Owen Shroyer dissects January 19, 2026’s viral case of police raiding a woman’s home over an anti-Israel social media post, framing it as evidence of pro-Israel political overreach. Polls show U.S. sympathy shifting from Israel (48-point lead in Oct. 2023) to Palestinians, with Democrats driving the shift. He critiques Trump’s "peace team" for Palestine—Jared Kushner and Tony Blair—lacking Muslim representation, while alleging Gaza could become an AI-run puppet state controlled by American Jewish technocrats. Shroyer ties ICE’s use of Israeli spyware Paragon to broader geopolitical influence, suggesting pro-Israel lobbyists like Marion Adelson exploit Epstein-linked blackmail networks to manipulate U.S. politics, despite growing public backlash against their tactics. [Automatically generated summary]
Well, over the weekend, of course, this stuff never goes away.
Seemingly never goes away.
There was an Israeli-American conference.
Seems every weekend there's one of these conferences now.
So there was an Israeli-American conference, which just, you know, I thought the whole hyphenated American thing, I thought we were ready to move beyond that.
I thought we realized that the hyphenated American thing in and of itself was kind of dual loyalty coded.
We kind of realized that decades ago, actually, but here we are.
And Marion Adelson was there.
And I think the Marion Adelson picture and story is really, it really becomes more clear after this weekend.
I think it really starts to make more sense after this weekend.
So we'll play some of these clips.
Pam Bondi was there.
I mean, folks, this is outrageous as ICE agents are under assault now across the country, but specifically in Minnesota.
ICE agents under assault.
Journalists now under assault.
Churches now under assault.
And Pam Bondi is speaking at an Israeli conference.
How many people listening to this have been affected by some sort of identity theft or personal private information getting out to criminals on the internet?
In fact, sometimes you might even be getting mail that says, Hey, you could be a victim in this hack.
It happens all the time now.
And so you need to find a way to protect your personal information online.
Actually, I found the way for you.
Patriot-protect.com/slash Owen.
That's patriot-protect.com slash Owen.
Our friends at Patriot Protect want to help you protect your online information.
Let me tell you how this goes as somebody that's actually been through it.
Again, you might get something in the mail, a big company that you have an account online with, or maybe you've purchased a product from.
They send you a letter.
It says, we have had a hack.
Your personal or private information may have been affected.
Some of these letters may even suggest that you change your password.
That's how serious some of these hacks can get.
So what these scammers do is they try to get your private information any way possible and then they sell it online.
Now, you might think, okay, I'm acutely aware of this and maybe you're doing some safeguards.
Well, what about when they get your private address?
What about when they get your family's private address?
That's something that I had to go through.
And I wanted to make sure that I never have to go through that again.
When you get into being a public figure, you know that there's risks that come along with that.
But my family didn't ask for that.
My family doesn't deserve the harassment.
I want to make sure that they're protected too.
So that's why I have an account with Patriot-Protect.
You can go to patriot-protect.com slash Owen.
And right now, 15% off a yearly subscription with coupon code Owen.
You heard that right.
15% off a yearly subscription with coupon code Owen.
So here's what they do.
They go through the internet.
They take the first sweep and they find all of the private information, address, phone number, email, whatever it is that you don't want out there for people to get access to.
I feel bad for people out there that are enduring the harsh winter that's going on right now in the northern states.
I hate to rub it in, but here in Austin, Texas today, it's 70 and sunny.
So no complaints here.
But we did have some weather.
We had some weather football, some football controversies.
It was a fun weekend.
It was a fun weekend in America.
Unless, of course, you're an ICE agent or a Christian attending church or just a citizen going about their day in Minnesota, where wild leftist protesters are trying to ruin your good time.
You know, we're going to start a little light today.
We got a lot of heavy news, but I want to start a little light today with this Dan Bongino story.
Okay.
Let me just start off with this.
Again, we're going to start a little light here.
But we do have a couple Bongino things from over the weekend.
It's all hilarious.
So it's all hilarious.
We're going to review some of his recent comments and then I'm going to show you because he's supposed to return in about 20 days.
I guess less than that now.
Yeah, I guess it's like 15 or so days now.
He's supposed to make his big return.
So it's the big buildup.
It's the big buildup, but there's nothing really being built.
It's like a lot of moving parts shuffling around.
It's kind of like when you have construction.
Everybody sees this.
You have construction on your highway and nobody's ever building anything.
It's just a bunch of cones and trucks and people, you know, whatever, and nothing gets built.
That's kind of what's happening right now with the Bongino return.
But some weirdness over the weekend.
So first he makes this statement.
And I'm sitting here reading this from Bongino.
And again, I was a Bongino listener.
I was a big Bongino fan.
I don't come from a place of anti-Dan Bongino.
We just call it as it is here, folks.
So some weirdness this weekend from Bongino.
He posts this.
Of course, this is all after his departure from the FBI.
He posts this over the weekend.
He says, dear liberal media children, yes, daddy's home now.
A little strange, but he says, I know that terrifies you as you claw at your own faces and pile up your feckless attack pieces in anticipation of my show launch.
I can assure you there is zero anticipation on the left of his show launch, and there's barely any anticipation on the right for his show launch.
And that's not just me saying that.
We'll show you the evidence.
But okay, so he's daddy and he thinks the liberals are anticipating his show and freaking out, endlessly emailing me for comments about your personal hit pieces.
He says it's all a waste of time.
He has less than zero interest in contributing to their fairy tales.
He says, I'll save us both time.
I'll issue a universal response to your inquiries in my kindness and most courteous Queens, New York voice.
And I'll ask you to respectfully go F yourselves and save the energy it takes you to thumb out an email to me.
If you had, let's say, an enemy out there in the political world, would you be more concerned if they had a talk show or if they actually had institutional power of the FBI?
Which would concern you more?
Which would scare you more?
So to me, this is all cope.
This is all cope.
And Bongino knows that in some way, shape, or form, he has hurt his reputation.
He knows, obviously, that going back to his podcast takes away the institutional power that he had at the FBI.
So he's coping by pretending, like, oh, this is the big move.
Are we saying that, because I mean, this would be the interpretation at face value that you have no power at the FBI, that the FBI has no power at all, and you're more powerful on your talk show?
Now, in some circumstances, in all fairness, in some circumstances, I can even understand that logic.
I can even understand that philosophy in certain circumstances.
These are not the circumstances.
These are the exact opposite circumstances when I don't know what your podcast offers.
I don't know what threat your podcast poses to anybody, except maybe yourself.
So, no, nobody's freaking out.
You just, if we're talking about institutional power and influence and status, Bongino just took a massive step down.
In fact, he left, he's in an entirely different arena, really.
He left the real arena and he went back to this arena.
So I don't know anybody that's freaking out about this except maybe himself.
He seems to be the only one freaking out.
I don't see any lefties freaking out.
I don't see any liberals freaking out.
If anything, they're breathing a sigh of relief because you're no longer at the FBI.
So that's weird.
But he says the liberal media children.
So Dinesh D'Souza, you know, Dinesh, he's got Dan's back.
