Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 10, 2024 - Rudy Giuliani

01:38:28

America's Mayor Live (E340): Special Counsel on Joe Biden—"Elderly Man with a Poor Memory"

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Good evening, this is Rudy Giuliani with America's Mayor live from New York.
	And could be a chance we'll be in Palm Beach near the good President Trump.
	Well, I'm not meaning the former President Trump.
	Very likely looking like the next President Trump.
	But in any event, let's begin because we got so much to cover tonight.
	And tonight I'm going to have to, like, tell you to go to because with regard to both the Supreme Court case and the report, the H.E.R.
	report, I'm going to do an overview.
	Ted and Dr. Maria and Rob are all here.
	They'll ask questions about it.
	So there are things I don't bring out.
	I will.
	They'll help.
	But then I'm going to do a special.
	On both.
	And one will be on tomorrow, the other will be on Saturday, and they'll be on all weekend.
	And that means we'll go into a little more detail on the argument, which I found to be, maybe it's my nostalgia for being a lawyer or whatever, but it was a very good argument and a very good indication that you all should have more respect for the Supreme Court.
	I know, maybe it's the only court to have respect No, that's not true.
	But I mean, there are a lot of courts, quite frankly, that you can have respect for, because they make decisions that are clearly intellectually dishonest and political.
	I thought the treatment yesterday was, and let's hope we don't get disappointed on the opinion.
	I mean, I don't mean the outcome of the opinion, but the intellectual honesty of the opinion.
	But everybody acquitted themselves well yesterday among the judges, and the lawyers were quite professional.
	So let's begin first with the H.E.R.
	report.
	So let's go to the end before we go over.
	You want my conclusion on the H.E.R.
	report?
	The H.E.R.
	report is a whitewash.
	Now, I served 17 years in the Justice Department.
	I can interpret anything that happened in the Justice Department.
	I'm going to tell you what happened.
	This guy had no leeway to reach the decision he wanted to.
	Now, remember, they call him independent.
	Nothing independent about him at all.
	He worked for the Justice Department.
	He worked for the most crooked attorney general in history, Garland, who will eventually be the most crooked attorney general in history, the most political, the most intellectually dishonest, the most actually dishonest that I know of.
	And there's no way this guy was going to survive if he Recommended prosecuting Biden after he leaves office.
	Remember?
	A president can't be prosecuted while he's in office.
	I know we forget sometimes, but he is the president.
	That stumbling, bumbling fool who falls down walking upstairs, tragically, is our president.
	And if that's all he did, it wouldn't be so bad.
	But her... Please don't get... Don't get romantic and...
	Sort of silly about her.
	Some of my colleagues have, because he did a few good things for us.
	Although I might say something nice about him before we're finished.
	But he definitely had no choice but to come to the result, I can't prosecute him.
	Very similar to what Comey did, except Comey was comfortable with that result.
	And Comey did the passive-aggressive craziness to protect his own reputation.
	Her, I have a suspicion, Knows that this guy, Biden, is guilty as hell and is a tragedy as a president.
	Because he interviewed him.
	He's got to know, as well as I know from just watching him as carefully as I do and talking to doctors, that the guy is, I don't know, when I was younger we would say out of his mind.
	He doesn't know what the hell he's doing.
	You wouldn't trust him, you wouldn't trust him, or your show wouldn't trust him, your kids.
	He likes Them to touch the hair on his legs.
	But in any event, you wouldn't trust him in anything serious.
	And the idea that he's president is a nightmare.
	That, um, will go down in history.
	Maybe it's one of our worst periods ever.
	So the whole thing, the whole 388 report, 88 page report is a whitewash.
	Okay.
	A normal guy, normal situation, been prosecuted.
	You want to compare his case to Trump's?
	Much worse.
	Much worse case.
	Do you want to compare his case, however, to history?
	He wouldn't have been prosecuted.
	Because nobody else has ever been prosecuted for this, but one guy.
	Trump.
	What he has done is much worse than Trump.
	The only reason he should be prosecuted is because Trump is being prosecuted.
	If there was no Trump, then this case wouldn't be necessary, because he never would have reported that he had the documents.
	So what Herr did, because I think he was compromised, he got back at them.
	And his report may be a bigger political bomb than an actual recommendation to prosecutors, which they would take on as unfair and whatever, because he has hit something that they can't disprove.
	You can try all you want to try to prove that Biden is actually fit for office, and what happens is what you run into last night, right?
	So they get all upset that H.E.R.
	has basically said he committed these crimes, but he can't be prosecuted because he's unfit.
	He can't help.
	H.E.R.
	knows what the standard is, just like I do.
	The standard is you cannot participate.
	You are so gone psychologically.
	Your mind, your brain is so gone.
	Psychiatrist has to be willing to say in court that you cannot participate in your own defense, which largely has to do a lot with memory.
	If you're charged with a bank robbery, but you can't remember, you can't remember when your son died.
	You can't remember when you became vice president.
	You can't remember if somebody's alive or dead.
	Or in his case, you think you actually are talking to dead people.
	If you got testimony like that, a judge would be required, no matter who it is, to declare that you're What they say is incompetent to stand trial.
	And if it's a crime, like let's say a murder or whatever, you're put in jail for the rest of your life until you're able to be fit to stand trial.
	That's sort of the way it works.
	Okay.
	So, uh, let's see what he found and let me show you why it's a time, why it's a time bomb.
	First, first, uh, right, right out of the box, he found that, uh, Biden took Classified material home, starting 18 years ago, at least.
	I mean, it could be further back, at least 18 years ago.
	The first capacity he was in, he cannot, he could, a United States Senator, you may think has all kinds of access to classified information.
	Not so.
	The United States Senator can only look at classified information as can a representative in a skiff.
	And I have had security clearances equivalent to that.
	And what a SCIF is, is a locked room that you cannot access, hopefully, you can't access with anything.
	It's soundproof, it's hack-proof, hopefully.
	And it's locked up and it's guarded 24 hours a day.
	That's where you read classified material.
	You are not allowed to take it out of the skiff to your office.
	Maybe there are a few exceptions to that, like for the majority leader, like for the intelligence committee, but really with record kept.
	You have it for three days, you have it for two days, you sign it in, you sign it out.
	Biden has a lot, we don't know how much because they're not being really that transparent, but he's got a good deal of material from his Senate days.
	If they are home, that's an automatic felony.
	Each one of them alone is a felony.
	And the senators are in a state of shock, even though the senators are covering for him.
	You can get senators to tell you off the record that this was a horrible thing you did because he puts all senators under the microscope, because this is something they're very careful about.
	These documents, Uh, he'd be in trouble if these documents were found in his office in the Senate.
	The fact that they're found in his home and they go back 18 years.
	I mean, if you're going to prosecute anybody for violations of classified material, you got to prosecute this.
	This is about as egregious as it gets.
	And I don't think he was out of his mind back then.
	I really don't think so.
	I think I know him for 35 years, maybe 40.
	What the heck?
	I have to count the years.
	I hate to even go back to when I first met him.
	And I knew him when he was just stupid.
	Stupid is not a defense to taking classified material.
	Even being the dumbest man in the Senate is not a defense to taking classified material.
	And he was the dumbest man in the Senate.
	There is no one that would disagree with me on that, if I'm being honest.
	How he made all this money is just a testament to how crooked he is.
	And how if you're crooked, you don't have to be smart.
	But for some reason, her sort of merges that in with everything else.
	You sort of, it's hard to pick that.
	You almost kind of like forget what I just told you is a separate crime and a really egregious one.
	And they merge into the documents he has as vice president.
	And they mostly concern Afghanistan and his opposition to, uh, his boss's policy on Afghanistan and his wanting to prove he's right.
	And they sort of create a little, uh, make believe defense for him that, well, he wanted these documents because he wanted to show that, um, that, that he was right when he recommended getting out of Afghanistan and Uh, and Obama, Prince Obama was wrong.
	Now, given the way he got out of Afghanistan, he obviously was, Gates is correct.
	He's always wrong.
	Why he wants to prove he's right is probably because Gates wrote he's wrong about every single decision on foreign policy.
	That is not a joke.
	That is, uh, tragically true.
	The man has complete, no judgment.
	And he's, uh, now we know he's owned also.
	So he has all these, he has all these documents that he took now as vice president.
	Once again, illegal.
	Trump as the president of the United States has the right to possess classified documents.
	He also has the right to declassify anything, anything.
	He can look at a piece of paper and he can say, declassified Rudy, take it home.
	Okay.
	He can do that.
	Only the president can do that.
	And the president can't classify anything.
	You can give him a document and he can say, Oh my God, this should be classified.
	Uh, so if a president wants to take something home, uh, well, first of all, he can under, under much less stringent circumstances than a vice president or anybody else.
	And number two, he can always declassify.
