KERRY ON DARK OUTPOST 12.13.22. HOW THE WHITE HATS ARE SAVING OUR COUNTRY
|
Time
Text
Thank you.
Let's bring her on in.
Carrie Cassidy.
Her website is projectcamelotportal.com.
Highly recommend that you subscribe.
You have excellent information, outstanding videos, and we hope you enjoy the program.
Hi, Carrie.
Welcome back.
Hi.
Nice to see you guys.
Nice to see you, too.
So, what do you make of everything that's going down right now?
Well, first of all, I just want to give a plug because yesterday Patriot Underground had me and Gene Decode, or Gene Code and I, however you say that, on this roundtable.
And we put out a lot of information, the two of us, it was like kind of crazy.
So I want to just recommend that for people who want to know, you know, some up-to-date and some... Is that on your channel?
Yes, I'm looking at it right now.
- Now, on Ukraine, Nazi's paper clip, Aldebaran, AI, COVID spot, and much more.
Yeah, it really goes deep.
It goes deep.
So I think you guys might have fun with that.
So in terms of everything, wow, what do we say?
I was listening to Juan07.
He did a recent update with Nino and I noticed that he is really, really plugging The Brunson case, and you guys know the Brunson case at this point.
I think everyone knows, or at least people that are part of this audience.
But it's interesting to me because he started out very low key when it first came out.
And then I did my interview with Brunson that kind of exploded things because I.
Inadvertently sort of brought the immunity defense like front and center that the deep state is going to use, okay?
That's what the justice is.
That's what's going to supposedly protect these people if they should consider the case.
And now I think it's really interesting that Juan is really plugging this.
It does sound as though It's kind of a preliminary to military stepping in.
And so everyone needs to watch that.
It's coming.
They're actually going to decide if they'll consider it.
It's kind of like the step-to-step process.
And that'll be on January 6th of all dates.
So put that on your calendar.
Pay attention.
There's a letter writing campaign To simply give a heads up to the Supreme Court that you guys out there think this is an important case to be considered.
Because they're going to decide, they're going to consider it.
And it's only after that that they'll go to trial.
Yeah.
Okay, so I was on Patriot's Perspective and I interviewed one of the Bunsons.
Can you please explain to people what this case is about?
Because many people don't know.
Oh, all right.
So let me see if, you know, I'm not a lawyer and let me see if I can gel it down really simply.
The bottom line is it's not about voter fraud straight up.
It is about.
The consideration of whether there could have been interference in the 2022 election, which over 100 plus Ted Cruz, Congress people, okay, said There was.
Okay, so I don't know how we're talking a number of like something like 368 or I don't know what the exact number is, but they've declined to consider it.
So some of the Congress wanted it considered, some of the Congress decided they didn't have, they could just blow it off.
And what the crux of the matter is, is that in blowing it off, in not even taking a couple days to consider what these other congresspeople were saying over a hundred right if not not even considering investigating okay so they didn't even they didn't investigate they refused to investigate they just blew through the whole thing and and and they went
And and confirmed Biden so that he could be inaugurated.
So that was a dereliction of duty.
And actually, I've just been writing in the middle of the night last night, I'm writing an article about this.
So the fact that they they and what that means is they blew off our constitution.
Okay, because we, as the people.
We we hire them and they are supposed to follow and and they they have an oath to the constitution to to to align themselves with the constitution and defend the people's rights.
Okay, because they work for us.
Okay.
So, basically, it's kind of like, you hire some guy.
They come along, they're supposed to do a job, you know, and they do everything else but that job.
They just ignore the job that you actually, you know, that is actually the crux of the heart of the matter.
And so, in doing so, this is what's interesting to me that I was writing my article last night.
is that in considering taking the case okay they haven't decided to take the case so on january 6 i think it's nine justices are going to look at the case and decide if they'll take it it doesn't so that's not taking the trial it's not doing the trial it's just deciding they're gonna do the trial The trial or whatever you call it, I think it's not called a trial, it's called something else.
But if they do consider the case, they could deliberate for months.
It could, you know, maybe not come to the fore until their decision might not come till June.
