May 1, 2022 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
59:55
20220501_rfn
|
Time
Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Hush, awokel, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon.
For the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be?
In the old spot by the river, right well known to you and me.
One word more for signal, token whistle of the marching tune For your bike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon With your bike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon Greetings from the Northwest homeland, comrades.
Today is Sunday, May 1st, 2022.
I'm Jimmy, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
The Valley's like the man, she's lonely croon, and a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon.
At the rising of the moon, at the rising of the moon, and a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon.
Since January of this year, there have been around a dozen mysterious fires that have destroyed food-related facilities, two of which were in the homeland.
And many of these facilities were on the West Coast.
As Harold would always say, crystal ball gazing is tenuous at best.
But I'm starting to solidify on a position that those that rule us are intending to create a Holodomer 2.0, Here in North America.
Between the forced killings of huge numbers of chicken because of avian bird flu, the rail carriers refusing to carry grains or fertilizers, and the burning down of many food processing, packing, and headquarter facilities, this coming fall and winter is starting to look like a time of massive food shortages.
Start growing food in your backyard.
Start learning to can foods.
Start stocking up on shelf stable supplies.
But more than anything, get to know your white neighbors.
They may not be racial, but they are still your kin by blood.
And the closer you are to a city, the more important having a network that you can lean on, of your own blood, is going to be.
Whether they realize that's what they are or not.
And even if I'm wrong, and we don't experience major food shortages this winter, no one who follows this advice is going to be upset that they did so.
These are skills we need to recover and remove the urban corruption that has removed us from the land and how to survive by our own might and will, and not by the merchant class.
Now ladies and gentlemen, the first document that I'm going to show you is the one that shocked me perhaps the most.
Here is a document which I couldn't possibly believe was on the level myself when I found it in the Library of Congress.
That's where I got it.
Here is the photostat of it right here in the form that you get it from us.
This is one of the pamphlets with all the photostatic documents.
This one is a full-page article from the London.
You can cite it yourself and get it from your own library if you don't want to send to me for it.
Here's the citation.
London Illustrated Sunday Herald, February 8, 1920.
At the time of the Russian Revolution, right after it, page 5. Here is the full page available to you so you can see it all.
Now, I can't read it all.
I haven't got time.
I'm going to take some selected portions.
I'm going to first give you the title and what it's about.
The title is Zionism vs.
Bolshevism, A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People.
And the author, ladies and gentlemen, is a man that there is no person in this audience can say is a bigot or a fascist or a Nazi.
The author is the Right Honorable Winston S. Churchill.
And in case somebody would say it's the Churchill who runs the garage, another Churchill that runs a garage down on 3rd Street, here's his picture.
And you can judge whether it's the right Churchill or not.
In this article, he says the Jewish people are dividing up into two groups.
One group, he says, is for Zionism, and they want to take Palestine away from the Arabs, who's had it for 2,000 years, and he thinks that's great.
This is what Winston Churchill believed, and he says Zionism is good, and these are religious Jews, and we should give them Palestine.
Well, so much for that.
That's what he says up to here.
But he says the other half of world Jewry is going another way.
Here he talks about international Jews, and I would like to read you.
Not George Wallace or Adolf Hitler or George Lincoln Rockwell.
I would now like to read you the words of Winston Churchill on the Russian Revolution, ladies and gentlemen.
Please listen carefully and see if you are not as shocked as I was because you have never heard this sort of information.
I never did.
In violent opposition to all this Zionist sphere of Jewish effort, rise the schemes of the international Jews.
The adherents of this sinister confederacy And parenthetically, surely you all know the Jews were persecuted in Russia.
He says, And this is Churchill's definition of communism, and I think it's pretty good.
This worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality has been steadily growing.
Now, remember, he's talking about the international Jews.
Now, listen to this.
Here's the shocker.
It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century.
And now, at last, this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America, not Russia, this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.
Here was Winston Churchill indicating to me that All of these people he named from Marx to Rosa Luxemburg, Belakun, were Jewish, and he says the Jewish Confederacy all over the world have seized the Russian people by the hair of their heads and become the masters of the Russian Empire.