He says, Dan comes out swinging, and it's good to have him back in the fight.
Back in the fight?
He just left the FBI.
Guys, what is going on here?
I'd love to just summarize this as the boomer crash out, but I don't think it's that simple.
That might be kind of the general overtone of all of this: the boomer crash out because they've been so used to imposing their will over the right, imposing their will over us, imposing their will over the media.
But now that the younger generations have come of age, now that social media and the internet is starting to take precedent over television media, this is kind of just the overall boomer crash out.
They can't impose their will.
They can't dictate the narrative.
They can't control how younger right-wingers think anymore.
And they're losing the institutional power to keep their control of the narrative.
But okay, so this is so this is the logic being proposed by Bongino and by Dinesh D'Souza.
This is like if Trump left the White House and they all said, oh, wow, Trump can really fight him now.
This would be like if Donald Trump said, all right, I'm leaving the White House and I'm going to go do a show from Mar-a-Lago.
I'm going to go to a podcast from Mar-a-Lago.
And everybody came out and said, oh, thank God, Trump is back in the fight.
Thank God, here comes Trump again.
No, he abdicated his power as president.
Now he's going to go do a show.
So to a lesser degree, that's exactly what Dan Bongino has done.
He's gone from being number two at the FBI, one of the most powerful institutions in our federal government, in our country, and he's going back to his, what was once a top podcast, what's what was once a popular podcast.
We'll see what happens.
But how is that back in the fight?
None of this makes any sense, actually.
And it's not landing.
I will tell you, it's not landing.
And here's the proof.
Now, again, this is kind of the second go-around.
And I think it was last week we had a very similar analysis where Bongino went on that show that nobody's heard of.
How many people have heard of the Haley Talks or what was it called?
I just don't see how he returns, especially after the way he's tried to rebuild himself upon the return.
I just don't see it.
I just don't see it.
And I think that he has underestimated all the things that have happened in the last 12 months as far as the media is concerned.
And I can, you know, I could imagine if you're at the FBI, you probably, there's probably a veil between you and the media now.
There's probably a great distance that Dan is not typically used to between himself and the media world and the average American that likes to consume political media.
And he was away for, you know, 10, 12 months, whatever it is.
And he doesn't realize how much the landscape has shifted.
He doesn't realize how much things have changed.
He doesn't even realize that the sentiments of his own audience are probably way different than they were, say, just eight months ago.
So, he might in his mind really think that everything is exactly how he left it and that the playing field and the arena is the same layout that when he left it, and it's totally different now.
And it's totally different now.
And I'll say this, and I've been saying this for over a year.
If you've been listening to my shows for over a year, you know, I've been saying this.
I said it right after the presidential election, in fact.
Every election cycle, people in the media rise and fall.
Every election cycle.
You'll have some that rise.
You'll have some that fall.
You'll have some that don't even exist, that become huge.
You'll have some that are huge and then don't even exist.
This is usually a four-year timeline, sometimes two, but it's usually four years.
It's usually presidential election cycles.
The way the media moves and the way the internet moves and all of this stuff, it moves so fast.
What normally took four years in political media now happens in 12 months, basically.
So Bongino might have taken that mindset and said, well, I can get away with this.
I was only gone for 10 months and everything's basically going to be the same.
It was only 10 months.
And he's an older guy.
I think he's like 40, 50, whatever.
So he's probably used to that kind of two to four year turntable, turnstile of political media where it's like, okay, I can still kind of come back in and everything is the same.
It ain't like that anymore.
Everything is condensed in political media now.
Everything moves so fast and the sands and everything and the land shifts so fast.
It is a totally different landscape than it was when Bongino left.
And maybe he just hasn't realized it yet.
Now we'll see.
We'll see what happens when he does return as far as how is he going to handle the ever-changing landscape and then how is he going to explain to his audience the lack of deep state arrests for the things he's been talking about for years and the books he's written and everything else.
We'll have to see how that goes.
But so far, I'd say it's not looking good.
And from what I can tell, and I don't know Bongino like that, I don't know him personally.
But now that he's like, okay, I'm trying to go back to my life.
I got to go back to my life.
Things just didn't work out here.
I'm not enjoying it.
I'm not getting done what I need to get done.
So I'm just going to try to go back to my life.
And I would say that if that life is not there for him the way he thinks it is or the way he wants it to be, I could see a major crash out.
I could see a major crash out if that is the case.
Now, I'm not rooting for that at all.
I would say if I could advise Dan Bongino, and this comes from a genuine place, I would say, Dan, you know, you're going to have, if you want this to work out, and I could easily say, well, he's my competition.
I'd say, Dan, if you want this to work out, when you go live on February 2nd, you have to explain to your audience, you have to explain to your audience why we're not getting deep state arrests.
And you might be able to hide behind an NDA, a non-disclosure agreement or, you know, you can't say things, whatever.
You can hide behind that just a little, just a little, but you can't hide behind it fully.
It will not be acceptable.
It will not be acceptable.
And I'll just say this: and maybe this is the move he makes, but it'll be different for him on his show.
The contacts that I have that are that are, let's say, you know, close to the head of the FBI.
I'll leave it at that.
They just say to me when I complain that, oh, the swamp is too deep.
The swamp is swampier than we thought.
The swamp is such a mess.
You know, we're trying, is basically what I get.
So he can, he might be able to roll with that, but that's not going to cut it.
That's not going to cut it when he goes on air and his audience wants answers.
I would suggest if I was Dan Bongino, I would just become an FBI whistleblower.
That's what I would do.
I'd become an FBI whistleblower and I'd say, all right, you know what?
And declare your whistleblower protections.
Maybe try to rekindle your relationship with Kyle Serafman and Garrett O'Boyle, Steve Friend, the rest of the FBI whistleblowers, maybe try to rekindle that, maybe call their lawyers that you help them fund and maybe become an FBI whistleblower and say, here's why we can't get anything done.
Because I know there's stuff there, Dan.
Anything less, I just don't know.
I don't know how it works out.
I don't know how he makes it.
Again, I don't think money matters.
I think he's got plenty of that.
But I would just say he seems to have the personality and the psychological makeup where if things are not comfortable and he gets more criticism when he comes back, I could see a major crash out.
I could see a major crash out when he returns to his show.
You know the time is going to fly between now and then.
It already is flying, isn't it?
My goodness.
My goodness is the time flying.
As I said, can you believe we are already into the second half of January?
Crazy stuff.
Crazy stuff.
All right, folks.
You know, the official coffee of the Owen Report is blackout coffee.
You got to try some if you haven't yet.
You got to try some if you haven't yet.
Trust me, it's going to be your favorite coffee, just like it is mine.
Blackoutcoffee.com/slash Owen.
Now, I told you, I just got a huge, I just got a huge package of my blackout coffee.
By the way, it comes in a pretty cool box.
I always see this stuff when you order different products, whatever.
Some put a lot of time and effort into the presentation.
Include blackout coffee in that.