	And finally, that has nothing to do with Trump because Trump was operating under the Presidential Records Act, which allows him to go through his records and decide what's personal, what's not.
	He gets to make the first decision on that.
	And then he has a debate with the archivist, which sometimes goes to court.
	And it has with other presidents.
	And Biden is the only one that they got this nasty with.
	They've given presidents eight years, six years, five years.
	They've let presidents keep records because they're writing books or libraries.
	If you ever wanted to take a look at how much is missing, it would shock you.
	And that's what happened here when they decided to go after Trump on this because they say Biden was so cooperative.
	Biden was cooperative because he knew they were going to nail Trump.
	In advance.
	It was only when he found out they were going to prosecute Trump for something I never prosecuted anybody else for that he made the disclosure that he had these documents.
	He didn't do it for 18 years.
	Just a coincidence that he does it when he frames Trump.
	And second, of course you'd be cooperative if you owned the Department of Justice.
	And if you owned the archivist and they would fix cases for you, and have been fixing cases for you for five or six years, just think of all the evidence in the hard drive of the cases the FBI fixed for him.
	How about hiding the hard drive?
	The whole freaking government know it!
	Except me and Trump, right?
	And you!
	It isn't like Trump.
	The government's an adversary with Trump.
	Biden owns the government.
	It really isn't an American government anymore.
	It's a Biden regime.
	It's like saying Stalin would be worried about disclosing documents to the Supreme Soviet.
	Yeah, and if they did anything wrong, he'd cut their heads off.
	If they did anything wrong, Biden, like he did with Adams, to shut them up, will get them prosecuted.
	So all this, I find this completely amazing when this her guy writes down Oh, but Trump didn't cooperate the way Biden did.
	Biden had the case fixed from day one.
	You knew the day this was given to her, right?
	All you did, that her was going to find that Biden wasn't going to be prosecuted, right?
	You knew that.
	Like Hillary.
	Why would he be treated any differently than Hillary?
	He's in the same golden circle of crooks.
	So that's ridiculous to use that as a distinction.
	But here are the things that he did that all technically violate the law.
	He took the documents.
	In the case of the Senate documents, they're stolen.
	In the case of the vice presidential documents, there's absolutely no known authority for him having them.
	And therefore, they're crimes.
	He never disclosed it at all until he found out that Trump was going to get framed this way.
	Or maybe he even helped invent it.
	I doubt it because he's too stupid.
	Somebody told him like they told him about the other frame-ups of Trump and he went along with it.
	Now it gets worse than that.
	His staff told him that these were classified documents and he is on a tape telling his ghostwriter that screw his staff.
	They're not and he's not going to turn them in.
	So this idea that he turned them in is not true.
	For a whole year he didn't turn them in.
	When he knew that uh people a lot more uh dispassionate about this and and his own staff knew they were classified he kept them anyway he admitted on tape that his staff told him they were classified and he said he disagreed and therefore i'm not going to turn him over and we can work on him he told his archivist then he knowingly took what he just admitted was classified material and disclosed it to a civilian without classification
	They allege that Trump did that.
	Trump denies doing that.
	But the difference is they want to put Trump in jail for that.
	They want to pat him on the back for it.
	Do you realize what kind of a country we're living in when something like that happens?
	We're living in Venezuela, where Morales, like Biden, is prosecuting his opponent so he can't run against him.
	Are we, are we ever going to stand up to this?
	Really stand up to it?
	Now I'm going to, I'm going to, I'm going to take, I'm going to take one that only I can figure out because nobody else would remember this, but me, but it's dynamite.
	And it proves to you what a massive crook he is and how the Ukrainian thing from the very beginning.
	Was always true from the minute I brought it out and probably much bigger than I even have brought out, but it's pretty big.
	You know, it's $12 million in bribes.
	I wouldn't sneeze at that, right?
	Uh, well, more than 12, five and five, about 14 million, including a tape recording the FBI has and will not play for you in which the guy who paid the bribe tells you exactly how much he paid, how he paid it.
	And, uh, and that was the initial down payment of 5 million each.
	To Crooked Joe and to the drug addict who is a pass-through to Joe.
	You see, none of these guys are dumb enough to pay anything to Hunter Biden.
	And none of you are dumb enough to really believe they did.
	But they'd like to think you're dumb enough to believe it.
	The Democrats would like to think you're dumb enough to believe that this money really went, these millions of dollars were really being paid to his drug addict son, who he made a drug addict, his crooked brother, None of whom have ever done anything in their life or know how to do anything.
	I mean, they don't have a single product of any kind.
	And the only thing that's for sale there of any value is his crooked influence, which he's been selling from the day he was a senator.
	Because he's a slimy, completely crooked guy.
	So, one of the findings in the report is that he He retained a classified document.
	This will not mean anything to anyone, and her didn't have the energy or desire or honesty to check this out.
	But if he were the kind of prosecutor I trained, he'd have jumped all over this.
	Biden retained a particular document that reflects a telephone call with a gentleman named Arseniy Yatsenyuk.
	And that phone call was on December 11, 2015, days after Biden returned from Kiev.
	And during his conversation in Kiev, he pressured the president of Ukraine to fire the prosecutor Shokin and drop the case against Burisma.
	Now, Burisma is the company that his son worked for.
	Burisma is the company Owned by Mykola Zlochesky.
	Burisma is the company, and Zlochesky is the man who gave them $5 million each, which there is a tape recording of that could be used as evidence against him if we treated him like a normal, massive criminal.
	Also, Burisma is the company that paid his son and his son's company about $1.8 million a year.
	Burisma is the company that we have on record at least one, possibly two, documented money laundering transactions, one of which was for $1.3 million, which is on my podcast number three.
	So that's Burisma.
	He was there.
	He was there a few days before he called Yeltsin.
	And he was there to get the case fixed.
	That's the testimony of all the witnesses.
	And then there's this telephone call on December 11, 2015, days after he returned from Kiev, between him and the Ukrainian Prime Minister, Yatsenyuk.
	Now, unless you're a prosecutor like I am, and you retain these things in your head, you have actually heard Yatsenyuk's name before, but you're not going to remember it.
	Yatsenyuk is on the famous video in which Biden stands up and admits bribery in front of the Council on Foreign Relations.
	Biden says, I withheld a billion dollars from the president, Poroshenko, unless he got rid of the prosecutor.
	That's a bribe.
	He offered something of value in exchange for official action.
	Straight out and out bribe.
	He doesn't tell you the rest, of course.
	His son worked for the company that the prosecutor had just arrested.
	He arrested the company on the 1st of February 2016.
	And Biden wants the guy gone and then approves the new prosecutor.
	However, it isn't just Poroshenko that he discusses it with.
	And if you listen to the tape very carefully, you're going to see why he's hiding this document.
	So this, I mean, this, this makes it almost required to prosecute him if you had been diligent enough as a prosecutor to follow evidence.
	And I would fire this guy tomorrow.
	And if he knows about it and hasn't disclosed it, Then I'd do more than that.
	So now let's play the famous admission of bribery and let's find out who this guy is, whose document he's hiding with classified documents, just so you realize these documents were not just kept for happenstance.
	There's a reason that this crook has these documents.
	Don't fall for this.
	He took this document because, well, if we had a fair system of justice, this document would probably put him in the penitentiary for the rest of his life.
	I remember going over convincing our team or others to convincing that we should be providing for loan guarantees.
	And I went over I guess the 12th, 13th time to Kiev, and I was supposed to announce that there was another billion-dollar loan guarantee.
	And I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from Yatsenyuk that they would take action against the state prosecutor, and they didn't.
	So they said they had – they were walking out to the press conference and said, no, I said, I'm not going to – we're not going to give you the billion dollars.
	They said, you have no authority.
	You're not the president.
	The president said – I said, call him.
	I said, I'm telling you, you're not getting a billion dollars.
	I said, you're not getting a billion.
	I'm going to be leaving here, and I think it was, what, six hours?
	I look at it, I said, I'm leaving in six hours.
	If the prosecutor's not fired, you're not getting the money.
	Oh, son of a bitch.
	Got fired.
	And they put in place someone who was solid.
	They put in place someone who fixed the case, who testifies to that, by the way.
	But the guy was blocked from coming over by the State Department.
	What you just heard, and those idiots laughing, are all foreign policy experts of the United States who don't know a bribe when they hear it.
	And when you heard the name Yatsenyuk, realize that was the number two guy in the government.
	And what he's withholding in the classified documents is a transcript of this conversation with Yatsenyuk.
	There were also four other conversations during that period of time with Poroshenko, all during the relevant period of time of one hour each.
	And all of those are hidden as well, are covered up.
	Two little things have come out of them.
	One, a leak by the Ukrainians, because the Ukrainians have copies of this.
	Ukrainians leaked on him that he approved the new prosecutor.
	He, Biden, approved the new prosecutor.
