid of all these technological advancements, get rid of their communication.
What is a hatred for the second amendment all about?
It's a hatred of liberty.
It's a hatred of freedom.
There's no question that it is.
And this has to be taught.
Because the natural spirit, the natural yearning of the human being is to be free.
Subjugation has to be taught.
To be subordinated to something greater than oneself has to be taught.
You have to be taught that that's how we ought to organize ourselves.
That there are people better than you, and they are more qualified than you to run your life.
That has to be taught.
Now the motivations for this hatred, and we could spend all day talking about why people hate the country.
And for every call we get that had an answer, we would have a correct answer.
At some point, though, you get past the motivation.
All I said was to open the program.
If I could change one thing, it would be to wipe out the hate for this country that people born here have for it.
To me, and I'm assuming to the vast majority of you, it's a non sequitur.
Why hate the greatest place on the planet?
Doesn't make any sense to us.
But it has to be taught.
If you and I had been raised that we live in the most unjust, immoral, unfair place for whatever reason, then you can understand it.
So I but I would I would I I think we'd solve the vast majority of our problems.
Of course, we can't wave a magic wand.
I'm I'm using this as uh as an illustration.
As an example.
The Obama administration, this this regime is full of hate.
They're not even close to normal.
Everybody in this administration, I don't care who they are, the czar, the cabinet member, I don't care who they are, they've got a grievance of something.
Obamaism is a politics of grievance.
And everybody in this regime is mad at somebody.
And if you look at the ones that speak publicly about the people in the world that they admire, it's people like Castro and Paul Pot and Mao Saitung.
If they knew how to get what they wanted.
Lenin, look at the people they admire.
Stalin.
The difference is that normal people get over the grievances.
Normal people eventually get over it.
Normal people don't want to go through life.
On the razor's edge of anger.
But these people have nurtured their anger.
They have made it something that they prosper.
And uh Sonia Sotomayor, we had a caller who explained what Sonia Sotomayor is all about.
The use of rage on campus to get what you want.
Even if it was manufactured rage.
Rage and anger scare people.
Rage and anger instill fear in people.
These people have been consumed with hatred for decades since they were born.
Their lives are consumed with single-minded determination to get back at whoever it is that's done them wrong.
And there's a never-ending list of people who have mistreated them.
And they're going to show us how they're going to die trying.
And all of this, there's nothing productive about hate and rage and anger.
There's nothing inspiring about it.
In any way, shape, manner, reform.
It's simply destructive.
Here's uh Nicholas in Columbus, Georgia.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hey, Rush, thank you for taking my call.
You bet.
Well, um, I was calling you today about uh how the Republicans what I'm worried about is that the Republicans want to have learned their lessons about past monetary and fiscal uh failures because I mean the Democrats have made this situation way worse with the high taxes and demonizing the wealthy,
but Republicans have had their uh past failures, Such as having uh low taxes which are good, but having very high spending, which uh very low interest rates, which have I think hurt the economy and kind of set this bubble up, the housing crisis and all that and all that kind of thing.
We don't worry about that.
The Republicans in the election will kind of take uh advantage of the Democrats, but not really, you know, change the game in that we'll all be in the same mess as before.
You know what I mean?
Uh I think I do.
Uh like I I did they claim that they want to uh cut spending and cut taxes and all that stuff.
I kind of worry that we'll end up playing the same game as before as we'll keep the taxes low, but we'll just keep on.
Well, I know who you're you're you're you're talking about the Rhino Republicans.
You're you're talking about Republicans who want to be part of the ruling class.
You're not talking about conservative Republicans.
And there are the Republicans that you're talking about who will say whatever they need to say to get elected, and then they'll forget or just ignore what they've promised they would do and govern in a whole different way.
Um that that's that's that's not an unknown.
I mean, the uh the whole notion that the conservatives need to take the Republican Party, need to capture it, recapture it, take it over, uh, is something that we have been uh uh encouraging and suggesting for a number of years here.
I mean, to say that there are there's some Republicans that are uh although I I have to tell you something, you yeah, the Republicans do get a bad rap for spending, but they thought they're pikers compared to what this guy's done.
I mean, Bush's last deficit was not even 200 billion dollars.