When you get, and I don't know if it's because I had a big order, but uh, the box that came in and everything, the presentation of all the different coffee that I got was like, wow, you guys really care about when you open this, it's like, this is nice.
This is this is classy.
And then this, the, the, the smell of the fresh coffee, too.
Oh, it's just so great.
My problem is I've got all this coffee.
I've got all this blackout coffee in my in my pantry.
I've got the single serve pods that are really convenient.
I've got the different bags of coffee, great tasting, fresh.
And this has been going on in Europe for quite some time.
I don't know if it's been, has it been a decade since this has been going on?
But it is still going on.
And we've seen a few instances.
There's been a few instances in the United States where this has happened, just a small handful.
And for most of them, it's, you know, you can argue that it's free speech, but it's hard to defend some of the stuff.
If you're making death threats, it's, it's, you know, that, that's, nobody really wants to defend that.
Well, that's not, that's not the case here in Florida, ladies and gentlemen.
So this is a woman who made a social media post critical of Florida's connection to Israel and more specifically, Florida's politicians who show loyalty to Israel.
And this is undeniable.
And by the way, this is where the Israeli conference was this weekend in Florida.
As we told you, it was happening last week and Trump down there and Mossad was down there meeting with Trump and Bondi was down there.
So it's amazing.
It's like the big players in the Trump administration are all in Florida because the Israeli conference is there.
Meanwhile, you've got ICE agents getting tormented and everything that's going on in Minnesota.
So they go down to Florida to show their loyalty to Israel.
Pretty amazing stuff.
So this happened.
So this guy shows up at this Florida woman's home because of a social media post.
And folks, I told you this was happening.
I told you this was happening.
I told you I was put in, I was put in prison for speech by the left in America.
And at this rate, I'll be put in prison for speech by the right in America for not saying everything as I'm supposed to about Israel.
So here it begins.
Is this the beginning, ladies and gentlemen?
unidentified
Is that your account?
I refuse to answer questions without my lawyer present.
So I really don't know how to answer that.
Like I said, you're not going to see.
It's a freedom of speech.
This is America, right?
All right.
And I agree with you 100%.
I'm just trying to see if it's human.
We're not talking to the right person.
We want to go see who the right person is.
Okay, how can I help you?
So pretty much it's just a statement that was made as far as, you know, our mainstream, the guy who consistently calls for the death of all Palestinians, tried to shut down a theater for showing a movie that hurt his feelings and refuses to stand up for the LGBTQ community in any way.
We covered this last year when it was making headlines.
It was actually Israelis that made it.
Some Israelis made a documentary film about, in their view, the genocide in Gaza.
So Israeli documentary about what's going on in Gaza.
It won awards.
It was going to be shown in theaters in Florida.
And then some of the local politicians and the Israeli interests got involved and they had that documentary banned.
And so it looks like that's the context of this post where she's talking about how, hey, you're getting documentaries banned because you don't like the content of it.
And so, you know, because it's not in Israel's interest.
So you get a visit from police.
unidentified
Even leave the room when they vote on related matters.
The concerning part, not concerning for the person who's posting it, we're just trying to prevent somebody else getting agitated or agreeing with the statement we're not saying it's true or not.
The left was doing that when they were attacking the right-wingers for free speech, and it was AOC and others saying, oh, it's stochastic terrorism, meaning if you say something that somebody else might go act upon, then that's on you and you're a terrorist.
So now it's the right wing doing it.
It's the exact same thing.
It's just, it's just, we've changed uniforms now.
And isn't it incredible to sit here and watch all of this going on?
And you can love Israel, support Israel, whatever, in that foreign policy debate, geopolitical discussion.
And of course, this exists on the right.
But where are the free speech advocates?
Oh, oh, the big right-wing free speech advocates are silent now that Americans' First Amendment rights are potentially about to be infringed upon in the name of Israel's interests.
unidentified
Where are they?
That guy who consistently calls for the death of all Palestinians, that can probably incite somebody to do something radical.
What this woman said, what this woman said is like 1%, like 1% of the things Randy Fine or Laura Loomer has said in the state of Florida when it comes to, ooh, this could incite violence.
And again, I'm not saying that Randy or Laura can't have their free speech and call for the death of all Muslims or whatever they want to do.
But I'm saying nobody's going to go visit their house.
No police are going to show up and say this could incite violence.
No, because they're acting in Israel's interest.
But when it's against Israel's interest, now you're getting a visit from the police.
unidentified
And we wanted to get your side of the voice that posted that to, I would think, to refrain from posting things like that because that could get something.
You're telling the truth about how these COVID vaccines either haven't been tested or the trials that we do know of have led to heart problems and turbo cancers and everything else.
So you can't say that.
That could cause somebody to act.
So now what are we saying?
You can't tell the truth is what we're saying because somebody might do something.
And I have a feeling it's not going to be the last time.
I have a feeling it's not going to be the last time.
And it's only going to be on one issue.
We all know what that is.
Now, so this is also happening in Florida over the weekend, the Israel Council.
Marion Adelson is there.
And we're going to get to some clips here from Marion Adelson and Pam Bondi.
We're going to come back to this in the third hour.
I've got some other clips from Marion Adelson that there's just kind of a general.
I think we kind of start to see where Adelson here, Marion Adelson is really coming from.
But we'll hold that off till later because I want to focus on the issue of free speech here.
Or more importantly now, priorities, priorities when it comes to this administration and what the priorities are and what the priorities aren't.
And this has been one of the biggest beefs.
It couldn't be more obvious.
Israel's interests have been number one for this administration.
Appeasing the Israel donor class, the pro-Israel donor class, the foreign donor class, has been the number one priority for this administration.
And they just keep doubling down and they keep rubbing it in your face.
And now with Pam Bondi, I mean, look, this is why it's so strange.
This is why it's so strange.
Everybody knows that once a politician gets into office, their number one goal, their number one agenda is to get reelected.
Everybody knows this.
So part of that agenda, part of the approach is, well, we're going to see things that we say that can help me win reelection, or we're going to look at things that I say or that I do that might hurt my cause of winning reelection.
So you would think with all of these different politicians, they obviously have to see how the Israel issue is just killing their chances of reelection right now.
They have to see it.
Everybody sees it.
So you're now looking at the single issue.
There is only one issue that I've ever seen in American politics where even though they know it hurts their chances of reelection, and even though they see the public distaste or even disdain for this commitment to Israel's interest, and they will double down and they will triple down and they will quadruple down.
You will never see that with another issue.
If they do it once, maybe they double down and then they see this isn't working and they just back off.
It doesn't mean they change policy.
It doesn't mean they're going to vote accordingly.
It just means, hey, we can't talk about this.
We just got to, we got to put a, we got to put wraps on this.
There is no other issue in politics where a politician will continue to support an issue that they know they get massive negative feedback on.
There is no other issue.
So how are you Pam Bondi?
How are you Pam Bondi?
No deep state arrests.
Everybody knows this is a major issue from the Trump base, from right-wingers.
No deep state arrests.
And now you've got these protests, you've got these ICE protests in Minnesota that are getting deadly and they're trying to kill ICE agents.