But what they've already done is they've already said they're not going to use any other defense.
for the congress people's behavior than in what's called immunity this is key okay and where this goes from here i don't know but i do know that they are they they've taken it seriously they're put they put it on um it's not on the docket to be considered at to be be tried it's actually to be considered now on january 6th they're going to to uh
Deliberate and I guess they decide in a very short period of time.
I'm not sure how long could be 24 hours, whatever.
And then they will say, yes, we're going to consider the case.
Let's say they did that.
Okay, which would be groundbreaking in and of itself.
Then at that point.
It's going to go to actually a kind of a court of some kind a litigation of some kind where both sides will argue.
The defense, which is the state, which is the Congress people that are accused here, is only going to argue immunity.
Immunity defense cannot cover treason.
Okay, are you guys with me on that?
So they have said straight up, there's a woman, and I'm sorry I don't have the name or her title, I don't know if she's the Attorney General, whoever she is, she has already told them, it's already public knowledge, that the only defense the Congress people for not arguing the case, investigating the fraud, election fraud, or the possibility of election interference, which
The, uh, let's see, um, okay, this is early in the morning.
Okay, that the, I think it's the DNI, but whatever.
Okay, the head of all the intelligence agencies out there actually said in their report that there was Chinese interference in our election.
So, Get this, so we have intelligence agencies and apparently the United States has more intelligence agencies than any other country.
And Radcliffe is his name.
So Radcliffe has already put forward his report.
It was even a preliminary report because they never delivered, as far as I know, the final report.
They did a preliminary report.
He said there was Chinese interference.
So already the bodies that you rely on To to inform you what Congress relies on to inform them has already come through and said there was interference.
What they didn't know was how much.
All right, so in quibbling over how much.
They declined to even consider it at all.
So, again, if you look at that, it's kind of like looking at a stack deck.
Okay, which is on in the favor of the people, because he's got these people are doing a job for us.
They declined to do that job.
And therefore they're in dereliction of duty.
And I don't know what the formal words would be, but the punishment.
Okay, so then the next step is what's the punishment for them not doing what they're supposed to do to defend our Constitution and our rights.
Basically.
The case itself is is a civil case.
It's not asking for criminal punishment.
It's asking for civil.
Okay.
So, and what they're asking is that all these and I think it's I think it might be something like 388, 388 people.
Congress people from both sides of the aisle.
Will be basically who didn't bother to want to vote who basically declined to vote on this matter and investigate it.
They would be fired in essence.
They would never be able to hold a public office and it would happen overnight if the Supreme Court decides to go with that punishment.
So, in considering the case, you know, just we're looking ahead now, they will actually, all those people would, we would just be gone, they would be gone overnight, okay, if that ruling was to take place.
But the punitive damages, now at that point you can actually, I believe, you can bring a criminal case.
So it's not like we would be done with them, we the people.
They could bring a criminal case in which all of those people could also be accused of, I believe, treason.
Because that's treason, okay?
If you take an oath of office and you don't perform according to that oath, that is in essence treason.
So kind of look at how this thing can balloon into something really enormous in our country.
Now, if on January 6, the Supreme Court, nine of them, let's say, you know, because you have to have a majority, and I think they have to have at least five.
I could be wrong about that.
It could be four, but I think it's at least five.
Then to go, yes, or no, we're going to consider it or no, we're not going to consider it.
So, on January 6th, that's the decision being made.
So, if you write to them, what 107 is asking is that people write to the Supreme Court justices and that they copy the Brunson brothers so that we can keep track of like.
In this case, I'm Project Camelot.
You guys are Dark Outposts.
You put that on the outside of the letter, on the envelope flap, because that way we get credit for having raised the issue.
And I don't know whether that matters, but it does, I guess.
And people You know, this is an action you can take.
It's not, it doesn't take a lot.
And they, even on my telegram, I've got the links and you can print out the letter and you can copy it in handwriting.
I think that's what they want you to do.
But, and then you mail it in.
Between now and January 6th.
It's Roy and Raeland Brunson.
