Alien life, like a pedophile, you know, and it just seems to tie all of that together.
Welcome to another episode of QAnon Anonymous. I'm your host, Jake, and I'm here with Julian,
and we're going to bring you all things Q.
That's not our new slogan.
Sounds like something on the back of a french fry box.
Full disclosure, I did walk into this podcast carrying a bag of Burger King french fries, double cheeseburger, chicken nuggets.
I was also playing HQ on my phone, so I was the living embodiment of a piece of shit.
He had a soda under his armpit, and he was playing HQ with the same hand.
How else you gonna hold it?
It's fine, man.
I mean, I'm just saying, like, it was beautiful.
Yeah, anyways, I threw all that stuff out.
Ugh, disgusting.
The sound of your fast food shilling is a continual source of discomfort for me.
Ah, Burger King.
So, a couple things before we start off.
There are two rules for Jake is that if he doesn't show up, he has to still pay for the session with me.
And the second rule is he should know that the superior fast food is Wendy's.
Definitely, but it wasn't on the way to your place, so.
Okay, so you're telling me that between where you are and where I am, there's not always two to three Wendy's?
There's one Wendy's, but I would have had to go a little bit out of the way.
It's true that you were five minutes late, so... Yeah, I wanted to.
It was worth it.
And I was going to be on time.
I left my place at 5 p.m., and it took me... I got to Burger King at about 5.30.
I was like, perfect.
Ten minutes, in and out, and I was right up the street.
Yeah.
And it took them 30 minutes to make my double cheeseburger and my ten-piece nugget and my... Yeah, and then people doubt that Q is right about what's happening to our country.
Well, don't let my fast food mistakes fool you.
That has nothing to do with the Great Awakening.
So I have a couple things that I want to address before we jump into today's episode.
Okay.
The first thing was that last episode you caught me with my pants down.
And listener, I'm going to make an effort to actually be educated on all of these different topics so I can attack Jake with a strong... With a gusto.
No, with just a strong foot in the dirt so that if you push back you're fucked anyways and I'm going to put you in a headlock.
I kind of am anyways.
Two things I want to address right off the bat.
The Muslim Brotherhood.
Last week we discussed the potential connection between Huma Abedin and these IT guys in the DNC and the Muslim Brotherhood.
I stated that the Muslim Brotherhood was an extremist, or at least a religious extremist,
entity, even in the places where it does proliferate.
I did some more research just to make sure that everybody actually has the information.
Quite interesting.
I was correct in my first statement, which is that it is considered a very religious
movement even for where it's from.
And that it got kind of famous and higher status, let's say, because after the Egyptian
spring break.
Right.
Yeah, it's in Spring Break when everybody got to Tahir Square.
Yeah, everybody went, everybody got on top of the Sphinx and took the shirts off and, you know, sprayed each other with super soakers.
Spring Break.
So yeah, during that, in the kind of power vacuum that was created afterwards, they came in to fill that void and they have a strong ideology.
They're like strong Sharia, are they not?
They're a Sunni Islamist organization, which is one of the main issues with all Well, the conflicts in the Middle East right now is that we don't usually understand those two sides.
Correct.
Which is one side the Sunnis and the other side the Wendys.
And those two sides don't like each other and we keep ignoring it.
Yeah, some like their shit flame broiled and, you know, some like it heated up in the microwave.
So I'll be bringing you this kind of level of actual in-depth information.
So yeah, so the Muslim Brotherhood, they kind of went in and out of favor with several large countries, including Saudi Arabia that once supported them because they had similar goals, and then now they're considered a terrorist organization by them.
Right.
They're considered a terrorist organization by the governments of Bahrain, Egypt, Russia, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, which doesn't say much, just that they're a player.
And they're currently backed by Qatar and Turkey.
Fantastic.
So there's all kinds of shit going on, but the chance that Huma Abedin, and I will give you a bit of her background, she was born in the wildly Muslim city of Kalamazoo, Michigan in 1976.
The Year of the Muslim Anchor Baby.
So she's, you know, she's better known because she's the one married to Anthony's wiener.
Huge idiot.
Yeah.
Huge wiener.
Noted Democrat.
I don't know if it was big.
Huge idiot.
Mediocre wiener.
Swinging medium pipe.
But anyways, Huma Abedin.
She went to literally girls' boarding schools, British style.
She ended up studying in Washington to do exactly what she's doing, which is a completely uninteresting political figure.
And even though her father was an Islamic and Middle Eastern scholar of Indian descent, so once again, Muslim Brotherhood connection kind of tenuous since they don't really deal with India that much.
But anyways, what he kind of did his whole life was founded incredibly boring journals like the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs.
I mean, it's this kind of It's this kind of like spectacles and a study kind of upwardly mobile post-colonial family.
But it just does not, to me, fit the profile of anybody who would be aligned or associated with the Muslim Brotherhood.
There's no credible connection there other than the name, literally.
And so that's why I wanted to address that early in the show.
Listen to this.
This is an article that was posted on The Hill on August 23rd, 2016.
And it's titled, Huma Abedin's Ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.
You got me.
The Clinton campaign is attempting once again to sweep... by Kenneth R. Timmerman contributor.
So, let me say, it's an opinion.
It's an opinion piece, it seems like.
No, let's examine this.
What's this idiot got to say?
The Clinton campaign is attempting once again to sweep important questions under the rug about top aide Huma Abedin, her family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.
Man, I really have trouble with brotherhood.
I think my lisp comes back a little bit.
I had a bunch of speech impediments when I was a kid.
Sometimes they come back when I reach it.
Don't try to make more fans by making them pity you.
That's all I have.
Her family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and to Saudi Arabia and her role in the ballooning Clinton email scandal.
Yadda, yadda, yadda.
The New York Post ran a detailed investigative... Now that should worry you right away.
I want to say directly, you just stated that she had connections to two different things, one of which considers the other a terrorist organization.
Right.
Her family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and to Saudi Arabia.
So right there we're in some conflicting waters.
We're in some conflicting waters.
And the guy, I mean, this is clearly one of those pieces, right?
It's like, literally what he's saying is they were asked about it and they didn't want to answer it.
And then you can just write an article that says they sweep it under the rug.
Hold on, hold on.
Go on.
The New York Post ran a detailed investigative piece over the weekend about Mrs. Abedin's work at the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs from 1995 through 2008.
That's the one her father founded.
A sharia law journal whose editor-in-chief was Abedin's own mother and founded by her father.
That's not a sharia law journal.
This is not some accidental association.
First of all, there is no sharia law journal.
That doesn't make any sense.
I don't know what that means at all.
That's written by a Fox News-like teleprompter.
But this is The Hill!
No, they're not.
They're deeply stupid and partisan.
But they're stupid on both sides.
I've seen them.
They play both sides of the fence.
This is not an accidental association.
Ms.
Abedin was for many years listed as an associate editor of the London-based publication and wrote for the journal while working as an intern in the Clinton White House in the mid-90s.
Her mother, Saleha Abedin, sits on the Presidency Staff Council of the International Islamic Council for Dawah and Relief, That's their whole thing!