	That's on tape.
	So we've got Biden not just getting the prosecutor fired, who's handling the Burisma case.
	We have him approving the new prosecutor who's going to take over the case of his son's company.
	What the hell is an American vice president doing that for, except for the fact that he got a bribe?
	And, uh, second, we have on the, uh, a portion that's been released of the Poroshenko conversations, uh, and admission, a very straight out admission that they're going to make up a story that Shokin is corrupt in order to cover his firing.
	So it doesn't come back to Biden.
	And then stupid Biden, of course, makes that comment that he makes, but I tell you, he's the dumbest man.
	But notice, even when he makes that comment about admitting the bribe, he is still smart enough to leave his son out.
	He doesn't mention that his son, he says, I got the guy fired, but he doesn't mention that the guy was investigating Burisma.
	He doesn't mention that Burisma employs his son at $2 million a year.
	He doesn't mention the fact that he has met with and talked to high-level individuals.
	And of course, he's not going to mention that he got a $5 million bribe from them.
	So he leaves that out.
	But he admits enough to make out all of the elements of the crime of bribery.
	And any other human being in this country that said that would be jumped on if we had a legitimate FBI.
	Not because he's Joe Biden, not because he wasn't even running for president then.
	He'd be jumped on because it's a breathtaking admission.
	And this is breathtaking, that he's hiding a conversation with the guy he talks about there.
	And this will tell you the value of this report.
	And this will tell you the integrity of the people who did it.
	That's what it is.
	Um, so he also, unless he really is insane, needs to be prosecuted for this because he didn't just take these documents, as I've just pointed out, willy-nilly, he took them with a purpose, like hiding the incriminating conversation with Yatsenyuk.
	He also put every, would you notice that these documents all end up in places that China has access to.
	So he has two, uh, two, uh, uh, institutes that he puts them at.
	They both are funded by China.
	Uh, he puts them in his house and he puts them, let's look at it again.
	I love looking at this because he puts it here in his house and right there in the, in the garage.
	If you can see that, can you see that?
	They won't show.
	A multi-million dollar partner of the spy chief of China passed those documents every day for at least a year and a half.
	And Joe knew that.
	You think that's a crime?
	Do you think taking class... I don't know what classified documents are there, but I do know that somebody who's in business with Red China should not be passing them every... First of all, it's just illegal for him to have them.
	But now we're trying to say are there aggravating factors or not?
	I think it's a pretty aggravating factor that a guy who is a self-admitted partner of the spy chief of China walked past what you just saw there, what you see right there, for a year.
	Nothing about that in Mr. Sellout's report, Mr. Herr.
	Nothing in there about it.
	How can you have actually investigated this case and not explain that to us?
	Or explain Yitzhak?
	Or many, many more things that you go to my podcast, you go to Rudy, uh, you, you go on CSR.
	How about, how about they just go to and hit, hit X, go to his X account, X.com.
	Hit that subscribe button.
	Okay.
	So we're going to take a short break and we'll be right back.
	Well, we're going to go right into MyPillows first.
	We have a new graphic I'll put up on the screen here.
	Right now?
	Right now.
	We're going to do MyPillows.
	We'll start off with MyPillows.
	We really want to help the mayor's good friend.
	And really, a lot of you probably feel like you know him from from those great commercials.
	We have up on the screen right now a six piece towel set.
	And the mayor has a towel with him right now.
	This is my favorite towel.
	You know, it's like a giant peanut.
	Unlike those hotel towels, I swear they make those towels purposefully uncomfortable so you don't take them.
	You got to be about 4'1 for those towels, right?
	That's right.
	That's right.
	So my pillows and slippers.
	Wow.
	And with Valentine's Day right around the corner.
	Please like these slippers.
	They're my favorite.
	I'd feel very bad if you didn't like them.
	They are so comfortable.
	Mayor, do you think some of these products might make a good Valentine's Day gift?
	You still have time.
	I want you to get red stuff.
	Just order red stuff.
	I don't know if you can do it that way, but you can pick out red blankets, and you can pick out red sheets, and you can pick out red pillowcases, and you can pick out red towels, and give your girlfriend or wife or whatever, give her red stuff.
	They like red stuff.
	Use that promo code, Rudy, for good luck.
	I'm telling you, they like red stuff for Valentine's Day.
	So you go to mypillows.com slash Rudy.
	I don't know.
	You can't really put down red stuff.
	We should have arranged it so you can.
	And now we'll take a quick break with Q-U-X, or would you like to keep going here?
	Go ahead.
	Let's take a quick break and then we'll be right back.
	...is something that you can plug into your television and now you can use your television as a social television type experience.
	So in the Portal universe, you can watch your favorite content creators' videos, live streams, music.
	We also have TV subscriptions as well.
	TV subscriptions, regular channels, all the sports.
	Right, you can actually cut your cable from your cable subscription and get QUX TV on our QX TV boxes and you can pay half the price that you're currently paying for your cable television subscription and you can get all the best premium TV channels and more.
	I mean, it's really, there's so much on there Rudy.
	I mean, you've seen it.
	No, no, no.
	I've seen it and I use it and it's I mean, it's just exactly the same except for half the price.
	Plus, nobody is finding out what I'm watching, and that's not being reported to anybody.
	Right, so you have absolute privacy using this device, which you don't have on other devices out there currently on the market.
	This is absolutely great.
	Q-U-X dot TV is how you can find out about it.
	Q-U-X dot TV.
	Use promo code Rudy to receive $30 off.
	Welcome back to America's Mayor Live, and we've taken you through Yetsenyuk, which shows deliberate conduct.
	We've taken you through a couple of others.
	You should know that his ghost writer deleted recordings upon hearing that there was an investigation.
	That's just a straight out and out obstruction of justice.
	It almost fits the exact words of the statute.
	The minute he heard there was an investigation, he got rid of the evidence.
	So they let him off the hook because he, I guess when he's told by Biden that the case is fixed, I mean, remember, we're not dealing with a legitimate investigation here.
	He said, well, why do these people come forward?
	They come forward because the damn case is fixed.
	You'd come forward too if you were Hillary and the FBI was investigating you and you knew they were going to clear you.
	You don't think everybody knew that Biden was going to get cleared and everybody around him?
	Notice around Hillary, nobody was prosecuted.
	So you prosecute people for them to give you evidence against Hillary.
	They never bothered to do that.
	Nobody around Biden has been prosecuted.
	So they prosecuted this poor Walt Nooter who moved, I think, documents from one place to another within a secure facility, Mar-a-Lago, where Secret Service agents were around all the time and everybody knew where they were.
	They prosecuted him, but they didn't prosecute the ghostwriter who deleted all kinds of material.
	And they didn't because he came forward and told them that he deleted things, and gave them the electronics, and they were able to recreate some of what he deleted.
	Some of what he deleted.
	No indication of how much, or what relevance, or did he recreate under oath what was deleted.
	Is it more stuff about the bribes in Ukraine?
	Could it be the stuff about the bigger bribes in China?
	This is mind-boggling.
	Is this guy also crazy?
	I mean, it would be kind of strange if he has a ghostwriter who can't remember.
	Then how can they write a book?
	He can't remember, the ghostwriter can't remember.
	What are they going to write?
	Empty pages?
	So I can't imagine that this guy gets off on the, he's an old man who has a bad memory defense.
	I'm going to try that one with Fannie Fannie quite contrary.
	I'm going to say that Trump and I are almost as old as, uh, as Biden and therefore we should be, uh, let off.
	But the problem is I remember everything.
	Nobody else would remember that but me.
	And, uh, so I can't really get off.
	I probably have too much of an ego to, And I'm too honest to make believe that I'm demented like Biden.
	I'd rather go to jail, actually, than be demented like him.
	And go to jail for a good cause.
	To show what crooks they are.
	So, you know, among other things, in addition to the ghostwriter being guilty as hell and getting away with it, because they're afraid if the ghostwriter goes to jail, he might give him up on everything, right?
	I mean, there are plenty of people that have given him up.
	The ghost writer is probably afraid that you know we'll never hear from him again.
	I also never heard of a case that was not prosecuted because the jury may be sympathetic
	to the guy who committed the crime.
	Jury might be sympathetic.
	How do you know if the jury is going to be sympathetic?
	I didn't think that was a basis on which Um, on what you didn't bring a case.
	Don't remember in the U S attorney's guidelines.
	And, uh, and, and let's be, let's just be straight out about this.
	I mean, this country can't be a democracy.
	If, if, uh, Biden, if Trump doesn't get the same benefits of the doubt that Biden gets and Biden gets only benefits of the debt and way beyond that, the X in your thing is way beyond that.
	The ghostwriter deleting material after he learns about an investigation is way beyond that.
	This is Hillary all over again.
	This is Hillary all over again because you have permitted a crooked Justice Department.