4287 South Harris Boulevard, apartment 132, Ogden, Utah, 84403.
And they have instructions on their site, so if you just Google the Brunson's, it says that they'd like you to mail a letter to SCOTUS.
They provided this information off-site.
And then they say copy your letter, mail the original to the Supreme Court, and mail a copy to the Brunson Brothers, they say this is critical so the Fines and Legal team can validate the amount of letters the Supreme Court is receiving, and the Supreme Court address is also on their website, but let me give it to you.
Supreme Court of the United States, attention, Chief Justice John Roberts Jr.
and all Associate Justices, 1 1st Street, Northeast, Washington, D.C.
120543.
And they're also asking, they said, promise of essence, And everything on their on their website.
Again, Carrie Cassidy has all these things on our site as well.
So please go to one of these, you know, just you can just Google Brunson v. Adams for this election integrity case.
Well, go to Terry Cassidy's website.
Actually, it's on my Telegram.
So go to my Telegram.
And my Telegram is linked.
Very huge links at the top of my website for all my social media and Telegram is on there.
And, you know, you should go over and join Telegram anyway, because I post every day over there.
And sometimes I just start ranting in text.
Yeah.
So if you want to have some fun, like I do that at three in the morning, California time, a lot of times.
I don't know why, I just wake up, sometimes I'll get a couple, like a cat nap, and then I'll wake up and I'll be up for hours doing work, so then I sleep.
Yeah, so.
Then when my eyes cross, Carrie, then I do this thing to my friends who are calling me Shepherd out, and they're like, oh, all right, she's out.
Yeah, so anyway, so this is very important right now.
Okay, so let me back up to 107.
So he's talking about this with Nino.
He did it like very recently, like I don't know, well it was 13 hours ago in the middle of the night last night.
Now it's later.
But the bottom line is that This could be the preliminary to how the uh sort of okay so can you kind of visualize what kind of state we're going to be in right around the time of January 6th so again kind of and and SCOTUS has scheduled this decision on a day when you know the notorious capital whatever you want to call that
Yeah, so in that case, it's kind of highlighting the rights of the people versus the state versus our Congress, you know, Senate and House of Representatives.
Actually, do they represent us or do they just do whatever the They want, you know what I'm saying?
So, so, I mean, this is kind of crucial.
So, I think the American people want to know about it.
I think everyone wants to.
To know that this is on, you know, this is under consideration by the highest court in the land, and they're going to decide if they're going to decide.
Or have a trial or, you know, a consideration of this issue.
And what they did most recently that was groundbreaking, of course, is to reverse Roe versus Wade.
So that indicates, according to Juan, A completely different, a sea of change within the justices, within SCOTUS, okay?
So, it's kind of interesting to look at it from that perspective.
I'm not so sure that that's the case.
I mean, I agree there's a sea of change.
However, I'm wondering, because this, what I find fascinating, again, is this immunity defense, okay?
That our congress people Can do whatever they want once they get an office and they're immune from prosecution, but that does not include treason.
You know, it, you know, hello.
I don't know how the constitution is.
I'm not a constitutional lawyer, but I have to tell you that this defense, the immunity defense is really front and center.
Behind the scenes of this decision.
So, so keep an eye on that because we need people to be accountable.
Okay, especially if they work for us.
You know, if they can work for us and become Hitler, okay, overnight.
That's not a good thing.
Okay.
And and we have no recourse to that kind of behavior.
How can that be?
So, so, you know, so focus on that and understand that that this is a very serious matter and it gets to the root of.
We hire these people, we ask them to do a job, they sign an oath of office that means they'll defend the Constitution and obey the Constitution, and then they ignore it.
So, you know, it's really in a nutshell.
It's an important case.
So you wanted to know about that.
So I also want to say that I think the next step to that, or along with that, is the idea that once the country
You see, right now they're ignoring it, but if the Supreme Court on January 6th was to decide that they're going to consider the case, okay, meaning they're going to go to court on it in some form or fashion, then it means it goes on their docket and then they consider the matter, okay?
So once the country, that will be, let's say, Because the Supreme Court is a mainstream thing, they can't ignore it.