A group that is chaired by the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, Sheikh Yusuf al-Khawarri.
Dude, there are literally other politicians going out and signing arms deals with Saudi Arabia that has direct ties to terrorist activity.
This is not... You're literally just saying, she was on the board of a thing with the word Muslim and he was also... I'm not saying... That's not a connection!
I'm not saying, I'm in New York!
She shares a board with someone?
I'm not saying.
I'm just saying that this hyper-partisan opinion piece by the Hill is supposed to try to shake my ability to see things relatively clearly.
Perhaps recognizing how offensive such ties will be to voters concerned over future terrorist attacks on the country by radical Muslims professing allegiance to Sharia law.
The Clinton campaign on Monday tried to downplay.
Let's see what that says.
That's a clickable link.
Huma Abedin denies active role at Radical Muslim Journal.
But it's not a Radical Muslim Journal.
It's not a Radical Muslim Journal.
It's one of those boring Muslim journals that are, like, put out by, like, the ambassador of whatever.
And their whole family thing is, we will be the diplomats that do the relations between those two countries.
It's not unusual to have American-born people of that descent do, like, outreach.
Right.
So the play here is basically...
Finding this harmless sort of background, and then just labeling the journal a certain thing, and so that therefore... That's like saying if Trump was in a room once with a group of 12 people that he had to make decisions with, that we should be saying that he has connections to every one of those people.
Which, I mean, if we start just applying that kind of thing...
This is tough because, really, what are ties?
What tells me that this is an article that doesn't have much substance is that it doesn't have any actions that she took that would show a kind of bias towards this foreign power.
Right.
Whereas we're literally putting people in jail right now who are hired by foreign powers to represent them, right?
I mean, that's literally what they're doing, is buying a stake in a foreign government, and that happens all the time.
Yeah, there's really nothing here.
My only point is not that Huma Abedin is not a lifetime profiteer, a spoiled rich girl, and a deeply corrupt politician.
I'm not saying that.
I don't know anything about that.
But I'm just saying it doesn't fit that she would be somehow secretly working for an extremist religious organization.
She smells to me of second generation, born in America, probably isn't very practicing.
She does a lot of very diplomatic stuff.
I mean, she's married to a guy named fucking Anthony Weiner, who's like... Man, her parents would have been very, very disappointed in her.
She's more of a private school American kid than anything else, and kind of a classic Democrat who happens to have a history of deeply inoffensive and...
Do you think that there's a possibility that, you know, when she was in Clinton's radar, you know, working in the White House or whatever, that Clinton, you know, just wanting to, you know, have more reach and more connections and more donations... Use her to reach out to those... Use her to reach out to those... What do you mean?
That's literally her role. She's hired, that's what her salary is paid for, to reach out to foreign governments and
start to broker stuff.
You understand all these governments talk to each other all the time and they're negotiating with each other and they're
also spying on each other and betraying each other in micro and massive ways all the time.
So what we're saying kind of is that credible but not important.
It doesn't seem like she would get, uh, I would be way more, um, inclined to believe that she's running, like, like, like that she's potentially taking money from foreign governments to, uh, to slightly, like, alter foreign discourse.
Slightly grease the wheels.
Why would they need that?
Saudi Arabia and America are, like, handing each other's back pocket.
They're sponsoring war in Yemen together.
They're selling weapons to each other.
There's no need to improve that relation or do anything.
Yeah, that doesn't make any sense to me.
And Saudi Arabia are already a deeply religious extremist government that is, like they just recently after having that whole kind of PR push around how he's changing the country and women are gonna be able to drive again, he then is now pushing for potentially like a kind of beheading of a female This is that critic of the government.
This is like that young 30-year-old prince or whatever.
Yeah, yeah.
Mohammed bin Salman.
Yeah, they did try to do a pretty big PR push.
But see, those guys from The Hill, even people in The New York Times and people in Washington Post, they're all doing puff pieces about these kind of burgeoning psychopaths who have access to deep, like, capitalist networks and labor in their own country.
Why?
Because all of those companies are working together to exploit that labor.
Right.
And so, essentially, there's no there there.
It's just, it's been going on forever, and they choose when to report on it because it conveniently fits into some other fucking, you know.
And the Muslim Brotherhood was already enabled In many cases by the American regime.
Like the American regime has no issues working with the Muslim Brotherhood when they need to for whatever ends.
I mean they literally funded the Mujahideen and a lot of extremists under Bush to influence Afghanistan and to influence Iraq.
They did the same thing.
They just sell weapons to whoever in that moment they need to negotiate with.
Even if it would be like just enemy of my enemy but in any In any capacity, they shouldn't quote unquote share the same values.
The real secret here is that they do share the same values.
Those governments are not different from each other.
America is very similar to Saudi Arabia in that it seeks to consolidate power, control information, and expand its reach so that it can continue to enrich the small percent of people that are in charge of it.
Yeah. So there's not that much of a difference there. To kind of tie Huma Abedin, in any way
that sounds shocking or interesting, you have to believe in this kind of Sharia law takeover thing
that is a kind of fox psychosis. Yeah. You would also have to, like you were saying earlier,
you would have to sort of believe that this kind of outreach and this kind of connection
is a secret thing. Yeah, exactly.
You want to hear more secret stuff that's more interesting?
Well, I did a little bit of research because last time we touched on the fact that the CIA is constantly involved in foreign relations.
This is a little piece of writing in the Harvard Review of Latin America, so definitely not some sort of left-wing journal.
I'll read you from it and we can realize at which point he makes a ridiculous statement.
But even he has to admit the interventionism is very intense.
John H. Coatsworth, the whitest man alive, wrote, In the slightly less than 100 years from 1898 to 1994, the U.S.
government has intervened successfully to change governments in Latin America a total of at least 41 times.
That amounts to once every 28 months for an entire century.
Oh my god.
Direct intervention occurred in 17 of the 41 cases.
These incidents involved the use of U.S.
military forces, intelligence agents, or local citizens employed by U.S.
government agencies.
In another 24 cases, the U.S.
government played an indirect role.
That is, local actors played the principal roles but either would not have acted or would not have succeeded without encouragement from the U.S.
government.
Um, this is, this is, uh, so there's like, then he talks about direct interventions, uh, and how he dismissed a bunch of like, um, indirect ones that, that weren't, or even direct ones that were unsuccessful.
Like, he didn't count the Bay of Pigs, which, in which they tried to, uh, in which they tried in April 1961 to literally invade Cuba
by ground. It did not work out for them. So there's obvious ones like that. And then there's
ones that are less obvious. For example, oh, sorry, an obvious another obvious case that was
successful would be the Guatemalan Army, the Oval Office basically incited the Guatemalan Army to
overthrow Miguel Idigoras Fuentes. And that was in order to prevent an open competitive election
that might have been won by left-leaning former president Juan Jose Arevalo.
And then a less obvious case is that of Chilean military coup against the government of President Salvador Allende on September 11, 1973, the original September 11.
Man, all these presidents must be like, every time they get elected or go into the office, they're like, oh man, we got to watch our back.
