Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 29, 2023 - Project Camelot

01:30:30

KEITH HUNTER: DEWS, NUKES AND LATEST ATTACKS

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	So this is all about preparedness.
	I would like to be clear with everyone listening right now that I know my work.
	I talk about a lot of things that could potentially affect you directly, but one way or another, we know that whatever happens to this country will affect you or someone you know, and what you do about that is up to you.
	Basically, you want to be prepared.
	So it might make sense to diversify your money with precious metals and that is why I partnered with Gold Co.
	because I believe that this could be the best way to help.
	It shows you how to get into precious metals like the IRA or 401k And then you may already qualify for getting $10,000 in free silver.
	Go to www.investforgold.com and get your free gold and silver kit.
	And this is about taking control of your freedom, financial freedom.
	We know we can't predict the future, but we can certainly prepare for it.
	And we need to make educated choices.
	So take care of Your own freedom, privacy, and your future by going to www.investforgold.com and you can get a free gold and silver kit there.
	Make sure that you've got a safer financial future.
	Okay, we are live.
	Hi, I'm Carrie Cassidy from Project Camelot and very happy to be here today.
	So, I have Keith Hunter with me and Keith is a fascinating guy.
	He's written, I guess, a few books.
	One is, I'm going to try to get the name here, it's all about occult physics And he also talks about earthquakes, weapons, and investigates ley lines, sacred geometry, and the link between nukes, earthquakes, and scalar programs.
	So, Keith, it's great to have you here on the show.
	I haven't had you on for the shows for a while, but maybe you can talk about, you know, your background since I don't have a bio for you, and And so that we can lead up to explaining what your latest information is.
	Yeah, as far as a bio goes, even on my own website, I'm not into bios really.
	I'm not really into that, but it's because I'm an independent researcher.
	I've not got any formal background in anything, you know, I suppose, like related to this, but I'm just a guy that's been interested in, you know, what you might call the esoteric stuff since the late 90s or so.
	Quite a few books on the bookshelf about it and initially I was fascinated by some of the stuff that Graham Hancock was talking about in his books, Fingerprints of the Gods in the 90s and I read Nexus Magazine and that really opened up a lot more subjects and so
	I was interested in astronomy and Greek mythology as well and so I thought it fascinating when I started to see researchers who were effectively tying in subjects like astronomy and mythology into hard science and that they were decoding this kind of stuff in such a way that led to understanding that real breakthroughs in physics and some of the suppressed information in physics
	was actually tied in to that kind of subjects, like the Greek mythologies encode like astronomical patterns which cause destructions, trigger them, and these are effectively kind of an esoteric area which is very much tied into natural earthquakes, okay, and natural great destructive events, which again it's kind of classified because it's to do with end of age cycles and the kind of things that could cause civilizational, you know,
	impacts such that governments would suppress that information.
	So there's that aspect to it.
	And yes, it's true that planets can cause earthquakes, but what you then start to find is that earthquakes can be manipulated or artificially triggered, and that some of the technology involved in that is, again, it's tied into what people might loosely refer to as sacred geometry.
	So these are the topic areas I looked into.
	So I went down that research path of looking into ancient calendar systems and my main focus, if you like, has always been on the destructive planetary alignments.
	But Whereas I'm focused on the great world age ending ones, I also realize that there are lesser configurations which are, you know, related to triggering things like solar flares and earthquakes.
	And I also was looking at some of the fascinating topics of how some of the developments made in secret by military bases, you know, that they site various places that some of the technology placed there can be used to artificially trigger earthquakes.
	And I'll just throw up two books on some of my Heroes, if you will.
	One is Bruce Cathy, The Energy Grid, and this is one of the books where he talks about some of the secrets, if you will, to do with, you might refer to as Earth Grid, you know, geometry, and some of the mathematics involved in that.
	And, you know, like earth grid patterns with, you know, platonic solids and lines crossing the earth.
	And he looked into that.
	And one of the things that he mentions in his books, one of the great breakthroughs, if you will, is that he found that there were relations even between Triggering nuclear devices on the ground and the literal position of the sun in the sky relative to those devices.
	And that was an amazing breakthrough there.
	And when we start talking about nuclear weapons and some of the secrets involved in that and how there's an astrological aspect to the devices, as strange as that may sound, but I'm going to decisively prove that in this presentation with some slides to really get you a handle on it.
	And it is building on Bruce Cathy's work.
	We also get into the related thing of how nuclear weapons also, the technology involved there, and that esoteric physics related to the Sun, is also related to what are known as scalar beam weapons systems.
	These systems here, they can actually be used to trigger earthquakes, like artificially.
	And one of the guys that wrote a book about this is Thomas Bearden, and this is his book called Ferdiland.
	That's actually a poisonous snake.
	And it says, Briefing on Soviet Scale Electromagnetic Weapons.
	And even in his book, he has many slides and whatever.
	And so some of the stuff that he talks about here, again, he's talking about a special kind of, if you will, laser beam, but it's a specific type of beam, which is a kind of modified electromagnetic beam.
	And these beams have certain properties which If you use them correctly can be used to trigger hotspots by interfering beams at a distance and these can cause all kinds of unusual effects and they're related to
	What we might think of as some of the most recent events, not just the most recent, but stretching back a few decades now, these weapons systems seem to have been deployed in things like what happened at 9-11, the Challenger disaster.
	But even more recently, it seems that some of these weapons, like the scalar beam weapons systems and what they can achieve, are related to things like these fires that have gone off in, is it Maui, in Hawaii, that area.
	And also, Some of the earthquakes of note in history and in particular what I'm thinking of here is the The earthquakes, if you look at this year, we had a 7.8 one in Turkey, February the 6th, and we've just had another one which took place September the 8th, just a few weeks ago in Morocco.
	And I think the death toll on that one is already well into the thousands, many thousands.
	And both of those earthquakes The Turkey one and the Morocco earthquake were high precision earthquakes.
	Those locations were deliberately targeted with high precision and they were targeted via scalar beam weapons to trigger those earthquakes.
	And so what I wanted to get into in this presentation here is to show you some of the main locations of some of these special facilities on the Earth which appear to be emitting ground waves Through the Earth, and those waves have a direct, if you will, musical harmony, frequency and wavelength wise, to some of the target hotspots where these earthquakes are.
	So I'm going to name some facilities and show you where they're located.
	And I'm going to show you some of the ways in which nuclear weapons, when they're triggered, They're relations to the Sun, and then I'm going to show you how earthquake epicenter locations have a special relationship also to the Sun and to some of these bases, which implies causality.
	You know, it implies that there are certain special distances of separation which can be split up into effectively whole numbers of frequencies, which implies that they're emitting ground waves which harmonize.
	And so that's the kind of, that's the introduction here.
	And so if I can get into some of the slideshows and get the presentation going.
	Do you want to do that now?
	Yeah, please do.
	Yeah, so I'll share my screen here.
	I'll just share the screen.
	Right, that's my website.
	So you can see on screen here then this is the first slide show you should be able to see them in the middle of this screen here we've got on the left hand side it says Menwith Hill UK and you'll get a top down view from Google Earth and this is of the This is in Britain where I am, so just kind of north of me.
	This is RAF Menwith Hill.
	It's essentially an American-operated base, even though it's in the UK, an NSA site.
	And it's one of these sites, massive complex of buildings, and you see these big white balls, they're like the big golf ball things.
	They're like the radomes underneath there.
	This is one of these so-called signals intelligence facilities, yeah?
	And you see the precise location, latitude and longitude there.
	And then you've got like a sister site in Pine Gap, that's near central geographically, central Australia.
	And again, precise coordinates.
	Anybody can zoom in on Google Earth and you'll see those same images right there.
	And so these sites, right, Pine Gap, again, it's on record that there's like a six mile deep shaft being built into Pine Gap, right at the centre of it, right?
	And what people are saying is that what they do with that shaft is they basically pulse Energy waves, and that the length of the shaft is tied into certain frequencies, or wavelengths.
	And so, this is one of these sites which is pulsing energy waves, and there's a special linkage between these sites which really sets it up to help you understand what's going on here.
	So, in the United States, for example, your power grid has a frequency of 60 hertz, that's 60 cycles per second.
	Right, so this is tied into a special relationship between these sites.
