Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 11, 2017 - Project Camelot

01:27:50

KEITH HUNTER : NORTH KOREA & SCALAR TECHNOLOGY

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Thank you.
	Hi, everyone.
	This is Carrie Cassidy from Project Camelot, and I am very excited today to have Keith Hunter back with us.
	This is a very impromptu broadcast, so please bear with us.
	I think it'll all go well.
	His sound sounds great, and we're going to have him on the screen as well.
	So If you just stand by one moment here, bring him on.
	And Keith Hunter is a researcher.
	He's written a very interesting book.
	And I'm going to have to have him introduce himself at this moment because...
	I've had no time to prepare, and I think his book is called Hidden Knowledge, and we can get more detailed on the title of it.
	And he is an investigator into scalar weapons and so on.
	Keith, say hello to everyone.
	Hello, everyone.
	Yeah, that's a good book.
	It's called The Lost Age of High Knowledge, but I've run out a print.
	So in the next couple of months, though, I should be getting the new edition out.
	And I'm going to be showing you, of course, this presentation, a few diagrams from the new book coming out because it deals with some of the topics that we're going to be discussing here.
	So in terms of introducing myself, I'll just briefly say that the main area of interest that I've had It's been in astronomy and looking at ideal systems of measure and you know how the earth currently has 365 and a quarter days.
	The mythologies that said it once had 300 days per year and the moon once had 30 days a month, you know, and all the solar system was in harmony.
	So I studied mainly things of that area, trying to crack mythological stories and scientifically prove that There is truth to this contention.
	The Earth once was an ideal orbit and the same with the solar system.
	But going further beyond that though, I found that these units of measure that you use for celestial time, like whole numbers of days and also imperial measures of feet and inches and so forth, this very same system of measures seems to tie together megalithic structures,
	From ancient times like the Great Pyramid, Stonehenge, and that there are key arc-length measures, that's A-R-C, arc, in case my accent throws anyone off, distance measures over the surface of the Earth using imperial measures.
	They seem to have units which are highly significant in terms of the numeric sequences, but also how these arc-length measures connecting up, say, Different sites, a latitude and longitude coordinates of one prominent megalithic structure to another, how these arc length measures have special ratios tied to the Earth itself.
	And what I found in studying that is that because the exactness of it is very precise based upon a highly accurate Earth ellipsoid model, the Earth is not a perfect sphere, I found that these monuments are placed with high precision globally.
	And it implies a global civilization.
	But then you find, when you look at modern-day military bases like Pine Gap Base in Australia or the Menwith Hill Base in the UK here, you find that the arc distances connecting those up over the Earth have got the same signatures, if you will, the same special ratios tie them to the Earth as you find with these megalithic structures.
	And so it leads you to believe that They're reconstructing the technology of the ancients and that things like the Great Pyramid and Stonehenge were actually devices, real energetic devices.
	My main focus in research has been not so much on an engineering perspective of these, but mainly looking at the global positioning and how they tie into ideal units of measure.
	So that's basically what my book was about, cracking mythological solutions for an ideal solar system.
	Showing that we've got scientific evidence which proves it true and also finding that the ideal measures associated with that tie not just to megalithic structures but even modern day sensitive military bases.
	So that's pretty much a summary of my work mainly.
	But I also looked into Conjunction patterns and cycles of destruction.
	Major breakthroughs in that area as well via some very interesting remote viewing stuff.
	That's for another topic.
	Let me just jump in here and say that Keith Hunter is coming to me with some interesting theories about The technology that North Korea has at the present time and also what they really are testing as opposed to what they're saying they're testing.
	And I also think that this relates very directly to an article that appeared actually recently and also in 2014 A sort of similar article in the UK Daily Mail, and I've linked it on my website.
	So if you go to ProjectHamletPortal.com and click on this particular show banner, You will see the link to the Daily Mail article if you're interested to actually read it.
	And if I can get it, I'll put it in the chat, the link as well.
	So, Keith, you're coming to me today because obviously North Korea is in the news, and there's a lot of speculation as to what they're doing.
	There's also been a remote viewing in, let's see, about May, I think you said it was in April, If I'm not correct, from Courtney Brown.
	So we're going to wrap that into our discussion at a certain point.
	But before we get to that, can you sort of outline your reason for coming forward today and the theory that you have?
	Yeah, yeah, basically.
	I want to present some of the details to back it up.
	But the brief summary is basically this.
	So far then in North Korea, They began a weapons program, they began nuclear testing, and the first test was detected about 10 years ago, about 2006.
	And they've triggered so far Five nuclear bombs, right?
	And they are actually all listed on the USGS survey website.
	That's the United States Geological Survey.
	They're listed as seismic events.
	And I'll even show you the screenshots of that later on.
	So they're right there.
	And they give you the seismic signatures.
	And from that, we can deduce even the yields.
	So they've got this weapons program.
	And they've wanted to develop nuclear weapons.
	And they've got a certain test site.
	And these five tests have all been done so far on that test site.
	But in addition to this though, there are other things they appear to be doing where they appear to be, you know, there's evidence that They have a weapon system which is generally referred to as a scalar interferometer system.
	That is where you have scalar beams that you intersect at a distance, right?
	You can achieve some very, very novel effects with this kind of beam weaponry.
	And one of the things you can do is trigger seismic events.
	You can trigger earthquakes with this kind of weapon system.
	And these seismic events then We're also registered, you know, by earthquake stations.
	But the thing is, there's a very esoteric aspect, if you will, to nuclear weapons in that they are related to special arc-length measures over the Earth's surface tied to the sun.
	And this is one of the research breakthroughs made originally by Bruce Caffey.
	And I've looked at some of his work and extended it.
	So because it's tied into my work in the sense that I've looked previously at how two different fixed facilities, say, megalithic monuments on the Earth's surface, relate to one another, with the great circle arcs connecting and how they relate to the Earth.
	You can look at modern-day communications between covert military bases having the same significant arc measures, but you also find the same kinds of signature patterns when nuclear weapons are detonated, which says something very special about them.
	They too appear to be related to the position of the sun in the sky, quite literally, the moment they're triggered.
	And when you are using certain advanced technologies to trigger earthquakes artificially, like with a scalar beam system, you will find that the signatures, the seismic location, the longitude, latitude, the epicenter, you could almost substitute in Ground Zero, where you've done a nuclear bomb, where the coordinates are for that, for the epicentre of the earthquake.
	And you'll find when you look at the Sun itself, astronomically, you find the same kinds of signatures.
	So we've got some articles that Kerry, you were just referring to there, which point towards North Korea.
	You know, the rumours that they were creating certain earthquakes, and again, one of them I'm going to go into detail here, And this particular earthquake appears to have a distinct nuclear type signature which is very much related to the five known nuclear tests that they've done, yeah?
	The ratio signature, yeah?
	So even though it's a different, a completely different means of achieving a high energy event, in this case a seismic event, yeah?
	You're using a beam weapon system to create a seismic event, yeah?
	Rather than, say, a nuclear device itself.
	Because a nuclear device, if you do an underground test, for example, you'll get a seismic signature.
	Qualitatively, it'll be very different to an earthquake-type signature.
	But you can look at nuclear weapons tests and you can see comparable yields.
	So what I wanted to get into today, then, is to just look at some of the ways in which, you know, to really give a case that...
	North Korea appears to have developed some sort of scalar beam weapon system and that they can, at a distance, trigger extreme...
	Well, this is one of the key points.
	How big could it be?
	But they can trigger seismic events at a distance.
	And these weapon systems can also trigger fireball-type effects at a distance.
	So this would have implications in terms of, you know, being a threat to, say, the U.S. ships, which are...
	Around the area at the moment.
	So can I do a screen share with you and just go through just a few of the details here?
	Yes.
	And not to take you off track, but just to clarify.
	So what you're saying is that North Korea has done five nuclear tests, if I understand it, and they want to do a sixth, but they have not yet done that.
