All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 2, 2024 - Human Events Daily - Jack Posobiec
48:35
EPISODE 662: J6, Fulton, Mar-a-Lago Cases Against Trump COLLAPSE

Here’s your Daily dose of Human Events with @JackPosobiec Save up to 65% on MyPillow products by going to https://www.MyPillow.com/POSO and use code POSOGo to https://www.BlackoutCoffee.com/POSO and use promo code POSO20 for 20% OFF your first order.Support the Show.

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I want to take a second to remind you to sign up for the Pozo Daily Brief.
It is completely free.
It'll be one email that's sent to you every day.
You can stop the endless scrolling, trying to find out what's going on in your world.
We will have this delivered directly to you, totally for free.
Go to humanevents.com slash Pozo.
Sign up today.
It's called the Pozo Daily Brief.
Read what I read for show prep.
You will not regret it.
humanevents.com slash Pozo.
Totally free.
The Pozo Daily Brief.
This is what happens when the fourth turning meets fifth generation warfare.
A commentator, international social media sensation, and former Navy intelligence veteran.
This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobiec.
Deliver us from evil.
His rise amongst people of color, African Americans and Hispanics, it's because they're following white working class voters Remember they told us we were dead?
Manufacturers dead in America?
China was going to eat our lunch?
Well guess what man?
- Remember they told us we were dead, manufacturers dead in America, China was gonna eat our lunch?
Well, guess what, man?
We don't taste that good. - Walgreens is planning to close yet another pharmacy in the Massachusetts 7th, this time on Warren Street in Roxbury, a community that is 85% black and Latino.
This closure is a part of a larger trend of abandoning low-income communities.
These closures are not arbitrary and they are not innocent.
They are life-threatening acts of racial and economic discrimination.
That is why I joined with Senator Markey and Warren to demand answers from Walgreens CEO.
When the president is in East Palestine, will he drink the water there?
The president's focus has been...
To do everything that he can to support this community from day one.
I'm not going to get into some sort of political stunts about drinking about drinking water.
I cannot understand why President Biden would not use his existing executive authority that he has right now to stop this.
He won't.
Yeah.
Instead, he said things like, give me the power.
Give me that.
Yeah, he knows that he has the authority.
We've documented it for him.
I've read to him the law myself to the president, read him the provisions of the law and said, Mr. President, please take action.
We have the worst border in the history of the world.
There's never been a border that allowed millions of people to come into a country, even a third world country, that fight them off, I always say, with sticks and stones, that fight them with sticks and stones.
They're destroying our country and it's not sustainable.
Today, an indictment was unsealed, charging Donald J. Trump with conspiring to defraud the United States, conspiring to disenfranchise voters, And conspiring and attempting to obstruct an official proceeding.
Well, it's Groundhog Day again.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events Daily.
Here we are live.
Here we are in Washington, D.C.
today, of course, February 2, 2024, and O'Domyny.
Folks!
Go look at that clip from Jack Smith back there.
Unsealing the indictment.
The January 6th case.
It was all over.
President Trump was going to be knocked out of not just the election, but possibly lose his entire freedom.
He was all done for, folks.
This was the end.
Yes, it was the end, my friend Jim Morrison.
But actually, it turns out it wasn't the end.
And in fact, it was just the beginning.
Because we just found, last night, and we've got a bevy, a booty, a booty, if you will, of goods, a booty of goods, not just Big Fanny and her big booty of indictments, which is going up in flames, but also Jack Smith's case going up in flames.
What do we have?
Well, last night, The January 6th case against President Trump was taken off the docket.
We told you yesterday that it looked like this thing was falling apart, then late last night after the show, the case was taken off the docket.
That means we do not know when it will be rescheduled.
Remember, I want to be very clear about this.
This was the entire reason for the Ron DeSantis campaign, $168 million we now know, wasted on this vanity run of the Florida governor, Then, we saw another case, a case against Fannie Willis, and they said, oh, this was the phone call, this was the, you know, this terrible call, find the votes, you gotta find the votes, Brian Kemp, find the votes, and Fannie Willis is running around, waving around this big booty of indictments that she has, but instead,
Fannie Willis, thanks to the receipts provided by Mike Roman.
Mike Roman of Philadelphia, a devout Catholic, a father of eight.
Go and support Mike Roman because he is the one.
Who came through with the receipts against Fannie Willis and set all this in motion.
And just moments before we went live today, Fannie Willis publicly admitted that she is in a relationship with the lead prosecutor here.
That means that all of the money, the kickbacks, the hiring, and they're trying to say, by the way, I'll tell you right now, They're trying to say, okay, we're in a relationship, but the relationship didn't start at the time of the hiring.
The relationship started after the hiring, okay?
It's not going to fly.
You can't separate it.
There is no way to determine the truth of that.
The only thing left is to throw this case out.
You must dismiss this case, and I've heard from sources in Georgia that this case is hanging by a thread.
