All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 14, 2025 - Rudy Giuliani
01:45:38
America's Mayor Live (799): America Reasserts Its Dominance in Space Race
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Rudy Giuliani.
This is America's Mayor Live, and we're coming to you from Palm Beach in the free state of Florida.
So first thing, first thing we tell you what, Ted.
What's that, Mayor?
Who's going to describe the first story, me or you?
Heads or tails?
What do you pick?
Tails.
Tails?
I got heads.
You got heads.
It was a penny.
I used a penny.
But that, so therefore, it's not valid.
It's not valid as of today.
Right?
This is like the cheating they do in baseball and basketball.
Here's the penny.
Show them the one up there.
But Ted went and got one for us.
So you see that one there?
Now look at this one.
I don't know how if you can get a close, if you want to put this right next to the camera so they can see the actual penny.
So Ted, Ted pointed out.
Yeah, you know, you can't really get a good close-up of it.
You got to zoom in.
But we're going to clean this one off.
We'll put it on tomorrow.
We'll get, we're going to see making, we're going to keep this.
We'll keep it somewhere nice.
But it's obvious Abraham Lincoln on the front.
There it is.
What's on the back?
What's on the back?
I think you're right.
It used to be the Lincoln Memorial for Lincoln, but there's a crest on the back.
It says United States of America.
And there's a crest on the back.
And I don't know that I can read it.
I have pretty good glasses here.
E porbus unum, it says.
The crest says.
It must be the crest of the United States, I'd imagine.
It says one cent, United States of America.
You wouldn't be able to see it if I put it up.
It's a crest, you know, like you would wear here.
And it says on the top of it, E. poribus unum.
I'll take a picture and put it up.
So the penny's gone.
That doesn't, they're not like, I don't think they're collecting them, right?
No.
Can you use them?
I think you can still use them.
They're still in circulation.
Somebody will take them.
Right.
And I think most people will take them for small items.
So if you have something like $7.91 for your people, you could put out seven singles.
Yeah.
Right?
Nine dimes.
Nine dimes, one penny.
And one penny.
Or 18 nickels.
Yeah.
See, I can do arithmetic.
Well, a lot of kids can't know.
Half of the kids to graduate from New York City schools can't, or less than half.
Right.
Yeah, terrible.
That's not a joke.
That's terrible.
That's terrible.
It's awful.
Absolutely terrible.
So somebody today on one of the shows, I don't know, because sometimes I have a couple at once.
I can't say for sure it was Fox.
Usually I have Fox or mostly Newsmax on, but I'll have then I'll have Fox or to see what the enemy is doing, CNN.
Although CNN did a great job of beating up on the Democrats for lying about Epstein.
Wow.
Wow.
I guess they don't want to get sued, huh?
Yeah, man, they really did a good job.
We just did that on the other show.
But we'll do it again here because a lot of you don't, you know, a lot of you are different audiences and some of you the same.
So we'll start off, I think, with the one that we teased at the end of the last hour.
And it's one of those.
You're being rude.
You think you fake news.
You fake news.
Not being rude.
You fake news.
Everybody should get one of these.
You get one for your kids so you can correct the news.
If you watch those lying bums, you can go, you know, you can have some fun when they come on and they say, and they say anything.
Any Democrat come, I mean, if Slalwell comes on, who's now going to get indicted finally for lying.
I mean, like, it's a big surprise that he was cheating on his mortgage.
Cheats on everything.
I mean, I wonder if he got that mortgage when Fang Fang was around.
Right.
And the Chinese probably have all the evidence somewhere or other.
Well, I have this because of the BB story.
So you know what BBC did, right?
BBC put out, and we played this, I think, twice.
BBC put out this doctored tape of the January 6th, 2021 speech where Trump was accused of inciting a riot when he told the crowd, and I was there at the time, when he told the crowd that they go to go to the Capitol peacefully and patriotically, peacefully and patriotically.
But they clipped together two different parts to make it sound like he was inciting them to go there.
Even this wouldn't be enough for incitement to riot, but it sounds provocative.
We're going to walk down to the Capitol, and I'll be there with you.
And we fight.
We fight like hell.
We're going to walk down to the Capitol and we're going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women.
We're going to walk down.
Now, it doesn't include the fact that the part they pick up of the conclusion about fight, fight, fight, actually, it wasn't the conclusion.
The conclusion was, and the fight, fight, fight was the fight against corruption.
It was a different kind of thought, not about the actual election.
It was about corruption.
It was a lengthy speech on a very cold day.
And I remember when I gave my speech with Professor Eastman, both the professor and I were a little disappointed.
We didn't get much applause.
You know why?
And I reminded him, because I had gone through two inaugurations in one degree temperature.
I said, they're all wearing gloves, Professor.
They're all wearing gloves.
I think the president was a little shocked too.
Maybe he forgot his inauguration.
His inauguration was freezing too.
His first one.
Second one was done inside, remember?
But I remember the first inauguration.
They were, if it wasn't for my son, Andrew, though, nobody would have remembered my inauguration.
He was the star of my inauguration, right?
Who now is in charge of all of the security for all of the World Cup games in the Department of Homeland Security, works for Secretary Noam, who, wow.
She's done a phenomenal job, huh?
Right.
Wow.
I mean, the border, the border is such a complete success that nobody talks about it anymore, right?
And even it's remarkable how many people they've gotten out too.
So that story was completely untrue.
BBC would like to say that was an accident.
Now, the two clips, you should realize, are 56 minutes apart.
Ted and I just edited, right?
What we're going to try to get you to go to, which is the subscription part of X. If you're on X, go to the subscription or go to X and go on subscription, and you'll get my, this is really the first half of an interview with Michael Francis, who was a former high-level member of organized crime a quarter of a decade,
a quarter of a century ago, and has since then been a truly reformed, extremely religious person who has given, he says over 2,000 speeches to try to encourage people, you know, to encourage people to let them know they can change their lives, which I tell him, and he knows it is what Jesus Christ asked us to do.
I mean, Jesus made it clear that he came here for the sinner, not for, I mean, that's why the parable of the prodigal son is so confusing to people.
I mean, how unfair is that?
How unfair is that?
A matter of fairness.
It's a matter of the people that need the help.
But there's a little bit of a, do you want to play an exit front?
Yeah.
If you can, I don't know if you can't.
I don't know which part that is, but spanning the last two centuries.
Largely because it's such a dichotomy, such a split.
You look at roughly the first half of his life, and he grew up in a mafia family, surrounded by the mafia.
His father was a very, very significant and powerful member of the Colombo crime family, but he didn't need his father to succeed in the mafia.
Father was kind of, he'll tell you this, his father was kind of split.
Should the son be part?
Should the son not be part?
Son turns out to become a part, and within a very short period of time, as a young man rises right to the top.
So high to the top, but by 1984, 85, 86, the magazines are writing that he's the number 18 most powerful and richest man in the mafia.
And that's when the mafia was five times what it is now.
When they said, when you could say it was the general motives of organized crime or something like that.
And then he turns out he's a very good looking guy.
He turns out to be the prince of the mafia.
You know, these articles are done, Vanity Fair, this place, that place, this place.
One would think that if he actually had stayed there, that it might not have been a John Gotti because he had the appeal that John Gotti had, but he knows John Gotti, and I know John Gotti.
And he's a heck of a lot brighter than John Gotti.
And it's not even a compliment to tell him he's brighter than John Gotti, but he's a very, very bright man.
He was a much better educated man, more sophisticated man, just the worst nightmare for legitimate society.
And maybe had he stayed there, they'd still be as powerful as they used to be.
We'll take that up with him.
But he made a switch, a lot of it through coming to Jesus Christ, which to me is really impressive.
