Project Camelot - MASTER PEACE SOLUTION: NEW BREAKTHROUGHS

Aug. 5, 2025 - Project Camelot

01:02:55

MASTER PEACE SOLUTION: NEW BREAKTHROUGHS

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Okay, we are live.
	Hi, everyone.
	I'm Carrie Cassidy from Project Camelot and very happy to be here today.
	So looks like for some reason I'm not on the screen.
	Am I muted?
	Oh, no, my camera's gone.
	Okay, there we go.
	So, hi again, everyone.
	So, I have two marvelous guests.
	And sorry, I am really, I was just on a phone call.
	Things have gotten just so discombobulated since I got back.
	Lot, lot going on.
	So, Matthew, what's your last name?
	Hazen.
	Sorry?
	Hazen.
	Hazen.
	Okay.
	Matthew Hazen.
	And I'm sorry.
	The other guest.
	Oh, it's Caroline Mansfield.
	Carolyn Mansfield.
	Okay.
	So sorry to be so disorganized.
	Normally I wouldn't be like this, but I can't even keep up with everything that's going on in, you know, in the world today, everything around my work and so on.
	So, but I'm glad to have both of you here.
	We are live.
	So let's get started.
	What we have done a previous interview, as I recall, I think it's been quite a while, though.
	So Matthew, why don't you introduce yourself and then Caroline follow with your own introduction?
	And then let's launch into the new breakthroughs and changes that you have to share.
	Absolutely.
	This may be the biggest show that we've ever done by far.
	This is going to bring out some news to everybody because there is a lot going on in the world and we need real solutions that are proven.
	We need good people who are doing good work that can provide a way forward so that we can, you know, avoid a lot of what is occurring to people.
	So I'm the founder for a company called Human Consciousness Support.
	And we developed a product with the help of Dr. Robert Young called Masterpiece.
	Masterpiece is a formula that has never been done before.
	It combines the two ingredients that you see on the healthiest parts of the earth, which is zeolite, clinoptilolite, and seawater.
	So we structure them together.
	There's a little more to it than that.
	And what we have found is that it purifies and cleanses the body.
	We've done quite a few studies that have never been duplicated.
	And we have produced results that we didn't expect to be so good.
	And those results have been published and peer-reviewed in India because America's system is unfortunately bought and paid for and as corrupt as it gets.
	And what we have done is people, unfortunately, in today's world, whether, and this is not.
	Okay, I'm sorry to break in here.
	All I wanted you to do was introduce yourself and not actually launch into your whole thing.
	So I want Carolyn to introduce herself.
	You haven't really said anything about your background.
	So could you say just two sentences or something so people understand who you might be?
	Yeah, I'm just a dad.
	I'm a guy who wants to help the world the very best I can.
	We have a world.
	You're the founder and CEO of the company.
	Is that correct?
	Yes, ma'am.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	And your company has had some success.
	I use your product.
	It's wonderful.
	Can you maybe speak a little bit about your business background or if there is any or anything like that?
	I had no business background before in a health supplement business.
	I've been mentored by the best.
	And yeah, it is definitely a product that has been built from a big labor of love.
	So Carolyn Mansfield, me and all the other rest of our team is got the same mission to help people as much as we can.
	Okay, Carolyn, some background and then you two can launch into everything.
	Yeah, sure.
	It's great to be back on.
	And just to refresh your memory and your listeners, I am a naturopath of 25 years.
	And I have been also working with companies for about the last 10 years looking at efficacy of products and seeing what it says it's going to do.
	I'm doing studies around that.
	And I was introduced to Matt Hazen about probably three years ago when the product was in its infancy.
	This is Masterpiece and we were deciding to potentially do some tests around the product to see whether the product would be removing these heavy metals and toxins from the body because we know that zeolites do that, but no one has really done human studies on an actual product itself.
	So that was the idea of where all this testing came from for Masterpiece.
	So I've been running various studies for Masterpiece for the last three years now.
	Okay, very good.
	So back to you, Matthew.
	Very sorry to break you off there and ask you to clarify who you were, but it's important because people, when they listen to people, want to know something about them before they kind of give you the benefit of the doubt, hopefully believing what you have to say and so on and so forth.
	So with all of that in mind, let's give a little more background in terms of the product itself.
	What does it claim to do for you?
	And if you have a picture, I can also put my ad here on the front page, but I don't know if it has a picture of it.
	It's just this little bottle and you just take it once a day.
	That's all I know about it.
	But it is actually helping to fight the COVID symptoms, among other things.
	So go ahead, Matthew.
	Very effectively, it does help.
	Yes.
	So we were the first and only company that did third-party tested clinical trials testing the levels of graphene oxide, hydrogel, common microplastic categories like PFOs, PFOAs, gender dysphoria, chemicals like atrazine and all the heavy metals.
	We've done all forms of testing that we that there is.
	And no other detox product or really health supplement company, especially in the alternative space, has ever done any of these types of studies.
	And so we wanted to not be selling snake oil.
	So we wanted to prove what we had.
	And so we were mentored and helped along and guided quite well by Dr. Robert Young.
	Anybody that knows his background, it speaks for itself.
	And what we knew was that the main components that was in the vaccines And that was graphene oxide, hydrogel.
	We originally did our initial pilot study with those, and we see significant reductions.
	In the course of 90 days, the study participants had an average of about a 70% reduction out of the intracellular, the inside the cell level of their blood, so the intracellular level of their blood.
	And that was astounding.