The Brunson Brothers may be somebody they can ignore right now, but once the Supreme Court says they'll consider that case, mainstream media will have no choice but to report on this story, which right now they're ignoring.
So that's really an interesting turn of events.
So that fulcrum is all on January 6th.
They're going to consider the case.
What's going to happen is mainstream media is going to sit up and notice.
Why?
Because 388 members of Congress Stand to be fired from their jobs overnight by the Supreme Court of the land if they should decide in alignment with this case in a positive way.
So this is this is major.
All right.
And this is where you might have civil unrest because.
I think it's going to hit the people, because obviously the people aren't paying attention right now, except for the alternative, which is us, right?
So the people, the masses, are going to suddenly realize that something has gone, a case has gone up to the Supreme Court, the ones who reversed Roe v. Wade, right?
Just, you know, nine months ago, whatever it was, and they're going to realize that something is at stake, and all the normies, all the demos, Whatever you want to call it, demon rats, whatever.
They're going to panic.
In theory, they're going to panic.
And something's going to happen.
So I think that this is really, like I say, it's a pivotal moment in our history.
If they deny the case, you could have the reverse of what I'm talking about.
You could still have civil unrest.
Because if you deny that case, Which, by the way, it's not a question whether they did dereliction of duty.
Do you understand that?
I want I, you know, and I, I'm sorry if I'm being boring here, but I think it's so important that people understand if you actually look at the case as it's written.
There is no doubt whatsoever that they refuse to.
Investigate the voter fraud.
There's no question so, in other words, in a sense.
They've already won the case, okay?
Because the case is actually as it is, as it was.
They refused to investigate the case.
That's a fact.
That's a fact that we know, they know, and even the Supreme Court knows.
So, I find this very interesting.
In the end, they can't say, There was no dereliction of duty.
The only thing they can say is they're immune from prosecution for dereliction of duty.
It's fascinating.
But why are they treason?
Well, no, because...
Actually, yes, for treason, because I'm calling it dereliction of duty.
But the reality, if you gel that down, and the Supreme Court, of course, are experts at this, right?
I'm just softening it by saying dereliction of duty.
The reality is treason.
The reality of dereliction of duty as a congressperson is treason.
Because it's treason against the rights of the people, to defend the rights of the people that they're hired to do, and it's treason because they refuse to defend the Constitution.
That's dereliction of duty.
That's treason.
So, you know, the one thing equals the other.
So I'm kind of trying to say that in a certain sense, the way this case was written, Allows them, allows the Supreme Court to basically not only fire all these people, but they stand to be accused to be fired for treason.
All right?
Yeah.
Now, I don't know what their wording is going to be, but I'm telling you straight up, it's treason.
And I don't think you need to be a rocket scientist to realize that.
So that's where we're at.
So you were kind of asking what's going on.
I think that's very crucial.
That's front and center.
Now we can talk about the Twitter files.
I've written articles.
Last time we had quite a groundbreaking show.
I think people went through the roof over that last show we did together.
So I don't want to repeat myself.
Bottom line is, okay, the Twitter files are all about the collusion behind the scenes of the politicians and the mainstream media and Twitter specifically and the employees of Twitter.
And the, uh, the chairman of the board, uh, Dorsey and, and the whole nine, you know, the whole company and their collusion to ban Trump, who was, uh, you know, I think at the time he was banned, I think, was he still president?
I can't remember.
Um, maybe you guys know, was he banned while he was president or was it before or after?
I, you know, I don't have the sequence.
Uh, I was banned around the same time.
Well, no.
Trump, I believe, was banned before the end of his presidency.
Okay, so what we're talking about is how a major media company, what you're looking at behind the scenes with the Twitter files, at least so far, is how the collusion of media, our mainstream media, is with directing the attention and censoring data that they don't want us to have, okay?
And in this case, it relates to the Biden laptop.
And refusing to publish anything about the Hunter Biden laptop and what it may contain, etc, etc.
So they refused to print that.
They refused to put it, allow people to talk about it on Twitter.
That's not the only thing they were refused.
Trump, they refused to talk about Trump.