In other words, he says the Russian Revolution was not Russian.
It was the capture of Russia by Jews who had been persecuted, rose up, and took the country away.
That's what he says right here in the article.
Anybody who says, oh, send for it, read the whole article.
I've got a few more paragraphs I'd like to read you.
He says there is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and, for the most part, atheistical Jews.
It is a very great one and probably outweighs all others.
With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures of the Russian Revolution are Jews.
Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders.
Thus, Checherin...
A pure Russian, now listen to this carefully, because this is the system they use in the United States, this is the system they're using all over the world right now.
When people say, why, there's no Jews running communism now, listen to what Churchill says.
Thus, Cheturin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate, Litvinov.
And the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunikarski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky or Zinoviev.
In other words, he says, at the top level, they have a Gentile who is a front.
And right under him, they have the Jewish leader who is the real driving power.
That's not Rockwell speaking.
That's what Churchill says in this article.
Remember the two names he says?
The two guys that are the real driving power?
Litvinoff and Trotsky.
That's what he says in Article 1. Now I'm going to show you another document, this time from the Jews.
Not from Mr. Churchill, but from the Jews themselves.
And I can't tell you how shocked I was when I began to follow this up.
I started checking on Mr. Trotsky and on Mr. Litvinoff to see who are these guys.
So there's a book put out by the Jews called Who's Who in World Jewry?
I'm sorry, Who's Who in American Jewry?
That's the title, Who's Who in American Jewry?
I have here a reduction of the title page, Who's Who in American Jewry?
Now, remember, haven't you folks always been told, and didn't you believe as I did until I was over 30 years old, I thought Jews were just a religious group.
If you are a Jew, you believe in Judaism.
If you abandon Judaism and deny it and become an atheist, a fanatical atheist, and attack religion, you certainly couldn't be a Jew if Jews are just a religious group, could you?
This is what the Jews told me.
They said there can't be no such thing as a communist Jew because Jews are a religious group, and if you become a communist, you're no longer Jew.
That's what the ADL says, and I believed it.
So the Jews put out a book called Who's Who in American Jewry, and who do they list?
Who is this picture right here?
But Leon Trotsky, and we find out his name is Bronstein, and he was a Jewish tailor from the Lower East Side of New York before he went over there to Russia to run the revolution.
There's one of them.
Remember the other guy?
We said Litvinov.
Imagine how shocked I was to discover it.
Litvinov, that sounds like a good old Russian name, doesn't it?
Well, it turns out that he's one of the tribe.
His name is Finkelstein.
Here he is, put out.
Now listen, this isn't stuff from me.
This is stuff from the Jews, published by the Jews as a directory of great Jews, American Jews, and they listed two leaders of Russia as American Jews.
Doesn't that surprise you?
It did me.
Now the next one, the next one, ladies and gentlemen, here's another one.
You may say, well, that was quite a while back, because that thing was published in 1938, 1939.
Here's one that just came out two years ago.
It cost me 35 bucks to get it, but boy, was it worth it.
It's called Who's Who in World Jewry?
Now, this is the real authoritative list of the real top Hebrews.
Let me give you the list, ladies and gentlemen, of the Jewish organizations.
I can't read them all.
I'll pick a few out.
There's about 100 organizations listed here as the sponsors of this authoritative list that says of the great and biographic dictionary of outstanding and noble Jews of the world.
Let me give you some of the people, the American Jewish Congress, the American Jewish Committee, the American Jewish Historical Society, Anti-Defamation League, B 'nai B 'rith, B 'nai B 'rith, the Hillel Foundation.
I bet you got one right here.
Ask them.
Canadian Jewish Congress, Central Conference of American Rabbis, Jewish Theological Seminary, and there's about a hundred of them here.
They say this is an authoritative book, a list of Jews.
On page 29, ladies and gentlemen, what do we find in the authoritative list of Jews?