Those fucking Americans are going to come in any second and fucking try to dethrone us.
So now this is my favorite line of this article and shows you that you're not dealing with a left-wing guy who just is kind of piling on the information.
Overthrowing governments in Latin America has never been exactly routine for the United States.
How could you write that statement after saying they intervened 41 times over 100 years?
Once every 18 months, what was it?
Well, this is the kind of mental gymnastics you have to do directly after that kind of information, because you're a scholar, right?
So you've studied at Harvard, you've gotten the information, and then you have to still say something that is somewhat in line with the way you believe things are.
Like, first of all, imagine the level of Insanity that you would have to think that it's normal for this to happen 41 times in a hundred years.
And imagine if it were to happen, because the continent of South America is about the size of the United States.
I mean, I'm not saying exactly, but let's just compare them.
Imagine if 41 different times we had like a hundred times what happened during the 2016 election.
What would America feel about this kind of stuff?
I think we'd feel very differently about it, right?
Yeah.
Meanwhile, we have American bases installed everywhere around the world.
So the apparatus that was set up there has, and I want to touch on this because it's something that I want to talk about further in later episodes, the deep state.
There's this concept of the deep state.
It's very involved in what we've described as the Q conspiracy so far.
And what I want to go into is, A, what is the deep state as commonly conceived of by the QAnon people?
And then secondarily, what is the deep state credibly?
As in, what happens over the course of, let's say, 150 years with institutions like the FBI, the CIA, and the government as they continue to stratify and even exist across multiple presidencies?
What happens there?
And how does that affect electoral politics and democracy?
I am interested in that, and I think there's some credible stuff around there.
We could definitely get into that.
Oh, and we will, my friend.
I just think it's funny, just to go back to that article, that dude had to do all the research to finally be like, okay, yeah, and let's see, and then 18 months later, oh, yeah, well, there's another one.
He's like on the... I imagine him in the library using one of those machines where you scroll through the... for some reason.
He's like, OK, let's take out the attempts that didn't work.
Let's take out the... Attempts that didn't work?
OK, but next year and then... Take out the stuff that was not clear enough.
How do you go through all of that research and then write a sentence like, well, The United States is not known to routinely... Yeah, it's, um, to say that something is not routine when it has happened as a foreign policy for 41... Why won't you just take the line out?
Because, because what's crazy is that...
Even if you want to try to dismiss that and say it's not routine, why not then examine the Middle East?
Because he then says, it's never been exactly routine, he says, however, the option to depose a sitting government has appeared on the US President's desk with remarkable frequency over the past century.
So it's like, those things contradict each other directly.
You're literally creating Yeah, you're just creating a mindfuck here in your sentence.
And then he says, it is no doubt still there, though the frequency with which the U.S. president
has used this option has fallen rapidly since the end of the Cold War.
Gee, mister, I wonder what happened at the end of the Cold War.
Where would America have turned its eyes?
I wonder if we could, with all assurance, say the Middle East and start to count the
amounts of interventions over there.
Something would tell me that would add up.
And then if you put in some Africa for good flavor, and potentially some Eastern Europe stuff.
And I mean we've already got... It's almost like we might have what one could call a routine direct intervention in other people's governments.
Even as just I've been looking into like this kind of shit like we've already had Gaddafi which who was installed by us and then... He was literally allowed to set up a tent on the lawn of the of the like I think the French Élysée like let's just put it this way he was friend of the Americans friends of the French and the West Western European kind of coalition.
And then they did him just like Bernie Sanders man dragged him out in front of a fucking car and let him get executed.
It's sad how they shot Bernie Sanders.
They shot him right against a rusty pickup truck.
It was like Dog Day Afternoon.
He's just out there screaming and jittering and jabbering and pointing guns and just saying, she did me!
She did me!
And saying, you know, and this is what's essential.
A bird landed on my podium.
And then she did me.
And then she did me.
And what was incredible is that he continued to call her the B word over and over in a crazed psychopathic way.
This is a fact.
The one that was not a fact is when McCain was literally overheard by a journalist calling his wife the c-word.
That's not a thing.
But this, we've never really recorded and that we have to base ourselves on some late 60s early 70s like think piece he wrote as a student in which he I mean it's it's a sad piece you should read it but oh my god yeah so that and then Saddam Hussein was another one who we propped up initially and then decided that he was no good and if you don't see a pattern here yeah and if you don't believe that deep state
Um, is even something that's worth examining?
I think that you clearly don't understand the CIA and the FBI and the NSA.
I mean, these are operations that oftentimes have run without, um, without even presidential knowledge.
It comes in and out in patches.
Right.
We will also have an episode down the line about Hoover and what he did with the FBI, why he stayed in power for so long over the course of about four decades, I believe.
And how that interacted with each president, which came and went by the way, Democrat and Republican, and so how that might form something that we could call like a shadow government or even a deep state as it's conceived of by the right.
Admittedly, the small amount of research I've done on the actual deep state, as opposed to them sort of being... It doesn't make sense to say that they're all coordinated in a perfect... They're kind of a boogeyman type deal.
There's stratified power, but I don't believe it exists in such a unified way that you could call it the Deep State and really be referring to it like a unified entity.
There was one, I can't remember where I read this, but there was somebody, I think it might have been like a 4chan post or something, you know, take it with a grain of salt, but there was somebody who said that essentially the Deep State is like a committee of rich white people You're just talking about the Heritage Foundation.
It's like the Committee of Family Affairs.
It has some sort of innocuous name or whatever.
What does innocuous mean?
I don't know, but inoculating someone is against the virus.
Innocuous, I'm really not sure if it exists.
Innocuous is seemingly harmless, right?
Sounds like an app.
Yeah.
Get an Oculus now.
Get an Oculus.
It gives you your flu vaccines directly from your phone.
Yeah.
It's like a square swiping thing that you can plug into your phone, but it's with like needles and it shoots you up with random stuff.
The government decides what.
But careful, one out of every ten injections also contains lupus.
Okay.
Why would the... That seems cruel.
I don't know.
But yeah, it was like the Council for Family Affairs or something like that.
And it's literally just a group of rich, elite white people.
You know that exists, right?
It's just called the Heritage Foundation.
There's a lot of different organizations like this that, you know, during the era of the Bush administration, when Alex Jones was pointing out that there was a New World Order or whatever, He was pointing to a lot of these meetings of rich people they have every year, these summits, these meetings.
The Heritage Foundation is a particular one that's built in with the kind of Koch brother thing, but it is a committee of very, very wealthy people, and they often decide what policy they want to push forward, and then they set their minions, and they set their schools to pumping out people that can encourage it.
No, I think in terms of Q, I think the deep state is referred to as by, you know, referring to guys like Comey.
Yeah, see that's where I stroke.
I want to look people that are people that were I think specifically to Q. It's people who were looking the other way on Hillary's Investigations and sort of embellishing the information that they had on Donald Trump.
And we can examine that.
We can examine partisan alliances as well as alliances to some sort of centrist obsession with keeping the status quo, which could be achieved by someone like John McCain or by someone like John Kerry.