	And those findings were accepted underneath the high rigor of peer-reviewed publication.
	And if there's any scientists out there, they understand what that rigor means.
	That's the highest level of science that they have to be able to get into a peer-reviewed publication.
	It's very expensive, very long process of putting those papers together and publishing those results.
	And so we became familiar with the irrefutable fact that people now on Earth are emitting Bluetooth signals, real MAC addresses, as if their bodies are emitting what your phone emits, an identifying address.
	And so this phenomenon is well documented in several documentaries now.
	The Bluetooth documentary is probably the most famous of them.
	And so we thought to ourselves, logically, and Robert Young was saying it from the rooftops before he was incarcerated for telling the truth and being a truth teller the way he's been.
	And he told everybody, well, if it removes those components, then it would stop the MAC address.
	And so we thought to ourselves, we need to do a study that is irrefutable, where we could take people who we could, and Caroline can go into a lot more detail in it, but we wanted to essentially try to, we set out to prove that we could take someone who is a transhuman or someone who's emitting a MAC address and be able to revert them back where they weren't emitting those MAC addresses.
	And so we hired on a third-party production team, David Icke's production team, the iconic production team.
	And during the filming of this entire study, it was filmed using four different angles, including a drone, so that nobody could try to say that anything was played upon.
	And the results give a lot of hope for humanity.
	And we are, this isn't supposed to, I don't want this to be a self-pitch.
	I would say that we are the most affordable product out there.
	We're about a dollar a day.
	We have no preservatives in there.
	During all of our clinical studies, we've shown to do no harm, even though some people are on a lot of different prescription medications.
	A lot of people had been very COVID vaccine injured.
	And we've shown to do no harm while being able to highly mobilize and purge and detox the body of all the forever chemicals that we've tested for.
	And there's a long, a long list that we could go, a lot of neurotoxins like lindane, phosgene, cesium-137, fluoride, chlorine, things that nobody else has tested on.
	And we've shown to significantly reduce the levels out of every blood, urine, and hair.
	And so I want to kind of pass it to Caroline because she was the study coordinator and can explain things a lot better than me.
	But the gist of it is, is that we have now took this weird sci-fi transhumanism agenda that has been put together for many decades through the World Economic Forum and other places, obviously.
	And we have shown that we are able to remove and stop that signal and disable that signal with Masterpiece.
	Okay.
	Carolyn, do you want to continue?
	Yeah, sure.
	I do actually have a slide deck if you'd like me to share that with you.
	Sure.
	You've got a green button.
	You can click that to share.
	Okay, let's go through some slides because I think when people see, you know, they understand better.
	So, yeah, the idea was born after we had such success with the previous studies that we've done with Masterpiece, proving out that the product is removing a lot of these components that have been shown by various scientists around the world to be the self-assembling nanotech that is forming these chips that are giving off these MAC addresses.
	So we decided, well, let's do a separate study now and test people out to see whether we can remove these signals from their body, the Bluetooth signals.
	So I started the study by using phone apps, which I'm going to share with you as we just go along, because these phone apps are actually very, very proficient at picking up MAC addresses from the human body if it's done properly with a specific protocol.
	But for the study, obviously we couldn't just use phone apps.
	So I had to source an expert in the field to do the run the IT side of the study for us.
	So we copied the Bluetooth documentary in as much as we use the same professional grade equipment that was used in that study.
	And we also copied the protocol where we were out in a technology-free environment where we're testing people because you can't be testing people where you've got Bluetooth signals coming off all sorts of devices and Wi-Fi signals.
	So we started off testing.
	Well, first of all, let's just backtrack.
	I had to source an expert in the field.
	And this is where I discovered Manu.
	His name is Montchau Pavlov, and he's been doing testing for the last three years.
	And I contacted him to find out if he would actually be part of the study and whether he would run the IT side for us.
	And after he had a thought about it, he said, yes, he would agree.
	So he actually flew out from Bulgaria and brought with him all the technical equipment that we need to copy what was done in the Bluetooth documentary.
	And there was also a French study who've done exactly the same testing.
	So we sourced a field, which is, as I said, totally free of any technology, technology-free.
	And we began testing test subjects.
	And we initially started off with about 30 test subjects.
	Now, we were initially going for people who've had the COVID injection because on a whole, they are the ones that test positive for this MAC address.
	But also, people who've had the PCR test were testing positive for MAC addresses as well.
	I came across one person who had neither the COVID injection or a PCR test, but she was testing positive for a MAC address.
	But her husband had had both the PCR tests and the COVID injections.
	So that is possibly transfection that's happening with that test subject.
	So there could be quite a few more people out there.
	But for this study, it was mainly the injected from the COVID shot.
	So, we performed this study in the middle of the field, and we had a station set up under a gazebo where we had all the equipment.
	And we would have the test subjects come one by one to this isolated field where they would have to literally have to walk across woods and across the field to get to where we were testing.
	And this study was the first longitudinal study and the first intervention study, because in these previous studies, it's been they've been showing that yes, people do produce a MAC address, but they weren't showing any remediation or showing how these MAC addresses may change over time.
	So, this is what we wanted to do.
	So, the study actually lasted 11 weeks, but when we started the study, we had no idea how long it was going to last for.
	As I said, the intervention was masterpiece product.
	So, the test subjects were taking the product five drops twice a day initially.
	And as Matt said, it was independently filmed at each step.
	So, every time we did testing in the field, we had the professional film crew from the David Ike team come and film everything.