Herbert Aptheker, the chief theoretician of the Communist Party, his daughter Bettina runs the riots on the hour and the half hour out there at Berkeley.
Here, ladies and gentlemen, is the proof from their own pages, from the Jews themselves, that they consider a communist, atheist Jew as one of the tribe, as one of the boys, even though he's attacking religion.
I didn't put him in there.
Can you imagine a book called A Directory of Great Christians?
Listing George Lincoln Rockwell as one of us?
Or Adolf Hitler?
Not yet, not for a while.
You will see the day that that will be in, but right now everybody's too scared.
People are scared of these Jews, so they don't do it.
But the day is going to come when we'll list our good boys in there, too.
Now, before I go on from this subject of communism and Jews, I want to show you another document here.
Here is a document, these little ribbons.
I've left this ribbon outside of the glassine cover so you can see what it is.
This one is a document obtained from the U.S. archivist, Wayne C. Grover, signed, sealed by the United States.
To fake this up would be forgery.
It would be a prison offense.
Here is an intelligence report by your G2, by your intelligence people, right after the Russian Revolution, to the American government.
And to the War Department and the President as to the nature of the Russian Revolution.
Remember, this is one of the documents you can get from me and study for yourself and see whether I'm misquoting it or whether it's misrepresenting.
I would like to read one section here where it says the composition of the first Russian government, the commissars and the first Soviet.
Here is what it shows, the intelligence report shows it was made up of.
This is the government of Russia right after the Revolution.
It was made up of two Negroes.
13 Russians, 15 Chinamen, 22 Armenians, and more than 300 Jews!
Does that sound like a Russian government to you?
Now, in case that isn't clear enough for you, this guy who was at the time, this has been declassified, but when he wrote this, this was a classified document, so the guy let himself go a little bit.
Listen to what he says.
He says, it is probably unwise to say this loudly in the United States.
But the Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type.
Now, can you possibly have any doubt what the guy is saying, what he means, that this is the Russian Revolution, wasn't Russian, it was Jewish?
But to tell you that, to tell you that, ladies and gentlemen, I've got to face violence and force and all sorts of insults and derogation in order to tell you, even if it's wrong, Don't you think the right way to deal with this thing is in the form of a formal debate?
Don't you think there ought to be a confrontation?
If I'm wrong, don't you think the Anti-Defamation League or the Hillel Foundation should supply an expert so that he and I could stand before you and we both present our sides and you judge?
They won't do it.
They never have done it.
They keep saying we won't degrade ourselves with arguing with Rockwell.
I don't wonder when I've got documents like their own who's who and world jury, what are they going to say?
That's why they tell you they wouldn't degrade themselves to come up here.
They won't use the old-fashioned American method of confrontation.
I accuse them and they keep calling me names.
They won't discuss the facts.
All they keep doing is trying to punch me in the nose, calling me an MF-er like out front here and so forth.
Ladies and gentlemen, nobody's going to stop me.
Nobody's going to stop me from preaching what's in here because he threatens to punch me in the nose or because he calls me a dirty name.
I am not convinced, because somebody has the brilliance to be able to say MF-er to me, that he's a genius and has better facts than I do.
If that's true, all these guys down here in Watts are the smartest guys in the country, because they use that word all day long.
For our first music break, this song may sound like it has a touch of a Russian feeling to it, and maybe that's just the minor chords it's written in.
This song was written by the Celestian songwriter and youth leader Eric Scholz.
There was never a Russian version of this song.
It was a song for the German youth movement.
The song is about the defeated West Russians Volunteer Army, which fought against the Soviets together with the Frey Corps, or Iron Division, in the Baltic states between 1918 and 1919.
The West-Russian Volunteer Army consisted of released Russian prisoners of war and was set up by the German Empire before the end of the war.
This is Knox Stett Hunger.
This is Knox Stett Hunger.
Noch fliegt Russlands heiliger Adler, Mütter röchelt unser Blut getroniert.
Mag das Brote, der uns aufjagen, Leuchtend steht noch immer das Panier.
