All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 7, 2017 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:04:29
20171207_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Hush, a wiggle, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be.
In the old spot by the river, right will known to you and me.
One more roar for signal, token, whistle of the marching tune.
Warrior bike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
With your bike upon your shoulder.
Cabin eyes were watching through the night.
Many a man, the chest was throbbing for the blessed morning light.
The warmers passed along the valleys like the mad she's lonely crew.
And a thousand blaze were flashing at the rising of the moon At the rising of the moon At the rising of the moon And a thousand blaze were flashing at the rising of the moon Greetings from the Northwest Homeland, comrades.
It's December the 7th, 2017.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
Happy Pearl Harbor Day, dudes!
Right, I think my upper respiratory infection is pretty much gone now, so I hope I can sound a little bit better this week.
I have an email here from Comrade Bill in Spokane.
Dear HAC, in an upcoming podcast, could you please do a rundown of how men and women will progress in voting in the Northwest American Republic?
I've heard lots of discussion online recently about how to limit the vote.
The first answer is typically one household, one vote.
Signed, Bill.
Yeah, well, I think this question arises from this white Sharia crap that's floating all around the internet, which is something our embittered misogynists living in mom's basement or who have been savaged and lost everything in their divorce have come up with as part of a fantasy world in which they will stop women from voting and take us all back to what they imagined the 19th century to have been like, but without the polio and the steam engines.
Now, in view of the complete mess that women's suffrage has made of this country, starting with the election of Warren G. Harding in 1920, and thus inaugurating the modern-day era of federal corruption and governmental dysfunction, and especially in view of the 20-year horror of the Hildebeest, I get this.
Unfortunately, in my considered opinion, that's one genie that probably can't be put back into the bottle.
Sorry, guys.
I've talked about this in the Northwest Novels, and I've discussed movement misogyny before on this show, and I won't get into it now as such.
But to answer the question, okay, how many of you folks out there have ever been to a good old-fashioned hoot-and-holler Baptist church, and somebody asks the preacher a question on some point of doctrine, and the first thing he says is, take out your Bibles!
And turn to the book of Matthew, chapter whatever, verse such and such.
Well, I need you folks to take out your copies of the draft Constitution of the Northwest American Republic, which you will find in the back of your white books, or else bring up the separate PDF copy of the Constitution, which I sent out a couple of weeks ago.
So let's give that a look and see what it says on this question.
Section 1. Nationhood and Citizenship.
Article 1. The Northwest American Republic shall be a homeland solely for the use and habitation of white people of all nationalities, cultures, and creeds worldwide, in order that Western civilization may be preserved and white children may be raised to responsible adulthood in safety, prosperity, and tranquility.
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.
Such is the overriding principle of this Constitution.
Nothing incompatible with this prime directive may be held by any authority to be constitutional.
Article 2. All white people of any nationality, ethnicity, or previous citizenship shall have the right to live permanently in the Northwest American Republic as legal residents.
This is important.
In the Northwest Republic there will be a distinction between the legal resident and the citizen.
The base of the Northwest Republic's political polity or governmental structure, however you want to put it, the first rung on the ladder, will be the citizens.
Okay, Article 3. Citizenship in the Republic as opposed to legal residence and domicile to include exercise of the franchise, i.e.
the vote.
And participation in government and the political process shall not be automatically conferred at birth or through racial identity alone.
Citizenship is to be earned through responsibility fulfilled, and that is one of the things that makes this constitution different from any other in the world, so far as I'm aware.
Article 4. Article
6, and here's where I finally get down to Bill's question.
Citizenship in the Republic and the right to exercise the electoral franchise shall be divided into three classes, with each class of citizenship holding one, two, and three individual votes respectively.
Those who demonstrate superior civic and political responsibility and who display the greatest dedication to state service and who thereby achieve a higher class of citizenship shall thereby have the greatest say in the political process.
Now, this means that while everyone who has fulfilled certain basic civic duties and responsibilities, which I'll get into in a moment, gets to vote, those who have performed more and higher service to society get to have more weight in the political process.
This actually is somewhat similar to the original United States Constitution as ratified in 1787, which contained a property qualification for voting, so that only those men who owned property, i.e.
had a material stake in the well-being of society, could participate in the political process.
As I recall, that wasn't dropped until about the time of Andrew Jackson, 50 years later, one of the reasons I consider Jackson to be one of the greatest presidents.
Our own franchise qualification is based on merit and duty fulfilled, which is actually more fair than a qualification based on money or land ownership.
It is, in fact, a good thing to live in a society where a doctor, an engineer, a senior military officer, a research scientist, or, generally speaking, an older and more experienced and mature person will have an electoral voice of more weight in the political process than some kid who's just completed his army service at age 20 or so and is just starting out in life.
Frankly, in a healthy society, 20-year-olds shouldn't be concerning themselves with politics anyway.
They shouldn't have to.
They should be getting married and starting a family and producing the next generation of white people.