	You permitted it when you voted for it.
	You knew that Hillary had a corrupt Justice Department and you voted for her.
	Also, lately, Biden's having trouble with dead people.
	He's talking to and meeting with dead people.
	Now, just in the last couple of days, he thinks he's talked to a Mitterrand, the former president of France, who was dead for 17 years before the day he claims he talked to him.
	Helmut Scholz, who was the chancellor of Germany, who was dead for 25 years, Earlier, he has several times repeated a story that he gave his uncle a purple heart after he was vice president in the White House at a very nice ceremony that his father was at, except his uncle and his father were dead for anywhere from five to seven years before that.
	And there was absolutely no record, like all of the other lives that Biden has told, that his uncle ever got the purple heart.
	He, of course, really, really destroyed the morale.
	I don't know if you heard him on television last week when it was the anniversary, but some of the families of people who died in Afghanistan, when he went to the ceremony, spent most of his time looking at his watch and then made a very pathetic speech about how his son died in Iraq.
	Of course, his son didn't die in Iraq.
	He died four years after he had been in Iraq, and he died in a hospital of cancer, and there is absolutely no connection between his death and Iraq.
	And he certainly didn't die there, and he's repeated that about three times, maybe four.
	So last night, The White House or the demented president decided to come out and defend himself and to show that the prosecutor... Well, I mean, I don't know exactly what they were trying to show.
	They're doing something that is really... They had this guy come out today.
	What was that bald-headed guy's name that came out today that was like a real jackass?
	But whatever his name is, they really should get rid of that guy because he... Oh, the lawyer?
	He completely contradicted himself.
	Yeah.
	He should go back to law school and learn the proposition of falsum in unum, falsum in omnibus.
	You know what that means?
	Yeah.
	If you tell one lie, if one part is a lie, it's probably all a lie.
	So what he's trying to do, what they're trying to say, both Biden in his totally inarticulate way, And this lawyer in his very convoluted, actually stupid, argument is that the prosecutor has to be trusted and believed when he makes the extraordinary decision that this guy shouldn't be prosecuted, or the ghostwriter, for what turns out to be obstruction of justice that's prosecuted on just about everybody else.
	And that Biden shouldn't be prosecuted, although Trump should.
	We should believe the prosecutor there.
	He's solid and sound on that, but he's lying his backside off over the fact that the guy's unfit to go to trial.
	He's lying about that.
	He's lying about Biden can't remember, can't remember when he left being vice president.
	Biden can't remember the son that he loves so much.
	He can't remember his birthday.
	Biden can't remember anything.
	And as he says in a very, very convoluted kind of way, he's completely unfit to go to trial.
	So they're livid about that.
	The prosecutor's all wrong.
	Now, how can you be wrong about one, but not about the other?
	He's either wrong about both or he's right about both or whatever.
	But in any event, if you need the proof that the guy is right, Joe gave, I mean, From the very beginning of this case, we have a confession of bribery.
	This should not be a difficult case.
	He should have been prosecuted five years ago.
	What I showed you earlier, in addition to having Yatsenyuk in it, which is a very interesting little connection that prosecutors love, it's a straight out admission of bribery.
	Now what you're going to hear basically says that at least that part of this thing where Herr says, That he's unfit to stand trial is absolutely true.
	Let's listen to this.
	This is him last night.
	He insisted on coming out and doing this.
	And as usual, he buries himself and the crooked media, the crooked press, the crooked Democrat party can let him get away with this too.
	I wonder if he murdered somebody in, in, in the open, if they say, Oh, that isn't what you're really seeing.
	The guy really isn't been murdered, but go ahead.
	Let's watch.
	Let's watch this.
	In the Gaza Strip has been over the top.
	I think that, as you know, initially the President of Mexico, Osisi, did not want to open up the gate to allow humanitarian material to get in.
	I talked to him.
	I convinced him to open the gate.
	I talked to Bibi to open the gate on the Israeli side.
	I've been pushing really hard, really hard to get humanitarian assistance into Gaza.
	There are a lot of innocent people who are starving, a lot of innocent people who are in trouble and dying.
	And it's got to stop.
	That is, uh, you don't have to be a doctor to realize that that 100% shows that he has a serious case of dementia.
	Now let's, you know, we got a country to run here, not a nursing home.
	And we got a country in which lives have been lost because of this son of a bitch.
	And what's wrong with us?
	What's wrong with us?
	What's wrong with the Democrats in his cabinet?
	If he's doing that on television, he's got to be doing that at cabinet meetings.
	You tell me all of a sudden he's at a cabinet meeting and he's John F. Kennedy?
	I talked to Sisi about the Mexican border, the president of Mexico.
	He's the president of Egypt.
	Jesus.
	You say, well, okay, one time, two times.
	This is the guy who went to Cambodia and greets the president of Cambodia and congratulates him on winning the election in Colombia.
	You can't tell a Cambodian, a Colombian.
	I mean, gee, there should have been a hint, like a little hint that this is in Colombia, if you have a brain left.
	Now, I'm telling you, he didn't have a lot of brains to sacrifice when he got dementia.
	This guy was not working with a full set of brains at any time.
	From the time he was in grammar school, he was the dumbest kid everywhere.
	It's probably one of the reasons, if you want to psychobabble him, it's probably one of the reasons why he's so nasty and he's so, uh, uh, uh, ridiculous and he lies so much and he hero-wise, this is not a word, but he sort of, um, he does like a, a vicious version of Walter Mitty.
	Every single thing he makes himself into a hero.
	For example, That confession of a bribe didn't take place that way.
	He would never have been that brave or tough in dealing with Poroshenko.
	It was more driving him crazy on the telephone for two weeks, including the one that he's covering up with Yeltsin.
	I've always wanted those telephone calls.
	I got a little snippets of them, like him approving the new prosecutor.
	I got them from the Ukrainians who'd gotten in a lot of trouble for getting them to me.
	Because let's face it.
	Zelensky's covering up for him.
	So when we hear all this stuff about Zelensky, will you stop it, please?
	The people of Ukraine are deserving of our attention and our sympathy and our help to the point that, you know, it makes sense.
	But the guy knows the whole Biden story and is covering up a massive crime at the highest levels.
	He also knows that his own president, Took a massive amount of money in that case, and he's covering it up.
	So, I mean, when we think about how far we go here, we're doing it for a guy that is not exactly, you know, an example of what a world leader should be like.
	His mentor is one of the, along with Zochevsky, one of the three or four biggest crooks in Ukraine.
	He's the money launderer.
	If that guy wanted to open his mouth, he could bury all of them, including, I'm told, a lot more American politicians.
	Wouldn't that be great if we could get them all at once and put them where they belong, get them out of the Senate, the House, put them in a penitentiary?
	Then, you know, then if they don't know who the president of some place is, he and McConnell could have very interesting conversations, right?
	Well, the Supreme Court argument the other day was superb.
	It was absolutely superb.
	I'm going to also do a podcast on that, which will be on X. Subscribe.
	That one, I don't know which one I'm going to do first yet.
	I'll probably do this one first, and then we'll do the other one, or maybe vice versa.
	But that one, I will lay out for you the rationales.
	I like that.
	each one of the, I'll make it easy so you can follow it.
	And I'm going to give you a prediction of how the case is going to come out. Not just, look, it's
	obvious that Trump's going to win the case. And, but it is not obvious what the grounds will be
	and the number of judges are not obvious.
	So I'm going to give you, I'm going to give you a prediction of that as opposed to a prediction of
	the Superbowl, because it's more important than that. I like that. Maybe we'll do the other one.
	This is extraordinarily important because Justice Roberts and Gorsuch both made the point at
	And I thought this point, they, I think all of them agree on this point.
	If they allow this, then within weeks, Biden will be off the ballot in seven, eight Republican States, because you can take what we're talking about right now.
	And you can decide that this is... I'll tell you what you could use.
	You could use the invasion of our southern border, where enemies of our country are coming in, Chinese are coming in, where he's reduced the number of questions from 40 to 4, which has increased the amount of fentanyl coming into this country, has increased the number of Chinese spies that have come into this country.
	Have increased the number of, even his own FBI director says, have increased the number of Islamic terrorists that have come into this country.
	And you can say that this is really all an aid of an insurrection so that we become a one world communist government.
	And since either a state secretary of state or a state court that's Republican could Decide that based on any evidence it wants.
	There's plenty of evidence.
	Doesn't necessarily mean you're going to believe it's true.
	But they can believe it's true.
	A lot of it I believe is true.
	They can just take them off the ballot.
	So the president of the United States will get decided by some reduced number of states where you can't get somebody to do that.
	Where you can't get a Republican to take Biden off.
	Or a Democrat to take Trump off by just saying, I believe that stuff that is in the report.
	I believe that, well, how about we do the opposite of J6?
	I believe they engineered J6.
