PBD - Patrick Bet-David - S&P 500 Dives As Trump Hints At Recession Fears | PBD Podcast

March 11, 2025 - PBD - Patrick Bet-David

02:35:34

S&P 500 Dives As Trump Hints At Recession Fears | PBD Podcast | Ep. 559

Patrick Bet-David, Adam Sosick, Tom Ellsworth and Vincent Oshana cover the S&P 500 dropping as Trump hints at a recession, Tucker Carlson calling out Tom Cotton over the JFK files release, Stephen A Smith getting confronted by LeBron James, and Mark Carney replacing Justin Trudeau! ------ 🍦 PBD'S INTERVIEW WITH BEN & JERRY'S CO-FOUNDER - WED, 3/12 @ 9AM: https://bit.ly/3XG6sjk 📕 CELEBRATE NATIONAL READING MONTH: https://bit.ly/43xPwPI 👕 GET THE LATEST VT MERCH: https://bit.ly/3BZbD6l 📰 VTNEWS.AI: ⁠⁠⁠https://bit.ly/3OExClZ 🎙️ FOLLOW THE PODCAST ON SPOTIFY: ⁠⁠https://bit.ly/4g57zR2 🎙️ FOLLOW THE PODCAST ON ITUNES: ⁠⁠https://bit.ly/4g1bXAh 🎙️ FOLLOW THE PODCAST ON ALL PLATFORMS: https://bit.ly/4eXQl6A 📱 CONNECT ON MINNECT: ⁠⁠https://bit.ly/4ikyEkC 👔 BET-DAVID CONSULTING: ⁠⁠https://bit.ly/3ZjWhB7 🎓 VALUETAINMENT UNIVERSITY: ⁠⁠https://bit.ly/3BfA5Qw 📺 JOIN THE CHANNEL: ⁠⁠⁠https://bit.ly/4g5C6Or 💬 TEXT US: Text “PODCAST” to 310-340-1132 to get the latest updates in real-time! SUBSCRIBE TO: @VALUETAINMENT @ValuetainmentComedy @theunusualsuspectspodcast @bizdocpodcast TIME STAMPS: 00:00 - Show intro 01:35 - Topics coming up on the podcast. 06:30 - 📕 CELEBRATE NATIONAL READING MONTH: https://bit.ly/43xPwPI 08:03 - Trump's uncomfortable hug on Melania Trump. 14:47 - S&P 500 drops 900 points as Trump tariffs goe into effect. 35:56 - Mexico President says country will avoid reciprocal tariffs. 40:45 - Trump's letter to Iran over nuclear agreeement. 47:40 - Tucker Carlson says Tom Cotton shutting down JFK files release. 1:01:00 - Anna Paulina calls out U.S. intelligence over Epstein files release. 1:17:08 - American sympathies for Israel drops to all time low. 1:43:43 - The View has Dylan Mulvaney on to celebrate International Women's Day. 1:55:37 - LeBron James confronts Stephen A Smith at Lakers game. 2:08:25 - Jasmine Crockett says it's not a crime to enter the country illegal. 2:15:20 - Mark Carney replaced Justin Trudeau. 2:25:40 - Trump calls for Thomas Massie to be primaried. ABOUT US: Patrick Bet-David is the founder and CEO of Valuetainment Media. He is the author of the #1 Wall Street Journal Bestseller “Your Next Five Moves” (Simon & Schuster) and a father of 2 boys and 2 girls. He currently resides in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida.

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Did you ever think you would make it?
	You want to feel on something secondary, sweetie bit?
	Know this life meant for me.
	Adam, what you're doing?
	The future looks bright.
	Handshake is better than anything I ever saw.
	It's right here.
	You are a one-on-one?
	My son's right there.
	I don't think I've ever said this before.
	Okay, so we are officially live.
	Episode 559, gang.
	This is a new set.
	We got an upgrade.
	We're at this new set we got here at this house somewhere off-site.
	And for those of you that want to see what happened this morning, okay, Adam slept at this house.
	The crew's been setting up.
	And guess who was late for set up this morning?
	His room is behind this wall right here, okay?
	If you want to see the clip on Adam waking up late to be here, we've been here already waiting for him.
	Go to Maneck, download the app and join the PBD podcast circle.
	Let me give a quick shout out to some of the guys that are members already there.
	A bunch of guys are responding in the back.
	Kim Smith, Roque Irwin, Vincent Dillman.
	I'm not going to get all of you.
	Jim Kaiser, Sean Ogassian, Oganessian, Steve Krugen, Cholinski, Teak Beckian, Maura, Lardieri.
	We got a bunch of guys.
	Mickey Sausage DeAngelis.
	What a great name.
	Anyways, go join the circle of PBD podcasts.
	We communicate throughout the day and the week on the stories we want to talk about.
	Anyways, let's get into some of the stories that we got here.
	Trump and Thomas Massey, we'll talk about that.
	Trump is not happy with Thomas Massey for not approving it.
	Thomas Massey responds back with a tweet.
	There's a ton of people supporting Massey, and there's a ton of people that are saying Massey's getting in the way.
	We'll give our thoughts on that on what's going on there.
	Representative Al Green blames discrimination for being censored after disrupting the Trump speech.
	We'll have that for you as well.
	Freer of Trump has elite law firms in retreat.
	Law firms are afraid.
	Has to do a little bit with Soros.
	Hang tight.
	We'll come to.
	That's a WHA story.
	Trump sends a letter to Iran on nuclear program, make a deal or face U.S. military.
	We'll see what that means and if that threat works.
	When it comes down to tariffs, guys, there's a lot of stories on tariffs.
	A lot.
	China, Mexico.
	China put a 100% tariff on certain products on Canada, which is kind of weird.
	Tom's got some thoughts on that.
	And then Commerce Secretary Lutnick emphatically shoots down recession concerns.
	There's a lot of people talking about potential recessions, especially yesterday after Dow lost.
	Was it 900 points in a daytime?
	Was it Dow?
	And apparently, Tesla, there's a story of Tesla losing.
	Is that the accurate number?
	$700 billion of valuation, or is that just from the market?
	That's cumulative.
	A cumulative $700 billion of gains lost.
	Tesla stock nosedives since the victory.
	We'll talk about what that really means there.
	Then we have the Democratic frontrunner for 2020.
	It goes after his own party.
	Guess who they're talking about?
	LA Times, Mayor Karen Bass, tell me if you're surprised by this, is deleting text messages.
	She is deleting her text messages.
	Guess who reported on that story?
	LA Times.
	Guess who typically defends everything the left does?
	LA Times.
	LA Times has even done with their own mayor.
	American sympathies for Israelis fall to record low.
	Poll finds.
	We have Adam here to give us an update on what's going on over there.
	Hundreds of minorities, including Christians, killed in Syria.
	When you see these stories, devastating.
	And this happening in a place where a lot of me and Vinny's family, Assyrians, came from, which we'll discuss that as well here in a minute.
	U.S. makes fresh push for World Bank to back nuclear power.
	U.S. and exploratory talks with D.R. Congo over mineral deals.
	Rebuilding LA's economic moment of truth.
	That's an LA Times story.
	Job cuts ready has surged 245% in February on federal government layoffs.
	Jerome Powell says, don't worry about the, you know, he's not worried too much about what's going on with the job reports that came in.
	And he's not in a hurry to cut rates, which some people aren't happy about that.
	Canada, Mark Carney, wins race to replace Trudeau as Canada's prime minister.
	This guy's a former WF guy, former Bank of England governor.
	Again, we'll talk about that.
	We'll talk about Tesla stock.
	Bill Maher slams liberal MSNBC, obsessive fact-checking of Trump.
	Stephen A. Smith gets his $100 million contract.
	And right after he gets his $100 million contract, he gets into a fight with LeBron Jim.
	LeBron James walks up to him in the middle of the game.
	There's a bunch of exchange.
	I got my thoughts.
	I know Vinny does as well.
	We'll cover that.
	Disturbing Ana Paulina calls that DOJ silence, urging Bondi to release the Epstein files.
	Why don't we not know about the Epstein files?
	A lot of people are not happy about that.
	Biden uses auto-pen signature on many official White House docs.
	You know what that is?
	It's like, you don't sign it.
	It's auto-penned like, you know, like stamp, like somebody else can sign on behalf of you while you're golfing or while you're in Delaware at the beach getting some sun.
	Anyways, that's pretty concerning.
	Some people are worried about it.
	There's a video of Biden hugging Melania and the hand goes slightly lower.
	She gets uncomfortable, moves a step towards Trump.
	Trump hugs her, asks her what just happened, then whispers something to Biden.
	Then everybody comes in.
	If you haven't seen this, it's a spectacle.
	Jasmine Crockett insists it's not a crime to illegally cross the border.
	Brilliant.
	Trump warns the rest of Palestinian activists that Colombia will be first of many.
	And we got a bunch of other stories here.
	Whoopi Goldberg made some comments on, you know, International Women's Day.
	And by the way, you won't believe who they had as their guest for International Women's Day.
	Let me say it again.
	You will not believe, though, maybe you will believe who they had as their guests on International Women's Day.
	Tucker Carlson calls out one of the senators on a conversation with Cuomo that's holding back many of the releases of the JFK files, which is kind of weird.
	And then there was a cyber attack on X, you know, a bunch of other stories we got here that we may go through.
	All right, before we get into it, guys, March is known as the, Rob, March is known for what?
	What is it called?
	National Book Month.
	National Book Month.
	And here's what we're doing for this month for March.
	It's funny, I had a couple book recommendations for my son I gave.
	Vinny, you're reading a book that's pretty insane on the way down here.
	Oh, yeah.
	Yeah, but there's for those of you guys that are big readers, if you haven't yet read Choose Your Enemies Wisely, The Academy, or your next five moves.
	If you're a parent, you want your kids to be thinking so they can think for themselves so the educational system can't brainwash them.
	Go order the Academy for them.
	Both my boys have read that book, 1112.
	I think anything above 11 is good for that book.
	But if you order any of these books this month, we're sending you custom bookmarks.
	Rob, can you show some of the custom bookmarks?
	That's the Valutamen one.
	We have a couple other ones.
	We have the Academy one.
	We have the Valutamin one.
	We have the What's Your Next Moves.
	Anybody that orders a book, we send you three bookmarks with any of the books.
	Go to vtmerch.com.
	All the books are signed.
	You can pick up any one of them you want at vtmerch.com.
	Get reading, folks.
	Get reading so you cannot be brainwashed by the people that are trying to do it to you, whether it's the mainstream media, whether it's teachers to your kids.
	Get yourself on the kids' reading so you can be liberated.
	All right, let's get into the podcast.
	First story I want to get into for me is what happened with the president and Biden.
	A little bit awkward, a little bit weird.
	Rob, if you can play this clip.
	So, Vinny, help us understand when this clip is from and what's going on here between President Trump, Belania, Jill, and Biden.
	Okay, so at this point, Trump has been sworn in.
	They're outside.
	They're waiting for Maureen One to show up to get Biden and Jill to put them on their farewell.
	So, as he's sitting there, you see Joe Biden, and I'll get into the history of him after we see the video because I have my thoughts.
	You guys are going to watch.
	He puts his hand.
	First of all, you should not be touching the first lady, period.
	Nobody's touching Jill.
	Nobody's asking the doctor for any help or anything.
	He puts his hand on her back.
	It's a long moment.
	And then as he's leaving, he kind of swipes down on her butt.
	You're going to be able to see.
	And then do they show both angles?
	They show this angle and then they show the back.
	Oh, yeah, you're going to see it.
	Rob, play the clip.
	And then you're going to see Trump lean in and then he brings him close.
	Like, you know what it is, Pat.
	You bring her close to you.
	I understand.
	And then it's an awkward moment because everybody scrambles as to say what's going on.
	What I want you to, folks, if you watch this, it's very simple.
	If you're married, specifically if you're married, okay, to the people that are married, are you okay with this?
	Is this appropriate?
	Is this inappropriate?
	Watch the clip.
	Go forward, Rob.
	Okay, so yeah, conversation.
	Look at Trump.
	Trump's trying to see what he's saying to her.
	And look, look at hand.
	Hands still on her, Pat.
	Still on her.
	Look at him.
	So while this is happening, he comes up to see what's going on.
	She moves closer to him.
	Look at him.
	Yep.
	And then he asks him a question.
	And then M. Hoff.
	Yeah, Doug.
	There goes Doug, who knows about that type of behavior.
	Something got said.
	Yeah.
	What's going on?
	You can tell Biden's a little bit concerned.
	Trump's aggressive.
	Not aggressive in his faith.
	Rob, show the other clip because this clip doesn't do it justice.
	There's another clip from the back.
	That's it.
	That's the one.
	Can you make that bigger go forward?
	Look at the hands, folks.
	Look at.
	And that's real time.
	And then boom.
	Dude, don't.
	Oh, man.
	Okay, Tom, you're married.
	Your thoughts on this?
	This is out of line.
	This is out of line.
	We all know what that is.
	All guys that have been out there around other guys, and there's dogs to be around.
	You got to be careful because they do that kind of thing.
	And I really would have been very, very upset.
	That was an intentional move.
	And that is the grabby Biden that we've seen in a creepy way around people.
	And you see Jill lean in, so you know Trump said something.
	But me, I would have stepped between her and my wife and just said, take a step back, dude, because this is kind of a formal thing.
	I would have been really pissed off.
	Adam, thoughts?
	If Trump did have an issue with this, what are the chances that he would say something publicly?
	What are the chances he would call out Biden?
	If this look, on the surface, it looks slightly creepy.
	If he would have given her a nice little slap, oh, World War III is breaking out.
	This is par for the course for Joe.
	I don't know.
	I mean, you tell me.
	Par for the course?
	Cut him slat?
	Half the time, he's senile.
	He doesn't know what he's doing.
	Half the time, he's vindictive and malicious, and he knows exactly what he's doing.
	Which one is it?
	So this is a three out of ten for me.
	Can I say my part, though?
	This is the type of behavior.
	And Adam, and I and I get where you're coming from, but that's always a go-to, especially when it comes to Joe Biden.
	Yeah, this is what we're supposed to expect him.
	Oh, he's sniffing kids because he's a grandpa.
	He's doing all this, but literally, he does that.
	He does that.
	No, no.
	And I'm, by the way, he's gone and good ribbon, good riddance, but he has a track record that speaks for himself.
	He's had multiple allegations for inappropriate behavior and sexual misconduct over the years, especially with Tara Reed, who accused him of sexual assault in 1993.
	She worked for him when he worked in the Senate.
	We've seen videos, and I sent the clip to Rob.
	We don't see it again, Pat, where he's sniffing kids and touching girls and inappropriate touching young females.
	Okay, and then his daughter wrote in her diary that he would shower with me at inappropriate ages.
	Okay, and now he's touching her back.
	It's like, how many more things have to happen?
	And let's not act as if this government, these people that I control, Pat, look, look at what's happening with the Epstein list.
	They protect these type of people.
	You're like, they, this is the type of behavior that they go, no, It's okay.
	And now that we want answers, we're not going to get answers from one of the biggest sex trafficking perverts in the world.
	And this is the type of behavior that I think we're going to be doing.
	Let me ask you this question.
	Do you think Trump, do you think she said something to him that got Trump to say something to him?
	Yes.
	I think she was like, he's creeping me out.
	So do you think Kamala and the other people that walked up?
	Why do you think the other people walked up?
	Look at Jill.
	Look at Jill.
	Jill runs in.
	Look at that.
	Did you see that?
	Jill's like, wait, what?
	Question.
	Yes.
	Where is this in front of?
	The roton.
	This is the capital.
	This is the rear service.
	This is rear serving the inauguration.
	That's the end of it.
	He's inaugurated.
	He's president.
	They're on the back steps, Adam.
	What do you think she said to him?
	He grabbed my ass.
	What do you think she said?
	He's creeping me out.
	No, no, she wouldn't say he grabbed my ass.
	She would say he touched me inappropriately.
	I didn't like it.
	What are the chances she said that?
	I would say 70%.
	I was going to say 80%.
	Yeah.
	I put 70%.
	Because Adam looked like that.
	And then because she walks and he's like, what happened?
	I'm closer.
	And then he's saying something.
	And you know, he would say something.
	Jill runs in there.
	Jennifer.
	And then what is Kamala doing coming in?
	What are the other people coming up?
	Jill's reaction is pretty telling.
	The fact that she rushes on.
	Yeah.
	Well, but then again, if I pop a talk, she can't hear him.
	She doesn't know what he's saying.
	No, no, no.
	I'm making no look at this.
	That's too much of a touch.
	By the way, this fits his legacy of Creepy Joe.
	Thank you.
	Great.
	And then it's a little creepy on the way you do it and step off, making a comment.
	By the way, you know who is watching that?
	Do you know who is watching that?
	Baron?
	A guy named Baron Trump.
	And a guy named by the way, the way a son is protective of a mother is very different than the way a husband is protective of his wife.
	It's a very different energy.
	By the way, I would even say crazier energy.
	If somebody messes with your mother, it's a very different energy than somebody.
	I don't know why I can't describe it to you.
	It's very different on the approach you will come in from.
	So a 19-year-old son, you know, you got to worry about a six-nine, 18-year-old kid that's sitting there saying, What the hell is going on here?
	Anyway, let's go to the next story.
	What did Trump say when he was doing the CPAC speech?
	He's like, We got a nickname for Joe.
	Do we want to go with Sleepy Joe?
	Do we want to go with Creepy Joe?
	What was the whole thing?
	He said, I like both of them.
	I like both of them.
	And he made the audience way in on it.