They don't really care.
Nothing really changes and the structure is not really destabilized.
To me, these people are like You know like the deep state like the deep state that's been around so you know that Whatever maybe had something to do with the the Kennedy assassination or some shit like yeah There's that's what I'm saying is it's a piece together thing where?
People people want to point to the unknown and think that unknown is a unified front.
I agree.
Yeah, I know it's like a sentient thing thing that does things and carries things out. And then QAnon
separates people into white hats and black hats, you know, because that is, that
is literally, for me at least, a kind of a symbol that speaks to that movement, the need
for clarity in a moment of lack of clarity where you can say that they're wearing the black
hats, we're wearing the white hats.
And I think that's why also sometimes it does divide along racial lines, because it is a
simple way to see.
see the world and it's one that television encourages, you know?
Right, and I totally agree.
So that's the part of, I think, of the Q conspiracy and even of like any partisan view of the
deep state that I think will not get us there the whole way is this belief that, oh, it
has to be one-sided or the other.
Whereas if you look at it, they've always worked as independent powers that had agendas
and against each other and against, and usually not towards the same means.
The history of the FBI and the CIA, and I studied this, is one of conflict.
They hated each other, they tried to undermine each other, they hid information from each other, many times at the cost of human life.
It's hard to think of them as a unified front now or ever.
Well, because they're human beings.
I mean, that's really at the base of all this.
Yeah, but human beings like to conspire and form powers.
I'm not saying that doesn't exist.
No, but we're sloppy and we're, you know, we're greedy and just, I mean, it's hard to believe that there is a, you know, like a Dr. Evil behind a chair with like a boardroom of whatever.
I think it's like any other... Why did Nixon get impeached?
Why is Watergate now a foundational thing?
Because two guys in the bushes got caught.
Yeah, idiots in the bushes literally got caught and they were the same guys they had running like on television
saying shit and recording interviews I mean these people have like it's like when you whenever
you you kind of pay attention to the birth of a sect It's always like around someone's kitchen table with six
people and like that's how a lot of these operations ran Yeah
I totally do judicial like miniature task squads that were formed to like
Accomplish one thing by the president or by someone within the FBI or whatever and I see it happening in every single
job I've ever been in there's always people around the table
and and everybody's I mean trying to do you know Everybody's got a got a stake in something or other and they're and they're trying to push for what they prefer the idea of self-enrichment and the idea of You know that it's a zero-sum game that I've got to take something from you so that I get something that those are very persistent ideas in modern capitalist society and the kind of idea of like pull yourself up by the bootstraps and Go and get yours and guess what yours is in the hands of others The problem is that very often the way that that those ideologies get pushed out is by people who don't want you to look at them
They want you to look at someone else.
Their pockets, right?
So they're not saying the most clearly full pockets in the entire country.
They're saying the pockets of this guy who quote-unquote took your job as in was hired by my company due to my direct choice to hire, you know, either an illegal alien or shut down everything and move it abroad.
Yeah.
Anyways, I want to deal with Q, and I have a couple of things I want to jump into, because we promised to get to level two in this episode, right?
Okay, yeah.
So, you know, the more I look into it, the more I realize you've been hiding some things, and I'm going to confront you on them.
Okay.
But second of all, there's some great starting points that we can use.
So, Roseanne Barr is one of them.
Yes.
Roseanne Barr, one of the highest visible Q supporters, was Was she thrown off her show in the end?
I can't remember.
She was fired.
Very boring series of events where she said dumb shit.
But anyways, she's a very big QAnon person and she once said, he has broken up traffic rings in high places everywhere.
And I think this is a good starting point because the public, millions of people read this and a lot of them probably didn't know what she was talking about.
Right.
What are they talking about and how is it linked to QAnon?
I think she's, I think she is, uh, I think she's talking about Trump.
Trump breaking up.
Now, I don't know.
I've seen different data on this, to be totally honest.
I've seen some data... Like the overwhelming Q belief?
The overwhelming Q belief is that there have been massive, massive child trafficking rings that have been allowed to be, that have been allowed to operate under Clinton and the general sort of, yeah, Clinton, Obama, Bush.
It's not just Clinton and Obama, it's Bush.
And is it connected to Soros?
No.
Because whenever I read about who's going to be in the handcuffs at the end, the three names that keep coming up are Clinton, Obama, and Soros.
I don't read a lot of Bush.
Um, there was a post early on where Q said something along the lines of, he was like, because the corruption is so deep that there were some that they would not name because they were old, close to dying, or whatever, and that it would be, you know, he supposed that it would be too much for the American people if they found out that like, you know, I'm guessing the example is like that Clinton Obama, Bush, every president that's come before them.
But then QAnon is quickly kind of retracted from putting any real bullseyes over right-wing politicians other than these weird, this shadow dance of bullseyes that are on Sessions, then not on Sessions, and on Cohen, and then not on Cohen.
I mean, there's something like McCain.
They've never liked McCain, but that's because McCain toes the line Yeah, they never liked McCain, and apparently they've accused McCain of having ties to Islamic terror groups and stuff.
We can get into that at another conjecture.
There were some posts for a while that Especially because today in the news, McCain announced that he's no longer continuing his brain cancer treatment.
There were some posts, I can't remember if it came directly from Q or if it was from an analyst, I think it did come from Q, that almost suggested that McCain's illness is not real.
That essentially that there is something coming down the line and that the illness was a cover to sort of like get out of the mainstream and get out of the limelight.
That is absurd and spurious but I'm trying to consider it but I just have, on what basis would this be?
Just no bases.
Just insider, you know, insider info.
Just a Saturday baseball.
Just what they know.
Just a moment off.
Just some leisure thinking.
Buds on 4chan, hacking and learning.
I think we can sideswipe this one.
But Q had a real post.
You need to bring me the actual post.
We're going to have a moment.
I'm going to start structuring the show because, um, so that I can better abuse you.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Cause it's so tough.
There's so many of them.
And so, but I guess we, we do want to, And I'm basically trying to reach back into a database of, like, you know, seven months of, like, remembering shit that I read.
But that's also what I mean is, I think we need to deal with the latest drops.
Do you have any prepared for us, or maybe we can do that?
Yeah, we can.
Let's see what... So, recently, what has been the general tenor?
It seems to me, like, obviously because of all these criminal investigations falling out, there has to be some effort on the Q side to at least pretend that they saw this coming.
Um, no, there's not a lot of talk about it other than there have been... That's wild.
There have been posts... There's literally people in handcuffs like they predicted and they just aren't the ones they thought.
Well, I mean, it's tricky because Manafort, what he's getting arrested for and what he's getting charged with, it actually has nothing to do with Donald Trump.
It has everything to do with his role as a Russian agent in 2010 through 2013 when he
was working for the Podesta Group, which is now closed.
I'm just saying, that's... Who said that?
Okay, first of all... So Manafort, so you know, the charges that Manafort's been brought up on, yes, it was him acting as a Russian agent, laundering money, doing all that rich people shit.