And in case you have any doubts about the switch, I mean, that was so long ago, it's probably hard to even remember exactly how it happened, Michael, but I bet he does.
I think it was in 1996, if I'm not mistaken.
1996 is a long time ago, before Donald Trump.
So we're going to get to when I say before Donald Trump, I don't mean before Donald Trump.
I mean, before Donald Trump was president.
Well, we knew.
People knew what you mean.
So now we're going to divide the world into before and after Donald Trump.
Yeah, right.
They're going to accuse me of being blasphemous.
I'm comparing Trump to Jesus.
Before Trump and after Trump.
Well, kind of a lot of things.
Like before Trump, anybody that wanted to come into this country could come in.
A lot of rapists and murderers and child molesters and human traffickers and drug dealers took advantage of that.
And after Trump, it's down to almost zero, if not zero.
So that is a before Trump and after Trump.
People in Texas know it, right on the border.
Oh, yeah.
Gosh, can you imagine?
I mean, Ted and I would meet with people who had property on the border and, you know, big, big pieces of property, because, you know, Texas is all big, right?
And they go out, you know, on their property.
I guess they had cows and stuff like whatever you have in Texas, which you don't have in Central Park, by the way.
And they'd find dead bodies and they'd find all kinds of remains of humans and sometimes dead, alive, just walking across their property, just coming in.
I remember the numbers sometimes, seven, eight thousand a day?
That's ridiculous.
And those are the ones we counted.
Right.
I always tell people because, again, fake news.
Listen, you're fake news.
Fake news has rendered useless all the work that was done by Ivy League schools mostly in trying to figure out if X number of illegal aliens come in that we know about in one way or another, either by arresting them or maybe even by seeing them chasing them, not catching them, because they get recorded.
How many come in that we don't see on a border that's gigantic?
And do you know what the lowest percentage was?
50% of the known.
You know what the highest was?
200%.
And do you know what the main fluctuation was?
The larger number of knowns that came in had to be dealt with, the larger the unknowns.
And think of why, right?
Because the Border Patrol, which has to take care of this vast, unguarded, unprotected space before there was a wall at all, right, of any time, is tied up.
And the cartels who don't leave this to chance take great advantage of that.
And this is where they can bring over not only large numbers, but the most dangerous and the most high value people, high value for the wrong purposes.
So think about it.
If you're China and you want to really get one of the really good spies in, you don't leave it to chance.
You pay the guys you've been dealing with for 25 years, the cartels, which they have been for fentanyl, right?
You pay them a million dollars and they'll bring a guy in.
Or if you're a human trafficker and you're going to bring in one of the leaders or you're going to bring in a large number of kids, it would be totally suspicious.
You don't kind of go near a border station.
You find a place, you know, 25 miles from one and 50 miles from another, and you come over the border.
There are plenty of spaces like that.
I can show you on a map.
So that's gone now.
That's gone.
Well, before I get off the subject completely, the reason I say that this BBC thing is getting more complicated is In addition to that edit,
there was these people in England, embarrassed by the fascist nature of BBC and what they did to Trump, found out that this is not the first time they've done it.
They found an episode with Mick Mulvaney, who was the former White House Chief of Staff, where they spliced the footage in the same way.
And when it was presented as a complaint to the BBC, they brushed it off.
Now, here's where that's important.
That's important if you bring a lawsuit because it shows that they, who knows how many more of these there are.
It shows that it was deliberate, that they were in the practice of doing it.
And by the way, I don't know if you know this, but in England, defamation is a crime.
England does not have a First Amendment.
It doesn't have any amendments.
It doesn't have a Bill of Rights.
Bill of Rights is an American invention.
We've been a hell of an improvement of the English monarchy, by the way.
Yes, of course, we borrowed a lot of our laws from them, but our laws were a lot fairer and a lot more interested in human rights than the English.
They don't have a First Amendment.
I mean, they're arresting people for what they think now.
But I mean, again, people wonder, well, how can they do that in England?
They can do it in England because there is no protection of free speech.
There's no Bill of Rights.
There's no written constitution.
I mean, until a couple hundred years ago, there weren't even written laws, laws were just made up by the judges.
Kind of like in America now.
We used to have written laws.
Now, if you want to be a sanctuary city, it doesn't matter that that's a violation of federal law, clearly.
Nobody even thinks it dares to think that.
So it's going to be very interesting because I think other people are going to probably find other examples of BBC doing stuff like that.
Now, an Australian news program also doctored Trump's January 6th speech in virtually the same manner.
This is the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
By the way, they're both owned by the government, and they didn't take the BBC.
They did it on their own.
They spliced together two segments of the speech, an hour apart, to make it look like he was inciting violence and left out the admonition that you should go to the Capitol peacefully and patriotically, which is the way he ended the speech.
You know, there's the president and Chi Jin Jinming and the negotiating groups for the United States and China reached an agreement.
I'm not sure it's been formally announced.
I'd have to check as to whether it's been formally done.
I think parts of it have.
Some of it's being implemented, some is not.
And the main part of it, you might remember, is so that we would get our access to the rare earths and minerals that China still has, if not a monopoly on, controls a lot of it, including a lot of the development of it.
And we are doing everything, Trump is doing everything he can to break that dependence.
From the very first deal that he made with Taiwan, virtually reproducing what they do in Taiwan and Arizona, to some of the last deals, including, I mean, he spent, before he met with Xi Jinming, he spent all of his time in Southeast Asia.
It was like he was collecting rare earth from Vietnam, from Laos, from Cambodia, from Malaysia.
Not only significant because, you know, basically it's the same land, right?
I mean, they have tremendous deposits of it that have been untapped, but of greater importance, the fact they want to stick it to China.
And the press, of course, doesn't point out what a great victory that is for him or how that really was even more significant than any of the agreements with Xi Jinping.
I mean, because, I don't know, an agreement with Red China that is atheistic, communistic, homicidal, kills more of its own people than any nation on earth, possibly Iran would challenge them for that title.
But China has now, well, I can't say caught.
It's been discovered that China is still getting NVIDIA chips.
Now, Nvidia, what?
Nvidia.
NVIDIA.
NVIDIA is the premier chip manufacturer in the world.
China may make more chips, but NVIDIA makes chips that China can't make.
Much more complex.
And they make semiconductors that China cannot, even with stealing from us.
They haven't stolen that from us yet.
So Trump is very much trying to persuade them not to sell any chips to China.
And they are trying to persuade Trump that they should, because the more that people rely on the NVIDIA chips and not on the ones that China is trying to make, even though they're less powerful than NVIDIA, if China can get those into semiconductors and computers and all around the world,
it becomes a tremendous surveillance device for China and dependence device.
So if NVIDIA becomes, even China becomes dependent on them, then when China says you can't get the rare earths, we say you can't get the chips.
Which of course we did with soybeans, believe it or not, and other things.
And that's how we were able to reach an agreement in which China really caved.
But the problem is, China then screws around in the execution.
So it was discovered that a Chinese AI company has 2,300 and recently got 2,300 NVIDIA chips.
Now, first of all, it isn't the most powerful NVIDIA chips.
And the company involved appears to be a civil company, a civil, not criminal, not military company.
But you say, well, how is that possible?
It doesn't violate the law.
Right now, it violates the law to sell those chips to China.
Yeah, it does if they're going to use it for military purposes.
If they're not going to use it for military purposes, then it's perfectly legal to sell to them.
And this becomes sort of a real problem because they could do the same thing to us.
Because when we buy from China, we don't limit it.
And that's part of what Xi Jinming is considering doing.
He's considering trying to put an end user restriction on what we get from China because, but if he did that, we would then cut off the only remaining source that they have for getting these chips for the supercomputers, which he can't get anyplace else.