	So just to show you the geography of it, on this next slide here, then, you've seen the green boxes.
	We've just got, again, the coordinates of Menwith Hill and Pine Gap.
	And you can see on the left-hand side there, you can see where we've got...
	You can see the earth, and you can see the little blob near the top where Menwith Hill is just in England, and...
	And you can see the great circle arc length, that's the arc distance in orange, directly connecting up to Pine Gap, the other side of the world, right?
	And in the orange box there, and these are all values in feet, which is like several thousand miles here, it's the 49.3 million feet or so.
	That's the direct Great Circle arc.
	And then you've got the equatorial circumference of the Earth, again in feet.
	It's about 24,902 miles, but that's the value in feet.
	And so what I wanted to just show you is a very precise relationship, right?
	Menwith Hill was built or set up as a site in the 1950s.
	and for the NSA and Pine Gap was built about 10 years later in Australia in the mid 60s.
	So if you look here what we've got is the following.
	If you do a simple division sum equator of the earth divided by that great circle arc you'll see in red here the values 2.66665 or so yeah It's almost dead on, this ideal of 2.6 recurring, which is the basic fraction 8 divided by 3.
	Now what does that mean?
	It means if you take the equator of the Earth and divide it by 8, and then you independently take that connecting act between the two sides, divide by 3, You get the same answer.
	You get a unit arc length that fits a whole number of times into both of these, right?
	And just by way of example, if we divide the equatorial circumference by 8, right, the value when we get it converted into statute miles is 3,112 miles or so, yeah?
	So that is the distance that fits 8 times into the equator of the Earth, and three times into the connection between Menwith Hill and Pine Gap.
	Now, the thing about resonance, when we talk about resonance, if you have a physical structure and you impinge upon it with a certain frequency waveform, if the wavelength of that incoming wave that hits the structure fits a whole number of times into the physical structure, It internally reflects and causes the target structure to go into an agitative state, right?
	So when you see things like this, you're thinking, hmm, somebody's emitting a wave here, which has got a resonant interaction with the Earth, but it also connects up both these sites.
	Well, if you want to work out the frequency Right, of something, an energy wave, well all you do is you take the speed of light and divide by a distance and that gives you the frequency.
	So what is the frequency associated with this unit measure here, this 3 1 1 2?
	And the answer is Divide the speed of light, 186,282 miles per second, divide it by that in miles, and what do you get?
	Near dead on 60 hertz, which is the frequency of the US power grid, right?
	So you can see where we're going with this.
	We're looking at harmonization.
	It's suggestive that somebody's triggering a certain waveform pattern with a certain wavelength, that it's going to have a resonant agitation to the Earth, but it also connects up these two very far-flung bases.
	And so when you're starting to look at this esoteric technology, you're looking for special basic ratios like this that imply somebody has found a certain wavelength of a special subset, and they're looking for harmony between two different components, right?
	And this basic setup here?
	That's how we're going to the main topic here.
	Some of the secrets of nuclear weapons, right?
	Because nuclear weapons, as I said, this is what Cathy found in his book Energy Grid.
	He did a few examples and he looked at some of the tests that were carried out, especially by the French in the 1960s.
	And because nuclear archives are all declassified, we know the precise locations of the devices and we know the precise time down to the second when they were triggered.
	And so you can work out very precisely where the sun is.
	And so you can work out certain special arc lengths.
	So in this case then, if you just consider this diagram here, this is one of the diagrams from my book, Occult Physics, just to show you some basic relations here.
	We've got the bomb position is the circle with the X marked in it crosswise, yeah?
	This is a hypothetical example of somebody placing a bomb at a certain location, in this case in the Northern Hemisphere, right?
	Now, when you obviously freeze time or any given moment in time, you can draw a straight line from the centre of the Earth to the centre of the Sun.
	And that line will pierce through the surface of the Earth and give you the coordinates of the Sun, what is known as the Sun ground position.
	And that's the symbol of the Sun, you say, with all the little spiky things around it, right?
	And so if you think about when a bomb is triggered, then you will have certain arc length distances, curved great circle sections that connect up these two coordinates in various ways.
	One is the direct great circle arc, which is this D you can see here.
	Another one of importance is the pure latitude separation.
	So it's not a direct connecting arc, but if you look at where the bomb is latitude-wise in the North Hemisphere, and look at the latitude of the Sun, and if you just move across to where it is here with this little diamond, that pure latitude separation also is an important arc.
	And just one further little diagram.
	This one just shows you three other relations of note.
	Here we have the pure longitude separation between the bomb and the Sun, that is the arc length E, which is a section of the equator, okay?
	And then we have the pure latitude arc from the equator up to the bomb, and in this case down into the southern hemisphere to the Sun, another L. So these different arc length measures then.
	When a nuclear bomb is triggered, The people that trigger them make sure that there are special harmonizations, you know, certain basic ratios that link together these measures.
	And I'll give you some great examples.
	Now, I'm using precise mathematics and I'm not going to bore anybody with real technicalities, but I'll just at least show you this.
	This is the computer software I'm using to work out where the sun is located.
	Okay, now, Keith, before you do that, let's explain the idea that you're talking about the Morocco earthquake, I guess, right?
	Yes.
	And I'm going to assume you're not talking about The scalar hits and the fact that these scalar weapons or directed energy weapons could be located on a satellite.
	So, that's like a different set of information, right?
	So, you're concentrating right now on the Morocco quake.
	I think it was, I don't know, Libya, I think, was a flood.
	I don't know if it was a quake.
	Turkey was a quake.
	So, are you focused only on the quakes or where are you going with this?
	Well, the main focus is on the earthquakes, yeah, and I'm going to show you some precise slides.
	I've done an analysis of the Moroccan earthquake.
	I could even throw in the Turkey one as well.
	With regards to the other events, like the fires in Hawaii, yes, they can be caused by scalar beams.
	This is per the work of Thomas Bearden.
	It's a certain effect of it.
	You're right about one thing, Kerry.
	I'm not really thinking about satellites targeting things.
	I'm actually going to focus upon these ground sites, because for me, especially in these examples that I show you, linking up the two sites, Menwith Hill and Pine Gap, I'm going to show you where they appear to be.
	Okay, now I'm also curious because, you know, there are a lot of people that say that nuclear weapons are actually old school and that what they're really using nowadays are directed energy weapons, scalar weapons, and you obviously got Tom Bearden's work.
	Who, by the way, has passed on for our audience's information, in case they don't know that.
	But he was a brilliant man, and no doubt about it, he had excellent information that led to, I think, and contributed to the development of scalar weapons.
	So the question, you know, becomes whether or not these nuclear events and the way they're triggered, regardless of how accurate your information may be, whether or not they're actually still using nukes to trigger these things or not.
	There's also tunnel boring weapons and tunnel weapons that they talk about, which I'm not sure whether you cover that.
	And the last little area that I want you to touch on, if it occurs to you, is this idea that, you know, a lot of people are saying nowadays that the Earth The circumference of the Earth is not accurate, that it's changed, that it, maybe even our perception of it has changed.
	And I'm not going for a flat Earth idea here, but a larger, they're saying it's larger, the land mass is larger or something like that.
	So just throwing those things out because people will want to know about that.
	Yeah, with regards to triggering earthquakes, I know you mentioned tunnel boring, I would say this much.
	This is some of the properties of scalar beams that Thomas Baird mentions and I can actually, I can skip ahead a little bit here and just tell you.
	Basically, a lot of earthquakes that you get They're underground.
	Many miles underground.
	In some cases, it can be a few hundred miles underground.
	Actually, Morocco, I believe, was 23.
	Yeah, about 26.
	I think it was 26 kilometers.
	I've got the charts, but yeah.
	Oh, okay.
	Well, miles.
	I'm talking miles.
	But okay, go ahead.
	But again, they're still sizable.
	And other earthquakes, again, can be a few hundred miles.
	I think the Japanese one in 2011, that was a few hundred miles underground.
	But I don't believe that we are talking about boring to get to that level.
	This is one of the things about scalar beams, right?
	I talked about them as being a special kind of energy beam, right?
	So what is a scalar beam and how is it different from an electromagnetic beam?
