All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 30, 2017 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
58:45
20171130_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you curry so.
Hush-a-woogle, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon.
For the bikes must be together by the rising of the moon Oh, then tell me, Sean O'Farrell, where the gathering is to be In the old spot by the river, rightful known to you and me One more roar for
signal, token, whistle, up and arching tune For your bike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon Which arrived upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon Out from many a mud-walled cabin eyes were watching through the night Many a manly chest was throbbing for the blessed warming light The waters passed along the
valleys like the man she's lonely crew And a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon At the rising of the moon, at the rising of the moon And a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon It's November the 30th, 2017.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
First off, as you guys will probably be able to tell from my voice during the podcast, I've managed to come down with a howler of a cold.
So if I sound a little off this week, that'll be why.
I'd like to thank the comrades who provided our Thanksgiving feast this year here in the Puget area.
Our attendance was a little lighter than usual because more people than most had family obligations elsewhere this year.
But that's what happens when people migrating into your area actually have families.
I would especially like to thank the couple who provided the huge, tasty, black forest-style ham and the deep-fried turkey.
Okay, deep-fried turkey may not be exactly traditional, but let me tell you, it's good.
Andy Donner outdid himself on the pies as usual, although unfortunately, I can't eat pie anymore due to diabetes, not to mention a whole lot of other stuff.
God, I miss eating.
Haven't had a donut or a bowl of ice cream in years.
This year, as always, I posted the true story of Thanksgiving on the Thought Crime blog, which I won't go into now the holiday's over, but this sparked a kind of historical back and forth on my email, and it's inspired me to insert here one of my famous or infamous Grandpa Simpson digressions.
One trick is to tell them stories that don't go anywhere.
Like the time I caught the ferry over to Shelbyville, I needed a new heel for my shoe.
So, I decided to go to Morganville, which is what they call Shelbyville in those days.
So I tied an onion to my belt, which was the style at the time.
Now, I got into a discussion earlier this week with a comrade on the origin of the whole Northwest idea, to the effect of, who actually thought up the idea of an independent white republic in the Pacific Northwest?
Who really is the father of the Northwest imperative?
Was it me?
Nope.
Robert Miles?
Nope.
Pastor Richard Butler?
Nope.
Nor was it the Order Men or Sheldon Emery or even the so-called State of Jefferson back in 1941.
The man who first had the idea of making a separate white nation out of the Pacific Northwest was former Vice President of the United States Aaron Burr back in 1807, who along with General James Wilkinson wanted to set up another nation was to the Mississippi.
In what was then the Louisiana Purchase, in a territory that had just been surveyed by Lewis and Clark.
It was also known as the Northwest Territory.
The actual rationale behind this was the very good one for the time that it was simply impossible to govern a territory as huge as the United States plus the Northwest Territory from a city on the east coast of a vast and mostly empty continent.
Wilkinson and Burr even went so far as to plan a new capital for this new Northwest Territory Nation, which was supposed to be somewhere around what is now St. Louis.
It was kind of a harebrained scheme that never really got off the ground, and Burr was tried for treason twice and acquitted both times.
But just so you know, this idea of an independent nation in the Northwest is not something new in American history.
It's almost as old as the United States itself.
Now...
Moving right along here, I have also been asked to do some crystal ball gazing by Comrade Martin from Centralia.
Dear HAC, here's a crystal ball type question I bet you have not gotten yet.
How do you think patents and copyrights should be handled in the Republic?
I don't need to rehash how the enemy has used them against us in the past, but I do think there should be some way for people to ensure that they can benefit from their creations for a time before their work passes on to the folk.
It's not in the draft constitution, nor is it mentioned in any of the novels.
I suppose it's something that should be left to the legislature since, as I said before, the Constitution does call for such a body, and you don't do that unless you mean for it to legislate.
The Constitution doesn't have to spell out every little thing.
I would suggest a 20-year term which can be renewed once by the Creator, their spouse, or their children only.
Everything in existence at the time of independence will be considered to be in the public domain.
Corporations cannot hold copyrights.
Everyone must be owned by a flesh-and-blood person.
You can license it to whomever you please, but a company cannot own it.
Signed, Martin.
Well, you're right, Martin.
Patent and copyright law in the Northwest Republic is not something I've devoted any great amount of thought to, although you'd think that wouldn't be the case, what with me being a writer and all.
Okay, this gets into a larger question, actually the question of what I suppose I might call normal everyday business and economic relations between the Northwest Republic and the outside world.
What will they be like?
Now, that will depend on how absolute and how crushing the sanctions which the Americans and the Canadians will impose on us might become.
And more effectively, it depends on how seriously and efficiently enforced those sanctions are.
I discussed some of this in Freedom of Sons, Section 4, the one called Border Towns.
I know you're talking about intellectual property law internally within the Republic, Martin, and as far as that goes, material that is written or composed or invented or produced within the bounds of the NAR for use within the NAR.
