All Episodes
Previous Next
April 20, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:11
April 20, 2009, Monday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 247 podcast.
The New York Times today has a story that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was waterboarded six times a day.
183 times.
Over 200 times total.
And their source is a left wing blogger.
Now I'm going to tell you what's going to happen here with a drive-by media.
By the way, greetings, folks, and welcome.
Rush Limbaugh back.
And broadcast excellence, all yours, three hours straight ahead.
The telephone number if you want to join us today, 800-282-2882.
The email address, lrushbow at eibnet.com.
I'm going to give you the new media model before I go on to this waterboarding point.
The new media model is going to be this.
All these drive-by media outlets, the mainstream media is cutting back on bureaus and reporters and so forth.
And what's going to happen is, it's already starting to happen.
New York Times, liberal media, TV and radio, newspapers, so forth, are going to start using left-wing bloggers as credible sources.
is For news.
Now you stop and think about this.
A hundred and eighty-three times, six times a day, Khalid Sheikh Muhammad was waterboarded.
His lawyers never complained.
He didn't complain to whatever civil rights organizations there were.
And I'll tell you the bottom, if if if somebody can be water tortured six times a day, then it isn't torture.
Can we just establish that?
If somebody can go through waterboarding for 183 times, six times a day, which is a little bit hard to believe anyway, but let's acknowledge, let's just say it's true for the sake of it, because whatever the left wing blogs print and publish, the drive-by media is going to say is true anyway, six times a day, it means you're not afraid of it.
It means you you it's not torture.
If you have uh if you've found a way to withstand it, it can't possibly be torture.
And yet there was Senator McCain, Senator Lieberman all over television today talking about how they have spoken to top Al Qaeda operatives, and top Al-Qaeda operatives have told them that uh this uh the news of waterboarding and torture, these interrogation memos has uh has helped recruit more Al Qaeda members.
And then you couple all of this with this blasphemous summit of the Americas that President Obama participated in over the weekend, and it's it's just I'll tell you what's become uh abundantly clear to me, and that is that I don't care whether you're talking about domestic policy or foreign policy, it's not about the United States anymore, it's about Barack Obama.
I really do believe the guy's got a God complex.
I really do think he believes he is the one.
We got some audio sound bites coming up to uh illustrate this, but perhaps the most outrageous, or depending on how you look at it, the the funniest story to me coming out of the weekend from the summit was a story from the Associated Press Stephen Hearst comparing Obama favorably, favorably to Mikhail Gorbachev.
Now, before we get to the details of this, I want to take you back to last Tuesday.
We had a great call from Victor in Boca Raton, Florida, who had lived under uh Soviet communism, had escaped, come to the United States.
He made the brilliant point that he sees similar things here to what he saw then in the Soviet Union as is, for example, in the middle of uh Stalin's reign of terror and the uh and the massive famines.
A lot of Soviet people, well, Stalin can't possibly know about this.
I mean, he's he was so beloved, he was so respected by the Soviet people.
11, 10, 10 million, 11 million deaths.
Stalin could not possibly have known about that.
Uh and he said that the you're you're exactly right, Mr. Limbaugh when you say the administration out is well, Obama doesn't know this is all going on.
He can't he can't possibly, or it wouldn't be happening if Obama knew about it.
And during the course of my conversation, I happened to make a joke.
Listen to this.
Thank you.
Please, please please hang in there.
Don't Trust any of these whiners who call and complain.
You are you are indispensable for us, and I just hope you stay healthy and uh only happens to you.
And we're we're gonna continue our fight here against Glasnost and Perestroika from the Obama administration.
I'm making a joke.
Glasnost and Perestroika, the two big policies that the left credited Gorbachev with for opening up the Soviet Union, ending communism, and of course Reagan, it just happened to be a Dunce bystander while all this was going on.
So last Tuesday, after making a joke, and we're going to be keeping a sharp eye in a fight on Glasnost and Perestroika from the Obama administration.
Get this.
President Barack Obama has gone abroad and gored an ox.
The deeply held belief that the United States does not make mistakes in dealings with friends or foes.
And in the process, he's taking a huge gamble both at home and abroad for a payoff that could be a long time coming, if ever.
By way of explanation, senior advisor David Axelrod describes the president's tactics this way.
You plant, you cultivate, you harvest.
And over time the seeds that were planted here are going to be very, very valuable, meaning the seeds at the America summit.