And they are not capable yet of duplicating.
And NVIDIA keeps assuring Trump that just by having the chip, you cannot, that there are intellectual property that they have for making that chip that you're not going to be able to figure out just by having the chip.
It's a good argument on both sides.
You say to yourself, well, you don't want China to get these chips.
But if China does get these chips, then they're dependent on us, right?
And I would say, until we get ourselves to the point where we're not dependent on China for anything critical, we got to have this leverage over them.
And although this Wall Street Journal article is very interesting and shows you the way in which they laundered, I would call it laundering these chips.
I think even the Wall Street Journal, it's a balanced article.
I mean, the article does point out that this is perfectly legal because from everything that can be determined, the company is not involved with the military.
Now, you're in China.
And could they turn this over to the military without our knowing?
Of course.
But there's no proof of that.
And of course, we can do the same thing.
And we don't accept this restriction.
So there's a lot.
This was port by a Shanghai tech startup, INF, and it says that it's for AI products that's basically used by the financial and health industries.
And all the checking that was done seems to bear that out.
Now, again, you're talking about a closed country and a dictatorship.
And yes, we don't have a free press, but they really don't have a free press.
We lie.
They lie and kill.
So far, we haven't done the other part.
I think.
I think.
We have.
I don't exclude anything from these scoundrels.
We can't.
Ukraine has a big corruption scandal.
Ukraine has a corruption scandal.
My goodness, how is that possible?
Rudy was right again.
Two of Ukraine's top ministers had to be removed because they were caught being involved in corruption in the energy sector.
Remember Barisma?
What was Burisma?
Burisma was a company owned by a man named Mykola Zloshevsky, who is one of the three or four most powerful and richest oligarchs in Ukraine,
who bribed the Biden family in order to get his company free of what were absolutely definitive proceedings to take back the money that the company had stolen from Ukraine.
When I'm talking about money, I'm talking about 10 billion, 20 billion, maybe more.
So, I mean, it's like deja vu all over again, in the words of the great American philosopher Yogi Bera.
Now, here's the, here's the, here's the, the two, the two people involved is Justice Minister Herman Halushenko, justice minister.
that's like the uh uh corrupt attorney general biden had right um who ultimately was responsible for raiding my house and my law office without any evidence right Right.
Yeah.
In an affidavit, too affidavit, I can't get my hands on even now, which I find kind of really weird.
And then the energy minister was not accused, but he was.
This guy, Halushenko, was the energy minister before he was the justice minister.
Now, that's what Zelchevsky was.
Zelchevsky was the energy minister way back in the Yashenko administration, which was a pro-Russian administration.
And what he did as energy ministry, with energy minister, for five or six years, is he gave his company, Burisma, all the best properties.
And his partner ran the company from Cyprus.
Then he came out of the government scandalously.
And somehow, you know, they owned the company like 51%, his partner, and 49%, Zelyshevsky.
And this is the guy that paid the Biden family as a matter of record $8 million, as a matter of record.
I know it's a lot more than that.
So when he came out, he had a partner who was running the company while he was feeding it illegally all this, all these contracts.
Just a short while after he came out, a horrible thing happened.
His partner ran into a tree and he took over the whole company.
He didn't want to, I'm sure he didn't want to do that.
I'm sure he spent a lot of time at the guy's funeral.
He cheated the woman's widow, the man's widow out of her share of the company because he bribed people.
Just like he got Joe Biden to bribe the president of the Ukraine to drop the case, which would have taken the $25 billion company away from him.
And he was literally peeing in his pants over that.
And he searched around.
And when Obama made Biden the point man for Ukraine and put him in charge of straightening out the corruption in Ukraine.
I mean, Biden was in on this.
I mean, Obama was in on this up to his, you know what.
Otherwise, he wouldn't have tolerated it.
It was well known that this was going on.
It was in the New York Times.
For a year and a half, Obama knew about it.
You don't think the prince wasn't wetting his beak?
I don't know.
If he wasn't wetting his beak, he would have gotten rid of Biden and his crooked son.
Getting all this money from a corrupt government.
So there's another minister, too, and also there are other Zelensky allies that are going to be named.
It says the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine known as NABU, which when I was investing, it was totally corrupt.
The Anti-Corruption Bureau was corrupt.
Alleges Haloshenko and other Zelensky allies schemed to demand kickbacks from companies that had contracts with Energom, the country's atomic energy agency.
That was just one of their.
And these are all Zelensky appointees.
Zelensky is not mentioned at all.
It doesn't say he was involved.
It doesn't say he wasn't involved.
And, of course, he condemned it.
Zelensky is sitting on absolutely explosive evidence of corruption that affects the highest levels of his government that raped his own people of money that they could recover now.
So whatever you think about the war, and I'm in favor of Russia being defeated, because I can see the danger of Russia winning.
And I also am enormously sympathetic with the Ukrainian people.
I can separate the Ukrainian people from the two decades of crooks that have run Ukraine.
But I don't fool myself into thinking that Zelensky is honest.
I'm not going to spend the time proving it to you.
All you have to do is go back to my old podcast and you can see the proof in writing.
You don't have to even rely on me.
We can do it in writing.
All witnesses that I had about how he was involved and his close relationship with the single biggest money launderer in Eastern Europe.
Kolomoyski was his mentor, his patron.
Kolomoyski was as big a crook as Zostzewski, but his expertise was laundering money, which he also did for the Bidens.
And there's a whole transaction that's laid out in black and white where the Bidens got 3.2 million laundered with a little note, 800 grand for the VP.
Nobody paid attention to that.
That was available in 2019, way before Biden ran for office.
So we're going to take a break.
Pay the bills.
And we'll be right back.
And the Exodus from New York has already begun, but it's kind of accelerated a lot since Election Day.
I don't know how it can get worse, but we'll point out one big one to you.
Here we are, pretty much at the beginning of the process here at this pristine, I call it a laboratory.
It's not like a factory, it's like a hospital.
This is the beginning of the process for roasting.
Deep green, very good quality.
Most people don't use this quality.
We deal with small farmers because they'd like to know who we're dealing with.
They give us the highest quality, all organic, non-GMO.
You should know all Arabica beans.
No Robusto.
All Arabica.
they're gonna go into the roaster and it'll get roasted for about 20 minutes or so oh my goodness Look at these.
My goodness, they're going to want to specially order these.
This is what goes into Rudy's coffee.
Are you ready for some action?
I'm ready for action.
Get the Elite TV plan only through the portal.
218 channels, and it's only $69.95 a month.
Wow.
Including your free portal.
That's cheaper than everyone else.
Your favorite sports, movies, news, even daytime dramas.
We're talking about ESPN, OAN, Newsmax, channels you can't get anymore in certain areas.
Compared to the competition, this is a way better deal.
Endless selection.
Not to mention all the free music channels.
There's over 700 premium and classic movies all ready to go.
Wow.
Plus, they got catch-up TV that allows you to go back and watch what you've missed or want to watch again.
Cut your cable in half and get twice as much for free.
Way more channels for half the cost.
After the first year, the subscription then drops to $57.95 monthly, where you change or upgrade anytime.
Go to QUXNow.com and get yours today.
Use promo code Rudy.
U.S. Army Major Scott Smiley paid a high price serving our nation.
Scott was leading his platoon in Iraq when a blast sent shrapnel through his eyes, leaving him blind and temporarily paralyzed.
Scott would become the first blind, active duty military officer before medically retiring years later.
Thanks to friends like you, the Tunnels and Towers Foundation gave Scott and his family a mortgage-free, specially adapted smart home.
Show your support for America's heroes now.
Donate $11 a month to tunnels and towers at t2t.org.
This is Rudy Giuliani, and we're back with America's Mayor Live.