The fact of the matter is that the lawyers down there, or the judges down there, I should say, are looking at this going, look, there's no way we can proceed given the facts as they are, the money that she has stolen from the taxpayers, and Fannie Willis herself very well might end up in jail if A.G.
Carr and Brian Kemp want to do their job.
Jobs.
Richard Burrus joins us next.
After the break, Human Events Daily continues.
Ladies and gentlemen, one of the best ways that you can support us here at Human Events and the work that we do is subscribing to us on our Rumble channel.
Make sure you're subscribed, you hit the notifications, so you'll never miss a clip, you'll never miss a new live episode, and we're putting them out every single day of the week.
I rolled with Bloods, and them boys had a saying.
You can't be listening to all that slappy, whack, Trimada, Zalat, Zabam, Ship, Nippy, Bam, Bam, like Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to Human Events Daily.
World absolute flames, Bidenomics, a complete and total disaster, but it cannot and will not ruin my day.
Do you know why?
It's because I start my day with a hot America first cup of Blackout Coffee.
Blackout Coffee, 100% America, 0% anything else.
Blackout Coffee is 100% committed to conservative values from sourcing the beans to the roasting process, customer support and shipping.
They embody true American values and accept no compromise on taste or I love this stuff.
When Tiny Tim makes it for me in the morning as we're getting ready, get the kids out the door.
It's incredible.
You can have it, too.
Power yourself, power your family, power your life, power your business.
BlackoutCoffee.com and use promo code POSO20 for 20% off of your first order.
You can check out the gear selection.
Incredible gift ideas.
Well, you are there.
Check out the gear.
Blackoutcoffee.com/poso be awake not woke that's blackoutcoffee.com/poso promo code POSO20 Rich Barris the people's pundit joins us next now rich I I wanted to go through some of these polls with you I was looking at this Q poll people were saying all the you know the Biden team was You know really celebrating that running around with it holding it up like a chicken with its head cut off You know, it's like I had my first beer.
I had my first beer.
We had our first poll.
We had our first poll That's good, you know in years And you then get the news, though, that last night we get the news, and this is both shoes dropping now, in rapid-fire succession, and don't tell me for a second that this isn't connected.
The J6 trial gets taken off of the docket.
We know that Fannie Willis has been working very closely with the Department of Justice.
Now she comes out publicly and says, you know what?
I admit it.
I was in this relationship.
But she says, this is the amazing part, she says, I was in a relationship, but it wasn't an affair!
I was in a relationship, but it wasn't until after I hired, I mean, it's, good game.
Just, it's done.
Big Fannie, Big Fannie's going up the river.
She's going all the way up the creek.
And then you had the free, the Washington Free Beaking, that audio.
Why that was so damning, Jack, even though it wasn't related, is because it shows a pattern of behavior.
Fannie Willis clearly uses her Fannie to get guys to do things for her.
She gets a piece of it on the back end.
And this is, you know, when I spoke, even left-wing lawyers, when they heard about this that I spoke to, Uh, we're just appalled by this.
Like, this is really bad.
Like, this is not something a prosecutor can get wrapped up in at any time, let alone when they're embroiled in a high-profile case against a former president who's running again and is the frontrunner to be president.
Like, this is not something you want- you would want to be caught up in.
But, listen, I was talking about this this morning.
Don't you find it funny that so many of these people who come for Donald Trump end up having so many skeletons in their own closet, and then they get exposed, and then they get hurt themselves?
Michael Avenatti is spending 400 plus years in a federal prison because of things that he had done.
There were always rumors about Michael Avenatti, yet the media held him up as he was some kind of a hero, Brian Stelter.
Mr. Potato Head once said he should be President of the United States and would be a serious contender for the nomination, the Democratic nomination.
Now you have Fannie Willis who, let's be clear, everyone knows the rumors.
Jack, can we?
It's like everyone's afraid to say them, and I think we all know why, but everyone was always afraid to say what those rumors were after she came down with these charges from Donald Trump, against Donald Trump.
And now, of course, there's, you know, we're all getting this peek into her closet.
Are you saying Fannie is dirty?
That we've got a dirty Fannie down in Georgia?
Are you saying Fannie is dirty?
That we've got a dirty Fannie down in Georgia?
She's totally dirty.
And I'm saying it takes a dirty person.
It takes a dirty person to concoct cases against somebody who's not dirty in order to prosecute them for political reasons, for political persecution.
I don't understand why anyone would be surprised we would find out that this is the caliber of someone's character.
Donald Trump is the most investigated person ever to run for office.
He was a real estate mogul during the height of the crime families in New York, and they didn't do business with him.
That's what a Boy Scout they view Donald Trump to be.
So if it takes a prosecutor, it would take – what I'm saying is it would take a crooked, dirty prosecutor to fabricate novel legal theories to use, to go after a guy they couldn't find any real crimes to punish.
To go after him on, Jack.
You understand what I'm saying?
Hope that makes logical sense to people.
If Robert Mueller and Andrew Weissman found anything, they would have used it.