	And what they're calling a nuclear test may actually...
	Correct me if I'm wrong, not involve a nuke, but instead involve scalar weapons.
	And there's also this thing where you said, and you can get into this if you like here, also saying that scalar weapons require two sort of interfering waves coming from, if I understand it, two different places.
	Is that correct?
	Yeah.
	They have done basically five underground tests so far of pretty low yields mainly at their main test sites.
	These are conventional nuclear weapons, so to speak.
	They've done them yet.
	But then we've got another article, one of the articles that was in a major newspaper, and it discussed North Korea making claims A new form of nuclear power.
	And this was tied into a certain seismic signature for an earthquake that was near to Korea, just in the sea to the south west of where they are.
	And this gave a seismic signature of about 5.0.
	And it was tied to this article.
	So in this instance, The suggestion is that they are not only doing conventional nuclear testing and doing a weapons program like that, trying to mirror what other countries have already done, they're also experimenting with other types of weapons systems which are capable of creating an energy event which is comparable in terms of strength to a nuclear test.
	That's what I'm going to get into.
	But the proof of this, the proof of this particular event being tied to North Korea is what I'm going to get into.
	So I'll see if I'm going to screen share here.
	Share screens.
	Share screen.
	Now, is that coming up?
	Can you see this Scottish castle thing?
	Yes.
	Yeah.
	Well, it's a good job I've taken down my hot picture of Monica Bellucci as a desktop.
	So let's see now.
	So the first thing I want to draw attention to then is this diagram here, right?
	It says diagram 3.2, because as I said, these are going to be in my book.
	So this is screen snapshot here.
	And you're looking at the Earth, right?
	And you can see here, this little thing where Maya is crossing the middle of a circle here, this is the bomb position.
	Let's say you're doing a nuclear test, so you put the bomb somewhere on the Earth, yeah?
	And at the moment you trigger the bomb, yeah?
	If you were to, like, freeze the solar system and freeze the rotation of the Earth, yeah?
	and you draw a straight line from the center of the earth out to the center of the sun it will pierce through the earth at a certain precise location on the ground yeah this is the sun ground position SGP here yeah and you can see at that instant then we've got this arc length here this curved arc distance t will connect them up which will have a very precise distance measure and then we'll also have This other example here is this curved arc length L. This is the pure latitude separation between
	where the bomb is on the ground and also the sun.
	And this is the equivalent of declination for the sun.
	So you'll find that these two arc lengths are very significant when a bomb goes off.
	And another set are these here.
	If you look at it again, you've got your bomb and you've got your sun.
	If you just look at the pure longitude separation arc between them on the equator itself, this is E. The separation arc there is a circular arc distance.
	That also is very important when bombs are triggered.
	And also, the direct arc from the equator to the bomb, it could be in the southern or northern hemisphere, or the same for the sun, arc F. You find that these arc measures When such bombs are triggered, they'll have special ratios,
	very blatant in some cases, connecting, you know, when you evaluate one and you divide by another, it might have a ratio of 8 over 3 or 7 over 11 or something like that, or the ratios will be one of these arcs will fit into, say, a whole number of times the equator of the Earth.
	They're not only tied to one another, they're also tied to the plant itself, and this suggests a kind of a resonance-based situation.
	Where you've essentially got roaming energy waves, so to speak, all over the Earth.
	And this is essentially the sun is like the clockwork, you know, the key marker here.
	And so when the bomb goes off, certain arc distances associating the bomb to the sun, right, they have special ratios, implying that the bombs themselves require external forces to go off.
	Now, I don't want to get too much on a tangent on that because...
	In terms of the, you know, in-depth explanation, but suffice it to say, when we think about a nuclear bomb, we think about, you know, standard ideas, you've got a plutonium core, your fire-shaped charges, it implodes the core to a critical, you know, supercritical state, you bombard it with neutrons, and you have a massive outward blast.
	Well, that action there has to be done at the right moment when the Sun has a special relationship to where your bomb is set on the ground.
	It's as if the bomb itself is destroyed by external energy, which converges on it at the critical moment that it's activated.
	So this is why we can study nuclear weapons in terms of their special signatures, yeah?
	Because they appear to be dependent, you know, as devices on locations of the sun.
	This ties in a lot to this megalithic connections and all the special things there.
	That's absolutely true.
	But let me also interject here that you did...
	Talk about, at the time that Fukushima happened, we had a show with you, and you were talking about this very dynamic, the connection to the sun and the nuke that was targeted under Japan in the Honshu area, I believe, off the coast there.
	Well, I think that that event, and I am going to be discussing that very event here, so I've got the mathematics for the analysis as well.
	All right.
	Because it's very important how that event relates to Japan.
	Very special event.
	And again, I think that that device, well I should say not device, that event, the epicentre of the Japanese earthquake that occurred in March 2011, yeah, that also I believe was triggered by scalar beams because they intersected very deep underneath the surface of the ocean.
	So this was deep underground.
	It wasn't an actual nuclear bomb, you know, somebody placed underground.
	They couldn't have done that.
	They triggered an energetic condition right at the precise epicentre to initiate that earthquake.
	And there's going to be a brilliant proof of that, you know, that connection there to really nail it.
	But let me just give you an example of some bombs here, because I've just showed you these arc length measures here.
	So let me show you a nice little example here.
	You can see this here.
	This is Bikini Atoll, and it says Castle Bravo.
	Now, Bravo is the highest yield atmospheric test the United States have ever carried out.
	1954.
	And it's a 15 megaton device, yeah?
	It's the Bikini Atoll here in the proverbial middle of nowhere.
	And let me show you.
	Here is the data then for Bravo.
	When you get the full details of it, we can get from the declassified nuclear archives, we get the exact coordinates of the bomb and the time it was triggered.
	So here you can see bomb coordinates, latitude and longitude, And I use the U.S. Naval Observatory's own ICE software, that's Interactive Computer Ephemeris, to work out the coordinates of the sun on the ground, like per the diagrams I've given.
	So you compute them, and you can see here in the red box, this is the arc distance connecting the bomb on Bikini Atoll to the sun at the precise moment that it was detonated.
	And it's in feet, units of feet.
	That's why it looks massive.
	And I'll show you this here.
	You can see this is Castle Bravo, and this is a visual representation of what you've just seen there.
	Here's the bomb at Bikini Astral with the red blob, and the yellow blob here is the sun ground position.
	And this arc distance here, this is the one which is about 35 million feet or so, or about 6,781 miles.
	So you can see that, yeah?
	And these bombs are triggered with split-second time.
	You know, they work out precisely when they're going to trigger them based on where they are.
	So just hold that in your mind for Castle Bravo, and let's go to another device of great interest.
	This is King.
	And again, you've got the coordinates of where the bomb was set up, the ground position of the sun, and here in the red box in feet, the arc separation.
	And in this case, this is it.
	The Ivy Seer is King.
	And you can see here, it's about 13.4 million feet or 2,543 statue of miles.
	And here, this is the arc length separating them visually.
	Now, I said to you that when they look at triggering devices, they've worked out experimentally that there are certain arc length distance measures over the surface of the Earth which have resonant significance.
	which are necessary to trigger a bomb and so if you've got one arc distance which is significant a basic fractional ratio of that will also give you some significance so let me show you this here this is an evaluation of the king and bravo arc measures the one at the top this is bravo and this is his king and if you divide one by the other You can see what an amazing sequence.
	We've got 2.6666 almost bang on 6 recurring, which is the basic fraction 8 divided by 3.
	Now, the reason why I give these values in feet is very important because in one second of time, right, And the Earth has 24 hours for one day, which is 86,400 seconds.
	In one second of time, the Sun's ground position will shift near to the equator about 1,500 feet, right?
	And so you can see these values, these arc length measures here, will dynamically be changing every second significantly.
	So when you look at a relationship like this, this is less than split-second timing.
	It's less than one second in error.