	Yeah, he did.
	I think they chose Sleepy.
	But he likes both of them.
	But he likes both of them.
	Okay, let's go into the economy real quick.
	All right.
	So a couple of things going on with the economy here.
	So, number one, the market tanks 900 points yesterday.
	Okay.
	And, you know, there's a story here about Wall Street Journal.
	The market finally woke up to tariff reality.
	Is this a buying opportunity on page 15?
	By the way, those of you that are on PBD podcast circle, the notes we're looking at, we left the notes in the PBD podcast circle.
	You can go to it and go to page 15.
	So markets are finally waking up to the tariff reality.
	Is this a buying opportunity?
	After President Trump was elected, investors got very excited about all the nice things he promised and forgot about the stuff that be bad for stocks.
	Now they are very anxious about all the stuff that is bad for stocks and I've forgotten about the nice things.
	Has the sell-off gone too far?
	I took the advice.
	I took the other side concerned that the threat of terrorism and immigration clampdown from frothy markets when investors were on tax cuts delegation.
	I have trouble turning bullish for the long run because I fear the new world order Trump is ushering in won't end well for investors.
	But in the short term, this feels like a very rapid sell-off that at least undoes much of the concerns about excess in markets.
	So, by the way, if you look at crypto, crypto took a hit.
	Bitcoin took a hit.
	75 or something?
	Bitcoin.
	75.
	Bitcoin's now back at 80%.
	Ethereum went to 1878.
	XRP's at 209.
	So that kind of took a hit.
	Tom, market, when you're seeing this, how much of it is this the tariffs?
	What are you seeing are the concerns, especially with this other story here?
	Tesla stock nosedives, wiping out $700 billion in gains since Trump's election.
	Tesla stock tumbled with shares dropping 4.6%, a partial rebound.
	The Trump bump faded as stocks fell 28% in a month and 32% since January 1st.
	Adam Serhan, founder of 50 Park Investments, told Bloomberg the bet on Tesla's shares soaring due to Musk's political involvement has not worked out thus far.
	Investors who initially anticipated massive benefits from Musk's political involvement got too excited and now cooler heads are prevailing.
	Thoughts, Tom?
	So when you look at everything from Bitcoin to the market, markets move based on facts plus future sentiment.
	Facts, earnings reports, unemployment reports, the amount of billions that have actually gone into Bitcoin in a given week.
	Those are facts.
	Then we have sentiment, the future sentiment.
	What do we think about the future?
	Well, right now, since November, the sentiment on consumers has been razor thin.
	What do we know?
	Because credit cards went up to $1.3 trillion balance and BNPL delinquencies jumped up.
	So everybody goes, oh, crap, it doesn't look like the consumer is going to be spending much in Q1.
	They're tapped out.
	So that was a forward sentiment people concerned about.
	And then comes this waves of sentiment on the tariffs.
	Some of the tariffs were small.
	And as I was saying, hey, remember, they're tactics, not taxes.
	Well, some of these tactics are taking a while to kick in.
	Canada stepped up and threw some tariffs at China.
	And China said, oh, you small child, and threw 100% tariffs back at Canada, showing that that's an unequal fight because China is going to say, get off my lawn with your little dog, right?
	That's what China is telling Canada.
	So right now we have a big shift in sentiment.
	So the forward sentiment, PBD, the market is concerned.
	Right now, there is less of a percent of investor dollars in Mag 7 than there was five months ago.
	So the Mag 7, remember it was so overweight.
	Everybody was buying the Mag 7 individually, led by NVIDIA, and then also buying Mag 7 ETFs that were dedicated to them that were so hot in 2023.
	Well, all of that has pulled back and there's a shift in sentiment and investment right now, led by, check this out.
	I looked up last night.
	There is now the survey of governors thinking there's a 50-50 chance of a rate cut in May.
	But we don't have unemployment figures.
	We don't have GDP figures.
	We don't have anything yet that normally would make Jerome Powell, who two weeks ago said, I don't think there's going to be cuts.
	I think it's going to be kind of level for a while.
	We're going to let this shake out.
	Well, now the sentiment marker on interest rates is even 50-50 for a cut in May.
	Thinking that we're going to get bad news in mid-April in five weeks when we get first quarter reports.
	But right now, this is sentiment.
	And the sentiment was led yesterday by one simple interview.
	Donald Trump saying, I don't rule out a recession.
	When he said those words yesterday, what he's saying is, and Howard Luttnick, our Secretary of Commerce, ran to the microphone and said, Whoa, I don't think there's going to be a recession at all.
	I don't think so at all.
	Trump said that he jumped.
	He's trying to calm down.
	Do you have that clip?
	Yeah.
	He's trying to calm.
	Do you have the clip of Trump saying, rule out a recession?
	Yes, I can find that.
	I have Howard Luttnick right here on MSNBC talking about the odds.
	I think Luttnick was on the weekend and it was Trump's interview on Monday.
	Yes, because this is Meet the Press.
	So this is something.
	He went first, then Trump went.
	Yes.
	Okay, so let's watch this first.
	Go forward.
	Anybody who bets against Donald Trump, it's like the same people who thought Donald Trump wasn't going to win a year ago.
	Donald Trump is a winner.
	He's going to win for the American people.
	That's just the way it's going to be.
	There's going to be no recession in America.
	What there's going to be is global tariffs are going to come down because President Trump has said, you want to charge us 100%?
	We're going to charge you 100%.
	And you know what they say?
	They say, no, don't charge us 100%.
	We'll bring ours down.
	We'll unleash America out to the world, grow our economy in a way we've never grown before.
	You are going to see over the next two years the greatest set of growth coming from America as Americans.
	You saw it, 1.3 trillion of new investment coming in America.
	Think of all those jobs.
	And remember, each trillion of investment in America is 1% of growth GDP.
	So Donald Trump is bringing growth to America.
	I would never bet on recession.
	No chance.
	So what Lutnik is saying, the minute everybody else blinks on tariffs, the markets are going to shift.
	Second quarter, third quarter, you're going to see huge economic growth.
	And for every trillion that we get of new growth, it's 1% of GDP.
	That's Lutnik, our Secretary of Commerce, saying it's ugly right now, but soon as the world blinks on tariffs, the market's just going to flip back.
	Did he upset you?
	Did Howard upset you?
	No, I. Why do you call him Lutnik?
	It's Lutnik.
	Is it like Donald?
	I know you messed up.
	By the way, Lutnick, Howard, he's just upset with you a little bit.
	Rob, can you play the clip of the president saying recession?
	Possibly play this clip.
	Go forward.
	This is with Maria Bartiroma, where he talks about he doesn't like to predict things like that.
	Okay, let's see what he has to say.
	And I want to ask you about Ukraine and the blow up the other day with Zelensky.
	Let me stay on the economy for a moment because there are rising worries about a slowdown.
	You've got the Atlanta Federal Reserve saying we're going to have a contraction in the first quarter.
	Look, I know that you inherited a mess.
	I've already been here, Jesus.
	Are you expecting a recession this year?
	I hate to predict things like that.
	There is a period of transition because what we're doing is very big.
	We're bringing wealth back to America.
	That's a big thing.
	He's right.
	And there are always periods of it, it takes a little time.
	It takes a little time.
	But I think it should be great for us.
	I mean, I think it should be great.
	It's going to be great ultimately for the farmer.
	You know, don't forget I made.
	Okay, so first of all, I just want to make sure when video is playing, don't comment.
	Okay, so just keep that part in mind.
	So you know what I like about what he just said right there, that he's right about.
	And then, Adam, I'm coming to you.
	So you know what's the biggest thing with negotiation?
	Whenever you're negotiating, what Lutnik said, I actually don't like.
	And I'll say why, if I'm Trump, I would say, what are you doing?
	Why are you saying that?
	Because he's saying that it's a tactic that they're eventually going to come to us.
	So what that means in negotiation is that you're eventually going to what?
	Give in, right?
	Okay.
	So who wins in negotiation?
	Who wins in a negotiation?
	You know, in a negotiation, leverage matters.
	What else matters?
	Whoever is willing to walk away from the deal, what else matters?
	Whoever has the most patience.
	If you read the book, Art of the Deal, there were certain deals that he waited God knows how long, where he was patient until he got paid premium, okay, as a negotiator.
	So I love the fact that he says, look, when you're trying to make a transition the way we are, we're going to go through something.
	Some things are going to be nasty.
	If you're trying to truly put reciprocal tariffs on people that are putting 25, 50, 70, 100% on us, we got to go through the pain for you to lower the prices.
	That's going to be painful.
	I do think the market could take a hit as you're going through that process until they give in.
	How long that takes, I don't know, but I don't think he's off with what he's saying.
	Is this going to affect the, because I mean, think about it.
	We always talk about Trump has his four years, guys, and he's done, right?
	How much of this, especially if this starts to creep up in these two years, affects the midterms?
	A lot.
	So that's his timeline.
	I wrote here: you can only be as patient as the midterms.
	Yep.
	He knows what he's playing with.
	By the way, if you look at numbers with job cuts, U.S. job cuts surged 245% in February on federal government layoffs.
	Rob, if you got a clip on that one here, 245%.
	So if job cuts are up 245, a challenger Gary Christmas report revealed planned job cuts surged 245% in February to 172,000 jobs last month.
	That's the highest level since July of 2020.
	We know what happened in July of 2020?
	COVID.
	That's July of 2021.
	The economy was reeling from restrictions related to COVID pandemic and the highest total for February since Great Recession of 2009.
	We're talking since Great Recession.
	That's 16 years with federal government layoffs under President Trump's administration driving the surge, including 62,000 announced job cuts across seven federal agencies.
	As Adrio Challenger noted, the government has laid off roughly 62,000 workers in the first two months, a 41,311% increase compared to a year ago.
	Let me say that one more time.
	A 41,311% increase compared to a year ago, which means last year, only three people got laid off.
	If you really think about how that number works, whatever the number, it's a small number.
	It's an important point there.
	If you take out the government layoffs and look at the layoffs in American industry, American retail or wherever, the layoffs are actually at par, right?
	The economy hasn't really reacted yet.
	Nothing major has happened.
	But what it's looking at is the government layoffs that came from Doge going in and changing agencies.
	Now, those are real consumers with real paychecks that are now really not going to be working.
	Some of those are early retirement.
	But we have to be careful when we look at it as macro because the economy hasn't reacted in any of the industrial sectors.
	Chips isn't down because Taiwan's been invaded.
	You know what I mean?
	Nothing like that has happened.
	These are people coming out of government jobs, but their paychecks are no longer buying things.
	Yeah.
	So if all of a sudden you see things with cost of living, which is still a problem he's been dealing with because he got, that's not on him.
	That came from previous administration that hanging in 3%.
	That's right.
	Hanging in 3%.
	If all of a sudden this affects unemployment, which we'll see what the numbers are going to look like there, if it forces interest rates to be lowered, if people are not making money, if the prices are high, if the people are losing money, very, very quickly, people will be sounding alarm on that.
	And if we tap into the recession, in order to make that drastic of a change that they want to make to the way we do things, a risk of a recession should be on the table.
	It's just the reality of it.
	If you're trying to make that drastic of a shift, the risk is recession.
	That's the risk.
	I hate to say it, Adam.
	Well, if you just look at the markets, buckle your seatbelt, brace for impact, because we're in for a rough landing.
	You know, we've talked about this soft landing concept, the economy, what's going on with inflation, what's going on with the markets.
	I mean, if you just look at the markets alone, we're negative since Trump took office.
	There's an image right here that's on the Wall Street Journal.
	Wall Street fears Trump will wreck the soft landing.
	So Trump, you know, the first time he took office, they were like, the economy is going to tank.
	It's going to be a recession.
	The market boomed.
	I mean, here's an image right here.
	In the first two months that Trump has taken office, it went up big time like a rocket.
	Bitcoin went to over 100.
	SP all-time high.
	Dow, all-time high.
	Boom.
	Crash landing.
	So what Trump needs to convey is: look, guys, brace for impact, because if you're looking at the markets, it's not going to look too pretty for well.
	Quote unquote, he said, there will be a period transition.
	What we're doing is very big.
	What we have to do is build a strong country.
	You can't really watch the stock market.
	So what he's saying is this.
	There's a difference between Wall Street and Main Street.
	We all know that.
	Only 50% of Americans own stock or in the stock market.
	I think more should take their suggestion.
	But Main Street is looking at this.
	They're looking at the tariffs.
	They're looking at what's going on with the markets.
	Inflation is still hovering around 3%.
	They haven't gotten to their 2% number.
	But what's the definition of a recession?
	We learned this during Joe Biden administration.
	It's two consecutive quarters of negative GDP.
	What he's saying is like, buddy, it's been 45 days.
	Don't necessarily pay attention to the markets.
	Let's see where we go with this.
	But if you're like, for instance, I just sat with my mother the other day, who's 74 years old.
	I love you, mom.
	And we went over her retirement planning.
	And thank God she has a son that knows what she's doing.
	Because if not, this woman's clueless.
	And I love you, mom.
	But if you're a retiree, you need to make sure that you're out of risky asset classes.
	You need to have a vast percentage of your asset allocation into bonds, into cash derivatives, into CDs.
	Don't mess with the market right now because it's going to be a very choppy landing over the next 12, 24 months.
	I want to say this when you said this to remind everybody.
	Do you remember the whole thing about two consecutive quarters?
	Yeah, they changed the definition.
	Or GDP.
	They changed the definition.
	They changed the definition.
	Thank you.
	So I have a feeling the definition is going to come back this time around.
	So just kind of be ready.
	Convenient.
	When this goes back, they're going to be like, no, no, no.
	Under Biden, it wasn't a recession, but under Trump it is.
	So they're going to be playing that game back and forth.
	Of course.
	All I'm saying is it could potentially be a good time to buy.
	But as a person who has one term left and he's dealing with midterms, if the way Trump answered it, to say he's okay with a possibility of a recession, that's the right approach to scare the shit out of your competitors, other countries, to say, he's okay if he goes through a recession.
	He's not worried about how it's going to look on him.
	No, he was like, yeah, I don't want to put define predict and all this stuff.
	If it happens, it could happen.
	We're making such a drastic change in our way of doing things.
	That could possibly take place.
	Things will get worse before they get better.
	I'm totally okay with that.
	I'm totally okay with that.
	But it's not going to be okay to the average person.
	But the main person he's talking to is the other guys on the other end, whether it's Mexico, China, Canada.
	He's talking to everybody else.
	Think about this.
	If you're a Democrat right now, if you're one of the Democrat politicians, it's actually a pretty good time to start going in on Trump.
	He's wrecking the economy.
	These tariffs are not what he's going to be doing.
	It would actually be an easy argument at this point to bash Trump.
	Now, I'm advocating for this because it's almost like we got to get the cancer out.
	So we're going to have to have some chemo in order to improve the cancer for what Trump is doing.
	Sure.
	Of course.
	The reciprocal tariffs.
	Yes.
	Shutting down the border.
	Like things are going to get worse before they get better.
	And I'm all in on what he's doing.
	I'm all in on what Elon's doing.
	I'm all in on Doge.
	But if I'm a Democrat right now and you see what they're doing, you ought to light it up.
	Fighting stances.
	Which, by the way, they could use this economic what Rachel Maddow did yesterday.
	Okay, Rob, if you have the clip.
	Here's Rachel Maddow celebrating the look on her face on what Rob was saying on how the economy is doing.
	Look at how happy she is.
	She's sitting on a motorboard.
	Freaking genius economists.
	We're all here.
	So this is the front page.
	We're just about ready.
	Oh, there's two clips playing, Rob.
	Yep.
	Sorry, hang on one second.
	There we go.
	Okay.
	Go back.
	Markets rocked by Trump show economic fear across Wall Street.
	Right under that, next headline, NASDAQ 100 sheds $1.1 trillion in value.
	Right under that, next headline, stocks fall most this year with recession warnings blaring.
	Right under that, next headline, Tesla tumbles most since 2020.
	Next headline over, billionaires at Trump's swearing in have since lost $209 billion.
	Quote, the start of Trump's second term has delivered a stunning reversal for many of the billionaires who were seated behind Trump in the Capitol Rotunda while he was being sworn in.
	This is my point.
	That's exactly what they should be doing.
	If I'm them and I want to go ham on Trump, this is a great time to do it.
	But what we know about markets is this could bounce back today and it could have an all-time high by the end of the month.
	So you never read into the day-to-day economic.
	Yeah, but the fact that she's smiling and she's happy about it, that average Americans are going to start feeling it shows how much of a scumbag is going to be.
	Let her smile.
	Let her smile.
	There are technical recessions and there are structural recessions.
	A technical recession is where you look at all the numbers and yes, it's here.
	Those you can relate to a power failure.
	Lights go off.
	Oh, gosh.
	But as soon as the city gets power back on, everybody's back to normal because the lights are back on.
	That's a technical recession.
	And I think that's what we're looking at here, maybe.
	A structural recession is like you lose the auto industry for seven years to Japan, who kicks your ass and people are laid off and have nowhere to go.
	Like in the 1980s, you're saying?
	Correct.
	Those are structural.
	Now we have a structure problem with this.
	I think that this is more likely, if it happens, to be more like a technical recession.
	And I think the bounce back is going to be as fast as we've seen here because it's driven by sentiment.
	You think Trump is going to change his tune?
	Or at what point would Trump maybe pivot on these tariffs if the economy actually starts getting worse?
	If the markets start getting worse?
	Or is he all in on this?
	I hope he does not.
	I hope he does not.
	Explain why.
	I hope he stays.
	Yep.
	Let me tell you why.