Ach, dahin ist Storchholzenmacht, Keine Glocken klingen durch die rote Nacht.
Ostenschritte, keine Freiheit mehr, Hinterstaffeltacht schließt schon ein blühes Teer.
Einer singt die erhalten Lieder, Lockt und schwer, ruht und seht aus der Brust.
Wild und trotzig beginnt es wieder, Im Vergessen liegt die alte Lust.
Und als er, das keine Heimat hat, Ziehen wir ausgewiesen, nun von Stadt zu Stadt.
Menschen kommen, hören unser Lied, Weiter geht die Fahrt, der um uns sinnlos blüht.
Heimat, Heimat, so mitten die Köder, tausend weltlich erstickt euer Bild.
Glocken, leuten unsere Tenörer, Orgelbässe klingelt und tritt.
Noch liegt Russlands heiliger Adler, mit euch in unser Blut wird und ihr.
Mag das Rote, der uns auch gab, in Deutschland steht noch immer das Panier.
you you Thank you.
I was looking for a house for probably three months or so before actually finding one.
The hardest part was every time you'd find something that looked okay to you, it was already under contract as soon as you can contact a realtor.
It was pretty open as far as where I was going to move.
I knew it was going to be a certain state, but the whole area was wide open as long as I could meet the criteria I was looking for as far as land.
I ended up having to buy my house without ever seeing it in person because, like I said, anytime you'd find something, there'd be offers on it right away.
Ended up having a good realtor that took a nice video and put in an offer the same day and it got accepted.
The journey home wasn't too bad.
It was a little more expensive than I was expecting because gas prices jumped up so high.
But overall it was a simple drive and unpacking and packing wasn't too much.
If I wanted to, I had offers for help from some guys in the homeland already, but it wasn't necessary, and it's probably not the most secure thing to have somebody new coming to your house.
Now that I've been here for a little bit, I saw the house needs quite a bit more work than I expected, because you can only get so much out of a video.
So that's been a little bit of a struggle.
And then I also went pretty rural, so...
Internet has been a bit of a struggle as well, but I think I finally found something that is adequate and allows me to continue doing my work and doing whatever else I need to do on the internet.
Aside from struggles, it's been pretty nice.
It's nice to have my own land.
It's nice to not be renting.
And I've already met some of our brothers out here in the homeland, so that's always a positive.
The biggest struggle I would say so far was that I was pretty gung-ho, so to speak, on getting out there and recruiting some people.
It's actually a lot harder to meet people even when you're rural than you would expect, but that doesn't mean that I'm going to stop trying.
Get some more people involved.
It'll just take a little more time than I thought.
The biggest positives I've seen so far, aside from meeting our guys, would just be the general area is nice.
Where I come from, there's not a lot of trees or anything, and snow's a ton.
But here I've got, you know, tons of trees, lots of green area around.
Yeah, it does rain a lot.
Pacific Northwest, but nothing that's too unbearable, and the general weather is still better than that of a very cold climate that I came from.
That's all I've got for today.
Appreciate you guys listening.
Music by Ben Thede Good evening, comrades.
Tonight I'm going to be discussing Germany's New Religion.
Now, this comes from the Welsberg Archives, and it doesn't seem to have any specific author.
It just seems to have a series of translators.
Now, this work introduces an English-speaking audience to the theology of Wilhelm Hauer.
And Hauer was born in Wittenberg, and he did spend some time in India as a missionary.
He studied at Basel and Oxford, and he became a member of Mansfield College.
Eventually, when he went back to Germany for Mansfield College, he becomes a pastor in both Frankfurt and Strasbourg.
But gradually he moved away from Christianity, at first becoming a free Christian and then eventually moving into the German faith movement.
Now, as you might suspect, Power was very much caught up in the zeitgeist of his time.
So, of course, this was going on in the 30s, and he wanted to find...
A religion or practice or system of beliefs that would better reflect the Northwest European history and ethnography.
So, this movement is not new, but it's a renewed expression of something long suppressed.
However, Hauer hastens to note that he does not mean to revitalize the Nordic pantheon.