Yeah, it's all the fraud in the relations with foreign governments.
Fraud and all that stuff.
Making money with your position.
But it was from 2010 to 2013, and there was...
So it is targeted, but it's targeted for a reason because, um, just like they didn't predict Trump's victory.
And my theory on this is that Trump didn't predict Trump's victory, nor did all of the grifters around him.
And unfortunately, Cohen and Manafort, the old guard, they're not very good at their job.
And so they get hired by the dumber side of Washington.
And so they, they, they usually skate by on the fact that there's not a spotlight pointed at them.
Unfortunately, because the spotlight pointed at Trump is so bright, it's starting to reveal all these shitty, petty criminals in his shadows.
Right.
There's some speculation that Manafort was a plant, because he did work for Fusion GPS and he worked for Tony Podesta, John Podesta's brother, in the thing.
I don't know, is that proven?
That he worked for the Podestas?
Oh yeah, absolutely.
I mean, the Podesta Group is named in a lot of the indictments as Company B or whatever, and you guys can go and look that up.
That's fact.
Which is so funny to me, because he fits better in a 70s spy movie as a corrupt guy, but I think he never grew up with the times, and so now his style of being a brigand and an operative just doesn't exist anymore.
He used to just be able to take a meeting with Libya and then go and convince someone to buy a missile or two more, Well, and this kind of feeds into the Mueller is on Trump's side or whatever.
I don't believe that.
I think Mueller, to be honest, I think Mueller is going to try to do the best job that he can.
I think he's going in there and where he finds crimes that have to do with Russian interference in any sort of American electorate.
So you think Mueller is a Boy Scout, basically?
I mean, he's one of those like, doing my job kind of guys.
I mean, I don't know. Mueller is also, you don't peg him as a player. Like Mueller also played a
role in the, in the Uranium One sort of melee or whatever. He was the acting FBI director and there's
records of him actually bringing.
That's, that's what I'm saying is I don't, I don't buy him as a naive.
I don't buy him as a naive either.
I mean, his service is impeccable.
He's not a dumb guy, I don't think.
I mean... I think that, you know, there's... and the reason why we're discussing this is that there's a mainstream QAnon belief that Mueller is actually secretly working with Trump to defeat the Deep State.
Yes.
To dismantle it.
That basically... And that's why we haven't heard more.
So basically what happened was—allegedly, I gotta say allegedly— It's a problematic belief because now the first people that Mueller took down clearly don't—they definitely don't lead back to Clinton, clearly.
They lead— I'm sorry, but it's— In a way you could reach that they do.
Okay, but that's so much less of a way than linking them to Trump.
They literally worked for months with Trump directly.
Yes.
Cohen for sure.
Cohen for sure.
I'm not talking about Cohen.
My point is to focus on the link to Clinton in what's been revealed so far I think is a very partisan approach because there's way more of a link to Trump so far.
Well not with necessarily... I'm discussing it in In regards to whether Mueller is a Trump guy and whether they're taking down the Deep State.
So far, it doesn't seem that credible.
Oh, that I agree with.
I thought you were talking about Manafort.
I am.
I'm talking about the fact that they were the first two and what they've been arrested for doesn't fit with Mueller working with Trump to dismantle the Deep State.
He wouldn't humiliate himself right off the bat with this Cohen stuff.
He's having to go on record and talk about the guy he hired for his whole life, that he hired and kept on staff for years, and he's saying he's a bad lawyer.
So he's basically saying, I suck at hiring people, which is his whole shtick is that he's good at hiring and firing people.
Well, and that sort of plays into the main through line of what Q has been going on for the last month or so, is basically that the preparation is over and that it's time to watch the show.
He references a bunch of times that it's a movie, that what we're watching is a movie with good actors that are playing their parts.
Sure, that's what politics are, by the way.
Yeah, exactly.
It is a form of acting, yeah.
I don't think so much about Manafort, but the stuff with Cohen that it's been planned, and that they are using Cohen, I think this is what they're after, is that they're using Cohen to enter evidence that Cohen has on Clinton.
Wow.
Into a court of federal investigation via the Mueller investigation.
At what point do we just call this a mind that is going through cognitive dissonance that's trying to cope with a reality that is diametrically opposed to what they believe?
I mean, yeah, that's why the story is so fantastic because if it is true, Well, my point is that some of these things are interesting.
The belief that Cohen is arrested in a special Awesome Plan thing by Trump, who's still working to take down the Deep State by revealing some information.
Let's think about it.
Cohen is raided by the FBI, all guys that Trump hired.
I mean, this was after Trump appointed a new head of the FBI, Christopher Wray.
He's got a clean house, he wasn't completely successful because Mueller was appointed without his consent, he's several times mused firing Mueller, and he's shown unhappiness during the whole thing that he thinks it's a witch hunt, because I think he's scared that maybe what they're aiming for won't be revealed, but a million other things will be, which I think is credible due to his past.
I think that's credible too, is that, yeah, maybe there was no direct, you know… Cohen was a fixer for Trump and he tried to keep him out of scandals so that he would win the presidency.
So that's just, but that's just, everybody has a fixer, that's just Washington.
He just happened to have the dumbest fucking fixer in town.
Yeah, and from what I understand, Cohen has pleaded guilty to crimes that he didn't even commit, that because of... Because he couldn't understand what they were saying in court.
Either because they couldn't understand what they were saying in court...
Yeah, it's like there's two sides.
It seems like half the people believe that Cohen is a bad actor, that he's always been tied to the Clintons just because he's worked in politics forever.
How could anyone look at that face and not think that that guy is the naive?
Of all the people we've talked about so far, I look at that man's face and I see a deeper stupidity than in almost everybody else's.
Yeah, I do too.
Manafort looks like a grandfather who just farted in a room full of people and looks deeply embarrassed.
You know, he's been at the party a little too long and he got a little too drunk or something.
He's just this guy who probably should have left the game a little earlier and shut up and he would have gotten away with everything so far.
But he's greedy and he spends his money on dumb shit so now he has to stay in the game.
He's a really tragic mob figure really.
He stayed one month too long in the game, and like Pauly, he had to kill somebody in a retirement home.
I mean, you know, he was only on the Trump campaign for, you know, three months or something.
Yeah, but if you said that about the Hillary campaign, you would be like, oh, clear connection.
Three months.
Worked for three months during the most crucial, pivotal moments.
Instead, you're talking about the Trump side and going, well, he only worked for three months, but That's a deep, direct connection.
Just because you kicked him out because he was clearly a criminal and got busted.
Trump doesn't want to be embarrassed, so he kicks out anybody who embarrasses him.
That's what I was going to say if you let me finish.
I will never let you finish.
They found out that he had all of these fucking skeletons in his closet, that he had been working for Podesta, that he had been doing all this shit, and they fucking fired him.
And the crimes that he's been convicted of, Are all like Chris Christie style cars.
Yeah, are all like old school fucking... He's a Washington crony.
He's just an old... He's an old fixer.
I think they're all like this.
He's an old fixer.
I agree.