Now, how do we determine civic worthiness and who gets one vote and who gets two and who gets three?
Let's pull out that Constitution again.
Section 5. Bill of Responsibilities.
Article 1. Article 2. All residents
and citizens who, by reason of gender or other cause, are not subject to mandatory military service, as stipulated in Article 1 above, must complete a term of national service to the state and community, the duration and nature of which shall be determined by law.
Basically, young men will go into the labor service after graduation from high school and then into the army.
Girls will go into the labor service, although they can, if they wish, serve in the military in the traditional female role like the old wax and waves used to do, doing things to relieve able-bodied men for the combat arms.
Note that the Constitution does not specify the actual terms of years, which we realized when we wrote it would have to be adjustable by the government of the Republic.
If I recall correctly from Freedom's Sons, Anyway.
but there were exceptions for girls who were pregnant.
There was a section in Freedom Sons where the early founders talked about actually encouraging teen pregnancy in a desperate attempt to get white numbers back up.
On completion of national service, or on the birth of the first child, as I recall, women were granted third-class citizenship, i.e.
one vote.
I seem to recall somewhere in one of the novels or discussions advocating the policy of giving women first-class citizenship with three votes on the birth of their third child, thus actually proceeding beyond population replacement level.
I can't remember where, though.
Look, guys...
I would rather have a lot of responsible, middle-aged mothers of multiple children voting who damn sure have a living stake in the success of Northwest society and the political system than I would some of these pale, geeky, or pudgy little white boys who spend their days glued to a computer screen in mom's basement and their nights delivering pizzas.
Are you listening, alt-right?
Greetings from Seattle.
Andy Donner here to spread the good word about DNA tests.
As in, don't bother with them.
And further, don't base any of your expectations or standards on them either.
Quite some time ago, I made a few remarks on a tangentially related subject, and they drew a little bit of criticism.
I had more important things to do in the meantime, so this talk had to wait.
Here's a brief description so that you'll have some idea what I'm talking about and where I need to go in order to make my main points.
Notice I said points, plural, because there are multiple takeaways today, and they're all important.
Right off the bat, I want to talk about the first time I ever found out something was off with these DNA test kits.
Following that, I'm going to talk about a very interesting, widely known example of why outfits like 23andMe are beyond broken and compromised.
And yes, I've got hard proof of that allegation.
I'm also going to bring up the example of one actual white nationalist that has hard proof their DNA test was bogus, since it's an especially good follow-up to the main proof I'm going to offer.
Having proven my assertions about 23andMe, I'll start in on things we all need to learn and what changes in thinking and behavior I expect.
I'll start with briefly going over the Northwest Front's policy on racial admixture.
It is what it is, and it's not going to change.
I'll contrast that with what the alt-right thinks is ideologically acceptable and why ideological compromise will result in abject failure.
And it will, too.
And lastly, I'll talk about a few interesting internet personalities, alt-right and otherwise, that have wrongly attempted to wriggle out of their own claims of Jewishness, either by just denying it or using 23andMe.
And with that, I'll get going.
My first exposure to the idea that something was very, very wrong with current DNA technology came in the form of a video presentation a lefty bitch of an anthropology professor played for our class during my first weeks of college.
The entire purpose of her having done so, and she flat out admitted this, was to cause her students to question their own background.
This class was cultural anthropology, and as such, the lefty loon's purpose was to cause everyone to be completely accepting of everything, from everywhere, And her tactic was to make everyone in the room believe they had no choice but to acquiesce because everyone is somehow mixed.
The subjects of this video were older elementary school students.
They each did a swab, and it was sent off to the lab.
The test results came back, and one kid in particular had an incredibly odd result.
Apparently, this very blonde, very blue-eyed, obviously white kid was actually Asian.
This result was calculated using mitochondrial DNA because it mutates far less than human DNA, and because mitochondria are acquired from a person's mother and matriarchal grandmother, and so on.
That is, they're said to be a reasonable indicator of where a portion of someone's heritage can be found.
This very same professor, thinking none of us would catch the discrepancy, admitted a week later that there are major problems with DNA collection and test methods.
One of the largest issues is that sample collection with a view towards building a database for comparison purposes more or less arbitrarily picked a person or a handful of people to sample and declared those to be Asian or Indian or European or whatever else.
There's very little ability to tell what is and isn't indicative of a particular ethnicity without verifying what your comparison samples really represent.
That is, taking a snapshot of what lives in a particular area at a particular date doesn't tell us a whole lot about what it really is.
Could it be possible that this obviously white kid with no known Asian admixture really is white?
To put that question in a more useful way, is it at all possible that the sample or samples used to gauge some mitochondria as Asian could actually be descended from the mitochondria in a white woman?
Hey, we know that white people were all over the place many thousands of years ago from various sources.
In fact, many non-white peoples from around the world are loosely related to us, but not the other way around.
It's far easier to believe that kid in the study had no Asian ancestry.
But what about human genetic tests such as 23andMe?