And so you'd think if you're Pam Bondi, hey, you know what?
Maybe it's not the best time to be a keynote speaker at the Israeli Council.
Just maybe.
It's like, you know what, Pam Bonnie?
Okay, she's a great friend of Israel.
She's a great friend of the Israeli lobby.
She's a great friend of Marion Adelson.
She's from Florida.
She's friends with all the giant rich Jewish donors there.
So it's like, okay, all right.
But you'd think she would have the wherewithals.
You'd think she'd know the optics of, you know what, with no deep state arrests and all of this stuff going on in Minnesota with the protests and the fraud, it's probably not the best time for me to speak at an Israeli council.
And then here's Marion Adelson saying, thank goodness for Pam Bondi.
She's prioritizing Israel at the Department of Justice.
I mean, this isn't conspiracy, folks.
This isn't conspiracy theory, folks.
This is conspiracy.
Yeah, let me rephrase that.
This isn't conspiracy theory.
This is conspiracy.
And it's all the stuff we complain about.
Our politicians being bought and sold.
Our politicians being corrupt.
The interests, the priorities of the American people being sold out to the highest bidder.
And it's all happening right in front of your face.
And so it's so obvious.
So now they're saying, if you say anything about this, we're calling the cops and they're going to show up at your house and they're going to say, hey, did you post this on social media?
Oh, we're not going to take you to jail.
Oh, not yet.
Not yet.
They're not.
So what is Pam Bondi bragging about?
And I'll give you a refresher of this if you don't recall.
But this is what Pam Bondi is bragging about today, or yesterday, excuse me.
Yeah, a young woman, a student, threw her phone, cursed, attacked a young student, a young man, male student, who was playing basketball because he was wearing an IDF shirt.
She was a student.
He was a student.
I spent the next few hours on the phone.
I call my U.S. attorney.
I call the state attorney, call law enforcement.
And I guess she saw it went through the system as it should.
And she now is kicked out of Florida State University.
But little things are the big things.
And that sends a strong message that you can't behave that way anymore in our country.
You can't bully other students simply because they're Jewish.
And you think they're better than they are.
Not going to happen under Donald Trump's presidency.
You'd think we'd see the security footage of that.
The only security footage we saw when this story broke, white college girl arrested, charged with battery for allegedly touching shoulder of Jewish student in IDF shirt.
So the only video we saw, and you may recall this, was this right here when they're in the weight room and the guy's sitting on the weight room and he and this girl just comes up to him and flicks him off.
And it looks like she grabs her phone off of the machine like she was using it before or left it or something.
So that was all we heard about was here's a guy who gets into a verbal altercation with this gal and she flicks him off and grabs grabs her phone and leaves and that was it.
So I'd never heard about anything else until Pam Bonnie just said that.
Now, folks, if you've been to a major university, maybe even specifically played basketball at the rec center at a major university.
Folks, let me just tell you, I went to Mizzou for two years.
I played basketball at the rec center all the time.
Do you know how many fights I saw?
Probably at least half a dozen, maybe more.
I remember there was one incident, and this wasn't the player that was involved in this, but there were a couple Mizzou basketball players that used to go play at the rec center.
And they usually didn't cause any problems because they were smarter than that.
But there were some guys that I don't know if they were trying to prove a point or trying to, you know, win favor with the ball players, whatever, but they would love to start crap on the floor.
Maybe to impress the players.
There were incidents where even guns were talked about.
You know how many people were suspended?
Zero. Zero. Zero.
This is unbelievable.
How many people have been to a university and seen crazy things happen?
Oh, here we go again with the conspiracy theories.
Well, look, if you can't forget what I think, if you can't see the evidence right in front of your eyes, if you can't listen to them say it themselves, if you can't understand the juxtaposition, throw the optics out.
I'm the attorney general.
I'm going to the Israeli conference in Florida to tell them how I arrested a schoolgirl.
I ruined the life of a schoolgirl because she got into a fight with a guy in an IDF shirt, who, of course, is so innocent and perfect and glorious.
So she goes to Florida to brag to the Israelis that she destroyed the life of a young college girl over she threw a cell phone.
Are you serious?
She threw a cell phone.
Is this a joke?
Hey, why isn't there?
Why aren't they addressing the ICE protest in Minnesota?
Well, where's Pam Bonnie?
Hey, why aren't they addressing all the fraud in Minnesota?
Well, where's Pam Bondi?
Hey, why aren't they addressing the church that got raided yesterday in Minnesota?
Well, where's Pam Bondi?
Pam Boni speaking at the Israeli conference.
So forget what I think.
If you can't see this evidence that is right in front of your eyes, I don't know what to tell you.
I don't know what to tell you.
It's never been more obvious, folks.
It's so in your face, it's ridiculous.
Now, here, I've talked about this individual before, Cameron Caskey.
He was a student at Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High, where they had the school shooting years ago.
He's running for office in Florida.
He is Jewish.
Now, if he wasn't Jewish, they'd call him a raging anti-Semite, by the way.
But no, he is Jewish.
And he's been very consistent on this messaging, by the way.
I've been following his campaign for about a month or so now.
Every once in a while, I give you an update.
He posted this yesterday.
Many Jewish people do everything we can to combat anti-Semitic conspiracy theories about us controlling the government and media and all of that.
And then people like Marion Adelson and Larry Ellison are laser focused on making that as difficult as possible.
I think that what Cameron is missing here is that Adelson and Ellison don't care.
And maybe, and actually maybe Caskey is kind of getting it now because he's like, these people claim that they want to stop anti-Semitism, or these people claim that they care about Jews, but really they just care about Israel and themselves.
And their entire agenda is all about whatever is going on in the Middle East.
And then how can we enrich ourselves in America to make sure that we take care of Israel in the Middle East?
And that's what it's all about.
And it's just like, yeah.
So Caskey comes out here and he's like, boy, you guys are making it real hard for me to stand up for American Jews that are really the victims of all this.
Larry Ellison, he's probably got millions of dollars of security that follows him around.
Marion Adelson, same story.
They don't give a damn about this.
They don't have to deal with the slave class.
They don't have to deal with the peons that they walk on every day.
They don't give a damn.
Caskey, though, he's average American, probably not worth millions of dollars.
He's lucky if he can have private security.
And he's like, boy, you know, as a Jew here that has to endure the anti-Semitism, you guys are making it real hard.
It's like, hey, you know, Jews don't control the government.
Jews don't control the media.
And then every time he looks up, it's like, oh, yeah, there's the Jews controlling the government and the media.
This weekend, a lot of people were talking about it in my social circles, and that is gold and silver being on the rise.
And it seems like there's a different angle to this.
Now, major industries are struggling to purchase silver.
Now, people that are trying to make big purchases of gold, they can't find the weight that they're looking for.
Some people are trying to sell their gold that have been holding it for a long time.
Point is, it looks like a lot of people are looking at precious metals right now, especially they're concerned about the dollar collapsing, banks collapsing, bank runs happening.
Maybe the stock market.