	J6 was really engineered by Pelosi and Biden, and therefore it was an insurrection in the other direction.
	We're going to take them off the ballot.
	And it's a state decision that can't be reviewed by the federal courts and go pound sand.
	So Trump is out in 10 States and he's out in 10 States.
	And what we got 30 that decided 30 States decided we'll figure out which 30.
	It's crazy.
	It was another great point made by, um, I forgotten which justice, but I love the quote.
	I think it was Justice Kagan who said, when a case is close or ambiguous, don't we always vote for more democracy?
	More democracy means the choice of the people as opposed to the choice of the bureaucrats.
	Now, that's a hell of a quote from a liberal justice who you figure is going to vote for Biden.
	But I have a feeling they've had enough of it.
	Every one of them asked questions that was issue-oriented.
	Even Justice Jackson, who is very strong on the history and background of the 14th Amendment, finds it very difficult to grasp that the President is covered by the 14th Amendment.
	You know why?
	The President isn't covered by the 14th Amendment.
	And I didn't necessarily agree That Trump's lawyer made the strongest argument.
	The argument that he made was that he's not covered under the category of an officer of the United States because he's not technically an officer of the United States.
	He is the United States.
	He runs it.
	Here's the argument that works for me.
	If you read the 14th Amendment, they specify the federal positions that would not be offices, because they're elected, that they want covered.
	And they leave out the President and the Vice President.
	And they have Senator and Representative.
	And then they go on to other offices of the United States.
	They never mention the President and Vice President in the entire 14th Amendment.
	So what I would have said to the lawyer for Colorado is, I'm putting in front of you a copy of the 14th Amendment, Counselor, and I'd like you to write into it at the very beginning, President and Vice President, because it's not there.
	And that's what you're asking me to do.
	And we don't do that in the Supreme Court.
	We don't write things into the Constitution.
	We interpret it.
	And if Congress intended to cover President and Vice President, We cannot assume it.
	They have to write it.
	Mayor, what is the reasoning, and is this where you have to look to the legislative text, what is the reasoning for omitting President and Vice President, or can we not even assume that?
	No, we can assume they were omitted because they want to cover them.
	I mean, it's real simple.
	But why wouldn't they want to cover?
	What would be the reasoning for not covering the president under that?
	Maybe they don't want to interfere with democracy at that level.
	At that level, yeah.
	That's a very high position.
	It should be decided by the people.
	Gee, that's what we're about, isn't it?
	Don't you notice the Democratic Party is always arguing for state control?
	They want the state to control.
	By state, I don't necessarily mean just the state government.
	I mean the federal government.
	You mean the federal government, yeah.
	Or the state, or a state.
	But I'm going to try to remember who the justice was.
	Of course this is who the justice was that said that Justice Kagan also said
	That the purpose of the 14th Amendment was to take power away from the states and give it to the federal government.
	Because Section 5 here says the procedures for this have to be set by the Congress.
	And the Congress has set no procedures.
	And therefore, there's another indication that they didn't want the president covered.
	If they wanted the president covered, they would have to have passed under Section 5 a procedure for how you do this.
	You don't just say remove the president and then basically what they're saying is you can, it doesn't say you can remove the president.
	President isn't there, but we're going to assume he's there and there's no procedure for removing him, but you can make up whatever procedure you want.
	So, uh, Colorado can have one and New Jersey can have another and Mississippi can have another and some other place can have a different one.
	Now, this is really important because this is the other problem.
	How have they proved that he was involved in insurrection?
	How have they proved it?
	They say they read the J6 report.
	I mean, that isn't worth the paper it's written on.
	J6 has destroyed most of its records because they're so damn crooked.
	In fact, it's an illegitimate committee.
	It was never even properly formed in Congress.
	It has no Republican or legitimate minority on it.
	There was no cross-examination of a single person.
	A J6 is worth as much as an article in the New York Times.
	You can't use that as the basis.
	Where's the due process?
	So that's the point that Roberts was making.
	If you can use the J6 report, you can use the Giuliani report.
	And there is one.
	A memorandum.
	Lays out all kinds of crimes that Biden committed.
	Lays out how Biden aided and comforted the enemy, China.
	Somebody could take that and say, I believe Giuliani.
	Don't put Biden on the ballot.
	He was involved in aiding and comforting the enemy.
	And that's the danger that you create.
	And that's why I think Roberts has said that this will result in just a handful of states deciding the election.
	Gorsuch has agreed with that.
	Alito, his questions almost suggest that I don't even know what we're doing here.
	I mean, this is so simple.
	The president's not covered.
	No one's ever attempted to cover the president before.
	Why?
	Because he's not.
	So the lawyer said because no one did what Trump did before.
	And I think the answer was no, because the president isn't included here.
	I think if Nino Scalia were alive, he would have done my routine and handed him the 14th Amendment and said, well, if you want us to read in the president and the vice, why don't you write it in?
	Since the people who wrote the amendment and the American people didn't write it in, why don't you put it in?
	Justice Jackson was concerned about whether the president is properly an officer under the definitions in the Constitution.
	And by the way, the president isn't.
	Officers are people that are appointed, not people who are elected.
	So it has a specific meaning when it said other offices.
	You can't cover the president there, and he isn't named at the beginning.
	Justice Kagan said that the 14th Amendment is to remove power from the states and give it to the federal government, and they did.
	Congress had to act, not a state.
	Justice Jackson said, when have we not voted for more democracy in a close case?
	When have we not voted for more democracy in a close case?
	This would be voting for a bureaucratic decision rather than a democratic decision.
	Kavanaugh said, democracy means people should elect candidates of their choice and not be restricted.
	Similar quotes from Coney Barrett, Thomas.
	So the question is, what is Sotomayor going to do?
	And we're going to discuss that on my podcast and I'll let you know.
	And then I'll let you know what I think of Leto and Thomas.
	Thomas is really the strongest intellect on the court, and we'll see what he's going to do.
	And I think the most respected of the people on the court.
	So shall we take a short break?
	Let's take a short break, and we'll come back with some balance of nature.
	All right.
	Foundation delivers on its promise to do good and never forget the sacrifices America's greatest heroes have made for us.
	Heroes who risked their lives to keep our communities and our country safe.
	Heroes like United States Marine Corps Captain and Pilot John Jeremy Sachs.
	Captain Sachs sustained fatal injuries when his military aircraft crashed during training, killing him and five other service members.
	He's remembered by loved ones as courageous, brilliant, and devoted to his career, family, and friends.
	John is survived by his wife, Amber, who gave birth to their second daughter three months after his death.
	Tunnel to Towers paid the mortgage on the family home for Amber and their two daughters.
	The foundation has helped over 1,000 military and first responder families navigate the worst of times by removing the burden of a mortgage payment.
	Our nation's heroes and their families need your help now more than ever.
	Donate $11 a month to Tunnel to Towers at T2T.org.
	T2T.org, that's T, the number two T.org, T2T.org.
	Please, donate now.
	I think we should put that out.
	Well, welcome back to America's Mayor Live, and we are in what we call soccer time, but let me cover a couple of real quick, and then we'll have a little conversation.
	First of all, there's a poll out today.
	And the poll, I think it's a Gallup poll, which means it's not necessarily a Trump poll.
	And it shows the minority vote really moving very, very strongly.
	Actually, it's moving, in the case of the black vote, it's cratering on Biden.
	It's not moving to Trump yet, but it's cratering on Biden.
	Biden has gone down just in two weeks 11 points in the black vote.
	And he's down to a historic low for a Democrat.
	Which also is going to indicate a turnout problem, obviously, when that happens.
	So let's see what the numbers are.
	He was at 77% of blacks, and now he's at 66%.
	He was at 77% of blacks, and now he's at 66%.
	And Trump remains at 19, which is about as high as a Republican has ever been.
	But I think if that, as I think I've explained to you before,
	people generally, when they have a longstanding commitment to a political party or a candidate,
	they generally go to undecided before they move.
	And then not all of them move, but a certain percentage of them do.
	So let's see if I'm right about that, because the Hispanics have started to move.
	A year ago, they were dropping down on Trump.
	And now, in some polls, Trump is ahead of Biden.
	In this particular poll, which is actually more of a Republican-Democrat poll, this is not even a, no, I'm sorry, I called it a Trump-Biden poll, this isn't.
	77% of people, when they previously took the poll, identified themselves as blacks as Democrats, 19% as Republicans.
	Now, 66% only of blacks say they're Democrats, and still 19% say they're Republicans, and the others have gone to independent.
	I would suspect that Trump's numbers are higher than generic Republican.
	Among Hispanics, it's much, much closer.
	It's 35% of Hispanics call themselves Republicans and 47% call themselves Democrats.
	And And that is, uh, a change of about 31 points from last year.
	Uh, so there, there you see that they've both fallen away from the democratic party and gone to the Republican party.