	And what else?
	We started off with after testing about 30 individuals, eight had agreed to be part of the study.
	But on the actual testing day, we had four turn up because it's very difficult for people to commit to such a study where they're going to be taking a product, they're going to be spending their time coming to a field to be tested and not once or twice, but it ended up being three times.
	They didn't know how many times they were going to have to be tested.
	So, I wanted to make sure the people that we had in the study were going to stick to protocol and were going to, you know, definitely be turning up for the rest of the tests.
	So, we had four individuals for this sort of pilot study for what we were doing, but it worked out really, really good because these people were very, very keen to take the product.
	One test subject had been having menstrual problems since she'd had the COVID injection.
	So, she was very keen to see if this was going to help her in that respect as well.
	So, we had three females and one male.
	And you can see here on this chart how many of these COVID shots had had.
	And one participant had had three Pfizer shots and over 50 PCR tests.
	And this is one of the test subjects who actually had two MAC addresses at the beginning of the study.
	And the reason she'd had so many PCR tests is because she was working for what's called the NHS here in the UK, which is the National Health Service.
	So, every time she went into work during the COVID period, she had to have a PCR test.
	And there was another participant who'd had over 30 PCR tests and three Pfizer vaccines.
	So, there was, you know, they'd obviously had a lot of, well, what can we say?
	They'd been interfered with a lot during that process.
	So, we had them come back to, we had them, we started off with the baseline on the 5th of April this year.
	So, everybody came into the field and they would come and the protocol would be one by one.
	So, we had them an hour apart.
	So, they would arrive.
	And with the testing equipment that we had, we could actually see them arriving before on our equipment before we saw them.
	So, especially if one of these phone apps had a radar facility.
	So, they would be arriving without any tech on them, no, you know, iPhones or smart watches or anything like that.
	So, this is basically just coming from the person.
	There was no doubt about that at all.
	And at baseline, two of the test subjects had two MAC addresses, and two of the test subjects had one MAC address.
	And excuse me, I'm sorry to interrupt you here.
	We are people in the chat saying that they've tried to purchase the products, and for some reason, you only allow it to be purchased on PayPal.
	Is that true?
	And that you don't allow credit cards?
	No, that's not, no, that's not accurate.
	I'm not sure if it's the browser.
	That might have been a long time ago.
	Our system is very, very fine-tuned right now.
	Well, they are texting this right now.
	They're saying, Yeah, did they just try to do it now or are they saying previously they should try it again?
	Because it says you're not honoring orders with credit cards.
	They've been trying to reorder for two weeks and so on.
	So, I know that I guess someone is putting in the actual address, which looks different than the one I have on my ad.
	So they're saying go to that address, which is the last link you see on the chat on the right-hand side.
	But maybe you could like I can show the website really quickly that I've got here and maybe you can explain to people.
	Sorry about this, but of course, when people hear about a product, they want to buy it.
	And I can understand that people want to use their credit cards.
	So, here at this moment, let me just use, see if I can get this on the screen, and then maybe you can help them figure this out.
	So, here this is the website, and they want to enter the website from your link, Carrie, so that they don't so that they pay the lesser price.
	And so, once they get the website, they will go and they will go right to shop.
	Well, you'd have to log in.
	This is just you're just in sign up mode right here, but you're not logged in.
	But you could hit shop now right there, and it would take you right to it.
	Okay, so here's the shopping area.
	And then it would say, like, say, add to cart.
	Let's go through and then continue, right?
	Um, you know, I don't know why they're encountering a problem and then total to pay, USD.
	And then let's see if you had a coupon.
	I guess they don't have a coupon.
	Um, they'd have to fit.
	So, yeah, I can't fill it all in until C, but assuming you're actually saying you take credit cards, okay?
	Is that absolutely?
	We do hundreds of orders a day.
	And yeah, absolutely.
	Okay, so I don't know.
	It could have to do with where the person lives.
	Is it possible?
	Are you international, for example?
	Yes, we're out of 80 countries so far.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	Does that include the UK?
	Because we have a fair audience over there.
	That is where this study was actually performed too, the study that we've been doing.
	Maybe they're trying to buy it without logging in.
	And that's the problem for their credit cards, do you think?
	No, they would still be able to purchase, but they would be purchasing for $57.99 instead of $52.99 by going through your link.
	It shouldn't have anything to do.
	It might be their browser.
	I'm not a tech guy.
	We have a tech developer.
	So I wouldn't be able to give an accurate answer.
	It'd be a guess.
	Okay.
	And someone from Masterpiece is saying everybody can buy without logging in.
	So I don't know.
	I just wanted you to address that.
	Hopefully you're saying that there's no problem.
	So the person may have some specific problem.
	If they want to write more details into the chat, feel free.
	And also, is there an email address they can reach you to get help?
	If there's someone that's in the chat from Masterpiece, I guarantee they're listening and they'll put it in there for us.
	Yes.
	Okay, great.
	Okay.
	Now, Carolyn, please do continue.
	And can I ask you that you're actually saying that you only tested three people?
	I mean, no offense, but am I to understand that you only tested three people?
	No, I mean, when I did my initial testing, I tested over 30 people.
	What I said was it's getting people to commit to doing the study that we have.
	And I'd asked Manu to come over at a certain time to start the study.
	So when we started the study, we had four.
	But it was still, yeah, we were still happy with that because it is a pilot study.
	And the results speak for themselves.
	If I go back into continuing what I was saying.
	Please do.
