All Episodes
Previous Next
April 23, 2022 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:09:53
20220423_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Hush, you vocal, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon.
For the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon Oh, then tell me, Sean O'Farrell, where the gathering is to be In the old spot by the river, right well known to you and me One word more for signal
Token whistle of the marching tune Warrior pike upon your shoulder By the rising of the moon By the rising of the moon By the rising of the moon With your pike upon your shoulder By the rising of the moon Greetings from the Northwest homeland, comrades.
Today is Saturday, April the 23rd.
I'm Douglas Morrison, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
I'm Douglas Morrison, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
With the anniversary of the massacre at the church in Waco by the federal government and the birthday of Adolf Hitler and your tax filing deadline behind us now, I thought it'd be a good time to talk about money.
It is with money that organized Jewry, some say Zionists, Not that there aren't a few loose ends to tie up,
a few nationalists to liquidate, and ongoing maintenance, of course.
Fundamentalist Muslims, Eastern European dissidents, and others outside the circle of power keep alive a few flickering flames of resistance.
But the rulers of all major countries are in bed with Zion.
If they resist, their countries are destroyed by the power of money, with embargoes, Hyperinflation of their currency and all the tricks of the real world rulers.
So what is this thing called money?
How did Zion use it to conquer the world?
Why are we consigned to a lifetime in pursuit of it, yet we never get ahead of the game?
Probably nothing is more important to our pursuit of freedom and our victory for the 14 words than understanding the money game played by international finance.
So let us back to a distant scenario, so far back in history that the exact date is but a guess.
When men begin to gather together in social structures, it was for safety and to improve the quality of life.
Once a community of sorts was formed, it often became advantageous to exchange the fruits of each other's labors.
Supposing a man were crippled during a hunt, but he could still manufacture spears for food acquired by others who could still hunt.
So trade was a practical and good solution.
However, as the communities grew and began to interrelate with other communities, We,
of course, have no idea what items were first used to facilitate trade, but eventually, for logical reasons, Gold and silver became the usual choice.
Since weighing gold and silver at each transaction was fraught with problems, such as accurate or universal scales, gold and silver were smelted into coins, which by government decree contained a specified amount of the metal, with a similarly specified purity.
So far, so good.
A method of exchange was created, and money is restricted, Unfortunately, however, there have always been those who placed greed and personal gain above the good of the folk, and corruption of an honest money system is perhaps the quickest and easiest way to power.
Probably inflation was the first scheme.
By reducing the purity of the gold or silver coins, the bankers or rulers could issue more coins while keeping the extra precious metal for themselves.
This is called coin clipping.
But this scheme pales into significance compared to the crime of usury.
Usury means charging interest on money.
It is still usury no matter if the interest is 5%, 20%, or 90%.
Ultimately, the only difference between 5% and 90% is how long until the usurer owns everything within a nation that allows this crime.
It is by usury that Zion conquered the world and by usury that they acquired the power to sentence the white race to death.
Quite rightfully, Ancient religious writings condemn the usurer to death.
Usury is slavery and man's murder by deception.
For the borrower spends a large portion of his few precious hours on this earth in service to the lender.
Let us consider the big picture.
Joe Sixpack, the typical honest working man, has been convinced by media propaganda that he should buy a house.
This is, of course, his first error because in a country with property taxes and eminent domain laws, one does not own anything.
One rents from the government, but that's another story.
So Joe Sixpack goes to the local lender and asks to borrow $500,000 for a house.
The lender checks around and discovers that Joe is a good little working drone, so he accepts to make the loan.
Joe signs a contract in which he agrees to pay roughly 10% interest, usury, amortized over a 30-year period.
What Joe does not consider is that the total payments over the 30-year period will add up to at least a million dollars.
Now, as pointed out earlier, money is a store of value.
In other words, the lender has just acquired In a country like America,
where virtually all commerce is conducted by credit, it is now obvious why and how the bankers of Zion acquired all wealth and all power.
But wait, cried the uninformed, doesn't the banker lend money deposited by other working folk, and don't they thus benefit from usury too?
While it is true that to some small extent the honest folk are induced in this manner to participate in this scheme, they receive only the crumbs, for they know nothing of the real deception called fractional reserve banking.
Simply stated, we have a small town with one bank.
100 of the townsfolk deposited $100 each at the bank at 5% interest.
That's $10,000 on the bank's books.
Now, old honest Joe six-pack decides to buy a new Ford pickup, and that costs, say, $10,000.
He goes to the bank, and again, after the credit check, He signs a contract in which he will pay the bank back $14,000.