They, you know, if you were a Trump supporter, you were basically, you got banned for that.
So this kind of thing, what went on behind the scenes, whereas some people may find it interesting, I say it's a no-brainer.
I was banned.
He was banned.
Other people were banned.
Obviously, there was something going on behind the scenes in a media company called Twitter, right?
So I don't think that's earth-shaking.
But what I do think is earth-shaking is the fact that in the Twitter conversation, Their focus is not on the Hunter Biden laptop and what it contains, okay?
It's on this banning and this keeping of data, keeping of information from the American people.
Because Twitter is, well not just Americans, but worldwide.
So So this control behind the scenes of media companies, of our lives, and this is so pervasive, and we call it the Mockingbird Media, okay?
Yes.
We have known this, we know about MKUltra, we know about, if you know anything you know about that earlier in, really it came from Nazi Germany, but into the 60s, that if you look at the subliminal messages behind advertising, I mean the things they have done to try to basically take the minds of the people of the world and channel them into certain areas.
It's like China on steroids, if you will, okay?
In fact, the question is, was Twitter run any differently than it would be run in China, okay?
Where the state is interfering and telling people what to think.
That's basically what we have.
We have a totalitarian mainstream media and twitter is just the edge of the iceberg this is kind of interesting right ever since the smith the smith month revision of 2012 under obama you have all the censorship and you have propaganda by the media Yes, yes, the ruling.
So, you know, we, look, to me, you know, it's very hard in a certain sense.
When you've been on this trail, like I have for over 18 years really, and, you know, publishing and talking and investigating and so on so forth, It's just, like, this kind of puts me to sleep, okay?
But this is supposed to wake up the mainstream, you know, normies, what we call normies, and certainly some of the Democrats who are completely clueless, and so on and so forth, okay?
And even maybe sleeping Republicans, okay?
What we call rhinos.
But the trouble that I have with all of it is the way it's being done and the fact that I don't think it's reaching these people.
You know, this is what we call a white hat move, okay?
A very good white hat move.
First of all, whatever Elon did, they made a deal with him to bring him onto their side.
That much is clear to me at least.
The second thing he did was he bought Twitter for them in a sense, okay?
So, I actually have a media person.
Okay, he's a financial expert and he's high level.
And he, I wrote an article that includes his comment that he wrote to me which I got permission to publish and I have published, okay?
And what in that article he's saying, he's saying basically what I'm saying here as well.
So he's a mainstream, he's kind of like a mainstream financial guy with incredible financial ties behind the scenes.
And he basically, not only he voices this, You know, and you could go to my website and look at this article.
And I've quoted him.
And in it, he basically says he doesn't believe Twitter, this Twitter, you know, to do right now is going to change the world.
It's not going to change the normies.
It's not even getting out there.
They don't even know, you know, they don't even get it.
It's too little too late.
It's not enough.
Okay, so that being the case, he's offering to buy CNN for them, for the White Hats, okay?
In this, yeah, in this statement that I quoted.
And I sent it directly to Juan, and I drew his attention to it on top of it.
He basically said he doesn't want his name out there, he doesn't want to be known, but he has the money to buy CNN, to buy the whole thing.
Or to buy shares in all the mainstream media companies so that people like Trump and the Trump sort of MAGA movement has a voice.
So this guy has that much money, okay?
And he is basically voicing his discomfort with or dismay or anger.
Straight up, it is angry.
It's kind of like an angry comment, which is fairly long.
You can go read it.
And basically saying, you know, look, I have the money to buy this for you guys.
You'd have to support me, but at the same time, you know, I don't like what you're doing.
I don't like this soft shoeing, you know, of bringing forward information after, what do we have?
You know, well, at least if you want to say since the Biden fake show has been going on for the last two years, okay, that we've had to sit through.
Promises, promises.
We thought this thing would be turned around by the midterms.
The midterms are stolen.
They've got the blockchain evidence.
Again, they're not bringing it forward, just like in 2020.
There are a lot of issues that us patriots have at this moment with the white hats and the way they're rolling this out, okay?
They may not want to do EBS.
They seem deathly afraid of civil war.
