PBD - Patrick Bet-David - Trump’s Speech STUNS Congress | PBD Podcast

March 6, 2025 - PBD - Patrick Bet-David

02:28:54

Trump’s Speech STUNS Congress | PBD Podcast | Ep. 558

Patrick Bet-David, Tom Ellsworth, Vincent Oshana, and Adam Sosnick are joined by political commentator Rob Smith as they cover Donald Trump's State of the Union address, Rep. Al Green getting booted from the speech, Canada, Mexico & China's response to Trump's tariff, and the S&P 500's reaction. ------ 🔥THE VT CIGAR & LIGHTER SET: https://bit.ly/4jsIxgI 🤵‍♂️ SIGN UP FOR BOARD ROOM MEMBERSHIP: https://bit.ly/4bstlwe 👕 GET THE LATEST VT MERCH: https://bit.ly/3BZbD6l 📕 PBD'S BOOK "THE ACADEMY": https://bit.ly/41rtEV4 📰 VTNEWS.AI: ⁠⁠⁠https://bit.ly/3OExClZ 🎙️ FOLLOW THE PODCAST ON SPOTIFY: ⁠⁠https://bit.ly/4g57zR2 🎙️ FOLLOW THE PODCAST ON ITUNES: ⁠⁠https://bit.ly/4g1bXAh 🎙️ FOLLOW THE PODCAST ON ALL PLATFORMS: https://bit.ly/4eXQl6A 📱 CONNECT ON MINNECT: ⁠⁠https://bit.ly/4ikyEkC 👔 BET-DAVID CONSULTING: ⁠⁠https://bit.ly/3ZjWhB7 🎓 VALUETAINMENT UNIVERSITY: ⁠⁠https://bit.ly/3BfA5Qw 📺 JOIN THE CHANNEL: ⁠⁠⁠https://bit.ly/4g5C6Or 💬 TEXT US: Text “PODCAST” to 310-340-1132 to get the latest updates in real-time! TIME STAMPS: 00:00 - Podcast intro 00:54 - Topics on the podcast. 05:20 - 🔥THE VT CIGAR & LIGHTER SET: https://bit.ly/4jsIxgI 08:24 - Donald Trump's Congressional Speech. 32:49 - Zelenskyy says Oval Office meeting regrettable. 43:51 - Trump's proposal for mandatory death penalty for cop killers. 50:56 - Amy Comey Barrett gives nasty look at Trump. 1:03:10 - Trump's message to Hamas. 1:16:42 - Stephen A Smith schools The View on Trump's win. 1:26:29 - Tate brothers being investigated in Florida. 1:41:01 - Charlie Kirk goes on Newsom's podcast. 1:44:17 - Ben Shapiro wants Derek Chauvin pardoned. 2:02:18 - Karen Bass facing recall over L.A. Wildfires. 2:12:54 - Justin Trudeau threatens to collapse U.S. economy. SUBSCRIBE TO: @VALUETAINMENT @ValuetainmentComedy @theunusualsuspectspodcast @bizdocpodcast ABOUT US: Patrick Bet-David is the founder and CEO of Valuetainment Media. He is the author of the #1 Wall Street Journal Bestseller “Your Next Five Moves” (Simon & Schuster) and a father of 2 boys and 2 girls. He currently resides in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida.

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Did you ever think you would make it hustled on something second chase sweet victory?
	Know this life myth for me.
	Adam, what you think?
	The future looks bright.
	And Jay, good is better than anything I ever saw.
	You are a one-on-one.
	I don't think I've ever said this before.
	All right, guys.
	I just fresh.
	I got out of chapel this morning.
	I learned a couple fun facts.
	I learned the fact that, you know, as a Middle Eastern, we are known for having big noses, but I found that Lady Liberty's nose was six feet long.
	Really?
	Fun fact.
	Second fact.
	When you would go into George Washington's home, he liked to greet you by bowing.
	Really?
	Very interesting.
	The first president liked to bow when you would go into his house.
	I did not know that.
	Interesting, fun fact.
	Anyways, we're getting smarter, folks.
	We got Rob in the house.
	Okay, Rob Smith's in the house and he's on Manect.
	Any questions you got, you can ask him.
	We got a lot of stories we're going to be covering today on the episode 558.
	I haven't yet had any chance to talk about the state of the union.
	I think we did an unusual that a couple guys talked about.
	Did you guys end up doing it that night or no?
	We didn't, but yesterday we did a whole reaction to it.
	Okay, so we'll get into it.
	There's a lot of thoughts, a lot of commentary.
	One observation I made that maybe if another guys cover it, I'll bring it up.
	I thought it was an interesting, interesting thing Trump did that he had never done before.
	And in the interim, let me kind of cover with you some of the stories.
	Of course, we're going to talk about the state of the union.
	Of course, we're going to talk about Al Green getting kicked out of a nightclub.
	Like it looked like it had happened before to him.
	Yes, MSNBC host said Democrats at the Trump speech.
	The signs are not landing.
	It was so bad that even Stephen Colbert did something on it saying, try something, try something out because they're just not doing good right now.
	They're kind of struggling.
	They need a CMO.
	They need a corporate executive marketing guru to come out and say, hey, this is the way to change your strategy because it's not landing with anybody.
	There was very weird moments.
	One moment where Trump looks at Pocahontas about Ukraine and she keeps clapping and says, there you go, Pocahontas wants another five years.
	There were some shots.
	There were some interesting moments, some very unique moments.
	And I was surprised that they didn't stand up for anything, including Lakin.
	Nothing.
	They didn't stand up for nothing.
	Lower taxes, no taxes for tips.
	No, nothing.
	They were literally not celebrating nothing, which was kind of weird.
	So imagine the people that are voting for them, how they're thinking about that.
	You didn't stand up for that?
	You didn't stand up for that?
	Okay.
	Maybe some of them support it.
	It was just not a good look.
	Then while he's giving a speech, he says, moments ago, Zelensky sends us a letter wanting to negotiate.
	President Zelensky, we appreciate you reaching out.
	And now, and then as I talk to Russia, they also want to find a peace talk, et cetera, et cetera.
	So who knows what that's going to lead into?
	But that was in the speech that he gave.
	Trudeau says U.S. wants to collapse Canada's economy with tariffs.
	This guy is so funny.
	He's talking about don't buy their products, don't go to Florida, all these weird types of things.
	China warns it's ready for any type of war.
	Let me say it again.
	China says they're ready for any type of war as Trump's tariffs go into effect.
	Fight till the end.
	Mexico says it'll impose retaliatory tariffs on U.S. with details coming Sunday.
	Yet they released and gave 28 cartel members to U.S., something they've never done before.
	If you're acting so tough, why are you giving those guys up to U.S.?
	Because maybe, you know, is it tough on the outside, but on the inside, you're scared?
	Which one is it?
	We'll find that out.
	Major threat to the American dream, making it harder to buy home.
	We'll talk about that.
	BlackRock strikes a deal to bring ports on both sides of Panama Canal under American control.
	BlackRock also is saying we're out of DEI because it's not working.
	And they were one of the biggest ESGDI companies.
	Stephen A. Smith goes on the view.
	They ask him a question.
	And he says, I'm not one that's a Trump supporter, but I'm for the truth.
	And let me tell you what the truth is.
	And you have to hear what he said next.
	Democrats answered to Joe Rogan loses a lucrative gig.
	That's just a funny one, but we'll cover it.
	Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate, after they left here, it was a mess all over the place.
	You know, first Ron DeSantis said some words about it.
	Then Byron Donalds was asked about it.
	Then the AG came in.
	There's just a lot of stuff that's going on.
	We'll cover that to kind of see what perspective we have on that.
	Ben Shapiro launches asking Trump to pardon former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin.
	And Elon Musk retweeted it.
	And it was kind of interesting seeing what's going on.
	They're Disney to cut nearly 6% of staff across ABC, Disney Entertainment Networks.
	Uh-oh.
	Goldman Sachs said to acts underperformers on latest playoffs, latest layoffs.
	And then last but not least, LA Wildfire email proves that Karen Bass knew critical fire risk before LA Mayor skipped off to Africa.
	Nicole Shanahan funds recall efforts to get rid of Mayor Bass.
	There's just a bunch of stuff with Mayor Bass.
	Not a good look for what she had going on there.
	Of course, we'll talk about Tate.
	Weekly mortgage demand surges 20% higher after interest rates drops to the lowest since last year.
	And Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson testifies in D.C. at sanctuary hearing.
	Okay, so a couple things.
	For those of you that are watching the podcast now, if you go download Manect, the app, and you join PBD podcast circles, if you join the circle, what you get a chance to do is 50 bucks a month.
	But everybody throughout the month gets to communicate together.
	Here's what we're going to be doing.
	All the notes that we look at, the way we write out the news in our research team, is all in there.
	So if you go right now and join the circle, you're going to see all these notes in there.
	On top of that, you guys get to communicate with each other all day long throughout the day, throughout the month.
	When stories happen, everybody posts there.
	We get to ask you what are some issues you want us to talk about on the podcast.
	And last but not least, after the podcast, we do a behind the scenes, what our takeaway was.
	We'll do it sometimes with some interviews, other things that we're doing.
	But go download the app, Manek.
	Rob, if you can put up the QR code up there, if you can download the app, by the way, the TV is off on here.
	If you can download the app and get that QR code, go to Manek, download the app, go to Circle's PBD podcast, join the circle, see the notes, and then we'll be able to interact throughout the month.
	We're excited about there's going to be a lot of unique surprises with Circle.
	Stay tuned.
	Aside from that, some big news for all of us.
	After a year and a half of trying to get permits of this city for the cigar lounge, after creating the sprinklers that they wanted in the ceiling for the cigar lounge, after getting the tobacco license, after getting the alcohol license, after getting the two bars set up, after getting all of it permitted into a club, comedy club, that's being launched here soon.
	And so for those of you that are wanting to be members of the cigar lounge, the boardroom, there's already 61 members, okay, that it's only 80 of them that we're talking about at the phase one that we're going through.
	And there's going to be an interesting guest showing up here soon to the cigar lounge, possibly for the grand opening.
	I can't tell you who that is, but you know, there's a lot of speculation who that could be.
	You can figure it out, but it's only for those who are members of the club.
	So if you want to submit an application to be considered, I look at every single application that comes into my hand.
	Rob, if we can put the website to go to for it, what is the website for the cigar lounge, by the way?
	Do you know what it's called?
	That's boardroomcigarlounge.com.
	Boardroomcigarlounge.com.
	Boardroomcigarlounge.com.
	Rob, if you can put the link in chat as well and the comment section and description, go to it, submit your applications.
	And for those of you guys that smoke cigars that maybe you want to come ready for it, once you are a member, 100 of these are available for you to purchase.
	This is Valutayman cigar accessories.
	Rob, if you can go to this so they can see it as well.
	In this one, you open it up.
	You have the ashtray, the valutainment ashtray.
	You have the value tempor lighter, and you have the value taiman cutter.
	Okay.
	$74.95.
	Go to the website, vtmerch.com, and we are looking forward to seeing you come there with your lighter and with your, what do you call it, cutter.
	So again, vtmerch.com to get that.
	Anyways, let's get right into it.
	State of the Union speech.
	All right.
	So, first of all, record-breaking.
	It is the longest State of the Union speech ever given.
	I think he beat, is it Bill Clinton's that he broke the record of?
	He beat everybody.
	He beat everybody's.
	But I think Bill Clinton was the second longest one.
	Now it's him being there.
	So he has the longest State of the Union speech, which is pretty interesting.
	He got up there and had a lot of things to say about it.
	Rob, I'm trying to get to kind of a clip to show, but I can't see anything here on the clips.
	I'll just start off.
	Rob, what was your biggest takeaway watching him give the State of the Union?
	What difference did you notice with him than from the past, how his energy was, the things he talked about?
	What was your biggest takeaway?
	My biggest takeaway, Trump was a changed man.
	All right.
	And I had brought this up to a lot of people that I was talking to and texting with back and forth during the Say the Union is that this is somebody who was very statesmanlike.
	All right.
	And so we've seen states of the union in the past with Trump.
	You know, sometimes things are a little bit more combative.
	Sometimes things are a little bit more rougher, like, you know, rougher on the edges because Trump can be sometimes, but this is very much statesmanlike.
	And this is somebody that does not care what Democrats think, that does not care what anybody thinks about him nowadays.
	And that's what I think the power of Trump 2.0 is.
	So I saw a lot of that, even when there were the disruptions from the Democrats, which we will get into.
	I'm sure that we all have a lot to say about that.
	I think that I have some ideas about that that may be a little different from other people on the panel.
	But he looked at them like you would literally look at a misbehaving grandchild because the theme of Trump 2.0 right now is that the adults are back in charge.
	The adults are back in the room.
	Daddy's home.
	And I am going to tell you every single thing that we are accomplishing for the United States of America right now.
	So that's what it said to me.
	They are no longer trying to play games with Democrats.
	He is no longer sort of, you know, trying to placate, you know, to what CNN or the New York Times, et cetera, wants, because I think that one of the issues with Trump 1.0 is that he was almost a little too magnanimous in trying to work and operate with the left.
	And they took advantage of that.
	Now you have somebody that does not care.
	We are doing things that Republicans want done.
	I think, and I tweeted this yesterday, you can follow me on X at Rob SmithOnline, that the changes that Trump 2.0 and the team are making right now are generational changes for this country and for the Republican Party.
	So I made that statement.
	I stand by it.
	That's what's different to me.
	Very cool.
	All right.
	So, Rob, let's see this clip.
	If you have a clip that you can show us, which one is this?
	This is.
	Hold on one second.
	This is where we President Trump talks about some of the money that is going towards sedentary migrants in countries nobody's ever heard of.
	I also have where he honors a 13-year-old cancer survivor.
	DJ Daniel.
	We also have where he talks about not being able to make the Democrats happy.
	Why don't you start off with Al Green first?
	Okay.
	I'm trying to disrupt.
	So first they wanted to disrupt.
	Which they planned.
	They planned on doing this.
	Didn't work.
	Of course they did.
	Didn't work at all.
	Members are directed to uphold and maintain decorum in the House and to cease any further disruptions.
	that's your warning members are engaging in willful and continuing breach of decorum and the chair is prepared to direct the sergeant at arms to restore order to the joint session It's almost as if he wanted this.
	They wanted this to happen.
	Of course.
	So at the beginning, they were trying to create a disruption.
	The signs didn't land.
	Do you have a picture of the signs, Rob?
	Where they're holding up the pictures of the signs.
	Elon steals.
	Yeah, Elon Steals.
	What is he stealing?
	And then there was another one, Rob, that wearing the pink.
	Can you pull up the pink picture where they're all wearing pink dresses?
	It's, yeah, right there.
	Wear pink to support women.
	Yesterday, we voted for men to continue abusing women in sports.
	Just a very weird opening with Al Green.
	Rob, maybe show up another clip on what we have.
	If you can go to whichever one you got.
	Just play a couple of the highlights and we'll get into it.
	The media and our friends in the Democrat Party kept saying we needed new legislation.
	We must have legislation to secure the border.
	But it turned out that all we really needed was a new president.
	That's a Mike Trump right.
	Mike Trump right there.
	Whack.
	Bam.
	So, Vinny, your thoughts on yesterday.
	Oh, well, all around.
	All around.
	I think it was, you know, visionary.
	He talked about values.
	He talked about our freedom, individual responsibility, and common sense was the main one.
	But the biggest thing that pissed me off, and I get Pat, I understand.
	And me and Jake had a conversation.
	We get it.
	Sometimes they bring people in.
	Like, remember when he brought the alleged rape and sexual assault victims of Bill Clinton in the State of the Union?
	Because he wants to put these kids all out on blast, right?
	But when it came to, like, for instance, during a debate.
	I'm sorry.
	Yeah, debate.
	Well, whatever.
	It's politics.
	It's profits.
	This is when Bill Clinton kind of looked like.
	When you cannot stand, Lake and Riley's mother and her sister are there, and you cannot stand.
	And at least, by the way, give them a round of applause because you know she's dead.
	She was raped and murdered because of their policies, because of Joe Biden's open border, okay?
	Corey Coppertone, the guy, the fireman that was shot.
	You couldn't stand up for that.
	You couldn't stand up for Mark Fogel, who they the only time they stood up was for Ukraine.
	That's all they stood up for.
	And the worst of them all, there's a that 13-year-old kid, Pat, DJ Daniel, 13 years old.
	He's had 14 brain surgeries for cancer.
	The guy makes him an honorary Secret Service member.
	Dude, I got emotional during watching it.
	I have to get emotional right now.
	He hugs the Secret Service agent.
	He's the happiest kid you've ever seen.
	And you can't stand and at least applaud that.
	Even if it was a test from Trump to see what they were going to do, you even failed that.
	Show camaraderie.
	Show some unity that this freaking kid has gone through more shit than they've ever gone through.
	And you couldn't stand for two seconds and clap for this kid.
	Unbelievable.
	Tom, your thoughts.
	My thoughts is when I looked around the chamber, I was really disgusted.
	This is a moment where our president comes together, and you don't have to agree with everything.
	And going back as long as we've had televised state of the unions, sometimes the other side will sit with their hands in their lap, even cross their arms, even shake their heads.
	But they do it on particular points.
	You know, they did the Republicans did it to Clinton when Clinton turned around and handed Walter Mondale a mock-up of what would be a national health care card.
	Remember that scene?
	He turned around, handed Walter Mondale, and Republicans are like, no, Those things happen.
	But then we come together and we applaud the things that are applaudable.