	We're talking about error rates of a few hundred feet for this fraction to be perfectly 8 over 3.
	So this is the kind of thing that you get when you're looking at nuclear weapons.
	They have a very special relationship to the sun, and it's energetically significant.
	You can't just trigger a nuclear bomb wherever you like, whenever you like, because it won't work properly.
	It won't give you the massive explosion.
	And let me show you a few examples.
	So at the moment, though, Keith, you know, a lot of this is quite...
	Detailed in terms of the mathematics involved, but I think your point is well taken.
	What you are relating here, though, is also, you know, references Bruce Cathy's work, correct?
	I mean, in many ways, you're basically saying there has to be a window of opportunity for doing any nuclear test and to get, like, the yield that you want and so on and so forth.
	But to get back to...
	I'm not sure if this is okay with you, but if we can get down to what it means as opposed to the mathematics, and then perhaps people can go to your own website to get more details and we can put a PowerPoint on my site and link as well to more detailed analysis here that is more technical, right?
	Sure.
	Yeah, what I was just saying there was very important.
	Yeah, no, I got that, and yeah, that's great.
	The proof I'm about to give to you that shows this scalar beam connection is this.
	I'm just giving you an example here of two very prominent nuclear weapons, yeah?
	Right.
	What you'll find is that if we suspect there's an earthquake gone off, which may not be entirely natural, you can do the same kind of analysis as I've just done Only instead of looking at a bomb coordinate in the Sun, you look at the epicenter of the earthquake in the Sun.
	And you can do the same analysis, right?
	And if there's this very prominent ratio signature, you know, really there, it'll indicate, it'll be highly suggestive of the fact that the seismic event was not natural.
	Okay?
	Okay.
	And this is what I'm basically going on to because Let me then show you an example, a brilliant example here.
	When I do this one, I'll then go straight into the North Korean evaluation.
	This is related to the Japanese earthquake, just to give you an example.
	If we look then, let me see now.
	I've got this one here.
	This is Hiroshima.
	This is a snapshot from my book, right?
	And I tell you, we've got the precise time, the universal time, when it went off, 5th of August, 1945, 23, 1602, yeah?
	Precise coordinates.
	Now, what we want to note here is the longitude of the bomb.
	At Hiroshima and the longitude of the Sun, okay?
	Remember I said to you, one of the critical arc lengths is this E, right, at the equator, the separation arc.
	Well, if I've got the coordinates for Hiroshima and I do this, I work out the equator.
	This is it here, this value here.
	The separation arc at the equator, that E arc, is 21,900,000 or so.
	This value here, yeah?
	In feet.
	That's the arc measure, yeah?
	Above this, we've got the equator of the Earth, yeah?
	So if we do a simple division sum, equatorial circumference of the Earth divided by longitude separation at the equator of the bomb and the sun, you get this six value, almost dead on six, implying that that arc measure fits a whole number of times into the equator of the Earth.
	It's these kinds of harmonic relationships that give you resonance, yeah?
	So this was present, astonishingly, right when the Hiroshima device was activated, and I put it to you that that's not due to chance, yeah?
	Right.
	Now, let's look at the Japanese earthquake.
	We've got the precise coordinates here in this next page here.
	This is a scrolling of an image of my website, yeah?
	It says 38.322 north.
	142.369 East.
	These are the coordinates straight from the USGS, okay?
	And then I've got the Sun coordinates here, right?
	And again, these are all based upon the precise time in the USGS. This here in red is the arc separation.
	This is the direct arc separation, not the equator.
	So it's this one here.
	Imagine that's an epicenter and that's the Sun.
	It's this kind of arc separation, yeah?
	This is what we get.
	That value is practically dead on to what we've just seen.
	If I go down here, the same equation.
	Equation of the Earth divided by this value here for the direct atom, what do you get?
	Practically dead on the number six.
	In other words, again, a one-sixth fit.
	It's almost like sending a message.
	You'd almost think that whoever targeted this spot for the earthquake event, the nine-point note that stuck Japan, It's the same harmonic signature as was used against them on Hiroshima, you know, against the city there.
	Very high precision stuff.
	But again, the point I'm making is Hiroshima, no nuclear bomb.
	Japanese earthquake, it's a seismic event.
	People think it's natural.
	I'd suggest it's not, okay?
	So, when you look at this then, we can now get on to the North Korean stuff, right?
	Right.
	Let me just show you then, using a completely different page here.
	These, as you see here, this is again, this is the USGS. These are the five tests that have been carried out in North Korea so far, yeah?
	This one here is the 5.3 one, yeah?
	These are all seismic signatures.
	Now, a lot of people there are wondering, how powerful are these devices?
	Well, let me show you, right?
	We can show you.
	Let me see now.
	And this one here.
	This is a guy.
	This is the Nautilus Institute.
	When they first started doing their tests in 2006, people were looking at them.
	And so basically, there's a special equation you use.
	This one here.
	And it basically converts the seismic signature from the point scale into nuclear yields.
	So to make it simple, what I have done then is show you.
	This is it.
	I've already used the equation to show you, yeah?
	So here are the five tests, yeah?
	And you can see the dates.
	The first one, 2006.
	The last one, just last year, 2016, yeah?
	And they've all been getting bigger.
	These two look the same, but they've all been getting bigger.
	Okay.
	This is the yield in terms of TNT, yeah?
	And you can see the last one is 11,662 tonnes per that equation.
	Now, I say that because what I've got here in the bottom These are three US devices, yeah?
	The first one is Trinity, the test done in Alamogordo, New Mexico, and then there's Hiroshima itself and then Nagasaki.
	And again, these are in tons.
	So you can see with the last nuclear tests they've done, they're pretty much now on par with the early yields of the US was achieving, yeah?
	So this is what they've got at present, yeah?
	Right.
	So what I want to do then, let me see if I've got this right.
	I want to basically show you that...
	I think it's this one here, yeah?
	Here we go.
	I want to show you the article.
	I'll show you the article first.
	This is the article I was referring to, yeah?
	Mm-hmm.
	Now, remember I showed you their tests began in 2006.
	Last one was 2016.
	Right.
	This article here, then, you can see it here says 1st of April 2014.
	It's from the Daily Mail.
	And it just says here...
	Earthquake off coast of North Korea sparks fears.
	Kim Jong-un has carried out his threat to hold nuclear tests, in inverted commas.
	But then, if you look at the little byline, he says, comes two days after North Korea threatened a, quote, new form of atomic test.
	New form.
	Now, what does that mean?
	And if we just scroll down here, we've got a nice little image, the content, and we've got this earthquake.
	Think of it as 5.1 here, but it's a 5.0 in the USGS, yeah?
	But they give it here, and they give the local time in GMT and everything, yeah?
	And again, it's a strange thing.
	They're saying, oh, it's a new form of atomic test.
	But again, this is for an earthquake, and this is it here.
	This is the actual listing.
	If you go to the USGS and you click on it here, they've listed it as a 5.0.
	It's the precise time on its unit.
	And again, it's the 31st of March 2014, which is just a couple of days before that article, yeah?
	So there it is.
	This is the Korean Peninsula, yeah?
	And if you look at the depth in the bottom, it says 17.9 kilometers.
	And it's obviously in the ocean, so this is a depth.
	Nobody drilled a nuclear device into the ground and set that off.
	They didn't do that, okay?
	They didn't do that, right?
	So...
	The question is, is this seismic signature, is it one really related to a weapon that the North Koreans tested?
	And if so, what kind of weapon and can we prove it?
	Well, let me show you this here.
	What you've got listed then, the first thing is a sea event unknown, right, as a highlight.
	That is the seismic signature we've just been looking at, yeah?
	Right.
	And here, North Korea, one, two, three, four, five.
	These are the Nuclear tests that they have already done.
	Known devices, right there.
	And I've done the big analysis of them, basically looking at the latitude and longitude coordinates.
	And then I've looked at the position of the Sun, right there, when they were done.