You know, we've told you for the longest time since this socialist, communist, and Islamic terrorist supporter has began running for mayor that this would be the exodus of businesses from New York.
Now, look, he didn't start it.
It's been going on since de Basio, who was also a communist.
And under Adams, the exodus of business didn't change very much.
He changed a few things, but businesses had no confidence in him either.
But now it's accelerated to a catastrophic level.
Two restaurateurs who have restaurants in New York already have completely canceled plans, in one case for four restaurants, and in another for several.
We don't know the exact number.
One of them had already made the decision to relocate a restaurant in Miami.
And interestingly, it's called the Brooklyn Shop House.
We'll have to go there.
It has 400 seats and a rooftop bar overlooking the skyline.
I don't know.
The skyline in New York is still better than Miami.
But you don't get raped in, the business doesn't get raped in Miami.
Miami has a Republican mayor and a Republican governor.
Wow.
That makes a big difference.
But this restaurateur who was willing to go public, God bless him, even though he has restaurants still in New York, he's just not going to have any more.
And he doesn't know what's going to happen to ones that he has.
His name is Stratus Morfogen.
He waited for the election.
And now he's just not, he is now not going ahead with four planned restaurants.
One on West 32nd Street and 10th Avenue, one on Upper East Side at 62nd and 1st, and then I think two on the Upper West Side.
And I can't believe that New York City, a city I love and where I grew up, voted him in.
He's worried about public safety under Mamdani.
And illegal immigrants have already assaulted members of his family.
And he thinks that they're going to get even more aggressive under a guy who basically is going to give them, promises them protection from federal law enforcement.
I don't understand how that isn't a violation of the law.
Never understood it.
We'll give you an example in a few minutes, but I don't understand why they're not prosecuted for violating federal law.
But also, another restaurateur named Richie Romero said that he's put a halt to several openings because the hatred of Jew socialism, the economic, it's too much, he said.
I had to be vocal.
And he's trying to put together a coalition to fight socialism, to protect the restaurants that he has.
But he's actually uh he, he actually is working on at least 12 new restaurants.
It could be as many as 15 and he has uh switched all of these plans to Atlanta, Dallas and West Palm Beach, right across the border here, right here, um.
So I mean, this is um, And there are a lot that wouldn't have the, you know, remember, they still have restaurants in New York.
When leases come up or as economic conditions get worse, I guess they'll pull them out.
But all of their future plans are decidedly out of New York, which is a disaster for a city that already is basically in bankruptcy.
Its budget is horrible.
And its budget is largely horrible because of Democrat corruption.
Remember, the budget of New York City is equivalent to the budget of the entire state of Florida.
New York City has 8 million people.
Florida has 22 million people.
The difference is the bribe money for the Democrat politicians in New York.
That's why homeless contracts are two or three times what they are elsewhere.
So there's lots of kickback money involved.
And that is true.
The Board of Education is true of all the agencies.
The Democrat Party has been doing this to New York City virtually unabated, except when there's a Republican or independent mayor since 1850.
So that's one thing that Mandani is doing.
Basically, so far, his picks have been decidedly irresponsibly and crazy left-wing.
The guy who is lauded as experienced in government, yeah, is experienced in government.
He's experienced in being part of the most corrupt government in America.
New York City and New York state governments under Democrats.
His first boss, Shelley Silver, well, the reward for his lifetime of public service was to die in jail.
That's where a lot of Democrats should go in New York.
One of the reasons I changed from Democrat to Independent and then Republican was as a young prosecutor seeing the enormous corruption in New York City in the Model Cities administration, which was intended to help poor people.
It just discouraged the hell out of me.
Nothing was going to the poor people.
They wanted to keep the poor people poor, so they voted for them.
Democrat Party was the party of the poor because it helped to create poverty and maintain it.
Right.
I mean, I was brought up to think that it was the party of the poor.
I mean, even that was bull.
It took me a while to see it, but I saw it firsthand.
And when you see it firsthand, it really has an impact on you.
And that's what's going on now.
And with this guy, I don't know if it'll be worse than Adams.
I mean, in the area of corruption, Adams was a tremendous failure.
Don't know if he himself was corrupt or not, but his administration was a joke.
I mean, it was just a kickback association.
That's why the homeless contracts and then eventually, I mean, I always wondered why did Adams encourage illegals to come to New York by giving them credit cards and giving them health insurance and giving them, look, it's bad enough that you have illegals.
And Adams was a smart enough guy, a cop, to know that this group of illegals was particularly dangerous because the border was wide open and controlled by the cartels.
They're not going to send us too many really good people.
So why was he encouraging them to come to New York until eventually Abbott stuck it up his backside and sent them there?
At first, remember, Adams was encouraging, meeting the people off the buses and he developed a city credit card for them.
I mean, we saw him in distinction to Mondani, but we didn't see the damage he did.
He's just a regular Democrat.
Now, when he was borough president, there were a lot of very strange homeless contracts.
And when he was mayor, there weren't strange contracts to take care of the illegal aliens.
They were scandalous contracts to take care of the illegal aliens.
Amounts of money that were nuts.
First-class hotels were buying in.
People that were taking care of veterans threw them out to cash in.
You don't think the people around the mayor, as they're indicted now, were cashing in too?
We'll see, I guess they're going to go on trial.
It may have been that Biden picked on him because he eventually spoke up against Biden.
That doesn't mean he's guilty or not guilty.
We'll have to find out.
The real question is, not was his administration corrupt, it was, but did he know about it or did he share in it?
Now, you say, are you being naive, Juliani?
Are you being absolutely naive?
No, no.
First of all, I'm being fair, which they would never be.
It could very well be that he didn't know.
It could be.
And I mean, I went through that with Koch.
Koch didn't know.
And I indicted a big chunk of his administration and convicted them.
I even tried the most important case myself, personally, in the courtroom.
These were major million-dollar bribery schemes by the top Democrats in the city.
And I know that Koch didn't know.
I think it was horribly negligent that he let it go on, which is why I ran against him.
The idea that Koch was a good mayor is in comparison to all the Democrat horrible mayors.
But I mean, he did do some really good things as the mayor, and he did some awful things.
And he sure as hell wasn't my model.
If he was my model, I would have left the city the way he left it to Dinkins in terrible shape with well over a thousand murders a year.
But Dinkins just took it to 2,000.
One of the things that Montani wants to do is rent control.
Well, I don't know how to tell you how communist that is.
Even communists, economists think that rent control is disastrous and ruins the housing market.
Well, think about it.
Somebody owns an apartment building.
In order to maintain that apartment building, they're going to need to make a profit, right?
First of all, they need to make a profit because, as they say in the Godfather, after all, we're not communists.
Most of us aren't atheistic, horrible people, which is what communists are, with an absolutely horrible view of human nature and a desire to break up the family and a desire to introduce a complete amorality as Marx told them to do, and a desire to destroy national culture and a desire to destroy even the use of our language.
Those are all things that communists aim to do.
Go read the Black Lives Matter list.
Most of us aren't communists.
If you own a building and you can't raise the rent as inflation grows and grows and grows, or you can raise the rent, but way below the rate of inflation, eventually the building is going to become not only not profitable, it's going to become a loss.
So what do you do with a building that's a loss until you can get rid of it?
You don't maintain it unless you're an extremely charitable person and are willing to take care of people for nothing.
And most, I know landlords are painted as if they're the devils.
And maybe some of them are, but a lot of them are just regular businessmen.
They want to make a reasonable profit.
And a lot of this, these rent control things, we're talking about smaller landlords.
We're not talking about the big conglomerates.
I mean, they're not going to rent to rent control people.
They're going to rent to like Montami's family, who are millionaires.
Yeah.
Right.