Yeah, that system you described sounds like it might work, but the fact is that one of the lesser-known consequences of independence will be that the Northwest Republic itself will be compelled to commit regular violations of international copyright and patent infringement laws in order to survive.
Basically, we will want or need certain patented or copyrighted stuff that the rest of the world says we're not supposed to have, and we're going to basically have to flip the rest of the world the bird.
I recall that in Rhodesia, there were bookstores and music stores in Salisbury and Bulawayo, wherein you could walk in and buy the latest books and paperbacks and vinyl albums, mostly from the UK.
I don't recall much in the way of cassettes, but this was in 1974, and music albums on cassettes were just getting started over here.
In theory, those items weren't supposed to be sold in a sanctioned country like Rhodesia, or in those days, Cuba, North Vietnam, North Korea, and it seems to me one other country that was officially out of bounds according to my American passport at the time.
What the hell was it in the 70s?
Maybe communist China, but it seems to me that it was some little pissant commie country like Albania for some reason.
Or was it Algeria?
Anyway, the official line in those days was that anyone holding an American passport was to have nothing at all to do with any of those countries on pain of being buggered by buffaloes.
Rhodesia was not actually on the outright travel ban list because of the large numbers of church groups that had missions and missionaries in the country.
And in those days, the Protestant evangelical sects actually had some real juice.
Technically, it was the same with copyrighted and patented material.
Items that were not supposed to be sold and used in Rhodesia, not just because of our wicked racist ways, but because sanctions and foreign currency restrictions made it impossible to collect royalties.
Remember, patent and copyright law is about money.
So far as I'm aware, people holding copyrights in the UK or the rest of the world never raised a stink about their copyrighted books and music being read and played and sold in Rhodesia, most likely because of the impossibility of enforcing a complete boycott and isolation against any group of people.
Rhodesia was a tiny market, and the amount of money wasn't that big of a deal, which is probably another reason no attempt was ever made, to my knowledge, to enforce copyright law.
Mostly, the world powers that be seem to have simply ignored the issue.
A man is, first and foremost, an economic animal, and if there is a demand for goods or services, and people are willing to pay for them, somebody is going to step up and fill that need.
That is economics Dr. Jekyll, the free enterprise system and the free market.
As opposed to capitalism, which is the Mr. Hyde of economics.
The iron law of supply and demand applies to everything.
From exotic animal smuggling, to narcotics, to sanctions against Iran and North Korea.
And it will apply to the Northwest American Republic.
People on both sides of the border will be economic animals.
And despite all the attempts to clamp down the iron heel from Washington, deals will be made and commerce will flow.
Greetings from Seattle.
Andy Donner here.
I need to briefly bend your ear about a somewhat sensitive subject I had hoped I could just avoid entirely.
Having heard herald segments from recent RFNs, though, I'm going to have to put my foot down in support of professionalization.
This Back to the Future business, or professionalization, or whatever we end up calling it, is something the party has resisted for some time.
While it's true that the party has been asking for something similar ever since it was founded, it has generally expected individuals would adopt these responsibilities on their own, as a result of having matured correctly.
This maturation was expected to be a process that occurred naturally.
Through first becoming white nationalist and working through the various materials provided by the party, up to the point of actively engaging any lingering aspects of the character issue.
The final step in this, of course, is completing one's own Northwest migration.
It's important to understand that this isn't a mere formality, either.
Having done so myself, I can promise that it's the source of the reference points I and the others you hear on RFN use to make the remarks we choose to make.
Something happened recently, and it's the metaphorical straw that broke the camel's back.
Someone, who was most likely shitposting, said something on Twitter and I got looped into a conversation about this thing they said.
If you know what I'm talking about, then you know.
If you don't know, then please don't worry about it.
I'm certainly not going to repeat it here, since it's not the sort of thing that needed to be said in any context, even shitposting.
And it's absolutely not something the party agrees with in any regard.
If the NF is going to professionalize, the first step is to insist that you do not speak for us unless we say so.
The party has resisted a traditional white nationalist formal organization, but that's clearly not flying.
The first thing you'll all note about formal organizations is that everyone involved more or less does what they're told.
And no, this isn't about homecoming as such.
I'm talking more generally right now about towing the line in terms of ideology and policy.
I'm not going to go into details about what happened because they're outright disgusting, so I'm forced to be somewhat circumspect.
What I need to get across to you is that you individually have no place making pronouncements on policy or ideology for the party.
There's a really drawn-out history of people loosely associated with the NF making said association known and then doing a 180 and contradicting us.
I don't think this is something people do on purpose exactly, but it's got to stop regardless.
This mess on Twitter isn't the first time it's happened, and sadly it's not going to be the last.
Thankfully, I can at least talk about a couple other examples of this that are eminently relatable.
The first of these examples is an odd email someone sent Harold that he looped me in on.