	And, uh, Trump of course, in recent polls has been ahead of Biden with the Hispanic vote.
	This has got to be causing tremendous anxiety among the crooks.
	I just noticed that there's an estate in Naples, Florida that's being offered for $295 million.
	Now, Naples, Florida is not... Naples, Florida is not... I'll show it to you here.
	Naples, Florida is not Palm Beach, number one, This is only eight acres, and Palm Beach is 19 acres?
	17.
	17 acres.
	And this is not on two bodies of water.
	It's only on one.
	It looks like the internal one.
	You can put it on there.
	I'm going to put a copy down.
	I can bring it up on the screen.
	Whereas Mar-a-Lago... Face it up, yeah.
	As if you're reading it.
	Mar-a-Lago is on... This is...
	That's it right there.
	Just that.
	If this were Mar-a-Lago, it would be more than twice the size and it would go from Atlantic Ocean, that's the Gulf of Mexico, to the intercoastal.
	This is only on this, doesn't even have a beach.
	It has a... You can read it at the... It has basically, it has a Just a place of votes here.
	Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar- Mar Because he's a Democratic hack.
	In fact, all these cases are one Democrat hack after another.
	Now, what recently happened to Little Annie Fanny?
	That's right.
	We want... Should I say Big Fanny?
	We want to give an Update on that situation.
	Um, there is new, uh, new evidence that she's lying.
	Evidence of her lying, specifically mayor lying about when her, we'll call it a special relationship.
	So this coming from the New York post just hours ago and battle district attorney, Fannie Willis.
	That's the one who wants to put your friend, me in jail for the rest of my life.
	And my friend Trump in jail for the rest of his life.
	That's right.
	So we don't like her.
	We generally don't like people who want to put you in jail for the rest of your life when you didn't do anything wrong.
	Especially when you didn't do anything.
	Yeah, they want to frame you for carrying on your profession like the New York Bar Association.
	So Fannie Willis has been accused of lying about the timeline of her relationship with Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade in a bombshell new court filing.
	Mike Roman, who along with President Trump and Our friend here have been charged with phony election fraud, charged by Wade and Willis in Fulton County, Georgia.
	This is a late filing tonight, Mayor.
	The filing claims, in the filing, Roman's lawyer claims that Wade's former law partner, so follow closely, Terrence Bradley, will testify their romantic relationship, the relationship between Wade and Willis, began before Wade was appointed to prosecute the 2021 case.
	That would be another lie because he's recently said that they didn't have a relationship When she decided to enter a contract that will give him about a million dollars, and she'll get to a million dollars because she created a totally phony, unnecessary grand jury.
	Have you ever heard of a case that gets presented to two grand juries?
	Except if you want to maximize the amount of money you spend on legal fees for your lover.
	Nobody, and this is something nobody's covered.
	It's like the Yatsenuk thing.
	I don't get these people.
	This is a very strange grand jury.
	It should have, from the very beginning, Bob Costello and I, from the very beginning, could not understand why she had this preliminary grand jury that couldn't indict.
	And boy, did they have some yahoos on this grand jury.
	Guy appeared before her.
	They wanted pictures.
	They wanted a video.
	She wanted a picture.
	Little Annie Fanny.
	No, she wanted a meeting.
	She didn't want a picture.
	She wanted a meeting.
	She met with you?
	She met with me.
	She wanted me to come to her office and she met with me.
	She did not get a picture?
	Some people got pictures, right?
	No, some of the jurors got pictures and some got photographs and one kissed me.
	Well, apparently... But this was an unnecessary... The point I'm trying to make, this isn't their fault, this is the jurors' fault, but this is an unnecessary grand jury because you had to present it again to another grand jury.
	And you were wondering at the time what the hell is going on.
	But now in retrospect, it's a great way to completely maximize fees.
	I mean, the guy charged for 24 hours a couple of times.
	And when he traveled to Washington to, you know, fix the case with the White House, I mean, the traveling to the White House is so completely suspicious, it's unbelievable that they would do it, but you've got to figure out what it's for.
	I'm going to tell you what it was for.
	It was to complete, make sure this fit into the conspiracy to deprive Trump of his constitutional right to run for office.
	They wanted to make sure they got all these cases jammed into the same year, 2024, since it's really hard to do that.
	I'm telling you, I don't know of anybody that's been tried four times in the same year or where anybody would be allowed to do that because you can't get a fair trial if you do that just by the mere fact you can't prepare for four trials, particularly of this complexity.
	It also, isn't it strange that every single thing he's charged with is new?
	Nobody else has ever been charged with it before.
	The Bragg case, nobody's ever been charged with that before in New York, and it's beyond the statute of limitations.
	And they had to pass a special law to extend the statute of limitations so they could bring their phony charge.
	All done by Democrats.
	There isn't a single Republican involved in any of this, even a turncoat Republican.
	This is all crooked, and this all emanates from crooked Democrat machines.
	You can't get more crooked than New York.
	Oh yes you can, Fulton County.
	Thank you.
	This new filing includes details about Willis and Wade's vacations and travel together, including that Wade spent thousands of dollars on at least five trips.
	And look at the quality of DAs that Trump and I get.
	We got this one here.
	I mean, we can't, I don't think we could ever claim that Little Lanny Fanny is a high quality DA, right?
	After all this crap is coming out, right?
	No.
	Bragg is the guy who just let the people who beat the migrants, the illegals who beat the crap out of the police, he let them go.
	They ran away.
	Now he's indicted them and he held a big press conference about how horrible they are.
	But he's the guy to let them go.
	I mean, he's the guy prosecuting Trump.
	So, I mean, come on.
	And Smith?
	Smith had his case reversed by the Supreme Court 9-0 because he framed a politician.
	So why would an attorney general who was honest pick him?
	He is a prosecutor with an official reputation for being unethical.
	Why would you pick him?
	Even if you don't believe he's unethical, why would you pick him and raise the issue?
	Because you don't care, because the press doesn't care.
	Because they don't care about liberty, and they don't care about decency.
	All they care about is framing their enemy, keeping their power, making their money.
	And a lot of it's about money.
	Particularly with the Bidens.
	A lot of it's about money.
	I mean, they've been crooks forever.
	Now, let's see, what else do we have?
	Amen to that.
	Great race in New York, Swasey and Mozzie Phillip.
	Swasey is a three-time congressman who left Congress to run against Andrew Cuomo and Lost, actually to run against Hochul and Lost, and now is running against A woman who originates from Ethiopia—try this, emphasize—originates from Ethiopia, is Jewish, went to Israel as part of the Ethiopians returning to their religion, which I'm very familiar with.
	I was there when the original group came there in 85, 86, when I first met Bibi and Ehud Omer.
	And it's really a wonderful thing to watch.
	I mean, it's fascinating to watch these Ethiopians Who have an ancient form of Judaism that they practice.
	It's not quite the same because they, I don't know, I don't remember exactly historically when they cut off, but it might even be pre-Moses.
	I don't, it can't be pre-Moses.
	Maybe it's right after, well, there's a whole area where they cut off and they have to learn the rest of Judaism.
	It just so happens that when I went there about eight, Seven or eight years ago, when they were having the first, the other war, and I got a tour of the Iron Dome.
	The commander of the Iron Dome I was in was an Ethiopian woman.
	So, and she had come in at the time that I was there.
	So we had a very wonderful conversation about that.
	And Mazi was a soldier in the Israeli army.
	Who's been in America now for 20 years, 25 years has run for office.
	You've been in local office and she's running, running, uh, against, uh, against, uh, Swazi.
	And the big issue is immigration because New York is overwhelmed with 170,000 illegals invited here by our, uh, by our mayor who has recently, um, I mean, he may have certain Biden problems because Uh, I got a little worried about him when he said that in 1993, God told him that he would run for mayor.
	Not only did I get, uh, concerned about him, I got annoyed because I was, I was running in 1993 and God didn't talk to me.
	I talked to him a lot, like, please God make me win.
	But we didn't have, we didn't, um, and I promised God that I would do a good job.
	And I think I did.
	Uh, but he didn't, he talked to Adams and not me, which And now, just a few days ago, he compared himself to Jesus.
	So, I don't know if we've got a guy that's—this is the guy who invited all of the people to come here, offered them health insurance before anybody else gave them health insurance, then wondered why they all came here, and then wondered why Abbott sent them here.
	Abbott actually thought he wanted them, but I guess he wanted them as much as Moses Vineyard wanted them.
	Now he's got 170,000 that have come here.
	We've got something like 65,000 registered in our homeless facilities, which is actually more homeless than we've ever had.
	So in essence, it doubles the number of homeless.
	And he and de Blasio had set a record beyond anything that Ed Koch experienced, I experienced, Bloomberg in homelessness, or even Dinkins.
	They somehow, they were able to produce like three to four times more homeless.
	than we had before.