	Yeah, sure.
	Yeah, so the testing was actually in the UK.
	It was in a field in Hertfordshire, as Matt just said.
	I didn't actually mention that.
	Yeah, so what I was leading on to say also is that, so we had everyone come back for the 35-day testing.
	And at this point, everyone was still testing positive for their MAC address.
	But one who had two signals was now down to one.
	We didn't quite know what to make of that, but it was an interesting observation.
	So we asked them again to go away and continue to take Masterpiece at five drops twice a day.
	But it was decided by the company about two or three weeks later that maybe we should up the dosage to be 15 drops twice a day.
	And then we'd have them come back, I think it was six weeks later from the 35-day mark.
	So the test subjects agreed to do that.
	And on the last testing day, again, the test subjects turned up in the field.
	Now, where we're stationed, as I said, we would always see on the computer the people arriving before we saw them physically with our eyes.
	And they arrived and there was no, the first test subject turned up and there was no MAC address.
	So, you know, we were all wondering whether there was something wrong with the systems and we turned them on and off again and we're testing.
	And we realized that actually the first test subject had no MAC address at the 11-week mark.
	So then we were waiting again for the second test subject who arrived.
	And this test subject had no MAC address.
	Now, previously to even starting the study, I had tested these same test subjects twice before.
	So they've already had four positive readings.
	You know, and then when the study started, now they've had two more positive readings.
	On the last test day, there was no reading at all.
	And the third person turned up, there was no MAC address.
	And then we hit a home run when the fourth person turned up.
	So we knew it was a very exciting moment, Kerry, because we've done so much testing around all of this since about February, the beginning of this year with these same test subjects.
	And this is the first time that they were now not emitting a MAC address.
	And the only change they've made was taking Masterpiece, because also with these test subjects, you know, when you're getting, when you're testing these vaccinated individuals, you don't want to be scaring them.
	So when I was doing the preliminary testing, they'd be saying, what are we testing for?
	And I would just say, well, we're testing for EMFs coming off your body.
	And that's how I kind of, you know, drew them into it because I didn't want them going away doing much research because otherwise they'd probably introduce some other detox product or want to do something else because they'll become fearful.
	So they began the study just believing that they were giving off some kind of EMF frequency.
	Then as they progressed with the study, we gave them more and more information about what was going on.
	So by the end of the study, and everything is videoed in this documentary, they were very relieved to know that they were omitting this MAC address at the beginning of the study and now it was completely gone.
	So yeah, it was a moment of elation.
	And let me just show you just the graph here.
	So you can see that two of the test subjects, and if you can see that very clearly, had two tests, two MAC addresses at the beginning of the study.
	And by the end of the study, they all had no MAC addresses.
	And I'm going to unpack the data here because there's probably a few technical people listening to this presentation.
	But when I'm just going to show you these phone apps, the progressive changes over time, at Baseline, this is one of the test subjects who always showed that they had two MAC addresses.
	And you can see them here.
	Now, this is a radar app.
	So as a test subject would walk away, you would see them move, these little circles move as they moved away.
	And then they'd come closer as they walked towards you.
	And anyone can download this app, which I'm going to share with you.
	At the five-week mark, one of the ones that I said who started off with two now had one.
	And the professional grade equipment was picking up exactly the same signals, but in a slightly different way.
	And then at the 11-week mark, you can see there was absolutely no signal coming on this particular phone app.
	I was using two different phone apps and they were all clear.
	So people say, well, what, you know, what are these Bluetooth signals coming off human test subjects?
	Well, we know that La Quinta Columna, for example, who were looking at Pfizer, for example, under the microscope, were picking up on these artificial structures that resembled electronic circuits.
	And there's been a lot of microscopists around the world and research teams, you know, picking up the same.
	And they say, well, what are these MAC addresses?
	Well, these are just basically an identification number.
	It's like an alphanumeric number.
	And it's like a license plate for a device.
	So it acts like an ID for a Bluetooth signal.
	But what's interesting is these signals that were coming off the human body, they don't have any information.
	They're called their unknown devices, basically.
	So when there's a category for maybe it's an Apple Watch or a Fitbit or something, when it's coming off the human body, it's totally unknown.
	And I'm going to unpack that a bit further once we just get past these slides, because I think people will be quite interested to know what equipment was used.
	So we were using software called Kismet, which was used in the Bluetooth documentary.
	And this is on a platform called Kali Linux.
	Now, this isn't easy for people to download and to use on their laptop.
	And this is why we were also searching during the study to see how the phones compared to the professional equipment so we can help people at the end of the study to do their own testing.
	And we found that the phones were actually, the phone apps were about 95% accurate compared to the professional grade equipment.
	But the only difference is you Can't unpack the data, but it's good enough for people around the world to start testing themselves.
	And in our report, we've got all the details of how people can do this for themselves and not just rely on us or any other scientific team around the world to tell them what's happening.
	They can do their own testing.
	We're also using another software called Bitmone, which was used in the other studies.
	And again, that was on a Kali Linux platform.
	Bit complicated for people to be able to download and use.
	You would need to be very IT savvy and spend a couple of weeks learning how to use it.
	So Manu also discovered another software packet called Wireshark.
	Now, this is a bit easier if people wanted to unpack the data themselves to see for themselves what these packets are.
	And it's actually very accessible and it can be used on Windows and Mac and not just on Kali Linux.
	So there are options for people which will be in our report so people can start doing the testing themselves with professional grade equipment.