While historic analogies are never perfect, Obama's stark efforts to change the U.S. image abroad are reminiscent of the stunning realignments sought by former Soviet leader.
Mikhail Gorbachev.
Oh, Hell's Bell's here, folks.
The drive-by media has just compared our president to a communist leader of the Soviet Union, and they have done so, they think, in a complimentary way.
During his short by Soviet standards tenure, Gorbachev scrambled incessantly to shed the ideological entanglements that were leading the communist empire toward ruin.
So we have here a comparison.
Gorbachev, it is said here by Stephen Hurst, was trying to get rid of the ideological uh encumberments that destroyed the Soviet Union.
What were those?
What were the ideological encumberments that were destroying the Soviet Union?
It's called communism.
It's called what Gorbachev was trying to do, and and the you cannot count on the drive-by's to tell you factually this.
Gorbachev knew full well that the economic days of the Soviet Union had never met their promise and there was no future, and it was over.
What Gorbachev was trying to do was hold on to a communist leadership while parceling out freedoms.
Perestroika, Glasnost openness and all that.
But it was too late because you can't parcel out freedom.
Once you enslave people who have not experienced freedom, they want all of it.
They do not accept little bits here and there.
And Gorbachev was not able to maintain control of the communist government of the Soviet Union.
At least he wasn't able to maintain his hold on it.
So we have a comparison here.
Gorbachev scrambled to shed the ideological entanglements leading the Communist Empire toward ruin.
Obama, according to AP, is doing the same thing.
Obama is shedding incessantly the ideological entanglements that lead the U.S. to ruin.
What are the ideological entanglements Obama is shedding?
Capitalism.
Now, would somebody explain to me the connection here?
How can you claim that Gorbachev and Obama are the same when they were trying ostensibly to shed different ideological entanglements?
And then get this next paragraph.
But Obama is outpacing even Gorbachev.
After just three months in power, the new American leader has, among many other things, admitted to Europeans that America deserves at least part of the blame for the world's financial crisis because it did not regulate high-flying and greedy Wall Street gamblers.
Told the Russians he wants to reset relations that fell to Cold War style levels under his predecessor, George W. Bush.
Oh, yeah, all of this is our fault.
All of This is the fault of the United States of America, but it's not his fault because Obama gets to exempt himself.
He wasn't alive, he wasn't old enough, he wasn't none of this was happening when he had anything to do with it.
He's going to come along and he's going to apologize to the people of the world for his own country.
He's not apologizing for him.
And he's not representing the best interest of the United States here.
He also asked NATO for more help in the fight in Afghanistan.
And not getting much, he didn't castigate his partners.
He lifted some restrictions on Cuban Americans' travel to Cuba and eased rules on sending wages back to families there.
He shook hands with more than once and accepted a book from Hugo Chavez, the virulently anti-American leader of oil rich Venezuela.
I had a friend of mine sending me some notes over the weekend about this, and I said, What is this is not hard to understand.
Please, folks, this is the virulently anti-American leader Hugo Chavez.
Do you realize that Obama and Chavez have more in common than they do not have?
And the only thing that they one of the big things they don't have in common, and I think it's an important point.
You've got you've got Obama over there kissing the ring of the Saudi king.
And what are the Saudis?
What do we care about the Saudis for?
Oil.
So he's kissing their hand, kissing their he goes down to Venezuela, yucks it up, yucks it up with Hugo Chavez, who has insulted the United States of America, insulted George W. Bush at the U.N. two years ago, calling the double.
Said, I can still smell the sulfur here in the room.
Gozna yucks it up with these guys.
Accepts a book as a gift from some leftist that claims the United States is the focus of evil in all of the Western hemisphere.
Central America, South America, we have plundered, we have destroyed.
Obama accepts the book from Hugo Chavez, yucks it up.
Hugo Chavez has nationalized his nation's oil companies.
His oil wealth is the hold he has on the country.
That and his command of the media.
Chavez and Obama, and the word has gotten out that they were yucking it up and they were good friends, and Viva Obama.
And now uh what's his name?
Chavez is going to put the ambassador from Venezuela back into Washington.
He's gonna he's gonna restore these uh kind of ambassadorial ties.
Uh let's see, he said that America's appetite for illegal drugs and its lax control of the flow of guns and cash to Mexico were partly to blame for the drug lord-inspired violence, that is rattling the Southern um uh U.S. neighbor.
He said this.
One of the benefits of my campaign, and how I've been trying to cooperate as pre or operate as president, is I don't worry about the politics.