Here's the bigger part of it.
They would have used it, of course.
And by the way, if any of this stuff works, we would have known in 16 for many of these things.
But specifically on this one, in Fulton County, before we get to the J6 bit, because I do want to ask you about what effect this will have for the general election.
And the piece that I see here, though, is it seems like people were asking, why is she indicting 19 people all at once?
This is not something you usually see in a prosecution.
You might see it in Rico or something like that.
But the idea that she was indicting 19 people, it just didn't make a lot of sense.
I remember even CNN was saying this.
Even their own legal observers were saying, what is going on?
And here is the reason, because she knew that she could requisition more money from the public coffers from the state of Georgia and potentially if what Mike Roman's receipts are, and they've all been true so far, so I don't know why we wouldn't We wouldn't trust Roman's receipt on this one.
What do they say about those conservatives from Philly?
What can I say?
They got the receipts.
That she was also taking federal COVID funds.
Which means, guess what?
That's an FBI jurisdiction that's a federal court.
Absolutely true.
That's why she's in a little bit bigger trouble here, or potentially.
And then people think, I know a lot of people jump on Brian Kemp, and they should.
By the way, Rich, this would not be the first time that we saw fraud with the PPP loans, would it?
No, no, not at all.
And but that's the difference is that, you know, people pining about because I mean, the state could take some action here as well.
But now when you're dealing with federal funds, that's when the FBI has to get involved.
And again, It's not just that, as you said.
I mean, Jack, it's not just one thing here.
We're talking about multiple, multiple dipping in federal funds and misuse of that money, and I think we're going to find out that there's even more.
Oh my gosh, Rich, I gotta show you.
I'm sending this.
I just saw this clip.
Somebody just sent me this clip.
I saw it on Carly Bonet on Midnight Rider.
She said, CBS is having a wake over there.
You should see them for Fannie Willis.
Well, it looks as though she may have had to run into a little bit of trouble down there.
They're so upset.
They're so upset.
We're going to get it.
We're going to get it during the break.
This is amazing.
They're so upset.
Oh, the long faces.
The guy's like...
Well, you know, you don't want them all, folks, because they know exactly what's going to come out.
They know exactly what's going to happen.
They know that a judge is going to look at this and say, you cannot separate the dirty relationship and the dirty dealing that Dirty Fanny was doing down here in Georgia from the case, from the indictment.
The whole thing is, this is, this is, it's not the same, but it's, it's like fruit of the poison tree.
Okay.
The entire thing was corrupt from the start.
Jack, there's a case, because we're doing a lot of work on justice system statistics and the fairness of our justice system, or lack thereof, actually, of fairness, and there have been cases where the prosecutor or the police that were involved, there was a lot less doubt cast on their credibility or their character, and that led to reopening cases or throwing out convictions.
How can you put this in front of a jury?
In question is a lot better than this.
Right.
You just you can't.
And by the way, on that timeline issue, I do think that you charge a whole bunch of people when you're trying to speed something up as well, for whatever reason that may be.
Because in a normal investigation, you would charge some defendants and you're obviously trying to get them to roll on somebody else.
And then, you know, so it takes time and unfolds.
She was trying to, you know, cram this into a timeframe, an artificial timeline here, which by the way, is another bombshell with the D.C.
case.
I mean, this falling off the docket, you know, I've had some people tell me it's because of the time involved, you know, that it's not going to be anywhere near the election now.
But then I've had some others tell me that's not true.
And so, you know, me not being a lawyer, I've got to just kind of, like, use my street smarts here.
And I just don't believe in coincidences.
And other lawyers are telling me that this, of course, still would remain on the docket, even if you're waiting for clarification from the Supreme Court.
So it just looks like... Because Rich thought that Supreme Court schedule...
Right.
That Supreme Court schedule is not, the Supreme Court is not exactly known for the swiftness of their decision making when it comes to, especially, by the way, when it comes to a question that directly involves someone who was the head of the executive branch of government. when it comes to a question that directly involves someone So you're talking about huge separation of powers issues, obviously a massive precedent.
And even if they rule against Trump, even if they rule that presidential immunity, et cetera, et cetera, doesn't get in here.
What President Trump is doing through his lawyers and to the Supreme Court, and he's making this case as well in Truth Social very frequently, is pointing out that this is a precedent that will rule over every president going forward.
And I think that his message with those Truth Socials that he's posting, he's making that pitch directly to the justices.
Consider what you are doing because this isn't just about Trump and it's not just about Jan 6 and all this stuff.
It's every president going forward, the essential The executive branch itself and the running of the executive branch will now be filtered through this decision.
Without a doubt.
And Jack, Democrats should think about it too.
Because it's not just who is, you know, moving forward now.
Consider the joking and the mocking of the argument that was made over the Navy SEALs being ordered to hit this one and that one and people are making a mockery out of it.
And Trump was basically saying, yeah, because what his team was saying.
That yes, certain immunities must apply to the president.
If you're a Democrat, you better think back.