	And I want to just draw your attention to some of the key outmeasures here.
	This one here.
	Bombson latitude separation.
	These are all in feet, remember, right?
	So just a little reminder.
	This is it here.
	You see it says L. We've got here, this will be for the sun, yeah?
	This here, bomb.
	It's the pure latitude separation arc, yeah?
	Right here, like a meridian arc, yeah?
	In feet at the moment the device goes off, or in this case, the top one, the moment the seismic signature's registered, yeah?
	So these are the values in feet.
	And I said to you that if you look at these here, you'll find, with the case of nuclear weapons here, you'll find that...
	They have these ratios very intimately associated to one another, very blatant, yeah, which identifies them as a nuclear event.
	Now, if we've got a seismic event here and it relates, the arc measures associated with it are intimately associated with these here, then you say, ha, this is definitely a nuclear event.
	And this is what we find.
	So I want to take a look at this.
	Just note this one here.
	It says, 11.825582.
	This first one, this is the latitude separation arc between the seismic signature and the Sun, the moment the seismic event occurred.
	And I'm going to show you here.
	Let's move on.
	This is what we get.
	This here, then, is the same one here, yeah?
	What you've got here are arc measures in this column of non-nuclear tests, right?
	They are these ones here.
	Right?
	They're all these devices, well-known, like Trinity, Mike, Bravo, all this stuff, yeah?
	So I'm basically looking at them, yeah?
	And I'm looking at the ratio between this, these, and these, yeah?
	These here are the ratios, yeah?
	Okay.
	So, for example, the ones I've highlighted here, it seems that the known nuclear tests that the North Koreans are doing, and you can see here, these are them here, yeah, known tests.
	There's one there, another one there.
	There, there, yeah.
	They're the five ones I've done, yeah?
	But I'm looking at the ones here, yeah?
	So let's just look.
	Hiroshima.
	At the precise moment that device went off, these are the direct arcs connecting up the sun to the bomb over the surface of the Earth in feet.
	There's Hiroshima, there's Nagasaki, and Sarpom is the high-yield 58-megaton bomb that the Soviet Union detonated in 1961.
	And what you find is if you divide each of these values here by the latitude separation, you get these values here.
	You can see that.
	Can you see it says 1.728, yeah?
	0.8, 2.7, yeah?
	You see how they're all almost bang on.
	And if you take that 7.28, for example, as a numeric sequence, yeah?
	It's this one here, yeah?
	If you divide it by 8 twice, you'll get the sequence 27, 27, like this one, yeah?
	So you can see this blatant ratio connection here.
	And if we move on, yeah?
	You see this value here?
	This 17251, yeah?
	All these values here, yeah?
	This is one of the known North Korean tests, yeah?
	And this value here is divided by the Tsar Bomber one, yeah?
	They're all related to that one.
	So this gives you this value here, yeah?
	The inverse, 0.54.
	Now, 5.4 divided by 2 is 2.7, which is this one here again.
	You see how they're intimately associated?
	If we go on, another one.
	Look at this.
	3.6.
	Yeah?
	And then we've got 2.3.0.4.
	And again, 2.3.0.4.
	If you put that in your calculator and divide by 8 two times, you know what you get?
	36 as a numeric sequence, which is this one here.
	And again, this is the latitude separation arc here.
	Divided by the same three types of bombs here.
	I looked very carefully and it seems to me that the known nuclear tests the North Koreans are doing They're choosing certain weapons that have already been done, yeah, conducted in history of great significance, and they're kind of using various variations on them.
	So the fact that I find the known tests closely related to Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and Tsar Bomber, and then I find this seismic signature, again, very, very closely related to the same bombs and, you know, the same variations like.2, .7, 5-4, you know, and it's just the new big sequences and they've shifted the decimal points.
	They're so close to one another.
	It tells me that the article that we were just looking at by the Daily Mail, it is essentially correct.
	And North Korea does appear to have some kind of sign of Beam weapon system for triggering seismic events at a distance, yeah?
	And I'll just show you what that would mean.
	I've got a table here, yeah?
	You see the 5.3 one?
	That's the last nuclear test they did, a conventional one here, yeah?
	And if you look at the value, it's 11,662 TNT, yeah?
	The 5.0 seismic signature, 5,734.
	So it's You know, it's just slightly half that, so to speak, yeah?
	But it's a significant event, yeah?
	So, the question then is, what can we say about this in terms of things?
	So, I'll stop sharing because I think I've done the math bit.
	So, back on me then.
	So, when we talk about...
	Scalar B weapons then.
	Let me give you an example of what we're talking about because I know a lot of people have heard this and they're a bit baffled, but some of the best books you can look at are, this is one by Thomas Bearden, Briefing on Soviet Scale Electromagnetic Weapons.
	And Bearden is famous for having, you know, being a scientist that has done a lot of work in this area.
	Oh yeah, these are major books.
	Another one's Oblivion.
	Again, he talks about the energetics weapon systems primarily developed by the Soviet Union, right?
	So, what he basically says in his books here then, just to give you a brief explanation, what is a scalar beam and how can this be weaponized, okay?
	Well, we're familiar with light, you know, just standard light, which is on the electromagnetic spectrum, yeah?
	Visible lights only at a certain small little part of it with certain wavelengths and frequencies, yeah?
	And then you go one direction, you go to the other, you either get into very long radio waves or high energy, you know, cosmic rays and whatever, yeah, x-rays and that kind of thing.
	And so we're familiar with normal light.
	When we think about laser beams, you know, you think electromagnetic beam.
	And, you know, you think about it being a concentrated beam, piercing wood and whatever, that kind of thing, yeah?
	That's a standard electromagnetic beam, yeah?
	And it's got, classically, it's got two components, electric components and magnetic components that alternate between one another at 90 degrees as a beam, yeah?
	That's a standard electromagnetic beam.
	How do you generate a scalar beam, then?
	Well, the answer is you take two electromagnetic beams and you interfere them, you superimpose them to another, right?
	And you do this in what's called destructive interference.
	Now, this differs from constructive interference in this way.
	If you have two beams, electromagnetic beams at the same frequency, And you set them together in perfect phase.
	You match the peaks of the electric components and the peaks of the magnetic components.
	So instead of having a beam like that, it does that.
	It doubles it, yeah?
	The amplitude is doubled and you get a more powerful beam.
	But it's still an electromagnetic beam.
	This is because you've interfered both beams in phase.
	If, however, you merge two beams together, Which are perfectly out of phase.
	So a peak in the electromagnetic component of the first beam is countered by a trough in the other beam and a peak of the magnetic component, a trough in the magnetic component of the other beam.
	If you do that, you cancel them out.
	So if you've got a safe facility, if you want to look at it, and this facility has got a nice little transmitter dish and it's doing a nice beam of electromagnetic energy yeah and you configure it so that it produces electromagnetic beams which can destructively interfere and cancel out the magnetic and electric components a person with a detector so to speak or detecting where there's anything coming out of the device They'll say there's nothing coming out of
	the device.
	They'll say because you've interfered these two electromagnetic beams, you have somehow, quote, destroyed the electromagnetic beams, the light itself.
	You have nullified it and it does not exist and nothing is coming out of the beam.
	This is not true.
	You have not destroyed.
	You have created a new type of beam.
	And this, you're still emitting something.
	But what you are emitting now is what we call a scalar beam.
	And this is created by merging two electromagnetic light beams straight out of phase of one another.
	All right.
	Well, that's a very good clear explanation.
	So thank you.
	Scalar beams, then.
	Rather than just travel at the speed of light, they can be superluminal.
	They can travel multiple times at the speed of light.
	And this is because they're like a gravity-stressing wave.
	Bearden gives all these little descriptions.
	He says, these are the waves that Tesla was talking about.
	Longitudinal waves in the ether, so to speak.
	They're superluminal and they travel very fast.
	Now, how do we know that the electromagnetic effects are not cancelled out?