Obama's first deficit's one point four trillion.
So, I mean, there's really no comparison here in the destructive nature of these two parties.
They're not the same.
Even as bad as some Republicans can be.
Now that last caller never got to the point that I was told he was going to get to, and that is that Republicans are responsible for the meltdown.
Uh that's the only reason I took the guy's call was because he was going to say the Republicans are responsible for the meltdown, and he didn't get anywhere near that.
But I still want to address this notion.
You know, there's a uh and it's it's it's these are third party types.
Rush, there's no difference between the two parties.
Republicans are just as bad as the Democrats are when it comes to spending.
Republicans have never had control of Congress for more than a blink of an eye when compared to how Democrats are controlled both houses for most of this and the last century.
Remember when the Republicans won the House in 1994 was the first time in 40 years.
The Democrats running and even when the Republicans won the Senate, they entered into a stupid power sharing agreement.
Who who came up with that idea?
Was it uh who was running the Republican?
Trent Ludd decided to show we're fair.
So we'll have a power sharing agreement with uh with Tom Dashell.
Now you you could argue that the uh it's recent years that the Republicans were in control, that they were so stunned to find they had the majority, they didn't know what to do, and they acted like it.
And there's no question that a lot of Republicans, this is the whole thing we talked about in this uh Angelo Codvilla piece in the American Spectator a couple weeks ago or last week, the ruling class.
There's no question Republicans that live in Washington want to be part of Lindsey Graham, a great example of wanting to be accepted, wanting to be in the big clique.
There's no question there are some Republicans like that.
But just like the left loves to say in defense of communism, it's never really been tried.
That's what they say.
Well, yeah, the communism been tried, but the right people have never really done it.
Or we never had the proper amount of funding.
That's that's what all this talk when Obama was nominated.
We're the ones we've been waiting for, meaning finally, finally, after all of these decades and eras, finally the right socialists have come along to create our utopia.
And you could almost say the same thing about about uh Republicans in control of Congress.
But the idea that the Republicans are responsible for this meltdown.
My friends, I I want to go back and and and re refresh your memories about this.
There is one primary reason for this meltdown.
One it is the sub-prime mortgage business, Which was a creation of Democrats and leftists.
And it was based entirely on the leftist ideology.
And that is that life is unfair.
If somebody can afford a house, everybody should be able to be in a house.
It's not fair that some can't own a home.
Not in America that's just immoral.
So we had to come up with a way, because market economics doesn't work that way because not everybody is equal.
No two people can ever be equal.
If there is indeed genuine free will freedom, it's not possible.
That doesn't stop the left.
So that was created with whatever the human, the uh investment redevelopment act or whatever the name of the uh laws were, the banks were forced to make loans to people who could never pay them back.
In fact, loans were structured with no down payment.
It was only principal that was being retired, and these loans were then sold, these worthless loans, these worthless mortgages were then sold to who?
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mack, who insured them.
And guess who it is that's not being reformed in any of this so-called financial regulatory business, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mack.
Guess whose executives, and I mean, not just executives, and a lot of people at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were also friends of Angelo who got sweet deals on their mortgages from countrywide, along with Chris Dodd and Barney Frank and all the rest.
And so these greedy banks who were forced to make these loans to people that they knew were never going to pay them back, had to come up with ways to turn something worthless into value.
So they came up with mortgage backed securities, and they came up with collateralized debt obligations and uh uh who the hell knows what else, and they started selling them to each other as insurance policies.
And Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac come along and buy up all these worthless mortgages and thus guarantee them, all because a bunch of liberal Democrats were buying votes and making sure that people who had no business owning a home owned them.
And of course they couldn't.
They couldn't pay the utilities, they couldn't pay the furniture, and they couldn't do anything.
And so that was handled too with other loans that didn't cost them any money for other things.
That's the that's that's the foundation of this so-called meltdown.
So we had a bunch of toxic assets.
We had a bunch of worthless mortgage loans, a bunch of worthless paper.
Well, these people circle the wagons for each other, and the people in government, Hank Paulson and the rest circle the wagons for them.
And created this notion that we were going to have a worldwide financial economic collapse in 24 hours if we didn't bail these people out and come up with ways to pay these toxic assets.