Let's talk about what it would mean for Barack Obama when he ordered Anwar al-Awlaki to be murdered.
That's a U.S.
citizen, terrorist or not, Jack, he's a U.S.
citizen.
If we wanted to go rooting through the decision-making process of that, You know, that action by a president, it could have serious consequences.
More than happy to.
Ben Rhodes!
Ben Rhodes!
Let's talk about that, Ben Rhodes, Mr. Deputy National Security Advisor.
Let's talk to Ben Rhodes and let's haul him up.
We'll have that conversation right before you get sent to the labor camp.
Rich Barris, People's Pundit, joins us after the break.
We're going to talk about how this affects the general election.
You talk about influences.
These are influences.
And they're friends of mine.
Jack?
Where's Jack?
Jack?
He's done a great job. - Jack, we're back live, Human Events Daily, Washington, D.C.
So Rich, talk to me for a second about the January 6th poll being dropped off the docket.
The idea that, now this doesn't mean the case has been dropped, but it does mean that potentially there will be no further action in the January 6th case.
Possibly until the election, or at least the trial will not be seeded.
A jury will not be seeded until sometime in 2025.
And if that's the case, President Trump very well could become the executive commander-in-chief by that time, which throws the entire thing out, basically, because it would create such a constitutional crisis.
You might even get to the point where, if Biden were smart, I'm not going to give him I'm not going to give him advice, but I doubt he'd take advice from me.
He would be smart to just drop it.
He would honestly just be smart at this point to just drop it because then you give, you take away something that Trump is railing against at this point.
But walk me through some of all of the equity that was pushed into this.
I mean, we had the ABC coming out yesterday with this clip saying, oh, actually, the January 6th committee was a made for TV.
miniseries that was never meant never intended to be a serious investigation.
Yes.
You have Ron DeSantis and his backers in media and in the donor class pumping almost 200 million dollars into this vanity run predicated on January 6.
And by the way, Ron DeSantis is still kind of running around out there acting like he's sort of in the running.
He's talking about all these national issues like he's, you know, in the wings ready to It's very strange.
His behavior is very strange.
But the idea here that they thought this was going to be the headshot, and it's gone.
Yeah, you know, remember six months ago when Team DeSantis and Team Haley would like pretend, Jack, when we would, and we refer to it as the indictment strategy or the lawfare strategy.
Yes.
They really thought that they would be the runner-up candidates and that one of these trials would go forward.
He'd be convicted, and they would argue to the delegates at the convention that we have to pass a resolution getting rid of the two-bound rule because we can't have a candidate who's convicted of a felony going into a general election.
They cannot win, and they would lose it when people like us would bring that up, even though we know it was true because we talked to donors and people inside, and they would pretend like we were speaking blasphemies or something like that.
I mean, I think it's important to know that this really—and I still do talk to a lot of Democrats who say this is their Hail Mary.
They know Biden is in a really bad position.
They don't understand that some of those indictments may backfire, or at least some of them, that it doesn't look good for a president to be doing this to his political opponent with such novel charges, ridiculous legal theories.
Politically, it was more of a liability than it ever was of an advantage.
And it would be smarter at this point, if you're really trying to be objective, to get rid of some of these cases if this is going to continue down this road.
Especially Biden, by the way, he's at this prayer breakfast or something, and he's with Speaker Johnson, and they're listening to Amazing Grace, and he's got tears in his eyes turning to him saying, oh, we've got to unite, we've got to work together.
Well, you're putting patriots in jail.
Your administration is, sir.
You're trying to put your own number one opponent in jail.
I wonder if it's an actor.
I wonder if it's just that he's so lost in dementia that he can't control his emotions, right?
And so he hears, you know, this, you know, this, you know, Amazing Grace, one of the most, you know, emotional, soulful songs out there.
And it just, it hits him.
And it, you know, he's got this, this exuberance of emotion that comes forth that he just can't control.
No impulse control.
Zero impulse control.
Maybe, Jack, but I mean, I'll tell you, he's always been a, you know, he ran with this, like, decency argument in 2020 as if he was some kind of a good guy and he didn't act like Donald Trump.
The report came out the other day about how he speaks about Donald Trump and Republicans, you know, with his filthy mouth, which, you know, I don't care about.
But don't pretend to be something you're not if you, you know, still speak about your political opponent like that.
So privately, he may tear up with crocodile tears when Amazing Grace is playing.
The way he talks about Trump and MAGA is that he wants to see them in camps and in prison at some point.
I mean, some of that language that was in that report is Lyndon Baines Johnson bad, buddy.
But yeah, I mean, I think really this is for Trump supporters.
I think it's important for them to recognize all the adversity they faced in the last year, This is a huge, these are huge W's that he's getting and the polls that are coming out, you know, that we've talked a lot about me personally.
I don't ask that question about whether or not he's convicted of a felony.
It just injects bias into the survey.
And it also doesn't give the voters a full scope of what is going on.
It's meant to poison them more than it is meant to get their true feelings on it.