Several months ago, someone attempted to organize a protest in response to that now-famous molestation incident in Idaho, where, if memory serves, not only was the refugee pervert not punished, but the family of the victim was placed under a gag order by the court handling the case.
This protest organizer, according to his email, had managed to work up a coalition of all sorts of random pseudo-racial individuals and grouplets to put on this protest, and one of the people slated to attend this shindig claimed to be with the NF.
This person's presence led the organizer to get the NF's blessing.
As nice as it is to be asked that sort of thing, since it seemed as though the idea was to run the event quite literally under the NAR tricolor, the NF isn't into the movement staple of the streetwalk, because, as has been addressed a few times a year every year since this program started, the reasoning behind these things is faulty.
And that's putting it nicely.
Nevertheless, learning from others'mistakes seems to be a lost art, so white nationalists insist on repeating the learning curve themselves.
I'd rehash all that, but I need to stay focused.
To my knowledge, there's been only one single solitary public appearance that the Northwest Front even tacitly approved of.
Someone known to the HQ people personally, and whom we are sure will represent us well, had a table at a gun show in Oregon some years back.
That's it.
Other than this, if the NF was present at your event, it wasn't really the NF.
This caused me personally, and the party generally, a real problem when some skinheads in Washington State decided that we somehow owed them for their help at a previous shindig of ours, which you should understand by now was nothing of the sort.
Some skins in our general area.
We're going to square off with various Antifa scum and tried to get our attention on a now-defunct Facebook page so that we would...
Honestly, I don't know what they were expecting.
For all I know, they wanted the Olympic flying column of the Northwest Volunteer Army to back them up in their tete-a-tete with Antifa.
I tried explaining to them that this isn't the sort of thing the NF does as a matter of policy, only to find out that apparently we were in their debt because they showed up to one of our rallies.
Not having had any rallies, there wasn't a whole lot for me to say.
They were able to name a specific place and date, though, and while I forget the details, they weren't making it up.
Nothing I found in the media named the NF specifically, but that's almost always the case.
Even so, I can promise you that this was not one of our events because, and let this sink in, we do not do that.
None of that seemed to matter, though, since some anonymous person out there took it upon themselves to speak for the party in some matter where they absolutely had no business doing so.
Like I said when I started out today, we wanted to be a little bit more casual about this sort of thing, but that hasn't worked out.
It pains me to say so, too, since most of the time those doing this think they're helping.
Nevertheless, I'm going to insist that this sort of thing stop.
Thankfully, nothing catastrophic has happened, and this, again, is due to the effort these people put forward.
Perhaps the best example of this is the guy who created a Facebook page for the party a few years ago and made me an admin.
He was super dedicated and did everything he possibly could to get attention where it's needed.
But, of course, Antifa managed to shut it down in short order.
In the meantime, though, I had to curb an awful lot of things that shouldn't have gone on.
None of this was his fault as such.
He just didn't know the political landmines to avoid when talking on behalf of the party or engaging other white nationalist pages who only pretend to be, quote, But in addition to not making policy pronouncements, it's probably best that you don't try to do the party favors on the internet.
Republishing our material and sending people our way is fine, of course, but in the time I've been with the NF, there have been almost a dozen attempts at starting social media accounts or making use of online services on the party's behalf.
Could you all do us a favor and tell us if you think we need something?
We need to be the ones making decisions about how we present ourselves since, again, regardless of the intent, mistakes have been made about this in the past and they turned out to be unfixable.
Normally, we're pretty genial around here, but if this continues to be a problem, it's going to negatively impact your relationship with the party in light of the trouble this behavior is going to cause us if we don't tamp it down.
This goes double for anything involving shitposting.
As fun as it can be, too much makes it impossible to tell when you're not joking.
Leave the NF out of it.
And most importantly, unless you're told otherwise, you don't speak for us, and you damned sure don't contradict us on points of ideology, policy, or acceptable public activity.
This is Michael Davis and Sarah Jarosz.
I stood on a mountain and planted some pines in the sand.
Every day I'd look their way, but I just couldn't understand why they never grew like I wanted them to.
I just couldn't understand why.
Now I've rambled around this whole world through Wednesday.
I just happened back.
Tall pines, tall pines.
Reaching out for the clouds.
Tall pines, tall pines.
I bet you wouldn't know me now.
I'll never forget the morning I left.
The hum of the bees in the hay.
The farther I walk, the louder they talk.
How silent it seems here today.
There's the old rail fence we built each line.
Surrounding the old family grave.
And there's one gravestone standing all alone.
You're waiting to meet me in the shade.
Tall pines, tall pines.
Reaching out for the clouds.
Tall pines, tall pines.
How could you blow me down?
I'm sorry.
Tall pines, tall pines.
Reaching up for the clouds.
Tall pines, tall pines.
I bet you wouldn't know me now.