	Because, so you know, when it comes down to Iran, everybody asks me and says, hey, do you think Iran's going to go back to being a democracy?
	Yesterday, you guys got close in 2020.
	If Trump would have had his two terms back to back, Iran would have had some kind of a change because the pain of sanctions was so bad that the people wanted a change.
	And if that meant getting rid of whoever they had, they were willing to do it, right?
	Biden comes in, boom, pain goes away.
	And now they're like, nah, let's just go back to our regular life.
	We're going to be okay, right?
	So now, tariffs.
	We're probably only going to have this chance to have somebody this crazy and unpredictable to be able to push the envelope for tariffs to get everything on level playing field.
	If he doesn't do it, it's probably never going to happen during our lifetime.
	I agree.
	Because think about what presidential candidate is going to come in that has the team that he has who can push.
	I hope they push as far as they can to get everyone checked into.
	Like, look at the Scheinbaum, what she says.
	Just listen to this phrase of Bloomberg's story.
	This is the president of Mexico.
	Look at the story.
	Sheinbaum says she sees Mexico avoiding reciprocal tariffs.
	Wait, what?
	Do you know what that means to me?
	Here's what it means to me.
	I don't have to change.
	She sees that, hey, guess what?
	We can go to dinner with another businessman, and I think we can get away with them paying for the entire dinner and we not have to pay anything for it.
	Reciprocal, right?
	You're having a business meeting.
	We do a conference with another guy, and we're renting an office space from a place.
	You're sharing half the office space.
	I'm sharing half the office space.
	Rent is $100,000 a month.
	You're paying $50,000.
	I'm paying $50,000.
	She's saying, I think we can get away without having to pay the rent, and only he's going to have to pay the whole $100,000.
	That's what they're saying to America.
	If I'm a president reading and saying, who the hell do you think you are talking like this?
	What do you mean you're going to be able to avoid not having to pay reciprocal tariffs to it?
	So here, let me read this to you.
	Mexican President Scheinbaum expressed confidence at Mexico City's rally on Sunday that Trump won't impose reciprocal tariffs on Mexico starting April 2nd, stating Mexico is not within the scope because for 30 years we have had two trade agreements, establishing that we don't have any tariffs on them and they don't have any tariffs on us.
	She clarified, in other words, they wouldn't have to apply reciprocal tariffs because there are particularly no levies from Mexico on the U.S. distinguishing these from Trump's separate 25% tariffs to migration and drugs, paused until April 2nd.
	Scheinbaum turned the rally originally set to counter U.S. tariffs into a celebration after Trump delayed the 25% tariffs on USMCA Good, a move she framed as a win saying we cannot give up on our sovereignty and our people can't be affected by decisions made by foreign governments.
	Tom, thoughts on the story?
	Well, first of all, it's on Sunday and she's at a political rally, which, you know, we have Face the Nation over here and over in Mexico.
	It's usually called Face the Bullets.
	So she's out there screaming, talking about how, oh, well, we're not going to do this because we've got these, we have these agreements where we don't have reciprocal tariffs.
	She's trying to calm her own economy.
	Don't worry about it.
	He's not going to do it.
	We've got these two treaties that are already in place.
	And she says, and by the way, the tariffs he's talking about, those are different tariffs because he's upset about the border and drugs.
	Don't worry about it.
	It'll be okay.
	She is trying to calm her economy and her stock market, which is going to open on Monday morning on a weekend rally.
	And she is actually not saying anything.
	Notice that she doesn't say anything negative about Trump.
	She merely says everything is going to be okay.
	That's what she's doing.
	And so what we have here, she is trying to spin because her back's up against the wall.
	Yeah.
	And Adam, go for it.
	Well, I think, you know, I'm trying to get into Trump's mind because, sure, Scheinbaum says her things.
	Justin Trudeau, the new gentleman that's going to be taking over over there, she's doing his thing.
	But Trump holds the cards as they say.
	What Trump is trying to do is right the wrongs that have happened in our trade agreements for the last 40 years.
	He's generally trying to make America wealthy again.
	He sees the unfair trade agreements.
	I think he said at one point, instead of taxing our own citizens to enrich foreign nations, we should tax and tariff other nations to enrich our citizens.
	So what Trump is doing, you remember the time when he was sitting with Truck Schumer?
	You asked him about this.
	You said this was your favorite point of his presidency when you said it was like a real-life vlog.
	He's like, I'll take the shutdown of the government, Chuck.
	Okay, Nancy.
	What Trump is doing is literally saying, I'll put on the tariff Superman cape.
	I'll be the bad guy.
	I'll deal with the markets going down and saying, I'll take the blame because the rest of you mothersuckers are just going to kick the can down the road.
	I'll make the economy better.
	I'll make us better again.
	I'll make us wealthy again because the rest of you won't do it.
	So we got to do the tariffs now.
	Yeah, most people cannot handle what they can handle, the amount of pain Trump can handle.
	I will tell you this.
	If I'm Trump, and if anybody from Trump's camp watches this, you guys like charts.
	Let me give you one of the best charts to show for.
	Go pull up military expenditure on Mexico and Canada versus ours.
	We spend 3.4% of our taxpayers' money on military to provide safety of where we are, right?
	And who's our neighbors?
	Mexico and Canada.
	Great.
	Canada spends 1.1%.
	Mexico spends 0.7%.
	0.7 is 2.7 less than we do on our military expenditure.
	That 2.7 should be paid as a form of a tariff to U.S. We're providing protection for you.
	Why don't you go spend that money out of the money that you make?
	You ought to do that.
	Why should I pay for protection knowing nobody wants to mess with Mexico because you're my neighbor?
	I'm not okay with that.
	I think there's so many ways they can work this Mexico and Canada relationship, but I think that chart needs to be given to them for them to see it.
	Okay, next story to get into is Trump sends a letter to Iran on nuclear program, make a deal or face U.S. militarily.
	Rob, if you got this clip here, this is the negotiation with Iran on the nuclear program.
	Here's Trump.
	Go for it, Rob.
	I hope that Iran, and I've written him a letter saying, I hope you're going to negotiate because if we have to go in militarily, it's going to be a terrible thing for them.
	You wrote a letter to the Khomeini.
	When did you send the letter?
	Yesterday.
	And you said you better negotiate, or we want you to negotiate.
	I said, I hope you're going to negotiate because it's going to be a lot better for Iran.
	And I think they want to get that letter.
	The other alternative is we have to do something because you can't let them have a nuclear weapon.
	Adam.
	So there was a great article in the Wall Street Journal, if I can pull it up real quick, about they called it, Iran is weak.
	Will Trump be strong?
	Tehran will try to delay and humor Trump like other presidents.
	And basically what they do is they lay out the, you talked about leverage in negotiations.
	What leverage does Iran have at this point?
	What leverage do they have?
	China.
	They have China, but how long is China going to back them up?
	I don't know.
	Is that what's going to happen there?
	So it said, essentially, the article lays out the fact that Iran is in no position to dictate terms with the United States.
	Their misery index, you said in 2020 they had a chance to basically reverse course.
	This is the first time since 1979 that they've been in a position of absolute weakness.
	Israel has taken out all their proxies, Hamas, Hezbollah.
	They're dealing with the Houthis.
	You see what's going on in Syria.
	Lebanon is going through a restructuring right now.
	Their misery index is one of the worst in the world.
	The people of Iran are amazingly just able people, but they're basically being subjugated by this theocratic regime.
	Trump is putting maximum pressure on Iran right now.
	He knows this is the time because what is Trump's fear?
	What does the rest of the Middle East fear, including Saudi, including UAE?
	Iran getting a nuclear weapon.
	That's the one thing they're like, no, So Obama appeased them.
	Jimmy Carter appeased them.
	It was only Republicans who are basically saying, nah, nah, Iran, we're not playing this game.
	So, Trump recognizes that he has two, maybe to four years to say, we're not messing with you.
	What do you think this letter said?
	Hey, let's be friends.
	Let's be nice.
	Basically, he said, Don't make us do what we're willing to do.
	You better deliver on the threats, though.
	I was just going to say he better.
	There's been too many threats lately: if you don't do this, we're going to do this.
	There's got to be some delivery on them.
	Yeah, and Malik, so and Adam, you nailed it.
	He's preventing them from getting nuclear weapons.
	I mean, it doesn't help the fact that the Biden administration with Anthony Blinken unfroze.
	What was it, Tom?
	Six billion?
	Six billion dollars to help them.
	It's crucial because they have been enriching uranium and they're getting Chris Pat, you know what they're doing.
	They're getting it close to weapons-grade levels.
	And who's to say where they're at?
	Where are they in that process?
	If you're already there, then Adam, because I personally think that if they're this worried and he's talking about it like this, if they're not very, very close, they probably already have something that they could definitely use to attack.
	That's the scary part.
	Well, the issue here is we've never, under Biden, we were never willing to have anything that we did except by hitting their proxies, right?
	Yes.
	Like their proxies were camped out in Syria.
	Bonk, right?
	Okay, if your proxies are camped out with the Hezbollah in Syria, we're going to drop cruises on you.
	And we did.
	Yes.
	And we did.
	What he's talking about, you better be ready for it.
	Now the cruises fly into their airspace, and there's five locations that are supposed to lead the research labs, and we know exactly where they are.
	And basically, that would seriously interrupt their nuclear program.
	Now, is he willing to do that?
	What we were just talking about, you got to be willing to make good on the threat.
	Because what he's talking about, if we send the high-impact cruise missiles over there and we hit those five locations, it says, I told you not to make nukes.
	You're up in your bedroom making nukes.
	Your dad and I told you, don't do that.
	And we messed the place up.
	We have to be willing to do that.
	And if we're not willing to do that, it's just an idle threat because that, if you read all the CIA threat assessments and stuff, those five locations is what Iran wants to protect.
	Here's another clip.
	Ultimately, build it.
	Here's another clip.
	Go forward, Rob.
	No, well, there are two ways Iran can be handled militarily or you make a deal.
	I would prefer to make a deal because I'm not looking to hurt Iran.
	They're great people.
	I know so many Iranians from this country.
	Well, not the leadership.
	No, not the leadership.
	The people are evil people.
	Obviously.
	No, but the people of Iran are great people.
	But they had a tough regime and they'd meet and they'd be shot in the streets.
	I mean, it was a tough, it was a tough deal.
	While that's being said, here's a story from The Hill.
	Iranian leader rejects Trump's push for a nuclear talk.
	Ayatollah Khomeini rebuffed Trump's call for nuclear talk, stating on Saturday, some coercive governments insist on negotiations, such as such negotiations aren't aimed at solving issues.
	They aim to exert their dominance and impose what they want.
	He argued that talks are a tool to impose new demands, adding Iran will definitely not fulfill these new demands, especially on defense and military limits.
	And obviously, that's a, we'll see how that's going to be reacting towards it.
	But Vinny, I think it was a lot of people.
	It's just, I don't know, man, because now I can see what you guys are talking about the left and stuff for them to argue about.
	If you think of a lot of stuff that we were promised and that people were told, especially on the other side, you can see, Tom, now it's like now all of a sudden, recession might be on the horizon.
	All right, we're talking about, he was talking about no wars.
	This looks like, because after him saying this, looks like the war stuff is happening.
	We were promised JFK.
	We were promised all the Epstein lists.
	It's almost like in all three of these fronts, everything that we were told and that we were promised, it's all kind of coming to a point where now the left, I think, can have that thing to fight for.
	And the other side could be like, hey, man, what?
	All this stuff that you said that was going to happen, it seems as if all of it is starting to turn the other way.
	Yeah, I mean, one of the things is yesterday, Chris texts me saying, hey, Tucker and I did a podcast together, and they're on the podcast.
	One of the topics that comes up is why the JFK files hasn't been released.
	And Chris asks Tucker the question, like, who is holding this up?
	And Tucker doesn't want to drop the name.
	And he finally drops the name.
	Rob, if you can play this clip.
	And this has to do for the community of people that want to know what's going on with Epstein, that want to know what's going on with JFK files.
	All those promises.
	Yep.
	That's this clip.
	Go forward, Rob.
	Okay, so I've always thought that.
	And then in January, you know, there was a scramble over who's going to get what jobs in the new administration.
	And at one point, there was someone who was being discussed for a job in the Intel world.
	And a member of the SSCI, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and Intel Committee, went to the people making the decision and said, you cannot hire this person because this person will be certain to push for the release of the JFK files.
	So this is in this effect.
	So this is in 2025, less than two months ago.
	And you have a sitting member of the United States Senate whose main goal is to keep those files secret.
	And then you have to ask yourself, why?
	Yeah.
	Exactly.
	Why?
	Were they even evil?
	Of course, no one was alive.
	It was 62 years.
	And by the way, the institution, no one could even tell you who the CIA director was.
	And who do you remember?
	The name of the CI director?
	John McCone, I think, 1963.
	But that person is like completely lost to history, except a specialist.
	And the CIA has already been through 50 years ago, the church committee hearings, 1975, where we sort of note they're sassing people, dosing people with acid, all this stuff.
	It's like the CIA has already been discredited.
	So if you're telling me that six weeks ago, a member of the United States Senate was trying to keep someone out of a job in order to keep these files secret, that is to protect the CIA, I don't believe that for a second.
	So wait a minute.
	Here's the part I don't know.
	So who's that person exerting pressure?
	But you are uniquely qualified to get this answer because one of us can call the president of the United States right now and ask him.
	And the other one is me.
	So why don't you know?
	Go ahead.
	That's a great question.
	That's the only kind I asked.
	So what I brought to it was the knowledge that a member of the Senate Intel Committee, I'm not guessing, called over and said, you cannot appoint this person.
	So why don't you expose that person, first of all, so we can start chasing after Cotton of Arkansas.
	Boom.
	Tom Cotton.
	Yes, correct.
	Did you ask him?
	I haven't.
	No, I haven't asked him.
	What the hell?
	What do you want with you?
	I'd like to.
	And kind of makes people suspicious of you, by the way.
	Because if you know that Tom Cotton said you can't pick this person, and then you didn't go to him and find out why?
	Well, I need to sit down with him.
	I'm not sure that he'll do an interview with me.
	With you?
	I'm weak.
	You are like the spirit animal of that administration.
	I know, but it's a fair.
	Look, it's a fair question.
	That's a totally fair question.
	And the answer is, I hadn't thought to do that.
	And there's a lot going on.
	And I didn't know.
	And again, and this is going to be a lot of people.
	Tom Cotton.
	So we know Tom Cotton.
	Tom Cotton's got some splendid to do.
	You remember Lucy?
	And I've been a fan of Tom Cotton, just like Josh Holly, like all these guys, they're speaking up, they're talking for us.
	But this is the problem when it comes to people like me that have been supporting this movement for almost over eight and a half, almost nine years.
	We're going on it.
	That we were made promises, okay?
	We were made promises.
	And this, this is to be, and I know the last podcast we had where Andrew Tate was like, yeah, well, this is just what they put.
	No, no, no, no, it's not about that.
	This is about, I mean, Epstein, number one, but JFK too.
	Why is Tom Khan, if this is true, holding it back?
	Everybody that was involved is dead.
	Who are you protecting?
	Because at the end of it, Pat, if you're holding it back, you don't want me, the American taxpayer, to know as a veteran, too, what happened?
	Who murdered our sitting president?
	Because 9-11 was one of the worst.
	I think murdering the sitting president and all the people involved, they're protecting somebody or a group that's still around right now.
	Same thing with Epstein.
	And this is the type of crap that pisses me the hell off because we were made promises.
	Now we're just sitting.
	I just posted another tweet today, Pat.
	We're on day 11 of business days.
	I'm not counting the weekends because Tom, you know, let me know.
	Just count the Mondays through Fridays.
	It's day 11 and counting.
	We were promised Epstein.
	We were promised JFK.
	We were promised 9-11 and nothing.
	Haven't heard anything.
	I think Cash arrested two people that were doing some nefarious stuff.
	What is the deal?
	What's happening?
	Who are they protecting?
	That's my question.
	Tom.
	I'm curious about Tom Cotton running so quick to the microphone.
	You see three hours ago, and he put a very comprehensive tweet out.
	It said, I did not talk to the president.
	I did not release the files.
	I did not involve anybody.
	It's a fairly long statement he just put out.
	This is false.
	I have no problem releasing the JFK files.
	Had Tucker Carlson asked me, I would have told him.
	He has texted me multiple times in recent weeks so he knows how to reach me.
	Again, release it.
	What are you holding back?
	What do you mean he's holding back?
	I would have explained that I've never spoken to President Trump or his associates or administration officials about the files, comma.
	Never objected to the appointment of any person because of the files, comma, and have complete faith that Tulsi Gabbard, John Ratcliffe, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, and other officials will release the files as appropriate in accordance with President Trump's directive.
	And here's my thing, Tom.
	He's going to get with all them and inappropriate in accordance.
	No, no.
	What are you holding back?
	And I'm being genuine, Tom.
	I'm very, very curious right now.
	It's been how many years?
	Why?
	Well, let me just take a completely different angle here.
	What's Tucker's background?
	Who was Tucker's father?
	Wasn't he CIA?
	Okay.
	Tucker's father has a very interesting background.
	He was involved.
	Whether it's CIA or whatever he did, he was involved.
	Is that confirmed?
	You can, that's American Journalism lobbyist.
	Voice of America from 66 to 91.
	Can you control FCIA?
	Can you control FCIA to see anything comes up?
	No, not Patricia, Patrick, CIA, Association, Superficiency.
	His name was Dick Carlson.
	Associate.
	Strong name.
	Yeah.