	And when the other side sits there and won't even budge on anything, it is to me the definition of Trump derangement syndrome where you so hate Trump.
	You are so incensed that you got your ass kicked in the election.
	You are so, you know, just rot with anger that you cannot applaud, you know, a child who is suffering from cancers and is being recognized.
	You can't applaud a mother who lost a daughter.
	You can't applaud the fact that a girl is sitting there who we all saw hit with a 106 mile an hour spike, I believe it was from a man who a couple days later says, Yeah, maybe I'll play with the chicks.
	And you can't do that.
	You can't speak up.
	What it tells me is it's they're not Democrats, they're globalists, they're not pro-America, they are globalist, they are with the side of the UN and they are anti-American and they don't, and they are socialist.
	I don't see any modicum of just appreciation for the country and to applaud a few things that are applaudable.
	You can't do that.
	So, what does that say that you really are deep down inside?
	They're not in favor of this country.
	They're in favor of turning it into something else.
	Adam, your thoughts.
	Well, what's the famous phrase?
	If you don't stand for something, you will fall for anything.
	That's basically the current state of the Democratic Party.
	They're just for the men, women, women play, and men playing women's sports, endless spending, just open borders, Trump derangement syndrome.
	They don't stand for anything.
	By the way, a little fun fact: Al Green, the guy with the cane who basically had to be escorted out, one year younger than Trump, walking with a cane.
	Just a little perspective for you.
	But you know what?
	I got a little secret for you guys.
	So I feel like the Democrats are completely lost.
	And I have proof to show it.
	So don't ask me how, but in the mail, I got something from the DNC.
	Oh, typical.
	Okay.
	The Democratic National Committee basically saying this is the official 2025 Democratic survey, right?
	And the premise is: help us figure out what the hell to do.
	Are you serious?
	What should we do?
	The Democrats are the last line of defense between Trump's destructive agenda and the survival of our democracy.
	They're still doing that.
	It's the opposite.
	Every Democrat, each and every one of us, is a leader in the fight to stop Trump.
	He's taken office, and Project 2025 will be unleashed to its full extent.
	And we must stop him and the MAGA extremists.
	Okay.
	So then that's sort of the cover letter.
	Then they ask you a series of questions.
	What should we do?
	What do you find the most troubling?
	Register as a Republican.
	So walk away.
	Take a look, Pat.
	So what do you find the most troubling?
	The mass deportations, the gutting of abortion access, the rolling back clean energy, the LGBTQ right.
	Same old hits, same old hits, same old hits.
	What this basically shows me, and I'll give it to you, Pat, if they're just like, what do we do from here?
	Is that really what we're doing?
	They're completely lost.
	Yeah, go ahead and take a look.
	So they're just asking their ass.
	They're just basically saying, where should we go from here?
	Help us figure out our agenda.
	Send us cash.
	And yes, send us some money, Pat.
	Please send us some cash.
	Send us some money.
	Well, here it is.
	All right.
	So the DNC is seeking your immediate feedback.
	I'm reading verbatim with no inherent.
	Hey, Tom, you're immediate feedback.
	I already read it.
	Is that the same thing that you read?
	I already read that.
	Yeah, but go ahead.
	I don't think that's what you read.
	But anyway, I'm just talking about seeking your immediate feedback as we determine the strategies that we needed to block agenda.
	We need your help.
	No, no, Tom.
	By the way, literally.
	You've got to read section two, which is kind of weird.
	It says, which of these priorities do you find most troubling?
	Trump's priorities.
	Do you find most troubling?
	Enacting mass deportations, slashing taxes for the ultra-wealthy, gushing abortion, gutting abortion access, rolling back clean energy solutions and crucial environmental regulations, severely restricting voting access, attacking the fundamental rights of LGBTQ Americans, dismantling key federal agencies like the American Education, Department of Education, defining the U.S. Supreme Court for decades by appointing even most ultra-conservative justices, which Rob, if you have that Coney Barrett video about how she looks at Trump, we have to show that.
	I'm not troubled.
	I am not troubled by policies Trump is advocating.
	So they put one of the options that I'm like, I'm good, yeah.
	Go ahead, Rob.
	So let me, I have a different perspective on this than you guys do.
	And I'm doing a podcast on this later today.
	My podcast can't cancel Rob.
	So go ahead.
	Definitely check that out.
	All right.
	So there's multiple strategies going on here.
	First of all, we say the Democrats can't stand up for this child, can't applaud anything that Trump is doing.
	Yeah, gross.
	We all know that, right?
	Because, you know, I used to be a Democrat.
	I'll never vote for Democrats again as long as I'm breathing on this earth.
	It's just never going to happen.
	But you have to understand that there's a two-pronged strategy going on here right now with Democrats.
	First of all, all of these people that are pulling these stunts in the state of the union.
	And by the way, I was actually able to go in that room.
	Speaker Johnson had a couple of us on a private tour.
	If you've ever been in that room, it is the power in that room is unbelievable, right?
	So they're obviously very disrespecting of that.
	But this is all about the social media cloud.
	This is what they're doing.
	So they have the Jasmine Crocketts of the world.
	They have the Al Greens of the world.
	They have all of these people pulling these stunts for social media because this is what their base wants, right?
	So that's one part of the strategy.
	The second part of the strategy is that you've got, and we'll get into this later on in the show, you've got kind of the centrist Democrats moving in and getting a lot of attention from the media.
	You've got Cuomo running for mayor in New York again, right?
	You've got Stephen A. Smith kind of like doing his thing as a political figure that's Democrat, right?
	So they're getting everybody ginned up on the internet by pulling these stunts because that is what Democrats like.
	You have to understand that their base likes this.
	All right.
	So this is the first year and a half of this, by the way, because the midterms are next fall.
	Now we're going to start seeing them become a lot more moderate when it comes closer to 2028.
	So my argument to all you guys is that as gross as what they are doing is, they are doing the right thing for their base.
	They're doing the right thing for their base?
	For their base.
	Pat, I absolutely do.
	They're doing the right thing for their base because they've got a low IQ base that has nothing but Jasmine Quacket doing the same thing.
	So look, Democrats have a low IQ base that do not know facts that are all over social media.
	And for a low IQ base that doesn't know facts that is all over social media, Jasmine Crockett twerking or whatever works for them.
	Al Green disrupting and being removed works for them.
	These stupid signs that they're putting up in the state of the union, this works for that base.
	You have to understand who these people are, right?
	Yo, Rob, who at this point would you say is the Democratic base?
	Childless women and gays.
	Childless women and gays.
	I don't disagree.
	Who else?
	Okay, so Democrat base, childless women, gays, definitely blacks are still a part of the Democratic base.
	I would say black women.
	92% of black women voted for Democrats and still will.
	So black, childless, gay women.
	Yes.
	So the WNBA.
	The WNBA.
	They're voting for the Democrats.
	Oh, for sure.
	They're voting.
	Shout out to Britain.
	So like, you know, I'm telling you, this is the strategy.
	I think that it works for that base.
	But it's just not big enough.
	But the base isn't big enough.
	Rob, what are they intentionally doing to expand it?
	Nothing, which is the problem.
	I am not disagreeing that they're in trouble.
	I am not disagreeing that they don't have a leader.
	They have no message.
	Their ideological agenda is being roundly rejected by the American public.
	But I'm telling you, I know these people.
	These people attack me on social media every single night.
	I have this TikTok account.
	They're all over me, right?
	So I look at some of these comments, and this is who these people are.
	What do they say to you?
	I don't know.
	Okay, let me tell you what I think.
	I don't know if the people, TikTok and Twitter is not all the Democratic Party.
	I don't think it is.
	For sure.
	I think TikTok and Twitter, the loudest people makes us seem like everybody else is in that way.
	I mean, we learned that during Free Palestine and Israel and Ukraine and Russia.
	And, you know, we learn when just because you're loud doesn't mean everybody feels the way you do.
	Most people are quiet.
	Most people don't.
	Majority of the people are very quiet.
	It's the silent majority, right?
	So let's go through the silent majority of Democrats, not the loud minority.
	Who are the silent majority of Democrats, okay?
	The silent majority of Democrats.
	I think the silent majority of Democrats are, you know, John F. Kennedy, you know, guys that voted during that time.
	They're probably Joe Manchin.
	They probably want decent economy.
	They want to have a job.
	They want to be able to send their kids to school.
	They want to be able to, you know, probably not have this transgender stuff happening.
	I don't think the majority Democrats want that.
	Now, the majority Democrats, in my opinion, they want pro-choice.
	They want, you know, certain government programs for people that don't have entitlements.
	They're probably the majority want those types of issues is where they're at.
	They want the military to not have a big budget because they used to be not war.
	I think the majority of Democrats are so confused right now.
	Yeah.
	They're so confused right now because they're sitting there with their spouse.
	And by the way, I'm saying this because Hollywood guys watch this podcast and they'll message me after two years.
	They'll say, let me tell you, I was sitting there myself watching and asking myself, you know, private conversations.
	These people don't want to go public.
	We'll have the private conversation.
	Why am I a Democrat?
	And they'll say, I used to say I'm a Democrat because I was not for war.
	Now Democrats are for the war.
	Trump's not for war.
	He wants to cause peace.
	And he said, you know, Zelensky finally sends a letter apologizing and, you know, whether it's apologizing or not to find a way to create a deal.
	And Putin is also open to the idea, right?
	And he sent a very strong, true social message yesterday to Hamas.
	And what he said, we'll get into that here in a minute as well.
	Trump doesn't want war.
	The Democrats want war.
	Under Biden, we were supposed to have World War III under Trump.
	Didn't happen.
	But under Biden, we almost had it.
	So Democrats are like, okay, I thought we're not, you know, party of war too.
	I thought we're the party of choice.
	Why are they forcing me to take the vaccine?
	67%, 71% of Americans took it.
	And a lot of them are now saying, why did I take it?
	Right?
	I thought we were supposed to be the party of what is going on here.
	I thought we were the ones that was supposed to help people make money.
	This guy just said no taxes on tips.
	He says no taxes on social security payments.
	What?
	And then he says, you get to write off interest on your car payment as long as the cars are made in America.
	Aren't these things good things for me?
	I think they are so confused.
	The majority of Democrats are so confused, but they can't help themselves to vote for Trump.
	They're willing to entertain voting for Republican.
	They have been just brainwashed so much to hate this man so much that they don't know how to go about it.
	By the way, without even thinking about it, do you know what tie he wore yesterday when he gave the State of the Union?
	What color was his tie?
	Did you pay attention to it?
	Don't say anything.
	Don't pull it up yet, Rob.
	What color was his tie?
	Red?
	Nope.
	Was it not the standard?
	No, it was like a trendy title.
	Always wears red.
	Nope.
	You know what color was his tie?
	When's the last time you saw the president wearing a purple tie?
	Can you pull it up, Rob?
	When's the last time you saw him wear a purple tie?
	I seem to have never seen that one.
	Ken brought it up yesterday from BDC.
	He says, you know, he wore a purple tie yesterday.
	I'm like, I didn't even see it.
	So I looked at him.
	I'm like, can you zoom a little bit into the tie?
	Does it allow you to rob or not?
	No, that's a video, but I can't.
	Hang on one second.
	Yeah, when you see, why is he wearing a purple tie?
	He never wears a purple tie.
	What's he trying to show?
	Show some unity.
	He's trying to say, guys, I want to work with you.
	Work with me.
	Stop thinking this way.
	That's not a red typical tie.
	Go to a typical Trump tie.
	Trump typically wears the red Stefano Richie.
	That's a Stefano Richie tie.
	That's the tie he wears.
	He wears that tie.
	Okay.
	He typically puts that tie on.
	Once in a while, he'll do a blue because he likes to wear his blue, but he's a red tie guy.
	You wear purple?
	He's trying to tell them.
	Hey, guys, let's work together.
	Hey, let's do something together.
	Why don't we work together and be united in front of our enemies?
	Let's debate some of the issues.
	Why don't we do this?
	But nope, they came out there trying to do a show.
	And I think the Democratic Party right now is in such, it's in such a problematic place that people are, like, imagine if you're a Republican.
	Okay.
	And all of a sudden, the face of the Republican Party, a new person runs.
	Let's just kind of say, Nikki Ailey's now the president.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	And she gets up there and says, no, the Republican Party is about allowing kids to transition.
	And then you're like, and you're like, all right, Republican, yes, Republicans, we should raise taxes on everybody.
	And then you're like, oh, dude, this is like weird.
	Yes, we should do pro-choice.
	Yes, you know, we should spend way less money on the military.
	Yes, you're just kind of like, all these values that you have, you're going to be sitting there at night confused saying, there's no way I can vote for, say, the other side of somebody else.
	There's no way I can vote for them.
	But I'm no longer this guy.
	What is this all about?
	That's what happens.
	Because what all along I've been saying this about Trump since 2015, 16.
	You know what Trump is?
	He's not a Republican.
	Trump's an independent.
	This is what people don't realize.
	This is not a Republican president.
	This is an independent president that had to run as a Republican.
	That's who he is.
	He's tough.
	He's strong.
	He's going to push people around.
	He's going to push his weight around.
	But he's at most, Vinny, a center-right guy.
	At most.
	He's not a right, right, right, right-wing guy.
	He's a center-right guy.
	And I think the left is super confused.
	I call it a New York City Republican.
	He was always a New York City Republican, right?
	Because, you know, you're New York City Republican and you're Mississippi Republican are two different people, right?
	And I think that you really make a good point because where we're moving now as a society is kind of away from these red-blue binaries.
	And I think that the tie is a really good example of that.
	Because look, I made a little video on my ex right before I came here, kind of like promoting the podcast.
	And the reason that I love Miami, the reason that I love Florida in general is because you have a lot of people here that are super conservative, super based, but they're not necessarily going to like wave the flag like I'm a Republican.
	They love Trump, right?
	But the vast majority of people can't sit here and talk through these issues the way you can or the way the Hollywood guys that reach out to you can because they're entrepreneurs.
	They know business like that, right?
	The vast majority of people don't.
	And that's why I do slightly push back on the idea that the Democrats are so lost.
	They are lost.
	I think that they're finding their way.
	And it seems like I'm advocating for them.
	I am not.
	What I'm saying is that there's a strategy at hand here.
	And so if they have somebody like a Cuomo, like even a mansion, like these figures, somebody that rises, and I think that there's somebody who we probably don't even know who they are right now.
	These slogans that the Democrats have when they tell these lies that Trump wants to end abortion or he wants to gut Medicaid or all of this other stuff, right?
	You know, yeah, all of this stuff, right?
	Like it doesn't work for you and I because we know better.
	But you wrap that messaging up in a masculine male, like white male package that says I'm a Democrat, because the next person that's going to rise up in the Democrats will absolutely be a traditionally masculine white male.
	All right.
	And if that person is able to articulate that messaging, they will make a comeback.
	It seems like they're in disarray right now.
	And I want them to be, God knows, because I would love to have four years of Trump and eight years of Vance.
	I don't know if I'm allowed to say this, but there's parts of Vance that appeal to me even more than Trump does in a lot of different ways.
	But I'm telling you, there's a strategy here.
	And I don't want us to lose sight of that.
	And he's right because, I mean, look at Gavin Newsom is now doing a podcast because he knows he's finished.
	I said masculine.
	He's a slithering snake.
	By the way, we'll play that clip here in a minute as well on what Newsom, the podcast, said about Charlie Kirk.
	It's very interesting.
	We'll play that here in a minute.
	But so while he's up there speaking, Trump says Zelensky sent a letter wanting to find a way to negotiate.
	Okay.
	Rob, do you have that clip of him saying that?
	Yes.
	So President Trump, during his Tuesday address to Congress, read a letter from Ukrainian President Zelensky saying earlier today, is this the clip?
	Yes.
	Go for it, Rob.
	An important letter from President Zelensky of Ukraine.
	The letter reads, Ukraine is ready to come to the negotiating table as soon as possible to bring lasting peace closer.
	Nobody wants peace more than the Ukrainians, he said.
	My team and I stand ready to work under President Trump's strong leadership to get a peace that lasts.
	We do really value how much America has done to help Ukraine maintain its sovereignty and independence.
	Regarding the agreement on minerals and security, Ukraine is ready to sign it at any time that is convenient for you.
	I appreciate that he sent this letter, just got it a little while ago.
	Okay, so while that happens, he also, Zelensky, calls heated meeting with Trump regrettable, is what he calls it, Wall Street Journal story.
	Ukrainian President Zelensky called this intense White House meeting with the president regrettable on Tuesday, writing on social media.
	Ukraine is ready to come to the negotiation table.
	Rob, is this what he says?
	Yes, I would like to reiterate Ukraine's commitment to peace.
	None of us wants to want endless wars.
	Ukraine is ready to come to the negotiating table as soon as possible to bring lasting peace closer.
	Nobody wants peace more than Ukrainians.
	My team and I stand ready to work under President Trump's strong leadership.
	Interesting.
	Strong.
	You put that word.
	That's going to turn Trump on.
	He likes that.
	Strong leadership to get a peace that lasts.
	We are ready to work fast to end the war.
	And the first stages could be the release of prisoners and truce in the sky, ban on missiles, long-range drones, bomb on energy and other civilian infrastructures and truce in the sea immediately.
	If Russia will do the same, then we want to move very fast through the next stages, all the next stages, not the next stages, all next stages, and to work with the U.S. to agree a strong final deal.
	We do really value how much America has done to help Ukraine maintain its sovereignty and independence.
	And we remember the moment when things changed when President Trump provided Ukraine with the javelins.