Joe takes the check for $10,000 to the Ford dealership and gets his new pickup.
The Ford dealer that evening deposits the self-same check that he received from Joe Sixpack in the self-same bank in which it originated, so at the end of the day, not one cent has left the bank, but they are richer by $4,000 interest that Joe has promised to pay.
The next day, Joe's neighbor sees Joe's new pickup and decides he wants one.
He goes to the bank and he repeats the process and the bank gains another $4,000.
So we see that the original $10,000 deposited by the 100 honest folks is loaned out over and over and over until the bank is receiving interest on perhaps hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of loans with only $10,000 on deposit.
Unless the car dealers come in and demand cash for the bank's checks, the scheme just grows and grows.
And naturally, the bankers keep enough cash on hand to cover such a situation.
That money on hand is called their fractional reserve.
Of course, all bankers must cooperate in this scheme and honor each other's checks too.
And the government has enacted laws inhibiting cash withdrawals and providing an insurance vehicle This they must do in order that the scheme is not threatened by disclosure.
Until the 1960s, paper currency was silver or gold certificates redeemable for precious metal at any bank.
Today, paper currency is merely a banknote or evidence of debt.
In this manner, Money can be printed and issued in unlimited quantities without the amount of gold or silver to represent its standing value.
Since banks charge interest usury on each dollar issued, they could effectively receive 1,000% or 2,000% or more on the actual face value of the printed money without even having precious metals in their vaults.
This is the massive deception of fractional reserve banking.
For honest money to exist, the bankers must have within their vaults a sum of gold or silver equal to the paper currency issued.
Their vaults must be open to inspection by the folk, or their representatives at any time, and the penalty for debasement of the currency must be capital punishment.
The invention of paper currency opened the doors to unlimited bankster fraud.
Admittedly, paper currency can be beneficial.
Obviously, carrying around large amounts of silver or gold causes problems with both security and transport.
But unless every single unit of currency issued represents a specific amount of silver or gold of a specific purity held by the bank or government, Then the currency will be debased.
In other words, if a $20 bill represents one ounce of 99.9% pure gold redeemable at the bearer's demand, then the possibilities for mischief are minimized.
Once usury is in place within a nation, the banksters have unlimited funds.
Their next step is to protect their interest, obviously, which means, first and foremost, by the media.
So today we see CNN, HBO, Disney, the New York Times, the Washington Post, all the publishing companies, all the movie studios, and on and on, all under Jewish ownership.
With media control comes absolute power, for it controls the minds of the masses.
The media barons have complete control over politics, for they decide who will be the candidates, who will be portrayed favorably, who will be called extremists, and so on.
The politicians then appoint the judges, who even control where our children may go to school and with whom.
There are many facets to power systems, but behind all, there is always the awesome engine of money fueled by usury.
By usury, The Bankster tribe of Zion rules America at every administration, at every level of power.
Which brings up central banks, like the private corporation called the Federal Reserve.
All money in America is loaned into existence at usury, paid to the Federal Reserve, which is why America is in debt to the tune of trillions and trillions of dollars.
Zion gets their cut from every single dollar.
The Fed decides at what interest rate money should be loaned into existence, and that controls another great hoax called the stock market.
The so-called patriot movement has long been plagued with writers of investment newsletters who purport to know the secrets of the stock market.
They are hucksters, and they know it.
All that the Gentiles can do is squabble over the scraps.
The stock market rises when the Jewish head of the Fed drops the discount rates, i.e.
the rate at which our money is loaned, and the stock market drops when the Fed raises the rate.
Obviously, the billionaire Jews know ahead of time when to buy and sell and make profits in the hundreds of billions.
That's with a B. Anyone who thinks the Jews do not cooperate or that conspiracies do not last should read Isaiah 60.12.
For the nation and kingdom that will not serve thee shall perish, yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted.
Also read the story of Joseph and how the money failed in Genesis 47.14.
If the Israelites were persecuted in Egypt, Then how is it that Joseph controlled all the money of the nation?
It seems that the lies of the eternally persecuted ones are not that hard to expose.
The question begs to be asked, how then can our folks survive and prosper in the occupied once white nations?
The ultimate answer, of course, Is that long-term, we can neither survive nor prosper under the rule of Zion.
Short-term, however, we can minimize the damage by, first of all, staying out of debt.
Credit cards in particular, with interest rates averaging around 18% are to be avoided like the plague.
If you must borrow to purchase something, be sure it's an item that appreciates in value faster than the interest you would pay on the loan so that there is at least some kind of net gain.