	So, you know, Voice of America at the time was also known as a, you know, the CIA had a lot of different methods of getting information.
	Anyways, if there is a way, because right now, is Tucker good with Trump?
	At this point, yes.
	Okay.
	If Tucker has to choose between Massey and Trump, who does he choose?
	If he's smart, he picks Trump.
	If Tucker has to choose between supporting APAC that comes with Trump, and if you don't support AIPAC, that you lose Trump, what does he choose?
	Well, that's a good one.
	At this point, why would you want to go against Trump?
	That wasn't a question.
	I don't think he's pro-AIPAC and pro- Okay.
	Yeah, I don't know.
	He had Massey on.
	It was actually a very good interview that he had Massey on.
	Be very careful with HAPAC.
	So, here's all I'm doing.
	Here's all I'm saying with regards to Tucker.
	Does Trump's administration right now need someone to blame for the way they handle JFK files and Epstein and all that stuff?
	Is Tom Cotton good with Trump?
	I believe so.
	I wouldn't see any, nothing that would say other.
	Everything we've ever spoken about with Tom Cotton has been positive.
	Positive.
	Has been good.
	Calling out everybody.
	Okay.
	So I don't know.
	I don't know if there is something here where the possibility of needing an out with somebody.
	I don't know.
	I'm just saying, like, if you needed somebody to say, hey, we have to figure out where we would put this on someone.
	We have fumbled.
	You know, we have kind of mishandled the way we promised that we're going to release and there's an intel.
	We had no idea this many people were interested in JFK files.
	We had no idea this many people were interested in what's going on with Epstein.
	Oh my God, we thought it was just something you would say from stage and then people would forget about it after election.
	Holy shit.
	No, there is really a big community of people that really want this.
	I don't know.
	That's one.
	Okay.
	And that me seeing that they use Cotton as a person to blame, I'm at 10 to 15% there.
	I'm not a other option is, could it have been something where the conversation is, say you and I talk, we're about to hire somebody and you don't like that person and you say, I don't like that person.
	And all of a sudden, Adam's in the room.
	Adam tells someone, someone tells another competitor and they say, let me tell you, the reason why that person didn't end up getting a job at Vagim is because of Vinny.
	And it was like, what are you talking about?
	Could it have been that kind of a misunderstanding that it was leaked to Tucker?
	It could have been.
	Because when Chris says, how come he haven't asked him?
	You know, Tucker was kind of like, well, I don't know.
	Maybe I ought to talk.
	And Cotton's coming out talking about it.
	I don't know.
	There's many things, many angles here with this one.
	Do you think, Pat, do you think, honestly, in this four years, we're going to get anything about JFK and anything about Epstein and anything about 9-11?
	And I'm not talking about that little stupid thing where they have influencers.
	Look at my fake, stupid.
	Let me ask you this.
	Do you think for RFK Jr., do you think for RFK Jr., is it important that that information of what happened to his father and his uncle be public?
	Or do you think he would be happy that if just he knew about it and the world never found out?
	I think as a relative, especially in that system, he'd want to know private.
	I would take the private over anything.
	Do you think somebody from Trump's camp could sell RFK for saying, you be the one to know the truth, we'll show it to you, but you can't ever tell anybody?
	Probably.
	You think he'd be okay with that?
	Or do you think he would want the world to know what happened?
	I think he's a crusader.
	I think RFK Jr. feels to me like a true crusader.
	Which means what?
	I don't think he could be bought like that.
	No, what I'm saying is, do you think to him it's important that only he finds out for his own reasoning to be resolved?
	Or do you think he wants the world to find out?
	I think RFK is out.
	Okay, so if he wants the world to find out, then I think the Kennedy stuff's going to come out because he's got a heavy-duty job position.
	So that has to come out.
	The Epstein stuff, I don't know if the Epstein stuff's going to come out the way you're thinking, this guy.
	I agree.
	Well, why is he calling out Tom Cotton?
	For a very specific reason.
	Tom is the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
	It's a pretty high-up position.
	So I think he enlisted in the Army after 9-11.
	I think you want to say he's maybe in his early 40s.
	He's a pretty stoic, straightforward guy.
	If you've ever heard him say that.
	This is the first time I've heard anything bad about Cotton.
	He's not sort of like bombastic and out there like a Josh Hawley.
	They're similar.
	And I like Hawley.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, I love him.
	So, Tom Cotton, very stoic.
	By the way, he does interviews on Meet the Press, on MSNBC, all the time, pushing back against Kristen Welker.
	He'll get out there.
	So I'm going to take Tom Cotton at his word that he actually has been communicating with Tucker.
	Tucker knows how to stir the pot a little bit.
	I've never heard Tom Cotton's name in relation to these types of things, whether it's 9-11, whether it's the Epstein, whether it's RFK, whether it's JFK, whatever it is.
	What I know about Tom Cotton, he's been a staunch advocate for Trump, super hawkish on China.
	I think he wrote a book called Seven Things You Can't Say About China, something to that effect.
	He's all about banning TikTok.
	He wants China out of our policies, very hawkish on the border, very hawkish on foreign policy.
	Tom Cotton.
	Exactly.
	So this is the first time I'm hearing that there's anything contingent on this, but why is he doing?
	Why is Tucker calling him out?
	Because Tom Cotton is the head of the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
	That's why.
	And Tucker's fed up.
	Dude, I mean, I'm with Tucker, though, because I don't think Tucker just made this out of the way.
	And he hasn't slept in weeks.
	What I'm saying is, I don't think Tucker made that out of Tucker's like, listen, this is a fact.
	I'm speaking with the person that was supposed to get the job to give us what we want, but he's been held back because of Tom Cotton.
	That's why it's such a weird thing because it's like, you don't just make that up.
	These are, I think, facts that Tucker knows that Chris pushed them, and I'm happy Chris did it.
	And that's why he was like, well, if you know this and you know this, and he went, Tom Cotton of Arkansas.
	Well, boom, consider this.
	You know how they're rewriting maybe the definition of recession.
	Maybe they're rewriting the definition of day one.
	Maybe day one is going to be day five hundred.
	Let me say this to you.
	So, Rob, do you have the Ana Paulina clip?
	Her calling it disturbing, calls out the DOJ silence, urges Bondi to release the full Epstein files.
	This is Anna Paulina Luna calling out the DOJ silence on Epstein.
	Go forward, Rob.
	What's going on with the Epstein files, Congresswoman?
	Well, you know, I'm really actually happy that you asked that question.
	So I was tasked with the task force on declassification to look forward and investigate the files once they are released from the Attorney General's office.
	Now, I want to be clear about something.
	What we found in the last couple of weeks, and what's definitely apparent, is there's absolutely a war taking place in the intelligence agencies, right?
	We saw the CIA was reporting that they're worried about their own people leaking secrets to foreign countries.
	And we were also notified last week that there was a whistleblower that came forward stating that there was evidence being destroyed at the FBI.
	As soon as the FBI found out President Trump won the election, they started their deep state nonsense.
	And so I have full faith in Kash Patel and A.G. Bondi to deliver those files.
	But I want to be very clear about something.
	The American people want the truth.
	We don't want redactions.
	And although we are the same team, I'm going to continue to press for that transparency because that is exactly what the American people asked for when they elected President Trump.
	Good.
	Good for her, by the way.
	Check this out.
	Okay, the story continues in different places.
	Frustrations mount at Attorney General Bondi and Kash Patel as a Justice Department faces backlash over the botched Epstein files release.
	People are asking on social, we still haven't gotten the Epstein files.
	Where are the files?
	JFK, MLK.
	Bondi told Fox News on Sean Hannity on Monday that Patel delivered a truckload of evidence on Friday at ADM, admitting she was misled initially and promising more release after redactions amid a truckload of documents.
	Sunday, March 9th, was a very special day because it marked the deadline for DNI, the top U.S. intelligence overseer and Bondi to submit plans for releasing files on RFK and Martin Luther King assassinations as ordered by President Trump in January, who said present, present a plan for their full and complete release within 45 days.
	And I was March 9th.
	Vinny, I'm just listening.
	I have, these are one of those things, Pat, that this is the hill that I'll die on because I'm sick and tired of them.
	Keep pushing it and keep walking it back.
	I remember the video.
	I remember Glenn Beck sitting next to us, going, Oh, I know this and this is going to happen.
	And Kash Patel saying on day one.
	So now, since we are where we are right now and they're holding that back, it leads us to believe everything that we believe to be true is true.
	They're not releasing Epstein list because the people that were there are still here and they're still in power.
	Okay, it's not Trump.
	It's not these people.
	It's all the people that are around him, all these people that are embedded in government that have like all these allegedly Reid Hoffman and all these people that have been anti-Trump and putting all this money in to get Trump.
	Kash Patel, in his own words, day one, what happened?
	I'm curious.
	I wanted to ask them, what happened?
	You promised us day one.
	We've been sitting here with our freaking hands folded like a bunch of idiots.
	You're making us look stupid because the other side's like, okay, see, we told you Trump is involved, or this is involved, or that's involved.
	It's just bullshit.
	It's just, it drives me freaking crazy because we were lied to and now we look like idiots.
	Pisses me off.
	What's this, Rob?
	This is a montage of Kash Patel talking about what he would do on day one.
	Go for it.
	You're right.
	Epstein black book, like on day one.
	On day one, roll out the black book.
	So, will you work with me on this issue so we know who worked with Jeffrey Epstein in building the sex trafficking rings?
	Absolutely, Senator.
	Child sex trafficking has no place in the United States of America.
	And I will do everything if confirmed as FBI director to make sure the American public knows the full weight of what happened in the past.
	What happened?
	Who talked?
	All this talk, now you're the head of the FBI.
	Who goes into your office and goes, oh, by the way, everything that you were saying, shut up.
	He hasn't made, I haven't heard.
	Have you heard him speak since?
	Have you heard anybody?
	Have you heard a peep from Kash Patel?
	Have you heard a peep of any of these people that promised us, Pat?
	That drives me insane.
	I know they're busy.
	I know they're doing the job.
	I know they can't do interviews.
	I know they can't do podcasts, but where are you at?
	Where are we?
	Day one.
	Let me ask you a question, Tom.
	And this goes to the audience.
	I'm curious, Rob, if you want to run a poll or just kind of ask the question.
	What were the top three issues of why you supported Trump?
	Top three issues, not like the hill to die on.
	Like I voted for this.
	If you were to say, one is this, two is this, three is this, what was it for you?
	If you have it, go for it if you got it.
	The border.
	Okay.
	For sure.
	Wokeness.
	Yep.
	For sure.
	Yep.
	And then I would say just having moral clarity and making literally making America great again and bringing back patriotism to our country.
	What was yours, Tom?
	Mine was absolutely.
	By the way, I used to say it when Amy and I would do our polling things.
	I would say, hey, look, I don't have an opinion on the poll, but I have strong opinions about Tom the voter.
	I was all about all of the wokeness that had infected companies, that affected schools, potentially infect my daughter and her admissions, and the border number one.
	And I had those right together.
	So that's two.
	What's three?
	And there wasn't a number three.
	The economy was like number four and a half for me.
	So you don't have a three.
	So it's no, because those were so intense.
	You know what I'm saying?
	Okay, I got it.
	So woke.
	So woke and the border.
	Crazy liberal was my one and two.
	Vinny.
	My number one, and border is a horrible situation.
	I wanted to know because we can't figure out where we are right now until we know how the hell we got here.
	Okay.
	Plain and simple.
	Epstein lies.
	Okay.
	I don't know about the rest of you guys, but JFK murdering a sitting president.
	What's your three?
	My third one.
	D-I-B-L-E.
	So number one was what?
	All the JFK, 9-11, all the tragedies of this country.
	That's my number one.
	Number one was secrets.
	All the secrets I wanted to do here promised.
	Two, border, border security.
	Three?
	Three, DEI, BLM, all that racist bullshit.
	So by the way, guys, if you're watching this, can you put it in the PBD podcast circle if you got it?
	I know we have guys that are commenting.
	Thomas DeVito commented on Biden touching Melania's back.
	Jara Hitchens has commented there as well.
	Can you guys comment here on what your three were?
	I'm curious.
	In the circle, if you haven't downloaded it yet, go download the app, join the PBD podcast circle.
	I'm going to be, we're involved here communication-wise.
	So when you think about this, this is where I'm going with this.
	Where I'm going with this is if I am Trump's camp and if we ever ran the White House and if we were ever presidents, you know what division of ours would be the biggest one?
	We would have a team of 50 business analysts, data analysts.
	I mean, we would be look, our biggest budget, I would pay myself to have a lot of data analysts, right?
	And I would ask myself, how many people are like Vinny?
	Tom, what percentage of people do you think exactly what I figured it was?
	Look at that.
	It's only 10% of people that are like you, Vinny.
	Yeah.
	That's the part.
	It's only 10%.
	Look at that.
	Look at border.
	28% is the economy.
	29% is the woke.
	And border is 33.
	Okay.
	So when you look at some, that's how many voters?
	2,300 voters.
	Okay.
	And that's our audience that we're talking about.
	So that's a qualified audience that were polling this because they wanted this, right?
	So you're looking at where the numbers are at, where people are at.
	Okay.
	So if that's the case and no one has ever been able to become president and hit 100% of all the issues, if they fumble this one, they're like, well, we missed this one.
	We didn't hit it.
	They're going to lose a guy like you.
	Okay.
	When that happens, but they got to see what's more important to them today.
	Can you go back to the one that you had, Rob, by the way?
	Can you go back to the poll that you just had?
	Oh, I just ended the poll.
	Oh, you ended the poll.
	I did.
	I can give you the results.
	So in total, securing the border, 33%.
	That's in first place.
	Second place, battling the woke agenda at 28%.
	In third place, making the economy great again, 27%.
	And in 10%, the transportation.
	Okay, so let's score each one of them so far in the first, whatever, how long?
	So January 20th, February 20th, it's November 10th.
	From March 10th, let's just say we're at 40, 50, however many days we got, right?
	How would you score the JFK Epstein files being dropped?
	Zero to 10?
	I think it's 0.
	I think it's incomplete right now, right?
	Right.
	You're never going to see it.
	But they said on day one.
	Yeah.
	Day one at zero.
	Redefining the word.
	No problem.
	Number two.
	How would you score the economy?
	Not great right now.
	See, I give it a five, but I'm optimistic about how it's playing out.
	I give it a seven because I understand when you want to change something around.
	If you want to change a comp plan in a company to teach a new habit, it takes 90 days.
	If you want to do it to a country, imagine how long that'll take.
	It's going to take a minute.
	On the same page.
	So, border, how are we doing with the border?
	I think it's doing great.
	9 out of 10, 9 out of 10.
	Yeah, I agree.
	It's a 9 out of 10.
	But that was his number one priority.
	Sure, how do you score the woke?
	The craziness.
	Oh, that's also being displayed.
	That's the point.
	So what we're saying is you can't, like, a guy has 32 points, nine rebounds, one assist, four turnovers, and all we're talking about is all we're talking about is this guy had no blocks and no steals.
	He had no assists.
	Which, by the way, to a defensive coach, guess what's the most important?
	You guys, you didn't play defense.
	You had no blocks, you had no steals, none of this stuff, right?
	So in my eyes, they're like, well, listen, maybe we can't jerk.
	Don't get me wrong.
	For a guy like me, I want to know exactly what happened with Epsy.
	And I want to know exactly what happened with that list.
	I want to know exactly what happened with, you know, John F. Kennedy, MLK.
	I want to know exactly what happened there.
	But for whatever reason, Vinny, every time somebody that becomes a president claims they're going to release that, every single time, someone, I want to know who is that person, like you said earlier.
	What does that meeting look like for them to be able to say, here's, let me role play one for you.
	Okay.
	And tell me if this makes sense.
	Go ahead.
	Okay.
	You're the president.
	Okay.
	I'm that guy that nobody knows about.
	Okay.
	President Trump, I think it's time for that meeting.
	Okay.
	You know, there are things that happen behind closed doors to run the biggest country in the world that people can never know about.
	If they did, it would disrupt the entire nation.
	Do you understand that?
	I think I do.
	Okay.
	There are certain things that we've done in the history of our country for us to deal with evil in ways that we have to hold them accountable.
	You know what is one of the ways?
	Bribery.
	We have intel on certain people that if we leak that to the public, if we leak that to the public, we lose that leverage that we have with them.
	And we can't.
	And some of them are your allies.
	Let me tell you who we have here.
	Here.
	Boom, boom, boom.
	Some of those people.
	These are your guys.
	If you release it all, we have to release all of this to the public.
	Some of those guys are your friends.
	What do you want to do?
	Well, they're not going to be happy with me.
	So I'm going to.
	How about we set this aside as an issue for now?
	And we have a method on how to release it so you don't lose credibility.
	But let's move on from this topic.
	Here's what we're going to be doing.
	You're going to hear a guy say this.
	You're going to hear a guy say that.
	You want to be able to say something like this and then we're moving on.
	Make sense?
	A meeting like that takes place to say you have a job that's very complex and complicated.
	We're not going to talk about this stuff because we have leverage over certain people.
	You don't think America has worked with other agencies, Mossad, MI6, all these.
	Yeah, I mean, for me to believe that Mossad is innocent and CIA is innocent and MI6 is innocent.
	The stuff that these guys have on people, they work day and night.
	You think J. Edgar Hoover's documentary on why he never dropped anything on the mob?
	The mob doesn't exist.
	There is no such thing as the mafia.
	There is no such thing as organized crime.
	Oh, really?
	Why is that?
	Because they knew you were a cross-dresser behind closed doors.
	You don't want that to be leaked.
