All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 12, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:23
November 12, 2008, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Now look folks, I want to say this one more time.
Every bit of this financial crisis, the bailout, what caused the bailout, what led to it, what's happening with the bailout, every damn bit of it can be traced directly back to the Democrat Party.
Every bit of it.
Glad you're with us.
It's Rush Limbaugh.
This is the EIB Network and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies open line Friday on Wednesday today, taking the next couple days off for the annual Limbaugh Golf Open.
800-282-2882.
If you'd like to be on the program, ladies and gentlemen, I don't know if you have noticed this, as have I.
I, of course, a highly observant human being.
It's my job.
I sometimes participate in life by observing others doing what they do as they live.
And I have been observing something that's not happening.
Now, you may say, Rush, how can you observe something that isn't happening?
That's why I am the host.
I have been watching all of my televisions, and I have been reading all of my websites, and I have occasionally even seen an actual newspaper in places.
And I have not seen the fact that millions of liberal bloggers are using the N word.
Angry at black people in California for voting against Proposition 8, the gay marriage amendment to the Constitution in California, Roseanne Barr, black preachers.
What'd she say?
Irresponsible, immoral.
Black people are ignorant.
Roseanne Barr, black people are ignorant.
And the N-word is being bandied about and black churches are being criticized.
And I'm not hearing a word about this.
I haven't seen a single report on this, ladies and gentlemen.
And I take you back now to September the 10th.
Barack Obama speaking before the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute.
They are counting on us to stop the hateful rhetoric filling our airwaves and rise above the fear and rise above the demagoguery and finally enact comprehensive immigration reform.
Well, they're counting on us to stop the hateful rhetoric filling our airwaves.
The hateful rhetoric filling our airwaves.
Can you say fairness doctrine, ladies?
Can you say censorship doctrine is what it is?
So he's going to stop hateful rhetoric.
Hey, Obama, your people are being insulted by others of your people.
Your gay people are insulting your black people with the N-word.
Your Hollywood people are insulting black people and black ministers as immoral and black people as ignorant.
You said you were going to stop the hate-filled rhetoric.
And I see that the hate-filled rhetoric is continuing.
By the way, ladies and gentlemen, we have some Barney Frank soundbites coming up.
And as always, prior to those, all right, ladies and gentlemen, Barney Frank, Congressman Massachusetts, is fit to be tied.
He is not happy.
The $700 billion bailout is not being used as it was intended.
He thinks it is his money.
He chaired a hearing today of the House Committee on Financial Services.
The bill we passed that is accompanied by a requirement that any profit that is made on those loans be returned to the federal government in varying percentages for the first five years, and even more by the fact that the federal government then takes the house.
This is not a free ride for that new borrower.
Right?
He continued.
We explicitly put in that bill authority to the Secretary of the Treasury to buy whole loans or mortgage-banked securities to make us the lender, to make us the owner, so we could do these kinds of reductions.
Again, the distinction seems to be between obviously owners and services.
To date, Sectay hasn't used that authority.
That's a question now that we will have to address, and it will involve using the second 350.
But I believe that we still have a need for that funding to be used to put the federal government in the position of being the owner so we can do the kind of sensible write-down of mortgage payments to avoid foreclosure that's in the interest of the economy as a whole.
Yeah, let me translate this for you.
He made this speech after Paulson went out there and basically said, you know what, we're not going to do what we were originally going to do.
We're not going to buy up the bad paper.
We're not going to do that.
I started begging the banks to start lending.
And then we're talking about bailing out credit card companies and auto companies.
So Barney is saying here, we explicitly put in the bill authority to the Secretary of the Treasury to buy these mortgage-backed securities to make us the lender, the owner.
And they're not doing that.
They're not doing it.
It's his money.
It's like his money being stolen.
His food is being taken away from him on the table.
And because of this, Barney now says he feels vindicated.
I will say I feel vindicated.
When the Bank of America announced that it was buying countrywide, a number of my friends were concerned that this would be a problem, that Bank of America was too big.
And I was asked with some consternation by one person with whom I've worked on some issues how I could justify supporting the Bank of America buying countrywide.
My answer is at that point, I would have supported Syria buying countrywide.
The disaster that was inflicted on the country by countrywide was deep-seated.
I think Bank of America did a useful thing.
Obviously, they're trying to make money, but I think the society will benefit.
Supported Syria by a countrywide.
That's Chris Dodd's bank.
Maybe Dubai could come back in and buy the ports now.
We're going to sell countrywide to Syria.
Here's one more.