We'll be right back.
Thank you.
Tonight I'm going to be discussing Part 2 of Albert Speer's Inside the Third Reich.
Now, Speer's career took a meteoric rise when Dr. Tot died in a plane crash.
Very soon afterwards, Hitler appointed Speer as a Minister of Armaments.
Now, this was a somewhat difficult adjustment for Speer, who confessed his lack of experience.
Sometimes in the Reich, roles could overlap, and his new role was one that could conflict with the Reich's marshal.
At any rate, Speer drew upon his skill as an architect to imagine the four-year plan in 3D.
Speer found ways to streamline production.
For example, one of his ideas was a reimagining of submarine production.
Under Spear, subs were built in pieces in an assembly line process inland and then were assembled near the shore.
Spear also wanted to increase the use of fighter planes.
And instead of carpet bombing, Spear wanted to focus on more precision tactics.
Also, too, labor shortage was a great concern.
Foreign workers were considered, but Spear questioned the wisdom of this.
The loyalty of these foreign workers could certainly be questionable, and language issues would also come up.
As a result of these concerns, Speer wanted to bring German women into the production lines.
As we know, this was a tactic employed by the Allies, and it was employed to great effect.
All of these ideas met with tremendous resistance.
They were seen as really too unconventional.
The other idea, however, that was implemented was that by the mid-40s, Germany was really overextended with war production, whereas in France, factories lay dormant and many French people were not employed.
So it really made sense to revise French factories So that the French could concentrate on making civilian goods and the Germans would make armaments.
Also, too, after the bombing of Hamburg, there was some concern about the availability of ball bearings, which were used in many industries.
So Speer would replace the ball bearings with subslide bearings when this was necessary.
By the height of the war, Hitler had abandoned his former easygoing schedule and ultimately forsook his leisure and was really engaged in a state of constant work.
But Speer noted that this really was ill-suited to Hitler's temperament.
Speer felt that it would be productive if Hitler would gain a better understanding of what was happening at the front.
And to this end, Speer arranged many meetings with active military personnel.
But when Hitler met with these personnel, they would often speak of shortages.
And this would be very upsetting to Hitler.
Sometimes Hitler is portrayed as dealing with the stress by taking a certain refuge in details, such as learning every possible detail about various munitions.
Or he would think about his plans for after victory, and one of these plans was a railway that would connect the entire Reich.
Because of the situation on the Eastern Front, Hitler developed a respect for Stalin and Stalin's son, and also Russians in general.
But of course we know that all of these bombings were a great strain on Germany and also on Hitler, and he really couldn't bear to look at the destruction.
The other thing was that as a result of all this bombing, anti-tank weapons were desperately needed on the Eastern Front, but they were even more desperately needed as anti-aircraft guns.
Now, one question that would come up with regard to the bombing raids was the question of whether or not churches and castles should be rebuilt.
Now, for some of the more extreme members of the party, and in particular the Galatiers, which were a paramilitary group, these symbols were really viewed as too reactionary.
And they did not wish to reconstruct them.
Now, this is very reminiscent of the notion of National Socialism being a left-wing movement.
But by the mid-40s, most party members really found these ideas too strict.
And, in fact, Speer would encourage the preservation of historic sites.
This would mean very often times that these historic sites had to be reinforced after heavy bombing.
Sometimes Speer would overstep.
For example, at one point he talked too freely about the availability of manganese, and he felt that he could talk about this relatively freely because essentially he had good news.
But Hitler corrected him on this and said that He wanted to have ultimate control of the output of that kind of information.
For a time, Speer was considered as something of an heir apparent.
But because of this disregard of protocol, it eventually put him into a lesser degree of favor.
Speer criticizes members of the regime for being...
So desirous to save their own lives that late in the war, they tended to lavish materials on personal shelters.
And also, too, they tended to ask very little of the civilian population in terms of overall self-sacrifice.
Certainly not the kind of self-sacrifice that was employed by the Allies.
Eventually, such measures would be taken at the very end of the war, but that would be too little too late.
This was largely because party members feared for morale.
And they felt that an injection of fantasy, such as repairing theaters, would be helpful to the rank and file.
Now, granted, notions of fantasy and escapism were true, really, on both sides during the war.
But at any rate, I do have to say that historically, I think...
I think that many people did become invested in winning when they felt like they were engaging in meaningful work.
Now, this is not to say that this would have worked for the Axis, but when I look at the situation in America, for example, I would say that The majority of citizens, and this was also true, I suppose, in England, they understood how dire the situation was, and when more was asked of them, they really wanted to contribute.
So I agree with Spears' concern that not enough was asked of non-combatants in terms of things like war production.
Also, too, Speer notes that Germany was reluctant to go into occupied countries and use their various raw materials.
Speer also talks about the hard water project, and as we all know, the sabotage and bombings would cause the hard water project to never develop fully.