	Well, I just think it's a great exercise of what you did in pulling our audience because I think our audience is very much so.
	Who voted for Trump?
	I think it is telling that only 10% wanted what Vinny wants.
	I understand why Vinny is so passionate about this, but this goes on cash.
	Trump didn't get out there and basically promote the fact that he's going to do all this.
	He didn't campaign on this.
	This was Cash's hilt die on.
	So Vinny needs to hold Cash accountable.
	By the way, I've been hearing this woman's name, Anna Paulina Luna for months.
	This is the first time I've seen her.
	I get it now.
	Why people want to continue talking about her?
	Because, you know, they say that DC is Hollywood for ugly people.
	Well, not for her.
	I think she's a great person to basically be the representative of the House Oversight Committee Task Force for Declassification.
	Talk about making America great again.
	Good for her.
	By the way, there's a report out there that says that Republican women are more attractive than Democrat women.
	I mean, if you look at Christy Noam, if you look at Pam Buck.
	If you look at Laura Trump, if you look at our girl Paul.
	She's from Miami.
	She's doing making Miami great again.
	Panhandle.
	If you look at Panhandle.
	She's in this area.
	If you look at Lauren Boeber, if you look at Ivanka and you look at Melania, Anna Pauli Laura.
	Republicans are making women great again.
	Realize he is single.
	I think she's looking for a woman.
	I think she is married, though.
	Is she married?
	Listen, I'm not trying to criticize.
	Slow down a little later.
	She's trying to be TLC.
	Slow down a little lower to see if she is married.
	It's okay.
	It's okay.
	Don't worry about it.
	I think we're in her district right now.
	Hang on one second.
	Let's just see if she's married.
	Wait a minute.
	Don't the Democrats have a little bit of a child.
	Is she married or no?
	Okay, she's married.
	Let's pull her.
	She's a messianic Jewish Christian, and we can get the best of both worlds.
	You're absolutely right.
	Look at what the Democrats have.
	She's married.
	They got Elizabeth Warren.
	How did you miss that?
	They got Maxine Waters.
	They got Nancy Pelosi.
	They got Hillary Clinton.
	The best they got is AOC.
	I'll take a Republican.
	But my two things is this.
	Don't make a promise if you're not going to keep it.
	I knew he was going to come in and do the border.
	But those three issues, man, I didn't see it in that light, but I'm talking about like 9-11.
	If there's six pages or nine pages, I know.
	Oh, man.
	The implications are.
	And then that's why they call people like us crazies.
	Oh, you guys have all these theories.
	No, no, we have these theories because you guys are lying and you're keeping it.
	Vinny, I like you, man, but you're crazy, man.
	You got a dart snack, bro.
	Yeah, I like you, man.
	You can't, Vinny.
	You're crazy.
	Doesn't it make you believe that there is a shadow government?
	It makes you believe that there is the shadow government underneath.
	And remember Tucker?
	We went up to Maine, the mosquito capital of Earth, apparently.
	Remember, we went up there.
	Oh, my gosh.
	Well, we were up there in the same cabin in there.
	Great conversation with him, great dinner.
	And he made some comments to us at dinner that he's also repeated since then on other people's podcasts that he says, you know, Congress is scared to death.
	You talk to the average congressperson.
	They are scared to death of what?
	The intelligence communities.
	Yep.
	Absolutely scared to death.
	That when something comes up, the invisible hand reaches out.
	They're trying to call a shot and the shot gets pulled back.
	And this is Tucker who would know.
	Well, your good friend Chuck Schumer said, if you mess with the intelligence community, they got six ways of Sunday to get back to you.
	Let's go to the next.
	If Chuck Schumer is my good friend, I'm taking him hunting and I'm going to talk about the story.
	Here's a Fox News story going off of Thomas Massey.
	American sympathies for Israel fall to record low numbers.
	Poll fines.
	Adam, I hope you're ready for this.
	Here we go.
	All right.
	So Gallup poll from February 3rd to 16, 2025 reveals American sympathies for Israel in an Israel-Hamas war has dropped to a record low 46%, down from 51 in 2024.
	With the question of the Middle East situation, are your sympathies more with Israelis or more with the Palestinians?
	Showing the poll support for Israel in 25 years of annual polling by Gallup, a well-known research organization.
	Support for Palestinians has risen to 33%, a six percentage point increase from 2024, the highest in over two decades, while a partisan divide shows 83% of Republicans view Israel very mostly favorable compared to 48% independents and 33% of Democrats amid a temporary ceasefire and hostage exchange between Israel and Hamas, the Palestinian militant group controlling Gaza.
	Adam, why do you think this is?
	American sympathies for Israelis fall to record low.
	You know, this is why you can't necessarily look at the headlines.
	Record low from 51 down to 46.
	Okay, they lost five points.
	Great.
	But I'll ask you a question.
	Would you rather be liked or feared?
	Would you rather be liked or respected?
	I would argue that I'd rather be feared and respected.
	If I'm Israel, now I'm American, but I'm Jewish and I'm definitely pro-Israel.
	I feel like they've tried to be liked for a little too long.
	At this point, do you see what's going on with Christians in Syria?
	Do you see what's going on with Islamic jihadism in Sudan?
	Do you see what's going on with Boko Haram?
	Do you see what's going on with Hezbollah?
	You're not dealing with a typical, just, you know, bully.
	These are people that are willing to die for a cause and take out you, your family, your kids, your entire community for what they believe in.
	You know, you say that you respect the enemy.
	You have to respect the fact that these jihadists want to kill you.
	So it's kill or be killed.
	It's eat or be eaten.
	So if Israel's poll numbers are a little low in America, especially, heads up, guys, within the Democratic Party, then that's okay.
	Second point to my Jewish friends in America who won't wake up and realize the Democratic Party is no longer your friend and you're still tikkun olam with trying to make peace in the world within the Democratic Party.
	Time to wake up and realize Trump is the best president, best friend to Israel that maybe we've ever had.
	Trump is very clear.
	He's on the side of our ally, Israel, not the terrorists.
	It's pretty damn simple.
	Now, whether his promises or threats are actually fulfilled, we'll still see.
	But I'm totally okay with not being as liked as before because we're killing terrorists that are trying to kill us.
	Tom.
	So there's a couple things here that I think create lies or create spurious data.
	This is a broad poll of Americans done by Gallup.
	Broad poll.
	And in broad polls, you have a lot of perceptions that are in the polls, and you have a lot of the informed that are in the polls, and you have the very informed.
	So look at that.
	The very informed, the informed, and then those that have a perception.
	They're not fully informed.
	And with the mainstream media and what's been going on on college campuses and everything in America with this pro-Palestinian bent that does not represent broad America, but does show up as broad media from the MSM, guess what you get?
	You get a movement.
	And Adam pointed something out in the numbers.
	Absolutely correct.
	This is only a move from 51 to 46.
	This is not a cataclysmic market crash.
	This is nothing.
	And I think what we have here is a broad poll shows that the cumulative effect of the Palestinian coverage and our mainstream media has in fact moved the polls.
	Because how could any informed person take a look at the condition of the hostages that came back and look at these emaciated, abused people and tell me that you're sympathetic to the captors?
	The answer is you wouldn't be.
	How can you be?
	And so that's kind of the way I see this here.
	You know, this is a small movement making a big headline.
	There, like this.
	Look at this and tell me, how are you not sympathetic to these men who were in captive and look how they were treated and look at the results?
	This is horrible.
	Vinny.
	Yeah, well, I think because it's what was the thing was the decline.
	What was it, Tom?
	The decline of the sympathy, meaning like basically what?
	Feeling sorry.
	And I think, I think sympathetic towards it.
	Well, I mean, I think there's a bunch of, there's a couple of factors, and you have to start with just from the war itself.
	I mean, October 7th, they still, and I saw some of the fighting.
	I saw some in their parliament.
	I don't know what their government structure is like, but they were going at Bibi.
	They were yelling at them about security and stuff like that.
	About October 7th, which we still remember, what was his name?
	Do you remember that guy's name?
	John Kirby.
	When they were like, what happened?
	Now's not the time.
	How long?
	We're over a year.
	Still no answers of how that day could have happened.
	That's one thing.
	But I think the sympathy is like, okay, like, I think the high civilian, it's high civilian casualty of that war, of the ongoing war, I think people, you have to feel like people are still kind of thrown back at the way that it went.
	And I get, I understand, guys, Hamas is there.
	Hamas are terrorists.
	I think a lot of Americans are like, guys, there are allies.
	They could have gone about that war a little bit different.
	You know, wiping everything out, flattening Gaza, I don't think is sitting in the Americans.
	It doesn't sit well with Americans because that's the main, I think that's one of the main things is like the way that they could have done it could have been a little bit more strategic instead of just wiping out.
	Well, I'm just giving an answer to why they would be upset.
	If I was Bibi Netanyahu, by the way, whose approval numbers are going up, if I was in his war cabinet, I would say, listen, man, slow down.
	Maybe you're going a little too hard.
	Yes.
	And then he would say, give me hostages back.
	That's our demand.
	Once you give us the hostages, we will stop bombing you.
	Yeah, but I mean, these are the things that are not.
	So Hamas has a choice.
	Hamas has loudly, proudly, the leaders of Hamas said, We're willing for our people to die for our cause.
	They believe in being martyrs.
	Yahya Sinmar has proudly said this.
	So they're willing to sacrifice their people.
	Like they talked about a genocide.
	Your leaders are willing to sacrifice you.
	So, like, which way does it work?
	You think, I mean, they give us the hostages.
	Okay, no.
	So, imagine they had your children.
	You would.
	No, that's a hot.
	And you're Christian.
	I know how close you are to everything you believe.
	Vinny, do you see what's going on in Syria now?
	Of course.
	What do you mean?
	I was watching.
	Do you see what's going on?
	Yeah, of course.
	Those are your people.
	Well, the world, and the world's not talking.
	Hold on.
	We talk about it.
	There's small groups talking about it.
	Why isn't it on the main stage?
	And why aren't more people pissed off than Christians?
	Because when it's Christians, nobody gives a shit.
	But we're getting about it else.
	Everybody gives a shit.
	But hold on, let's stay here.
	We're talking about it now.
	What would you do if those are your people?
	You're from, you're a Syrian, which is Babylonian, which is modern-day Iraq.
	Yeah.
	Where's your community now?
	We don't have a country.
	Why?
	Because we were crazy warriors and we were fighting.
	No, because the caliphate came in and said, get out or you will die.
	Or pay the jizya tax.
	Or you're infidels.
	Because, and it's not all Muslims.
	I have great Muslim friends.
	But even if it's 1%, which is more, of 2 billion people, that's 20 million people who are willing to die and sacrifice their lives to kill you.
	Do we have any of the videos of Syria?
	Yeah, let's see if we can get this video.
	I do have this video.
	Yeah, I don't know if we can show that for you.
	How graphic is this one?
	But this is a mass, unidentified Assyrian Christian talking about how the media is not reporting on what is going on, that there are people going through and killing women and children in the region.
	For being Christian.
	Because I don't want anyone to see my face because if they see me, they will kill me.
	I'm from Syria.
	I live now in the city of Latakia.
	Please, please, please.
	The media is not showing you anything.
	The terrorists are killing everyone, children, women, teenagers, old people, just killing.
	There is more than a hundred bodies in my there is more than a hundred bodies in my village.
	Now, even in the city, they are just taking the children and the women and kill them.
	I don't know what to do with my mom and my two sisters.
	Please, you gotta help us.
	Nobody is talking anything about it.
	Not the social media or the TV channels.
	They are all hiding the truth.
	They are saying that they are killing the resistance, but this is ended up two days ago.
	Please, you gotta help us.
	They have been killing people since two days until now.
	Hundred and hundred and hundred of bodies are thrown in the street, in the villages, and in the city of Syria.
	We are not allowed to go out of the house.
	They just come to the houses, take the people, kill them outside of the house, and take all the phones so nobody record or do anything.
	Please, you gotta help us.
	I have to, I have two sisters.
	I have two sisters.
	I don't know what to do with them.
	It's okay for me if I die, but not for my two sisters or my mom.
	One of them is a teenager.
	Please, you gotta help us.
	Nobody's talking anything about it.
	Human rights, United Nations, anyone, America, anyone, anyone, just please help us.
	What are the units you have to do?
	This is heartbreaking to listen to us.
	Heartbreaking.
	And you know, the saddest thing about it is nobody's going to help them.
	Nobody is going to help the Christians because nobody gives a shit about us, period.
	And I understand what you're saying.
	The question going back was, why is the sympathy for Israel getting lesser?
	I think it's because they're getting tired.
	Do the Americans get tired?
	Because October 7th, they for a year everybody was like, it was all crazy.
	Now it's kind of died down.
	We just gave Israel another $4 billion.
	Nobody really talked about it.
	And Americans are just like, you know, I'm shocked you're missing the point here.
	I didn't miss the point.
	I'm not giving an answer of why are the numbers dropping by 6%?
	That's not what I'm worried about.
	Well, that's what the question was.
	Vinny.
	Yes, it was.
	Okay, listen.
	What that guy just said is they're going around killing people indiscriminately.
	Why?
	Because they're Christians.
	Okay, okay.
	Who else are they killing?
	Whoever.
	I don't know, Adam.
	They're killing any minority that is not their faction of Islam.
	Druze?
	Alawites?
	If there's any Jews left, they're dead.
	So who cares if percentages of sympathies have dropped?
	Let's recognize what it is.
	Radical Islamic terrorism will exterminate an entire region.
	Focus on that.
	It's not about Jews.
	It's not about Christians.
	It's not about the Druze.
	It's not about the Alawites.
	It's about this faction of radical Islam will take out anybody in their path.
	By the way, did you see that clip of maybe 10 years ago when Trump understands the difference between Assad versus whoever else is out there?
	Do you have that clip by any chance?
	He says, he says, why does Russia support Assad?
	He goes, we got to take out ISIS, but we have no idea who's on the other side.
	Well, we're finding out who's on the other side.
	So if you can't find that clip, maybe we can show some other clips of what's happening in Syria.
	Rob, you have a check your text.
	You have to.
	You have to understand, this is what they're trying to eradicate.
	This is what Israel is fighting every single time.
	So going back, and Adam, I understand everything that you're saying, and I agree with what you're saying.
	The question was, that came to me, was why Is the percentage, even though it's small, going down?
	What does that?
	What does it have to do?
	So, you mean to tell me this is why Israel's losing sympathies because Syrian terrorists are killing Christians?
	No, he's combining what's going on in Syria with what's going on with the camp that same Free Palestine.
	He's combining those two together because they are related.
	Yes, Rob, what is the terrorist sympathizer?
	This is what we sent.
	This is President Trump, I believe, 10 years ago regarding Assad.
	Let's hear the clip.
	Go for it.
	So I've watched Assad, and I've lost weight since the other side.
	The problem is the other side of Assad, we have no idea who they are.
	They probably are ISIS.
	I'm saying, are we better off with Assad?
	We have no idea who these people are.
	We give them weapons, we give them ammunition, we give them everything.
	Aaron, we have no idea who I mean, maybe it's worse than Assad.
	So, what are we doing?
	Why are we involved?
	We have to get rid of ISIS, very importantly, but I look at Assad, and Assad to me looks better than the other side.
	And you know, this has happened before: we back a certain side, and that side turns out to be a total catastrophe.
	Russia likes Assad seemingly a lot.
	Let them worry about ISIS, let them fight it out.
	So, I've watched Assad, and let's show those clips of what's going on in Syria.
	If the Gays for Gaza crew and the Free Palestine crew want my respect, I want to hear you protest about what's going on in Christians.
	Go ahead, Palestinian brigade.
	Talk about what's going on, Christians, because you don't like killing of innocent people, right?
	Yep, you don't like genocide, right?
	But they won't say shit because they only condemn what Israel does to other people.
	They don't talk about what's going on in Yemen, they don't talk about what's going on in Syria, they don't go talk about what's going on in Lebanon, they don't talk about what's going on in Sedan.
	All they want to talk about is when Israel bombs Hamas or Hezbollah or whatever they do.
	You want my respect, Palestinian crew?
	Talk about what's going on in the Christians, then you'll have a little bit of my respect.
	Watch this: bark like a dog.
	Go ahead.
	They're making Christians crawl and bark like dogs as they beat them and shoot them simply for being Christians in Syria.
	Is that the end of the clip?
	There's gunshots.
	Let me give it to you from my angle on what's going on.
	So, if I see the number on it's lowered what?
	By six points?
	Was it five points or six points that it's lowered by?
	Let's say five points it's lowered by.
	Okay.
	How much of that is people who are sick and tired of just giving money out to anybody, period?
	How much of that is the APAC community that they're being critical of APAC and how many congressmen and senators they own?
	How much of that is the recent virality effect on social of people saying things about how much control and power, what do you call it, Mossad has and Israel has?
	How much of that is the messaging being said about the level of bribery that they have to hold people hostage and there's a reason why Epstein?
	How much of that is that?
	I would say what?
	A lot.
	I think a lot of it is that.
	Okay, the poll here, our audience, 5,200 people voted, right?
	5,265 voted.
	5,300 people voted, okay?
	61.
	Do you have more sympathy for Israelis or Palestinians?
	61% Israelis, 39% Palestinians.
	And then the comment section is: God forbid, if you defend Israelis, you're a Zionist, you're this.
	They're calling Tom Israel first.
	He's this, he's that.
	So, okay.
	So, that's the part where people nowadays are afraid of having labels on them.
	You're a bigot.
	You're a racist.
	You're a, what do you call it?
	Whatever it is, Zionists, you're this, you're that.