There have been some plans floated to have taxpayer money go in, buy up the loans, and then reduce the amount paid.
I think it should be very clear, no matter what people have argued, there is, in my judgment, zero likelihood that federal taxpayer dollars will go to those who hold loans that never should have been made in the first place.
So he says here that there is, in his judgment, zero likelihood that taxpayer dollars will go to those who should never have had loans in the first place.
It's the same guy who said that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were on solid ground.
Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, these people ought to be answering questions, not making statements.
Yeah, let me translate all four of those sound bites.
Those are supposed to be our houses now.
Those are our houses.
Stop buying them.
This is supposed to be our house.
It's supposed to be the owner.
It didn't work out.
The way old Barney thought it would look.
Let's get a call, Cincinnati.
We'll start with you, Chris.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
This is Chris in Cincinnati.
It's an honor and a pleasure to speak with you today.
Thank you.
Thanks very much.
Yes.
I just had a comment about something you said yesterday.
And let me preface this by saying I've been listening to you for eight years.
As an African-American female, I do get a lot of slap from family or friends for that.
However, I like to have many different points of references when I'm making my opinions on things.
And you happen to be one of them.
Thank you very much.
I appreciate that.
I can't understand why you would seek another after hearing mine, but give me time.
Yesterday, you spoke about how the exit polls stated that if the Republicans had come out, a lot of them stayed home, but if they would have came out, we would have beat Obama.
But during the election, you were speaking of the exit polls as, oh, don't pay any attention to the exit polls.
You know, they don't mean anything.
So which is it, Rush?
No, Now, this is a nice trick.
See, you should have called up and stumped the host day.
We very rarely do stump the host day anymore because it's not possible anymore.
It used to happen.
Okay.
But what I said on election day, pay no attention to the first wave of exit polls that are released at 5 o'clock.
The first wave of exit polls that were released at 5 o'clock, actually at 2 o'clock back in 2004, and then the second wave at 5 o'clock had John Kerry winning in a landslide.
That's why I said pay no attention to the exit polls before the polls close, before the actual votes are counted.
I said on Election Day, pay no attention to exit polls.
Not ever.
Okay, so thank you for clarifying that.
But I do want to say, however, before I go, that the sky is not falling.
And because Obama is president, believe me, as a self-made woman who's working on her PhD, raising my children on my own, that I feel that there's been 44 presidents.
Not one of them has made me, and not one of them will break me.
So, you know, in terms of, yes, I did vote for Obama.
I have my reasons.
Let me ask you a question.
Yes.
Do you have financial assets?
I assume you do.
You're in the process of getting your PhD.
This is really none of my business, but this is a little game I play sometimes with callers.
Do you have an annual salary or amount of money that you want to make?
Absolutely.
What is it?
What do you want to make?
What is your dream?
Let's put it this way.
Well, my dream, I don't, you know what?
I don't think there's ever enough money, depending on the lifestyle that we lead.
I've been blessed to be able to take care of what I need to take care of.
I do have student loans, I will say that.
But let's put it this way.
If someone asked me my next job, which I plan to go into public health, what do you want?
I need to make at least $150,000 to $200,000, which I don't make right now.
All right.
Good.
You have just fallen into Barack Obama's tax increase target income.
And at that point, whenever you are paid that amount of money, that is when your American dream ends.
I don't believe he'll be able to do that.
Oh, okay.
Sure, fine.
I just listen to what he says.
You choose to ignore what he says and instead invest in an image that you have of Barack Obama.
By the way, I've not said the sky is falling out there.
The sky is blue.
The birds are chirping a little brighter.
The poor people are even nicer when they beg.
It's a great, great, great, great national mood out there, Chris.
It is.
It is.
And you know what?
One thing I would like to leave you with is that although I don't agree on all his fiscal policies and everything, I will say I have a 17-year-old son who has had a hard time motivating him.
Ever since Barack Obama has come into the scene, for what it's worth, my son has gained an internal motivation that I have not seen.
So, although it's a little small piece, Rush, a lot of African Americans are feeling that.
I've got a story in the stack.
I know exactly what you're talking about.
And I think this is one of the genuine positive reactions here.
I think one of the problems, the African-American community, is its leaders have continued to make people in that community feel inferior and like they have no chance.
So if Obama can make people think that their horizons are brighter, fine and dandy, as long as he gets out of the way and doesn't get in their way, their horizons will be brighter.
But I've got a story coming up here, Chris, about how the AP or somebody went to another poll, and they have found an increasing number, get this, folk, increasing number of white people now say that they would feel comfortable working for a black boss.