	But when we think about a normal electromagnetic beam, we're talking about light waves, you know, of the electromagnetic spectrum, which could be really, really short in wavelengths.
	The visible light spectrum is very short.
	If you start to get higher and higher frequencies, far shorter wavelengths, you get into like, you know, really dangerous, you know, very powerful.
	But then you go all the way and you went towards the red end of the spectrum and the long, very long waves, right?
	But it's all a spectrum.
	And it's all electromagnetic waves.
	So if you've got, say, a quote, laser beam, and you wanted to, say from a satellite, just fire a laser beam, or even from a plane, you've seen some of these planes can fire laser beams.
	He might have a very powerful laser beam, but when it hits the ground, the ground is going to block it just pretty much instantly.
	If it's very powerful, it might kind of melt a bit of ground, you know, but it's essentially blocked almost straight away.
	Now, the thing about scalar beams is, and this is what Ben talks about in his book, how do you generate a scalar beam?
	What is a scalar beam?
	Well, this is where you take, and I've got my website here, if I've got a You can see this is creation of scalar beams, right?
	So let's say you've got two separately propagating electromagnetic waves, and you've got the one in green here and the one in purple, and they are in phase, so they can be moving in the same direction, so to speak, okay?
	So, in this case, if you were to combine them in phase in this way, you would double the amplitude.
	You'd make them louder, so to speak, okay?
	So, wave superpositions merged in phase.
	You can see this little diagram here.
	So, you've got, in this case, it's blue and green.
	In phase, it just makes that in red.
	The amplitude is higher, but you still have an electromagnetic wave.
	Scalar beams are where you take electromagnetic waves, combine them, and you do it out of phase.
	So instead of it being peak matching peak and trough matching trough, like in that example there, it's like this.
	You have the green wave going this way, so it peaks, as the other one troughs, and they sum to zero, right?
	They mathematically sum to this red line here, okay?
	So in this case, if you were to have Two electromagnetic beams merged out of phase like this and like, quote, fired them out of some beam, you know, some kind of projector thing.
	You might think, well, nothing, nothing is coming out of the beam here.
	You know, I've cancelled them.
	Well, you haven't cancelled them.
	You've enfolded them.
	The electromagnetic properties are not like deleted and ceased to exist, they've become enfolded and what you've done is you've created here like a scalar wave, you can see diagrammatically in black here, and this red line effectively represents the hidden enfolded electromagnetic properties, okay?
	Now a scalar beam then, if you fire one of these into the Earth, It'll go straight through it as if the Earth's almost not there.
	These beams have superluminal effects, they can travel faster than standard light, and they also have a very minimal interaction with matter.
	So then the question is, how do you weaponize this?
	Well, what you do is you need to unlock the electromagnetic enfolded effects.
	So you do that by interfering two scalar beams at a distance.
	This is where you can use certain adapted bits of technology like these dishes here, but what you're doing is this.
	Imagine in this diagram here then, you've combined two electromagnetic waves at this scalar site 1 here, okay, and you create a scalar beam and it shoots out like so, and you do exactly the same at another scalar site 2.
	When you have that interference zone, that's when the electromagnetic effects re-emerge.
	So if you wanted to target a kind of hotspot deep underground, you would fire one scalar beam from one site, another from another site, and you'd have high precision interaction at a certain select target location underground.
	The electromagnetic effects can re-emerge, and they can re-emerge explosively.
	And these kinds of hotspots are what are used to trigger the epicenter points of earthquakes.
	But they do it by combining natural planetary configurations.
	They like hijack an energy signal.
	Which would result in a natural earthquake, but they do it very carefully because they're aware of certain energy waves roaming around the Earth that are heightened when you have certain planetary configurations.
	And they basically, instead of allowing the wave pattern to degrade naturally, so an earthquake would occur naturally at some magnitude at some location, they create one of these hot spots, hijack the signal, the energy effectively like a waveform collapses in, Due to this hot spot here and that's how they trigger these earthquakes.
	Okay, now that's great and thank you for explaining that so well, but what I want to know is the fact that they have targeted these certain areas.
	Okay, so did you look at in essence the what I understand it to be is that there's already the potential for an earthquake in the area and I'm not sure when you're saying hotspots, where the hotspots exist or why, but you know what I'm saying?
	In other words, for example, the Fukushima quake that happened at the northern part of that, I think it was called Honshu, was actually right off the coast of Honshu.
	That was the, I guess you'd call it epicenter, right?
	Or target point.
	And then from there, it, you know, sort of radiates out.
	In the case of whether it be Morocco and you're saying the epicenter if I understand it correct me if I'm wrong is 20 well in my case that I looked it up it said 23 miles under earth you use kilometers I understand but you know what I'm saying so is that the epicenter underground is that what we're saying or is the epicenter of the Morocco quake is it located on the surface or what?
	No, the epicenters, when you look at the earthquake databases, they do tell you the depth of the earthquake.
	So yes, the epicenters don't say that they are underground.
	So it's the same as the depth?
	Yeah.
	Location of the quake.
	So did you look, okay, because my understanding also about the Moroccan quake is that it was in the mountains, the Atlas Mountains.
	Now I'm not sure if it was at the base of the mountains or in the mountains, but that's also pertinent.
	Well the damage obviously is surface damage but the epicenter you know the earthquake is underground it's deep underground and we do have obviously like we can give you the the quote surface coordinates longitude latitude for where it occurs but it is obviously there's our underground you know that's where they give the depths um okay so so when so I want you to go back you know and continue your your presentation as it were but
	When you do, I want you to make sure to explain, are we talking about the same astrological configurations that are used by the nuclear weapons as by the scalar weapons?
	Yes, essentially yes, that's correct.
	I'm going to give you some examples of how the similarities work between them, but There is a very precise linkage between them.
	So this is the, you can see this is just the actual software I use, right?
	So let me give you a couple of examples of nuclear weapons, just two in fact.
	So two pairings.
	So what you're looking at here, as I said, the nuclear archives have all been declassified.
	These are from the first 15 bombs that the United States set off.
	Two of these were wartime bombs against Japan, and they are the Alberta series, which has bombed two and three following on from Trinity.
	So Hiroshima then, the codename they had for that device is Little Boy, and that's one highlighted here.
	So 1945, 5th of August, and it's 23 hours 16 minutes and two seconds, and those are the precise coordinates on the ground when the bomb was dropped.
	It was programmed, if you will, to explode just slightly above ground, about a thousand feet or so.
	But those are the coordinates for it, yeah?
	So if you take that then, and you know what that time is, you can use that software I've told you to work out the coordinates on the ground of the Sun position, right?
	The longitudinal latitude coordinates on the ground of where the Sun is located.
	So this gives us the following.
	You can see here in green, we've just got the basic details of Hiroshima, the device, 15 kilotons, and the location of it.
	And then you've got the bomb coordinates.
	Those are straight from the archives, and you can see they're like the red blob on the map.
	That's where Hiroshima is.
	You can see Japan there.
	And then we've got the sun coordinates, the precise time in question.
	The sun was located in the Pacific, right?
	That's its location on the ground, so to speak.
	And so you can look then at this yellow arc, and this is one of those arcs I mentioned in my diagrams, right?
	This is the pure longitude separation at the equator between the location where Hiroshima is and the location where the Sun is.
	So you've just got these two longitude figures, 132.45 East and 167 West.
	This arc length here in yellow, okay, This is the critical distance, and it's, I give it to you, this is 219, you know, it's 21.9 million feet or so, and it's the orange box here.
	And again, we've got the full equatorial circumference in purple here in feet.
	So, here is the critical thing then.
	We talk about harmony.
	When the bombers dropped in Hiroshima, right, you've got to understand a couple of basic points, right?
	The ground location of Hiroshima is obviously fixed.
	The Earth is rotating on its axis, okay?
	Every second of time that passes, literally every second of time, the longitude position of the Sun is moving over the Earth by 1,524 feet.
	So that yellow line here, you can see here, is changing every second by about 1,524 feet, right?
	When the guy, I think it's at 35,000 feet or so, the B-29 bomber, and they drop the bomb as a free-fall bomb drop, that bomb is in the air for 43 seconds as it's falling towards its target and the plane's banking away.
	So every 43 seconds, every one of those seconds, that yellow line there is changing by just over 1,500 feet, right?