Hitler also seems to believe that this notion of new weaponry was so extreme that it was possibly difficult for Hitler to imagine.
But he also has this other theory that Hitler did in fact imagine it, but deemed the new type of weapon to be too dangerous.
Secondly, one could make the argument that when you're talking about the atomic bomb and things of that sort, that kind of weaponry is a creature of large spaces.
It lends itself to deserts or maybe the steppe, but I suppose one could be rather reluctant to experiment with something like that when one has only perhaps a small space.
Also, it is mentioned in a footnote of this book that there was an individual who was roughly a contemporary of Einstein, somewhat older than Einstein, by the name of Dr. Leonard.
And he always felt that all this theory of relativity was a Semitic notion, that it was far too abstract.
And so he really had very little faith in the work of Einstein, and he was a nationalist bent.
So Speer theorizes to what extent Hitler might have been influenced by the thinking of Dr. Leonard.
At any rate...
I know there are some people these days, there is a theory that perhaps Germany did have an atomic bomb, but they decided not to use it.
This theory is really one of those theories that is just water under the bridge.
It doesn't really matter now.
If indeed that was true, it's hard to reconcile that with the desperate last days in the bunker.
So whether Hitler believed the development of such a bomb was too dangerous, whether he simply believed that it was impossible, or whether he just couldn't make it because of the aerial bombardments and the problem of raw materials, seems to be, at this point, of course, really a very academic question.
So, I hope you found this interesting.
Again, I've been discussing the second part of Albert Spears Inside the Third Reich.
So, thank you for listening.
Have a good evening.
Inhale victory, comrades.
Thank you.
We're going to do what they say can't be done.
We've got a long way to go, and it's short time to get there.
I'm Westbound just like a bandit run.
If you put hard on the belt, and some never mind it breaks, let it all hang out cause we gotta run the bandit.
Greetings, comrades.
This is the Trucker coming at you from the homeland.
I'm sitting outside Portland right now, making my way back home for Thanksgiving, and I'm seeing a few U-Hauls.
Out there, moseying down the road.
I know it's probably not any of you because you're just too comfortable sitting at home or wherever you happen to be at in the United States or wherever and don't feel like taking the plunge and migrating.
Well, the weather is getting a little slicker.
I heard snow the other day coming up out of Nevada on my way up here.
The roads aren't that bad.
Of course, there's always Wyoming, and that place gets crappy just about any time of year, be it wind or snow or whatever.
But, yeah, probably wouldn't be a good time of year to go cruising across Wyoming.
But I just thought I'd go and touch base with you on this upcoming Thanksgiving later this week.
If there's, I don't know, if there's a layer this week or what week, but anyway.
Up here, coming across the homeland on I-84, there was various places that I saw RVs parked in kind of right alongside the Columbia River on the Oregon side by Rufus, Oregon.
It was kind of a do-it-yourself park that they had RVs out there.
Sailboarders use that a lot, windsurfers, people like that, or people that just want to go.
And park their RVs alongside the river.
I didn't see any fee gates there.
Did have bathrooms.
You'd have to go and provide your own showers.
But there was one RV out there.
Somebody dropped a trailer out there and you could tell it was somebody living out of it.
Just by the age of the trailer and the amount of stuff piled around it and the way it was secured out there and stuff.
So those of you that are single or...
Young married without kids and stuff and feel like semi-ruffing it.
Well, there's always...
Get rid of everything that you don't need and shoehorn what you can into a RV trailer and pull it behind some vehicle suitable for that size trailer and go and find some jobs out here, wherever.
But yeah, there's places where people go and be able to park RVs without having to go and pay rent and stuff.
You just have to figure out some source of power for them and have a job to go and be able to feed yourself and have food or fuel and stuff to move the thing around if you need.
So I just thought I'd throw that out there.
For those of you that are thinking about starting a business out here, well, I haven't made it home yet to check out the latest gun shop in Bremerton that just opened up here this last Saturday.
Tankworks with an X armory.
Should be interesting to see what they have in there.
Looking forward to that.
But there's other things if you want to be an entrepreneur around here.
Coffee stands.
There's a lot of places that go and make sheds or shed-like buildings.
And you can go and upscale them to go and be able to live out of on property and stuff that's unincorporated and doesn't have a whole lot of zoning ordinances and stuff where you'd have to go and meet the city specs and stuff.
Yeah, that and, like I say, coffee stands around the truck stops and stuff.
There's a lot of people that come around polishing, wanting to polish chrome and stuff.
Either have their own generator or something like that and just go and polish wheels and chrome and tanks and stuff if you feel like doing that kind of stuff.
In the wintertime, by the passes, I've seen people out there hanging chains for money and they also cruise up and down the passes picking up chains and repairing them and reselling them to truck drivers.
So that's another thought.
But anyway, so I just thought I'd go and touch base and throw that out to you and give you some ideas of things to do out here.