Open line Friday on Wednesday here at the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, the most listened to radio talk show in America to Charlotte, North Carolina.
Hi, Eric.
Great to have you here with us.
Oh, my man, Rush.
This is going to be rough here.
Probably people are going to think I'm a very mean, hateful person.
But as a black American who is strongly evangelical and very conservative, I'm certified black enough to criticize Obama.
I'm certified Christian enough to criticize his ungodly moral positions on abortion and homosexuality, and I'm certified conservative enough to criticize you.
Whoa, What do you think about these Prop 8 gang calling using the N-word out there?
Well, when you are immoral, as immoral is, immoral goes.
That's just part and parcel with the way they are.
So that's not surprising.
But one thing is, Rush, I'm the same guy, same Eric Woods out of Charlotte who called you about back in 2005 that you said was one of the best calls you ever had.
But I want to get on you big time because you were talking about yesterday that I told you so.
And I'm going to criticize Obama as well.
I got some very ugly things as they'll find out to say about him.
But you talk about the I Told You Sos, the I Told You Sos.
There's this song that Johnny Mathis and Denise Williams sang a few years ago called Too Much, Too Little, Too Late.
I remember that song.
I love that song.
All right, great.
Too much, Too Little, Too Late to Ever Do Something Again, whatever the lyric line was.
Yeah, I remember that.
Right, right.
Well, that's what you did yesterday.
You talked about how creepy.
Obama's not creepy.
There is a wicked element.
I'm going to be very strong here and say what he says.
Wait a second now.
I'm quoting Newsweek people.
You've got to listen every day, Eric, to know what's happening.
They have this show in context.
It's Newsweek reporters that covered him during the whole campaign.
He's creepy.
He's singular.
He ascends and watches us watch him.
And so if they're going to call him creepy, and he is creepy in a way, I'll call him creepy.
I'll take the lead from the drive-bys.
I'm not arguing with you.
I'm agreeing with you, but I'm going a little step beyond and say.
I'm not hitting hard enough then, okay.
No, because see, the word that you probably are reluctant to use or reticent to use is the word wicked.
And I'm going to use it in a moment, and you'll see why I'm saying this.
But the point is, Rush, you, back during the campaign, and I warned you back in January of this year that when we were talking about Huckleby, I said Huckabee, they're going to go in bloodied, bruised, and hobbled and beaten because of the way conservatives were just really, we were just so hard on our own.
And Reagan said the 11th commandment is, don't criticize the Republican for certain reasons.
Now, there's some worthy criticisms to be made.
Hold on.
Hang on a second.
Reagan did have the 11th Commandment, but during the 76 primaries and the 80 primaries, Reagan was destroying other Republicans so he could get the nomination.
Well, we.
And we're talking about a primary here.
Well, listen.
I stayed out of the primary.
Well, I stayed out of it.
Many people think that's what blew it.
Rush, you're going to have your three hours, man.
I'm trying to tell you, this is, I got to say as much as I can as quick because you won't let me say.
Eric, get to it.
What am I responding?
What did I do wrong?
What I'm trying to say is: look, we had silly people like Ann Coulter, foolish people who were out there saying, I'm not voting for McCain.
I'm going to vote for Hillary.
We have foolish people like James Dobson saying, I will never vote for McCain, and wound up eating his word.
We had people down here in Charlotte.
We had a Jeff Katz here, just really, everybody was just so hard on McCain, and he was so bloodied and brutalized in it.
And what happened is we suppressed, we, well, we depressed our own turnout.
And so when you talked about yesterday, wait a minute.
Now, Rush, come on, please.
I respectfully disagree with you on this.
I think those of us who were sounding those warning bells have been vindicated as right all those many months ago.
We got exactly what we feared we were going to get.
We got the exact campaign.
We got the exact result.
We got everything we knew would happen should the party nominate Senator McCain.
Well, Rush, the problem that I'm trying to say is Ann was silly.
Ann was silly.
Hold on.
Look at it.
There were a lot of people talking about voting for Hillary.
Hold on.
There were a lot of people.
The point is, nobody caused Republicans to stay home except the Republican Party.
Rush, that is true in part.
You're leaving out a crucial component here.
We had people calling in and saying, I'm, you know, they were listening to the hosts like Ann Coulter and you and Dobson saying, I'm not trusting McCain.
I'm not going to vote for him.
And we wound up suppressing our own turnout, Rush.
Think about it.
You may not want to.
I'm going to disagree with you on this.