But if you kind of look at the horizon and the January 6th thing I just talked about, it looks like the deck is getting stacked more and more towards none of this is going away.
It's only getting worse, okay?
And the longer they wait and allow, you know, how do you go on?
This is the real question, okay?
And actually, I'd like you guys to step in here and tell me your points of view, but The Biden show.
I'll tell you this.
If he buys CNN, I think I know what you're saying.
Rather than an EBS alert, which would be something so dramatic that it could trigger a civil war, he would buy a news outlet and slow burn the information into the American psyche through a slow, Process of delineation and distribution of information rather than some big blast.
He's going to do it on a more subtle basis.
Well, and I think, actually, and I even heard rumors to the fact that they'd already done it.
They'd already bought CNN.
Now, I don't know if that's true, but what we're talking about is a media presence, in this case of Twitter, that's turned around.
This is now run by, in theory, someone who is aligned with the MAGA movement and the White Hats, okay?
Whether people know that or not, it doesn't really matter.
Bottom line, however, is that to have a presence in the minds of the normies, they have to have a mainstream media presence.
Okay?
You do see that equation.
But what I'm saying here is that This is the question, okay?
For two years, we've had a fake president.
We've actually had two presidents, okay?
And this is a fact, okay?
It's been proven by Derrick Johnson and, you know, in the military sense.
But also, 107 has straight-up said it, you know, he's commander-in-chief.
He was sworn in again by the military, March 2021.
In other words, This show that is going on, at the moment it seems only for the American people because I think that all the leaders, if you want to call them leaders, of other countries in Europe and around the world, they know already Trump's in charge and Biden's a fake.
Uh, administration.
But the American people are still in the dark.
All right?
So, how do you come out of that?
You understand how the White Hats operated here?
They put in place a faux administration.
Trump appeared to take a step back, went over to Mar-a-Lago, but he established what is in essence COG, Continuity of Government, And he never left office.
He never left office.
They never conceded.
In essence, he has remained president behind the scenes.
He has also remained commander-in-chief.
So, and I even heard him say in Minden, Nevada, at one of the rallies, he has the keys to the footballs, to the whatever extension level weaponry.
Biden does not, okay?
And that's proof, okay?
And he said this on the mic at Minden, okay?
And the people that were paying attention heard him, all right?
And I don't think that's the only time he said it, but I know Juan has said it numerous times.
So, and that gets into who's Juan?
You know, why should you listen to Juan?
And that gets into my whole JFK Jr.
thing.
But Backing up here and looking at the situation, kind of look how they have erected a straw man, the White Hats.
It's a straw man administration.
With this paper doll, if you want to call him that, or clone, or, you know, actor, because Biden's, Biden actually died apparently, and lied to the American people for two years while Trump was still doing and acting president and commander-in-chief behind the scenes simultaneously, while letting the paper straw man
Write laws and change and open our borders and do all kinds of... letting them get away with nefarious acts on their watch.
See, it's not an easy sales job.
When all the dust settles, I think this is what they're looking at.
They're looking at, yeah, you guys are heroes because you preserved our union, right?
And that is really what they're doing.
And then they're going to have to lay out the fact that we became a republic, and that they threw up the corporation of the US, etc.
But when you look at the things they have done, it's not going to be that easy to... In the minds of the American people, they still were deceived by you.
Do you get that?
Um, how do you walk away from that?
How do you get out from under that?
It's gonna be... Now, I'm sure they have it figured out, okay?
Obviously.
But I don't think people out there, you know, my colleagues, if you will, have been talking about this.
It's just like this glaring elephant in the room.
Once you put up a fake facade, and then people look behind it and see the little old man like in The Wizard of Oz, You know, that's where you're going to be.
What is going to go on?
Are they going to blame you?
Are they going to thank you?
Well, I'm sure some people will thank you, you know, but I also think some people, and from the feedback I get, will blame you because no one likes to be lied to and not in their face for two years and not while people are dying of COVID, by the way.
Yeah.
And not while people are being killed in tribunals, even if they're bad people behind their backs.
You gotta kind of look at how, what does it mean even in our country to be an American?