As it turns out, there's a body of proof that 23andMe also has severe accuracy problems.
Even if this weren't the case, many of the advertisements for the 23andMe service are outright pro-mixing, and that should not go unnoticed.
There are all sorts of places I could go with potential process failures and how DNA samples are analyzed, but that stuff doesn't play well over audio, and most of you certainly don't care about those details.
And even if it were a generally good idea to go places like that, I think delving into such issues is sufficiently removed from my points today that it's better not to do so.
Heartproof of 23andMe's insufficiency comes in two parts.
Testimonials and a famous incident occurring earlier this year involving identical triplets.
I'll only use one testimonial as evidence, but it's more than good enough for this purpose.
One white nationalist Twitter user got a hold of me to share his 23andMe experience.
Prior to having his DNA examined, he did do diligence and researched his family history.
He was able to get a hold of paper records for both sides of his family going back quite a few generations and found nothing but whites.
His 23andMe said he had several percentage points of Arab admixture, which should be believed.
Given that DNA analysis as a field really didn't take off until a couple of decades ago, it's still a new science.
I'm inclined to trust records that human beings created because they were motivated to keep track of certain facts accurately.
Everyone ought to know what their ancestry is alleged to be and should question any claims of mixture.
If your family can't tell you specifically who was mixed and what they were mixed with, there's an excellent chance that it never happened, because 23andMe is effectively random, and I can prove it.
My second line of proof about 23andMe, as I said earlier, is an incident from earlier this year involving a set of triplets named Nicole, Jacqueline, and Erica Dahm.
That's D-A-H-M for those interested in reading up on this.
They were on a television show called The Doctors to have their 23andMe tests processed and reported on.
In short, these three women who are confirmed to have identical DNA samples Both by being obviously identical siblings and by 23andMe's analysis had different test results.
Yes, really.
The broad strokes were more or less the same in terms of where in Europe their ancestors came from.
The differences were in what proportions of which nationalities were in each triplet's sample.
Oh, and each of the three test results was uniquely different from the others.
Yeah.
Isn't that great?
Three different test results for samples confirmed by the testing agency to have identical contents.
You know, Harold and I were talking about just this subject among a group of comrades on Thanksgiving Day.
He reminded me that one of 23andMe's slogans is, Does this show their actual motivation?
Well, maybe, and maybe not.
Even so, differing test results for triplets is perhaps just a little too much of a surprise to retain credibility.
Oh, yeah.
One other item for your consideration.
A couple years back, I was attending a conference, and a speaker for one of the sessions I chose to sit in on was very openly Jewish, though you'd be somewhat hard-pressed to tell that just by looking at him.
Anyway, he opened his lecture with an offhand remark about how he had just received his 23andMe results.
It turns out that despite knowing he has Jewish ancestry, he's entirely European.
23andMe says he's not Jewish at all.
Way to go, 23andMe!
One of the doctors on that show, The Doctors, in response to the Dom Triplett incident, made it clear that 23andMe is purely for entertainment.
Hey, I didn't say it.
A recognized medical authority did.
So, where does that leave the who-is-white issue?
Like I said in my outline of this material, the party's standard still reigns supreme.
No known or detectable racial admixture is acceptable.
Period.
Anyone who tells you otherwise is not really a white nationalist.
That goes doubly so for the alt-right because no one there really knows anything beyond tidbits of racial theory and the JQ.
And while I haven't seen anything definitive with my own eyes, I'm told just about every alt-right outfit has some standard like one-eighth mixture is fine.
The alt-right likes to refer to itself as White Nationalism 2.0, but they're nothing but a downgrade.
At least White Nationalism 1.0 was, you know, for white people.
I'm sure you all remember I did a talk about discernment between my TheoryCraft and TheoryCraft Part 2 talks.
You might think of this as my discernment, part two.
I and the Northwest Front have been raked over the coals by the alt-right because we dare to point out the fuster-cluck that is TRS and Mike the Kike Enoch.
I'm told he put out a 23 in me with no Jewish ancestry on it, but today's material ought to reveal that's not enough to contradict his own repeated claims of Jewishness.
He's admitted Jewishness on record repeatedly, but strangely no one seems to care for some reason.
Oh, and there's the curious case of Lauren Southern.
And save me the explanations, guys.
I followed that situation from the beginning.
She tweeted some malarkey about Jews still surviving the Holocaust and, in the same breath, said her great-grandparents were forced to flee Europe.
Immediately after that, she tweeted to say that by saying her grandparents, she really meant Milo's grandparents.
Note that she clearly understood what she had said and had to distance herself from it.
Later, she tried to explain this as a remark about her great-grandparents, but that she didn't actually indicate they were Jews.
And immediately knee-jerk and dumb correction usually leads to just as contradictory a follow-up, and this is no exception.
Later, she, too, produced a 23andMe with zero Jewish ancestry.
We know that 23andMe is effective garbage in terms of reliability.