	And the actual Bluetooth detection antennas that we used were called Bluefruit LE sniffers.
	And it was particularly the NRF 52840, which gave us so much more data than actually the Bluetooth documentary antenna was able to use, able to, sorry, because they were using something called Ubertooth One.
	I'm sure some people are familiar with this, but that is no longer available since they did that documentary.
	The company aren't making them anymore.
	So we couldn't reuse, we couldn't use that and replicate the same antenna.
	But actually, this it worked out fortuitous because this gave us a lot more information.
	And just also the mobile apps that we're using, I've just highlighted the actual icon so people can just come back to this recording and they can see the icon if they want to go into the app store so they can see exactly which one it is.
	And it's a Bluetooth scanner Bluetooth finder, which is peering by Zontan Pelaghi, is one of them.
	And the BLE 4.0 by Blue Pixel Technologies LLP.
	Those two are really very good and proficient at testing people for these MAC addresses.
	So as I said, these signals are what we call unknown.
	On the phone apps, people will see that it just says unknown, unknown device.
	There's no information on it at all.
	And on the professional grade equipment, again, there'll be a classification that's that says, you know, add non-con it's basically means non-connectable, which is very similar for beacons and hidden devices.
	And it's like, as it said, it's a device saying, I speak, you listen.
	There's not a lot of communication.
	So it's almost like when we unpack the data on what the packets look like, it's very, very similar to the find me on iPhones or luggage tags have very similar packets as well.
	So it's almost like it's a tracker is tracking you where you are basically to find you.
	And if I can just unpack that a bit further for you.
	So we were able to show you exactly what the signal looks like.
	There was a facility on the Wireshark that was able to give a graph.
	So the human Bluetooth addresses give out one packet every two seconds.
	So this is what it looks like on a graph.
	There are some interruptions, and we feel this is because, you know, these nanochips must be in a very unstable environment being within the human body.
	There must be changes going on.
	So potentially that is why they, you know, sometimes there will be an interruption, but on the whole, they're consistent at one packet every two seconds.
	And how does that compare to other Bluetooth signals?
	So you can, I don't know if you can see this graph very well because it's turned out a little bit small.
	But as I said, on the on the find me mode on an iPhone, this is three packets every two seconds.
	And you can see how the signal is very, very similar on the right here compared to the human signal, compared to something like a Fitbit watch down here on the right-hand corner at five packets every few seconds.
	And you can see the pattern is totally different.
	And if you even look at a gimbal, a camera, there's 125 packets every few seconds.
	So I think the more powerful, the more information that's being transferred, the more packets you're going to see.
	So just visually for people watching this, the human nano chip, you can see this very this blue line at the bottom.
	That's what it looks like at one packet every few seconds.
	Now, the red line just behind it is the find me mode in the iPhone.
	And you can see very similar, but it's more powerful because it's working off a lithium battery, right?
	And then after that, you can see the next one would be the Fitbit watch, which is a yellow line going across at five packets every few seconds.
	So they're totally different signals.
	So if anyone says, oh, you're picking up on something else, it's something to do with a phone or something.
	No, it's not.
	It's definitely got its own signal.
	And this is concurred by the French study.
	So we were able to go into the French study document, which is which anyone can download.
	If anyone goes to bluetoothpolice.com, you will find all the details of the other studies on that particular website, which is owned by Manu, who ran the IT side for this study.
	And he unpacked the data from the French study.
	And you can see that they picked up exactly the same signal of the human test subjects at one packet every two seconds with the intervals.
	So it really concurred with previous studies that have happened previous to us.
	So we were delighted to see that the data that we found from this study is the same and that we were able to find an intervention for these very same signals that other studies have been picking up on around the world, but hadn't been able to offer any solution.
	And I just want to say also that going back to when I first spoke to you, Kerry, and we were talking about the pilot study when we're looking at the intracellular toxicity test.
	And we were able to prove out that graphene oxide was removed by Masterpiece after 90 days from the very high and high levels down to the tolerable levels.
	And we know this is a highly conductive material.
	So we knew that there was a very good chance for Masterpiece to be able to disable these MAC addresses coming off human bodies.
	And that was the whole reason we did that, this study in the first place.
	And even the work that amazing Dr. Young has done at the 500,000 times magnification, where he was showing That these nano components of graphene oxide, how they are actually absorbed and adsorbed into the structure of the clinoptilolite in Masterpiece, and how this is how they are removed from the body because clinoptilolite has a powerful negative charge.
	It picks up these toxins, which have a powerful positive charge, specifically graphene oxide, and pulls them out the body.
	And this is a great visual of exactly what is happening and why the study was so successful.
	So, let me just unshare my screen with you there.
	That picture right there, Caroline.
	Yes, if we could show that one more time, that is done with a high, that was Robert Young's high-resolution transmission electron microscope.
	You are looking at a piece of clinoptilolite zeolite, which has a hexagon structure.
	That's why you see the hexagon shape, and those little itty-bitty dots that are all trapped to it.
	Those that's after Robert Young put one drop of graphene oxide on the slide.
	So, after he put a graph, that is what you call nanobots, nano dots.
	When they're talking about that, they are talking about the smallest size of these metals, graphene oxide.
	And that is what happens that they get magnetically stuck to Masterpiece.
	And there's other great products out there that are nanozeolites.
	Root Brands has a fairly decent product.
	The difference with us is that we have a smaller size.
	We actually perfected how to get it down to about 500 times smaller than the poisons that are manufactured against humanity.