With this, once you have that knowledge, you know, you've got one administration that's completely fake and a puppet, And partially run by Trump and partially run by the Deep State is what it appears, because he does very nefarious, horrible things.
And then at the same time, you've got this, you know, these people of integrity, supposedly, the White Hats, but at the same time, they are the ones that put up the puppet government.
It's just a really crazy dichotomy here.
And, you know, I don't need to go on about this, but you want to know where things are at?
That's where things are at.
Okay?
So it's kind of like if you're watching a movie, it's like, how are they going to get out of this one?
How are they going to come out the heroes in this one?
Yes, they're going to demonstrate that they've saved children and they've gone into underground bases.
They're going to reveal the plot That the Deep State has had, and how they've rolled it out, and how the White Hats have been defending us against that plot.
They're gonna have to really handle this narrative, right?
So, this is where we're at.
It's a really... You couldn't even make this stuff up.
I mean... Does 1-7 believe that the Supreme Court... Do you think they will take up this responsibility?
Well, this is kind of what I was saying, and I have written articles again, so I do urge people to go to my website.
I've also done shows besides yours and talked about this, and I probably need to talk about it some more.
It's just that I'm kind of inundated with stuff.
But the bottom line here is that 107, in the early days when the Brunson case first, it first came out that the Supreme Court was gonna consider the case, and they actually helped the Brunson brothers bring the case, okay, by telling them, look, you need this, this, and this.
So they wanted the case for some reason.
And they get thousands and thousands of cases to consider that they ignore.
So say they focused on the Brunson thing.
So, of course, then, of course, Brunson hit the news, at least the alternative news.
Nina was the first person to interview him.
I was the second, okay?
And it's gone on from there.
I think he's been on many shows since then.
So, what does Juan think?
Well, now, as of, you know, 13 hours ago, whatever, the show he did with Nina, which I encourage everyone to watch, however, he is yelling and part of it, so some people don't like it when You know, when people who are being interviewed yell, he has kind of this dramatic side to him.
So usually when he yells, it's actually kind of fun and interesting.
In this case, I'm not so sure.
It's kind of a borderline thing.
I think he's really exhausted.
I think he's been burning the candle at both ends and needs to cool it.
Bottom line is what he has to say is very important, and he seems to be in a place of tension.
This is how I started even this conversation with you guys today, because Juan is a very pivotal figure.
in the MAGA movement and if he is in a good mood we're in a good mood if he is not in a good mood we are not in a good mood okay that's kind of my take on it now this is not across the board obviously he has his detractors and this and that but by and large
Of course, if you know him like I know him, and I've met him eye-to-eye, face-to-face, several times, had huge arguments with him, both on the phone and actually in person, and I have to tell you that there are two Juans, and one of them is JFK Jr., okay?
He's in disguise and so-and-so.
Let's pretend that I'm right, okay?
And I actually have proof, okay?
So, forget that.
Let's pretend that he actually is the son of JFK and he's in disguise to protect himself and his family, by the way.
Let's look at his influence, his ray of influence out there, okay?
And right now he is in a place of tension over the Brunson case and how important it is.
So to answer your question, I had to go in this direction to explain that why does it matter what Juan O'Savin thinks or says?
Think about who he could be and I know there's tons of people out there and they write to me and try to convince me like of something I already know for a fact so it's really interesting but nonetheless they're out there and they're going to listen to this and I have to say that if hypothetically he is who I say he is And he's that close to Trump.
That close.
And he's also, you know, one of the main white hats, if you want to call it that, okay, of the entire MAGA Q movement.
In a sense, he may even be the leader, the cue leader.
He may be cue.
Okay.
Now consider that, just consider it.
I'm not saying it's true.
I'm simply saying to you that look at the playing field in that aspect and look where he is mentally right now and why he's backing the Brunson case.
And then you believe you have to realize that we are actually reaching some kind of crescendo, some kind of, Push comes to shove that is going to affect the lives of Americans.
Okay, in a major way going forward from January 6 when the Supreme Court either takes the case or doesn't take the case and everything could be turned around.