And don't forget Stefan Molyneux's admission from years ago that his mother was born into a Jewish community in order to gain a certain amount of credibility with the audience he was speaking to at the time.
It's on video.
I've caught him repeatedly claiming his mother isn't Jewish when someone brings his Jewishness up as a response to his hatred of genuinely pro-white policies like National Socialism.
The alt-right likes to tweet about coincidences involving Jews and the things they say or do.
Well, I'm going to have to insist that, for the sake of honesty, the very same alt-right recognizes coincidences, even when they're bad for the alt-right.
I mentioned a moment ago that this is more or less my discernment part two talk.
The alt-right produces an absurd amount of moo about preserving Western culture.
I no longer buy this at all from any of them.
Because Western culture, and more specifically any mythology or system of belief that has ever interested white people has parables and full stories that teach what happens when you abandon your moral standards.
We all know what a slippery slope is.
When you lower the racial purity requirement, you're doing so to an arbitrary level.
Because the only non-arbitrary standard is none.
Those who drop the racial purity requirement have no basis for resisting further change and will drop their standards even further when pressed.
True discernment would inform someone that they never need to abandon principles.
As Harold regularly says, there's no point in making any sort of white nationalist effort if we're only going to recreate the situation we find ourselves in now.
Collective Western wisdom about what happens when you give up on principles emphasizes two things.
The first, moral compromises are never necessary even if it seems they are in the heat of the moment.
The second, there's no reason to do so anyway because whatever you think you're going to get in return never comes about.
Concerning the situation I'm discussing today, 23andMe isn't proof of anything at all, so dropping the standard of racial purity wasn't ever necessary.
Further, there was no point in making the trade of racial purity because that would only result in octaroon nationalism, not white nationalism.
Mike the Kike Enoch, Lauren the Yenta Southern, and Stefan the Deceiver Molyneux are all Jews by their own admission.
Granted, I don't know that Molyneux has ever put out a 23andMe, but he's entirely relevant to the subject just because he attempts to wriggle out of his claims of Jewishness like the other two sheenies I've named.
And neither he nor Southern has anything to do with the alt-right, but the coincidence of their backtracking is too much like Enoch's not to comment on.
Even so, they're somehow looked up to even though none of them have contributed anything original.
Even Molyneux just repeats talking points from anti-communists of yesteryear.
The same dumb 23andMe standard that justifies kikery in the alt-right also justifies known mixture in the rank and file.
This is why you never ever drop your standards.
Anyone with any useful life experience will tell you this, which is exactly why any idiot claiming Jews or racial admixture are acceptable should be ejected immediately.
Hail Victory!
But it's darker than you know in those complicated chairs All you gangsters and rude clowns Who were shooting up the town When you should have found someone to put the blame on Though
the fear is hot and hard I still see that cold graveyard There's a solitaire stone that's got your name on You don't have to take it from me But I know what I speak
it
All those phantoms and those shades should jump up on judgment day and say to So you'll see your openness to those complicated shadows.
We'll be right back.
You can say just what you like in a voice like a John Ford film.
Take the law into your hands.
You will soon get tired of killing all those complicated shadows.
Complicated shadows.
Yeah.
Thank you.
Good evening, comrades.
Tonight I'm going to be discussing Part 3 of Inside the Third Reich.
Now this segment begins with Speer's knee problem.
While Hitler never seems to delve into athletics, Speer has the classic German tendency to pick a sport and overdo it.
Hitler supports athletics for the youth.
He is exasperated that an intergovernmental member has a ski injury in the middle of a crisis.
This injury would be politically costly for Speer.
Nevertheless, in May of 1944, Hitler turns over Armament's production to Speer.
At around this time, a very serious debate was taking place with regard to the Measuresmith 262.
He was actively promoting its use as a fighter.
He wanted to use a design which was innovative for its day to fend off bombing raids.
Claimed that in those days, Hitler was still insisting that the plane ought to be used as a light bomber.
Speer, along with others, insisted that it would make more sense to use defensive bombers and also ground-to-air defense rockets.
By July of 1944, the leadership was having an acute attack of self- An invasion was feared, and at that point, any possible combatant would be needed.
A plan was designed for convalescents and soldiers on furlough to defend North Germany.
At this time, General Albrecht asked why the services were split.
And suggested that perhaps if they were unified, they would be more efficient and there would be less redundancies in supplies.
Now as events developed, some military members were working on the famous July 1944 coup attempt.
It's interesting to ponder what the actual result would have been if they had succeeded.
Did they want to use...
Weapons and supplies such as the Measuresmith 262 and the V2 to greater effect?
Or at the end of the day, did they merely hope to surrender?
Were they against the ideology as is often promoted in the media today?
Or did they simply feel fed up with the notion that Hitler was making too many tactical mistakes?
Speer concedes that Hitler was very much taken up with the traditions of the army, and he was slow to awaken to the possibilities of innovative air power.
Now, I'm often given to muse that better air power would have potentially turned the tide of the war.