So this is why I didn't, because there's a lot that can happen.
I don't think it captures the entire choice that people have to make.
And I don't think there's any other way for Trump supporters to take what's been going on in the last 48, 72 hours other than a win.
I just, I don't, I don't know how else.
The Quinnipiac poll that you brought up in the first segment clearly was the outlier that we expected it to be.
We told you guys to You know, take the aggregate more seriously.
Everyone's argument against Donald Trump has fallen away.
The electability argument DeSantis tried to make and now Nikki Haley is trying to make has evaporated.
The legal case, the argument about, you know, with the the lawfare strategy, the indictment strategy is failing.
It's collapsing.
So if you're a Trump supporter, you got a lot to be happy about here, Jack.
You really do.
I mean, let's face it.
It's hard.
To get Donald Trump.
This is like the real Teflon Don.
And he just has this enormous ability to do two things.
One, absorb an enormous amount of punishment that would kill any other political candidate.
And yet still, he remains viable.
And then two, to win.
You know?
I mean, to win against all the odds.
And there are even challenges against Jack Smith now.
There are complaints filed against the appointment of Jack Smith, whether or not that was appropriate outside of the The arguments that the Trump campaign or the Trump legal team has been making.
And I'll tell you, if he does succeed in pushing any of these back toward the election, then that's it.
It's a total W for him because the Justice Department cannot prosecute a sitting president.
That is longstanding policy, Jack.
They're not going to change it now.
And even if they did try, he'd well be within his authority to vaporize the investigations anyway with the stroke of a pen be over.
So, and by the way, he wouldn't have to care about the blowback the way he had to care during the days of Robert Mueller, because he wouldn't be facing any other re-election concerns.
All that would be out the window.
So again, if you're a Trump supporter, it's a huge W.
And all voters know this already.
And yet you still see his strength in the polls the way he did, the way we have in the last couple of hours.
There's no way, in another word on that Quinnipiac poll, we know now one was right and, you know, one was wrong and the rest were right.
There's no universe where he could be doing that well in the battleground states.
Fox now, Bloomberg, all of them.
He cannot be winning Georgia by eight, be winning Wisconsin by three, and be down by seven points nationally.
There's no universe.
Where that makes sense.
And by the way, even Haley was losing in Georgia to Joe Biden.
She was losing in Wisconsin to Joe Biden.
So it's been, with all the adversity they faced, it's been an incredible 72 hours for Trump and his supporters.
It has.
It's amazing.
It really has.
And Rich, you know, we've got a couple of minutes left in this segment.
Keep in mind, as this is going on, he's also out there making deep inroads into what?
The union vote.
I can't believe the media, they're so locked into their soap opera tabloid style reporting on Trump that they're not doing the normal horse race reporting of the actual race.
And the fact of the matter is that Trump right now, I believe I saw a poll yesterday, that he's at parity with Biden when it comes to these union households.
That's a huge problem for Biden in the Rust Belt.
Yeah, disproportionately in the Rust Belt.
And last month we wrote that.
I came on your show, we talked about it briefly.
I wrote an article on Locals about the change in the union vote.
And I think it was a day or two days ago, Harry Enten on CNN, who is one of the few who really seems to pay attention to stuff that matters, wrote about the union vote.
And that was because of Trump's second meeting with the Teamsters as Biden was going to the UAW.
I mean, Over a million members in the Teamster Union, Jack.
Over 50,000 in key areas of Pennsylvania alone.
No doubt that Trump had some slippage in 2020.
Union bosses really put the screws to their members in 2020 and said, don't you dare do what you did during 2016.
Do not abandon Biden the way you abandoned Hillary.
Some of those tactics worked, but now it is looking—last month it was looking more like 2016 again, but even a better, a little slight advantage, more so for Trump.
Now we're at a point where I don't think we have the whole story.
The polls that have come out in the last couple of weeks show an even better number for Donald Trump among union households.
And that's one thing we track all the time, not just households, but whether they're public or private sector union households.
And because we're not in the 1940s anymore, household composition is different.
What makes the union member, the demographic composition of a union member is totally different.
And that's why that non-college working class number is so important, buddy.
So important.
You get that high where Trump is now, you break into unions.
You do.
Yeah.
I think people remember as well that President Trump skipped the first debate, and what did he do?
He went to the autoworker strike, and he gave a speech there, but it wasn't even so much a speech.
He was actually listening.
He was interacting with the crowd.
He was interacting with the families.
He was talking to people who were there.
He was listening to their concerns, one of which, a really big one, and I'm going to keep pointing this out, was the electric vehicle mandate, the EV mandate that the Biden administration is pushing down.
This is absolute anathema to those union households because they hear EV mandate and they think China.
They think that means that's not going to be.
Look, I know Elon's got the gigafactory down in Texas and all that.
But everybody knows that the real the real, you know, mega factories, the giant factories of this are in China.
And, you know, obviously Elon has one is there as well in Shanghai.