He just doesn't think that would be possible.
Even so, this is going to be a socio-political religion in that it's going to place emphasis on the good of the state.
And I would honestly imagine that in this religion, religious experience, such as meditation and visions, Would take precedence over study.
And to a certain extent, religious ideas would be left up to personal interpretation and there would be less of an emphasis on monotheism, for example.
This is a religion that would dissolve the idea of either indulging in the world or giving it up.
This faith would contain also a greater sense of the heroic.
Hauer is prepared to allow the Christian faith to continue existing within, let's say, Northwestern Europe, but he doesn't want it to be funded by the Reich.
He says that young people need to be Now,
if you want an example of what this would have looked like, for example, the Funeral scene in the series High Castle is a good example of that.
In some ways, this religion would likely have some resemblance to the Shinto religious practice because it is collective and specific to a certain region and a sociocultural group.
And it would tend to not really divide the spiritual as much from the world itself.
Now, naturally, this would have been a religion that would have matured and created itself over time with new martyrs, stories, and potentially even perhaps deities.
Now, it's interesting to think of stories with a historical basis actually becoming myth over time.
Now, whether or not any religion is actually literally true, religion can be seen as a mechanism for sociocultural survival.
For example, studies show that religious couples tend to have more children.
This is perhaps because they see a purpose in life transcendent of mere existence.
So, certainly a religion that reminds an ethnic group of its special mission, at least under ideal circumstances, is racially healthy.
Was certainly no doubt delayed, but might one day yet become a beacon.
Although this was a very brief book, I found it to be very interesting, and when I think of this book, I picture someone Going out into the woods and meditating.
That seems to fit the overall feeling of this book.
So, I thank you for listening.
Have a good evening and hail victory, comrades.
Hello, I'm Johnny Cash.
I hear the train a-coming It's rolling around the bend And I ain't seen the sunshine since I don't know when I'm stuck in Folsom Prison And time keeps dragging on But that train keeps a-rolling All down to San Antonio.
When I was just a baby, my mama told me, son, always be a good boy, don't ever play with guns.
But I shot a man in Reno just to watch him die.
When I hear that whistle blowing, I hang my head and cry.
I bet there's rich hopes even from a fancy dining car.
They're probably drinking coffee and smoking big cigars.
Well, I know I had it.
I know I can't be free But those people keep a moving And that's what tortures me Here they go!
Here they go!
Here they go!
Well, if they freed me from this prison If that railroad train was mine I bet I'd move it on a little farther down the line Far from Folsom Prison
That's where I want to stay And I'd let that lonesome whistle Welcome
to In Pursuit of Clarity, episode number 29, entitled The Spirit of the Law vs.
The Letter of the Law.
As you may have sagely deduced from the title, I wanted to discuss the difference between the spirit of the law and the letter of the law, and why this difference is so important and the understanding of this difference is so important.
The spirit of the law represents its foundational purpose, its essence and reason for being.
The letter of the law might best be thought of as the fleshing out of this skeletal structure, the branches of the root, the specific technical language used to help implement and enforce the law.
To give an example, let's say a law on the books prevents anyone from using corporate funds for personal reasons, and an individual decides to take advantage of a perceived loophole, whereby he causes funds to be transferred out to a different company, and then funneled from there to his personal account.
By almost any objective definition, this would be a violation of the spirit of the law, but perhaps in many cases not the technical letter of the law.
It strikes me that there's a very clear cultural difference in how this dynamic is viewed.
Western or European peoples, especially in Great Antiquity, have always had great respect for the spirit of the law, and have focused far less on the letter, whereas the Jewish people, to use a random example, have traditionally been very much the opposite.
In fact, the Book of the Talmud, a core text of modern Judaism, is a masterclass in exactly this.
With regards to law, it's an attempt to turn all spirit into letter.
In ancient Germanic societies, they seem to have little concern or need of lengthy law codes.
The same holds true among their relatives, the ancient Scythians, as recorded by all who encountered them.
Everyone seemed to know the spirit of the law and what was considered right and wrong and were expected to act accordingly.