Well, of course you will.
Rush.
You know, are you capable of assigning any responsibility for what happened here to the candidate?
What responsibility does the candidate have in his own victory or defeat?
Well, you speak too fast.
I would have ultimately gotten to that rush, but you wouldn't let me get to that point.
You cut me off too quick.
You got to listen sometimes.
Well, I take so much.
I mean, I'm glad to listen, but not when you're wrong.
I owe a duty to the audience here.
Oh, look, it's just too bad.
Out of time.
Eric, I'm sorry.
It's great to have you on the phone.
Hi, welcome back, Rush Limbo.
Talent on loan from God.
Open Line Friday on Wednesday.
All right.
Back to the bailout news here and some of the interesting stories related to it.
CNBC today had a video clip, a segment, I should say, that deals with the auto industry since they're being talked about in terms of being bailed out.
And there's a chart.
They had a chart, and I got a hold of it here.
And when you look at the chart, it's no wonder that General Motors and Ford and Chrysler are having financial problems.
Their costs are 53% higher than Toyota and 132% higher than other manufacturing.
The cost per hour to manufacture at the big three auto companies is $73.20.
And that's total compensation per hour, selected workers, 2007, 2008.
At Toyota, it's $48 an hour.
Management and professional, $47.57.
Goods producing, $3,159.
All workers, $28.48 an hour, average out all workers, and it costs the big three auto companies $73.20 an hour.
And a lot of this is they're paying people that no longer work for them.
And these pensions and the union.
If we bail out the auto companies, let me ask you a quick question.
If today all three auto companies received what they're talking about, $25 or $50 billion they divvy up, what change do you expect from these companies?
What change would you expect?
Well, there wouldn't be any right off the bat.
I mean, they've already got $25 billion that's been pledged for retooling and rebuilding.
But do you realize what's happened?
The federal government and these executives, they are so strained with these union contracts.
This is not a bailout of big three.
This is a bailout of the United Auto Workers Union.
That's what this is all about, folks.
It is a bailout of the United Auto Workers Union.
It is a Democrat SOP to Jennifer Granholm to make sure that her reputation doesn't get sullied because she's already running a state in recession that she helped put there along with her party.
This is a bailout of the United Auto Workers and the union contracts and everything else that goes hand in hand here.
And the executives are in such trouble at these companies.
They are promising everything.
Well, of course, we'll make all kinds of cars to get better mileage.
And we will limit executive pay and we will end golden parachutes.
Liberal Democrats are infecting and perverting elements of the private sector and the free market private sector that I never dreamed would ever happen in my lifetime.
We're bailing out unions is what we're doing.
And we're going to be bailing out credit card companies and whoever else.
You wouldn't believe the number of lobbyists that are signing up to get their hands on the bailout money.
Lobbyists for various companies are lobbying the Treasury Department for their companies to get a percentage of the bailout.
Why should it be any different with a bailout than it is any other pile of money?
Congress sits there with a budget every year of $3 trillion.
Lobbyists, everybody else, and this is not against lobbyists, by the way.
You're never going to get rid of them.
I don't care what any politician says.
You're never going to get rid of them.
They do what they do.
Most of them actually perform a service.
At any rate, I don't want to get off on a tangent of that.
But why did everybody expect purity and comity and seriousness when you throw a pile of $700 billion at people?
I mean, every year they get $3 trillion and everybody starts divvying that up.
Who's going to get that portion?
Lobbyists start lobbying Congress.
This group needs some money.
We need to build a bridge out there.
Congressman, senators do their own lobbying.
So now we've got the $700 billion bailout bill, which could not wait.
It was a crisis.
It was deathly.
This country's future, its very existence, rested on this bailout being passed in 24 hours.
And then as weeks went by, before it was passed or a couple weeks, everything kept chugging along.
People kept getting up and going to work.
The stores had food in them.
Gas stations had gasoline.
But it was a crisis.
And we had to deal with this.
We had to deal with it immediately.
Otherwise, the country would simply implode and cease to exist.
But the country kept on working.
So now the original purpose of the bailout has been broomed.
The Treasury Secretary says, nah, we're not going to buy up that bad paper.
He begged banks to start lending today.
And then he apologized to the world for the United States failing to meet its responsibilities and obligations and having contributed to the global financial collapse.
Well, all that means is that all these little tinhorn dictators and every other hapless fool leader around the world is, okay, you take the blame for it.
Fine.
Well, we've been irreparably harmed by your immoral behavior as a superpower.
Where is my damage payment?