	And the answer is...
	We know it because of how this system is weaponized, right?
	What you need for this are two transmitter sites, each producing a scalar beam.
	You see, what you've done originally, at one transmitter, you've got two electromagnetic beams, merge them destructively to produce a scalar beam.
	If you do the exact same thing at another site, and you merge two electromagnetic beams, produce a scalar beam, and that one flies off, and these are like Precise beams like, you know, almost like direct straight-of-the-line things, yeah?
	And these beams literally go through matter as if it's not even there.
	They'll go straight through the earth, through the oceans, with practically zero resistance.
	Very little interaction, yeah?
	So if you get two such beams and you fire them, you'll be thinking to yourself, well, nothing's coming out of the first beam, nothing's coming out of the second beam.
	The electromagnetic components, not there.
	But...
	If you interfere these two scalar beams at a distance, the electromagnetic effects re-emerge.
	You've unlocked it.
	You've done the same thing in reverse, yeah?
	Oh, that's fascinating.
	Okay.
	Yes.
	See, originally you get two electromagnetic beams, merge them to produce a scalar beam.
	Now you've got two scalar beams.
	Interfere them at a distance, the electromagnetic effects re-emerge.
	So you could have extreme heating effects produced which emerge at all points within the interference zone.
	Yeah, and you can do this explosively fast to create heating effects or you can withdraw heat to create extreme cooling effects.
	Yeah, now because these beams are superluminal and because they go straight through matter Right?
	It's not even there.
	If you have two transmitters, this is what I think happened in North Korea, yeah?
	They've got some transmitters and Bearden actually says in his book, he says, you can adapt standard transmitters, you know, you normally use electromagnetic beams, you can adapt these quite easily, he says, you know, if you know what you're doing.
	I think North Korea then had two such transmitters and they shot With high precision, a scalar beam out of each of them, and they targeted this precise point, right, when they did this test in 2014.
	And they did it, and they built up energy underneath the ocean, right?
	Because remember, they go straight through the ocean, straight through the earth, and that critical interference zone, they create an energetic condition, which in many ways mirrors the kind of thing you get when you trigger a nuclear bomb.
	And if they did it at the exact right moment, when the sun is in the right position and the earth's going round, they tap into the same physics to create a seismic signature.
	In this case, a seismic signature that's About 5.0, which is equivalent to about 6,700 tons of TNT as a yield.
	So now you're transmitting energy in this way.
	It's superluminal, faster than the speed of light.
	And so you have the energy pumped in at each scalar site.
	There's nothing going between them, so to speak, in terms of the normal electromagnetic spectrum.
	And the effect occurs, it emerges right there underneath it with practically no time delay and almost no way to block it in many ways.
	Okay, great.
	And that's very good.
	I just want to stop you there and basically say that what you're saying, there is a progression there.
	In the tests they're doing, and they are increasing the yield, I guess you'd call it.
	And it appears that one could conjecture what is the test, the sixth so-called test that they want to do.
	You could imagine sort of in terms of the earthquake signature.
	So you're saying, I think it was 5.0 and it went to 5.3.
	Is that correct?
	Well, on this point here, right, we've got some nice little commercial satellite images and there are a lot of people looking at the test site and they've got a great big massive mound of dirt they've dug out and they do appear to be wanting to do a sixth standard nuclear test at their proving ground, yeah?
	Now, as I said before when I gave you the listing, The yield they've achieved so far in their test is about 11,600 tons of TNT. They're on par with early devices.
	But it makes sense that they're not quite doubling it Based on the last one, they're actually almost doubling it.
	So then they might go to the level of, I don't know if it's Hiroshima or what, but the 19.
	They might get from 11 to 19.
	Is that kind of where you...
	The mind of that, yeah.
	This is one of the things that they've mentioned.
	You see, I don't think that they are triggering...
	Totally crude atomic devices like we made in the 40s and 50s.
	We've done so much technology-wise.
	And they were making references that these were not standard atom bombs using pure fission.
	They were saying these were hydrogen bombs using fusion.
	Now, hydrogen bombs or thermonuclear bombs, they get you into the megaton range.
	So they may well be using fusion, but still giving you these smaller yields, if what this is right.
	But what I'm saying is this, Gary.
	I think that what is worrying people is what we seem to have here is they've achieved certain yields with their nuclear weapons around about 5.3-ish, yeah.
	They may want to do another test, and if they do, we might see that the value is maybe for, you know, instead of being 5.3 on the scale, it might be 5.7 or 6.0, who knows?
	They could then demonstrate that they are, I don't know, 50 kilotons, you know, 50,000 tons, something like that.
	But it seems to me that there's a kind of a worry that if they can achieve those yields with their nuclear weapons, that they may well be able to achieve comparable yields, so to speak, with scale interferometers, which they appear to have demonstrated they've got this technology.
	In other words, they could transmit the power of a nuclear explosion at a distance from Using these devices without, you know, having to deliver a nuclear warhead saved by a missile or something like that, yeah?
	And this is why when I think about your carrier fleets, you know, your ships that Donald Trump's ordered into the region, yeah?
	And we're getting all these statements by, you know, North Korea, Kim Jong-un, you know.
	And you don't know whether some of them are lost in translation because some of them almost seem like joking, like cartoon Dr.
	Eve lost in power sight things, you know.
	We've got a super mighty strike we're going to do against you.
	We're going to turn your aircraft carriers to ashes and all.
	You know what I mean?
	They come across as a bit bizarre, and I'm sure this is the mainstream press.
	They always like to try and make North Korea look nuts.
	I mean, let's face it.
	But the threats...
	I think there's something incredible about them.
	I think that this guy, they may have these weapon systems, they seem to have, and he may well be convinced that he has a shot, he has a chance of using them to trigger blasts, energetic blasts, not below ground as seismic signatures, but you can create, using these scale interferometers, massive pulses of expanding energy spheres.
	And this is actually one of the things that He mentions in his book here.
	I wonder if I could hold this up.
	Here we go.
	This is Thomas Bearden's book.
	And he talks about the effects then of scaling interferometry.
	And one of them is this.
	And this is the expanding sphere of what looks like a mushroom cloud.
	This actually is like 380 miles across actually.
	These are the really powerful devices used.
	And they produce all kinds of Massive effects to take out.
	He even says it here, and I'll just read it.
	It says, superpotential interferometry using longitudinal EM waves.
	That's the longitudinal electromagnetic wave.
	That's the scalar beams.
	It says, cold explosion just above surface, brackets, as anti-ship dash or anti-fleet, yeah, in brackets.
	And they talk about how these kinds of weapon systems can be used in this way to really attack the Surface fleets, ships, that kind of thing.
	So, if you think about this particular test that has been done, and this was in 2014, so this was three years ago.
	If this test is a North Korean test, and my evaluation here convinces me that's very, very likely.
	I think, you know, the signature of it is definitely nuclear, even though it says it's a seismic event.
	And the ARC measures are so closely related to known Korean tests makes me think, yes, they have this kind of technology.
	Could they deploy this against U.S. surface fleets?
	Yeah.
	Possibly.
	Quite possibly.
	Okay.
	So, but this is speculation and, you know, and I do appreciate what you're saying, obviously, and everyone needs to take note of this.
	And, of course, Our military is going to be well aware of these kinds of contingencies.
	But at this time, I think what it would be interesting to do is also to possibly look at the Courtney Brown, Dick Allgaier viewing that he did in, I guess it must have been in April, of a so-called...
	Event that hits the newspapers that will be a very large event and something that will outshine all the other possible events to hit the news.
	And what he is basically seeing is some kind of, well, troop deployment, it appears.
	And in a country that seems to have water alongside it, if I understand it.
	So you can clarify that if you'd like.
	But we don't want to go too much in detail into the Courtney Brown thing because that's kind of a separate issue.
	And we don't even know if that's really what he...
	if he was seeing some possible event.