	We are grateful for this.
	Our meeting in Washington at White House on Friday did not go the way it was supposed to be.
	It is regrettable that it happened this way.
	If it is time to make things right, we would like the future cooperation and communication to be constructive.
	Rob, can you zoom in a little more before the bottom?
	Regarding the agreement on minerals, what does he say about that?
	And security, Ukraine is ready to sign it at any time.
	Good, there you go.
	Boom.
	Good.
	We see the agreement as a step forward, greater security and solid security guarantees.
	I truly, I can't read the last part.
	Can you just Rob say what it says?
	I truly hope it will work effectively.
	Good.
	So, you know what I like about this?
	Guess what?
	We watched a video last week.
	He's intense.
	Zelensky comes in tough, okay?
	Calls JDJD, not Mr. Vice President.
	Right?
	There was a moment yesterday where President Trump says, Mr. Vice President, can you please sign the executive order right there?
	The respect that you got to give him.
	Zelensky was being very disrespectful on the way you're speaking to him.
	A few days later, what happens?
	He's willing to not talk.
	What happened there?
	Everybody acts tough.
	Another guy did that as well.
	Adam, your thoughts when you saw Zelensky with the letter here.
	So I'm trying to find like the closest metaphor to what this is.
	And this is what I have.
	So Zelensky is like a petulant child.
	And basically, he gets, he's like ungrateful.
	That was JD Vance's entire message.
	It's like, you didn't even say thank you one time.
	So it's almost like Trump is the new stepdad that married the mom who's the EU.
	And Biden is the old dad.
	He's out.
	He's gone.
	Now Trump's in there.
	He's like, listen, I'm taking care of mom now.
	I'm taking care of everything.
	I'm taking care of the kid.
	I'm paying all the freaking bills here.
	And you're going to be ungrateful.
	And then his boy JD is like, yeah, yeah, I don't like that.
	And just basically like that.
	Meanwhile, Putin's the town bully in the playground.
	And he's like, no, no, no, no.
	I'm not going to give you any more toys.
	I'm not going to give you anything.
	You get back out there and you deal with the bully.
	And he's like, well, okay.
	And he gets back on the playground and he realizes, yeah, I'm sorry, stepdad.
	I'll write an apology letter.
	I'll do my homework.
	I'll make my bet.
	I'll do whatever I got to do because you were right.
	Because now I don't have Daddy Biden here to save me.
	I have this new mean stepdad that basically stepped in.
	He's like, no, You've been taking advantage of mom and dad way too long.
	So new stepdaddy Trump stepping in and you better do what you got to do or you're going to go out there by yourself and deal with the bully.
	And he's like, nah, nah.
	And that's where we're at.
	I like, no, it's just, it's just funny.
	Listen, I've watched that video probably three or four times too.
	Because Zelensky's not that great at English.
	So it was like, don't get me wrong, he effed up horribly.
	But if you watched it, Pat, he doesn't really even, he's like, I don't understand.
	The body language, too.
	He was literally like this on Trump.
	If I was Trump, I would have been like, push his ass away.
	But this, again, that's all posturing.
	It's all showing off.
	And Adam is right.
	He is that freaking child that's gotten everything that he wanted.
	And now the stepdad who's militant, which the kid needs it.
	The other dad.
	He's like, make your bed.
	Yeah, yeah.
	No, no.
	You don't know what it's like.
	$350 million later, almost a million people dead.
	Enough is enough, man.
	Enough.
	Finished.
	Tom, I'll tell you what I see.
	I see all of this stuff happen, and there is 48 hours of devastating PR for Trump.
	All the European leaders, we stand with you.
	And they all stood on these stairs and made a big group of them and included Trudeau.
	Did you see that photo up?
	All the European leaders.
	But let's remember something.
	Those European leaders are talking about defending Ukraine with something, and that is called NATO armaments.
	That's what's there.
	This is U.S. arms.
	And when Trump came out and said, all right, then, I'm stopping all aid.
	Everything stops.
	And I'm also stopping the intelligence.
	Everything stops.
	That's what happened the night before this letter.
	Remember, Trump came out and said nothing.
	Okay, then you'll get nothing.
	And the other thing was he was manipulated.
	Zelensky was willingly manipulated, and he listened to what these people were saying.
	Go in there and instigate and tweak and do these things.
	Okay, whatever was said was said, but he came in there and he screwed up because there are people that want war that don't care about his country, that care about the economic benefit they can derive from war continuing in his country.
	And those people, you know, manipulated the situation.
	And so he came in and acted like a petulant little child.
	Trump said, okay, nothing.
	He went over and got all the European leaders to talk to each other.
	But you know what I read?
	What I read was when all of the war supply is exhausted that is currently warehoused, that Europe can't support the Ukraine war more than six or seven weeks without turning to U.S. NATO supplies.
	So guess who's going to need help from us?
	All the NATO partners.
	And so they got to be careful with what they're all talking about here.
	And I think what happened is all of that went down.
	And then Zelensky came back and blinked.
	Rob.
	Does anybody remember what Zelensky said to Trump to really make him pop off?
	Do you remember that moment?
	Well, you're going to feel it soon.
	You have an ocean.
	Tell me what to feel.
	It was crazy.
	You don't have the cards, Rob.
	And there was not enough time spent in all of media and people like, you know, everybody on this panel and all of our social media talking about how outrageous that was, how outrageous it was that he came here, that welfare queen Zelensky, who has been basically running around the world begging for money as this war has gone on for three years.
	Outrageous to sit here next to the president of America and tell him, talk to the president of the United States, say you're going to feel it.
	That's when Trump popped off.
	That's when he had to son Zelensky in front of the whole world.
	And what happened with that is like you guys said before, this is somebody that went into this meeting performing for the globalists that are pulling his strings, but also for the American media, because the American media had propped him up for so many years under the Biden administration.
	Remember, he was addressing the Oscars and he was going to the Grammys.
	He was begging for money in Hollywood and all this stuff.
	Man of the year.
	Yeah, that is over.
	All right.
	That has ended.
	And so that's why he came back, by the way, willing to sign that deal when he didn't want to sign it before.
	And by the way, Trump did another presser right after that meeting where they said, oh, do you think that you will invite Zelensky back to the White House?
	He's already begged me to come back right now.
	I don't think it's going to happen right now.
	Yeah.
	I mean, look, at this point of the game, you're seeing patterns.
	What's the pattern?
	Toughness that lasts 24 hours.
	Toughness, Colombia, lasts eight hours due to alcohol.
	Toughness by Panama, don't worry.
	We're going to get the canal and we're not going to let China have it.
	Toughness on Greenland, we're not going to give this up.
	He says, look, did you hear how we said about Greenland?
	He says, yeah, and Greenland.
	You know, the people there are fine people, great people.
	You know, it would be very good for both, you know, international and national security for us to have Greenland to be part of us.
	And, you know, one way or another, it's going to get done.
	Just so you guys know that.
	So he started off nice and he's like, look, you're going to be here because we're going to have this.
	And he's going and everybody acts tough.
	And then you're like, oh, shit, the deal is getting done.
	Oh, shoot, the deal is getting done.
	Because this is a different administration he has than ever before.
	He has a team that has his back 100% and they believe him because they saw how hard he fought.
	And everybody at some point, everybody that's following him, you know what everybody said at some point?
	You know what happens?
	You know why he's the alpha of alphas?
	Here's why.
	Everybody at some point said, yeah, I could do that.
	Yeah, I would do that as well.
	Yeah, I could take that.
	I don't know if I can take that much shit.
	Holy gets up after you're bleeding.
	He puts a five-five-five.
	I would have ran off this.
	And then in that moment, they're like, this is my leader.
	I'm not even.
	That's what happened to everybody.
	And that's why there's no more explaining himself.
	Everyone knows he's the alpha amongst alphas.
	Get in line.
	It's what we're doing right now.
	Let's get the job done.
	And that's exactly what's happening here.
	Rob, what clip is this year?
	So I have a few.
	This was the message to the citizens of Greenland.
	I also have the clip of Trump talking about moving forward any type of prosecution for people who kill cops.
	That's the one.
	Can you play that clip?
	Watch this one.
	This was one of my favorites.
	Go for it.
	I've already signed an executive order requiring a mandatory death penalty for anyone who murders a police officer.
	And tonight I'm asking Congress to pass that law.
	And I saw this.
	I'm like, good for you.
	What's happened with people wanting to be cops?
	They don't want to be cops.
	No.
	Why do we not want to be cop?
	I don't feel safe on the street.
	Guess what?
	Go kill a cop and see what happens.
	Wow.
	Go ahead and do it and see what happens.
	Death penalty.
	Can you imagine what that is?
	Mandatory.
	Yeah, mandatory death penalty to do something like that.
	That's wild.
	I missed that.
	That's freaking me.
	By the way, that was at top three on my list when I saw that.
	I said, great.
	Because Democrats want cops.
	Andrew Cuomo goes on Stephen A and says, what?
	Andrew Cuomo, who's a former mayor of New York, what does he tell him?
	He says, the former governor knew he's running for mayor now.
	He says, what does he say?
	He says he's against defund the police.
	Where's the story?
	Andrew Cuomo blasts, defund the police during Stephen A. an interview, despite once calling movement legitimate.
	He's realizing it didn't work.
	Yeah.
	Is this it, Rob?
	Yes.
	Go ahead and play the clip.
	Go forward.
	There's been a shift in philosophy here in New York City and other cities.
	But you've had this move starting in about 2020, an anti-police movement, right?
	Cut the funding for the police.
	Police are bad.
	We have thousands fewer police today than we had.
	Well, that has consequences.
	You cut the police.
	Don't be surprised when crime goes up.
	You cut the police.
	Don't be surprised when people are afraid to go into the subways because of the rate of crime.
	We have a mentally ill homeless problem.
	People who are mentally ill, dangerously mentally ill to themselves and to others.
	Rob, can you pause it right there?
	So by the way, this is a guy that had one.
	Do you have the clip of at one point him being supportive of BLM, Rob?
	I can find it.
	If you can find that.
	Oh, that's out there.
	Yeah.
	But you know what the point is, though?
	Here's the point.
	I'll come to you.
	The point is this.
	Even an Andrew Cuomo, who the mob came and got rid of him on his own side.
	Yes.
	Because he wouldn't be locked in.
	And at one point, everybody thought this guy's going to run for president and be a president, right?
	And then you saw the old folks' homes and all that stuff that happened.
	Boom.
	And then they come, they got rid of him, right?
	Now Adams is going through a similar situation.
	At least what he is noticing is realizing what ideas didn't work.
	And he's willing to go back and shift and adjust.
	He is willing to say, we learned it didn't work.
	We got to get away from it, right?
	It's so hard for the rest of them to do it.
	It's so hard for the rest of them to do it.
	And if you don't protect cops, who the hell wants to be a cop?
	Think about, especially in NYPD.
	Go for it.
	Let's talk about that whole BLM era, the whole defund the police era in 2020, right?
	I just, you know, have relinquished myself of New York after having lived there for many years.
	Who were the people that were advocating for defund the police, that cops are bad, that all of this other stuff?
	It was basically white libs, all right?
	White libs that were either, you know, local activists, but especially people like Cuomo and people like AOC, people like Corey Bush, the squad members, all these people.
	Yeah, AOC, all those people that had, you know, the police protection for themselves, right?
	You know who wasn't advocating for this and who never advocated for any of this stuff?
	The people that lived in the dangerous communities in these cities that more likely than not were African-American, were black Americans.
	These people were never advocating for that.
	So you would watch the local news reports and these people would be like, what are these, what are these people saying?
	We want more cops here.
	The cops make me feel safe.
	None of the people that were advocating for any of that had to live in any of these cities.
	They walked around with police protection.
	It was the height of hypocrisy.
	And I give Cuomo less credit than you, Pat, for coming out and saying this now that it is the safest possible time for him to ever say this.
	Because if he was a true leader, if he was a true leader, he would have gotten up and said that right then and there.
	If he was a true leader, he would have stood up to the far left right then and there.
	I got the clip.
	I just found the clip.
	I said it to Rob.
	If you can play this clip, Rob, watch this.
	Different schools of thought.
	You want to say, oh, no, which do you think is the no-brainer?
	Is it a no-brainer to put more police or is it a no-brainer to say defund the police?
	You know, they're both legitimate schools of thought.
	They're not.
	They're not.
	And we talked about it here on the podcast.
	That's not, right?
	But here's the part.
	What is he doing there?
	Do you really think he doesn't know having more police on the streets is safe?
	Do you not think he knows that?
	His father was a three-term governor.
	He knows.
	Do you think he knows it, or do you think he's playing politics at the time?
	He's playing politics.
	He's playing politics.
	They all are.
	Guess what he learned?
	It doesn't work.
	By the way, if the majority of Democrats, not the minority, the silent majority, if those guys don't make adjustments, by the way, how much, if he was sitting right here, what would I tell him?
	I called you because you know you were playing politics.
	I would tell him that if he's on a podcast.
	But at least he realizes he has to go there.
	If he doesn't go there, it's done.
	If Democrats don't come out and go there, guess what?
	No problem.
	You know what happened after Lincoln had a two-term president?
	You know who was the president next?
	Ulysses S. Grant, one of the worst presidents.
	But you know what happened to Ulysses S. Grant?
	He was a two-term president.
	You know what's going to happen if Trump crushes it the next four years?
	No matter what, it's a two-term president afterwards.
	Pretty much high likelihood.
	For sure.
	Because the good policies are going to stay like that.
	What's a two-term president?
	So do the math.
	2028 at eight years, 2036, till 2036, it's going to be a Trump type of a president.
	That's what the Democrats are messing with.
	So if you're upset now, Dems, just so you know, stay upset and don't do anything about it because you're going to have to deal with this till 2036.
	If you don't pivot and suck it up and realize your ego is in the way, and every Democrat that's involved in politics should read the book, Ego is the Enemy, because that's in the way right now of what they're doing.
	Truly, that's what's going on with them.
	Now, Rob, let's do this.
	Can you go back to trying to see what other clips we had?
	What were your favorite moments?
	For me, it was that death penalty, no funding for LGBTQ.
	And you know what he said, which was fantastic?
	He says, if you're teaching these things in school, federal funding stops.
	Federal funding stops.
	I don't know if you have that clip or not.
	I'll find that.
	And then he says something so powerful that every parent relates to.
	You know what it was?
	Kids are perfect just the way that God created them.
	Yes, he did.
	I remember that.
	Oh, that was a great one.
	That was a beautiful thing to say.
	You know who relates to that?
	What percentage of parents do you think relate to that?
	What percentage of parents sit there and say vast, vast majority?
	100%.
	The number is close to 100%, 95%.
	The 5% are the ones that bailed on their kids who don't care about it.
	But vast majority are saying that's exactly right.
	That's not a Democratic or Republican or an independent position.
	That's an evergreen position.
	But there was one moment, which was kind of weird, Rob.
	Can you pull up that clip that Amy Coney Barrett that David Harris Jr. posted?
	I want to know, Rob, what do you think about this?
	Tom, I want to get your thoughts as well.
	First go back, Rob, and let's read what he put in the captions, if you don't mind.
	Do you have it on what he says?
	And whoever the commentary are supporting now, it's certainly not America.
	David Harris also said the fact that no wonder she always votes against him.
	Okay.
	Look at the way Amy Coney Barrett looks at the president on Tuesday night.
	Go forward.
	Ugh.
	Whoa.
	She hates it.
	Go back to it again, Rob.
	Go back to it again.
	Look at this.
	If you read body language, look at that.
	He's complimentary, Kavanaugh, but look at her.
	Go to it one more time, Rob, please.
	And pause right there.
	Look at that.
	That's disgust.
	That's disgust.
	He put Pointer on the bench.
	Jenny a pointer?
	Yeah.
	He would put her pointer.
	Put her on the bench.
	He did.
	No, but what happened?
	Do you guys know anything about what happened there?
	Are there actual stories?
	Are we just speculating?
	I have some thoughts.
	Go for it.
	So remember what happened to this country during the Kavanaugh confirmation here.
	It's completely ridiculous.
	You know, he's driving them under the mud.
	But remember that there were all these leftist protesters that were being activated that were at Kavanaugh's home.
	This is what I believe because Amy Coney Barrett consistently votes against the conservatives, Trump's agenda, et cetera.
	I think that she's being threatened privately.
	I think that a lot of very bad people know where she lives.
	And I think that she lives under the constant fear of that.
	That's what I truly believe, because there's nothing in me that thinks that she is in any way not being pressured by some outside forces.
	You think she's being strong-armed?
	I absolutely believe this.
	100%.
	Who knows?
	I mean, look, we talk all the time.
	You know, people like us talk all the time about globalists, about the agenda, about et cetera.
	I go to D.C. regularly, right?
	I've been there more in the past six weeks than I've been, I would say, like in the past five years.
	And if you think that that's not a swamp, if you think that there are so many people in D.C. at every level that are not being influenced and persuaded and blackmailed and pressured by people, it's 100%.
	I mean, you feel it the second you get off the airplane at Reagan, right?
	So I think that she's actually being very much influenced, very much strong-armed by some people behind the scenes, because even constitutionally and legally, her rulings make no sense.
	Well, let me read you what I have here.
	Since 2020, October, when she was sworn in, here's the instances where she is diverged from Trump's preferences.
	Trump's election challenge, 2020, 2021, which, you know, in that case, she didn't challenge the Pennsylvania mail-in ballots and election laws.
	Okay, so that's one.
	Two, Trump's administration immigration policies.