And so they hear this stuff and they know that it's coming through.
So, we're coming up on a quick break, but I want to hold you over if you can, because I think this is actually going to be one of the biggest, biggest wedge issues of the Democrat coalition, which is already facing wedge issues, a huge, not just wedge, but an absolute schism when it comes to the Israel-Gaza issue.
This is decimating Biden with a key area of his support, not one that Trump is necessarily going to pick up, but With the union households, Trump is going to pick up those supporters by going after the EV mandate.
Book it, folks.
Human Events Daily continues next.
Jack, where is Jack?
Where is Jack?
Where is he?
Jack, I want to see you.
Great job, Jack.
Thank you.
What a job you do.
You know, we have an incredible thing.
We're always talking about the fake news and the bad, but we have guys, and these are the guys who should be getting policies.
All right, folks.
We got our Trump tweet here.
We got our Trump tweet.
You gotta hear this.
Rich, you ready?
Fannie Willis, the DA of Fulton County, just admitted to having a sexual relationship with the prosecutor.
She—and you could just hear it.
You could hear his voice.
You could hear he's very—this is classic Trump, right?
She, in consultation with the White House and DOJ, appointed to get President Donald J. Trump by going after the most high-level person and the Republican nominee.
She was able to get her lover much more money, almost a million dollars, than she would have been able to get for the prosecution of any other person or individual.
All caps.
That means that this scam is totally discredited and over.
And it, I mean, look, most normal Most normal people are gonna believe that, Jack.
I mean, let's be real.
If you're just a normie somehow- It's true!
It's just true!
Come on!
Not- I mean, but believe it- There's no way out of this.
It taints the case.
But believe it taints the case.
You can't separate this from the case.
You can't.
And we- well, let's get- let's- so CNN apparently is- we've got the clip.
CB- or CBS, rather.
CBS is- they got a guy up there.
Guys, let's- let's roll this clip, and if you can keep the mics open and our- our shots up, because let's- let's see how CBS is trying to squirm their way out of this.
Do we have a sense at all, I know obviously this is all still developing, but what this could mean in terms of consequences?
Look how long the face is!
He's so upset!
This is the question that everyone wants to know and there's a hearing that Judge Scott McAfee, who's the presiding judge in this case, has scheduled for February 15th.
An evidentiary hearing where he's going to have to I think he's stammering.
He's stammering!
Fonny.
Fonny.
Well, you don't want to say Fanny.
He's stammering.
He's stammering.
On the basis of conflicts of interest.
And this is the argument that Fannie Willis and her team make here, that they had no vested interest financial or otherwise in a conviction in this case beyond wanting to do justice, beyond wanting to vindicate that they had no vested interest financial or otherwise in a conviction in this case beyond wanting to do justice,
So the idea that the financial entanglements between Fannie Willis and Nathan Wade could have somehow biased the investigation, they say that is not true at all.
One other important detail in the Bible.
Based on what?
Based on what?
What's your counter evidence?
There's none!
The allegation was that Nathan Wade and Fonny Willis went on vacations together.
All right, here we go, here we go.
Lavish vacations.
And that Nathan Wade paid for that from money that she was authorizing paying him for this job.
It was the same bank account.
It was potentially a misuse of taxpayer funds, potentially added to the IPO.
Potentially.
- Potential. - What they reveal in this filing was that they actually alternated paying for some of these trips and Fonny Willis actually paid for some of them as well.
And there are actually receipts for Delta flights to Miami that Fonny- - Oh, she paid for some of the stuff herself.
So they went double dutch, so it's okay.
They went double dutch.
They went double dutch, so it's okay.
That's his argument?
That's your big way out of this?
Oh, well, she paid for some of the stuff herself.
He didn't pay for all of it, so therefore that...
Dude.
No, man.
You don't have it.
I'm sorry.
You think you got it.
You don't got it.
Because this is... Dirty Fannie.
Dirty Fannie.
She was dirty when she got in there.
She was dirty when she started this case.
She was dirty when she ended the case.
And she's up there doing... She tried to do Trump dirty.
She tried to do him dirty over this.
And we remember the phone call.
The phone call was a joke.
Saying that he was, you know, ordering Kemp to, you know, generate votes.
Ridiculous.
Absolutely ridiculous.
Not even close.
We don't even have to go through it.
We don't have to go through it.
But this, I just don't see any way out of this, man.
I really don't.
And the bar, you know, he's talking about the bar is so high to prove that this had an impact on the case.
First of all, that's been something that a lot of people have been arguing for a long time.
It's ridiculous.
I've seen so many cases where courts don't want to argue that.
They don't want to have to make the case that the system appears to be corrupt.
It's just the way it is.
You just don't understand the law.
And then you're talking about a case here that's with the former president, who is now The frontrunner to be the future president.
I just don't know how the public would see this any other way.
You're going to rely on some obscure, well, the bar is super high to make that case.
It's not in the court of public opinion, Jack.
I don't think it's as high as what he said.