	But what you're basically saying is that technology exists and likely they have it and that there are...
	Are these indicators that you've demonstrated for us?
	And we can go into more detail about that at some...
	You certainly can on your website.
	So at this moment, you're saying this is a possible eventuality if they wanted to do it.
	Of course, we don't want them to do it and we'd like to prevent this, obviously.
	And there is reason to believe that Newspapers like the Daily Mail, for example, will be putting something out there in order to alert the public, but at the same time, maybe take them off track.
	They're actually talking about use of a satellite in the recent article, two satellites, in fact, over the U.S. So they're kind of indicating that there would be some targeted, you know, something aimed at the U.S. as opposed to what you're saying It's a fleet, or could be a fleet, right?
	Well, as I said, regarding the far side to study, my understanding of it is, it's specifically this time cross project that Courtney's set up, yeah?
	And what they do is they get some remote viewers, about three or four of them, and they do some remote viewings, right, a month in advance.
	So in the month of April, They've all done a remote viewing session and the the project is basically for the viewers they're working totally blind and they've just got the general question is what is going to be the biggest news story event in the month afterwards yes if they're doing the viewing in April the question is what's going to be the biggest news story in May and they're working totally blind so they could come up with anything basically yeah but They're basically looking
	at events which are not scheduled, so there's got to be no time.
	They're not anything that's publicly on the listings.
	This is one of the rules that Courtney has.
	So it's got to be something a bit unexpected.
	And with reference to the far site viewing then, and I'm sure you put the link to the latest time across the description of this video, okay, when it goes out.
	But what it does is, for the May viewing, which they published, again, just, well, they always do it, they publish it like the first day of the month for May or whatever, Yeah, and it's what the remote viewers have done in April, so you can view it.
	There is a particular viewing session that Dick Algey has done where he's describing what looks to be some kind of rocky sort of area, yeah, and it's highly surveilled, you know, and then he talks about a massive force he feels going underground that mimics an earthquake.
	This is what he actually says, and he even writes...
	All these descriptions on this particular piece.
	Personally speaking, we're all aware of the fact that there's been various hints and threats by the North Koreans.
	They want to do more nuclear tests.
	We've got certain articles saying They prepped one of the sites.
	They've taken out lots of earth from a certain mine shaft.
	There's activity there.
	We've got this commercial satellite.
	And so I must admit, when I saw Decalgei's session in particular talking about an underground explosion, very powerful, that mimics an earthquake, my own, it's just purely my own interpretation, I thought, maybe this refers...
	To the North Koreans actually going ahead in May and conducting their sixth nuclear test.
	And some of the other viewers in particular as well, they talk about all kinds of military operations.
	And again, it's just my own personal view.
	We'll have to see.
	But they all seem to be, for me, seemingly hinting at some kind of military response involving some sort of troops going into parachutes or whatever you're One of them even draws a picture of...
	I don't say it, but again, it's just my working theory.
	It almost looks like a speech made by Donald Trump saying something about we need effectively to do some military action, and he doesn't like it, but he thinks he needs to do it.
	And when you think about...
	What Donald Trump's done recently, just recently, he launched some kind of Tomahawk missile strike at Syria because of this sarin gas story, which may or may not be a false flag.
	He's launched this Moab bomb at Afghanistan, the massive ordnance air burst, and then he's got all these carriers he's ordered to the North Korean area, and he's saying, you know, saying, we don't want you to be doing any more testing or whatever.
	And it just makes me think, when I'm seeing this remote viewing that Dick Algar has done, my own interpretation is I just think this has to be North Korea going ahead with his test.
	And then I think, well, Donald Trump has really set himself up here because how can he not respond militarily?
	How can he not do some kind of punishment strike against North Korea if they do it after what he's done to Syria and Afghanistan and moving all the aircraft carriers there?
	You know what I mean?
	So it's just something on my mind that...
	Yeah, no, I mean, I totally appreciate that, and that's why we're doing the show.
	But at the moment, and I'm going to put this link to Dick Algar and to the minutes where he specifically relates this information on his viewing.
	And again, we are saying here that this is speculative only.
	So you're not actually...
	You have no idea whether Dick Allgaier had this in mind and whether he even thinks it's in that part of the globe, as often they do when they remote view.
	They say where they think it might happen.
	I have no idea what Dick Allgaier's view is on his own viewing or what the position is.
	The Farsight does come out with their own summary of what they think it means, but they do that after the month has passed.
	So I'm just telling you, just based on my own personal viewing, that Dick Helge's session, to me, it hints at North Korea doing this test.
	That's my own interpretation, but I don't know whether it'd feel the same or anything.
	Yeah, for sure.
	Okay, you know, I'm just the caveat there.
	So, in terms of looking at the situation, though, and in terms of what you're doing, analyzing this, have you ever...
	May I ask, have you ever tried to get in touch with a military person or a person who used to be in the military to run some of your theories by them?
	Have you ever gotten any kind of validation from someone who works with, let's say, nuclear weapons as to the arc length?
	Connections and so on because as you demonstrate mathematically that it looks compelling But I'm just curious whether you've gotten any validation from anyone.
	Well, I don't know but Bruce Cathy did because it's an extension of his work and all right, this is his book here right and When in 1968 right this is how long it goes back.
	Yeah, the French were doing some tests right in 1968 and And they detonated one device, I think it was Canopus, the highest yield device they detonated, August 25th.
	And he was asked to give in advance because he thought, oh, they're related to the sun.
	He'll do some analysis.
	He'll look at some of the tables.
	And somebody challenged him and said, you know, can you tell us when the next French test will be?
	And so this is exactly what he did.
	He wrote down in advance...
	What he thought the next tests were going to be in sequence.
	And you can see, well, you might not be able to, one year, 8th of September, 22 hours, 50 minutes, GMT. That's what he thought it'd be.
	And this was a few weeks in advance.
	The actual was 8th of September, exactly the same day, and it was 1,900 hours.
	So it was just a few hours off.
	And he had it stamped 5th of September, giving him official acknowledgement.
	That he did produce this, you know, this is the official meteorological office, yeah, before the test went off.
	And he himself did have contacts, and he relates this in his books, that when he started talking about this, and he was successful in just forecasting one or two others, like Kanakim.
	So he has had those intelligence contacts that you're talking about, Kerry.
	This is all, like, ancient history as far as he's concerned.
	I've not personally had them, but He has, and he did confirm, he got confirmation that these guys, they know full well that the sun is a critical factor in triggering nuclear explosions.
	And because of that, it is possible if you know where somebody has set up a device to do a test, you could say when they're going to trigger it.
	Okay, well, along those lines, then, let's extend that and say that we know where they've conducted the tests in the past, isn't that right?
	The five tests, you have the locations, you showed us that little map, I believe, right?
	So do you know where the next one would be?
	And can you therefore extrapolate, you know, from there?
	Have you tried to do that sort of thing?
	I have a, Kerry.
	Actually, let me just do a screen share with you again.
	Let me show you something.
	All right.
	Yeah, screens.
	Share your screen.
	Start.
	We're in this database, yeah?
	Right.
	This is the May forecast I've made.
	I've actually, I've had a bit of an evaluation, and again, this is speculative because it's like what Cathy did.
	You can come up with a series of, you know, answers, but You don't know for certain.
	So this one here then, I've done a forecast beginning here, May the 12th, going to May 20th.
	I've only done the past few days in a row.
	And what I've done is I've assumed, if you can see here, bump coordinates.
	These are the coordinates.
	I can only work with the coordinates of other test devices.
	So this is the coordinates.
	These are the coordinates, latitude and longitude.
	Of the last test they did, the 5.3 one, yeah?
	And so I said, okay, they tend to like do them at roughly half hour intervals, possibly, but slightly different in the early morning.
	So I've come up with a few possible ideas on when they might do it.
	So these are all universal time, 12th of May, 2017, 30 minutes past midnight, yeah?
	And again, latitude separation arc here.