	She joined her colleagues in upholding certain legal challenges against Trump's era immigration policies as those related to asylum seekers and public change rule.
	Okay.
	And the third one is case involving Trump's financial records.
	She participated in decisions relating to Trump's tax returns where the court upheld subpoenas for his documents, which was not in his favor.
	So I don't know.
	And there's other four times that she was for him.
	Fournade funding dispute, March 2025.
	That's now.
	New York sentencing appeal, January 2025.
	That's now.
	Colorado ballot eligibility case.
	If you guys remember March 2024, she was not for that.
	Immunity ruling, Jule 2024.
	I don't know.
	But that look to me was a strange look.
	And maybe we're reading into it.
	Maybe there's nothing there, but it seemed kind of weird on how she looked at the president.
	Give a different perspective on this because anyone who thinks that just there's, you know, there's six conservatives and there's three liberals on the Supreme Court.
	And the whole narrative is that there's a ideological monolith that the conservatives are always going to vote.
	The conservatives and the liberals are always going to vote with the liberals and that's the way it is.
	And if that is the case, then it's always going to be 6-3 and that's what it is.
	And the Democrats were going to pack the court.
	That was the whole conversation that was happening in 2020.
	But I got a little bit of a different perspective.
	Because who are the three liberals?
	Who are they?
	Katanji Jackson.
	Yeah, that's one.
	Sotamaora.
	Sotamayor.
	And Elena Kagan.
	And those are three women.
	Who are the conservatives?
	Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice Roberts, right?
	Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and now Amy Comey Barrett.
	So she is the one female conservative.
	So who do you think she has more in common with?
	The ideological, political, conservatives or the ladies?
	So she's the most swayable because, you know, when you go to the bathroom, you're with the ladies.
	I assume that the men aren't allowed to go to the women's bathroom when you have lunch.
	You know, maybe this is the craziest thing, which I found out recently, and I've known this, but women, they sink their periods.
	I don't even know if these ladies don't get their periods, probably not.
	But that whole thing robs it.
	But the point is this.
	She is way more willing to go over to the left side because her girls are hanging out there.
	That's my perspective.
	Why else would she look at Trump with such disdain?
	Her girls hanging out there?
	That's where her girls are hanging out.
	I don't know.
	So you don't know anything.
	So you're just given up.
	These guys have Supreme Court decisions that they make in the bathroom stall while they're sitting there talking to each other.
	That's what you're saying.
	100%.
	Think about the ruling.
	That's what you're saying.
	That's visual.
	That's what I'm trying to say.
	All right, Tom.
	Don't ask me.
	Do you agree with this guy here?
	No, I don't.
	Do you think there's anything there, though?
	Or do you think this is one of your famous Nothing Burgers?
	What do you think?
	No, There is something there.
	There was something on her mind.
	You know, you could see the very rigid body language and you could see the facial expression.
	There was something there.
	And that something is very real.
	But it's interesting in this picture.
	Do you know who she is closest ideologically to?
	Who?
	The man directly in front of her and the man directly on her left.
	Roberts and Clarence Thomas?
	No, she's over there.
	Clarence Thomas and Gorsuch.
	Right.
	That's where if you look at her history, her history of her appellate writings and the things that she's done, that's where she's closest ideologically.
	So I don't know about this, what Adam just said, that she's going to align with the women.
	It's very interesting that Katanji Jackson hasn't really aligned with anybody.
	And as a matter of fact, her and Elena Kagan are not exactly close.
	You can read about all this stuff.
	All this stuff is available out there.
	But when it comes down to the, you want to look at what they write and what they support, right?
	And what they're and what they write in a dissenting view.
	So I think there is something very real with Trump.
	But I look at her voting record.
	I just go back and look at the voting record.
	And I look at it before she was on the court and I look at it since she was on the court.
	And until I see her suddenly broke, as we say in the military, broken arrow and she flies off and I see three rulings in a row that are like, whoa, that's really weird.
	Because remember what happened with David Souter?
	They told Bush Sr., it's a slam dunk.
	He's going to look like this, but he's going to be with you.
	And guess what?
	Bush Sr. put a liberal on the court by accident listening to it.
	You can go back and look at what happened with Neil Souter.
	All of a sudden, they start looking at his opinions and going, Bush Sr., you put this guy on the court and he was completely broken arrow off last.
	Wow.
	So I'm trying to show you.
	Tom, you are half right because she does align very closely to Neil Gorsuch, but she ain't nowhere near silent Judge Claren Thomas.
	He is literally the most conservative guy on the bench next to Samuel Alito, where she is very center-right.
	So if she did align with Clarence Thomas, she'd be all the way to the right.
	He's far left Sotomyer is ignore the Alito line.
	I'm not going to ignore the Alito line because it's right there.
	Oh, please stop playing.
	If you take a look at where Alito's not.
	That was like Tom's version of a sassy black girl.
	Stop playing with me, boy.
	No, I think you're impersonating that yourself.
	But you take a look at where Gorsis is, and then you look at what's remaining over there on the right.
	And you look at where everything else is.
	Yeah, Tom, I don't know what you're trying to do.
	You got caught with your pants down, buddy.
	She's not as conservative as Clarence Thomas.
	He's all the way to the right.
	Take your pants off.
	She's just somewhere center right.
	That's all it is.
	All right.
	So one point about the Supreme Court that I want to make.
	You said that they were having the conversation in 2020 about packing the court, et cetera, et cetera.
	Just because that conversation is over does not mean that they are not still trying to actively do that.
	When Democrats start having conversations about things, they dump millions of dollars into multiple nonprofits and have people that are working on this and probably getting paid by this at this very moment.
	So you better believe that in any Democrat presidency in the future, it will happen and Democrats will run on this, right?
	About packing the court.
	Let me tell you guys one thing that I you kind of got to look at what happens.
	I just searched right now.
	Who are the oldest members of the Supreme Court, Justice?
	Clarence Thomas, 1948.
	Makes him how old?
	70.
	Okay.
	So depending on how things look, if I'm Trump, I'm probably speaking to him to replacing him in 2028.
	That's very important.
	Absolutely.
	And replacing him with a you got some options.
	I don't know who you bring, Ted Cruz or whoever you want to bring, you know, you know, some of the guys that he brings in that he can suggest.
	But I think that part, he's got to be strategic on where he's at.
	And hopefully they'd be willing to work with him because Sodomyer is 70.
	She can still go eight more years.
	Health-wise, she's far older than 70.
	And the Dems had actually approached her about resigning.
	You know what's crazy about DC?
	And I was having this conversation with one of the producers early before I came on set.
	When you spend a lot of time there, you realize how old people are.
	And I mean, these people are old, man.
	They look old.
	They move old.
	And it just, when you think about why we have gotten to the place where we have gotten in this country to where we needed Trump to really come in like a sledgehammer, it's because so many people are so old and out of such, it really is this bubble of just antiquated ideas, antiquated people.
	And I just come on, dude.
	You're saying that Joe Biden is old.
	No, no, no.
	You're saying that 92-year-old Joe Grant.
	Yeah.
	You're saying that Mitch McConnell, who's always having a fall, these people are so old.
	So it's a point if we're going to talk about if we're going to talk about the Supreme Court, it is a good point that Trump should replace one or two of these.
	And I would get some guys that their age starts with the number four.
	Yep.
	That's what I'd be looking for.
	I'd be looking for some guys early five years.
	That's a radical idea, Pat.
	No, I'll take it.
	I'd like to see that.
	No, I mean, it's cool, but it's just radical to think of somebody that young on the Supreme Court.
	Oh, no, I'm good with mid-40s.
	Who's the youngest Supreme Court?
	53?
	52?
	No, in general, ever put on the last 50 years, let's say.
	The youngest.
	Can you find that?
	I would say 51 years old.
	You're just throwing a number out there.
	What do you think?
	Because I think the oldest guy.
	I bet it's never been young.
	32 years old.
	32 years old.
	Just if Joseph story in 1811 was 33 years old.
	People lived to 40 at that point.
	I'm saying in the last 50 years.
	52 years old.
	Let me call you.
	Amy, okay.
	All right, so let's go to the next door here.
	Rob.
	So right after, I think yesterday or right after two, it could have been yesterday, President Trump put out a very strong tweet on Truth Social about Hamas, Rob, that I'd like to read you if you can pull up.
	This is, there is no holding back.
	And Adam, I think you send this in a group text.
	So shalom Hamas means hello and goodbye.
	You can choose.
	Release all of the hostages now, not later, and immediately return all of the dead bodies of the people you murdered, or it is over for you.
	Only sick and twisted people keep bodies, and you are sick and twisted.
	I am sending Israel everything it needs to finish the job.
	Not a single Hamas member will be safe if you don't do as I say.
	I have just met with your former hostages whose lives you've destroyed.
	This is your last warning for the leadership.
	Now is the time to leave Gaza while you still have a chance.
	Also to the people of Gaza, a beautiful future awaits, but not if you hold hostages.
	If you do, you are dead.
	Okay, I think that's very straightforward.
	Make a smart decision.
	Release the hostages now or there will be hell to pay later.
	Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, Adam.
	Yeah.
	After this message, is there, does anybody need any more clarity on which side Trump stands on this issue?
	Is Trump playing at all with this?
	Interesting about shalom means hello and goodbye.
	It actually means a third meaning.
	Shalom means hello, goodbye, and peace.
	So Trump, whether it's Ukraine and Russia, whether it's Israel and Palestine, Trump is, there you go.
	Trump is a word meaning peace, and it also means hello and goodbye.
	Trump is very clear on what the hell he wants.
	He's done with this.
	He's going to take over Gaza.
	He doesn't even care.
	Meanwhile, you have the Egyptian president, Al-Sisi, is basically saying, all right, cool.
	Yeah, I'm in.
	Whatever you got to do.
	So we're going to see what happened with Jordan.
	Jordan, basically, the king of Jordan came in about two, three weeks ago, and he basically said, we'll take over sick babies.
	We'll see if they're going to actually do that or not.
	But here's the most interesting thing.
	After the Holocaust, do you know how many countries were affected, how many Jews were affected?
	There was like 30, 40 countries that were affected by World War II.
	Israel absorbed all the immigrants from all over the world.
	They said, if you're Jewish and if you want to be part of the land of Israel, come on down.
	If the Middle East and the Arab countries, the Muslim countries truly cared about the Palestinians, why would they not absorb them?
	Why would Egypt not let them in?
	Have you ever seen the border of Egypt?
	They're not letting anybody in.
	They're not letting a cockroach from Gaza in.
	Jordan is basically, Transjordan was basically what Palestine would have been.
	I think 70% of Jordan is Palestinians.
	Why don't they take them in?
	Why doesn't Saudi take them in?
	Why doesn't Syria take them in?
	Why doesn't Lebanon take this in?
	Do you know that in Syria, in Lebanon, Palestinians are literally treated as second-class citizens?
	Did you know that?
	Whereas in Israel, in Israel, you have Supreme Court members that are Palestinian.
	You have police that are Palestinian.
	You have all members of society that are Palestinian.
	It's just very interesting to me, the dichotomy of actually what happens in Israel versus what happens all along the Middle East.
	They talk a big game, but at the end of the day, they just hate, quote unquote, Israel having their own peace and prosperity.
	They don't care about the Palestinians.
	They're using it as a cudgel to basically try to take down Israel.
	But if Trump's there, none of that's happening.
	Tom, thoughts?
	I think Trump, as he has spoken on tariffs, and I'm not comparing the human life in the situation started on October 7th with tariffs.
	I'm looking at the way Trump speaks and what he puts on the table, and he is not screwing around.
	He gave them, they have blown through a deadline where they only released about half of what they were supposed to release, and they were given a deadline, and they didn't.
	They didn't do everything that they were supposed to do on that deadline.
	And now Trump is speaking up and saying, look, you know, I have just spoken.
	And the key thing for me of the post was I have just spoken to some released hostages, and I did not like what I heard.
	And I'm telling you, you're keeping dead bodies.
	You're doing these things.
	I have had enough.
	And the only thing he didn't put in there is, can I remind you that two weeks ago I gave you a deadline and you only released about half of what you should?
	How far do you think he's willing to go?
	He's not going to drop nukes on Gaza.
	Not nukes, but how far do you think he'll go with anything?
	I think with him putting dead in capital letters, he's willing to send people to go get them, like actual freaking special forces to go get them.
	Because at this point, it's like, who knows?
	Remember those photos that we have, Tom, of some of the prisoners that were released later on?
	And it was like, whoa, they looked really, really rough.
	But you made a great point.
	Yeah, you made a great point.
	I saw him in the White House yesterday and he was genuinely asking him like, how was it?
	Are you okay?
	Is everything okay?
	And I think the stories that he heard when the cameras were off really, really pissed him off.
	Yeah, look at the cameras are off.
	What is being said?
	Beyond the post.
	Same person.
	That is the same person.
	No, but they're being treated great.
	No, nobody's saying.
	No, nobody's saying that.
	I'm not saying that.
	I look at one thing.
	People are saying that.
	Yeah, well, my thing is my supporters are saying they love being there in Gaza.
	They're being treated so great.
	It's what's being said behind closed doors, and then I'll shut up.
	What did Mexico just do?
	They talked tough, and all of a sudden they were walking a bunch of guys to the border.
	The guys that we wanted, the bad guys we wanted.
	Suddenly they're all shown up.
	Suddenly they're rounded up and they don't look happy.
	I think what you see behind closed doors, whatever Mexico was saying, but whatever.
	And what is he willing to do?
	How far will he go with this?
	If they don't respond, because already it's been two weeks and they haven't done anything.
	To me, it's pretty simple.
	I think you're going to see some strategic strikes and some guys are going to disappear in the middle of the night.
	And how soon will that happen?
	I think we're hours, not days.
	Okay.
	I was going to say days.
	But my thing is this.
	I'm not trying to be funny on the situation.
	The message, the platform that he's doing this, Truth Social.
	You think Hamas is on Truth Social?
	They better be.
	No, but I'm saying is I don't have.
	Is anybody here on Truth Social?
	I don't.
	You can't expect Hamas.
	Yeah, but they know that when Trump says something on Truth Social, it goes around the world, right?
	Everybody knows that.
	Look, I think that this is the peacetime president.
	Trump wants peace.
	He made it very clear in that troops, that Truth Social post what Hamas needs to do.
	What I will say is that the extent of America's involvement in this, if it goes to a certain point, it's likely not to be very popular with Trump's hardcore base.
	So I think that there's a lot of very delicate ways that this needs to be played.
	I think Trump controls, but his hardcore base, I think they're going to go along with that.
	Go with that.
	Go with that.
	Go and tell me how to do this delicately.
	Oh, I don't know.
	Yeah.
	That's why I'm here, not in D.C. How do you do this?
	Because to me, I think Assam Soleimani was not delicate.
	It was boom.
	Here's what we're doing.
	Right?
	Dead.
	Dead.
	Right.
	Here's what we're doing.
	Okay, great.
	If they go and they attack to try to find some of these guys and they're in the bunkers and it kills innocent people, the left is salivating for that.
	1,000%.
	Salivating for that.
	So is that why he is moving this slowly?
	And do you think Hamas and those guys know about the fact that he doesn't want innocent people to die because those clips will be going viral everywhere and you're going to see Free Palestine, you know, protesting happening in the streets and Twitter's going to lose their mind going out there and saying President Trump is this and he's owned by Jews and he's owned by this?
	Do you think that's the reason why he's moving slow with it?
	Do you think that's the hesitation?
	I don't think that's hesitation because honestly, that pro-Palestine stuff and all of those protests are not particularly popular among the mainstream left right now anyway.
	You know, you saw when a lot of those protests happened.
	Remember they were protesting in the middle of Broadway shows and they were screaming at people's faces and dinners.
	Nothing has happened.
	He said the same threat two weeks ago.
	What's the difference between the threat now than two weeks ago?
	I do not know.
	What is the difference between the threat now and two weeks ago?
	You give a threat.
	You haven't done anything.
	We're still there.
	And I'm not giving you about half of the hostages.
	Yeah, well, like I said, Pat, the capitalization of words and saying like, enough is enough.
	I'm thinking now.
	Let me see if that means anything.
	So here's my question.
	Let's go on a test.
	Even with Hamas.
	Yeah, let's do a tactical, like militarily type mindset right now.
	We know where they are.
	Can we all agree, Tom?
	We know our intelligence, Mossad, everything together.
	We know exactly where these terrorists and the hostages are, right?
	How do we get, do we let them stay hostages?
	Because America doesn't negotiate with terrorists.
	Do we go in and just say, hey, enough was enough?
	And this is the worst part that people don't want to talk about?
	People are going to die.
	If you do an invasion and you go and get them, some hostages, if not all of them, are going to die, but we're going to kill the people that are raised.
	What's the question?
	Can you go to the truth social?
	Can you go to his truth social?
	So who is the we that we're talking about, right?
	Are we talking about we as an America or are we talking about we as in funding Israel to go to the next step?
	Exactly.
	So check this out.
	Go ahead.
	Go to the truth social, the one you just showed.
	That's the one right there, Rob.
	Yeah, Shalom Hamad.
	Okay, zoom in.
	Key word.
	Key word in this sentence is what?
	In this truth social.
	I am sending Israel everything it needs to finish the job.
	I'm sending Israel everything it needs.
	What does Israel need?
	Do they need Delta Force?
	Do they need special?
	Do they need Navy?
	Is that part of the novel?
	They don't need anything from Israel.
	Is it weapons?
	No, what do you need?
	I feel like when he says he's sending Israel everything it needs, I believe that that's funding.