	By the way, that actually had a lot of power on a lot of people for a long time.
	Doesn't carry the same weight anymore today.
	But I'm going to give you the flip side of it.
	You know what's by far the best case study?
	Here's by far the best case study.
	Tate is here last week.
	Okay.
	Do you know how many people message me?
	Screw you saying stuff about Pierre Polivier.
	You don't even, you're, he should never go on your podcast because of papa papa papa, you know, what do you call it with um uh Tate?
	I cannot believe you have Tate on.
	Why did you platform that guy?
	My challenge with Pierre is the fact that he reminded me of DeSantis and Nikki Haley, just elitists that think they're too good to go out there and talk to anybody.
	And I've never liked that vibe.
	Never could for DeSantis.
	He finally showed up.
	We had a great conversation together and got a lot of eyeballs.
	Nikki Haley never showed up.
	At least DeSantis showed up and he sat down.
	We had a conversation together.
	But his team was very much arrogant.
	Like they're already like, they're already a president.
	I don't like that vibe.
	I've never liked that vibe since I was a kid.
	But watch this.
	What's his name comes here on the podcast?
	Andrew Tate.
	And I ask him about what's going on with Israel, UK, Muslim, Islam, everything.
	Okay?
	Because he made some comments about Muslims on what's going on in the UK.
	If you're not going to live the way UK lives, get the hell out.
	Who's he talking to?
	Muslims.
	Muslims.
	Do you know how many people reacted on the podcast that we had?
	How many Muslim podcasts reacted to what Tate said about Jews and Muslims and criticizing him for giving a reasonable answer?
	A lot of them.
	What was his answer?
	What did he say?
	Do you remember what he said?
	Stop blaming Israel forever.
	They're not your problem.
	Your arms look skinny.
	Is that Israel's fault?
	Hit the gym, loser.
	So the point, the point there, the point there is that in the Middle East, Israel has negotiated better.
	Israel has better terms.
	Israel has a better community of people that are getting them to pass policies that favor Israel.
	You're naive if you don't believe that's what's taking place.
	Of course, that is what's taking place with the level of negotiation they have.
	Guess what they do?
	They invest more money in education in their kids.
	They invest more money into getting their guys to be bought into their country.
	They get their people to go back to Israel.
	They'll pay for the school.
	They'll travel you back because they want to do what?
	They want to ingrain that culture in you so you love who you are.
	By the way, I wish Assyrians did that.
	I wish Armenians did that.
	I wish everybody did that.
	But no, they're upset that those guys are doing that.
	And for me, when I see something like this, all I think about is this: who makes communities better?
	Who makes communities better?
	You can say whatever you want.
	Who makes communities better?
	No, did Jewish people ruin UK?
	Nope.
	Did Armenians ruin UK?
	Nope.
	Did blacks ruin UK?
	Nope.
	Who was it?
	What is it?
	What's the most common name right now in UK?
	Muhammad.
	It is Muhammad.
	Why is stabbing so high?
	Why has the culture changed so much?
	Who did that?
	Jews did that?
	Why is Poland training their people the way they are?
	Because they don't want it.
	Because they know what happens when you culturally try to change somebody.
	And I'm sorry.
	You can be uncomfortable talking about this.
	Stats.
	You hate stats?
	That's the stats.
	You want to talk about who Planned Parenthood, you know, destroyed the most?
	You ever seen the interview with Sanger on what she says about what she says with Sanger?
	Yeah.
	You ever seen what she says about abortion and blacks and how she feels.
	Tom hates it.
	Tom hates.
	I know Tom.
	Have you ever actually seen her in an interview on what she says?
	Rob, if you have this clip with her.
	If you haven't, watch her eyes, everyone.
	Watch her eyes.
	Is this the interview?
	Go for it, Rob.
	Play this.
	What is she saying here?
	I believe so.
	I can play it.
	I have not listened to it yet.
	I think this is the clip.
	Watch this interview.
	Go forward.
	Eyes are the window of the soul.
	When I say believe, I don't mean to believe in committing sin.
	Do you believe there is such a thing as a sin?
	Well, I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world that have diseased from their parents, that have no chance in the world to be a human being, practically.
	Delinquents, prisoners, all sorts of things.
	Marked when they're born.
	That to me is the greatest sin that people can commit.
	But sin in the ordinary sense that we regard it, do you believe or do you not believe?
	What would they be?
	Do you believe that infidelity is a sin?
	Well, I don't.
	I'm not going to specify, but I think it's a sin.
	I state it.
	I think it's the worst sin.
	Yes.
	But then you asked me to say what, and I said what, and you refused to answer me?
	Yes, I do not know about infidelity.
	It has so many personalities to it.
	What person's own belief is you can't generally.
	What community gets the most abortions in America?
	The black community.
	So you think she was for blacks?
	Absolutely not.
	You think she was for blacks?
	You can sit there and statistically look at things and get to an argument and say, you know what?
	I'm sorry.
	You can say whatever you want.
	This is not favoring your argument, period.
	So to me, I understand whatever's happened.
	I think people are just burned out with helping out Ukraine.
	They're just burned out.
	They're just burned out.
	Israel.
	They're just burned out with so many of it.
	They're just like, listen, can we just move on?
	I think a big portion of the people that were voting, I will say a bigger portion of Democrats and independents that voted for Trump, they actually didn't want war.
	They wanted peace.
	Those guys, top three, I'm willing to bet if we ask them who voted for Trump, they wanted security.
	They wanted these things to be done.
	They were afraid of World War III.
	What's this clip you got here from the Shah, by the way?
	Rob, probably, what year did he die?
	81.
	Okay, so give or take?
	So this is probably in the mid to late 70s, I'm assuming.
	Where his opinion on what's going on with the Palestinians.
	Go ahead.
	Turn to the Palestinians.
	The Palestinians obviously had the sympathy of many, many people, many, almost all the countries in the world.
	Prosecuted people, stateless people, looking for a home or something.
	You know, exactly like the sympathy that the Jews had when they were searching for a home.
	Right.
	But our good Palestinian friends must know that there is only a limit to where they can go and bully the world.
	Bully the world?
	Yes, by terrorism and blackmailing and this and that.
	You know perfectly well, Your Majesty, that the leaders of the Arab world find the Palestinians as much a problem almost as the Israelis do.
	Isn't that a fact?
	What I can say is that they should really open their eyes, reassert their situation.
	And if there is a hierarchy and someone there in command.
	Of the Palestinians, you mean?
	Of the Palestinians to start a new policy.
	Because the actual one is going to lead them nowhere.
	With whom do they really have understanding?
	With Assad, with Sadat, with Hussein?
	That's a very good question.
	They have none with any of these leaders.
	Not to my knowledge.
	And they seem to be out of control.
	It seems so today.
	And what about the Arab leader who supports the Palestinians?
	Well, I think it's so telling.
	He was giving them advice that you do have certain sympathies around the world.
	I think it's interesting that this article talks about American sympathies for Israel versus the Palestinians.
	He was giving our Palestinian friends a heads up.
	He said, there are certain people in the world that have sympathies for you, but you're not going to bully the world.
	He used very specific terms.
	He speaks very eloquently.
	You're not going to create terrorism.
	You're not going to blackmail people.
	You're creating a bigger problem than you are solving the problem.
	He says, I highly suggest you reassess your situation and develop a better policy and better strategy that will hopefully put you in a better place.
	I'll ask you this.
	Has their policy changed at all?
	If anything, it's gotten worse.
	They have not tried to negotiate.
	They have not accepted any sort of peace deal.
	They're in a worse situation than they were in the 70s.
	They have not chose their enemy wisely in the capacity that they have zero game plan.
	Their game plan, from what it seems, is to attack, lose, cry victim, wait a few years, attack, lose, cry victim.
	It's going on for perpetuity, and he called it out right there.
	And it's been 40 years since then, and nothing's changed.
	Well, I mean, listen, for what it's worth, if you spend some time watching clips of the Shah, I've watched anything and everything I can find over the years, you will realize how safe the Middle East was when he was running.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	They got along with everybody.
	They were the second country after the United States, Iran, to recognize the state of Israel in 1949.
	I know.
	I know.
	And look at this.
	And the revolution that has spread since 1979 has been one of the worst traits of the world, all caused by the Ayatollah.
	And guess what?
	Saddam Hussein, say what the hell you want about him.
	He kept all those freaking people in check.
	All right.
	It was until we did an illegal war and made them hang his ass.
	And then what happened to the Middle East?
	So thank you.
	It's almost like what's worse, an autocrat or jihadist.
	All right, let's go to the next clip.
	Let's go to the next clip.
	Let's go to the next clip.
	All right.
	So Whoopi Goldberg and the View.
	So this is the International Women's Day.
	On International Women's Day, do you know who the View has as a guest?
	You ready?
	Let me guess.
	Dylan Mulvaney.
	Or International Women's Day.
	And they wonder why they keep losing Democrats.
	They wonder why they keep losing Democrats.
	But you have to hear what Whoopi said here.
	I just want to get your thoughts.
	I asked everybody, guys, how did you take this thing here when you watch it yourself?
	And Rob was giving me his perspective.
	I want to know what you think about this.
	Rob, go on and play this clip.
	When you come in and you say, oh, you know, these men, these are men, you know, competing, competing against women, you're assuming that the women are weak and just can't do anything except they?
	Have you seen female athletes?
	They know what they're doing.
	So i'm not sure what's going on or why.
	This is an issue adam, I mean Rob.
	So at one I remember having a conversation with a woman who was incredibly woke and I said at what point, when a man wants to identify as a woman uh, do you accept it?
	She goes right away.
	I said so right away.
	Once they identify as something you're, you're willing to allow them to be the gender that they.
	So I said, so, i'm a dude right, she goes.
	Yeah, and I go.
	But now i'm a woman, she goes, okay, I go.
	Am I a woman now?
	She goes, yeah, if you feel that way, I go.
	No, i'm not, i'm a dude.
	So like, what game are we playing?
	And she got very upset with me and I go excuse me, don't talk to a lady that way, and now I start mocking her, but I realize the absurdity of her.
	However, you feel you can identify Rob, here's a picture of Dylan Milvaney just a few years ago.
	Let me know if you have this.
	I sent it to you via text, so It's in your text.
	Oh, he's still a dude.
	Can we just make this clear?
	He's a dude.
	It's a dude playing dress.
	He's got testicles underneath that dress.
	So it's the view, all chicks, and a dude, a well-shaved dude.
	Let's just not forget, guys.
	Don't let them know.
	That's who he was.
	It was just a dude holding tampons in his hand.
	So they just had a vote in Congress about banning men from women's sports.
	I think 100% of the Republicans voted against it.
	Yeah, I guess the question I got is Whoopee's perspective.
	What is Whoopee saying?
	Do you have opinions on what Whoopee said?
	I think Whoopee's basically making the case as like men competing in there as if women can't step up and actually compete with these men.
	That's how delusional and how stupid.
	And that's why you notice the audience, nobody's clapping.
	Even Dylan's, him and his testicles have no idea what the hell is going on or what she's saying.
	It's complete lunacy.
	Do you have the high jump?
	The guy that decides to go compete with ladies and how he performed against the ladies.
	He ate triple jump last week.
	Yeah, triple jump.
	If you have the clip, Rob.
	Did you see the guy that woman that dumped it on the chick and like basically put his nose in her face?
	Yeah.
	He's like.
	Can you pull up that clip, Rob?
	What clip is he talking about?
	Look at the triple jump.
	Adam watches interesting videos.
	Unfortunately, these videos exist at this point.
	Look at this.
	Triple jump and it's set up for women.
	This is set up for women.
	Look at this.
	And that's a guy.
	That's a dude.
	Is there an interview afterwards?
	Did you hear that?
	Is there audio, Rob?
	We can hear that.
	Oh, that's the interview.
	That's the interview.
	Let's hear the interview, what he says.
	Just playing dress up.
	High school, amazing.
	Three wins today.
	What is the SMR?
	SMR, long triple, and then have highlighter.
	And you still got the high jump.
	Amazing performances.
	So far, how are you feeling?
	You just go out a day and went today at the Ontario Relays.
	Oh, I'm very excited.
	I don't know.
	Is this a guy?
	That's a dude.
	I was like, oh, maybe I'm not going to do as good as triple, but I'm glad that I performed pretty well, and I'm just excited.
	What do you think?
	Just as Paul.
	Do you know what this is, Beth?
	This is, besides the insanity part of it, besides the insanity, these dudes are just lazy pieces of you-know-what.
	Because you cannot compete against other men.
	Let me ask the question.
	Yeah.
	That person.
	She's in high school.
	You mean he?
	Well, he's in high school.
	How much of him behaving that way is his parents?
	How much of it is him?
	I think a lot of it comes to either trauma or something happened in his life where they didn't deal with the actual problem that was going on.
	What percentage you put on the parents?
	I put 80% on the parents.
	Toma, what percentage you put on the parents?
	I'm with him.
	I put 70, 80% on the parents on the enabling side, and then I put 30% on some sort of trauma or crisis.
	We start questioning himself.
	And there's the outcome, America.
	There's the outcome where we now think feelings are okay.
	Your feelings, whatever feelings you have.
	So we're going to ratify your feelings and saying you're okay.
	But there's a hell of a jump, no pun intended, from your feelings are okay and trying to, you know, make somebody not feel bad, which is not the way to handle these things.
	And then say, oh, and you also want to do other things now that you feel this way?
	Well, certainly I don't want you to feel bad, so I'm going to let you do them.
	Wait a minute.
	Now you've discriminated against a whole group of people.
	Yeah, I put it right.
	And to your question, I'm 70% parents, 30%.
	There's some sort of a crisis or something caused by individuals.
	Let me do this.
	Let me do this while we're moving off from this.
	Rob, can you pull up the Bernie Sanders concert clip and who he brings up, okay?
	This is why you're losing people.
	This is why the Democrat.
	Did you hear what Van Jones said yesterday?
	We'll go to the Van Jones clip afterwards, but if you can find that clip, Vinny, do you have the concert you texted to?
	Yeah, Rob, did I?
	Did I?
	There is one specific one with the key.
	Bernie Sanders, it was, yeah, it was a trans.
	I actually wrote this down.
	Let me write it down.
	So, Bernie Sanders had a transgender singer, Laura performed at his rally.
	And you know what?
	I'm not going to say it because it was blasphemous.
	It was disrespectful and should not be celebrated.
	The song was, and Rob, trust me, you don't want to play it.
	You're going to piss people off.
	God have, does God have a big fat?
	You know what?
	And then kept going.
	And even the hand interpreter was like, what the?
	Didn't even know what to do because they're disrespecting God.
	Okay, why don't you do it?
	And let's just don't put the audio.
	Let's just see the hand interpreter.
	I've seen this.
	Just turn off the audio, Rob, if you could.
	Go forward.
	Look at the.
	Look at the hand to big.
	Here it comes.
	Big fat.
	Yeah.
	Look at that.
	She's like, what the?
	Can we can't sing?
	Well, they're talking about God and big, and that's God.
	Okay, and but where is that?
	That's the key.
	This is where.
	This is at a Bernie Sanders rally, and then he comes on after and thanks him, her, she, them.
	Can you find that clip, Rob?
	Can you find that show?
	So Bernie, Rob, Rob, Bernie.
	We just had one of Bernie's biggest supporters, Ben Cohen, the founder of Ben and Jerry's, was here.
	We did the podcast last week.
	That's it.
	Look how crazy his eyes look.
	Is that him thanking him?
	That's him thanking a couple people.
	Let me see it, God.
	Rob, play the clip.
	Me thank the University of Wisconsin Park Site for the venue.
	Let me thank Kinsella and Pulse LLC for the music.
	Here comes Laura Jane Grace for the music.
	Right there.
	Laurie, Ellen, Randy, and Commander.
	Laura Jane Grace.
	You're thanking a blasphemous interviewer.
	By the way, Van Jones, if you can find Van Jones, he says, we're in deep issue with the Democratic Party.
	Guess what?
	This is why you're getting your ass handed to you.
	Because you think just because Democrats, all of them are Democrats, they're 100% supporting this.
	They're not.
	I'm willing to bet two-thirds of Democrats are sitting there saying, hell you guys talking about?
	Rob, that's the clip right there.
	That's the one he's saying that absolutely keep.
	Is that the one, Rob?
	What does it say in the description?
	Can you look it up?
	Because the girl in the middle is the one.
	Van Jones, Tomo Democrats.
	That's the one.
	That's the one.
	Watch this clip.
	And he's right.
	Go forward.
	Yeah.
	And then just lastly, Van, in terms of Democrats and where they go from here, this last week, we did see them try to, some people try to protest during the president's address and then house leadership getting on to them.
	Other Democrats calling them out.
	They still seem to be wandering around trying to figure this out.
	What's your take?
	Can we ask another question during talking about my own party?
	Can we talk about Ukraine or something?
	No, no.
	Look, man, we're screwed.
	I mean, we don't know.
	No, Democrats don't know what to do.
	This is a nightmare.
	You know, somebody like Donald Trump, we thought we'd at least have Hakeem Jeffries in the speaker's chair to hold him back if we didn't have Kamal in there to do the right thing.
	Listen, the Democratic Party is going through a massive set of internal crises.
	You have to get trapped two ways.
	One, defending a broken status quo that nobody likes because they thought that Donald Trump was going to make it worse.
	But when you're defending the status quo, you're going to lose.
	And then offending most people in the country, calling everybody sexists and racist and transphobic and every other name, and then saying, please follow us.
	That's not a good strategy, folks.
	Bingo.
	Defending a broken status quo.