In other words, if you could borrow money at 10% to purchase a property that will double in value in five years, adjusted for inflation and taxes, it might be wise.
However, such speculation always has risks.
Barter is the real bane of the bankster gangsters and their stooges in government.
Learn to barter wisely and bypass the usury system.
And, of course, trade only with racial kinfolk whenever possible.
Lastly, and it should go without saying, that usury between kinfolk is forbidden.
No exceptions.
When we have our own folkish nation, there will be no such thing as usury.
Remember, The first, most profound revolutionary action you can take is to drop out of their system.
David Lane There's
a lot of talk about hate crimes.
There's an entire body of laws against hate crimes.
Everybody seems to be worried about hate.
Hate appears to be the gravest problem of our time.
But hate is good.
Hate gives a structure to our life.
Hate gives us a reason to exist, a focus, something to strive for, an identity.
Hate is energy, pure energy, provided by Mother Nature herself.
Hate enables us to see through lies and pretense, and helps us to concentrate on the essential.
Hate is democratic.
Even the rich and the powerful cannot hate more than their slaves and subjects.
And soon, hate may well be all that we have left.
Hate emancipates.
Without hate for slavery, you cannot break your shackles.
And without hate for injustice, there can be no justice.
The greatest achievements of the human race have grown from hate.
And from the ability to control hate.
Hate separates humans from animals.
Animals do not hate, but humans do.
Humans can hate for decades, sometimes their entire life.
We can even pass hate on to our children and keep hate alive for centuries.
Hate is a sign of abstract intellect, for only humans can hate people they have never seen or met, and only humans can hate concepts and processes.
How can we know what love is?
If we refuse to recognize and understand hate.
Love and hate are the two opposite sides of the same coin.
Without hate, we are only halflings.
In order to be complete, we need hate.
Only fools talk endlessly about love, but forget the hate.
Hate separates us from the meek and docile masses.
Do not fear hate.
Do not deny or reject hate.
Accept hate.
Embrace hate.
Learn to know it and learn to use it.
Hate is your most powerful weapon, a hidden source of your strength.
Do not deny it from you.
What the liberal elite fears most in this world is our ability to hate, because our hate will one day be the most revolutionary force on the planet.
our hate will destroy and create empires.
Music by Ben Thede
Good evening, comrades.
Tonight I'm going to be discussing Always the Horizon by the Murdoch Murdoch group.
Now this is a short poetic book that's written in a very Nietzschean style.
It is written about the seeker who is the protagonist.
Now the seeker is concerned with the tree, not the limbs.
So therefore he will sacrifice the colonies if necessary.
He is an iconoclast of modernity and wears the cloak of the rune.
He has Darwin's book in his pocket.
He says that the rune is too heavy for the Germans to carry alone, and therefore he must help them to carry it.
The seeker, who is apparently American, will also wear the American colors on his wrist as a fond token, but he does not wear the yellow flag was a snake.
As it is a burden he does not want to carry.
He says that notions of individuality and autocracy can be discussed later.
Someone asked the seeker if the rune itself might be roleplay.
And the seeker states, If the rune is roleplay, then so be it.
It will not be the first time in history the roleplay has been done.
And the seeker says what of the appropriation of Greco-Roman architecture when the American colonists built Washington?
The seeker is asked why was 1945 allowed to happen?
And the seeker says that 1945 happened in order to teach all of the West the new dispensation.
By bringing everyone in the West under Weimar standards so we might see that decadence for ourselves.
The author speaks of the polarity between asceticism and hedonism and declares that both are problematic and unnatural.
So the seeker wants to restore The balance between these two concepts.
Most of all, the seeker wants to return to the path of knowing from the deter of nihilism.
In the end, the seeker ends nihilism, but is almost destroyed in the process of following such a hard but rewarding path.
Now, clearly, even though the style of this writing is highly Nietzschean, it is, of course, a contemporary book.
And in that sense, it is far more to the point.
Now, of course, reading this book will be easier if you've seen especially Guardian of the Rune.
Also such cartoons as The Last Stand of Implicit Whiteness and The Last Son of the West.
And I would also say that Galaxy 88 is one of their better cartoons, along with Why We Fight.
Now, the author also discusses the question of the parameters of whiteness.
And after much overthinking, decides that he knows it when he sees it.
Although this book really does not take very long to read, it does say a great deal, and like many other people, I did enjoy the Murdoch cartoons.
I've been disappointed that they have not come up with anything new since September of 2020.
Nevertheless, the content they did make says quite a bit, and I would say that it has a value because it does reach out to the youth.
And I would honestly say that it's one of the better cartoon elements that are out there, at least in terms of my taste at any rate.