Although he has a rent-stabilized apartment and is not entitled to it because he's a miserable crook.
That's why.
And a liar.
So a lawsuit was filed on Wednesday by building owners that now are challenging the city's rent stabilization, which does allow rent increases, but they're limited to between 3 and 4.5%.
One of them had two units that were occupied for more than 40 years.
Two bedroom apartments.
Ted, you know what the rent was?
Limited to $710 a month.
Okay.
It had to cost $2,000 a month to maintain that unit.
Right.
So the minute that person moves out, they don't rent it anymore.
Right.
So basically what you do, if you're stuck in that predicament, you got it.
Nobody's going to buy it from you.
So you can't sell it.
Why would you buy a building that's going to cost you 50 grand a year?
You don't want to rent it out.
You're going to get $50,000 in rent.
So you repurpose it.
It costs you $100,000 to maintain it, buy the gasoline, the oil.
So you're going to lose.
Basically, you're going to charitably support all these tenants in your building and basically put in $50,000 of your own money.
I'm just using that number.
Actually, it would be more like $5 million and $10 million.
They become something they repurpose them.
No, what they do is, well, first of all, at one time, they started burning them down to collect the insurance.
I mean, that went on.
When they say the Bronx is burning, it was burning because landlords were burning their buildings down.
To get rid of them because it was pulling money out of their pocket.
It wasn't just putting money in, it was pulling money out of their pocket.
So these two landlords and ones who are bringing the case are middle-class landlords.
They're not, as far as I can tell, slum lords or multi-millionaires.
They make the point when rents are regulated so that the amount that you can rent something for is determined by the government and requires you to take a loss, even though you can demonstrate that to the government, it violates the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which does not allow you to take someone's property without due process of law.
That's called the taking clause.
It's called the taking clause of the Constitution.
Also, since the restrictions apply mostly to buildings, before 1974, they say it violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.
The Supreme Court in Lucas versus South Carolina, Coastal Council, decided that if the government prevents all economically profitable uses of a property, that that constitutes a taking under the Fifth Amendment, an illegal taking under the Fifth Amendment.
It sounds like if they get themselves to the Supreme Court, no matter what the communist does, his rent control promise is going to be destroyed.
Probably a lot of what he's going to do.
That doesn't mean he can't do damage for three or four years.
If you do anything irresponsible with the economy of New York City right now, you're going to bust it.
What New York City needs right now is a me.
It needs somebody that comes in and cuts the budget by 5%, 10%, lays off 5,000, 10,000 people, then continues to do it until you get down to the number you really need, and then goes into each one of those contracts and cancels every one that's beyond what would be reasonable market.
A lot of them were also no-bid contracts.
So you start off with the, I mean, Adams was a probably at least had more no-bid contracts than I've ever heard of.
I mean, I remember most of the contracts we had were bidding, bidding, and I'd have to set up committees to do it.
But homelessness was declared an emergency.
I mean, that's what they did with the pandemic.
You can't imagine how much money they stole all over the country, including some Republicans.
When they had, that's why they love the emergency cause.
You wondered why did they keep the emergency going so long?
Because as long as they have emergencies, governors all over the place, including some Republican governors, can make a fortune.
They just pick, they don't have to put it out for bid.
They just say, my pal is going to get the contract.
And my other pal is going to is going to be the subcontractor.
And nobody gets to review it.
Of course, it's an emergency.
That's right.
So you told me that.
New York.
There is a report from the John Jay College, which is a college owned by the city.
It's supposed to be a college for police.
It's really a left-wing, like all colleges, most colleges, it's a left-wing rat hole.
However, one of their studies points out in about 10 different ways how they call it the reduced use of bail.
How about no bail?
It's linked to massive amounts of crime, which completely contradicts the two Democrat leaders in the legislature who refused to do anything about the process of just putting criminals back out on the street after they commit their crimes,
which, as I say, has about 5,000 to 8,000 people on the street that'd be in jail under me, Bloomberg, or any mayor who wasn't some kind of a communist left-wing ideologue who kind of loves criminals and doesn't mind that they kill people and rape people.
Which gets me to aliens and this case and this situation in New York.
So there was an arrest in New York.
Ted, do you have the video of that?
Yeah, we'll find it.
Well, before we do that, we'll just quickly go over Israel.
You know, there's a ceasefire in Israel.
Is there?
Well, they're still killing each other.
So I don't know.
I don't know, Mayor.
Hamas, Hamas comes out of where they're isolated theoretically in Gaza and constantly shoots at the IDF.
Well, you know, the IDF doesn't take this crap, right?
Right.
So they just go in and kill them.
And they only, they say for every one of these operations by IDF, there's a definable attack by Hamas.
So I guess, and Hamas has as yet to agree to what would trigger part two of the agreement, which is to demilitarize.
They refuse to give up their arms.
So I don't know when or how we're going to take it from them.
Israel says, why don't you get an international group and go in and take their guns away?
Until you do, which is in the agreement.
Well, so far, Israel hasn't decided to do that, which I guess would they're supposed to sit there and get killed.
Otherwise, the world will condemn them, right?
But they're not.
They're not sitting there and getting killed.
They're responding.
The real answer here is, you know, give them another week to give up their arms and go in and take them.
Otherwise, a lot of people are going to get killed in the interim.
These are terrorist murderers.
Yep.
And they still have a lot of the tunnels left.
Israel was able to get rid of, there was a point at which they had gotten rid of about 30% of the tunnels.
Then they engaged in a lot of operations in the last three or four months, you know, before, and really focused on the tunnels.
So I don't know what the percentage of remaining tunnels are.
But I mean, it's still going to be a substantial number of tunnels.
And which means that who's ever there who wants to be violent can operate.
Oh, by the way, they're killing their own people, too.
Hamas, in order to keep control of whatever land they have, basically has eliminated any possible eliminated means.
They didn't have a vote.
But there's been no election.
The election is you kill your opponents.
That's what extremist Muslims do.
And when you say extremist Muslims, please don't think it's just a small little group.
Oh, yeah.
The minister of They have in Israel someone known as the Minister of Diaspora Affairs and Combating Anti-Semitism.
So, this is a guy who's looking after Jews all over the world, right?
And his name is Amakai Chickley.
And he gave a speech the other day in which he said something very alarming.
He says, I'm far more concerned about anti-Semitism on the right than on the left.
And I say this as a conservative myself.
I don't know if that's a bit of an exaggeration in terms of numbers and frequency.
Of course, whatever anti-Semitism there is on the right is dwarfed by the thousands and thousands of people who go out on the street and march and create violence and hatred for Jewish people and all the problems that were in the universities were all left-wing.
The reason it's more concerning on the right is there shouldn't be any of it on the right.
Any of it is completely contrary to the values of the Republican Party, the conservative movement, and should be stamped out.
And the fooling around with it is if somebody's doing this for some kind of political advantage, it's a terrible mistake and defies the whole purpose of the Republican Party, which, after all, is to free people.
I mean, if we don't stand for something far greater than our opponents, then what the hell are we doing?
Just go do something else.
So I agree with him.
To me, it's of more concern.
Also, because who's going to combat this?
Who's going to combat this horrible hatred if it isn't us?
The Democrats aren't going to do it.
They're too afraid.
And if we get major voices in our movement or party spouting anti-Semitism and hatred of Jewish people, then we're lost.
We're lost.
So we will, you know, we've gone through the situation with Tucker Carlson, which is still not explained by him.
His dalliance with these anti-Semitic individuals, people that hate the Jewish people, his giving them a voice, his not questioning them in any other way than patting them on the head.
It's extraordinarily disappointing to me.
Very.
And the longer it goes unexplained, the more disappointing it is.