Or make them worth something.
Hence TARP was born.
But the first vote on TARP failed.
It was two weeks before TARP was actually voted on, and in the two weeks we didn't have anything near a financial meltdown.
We were had a giant 100% scam.
And it was all based on the fact that the powers that be who created the problem had to then make their buddies whole so that they didn't lose their homes in the Hamptons or in Aspen or wherever the hell else they have their second or third homes.
So he had to bail out these people, and these people creative on Wall Street, they had to come up with ways to make these worthless mortgages worth something.
So they created all this stuff.
You can talk to some of the people that were involved in this at the time, and they knew what they were doing was ridiculous.
They knew that most of it could not even be explained, much less understood.
They knew at some point the bubble was going to burst on all of this, because the only thing that kept this fraud alive was the continuing escalation of housing prices, real estate values.
Once that bubble burst, the dam broke, and everything fell to the wayside, and that's when the ruling class got into business and said we need these bailouts here, we need these bailouts there, because we need to make these people whole, we got a financial crisis going to destroy the financial crisis was going to destroy the people who engineered the scam.
And they had to be bailed out.
Financial meltdown implies that every aspect of our capitalist system fell apart and it didn't.
And that's why we're in the mess that we're in now, because enough people were convinced that capitalism was corrupted, capitalism by design failed.
So all of a sudden now, the whole system on which the greatest nation on earth was founded and operated is under assault.
When in fact capitalism didn't fail.
Central planning and command control economies with subprime mortgages and their creation and their demand to be implemented under fear of federal investigation is what led to the meltdown.
Liberalism.
Socialism, Marxism, whatever you want to call it, that's what led to the economic crisis that we're in, not capitalism.
You can say that these greedy bankers creating all these phony like CDOs of collateralized debt uh obligations or the whatever insurance policies quasi that they came up with to try to give their worthless paper some value.
They wouldn't have done it in the first place if they weren't forced to make these stupid worthless loans.
No responsible person in the banking industry is going to loan money to somebody that cannot pay it back and do it as a matter of policy.
They may have friends that they'll scratch their back, like Angelo Mozillo.
He'd give Chris Dodd a favorable deal on a couple mortgages, or Barney Frank and the guys at Fannie May of Freddie Mac.
But institutionally, nobody's gonna give away money.
It doesn't happen.
Yet it was happening.
Banks and whoever else were giving away money.
In effect, giving away houses.
So homes were being built that had no business being built because the people buying them really couldn't.
The whole thing was artificial.
The whole thing was a fraud.
And it wasn't capitalism that did it.
It was activist social engineering brought to us started by Jimmy Carter, acted upon and enlarged by Bill Clinton, and then really amplified by Barney Frank and Chris Dodd.
And there were regulators who knew this, and there was the Bush administration who knew this, and they tried to shut it down, and the regulators were impugned out of town.
The regulators were harassed and threatened by members of Congress when they dared speak the truth about all this.
And then election years rolled around.
It was time to put all this under the under the rug, so nobody knew what was going on.
Let's continue the facade that all's well and hunky-dory in the real estate market when everybody knew that was involved that this was a it was a it was a time bomb, it was going to blow up at some point.
And it just so happened to explode in the 2008 presidential campaign.
Why shazam?
It just happened to blow up in September, August to September 2008, right out of the Democrat convention in front of the acceptance speechless fake Greek columns, and they played our nominee like an absolute strativarious fiddle.
The guy cancels his campaign, goes into Washington to deal with the problem that his own ruling class had created.
Capitalism did not create the problem.
We are in the financial straits that we're in.
I know there's some other things that are now a part and parcel of this.
It's not just the subprime crisis, but that's the foundation.
That's that's the floor that gave way, that led to where we are now.
And it was predictable.
And the people involved knew it at the time.
The subprime stuff was not created during the Bush administration, the subprime loan mortgage business actually got rolling in the 90s.
It took 10 or 15 years for it to um crash and burn.
And all it took to crash and burn was the housing bubble when the value of real estate finally peaked, started plummeting.
And now look where we are.
Look at how many people's homes are basically underwater, not worth the monthly payments.
Now we've got stories urging people to just walk away from them, just walk away from the mortgage.