	And when that bomb explodes precisely, that's when we have that arc length there fixed.
	And let's have a look at the ratio if we divide the circumference of the Earth by that heart length there and the answer is practically dead on the number six.
	It's practically perfectly a six to one ratio, which again, You can't put that down to just, oh, it just happened to be there, that relationship due to chance.
	No, they planned it.
	For some reason, when they wanted that bomb to explode, they wanted this kind of like resonant relationship that that arc length there, linking the sun to the side, fitted in a whole number of times, six times into it.
	Yeah.
	Now, you say for some reason they wanted that.
	Yeah.
	What is the reason?
	I think and I would answer the question with what I would say and then you tell me if I'm right or wrong.
	What they want to do is they want a certain amount of amplification that they can't get any other way.
	In other words, this is how they make it larger or up to the point of how large they want it to be.
	Is that correct?
	Yes, in the sense that these relations do matter, because as far as they're concerned, the planners, right, a nuclear device is not what you call a closed system.
	The actual energy functioning, the fission, the fusion, the whole works of the internal workings, when you, quote, activate the device, blow it up, you know, The positions of the celestial bodies, such as the Sun, relative to your device, they affect the efficiency of the device and the functioning of it.
	And so these kind of relationships here, they either make the functioning as clean as possible or somehow boost it.
	In some way.
	And I could go into efficiency things on it, and it wasn't even a very efficient device of achievement.
	For some reason, I do think it is part of the energetic functioning of these devices that they go for these relations and they're testing how these spatial relations, it's like alchemy effectively.
	You know, like the ancient alchemists of old, they'd have like their laboratory or whatever, And they'd have various ingredients, you know, mixed.
	They'd have little ingredients laid out before them and they'd have the big mixing bowl and they're going to mix their ingredients together to create this kind of alchemical reaction.
	But the alchemist is sat there and he's got his ingredients ready to go, but what is he waiting on?
	Well, he's looking outside and he's calculating the position of the moon and he's waiting for the moon to get to a certain point in the sky relative to his This site where he's got his mixing bowl, and only when it's there will he mix the ingredients together to capture the influence of the moon.
	And it sounds very strange and bizarre when you put it like that, but what the scientists do with bombs, when they trigger nuclear devices, it's the same kind of thing effectively.
	Okay, so this is my question.
	So I understand that, and I think my audience would understand that, but why is it only the Sun?
	It could be, as you're saying, it could be the Sun and the Moon.
	It could be even other planets, right?
	They could be using Uranus, or they could be using Jupiter.
	How do you determine what they're using?
	Let's go back to the Morocco quake.
	I don't think we need another example because I want to move you along because we don't have a ton of time.
	I want to skip you.
	over another example and get back to the Moroccan quake because that's you know more going to be in the forefront of people's minds but why why is it that they would only use the sun or would they use other planets?
	Well, yes, they can use other planets.
	I did a study, this was specifically related to earthquakes, and you know how I talk about the Sun's ground location?
	You can obviously get the ground location of all the other celestial bodies, the Moon, all the other planets and what have you.
	There is a special relationship between the epicenters of what we may refer to as natural earthquakes and the ground locations of very celestial bodies.
	And as a general rule, Right?
	Earthquakes will occur, they more frequently occur, at the furthest distances from the ground locations of celestial bodies, right?
	So, if you want to know where is the safest place, where could you be to ensure that an earthquake will never occur?
	And the answer is Let's say you're on a fault line, and you think, oh, I'm on a fault line, an earthquake could occur.
	There's one time when that earthquake will never occur, and that is when, directly overhead in the zenith point of the sky, you have a celestial body.
	It could be the sun, it could be the moon, it could be Pluto far away, or it could be the antipode point on the other side of the world.
	But again, these are fleetingly achieved because of the rotation of the Earth.
	But it seems that the further away you are from having A celestial body directly over the zenith point over the Earth.
	The further away you are from that, the higher the frequency chance of an earthquake occurring.
	So all the planets are implicated in this.
	That was related to the science there of earthquakes.
	You're right.
	I look at the Sun when I'm doing some of these testings because it is the most prominent body and the one that the people seem to be more concerned with looking at, you know.
	So that's the one I mainly look at.
	But as far as the earthquakes go, let's see if I can look at the Moroccan earthquakes, see if we can skip ahead here.
	The only one I was wanting to show you, just to show you the linkage with scalar beams, is this.
	So let me show you this slide here.
	This is from Thomas Bearden's book to show you the link between nuclear stuff and scalar beams.
	Remember I said to you about how you interfere scalar beams.
	If you interfere them underground, you can cause electromagnetic effects.
	Right there, to create a hotspot you can trigger earthquakes, so you'll get seismic activity.
	If you interfere them atmospherically, you can create build-ups of these expanding glowing energy spheres.
	And this is what was reported in the 1980s, right, while the Soviet Union was still alive, so it was big.
	There were airline pilots, you know, they're flying around the edges of Russia, you know, various commercial, you know, traffic and what have you.
	And they did spot out to see that the Soviets were doing testing.
	And in some cases, they saw mushroom clouds, you know, implying, hey, we're We're testing some kind of nuclear type device.
	But at the same time, they also spotted glowing spheres of light.
	And in one case, somebody spotted a glowing sphere of light right above, forming massively, in this case, the estimated 380 miles diameter.
	Over the site of a nuclear mushroom cloud, yeah?
	So the implication is that whereas when you trigger nuclear devices you do it with relations to where, say, the celestial bodies, say the Sun is, relative to where your device is, they're also doing the same.
	They're interfering scalar beams over the same site, so they're doing two experiments at the same time to see how the celestial relations boost The energy amplification of these weapons systems.
	But because they're doing it atmospheric, they see these glowing balls of light, yeah?
	So, that's the connection between them.
	So, these special relations that you get then, you can have.
	I'll just briefly show you, because you mentioned it, this is the Japanese earthquake, okay?
	The 9.01 that occurred in 2011.
	And you can see there, we've got the coordinates of it.
	In the bottom here, that's the precise timestamp and that's the location.
	And if you do that, you can work out where the sun is at that precise time.
	Right.
	And here it is.
	There again is that red blob is the epicentre of the earthquake, just off Japan, and the Sun is located here, just slightly lower than the equator, right?
	But if you look at the arc distance between them, it's 21.9 million feet, it should look very familiar.
	This is the direct great circle arc linking the two sides.
	But again, if you do a simple division sum, equator of the Earth divided by this, You get a value almost dead on, six, okay?
	Again, it fits into the earth a whole number of times.
	So you know that Hiroshima event, that was a six to one ratio between An arc section on the equator and the whole equator, and this one is a direct great circle arc between the two things and the whole equator, yeah?
	And again, it's high precision stuff for this particular thing.
	So bearing that in mind then, when we start to look at things, let's look directly at the Moroccan earthquake, just to show you where we're coming from here then.
	So this is the USGS, and this is just a screenshot of it that I took.
	It's a 6.8, and this just gives you the location in Morocco where the blob is, so to speak.
	This is another slide when you click on the description link.
	And you can see just under where it says 6.8, what we've got here is the precise time.
	We've also got the epicenter coordinates, and it says 26 kilometer depth.
	There you go.
	And so when you've got that then, With the precise time you can work out the precise location of the sun.
	And you can look at the coordinates of that relative to the coordinates here of the Moroccan earthquake, so let's do that.
	And in this case, what we're going to show you, what I'm going to show you here, is how an arc length associated with a prominent nuclear weapons test, remember these arc lengths, they tie into nuclear devices and they like interchangeably between nuclear devices in harmonies and how they are used with scalar beams, right?
	Like I said with that glowing sphere of light thing, They're using the same kinds of frequencies, or rather interchangeably, for both weapons systems, so to speak.
	So here, then, is the Moroccan earthquake.
	And with this diagram here, then, you've got in green the main details of it.
	And what we're looking at here, then, you've got the earthquake here.
	And you can just see it right on the edge, this red line, and you might just see this black line.
	This black line is the line down from the earthquake, and it's down 31.06 degrees to the equator.
	And the point on the equator, the longitude point, is this orange blob here.
	And then we've got the sun just slightly above the equator here, 5.5 degrees north, right at the other edge.