So I thank you for listening.
Have a good evening and hail victory comrades.
The End This next song is The Wayfaring Stranger.
It's an American folk song likely originating in the early 19th century about a plaintiff soul on his journey through life.
As with most folk songs, there's a lot of variations of the lyrics, and many versions of this song have been published over time by popular singers, often being linked to times of hardship or notable experiences in the singers' lives.
According to the book The Makers of the Sacred Harp by David Warren Steele and Richard Hoolan, the lyrics were published in 1858 in Joseph Beaver's Christian Songster, which was a collection of popular hymns and spiritual songs at that time.
This may or may not have been the first time the song appeared in English print, and the songwriter is unknown.
During and for several years after the American Civil War, the lyrics were known as the Libby Prison Hymn.
This was because the words had been inscribed by a dying Union soldier incarcerated in Libby Prison, a warehouse converted to a notorious Confederate prison in Richmond, Virginia, and it was known for its adverse conditions and high death rate.
It had been believed that the dying soldier had authored the song to comfort a disabled soldier, But this was not the case since it had been published several years before the Civil War in 1858, before Libby Prison was put into service.
Members of the Western Writers of America chose this song as one of the top 100 Western songs of all time.
This is Jack White singing Wayfaring Stranger.
I am a poor wayfaring stranger Traveling through this world below There is no
sickness, toil, nor danger In that fair land to which I go I'm going home to see I'm going home.
No more to roam.
I am just going over Jordan.
I am just going over all.
I know my pathway is rough and steep But golden fields lie out before me Where weary eyes no more will breathe I'm going Just
going over Jordan I am just going over all I
am just
I'll soon be free from every trial this form shall rest beneath the sun I'll drop the cross of self denial and enter in land home with
God I'm going home to see my Savior I'm going home no more to roam I am just going home Jordan I am just
Going over all.
Going over all.
Not for nothing is economics called the dismal science.
It's not only a complex subject, but usually pretty boring.
Please bear with me.
I'll try to keep this as simple and interesting as I can.
First off, you need to understand that although Karl Marx was full of sheep dip, he did recognize and articulate certain correct and vitally important things about the nature of capitalism.
Capitalism is utterly dependent on the exploitation of human beings for their labor, and in order to function, must reinvent man as a commodity, an economic unit of production and consumption.
This dehumanizing concept has proven one of the most destructive aspects of the Jewish incursion into Western civilization.
Money was first invented as a substitute for barter, and for millennia consisted only of gold, silver, and occasionally copper or bronze coinage.
Eventually, as trade expanded, it became too cumbersome and dangerous to go on a trading expedition lugging long mule trains loaded with gold coin.
And so, with the establishment of the first medieval banks, the first paper bank draft was invented, allowing a merchant in London to travel to Paris carrying only a document instead of heavy bags of money so tempting to bandits.
He did his business, he deposited his profits in the parish branch of the Bardi or whoever, and then he drew them out again from the London branch when he got home.
This was the first paper money, and it was specific like a check made out to only one person.
Secondly, capitalism is dependent for the generation of capital not only on profit, but on the highly cost-effective form of profit known as usury, the collection of interest on loaned money.
Long recognized as the ultimate tool of Jewish power, Usury was forbidden for centuries to Christians, which used to be pretty much the same thing as saying Aryans, by the church.
Only Jews were allowed to practice it, and any Aryan found charging interest was subject to a variety of penalties, ranging from fines to the public removal of bits and pieces of the offender's anatomy.
Modern-day banks would have you believe that the economy is entirely dependent on the charging of interest, but that's bullshit.
The generation of non-production-related profit through interest is actually a fairly recent development in man's economic history.
So, how did the economy work in the days before usury?
We need to pay at least some attention to the dismal science of economics from our point of view.
The nature of usury is a good place to start.
Before we can understand the National Socialist solution for the economic woes of capitalist society, We must first understand the way our present form of usury-generated finance capitalism arose in the Middle Ages and the early Renaissance period.
A good case study would be the rise and fall of the great Lombard banking houses of Italy during the Middle Ages.
Okay, let's say we're in Venice, a great trading city about the year of 1396 or so.
Usury is forbidden to everyone except the Jews, and their interest rates are as high as 50%, so no one but a drunk or a madman deals with them.
They exist on interest mostly off the very poor as pawnbrokers, and the church has even established a series of interest-free co-op religious pawnshops to try and protect the poor from the bloodsuckers.
But if you're a merchant, you still have to finance your ventures.
So, how do you do it?