It's true that the conspirators hoped that Speer would continue as the head of armaments.
Which at least suggests a desire to fight on, even though the conspirators hoped that Speer would join them in the new government that they hoped to create.
Speer was never implicated in this conspiracy himself.
After July of 1944, Hitler was not above self-questioning.
And he came to decide that he had been too rigid in preferring bombers over fighter planes.
At this point, a lot of fighter planes started to be produced in underground factories.
Now, of course, by this time, the war was getting entirely desperate.
And you had individuals coming up with ideas like single-operator submarines and also discussing the possibility of suicide squads.
In those days, Germany also had a gas called Tübben, which was extremely toxic, but Hitler didn't want to use it.
At the last stage of the war, Hitler seemed to want to transfer resources to the West.
Now this may be due to his admiration for Stalin, or simply relating to the notion that the situation in the East was increasingly hopeless.
Speer even offered his fortune to stabilize the Reich.
On the 19th of March, Hitler talked about a policy of destroying resources that would fall into enemy hands.
Now Hitler knew that Speer did not wish to follow these orders.
And at this point, Speer goes through something of a crisis.
Hitler said to Speer, if you could at least hope that we have not lost, then that will be enough to satisfy me.
Speer seems to have something of a duality in this book.
In addition to the legal matters that Harold mentioned, it may be a case of a genuine ambivalence.
Spina writes about a desire to go on Also, in the spring of 1945, Roosevelt dies, and some National Socialists come to the belief that Roosevelt's death is some kind of miracle.
This hopeful mood is...
Very short-lived, and really illustrates the kind of desperation that they were in.
Now, at around this time, Speer moves his family to Holstein, which is in the Donitz sector.
Speer is against the werewolf messages, and indeed in this book, he'll say in a footnote that the werewolf movement or phenomenon was only propaganda.
I don't believe that's true.
I believe that there were actual werewolf sabotage actions.
Now, on the 22nd of April, Speer visits Hitler one last time.
At this point, Hitler has become increasingly mentally distant from events.
Now, at around this time, Donitz was appointed the president of the government.
And this was effective after the 30th of April.
Now, Donitz plans to surrender, but Major General Rook says that Donitz has no right to do this.
The Donitz government was set up in Flensburg, and it was actually in operation until the 15th of May.
This was done for legal reasons to create continuity of governance.
Eventually, all those that were involved in this government were arrested.
When it came to signing the surrendered documents, Donitz never signs these documents because his government is considered entirely irrelevant by the Allies.
In reality, that came to an actual legal judgment that the Reich was actually suspended.
Speer makes an interesting complaint about Goring.
He talks about how Goring was apparently something of an addict, which seems to be a rather embarrassing historical footnote.
And apparently, once he was imprisoned, Goring got over his addictions and found a new vigor.
And Speer complains that it's unfortunate that he was not sober in the days when he could have been of service to his country.
So this concludes my three segments on Inside the Third Reich.
I really found this book to be quite a page-turner, particularly as I got into the latter half of it.
So I thank you for listening.
Have a good evening, and hail Victory, Comrades.
We'll be right back.
We've got a long way to go, and it's a short time to get there.
I'm best found just like a band that runs.
If you put the heart on the belt, the sun will remind them breaks.
Let it all hang out, cause we gotta run the base.
Now we're going to go.
Greetings, comrades.
This is the Trucker coming at you from now Virginia.
And I thought I'd go in.
Touch base on something that you may not all think about because you're just used to going out and either picking up what you need at the store or ordering online and it shows up in a few days or the next day or whatever.
But this country is pretty much run, I'm not sure about the other countries, I'm sure they're probably in the same boat as we are, but they're all doing the just-in-time delivery.
I don't know if you know what that means, that, say, your grocery store, back in the day, it used to have a stockroom, and they'd go and bring stuff up and restock the shelves.
Well, now they have grocery warehouses, or distribution centers, is the new catchphrase, that they bring all the trucks into, like myself, bring, like, say, a load of potatoes, or a load of onions, or whatever the product might be.
to the distribution center and then they go and break it down and send it out to the stores as they need it and you go around the back yeah there's a loading dock and there's a pallet breakdown area back there in the back of the store where they offload the trucks and they break down the material and wheel it out there and Stock the shelves and then send the pallets back with the next empty truck that's headed back to the distribution warehouse.
So basically what you see on the shelves is all the store has.
And they have product, multiple trucks coming in every day.
So if one of you ingenious little techno geeks manage to go and decide to shut down, hack into and shut down something, I'm not saying you should.
I'm not advocating it.
I'm just saying for the general populace, if somebody did get in there and, say, shut down the network that the trucks use for getting fuel.
Well, a whole bunch of trucks would be coming to a stop.
I mean, normally I'm getting fuel every one to two days, and that's usually, say, 100 and maybe up to 150 gallons at a shot, and that'll give me about one to two days worth of running, depending on where I fuel at and weather conditions and all that kind of stuff.