I try to figure out what's right in terms of American interests, and on this one I think I'm right, meaning yucking it up with uh with Chavez.
Uh and the last line of the APP, so thought Gorbachev, but being right is not always politically healthy.
So he's Mikhail Gorbachev.
Now, you have to understand a media template.
They've loved Gorbachev.
Gorbachev saved the world, Gorbachev saved the world from Reagan.
They are factually uninformed, refuse to see the truth on this.
So now our president has been compared favorably, and he's even outpacing a Soviet communist dictator.
Mikhail Gorbachev.
And I can't help, you know, think of the idiots on our side.
These so-called intelligent conservatives who kept saying, well, at least he's a centrist.
At least Obama is following Bush's foreign policy.
At least he's appointing centrists on foreign policy and defense.
They've never understood who this guy is.
He's either a useful idiot or he's worse.
And I frankly think he's worse.
I think he's stupid, Obama, but he's been trained well.
Bill Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, all of his liberal professors.
And now he's going to meet with the cabinet today.
He's going to meet with his cabinet today to make a big PR splash about how he's telling them to cut their budgets.
How clever.
After increasing spending with trillions in deficits.
Do you realize here's here's let me give you the numbers.
Barack Obama, big PR thing, and it's working to drive by media's.
Oh, oh, oh, Obama cutting spending, Obama cutting spending.
They're just having orgasms here over what Obama's cutting spending.
He's ordered a hundred million dollars in budget cuts.
Do you know what the interest per day on the porculus bill is?
Try 95 million.
He's not even eliminating the interest on the porculus bill with these budget cuts, and yet he's getting all of this.
Oh, he's he's cutting spending, he's cutting spending, and he's just ordering this.
There's no way it's gonna happen anyway.
A hundred million dollars in budget cuts compared to four trillion dollars in spending in debt.
Just amazing.
Increases the deficit fourfold.
Then he says he's gonna cut it in half.
Even the CBO said Bologna did that.
You're not cutting anything.
The bigger, the bigger point here is he doesn't want to cut spending.
He doesn't care if it's spent well or not.
His goal is to crush the private sector.
And he just got through paling around with people who have crushed their own private sectors in their own countries, yucking it up and paling around with them.
Now, as we mentioned, Hugo Chavez gave our president Barack Obama an American bashing book, blaming America for all of the problems from colonialization to the CIA to uh all the economic problems, all the political problems of the Western Hemisphere.
Gave Obama the book.
There's a picture of it, Obama smiling, accepting the book, looking at the uh at the cover of the book, and of course, the book shot up the Amazon list.
I I think he looked at the cover of the book because he probably had a copy.
He probably had a copy of the book already.
He says, geez, how do I okay?
I gotta act like I don't know what this is, but I'm sure it's in his library somewhere.
I'm sure Obama's already read this book.
He went down to the summit of the Americas and pretty much repeated the theme of this book.
I don't have the title of it in uh in front of me, but it zoomed up the Amazon.com list.
We have a we have a montage here of the the drive-by media in America.
George Stephanopoulos, Chuck Todd, Savannah Guthrie, just a whole bunch of them.
They're excited as hell about this.
It was at 54,000 plus in the Amazon.com rankings, now up to number seven.
That book is now at number two on the Amazon best seller list.
Its previous position, 54,295.
It's Amazon.com sales rank was 54,295.
Just now I checked it's seven.
It was fifty-eight, something like that on Amazon.com.
It's jumped to 20 at 10.
It is the number two best seller on Amazon.com.
It was 54,295th position.
It's number two, number two on Amazon.com's best seller list tonight.
Now it is number two, that book on Amazon.com.
Ranked 54,295.
It is now number two on Amazon.com.
An astonishing climb.
Did you believe this?
Do you believe the excitement in the drive-by media that an anti-American book filled with lies given to our president by Hugo Chavez?
The drive-by is excited at how rapidly it climbed the Amazon list.
But do you know there's something interesting they left they left off of this in their report?
Yes, it went from 54,000 plus up to second place.
But do you know what it failed to unseat at number one?
Mark Levin's Liberty and Tyranny.
Despite this all-out effort by the drive-by media to push this book after Obama had accepted it from Chavez.
The leftists in this country start buying this book.
Look at how many people had to buy this book to move it up that much.
A book that blames America for all of the problems in the Western Hemisphere.
And it shoots up to number two, but not even Fox News.