Now, let's say you want to send a ship to Constantinople full of Italian goodies, cloth and worked metal goods and glassware, wool, so forth and so on.
You want to bring back the same ship, full of Oriental goodies like spices, mahogany, Turkish rugs, etc.
We'll assign an arbitrary cost to this venture of 10,000 gold florins.
You believe that the profit from the sale of your goods in Constantinople and the resale of their goods in Venice will yield 20,000 florins, which, for the sake of argument, we'll accept as accurate.
Where do you get the money?
You can put up the entire 10 grand yourself, if you're filthy rich, and many of the wealthiest merchant adventurers do, as well as putting up their lives.
For many of these guys are not just businessmen, they're sea captains and explorers, and occasional pirates.
And they command their own vessels.
They can opt to take all the risk, including the risk of the ship sinking or getting captured by pirates, and take all the profit.
Or they can look for investors to share the risk.
Now, since our hypothetical merchant is a good Christian who doesn't want to deal with hebes and a good businessman who doesn't want to pay half his profit literally to a Shylock, he goes to one or more of the great lumbered banking houses, the Bardi, the Patsy, the Stratzy, the Albizzi, or the up-and-coming new kids on the block, the Medici.
These banks are centered mostly in Florence or Siena, but they have branches all over Europe in the days when the first Rothschilds were still haggling with peasants over the pawn of their wooden shoes for a few fennig.
Our merchant adventurer goes to the banks, most likely several of them, because they will be more likely to back him if their individual exposure is less.
He explains his venture, shows them the ship so they know it's a stout seaworthy vessel, and lets them know that he'll be captaining the voyage himself.
And points out that he's got a good track record of a dozen prosperous expeditions prior to this.
He looks good to the Lombards, and so they lend him the dough.
The total outlay for this project is ten grand in gold florins.
The merchant himself will put up four thousand florins, or forty percent.
The Bardi, the Stratzi, and the Medici banks will put up two thousand each.
They know that they will have to wait one year for the ship's return to find out how they did.
This is the origin of the old expression when my ship comes in.
If everything goes according to plan, the venture will bring 20,000 gold florins, thus recouping everyone's initial investment and leaving 10 grand profit.
The merchant will take 4 grand of the surplus and the three banks 2 grand each, 100% return on their investment.
Good business.
And something comes of it when those who can afford it get a nice Persian rug or some pepper to put in Aunt Maria's lasagna, which in the days before refrigeration disguises the taste of the half-putrefied sausage that she uses in her recipe.
Of course, it was all a lot more complicated than that.
For instance, in many cases, the ship's captain, if he was not the owner, would have a substantial share, and the crew would have to be paid not only a minimum wage, but a small share each as well.
Plus, there was taxes and overhead just like today.
But you get the idea.
A rich merchant might send out ten ships a year under this system.
Three are lost, but seven of them return, leaving an overall profit and Venetian society wealthier thereby.
Now, do you know the difference between this system and Jewish usury?
The Lombard banking system was based on productivity for profit, whereas the Jewish usury system is a shell game where money multiplies by itself without relation to anything in the real world.
Money was to be earned by buying actual things of value low and selling high, by making something or building something or undertaking risks to obtain something material and tangible.
In this example, the objective was the importation of X amount of real consumer goods, not the manipulation of numbers on a piece of paper as in today's stock exchange, for example, or the commodities market, where there is only the most tenuous connection, if any.
Between the arbitrary value of the paper and any real or valuable object or commodity.
If the voyage didn't succeed, the investors were out their money, and this risk element led to a high degree of caution, canniness, and ability to assess risk, as well as encourage daring an enterprise for higher profits.
The merchant princes of Renaissance Italy may have had a taste for a luxurious living, intriguing, and poisoning one another, but they never threw money away, like present-day governments and multinationals.
They had worked and sweated and bled and killed to get it.
Another variation on this system was public works, for example the bridges over the River Arno in Florence, many of which were built by the bankers who were then allowed to collect tolls until they had recovered the expense of construction and a set profit, after which the bridges became free.
There are endless variations.
Money was lent for agriculture to build a factory or a workshop.
To build a road, whatever, but always something you could touch, feel, taste, use, or consume.
Money did not magically produce money out of nothing as it does with usury.
So, when did usury get its first foothold in the Western economy?
Basically, when the Aryan ruling elite of that time, like their counterparts of the 20th century, lost sight of their principles in the scramble for wealth and started acting like Jews.
Unfortunately, the first big capitalist usurers in modern history were these same Lombard bankers in their early stages.
The Jews then slid in on the coattails of the true claim that everybody's doing it, and within a short time, they were running the whole game.