And banks owning all kinds of properties here.
The price, The price of housing continues to fall.
This was all brought about by policy, not capitalism.
It was all brought about by liberalism.
One fourth of the mortgages in Miami are either late or in foreclosure.
That tells me that one fourth of the mortgages in Florida had no business being created.
If that have you ever stopped to ask yourself, in this economic crisis, now you look around, and you'll find there are a lot of people that are not hurting.
A lot of people have been dinged.
I mean, anybody who had a stock portfolio has been dinged, but there are a lot of people who are not hurting.
There are a lot of people who aren't underwater.
There are a lot of people who are not living paycheck to paycheck.
Do you ask yourself who they are and why?
They're in that circumstance.
Because there are answers to it.
And they're the good old-fashioned answers.
What?
No, they're not lucky.
It's called thrift.
It's called it's called understanding the basics of not spending what you don't have.
And not financing what you'll never be able to pay back.
And then continue to roll that debt over and over and over.
But so there are the choices.
This this economy has not ensnared everybody.
Everybody's not in dire straits.
I was explaining this to somebody the other day.
So, well, then why are you concerned about it?
Because I love the country.
I hate, you know, this this whole thing has been artificially manufactured.
All the October surprise of 2008 was the subprime mortgage crisis uh failure timing.
That's the that that that was the October surprise.
You know, I've I have the view of this country that I have, greatest country ever, the greatest land of opportunity, no cliché ever.
And to find as many people who live in this country to be as shut out and denied that opportunity on purpose by design.
Yeah, makes me mad too.
Ruling class was not hurt in a depression.
FDR wasn't hurt during the depression.
The ruling class has not been hurt.
John Kerry's still out there buying yachts and not paying taxes on them.
The first subprime loan was given in 1993, folks.
The subprime mortgage business, that's that's the floor that fell out of all this.
That's why there is a meltdown, if you want to call it that.
And it's not the fault of free market capitalism.
A little Elton John in the uh the bumper rotation.
I'm still standing.
By the way, the Arizona Daily Star has a story about Elton John.
Elton John did not mince words in slamming his fellow musicians for boycotting Arizona over their immigration law from the stage at his sold-out Tucson concert.
On a Thursday night, Elton John savored a few choice, not so family-friendly words.
He said, We're all very pleased to be playing in Arizona.
I've read that some of the artists won't come here.
Well, they're a bunch of nitwits.
Let's face it.
I still play California.
As a gay man, I have no legal rights whatsoever, so what's with these people?
He also refused to cancel a concert in Israel.
He played Israel during the flotilla controversy, ignored the artist boycott of Israel in June, played a show in Tel Aviv.
And then this story concludes with this.
Elton John also played Rush Limbaugh's wedding reception in early June, which drew the ire of gays and lesbians.
Limbaugh is vehemently anti-gay marriage.
John is married to his longtime partner.
No, he's not.
He's not.
He doesn't believe in gay marriage.
He's got the same attitude on it that Obama does.
Anyway, I like this guy.
This guy Is not afraid to go against the grain.
Now, on this, folks, in this subprime business, let me let me be charitable.
Even if, even if the Democrats did not purposely cause the financial crisis via the Community Redevelopment Act and the subprime mortgage, even granting that they were simply purely motivated by altruism.
They just wanted affordable housing as Morning Frey.
They just wanted to get poor people in the house is a fair thing to do.
Even granting that.
When the whole thing fell apart, they didn't try to manage it.
They tried to exploit it.
And when the whole thing fell apart, they tried to blame capitalism, Republicans, and conservatives for it.
So even being charitable, and that's a big stretch here.
I'm just doing it as an example.
Even being charitable, there's still a bunch of creeps for what they've done here.
We'll be back.
And we're back.
It's Rush Limbaugh, the fastest three hours in uh in media.
Two of them today already in the can, one more to go.
And really, folks, this is uh a point well worth remembering.
Obama and the Democrats, when a crisis comes up, even a genuine crisis, they're not going to manage it.
They try to fix it.
They exploit it.
Oil spill, you name it.
Whatever crisis comes up.
In fact, crisis, that's what Rahm Emanuel meant.
Crisis is too important to waste.
They exploit them.
▲
Export Selection