But it is in a sense, I would say I would say in a sense it is because here's where the public opinion comes in.
And this is something that you have have tracked as well.
I said that kind of backwards.
Because of the juror, because the jury pool, if you get somebody from the jury pool that hears this stuff, I'm sorry.
I have to say, even with Fulton County being, you know, fairly left county, you don't know for sure that you're going to get somebody.
And if you're the prosecutors, are you really going to sit there and roll the dice and say, we're going to go 12 for 12.
Everybody who goes through that system is going to be our side against this.
And we're not going to find one person that looks at that and says, yeah, it kind of looks like there's a problem there.
I just don't see how you do it.
Jack, there's a lot of people in Fulton County who have maybe themselves or friends, family, and associates, people they know who have been, you know, for lack of a better word, Screwed over by this same system, you know, by people who get, you know, they don't get the benefit of the doubt under the law, and their family and their friends didn't, the way that the prosecutor is going to ask them to give them the benefit of the doubt.
So while I said that kind of backwards before, I guess what exactly, though, what I was trying to say is, you know, that it I just don't know how the public would see this any other way, and I don't know how as a prosecutor you roll that dice, just like what you just said.
I guess you could try, but you could end up in real bad way here, and then if it doesn't work, Jack, And you know you're opening yourself up to even more scrutiny, because if they do continue, there most assuredly will be more scrutiny, which could lead to more federal investigators getting on your tail.
Precisely!
Of course there will be!
Come on!
Let me go back, though.
Let me go back before we lose you.
I want to talk about the general here, because Isn't there potentially, and I think something that we're seeing now, if Trump is able to beat the rap on all of these cases, doesn't that create massive problems for the Democrats?
Because if they see him beat, they put so much energy into saying, we're going to get him on January 6th, guess what?
That's gone.
We're going to get him on Georgia.
This thing is gone.
You're going to see a supercharged Trump coming out of these things, aren't you?
Yeah, he'll be.
There is potential here for a backfire in more than one way.
And one of those is that he could come out of this with just a huge suit of armor and it'll be seen as more of a mandate than, you know, we normally see a president when he's elected with a mandate, right?
After 16, he won and he won more than anyone thought was possible.
So that was seen as a mandate.
He had the House and Senate with him.
This would be some kind of a different kind of mandate.
It would be the public saying, we know what you tried to do to him, and we still elected him anyway.
Look at the Fox poll in Georgia last night.
Look, we're talking about Fulton County.
We're talking about the Atlanta metro area.
Look at his strength in the Atlanta metro area, in the Fox poll.
And that's still with this going on.
They weren't subjected to this new cycle.
That was before this.
I just, what my point is, is that you're risking the public saying, alright, I know what you alleged, I know what you tried to do, and guess what?
We sided with him.
That's just huge.
Huge!
He'd be unstoppable.
I mean, this is the quintessential American story.
It's the underdog versus the establishment.
It's the American Revolution.
It's Rocky.
It's the plot of every movie!
It's the plot of every single movie.
The one plucky guy who has the truth on his side versus the big establishment.
It's Star Wars.
It's Rocky.
It's 1776.
It's every single movie you've ever watched.
This is always the plot.
And when the hero wins in Act 3, right?
When he defeats the... Remember, Act 2.
Act 2 of the movie is always... The Empire Strikes Back.
You know, the Empire Strikes Back.
All is lost.
We're destroyed.
You know, you're at the lowest point possible.
And then Act 3...
Act three comes in and that is the resolution when they come back and you have the final culmination of all things.
Rich Barris, final minute to you, sir.
Yeah, they're going to.
It's so glad.
I'm so glad you just drew that Star Wars analogy because it it fits here 100%.
Donald Trump's election, if you're on the side of Trump and you're a Trump supporter, that was the new hope, right?
And then from that point on, we've been in the act of—and maybe it was longer than people expected, but we were in the second act, which was the empire striking back.
And now, Americans love the underdog.
And this would be, you know, him coming back.
He'd be stronger than ever, Jack.
He'd be stronger than ever.
Rich Paris, we'll be before you real quick.
Best place is always Locals, peoplespundin.locals.com.
All the best, my friend.
Incredible.
Right back with a very special message for our listeners.
I'm working long hours.
I'm always listening to Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
All right, Jack Posobiec back here live.
I want to play a special clip now from a couple of years back from Morgan Freeman.
Black History Month, you find ridiculous.
Why?
You're going to relegate my history to a month?
Oh, come on.
What do you do with yours?
Which month is White History Month?
Well, come on.
Tell me.
I'm Jewish.
Okay.
Which month is Jewish History Month?
There isn't one.
Oh.
Oh.
Why not?
Do you want one?
No.
I don't either.
I don't want a Black History Month.
Black history is American history.
How are we going to get rid of racism?
Stop talking about it.
I'm going to stop calling you a white man.
Yeah.
And I'm going to ask you to stop calling me a black man.
I know you as Mike Wallace.
You know me as Morgan Freeman.