But I do really believe that the vast majority of Republicans, conservatives, decent people reject it completely.
Completely.
I mean, there's no debating.
This hatred has been around, you know, maybe before recorded human history.
It's got to end.
God just end.
There's no President Trump is terrific.
He's advocating for a pardon for BB.
The President Herzog, who's very left-wing, by the way, has said that he respects the president very, very much.
But pardons have to go through official channels.
Yeah, so do corrupt prosecutions, Mr. President Herzog.
I know the case against Bibi.
I even thought about being his lawyer for a little bit.
And it's a completely political case.
Cigars?
Turning in bottles?
Jesus, you really had to scrape the bottom of the barrel for that one.
Right?
It's like the Trump cases.
Right.
That's absurd.
Only thing I can say about Israel is they did it to their prior prime minister.
And they've done it before.
In the case of Biden, it was a first time that it had happened and introduced into the United States like we were a banana republic.
And I think on a greater scale than with BB, I don't know if all of BB's supporters have been persecuted, prosecuted, bankrupted, destroyed.
But any part of it is horrible.
And to think that he had to save his country with this on hanging over him.
Jeez, if this guy hasn't earned a pardon from his country, there ain't no way to earn a pardon, I'll tell you.
He saved this country.
He saved it, particularly with Biden around.
It took guts to do that.
Real guts.
I mean, President Trump wasn't there for most of it.
He had a guy.
He had an auto pen.
I can't say that Biden was an enemy of Israel, but Biden wasn't functioning.
The Polish Bureau that was functioning for him were terrible enemies of Israel and great friends of Iran.
And Bibi had to deal with all that.
And he did.
And he did.
For the good of his people, for their survival.
So no clue.
So I don't know what they're doing, but Falwell.
We can't finish because nobody else will cover it.
Eric Swalwell.
Swalwell, Falwell, Swalwell, Paulwell.
What's his name?
Feng Fang.
Fang Fang.
Fang Fang's boyfriend.
Fang Fang's boyfriend.
Fang Fang's boyfriend was cheating on mortgages, too.
But in his case, it's kind of big money, Ted.
Right.
He claimed several primary residences.
You know what primary means?
Singular, one.
I imagine a guy who's screwing around with a Chinese spy doesn't pay much of attention to that, right?
Right.
So he's been referred to the DOJ.
What a horrible human being he is.
Let's hear his response.
How in the name of heaven did he stay in office after having that girlfriend spy hanging around when he was on the intelligence committee?
How is he doesn't get prosecuted?
Oh, Biden was the president.
That's how he doesn't get prosecuted.
Or at least investigated for giving out information to the, you know.
Who knows what he and Feng Fang were talking about late at night.
I mean, I understand that.
I can't imagine that someone other than a Fang Fang would be hanging around.
I understand he has a terrible body.
That's what people in the Congress tell me.
Whenever he comes by, it's like.
Right.
It's.
And he is from California, which means he's, you know, he's a Democrat from California.
Well, here's his response.
You know, that Gavin Newscomb's chief of staff got indicted.
Well, former chief of staff.
Really?
Yeah.
Well, that's the news.
Yeah, yeah.
Government, government corruption.
Well, that's your swallow.
He ran to MSNBC to defend himself.
Oh, yeah.
What did he say?
I didn't do it.
That's just as true as his Russian collusion stuff.
Right.
His political enemies.
And no one has been a more vocal critic than me.
But this is why being in the majority also matters, because these guys think that they can do this because they're invincible and there are no consequences.
And a year from now, we are going to win the majority.
And that's what we learned last Tuesday when California voters stood up against Donald Trump.
And when we're in the majority, we will have subpoena power and accountability will happen.
So Bill Pulti and any other lawless official who is carrying out these political prosecutions on behalf of Donald Trump, they should familiarize themselves with the judiciary committee room because they're going to be spending a lot of time there answering questions.
And I sure hope everything they did was above board.
Well, that sounds like a threat.
Well, of course it's a threat.
What else would he be capable of?
He's threatening retribution.
So while claiming he's, I haven't seen the details yet of here's what I know about it.
He claimed at least two residences as primary residences.
Yeah.
And it resulted in thousands and thousands of dollars of savings for him.
Right.
I don't even want to use the numbers because they seemed extraordinarily high in comparison to some of the others.
Now, any amount of it is terrible on the part of a public official, but the amounts here seem to be.
And I'd really like to know if Fang Fang was hanging out with him in those places, sleeping with him in those places.
And if we can go take a look and see how much intelligence material he brought home with him.
I don't think she was doing it given his body order because of his good looks, you know?
And what's that crap on his face that he has now?
What was that?
Did he put his head in something?
Guy's got to shave.
No, no, no.
That's not.
Was that whiskers?
Look to me like he put his head in something.
Who knows what he put his head in?
Right?
I mean, it's California after all.
Yeah.
There he is.
Look at the CNN guy.
He's not going to even ask any questions.
God forbid.
I don't want to cut.
He may fall apart if I ask him a question.
He's sitting there like this.
He looks like a real genius, the CNN guy.
Right.
Right.
Well, I think we've covered most everything that's the most important.
I just want to make sure here, the blue, blue origin launch.
You know, we did that on the first show.
We did that on the first show.
Yep.
But I think we should end with it.
We should end with it.
And Ukraine corruption.
I don't know if we did it on this show or the earlier show.
We touched upon it here, but that space launch, we definitely should.
But most of the first show, you know, the Rudy Giuliani show, we concentrated on the space launch and Epstein, right?
So the space launch was just, I don't know that, I don't know that we're celebrating it enough.
I go back to Sputnik and how the Russians somehow got up there first and Kennedy was angry as hell.
He was like, like Trump, and he was operating on Kennedy time or Trump time.
And then we ended up getting to the moon before them, getting into outer space before them, circumnavigating the world, you know, the globe, John Glenn.
And the main rocket here is named after John Glenn.
And this is the result of good old-fashioned capitalism.
And this is what we can do that they can't do.
And this is how, you know, it's only about four or five years ago that Trump established the Space Force.
Right.
And that's after years and years of, I mean, there wasn't enough money left to go to deal with NASA and space when Obama was giving so many billions to Iran, right?
Right.
Just, I mean, no one even bothers to look at that.
There is absolutely no question that during the Obama administrations and Biden administrations, the United States of America was the single biggest financial contributor to the Ayatollah.
In fact, during the Obama administration, it was so bad we were giving them cash.
Right.
Now, how you don't get investigated for that?
And if it's true, go to jail.
I don't know.
Imagine, I mean, the Ayatollah is bin Laden.
The Ayatollah is Hitler.
The Ayatollah is Stalin.
Imagine if we were sending them cash.
I guess it was a Democrat.
It might be all right.
I don't know.
Right.
So the Blue Origin is really a credit to Jeff Bezos.
It's the first of their collaborations with NASA.
There are two others.
This is a product of his.
This is the healthy part of American competition.
I mean, I can't be sure, but I bet you without Musk on the other side, and Musk is way ahead still, even with this.
But this is Bezos catching up and taking what they learned in the commercial area of putting rich people in space and then using it for really an unbelievable mission.
This is an unbelievable mission.
We watch the life.
This whole rocket complex stands 32 stories.
And it has seven liquid-fueled engines.
Seven.
The main device engine or I'm sorry, a rocket is called the New Glenn.
That's the one that's going to eventually circumnavigate go around the planet Mars.
And it can do it for 11 months.
But that isn't going to be until 2027.
It's right now going to go around the Earth and it's going to wait for a change in the atmospheric pressure that assists it in being able to get to Mars.
And then when it starts that journey to Mars, it will take 11 months from where it is in space to get to Mars.
So they think it'll be in Mars in November of 2027, roughly two years from now, right?