This is why QAnon to me actually isn't that mind-blowing and it actually isn't that big a deal.
Yeah, but QAnon is selective and partisan in the way that it focuses on one thing and completely obviously ignores the overwhelming evidence.
Right.
That's my problem with it, and that's why I will grant that certain parts are completely credible because they fit with my general perception of politics as they exist, but then other parts, it's not even that they're lying, it's just that they're omitting, like, they're trying to lionize Trump and they're omitting, like, Clear indicators that their narrative is falling apart in some places.
Right, right, right.
And the child trafficking ring, where did that start?
When did Q start seeding that?
And can we build a bridge between this kind of dog whistle stuff and what's happening today with the South African land owner stuff that Trump is tweeting about?
Which is clear white supremacist kind of rhetoric at a time where They don't really want to talk about Manafort.
They don't really want to talk about Cohen.
Right.
To me those are similar.
So what's happening in South Africa?
So it's not really, it's just not a thing.
Oh, it's not?
There's nothing happening there?
It's about as much a thing as what they just did with that girl and the jogging girl and the guy who killed her.
It's got that level of, like, as soon as you scrutinize it.
So one guy murdered somebody and they're saying that, oh, this is white genocide.
Yeah, white genocide, exactly.
Actually, if you look at the history of apartheid, that's ridiculous.
And what's clearly still happening is the opposite.
And South Africa still has a long legacy of consolidated white power and of racism and of colonialism.
But But that's not to say that there's probably not cases where people are being assaulted, but the opposite is true in so many more measures that even publishing something like that, instead of publishing the opposite, is a form of bad faith.
So it's the same kind of bad faith you're seeing with Molly Tibbett and her murder.
You know, basically they found one person in the entire country who did one thing that fits with their view and then they're pushing it even though he wasn't technically an illegal because he had passed the E-Verify system.
I think everybody does that.
I mean, that's just your average 24-hour news cycle and you're totally divided.
But the Democrats suck at doing it well.
I'd say they haven't had a good run at making a hate crime a poster for what's wrong with the right because they know it doesn't work anymore.
They're pretty good at it.
But the right doesn't care anymore.
The left can be swayed by stuff like that, because most people aren't on the left.
They think they are.
They flirt with being a Democrat, but they're just this soupy... There's a soup of information, and if this girl touches them... I could hear my grandmother being like, it's horrible what happened to that girl.
Why would she say that?
Because she sees it on TV for two or three days in a row, right?
Whereas she wouldn't say it's horrible what's happening in apartheid Africa currently.
Because she never sees it.
Because she never sees it on the television, so it's not the narrative.
Yeah, it's like what was going on during the Holocaust, when the fucking, even the New York Times was doing their best to not cover it.
Oh yeah, of course.
So history is written by the winners, this is not something new, and also the history of obfuscation through just putting something on page 3 versus page 1, it's just as powerful as burning something and putting it in a dark hole like in 1984.
You don't need that symbolic final gesture because the data on page 4 is rendered irrelevant by what you've plastered on page 1.
Absolutely.
And they do it the same digitally with the corrections.
The original article gets, you know, 10,000 retweets and the correction gets 200.
I mean, they know exactly what they're doing.
Please tell me more about this human trafficking.
What is the theory here?
Give me just a Q perspective and I'll try to not interrupt.
The Q perspective is that high-level individuals in every government, okay, not just the United States but Saudi Arabia, all of these places, that they all are so rich and so bored that they like They love having sex with children.
So why the governments and why not the individuals?
Because for me, corporations have bigger power and individuals with vast wealth have bigger power than governments.
I don't know.
I mean, to me, it's—to me, it seems pretty—it's pretty far-fetched to imagine.
TREVOR POTTER I just don't think it would be, like, rubber stamped by the government, but I do believe that the
individuals— HOST They're individuals.
TREVOR POTTER And corporations have enough rights that they are completely outside of the government system.
HOST Exactly, yeah, that's exact—I'm not saying that, like, that it's a—that once you,
you know, you get in—you know, let's say you win the Senate or whatever, and they bring you
into a room and they go, well— TREVOR POTTER They're like, hey, okay, so by the way,
you're not in on this. HOST You know, hey, you're not in on this.
You're in on this now.
That's so unlikely.
Here's the deal.
Here's an alternate video of the JFK assassination.
We never went to the moon, by the way.
From a different angle.
Yeah, the moon is... Well, we actually went, but we didn't have the camera that could record it, so we had to recreate the whole thing.
How is there not a Saturday Night Live skit that just has Ocasio-Cortez being brought into that briefing?
Just like a social democrat with all the dreams in the world and like a plan for the future that like
Democrats hate and Republicans are like Lee are confused by 9-11
That was us. They just give her proof of all this fucked-up shit Roswell is true. Yeah
Oh, yeah, they would aliens are true. We actually that's a great
So they wanted um, they wanted peace, but we killed them all cuz they had everybody these fucking they these amazing
little things they had an apple on the back and
Screen and you could call your friends on it and search the internet was amazing
And she walks out of the epi she walks out of the room. She's called a kajak Ocasio-Clark
And she's just like has this weird empty look in her eyes Yeah, just wearing like a red fucking pantsuit.
She looks like every politician's wife who has to stand by him while he says that he had an affair and that he's incredibly sorry.
Yeah, just a glazed, dead look in her eyes.
Dead look in your eyes of like, please be the prop.
I hope not, you know, and I don't believe that those happen.
What I do believe is that people with private power, as we discussed in episode one, have access to these services.
With private jets, with the way that borders exist for rich people.
They can do whatever they want!
There's so many weird...
Now, I mean...
There's human trafficking.
I wouldn't say that it is definitive evidence of human trafficking or pedophilia,
but there are some weird fucking emails in the fucking Podesta WikiLeaks dump.
If you've read them, I mean, it could be code for drugs.
It's code for something, because the way that they're talking does not make any sense.
So to me, it's very possible that this is Xanax.
It's very possible that this is Dexedrine, Coltaine, Adderall.
Anything that's actually fun for these losers, because they're bored.
Why would they fuck children in the middle of like a workday?
It just doesn't, for me, if you're gonna do that, you're gonna go to an island with a jet, which is why Epstein thing makes more sense.
Right.
Why would you be like, ah, it's lunch, I really can't help but try to rape a kid in like a, in a, in a fucking, I don't know, man.
Washington, you can just travel!
They travel all the time on private jets!
I don't know, man.
There was some... But this is a Pizzagate thing, too, right?
I don't know if it came from Q, but there was... Somebody said on one of the boards, one of the Anons had said that it's about the adrenochrome, that they actually... Now, this is where the shit gets fucking fascinating, is they harvest the adrenaline glands from these children, and they fucking eat them, and that's how they like...
That's how they barely pass out on the way back to their car from a place where they just have to stand for 10 minutes.
These people are not in shape.
They're not supermen.
They don't age well.
The only way it would kind of work is if they had been sick for a long time and the adrenochrome was keeping them alive or some shit like that.
Which is so funny because the right always makes fun of Hillary Clinton for being sick and passing out.