	This is one of the key ones.
	And I said, well, if we have that one there, For this time here, yeah?
	It turns out that this has got a relationship to Tsar Bomber here, which, again, if you step down, you get 0.36.
	Nice ratio.
	So this one's for 12th of May.
	Another one here is for 13th of May.
	3.30 universal time.
	And again, similar ratios.
	And I'll just show you again.
	This is at 14th, 2.30.
	15th, 1 o'clock.
	16th, 13...
	30 minutes past, 18th, 3.30, and then we've got the 20th.
	I ain't chosen every day.
	I think there's one or two days I don't really get much going, but I've looked at some of the patterns.
	I said that the ratios are complex, they're subtle.
	I mean, I might be wrong about these, but I tried my hand at it and I said, well, you know, I've done an analysis of possible times when they may do this test at their test site then, and these are all kind of on record here.
	So, That's what we've got, so...
	Okay, well, now from the point of view of on a more sort of psychic, spiritual kind of connection, the idea would be that if you publish something like this, and this is obviously going live, so it's going to be out there, but in essence, you can imagine some North Koreans might find this broadcast interesting.
	At the very least.
	And certainly the U.S. military and so on and so forth.
	But they, I'm sure, have come to some of these conclusions on their own in different ways, maybe using your exact method or maybe using other methods that we're not even party to.
	So it is interesting.
	It's possibly a deterrent, is my point here, that if we talk about this and out it, And put the eventuality out there.
	Then the element of surprise is gone.
	And it can actually be planned, you know, against.
	You can plan against such an event.
	So in sort of an answer to some people out there that want to say, oh, this is fear-mongering, etc.
	What we're looking to do here is expose things that are possibly going on behind the scenes.
	Put the, you know, shine the light of day on them.
	And then see what happens.
	And it is interesting that in what's going on here, you're also, I believe, you know, Ed Dames at some point in the past has highlighted Korea, North Korea, and a possible nuke and or EMP event associated with North Korea, whether it actually happens or whether it's a threat.
	I don't know.
	But this is certainly something that is linked to these articles in the Daily Mail, which is a British newspaper.
	And I don't know whether we have some similar articles in the U.S. press, but it's very possible.
	But we'd have to do a search.
	I haven't had time to do that at this point.
	So, just to kind of, you know, not to sort of belabor the point, although we can take questions from the chat if you'd like for a short time.
	I am doing a later broadcast tonight.
	This was sort of an impromptu, as I said, broadcast, so don't want to last too long.
	I am interviewing Joanne Richards, Mark Richards' wife, about his work, and she is a speaker on the circuit and very knowledgeable, so that will be quite fascinating tonight at 7 p.m.
	on this channel, my YouTube channel, as you know.
	This will be available for people to watch as well.
	It goes up, the minute we shut it down here, it goes automatically onto my YouTube channel.
	And you can watch it from the very beginning if you joined us late.
	So, Keith, do you want to say some possibly wrap-up comments and or take some questions from the chat at this point?
	I'll just briefly summarize it again and take some questions.
	It's like you say, I don't think anything's written in stone.
	And I remember the other remote viewing project that Courtney did about the...
	It was supposedly a climate one.
	And it looked like major meteor strike, you know, major meteor strike was going to hit the earth.
	You did a big interview about 2012 on this one.
	And again, it looked like two thirds of the remote viewers seemed to see a massive impact strike, you know, and then the other third, everything was fine.
	You know what I mean?
	And I think that was tied into the DA14, whether it broke up or not, and there were different timelines.
	In the same way then with this remote viewing here.
	There's nothing set in stone.
	We don't know for certain that North Korea will go ahead and do this test.
	We don't know for certain that what Dick Algeist said, you know, what he viewed there was in fact the North Koreans doing a test.
	We don't know for certain.
	I mean, for my own part, it's just purely my own interpretation.
	I think it is referring to a North Korean test, but even if it is, they may not decide to do it in May.
	They may call it off.
	We don't know.
	As far as the scalar beams go, I do think, based upon what I've at least done myself, my own view is they do seem to have this technology at some level.
	It may be rudimentary.
	It may not be that powerful.
	But remember I showed you the Japanese earthquake.
	Somebody, I think, used scalar beams to trigger that, a 9.0 earthquake.
	Now, if you use the same equation to translate that Seismic Signature 9.0 into a nuclear weapon yield, you get about 74 megatons of TNT. Now, the high steel device that's been detonated officially is the Soviet Tsar bomber at 58 megatons.
	So you're commanding yields on par with massive nuclear explosions.
	So whether or not they have scale interferometers in North Korea, which could produce Very powerful energy signatures.
	I don't know.
	They may only be limited to energy values close to what they can command with their nuclear yields so far.
	But again, we don't know.
	It's possible though that they...
	They have a potential credible threat if they could use these devices, if the naval fleet went into certain areas and at certain times, again, they trigger them at the right moment, they could cause expanding balls of light, that kind of thing.
	But again, this assumes an escalational situation.
	We don't know for certain what's going to happen.
	And even those forecasts I've given you, they're speculative.
	They could all, every single one of them, be valid signatures energy-wise for triggering their tests.
	They might not use any of them.
	You know, they might not use anything.
	We'll have to see.
	What happens there.
	But yeah, I don't mind taking some questions in the chat room, is it?
	Yes, it is.
	All right.
	So we have a couple of questions that did crop up.
	I'll just jump on one of them.
	It says, how do you create energy tech if it can be seen from anywhere by governments?
	Oh, free energy technology companies.
	Knowing that free energy technology has a sort of a signature, and we have been told this, actually, and they do track this kind of inventions.
	So I'm not sure how that relates to what we're talking about, but go ahead and take a stab at it if you'd like.
	I'm not entirely sure.
	I think I might have heard something similar, but this has been back a few years.
	It's almost like a Star Trek thing.
	You know, like when they're going to orbit around a new planet and they say, do a center sweep, and then little blips pop up, little locations say, oh, there's such and such located ores here and there and whatever.
	Are you saying like that if a person activates, you know, some garbage inventor activates a little energy device that...
	They've got sensors that can...
	Oh, look, there he is.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Is that what you mean?
	Yes, they do have that.
	Yeah.
	Well, I don't know.
	It's just something I've heard.
	I've got nothing to confirm or deny.
	I've got no inside information on that at all.
	It's just something I've heard, so I can always say I've heard it.
	All right.
	Let me see.
	I'm looking to see if there's any...
	Actually, that was in caps.
	um okay I don't know if this is a joke question so I think I'm not going to ask that one It doesn't make sense.
	Is scalar tech being used for mind control of the masses to hide the fact that the Earth is flat?
	I'm not sure that sounds like a joke question as well, but you can answer it if you like.
	Never go full flat Earth, Kerry, that's all I can say.
	Well, I certainly won't myself.
	Let me see.
	So someone is asking kind of on a more literal level, will North Korea attempt to hit Japan, Australia or U.S. in a possible nuclear strike? Australia or U.S. in a possible nuclear strike?
	The whole point of this discussion has been that actually they're not going to be using a nuke if they did try to strike.
	But go ahead and address that, Keith.
	What I'd say is, I mean, this is just my own personal opinion.
	I think if they are provoked, they might strike.
	And this is the thing.
	They want to do some more nuclear tests, right?
	If they go ahead and do this test, you know, because of the activity at the test site, it looks like they've got something set up They've got a device in the ground.
	They've got certain signatures related to the sun.
	You know, they want to do this test.
	I'm sure they'd be happy to just do this test and hopefully nobody will bother them.
	But the problem is, will it provoke a response from, say, the West?
	Will Donald Trump want to do a punishment military strike on them?
	If something like that were done, would they strike back?
	I think it's possible.
	They might strike back in and go try something, you know?
	Well, I think we're really talking...
	Yeah, I appreciate that, but I think we're talking about what you call mutually assured destruction in those cases.