From the point of view of the lender, usury has one advantage over the productivity or venture-based system.
It eliminates risk for the lender, anyway.
But it increases risk manyfold for the borrower, who not only puts his business and his own capital on the line, but sometimes everything he possesses.
The borrower signs a bond or contract, borrowing 10,000 florins and promising to pay back 15 come what may.
And as collateral, he gives the lender the right to seize certain property if he's unable to pay by the stated date.
The Lombard banking system was essentially a tool for the production of new wealth, while usury is a system for transferring existing wealth into a smaller number of hands, usually Jewish.
Essentially, two things happened.
First, a lot of the lumbered banks crashed down through the years when they inevitably made too many bad decisions, creating fewer and bigger banks handling more money led by more unscrupulous men as the Renaissance advanced.
That's starting to sound familiar here?
By the way, late Renaissance bankers and financial tycoons were often converted Jews, many of whom continued to practice Judaism in secret and openly favored their own people at the expense of their host nations.
Additionally, the church became corrupt and quit enforcing the anti-usury statutes, and the secular princes and dukes and whatnot got into debt to the banks and overlooked the fact that they had begun to charge interest just like the Jews.
Eventually, the Lombard and later Jewish banks began to issue what today we would call negotiable securities or debentures.
Bank drafts for X amount of money with no name on them, which could be used as legal tender to buy, sell, pay, and lend.
The practice of individual banks issuing their own paper money continued up until the beginning of the 20th century.
You can see all kinds of examples in museums.
In the flourishing and expanding economy of a dynamic young America, private banks, states, cities, and even railroads issued their own paper money.
But these paper notes or bills were always gold or sometimes silver certificates.
That is, if you had a $10 bill from the First National Bank of Philadelphia and you took it to that bank, you had the right to get a $10 gold piece for it.
Paper money was originally intended as a convenience, not as a substitute for precious metals.
Now, redeemability in gold or silver had one big advantage.
It kept the money supply under control and pretty much eliminated the curse of inflation and insane interest rates.
Almost all the inflationary spirals in the past, aside from the odd catastrophe like the Black Death, have had to do with the uncontrolled issue of paper money, i.e.
the Continental Congress period.
My grandfather, for example, used to use the expression, not worth a continental.
Confederate money, the Weimar period in Germany, etc.
Now, in 1913, this country did something so stupid that it defies rational analysis even today.
We handed control of our money over to the Jews in the form of a private corporation, the Federal Reserve.
Every head and important official of which from 1913 to this day has been Jewish.
There is no such thing as U.S. currency, only Federal Reserve currency, which is by law the only authorized form of legal tender.
It took the Jews 20 years to take us off the gold standard and free themselves of the obligation to back up their green paper with gold or silver.
But when Roosevelt got in, they managed it, and from 1934 onward, the Jews have literally had a license to print money hand over fist.
Usury crept into our economy in stages, and it was still frowned upon even as late as the 19th century.
For example, a character in a Sherlock Holmes story, a ruined gambling nobleman who has mortgaged everything he owns and is about to lose it all, is referred to as being, quote-unquote, in the hands of the Jews, by author Arthur Conan Doyle, an expression one could still get away with using as late as the 1890s.
Now, of course, we've got credit cards operating out of states like South Dakota, with no banking laws to speak of, who charge 24% revolving interest.
It's actually cheaper to borrow money from the mob.
Organized crime's traditional vigorous or interest rate being 6 for 5 or about 18%.
The more paper money there is in circulation, the higher interest rates are charged, and the more impossible it becomes for young white married people to buy a home.
It's all very complicated, and I don't understand all the ins and outs of it myself, but basically the cause of inflation and the insanely high cost of everything today is due to the Federal Reserve System using our money as a means to enrich world Jewry and loot the gold in the Medina.
which in Yiddish means the golden honeycomb.
It's their word for America.
Another question I've been asked is about various times when I have advocated a return to the gold standard.
As most topics dealing with money seem to do, this also gets into the Jewish situation.
As the French say.
Now, I have, in my novels, advocated a return to the gold standard as a temporary measure to get the money supply under control, reverse the wage-price spiral and get the cost of living under control as well, and to see if we can't slash the incredibly inflated cost of real property to the point where young couples can actually buy a home large enough to raise children in, not some cracker box condo or ranting until they're 40. What I would eventually like to see...
Ah, well, that's for another time.
I don't want to be hostile.
I don't want to be dismal.
And I know I know who I think.
I'm not the Benedictine systems.
I still want to be in you.
I don't want to do what you're asking.