	And so like, like, I don't think that he's sending our American soldiers to go fight.
	Like, that's not happening.
	So when I read that, my first thought is when he's saying I'm sending Israel everything it needs, it means American funding to go wage the war.
	Well, let's see.
	Let's see what.
	There is a technicality here, and I'll be 30 seconds.
	When he made that first threat and he said, listen, I want these hostages.
	You know, they gave the hostages back.
	A lot of them.
	Wonder, they gave two dead babies back that they the B bus kids, these little redheads, rehead babies.
	Redhead kids, and they wanted their bodies.
	Who kills babies and keeps it all in hostage?
	And the mother of these two kids, they wanted their body back.
	And turns out they just swapped bodies and put some other persons in there.
	And Israel has what's called DNA testing.
	And they're like, yeah, this isn't even her, dude.
	What are you guys doing over here?
	So the point is, Trump made this threat.
	You don't think that Trump and Netanyahu and the IDF are having conversations?
	You don't think the Mossad and the military is having conversations and are defending Pete Hegseth and the military structure within IDF are having conversations.
	And they're like, yeah, dude, the whole hostage thing.
	It's like, if I came and I said, hey, Pat, I have this gift for you, and it's supposed to be a cigar cutter, and it just turns out it's a box of hay.
	Are you going to be like, dude, no.
	You're always like that.
	You never get it.
	It's just a box.
	No, it's just a box.
	There it is.
	So the point is, this time around, he's like, all right, you guys want to see what's going on?
	You're going to feel the hate right now.
	Look at this.
	He just, Rob just ran a poll, and the poll is, will Donald Trump's message to Hamas lead to the release of all hostage, all the hostages?
	4,400 people voted nine minutes ago, right?
	What's the number, Rob?
	Let's zoom in there so we can see it.
	63% say yes, 37 say no.
	It's not 80 plus percent.
	Nope.
	There's a group of people that are saying they don't think they're going to be released.
	So I don't know.
	That's actually fine.
	I was actually higher than I would suspect.
	No, what I'm saying is, I think something's about to happen.
	And you can't keep saying it.
	You say it once, you say two weeks later, you have a reputation of your threats are being heard by others.
	You don't.
	Reagan, you know, the prisoners were released the day, the moment he's given inauguration.
	And that was Iran and Khomeini.
	And it hasn't happened right now.
	So they're trying to play games.
	And I don't know.
	I mean, I don't know.
	I think he's at a point right now that something may happen in the next, you know, like Tom said, hours.
	I don't know.
	Because if it goes any longer, you can't threaten somebody that's solid and not do anything.
	That's what criticism was towards Putin.
	Putin would threaten, threaten, threaten, threaten.
	You're like, dude, you're not going to do no nuclear.
	We're going to use nuclear.
	Look, you're not going to do it.
	You're not going to do it.
	Stop using the threat.
	And Trump's not a guy to me that I think he's going to keep allowing his threats to go unnoticed.
	No.
	So I think something's going to happen.
	We'll see.
	All right.
	Let's go to the next door here.
	Let's go to the next door here.
	Stephen A. Smith.
	He's on the view.
	They try to ask him a question.
	And Rob, I'm coming to you with this one here.
	So Stephen A. Smith is on the view.
	They're asking him a question, and he answers it in a way where everybody was like, whoa, we were not expecting that.
	Go ahead, Rob.
	Seems like six years, doesn't it?
	And he's been going around with his cronies touting his so-called landslide and blowout win.
	But he won the popular vote by 1.5%, one of the smallest ever.
	And he won the general election by less than 50%.
	So what kind of mandate is this really?
	Oh, it is a mandate, and I'm going to explain why.
	And I don't mind the question, but let me be very clear.
	I'm no supporter of Trump.
	I'm a supporter of truth and the facts.
	And here's the facts.
	The man won every swing state.
	He increased in terms of his voter turnout in his favor from the standpoint of blacks, Latinos, and young voters.
	He increased his numbers in that regard from 2020.
	89% of the counties shifted to the right.
	That's a mandate.
	We can sit up there and play around all we want to.
	In 2020, Trump didn't win the popular vote.
	He didn't win the Electoral College vote.
	A matter of fact, the Republicans had won the popular vote, if I remember correctly, since 2004.
	But they did this year.
	So 20 years after they last won a popular vote, they won the popular vote.
	They won the Electoral College vote.
	The man won every swing state.
	And on top of it, all 89% of the counties shifted gifts.
	I don't understand how people can look at that and say, there's no mandate.
	There's a mandate.
	But the problem is that if you're the Democratic Party and you lost 49.8% to 48.3% and you're looking at that 1.5% dip, that's an excuse for you to say, what we did really wasn't that bad.
	We should continue to do that.
	Don't continue to do that.
	Find a new strategy.
	Rob, do you know how uncomfortable all those women in the panel were by literally sitting next to a black man that's not just going to nod on like a bobblehead and go along with all their Democrat talking points?
	So look, the Democrats have a black male problem, right?
	Everybody knows that.
	And Stephen A. Smith has been very savvy in kind of like coming from the sports commentator world.
	He's extremely successful.
	And then kind of putting himself into the space where I'm going to say, I am not for Trump, but I'm going to sit here and I'm going to tell you the truth about everything that is going on right now.
	It's very savvy because, and this is where I'll throw the black card down on the table.
	If you are a black man, Democrats have absolutely nothing to offer you.
	The black men that Democrats push forward are either gay drag queens, the Corey Bookers of the world, the people that are just going to sit there and basically be dominated by like loud, masculine black women who are the face of black people in the Democrat Party.
	So there is a real opportunity there.
	And Stephen A. Smith, I think, is positioning himself perfectly.
	And he's going to run with this, right?
	And so I think that this going viral speaks to how not often, how rare it is that we actually see a black man literally stand up and say, well, no, I'm not going to sit here with these Democrat talking points.
	I am going to tell you exactly what it is and be unapologetic about it.
	If the Democrats, again, it seems like I'm advocating for Democrats.
	I am not.
	I'm telling you, I despise Democrats.
	I'm not a Democrat.
	I am not a Democrat.
	Literally, not a Democrat.
	Never will be.
	But if they lean into the Stephen A. Smiths of the world and they lean into this messaging, those black men that they lost to Trump, just your run of the mill, you're working at the barbershop, you're working class, whatever.
	That is the black man that they lost to Donald Trump, right?
	And I am not going to say that those black men will never go back to Democrats because it is still deeply unpopular to be a Republican in the black community.
	So Stephen A. Smith doing this right now and the fact that this is going viral tells me that he knows what time it is.
	And Democrats are going to start figuring this out maybe later rather than sooner.
	Adam.
	Well, does anybody have more credibility on this topic than Stephen A. Smith?
	Why?
	Because he didn't vote for Trump.
	The first thing he said, he goes, I'm no fan of Trump.
	But let me tell you in truth.
	And fake Bette Midler over there, whatever her name is, is just doesn't know.
	That doesn't mean it.
	It's a man that shut your mouth.
	Like, no matter what he says, she's just going to be like, wow, it's not a bad man.
	They've had no response.
	They've got nothing.
	But here's what I will say.
	The view, and I know Vinny watches the view all the time as you like her favorite show, right?
	It is so much better when there's a guy on the podcast.
	Because women will just like, they won't say what they really want to say.
	They'll say the things that's like, well, I don't know, I disagree.
	Stephen A. Smith's like, listen, fake Bet Midler.
	And they will serve him the truth.
	By the way, you see on CNN, who's the guy that disrupts Scott Admitting Jennings.
	They don't last.
	They don't serve them.
	Exactly.
	Right.
	He's on a panel full of women or female men.
	And then you go on, you know, the Fox has the show, The Five.
	A man will tell you what you need to hear, not what you want to hear.
	So Stephen A. Smith showed up.
	He didn't tell them what they want to hear.
	He told her what they needed to hear.
	And he dropped the mic and she had no response.
	Hold on, can I get a sauce appreciation moment right here?
	Because this is the most versatile man in podcasting.
	You go from old Jewish woman to sassy black girls to like finance bro to like New York black Brooklyn dude in the space of like 30 years.
	I'm going to do that to him, Rob.
	We're going to be here all day.
	Guys, you can subscribe to my own.
	Well, Adam makes a great point.
	And I love, I love that.
	I love that part.
	Thanks, Vinny.
	I love what Stephen A. said at the beginning.
	He's not a fan, but you know what he's a fan of?
	The truth.
	Truth and facts.
	And the facts are, and these people cannot accept the fact.
	My only thing is, and you nailed it, Rob, I think he's positioning himself.
	So is Andrew Cuomo, like he's going for mayor.
	But when it comes to Andrew Cuomo, I don't want people to forget he was disastrous with COVID, with lockdowns, with all that stuff.
	So, and again, we always say this: you're going to vote for what you get.
	And I'm not going to feel sorry for you if people vote for these type of people.
	But it's interesting with Stephen A. Cause he, in another interview this week, he said, I'm not into politics.
	I'm not saying I'm going to run.
	We know what he's doing.
	Okay.
	He's positioning himself.
	Maybe Andrew Cuomo, president, maybe him vice president.
	I don't know.
	My question is, though, what are you going to run on?
	Meaning, are you once this Democrats now that are just doing opposition, Rob, to make a fellow Democrats to go, yeah, that's what we want?
	What are you going to run on?
	And are you going to reverse all of Trump's orders just like Biden did with the border, with drilling, with the war?
	That's Pat.
	That's the one fear I have.
	And I love Stephen A. Smith.
	I think he's one of my favorite people right now that are talking about these facts and the truth.
	Once you're in, the Schumers, the Pelosis, the Obamas, who are still, even though, by the way, they lost the black vote because of that guy, because of Obama scolding them, telling them, if, yay, Kamala's black, you have to, no, no, that message is dead.
	I just hope, and I hope they got, because that's the, to me, that's the future of the Democratic Party of people like Stephen A. Smith.
	Once you're in, you don't flip because of them.
	Tom.
	Because of those losers.
	Well, I don't think anything more needs to be said about Stephen A.
	I mean, he said, I'm going to, I'm on the side of truth, and this is how I feel.
	And then he correctly pointed out the authentic results of the election as looked through the lens of history.
	How is it different now versus what it was?
	And let me tell you what you saw.
	What you saw is coping and denial having a head-on collision in the middle of a synapse in her brain.
	She's just like, well, maybe, maybe, maybe it's a different definition of mandate.
	And it's just like, they can't because when you start with feelings, feelings lead you to denial.
	Feelings lead you to coping.
	I can't cope with what I'm feeling.
	And we lost.
	And I can't look at the facts and say, why did we lost?
	We couldn't have lost.
	This isn't happening.
	I'm not here.
	This isn't happening.
	She's having an out-of-body experience.
	And it's Trump derangement syndrome.
	So it's like a triangle.
	On one side, you have Trump derangement syndrome.
	On one side, you have coping disorder.
	And the other side, you have raw denial.
	And that's where she was.
	And that's what you're seeing there.
	And you're seeing Stephen A very calmly just turn to her and say, well, if all these things happened in this way, what do you call it?
	And she can't handle it.
	And this is why the Dems usually start positions with feelings and victimhood.
	And the Republicans usually start with facts.
	And when you get down to a core conservative like me, I don't think liberals are evil.
	I just think they're wrong.
	But they think I'm evil and they want me to die.
	So, I mean, when you're talking about this, to go to the next topic, were you going to say something on this?
	Yeah, last topic.
	The last thing I'll say on this, and I'm going to get in trouble for saying this, but I'm going to say it with blacks lack is fathers and dads.
	And there is a position right now for Stephen A. Smith to be basically mean black dad to get black America back together.
	I read, like, is wide open and he's stepping into it.
	And I think he's going to be big in the coming weeks.
	What you're saying is Stephen A. should go watch the movie Lean on Mega.
	One follower.
	That's going to be a lot of fun.
	Oh, you think Stephen A. Smith hasn't seen Lean on Me 10 times?
	Every black man in America has seen Lean on Mecca.
	But listen, it's a great movie.
	All right.
	So Rob, can you do me a favor?
	Pull up the clip on Andrew Tate and brother Tristan Tate under criminal investigation of Florida Attorney General.
	And maybe if you got whatever the clips you got, let's just go through them and let's comment on them.
	So, this is the Attorney General saying what he plans to do with the Tate brothers.
	Go forward.
	Yeah, look, these guys have themselves publicly admitted to participating in what very much appears to be soliciting, trafficking, preying upon women around the world.
	Many of these victims coming forward, some of them minors, you know, people can spin or defend however they want, but in Florida, this type of behavior is viewed as atrocious.
	We're not going to accept it.
	They chose to come here and set their feet down in this state, and we're going to pursue every tool we have within our legal authority to hold them accountable.
	So we are in the process today.
	We have secured and executed subpoenas and warrants, and we're going to continue to move forward with full force of law.
	This is an ongoing criminal investigation, and we're going to use every tool we have to ensure that justice is served.
	You've opened a criminal investigation.
	There is an active criminal investigation, yes.
	Do you believe that there is a question?
	I can't comment on a pending investigation, but what I can tell you is if these guys did criminal activity here in Florida, we will go after them with the full force of law and hold them accountable.
	Okay, so the key sentence there was what?
	If these guys did.
	If.
	Okay, yeah, if these guys did, and anybody in the world that does that, if they did, but you have to prove that these guys did.
	Of course.
	Here's what Byron Donaldson says, because originally, when we had Tate here, we talked about Ron DeSantis, and he was the good word to use it.
	There's people that choose the titles for the clips.
	They said, Andrew Tate destroyed Ron DeSantis.
	And that was trending all over the place, right?
	Maybe he did not hold back, was a better way of saying it.
	There wasn't holding back with Tate on Ron.
	And then he supported Byron, what Andrew said.
	But here's what Byron said afterwards about Tate.
	Go forward.
	The current Attorney General of Florida has announced he's opened a criminal investigation against Andrew Tate and his brother Tristan, because in Romania, where they just came to Florida from, there were charges of rape, sex with MITRE, and trafficking, human trafficking.
	Do you support the Attorney General's actions here?
	I do.
	I think those allegations have to be fully investigated, and then we go from there.
	The key thing is we don't tolerate the trafficking of women or, frankly, the abuse of women.
	We do not tolerate that.
	So if the Attorney General finds cause under Florida law to investigate that, then I wish him the best and I support whatever he's going to do on that matter.
	Are Andrew and Tristan Tate welcome in Florida?
	No, quite frankly, not.
	Because if you listen to some of the dialogue, I find it to be demeaning and disgusting.
	That's not about being, that's not about being an alpha male.
	It's not about being a strong man.
	What they stand for, in my view, is something totally different.
	Okay, so what were the words you said?
	If the allegations fully investigated, if there's abuse of women trafficking, none of us are for that.
	They're not welcome to Florida.
	A little bit of a strange thing to say.
	But now I have a bunch of opinions on this.
	This is who.
	This is him and Candace.
	That's right.
	So, Rob, can you play this clip here?
	Go forward.
	Come get me.
	Arrest me.
	Purp walk me.
	Put me on the news.
	Tell everyone I'm a human trafficker.
	You think I'm all verse?
	You think I'm all ready?
	I'm a Navy SEAL in this shit.
	Fucking come get me.
	Raid my house.
	Take my stuff.
	You think I sleep with a phone full of evidence?
	You think I don't wipe my phone every night?
	You think I'm dumb?
	Come get me.
	Arrest me.
	Let's do this all over again.
	I better.
	Wow.
	You think I don't go to sleep with a phone full of evidence?
	What does that mean?
	It's a little strange thing to say right there.
	Rob, is there any other clips to play on this or no?
	That's fine to go right here.
	We'll go to the rest of it.
	Rob, go forward.
	Rob Smith, go for it.
	What?
	Oh.
	I thought, you know, you talk about Rob.
	It's two Robson room.
	All right, so look.
	It's a political play by Team DeSantis here in Florida.
	I think to just go out and kind of like have the attorney general say that, you know, we're going to investigate, etc., etc., with this has to do with the fact that Casey DeSantis is rumored to be running for governor, right?
	So this is all politics.
	And what it speaks to me, and this is the reason that DeSantis got destroyed in the primary, it's the reason that honestly, a lot of people that were on Team DeSantis are so dead in DC and MAGA World right now is because they do not read the room.
	They're all about politics.
	Now, Florida politics is very insular in a way.
	And I understand that Byron is running for governor of Florida as well.
	So he said what he said.
	But when Byron Donald made the point, number one, it came up, he was prompted to say this.
	Like somebody asked him the question.
	He didn't lead with it.
	And he said, Look, if you know the Attorney General in Florida wants to investigate this and he finds something, I support him in that, right?
	But like I said, this is all coming from DeSantis world.
	Look, DeSantis has been a great governor in Florida.
	I was very much a fan of him, still is in terms of what he does in Florida.
	But this is naked politics.
	And this is also Team DeSantis trying to run to the left of anything that they see as sort of unseemly or any cultural figures that are very powerful in MAGA world.
	This is the reason that they are dead in DC.
	This is the reason that Ron DeSantis spent a lot of his political capital running against Trump.
	I do not think that there's any real particular reason why they wanted to pick this fight other than to try to look good or more moderate or to the left of what they see as hardcore MAGA or even Trump in some ways.
	Yeah, so this is Ron DeSantis post this tweet yesterday or two days ago.
	Casey Tienoff at Trump International Palm Beach made Burby Birdie on the hole.
	Casey and Trump had no trouble winning the match.
	So meaning, hey, we're united with Trump.