So we're going to have the world coming at us with our hands out.
They already come at us now through the United Nations in stealth ways.
Now they're just going to be open about it.
Well, the Treasury Secretary apologized.
He said the United States is responsible for all this hell that's going on globally in the financial markets and other areas of economics.
He said the United States is to blame for it.
So in the meantime, we're going to bail out the United Auto Workers.
And we're going to bail out credit card companies.
And in the process, the federal government run by Democrats are going to have their fingers in every business they can get it in and they're not going to ever let go of it.
And so they couldn't actually muster the votes for limits on executive pay.
And some of you, by the way, may say, well, Rush, that's pretty good.
I think that might actually help employees like management a little better.
You know, there's a lot of resentment out there, Rush, because these executives pay themselves all this money and the workers don't get very much at all.
Fine.
Okay, so you're going to limit executive pay.
They will find a way.
Last time they tried this, it led to stock options.
They'll find ways around this.
There are always ways around this.
But even if there aren't any ways around, even if executive pay is limited, it ain't going to make the workers any happier.
Their paychecks aren't going to get any bigger.
That's not the result.
We're not going to have a trickle-down, if you will.
So all these years, we wanted to limit executive pay.
Now executives are going right along with it.
And the way Nancy Pelosi and Barney Frank is going to be designing cars.
Newspaper's in trouble, too.
I mean, Time magazine asking for volunteers to leave, take a buyout.
Newspaper is in financial distress.
Circulation's down.
Advertising's down.
Reputation is down.
Well, what do they do in the newspaper business?
They cut corners.
One of the things they do in the news business is rerun old news.
Look at all the old news that's being rerun.
Camelot.
Camelot is back.
Do you realize that Camelot did not become Camelot until after the Kennedy assassination?
Ted Sorensen and who was that little guy, Arthur Schlesen Jr. seeded that word.
Jackie Kennedy actually was the one.
Jackie Kennedy was responsible for getting that word seeded into the media to establish this great image and legacy for her family and her husband.
And that's how Camelot was born.
Nobody called it Camelot while Kennedy was serving.
But now we got Camelot back and Obama's not even there.
Oh, by the way, from Newsweek, Obama will not meet everybody's expectations.
Whose expectations in Newsweek trying to manage here?
The end of the article, interesting quote.
To be sure, America's friends will be grateful for the change in tone Obama is likely to bring.
They'll be delighted if he closes Guantanamo Bay as promised.
And even if he disappoints allies early on, now listen to this, folks.
Even if he disappoints allies early on, there will be plenty of time to repair things later in his term.
One reason for hope.
Kennedy and Clinton went on to become immensely popular around the world.
Now, what's going on here?
These guys at Newsweek are setting the stage for failure, but there'll be plenty of time for Obama to recover because he'll be there for four years.
One reason for hope.
Hope for what?
What are we hoping for here at Newsweek?
You got the guy failing miserable, but now you hope that somehow his reputation can be resuscitated?
The hell is this?
Why does this matter to anybody?
Kennedy and Clinton went on to become immensely popular around the world.
Why are the liberals so insecure that they have to be liked by people who will rob, cheat, and steal them blind, who will burn their crops, salt their fields, kill their livestock, poison their wells, kidnap their women, and then slit their throats the first chance they get?
This is the approval, the kind of approval the Democrats seek, the type of people.
Why?
What does it matter what the reprobates of the world think of liberals?
What does it matter?
So the whole focus here in the Newsweek story is he's going to screw up.
He's going to screw up, but there'll be plenty of time to repair things.
And one reason for hope.
Kennedy and Clinton went on to become immensely popular around the world.
Do I need to correct something?
It was Theodore White.
And I said Sorensen, right?
Theodore White introduced Camelot after interviewing Zach Kennedy.
So the story is true.
They manufactured this whole image, Camelot, after the JFK assassination.
It was not called Camelot while they were ruling.
But have you seen the number of stories where Obama will rule?
They're all over the place out there.
We'll be back after this.
Okay, headphone time, Dawn, going back to the phones here.
800-282-2882.
This is James in Cincinnati.
Nice to have you on the program, sir.
Megatitto's Rush.
Yes.
I've got a very simple comment here.
I think that there's a very simple solution to the conservative crisis and the financial crisis in the country.
It goes like this.
Get out your electoral map.
You flood the red states with conservatives.
And you begin to actively promote the conservative way of life that half of Americans in this country want to live.
You know, family, free enterprise, freedom, and faith.
It would make the governors happy.
It would make the business leaders happy.