	And so, you know, I'm not sure going down that road is going to bring us anything of value, if you will.
	Well, again, the issue, I suppose, is Would we want North Korea to continue to develop scalar interferometers, continue to experiment in causing higher magnitude earthquakes?
	Well, I mean, considering the tech is already out there, and you're talking about it as a layperson, so to speak, certainly scientists like Tom Bearden have been talking about it in quite sophisticated books.
	And so, you know, in other words, the tech is out there.
	The intellectual property is out there.
	So whether they do it or not is simply, you know, the next step.
	As far as we know...
	If men think of it, they actually try to attempt it at some point.
	So it's kind of a no-brainer that this sort of thing goes on.
	Whether they actually decide to attack their fellow man is a whole other ballgame.
	And then we're talking about other things such as bring forward that notion of what we call MAD, mutually assured destruction.
	And they have to contend with that.
	And...
	Pre-emptive strike also has to be thrown into that mix as well.
	Someone wants to know, this is a good question here, any words about the upcoming solar minimum and are you looking at that at all?
	Not really.
	I must admit I'm not looking at all the space weather things so much.
	I mean if people are thinking about this maybe in terms of Global catastrophe, a la biblical prophecy, that kind of stuff.
	I made a decisive breakthrough in these cycles of destruction tied into that kind of thing, so I'm very satisfied that we're not going to have a major conjunction event, I don't think at least, which will trigger Massive global devastation that we could have.
	Actually, you know what, I appreciate that, but I think that the question, correct me if I'm wrong and someone can rephrase it in the chat if they like, but I actually thought they were asking you if the Sun contributes to escalating the sort of megaton capacity or yield of these events, will the solar minimum then indicate that they have less of a window to do these kinds of things?
	That is one of these questions which, I must admit, I have no idea.
	I literally have no idea.
	I mean, obviously, all I've got are patterns here.
	The full technical details of how the signatures, you know, boost the power or allow them to create powerful bombs, that would be highly classified.
	That's something I don't really know the answer to.
	So the precise way in which the sun, in terms of the state of the energy of the sun, Relates to these devices, I must admit I have no idea.
	Yeah, I mean, I think it is, but it is sort of interesting to contemplate.
	If I understand solar minimum means that the kind of, you know, what they call the waves that come off the sun...
	Aimed at the earth or potentially hitting the earth could be like more or less.
	In other words, it's ejecta from the sun.
	The sun is still a standard body.
	So regardless of what is coming off it, whether it's very active or not very active, it's still this huge body that when, as you say, when there's a resonance, it's not going to really change that resonance necessarily.
	Unless you have a way to capture one of those, the ejecta from the sun, so to speak, at the same time, if that makes any sense.
	Yeah, vaguely.
	I think, you know, when it comes to the sun, this is something I discuss in my book regarding the positions of the planets.
	On the one hand, you've got all the light from the electromagnetic spectrum, but then you have...
	What I think are long range, long period, long wavelength, scalar waves.
	And these are peaks and troughs going away from the Sun.
	And so the planets are locked into them, yeah?
	They're locked into their own little gravity well troughs.
	So I think there's a tie-in between all the light waves creating the scalar waves which establish and keep the planets in their positions.
	Yeah, there is a subtle tie-in there.
	So...
	I would imagine that surface activity turbulence associated with the Sun is disruptive to some extent of the planets in orbit.
	And in extreme situations where you have special conjunction patterns, that's when the gravity waves suffer agitation.
	They can almost collapse momentarily and the planets temporarily, just briefly, almost drift.
	And then they're recaptured when the Sun stabilizes.
	Well, then why, or have you, Not wrapped in the astrological sort of alignments, looking forward to these various predictions that you are theoretically making.
	Wouldn't you want to do that, you know, at the same time?
	Look, the analysis purely of the positions of the Sun via, you know, what I've done here is very exacting and very precise.
	And it's got nothing to do, essentially, with the background stars, the background star field, yeah?
	Now, saying that, when it comes down to long-range cycles, conjunction patterns, destruction, yeah?
	They're usually targeting certain very precise areas of the sky.
	It seems like that.
	They seem to be targeting certain areas.
	In order for these destructive effects to occur.
	This is why I don't think that conjunctions of a certain type necessarily will always result in, you know, say earthquakes.
	They have to be in a certain part of the sky.
	I think it's very complicated.
	I'm certainly not an expert in astrological systems.
	I've not really gone into that in terms of psychology, you know, birth charts and horoscopes and that kind of stuff.
	I've never looked into it.
	For me, this is like purely a numbers game and looking at relationships between them.
	See, I always had fascinating, as I said, with the ancient myth stuff.
	And some of them are related to periodic, you know, catastrophes, real disasters, which are related to conjunctions.
	So that's an area I've looked at.
	That's very much a grander scale than looking at, say, Earthquakes and nuclear weapons.
	Well, you know, Paul LaViolette, he does tend to look at some of these things when he is contemplating what is, you know, basically going on in space.
	And, you know, I can't cite any particular examples of it.
	There could be some reasons to do those link-ups as well, especially if you get into the area of what you call predictions, right?
	I've got more remote viewing than anything else when it comes to predictions, to be honest.
	I've got blind remote viewers and necessarily looking at chat conjunction patterns.
	Conjunction patterns, as I said, I was interested in the grand conjunctions that destabilize the solar system.
	And I'm very happy that several months ago...
	I made the critical breakthrough.
	It's practically a topic for an entire new book, but I might write it up on my website and put the essays on there because it takes me years to write books.
	Okay, well, I appreciate that.
	All right, so I guess what we'll do here is wrap this up.
	I want to thank you so much for coming on the show.
	You know, it's a fascinating study for sure, and And perhaps, you know, making people aware of these eventualities and what might be going on behind the scenes is worthwhile.
	It's important that humans know what may be in the offing or planned by certain governments, etc., that may affect them.
	And it's also a cautionary tale, so to speak, to basically make other people aware that this is not a great sort of Way to go for humanity in any case for us to have a world war, etc.
	And whether they're planning this on purpose or it has any sort of blowback, you know, even the fact that they're working in this way and the fact that they want to do more tests, etc., I do think it's important.
	Again, I think that you're talking about something that isn't nuclear, if I understand it.
	We're talking about scalar waves.
	We're talking about interfering scalar waves.
	So that you're calling it a nuclear test, but on the other hand, it's really not a nuclear test.
	No, no, no.
	I think we mix a bit.
	They are doing a nuclear program.
	They have got...
	Yes, I understand that.
	They're wanting to do a sixth normal, if you will, nuclear test, right?
	Supposedly.
	Well, yeah.
	In addition to that, I'm just saying that I do believe they have the capabilities of triggering events via scalar beams, which could be seismic events.
	Okay, can you hold on one second?
	Just hold on.
	I have somebody at the door.
	Hi.
	Hi, I'm going to do the dryer.
	Okay, can you hold on one second?
	I'm just going to...
	Oh, God.
	Okay, some workman person wants to, you know, fix something in my apartment.
	I don't know what it is, actually.
	But it has to do, supposedly.
	Anyway, so I got to get off the air here.
	Sorry.
	But thanks, everyone, for watching.
	Thanks very much, Keith, for going into this with us.
	And it's fascinating.
	And stay in touch.
	And let's track this and see...
	What goes on also with the remote viewing that recently happened and see if there's any correlation when they do do their report, which it will come out at some point, I imagine.
	So any last parting words and I really have to go.
	Thanks.
	No, no, I won't keep you.
	Just check the idea that guy at Dole, though.
	All right.
	Okay.
	Very good.
	Okay.
	And we'll put your link to your website.
	And certainly if you make any videos about this more extensively, we can link to those for you on this page.
	Okay?
	Okay.
	All right.
	So thank you very much.
	And as I say, I have to go.
	Thank you for watching.
	And I'll be back tonight at 7 p.m.
	Okay.
	Take care.
	Bye-bye.

▲