	Now it's ridiculous because now they've got, we saw a group of, a group of them today who look really quite well fed, huh?
	They look like they had nice, nice clothes on.
	All lined up, uh, getting ready for something or other.
	I guess, you know, and you know, they're getting, Oh, you know what Adams is doing?
	Adams is giving them a debit cards because they're unhappy with their meals.
	They feel that no one's taking account of the sensitivities of their ethnic cuisine.
	And therefore, they should be able to go get, you know, whatever Somalian food, if there is Somalian food, or whatever, or bubulan food, because they come from places I never heard of in some cases.
	Bubidi-bubulan.
	So I don't know if there's anybody who makes bubidi-bubuli cooking, but you now have a card, and you can go around, you can call up, and if somebody makes it, somebody makes it in New York.
	Even Boobity Boobity Land will have cooking in New York.
	Also, if you want to go to the Super Bowl, which is coming up this weekend, I think the lowest price right now is about $6,000 to $10,000 for a ticket and about $20,000 for a suite.
	But that's like the really bad ones.
	Yeah, but I should have bought these tickets Monday.
	And right, I'm guessing the prices went up since Monday.
	Yeah, but honestly.
	It doesn't always happen.
	On Saturday they go down.
	They go down.
	So you got to make sure you got to sell at the right time.
	Well, you got yourself now.
	Or you might be stuck.
	Today.
	Tomorrow they'll go down.
	They'll go down?
	Because then people start panicking?
	Well, yeah.
	Or you really want to, you really have guts, you go on Sunday morning.
	If you want to buy.
	And you get somebody who's like trying to get rid of their tickets.
	Oh yeah.
	You got people that get stuck, you know, they, uh, now is this going to be different?
	I don't know.
	Almost every Superbowl that happens.
	This is in Vegas.
	This is the first Superbowl in Vegas, I believe.
	Well, it may be, it may not work in Vegas.
	There may be, and there may be enough money in Vegas that they can cover these, these tremendous prices for the Superbowl.
	Well, now you know, San Francisco, you know, that San Francisco is favored by two points.
	That's what I saw.
	That's interesting.
	Now, why do you think that you and I both think now I'm not going to tell you who I think is going to win.
	I will before we end, but I do think the Kansas city should be favored.
	Really?
	I I'll go with why I, uh, although I think San Francisco is going to win.
	I'd say defense is why I think San Francisco is going to win.
	You do?
	I do.
	Why?
	Because I want them to win.
	Not that I like San Francisco.
	I think we probably have more voters in Kansas City than San Francisco.
	Oh, so then I should be for Kansas City?
	No, no, no, we're not running for it.
	I'm annoyed at the whole, uh, the whole stupid thing with Taylor and her boyfriend, Travis, Travis, uh, Travis Swift.
	So it's going to be Travis.
	So is he going to take her last name or would she take his last name?
	He's got more money.
	She's more famous.
	Who the hell knew about him before?
	I mean, Travis Swift, it works if you think about it.
	I mean, I'll take nothing away from him.
	He was a really superbly talented tight end.
	He was, and he had a good week last week.
	And he had one game so far where he showed his old show.
	Can he ever repeat that?
	He's got the most, I mean, they've got the most talented quarterback in my home.
	Although the kid is fabulous.
	Purdy is fabulous.
	Isn't he?
	What a great story that is.
	He's earning less than a million dollars, that guy.
	Well, for now, right?
	Oh yeah, but you know, you never know.
	He could get injured and never get there, right?
	Yeah, that's actually a very good point.
	He could get injured and never get there, particularly in a Super Bowl, man.
	They're going to be out there to kill him.
	So is the Super Bowl, have they retired the Roman numerals?
	I don't know if I should really be for San Francisco.
	It's very hard to be for San Francisco because of the city, not the team, but they really play in Santa Clara.
	I mean, that city is disgraceful.
	In Santa Clara?
	It's so far out of town.
	I've been there for- No, not Santa Clara!
	Oh, sorry.
	Which state?
	Santa Clara's kind of nice.
	San Francisco's disgraceful.
	It's a disgrace to the United States, particularly the big parade they had for the communists.
	Oh my goodness.
	When they had the, you know, the homecoming parade for Xi Jinping, they were all waving Chinese flags.
	Who were those people, by the way?
	This mass murderer.
	Who were those people?
	Those weren't American Chinese, Chinese Americans.
	Probably friends of Newsom.
	A lot of people chiming in on the sports stuff.
	Well, comment below.
	Well, first of all, before we sign off, let us know where you're tuning in from.
	We like doing that.
	It gets the chat really moving.
	Comment below.
	Where are you tuning in from?
	Should I not let Taylor Swift affect my football pick?
	On field?
	Well, look, who do you think will win?
	You know, once it comes down to it, Mayor, the teams are on the field.
	It's another 60 minute game like every other one of them, right?
	The whistle blows and we're off.
	Who wins?
	There is a reason why the 49ers are favored.
	And tell me.
	Defense.
	Which wins games.
	Which wins Super Bowl.
	Well, it's against a super talented, very, very Super Bowl comfortable quarterback.
	That's true.
	And that's a good point.
	Could eventually, if he remains healthy, he could challenge Brady.
	Not yet.
	Not yet.
	Right now, he's not even... I mean, there are four or five others.
	Well, remember, the 49ers haven't been underdogs in a year.
	This is a very good team, and people forget, I think because of the West Coast bias.
	No offense to you East Coasters, I'm a Midwesterner, but I even have some of that West Coast bias.
	Sometimes, right, there's a really good team out there, and we don't... The 49ers are a very good team.
	They're complete.
	Is that who you're picking?
	Yeah, I think you can probably tell.
	Yeah, I'm going with the 49ers.
	They're a complete team.
	This Brock Purdy guy, he was a weak link.
	And here he comes.
	He was the last pick in the NFL draft.
	The last pick in the NFL draft every year is known as, affectionately, Mr. Irrelevant.
	He was literally the last pick.
	You just talked me into it.
	They're like the underdog, really, even if they're favorite.
	You love the underdog.
	Yeah, they're really the underdog.
	Everybody thinks Kansas City's going to win because they won before.
	Which is funny to say.
	I don't like Mahomes, so I don't like rooting against Mahomes.
	I really, I really, I'm big on the I'm big on the best quarterback because very often, you know, well, of course, it depends if the quarterback has the ball last.
	That's right.
	So before we go, comment below, who do you think is going to win the Super Bowl?
	We're getting a lot of action here.
	People are asking, oh, I know the answer to this.
	Will you be betting on the game?
	I don't bet.
	That was a quick answer.
	I knew that.
	The only time I ever placed bets was for my uncle when he was dying.
	And actually, I got so nervous about placing the bet that I just paid him what he won.
	I lost a lot of money.
	My uncle was in the hospital fighting.
	He fell.
	He was 84, 85 and he fell.
	My uncle would be alive today if this didn't happen, but he fell down the stairs and he broke his back and that really deteriorated his entire body.
	He was my hero.
	He was in the Navy in the Second World War.
	He was a three-time decorated New York City police officer.
	He brought three different people down from the top of the Brooklyn Bridge.
	You can tell he's my hero.
	His name was Rudy.
	His name was Rudy.
	Also, he taught me how to swim.
	He taught me how to box.
	He taught me, along with my father, how to be a man.
	And he was a hell of a guy.
	And he'd probably be alive... He was 85.
	He looked like he was 60.
	And it was just an accident, which, you know, you got to be so careful.
	Elderly people, which he still was elderly, falling is like 60%, 50% of the problem.
	And he fell down the stairs and he lived alone.
	And his son-in-law had just left him.
	They had had watching a game together.
	And his son-in-law came back the next morning with, with my cousin and they found them at the base of the stairs, unconscious.
	And then he recovered.
	Lasted about four or five months, but because he was basically paralyzed, it deteriorated all of his organs.
	But it was during the Giants' march to the last Super Bowl, and he used to bet on the Super Bowl, on football.
	So one time, he said, I don't trust your cousin to get the bet in right.
	Here, you take the money.
	And I said, don't worry, I don't have to take the money.
	We'll square it up later.
	So I then called my cousin to see how you could make a bet.
	I didn't like the whole idea of my making a bet.
	So I said, oh, well, maybe the Giants won't cover or whatever.
	But the Giants were phenomenal.
	They won, what, four in a row?
	And really lost a lot of money.
	That's a great story.
	And the mayor told me the story.
	I haven't said this yet.
	He didn't bet that much, but he wants to see a picture.
	Let's show a picture.
	Of Uncle Rudy?
	Yeah.
	I'll get one.
	It was a handsome guy.
	And I've met a good amount of your family at this point.
	Yeah, we've met his son.
	I've met numerous Giuliani's at this point.
	Rudy's out.
	And just the best.
	Great family.