In those strikingly rare instances in which this spirit was transgressed, they could expect a subjective judgment handed down from on high, as chieftains and leaders often doubled as judge and jury and helped keep the peace.
Failing this, if both parties wished it, they may even resort to physical combat as a last resort, a tradition somewhat similar to the more recent custom of dueling.
There was a direct and meaningful consequence to the violation of the spirit of the law, a loss of reputation and honor, and possibly a loss of life or limb.
It's been taken as a given by so many for so long.
That the progression of our law codes into Byzantine complexity has been a net positive.
Specificity, after all, can certainly be helpful.
What's gone largely unrecognized and undiscussed is just how this changes a society and its potential negative ramifications.
Firstly, it transfers power away from what might be deemed natural leadership and into the hands of a new class of individuals, lawyers, for example.
So, whereas in ancient European societies a man might be chosen for leadership and influence due to his strength of will or charisma or courage on the battlefield, or just because he was so well-liked and respected by all around him, power and influence has shifted over time into the hands of those who wrote or interpreted laws, who over time gained power to both author and guide the enforcement of all rules and regulations.
In a short span of time, much of the world shifted from being governed by concise and readily understandable codes of conduct, such as the Ten Commandments or the Laws of Manu in Aryan India or Hammurabi's Code, into sprawling complexity of a type and extent that no man could hope to familiarize himself with in a single lifetime.
Not only did this usher a different sort of man and institutions into power, and change our conception of power itself, Not only could a disreputable sort occasionally author laws in their favor,
but they could include so many letters in this letter of the law as to attain almost limitless wiggle room.
There's a reason the terms of service we read and are asked to agree to by so many products and services we make use of, And in such an immense collection of words, any legal expert then became capable of finding something within them when the need arose, allowing him to attack or defend almost any position.
So much so that most of these experts could formulate an extremely convincing argument on both sides of almost any dispute.
Regardless of whether the individual in question was in the right or wrong.
The further we moved from the spirit of the law towards the letter of the law, this question of whether an individual was right or wrong became almost irrelevant in actual operation.
It instead became a question of whether it could be made to appear, using clever legal wrangling, whether the individual was right or wrong.
What's worse, men willing to act unethically for personal gain now felt increasingly justified in doing so, as long as they could locate some technicality or some particular phrasing in the law that seemed to justify their behavior.
And this holds true to the extreme in the economic sphere of modern capitalist America.
The amount of financial corruption and fraud that occurs on a daily basis Merely because a clever legal team has managed to create a framework to cause it to appear otherwise is stunning.
Men who, if brought before an elder or patriarch in ancient times, would likely be shunned or banished, or face a significant loss of property or even life or limb, now not only walk freely in our age, but often don't even face a slap on the wrist, and are even, frequently, held in the highest regard, due to the direct and indirect influence of their money or occupational or social position.
Thank you.
It's my contention that this moving away from an emphasis on the spirit of the law and towards an obsessive immersion in its letter has harmed our nations and cultures in the most profound and fundamental ways.
An overly technical approach to law can now allow the most disgusting scoundrel to walk free.
and just as bad can allow for good men to be punished severely and has transferred the most supreme powers to a class of men who no longer run the gamut of political or ideological worldview but instead tend to share a fairly singular outlook.
Recent studies bear this out and only media and finance show a similar degree of homogeneity in their ranks.
I mentioned the Talmud a moment ago and it's a fascinating compilation from any perspective.
You may know by now that it attempts to provide some justification to act unjustly to the other, to anyone outside of the ethnic or religious circle.
But what's even more unique about the work is its manner of doing so.
While it allows for, and in many cases even encourages, actions that may help one's in-group and harm others, it seems to repeatedly stress the avoidance of getting caught in doing so.
That specifically speaks to the merits of causing these actions to be done through a proxy.
Meaning, if one seeks to do another harm of any sort, instead of doing this harm directly, if you can find a means to cajole or force another individual to carry out this action, this is the ideal.