But like I say, it's probably not the best time of year to be traveling.
It's getting into winter, and like I say, we've seen a few snowstorms across Wyoming already.
All right, this is the dark.
Signing off from Portland, Oregon at the TA.
Have a good one, comrades, and hope to see you making your scouting trips and making your migration out here to the homeland.
Signing off from Portland.
We're going to do what they say can't even go.
We've got a long way to go.
Any short time to get there, I'm Chris Bounders, but you're ready to run.
We've got a long way to go.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Had this young lady on last week.
To my amazement, nobody emailed in telling me all about how she was a mad lesbo avenger or a Jew or a secret feminist or some kind of FBI undercover or whatever.
Nobody started screaming at the top of their lungs and yelling and hollering that this girl was just absolutely imperfect and no, no, no.
I must not read podcaster stuff, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Actually, so far as I can tell, she's exactly what she appears to be.
She's a nice-looking young woman who has proven that, yes, it's possible for white women to wake up.
And so, yeah, I'm pinching a couple of her YouTubes to podcast on here.
I apologize for the little section in Spanish here, but you've got to bear in mind that what she's doing is she's doing a video, and she actually pulled this from, like, a news clip, the Spanish bit.
Anyway, her name's Lauren Rose.
We have to go back.
I don't want to set the world on fire.
I just want to start a flame in your heart.
In my heart I have but one desire And that one is you No other will do I saw two new stories and new statistics that have come out from the Census Bureau that
support my claim in yesterday's video.
Absolutely, which is that the U.S. doesn't do nearly enough to assimilate people from other countries and other cultures into the U.S. and American culture.
U.S. Census Bureau just released statistics of percent of people speaking languages other than English in their households, people age five and above, so most Americans, who speak a different language, a foreign language at home, so not English.
California, you're at 44.6%.
44.6% of Californians do not speak English at home.
Why don't we hear this in the news?
This data came out yesterday.
Why isn't this everywhere?
You know what really grinds my gears, though, about California and Californians?
The same people who vote for these policies for illegal immigrants to stay here and create sanctuary cities and increase immigration, all these great, diversity-loving people.
They either, one, are living in their ivory towers, their gated communities, and will never experience the glories of diversity of the Champagne Socialists, or they're fleeing California.
In the last about ten years, over five million Californians have left California.
They're moving out at a rapid rate because...
Gang activity is increasing, and illegal immigrant population is increasing.
So what does that tell you?
The Californians love to virtue signal with their votes and attitudes towards illegal immigrants.
Oh yeah, we love them.
We love everybody.
And then, when they come into their country and start changing it, I mean, sorry, state.
When they come into their state and start changing it fundamentally, to the point where 44% aren't even speaking English at home, what do they do?
They leave.
Bye-bye!
Bye, California!
Should we just cut it off and let it float into the ocean?
Should we just give it to Mexico?
Let them secede?
If only there were a way to keep the Californians who voted and behaved in that manner in California and banned them from ever leaving.
Maybe then they'd change their votes if they knew they had to stay there and tear down their gates, their walls around their communities, right?
Because they don't want a wall on the border, but they want one around their house.
So yeah, 44% of...
Californians are not speaking English at home.
I thought that was incredible.
The national average is now 21%, I believe.
21% of people do not speak English at home in the U.S. 1 in 5. Okay, let's move to the next story.
I don't want to think about that one too much.
Now let's talk about the heartwarming story of Jovita Mendez.
*music*
I never thought I would reach this.
It's the same thing that I don't know how to write and read, but I informed me about the classes that the lady gave, the Mrs. Maribel, and I read me three or four times.
I always read the words and read it to me so I could leave them.
She said to me, "No matter, the other is the good one.
Don't you get excited, you will be able to pass." She is very intelligent, she is left the words, I'm happy.
So Jovita Mendez is, well, is now going to be a U.S. citizen, but has been living in the U.S. illegally for 20 years.
Now...
During that time, she has never learned to read, write, or speak English.
20 years in America, still doesn't know how to speak English, read, or write.
She's illiterate.
So, in order for Jovita to be naturalized into the U.S. and become a citizen, she has to pass the naturalization test, which is administered by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
Now, a naturalization test is a civics test, so like about American history and government.
And you get asked 10 questions, and you must answer 6 out of 10 of these questions correctly.
Now, the 10 questions that you will receive come from a pool of 100 civics questions that they could possibly ask you.
But every question they could possibly ask you is available online with the answers.
So you can study it, read it all you want, and then they'll ask you 10 of them.
You only need to get 6 right, and then you pass.
That's how easy it is.
So, Jovita, again, 20 years in the U.S., never learned how to speak English, write, read, nothing.
So, Jovita, she couldn't stand to learn English and pass this test.
So, what she did was her professor or teacher for the test, instead of teaching her English, emphasizing the importance of speaking English in our country.