Yeah, it's high right now, but can we be sure that that's going to last?
So a lot of people are trying to protect their wealth with gold.
And you can do the same with our friends, Allegiance Gold.
All you got to do is go to protectwithoin.com.
And right now, $5,000 in free gold and silver with qualified investments.
$5,000 in free gold and silver with qualified investments.
But as I warned you when we first started telling you about our friends at Allegiance Gold, that weight, $5,000 worth of gold and silver is a lot less today than it was just a few short months ago.
Now, if this is something you've never thought about before or maybe you're really starting to consider, but you got a lot of questions, curiosities, all you got to do is give them a call.
Just give our friends a call, 844-790-9191.
That's 844-790-9191.
And our friends at Allegiance Gold will be happy to answer your questions.
They want to make sure that you're fully informed and understand what you're doing when you move into gold and or silver.
It could be your 401k, IRA, savings.
They make it simple to move into precious metals.
And with qualified investments right now, $5,000 in free gold and silver.
So give them a call.
Ask them whatever questions you have to get that confidence.
If you want to make the move, 844-790-9191 or go to protectwithoen.com.
That's protectwithoen.com.
Protect your wealth and your freedom because no one else will.
We're going to get to some of these ICE protests coming up.
I got a little bit more on this subject material, including that poll I just teased.
How's everybody doing out there?
I see these ICE protesters walking around in Minnesota today.
It's like negative five.
It's like real field temperature is negative five.
You guys are nuts.
You're crazy.
It might have been worth it might have been worth negative five to go watch the bears game this weekend.
But I don't know to walk around the streets protesting for non-citizens, criminals.
That's a new one.
You know, one other thing here before we get back into the back into the subject material.
I don't know what it was.
You know, everything gets everything is impacted by things that happen in your life.
I'm not a big New Year's resolution guy.
I'm not, I don't really talk about that, promote that.
It's like, oh, okay, whatever.
Any excuse to improve yourself is good.
I'm not going to get it.
But I don't know.
Something, something really came over me this weekend and then this morning.
And, you know, I just want to encourage you out there, and I thought about this myself.
I just want to encourage you out there listening.
You know, it is, there is never a bad time to improve yourself.
There's never a bad time to improve your quality of life, your quality of health, and to just commit to something, whether it's, you know, a hobby or a career, whatever it is.
So I've just made the decision.
I'm like, I'm going to do even more to be better moving forward, improve myself, improve my life, and thus the lives of those around me.
Just in case it's a little late for a new year's resolution, but if you will, but you know, never, never too late to encourage people to better themselves, better their quality of life.
And this trend has been happening for a while now, but it's overtaken the right wing.
And I think that that's really why you see this shift.
I think this is more about representative how the right has changed on the issue of Israel.
And, you know, the different factors here, I think for the left, you know, it's all kind of bleeding heart liberal stuff.
That doesn't mean it's all wrong.
Doesn't mean it's all bad.
And obviously they have very selective, a very selective process about what the bleeding heart liberal is going to be concerned about.
But, you know, they look at that.
They look at the foreign policy.
They look at the Israel angle from kind of the bleeding heart liberal angle of, oh, Israel's the oppressors and they're, you know, killing all these people, whatever.
And, you know, I don't really think that that's where the right is coming from.
I think the right is coming from now.
It's like, it's more of kind of a political foreign policy thing.
It's like there's no doubt there's people on the right.
There is a massive movement on the right that definitely shares a lot of the same sentiments about Israel.
And you might even say Jews in general.
But I think it's more directed at Israel and just the foreign policy.
And I think the reason the shift has happened so much in the last couple of months, it's because Trump gets in and the American right, specifically the younger generation of American right wingers, we're like, okay, this is our chance to drain the swap.
This is our chance to arrest the deep state.
This is our chance for justice, retribution, however you want to say it, against all these crimes that have been committed against the American people, committed against Donald Trump.
And so here we are 12 months in, and it's just all Israel.
It's just all Israel's interests, all Israel donors.
Everything just goes that way, that direction.
That's the priority.
And so right-wingers are sitting back here.
It's all right in front of their eyes.
They're not making it up.
They're watching it happen.
And so now it's like, okay, it's kind of more of a, we're just so sick of the Israeli involvement.
We're just so sick of the Israeli influence foreign policy that it's just like, you know, just get out, just go.
So it's maybe less, you know, judgmental of, oh my gosh, Israel just killed 100,000 people in Gaza and they're bombing seven countries.
That exists on the right.
But I think for most people on the right, it's not even that they're sitting here looking at the Middle East or looking at what's going on in Gaza or Iran or any of these places.
They mostly probably don't care.
They're just saying, hey, can we prioritize America?
Can we do things in America's interest and just leave the Israeli interest out of things?
Can we just try that for an administration, maybe a decade?
Now we're talking about the Palestinians by a point.
I looked back at every single poll that I could possibly find since this question was first asked in the 1980s.
This is the first time ever in which the Palestinians had any sort of lead on this particular question.
It is very clear that this war caused a historic shift away from the Israeli position in the Middle East conflict and towards the Palestinians when it comes to who Americans and voters sympathize with.
This, of course, was led by Democrats because what are we talking about?
We went from Democrats favoring the Israelis by 26 points to the Palestinians by 46 points.
That is a shift, John, quick math in my head of over 70 percentage points.
But overall, the first time ever in which more Americans sympathize with the Palestinians over the Israelis, truly a historic shift.
So, again, I think a lot of that on the left is the kind of the bleeding heart angle of, you know, we don't like all the dead Palestinians or all the increasing war and tensions in the Middle East because of Israel's actions.
But I think on the right, it's more of like a middle finger to the establishment.
It's like, oh, you're going to sit here and tell me I have to be a slave for a foreign nation.
How about F you?
I side with the Palestinians.
But I don't think that's really representative of where the right is at.
You don't see right-wing protests waving Palestinian flags.
You don't see right-wing protests chanting free Palestine.
These are still left-wing stuff.
So it's still kind of the left-wing issue.
I think for the right, it's more of an America first issue.
Please, Israel, get out of our business.
And then this feeling of ultimate betrayal and disenfranchisement from this administration that has probably prioritized Israel more than any other administration, certainly in modern history, maybe in American history.
And by the way, that's their own words.
That's Trump's own words.
But, you know, they're not really doing themselves any favors here with some of their actions.
So this is in Australia.
We got a couple of things out of Australia.
Somebody put this projection onto an apartment building in Surfers Paradise, Australia.
And it just says genocide is a crime.
Protesting and resisting our duty.
And so all of the, you know, pro-Israel stuff, it's just like in Australia, it's just the same.
All the pro-Israel stuff in Australia aimed at the people, the propaganda.
So it doesn't even say Israel.
Why People Get Comfortable With Discomfort00:15:39
This has to be one of the craziest things you're ever going to hear of.
I'll give you a little context.
This is outside of a courtroom.
So there is a lady in Australia who I guess happens to be Jewish.
Nobody knew this.
At least that's the claim.
And she is a fitness influencer.
So she does stuff on social media.