	This is very important for DeSantis.
	The fact that Trump is okay with him posting this picture tells you another one of those moments that Trump wants to find a way to unify the party and he wants to find a way to unify the MAGA community as well as the DeSantis community.
	But specific to the Tates, Adam, you ran a poll, Rob, if you want to pull up the poll that he ran on Instagram, your thoughts on what's going on with the Tates.
	Look, I'm actually very disappointed in the Florida government right now.
	I mean, the Florida, if you told me something like this happened in New York, if you told me like something like this happened in California, if you told me something like this happened in Chicago or Blue State, I'd be like, all right, I could see that.
	But Florida, where woke goes to die, the free state of Florida, these guys haven't been charged or convicted of anything.
	It's all allegations.
	And I'm not making any apologies for what they may or may have done.
	I'm just stating the facts here.
	But Florida, as a lifelong Floridian, my entire life, I'm actually like, I don't even feel comfortable saying how I truly feel for the first time in my life because maybe the Attorney General is going to open up an investigation on something he hears on the internet.
	And I get that the Tates say some things that are incredibly shocking.
	But like I made the analogy the other day, it's like when Hulk Hogan or The Rock or Macho Man Randy Savage say some ridiculous stuff, they're playing a character.
	And in many components, Tate, when he does his online persona, is playing a character.
	Can we at least admit that?
	How many times has Tate put on the sunglasses to play the character?
	And then he goes, Let me take these off to make my point.
	Like, it's almost like Superman's cape.
	Those are his glasses.
	So, you know, Governor DeSantis, who we've been very congratulatory towards and, you know, say great things.
	He comes and says, You're not welcome.
	Why?
	Are there any crimes?
	It's almost like they want to find the man and then find the crime.
	And then Tate called it absolute communism.
	So it's very confusing.
	Based on this poll, and it's not like my particular Instagram audience is like completely right-wing, probably have a center, center-right audience.
	80% said, no, Tate's the man.
	He's free top G, or I don't agree with everything he says, but I do respect him.
	80%.
	The other 20% say, not a fan, but I see why people are.
	And only 6% say, I hate him with a passion, lock him up.
	So based on a pretty moderate audience, 80% of people like Tate.
	Vinny, any thoughts on this?
	Yeah, I just feel, I think it's hypocritical with DeSantis and all these guys that were just so anti, you know, Joe Biden's weaponization of the justice system going after Trump for everything that they were saying that he was doing, all the charges, everything.
	You're just, you don't like the fact that he was talking shit about you.
	So now you guys are sending the attorney general.
	By the way, he took Pam Bondi's job that AG.
	You're looking for a crime now because, and you nailed it, Pat.
	Right now, if they just start an investigation on someone, you don't think people are going to come on and be like, yeah, you know, I'll say something.
	You know what they'll do?
	They're like, did you feel uncomfortable in that room with him?
	Did Andrew Tate make you feel weird?
	Oh, did you hook up with him?
	Oh, were you uncomfortable during the sex?
	They're looking for something because they don't like him.
	And you nailed it, Rob.
	This is, you know, they're trying to get it's election season.
	She wants to do her thing.
	What was Byron Donaldson going to do?
	Go up there and be like, no, man, I like that they're alpha and they're trying to hook up with chicks.
	No, they have to do it because at the end of the day, even though I love Byron being from New York, being from Brooklyn, you're still a politician.
	These are the things that you have to say.
	But these guys, and again, this still goes down to Andrew.
	I didn't get to ask him the other day.
	You're talking the talk.
	They're going to do it.
	They're going to come after you.
	And I don't think he's going to back down.
	He's going to keep doing it.
	And it is what it is.
	Here's what I got.
	Okay.
	Before we go to the top G, Tom Ellsworth.
	But here's my thoughts on Tate.
	So a few things, a few things to go through.
	If they did, if these guys did X, Y, Z.
	Yeah.
	If they did, they did.
	There's nothing we control over the guests that we have on and people that we talk to.
	If there's a crime that's done, a crime is done.
	I have kids.
	When I go to school and they get in trouble and they tell me and then they have tape and you see and say, hey, bro, you punched a guy.
	What do you want me to tell you?
	And then we go back and we're like, pull up the tape.
	And they pull up the tape and the kid punched my son first and then he punched him back.
	They kicked my son out of a soccer camp, Tico.
	Oh, really?
	And he's like, Dad, I'm telling you, you know you and I have a relationship.
	I don't like to hit my stomach.
	I punched him in the face.
	I said, he did not hit you in the stomach.
	He says, Dad, I'm telling you, he's crying now.
	And that's not to eat.
	He doesn't do that.
	I'm like, dude, I call the owner back.
	I said, do you have tape for the protection of kids?
	I noticed on your site you said you have tape.
	We do.
	Play the tape back.
	I want to see it.
	And then you have to call me back.
	No problem.
	So we'll get back to you.
	They call me an hour later.
	Voices cracking.
	What happened?
	Your son is right.
	He punched him in the stomach first.
	Then he punched him in the face and dropped him.
	And the only thing we saw was him being punched and we kicked your son out.
	We apologized to her.
	I said, you don't need to apologize to me.
	You didn't do anything to my ego.
	He needs to hear it from you guys.
	I said, what'd you guys do to the other kid?
	We call the parents.
	That kid can never come here ever again.
	Wow.
	We take him there.
	They apologize to him.
	He goes in there and trains.
	Guess what?
	The tape is there.
	If they're guilty, there's nothing even a fan, a supporter, a friend, a relative, a family, anybody can do.
	It doesn't matter what it is, right?
	So let's go to the next one.
	Allegations fully investigated.
	Why are the allegations in Florida?
	Are you investigating for what he's doing in Florida?
	Okay.
	Not been here for six years.
	You want to investigate him for what he's doing in Florida?
	Okay.
	Based on what premises?
	Based on what issues?
	Based on what evidence?
	If you do, great.
	That's your job.
	Go do it.
	But if it's because of what they did in Romania, you want to do it here.
	Do we have an extradition law between U.S. and Romania?
	Is there any kind of, I know U.S. and U.K. have it from 06 and 03 or 07 and 03, but is there anything there with Romania?
	I don't know what the relationship there is with Romania.
	So are you working closely with Romania?
	Is that what you're doing?
	I'm going to get no, but I could.
	You know, I said Romania have an extradition treaty.
	The treaty was signing bookers of 2007 and went affected.
	So that's a different treatment.
	But that's a federal, that's federal, though, right?
	I mean, yeah, but you can, you're right, that's federal, but can they use it so they would need Trump to come in?
	And Trump's answer was, I don't know anything about it.
	Then what's the other one?
	Abuse of women trafficking.
	If they're accused of this by law, then they're guilty.
	Then that's the law.
	So let the law prove that this has happened.
	If it's happened, it's happened.
	And, you know, when you're asked, you're not welcome to Florida.
	It's a little bit of, and by the way, for Tate is not helping himself out either when he's saying, you think I'm going to leave my stuff?
	You don't think I'm a pro?
	You don't think I know this, my phone?
	That's a little word.
	That's incredible.
	You're poking the back.
	Anyways, that's a whole different conversation.
	But the question is, can you be charged, arrested, tried for being a loudmouth talk?
	Look at Trump, that's not the point here.
	Look, for my lifestyle, who's my lifestyle more close to?
	Tate or DeSantis?
	DeSantis.
	DeSantis.
	The end of my life.
	Obviously.
	Way more DeSantis.
	Way more DeSantis.
	Okay.
	Tom Tate, but who's whatever?
	Whose is?
	Tom Tate.
	Tom DeSantis on the lesson nobody knows about Tom.
	Don't talk about that.
	I'm sorry.
	It's time.
	Tom.
	I'm sorry that I'm not.
	Don't do that again, Benny.
	But to me, dude, we had Anthony Wiener here.
	Oh, you think we have Anthony Weiner because we support what he's done in his life?
	It's a conversation.
	And some of the people don't realize.
	We've had Tate on two other times.
	Each podcast was five hours.
	You know what things we asked about?
	Everything.
	Everything.
	This is like the 13th hour of a podcast we've done together when he came to the States.
	You know why he feels comfortable here and he comes to the podcast?
	Because it's a conversation.
	It's safe.
	It's like, hey, where are you at?
	What do you want to do?
	You know what else I said?
	I hope he goes on Making Kelly.
	I hope he goes and does Making Kelly.
	I hope he goes and I hope Ben Shapiro invites him similar to how Newsome invited Charlie Kirk.
	Can you pull up the Newsome Charlie Kirk thing?
	I hope Shapiro sends an invite.
	Can you imagine if Shapiro, you know what will be the biggest alpha play here?
	If Shapiro tweets out and says, hey, Tate, since you're in Florida, let's do a podcast together.
	Now, Tate may not trust to go there because, you know, Ben is close to DeSantis and he may feel like they may set him up.
	So he may have a little bit of concern there.
	Here's what Newsom did.
	There's Newsom and Charlie Kirk.
	Newsome invites Charlie Kirk on his podcast.
	Would you have ever guessed that he was going to do that?
	Never.
	But he did.
	Play this clip, Rob.
	Play this clip.
	Trying to put my son to bed.
	He's like, no, dad, I just, what time?
	What time is Charlie going to be here?
	What time?
	And I'm like, dude, you're in school tomorrow.
	He's 13.
	He's like, no, no, this morning wakes up.
	It's six up.
	Then he's like, I'm coming.
	I'm like, he literally would not leave the house.
	Did you let him take off school?
	No, he didn't.
	Of course not.
	He's not here for a good reason.
	But the point is, they canceled school for like two years.
	Once one guy can't damn it.
	Great comeback, Charlie Kirk.
	Charlie is amazing.
	Charlie's so damn good.
	By the way, Gavin Newsome's son, who's 13 years old, is a fan of Trump.
	Huge.
	Yeah.
	Read between the lines.
	You think his son is woke and weird?
	But by the way, the part I'm trying to say here is you're afraid of a conversation?
	Listen, say what you say about Newsom.
	I love the fact that he had Charlie Kirk on.
	I can't wait to watch.
	When is it coming out?
	But I can't wait to watch the whole thing.
	It might be.
	I love it.
	It's got to be already.
	Is it out?
	I haven't seen it.
	That's the first clip I've ever seen that Rob just played.
	I can't wait to see the podcast.
	So guess what?
	The Shapiros of the world, the Megan Kelly's of the world, invite him.
	Invite him and ask the questions.
	Your questions, whatever they may be.
	Why don't you have the conversation?
	See where it goes.
	Yes, of course.
	And look, I don't know if he's going to say yes or not.
	They're definitely going to have to have a box of chocolate ready for him when they go there.
	Maybe not 250 grand.
	I don't know if he's going to ask for the chance.
	I think going back to this Florida thing and another point that we should make as well, knowing that Casey DeSantis is likely going to run for governor, that this is all about, you know, a female, a woman running for governor being tough on basically one of the biggest, you know, figures of masculinity that exist in the world today, right?
	So visually, that's what that's about as well.
	Great.
	Let's see if it works.
	If you're lobbying for that, what Trump has shown, pattern with Trump, absolute respect, absolute loyalty.
	He's extremely forgiving, as weird as it sounds.
	Typically, bosses are not forgiven.
	He's very forgiven.
	He moves on very quickly once you apologize.
	And then he lets competition decide who's going to be the leading candidate.
	And last minute, he will endorse whoever's able to do the work to get the support that they deserve.
	That's his formula.
	Very simple.
	That's how capitalists think.
	You have to forgive.
	Whenever you're in the sales business, you know what sales business does to you?
	Let me tell you what's the weirdest thing about sales business.
	Sales business, you cannot make it as a sales leader long term without learning forgiveness.
	You will not make it.
	You will not make it because your sales guys F up all the time and they screw up and they say stuff to you and they go through the process and da-da-da-da-da.
	And you're like, we got to move on, man.
	What did you do?
	Okay, let's move on.
	What are you going to do this?
	Let's go.
	Okay, I apologize.
	I F'd up.
	Okay, great.
	Let's move on.
	That sales and business culture teaches you to learn how to move on.
	But anyways, thoughts on Tate?
	That's where we are with that.
	Now, here's another thing.
	Ben Shapiro, the same day that Tate is going through all this stuff, guess what Ben Shapiro comes out and says?
	Ben Shapiro comes out and says he's asking Trump, Rob, if you got this clip, to pardon.
	I'll let him say it.
	Go forward, Rob.
	If we are issuing pardons, however, there is one person that President Trump should pardon from federal charges forthwith.
	It would be incredibly controversial, but I think that it's absolutely necessary.
	That person is Derek Chauvin.
	President Trump should, in fact, pardon Derek Chauvin.
	He should.
	He should pardon him as federal charges.
	If we are talking about reversing the evils of the last several years in American life, obviously COVID and its handling was a massive evil.
	Destroyed the economy, set us on a path to fiscal insanity, destroyed children, led to massive health-related cover-ups, just horrifying all the way around.
	And President Trump has taken on a lot of those things.
	But when it came to BLM, the inciting event for the BLM riots that caused $2 billion in property damage in the United States and set America's race relations on their worst footing in my lifetime was, in fact, the railroading of Derek Chauvin in the death of George Floyd.
	The evidence demonstrates that Derek Chauvin did not, in fact, commit murder of George Floyd.
	George Floyd was high on fentanyl.
	He had a significant pre-existing heart condition.
	George Floyd was saying he could not breathe.
	So this happens simultaneously.
	Elon Musk Rob response, I believe, because Elon Musk take on 200 times.
	He says something to think about.
	He tweets this video out to 290 million followers on X and says this is something to think about.
	Newsweek says Chauvin serving a 20, 25 year sentence for second degree unintentional murder and a 21 year federal sentence for violating Floyd's civil rights, though Shapiro noted in a video that Trump's pardon power only applies to the federal charge, saying the Derek Chauvin conviction represents the defining achievement of the woke movement in American politics.
	Rob, your thoughts on the story?
	I hate this so much.
	And I'm going to tell you exactly why I hate this.
	Number one, there is absolutely nothing beneficial that pardoning Chauvin would do for the Trump administration, for this country, for race relations, for anybody else.
	It is absolutely destructive.
	It makes no sense.
	And so for me, when I first saw this, generally conversations that happen come from the ground up.
	Usually there's some sort of murmuring under, and then it kind of like bubbles up, and then it becomes a national conversation.
	This seems to be a very top-down conversation that comes from somebody with an enormous amount of influence.
	This is nothing that anybody was talking about or thinking about.
	So it really makes me question, why is this conversation happening right now?
	It makes me question, why did Ben Shapiro want to start this conversation right now?
	Who does this benefit?
	Doesn't benefit Trump, doesn't benefit America, doesn't benefit race relations.
	It doesn't benefit anything.
	And the last point I'll make on it is this.
	There are very few people that can actually really speak to in depth what was going on in that trial, excuse me, how George Floyd actually died, et cetera, et cetera.
	There's probably five people that have spent the bulk of their day on a podcast set every single day like Ben Shapiro, like maybe two or three other people that can really talk to you in depth about this.
	So then they're positioning themselves to say, no, listen to me.
	I'm the one who really knows about this.
	So what?
	Trump's agenda is supposed to be derailed.
	Where we're at as a country right now is supposed to be derailed because these leftists and these Democrats are looking for a reason to have another race war.
	That is what they love.
	So why this conversation is happening right now, I have no idea.
	I'm not for it at all.
	No.
	I am not.
	Interesting.
	Vinny, yourself.
	Well, it's weird.
	I sent Rob some of the clips, Rob, of Ben Shapiro back in the day talking about how great it was that they should definitely go after Derek Chauvin and how he deserves it and all this.
	And I'll have them put it up.
	But it doesn't make any sense.
	If the evidence is there, which listen, it's more than likely that he died of all the fentanyl and all the stuff in his body and all that stuff.
	And you know what?
	Retrial, do something different.
	But for Ben Shapiro, who was at that State of the Union, whatever the hell it was, standing there, kind of applauding with kind of a whatever face, the only option that I would think of is that this guy, he must not like Donald Trump.
	Why the hell else would you, because you listen, guilt, innocent or not, you free Derek Chauvin today.
	What does this weekend look like in the country?
	The country is going to be set on fire.
	And who's the president?
	Donald Trump.
	So for Ben to say something like that now out of nowhere after he said all this type of stuff and Rob, if you just put it up, all he's saying is that government has one primary function to prevent the violation of rights of life and liberty.
	The police officer destroyed George Floyd's rights.
	That is no excuse for our government abandoning citizens' rights to life and liberty in favor of writers and looters.
	Do your damn jobs.
	Why the flip-flop and why right now?
	The only conclusion, my opinion, Vincent O'Shaughness, is that he wants civil war and something crazy to happen under Trump.
	I don't know why his mother's not.
	I don't know about that.
	That's a good idea.
	Well, why would you come on?
	Let me tell you why, though.
	Let me tell you why.
	First of all, just so you know, I had no idea.
	You didn't show me this before the podcast.
	I don't know he tweeted this.
	I don't mind reading the other two.
	I returned to a two-day Jewish holiday in five countries on fire.
	We all agree, George Foe, which is why Bad Cop is on the arrest.
	And anyone who defends look looting and riding and targeting the business on cops, okay?
	You're not stealing.
	You're not stealing that TV to honor George Roberts.
	Okay, so that's other stuff.
	So let me tell you why I don't think that's the case.
	And my likelihood of that being the case is less than 10%.
	Rob, can you pull up the picture of him and Matt Walsh being at, what do you call it?
	They were at the Union.