Which does, by the way, some of the plaintiffs are, I don't know if you can call them defendants, are actually Biden, Kamala.
It doesn't just go into the, it goes into the executive offices and it would reinstate Trump by default because Trump won when they investigate the vote.
These are step-by-step pieces, but the implications are gigantic.
So it's, you know, this is a very strange, you know, game being played that involves lives.
And when you get into the whole COVID thing, you know, then they want to have tribunals.
When is Fauci going on trial?
I want to know that right now.
I've heard some of the tribunals are taking place at the Pentagon right now.
Yes, yes.
Well, they're taking place in Washington, D.C., behind that fence.
Right.
But again, how do we as Americans feel about that?
In other words, how are you going to ease people into the idea that our military is acting without our consent, so to speak?
Now, we gave them powers because, again, they're our military, and they have certain powers and responsibilities.
And I could get into a whole discussion about the Law of War Manual and why they followed that, which has pissed me off to no end.
And I also wrote about that in my article.
So, very recent article that I suggest everyone, you know, go and read, but it's quite extensive.
So, you know, I understand people don't like to read that much nowadays, but it is important.
I'm painting a picture here, and when they use the Law of War manual, which is actually based on the Geneva Convention, which is actually drummed up by the same people who basically, you know, did the Nuremberg Trials and who are, by and large, the Deep State, New World Order.
And so our Law of War Manual, if you ask me, has been written by the very people that are our enemies.
And in that Law of War Manual, it says very clearly That when you're invaded, when any country in the world is invaded, that their military can wait a year before acting, or in fact they not just can, should wait a year.
In other words, it's kind of like a, I don't know, the law of war manual, these are called laws or what, or suggestions, or I don't know, you know what I'm saying?
Do you understand that?
So how is it that our country was invaded the day Biden was sworn in?
That was proof of the invasion.
If you understand that there was, you know, fraud in the election.
Biden didn't really win.
Therefore, he's part of the invasionary force, which is the CCP, the Chinese CCP.
Yeah.
And why are there Chinese police Precincts being set up in several major cities across the United States, including New York.
And why are Chinese being trained down in Texas?
Yeah.
You know, in other words, we're invaded, and the Law of War manual says our military is supposed to sit around and wait for a year, a year before acting.
Well, that year was up a year ago.
Right?
Okay, now wrap your mind around this.
That is insane.
To me, that's the definition of insanity.
That's the definition that our entire military are actually traitors.
Now, I know that a good portion of our military are probably chafing at the bit, To act, to fucking take this thing, you know, to get rid of the Biden government because it's a fake, totally fake facade.
Out that fact and take back our country, which is what they should have done as far as I'm concerned.
The day after they swore in Biden, you know what I'm saying?
So now they're sitting around, and the White Hats, why?
Because they're under control of Trump and the White Hats.
And this is how they're choosing to play it, waking up the people, trying to soft-shoe it so that people don't all hit the streets and go crazy.
But you know what?
If you look at January 6th and the two million people that showed up there, most of those people didn't go crazy.
Most of those people were there with their babies in hand, okay?
Being peaceful, okay?
So the American people are not like, no, we're not dying to destroy our society.
That's not what's going on here.
But we're certainly not going to sit around forever.
I don't know why the people out there don't have my clarity of mind.
I think that everything I'm saying is absolutely accurate.
I have listened to Juan day in and day out.
I've listened to everyone else.
I've read the Law of War manual parts that are crucial here.
I was flabbergasted when I found that out, okay?
It says wait a year.
Tell some military, wait a year, and then stop the invaders.
I don't think so, okay?
I think the day after they invade, I don't give a fuck who they are.
You kick them out.
If you're working for me and you're my military, fuck that shit.
Okay, what the hell is going on?
All right, so I guess now I've gone off, you know?
That's all right.
Listen, we really appreciate it.
We, unfortunately, and God, I wish we had more time, but we are... No, we're good.
I think I actually fit in everything I wanted to say.
We appreciate it, and we will have you back on again, I think, next week or so.
So thank you so much.
And please visit Project Camelot portal.com and subscribe.