	And that other little black line here is, again, the line down to this orange blob here, which is the sun's location on the equator.
	So this longitude line here in orange, it wraps around, it's almost 40% of the equator of the Earth, almost, right?
	And so this is the Great Circle Arc on the plane of the equator, just separating longitude, the earthquake and the Sun.
	So that's the distance there, it's 52.9 million feet.
	And now the comparison.
	You're now looking at Bravo, This is the highest yield nuclear test ever conducted by the United States, so I'm not just picking any random one, I'm picking the biggest, you know.
	And this particular one here then, this was done in 1954.
	And it was done at Bikini Atoll.
	And the bomb location there is in red.
	And if you just again that little black line is the line down directly to the equator.
	And then the sun is in the slightly in the southern hemisphere about eight degrees south.
	And you've got that little black line going up there to where it touches the equator.
	So what we've got here is the same kind of arc length as in the previous diagram here.
	This connects the sun to the bomb for Bravo longitude wise, you're right, on the plane of the equator.
	And it's this 35.29 million feet, right?
	So that's the distance here.
	So we're going to do that comparison just to show you the special ratio.
	So here they both are, and the data for both of them.
	And all I'm going to do is divide the longitude arc of Bravo, this one here is 55.29 million feet, by the longitude arc 52.9, this one here, yeah?
	For the earthquake.
	And if you do that, you get this value right here.
	It's practically dead on, 0.66 recurring, which is the basic fraction 2 divided by 3.
	And the error rate is just 1,508 feet, okay?
	So what that means is, if we were to just for the sake of argument, Take the value here, this first one, 35.29 million feet, you know, the one from Morocco.
	If we just divide that by, like, two and then multiply it by three, I think that's right, or it could be the other way around, if we use a perfect fraction two over three, we will get a separation distance from one of these figures of just about 1,508 feet.
	Now, remember, bearing in mind, like with the Bravo test, Every time the Earth's rotating, every second of time, the Sun moves longitude-wise just over 1,500 feet every second.
	So to achieve this kind of relationship like this, with this level of precision, it's literally split-second timing, it implies the following, right?
	It implies that the people, there were a group who wanted to trigger an earthquake.
	They chose that site in Morocco and they were thinking to themselves, okay, We know, for the Bravo test, we know exactly what the longitude arc was in the plane of the equator at the precise moment that test was detonated.
	And so they thought, hmm, we know that there's a special subset of wavelengths, frequencies associated with, that are important.
	So they took the Bravo value here, this 35.29 feet or whatever, yeah, and they just divided it by two, Multiplied it by 3, and that's what gets you this 52.94 million feet.
	And they then said to themselves, right, we're going to choose that longitude, that latitude site there for Morocco.
	And they then waited, literally, for the Earth to rotate round until that arc length on the equator separating where the Sun was To the longitude of that Moroccan earthquake.
	When that was that special distance right there, with this two-thirds ratio to Bravo, then they triggered it with split-second timing.
	They interfered the beams and triggered that hotspot.
	And this is the kind of high-precision targeting going on.
	So when you see ratios this exacting, like this, with a margin of error of like a second of time, this is smoking gun evidence.
	That the location was targeted, right?
	That didn't appear by chance, you know what I mean?
	Absolutely, but I'm trying to get down to what you're actually saying in terms of Morocco.
	I understand and in theory you're talking about kind of a human doing this, but in reality we know that now an AI would be doing these kinds of calculations and give them options, right?
	And that's one option.
	So let's figure out...
	Or let's, please tell me, which we're talking about?
	Are we talking about the Moroccan quake being triggered by a nuke?
	And if so, where was the nuke?
	And if not a nuke, then a scalar hit, a scalar weapon hit.
	And the hit, in other words, first of all, we need to know where the, if it's a, if it's a nuke, where is it placed?
	If it's a scalar weapon, where is it, I guess, originating from?
	It's not a nuclear weapon in terms of a physical device.
	It's somebody interfering.
	It's a scalar weapon.
	A scalar beam, yes.
	You've got two sites.
	One of them I'm going to get into and they're going to be emitting or firing a scalar beam signal, yeah?
	Okay, now let me... I'm going to jump ahead a little bit here.
	Is it possible it would come from, like, Demona?
	Oh, you mean that Israeli site?
	Yeah.
	Absolutely.
	Well, I don't know about that.
	I've not even looked into that.
	I mean, it's a convenient, but it's a convenient, you know, it's quite close.
	It sounds like you're kind of going to or orient yourself from in England to, you know, Menwith Hill or something like that.
	Oh, yeah, yeah.
	Or where?
	I mean, where do you think?
	Go ahead and tell us because I, you know, I... Well, I think the thing about it is this, as I said, you're dealing with special places, special sites, where you can fire a scale beam.
	So you basically, it's a site where you've got two electromagnetic beams, you combine into one, and you fire it from a device.
	Exactly.
	So from where?
	Yeah.
	You're going to be, but it's going to be placed, I personally would say it's probably at a ground-based site, it's not a satellite, you know, but it's going to be a ground-based site, and you're going to fire one of those, and you're going to fire it straight through the earth to some location on the other side of the earth, but say underground.
	On the other side of the earth?
	You can fire the beams through the earth, because as I said, there's minimal interaction.
	I know, but why would you do that when you could get, fire them from a closer distance?
	I'm just wondering.
	Well, what do you mean?
	You mean like a satellite in space?
	No, again, like Demona versus that wouldn't be the other side of the earth from Morocco.
	Well, I know it's not necessarily, but it's thousands of miles away still, isn't it?
	It is, okay.
	Okay, again, give me a location.
	Where do you think the Moroccan quake originated from?
	What ground-based site are you talking about then?
	What I'm saying is, I'm not going to tell you all the sites, you know, in terms of like the sites that are firing the scalar beams, right?
	You will have at least two sites somewhere on the earth.
	They could literally be thousands and thousands of miles away and you will with high precision you'll have one of these things target and fire.
	Because you're doing this direct it will be firing through a section of the earth and it will almost come out, well it will fly all the way through this and effectively fly off into space but what you're looking for is having another beam where you do the same thing you fire it and you intersect them.
	I get that.
	Underground slightly to create that hotspot.
	So the earthquake in Morocco, yeah, it's going to be the epicenter is directly created by interfering two scalar beams Right there at that longitudinal lattice of corners, but at that depth, right?
	There's your epicenter.
	Okay, so tell us where the two ground sites are.
	Well, what I'm going to... the thing about it is, you know that the Men With Hill... Are you afraid?
	Are you afraid to tell us?
	No, no, no.
	That's what I'm getting onto.
	Okay.
	You know the two... the very two sites I mentioned?
	Yes.
	Men With Hill and Pine Gap.
	And I said that the Pine Gap site has got a kind of an underground shaft and that they are pulsing energy through the earth, yeah?
	And the same thing with Men With Hill, I believe.
	They've also got a similar site.
	They can pulse energy.
	So, these sites, right, can Emit ground waves through.
	So, do you know how we do this analysis?
	Where I say, okay, here's the coordinates of the sun, here's the coordinates of either nuclear bomb or the epicenter, yeah?
	And you look at the arc length connecting them.
	Right.
	The same analysis, only this time you can connect, say, Menwith Hill to the Moroccan earthquake and look at certain arc lengths there.
	And that is what gives you an indication that that site in particular is actually responsible for emitting ground waves.
	So, let me So was it?
	I mean, is that what you're saying?
	Is that what you're saying?
	Because, you know, I know you're looking at this very technically, like, you know, and following the numbers.
	But what I would do as an investigative journalist, if you're going to tell me that the two waves came from Menwith Hill and Pine Gap, You know, and then intersected in this underground place, 26 kilometers down in Morocco, then I'm going to be looking at, OK, so the British and the Australians were working together to create this.
	I mean, it's actually very important, you know, if that's actually true.
	Well, both these sites are actually run by American personnel.
	Pine Gap and... Yes, there is involvement of the Americans, but the British are also involved.
	Okay.
	Yeah, but what I'm saying... So, I know we haven't... you haven't shown me, like, you know, the globe and all the intersecting, but... and you should do that, but am I right?
	Is that what you're trying to say?
	Are you trying to say that this is actually what you've figured out?
	Well, yeah, the connection is to specifically Menwith Hill.