So if you want to go and shut the country down, all you'd have to do is get the truck somehow or other, like that was one way to do it.
Shut down and within 24 hours, delivery of medical supplies to whatever affected area will cease.
Hospitals will be running out of basic supplies.
Service stations will begin to run out of fuel.
Manufacturing, using just-in-time inventory, will start to see shortages.
And U.S. mail and other packages, deliveries will cease within a day or so.
And like I said, food shortages will begin to develop and automobile fuel will begin to dwindle and prices will start to go up.
Two to three days, food shortages will escalate, especially in the affected area.
Supplies of essentials such as bottled water, powdered milk, and canned meat at other major retailers will disappear.
ATMs will run out of cash.
And the banks will be able to process transactions.
Service stations will run completely out of fuel.
Garbage will start to pile up in the urban areas.
And container ships will sit idle in ports.
And rail service will be disrupted, eventually coming to a standstill.
And basically within the first week.
Automobile travel will cease because of lack of fuel, and hospitals will begin to exhaust their oxygen supplies.
That's just in the first week.
So, you run that out a bit, and you'll get to see that you'll definitely be, the country will be hurting, whichever country it may be.
So, my suggestion is, if you don't stock up at least some reserves at your...
House or residence or bug out location or cabin up in the woods in the mountains or whatever, you know, you might want to think about doing that because you never know what's going to happen, be it a solar flare or somebody shooting out the transformers that knocks the power out.
Oh, that'll, yeah, that'll definitely screw things up if somebody knocked the grid offline.
Even a section of the country would affect the whole country.
So, you know, snowstorms, hurricanes, whatever.
You just need to be prepared and have some food at the house and try to keep at least, like, say, half a tank or so of fuel in your vehicle.
Don't let it get down below that or else...
You could end up not having any fuel to get somewhere where you need to be.
And so, anyways.
Well, this is the trucker coming at you from Virginia on my way from Georgia up to the dreaded northeast.
So, I just thought I'd throw that out, touch base with you, and encourage you to be prepared.
Not necessarily for a civil uprising.
Of course, that may happen too.
But just be prepared.
You never know what's going to end up coming down the pike.
Always try to have four basic things with you at all.
Something sharp, like a knife.
Something lethal, like a gun.
Of course, that doesn't do any of you over in Great Britain any good, because both of those are just about outlawed.
Something bright, say flashlight, and something medical, like tourniquet, pressure dressings, that kind of stuff.
So, anyway, it's just common sense.
Alright, well this is Trucker, signing off from Virginia.
Hoping you all have a wonderful day.
Hope to see you out on the road.
Making your scouting trip, or better yet, your migration to the homeland.
Alright, this is the Trucker, signing off from Virginia.
Have a good one, comrades, and see you out on the road soon.
Thank you.
You know what we haven't had on here for a long time?
A good old Irish rebel song.
This is the Ballad of Billy Reid by the Wolf Tones.
The Ballad of Billy Reid by the Wolf Tones
The Ballad of Billy Reid by the Wolf Tones
But they didn't say why Billy Reid had to die For he died to free Ireland By returning the guns Billy met pretty Shones And when the fight was begun His position was dire When the gun wouldn't fire And he died with that old Thompson gun
If you think he was right, come and join in the fight, and help the free Belfast.
For the blood bill he shed, although he lies dead, in our hearts his memory will last.
What the radio said was another she had dead, and he died with a gun in his hand.
But they didn't say why, Billy Reid had to die, for he died to free Ireland.
What the radio said was another she had dead, and he died with a gun in his hand.
But they didn't say why, Billy Reid had to die, for he died to free Ireland.
You're welcome.
you This is something I'm glad to just talk about and talk about and talk about and look at every angle of and make sure you guys all get it, because it's important.
Now, there are a host of reasons why you may not feel that you can commit to the Northwest homeland, but first thing, let's can that crap about, oh, Harold, I just can't move right now.
Now, time and events are not standing still here, and experience shows that vague promises to come home next year or the year after in practice usually means never.
Just somehow the time never seems to be right, and eventually the context simply goes dark out of loss of interest or else shame or whatever.
Now, I get the practical reasons why everybody can't just pack up and move.
You know, I am not totally unreasonable about this.
Inability to sell a house, some of you have got a good job with people you may like, got family commitments, love of the place where you live now or where you were born.
All of these are perfectly understandable and logical reasons to stay where you are.
The problem is, history is telling you something completely different.
It's not about you or what you find comfortable or convenient.
That's the first thing you guys really need to internalize.
Your life in this day and age is not just about you.
It is about your race and civilization.
Northwest migration aside, now that the Trump phenomenon has lit the fuse, the coming years are going to be full of problems and chaos everywhere.
And one way or the other, There will be a lot of migration going on on the part of everybody.
A lot of it will be unwilling and unwanted.
Northwest migration is a good and sensible answer to a lot of the problems that you may have in your personal and family life.
Problems that you will have to deal with one way or the other.