	So, when you're talking about all these transhumanism components and all this nano-sizing of things, they nano-size things down to what would be 50 nanometers.
	Well, most of Master, well, more than half of Masterpiece is less than one nanometer.
	And so, it goes deeper than even the poisons that were put against us.
	And we have about 15 times more clinoptilolite zeolite in Masterpiece as compared to any other nanozeolite product that we did reverse engineer, for instance, root brands, which they do have a good product, but we have about 15 times more clinoptylolite in our product than them.
	And then we also have the nourishing minerals because we take seawater and we dilute it down so that it is actually identical to the extracellular fluids in our body.
	So, when we're grabbing out toxins, we're replacing those toxins with the highest sourced mineral supplement that we have.
	And so, what we end up seeing is people getting upgraded because they're getting toxins removed and replaced with the minerals that they need.
	Okay, and that's uh, that's actually you know very good.
	Uh, now I have a question on your study in terms of the amount necessary to kind of get up to par.
	And I understand that you were your particular study this time was tracking the MAC addresses, but there are people that have obviously taken the jab.
	And by the way, also had the PCR tests who also have the symptoms that go along with, you know, you could say the downside of having taken such thing.
	And they, uh, so we know that, for example, the nanographene oxide jumps.
	Okay, I know this, and I've a scientist, a NASA scientist behind the scenes who told us this.
	And it goes from a person who is taking the jab to a person who is not.
	So, that you find that, let's say, you go into a crowded restaurant and you're eating there, and you leave and you go home, and then you'll find that you start to have some what we consider to be those COVID-like symptoms.
	You might have trouble with your breathing, or you might be congested, or whatever it happens to be.
	So, then if you take the masterpiece, you will get rid of those symptoms.
	But I'm just saying that it might help people if they knew what is required, because just because you show the MAC address doesn't mean you're not, or you don't, you are do, or you do.
	That's kind of a measurement for sure if you're suddenly broadcasting a MAC address.
	But aside from that, you've still got all of this stuff in you, right?
	And so, this is where you're also trying to document how it removes the nanographene oxide, right, in general, right?
	Um, so prior to the shows prior that we've done, you've also been showing how that is also been something you studied aside from the MAC addresses, just saying, right?
	Absolutely.
	Yeah, we've done uh placebo-controlled studies, we we've done done blood tests, urine tests, and hair tests.
	We actually have an ongoing hair test right now with about 400 ongoing study participants that are opted into the study that are coming back in because heavy metals, uh, forever chemicals, all these microscopic environmental pollutants.
	We have tested people that were not COVID-jabbed.
	We've tested people that were the healthiest people out there that are part of our study.
	And everybody has these high levels of these nanotoxins because it's inundated our earth, it's in the air.
	We know it's being dropped on us and everything else.
	So, it's impossible to escape the poisoning that they're doing against us.
	What we do know from our various studies that we've completed, they're all third-party tested clinical studies.
	They've all been peer-reviewed and published on, is that for everything that we have looked into, we Masterpiece significantly mobilizes to get these levels out of you to get to purge these and detoxies out of you.
	Right.
	Okay, so that's very good.
	Uh, now I'm going to look at the chat to see if anyone has questions.
	And if you do have questions, please put them in the chat before we wrap this down.
	Um, and if there's anything we haven't gotten to, um, please, uh, please do talk about that before we wrap up.
	And in the meanwhile, we'll wait for questions to show up because I don't see any obvious questions.
	Put a question mark if you do have a question, that will help.
	Yeah, no question, Caroline, go ahead, please.
	No, I was just going to say, we've done so much testing around Masterpiece and looking at all different metals and compounds, environmental toxins.
	And it's so shocking always at the beginning of a study to see how toxic people are, what their toxic load is, and all these different chemicals and environmental toxins, including what Matt was saying, like atrazine, for example.
	So many people here in the UK were Testing highly positive for atrazine, which is the body dysmorphia herbicide that I think is contributing towards a lot of stuff going on with this sort of transgender movement as well.
	You know, that was the, that was the chemical that was found in one of the studies to turn the male frogs into female frogs.
	So, yeah, so why would we have this in our bodies in high levels?
	It's not great.
	But, you know, with Masterpiece, we found that a lot of these toxins are able to be brought down.
	So it really is a great remediation, but also to tell people, you know, to it's about what you do with your diet as well.
	You can't just be going out eating McDonald's and KFC and drinking alcohol and just taking a few drops of Masterpiece.
	You know, you should be really looking after your body and doing a lot of other things to help with the organs of detoxification, supporting your liver, supporting your kidneys, you know, regular saunas, eating well, choosing organic food as much as possible and watching the water that you drink.
	You know, distilled water, I feel is the best water to be having to help not only cleanse out your system, but it's one of the cleanest waters.
	And to try and structure that water, obviously, once you've distilled it as well, there's many things that you can do to really support your body.
	And some people, if they are very toxic, when they do start a detox program, they may start to get symptoms.
	And so, you know, to pull back, if you are finding that you're getting symptoms, even just taking a few drops of Masterpiece, if you decide that maybe you're, you know, you may get a slight headache, you may notice that maybe you're getting a slight skin outbreak, you would pull back like you would for any detox protocol.
	It doesn't mean to say there's anything wrong with the product, but it's just a very sensible thing to do.
	So I just want to say that.
	But, you know, on this study, the test subjects, well, on all the studies, actually, the worst symptom I've ever had is a test subject having a headache at the beginning of the study on day one.