	The mathematics for Menwith Hill is decisive in linking to the coordinates of Menwith Hill.
	Okay, not Pine Gap?
	The other one?
	I have not got the same like um uh high precision mathematics for pine gap so it may not be that that was that may not have been a site from which the ground waves were emitted to boost the signal but for men with hill they do appear to be.
	Okay can I ask you one more thing before you continue which is Do you know the military bases or all of the places that have, you know, what you call ground-based scalar weapons facilities?
	Do we know that or could some be secret?
	I'm sure there are.
	There are some secrets.
	I mean, as I said, what Bain talks about in his book that you can modify, like the dishes, you know, the ones I was showing in that picture there, you can modify things quite inexpensively to To generate interfering EM waves, to generate a scale.
	Okay, then, in terms of the mathematics, could you rule out certain places?
	For example, if I said, well, I think it's Demona and Menwith Hill, and then you could figure out if they could generate the right, can you do it from anywhere, or do they have certain, have to be certain locations to interfere with each other?
	Well, obviously they have to make the system, make the targeting work.
	Right, as I said, the Earth's rotating around, so the Sun, for example, if this is a key point in it, is going to be moving over the surface of the Earth.
	So they have to wait until certain arc length distances, great circle arcs, Are of certain distances connecting up say directly the sites say of Menwith Hill to the Moroccan earthquake or the other significant arc lengths.
	They have to wait until certain distances are achieved then they can trigger the effect.
	In terms of an analysis, I've not actually thought about looking at Dimona.
	I'd have to do the analysis.
	If I did do the analysis, then yeah, if there was something that jumped out at me, I'd say yes.
	But in terms of all the different places out there that might be possible emitters for this, you obviously can't prove a negative, but you can look at certain sites and if you see, again, something Smoking gun, like, jump out at you with it.
	Okay, now I have another question.
	Can you predict this?
	In other words, are you able, using, I don't know, astrological alignments, Illuminati, occult, numerology, if you will, or gematria, is it possible for you to then look into the future and predict where the next one might hit and what day and time and so on?
	Well, the thing about it is it's a question of interference.
	Let's just say, for the sake of argument, we did not have this technology, right?
	Go back 100 years or whatever, yeah?
	You still get earthquakes, right?
	The planetary patterns, the configuration of the solar system, the sun, the moon, all the other planets, they do shuttle energy around.
	It's like the music of the spheres.
	There is a resonant agitation state and earthquakes are caused by the patterns of the planet.
	So on that one point there, I would say, if you were really, really brilliant at understanding the system, then I would imagine that you could figure out, you know, What planetary patterns would result in earthquakes?
	My concern in that regard, though, my primary concern is in what patterns cause massive global catastrophe, world age ending.
	So if I look at those patterns, I'm not so much interested in Low-level earthquakes, but the natural patterns of the planets will trigger seismic activity.
	Okay, so even without this extra layer of technology, you could have, to some degree, looking at planetary alignment.
	So, because, didn't you tell me that you, I know you wanted to talk about this, but didn't you also want to talk about an event you think is coming?
	Oh, yes, there is.
	We don't have all day, so, you know.
	Yeah, I'll show you an idea.
	Let me see now.
	This is the great pattern for destruction, and that's tied into these, but the specific one, I'll jump right to the end.
	These are two dates right now, 28th of October and 3rd of November, and this pattern 28th with a lunar eclipse on, this could be very significant in terms of causing either high seismic activity or a solar flame, but it is a genuine bona fide contender for an end of age alignment.
	It's this pattern here.
	It's an alignment of Jupiter, the Earth, Mercury and Mars, Ceres, Mercury and the Sun.
	But at the same time as this though, you've also got this, a lunar eclipse, and this is optimised at 2030.
	So this is an alignment pattern which Might produce an X-class solar flare, a big one.
	Might produce high magnitude earthquake, something very big.
	But then again, if it's something bigger than that, it could produce You know, some of the celestial bodies like Ceres or Comet Encke, which is near perihelion, flaring up to develop cometary properties or even other planets flaring up in there.
	But it might cause things like changing the energy output of the Sun, possibly breaking off material from some of the comets, you know, the Earth going through a debris field.
	These are the rare, this is highly speculative, but it is a pattern which It is very intriguing.
	It's the most important conjunction pattern on the 28th, for me, up and coming, definitely, and maybe for the next few years.
	So I want to watch.
	There's also, as I said, there's another little shift in the planets on the 3rd of November, which could be just as significant.
	But this is all tied into the work I've done in looking at planetary alignments and how they might trigger massive global effects.
	But That's okay now uh just for the future can I ask you to look at a period of time where Richard Allen Miller you know he is the physicist I've interviewed him a number of times.
	Well, about a year ago, he came up with something that he mathematically figured out is a major event.
	It's going to happen end of March, beginning of April.
	It could be April 8th, or there's a planetary alignment in 2024.
	So it's, you know, six months away or whatever that is, or nine months.
	So I want you to look at that period of time between now and when I next talk to you.
	March next year and.
	End of March, beginning of April.
	There is planetary alignments that coincide with what he is predicting. - Right.
	Now, he backed off his prediction.
	He's not sure if it's this year or next year, but, or I mean the 2025 year, but, or 2027, then he said, and you know, so on and so forth.
	But there's also Cliff High, which you, do you know who he is?
	Oh yeah, absolutely.
	I know who Cliff is.
	Okay.
	So he's predicting, he is predicting based on his model coming from the web bot, you know, about that.
	So he's predicting a major event.
	And this would be a physical event that you don't seem that either you would think that he would be coinciding with your two dates.
	He said it's before the end of the year.
	And there's a couple other people predicting something before the end of the year too, but I'm not sure, you know, in other words, before the end of the year, October seems soon, November maybe not so soon, I don't know, you know, whatever, however you want to look at that, but that's kind of interesting.
	Oh yes, I'm familiar with this.
	I've seen what Cliff said, I've seen some of the stuff from the remote viewers, Dick Allgaier does.
	Oh yeah, okay good.
	I'm familiar with what he's talking about, yeah.
	I actually thought, I mean they did a presentation about an hour and a half, I thought, on their future forecasting group.
	I watched it recently.
	They did a little promo video where they were just giving out a few teaser slides.
	Just from the teaser slides, what they were seemingly showing was What seemed to be implying some kind of ground explosions, mushroom cloud type settings.
	Yeah but I have a theory about that because if you get a kill shot from the sun and it's targeted and I think this is going to be a man-made event so that's why it's also important okay and they admit it's going to be man-made and by the way I signed up and I joined that group I watched the whole video And they are saying, yes, they're seeing debris come out of the earth.
	But if you hit the earth in a certain way, certain angle, then you're going to have that kind of thing coming, you know, out of the earth.
	But the actual hit could come from the sun or a directed scalar, you know, what they say, a kill shot from the sun type of thing, you know, a solar flare.
	Kerry, we're totally on the same page.
	This is exactly why I joined their little group as well.
	And that is exactly what I was looking at.
	Because I saw from their little teaser video, and then when I looked at the whole thing, the question I was absolutely focused on asking is, when I looked at their data, is this like, quote, 100% man-made?
	Is it like a nucleotide exchange?
	Or Is it that some of this stuff from the ground could be something like debris from space?
	I think from what I gather though there were only, I think one guy mentioned a possible solar flare, he just briefly mentioned it from something from the sun.
	Well I happen to think Okay but this goes back to my research going back even to as early as 2002-2004.
	You know back then there was a lot of talk about something like this and then what happened was and it was going to be man-made and then they got interfered with and they didn't do it they couldn't do it.
	It also involves a plate shift of some kind not sure how big and it and it also According to Richard Allen Miller, the targeting would be hitting the Juan de Fuca Fault to trigger that, to then trigger Yellowstone, which is a supervolcano, and then that would trigger other volcanoes that resonate with the Yellowstone one.
	So, you know, you don't have to answer me now.
	Think about all this, and I can send you, you know, information I've got, and you can look at Richard Allen Miller's video as well, but in other words, because it would be very useful if people could be prepared for any of these things, and I do think, see, this is the thing that I'm talking about even with the Morocco quake.