I don't want to have you take me.
You're going to wave the dagger.
But you lie, you lie, you lie.
You lie, you lie.
You lie, you lie.
And I talk to you.
You lie, you lie.
I don't care.
guitar solo
On the virtue of intolerance.
As the world has so profoundly shifted to a focus on economics and the markets, and the merchant class has ascended to total power across much of the West, especially with regard to media, popular culture, and the shaping of norms and opinions, and the general zeitgeist, many of our virtues and morals of past ages have been slowly but surely inverted in the process.
And I'd like to discuss one of the most important of these, an inversion which I believe has helped make all of the others possible, namely the new cult of tolerance.
Tolerance essentially means putting up with something one considers negative, or in some sense unhealthy or destructive.
Intolerance is the instinct to keep these negative forces at bay.
In stronger and healthier ages, this instinct was one of those that set Western nations apart.
Especially as it applied to ourselves, and even more so on an individual level.
Throughout history, our culture taught us that it was good to be intolerant of our vices or weaknesses or our lack of discipline or crude or ignoble behavior.
It was this excess of intolerance that helped us lay the groundwork for the conception of chivalric knighthood and helped foster the greatest and most courageous warriors.
And helped cultivate the most wise and magnanimous and effective leaders.
We learned to have our guard up against forces of weakness and degeneration, and all deeply poisonous influences, both as individuals and as groups or communities.
We understood that it was this vigilance, and it alone, that acted as the city walls, to use an analogy, keeping chaos at arm's length.
Historical examples were fresh in our minds back then, showing clearly what happens when we become lazy or short-sighted or forgetful.
Corruption and degeneracy are always at the door, just waiting for the smallest opening to slither through and infect all they touch, with radiating ripple effects that often travel far and wide.
Post-World War II, as the West began to fall into the hands of the most disreputable sort of hucksters, Undermining the strength and solidity and confidence and health of nations seem to become a foremost priority of these ambitious men.
And in fact, a few of the leading thinkers on this ideological side of the fence even admitted as much in their less careful and guarded moments.
After all, to move towards the global community these new power brokers sought to lead, all allegiance to family, culture, or nation had to be destroyed utterly.
and replaced with a new allegiance to what might aptly be called a new religious conception.
The tenets of this new religion were, coincidentally enough, those that best facilitated these future goals.
Diversity somehow was going to propel nations forward, and border security was now somehow a negative.
Our traditional conception of family with a two-parent household And children growing up with a strong male and strong female influence was now backward.
And in fact, having children at all, this greatest and healthiest and most life-affirming act of creation, some might say the purpose of existence itself, was bad and selfish, especially if you should happen to be of Western lineage.
And finally, seeking to keep the most negative and destructive forces away from yourself, or your children, or your nation, That brand of intolerance that has been a leading cause of, and one might argue a prerequisite for, greatness throughout human history, was cast as the greatest evil, and its opposite, the unconditional embrace of what we consider unhealthy, was raised on a pedestal, as a new sacred cow to worship and revere.
Few happenings are more purely and perfectly indicative of the madness we're grappling with in our times.
And how has this occurred?
How have we been made to shift nearly 180 degrees in just a few short decades?
How have otherwise reasonable and intelligent people been goaded and prodded into sprinting headlong, eagerly and enthusiastically, into their own destruction?
The key word I used a moment ago was religion.
I feel it's important to understand what Friedrich Nietzsche so presciently tried to warn us about at the turn of this century.
In the minds of hundreds of millions, especially throughout the West, God is dead.
Our traditional religious conceptions have been destroyed, and what remains is often so twisted, mangled, and subverted as to be unrecognizable to the point of being blasphemous.
It's my contention that those leading the charge to turn our planet into a one-world shopping mall presided over by an insatiable merchant class Have expertly both caused and taken advantage of the rising tide of atheism, and the general disdain for belief in any higher power, because they understand human nature.
And they understand this God-shaped hole, as it's been described in the past, must be filled with something.
Thus our social justice warrior heroes and prophets of a new age, the LGBTQ movement, our Greta Thunbergs, This is their replacement set of morals and virtues and standards, crafted for the mass mind by the hidden hands behind the scenes.
And tolerance, or rather their absurdly narrow and selective definition of the concept, is at the core of this new religious doctrine.
This push has been successful due to an incredible coup with regards to language and thought pollution.
Namely, the pairing of the term or conception of intolerance with hatred or ignorance or a mean-spiritedness or some combination of the three.
As if it simply wasn't possible to have one's guard up against threats to our health without negativity being the fuel and motive force.