	They were at the State of the Union.
	Why are they at the State of the Union?
	Why are they standing next to all those people?
	They were guests of the Spanish.
	Why are they guests of Donald Trump and their guests to the speaker specifically?
	Somebody, the speaker.
	there.
	So they're at the, so are they there?
	You think the average person knows they're there because of the speaker?
	We think they're there because Trump approved that these guys can be there.
	You think Trump's going to be okay if the speaker, let's just say Speaker Johnson invites someone that really Trump can't stand.
	And Trump looks up and he sees them there.
	He's going to say, why'd you invite them?
	You don't think he's that delicate, that intentional?
	If I'm running meetings and one of my guys brings a guy intentionally that I said, what are you doing with that guy being in here?
	I would catch that.
	No, he's there because Trump approved him.
	So Trump's ability to play politics.
	Remember, who said it that, oh, Van Jones said, let's face it, Trump is the greatest politician of our lifetime.
	He said this after they lost.
	If you remember, November 6th is when he said that.
	So whatever the date was when he said that.
	So I think Trump is playing the game very well with everybody, and they're there because Trump wanted them to be there.
	I don't think that's the case.
	I don't think it's a, you know, you can debate the fact that it's not a good idea and it's a terrible timing.
	You can say the fact that, you know, the Paul brothers have a documentary coming up.
	I have a show coming up, right?
	It's called Paul Americans or American Pauls or something like that.
	American Paul, something like that.
	A show is coming out.
	The trailer is sick, right?
	The way they really, it's like, it's such a great trailer that you want to watch it.
	And in one of the clips, Logan says, it's not about being liked.
	It's all about getting attention.
	That's what he says.
	Guess what?
	He gets a lot of attention.
	Shapiro is getting attention.
	Okay.
	So whether you agree with it or not, but to say that he's trying to hurt Trump and all that.
	But we're missing why Ben Shapiro and Matt Walsh were there.
	There was a, you know, Ben Shapiro and Matt Walsh, the Daily Wire, were instrumental in bringing the no boys and girls' sports.
	They were instrumental in mainstreaming that conversation in a way that I had never had before.
	And even Matt Walsh was instrumental, even locally in Tennessee, you know, ending some of that stuff, right?
	So that's why the two of them were there because, you know, they were sitting right next to Riley Gaines, obviously an icon in that movement, right?
	So that's why they were there, I think.
	I don't think that had anything to do with the fact that Trump loves them or anything like that.
	I think it was very specific to that.
	And he brought that up in the Say the Union address.
	I don't know.
	It's about Trump loves them.
	I just think that Trump is saying in politics that he knows Shapiro and Netanyahu and that community and Daily Wire.
	Trump's understanding what he's also doing.
	Trump is not somebody that doesn't make moves accidentally.
	Yeah, but here's my thing, though.
	That came out.
	When did that clip come out of Ben Shapiro?
	Right before the date.
	Was it the day before?
	I saw the day of.
	Could be.
	I saw it.
	I don't know, but it's within 24 hours.
	I think, and I think we all agree, Ben is really, really, really smart.
	Okay.
	Let's put that over here.
	He is smart.
	Why?
	I'm just asking, what would that do?
	Because he's smart.
	If Trump says, I'm pardoning Derek Chauvin, what happens to the country?
	Honestly, it's going to be all out insanity.
	George Soros says freaking BLM is going to get triggered up Antifa and everything.
	So that's why I, my opinion, Vincent O'Shana's on his own, I'm thinking there's something that this comes out of nowhere.
	Where did this come from?
	For Ben to say that makes me go, wait a minute.
	The only outcome is negativity in this country, right?
	And the president is Donald Trump.
	I don't like it.
	So I agree with the hypothesis.
	I don't necessarily agree with your conclusion.
	Like, oh, well, he wants to talk about Derek Chauvin, so he must hate Donald Trump and he wants a civil war.
	So I don't know how you got there, but I respect your pretty simple.
	Yeah, but the country was on fire because of the situation.
	I get.
	And you don't think black people are going to be furious that we're walking around and burning down churches and beating the shit out of people?
	Okay.
	I understand.
	I understand where you got there.
	I know you're the angry patriot.
	I love you.
	Calm down.
	Let me get to this thing.
	Just because he came up with this idea doesn't mean it's actually going to happen.
	Doesn't mean it's going to be implemented.
	Doesn't mean that anybody's going to hear this.
	But I think what Ben, who's one of the smarter guys out there, realizes is I think a lot of us don't really fully understand that we were tricked because I was one of those guys.
	I fell for the Russia, Russia, Russia thing.
	I fell for the George Floyd thing.
	And then looking back at it, it's like, huh, maybe the media played us.
	Maybe the media kind of really motivated us to want to see this guy, Derek Chauvin, go to jail and go to hell.
	I mean, I remember whether it's George Floyd, whether it was Eric Garner, whether it was Michael Brown, Freddie Gray, Fernando Castillo, all these names, you would think, based on the media, that cops are just going around mowing down black people, left and right.
	Oh, my.
	And like, as someone who has a heart, someone who has eyes, if you turn on the media and the only thing you see is it happened again today, they got another one.
	Black people are going to get upset.
	Anybody that is empathetic is going to get upset.
	Anyone's going to get upset by seeing, oh my God, this is actually happening.
	But it turns out it's actually definitely not happening because PBD had the guy, the Harvard professor, Roland Fryer.
	Was that his name, Pat?
	He came on, black guy, by the way.
	And I'll never forget the story that he told.
	He came up with this conclusion and he came up with a report.
	I think he said he hired eight data researchers, attorneys to find out what was actually going on in the black communities with police.
	And the answer was nothing.
	So he goes, nah, can't be.
	Did another whole set of research and it came to the conclusion that no, police are not just going around killing and shooting black people.
	So the people at Harvard, the people of the professional elite, what did they tell him, Pat?
	They're like, do not put this out there.
	Did they not say that?
	They said, do not put this out there.
	This is going to go against our entire narrative.
	And he's like, no, I'm going to do it.
	And the findings were this.
	Maybe there was a little bit of like minor stuff, like, hey, what are you doing?
	You're jaywalking?
	That kind of stuff.
	Where are you going with you?
	The point is this.
	He found that it's actually not true.
	So what I'm saying is maybe Ben Shapiro is realizing, listen, he might have fell for it too.
	And I know that it's only a small thing.
	Maybe this guy is just one minor blip on the radar.
	But maybe he actually believes that he's sitting there in jail fraudulently and the media lied to us.
	Okay.
	So were you going to say something?
	You look like the other person.
	No, no.
	So what I would say with this part to me is this, Vinny.
	Do you think Shapiro is Team Trump or Team DeSantis?
	DeSantis.
	No question.
	100% of the time.
	He's a DeSantis conservative.
	At 100%.
	He's a DeSantis conservative.
	Wait, wait.
	What are you doing?
	You're saying no, he's not?
	I'm just saying if this were a year ago, I can understand this.
	At this point, DeSantis is literally irrelevant.
	No.
	He's the governor of Florida.
	He has no...
	You think that Florida, that's false.
	Based on what he did with Tate, it's a little bit more relevant.
	But the point, it's a very basic question.
	You're saying that DeSantis is even in Trump's league at this point?
	You think Ben Shapiro would have preferred a DeSantis president or Trump president?
	Okay, he maybe would have preferred a DeSantis.
	Sure.
	But at this point, like the conversation's over.
	Trump's the president.
	Buddy, I didn't ask you for a 17-second monologue answer.
	It wasn't.
	It was a simple answer.
	Which one do you think he would have preferred?
	A Trump or a DeSantis?
	He probably would have preferred DeSantis a year ago.
	So to what Vinny is saying, I understand that there's a percentage of people that may say he's doing this because, hey, disruption or whatever.
	Fine.
	Let's give that a little bit of credence that that is taking place.
	Let me give the opposing side to why I don't believe that's the way to go.
	Trump's the wrong guy to mess with right now.
	Wrong guy to mess with right now.
	It could be career ending.
	It could be losing two to four years of momentum.
	I don't know how Daily Wire's business is doing right now.
	I don't have any idea.
	Maybe they're killing it.
	Maybe they're not.
	Maybe, you know, they used to not be that friendly with Fox, a little bit more friendly with Fox.
	Maybe they want Fox to buy Daily Wire right now.
	Maybe they kind of want to, hey, financially, you know, our investors are kind of pissed off at us because they go, we got to get the returns.
	And you got Brett Cooper and you got this and you got that.
	And you got Candace and you got all this stuff that's happening.
	Everybody, oh, Candace's going to buy Taymant.
	That's the person behind closed doors of a lawsuit.
	It's Patrick.
	Someone up, talk, talk, talk, talk.
	Yeah, okay.
	Now, I'm friends with almost everybody from all sides.
	I'm friends with Cuomo.
	I'm friends with Candace.
	I'm friends with a lot of people on many different fronts.
	Sports, business, politics.
	I get along with a lot of people, entertainment.
	I have a lot of conversations with people I agree and disagree with.
	But to me, you know, they may have some other things behind closed doors that they're trying to kind of figure out things to get to do.
	Let me tell you how investors work.
	The moment EBITDA numbers drop, loans, Tom, you and I have been through this game many, many times.
	And you know what happens eventually when you keep going back to investors saying, we need another 200 million, we need another 100 million, we need another 50 million.
	Eventually they're like, maybe it's time to sell is what we got to do.
	Maybe it's time to this.
	I don't know.
	I wouldn't be surprised if all of a sudden we heard news that, you know, either Daily Wire is raising another round from somebody that's coming an equity partner, whatever, or, you know, a Fox interest report's coming out that maybe Daily Wire is trying to get themselves to get a little bit closer because they would be open to the idea of Fox buying them.
	And, you know, what is the valuation, all this other stuff?
	I don't know.
	But all I know is right now, Trump carries so much weight that guess what?
	It's not about him needing you as much as you needing him today.
	Trump doesn't need anybody today.
	He's choosing to build relationships today, not because he needs him desperately, because he's choosing to.
	He is probably the most diplomatic I've ever seen him be, ever.
	I don't know if I've ever seen him be more diplomatic.
	I know this sounds kind of weird because you don't think about diplomacy when you think about Trump.
	It's the most diplomatic.
	He said, President Zelensky sent a letter wanting to do this.
	And I have to say this.
	I appreciate the president's letter.
	I appreciate the president's letter.
	Thank you for sending the letter.
	What?
	He's going there.
	So again, you're right that that thought could be in there, but I think not now because they have nothing they can do to hurt this guy.
	Nothing.
	It's a second term.
	So this is what I think.
	There's two different types of Republicans, conservatives right now, right?
	And so we're definitely like MAGA, MAGA, MAGA, and I get that.
	But there is a group of conservatives, Republicans that is more in line.
	And so when we talk about the DeSantis versus Trump thing, it's not necessarily about DeSantis versus Trump because that's a tired conversation.
	I don't think anybody's having that conversation, but it's about the type of people that are really drawn to Trump and the type of people that are really drawn to DeSantis.
	And there are some people that some Republicans in D.C. right now that do not like these things that Trump are doing.
	Okay, these are establishment conservatives and Republicans that have been around for a very long time.
	They do not like any of this.
	They don't like dismantling USAID.
	They do not like dismantling the Department of Education.
	They see this stuff as crazy.
	And so there's a lot of people right now that are positioning themselves kind of like to the left of MAGA.
	And I think that that's kind of like what's going on.
	28.
	That's it.
	You're right.
	28.
	But guess what?
	Wrong time.
	I agree.
	It's a wrong time.
	Yeah.
	Wrong time.
	So wrong time.
	Bad time.
	I think Q1 2027 is good timing.
	Q1 2025, bad timing.
	Way two more years.
	Okay, Tom, coming to you with this one.
	Emails prove.
	Karen Bass, mayor of LA, office knew of critical fire risk before LA mayor skipped off to Africa.
	Not a good look.
	And Nicole Shanahan and a bunch of other guys are getting involved in this one here.
	So let me read the story.
	Rob, is that a clip you got there?
	So I have the fire chief who was fired by Karen Bass talking about Karen Bass being warned about the fires.
	So that's the clip from here.
	And then I also have a few clips of the recall efforts.
	Dude, play that clip first.
	Let's look at that clip.
	So this is the former LA fire department chief that got fired by the mayor.
	Go for it.
	It is also a false allegation that we failed to notify the mayor's office about the upcoming weather event.
	I stand by our previous statements about this.
	The LAFD engaged in all of its standard communications, including emailing two separate media advisories, conducting multiple live and recorded media interviews about the predicted extreme weather and fire danger, and also notifying city officials about the upcoming weather events.
	The emergency management department also plays a key role in notifying the mayor's office and city officials.
	And the mayor's office itself also sent out multiple media messages prior to the fire's warnings.
	Okay, so that's not good, right?
	What else do you have, Rob, outside of that?
	So I have a news report of the recall if you want to play that, or I have a promo video that the recall effort has put out.
	By Nicole Shanahan?
	Yes.
	Okay, go for it.
	This has the potential for 200 plus acres in the next 20 minutes.
	We have a penetration for structures being threatened in the next 20 minutes.
	She put this together.
	Los Angeles wildfires.
	At least 24 people have tragically been killed.
	When the fires broke out LA Mayor Karen Bass was in Africa.
	We know that there was warnings about the weather before you went.
	When she returned, instead of answering critical questions from reporters, she chose to just ignore those questions and stay silent.
	Do you owe citizens an apology for being absent while their homes were burning?
	Madam Mayor, have you absolutely nothing to say to the citizens today who are dealing with this disaster?
	We'll accept complaint, right?
	So at early times, we endorse Karen Bass.
	That's a mistake.
	Warner of LA time.
	There are calls for Karen Bass to resign, and those calls are getting louder.
	Damn.
	Rob, that's by Nicole Shanahan?
	That is by the organization leading the recall, which she has supported.
	I'm not sure if she directly had anything to do with this video.
	It could be funding, could be money.
	She's got money.
	Tom, your thoughts.
	Well, first of all, Karen Bass and Deputy Mayor Seidel, Zach Seidel, have been caught here.
	And this recall effort, you're going to see more ads and more things that are showing that, oh, I was never informed.
	And they're playing this ticky tech game.
	You know, it's like, Dad, you didn't tell me I had to go to bed at 8:30 tonight.
	Well, wait a minute.
	You go to bed at 8:15.
	You have to read books, lights out at 8:30 every night, but you didn't say it tonight.
	That is the kind of game that is getting played here.
	But guess what's coming out?
	What's coming out is emails saying, whoops, there's emails from the Emergency Management Department EMD that were warning him.
	And then Seidel gets caught because he said, well, I saw a tentative.
	The tentative was in the time in the time for the phone call to take place.
	Said tentative 8:30.
	And so he's saying, Well, I thought, I thought the whole thing was tentative.
	No, it wasn't a tentative warning.
	The time was tentative.
	So they are trying to play games with everything, and it got deeper over the last week and a half.
	It's gotten much deeper.
	Where people can see two things happened.
	Number one, the mayor's office, deputy mayor Seidel, and Karen Bass knew about it.
	They knew it was coming, and warnings had been received by them.
	The warnings got worse only 20 hours into her trip.
	So 20 hours into the trip, it's like, hey, man, they just escalated this.
	And so that's coming out.
	The last part that's coming out is that it turns out that the fire chief worked really hard to do this and that.
	And there was previous policies.
	Now, was the fire chief innocent?
	No.
	But was the fire chief made the fall girl here?
	Absolutely.
	And that's what's worse.
	So now part of the recall effort is going to be the previously employed fire chief, and you're going to see her interviewed.
	So if, here's my if, if the Angelinos will look at everything that's in front of them and ignore their political biases and listen to people like Suit, who owns the LA Times, and be objective about this, Karen Bass should get recalled.
	They need about 315,000.
	They need 15% of registered voters on a petition on a basically a recommendation petition.
	And they've got 6,000 so far.
	They need 315, but it just started.
	So as soon as they have that, then it will go to recall.
	But will the voters of LA come out and step aside from their political viewpoints and look at this objectively?
	No, I actually don't.
	So let me ask you this.
	That's my if.
	Yeah.
	So here's the question: the recall for Newsome was what?
	5743, some number like that.
	It's over.
	It might have been more than that.
	No, I think it was.
	And then it dropped lower.
	What did it end up being?
	Percentage-wise?
	I may be wrong.
	I just might have had wise.
	I remember he had 60-something percentage.
	I remember it was 64, and then it dropped to like a lower.
	There you go.
	6238.
	Okay.
	So 62.38 is what the recall was, but that's when 21.
	And that's what?
	COVID, like almost COVID, you know, middle of it.
	This is after fires.
	This is LA.
	This is legit, legit LA taking place.
	Driving by it every day, right?
	That's right.
	Do you think it's a different recall because it's specific to a city instead of a state?
	I believe it is.
	And I still say, if the voters will look around and look at this evidence, this should be a fairly straightforward recall.
	Tom, I wish it was that that was the case, but look who we're talking about.
	We're talking about people in California that are freaking brainwashed with Stockholm syndrome.
	It's not going to change.
	And going to this story, Karen Bass, knowing the fires were coming, okay, but conveniently leaving the country is like you ever watch those shows where the wife hires a hitman to take out the husband, but they just happen to be on vacation when it all goes down.
	That's plausible deniability.
	That's her leaving.
	And that's why she had that.
	Yeah, thank you.
	And that's why she had that face while she's questioning.
	You know what you did.
	I don't know the motive of why would you not want to be there when you knew it was coming.