	Bingo.
	And offending most of the country.
	So guess what?
	You can pause it at that point.
	I mean, that's the part when you're watching this kind of stuff where Van Jones is cornered to the point that he has to say, hey, guys, this strategy kind of sucks.
	You're judging everybody and yet you want them to join you.
	And then you want to have a performance of a guy mocking God.
	And then you want to have a woman on International Day.
	You want to put a guy there, Dylan Mulvaney.
	You couldn't have chosen a better lady to put on there than a Dylan Mulvaney.
	That's a spitting in women's face.
	You're pushing.
	Keep doing.
	Republicans ought to sit there and say, please keep doing that.
	Keep doing that.
	Bill Maher is sitting there saying, Bill Maher is so close to being a Republican, but he just cannot do it.
	He knows if he does it, he will never be invited to those parties ever again.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	I love it.
	If you ask the question, who do you put this on?
	Do you put this on the parents?
	Do you put this on the children?
	Everyone can get a little blame.
	You know, I also blame women themselves.
	At what point, if you're the girls in high school, do you say, no, no, no, I'm not competing with this dude playing dress up, competing with us?
	Like, you have no idea how much respect I have for someone like Riley Gaines, who's out there.
	She's getting hated on by women who are basically saying you're anti-woman or you're anti-wit by woke liberal women.
	Thank you.
	So what Van Jones is doing is calling out the Democratic Party.
	I don't remember who it was, but we've said it multiple times.
	All Trump and the Republicans are doing is taking 80-20 issues and going on the 80% side and letting the Democrats, who have a 31% approval rating, the lowest on record in our lifetime, and then let them take the 20% of the issue.
	It makes no sense.
	Let's go to the next story.
	Stephen A. Smith ends up getting his $100 million contract from ESPN.
	Well deserved.
	I think he's still underpaid, but congratulations to him.
	He makes more money than a lot of NBA players.
	Matter of fact, I think there was a chart showing that the guy makes more money than most NBA players.
	However, wow, I mean, he didn't even have a chance to celebrate his contract.
	Gets a $100 million contract.
	Then all of a sudden, he's at a game watching the Lakers play.
	Rob, if you have that clip of him watching the Lakers play where LeBron walks up on him, watch this clip here, guys.
	Watch this.
	Ford.
	What do you think he said?
	Okay, so Rob, do you have the words on what was said?
	Because there's clips.
	Is this him explaining what happened?
	Yes.
	Okay, play this clip here.
	Go for it.
	LeBron ambushed me at the Lakers game last night.
	The guy came right up to me, court side, and yelled in my face.
	He said, fuck you, Stephen A.
	I take craps bigger than you.
	Plus, I heard you said Bronnie sucks at basketball and he's only in the middle of the day.
	You're saying that on yesterday.
	I made the Lakers draft him.
	So I said to him, You can't say that word.
	Rob, is this AI?
	You got your son a job.
	He didn't deserve it.
	White people do it all the damn time.
	So I don't blame you.
	LeBrony is shorter than a guard.
	No.
	And he lays more bricks than a tequila fuel.
	No, no, that's not.
	And this is fake.
	This is watching the lips.
	That is not me.
	No care, bro.
	I was like, wait, Bronnie James should work out.
	Yo, the lips.
	Go find a clip of him saying what he said.
	Rob, I didn't even find that clip, bro.
	That was on Twitter and AI got.
	Well, if it was on Twitter, it must be true.
	Well, there was no, no, there's a one that he's reacting to.
	Yeah, and he's like, okay, while Rob's finding that, go ahead, Vinny.
	Your thoughts on this.
	Okay, so a few things for me.
	Well, I mean, congratulations to Stephen A.
	I don't think anybody special in that space deserves it more.
	But, you know, and you guys are going to see the conversation.
	I found it.
	Hang on, I found it.
	I found that it's a minute.
	Is this a minute clip, Rob?
	A minute clip.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Go forward, Rob.
	Go forward.
	He approached me during the game and he said, stop effing with my son.
	That's my effing son.
	Stop effing with my son.
	I said, what?
	Nah, nah, nah.
	Straight up, man-to-man.
	Real talk.
	Stop effing with my son.
	And I saw how furious he was.
	And I said, We talked about it.
	Nah, F that, F that.
	Stop effing with my son.
	That's my son.
	That's my son.
	I said, All right, dog.
	Fine.
	And he walked away.
	That's all he said.
	I knew what he was talking about.
	I've spoken about this before.
	Matter of fact, I heard that not many, not all, but a few players were upset at me about that.
	I think one player in particular was Traymon Green, who I haven't spoken to since and has no desire to speak to me primarily because of this, I suppose.
	And I found out the way that I found out, which was last night.
	Vinny.
	Okay.
	So long story short, Stephen A. Smith is what?
	What's his job at ESPN?
	Sports.
	He's a sports reporter, sports analyst.
	Thank you, Adam.
	So him criticizing Bronnie James being in the NBA basically because of his father, okay, LeBron James.
	And he just said he doesn't believe that he's ready for the league and would benefit more development in college or in the G-League.
	Okay.
	That's just it.
	Okay.
	So LeBron crying and the whole father point of view, but like I'm anti-the whole that was a father.
	Talking, no, no, no.
	You're the reason that your son is way in way over his head.
	Okay.
	Bronny's good, but he needs time to develop.
	You just want to be on the court with your son.
	I get that.
	But in regards to Stephen A, bro, let me explain something to you.
	That Stephen A that just got that $100 million and that freaking New York.
	And I know being a freaking New Yorker, any man, I don't give a shit if it's LeBron James.
	I don't care if it's Donald Trump.
	I don't care who you are.
	You are not stepping to me on a court and trying to sun me in front of the world because every camera's on you and you're just going to sit there and not say anything back.
	I don't give.
	If he's barking at me, I'm barking right back.
	I was expecting Stephen A to be the Stephen A. Smith that we know on freaking camera.
	I was a little bit disappointed because I was expecting him to be like, yo, get the hell out of my face and check his ass.
	Be like, you know, your son doesn't belong in the NBA.
	I'm not, it's not a personal thing.
	He's not going after Bronny James because he just doesn't like Bronny James, Pat.
	He doesn't belong in the league.
	If you've been watching any of the games, and I know you haven't, neither have I, I had to go look up clips.
	He's okay.
	I think he needs two or three years to develop.
	But I don't respect what LeBron is doing, stepping to him and trying to embarrass him.
	But I wanted Stephen A to go back and go for his job.
	By the way, he's played 44 minutes in the NBA, has scored four points, is 1-4-16, 0-4-6, 0-4-7 from 3.
	So what does that mean?
	Stephen A. is right.
	Why aren't you sticking back?
	He's averaging 0.4 points a game, and he's 1-4-16.
	So, Tom, your thoughts.
	Well, I split it in half.
	And the first thing we were talking about the contract, you know what?
	Stephen A just did something.
	First guy through the wall usually takes a lot of heat in when you create a precedent.
	And this is the future of media contracts.
	In the old days, he would have had an ESPN contract to do ESPN things, and he could not have gone beyond that realm of ESPN.
	This way, he gets to be who he is as a personality.
	He has a voice.
	He's got talent, and that talent can be spread in different ways.
	And now this contract values him at ESPN and gives him the ability to do those things.
	Congratulations to Stephen A.
	And just remember, first guys through the wall get the bloodiest, and that was your job right now, but a lot of people are going to follow you.
	Now, in terms of the rest, I don't know any further history with Stephen A and LeBron, but it is, but suffice to say, they know each other.
	They've had interviews together.
	They've had a lot of conversations together.
	They probably text together.
	And then with all of that background, maybe they're not super buddies, but there's a background there.
	This is Stephen A's.
	This is Stephen A's sports.
	He's an expert on this.
	He comes over to him and really gets in his grill.
	And as you said, kind of sunned him.
	He's sunny him.
	And I'll have to say this, you know, LeBron, you got to look at what is the reality of the draft pick.
	Let's all step back and take the name off the jersey.
	How does that draft pick working out against NBA competition?
	It looks like a draft pick.
	And Adam, I think you would agree.
	Hey, that particular draft pick, clearly a talent, but maybe it's going to spend some summer in the G League.
	Right?
	Maybe we're going to have some things here.
	And if that would get said, now, on LeBron's, of course you're going to be upset as a father if things are like this, because he's probably trying to protect him from the avalanche of stuff that LeBron knows the media can bring on you.
	But I don't recall Stephen A going after Bronnie the way people sometimes go after you on sports talk shows.
	I don't recall that kind of heat.
	And so, yeah, it was a father.
	I think that's given LeBron a little bit of an out there because nobody came down on LeBron and nobody came down on Bronny with a lot of heat.
	And I think that's what gets lost in the middle of this.
	I think it's really unfortunate that Stephen A.'s got this little controversy in the middle of a week where we should be looking at what did he just do for media talent going forward?
	He set a great precedent.
	Adam.
	Well, and I'll just quote what Stephen A. Smith said.
	LeBron didn't come and talk to him as a Laker.
	He didn't come to talk to him as an NBA player.
	He didn't come to talk to him as arguably the second greatest player of all time.
	He came and talked to him man to man as a father.
	Straight up.
	Stephen A. Smith said this.
	He basically said in mouth, if you're going to like, keep my son's name out your mouth.
	I'm some Will Smith.
	Keep my wife's name out your mouth when he slapped Chris Rock.
	And LeBron looked like he could have Stephen A. Smith respected him.
	He stood there.
	He took it like a G.
	But Bronnie is playing in the D-League or the G-League as they call it.
	And here's a little fun fact for you.
	Stats.
	LeBron's rookie year stats compared to Bronny's rookie year stats are eerily similar when LeBron won rookie of the year in the NBA.
	20 points, five rebounds, five assists, shooting over 40%.
	That's exactly what Bronnie is averaging in the G-League.
	20 points, five rebounds, five assists, shooting 43%.
	The only problem is it's in the G-League.
	In the NBA, he's averaging one point, a half a rebound, a half assist, shooting 25%.
	Nobody thought Brownie was ready for the NBA.
	Was that a LeBron using his influence to say, I want my son to play with me.
	I don't care if he's not ready.
	A year ago, he was playing for USC and he missed half the season because he had a heart condition.
	I think it's actually awesome that a father and son first ever are playing together.
	Nobody thought that Bronnie was going to be an integral part of the Lakers, who, by the way, don't look now, just acquired Luca a month ago.
	They're now, I think, tied for second in the West, maybe third behind Denver.
	Last point is this.
	Stephen A. Smith is not tight with LeBron at all.
	They're not cool.
	They're not homies.
	Stephen A. Smith is an MJ guy.
	He always defends MJ.
	He always says that MJ is the greatest player ever.
	He's the GOAT.
	What's your point?
	And he trashes LeBron, meaning there's history there.
	Yeah, okay.
	So let me give my final thoughts and I'm going to go past this and just kind of simplify it.
	By the way, I think there was another take that Stephen A. did to say that it came up and it's really about LeBron.
	It's not about his son.
	It's really about you.
	It's not about your son.
	It's about you.
	And I agree with him.
	This is about LeBron.
	It's not about his son.
	LeBron wants a certain kind of immunity that maybe other players haven't had.
	And guys are getting called out for coming in and how they're playing.
	He was able to get certain favorites to get his son to play.
	Now, I'm very comfortable with what Stephen A. has said to him, calling him out, double down on it.
	LeBron James will go down as the greatest flopper of all time.
	He will go down as there's so many different arguments being made right now with this guy here.
	To me, he destroyed the league.
	He destroyed viewership.
	He lost half the clients, half the fans that were watching him.
	Last two all-stars, the one he played in, was the least viewed all-star.
	God knows since pre-MJ getting into the NBA, the least viewed all-star.
	It's dropped over 50% since he entered the league in 2003.
	This is a guy that is such the most drama queen, you know, superstar in the history of any sports we've ever had.
	And now he wants to pass that along with Stephen A. Good for Stephen A for doubling down.
	I'm actually very comfortable with it.
	Okay, can somebody go check to see what that is?
	Can we add one thing to that?
	What's that?
	He won four championships manipulating rosters and traveling from coast to coast.
	And Larry, Michael, MJ, and Magic never did that.
	Who's that?
	Who never did that?
	Said, traveled coast to coast to manipulate rosters and win his championships.
	MJ didn't do that.
	Magic didn't do that.
	Larry didn't do that.
	Kobe didn't do that.
	They didn't go.
	He's the biggest crybaby of all superstars of all time.
	But he is the second greatest basketball player of all time.
	That's statistics.
	I've said that myself.
	Yeah, that's fine.
	And I'm comfortable saying that, but he is not at the level of.
	He ain't MJ.
	Not even close.
	He's never, ever, ever.
	Not even close.
	It's just not going to take place.
	It's just not going to take place.
	Okay, so let's go through a couple things here.
	Watch this one here.
	So Bill Maher is saying stuff about Jasmine Crockett.
	But before I go to the Bill Maher clip, Rob, can you go to the Jasmine Crockett clip of her saying it is not a crime to cross the border illegally?
	Watch this and then go to the Bill Maher clip.
	Go forward, Rob.
	It is not a criminal violation to enter the country illegally.
	It's not a criminal.
	It's a crime.
	It's not a crime, which is why they're so frustrated.
	What's the word illegal mean?
	Our local law enforcement can round up people when they could be looking out for the murderers and the sexual abusers, as well as the robbers.
	They want them to go and round people up on civil accusations.
	And so that.
	And who is she?
	She is somebody that's become a star in the Democratic Party.
	Go ahead, Rob.
	Watch this clip.
	Makes sense.
	Certainly not for Crockett, who is, I thought, a big leader in the Democratic Party.
	Her quote is, this is a terrible nightmare.
	Somebody slap me and wake me the fuck up because I'm ready to get on with it.
	On with what would be my first question.
	And also, this is the way a leader.
	This is like how a podcaster talks or some shit.
	Fuck it, man.
	Can you imagine?
	I don't know, Obama saying, oh, man, dude, this shit is whacked.
	Fuck it.
	I'm fucking over it.
	I mean, come on.
	He's not wrong, by the way.
	And by the way, if you can, you can go to the other clip as well that he had with the stats and the polls and fact-checking everything.
	Go forward.
	So, did you watch the speech on Tuesday night, the long 100-minute speech?
	Regrettably, but yes.
	Most of it.
	All right.
	So Trump said some things that were not exactly true.
	And when I say not exactly, I mean not at all.
	And I just think we should talk about that by saying, I don't want to talk about that.
	Because if you're conservative and you see him say many, many things that are not even close to true, you just don't care anymore.
	This is so baked in the cake.
	That is who he is.
	They do not take him literally or think he needs to be taken literally.
	That's an amazing advantage in politics, I think, but that's in.
	And if you're a liberal watching MSNBC every day, you're obsessed with this.
	And you've seen all these things where they exposed it.
	I'm bored with that shit, okay?
	This is what he does.
	It's, I just take everything with a grain of salt.
	If he says Zelensky's approval rating is 4%, it's 57.
	Who's the girl on the right?
	Is that the view?
	She's the conservative on the view.
	She's the conservative on the view.
	And that's John Tester, who's the.
	He was the Democrat senator of Montana, I believe, that lost, but he was a Democrat in Montana.
	So she's the conservative on the view?
	She's supposed to be the conservative ones.
	She's hating on Trump.
	Jasmine Crockett, you see something like this.
	What do you think about, Vinny?
	Oh, well, think about it.
	This is the same as these, they can't get out of their own way.
	Like the same thing that we see with the Dylan Mulvaney and the transgender and the men's sports.
	She is the epitome of DEI hire.
	I'm telling you guys right now, Republicans, they're in such good shape for, I think, a generation, maybe a couple of generations, because this loud, egg, motherfucker, by the way cussing in Congress, cussing on the floor in front of Congress live, in front of the world to see.
	She just made another video of who's the guy that's saying the halftime show at the Super Bowl?
	Kendrick Lamar.
	She did a video of dancing like him in the Senate.
	By the way, in Congress, she's doing these type of videos.
	It's just ignorant at all levels.
	And like I said, they're doomed.
	The Democratic Party is doomed because of people like this.
	They think the answer is Jasmine Crockett, a loud, angry black chick that's only got her job because of DEI.
	Period.
	Tom.
	Contrived outrage wins no new followers.
	And guess what?
	Keep it up, baby.
	Keep it up and take the L.
	Well, she didn't get her job because it's DEI.
	She actually won her election in Texas.
	I'm not defending how she acts, but if the Democratic Party wants to keep doubling down on not securing the border, on Doge not finding waste, fraud, and abuse, on woke DEI agenda, they're going to continue to lose.
	I repeat, just like James Carville, it's the economy, stupid.
	Focus on what's going on in the economy.
	Focus on jobs.
	Democrats lost union support in the 2024 election.
	That should never happen.
	So if you want to keep doing this ridiculous song and dance, go for it, Kendrick Lamar.
	But it's not working.
	You want to see a clip of her?
	Like, have you seen her in Congress?
	Rob, I just sent you a clip.
	This is her.
	Look at how professional how she speaks.
	She's a very, very like positive.
	Like, you want this person leading the charge.
	There has been no oppression for the white man in this country.
	You tell me which white men were dragged out of their homes.
	You tell me which one of them got dragged all the way across an ocean and told that you are going to go at work.
	We are going to steal your wives.
	We are going to rape you.
	She hates white people.
	That didn't happen.
	That is oppression.
	We didn't ask to be here.
	We're not the same migrants that y'all constantly come up against.
	We didn't run away from home.
	We were stolen.