She memorized the English answers.
So she memorized the questions and their answers.
And that's it.
She still doesn't know how to speak English.
She just played basically a big memory game.
And she passed.
And now this is a great story because now Jovita gets to be a US citizen even after living here illegally for 20 years.
And she still doesn't have to speak English at all.
How is it that you can admit on video after passing your naturalization test?
Yeah, I never learned English.
I just memorized the answers.
Instead, it's all praise.
Wow, she did it and she didn't even have to learn English.
That's amazing.
Like, what?
We're supposed to be encouraging assimilation.
And it's the exact opposite.
Now it's like, what is it, cool that she never learned English?
It's like, really cool that she figured it out without having to learn English.
She just memorized the sounds and put them together.
Oh, man.
At least one in five Americans.
Americans.
Don't speak English at home, and that illegal immigrants are encouraged to take their naturalization tests and not encouraged to actually learn the language or put in the effort, but rather memorize the answers to a very simple test in which you only have to get about half of the answers right anyway.
Trying to force a little assimilation.
No good, so let's just wait until every household's, you know, 60% of households are speaking a different language at home.
70% of households.
We're already at 20!
Why wouldn't it keep going up?
Give me a reason why it's not going to keep increasing.
We have to go back.
Let me know what you guys think we should do about California and what we should do about that naturalization test that is easy enough for people who don't even speak English to pass and become citizens.
What do you think about that?
Please let me know.
And I'll see you guys in the next video.
Bye!
Okay, I was going to drop in a little Back to the Future for my closing monologue, but I see Andy's already done so, and so I can move on to another equally sore point of discussion.
Again, I apologize for the nasal and stopped-up sound of my voice, which I can tell even as I speak these words is going to come across pretty bad, not to mention interrupting myself with coughing fits, which I will have to edit out with my trusty wave pad.
Now...
Occasionally, I get these emails complaining that, Oh, Harold, Harold, all you and Andy ever talk about these days is the internet.
No, we talk about ideas and information that comes to us off the internet, which isn't exactly the same thing.
Whether we like it or not, the internet is the only means of mass communication open to white nationalism right now, and we have to use it while we still have access to it.
Which may not be for long, what with all the deplatforming going on.
Lest we forget, there are some very bad people out there who are trying to deny us access to the internet, and they may succeed.
If it's any consolation to all you Luddites out there, as I mentioned last week, there's a good chance that after December the 18th, Andy and myself and almost everybody else who ever uttered a single word, even mildly to the right of center, is going to be banned from Twitter altogether, so we won't be talking about tweets too much longer.
Be careful what you wish for.
You might get it.
I joke on here about going back to paper and postage stamp and the mimeograph machine in the garage, but come on now, let's think about this.
Do we really want to do that?
I don't.
I admit, having instantaneous communication at my fingertips has spoiled the hell out of me.
Okay, this particular somewhat internet-related sore point topic is emails and private tweets and blog comments I've been getting to the effect of...
Oh, Harold, Harold, you're reverting back to the bad old days.
You just don't do nothing but attack everybody.
You have to stop punching right.
Punching right is the latest hip term for dealing with the white character issue in public in a way that makes the guilty parties feel uncomfortable because I'm holding up a mirror and they see themselves in it.
Back in the day, it used to be, Harold, Harold, you gotta take the high road, be the bigger man, and just ignore all these clearly organized and systematic campaigns of falsehood and vilification directed against you, which originated from sources never quite made clear.
In other words, just lie down and take it, shut the fuck up, and stop telling tales out of school about some of the things that our former fearless leaders used to get up to on white people's dime.
Remember.
The second prime directive is that whenever there is bad behavior in the white nationalist movement, it is always Harold Covington's fault for speaking about it in public.
Never the fault of the people who actually did the bad behavior.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, I've heard it all before and will take it all as read.
The big thing now is that I am supposedly quote-unquote fighting a feud with Richard Spencer, the man whom the media have officially appointed to be our fearless leader.
I have to say, I always think it's kind of our friends in the Fourth Estate to explain to us so carefully and patiently as they always do just who our racial leaders are.
Otherwise, we might never even have known that Richard Spencer is our Alpha and Omega, our maximal leader.
Thanks, guys.
The official line is that I'm quote-unquote jealous of Spencer because he's getting all the publicity now, and he's this big, brave, heroic, handsome young man who boldly strides around in public wearing his cool Elwood blue sunglasses inspiring the masses.
I'm not sure inspiring them to do what, and I'm not sure he knows himself.
If he does, he isn't talking to anybody.
I'm not sure that the 400 or 500 guys he got to come out to Charlottesville really constitute the masses.
I've pointed out before that what really happened in Charlottesville is we were able to bring together, through a massive effort, roughly the same number of people as a fairly well-attended wedding reception or bar mitzvah.