Right.
Right.
So it takes until then, until it goes off on the 11-month voyage to Mars, it'll be sending back extraordinarily valuable intelligence, both of a scientific nature and I'm sure national security nature to the United States.
So thank you very much to Jeff Bezos and he organized this and he put the pressure on to get this done.
Again, I think because of competition, but also because I'm sure he's a patriot.
And New Glenn achieved a key engineering objective already when its reusable first stage booster separated within about 12 minutes, right?
And came back to Earth, virtually landed on a little, you know, on a little barge.
Just think of how incredible that was to do that.
The expertise that the United States has to do that.
As well as then, when that returned, the other rockets are headed.
It took about 32 minutes for them to reach out of space.
Pretty fast to get out of space.
Takes a long time to get to Mars.
Wow.
And again, they're going to circle for a while to wait for this atmospheric pressure, but it still takes 11 months once they get that.
Right.
So I guess if you could go directly to Mars, it would take 11 or 12 months.
Wow.
Pretty much.
And the purpose of having it go around Mars.
I guess we'd be fine.
We could do the show from the space capsule every day.
It's like, what are you doing that thing?
I'm too restless, I think.
11 months.
I can never understand how they could do that.
I mean, my goodness.
They'll do 11 months of studying Mars's weather, its environment.
And the purpose of that, of course, is to put human beings up there and therefore to see what we have to encounter in order to do that.
This was supposed to happen in October of 2024, but Autopenn was the president then, and nothing happened during that period of time, except Americans dying.
Very bad time.
Because of the Democrat stealing of the election in 2020, which is available for you to review if you just take a look at Martin's report or any number of other reports, by the way.
So this was built by, I want to make sure people get the credit for it, by the Rocket Lab, which is a California company.
And the instruments were supplied by the University of California, Berkeley, which we don't have much good to say about except that, right?
You're right.
We got to give them credits due.
And the secondary payload was from the satellite company Viasat.
And that really contains all of the communications equipment, which is obviously pretty damn critical.
And look how excited these people are.
I don't know if these are just citizens of Florida or people who came there.
If you look at the employees, which I think are probably Bezos employees and from the two companies and NASA, a lot of people, there was a lot of people in that working there.
I mean, gigantic number of people.
But this is a heck of a complex, I mean, this is a heck of a complex mission.
This is the first science project from Blue Origin.
And there are two more on the drawing boards that are.
And this is, as described here, to try to put them on more of an equal footing with Elon Musk SpaceX, which is the world's leading rocket launch service.
This one was named for John Glenn, who was the first American to orbit the Earth.
This is going to orbit Mars.
Pretty appropriate, huh?
And although SpaceX is ahead of it in terms of the number and even the complexity of the rocket still, this rocket has more cargo space than any that have been developed so far.
And NASA has spent 55 million on this, which tells you how much Bezos put into it, huh?
And then all these companies and Blue Origin, Bezos' company, was paid 18 million.
Now, it has to have cost them a hell of a lot more than 18 million.
I'd love to see, I'm sure we'll find out at some point.
And then they're also working on a crewed moon lander for Artemis' lunar exploration program for NASA Space Forces exploration program.
They do say that Blue Origin still has a long way to go to catch up with SpaceX, which has launched Falcon rockets nearly 280 missions during the past two years.
Now, a large number of them serve Starlink.
Yeah.
That's a mistake, which we're looking into, right?
Aren't we?
We're going to look into that, right?
We may want to get Starlink.
I'm trying to encourage Ted for us to look into it.
Well, let's finish up with the shutdown, which the Democrats.
Excuse me.
Let's finish up with the shutdown.
So the shutdown, the Democrats are now claiming this was really a grand plan by them to put the focus on the unaffordable health care.
Well, it's good that they put the focus on it because they caused it with not just Obamacare, but with the unbelievable catastrophic increases of Obamacare under Biden, which is what they wanted the Republicans to continue so that healthcare could become more unaffordable.
I don't understand how they lie so much, Ted, and get away with it.
Do you want to play the congresswoman who said that stupid thing so that everybody could know her in her district and do everything you can to make sure that this lying half-wit doesn't go back to Congress?
Yeah, this is a shutdown, right?
And then we'll finish up with probably the worst and dumbest member of Congress.
So this is Rep. Madeline Dean.
Madeline Dean from where?
The great state of Pennsylvania.
Oh, American people got it, that by shutting the government down, we were able to focus on and get everybody else focused on the unaffordability of health care across this country.
In my own district, we had Lisa come in and testify in a hearing that we had last week here, Democrats Working.
Her health care for her and her 19-year-old son will quadruple.
She said effectively, I am going to have only catastrophic health care because of the high deductible and co-pays and the extraordinary cost.
We made a very strong argument.
These were extraordinary circumstances, but the American people got it.
That by shutting the government down, we were able to focus on and get everybody else focused on the unaffordability of health care.
Wow.
Do you believe that?
The unaffordability.
They did the shutdown for 45 days.
Yeah.
Putting so many Americans into terrible situations.
Not all of them repairable.
I mean, a lot of them, some of the damage done is irreparable to some people.
But in any event, they do this shutdown in order to get us to focus on the unaffordability of health care, which is caused by them.
There's no question about it.
It's the huge, unbelievable increases in healthcare that's caused by first the original Obamacare legislation, and then the absolutely insane increases that were done in it and the cheating that's done in it, which is almost impossible to measure, except you can just go investigate anywhere and pick out.
I mean, I'd love to be investigating this.
You can make an entire career out of it, out of recovering money from the government, from the people that are cheating because of the expansion of it and the unaccountability of it.
So I don't know who, I mean, I don't know.
Did anybody believe that?
And she's probably in a swing district if she's in Montgomery County.
Right.
That's a place where, I mean, some Republicans should take a look at her and say, man, if I can't beat her, I probably didn't graduate from high school.
The other one, the other lie, big lie that they're, I mean, not enough they go with one, they got to go with two.
It's sort of a continuation of the persecution of Trump, which began with Russian collusion and the hard drive and the impeachments and the four, the four prosecutors, the four indictments for him to go to trial in the month before the election and the taking him off the ballot for inciting a riot that he, where he told the people to be peaceful and patriotic.
And I don't go on and on and on and on.
This is just another, this Epstein thing is another complete, absolutely shameless fraud on their part.
They put out an email out of 2,300 of them.
They cross out the name of the victim and they are condemning Trump on the basis of the word of Epstein, which says that Trump had spent a lot of time with this young girl, victim.
They cover over victim, not to protect victims' privacy.
Victim is dead.
And victim has already spoken on this subject numerous times.
And what she said on this subject is that Trump had never done anything inappropriate of any kind with her.
In fact, he was very kind and nice to her.
And you even have a deposition where they try to say to her, well, when did Trump furt with you?
Her answer was he never did.
And Virginia Juffrey has absolutely no reason to lie about it.
None.
And Epstein has every reason in the world to lie about it.
And all of this is being promoted by this guy, Wolf, who has written scandalous books about Trump.
The last one being so stupid, it sold 20,000 copies or something, got 12,000 copies.
And then the other emails that come out show Wolf trying to get Epstein, trying to school Epstein on how to frame Trump.
And there's, I mean, you settle this very clearly by going back to the person who has no reason to lie, who says unequivocally numerous times, including attempts to get her to lie, that he didn't do anything to me or anybody else that I know of.
And she was there at the critical times when Trump would have had anything to do with him because he got rid of him years ago.
So let's finish up by playing the other congressional nitwick.
This is Jasmine Crockett, who comes from Texas.
That's strange.
11.
Republicans were saying that that victim is Virginia Jufre.
As you know, she died by suicide.