	So I said, pull back to one drop twice a day and then two drops twice a day, three drops twice a day, so they're back up to five within five days and no problem.
	I had a lady in her 60s who started to get some spots, you know, like, you know, acne outbreak, but she hadn't had that since she was in her teens and that resolved very quickly.
	So, you know, these things can happen.
	It's just a detox reaction, but obviously, you know, support your body.
	That's what I want to say.
	Okay.
	Now, I do see some questions here.
	So I'm going to try to zoom in on it and see if we can get.
	So I'm not sure.
	Is there links to V2K tech or voice to skull?
	Links from nanographen oxide or from where?
	I'm not sure.
	Do you understand that question?
	Voice to skull technology.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Sorry.
	Voice to skull technology.
	Yeah.
	What it appears on some level, and some people may have heard of God's voice technology or what MKUltra is another.
	It's all the same level of intelligence agencies that we've been testing on smaller groups of people for decades and decades now, where they were doing implants at first that started off remote controlled and radio controlled, and then they've been making it smaller and smaller.
	I don't think they're asking for a definition of it.
	Voice to skull is very well known, but what they seem to be asking is whether your product can mitigate that type of thing.
	I mean, it's electronic, so it's not something you're ingesting.
	It is something that Masterpiece should disable.
	The reason is because voice to skull requires electromagnetic signals.
	And zeolite is a negative magnet, which when you take a positive electromagnetic implant and you start putting a bunch of negative magnets to it, it takes away the magnetic charge and disables the technology.
	We are in very secret, high-level work right now with the most targeted people, groups, and we are showing insanely good results, but we're not ready to go into that yet.
	So yes, the answer is absolutely.
	If you have implants that were done, however, from however long ago, you are taking a natural solution with Masterpiece, which is going to demagnetize that electromagnetic component and is going to short-circuit it.
	Yes.
	Okay.
	So I think that that answered the question.
	And that's very good.
	Actually, that was a good question for people to consider because there are a lot of people that are getting targeted electronically and targeted individuals.
	It's not just voice to skull.
	It's all kinds of targeting with scalar waves, et cetera.
	So this is interesting to find out about that Masterpiece can actually mitigate that targeting.
	I think that that's an exciting direction for you guys to be going in and very happy to hear that you're going in that direction.
	Yes, absolutely.
	Anyone want to say, okay, do you, I don't see another question that I can make sense of here.
	Again, put a question mark if you do have any last minute questions.
	I'll try to keep an eye here and see if we missed anything.
	And when it comes to the targeted individual phenomena, those, you know, when we had there, we had smaller groups.
	Everybody now is a targeted individual.
	Smart dust, what they're dropping from the sky to assemble.
	What this targeted individual phenomena used to be was that was their beta test to get to where we are today.
	Sure.
	And today they've refined that technology.
	We know that that technology assembles due to Tesla phoresis.
	We understand that process very well, what they do with those nano dots that start with the LED lights and the 5G plus waves.
	The combination of those two causes that to self-assemble.
	Very well documented.
	And we know that Masterpiece is going to carry out those nano dots and that self-assembling stuff and get it out of there.
	And we have had people that have had severe issues where they would be hitting the back of their head to try and stop signal.
	It's some kind of phenomenon.
	Isaac Cappy was well known for it, that one guy that had put himself off the ridge.
	And anyways, we have shown they have 100% relief.
	And so it's just not ready to publish and come out because it's something that it's the biggest thing we've actually started working on in the last couple of weeks, actually, to really put it together, that it needs to be put together for the people.
	Okay, very good.
	And again, do you guys have anything else, any wrap-up comments that you perhaps Carolyn would like to make?
	Yeah, sure.
	I mean, I think the biggest remediation that people find when they take masterpiece is that their brain fog goes, you know, they can think clearly again.
	And this is one of the biggies from all the studies that I've done.
	That and sleeping well.
	But the highest score of all was feeling joy.
	So I feel when we're getting these toxins out of our body, it's, you know, opening up, it's clearing our brain, our pineal glands, and people are able to connect in that much better.
	So they're able to tune into their intuition, right?
	And their Christ consciousness, basically, whatever you want to call it out there.
	And so now you're going to make decisions for yourself because you're not wrapped in fear.
	You're not toxed down.
	So you're not relying on outside sources to tell you what to do.
	The government's, you know, the doctors in white coats, et cetera.
	You're making decisions for yourself.
	And I think it's really important for people also to get out in nature, you know, doing all this testing around what I do around London.
	I take my meter with me.
	The only place that goes green, obviously, is in the woods in nature.
	I've been on beaches in Dubai, and the, you know, the meter is flashing red because that is a smart city.
	Even on the beach, for goodness sake, you know, yeah, these towers are affecting people.
	You're standing on the sand.
	You think you're grounding, but you're not.
	You're just being bombarded with these frequencies.
	So I'm always looking for places.
	And I feel if you're spending like 20 minutes in nature, feet on the ground, all the electron donors, you know, you're just, you know, sucking up all the good energy.
	And it's actually removing, you know, all the self-assembling nanotech.
	Or if you do have nanotech and you, it can't self-assemble while you're in nature.
	So I feel this is so important.
	You know, people need to be where possible in their lifestyle, getting away from these cell towers, having device detoxes, because it's like a narcotic now, these devices, you see kids on them.
	And when you're holding your phone, it's going to be helping self-assemble all this crap that's in us.
	So yeah, really important to look at lifestyle.