When you say you flood these states, people move there.
Oh, sure, yeah, just like they do in California.
The liberals flooded California and San Francisco, and they create a little sort of liberal oasis.
There's no reason that conservatives can't do the same thing.
And, you know, it would make everybody happy.
Business leaders, evangelicals, and Catholics, all people of goodwill, happy.
Well, you know, it's interesting.
I saw today the final county map, red state, blue state map by county.
And if you just landed here from Mars and you looked at that map, you would swear the Republicans won this thing in a landslide.
If you didn't know where the population centers are, I guarantee you, by county and by square mileage, we skunked them.
But then you look at the coasts, you look all up and down the left coast, you look all up and down the east coast until you get past New Jersey and Maryland, D.C., even Virginia.
Three counties in Virginia won it for Obama.
Those three counties are microscopic on the map.
But it's just amazing that population centers feature big cities, of course, and people who live in big cities are largely Democrat.
And I don't know, for example, how many conservatives are going to want to move to a place like California.
Look at the tax rate in California.
How many conservatives wanted for a daughter to live there want to move to New York?
I mean, you need a great job, a lot of money to live there.
Besides, you know, conservatives don't balkanize themselves.
They live their lives.
They want to be happy and so forth.
Liberals are the ones that organize in little communes and cliques and cities and so forth and only want to hang around with each other and themselves.
We're not that way in many regards.
In some parts of country, that happens to be the case.
But this map is just stunning.
And I'll tell you something else that's stunning.
If you look at the counties in what I call the Hispanic border states, you go up the border of Mexico with Texas, and you look at those, the only blue counties in Texas, other than one outside of Houston, are right on the border with Mexico.
And then you go into New Mexico, same thing, going to Arizona, pretty close, same thing.
You go to California.
You can see.
You can see the Hispanic vote.
You can see where it's going.
It's all blue.
Well, not all, but I mean, it's just amazing.
And the Republicans think they're going to crack that by going out and acting like Democrats, just promising a better list of goodies.
It ain't going to happen out there.
It's not the way to do it.
In fact, we got to, let me please audio soundbit for you right now.
This is interesting.
Number 10 here, Andrea Mitchell on Nightly News last night.
She had a report about Chris Shays and I, all over the news yesterday and last night, also in this report.
Is the party over?
As Republican governors prepare to meet in Miami to debate what went wrong and who will lead them out of the wilderness, Republicans have to resolve their identity crisis.
Do they want to follow moderates like Chris Shays, who lost his Connecticut House seat?
You've got to reach out to African Americans.
You've got to reach out to Latinos.
And you've got to be an inclusive party.
And we aren't right now, but we will be.
Or should the party align itself with traditional conservatives?
We can get women.
We can get everybody with a set of core principles that we do not abandon that benefit everybody, regardless the damned color of their skin or their gender.
That was from yesterday, and I stand by that.
We start going after groups of Americans, the middle-class Walmart people, and then the Kmart people, and let's go get the, let's go get the Starbucks crowd, and let's go get this group, and let's go get the Hispanics loser.
We just did that.
We just did it.
The architects of this should be disqualified from running another Republican campaign.
Set of core principles that improve life for every human being in the country, and you will attract them.
I don't care where they were born.
I don't care what their skin color is, what their gender is, what their sexual orientation, or none of that.
You'll attract enough of them to win.
By the way, folks, I want to share something with you.
One of the sheer pleasures of this job is hearing from people who have patronized a sponsor and have loved the product.
It happens.
It's happening a lot with the Renaissance Tankless Water Heater.
It is happening with carbonite, the computer software backup.
I can't tell you, just yesterday, last night, I got two emails from people who finally tried a Renaissance tankless water heater.
So it was the toughest thing because it's so unconventional.
Everybody's so used to having the tank, big tank.
The problem is the tank heats up all the water you'll never use.
It's a waste of money.
It's like a Model A.
This new technology is phenomenal.
And these people finally, both of them put it in and they're just stunned.
The hot water never stops.
No matter what number of appliances in the house using hot water being used.
And that just warms my heart when people actually go out and try this thing because the best thing you can say about any product is it works.
So the Renaille Tankless Water Heater is pleasing a lot of people.
Foreverhotwater.com, by the way, is the website to see how it works and see maybe if it's for you.
Foreverhotwater.com.
They've got a hub in Delaware.
They got a hub there.
If you're talking about Wilmington, Ohio, and DHL.
By the way, folks, further evidence when we come back here.
Do not doubt me.
▲
Export Selection