And while it's not easy, it's always easier to consciously choose to step away before you are forced to leave.
Easier than it is to abandon your home in pain and storm and disaster when something happens that makes it simply impossible for you to remain where you are any longer.
I always refer, folks, constantly to the chapter in Part 1 of Freedom Sons where the Horikova family has to flee from Chicago in the dead of night.
Making a life-or-death run for the Northwest homeland because a sudden explosive racial incident of the kind that can happen to any American at any time out of the blue suddenly destroys their lives and causes them to lose everything they have.
All this talk about standing and fighting is bullshit.
No one is standing and fighting anywhere.
Us white boys just don't do that anymore.
Realistically, for white people, getting out of Dodge is the way to go.
To the Northwest.
Where we can build communities and someday really stand and fight with our own kind around us.
People, things are going to get bad, bad, bad.
You really should consider leaving where you are and doing it sooner rather than later because you have little or no hope of successfully remaining in place during the storm that is coming.
You're like sparrows who have built their nests in a drain pipe.
When the floodwaters come, you're going to be washed away.
Okay, I get that some of this comes down to long-term versus short-term issues, and there are balances to be struck.
For example, let's say you're in your 50s and 60s.
Now, that's a bad time of life to make a move, true, although it has been done.
I mean, I was 49 when I came home for good.
But I think about what's in store for you when you're in your 80s.
Think about what the country will be like then, if even there will be a country left in any recognizable form.
It's no longer conspiracy theory for us to ask that question.
Do you really want to have to face living in a black ghetto or a Mexican barrio as an 80-year-old white man or woman?
Do you have a support network that will help you if you stay?
If you wait to make the move until things get much worse, how likely is it that you will be able to sell your house at all as the area you live in becomes unfit for human habitation?
You may be worried that you can't get your equity out now, but what about in another five years or ten?
Do you really want to gamble on the system being able to right itself?
You may be one of these stubborn people who just says, this is my home and I'm staying here.
But I got a hot flash for you.
Your right to live where and how you want is not inviolable.
When things get worse and worse, no one is going to care about you or what you want or your so-called rights.
In case you hadn't noticed, white people don't run this country anymore except for the very super rich ones at the top.
You call the police, there is a chance that the officer who responds is going to have a black or brown face.
What kind of help or support for your so-called rights do you think you're going to get there?
Okay, here's a list of some things I think you need to think seriously about when you're contemplating coming home.
Now, things will be different and there will be exceptions in individual cases.
I know that.
Now, number one, if you were stupid enough to sign an adjustable rate mortgage back during the housing boom and you can't reset it, if you're already facing foreclosure or have no reason to believe that you'll be able to pay for your house, or if your current house was bought near the market peak and you require two full incomes to pay for it and you got no equity, Then I think you need to read the handwriting on the wall.
The odds are good that you're going to lose your house anyway.
Because all it will take is one lost job and one lost income, and that can happen in a heartbeat these days.
Never mind the Trump promises.
His recovery is confined mostly to the 1%, and in any case, Trump will probably be overthrown in a coup d 'etat before his first term is out.
Tomorrow morning you could find yourself without an income.
Do not go frantically into debt trying to keep your old way of life up and running.
That closes off other options even worse.
If you can see the train coming down at you full speed, get the hell off the tracks.
Go ahead and sell up and come home to the Northwest.
If you do end up in full foreclosure, remember the magic words.
Produce the note.
Require that the company do full due diligence and then stay in your house and live free as long as you can.
You might as well save up rent and deposits for your home coming to the Northwest.
Number two, if you have young children, you really need to think about getting them into a permanent situation and living area now.
While they're still too young to remember Minneapolis or Miami or wherever the hell they're living at the present, so they will have a stable future life.
Ripping up a kid when they're 10 or 12 or a teenager is usually not a good idea if it can be at all avoided.
Number three.
Entirely too many middle-aged white people, especially white males, end up getting stuck with caring for elderly parents, especially if you're divorced and you have married siblings.
Now, I've seen this kind of thing happen so often, I swear it follows some kind of script.
The married siblings tell our guy, well, you screwed up your life by being a wicked, evil racist, but we have families and real lives, and so you can just earn your keep in the family by taking care of mama, or daddy, or meemaw, or whoever.
Of course, there's also the aspect that you may really love Meemaw or Daddy or Uncle Albert or whoever, and you will feel horribly guilty about leaving them behind to be cannibalized one night in a nursing home by African caregivers.
I first noticed this pattern some years ago, and now, ironically, some of our people are being liberated, if that's the word, by the death of their elderly relatives.
Now, the way that seems to work out is that the person who was stuck with the caregiving is usually too spiritually exhausted after all those years to do much of anything movement-wise.
They've been forced, either through love or emotional blackmail, to give up the best and potentially most politically productive years of their lives and by the time the senior citizen finally obliges by checking out, they are in need of a caregiver themselves, sometimes literally.
As much as I hate to sound mean and cruel to the old folks, especially since I am one myself, I have to take a purely rational and pragmatic position here.