She helps people lose weight, get into better health.
She just so happens to be Jewish.
I don't even think that that's really, I don't think anybody knew that.
I don't think, as far as I can tell, she's not one of those that brags about it and makes it all her identity.
But nonetheless, so this woman is trying to lose some weight and she's trying to hire this fitness influencer, Serena Tenori.
She's trying to message her and she's trying to hire her to help her get in better shape, lose weight, do some fitness stuff.
And she doesn't hear back.
So somehow she butt dials this lady.
I guess her social media was open or whatever it is.
She doesn't hear back from her for a couple months.
And then, you know, I mean, it happens.
Everybody's done a butt dial a couple times.
Just, you know, it happens.
You just hope that you're either aware of it before you're talking or, you know, you're not doing anything that might be embarrassing when the butt dial happens if they pick up.
So this lady, and she, I mean, she's got a big butt.
So, you know, if you have a big, if your butt is big, does that increase the chances of a butt dial?
I think so, right?
I mean, that's just a matter of mathematics.
If you have a bigger, if you're, if you have a bigger butt, then that's more area to have a butt dial with.
So I guess if you're a big butt person, you know, you got to think about these things.
She reached out to you because she wanted to hire you.
Do you see what I'm talking about?
This is the paranoid schizophrenia right now of a lot of Jews.
And that's what it is.
It's paranoid schizophrenia.
It's trauma-based mind control.
And the irony is, if you want to call it that, might be a little callous to call it that, but it is ironic.
The reason why they have this paranoid schizophrenia, the reason why they have this trauma-based mind control is because of the Israeli lobby.
They want you to be afraid of the world.
They want you to think everybody is out to get you.
They want you to think there's a Nazi or an anti-Semite lurking around every corner.
They want to make sure that any case of violence against a Jewish person is the biggest story so that all these other people, you know, sit here and shake in fear.
And this is the paramount example of that.
No pun intended.
But this is the paramount example of that.
She hears noises on a butt dial call and thinks this is an anti-Semite threatening me because she thinks she hears gunshots.
You've lost your mind.
You're actually more mentally ill than that lady is.
You are engaged in paranoid schizophrenia and trauma-based mind control.
And it's all by design.
It's all by design.
So that you can have these moments and have these freakouts and then say, oh, see, we need to have anti-Semitic speech laws.
We need to have, you can't say anything bad about Israel or boycott Israel laws because whatever it is Israel is doing or is planning to do is so evil that they need to make sure that you can't talk about it.
You can't post about it.
You can't film it.
You can't upload it.
It has to have total blackout.
Whatever Israel is getting ready to do or is currently doing, nobody can know about it.
And so they create this trauma-based mind control.
They create this.
They create this paranoid schizophrenia that then puts all of these people in this state of fear and delusion so that they support the anti-free speech bills, so that they support anything that censors negativity about Israel on the internet, so that they can say, Oh, it's my life is in danger.
This woman called me and threatened me.
And it's just she probably did a butt dial and she's probably farted.
And now you've literally created an international case.
And so, again, it's like this is why people are so sick of call it Israel, say it's Jews, whatever you want.
This is why people are so sick of it, folks, because it's totally insane.
It's totally insane.
It's like, oh, well, it's like, oh, yeah, well, you can sit here and you can talk about how propaganda in the entertainment industry, you can, specifically the rap industry, you can talk about how the rap industry and making black single mothers has led to gangster culture in black youths.
And then they commit crimes and acts of violence and fighting and all of this stuff.
And it's like, okay, you can sit here and talk about what leads to that.
And that's all okay.
But don't talk about why this Jewish lady over here is such a paranoid schizophrenic that she hears a fart on a phone call and thinks that somebody's threatening her with guns.
Like, don't talk about the culture that led to that.
Don't talk about the propaganda that led to that.
No, You're not allowed to talk about that.
And it's just, and so people see it and they're just sick of it, just like they're sick of it when they go downtown and they see a bunch of black teenagers robbing somebody who's playing his guitar on the street or starting a fight in 6th Street or anywhere else.
And they just say, oh, here it is again.
Oh, here's the culture.
Here's the rap culture.
Here's the industry that did this to them.
But a Jewish lady hears a fart on a phone call and thinks it's anti-Semitic.
This is the beginning of what's going to happen here.
When you violate people's due process, when you pull people off the street, you start dragging them and hurting them and not abiding by the Constitution.
When you start doing all of that, people get upset and angry.
If you remember what the civil rights movement was about, the civil rights movement was about these very kinds of protests.
There's nothing in the constitution that tells you what time you can protest.
You can protest at any time.
That's the whole point of it: to disrupt, it's to make them comfortable.
And that's what they're doing.
And that's what I believe when I say everyone has to be willing to sacrifice something.
You have to make people uncomfortable in these times.
If you see how uncomfortable people uncomfortably, this is the beginning.
But the truth is now, folks, if you go to church or you go to synagogue or you go to any place of worship, whether you're Jewish, Muslim, Christian, whatever, you better have amplified security.
Now, I know it's a lot harder when some of these churches don't have the funding and nobody gets the government funding like the security state for Israel does.
So the synagogues get, you know, we basically subsidize security for Jews in these synagogues.
I don't think Christians get that.
I don't think Muslims get that.
So, you need to have, you know, rich people or donors or somebody add to that security.
But if you're in a place of worship, I don't care what your faith is, you better have amplified security.
There was an organization that funded and organized and activated this protest.
Did you hear that?
There was an organization.
The same organizations that Pam Bondi said she was going to shut down.
The same flow of money, the same infrastructure that Pam Bondi said she was going to identify and shut down and hasn't done it.
And now they just invaded a church.
So Pam Bondi, if you're paying attention, if you're done prioritizing Israel and hanging out with Marion Adelson and getting your hair dyed with Adelson, maybe those two blondes are getting their hair dyed right now.
Very important stuff.
So whenever you're done with your blonde hair dye, with bleaching your hair with Marion Adelson, maybe you can address this.
I would call Don Lemon and say, what was the organization?
Can you give me some information?
And if you don't want to cooperate, maybe we will look at a face act.
Pam, what are you doing?
Seriously, what are you doing?
There it is right there.
Don Lemon just told you this was organized and funded and activated by an organization.
And Don Lemon has a contact with the organization and he has knowledge of the organization.
Once the protest started in the church, we did an act of journalism, which was report on it and talk to the people who were involved, which included the pastor, members of the church, and members of the organization.
unidentified
That's it.
It's called journalism.
First Amendment, all that stuff.
All of you people who believe in the First Amendment, absolutist.
I think we need to just take a breath here, forget about who he is or what he represents, and just ask, do we agree with Don Lemon?
Because with the details that we have, it looks like probably somebody reached out to Don and said, hey, we're going to do this protest, or maybe Don initiated the conversation.
He's obviously not running these.
He's obviously not running these operations.
But he had prior knowledge of it enough to be there to do an act of journalism, as he says, to document it and interview the people involved.
Now, I have a hard time disagreeing with Don.
I got to be honest.