She's been very outspoken, a very outspoken victim of Jeffrey Epstein.
Here's the email right here on your screen.
She wrote a book, as you know, and she did not accuse him of any wrongdoing.
What do you make of that?
And can you confirm that?
Yeah, I don't know.
Obviously, it's redacted who the victim is.
So I won't necessarily take the Republicans' word on who it is that's redacted.
And I don't know why they would necessarily redact someone's name who is deceased at this point.
The Democrats did that, though.
The Democrats were down.
No, no, I understand, but I'm just saying, like, our biggest concern is to actually make sure that we are protecting victims.
And obviously, she wrote a book, she told her truth.
This is an email from April 2nd, 2011.
Republicans were saying that that victim.
That is about as stupid as you can possibly be.
She accuses the Republicans of concealing the name of Virginia Jufre when Virginia Jufre's evidence,
body of evidence, her statements, her co-author's statements, her testimony under oath, completely 100% exonerate Trump and make a liar out of Epstein and Wolf.
And her own party admitted putting it out.
And then also, after it was revealed that the victim was Virginia Juffrey, they put out documents that the Democrats put out documents with a name and all you had to do was lift up the name wasn't covered over by any official.
It wasn't given to them that way.
They did that.
The Democrats did that.
You went to the congressional documents, you saw Virginia Juffrey's name in it, which people did immediately.
And then the stupid idiots themselves put it out.
So, what she's saying is completely.
So, I mean, the conclusion you have to come to is that she's either a massive moron or a massive liar.
And she's both.
In this case, it's actually because she's a massive moron as well as a liar.
Because no one would tell a lie like this if they weren't an idiot.
Right.
And there, and this, and this unbelievably anti-American, anti-patriotic, anti-Trump, crazy, insane, corrupt network has to correct her.
Right.
Now, notice how gently they did it.
Right.
I mean, really, really, it's like, you know, well, just a little mistake.
But it's still better than what they were doing before.
Right.
I think they're all afraid of being sued now.
I think now they got to, they got to.
Like the BBC is going to get whacked big time since they've now found that there's a pattern of doing it.
Right.
There's a pattern of doctoring Trump, taking Trump at the beginning, take out 56 minutes, and then take Trump at the end, leave out what he said about being peaceful, and say he incited a riot.
Right.
And then it turns out that they also, the Australian broadcast company owned by the government of Australia did the same thing.
And they've done it before.
BBC has done it before.
Yep.
That'd be a hell of a good lawsuit.
Well, I don't know what we're going to, how much more we're going to have on this, because there are a lot more important things to cover than you got to, you got to answer it.
And if we are going to cover Epstein, let's figure out who are his real clients.
Yep.
Now, I do think, and Alan Dershowitz was on somewhere or other saying this, and I think he's right about this.
I think it's going to be really difficult to do.
There's a lot of names.
But the guy had two lives.
Even pretty much up to the end, he had two lives.
Now, once he got revealed, it's a little tougher to say that somebody is associated with him and doesn't know.
Now, Trump never had anything to do with him during that period of time.
Clinton did.
Raised a lot of money for Clinton.
Yeah.
But I'm not accusing Clinton of anything either because I don't know Clinton could have been getting money from him because he couldn't have got money from everybody.
Doesn't mean he was involved with little girls.
That's a big step.
That's a big step.
I mean, we know about Clinton's proclivities, but that's a big step to accuse somebody of being a pedophile.
I mean, that's a different, altogether different.
Yeah.
You better have proof of that and not 100%.
That just destroys somebody completely as it should.
But it better be true.
Right.
So.
Tomorrow, Friday, tomorrow.
Please give it a try.
Go on X and subscribe.
You can do it for one month.
You can do it for a year.
We're going to have podcasts on there at least once a week.
The one there now is an interview with Michael Francis, a former major figure in the Colombo crime family and an organized crime who, a quarter of a century ago reformed, has been all over the country helping people who have to turn their lives around,
which he did, but at the same time, he's a wealth of information about what the mafia did in the era in which it was really, really much more powerful than it is now, much more, and much more powerful really than any organized crime group that we have now.
I'm not saying more violent.
I'm not even saying more dangerous.
I'm saying more powerful.
What I mean by that is there is still no organized crime group that has infiltrated legitimate America the way the mafia did.
The mafia had tentacles that went right into just about all the major legitimate endeavors of America.
As you'll find out from this interview, they had major political influence, particularly with Democrats.
Frank Costello, who we mentioned, was very, very close to the leader of the Democratic Party in New York.
They also controlled Las Vegas, the Teamsters, a lot of the garment industry, all the ports.
One of the reasons a lot of the ports on the East Coast, particularly in New York, are destroyed because of the mafia.
Watch on the waterfront if you want to find out about that.
Or watch Goodfellows if you want to find out about Michael because he's a character in that movie, Goodfellows.
I don't know that, I mean, it would be possible for another group to replicate that.
It might have even been possible for them to survive and reorganize after my RICO prosecutions.
But as you'll find out, if you listen to this, they destroyed themselves.
And Michael might disagree a little bit on this, a little bit, although I think I persuaded him.
But you go, listen to it.
I think you'll find it very interesting.
And what we intend to do with that is each week to go into a subject that we're covering that you have to know about and I have to know about.
We all have to know about, particularly with the kind of censorship and communist brainwashing and democratic censorship that goes on.
And we'll give you the inside of it so that you can decide for yourself, like on Ukraine and Russia.
Right.
So we're going to, we're going to sign off now.
We're going to ask you to pray for the people in Israel and for the people in Ukraine and for the people in Iran who are still being oppressed under the tyrant Ayatollah and to pray for the people of the United States.
And we're going to say a special prayer to God to cure us.
Those of us who still have hatred in our hearts, we'll take up the hatred of Jewish people as an example.
Why?
Why do we take that one up?
Because it's so prevalent right now.
It's infecting our country.
It's even affecting our party.
Oh, yeah.
And it's the oldest hatred that I can think of.
It goes back before recorded human history.
And it's impossible given the length of time that existed, which is a couple thousand.
Gosh almighty, it goes back to two millennia before Christ.
So it can't be that any other hatred has done more damage than that because it's existed for so long.
But I think all the rest of them kind of spring from it.
And I really thought we had put it behind us in America, and we haven't.
So God, you help us with that.
And give our president, give our president the support that he needs.
He's doing a great job, but nobody can do a great job without you.
So we'll be back tomorrow night.
We'll be back on Dell TV at 7 and X at X, and then we'll be back on X at 8.
And remember, in between, you can get our podcast.
So, God bless America.
It's our purpose to bring to bear the principle of common sense and rational discussion to the issues of our day.
America was created at a time of great turmoil, tremendous disagreements, anger, hatred.
There was a book written in 1776 that guided much of the discipline of thinking that brought to us the discovery of our freedoms, of our God-given freedoms.
It was Thomas Paine's Common Sense, written in 1776, one of the first American bestsellers, in which Thomas Paine explained, by rational principles, the reason why these small colonies felt the necessity to separate from the kingdom of Great Britain and the King of England.
He explained their inherent desire for liberty, for freedom, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, the ability to select the people who govern them.
And he explained it in ways that were understandable to all the people, not just the elite.
Because the desire for freedom is universal.
The desire for freedom adheres in the human mind and it is part of the human soul.
This is exactly the time we should consult our history.
Look at what we've done in the past and see if we can't use it to help us now.
We understand that our founders created the greatest country in the history of the world.
The greatest democracy, the freest country, a country that has taken more people out of poverty than any country ever.
All of us are so fortunate to be Americans.
But a great deal of the reason for America's constant ability to self-improve is because we're able to reason.
We're able to talk.
We're able to analyze.
▲
Export Selection