To me, this epitomizes the most significant flaws in an exclusive focus on the letter of the law.
and speaks to how a more elaborate and long-winded law code can act as a net negative.
The Romans, perhaps as a reaction in part to this creeping legal complexity in their own age, developed a brilliant antidote of sorts, popularizing that phrase ke bono, or who gains, as the governing principle of justice when prosecuting crimes.
This helped strip away all of the clever talk and meaningless fluff Finally, pull back from the utilitarian and legal conceptions for a moment, and consider what these different approaches say about the people that embrace them.
On the one hand, we have a focus on the spirit of the law, in which each citizen can constantly bear in mind a few simple golden rules of behavior, and far more often than not knows clearly if he's transgressed them.
and how to avoid doing so, and knows that if he falls short here, he's likely going to have to take full responsibility and pay the price.
There's no clever means of escape or evading taking blame.
On the other hand, we have a focus on the letter and technicality of the law, in which each citizen has some vague idea of the wording of the laws on the books, but knows if he's willing to pay a high-priced lawyer a significant sum of money.
He has a good chance of creating the appearance that he did nothing wrong, or at least reasonable doubt as to his guilt.
Or perhaps he does know relevant snippets of the massive tomes of laws pertaining to his actions, and was inspired to take the offending actions precisely because he knew he'd be able to frame the situation in a certain manner as to avoid punishment.
Our age has taken it as a given, for the most part, that modern law, broadly speaking, I disagree with this, and wanted to play a bit of devil's advocate here to spur some thought on the subject.
Even more importantly, I'd like to spur some thinking as to what these different approaches to the law and to life in general say about the different peoples and cultures from whence they spring.
and what fundamental contrasts they paint, and how these contrasts affect the interplay of cultures in the modern world.
Understanding the core differences here is absolutely key to understanding the broader picture.
And that's it for the moment.
Thank you for listening.
This is the end.
Beautiful friend This is the end This
last music break is from a Native Pacific Northwest band.
And while the lyrics aren't explicitly white nationalist, they were one of those influential bands of my teens.
And the chorus expresses how I sometimes feel about this wee little movement of ours.
This is Sunny Day Real Estate with Circles.
This is Sunny Day Real Estate with Circles.
Make me there in the blue where words are not.
Feeling romance, sincerity, trust in me.
Throw myself into your door.
Running down.
Still running down.
Still running down.
Meet me there.
Within the blue where words are not.
Healing remains.
Oh, I dream to heal your wounds.
But I bleed myself.
Oh, I bleed myself.
Running down.
Running down.
Circles.
Circles.
Running down.
Still running down Still running down Still running down
While perusing old white nationalist literature, I read an article from Edgar Steele's Conspiracy Pen Pals e-list entitled A Government of Men.
As always with Mr. Steele, it was a very well-written and a concisely formulated analysis of one aspect of the overall problem our race and civilization faces today.
Most notably, the fact that the legal and constitutional norms which have governed our society for 200 years are now null and void, and the United States has become an arbitrary government of individual bureaucrats, criminals, and incompetents.
It was very well stated.
With the greatest of personal and political respect to Mr. Steele, therein lies the difficulty.
Mr. Steele aptly and articulately stated the problem, but beyond a few vague and obscure references to restoring the Constitution, he made no suggestions whatsoever as to exactly how we go about solving that problem.
In his article, there is not an inkling as to how we go about restoring the Constitution.
Or just how the hell we're supposed to do anything else about the fact that we are ruled by criminals and fools.
This is the essence of the American right.
This is what we have been doing for the past 77 years.
Time and time again, over and over and over, in untold numbers of newspapers and pamphlets, in cow pasture rallies and now on the internet, We state and restate the problem in a hundred different ways and from every possible angle.
But that's all we do.
Constantly state and restate and reformulate and reanalyze and reiterate the problem.
This isn't original for us.
Jost Turner identified this problem-orientation weakness of ours back in the 1980s.
I've only been involved in this thing of ours for a few years now.