	My understanding is that they actually do take, it's kind of like a river going by, and they see a certain opportunity Presented by a configuration that they then decide to amplify to make it their own, so to speak.
	But initially, it wasn't going to be that big.
	It was just going to be smaller, just in a natural way.
	So they take the natural inclinations of the planetary alignments, this, that, and the other, and then they amplify it.
	That's exactly what I think is going on.
	There is, first of all, it's the positions of the planets naturally shuttling energy around.
	I remember from Nexus Magazine, it was a while ago, it was a very fascinating one, where they were talking about people who are, quote, earthquake sensitives, and they could, like, feel the energy wave, like, whoomp, go through them, you know, and they could almost even feel a direction, you know.
	Oh yeah.
	No, I have a thing with my feet.
	That I can feel earthquake energy coming and so there are these natural waves.
	And so this is what I'm thinking.
	It is the configurations of planets which trigger energy exchange.
	Energy emerges, in my opinion, from the core of the Earth.
	And it is basically of a higher level of kind of frequency, it doesn't interact much with matter.
	And it's like in a degrading wave pattern as it expands and flows around the planet.
	And before it, if it were allowed to naturally degrade, it would then cause a natural earthquake of a certain magnitude, you know, somewhere around the world.
	But what I think that what is happening is, with technology, They've no doubt got sensors all over the world as well.
	They know something about the planets and the positioning of them, but they've no doubt got also set ground sensors, like working out these precursor energy waves.
	And so they know when one is there.
	And it's like you said, they at this moment, I think they very carefully and very precisely and Efficiently decides to hijack the signal, create a kind of hotspot with scalar beams, which collapses in this energy wave.
	So instead of it naturally causing earthquakes, say somewhere, you know, at a certain given location, they harness the energy and capture it and cause it to cause an earthquake epicenter somewhere else and that they can boost it with various ground waves.
	That's what I think's going on and the difficulty with all of this is trying to figure out to what extent things is something is natural versus artificial.
	And this is what I was thinking about with the remote viewing stuff.
	I think that on Edward Riordan's website, he works with the Future Forecasting Group, but he also has his own website, he's another remote viewer, and he did a video that somebody posted on Project Avalon
	The forum was just drawing attention to it and he was talking about something in the time frame of 2023 and it looked like he was drawing pictures of some kind of a meteor type or a comet or something in the sky and I thought it was fascinating.
	That seemed to be more in line with what I'm saying here because one of the things that can happen when you get certain planetary patterns is you can get celestial bodies flare up And if anyone wants to Google Comet P17 Holmes, that's a good example.
	But you know, in 44 BC, Caesar's Comet, so to speak, it was Ceres.
	It got into an alignment, and there's a precise date, you can Google it because it's on record, that there were comets to have to form in May.
	And then it went through, I think to July or something, and that there's a precise date when it did some kind of strange airburst and really bright in space of, you know, just like in one day it flared up crazy like, and everybody saw this.
	And it turns out that on the precise day in question, if you use some astronomy software, It's an alignment of Jupiter, Ceres, it's a dwarf planet between Jupiter and Mars, and Ceres is the comet that flared up.
	And Ceres, you can see this example here, it's one of the planets linked with Mercury in the Sun.
	And so I always thought about could Ceres flare up or Comet Encke, which is also, it reaches perihelion on 22nd of October, Comet Encke, this year.
	So it's only, you know, less than 30 days away.
	And again, it gets in some conjunctions with Mars on the 3rd of November.
	So I was thinking to myself, could we be seeing some kind of flare up of one of these bodies And is maybe that tied into what the remote viewers?
	Well, by the same token, yes, by same token, you can have a flare up as you're calling it from the sun.
	Now, this is just hypothetical.
	I want to ask you, is it possible to take a scalar weapon from the earth?
	Aim it at the sun kind of it's kind of like you know playing billiard balls or whatever then so or not um like pool so you hit the sun at a certain angle with a scalar weapon in order to generate to trigger a scalar wave that and then it will come down in a certain angle a specific angle and hit the earth at a specific place is that something they would conceivably do or is that too difficult?
	I've never even thought of that, to be honest with you.
	I have no idea.
	I've never even thought of that.
	Well, the reason I'm thinking of this is because I know that they wanted to do, they want to generate a scalar wave, or not a scalar, a solar flare from the sun.
	And if you want to do that, I mean, there's solar flares, as you know, right?
	On and off.
	But if you wanted to do it specifically and you wanted to actually, as you say, capture that energy and then target it, you see, I think that they may be working on this.
	And it's just if you think about it and then the idea that if you hit Again, it would be, it's a lot like when you play pool and then you hit something and then it bounces off that, it goes in an angle, and if it hits the Juan de Fuca fault line at a certain place, that could trigger a lot, you know, plate shifting, major earth changes.
	You see?
	I don't think you need the sum to that, but as I said, if, where's this fault line?
	What country is it in?
	Oh, it's right off the coast of California, in Northern California.
	Oh, I see.
	Going into Oregon, I think, in Washington.
	It's near the San Andreas Fault somewhere, is it?
	Well it does, it crosses it, it probably crosses it or something like that.
	I mean, it's possible.
	It's just that I have witnesses, I have another witness who I don't really interview much because his religious bent was such that I think he believes too much on a vindictive God and I don't agree with that.
	Perspective, but his name's Eddie Page and he, a few years ago, kept saying that the Juan de Fuca fault was going to be triggered.
	He said that so many times, so it kind of stuck in my mind.
	And then when Richard Allen Miller did his Recent prediction.
	Well, it was a year ago.
	He also mentions the Juan de Fuca fault.
	So there's some Pacific Northwest and the Juan de Fuca fault seems to be a trigger point, at least to wreak havoc in the United States.
	I think those kinds of things are possible.
	I remember, and this was a while back, do you remember La Palma?
	Sure.
	There was a volcano kind of thing going off there, a bit of an eruption.
	Yes.
	And I did an analysis of that at the time, and I think it was two sites.
	It was only a small one, like a primary event, I think it was a 4.3.
	Earthquake, and I had the coordinates of that, and then it set off, you know, a big multitude of others around it.
	And if I remember rightly, I did that analysis of that site there, and it did seem artificial.
	But a 4.3 earthquake... It was?
	Yeah, it made me think somebody is just kind of testing it out, you know what I mean?
	They're doing a low-level experiment to see what kind of energy input they might trigger, just to see if they can get some kind of eruption.
	And it makes me think that these kinds of things are And there was another one, was it a Tonga earthquake?
	Or volcano, rather.
	And again, that almost looked like a nuclear blast at first.
	And again, it makes me think that somebody may well be doing some kind of experiments and they're kind of building up to something.
	It would not surprise me that there are low-level tests being done with a palmer and then Tonga.
	And it may well be that somebody's calibrating something for a far bigger event and they are going to target something Well, these are the predictions coming down the pike right now.
	We have been actually going for an hour and a half and I try to keep these interviews under two hours.
	I want to give you the floor to complete what you wanted to sort of tell us about if there's anything you need to go back to or you wanted to explain further with regard to Morocco or Turkey or whatever.
	Yeah, I'll just show you that Men With Hilt Connection, just so people can go back to this one here.
	Again, this is the Moroccan earthquake.
	There's two little connections here that are linked to it, just illustrated.
	So we're just looking purely at the sun, the location of the sun when the Moroccan earthquake occurred at the precise time.
	It's just slightly, about 5.5 degrees above the equator, and it's that black line there.
	And that's the latitude out there in feet from the equator.
	It's just 2.01 million feet, right?
	And let's just go to this one.
	This is another nuclear test.
	This is the highest yield French test ever completed.
	2.6 megatons, codenamed Canakin.
	And again, we're just looking at a latitude displacement.
	In this case, from the bomb up to the equator, 22.2 degrees.
	And you can see that the latitude arc here is this 8.06 million feet, okay?
	So this, again, is just going to show you certain interchangeable special ratios.
	So we're just going to do a ratio connection between the Canopus arc length down to the bottom and the latitude from the equator up to the sun for the Morocco earthquake, right?
	And the answer is practically dead on the number four.
	So it's just like almost dead on perfect fit.
	It fits in four times.
	So somebody like basically knew when Canopus, when they were using it, they thought, OK, that arc distance there is a significant, you know, significance in terms of a wavelength unit.