I can't help but think anyone looking down at us from a prior age would be completely baffled by these ideas.
If presented with the choice of standing tall, and often at great cost, against all that might weaken their nation and make the lives of their children fundamentally worse, or making a public show of allying with these forces, like Pharisees loudly praying in the streets, and asking them which was the more truly selfless or noble or compassionate path, it's difficult to imagine anyone picking the latter.
The latter would likely appear to them transparently self-serving, a Judas-like betrayal in exchange for the modern incentivization mechanisms that act as our pieces of silver.
It's difficult to overstate the importance of our approach to the tolerance and intolerance dynamic, or the importance of exactly what we understand these words to mean.
Prior ages seem to have intuitively understood that we all naturally consult cultural and societal norms to guide our behavior to some degree, and that this is especially true for children.
And that it's only our intolerance towards the most destructive or aberrant or unhealthy behavior that keeps us all, as a group or nation, from backsliding.
Our ancient conceptions of shunning or even banishment for the most extreme offenses were considered tough but fair, and in fact they were seen as the highest form of compassion.
A word we've since allowed to be perverted into the most short-sighted caricature of itself.
This ancient compassion was for the entire generation of children being shaped and molded, and towards those still to come.
Whereas our modern understanding of compassion seems to be more akin to an immediate granting of desires towards anyone seeking an upgrade in life conditions, regardless of costs to others.
This isn't true compassion, and in fact it's suicidal.
Inevitably.
It's not seeking long-term, stable and lasting solutions to profound problems.
It's giving away our children's inheritance to allow far less than 0.1% of the world's poorest to have a new address that they call home and a few additional creature comforts.
Our nations are becoming glorified hotels, which seem to exist in the minds of many for the purpose of offering a greater number of amenities to guests.
And what's more, We have no proof that this mere economic improvement produces a genuine improvement in their lives at a fundamental level.
Money, comfort, and convenience can so easily lead to scores of negative and direct side effects.
How is it, then, that so many have come to see it as something of a cure-all?
The self-proclaimed elite like to paint the picture of our open borders being something of a means of saving the world from poverty.
Not only is this absurd, but any one of these billionaires who champion these ideas, like Soros or the Koch brothers, could quite literally eradicate world poverty in a matter of a year or two using their own funds, if it meant more to them than hoarding their own personal wealth.
And immigration is just one example of many.
Children everywhere are now schooled in every variety of abnormal sexual behavior and taught that it's normal, healthy, even progressive or heroic.
and encouraged to make the most extreme and permanent life-altering decisions accordingly, placing those convinced to transition their gender in a demographic bracket with a suicide rate nearing 50%.
Crime is rising, streets are filthier, popular culture is becoming almost entirely filth, in short, our standards of behavior and human decency have been completely compromised, and this descent into something of a new Sodom and Gomorrah is hailed as progress.
I believe a key to untangling this mess is our embracing something of a compassionate intolerance and a recognition that these two conceptions aren't at all contradictory, a kindly and thoughtful and forward-looking intolerance, and destroying that ridiculous idea that being on guard against vice, weakness, degenerate or unhealthy influences is equivalent to hatred or must spring from a negative place.
It's often the exact opposite.
To use an example, if you truly love a drug addict, you don't enable his behavior until he dies a miserable death.
You seek to find him treatment to get him back on his feet, as much for his sake as for the sake of everyone around him.
Amen.
Most of us have heard the popular cliche, if you can't help yourself, you can't help others.
This holds equally true for communities and nations.
If we allow the Western world to become the Third World, This is one of the many reasons the libertarian mindset can be so upsetting.
The mentality of, don't worry, they're only dumping the poison into their end of the pool, is both selfish and absurd, because no man is an island unto himself.
So again, I'd like to see us someday extricate the conception of intolerance from the petty and hateful and ignorant caricature that's been so masterfully painted.
A noble brand of intolerance was what created great nations and societies and individuals and helped them retain their greatness.
Making a virtue of its opposite is a death sentence and serves only a handful of the worst type of human beings.
Lowering our standards and embracing ugliness, degeneracy, and corruption is no virtue.
A fatherly brand of intolerance, from a root of love and a desire to strengthen and improve, is what is needed, now more than ever.
Thanks for listening.
This is the end.
Beautiful friend This is the end Alright,
well that's about all the time we have this week.
Radio Free Northwest is brought to you by the Northwest Front.
You can reach the party on our website at northwestfront.info If you have any questions or comments that you'd like to have addressed on air, feel free to drop us an email at radiofreenorthwest at protonmail.com We'll talk to you again next week.
▲
Export Selection