And during that time, I can count on the fingers of one hand the times I've heard anyone other than the Northwest Front suggest any kind of practical solution to the crisis of civilization that we face, namely the looming genocide of our race.
By that, I mean a program of action Is this because there's no solution to the problem?
No.
There's a solution, and we all know it.
The solution is very simple, ancient, and effective.
The government and the people who are doing all of this to us must be removed from power, not unelected and replaced with a different set of droids and three-piece suits, but removed Like you move a piece of furniture from point A to point B. These people must be moved from the corridors of power to the gallows.
Or possibly the guillotine.
I think I could go for a guillotine.
With Sarah Weaver and Debbie Matthews sitting by and knitting.
The men and women who are responsible for inflicting war, oppression, depravity, injustice, and horror on the white people of America must be physically dragged out of offices by white men with weapons in their hands, and they must be punished for what they have done.
To borrow a phrase from Israel, I would prefer that such a government be based on the principles of National Socialism.
But frankly, right now, I don't care.
The long-term implications of allowing the present power structure to remain in place are so appalling...
That just about anything white would be an improvement.
Hell, if we can produce another man of the stature of Commander Rockwell, let's crown him king.
Napoleon may have been dragged into a series of pointless wars by the outraged powers that be, like his 20th century successor in Germany, but his legal and political and social reforms survive in France to this day.
A white Napoleon is better than Hillary Clinton.
Any day.
All of our problems will be solved through the physical removal of the present power structure and none of them will be solved without it.
We know this.
Every man and the few women listening to this podcast know this.
But we don't do it.
In fact, the likelihood of our attempting such a thing in my lifetime He's so slim that I'm not particularly worried about publishing these words, despite the draconian measures of the past two years.
I'm simply speaking science fiction here, and the FBI and whoever the hell else is monitoring me know it.
Why don't we do it?
I'm tempted to state flat out that it's plain old common or garden variety cowardice, that we are not white, we're yellow.
And there's a good deal of truth in that.
But it's also due to physical and moral laziness of various kinds.
We have become too lazy to bester ourselves in much of anything, never mind revolution.
We have become too mentally lazy to think, hence our desire for a man on a white horse to take our membership dues and do our thinking for us.
I was speaking earlier of a true Napoleon, by the by, and...
We have become too spiritually lazy to make moral and ethical judgments on the behavior of others.
There is only one solution.
White people should have their own version of the provisional IRA in this country starting in the late 1950s.
All of us know this perfectly well, but we prefer the television, the air conditioner, The foaming can of beer from the cooler and the mesmerizing spectacle of niggers chasing a ball.
It's now the 21st century and the bill is coming due.
We ain't seen nothing yet.
Wait until 2024 when Hillary plunks her liposucked buttocks back down in the Oval Office.
Okay, so what do we do?
Right now, the only two things we can feasibly implement Given the human material we have to work with, is number one, do what we here in the Northwest Front have done.
Come home.
You know our reasoning behind that, and I won't digress on that topic here.
Number two, remove the taboo on speaking aloud what we all know to be truth.
Look, you guys all know that the Northwest Front's platform is not big on verbalization replacing action.
But in this case, we need to at least get to square one.
And speaking aloud a truth we have all been hitherto afraid to utter is a definite square one from which we can begin.
And Thank you.
Historically speaking, the physical courage to act is always preceded by the moral courage to speak.
Before George Washington came Patrick Henry and Thomas Paine.
Neither I nor...
Anyone else expects the middle-aged men with big bellies who comprise the overwhelming majority of alt-right wing and racial nationalist email lists to do any storming of the barricades anytime soon.
We have failed in our duty there, but we can at least prepare the next generation.
With any luck, they will rediscover their testicles that we seem to have mislaid somewhere among the beer and the nachos.
This is the first time we have.
Alright, well that's about all the time we have this week.
Radio Free Northwest is brought to you by the Northwest Front.
You can reach the party on our website at northwestfront.info.
If you have any questions or comments that you'd like to have addressed on air, feel free to drop us an email at radiofreenorthwest at protonmail.com.