	So, yeah, we are going to sit here and be offended when you want to sit here and act like, and don't let it escape you that it is white men on this side of the aisle telling us, people of color on this side of the aisle.
	That's who she is.
	That y'all are the ones being oppressed.
	There has been no.
	That will work for her district.
	That's it.
	Meaning the victim mentality, whoever, I think she's in Dallas.
	I want to say that.
	She's Texas 30 on the south side of Dallas, economically desolated area.
	That's not a winning Oakland.
	This is Oakland, huh?
	No, no, no.
	This is the east side of South Dallas.
	That's Oakland.
	South of.
	But that's not a winning message.
	She's south of the message.
	She's the financial electoral.
	Her and AOC, they think that she's the future.
	They're putting it all in on her.
	She was named the co-chair of the country.
	Don't get representatives twisted with senators, governors, or presidents.
	AOC will do just fine in her little district in Brooklyn, and this girl did, or the Bronx, this girl did just fine in her whatever district in Dallas.
	They're not winning state elections or national elections with this type of mental health.
	Let's go through two more stories and we'll wrap up.
	Okay, one of the stories I want to go through is Canada.
	Canada, Mark Carney, wins race to replace Trudeau as Canada's prime minister.
	Rob, if you want to play this clip, this is the same guy that's a former Bank of England guy, governor, and World Economic Forum guy.
	Rob, if you can play a couple of these clips on how he says, the one clip that he says, I wish I could stand up here, talk about your accomplishments, but I don't have that much time.
	You know which one I'm talking about?
	He's giving Trudeau the clip.
	This one, where he talks about Donald Trump.
	Play that clip.
	Play that clip.
	I got it.
	Hold on.
	You're going to pull it out of the thing.
	Children?
	Okay.
	Go for it.
	Yeah.
	Donald Trump.
	Donald Trump.
	And Donald Trump, as we know, has put unjustified tariffs on what we build, on what we sell, on how we make a living.
	He's attacking Canadian families, workers, and businesses.
	And we cannot let him succeed.
	Wow.
	And we're great.
	We cannot let him succeed.
	We cannot let him succeed.
	What other clips you got of this guy, Rob?
	Is this the one that he's thanking Trudeau?
	No, I'm looking for that as well right now, but this is another clip of him where he talks about the tariffs from Trump and their effect on the dark days.
	Dark days brought on by a country we can no longer trust.
	Wow.
	We are getting over the shock.
	But let us never forget the lessons.
	We have to look after ourselves.
	And we have to look out for each other.
	We need to pull together in the tough days ahead.
	And then here's the final clip.
	I believe this is the one you were looking for.
	Go for it.
	Prime Minister Trudeau, my time doesn't permit me to recognize all your accomplishments.
	Yeah.
	So I'll speak at a higher level.
	You have combined strength and compassion every day as a fighter for Canada.
	I have to read that up a little bit.
	Good George.
	What a Dorothy.
	You have led us through some of the hardest challenges that this nation has ever faced.
	You put them in.
	Hey.
	Rob, can you do me a favor if you can play the clip of Trudeau crying and getting emotional if you got that clip?
	If you can't go to that.
	I played that to go to sleep at night.
	Yeah.
	I just have that.
	There's him.
	This is after the tariff war.
	On a personal level, I've made sure that every single day in this office, I put Canadians first, that I have people's backs.
	Liar.
	And that's why I'm here to tell you all that we got you.
	Even in the very last days of this government, we will not let Canadians down today and long into the future.
	You can pause right there, Rob.
	This is great because you can only take so much of this.
	Tom, your thoughts on this with the new president, new prime minister?
	Well, first of all, it's going to be fun to watch Canadian politics all this year because the reason this guy, by the way, this guy was not elected by the people.
	He was elected by 89.5% of the Liberal Party that said, you're our guy, because they're still in power.
	And so when Fidel Castro's son resigns as prime minister and suddenly, I went there.
	And then you have this guy gets elected 89.5% of his party.
	This would be like Nancy Pelosi resigning as speaker because she had an illness or just resigned for controversy.
	And then, well, that doesn't change the fact that the Dems would still be in power, so they would elect a new speaker.
	Well, now October's coming.
	And October's coming.
	We're going to see this guy face off against probably, you know, Pierre Poliver.
	So that's when the next big roundup is going to happen is the national election is going to happen.
	But now what Mark has had, this guy's a real globalist.
	He's Bank of England.
	There are people even in Canada that are really worried about this guy on a far deeper level, that he's really not Canada.
	He's really a hyper-liberal globalist.
	And we're going to see the parlor game play out this summer with tariffs and things that are going on.
	And by the way, they just stood on their little Canadian soapbox.
	The population of California that all lives within 100 miles, that excuse me, 89% of them live within 100 miles of the U.S. border, right there on the border, mainly Vancouver, Montreal, and Toronto.
	And now he's your guy, but there's a lot.
	There's a lot that's going to go on this summer.
	And then there'll be a big election in October.
	And right now, their biggest issue is they thought, with that size of country I just described, that they could put a finger in China's eye that came back with heavy tariffs back the other way.
	So congratulations, dude.
	Your first job isn't Donald Trump and 25% tariffs.
	Your first job is you just pissed off China.
	So this is actually sort of backfiring against what we would have maybe hoped or expected to come from Canada because Justin Trudeau's approval ratings were in the basement, 20-something percent.
	He actually had one?
	Yeah, was it actually approved?
	He steps down a couple months ago and he sort of slides in this guy, Mark Carney.
	You know, three months ago, Pierre Polyev, who was expected to be the next prime minister, his polymarket ratings for likelihood to become the next prime minister were at 90%.
	Now they're at 60%.
	This guy, Mark Carney, who was in Nowhere'sville, is now at 40%.
	What Trump has done is he's sort of revived Canadian pride.
	When have you seen Canadians talk tough in the last half-year?
	Even if they try, they can't.
	They're basically saying they found an enemy.
	Everyone needs an enemy.
	They found an enemy in Trump, and it's backfiring.
	Now, the guy that they're basically saying, anyone who's true conservative is my friend Rich Cooper, talking about this guy, Max Bernier, they're talking about him being the guy.
	I don't think this guy, Carney, is going to be the guy long term.
	He's a temporary stopgap.
	You know, what did Austin Powers, the great Austin Powers, say about Carney's?
	He goes, there's only two things I fear in this world.
	Number one, nuclear war.
	Number two, Carnies.
	Circus folk.
	Smell like cabbage.
	This guy, small hands.
	Smells like cabbage.
	So this guy's a Carney.
	I think he's only there for show for a couple months because election is happening, I think, in May, a few months away.
	He's enjoying a bounce right now in the polls.
	The actual election's October 20th of 2025.
	You're aware.
	But they're saying that they can call for a snap election in May.
	Let me just give my thoughts to the people who were not happy with what I said about Pierre Polivier on how much of an elitist he gives me the vibes he is and he's not going on other podcasts.
	And a lot of people responded back.
	Who the hell do you guys think you are?
	You're Americans.
	You're this.
	A lot of people support it.
	The fact that you're right, he's not.
	You know, he's a World Economic Forum guy and he's an apologist to Ukraine, recent support of Ukraine, what he's got.
	And then some are bringing up Max and Max, you know, he is the conservative guy.
	He's the guy that some of the guys are excited about, but I don't think he can win.
	That's what a lot of people are saying.
	Here's what I'll tell you.
	The common thread was that politicians in Canada are afraid to talk to Americans because they're worried that the liberals will use them as a, hey, look at this guy.
	They're another person that's owned by Americans and they're another person that's owned by this.
	If you're afraid to have those conversations, it just means you're not fit for the job.
	It means you're afraid.
	You're concerned.
	You're worried.
	God forbid.
	You're playing politics.
	Wear this color tie.
	You know how you watch these movies?
	What was that one movie with Zach Galafanakis with the other guy that they're running for president with Will Farrell?
	Wear this tie.
	Wear jeans because if you wear jeans and roll up your sleeves, it looks like you're a presidential and you relate to people and wear this and wear that.
	Be quiet.
	You know, who are you?
	What are you running for?
	Go run on that.
	Go run on that.
	If you're so worried about what the left is going to say about you, you're already not qualified enough to be the president.
	What are you going to do what Russia is going to say about you?
	China is going to say about you.
	Other people are going to say about you.
	If you're a leader, go sit down with as many people as possible.
	So the race is October 20th.
	I am so curious on how much offense Pierre is going to play between now and then.
	And I hope all the people that are supporters of him, if you want him to win, keep asking him on X every single day.
	What podcast are you going on next?
	What show are you going on next?
	Who are you talking to the people?
	Hold them accountable the same way we held people accountable on our side in America to get who we wanted.
	You as a voter got to do the same as well.
	It'd be interesting to see what Max is going to be doing.
	This will be an edge for Max.
	If Max decided to go on a tour and sit down with a bunch of different people, America, Canada, no matter where you are, just to talk and tell the story, Max plays that card of going to people and he doesn't.
	That'll be his campaign.
	I'm not afraid to talk to anybody.
	You're afraid.
	Last one I'm going to wrap up with before we move on is Thomas Massey and Trump.
	Rob, what is going on there with Thomas Massey and Trump?
	So there is a tweet that comes out from the president this morning.
	Axios reports that Trump vows to lead charge to unseat GOP Representative Thomas Massey.
	Thomas Massey responds back.
	Rob, if you have the clip on right there, okay, zoom in a little bit.
	Thank you to the House Freedom Caucus for just delivering a big blow to the radical left Democrats and their desire to raise taxes and shut down our country.
	They hate America and all it stands for.
	That's why they allowed millions of criminals to invade our nation.
	Sometimes it takes great courage to do the right thing.
	Congressman Thomas Massey, a beautiful Kentucky, is an automatic no vote on just about everything, despite the fact that he has always voted for continuing resolutions in the past.
	He should be primaried, and I will lead the charge against him.
	He's just another grandstander who's too much trouble and not worth the fight.
	He reminds me of Liz Cheney before her historic record-breaking loss, fall loss.
	The people of Kentucky won't stand for it.
	Just watch.
	Do I have any takers?
	Anyway, thank you again for the House Freedom Caucus for your very important vote.
	We need to buy some time in order to make America great again, greater than ever before.
	Unite and win.
	Rob, can you go to Thomas Massey's Twitter?
	Because I think he did respond back to that.
	His message is, it's typing here.
	If you can go to it, it is a recent tweet responding back to it.
	Go a little bit lower.
	Zoom in to see if you see it.
	It's on one of the accounts.
	You know, nowadays everybody's got like 10 accounts.
	Someone thinks they can control my voting card by threatening my re-election.
	Guess what?
	It doesn't work with me.
	Three times I've been challenger who tried to be more MAGA than me.
	None busted 25% because of my constituents prefer transparency and principles over blind allegiance.
	Okay.
	And the guy puts a Twitter tweet like TikTok.
	Your time is coming for this to happen.
	So, Vinny, what are your thoughts on this with Thomas Massey and Trump?
	I was just going to say, this came out of nowhere.
	Like for him to just go after him this much.
	What is this thing that he's going up against, Tom?
	What's the thing that he's actually going against that would piss off Trump to get to that level?
	Well, he supposedly is holding his vote for the CR, the continuing resolution.
	And Trump and Howard Lutnick are both pushing people to vote on the continuing resolution.
	And what's a continuing resolution?
	Well, a continuing resolution.
	It'll be abbreviated CR.
	You see it all over in Twitter space.
	It's basically a resolution that says, okay, we're going to put this much money over here, and we're going to have to continue, we'll be able to continue government operating.
	We'll be able to continue these things going on.
	And we're going to continue this till we get to the big bill.
	And so a continuing resolution is a resolution to continue with these spending over here while we negotiate maybe a larger bill or we get to the end of the legislative session.
	And apparently Thomas Massey and others, and there's a few things going on in here, are like, no, I'm not going to automatically vote on a continuing resolution because I want to know what's in it.
	Why don't we speed up the vote on the bigger, what did, and I won't do the impersonation that Adam does, the big, beautiful spending bill that they've been talking about.
	And so that's what's going on.
	And apparently there were talks behind closed doors or something happened.
	And, you know, Trump, we saw his tweet this morning.
	He was very aggravated and was very, very direct about it.
	And Thomas Massey was equally direct in the other way saying, okay, threaten me with my election.
	Gosh, you know, the last couple of people done that haven't broken through 25% of the vote.
	I've done okay, and I feel confident in my own skin.
	Okay, so because this is the first time because I looked it up that Trump targeted Massey back in 2020, where Trump criticized him for opposing a COVID-19 relief package, calling him a third-rate grandstander.
	So they do have Massey is known for being a proponent of the single-issue resolution or the single-issue bill.
	It's like if you call it a COVID bill, then the only thing that should be in here is COVID.
	By the way, so I respect Rob.
	I can pull up this clip.
	This is the clip.
	This is what's said by Massey.
	Because to him, it's like, hey, I want that money that we're saving with Doge to go towards savings, not go towards wasteful spending.
	Yeah, if you can pull this up, Rob, I'm stepping on things up.
	I don't break anything.
	Okay, it's fine.
	Zoom in a little bit on this if you could.
	I'm not voting for the continuing resolution budget, cut, copy, paste omnibus this week.
	Omnibus means everything.
	Why would I vote to continue to waste fraud and abuse Doge has found?
	Great question.
	We were told the CR in December would get us to March when we would fight.
	Here we are in March punting again.
	Wow.
	Right?
	I got it.
	So that's kind of the challenge.
	But then Trump, he needs his vote.
	Of course.
	He needs his vote for this to be taking place.
	Adam, your thoughts on this.
	So the reason that I know this name, Thomas Massey, is do you know who talks about him constantly as her favorite person in Congress?
	Candace Owens.
	She always says that Thomas Massey is her favorite politician and that she would be the one person to advocate for him to run for president.
	Now, I don't think he has the cachet or name recognition to do anything like that.
	But in my opinion, this is America first versus America only.
	Thomas Massey is of the libertarian camp.
	Something's going on on the waters in Kentucky.
	Ron Paul, Rand Paul, libertarian.
	They want nothing to do with the rest of the world.
	They want zero foreign aid.
	They want zero intervention.
	They want to do the ostrich thing.
	And there's a lot of people that agree with them, much like Vinnie over here.
	And I understand that.
	Libertarian, limited government, limit government spending, stop getting embroiled in foreign wars and doing anything with U.S. aid or foreign aid.
	The challenge with that is if you don't do stuff around the world, then someone's going to fill that void.
	And that someone is going to be China.
	That someone is going to be Russia.
	That someone's going to be Iran in the Middle East.
	So there's also another history here.
	Do you know that just two months ago in January, Thomas Massey was the only Republican to not vote for Mike Johnson to be Speaker of the House?
	So there's history here.
	There's some strained relationships here.
	But I think he's a necessary voice.
	He's definitely a thorn in the side of Trump.
	He's the Tea Party Republican libertarian leaning.
	I think there's a best way to describe Thomas Massey for people to understand who he is.
	Thomas Massey is to Trump what Joe Manchin was to Biden.
	That's who Thomas Massey is.
	So just think Thomas Massey is Joe Manchin.
	Okay.
	That's who Thomas Massey is.
	Now, he's not a Democrat.
	Far from it.
	Far from like Joe Manchin was a on the economy, he agreed with a lot of stuff maybe conservatives talk about.
	But Thomas Massey, if you go and look at the comments on Trump's clip, Rob, of what Trump said about Thomas Massey, you go to the comment section below and you read what people said.
	They're kind of on Massey's side.
	A lot of them.
	I'm just telling you, a lot of them are on Massey's side on what was said there.
	Yeah, if you go to truth or if you go to Twitter on X, you would see a lot of people.
	Just go on the one that was.
	The only thing that matters is his constituency in Kentucky.
	So, and they clearly have re-elected the guy because I think he's been there since 2012.
	So, he's on his.
	And the one thing we have to keep in mind and not forget when it comes down to this issue is the fact that Massey kind of campaigned for DeSantis.
	Okay.
	Oh, really?
	Massey's more DeSantis than he is Trump because DeSantis is more conservative than Trump.
	So this is the part that, you know, who is more conservative than me?
	Who is more MAGA than me?
	Who is more America first than me?
	Massey's a, you know, standalone.
	He stands on his own.
	And sometimes he loses, sometimes he wins.
	But the reality is his people are loyal to him.
	And this is where Trump's got to find a way to work with him.
	And Massey's got to find a way to work with him if they choose to.
	But if he doesn't, the concept of primary in him, in order for Trump's primary to carry more weight, he needs to win.
	The more he's winning, the more he'll be able to do that.
	You also need a good candidate sometimes just because you can primary somebody.
	Massey's not a weak person that you can primary against.
	And what would their message be to go against Massey?
	Because clearly they like the guy.
	So I don't know.
	I'm waiting to see whatever Trump comes up with for a nickname.
	He's just going to be like, nasty Massey.
	We'll see what happens.
	It's coming.
	But his election is when?
	In 2026.
	So he's going to be a thorn in the sidewalk.
	We will see.
	Anyways, all right, Gang.
	By the way, once again, download the Manect app.
	Join the circle.
	We have so many things we talk about there that we don't talk about anywhere.
	And we ask for issues.
	So right now, when I'm looking at the Manect circle, who was most active while we're going through it, we have people that were responding.
	Joseph Todd, Beckian, Stewart, DeVito, Hitchens, a lot.
	Hutchins, a lot of people are active today.
	Go to the community circle.
	This is where all of you can communicate with each other throughout the entire month, not waiting just on a podcast.
	God bless everybody.
	Take care.

▲