	Is that Kathy, his wife?
	Yep.
	Great people.
	Just really good people.
	And as you guys, folks, just imagine, right?
	I'm there with Mayor Giuliani's family.
	And where was that?
	And these people all got elected.
	Brooklyn or Queens.
	I had a family.
	It's a very New York experience.
	I had a family that's very political.
	Very politically active.
	Yes.
	Republican and Democrat.
	Definitely.
	By and large, one side of the family was more Republican, the other was Democrat, but they even had mixture within.
	One of my uncles, Rudy, was very conservative, and his older brother was rather liberal, and my father was sort of in the middle.
	My father was what you would call But by the end, he was a Republican, but he was a conservative Democrat, really.
	But they didn't shy away from debating with all the two brothers love each other.
	All three of them did.
	But my father was like much older.
	So this this brother was 19 years younger.
	So he was almost like my older brother.
	And and my father would be in the middle and sort of.
	I don't know if he would sort of settle the disputes, but.
	Depending on who he sided with, that would be two to one.
	And he would go back and forth.
	And my father tended to be liberal on, on, uh, social policy and conservative on foreign policy.
	Kind of a really traditional scoop.
	Jackson, uh, Kennedy, Democrat, Democrat, straight out.
	What were the Republicans who Rockefeller Republicans, right?
	She, she, she or Goldwater.
	Sorry.
	Until, until, until he got a little wacky, she was, uh, she was big on Joe McCarthy.
	Senator McCarthy for a while.
	He she was she was very anti-communist Which is where I get it.
	My father was too even though he was a democrat both of them That's where they came together and agreed That communism had gotten too much of a hold Even my father as a democrat felt that the communists had got too much of a hold on the Roosevelt and Truman administration so I grew up with that I grew up with Looking at it a little differently than other people did and you know when you look at what happened with East Germany and you look what happened with the two careers and Was that really necessary?
	Yeah, I don't know if it's really necessary.
	I don't know if that wasn't communist influence in our government.
	I mean McCarthy and he probably... I know that he's Berlin for sure.
	Is what?
	Definitely a product of the communist influence within the Roosevelt administration.
	holding Patten back. You've read a lot about that right? I mean there's no doubt
	about it. I mean it was the deal the deal was made at either Potsdam or Yalta or
	both. At Yalta Roosevelt was in the condition. I was gonna say. He was a Biden.
	He got ran over. He died he died three weeks later.
	I mean right isn't he also.
	He gave away the world.
	And Churchill went nuts.
	His decisions there led to the Cold War.
	Churchill basically told, you know, we only made believe we were Joe's friend.
	But what was the alternative?
	To be fair, what was the alternative?
	Just march into Berlin and take it.
	And tell the Russians, sorry?
	Yeah, tell them, yeah, tell them you got, you got, yeah.
	What did we take?
	What did we take?
	We had a- I mean, we've had a major- They had a defense- Yeah.
	Look, they decided the Russia- I would have told Stalin to go to hell.
	Yeah.
	I would have said, thank you for helping me and I'll go to hell.
	Back up- I helped you.
	I helped you.
	You didn't help me.
	You decided to be an ally of Hitler's.
	Yeah.
	You gotta pay for that, Joe.
	I'm sorry.
	You were an ally for, what, three, four years of Hitler.
	Then you- Hitler invaded you.
	Yeah.
	Double crossed him.
	Is that what happened?
	You're telling me you helped us win the war?
	We helped you win the war, you son of a bitch!
	Yet we gave them that, all of Eastern Europe.
	And when they needed arms, where did they get them from?
	They were on the balls of their backside.
	What was, real quick, I know we gotta go, we're way over in time.
	Now they lost more people than we did, but we weren't allies of the Nazis, they were!
	What was the thing, just real quick, and we're well into soccer time, but I have to know, Mayor, you're such a student of history, this particular time period, What was the thinking from the Roosevelt people other than maybe there's some communist infiltration?
	What was the justification?
	What was the justification?
	Communism was the greatest movement back in the 1920s.
	But what was the Western, what was their justification for allowing...
	It was a bit of a...
	Communism was much better than capitalism, just as it is now.
	Capitalism was a horrible thing.
	Capitalism caused the depression.
	The depression allowed a lot of communist inroads because on the surface of it, socialism sounds good on the surface.
	Everybody's going to get paid.
	But then you just start thinking about the slogan, right?
	And you say to yourself, from everyone depending on their contribution, to everyone depending on their needs, From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.
	Okay.
	So now, if your abilities means, I use contribution because it means work.
	If I'm doing all the work, there's a period of time, unless you're not normal, that when the guy next door isn't working.
	You're resented.
	And you have to, you have to take less for your family.
	So he can take more for himself.
	Because he's spending the entire day, you know, reading the newspaper or doing something else.
	You become resentful.
	And then somebody has to, even that distribution of income, if you're not happy with it, tough luck, they shoot you.
	So they have to enforce it by, because socialism is by its very nature, gets rejected by human nature.
	It needs force to keep it together because a sensible person is going to revolt.
	A sensible, intelligent, hardworking person who wants to grow in life is not going to be able to grow.
	You're going to grow based on how the state tells you you can grow.
	And there are going to be so many people that are disagreeing with that because human beings are just human beings.
	You put them in positions of power and they become dictators.
	So now people are selected not based on merit.
	They're selected based on politics and kissing the backside and sex and sexual, all sorts of horrible things.
	I mean, as Madison said, if people were angels, we would need governments and governments with checks and balances.
	Well, there are no checks and balances in socialism.
	Socialism is, he's in charge, and he decides how much Rob gets, he decides how much you get, and that's it.
	And he decides what your children do, which is why they want to take your kids at two, which is why they're taking our kids at two.
	Well, we want to do a couple quick shoutouts, Mayor, and then maybe we'll get off for the evening.
	Hema says hello from Michigan, our friend Hema.
	Rachel is tuning in from Florida.
	Hello, Rachel.
	And then our friend Dee right here in New York.
	And that's just a few.
	We have hundreds, thousands of people tuning in.
	Wish we could say hi to everybody.
	We just can't.
	We can't.
	We want you all to make sure on Sunday You listen to Uncovering the Truth on wabcradio.com.
	Make sure over the weekend you check on X and you hit subscribe and you get both of the podcasts that we're going to do on both the Supreme Court decision and then on the report.
	And then we'll be back Monday on wabcradio.com.
	77 WABC at three, and we'll be here eight o'clock at night, except we won't be here.
	If things work out the way we think, we'll be in Florida.
	And we will discuss everything that's going on, plus a little Super Bowl conversation.
	Right, Ted?
	We're going to have a very... Yeah, of course.
	Yeah, we're going to talk Super Bowl.
	But of course, check out these specials.
	We have a couple of specials coming up very soon.
	You'll want to Uh, check out and stay tuned for it.
	Okay.
	Well, thank you very much.
	God bless the people of Israel.
	God bless the people of the United States.
	Good luck to both teams.
	Hope nobody gets injured.
	I hate that.
	I hate that when that happens because these guys are so vital and it's a shame when their careers get ruined like that.
	And let's hope that it's a nice Superbowl without any attacks on the United States.
	Notice we haven't mentioned the fact that the demented president won't be interviewed, but now you know why, right?
	The report makes it clear he can't remember when he was vice president.
	Imagine when he gets interviewed on the Super Bowl and he thinks it's the World Series or something.
	So enjoy the Super Bowl if you like football.
	Enjoy the advertisements if you like the advertisements.
	I don't particularly.
	Enjoy the halftime, which is... and enjoy the game, which is what it's really all about.
	God bless America.
	Great show.
	...is to bring to bear the principle of common sense and rational discussion to the issues of our day.
	America was created at a time of great turmoil, tremendous disagreements, anger, hatred, It was a book written in 1776 that guided much of the discipline of thinking that brought to us the discovery of our freedoms, of our God-given freedoms.
	It was Thomas Paine's Common Sense, written in 1776, one of the first American bestsellers, in which Thomas Paine explained, by rational principles, the reason why these small colonies felt the necessity to separate From the Kingdom of Great Britain and the King of England.
	He explained their inherent desire for liberty, for freedom, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, the ability to select the people who govern them.
	And he explained it in ways that were understandable to all the people, not just the elite.
	Because the desire for freedom is universal.
	The desire for freedom adheres in the human mind and it is part of the human soul.
	This is exactly the time we should consult our history.
	Look at what we've done in the past and see if we can't use it to help us now.
	We understand that our founders created the greatest country in the history of the world.
	The greatest democracy, the freest country.
	A country that has taken more people out of poverty than any country ever.
	All of us are so fortunate to be Americans.
	But a great deal of the reason for America's constant ability to self-improve is because we're able to reason.
	We're able to talk.
	We're able to analyze.
	We are able to apply our God-given common sense.

▲