I have a hard time disagreeing with Don because if it's true that he had nothing to do with the organization, he had nothing to do with organizing it or fundraising for it or anything like that.
And he just got a tip and he went there to cover it.
And when they went inside, he followed them inside.
Let's keep our consistency here, folks.
I mean, isn't that what we talked about on January 6th?
And, you know, let me just add a little something here and we'll go back to the church because this has come my way in a couple different circumstances.
And I'm just like, I really don't even care to address it.
But in this vein, I think maybe it's time.
Folks, there were a lot of journalists that were there on January 6th that went into the Capitol or broke Capitol grounds that never got charged.
And it's not like I'm not, I'm not here calling them out.
A lot of them are friends of mine.
But there were a lot, okay?
There were a lot of journalists that, you know, would have committed, let's say, the same crime, quote unquote, that I got charged with, that never got charged, probably dozens of them.
So, okay, there was obviously a selective prosecution.
We know why they went after me.
They wanted to make an example of me, and they thought that they could find something on Alex Jones and my phones and my emails and my texts, whatever.
So just maybe that'll help for people that keep asking these questions about why was Owen charged and nobody else.
They wanted to make an example of me because I'm one of the few people on the right that actually goes into the arena live and calls these people out to their face.
I go to their hearings, I go to their grounds, I go to their events, I created an entire genre of it, and you see everybody else doing it now.
So that's why they wanted to make an example out of me because they wanted to say, hey, if you're a right winger and you dare come to our events or cover our events or disrupt our events or call us out to our face, then you're going to get the same fate as Shroy or you're going to prison.
So, and they also wanted to get access to my phone and my email and everything else to look for any evidence against anybody else, which obviously there was none, and thus nobody else got charged.
But that's why they came after me.
And this might come up.
This might come up with some other legal stuff this year.
It might dealing with maybe yours truly.
But understand, there were dozens of other journalists, influencers, however you want to put it.
There were dozens that broke the Capitol grounds, went into the Capitol, all that stuff, and never got charged.
Dozens.
So you can pick out one or two or whatever and ask questions, but you need to know there were dozens.
And would you not argue, as I would, as I did, they were journalists.
If you're at the Capitol filming this as a journalist and all this goes down, you're filming as a journalist.
So let's just try to remain consistent here with Lemon.
But I would still call Lemon and say, Lemon, what information do you have about these operations, these organizations, the funding, the organizing, everything?
Now, I'd still call him and I'd say, well, Don, you did go in there and maybe we got you on something here.
But hey, you know what?
We don't have to charge you.
Now, I give this advice to Don Lemon.
I will say this to Don.
Hey, Don, don't trust anything the feds say to you.
Don't trust anything they say to you.
And if you're going to make an agreement with the feds, you better get that in writing and you better get that signed and stamped and sealed and delivered because the feds word means nothing, means nothing, Don.
Trust me on that.
So, if you do end up making a deal, make sure you have it signed, sealed, and delivered in writing because otherwise you can't trust these people.
They'll lie to you, they'll trick you, they'll deceive you, they'll throw you in prison.
So, if I was Don or I was the DOJ, that's what I'd do.
I'd call Don Lemon.
I'd say, all right, we can cut you a deal, but we're going to need some intel.
And if I'm Don, I'd say, okay, well, I don't mind.
Although he might tell them F off and decide to take that route, or he could say, Look, here's the organization, and this is what I got for you.
And so I'll give it to you, but I want signed and delivered that you're not going to charge me with anything.
And then they can make that deal.
But I tell you, you know, I got to say, I think Don is kind of, I just want to remain logically consistent, folks.
And I would never call for the journalists on January 6th to deal with the same punishment I had to deal with.
I would defend them to this day.
So I have to remain logically consistent and say, well, that would apply, I think, here to Don as well.
But I still think they should call him in for questioning.
Sorry, I'm trying to look at the screen here before I put this video up.
There's some scenes from outside where you're watching them getting harassed.
So, so here's, let's, again, look for logical consistency here.
And let's just be honest about what this is.
This was anti-Christian bigotry.
That's what this was.
These leftists hate Christians.
And that's why they went into that church service and did it.
So really, this was a hate crime.
And everybody knows.
Everybody knows damn well, as sure as I'm sitting here right now behind the Golden Wynn microphone, that if that happened at a Jewish synagogue, every single one of those protesters would be arrested and charged with a hate crime.
Everybody knows that.
Everybody and their mama knows that.
Will that same approach be taken to these Christians?
That is 110% a targeted attack on Christians.
100%.
That's exactly what it was.
They chose a church and they chose a Christian church because they hate Christians.
That is an anti-Christian bigotry crime.
Now, I'm not against, I'm not, I'm not, well, whether I'm not for hate crimes.
I don't like, you know, hate crime as an element in the judicial system.
It's either a crime or it's not.
But everybody listening to this knows damn well, if that was a Jewish synagogue and they did that, every single one of those protesters would be arrested and charged with a hate crime.
So I wonder if that same standard will apply towards Christians.
Now, Christians in general don't have the same level of vengeance factor and they don't have the same level of paranoid schizophrenia that anybody that commits an act against them needs to have their lives destroyed.
So I think because of that factor, you will not see this approached as you would if it was a Jewish synagogue.
But nonetheless, here's evidence.
This is outside of the church.
They know these are Christians going to church.
Listen to what they do.
unidentified
Fuck you, you fucking traitor.
How dare you have a rainbow fucking umbrella, you Nazi bitch?
So now we're going to go to these ICE protests where law enforcement is basically AWOL.
And we actually have a statement from the administration on that.
And, you know, it's probably not Christian behavior.
And I'm not endorsing this.
Let me be clear.
I'm not endorsing this.
I'm not promoting this.
I'm not encouraging this.
I'm just saying, you know, that's kind of the situation where you just beat a guy's ass.
You know, that's kind of a situation where, you know, you're with your congregation or you're with a group of men or whatever, and the guy doesn't shut up.
And so you just, you know, you kind of congregate for a second.
You tell, you tell the women and children, you say, hey, guys, here's, you know, here's a $50 bill.
But if you're not going to do this, if you want to put that bullhorn in our face one more time, we're just going to go ahead and beat your ass and stuff you in that dumpster in the alley over there.
I mean, I don't know the laws in Minnesota, but I'm pretty sure they have similar laws here in Texas.
You can't just shove an amplified sound device in somebody's face, folks.
You can't do that.
It does cause damage to your eardrums.
I don't need to get into the specifics.
But it's like, okay, if we have a healthy civilization, if we have a healthy society, then, you know, if the guy doesn't stop, the men just get together and say, we're going to beat your ass and stuff you in a trash can.
And law enforcement says, yeah, they look the other way.
So if law enforcement isn't going to stop these hooligans, if law enforcement isn't going to stop these terrorists, then yeah, good men are eventually going to stand up and do it, folks.
You can only push good men so far.
And I'm already hearing a buzz about the Proud Boys going up there and some of these other groups that we saw when this happened in the first Trump administration kind of reorganizing and reactivating.