	And I also want to say that, and I want you to answer the question about the status of Dr. Young, they're asking in the chat before we wrap up.
	But I also want to say that according to my information from whistleblowers and the studies I did, you know, information-wise over the last COVID years, which were, you know, I guess it's been like five years or something so far, whatever.
	But the fact that I've interviewed people like Dr. David Adair, who says that what this process is, is a transhuman agenda.
	It involves changing your body from carbon-based to silicon-based.
	So you do have a motivation to keep, like to keep the growth of this, if you want to call it that, in your system down, regardless of how dedicated you want to be to trying to get it all out every day, type of thing.
	And I agree that you, that even children should be encouraged to go into nature without their phones.
	This is a key element to get people to go, even adults, often go on walks.
	I see them talking on their phone, and they're not getting the benefits of what they should be getting when they're out on a walk.
	So just wanted to make that note.
	And now, if you could talk to the status of Dr. Young, I'm sure everyone would like to hear that.
	So I speak to Dr. Robert Young every day on the phone.
	He has, if there was professional sports for 70-year-olds, he would absolutely be a professional sports player right now.
	He's doing about 600 push-ups and 600 sit-ups, 600 leg lifts a day.
	He's stronger mentally than ever.
	He's the greatest man I've ever met.
	The way he's holding up, the way he handles all this well.
	He, you know, he was the first one.
	There's only been two groups, and he was the first one in 2022 that published on the exact ingredients in the COVID vaccines.
	And that really got him targeted, retargeted big time, where they set him up with a five-decade-long friend who he had been helping with her diet for a long time.
	And they set her down and he didn't even go to treat her.
	And they still got him for practicing medicine without a license, which is a tragedy because he spent his entire career speaking out against practicing medicine.
	And Robert Young is a very good chance in a month from now due to a lot of what's happened that would take too long to go into right now.
	And he should be in a halfway house.
	And they were planning on getting rid of him and for the rest of his life.
	In fact, they promised that to him.
	The investigator that had been on multiple cases of his, the same prosecuting attorney and the same investigator tried him twice.
	They did not offer him a plea deal this time around.
	They wanted to give him 19 years and get rid of him forever.
	And because of the people and their response, an incredible documentary that was put together at the last minute so that it got millions of views and really got out there called the Truth on Trial.
	And there was a big rally outside of the courtroom, the sentencing day, and all the investigators and all the people in the court had to be brought in with security because there was a bunch of 70-year-old women there holding signs that they wanted to, you know, that they were scared of because they were all standing for Robert Young.
	And he came away with only five years and eight months instead of 19 years.
	And I believe that all had to do with people coming together.
	And, you know, Robert Young is the brains and the heart behind Masterpiece.
	This formula would be much less effective and wouldn't be it.
	This formula wouldn't have the exact same pH, electrical charge, and composition of the human body like it does if it wasn't for his help.
	And he is the most humble, modest, and authentic man and role models to everybody what a real man should stand for.
	And he should be home in a month.
	He should be at least halfway house where he can, he's going to work as a pickleball coach.
	He used to be a professional tennis player for anybody that doesn't know him.
	He was a professional tennis player till he was 29.
	So he's going to go at 74 years old, help people at tennis.
	And yes, it's a wonderful story.
	That's lovely.
	Also, I want to say that I've interviewed him so many times over the years.
	And so if you want to see all my interviews with Him.
	I highly recommend all of them.
	And he also did one interview with him and Judy Mikovitz, maybe even two.
	And just go to my front page of my website, projectcamelotportal.com.
	And under the search bar, which is right on the front page, you put in the last name Jan and you should find all the interviews.
	So I highly recommend that to get to know him and what his sort of own health regime is, the books he's written, the papers he's written, links to his website, and so on.
	So you can find all of that on my website, projectcamelotportal.com.
	So thank you everyone for being here and thank you both.
	Sorry I was so unorganized, I guess, at the beginning.
	Just sort of virtue of what's going on now in everything.
	So this has been a great show and I appreciate everything you've had to say.
	I am going to bring up the credits.
	So go ahead and sign off.
	And I guess we've heard everything you had to say for now.
	And then we'll hope we'll hear from you in the future, I hope.
	Can I just say one last thing?
	Yeah.
	If people want to find out more details about this MAC address study, go into a lot more detail.
	They can find the report on the masterpiece website, which I believe is under research or study.
	Do you know what tab it is, Matt?
	No, I don't.
	No, I don't.
	Okay, so yeah, so it's under the research section, and you'll be able to click on the report so you can get all the information that you need, especially about the different apps and the equipment that was used, because I feel it's really important for people around the world to start doing this testing themselves.
	And the more people that can test and find out they potentially have a MAC address, and then we can gather as much information as possible on this from around the world and correctly.
	So I'm sharing a screen of your website and I'm on research.
	Is it our studies?
	Our studies.
	Our studies?
	All right, great.
	So people can go there and take a look.
	Yeah, please do support Project Camelot by using the link I have on my website.
	And by the way, Matthew, the link I have doesn't look the same as the one your person put in there.
	So could you make sure the link I have is correct?
	Absolutely.
	Absolutely.
	And I'm sure the link that they put in is you have about four different links.
	So don't worry, they all go to the same place.
	All right.
	Very good.
	All right.
	Thank you again, everyone, for watching today.
	And thanks both of you for all the wonderful information.
	I'm going to put run the credits.
	So please go ahead and leave.
	Thank you.
	Okay.

▲