You want to say, well, I know this white guy named Mike Wallace.
You know what I'm saying?
So there's Morgan Freeman.
Morgan Freeman explaining the difference between Black History Month as is celebrated versus what he would have wanted.
Now that's from a while back.
That's Mike Wallace when he was still around.
I don't think Morgan Freeman would say that today.
I really don't.
And honestly, I think people need to understand that's what America was like before Obama.
That's what America was like before the Obama years, particularly the second Obama term, because that was kind of the idea of race relations in America today.
Or in America, I should say, at the time.
Because the idea was that we were going to be all in this together.
We're all going to work together.
We're going to be colorblind, at least in terms of people's worth, in terms of what people could bring to the table.
And we would treat everybody with respect.
That's what I teach my kids.
Treat everybody with respect.
Right?
But at the same time, if you're going to judge somebody, you judge someone based on their actions.
You base someone on their ability, their actions, what they bring to the table, and what they're able to do.
However, of course, since the Obama years happened, we don't do that anymore and we have that we have now completely separated into these various groups.
Wokeness rules the land.
We've decided that we are going to be race conscious now in America.
And of course, we Spent several episodes discussing how the 1960s and the legacy of that legislation created a race-conscious America.
And so, ladies and gentlemen, I would just like to say happy White History Month to everyone who's out there, and I would also like to announce That we have decided to award our first National Snow Queen, Taylor Swift, here on Human Events Daily, White History Month.
She is our Snow Queen.
We stan an absolute Snow Queen because Taylor Swift is the quintessential leader, really, of White History Month, and there were a series of tweets that she potentially could tweet that we presented earlier on social media from her, and said, you know what, Taylor?
It's not just about making history, of course.
It's about celebrating the rich tapestry that is white history.
That's what Taylor Swift is all about.
And so, look guys, I understand.
I've heard the criticism.
People have said, oh, why are you attacking the Swifties?
Why are you attacking Taylor Swift?
And I say, fine.
Fine.
You know what?
I embrace Taylor.
I am centering and celebrating my whiteness on the Snow Queen, Taylor Swift, herself.
I'm centered on her.
I'm centered on her energy, her white energy.
I'm centered on her whiteness.
And I feel that through this... Whoa, whoa, whoa!
I see people in the comments saying, is this about hate?
I said, this isn't about hate.
It's not about hate at all.
This is about love.
This is about love for Taylor Swift and white history.
Yes, because you see folks, now I know Jesse Lee Peterson.
Jesse Peterson has a great white history month.
He's been doing this for a while and he does it in July.
Remember, people were asking, I said, why do you want to do it in July, JLP?
And JLP says that he wants to do it in July because July just feels white.
I mean, I guess, you know, it kind of makes sense.
You got air conditioning, you got hot dogs, you got barbecue going on out there, driving your car around, you could be outside, the fireflies are going.
There's just something about that.
There's just something about that that really feels Like, it's White History Month, so potentially.
So, of course, we're making the announcement today, and I want people to put in now.
There is a little bit of a corollary coming up, so we can show some of the Taylor Swift White History Month.
You know, I know we really wanted to get this up, folks.
So, the idea is, of course, we know that Taylor Swift will also be arriving at the Super Bowl In a couple of weeks time out there in Las Vegas, she's going to be cheering on her white boyfriend.
She's only ever had white boyfriends, 37 of them actually, and she's going to be cheering him on.
We heard that at the beginning of the Super Bowl this year, for the first time as far as I know at a Super Bowl, They are going to be playing something called the Black National Anthem.
I think that's wonderful.
I think it's incredible.
But that also means, of course, we must respond and we must also include the White National Anthem to be sung, of course, by Taylor Swift, the Snow Queen of White History Month.
And so, folks, if you can send us in the comments, whether you're on Rumble, whether you're on X, whether you're on the podcast side, what song should Taylor Swift sing as the White National Anthem?
Now, it could be one of Taylor Swift's songs.
It could be another song.
I don't know.
You guys let us know.
We're gonna pick from the best comments.
Again, Rumble, YouTube, X, podcast, let us know what song should we pick.
And so to all the Swifties out there who were very upset, they said, why are you calling out Taylor Swift?
Why are you criticizing?
I'm not criticizing Taylor Swift at all.
No, no, this isn't about hate.
This isn't about criticism.
This is about absolute love.
Swiftie poso has been unlocked.
I am now a Swifty.
I am a member of the White Swifty Movement here in America, and we are all going to celebrate White History Month together as we listen to Taylor Swift music, the whitest music that you can find in the entire Let's all gather around and listen to some Taylor Swift white music right now.
In fact, you can play it for your kids and whenever you listen to it, just remember, you're listening to white music for White History Month.
It's incredible, and I know folks, I know there's a lot of people who say, hey, we should be colorblind in America and we should judge people based on their skills and based on their abilities and their actions, but apparently we're going to judge everyone based on race.
What am I forced to do?
All I can say is, look what you made me do.
▲
Export Selection