The Northwest Republic needs you.
Your people as a whole need you more than one person needs you.
Long experience teaches me enough to warn you guys that if you allow yourself to get sucked into the position of being the primary or sole resource for an elderly person or couple then that's pretty much you gone.
Congratulations.
You have your excuse to set out the movement and the revolution for the duration.
Got responsibilities, you see.
Got to take care of the old folks.
The problem is, and let me say this again, clearly your people need you more than one person does.
That is a moral decision you've got to make on your own and I can't make it for you.
Number four, getting back to the house selling thing.
Another point just occurred to me.
If you need income from the sale of your house, You might want to think about selling sooner rather than later because there will probably come a point at which the number of people who want to live wherever you are now declines dramatically, and it will be even tougher to sell than it is now.
Even if some places become uninhabitable, they probably won't do so immediately.
But remember that it will probably become gradually and increasingly harder.
To live there, and as the area around you deteriorates, the likelihood of your getting out short of packing the car in a U-Haul and downright fleeing to the Northwest like the Horikovas becomes ever more bleak.
Someday, we're going to have that situation, you know.
People simply packing their cars and fleeing to the Northwest with nothing but the shirts on their backs.
Yeah, that's going to happen.
Number five.
Never forget how just plain physically dangerous it can be living around large numbers of blacks and Mexicans, and it will get even more dangerous as time goes on.
Staying where you are can get you killed, literally.
As in waking up in the middle of the night and finding some nigger or Mexican standing over your bed with an iron bar or a butcher knife in his hand.
Now, that applies especially when you get older.
It is notorious that elderly white people are easy targets in racially mixed neighborhoods.
The stupid nignogs or beaners always assume that old white people have a fortune stuffed in their mattresses, being as they're too stupid to realize that if the old white guy had any money, he wouldn't be living around them.
Number six.
If you have children, think.
Think hard.
What kind of future do they have where you are now?
You really need to consider the larger consequences of committing to a place that almost certainly does not have a future.
Your children will probably have to leave to get work, maybe go into the military because those are the only jobs available these days for white boys.
I can't repeat this enough.
Donald Trump was an accident, a flaw in the pattern, a glitch in the system.
He is going to be removed, and eventually the aging crone Hillary or the high yellow negress Kamala Harris, or whoever ends up on the top of the heap, will ensure that the Democrats finally create their one-party state.
So stop counting on the Republicans to save you.
Once that ultimate amnesty bill goes through...
However many years down the pike that happens when the Democrats finally get back in or else some high-yilla bitch simply signs an executive order, the Republicans are never going to see the inside of the Oval Office again.
If you have land or something you hope to pass down to your kids, what's it going to be worth 30 years from now?
You see, this is the whole key to homecoming, thinking about the big picture, about the future, not just the inconveniences of the present.
Number seven.
If your present home is untenable and you plan to move anyway, why not come all the way northwest?
There are people on this list who started coming west from the east coast and they stopped just short of the homeland.
They ended up in places like South Dakota and Salt Lake City.
They moved northward in California out of Los Angeles, but they stopped short of the Oregon state line.
Why the hell not come all the way?
I've never understood that.
I think there must be something that frightens people about making that last step.
Driving those last few miles and settling down in the Northwest homeland itself.
Look, if you're going to do it, do it right.
Don't make a half-assed migration, a homecoming light.
Go all the way.
Come home here to the Pacific Northwest and don't dig around with the Dakotas or Northern California or Alaska or whatever.
By the same token, I noticed that a lot of homecomers pointedly avoid the area where I myself am.
Okay, what with the real estate prices in the Puget area soaring into the stratosphere to where Seattle is now the third most expensive city for housing after New York and San Francisco, that's partly down to me.
I cannot in good conscience tell everybody to come here and hang with Harold when housing costs an arm and a leg and your firstborn child, and so I'm always totally up front about the disadvantages of coming here.
Jobs are no problem.
I've never seen a homecomer here remain unemployed for longer than about three weeks.
And back in the aughts, that was a major consideration, but $1,500 a month for a livable one-bedroom apartment?
I get it if that's too rich for a white boy's blood, but there's something else that comes into play here.
It's like they're afraid I'll make demands on their time and their resources, and they're right, I will.
That's fine.
I know a lot of people aren't coming here to the Northwest to help me or the NF.
They're coming to find a little hole in the woods to hide in from the big bad world and pull it in after them.
Which I get.
Look, it's better to do the right thing for the wrong reason than to do the wrong thing for any reason.
As long as you land on your ass here in the Northwest, you're headed in the right direction.
Guys, this Trump thing is great.
Because he has the potential to destabilize the system to the point where change is possible.
But, I'm sorry, your moral duty to the 14 words in history demands that you pack the moving van or the U-Haul.
But our time is up for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 2188, Bremerton, Washington, 98310.
Or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.
Until then, Sarsha Underban.
Freedom.
▲
Export Selection