And she's also this demonic pedophile.
Who literally sport fucks children all week.
Please, pick one.
So you still haven't described, so all these governments are in on a pedophilic ring.
Well, yeah, I think you're right.
It's that individual members enjoy these certain things.
It's called the wealthy, and a percentage of them are bored.
Yeah, and that everybody's in on it, like fucking Oprah's in on it, and that her school that she started in Africa, that they busted a child trafficking ring there.
Imagine being so dumb that you think that they would use the same ribbon-cutting ceremony to do their PR, then they would also store the children that they want to violate.
Maybe they're really stupid.
I mean, maybe it's just like hiding it in plain sight.
I'm sorry, man.
Think about personal pleasure, right?
I think this is a classic example of the haves versus the have-nots.
You know, the have-nots are upset that these wealthy people can have whatever desire.
It's also, once you get addicted to control, once you get addicted to power and money, like Oprah clearly is, it's very hard to not kind of one-up yourself all the time.
It's like, okay, I want to own a channel.
Okay, I want to own a network.
Okay, I want my bank account to be this big.
I want to own a child trafficking I want to be seen this good.
No, I don't think that's the point.
She would rely on external, like, these are people that rely on black sites for torture.
Yeah.
And it's only now that the government's doing stuff like Gitmo, which is basically a shameless version of what they've been doing for years in foreign territories.
A black site in open air, as we discussed on the first episode.
So that's the final idea, is that this black site in open air, which is a clear sign that the deep state and the government are fucked up and working together, Would somehow also be the final destination and the just deservings of Soros, Obama, and Clinton at the end of the QAnon storm, which is what they have called the kind of final unraveling.
Which, by the way, they've called many times as like, it's coming this week, it's coming this week, and it never did.
In fact, I wanted to confront you about a particular moment in which Q kind of got mixed up and potentially was wrong and then had to cover it up.
It turns out that That Q was hyping people around the Justice Department's Inspector General report on the FBI's Hillary Clinton email investigation.
He was promising that it would contain the storm or whatever about the top Democrats in a deep state, and when the report kind of fizzled, Q was then saying, well, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, he actually tampered with the report, and there's a real report, and that would, you know, if it ever releases, it will solve everything.
So, to me, if you look at the history of Cults and religious believers that believe in something that doesn't come true over and over, they grow in number, they grow in force.
Is this not another example of that?
Or how do you concile that?
I mean, if I'm coming at it from that side, I'm thinking that the Inspector General report was not a fizzle.
It certainly wasn't the storm though, right?
Or they'd be in handcuffs in Guantanamo.
I don't think so, dude.
That's the common conception, I think, of the storm.
Maybe people were hoping that that would... But realistically... Yeah, but realism is not... If you don't go on Reddit slash R slash The Awakening for realism, you go there for this.
This is what's discussed there.
We can't argue that realism is what's discussed there.
They're discussing the storm.
They believe that the storm is coming.
It's one of their sayings.
So, to paint Q and the QAnon following as people who don't really believe this stuff, I think that's misleading.
Well, look at what was revealed in that Inspector General's report.
There was messages from Stroke and Page that had never made it out, that had never been released before.
And this was stuff where, you know, you have Peter Stroke saying, like, don't worry, we'll stop him.
And this happens on the Russia side as well, because they keep discovering stuff and you're like, well, now he's going to be in handcuffs.
But he isn't!
Right, right, right, exactly.
The storm is absurd, and it is at the core of QAnon.
We don't know.
The storm is just basically saying something big is going to eventually happen, and then when it happens, you try to mold your story and retcon it so it works.
I think we've got a definite timeline, because if there is a storm, and if it's real, they're going to do it before the midterm elections, right?
Why would it not be the storm over Puerto Rico that they never fucking repaired?
How is that not the fucking storm?
But look, this Inspector General's report was really interesting because they did the same thing that they did with the Clinton email.
They said, you guys fucked up in this way, this way, this way, this way.
Yes, there was an appearance of a bias, there was appearance here, there was appearance here.
But we found overall that none of the stuff that we uncovered affected your But it's tough, man, because you've got this dude, Peter Stroke, who is, you know, sending all of these anti-Trump text messages.
This is the same guy who hand-picked 3,000 emails of the Anthony Weiner laptop on which 700,000 emails were found.
And Peter Stroke picked 3,000 to go through to check for classified, and they said, oh, we stayed up all night, we ate pizza, you know, and we went through it.
Oh, well, you know what that means.
They ate pizza.
They ate pizza.
Full circle.
And then you've got the same guy who is running the counter, the COINTEL operation on Trump.
It's like all that became revealed within the Inspector General report and everyone went, what a nothing burger.
What I mean is that it did not kick off, quote unquote, the storm.
No.
And it did not, so this is again, it's an example of saying the world is going to end and then it passes and nothing happens, or a spaceship's going to come and pick up this entire cult and it doesn't Yeah, I see that.
So it is part of this way of believing as...
Yeah, that's true.
And one of the main tenets I find that's contradictory within QAnon is this idea that look for the
information, open your eyes and wake up, whereas there's oftentimes where clear information
comes through and they don't, like, they don't want to assimilate it.
Like, there's a resistance to certain pieces of information.
They don't want to wake up to that stuff.
There's uncomfortable bits that don't fit in with the general conspiracy.
Because, I believe, it is less interesting to have a non-partisan approach here than to have a partisan approach that involves clear good guys and bad guys, white hats and black hats.
Again, for me, QAnon is a way to have clarity in a world without clarity.
Right.
I agree with you.
If you have, let's say that you've got a deep state that has been entrenched for 50, 60 years.
Are we talking about the QAnon version of the deep state?
Yeah, the QAnon version of the deep state.
John F. Kennedy tried to dismantle the CIA and they killed him.
Reagan tried to take power away from the CIA and they gave him Alzheimer's.
They put it into his Diet Coke just like they're doing with Trump.
What are they putting in?
They're making him say dumb shit?
Yeah.
He doesn't have a history of that.
He fucking sucks.
What did they put in his coke for him to say that his baby daughter already looked physically good when she was literally a baby?
I can't remember.
You can't remember what they put in his coke for that?
I can't remember what they put in.
It's some combination of food coloring and stem cells.
They don't need to put anything in anything.
The guy eats mashed up meat with ketchup.
He ate like I did today and I feel dumber.
I like this new model of episode where we pump you full of disgusting American fast food, and then I bring you in here and I assault you.
Ugh, I'm sweating.
I feel terrible.
So let's suppose that for 50 years there's been basically a couple families in charge of everything.
Okay.
You know, and for story purposes we'll say the Clintons and the Bushes, okay?
Okay.
And they've got all their friends in every level of government.
They've got people, they've got, they've appointed judges, they've appointed, you know, federal prosecutors and all this stuff.
And it's a really unbeatable system because of so much of the corruption and everybody is in essence sort of on the payroll.
It's hard to clean the system.
It's hard to clean it.
As we learned in Serpico.
And so if If that is somehow true, it would make sense to me that trying to take it down would not be a perfect science.