And I say again, for that I give all props to Richard Spencer, because that's the best we've been able to do body-wise since Forsyth County, Georgia, in 1987.
Okay, never mind all that.
Let's just get back to this recrudescence of this idea that, quote-unquote, Harold just attacks people all the time.
I have never made a secret to the fact that I believe we should be taking a few leaves from the Bolsheviks' playbook, which will allow for our modern situation, which by now does not resemble Weimar Germany hardly at all.
Back in the 70s, yeah, there were some parallels and a properly led and adequately financed All-American National Socialist Party might have had a chance, which is one reason I'm convinced Matt Cale is probably sizzling on a skillet somewhere down below right about now.
One of the ideas that the left has always understood is the necessity for internal struggle on the ideological and political fronts.
An internal battle for what Reds call the correct line, the plan that will work.
We have to do that too.
I know it's not pleasant and it's not comfortable.
And 21st century Americans have been socially engineered from birth to demand that all be pleasant and comfortable about them in their lives and to avoid anything that is quote-unquote controversial.
It was not always thus.
White people in earlier ages, such as the Reformation in the 19th century and the early 20th century era of conflicting ideologies, took delight in controversy.
They embraced it.
They ran with it and reveled in debate and disputation on serious matters of life and death and God and man and the universe.
Not the childish horseshit we get on the internet today, by the way, which consists basically of a gaggle of adolescents of all ages going nyeh nyeh nyeh at each other, but I'm talking about genuine, deep.
Not so today.
Today, white boys are taught from birth that one must never rock the boat or answer back or question the official viewpoint of our loving and benevolent state and its appendages.
Because, you see, that might cause controversy.
And controversy is to be avoided at all costs, except when the aforementioned loving and benevolent state desires to make a point and use it to destroy someone.
Now, if you back-sass the boys and the bitches with the power these days, you will be shamed and shunned, cast out from the herd and banned from employment.
And if you can't make a living, you won't be able to live in a nice McMansion and pile it high with stuff.
Essentially, that's what the system's whole deterrent boils down to.
Step out of line and demonstrate that your mind isn't under control, and they will use the law or social mechanisms to take away your stuff.
No, no, Harold, not my stuff.
Gotta have my stuff.
Controversy other than that approved by the state is very, very bad because it might lead to the most horrific of results in a society like ours.
It might cause trouble.
And the one thing that we must not do in our world is to cause trouble.
We are 21st century white Americans, and these are the attitudes and coping mechanisms that we've had hardwired into us, and so it's only natural that this is the attitude we would take in our attempts to build a political life on the internet.
And yes, I know, I'm rambling again.
Sorry, this time it's because of the cold.
I'm on a Theraflu high.
Now, to take the ferry cost a nickel, and in those days, nickels had pictures of bumblebees on them.
Give me five bees for a quarter, you'd say.
Now, where were we?
Oh, yeah.
The important thing was that I had an onion on my belt, which was a style at the time.
Okay, staggering back in the general direction of the point.
Before you can build a big, beautiful house as a home for your family, like the Northwest American Republic, you have to plan it, and you have to start with the right tools, the right materials.
And the right craftsmen that you'll need.
You can't use inferior materials or inferior people because if you do, the house will at the very least not be all that it should be and it'll be inadequate for the purpose that it was designed for and at worst, it will collapse on the heads of your children because you couldn't be bothered to exert the effort to do the job right from the beginning.
You have to confer with other people.
Talk about the project in practical terms.
What will be needed by way of money and materials and human resources in order to get this job done?
You need to look to past houses that were built in your neighborhood and analyze what went wrong and what went right with their construction.
What contractors seemed to know what they were doing and which ones failed, and why?
You do not avoid speaking about the entire subject of house building because other people might get upset or uncomfortable when you refer to mistakes that they made in building their own houses.
You do not decline to analyze past errors in detail, pointing out exactly where they went wrong and who was responsible.
You've got to do this.
You are building your house now, and it's got to stand for a thousand years.
Guys, you need to relearn a very old Aryan thing that all of us white boys used to do because it was our role in the scheme of things.
You need to learn, once again, to think and not to feel.
That means calm and intelligent reflection on what we're going to do and how we're going to do it, as well as what we're not going to do and how we're not going to do it.
It means open and honest evaluation of what's needed and how we are to proceed, and a healthy and serious awareness of where we have failed in the past, precisely who has failed us and how.
Complete with details and 8x10 glossy photos.
Nothing is to be gained from pretending that the deep and systematic flaws of the white man's character don't exist.
They do, and we can't solve them if we're not willing to talk about them.
And if we don't solve the problem of our own weak and contemptible character and learn to transform ourselves into men and women whom our great-grandfathers would recognize, then we will perish from the face of the earth.
But our time is up for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 2188, Bremerton, Washington, 98310.
Or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.
Until then, Sarsha Underban.
Freedom.
▲
Export Selection