	So they thought, We'll just divide that by, you know, four, and then we'll wait for the sun to reach that same latitude for Morocco, and then we'll trigger the device there.
	Do you know what I mean?
	So that was that one.
	So let's look at the Menwith Hill connection, because it's based upon a similar ratio.
	So here, the connection involves a comparison to Canakin.
	This again is a very prominent historical nuclear weapons test.
	It's the highest yield underground test ever conducted by the US, 4.8 megatons, and it's on Amchitka Island.
	It's one of the Aleutian Islands.
	You can see Alaska and you see all the trails away.
	And that's where Amchitka Island is, that red blob there is where the bomb went off, yeah?
	And so at that precise time, 6 November 1971.
	So you see the meridian line going from the North Pole all the way down to the equator here.
	So this purple blob here on the equator is the longitude, right?
	179.1 East for the bomb, right?
	And you can see the Sun is located just in the Southern Hemisphere, about 16 degrees South.
	And again, same line, but in this case just going up to the equator.
	So this purple arc here, is the longitude separation arc on the equator, and it's this value here, this 9.78 million feet, okay?
	Hold that in your mind and we're going to look at a comparison, a similar arc measure, but this case we're looking with regards to Menwith Hill.
	So in this case, Same kind of diagram.
	We've got North Pole, and the Moroccan earthquake's in red, that red blob there.
	And it's just, again, the Great Circle line just connects up Morocco to the point on the equator, right?
	And that is the longitude of the Moroccan earthquake, which is this 8.391 west, okay?
	And then you've got Menwith Hill in England here.
	Same arc length, and it goes all the way to this other little blob here, and that's where the longitude of Menwith Hill is on the equator.
	So it's this shorter arc here.
	This is the section of the great circle arc of the full equator, and it's this value here in purple, in the purple box, 2.44 million feet.
	So again, it's a simple ratio, right?
	We're going to divide the arc length on the equator of Kanakin by the Arklanthea for Moroccan earthquake?
	And the answer is practically dead on the number four.
	Wow.
	You can see, again, error rate 3.83.
	So it implies that Menwith Hill, in some way, was connected to the precise epicenter and that ground waves somehow emitted from it had this special harmonization of the equator.
	And, again, it's the kind of death, the smoking, going evidence of a connection there.
	So these are the kinds of connections that you have which seem to impact.
	Implicate certain sites.
	Now, I know you mentioned Dimona.
	I've not even looked at it.
	I know it's the Israeli nuclear power plant.
	I'd have to do an entire analysis, but if it were implicated, you'd be looking at some kind of special in-your-face ratio like this.
	I see that.
	You see what I'm saying?
	So, this is the kind of thing that I look for.
	So, this is why I would say that Men With Hill was in some way involved in triggering the Moroccan earthquake.
	And it's all related to these special arc lengths.
	You see them repeated, these ratios that connect up arc lengths associated with nuclear weapons, you know, and the sun.
	And you can see them to what appears to be the epicenters of earthquakes, and then coordinates to these sites.
	So that's how you tie it all together.
	So that's the kind of thing there, that essentially is the Moroccan analysis there.
	I mean, I could just briefly mention the Turkey earthquake, the 7.8 one.
	It's a similar kind of thing.
	In this case, we're looking at, again this is a top-down view, but we're just looking at the longitude arc from where the quake is in Turkey, there you can see it on the map, and then where the sun is.
	That's the longitude on the plane of the equator in this orange one.
	And here we're looking at Bravo, and this is the Bravo arc which directly connected up when the bomb was located, the Great Circle arc, to the Sun.
	So it's not on the plane of the equator, this is the direct one, okay?
	And this again is this 35.8 million feet, right?
	So a simple ratio.
	We're going to look at what the Bravo arc is relative to this one here.
	A simple division sum reveals this.
	And what you've got going off here, then, is what is a very special numeric sequence of the Base 6 system.
	If we divide the arc for the Turkey earthquake to the Bravo one, it's almost dead on 1.296, discrepancy 194 feet.
	And you see, if you start out with number 6 and just successively multiply by 6, so 6 times 6 is 36.
	36 times 6 is 216, and that times 6 is 1296.
	It's part of these special numeric sequences that you see, and again, this again is quite decisive of a connection that the arc lengths associated with the Turkey earthquake They're not just random.
	They are tied in ratio wise to some of these nuclear devices that are getting implied.
	Okay, but the Bravo Quake was a bomb.
	It's called Bravo.
	But where is which country?
	You know, because you said Menwith Hill, what base is?
	Oh, Bravo is the code name for the nuclear bomb test.
	It's not a country.
	It was on Bikini Atoll.
	Okay, but who did that test?
	Was that US?
	United States?
	Yeah.
	So that's the highest yield test he did on 50 megatons.
	He's also the dirtiest bomb going in terms of like radioactive stuff.
	But yeah, that's the most historical one going.
	And a lot of these connections you get with these ratios, they're strongly tied in just to Bravo alone, amazingly enough.
	But, you know, it's one of the most prominent connecting devices.
	There's also King, another device there.
	Let's just have a look what the other one was here.
	There's a Menwith Hill to Cannockin connection here.
	Let's have a look.
	This again makes use of the number four, if you can see it.
	Again, just briefly mentioning it, it's the latitude separation between the Cannockin bomb test and where the sun is in green here, latitude between Menwith Hill and the Turkey earthquake.
	Well, the Turkey direct is in red, but it's that same If you just move across longitude-wise, it's the same latitude there.
	Again, between those two, see that number four?
	Perfect, kind of, dead-on ratio there.
	So, again, this implies a connection between Menwith Hill and the Turkey earthquake, you know.
	So, this has said, there's lots of permutations.
	Mounting evidence of some involvement, it would seem.
	That's actually a political statement and gets into a whole huge amount of stuff as to what they're really doing using Menwith Hill for these quakes.
	Okay, we're going to have to shut this down now.
	I want to thank you very much for coming on the show and sharing your stuff.
	Like I said, it's been quite a while and it was a pleasure to kind of dip into all of this stuff.
	We'll see if we get some feedback, if there's other people with theories out there that want to connect with you.
	Is there an email address or something where they can reach you?
	Yeah, if you go to my website.
	Okay.
	Then, let's see now.
	It's this one here.
	Yeah.
	So what's their secrets?
	If you go to my contact page, that's my email there.
	Okay, great.
	If you want to contact me.
	But as I said, as far as my book goes, I've just sold out all physical copies of it, but that's my occult physics book here.
	But what I am going to be doing shortly, I'm going to split it up into two sections because part of it deals with all the nuclear weapons testing stuff.
	What I've just shown you here, I've got like a special chapter all about nuclear weapons on it, you know.
	My Canopus, all the rest of it.
	Okay, but now that you... If anybody wants to... As I said, I'm going to be trying to make that into an e-book and sell it via my website, so if anybody wants to... That would be good.
	You know, just give me an email if you want me to put on a bit of a list to contact you when I go live with that, if you want to buy it.
	Okay, that'd be awesome.
	Yeah, you should do that, because I know that...
	The actual book is actually a hardback, it's very heavy, but you say they're out of print, right?
	Oh yeah, I've sold them all out.
	Okay, well good for you!
	Alright, so thank you very much again for being on the show, Keith Hunter, and we'll welcome you back.
	I hope you'll look into these events that I'm looking at in the future here, and apply your reasoning to it, and see what you come up with, and then we can have you back on.
	Yeah, okay.
	All right.
	And then we'll look at those two dates you gave us, which is October 28th and November 3rd.
	So, you know, so shoot me an email to remind me around those dates as to what you're seeing and whether or not... No.
	If anything happens, we'll know.
	I wouldn't say about the dates.
	If there is going to be something, if those patterns are significant in some way, you would expect to see some sudden effects.
	Okay.
	Either sudden earthquakes or flare-ups or something.
	If we pass beyond, into November, went beyond 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, if we go beyond there and nothing significant appears to have happened, then I would say they did not have any power at all in terms of celestial power.
	I would say that they were All right.
	They are so intriguing based upon my own research.
	I can't help, you know, but mention them.
	Fair enough.
	All right.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Thank you very much and you take care.
	All right.
	Thank you.
	Okay.

▲