Not even Fox News, who was part of the montage here with uh Julie Manderis and Heroldo Rivera could bother to mention that it failed to unseat what was at number one, what is at number one, and it's been this way throughout the weekend, Mark Levin's Liberty and Tyranny.
And so a book that is devoted to the principles of the American founding, liberty and freedom, American exceptionalism, a book that talks about people's love for their country is at number one.
And the drive-byers can only talk about what a mammoth mammoth increase.
To number two, thanks to Hugo Chavez.
And Barack Obama.
Here's also a montage from yesterday.
This is uh various members of the administration dismissing the uh the handshake between Obama and what's his face, Chavez.
Words and handshakes are nice, but they're not enough relationships depend on more than smiles and handshakes.
Well, handshakes and photographs and smiles are important.
They're certainly not good enough.
The noise I hear is all about how did he shake hands with Hugo Chavez?
How did he accept the book?
What was he supposed to do?
Well, it's just a handshake.
What's the big deal?
Maybe, you know, here's the thing.
Why are these people putting it down?
These are all Obama supporters.
Oh, what's a big deal?
He shook hands.
Why are they making mincemeat out of it?
They know it's not good politically.
They know that it doesn't make any sense.
What's he supposed to do?
Shave his hands.
These are the kind of things you take care of before you get there, before the photo ops happen.
If you don't want them to happen, they won't happen.
They wanted this to happen.
We'll be back.
The all-knowing, all caring, all sensing, all feeling, all concerned.
Maha Rushi.
Here is Obama.
This is uh this is yesterday in Port of Spain, Trinidad, and Tobago.
And the White House correspondent for CNN Dan Lothian uh asked the president this question.
During the campaign, you were criticized by some within your own party for perhaps not being able to be tough on foreign policy matters.
Now you've had this friendly interaction with Chavez.
Are you concerned at all about how this might be perceived back in the U.S. as perhaps going soft?
Already one senator is calling this friendly interaction irresponsible.
And as a quick follow-up, if I may, when you got the book from Mr. Chavez, what did you really think?
It was a nice gesture to give me a book.
I'm a reader.
We had this debate throughout the campaign.
I mean, the whole notion was that somehow, if we showed courtesy or opened up dialogue with governments that had previously been hostile to us, uh that that somehow would be a sign of weakness.
Yeah, the American people didn't buy it.
And there's a good reason the American people didn't buy it, because it doesn't make sense.
What doesn't make sense?
We showed courtesy or open up dialogue with governments that had previously been hostile to us somehow would be a sign of weakness.
What else would you call it to run around the world and apologize for your country?
By the way, the name of the book that Chavez gave Obama is open veins of Latin America, five centuries of the pillage of a continent.
And the pillaging was done by the United States in this book is by Eduardo Galliano.
And he didn't say what he thought of the book.
He didn't answer that question.
Well, he did.
He continued the answer with this.
Venezuela is a country whose defense budget is probably one-six hundredth of the United States.
They own Sitco.
It's unlikely that as a consequence of me shaking hands or having a polite conversation with Mr. Chavez that we are endangering the strategic interests of the United States.
Even within this imaginative crowd, I think you would be hard-pressed to paint a scenario in which U.S. interests would be damaged as a consequence of us having a more constructive relationship with Venezuela.
So if the question, Dan, is how does this play politically?
I don't know.
One of the benefits of uh my campaign and how I've been trying to operate as president is I don't worry about the politics.
I try to figure out what's right in terms of American interests, and on this one I think I'm right.
He's not representing American interests.
He's representing his interests.
This is all about him.
It's not about the United States.
The Obama theme song.
White comedian Paul Shanklin, the official Obama theme song, I'm sorry.
He says, even within this imaginative crowd, you'd be hard-pressed to paint a scenario in which U.S. interests would be damaged as a consequence of us having a more constructive relationship with Venezuela.
How does that more constructive relationship happen is the question.
Does it happen by converting an enemy to an ally?
No.
It happens by virtue of Obama going down there and agreeing with Chavez and his opinion of the United States of America.
Yep, we were wrong.
Yeah, we've been horrible things.
Yep, everything in that book that you gave me, yep, that's true.
We gotta show these people we don't mean them any harm.
We gotta apologize to them.
So the whole concept of American exceptionalism doesn't even exist.
I want to add some more to this.
I remember mentioning this during the campaign.
It didn't matter then, and of course, it may not matter now.
But back in November of 2006, there was an education forum in Caracas, Venezuela.
President Hugo Chavez was there.