	Why not try to prevent it?
	But yeah, I don't, guys, as much as I want to say, I hope, because all my family pets in California, I mean, they don't vote with stuff like this, but it's not going to change.
	These people, you're not going to change.
	They're not going to vote any of these people out.
	Not her, not Newsome.
	Never.
	I totally think that people really don't understand how brainwashed people in these places are.
	Thank you.
	Like you do not understand.
	I lived in New York for over a decade, probably for about 15 years.
	These people are so locked into their ideological agenda that they will not move away from it.
	And by the way, Karen Blass, Karen Bass is a black woman, and that's God to Democrats.
	And anybody that is criticizing a black woman or will literally say, this is what you should have done that was not done.
	Automatically, they're going to be put as racist or they hate black women, et cetera.
	And number one, do not think that they're not going to play that card because that is the first card that they're going to go to when people actually start criticizing her.
	They've already, there was a couple of these Hollywood actresses, black women that were in something or other.
	And I remember starting seeing them do a lot of social media stuff about how everybody's being so racist and so mean to Karen Bass.
	I was like, oh, so they're getting paid.
	And there's going to be a lot more money spread around to a lot of these black entertainment figures in LA to stand for quote unquote Karen Bass, right?
	Adam.
	I think this broad is finished.
	I mean, are you kidding me?
	I think the day that she showed up and from Ghana, Ghana, for the inauguration of the media.
	And she said nothing, like watching the movie like Silence of the Bass.
	Like, she looks so stupid, dumb, uninformed, unequipped.
	Just, you got nothing to say.
	At least Gavin Newsome will put some spin and some slickness and some hair gel and kind of spin it and at least give you the impression like maybe he's got something.
	This was such a disaster.
	And if you ask me like, who's the mayor of LA?
	I'm like, I don't know.
	I know exactly who this lady is now.
	She's the lady that landed from Ghana when her city was burnt on fire and had nothing to say.
	That's what I know about her.
	And I think this people of the city, as brainwashed as they are and as much as they have Trump derangement syndrome, who she ran against was Rick Caruso.
	She only beat him by a little bit.
	And if you're judging, you know, some COVID lockdown masks in 2020 versus your city burnt down, bro.
	I'm assuming that she's going to be a goner and she deserves everything she gets.
	By the way, again, it's concentrated, Vinny.
	That's the difference.
	She barely look at that, 54.8 to 45.2 by say 89,000 votes, which is a good amount of votes because it's 420 to 509.
	But it's concentrated LA.
	So the problem was like this with Newsom.
	So not everybody was feeling the pain.
	The problem is like this for her.
	Everybody within the city feels the pain.
	It's more concentrated.
	And a lot of Hollywood people are done with her and they want Caruso.
	Like literally, people want Caruso on the left.
	Oh, really?
	Oh, yeah.
	When's this going down?
	When's the actual if it happens?
	They need 315,000 signatures and we can check into that every day.
	Yeah, we're going to learn more about this.
	Let's go to the next store here.
	Trudeau says U.S. wants to collapse Canada's economy with tariffs.
	Rob, if you got this clip here, you gave a 22-minute message that if you go on CNN's YouTube page and you see how it performed, just to kind of put things to say, well, nobody cares what he has to say, go to CNN's YouTube page.
	Okay.
	And so just, if you don't mind, just go to their channel and then go to the videos and don't go fully down yet, Rob.
	Zoom in a little bit so we can look at the view, so the audience can see this.
	Yeah, there you go.
	Watch this.
	36,000 views, right?
	Just look at the videos.
	Go a little higher, Rob, because I can't see nothing.
	37, 93, 28, keep going.
	35, 33, 5,200, 126, 346,000 views about dealership, 627 about Zelensky.
	I'm sorry, about Trump.
	142, 232, 738 is about the Supreme Court.
	38, 462, 258, 204, 5,000, 186, 480, 13,000, 10 million.
	Wow.
	Trudeau.
	People want to hear what he had to say.
	Click on it.
	Look how many comments it was.
	Zoom in on the comments, please.
	Damn.
	96,000 comments.
	Look how many likes on the video.
	Go all the way up to the video.
	Gualdo, you may not be thinking about it.
	272,000.
	This is a real issue that people are following closely because of what he had to say.
	Go ahead and play the clip on what he said, Rob.
	If you got the clip, yeah, go for it.
	Excuse that he's giving for these Paris tariffs today of Sentinel is completely bogus, completely unjustified, completely false.
	So we actually have to fold back on the one thing he has said repeatedly: that what he wants is to see a total collapse of the Canadian economy.
	Because that'll make it easier to annex us, is the second half of his thought.
	Now, first of all, that's never going to happen.
	We will never be the 51st state.
	But yeah, he can do damage to the Canadian economy, and he's started this morning.
	But he is rapidly going to find out, as American families are going to find out, that that's going to hurt people on both sides of the border.
	Americans will lose jobs.
	Americans will be paying more for groceries.
	Pausitrust.
	For gas.
	Play the clip I just texted you, Rob.
	So this is the next clip on what he said.
	And I think this is the clip that's going to get him in trouble.
	But it's okay.
	He fell for the trap.
	If you can play this next clip, this next clip of him, watch what he says about this is the one.
	This is the one.
	Go ahead, Rob.
	Make it bigger, please.
	There you go.
	We're not angry at the American people for this.
	We don't have anything against Americans.
	Americans are our neighbors, our friends, our partners.
	We do things together.
	We've done things together for decades and generations.
	This is a policy decision by the American government designed to go after the Canadian economy.
	This is a trade war, yes.
	But Canadians, yeah.
	Canadians are hurt.
	Canadians are angry.
	Get to the point, buddy.
	We're going to choose to not go on vacation in Florida.
	There you go.
	Old Orchard Beach or wherever.
	I don't know.
	I see all Canadians here.
	We're going to choose to try to buy Canadian products and forego bourbon and other classic American products in the world.
	Get to the point, guys.
	Yeah, we're probably going to keep booing the American enemy.
	But look, tell Americans.
	So he said we're going to choose not to go to Florida and we're going to not buy bourbon.
	We're not going to go there.
	I'm not going to lie to you.
	I go to a soccer thing with the kids.
	It's as if every parent I talk to came here and escaped Canada.
	It's the weirdest thing.
	Vinny, your thoughts on this here with Trudeau.
	Well, first of all, telling him to stop doing this and vacation, all that.
	Let's like, first of all, we protect this freaking loser.
	Okay.
	God bless you.
	You're allergic to the bullshit.
	I get it.
	We keep their economy alive.
	75% of the exports come from us.
	We provide energy.
	We provide safety.
	We provide protection.
	For him to say to boo and do all this shit to our national anthem, it's like, if he wants to act like an enemy, we should treat him like one.
	Cut off their freaking tourism.
	Shut down any economic advantage we give them.
	No more hands out.
	No more cover.
	You know what I thought about?
	Ban Canadian teams, ban them from the U.S. for one season.
	NHL, MLB, NBA, these leagues rely on our, they rely on our audience to suspend their ability to play games on U.S. soil.
	And if your dumbass wants to, yeah, raptors.
	They're going to play at the YMCA.
	Yeah, you want to say boo?
	Let's see how you act without our money.
	Okay.
	Justin Trudeau.
	The only reason, by the way, now he's popular and cool.
	Have your election and get the hell out of here, bro.
	Booing us, that's the biggest form of disrespect I feel.
	Tom, I think it's bullshit.
	No more sports for a year.
	Trump should say, you know what?
	Get your asses back to Canada and play that game with us.
	He's playing, just like Ukraine, you're starting a war that you know you're not going to win.
	Period.
	Well, actually, he's not popular and cool.
	The polls in Canada have not moved that much.
	This guy is still, number one, incredibly unpopular.
	Number two, he has resigned.
	He's in the middle of a pending resignation.
	He just hasn't put a date on it because he has a Chuck Schumer of Canada named Jagmeat that is working with him to stay.
	So now he's running to the microphone to stay relevant.
	And if all of these Canadians believe that this is only Trump getting after him, why is this guy moved barely five points on these horrifying polls that he's on?
	Why?
	Why haven't people said, wait a minute, Justin's okay.
	He's our guy.
	No, that's not what they're saying.
	They're saying, we don't want you here and we don't want you here because of, tell me where this sounds familiar, because of immigration, immigration reform, inflation, and the overall economy.
	Gee, that sounds a little familiar.
	And what's about to happen in their election is not very different from what's going to happen in our election, except their version of conservative is more liberal than our version of conservative.
	And so he is the same guy he was.
	And you know what?
	Talk to me in a week.
	Let's see who blinks on this.
	Let's see what happens.
	And by the way, Justin, come down here and check it out.
	There are Canadian license plates all over the place in Florida enjoying the warm weather, enjoying the winter of relief for their arthritis.
	And you are up there still suffering under these polls, dude.
	And you're just running to relevance on this.
	He is just another angry.
	He is a deranged angry man.
	Say it, Tom.
	Say what you want to say, Tom.
	He's an Adam.
	We got it.
	Deranged angry man.
	So here's a question.
	When you think about, you know, it's kind of like the, anyways, I was about to make it.
	I'm not a good idea.
	I want to know.
	No, no, no.
	Tell me after that later.
	But you know what's funny, though?
	Here's what's funny.
	Think about who, as a world leader, has a shittier resume than him and a worse approval rating.
	The fact that people are done with him.
	And even with that, Pierre Polivier couldn't beat him.
	That's what's the sad part.
	You know why it's not sad?
	Because every time we invited Pierre, arrogant, pompous team, the only podcast he ever did is Jordan Peterson.
	So let me get this straight.
	You saw Millay win because he went everywhere.
	You saw Bikeley win.
	He went everywhere.
	You saw Trump win because he went everywhere.
	You saw Bobby win because he went everywhere.
	You saw Vivek become a superstar because he went everywhere.
	And you don't, you deserve losing.
	And you didn't win.
	And I said that to Canadians who love him.
	The candidate you adore and admire and love doesn't want to work.
	God forbid he has to cross the border and go talk to other borders to bring attention.
	God forbid too much travel time.
	He's got to eat his apple.
	He's got to eat his apple because he's got to get his apple in his system.
	Go to New York, do a damn podcast outside of Jordan Peterson.
	Go do Joe Rogan's podcast.
	Go to some other podcast and talk to Lex.
	Go talk to whatever these other podcasts are.
	Go talk to Andrew Schultz down the street from you in New York.
	And you lost to Justin.
	You couldn't beat him.
	That's embarrassing.
	So that's the part also of anywhere the opposition is so arrogant and confident that they're going to win that they lose.
	How many clips did we see of Pierre going viral?
	A bunch.
	Rob, just go type in his name and type in, type in, no, go on YouTube, Rob, and type in his name if you could.
	Just type in YouTube, Pierre Polivier.
	It's very easy to spell Pierre, P-I-E-R-R-E right there.
	Just go to that one.
	And then go to filters and go to views.
	Okay.
	Go to filters and go to views.
	Just play, what is that one?
	Response to questions about Canadian sovereignty.
	Maybe go to one that has to do with Trudeau right there.
	Play the second one.
	Watch this.
	Watch this.
	This is the debate.
	Can you?
	By this wacko prime minister.
	Go back a little bit, Rob.
	An end to this wacko policy by this wacko prime minister.
	No.
	I'm going to ask the honorable leader of the opposition to withdraw that term, which is not considered parliamentary.
	Mr. Speaker, I replace wacko with extremist.
	He is an extreme.
	The honorable member to please.
	I'm going to ask the leader of the opposition once again to just withdraw that comment.
	I'll replace it with radical policy.
	I am not asking to replace.
	I'm asking the honorable member to just simply withdraw.
	Mr. Speaker, I replace the word wacko with extremist.
	I'm going to ask the honorable.
	You get the idea, right?
	Go back a little.
	Let's go to another one, okay, to see how talented this guy is.
	Go to this next one.
	Prodigor Tax Very Funded.
	Okay, play this one here, Rob.
	I'd like to welcome the Prime Minister back from his $80,000 vacation, which he got for free.
	He said, like most Canadians, friends welcomed him for that vacation.
	He took two, not one, but two private jets paid for by the taxpayer, burning 100 tons of greenhouse gases into the avatar.
	So now go all the way to the top, all the way to the top if you could, and just type in podcast next to him.
	And do me a favor, eliminate his first name.
	Just put Polivier podcast and go to filters and go to views.
	And let's see what podcast he's done.
	Okay.
	Zoom in.
	So Jordan Peterson, two months ago, $5 million.
	He needs to do that once every other month.
	Okay.
	Go keep going lower.
	Specific to podcast.
	Specific to podcast.
	Keep going.
	That's another Jordan Peterson from two years ago.
	It's the only one he does.
	Keep going lower.
	Keep going lower.
	None.
	Keep going lower.
	Nothing.
	Keep going lower.
	Keep going lower.
	Another Jordan Peterson.
	Keep going lower.
	Other people are talking about him.
	Yeah.
	So guess what?
	You can be as talented as you want and as strong as you want, and you think you've won without earning the right to win.
	You don't believe in capitalism.
	You just want it to be handed to you.
	I'm sorry, Canadians, you need a better candidate that's willing to work their asses off to make Canada great again.
	And this guy didn't want to work.
	I watched him give messages.
	I'm like, what a great message.
	Get your ass in front of cameras.
	Didn't want to do it.
	Go talk to people.
	Pierre Polivier campaigned the same exact way as Kamala Harris did.
	When it comes down to campaigning, not policies, he is Kamala Harris.
	Pierre, your hero that you guys wanted, does not want to work.
	I hope Canadians see this and send it around and blast him and encourage him to go talk to the biggest podcast in Canada.
	He's not too good for podcasts in Canada.
	He's only talking to Jordan Peterson.
	Go talk to the people.
	You say you want to be a man of the people?
	Go beat a man of the people.
	That's what Millay did.
	That's what others did.
	Locked up behind camera, just talking to Jordan Peterson, a mainstream type of people.
	This is 2025.
	A 78-year-old man did laps around you.
	And he went and took it from the other guys with all the games they played.
	You just want to sit there, play easy.
	Very disappointed.
	The reason why I'm disappointed is because I love the people of Canada.
	We have so many great friends in Canada.
	I have so many memories of going to Canada, going to Lake Louis, staying at the Chateau Fermont Hotel on Lake Louis, or going to Banff or going to Toronto to eat at the restaurant.
	You know, good fellas that had some incredible burrito cheese with the owners, bringing out to me the, you know, the pizza that they would make in a little mobster-looking type of a restaurant or going and doing business with people like at Forrester's Insurance Company that for many, many years, we sold more policies at Forrester's in Canada than any other insurance company in the world.
	Some incredible people when I would go out there, have a great time.
	One time I read in it, I bought an RV.
	I went from LA to Miami, to Toronto, to San Francisco, back to LA.
	We had such good times in Toronto.
	I am so disappointed in a lack of fight that Pierre showed outside of just getting on mainstream media.
	You had such a big opportunity.
	Canadians, hold your candidates accountable.
	There is no such thing as competition that is going to be handed to in no space, not business, not politics, not sports, not church, not military, in nothing.
	What a disappointing of a performance by a candidate to not show up.
	What a disappointing of a performance.
	I'm not even Canadian.
	I shouldn't give a shit.
	And I'm like, he should go on that show.
	Canadians are texting me.
	Hey, what do you think about this guy?
	He's great, but he's not working hard enough.
	Well, what do you mean you should give him a second chance?
	He's not working hard enough.
	Give me a flipping break.
	You had an opportunity to get in there and change your policies up.
	No, you didn't.
	You need a fighter, man.
	No matter what the place is.
	Anyways, I can't believe we're going to finish on Canada.
	We're going to finish on Canada.
	That's what we're going to be doing.
	Right?
	To all the Canadians out there, we love you and hold them accountable.
	And I have a feeling he will never come on the podcast.
	Here, never.
	Pierre will never come on this podcast.
	Never come on this podcast because he wants to only go to places that's controlled.
	It's these politician-controlled safe places they want to go to.
	So there you go.
	Hold them accountable.
	Anyways, gang, today's what, Rob?
	Today's Thursday.
	Today's Thursday.
	Do we have anything going on tomorrow, Rob?
	We do not.
	Next week, Tuesday, we'll be back live.
	Tuesday, we'll be back live is the whole situation, right?
	What next week, Tuesday?
	Yes.
	Yeah, okay.
	So stay tuned.
	We got some stuff that's going on.
	Rob Smith, Rob, if you can pull up, I'm going to say Gargo.
	If you can pull up Smith's QR code to his Manect, pull up his QR code to his Manex.
	Go out there and send a Manek to Rob, whatever questions you liked, what he said, what questions you got, follow-ups.
	Send him a Manect.
	He is on Manek.
	Rob Smith, QR code.
	Do we have the QR code or no Rob?
	I do not, but we will put it in the chat.
	I'll have it for next time.
	I'll put the QR code at the bottom as well.
	It's been great having you on again.
	No conversation.
	Great being here.
	And if you guys liked me, if you like what you heard, definitely go download my podcast, Can't Cancel Rob Smith, Apple Podcast, iHeartPodcast, wherever you find your podcast.
	And if you hit me up on Manect, I talk about building a social media brand from zero to 1.6 of my own personal brand.
	I talk about 4.6 million.
	I talk about a whole lot of stuff.
	So definitely Manect me.
	And by the way, maybe Manect him and have Pierre go on his podcast because Pierre won't be canceled if he goes on the podcast.
	What a freaking situation there.
	God bless everybody.
	Take care.

▲