You would be missing timelines.
But everybody knows that if you were to try to take it down, you would put at the center of your efforts a man who can't go downstairs without holding somebody's hand.
Which is the craziest part of it.
It's almost as if they needed somebody so moldable.
He's literally Mr. Potato Head.
And they have an agent inside him.
There's the great story about when Admiral Rogers went over to Trump Tower and said, hey, they're wiretapping you.
You've got to move your thing.
Wait, is Admiral Rogers Captain Crunch?
I don't know.
There was a story that I read about Admiral Rogers, Mike Rogers, going over to Trump Tower.
This guy's in the Marvel movies.
He's the friend of Captain America.
Yeah, he's got one arm.
No, that's Buck Rogers.
Yeah, that's Buck Rogers.
And so, I don't know.
Part of me thinks that if the whole thing is a fucking go, that maybe there's maybe a couple Because you really can't talk about this as good and bad because there really isn't.
Have you ever had that fantasy, like let's say you have a pimple, right?
And you have this bizarre fantasy of like somehow being like a surgeon and it gets extracted perfectly, there's no red marks and it's like it was never there when you're done, right?
And then you actually try to pop the pimple and it's a fucking disaster and you realize I'm the wrong man for the job.
Yeah.
I think that's what we're talking about here.
This fantasy of the cleansing fire that wipes the board for everybody clean.
Hey man, we all dream about it.
And it's better, I think, to follow an awesome conspiracy theory and get together with your friends and have a barbecue than to be someone like Ocasio-Cortez who has to do the footwork and come forth with some actual policy that is in full opposition of the interests of the deep state if it does exist.
Yeah, absolutely.
And these wealthy people, if it does exist.
So to lionize someone like Trump, instead of someone like her, and to demonize her and to lionize him, ignores the history of interventionism in South America.
I have not demonized her, and I have not lionized Trump.
No, but you have told me.
I'm just pointing out, QAnon conspiracy does involve that, and so that's where, for me, it falls apart a little bit, right?
It falls apart for me there, too.
Yeah, a little bit.
But some of the parts are very interesting.
Because the idea that Trump is this mastermind and that he's been planning this for 30 years, you know, working in politics and seeing all of the corruption and deciding that, you know, that doesn't track for me.
It doesn't track with his speeches?
Yeah, if I was writing that script, it wouldn't track because I, like you, think that he had no idea or any sort of indication that he thought he was going to win.
Dude, he was recently in a Vietnam vet meeting, and this is documented, where he pissed off Vietnam vets who were aligned with him politically because he kept insisting that Agent Orange was in that movie, which turned out to be Apocalypse Now, but he kept saying, in that movie, it's that stuff from that movie.
And they kept telling him, no, that's Napalm.
And he literally, because he couldn't be wrong in front of this Vietnam vet, made it a thing that pissed him off.
By insisting.
Yeah.
And then later asking again.
And they kept trying to get him off it.
It's like, I'm sorry, but that man, who's unable to even get out of a quabble with someone aligned with him, who knows more about the Vietnam War than him?
Yeah.
That just doesn't seem like this amazing, deep mind.
No.
Exactly.
I'm totally with you on that.
I think he's a perfect foil, though, for the deeper minds.
He is a foil.
For the Mitch McConnells, for the truly devious bastards that want to build the Koch brothers, etc.
Yeah, that's what I'm thinking.
There could be guys who realize that they've got Gumby, essentially, in their hands, and they're going, oh, well we can take down the fuckin' McCoys.
That's what they did, yeah.
They've been doin' fuckin' dog shit.
They've been busy, and they've been doin' fuckin' dog shit for years, so have we, but it doesn't matter, because we're good and they're bad.
So we're gonna use this guy, and use this moldable bass, and this moment, to orchestrate this kind of thing.
Now, to me, that's much more believable.
Yeah, they know he's chaotic, and when he does take control and push people around, it sucks.
But they also know, probably, that building a deep coalition with him right now provides the Republican Party with full control of all houses and continues to allow them to pass legislation without any results, without any kind of opposition, especially when you have Senators Schumer and Nancy Pelosi being the kind of counterpoint.
We're gonna end with, um, one of the latest drops.
Actually, Q has been pretty silent for the last week.
The last drops were on August 20th, 2018.
And what were they?
It is a link to a Reddit... It's a link to a Reddit post.
That was his drop.
And it says, and it says, The Great Awakening, Q. Now let's click on the Reddit link.
Okay.
And it's just another Q post that says the same thing and clicks you back.
Okay.
Choose your own adventure loop.
It says connecting some dots.
Q linked.
This is the post.
Oh, so he's just literally reposting fans he's so busy?
He's reposting fans.
You know when you're too busy doing shit and then you just have to, for your social media, you just have to repost fan-made stuff?
Yeah, oh my god, this is so long.
We can't, I can't read this.
Okay, so Q's latest drop is a boring, long thing.
Yeah, Q's, well Q's latest drop is reposting someone from Reddit who has put together some dots.
He seems to be talking about, I'll read the beginning of it.
Okay.
I am passing this on from someone who's connecting some dots with input from sources he cannot reveal.
Here's what it looks like when all the pieces are sewn together.
It smells like conspiracy and treason.
Everyone needs to read this.
Slowly and patiently.
Because it's very important.
Fuck yes.
From 2001 to 2005 there was an ongoing investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
Oh hells yeah.
A grand jury had been impaneled.
Governments from around the world had donated to the charity.
Yet, from 2001 to 2003, none of those donations to the Clinton Foundation were declared.
Now you would think that an honest investigator would be able to figure this out.
Look who took over this investigation in 2005.
None other than James Comey.
None other than Inspector Gadget himself.
Coincidence?
And we all know that he's the goofiest of inspectors.
Coincidence?
Guess who was transferred into the Internal Revenue Service to run the tax exemption branch of the IRS?
None other than Lois Lerner.
I have no idea who that is.
That's the wife of Superman.
Moving on.
That's what I thought.
Isn't that interesting?
God, this guy would be so much better if he didn't add a little, like, isn't that interesting?
He's trying to give you a story, Jake.
Respect the man.
But this is all just a series of strange coincidences, right?
Guess who ran the tax division inside the Department of Injustice?
See what you did there.
Wow.
From 2001 to 2005.
Bam.
None other than the Assistant Attorney General of the United States, Rod fucking Rosenstein.
We now have a Patreon.
Patreon.com slash QAnonAnonymous.
Yeah.
No spaces or dashes.
There's no need for you to Puff Daddy me on this.
You don't have to.
Okay.
You don't have to do that.
Uh-huh.
QAnon Anonymous on Twitter.
And you can come join us on SoundCloud.
We're on every single platform.
Two things you can do.
If you don't have any money, we understand.
Just go and rate us on iTunes and leave a little review saying that you dislike my voice because it's too high-pitched.
I don't have any money.
If you can spare some money and you would like to hear us record more of this, Patreon is just a way for you to kind of give us a monthly subscription and it helps us be able to invest in this and get Jake the Yeah, that's rough.