He had invited Bill Ayers, the man who introduced Barack Obama to Chicago politics.
Bill Ayers, a good friend of Barack Obama's.
Chavez invites Ayers to come down and attend an education seminar, an education forum in Caracas.
And this is what Ayers said.
First thing he did is he announced his support for the profound educational reforms underway here in Venezuela under the leadership of President Chavez.
We share the belief, Bill Ayers and Chavez, that education is the motor force of revolution.
I look forward to seeing how you continue to overcome the failings of capitalist education as you seek to create something truly new and deeply humane.
At the end of his speech, Ayers said Venezuela is poised to offer the world a new model of education humanizing and revolutionary model whose twin missions are enlightenment, enlightenment, and liberation.
Now, Ayers and his uh his buddies at the Annenberg Project and whatever educational uh projects that Ayers is a part of, he believes that the purpose of education is to indoctrinate public scruble students with the belief that America is a racist militarist country and that the capitalist system is inherently unfair and oppressive.
That's Barack Obama's buddy, Bill Ayers, about whom nobody cared during the campaign.
In November 2006, getting an award from Hugo Chavez, our new friend in Caracas, Venezuela, praising Chavez for reforming education, turning it into a means of social revolution, opposing capitalism and militarism.
And that is what Ayres curricula here in the United States attempts to do.
Now, again, we're probably going, well, Obama didn't know anything about that.
Obama didn't know that Ayres went down.
Obama doesn't know what Ayres curricula instruction is all.
Obama doesn't know this.
Of course not.
No, Obama doesn't know.
He just goes down there and yucks it up with the guy who honored his friend, Bill Ayers.
He goes down there and accepts a book, Open Veins of Latin America, five centuries of the pillage of a continent.
Oh, but Obama doesn't know anything about this.
No, no, no, Russia.
Oh, he can't possibly know anything about this at all.
Basically, what you've got, you got Bill Ayers down there applauding Hugo Chavez for teaching Marxism in the public schools.
And agreeing that this is what needs to happen in the United States.
To get rid of the capitalist system and to get rid of the notion of American militarism.
So if you're going to say, as he did to the press, I think you'd be hard-pressed to paint a scenario in which U.S. interests would be damaged as a consequence of us having a more constructive relationship with Venezuela.
Mr. President, if you're going to go down there, and if you're going to yuck it up and laugh it up at the guy, and if you're going to accept his premises as a means of forging a new relationship, as a way of getting rid of the failed ideologies of the past, which has now become a trademark line.
If you're going to accept the premise of every nation that hates this country as a means of forging a new relationship with those countries, then in the end, you yourself, if you're going to accept their premise, are agreeing with it.
That the U.S. is the one that needs to change.
The United States needs to be cut down to size.
The U.S. needs to reform its education system.
The U.S. needs to be made smaller.
The U.S. is guilty.
Well, hell's bells, anybody could form new relations.
I could form a new relationship with the Crips and Bloods if that's all you had to do.
I could forge a new relationship with the American left.
Do you realize how big and popular I could be if I call the American left leaders and say, you know what, you people are right.
And you've been right all this time, and I've been wrong.
And I want to apologize to Ronald Reagan.
I want to apologize to every talk show host that's ever come before me, including Larry King.
I want to apologize for everybody.
Oh Mom, they would love me.
They'd love me, and they would and uh they might doubt it at first, but it wouldn't take me long, a couple days to prove my sincerity if that's where I really was.
I mean, that's easy to make friends that way.
Easy as hell to make friends with your enemies.
I tell them they're right and apologize to him and say, please don't hold me personally accountable.
Please don't hold me.
You know, go ahead and blame Roger Ayles.
Roger Ailes is responsible for Fox.
I'm not.
And don't blame me for all of talk radio.
Don't blame me.
I could easily get I I I could become the most favorite liberal personality in media.
It'd be easy.
Just go apologize, prostrate myself, bow down, kiss the ring, accept some of their books, promise to get my mind right.
Would I be forging new relationships?
Yeah.
Between me, not my country and not my ideological brethren, between me and them, and that's what Obama's.
It's all about him.
Was this and by the way, um is not there saying he doesn't worry about the politics of this?
That's absolutely crazy.
What's Al Qaeda's defense budget?
He says Venezuela has a defense budget one six hundredth of hours.
What's Al Qaeda's defense budget?
He doesn't worry about the politics, so he's canceling those daily morning meetings with all these left wing groups.
Is that what this means?
He doesn't care about this anymore.
Was the election about Barack Obama meeting with every nut job in the world?
I seem to recall he flopped all over the place on that point after first saying yes and then saying he would require preconditions.
What were the preconditions?
There aren't any preconditions.
He didn't even establish as a precondition.
Don't give me an embarrassing book at a photo up.
We'll be back just a second.
By the way, we're going to post at Rush Limbaugh.com later this afternoon, Bill Ayers' speech at the um Venezuela educational forum.
We got it from Bill Ayers' website.
He posted his own speech at his website.
And uh, well, maybe it's not his, it's Bill Air's WordPress.com.
I don't know if it's actually his website, but we've got the speech from the World Education Forum in Caracas, Venezuela, November 2006, and it'll be at Rush Limbaugh.com later today.
Saratoga, New York, let's grab some phone calls here.
This is Mel, nice to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Yes, uh, good afternoon there, Russ.
How are you today?
Just fine, sir.
Thank you.
Uh I I I I I agree with most of what you say.
But a lot of times, you know, it turns out to be right-wing spend.
But the fact is that when you take Chavez, you take Barack Obama, don't say for one minute, just over a handshake that Chavez doesn't know if he stuffs out a lie, that this great nation of the USFA will crush him like a bug.
But the fact of the matter is that Obama's not a fool either.
If he knew he knows that what Chavez has in the ground over there, and his and Shave is his country, that that affects how we uh live our way of life here.
how much we have to uh lay out each month on our budget to uh our our personal budgets, our house household budgets to get by.
And that oil is is is the bottom is is the is the linchpin of uh economic prosperity here in this country or or pressure, personal pressure on individual families and uh a corporation.
Wait a while hold on a minute.
I've laughed.
Are we talking about Venezuela or the United States here?
I'll talk about Venezuela.
Well, who you Hugo Chavez has as his natural resource to sell to us at a lower rate, because I mean uh Barack Obama is is is you know, he's not gonna ostracize this guy.
He knows he has what we need, and Chavez has we we've got what what Chavez wants is money, and that uh keep the pressure off of off of individuals here in this country, and it what I mean is by doing that is is having uh uh uh uh cheap uh cheap uh uh uh spending less money.
I'm I'm I'm I'm not getting your point.
What what what's what's the point here?
Well, the point here is that you know, Chavez, we we keep our you have to talk with one another.
You have to talk to people regardless if you're you're if they're your enemy or not.
I'm sure, you know, you're you're you're well, you were coming up as a as young man, and yeah, as of today.
You know, you you got people that really don't like you, and you you have people that you don't like, but you don't you don't go out and and and and bare knuckle them every day.
You you have to deal with them, you gotta talk to them, you've got to be around them, even though you don't like them.
Um vice versa.
Well, if that's your point, if if that's your point, Mel, I don't talk to my enemies.
I don't talk to them.
I don't have to talk to them to know what they think.
I don't have to talk to them to know what they believe about me.
They say it anyway.
My enemies are not to be gotten along with.
I'm I'm not out to show my enemies that I care about them.
I'm not out to show my enemies that I'm not what they think I am.
I'm out to defeat them.
I'm not I don't run around apologizing for myself.
I don't run around apologizing for my success.
We have what Chavez, we need what Chavez has, oil.
We don't really, if we would drill our own, this is what's stupid.
We go kiss the hand of the Saudi King, and we go down there and bow down to Hugo Chavez.
Why?
Because they both have oil.
We have oil too.
We just don't have a president that wants to go get it.
We don't have a Democrat Party wants to go get our own.
We'd rather have a Democrat Party would like to see their president run around and kiss the ass of people like the Saudi King and Hugo Chavez, who is a blatant anti-liberty communist and socialist dictator.
I don't want to get along with people like that.
We can squash them like a bug, you say.
Who have we squashed like a bug recently?
The last time we tried to squash anybody like a bug, the president and his people get sued for committing torture.
The last time we tried to squash people like a bug with the people that killed 3,000 Americans, and your party tried to do everything it could to stop us from succeeding in defeating that enemy.
And now your party has a president that's down kissing ass with people who hate the United States of America and accepting books from people who have written how this is the worst place in the world, the United States of America.
You can have it.
But I'm not gonna try to become friends with ass people like that.
Okay, so we have talked to each other, right?
When was the last time President Obama spoke to me?
He doesn't speak to me.
He has directed his hacks to attack me while he makes friends with enemies of the United States of America.
▲
Export Selection