The problem is then law enforcement comes after you.
The local police will watch these leftist protesters burn buildings, attack law enforcement, raid churches, disrupt the public, and they won't do anything.
I may try to speed through this for the sake of time, but all kinds of protest footage from Minnesota, including here where you can see protest firing fireworks at police and firing explosive devices at police.
So I, you know, what are we doing here, guys?
We already went through this in the first Trump administration.
And my interpretation of Trump's in action in 2020 with the BLM riots and before that with Antifa and everything else was he kind of figured it was good for him politically.
He figured it was good for Republican voter turnout and for him to run again.
Well, if this is how the left is going to behave, you know, let's just let him do it.
Uh, yeah, you want another you want another hint of who they are again.
I've dealt with this, dealt with this before.
Listen to what this lady realized in Boston.
What is their tactic?
If you're an ice officer in Boston, uh, get ready for this.
unidentified
People in Boston are putting out little containers where you can dispose of your dog's poop and they're collecting your tooth throw at frozen water people.
Don't even come at me because I don't have a dog.
I will not be participating because I don't have a dog.
But like, did you learn nothing from the tea party?
People in Boston are putting out little containers where you can dispose of your dog's poop and they're collecting your toothrow at frozen water people in Boston.
And, you know, there's kind of this space between the people that have been, you know, doing this since 2015, 2016, and now the people that have kind of just kind of popped up since 2024 that are seeing all of this really for the first time.
This is to Norway's prime minister, Jonas Gar Store.
And, you know, this is in the standoff for Greenland.
So Trump sends this to Norway's prime minister.
Dear Jonas, considering your country decided not to give me the Nobel Peace Prize for having stopped eight wars plus, I no longer feel an obligation to think purely of peace, although it will always be predominant, but can now think about what is good and proper for the United States of America.
Denmark cannot protect that land from Russia or China.
And why do they have a right to ownership anyway?
There are no handwritten documents.
It's only a boat that landed there hundreds of years ago, but we had boats landing there also.
I've done more for NATO than any other person since its founding.
And now NATO should do something for the United States.
The world is not secure unless we have complete and total control of Greenland.
Now, I'm still like, hey, I'm for the Greenland annex.
I'm still for it.
I just don't see any negatives.
And I think we get a little taste of that after something that happened this weekend.
But I mean, clearly, this is not, there's other interests involved here.
Clearly, there are other interests involved here beyond just Trump or the United States of America.
There's obviously special interests and foreign interest at play here.
Let's not pretend like that's not going on.
And it's just like, well, what are you, what do we, what are you doing here negotiating with NATO that tried to have a standoff with you?
What are you doing here talking about, oh, it's all about the Nobel Peace Prize?
Like, oh, you didn't fluff my ego enough.
It's like, you know what, Donald?
Just come out and say it.
Hey, my big donors want all the raw minerals and resources in Greenland.
We're the superpower.
We're taking it.
And if you get in our way, we're breaking with NATO.
Just say it.
Just say it.
And even go a step further.
Say, and once we take Greenland, we're going to remove all of our troops out of Europe, especially the countries that won't cooperate.
We're done playing defense for you.
And we're going to move everybody to Greenland and we're going to play defense for America.
And he also says we need this for the Golden Dome, which to me is just like, yeah, that's just bad news, folks.
I tell you, that one breaks my heart, I think, more than anything else, because to me, that tells me we're going to get bombed.
I don't know how else to interpret this.
If we believe we need air and missile defense systems like the Golden Dome, like the Iron Dome they have in Israel, that means they're anticipating they're going to piss off the world so much that we have to have this system because somebody's going to try to bomb us.
That is so tragic to think that this is what we're going to leave our lineage with.
This is what we're going to leave future generations of Americans with is a country that needs a golden dome because we're about to commit so many crimes around the world that people are going to want to bomb us, just like they have to do in Israel.
That is the most heartbreaking thing I think this administration has done.
I'm dead serious, by the way.
I'm dead serious.
The fact that we think we have to have a golden dome to protect our country, that's the state that we're going to leave our country in.
That's the state that the boomers are going to leave younger generations of Americans with.
We need the golden dome for defense.
That has to be the most tragic thing ever.
Imagine explaining that to your kids and grandkids.
Yeah, sorry, because of the Trump administration, we angered a bunch of people that want to bomb us now.
So, yeah, we have to live like they do in the Middle East.
I think that's the most tragic case that we've seen from this administration amongst all of it.
Bigger than the Epstein cover-up, bigger than all of it, folks.
Because all of that kind of has an encapsulation factor.
That's just leaving something for the future that they don't have to deal with.
It's disgusting.
It's the darkest thing I think that this administration has done, I have to say.
The United States plan to annex Greenland may only surprise at first glance and lead to the mistaken belief that these are merely extravagant remarks by President Trump.
In fact, the United States had such plans as early as the 1860s when the administration considered annexing Greenland and Iceland, but the idea lacked congressional support at the time.
In 1910, a trilateral deal was prepared to exchange territories between the United States, Germany, and Denmark, which would have granted Greenland to the United States.
During World War II, the United States established military bases in Greenland.
After the war, it offered to purchase the island from Denmark.
In summary, the United States has serious plans regarding Greenland.
These plans have deep historical roots, and the United States will continue to systemically advance its geopolitical, military, political, and economic interests in the Arctic.
So that's Putin that Trump is claiming he needs Greenland and protection from Putin.
You know, look, you make statements like this, and it comes with a lot of weight.
But folks, it seems to me that Vladimir Putin is the most grounded politician in the international theater today.
It really does.
He seems to have the best grasp of history.
He seems to have the best grasp of the constant shifting sands of the geopolitical world.
He seems to understand how to best communicate with other world leaders.
And the only issue, really the only issue that Putin has is the false idea that Europe has to hate Russia or this ancient Cold War foreign policy that the United States still engages in.
It's like if you remove those two hurdles, which Putin has tried to remove multiple times, then Putin really emerges as the leader of the world in a way.
So, you know, people, whatever, they say bad things about Putin.
And it's, you know, it's just like anywhere else in Russia.
Putin has his haters and his lovers, just like everywhere else in the world with political leadership.
But I don't hear any other world leader talk with such historical reverence than you do Vladimir Putin.
I don't hear any other world leader talk with the general understanding of modern day geopolitics as you do Vladimir Putin.
And the fact that his restraint in the theater of Ukraine is underappreciated, it kind of just goes to show you if you don't have all this anti-Putin, anti-Russian propaganda, the image, the interpretation of Vladimir Putin would be a lot, lot better.
It would be a lot better.
Now, over the weekend, Trump announced his peace team and his peace board or whatever it is.
And it's, you know, it's exactly what you would expect it to be.
And they're going to be taking charge of Palestine.
As Steve Witkoff announced, we have officially entered the next phase of Gaza's 20-point peace plan.
What, Israel just keeps killing people?
Since the ceasefire, there is no ceasefire.
My team has helped deliver record levels of humanitarian aid to Gaza, reaching civilians at historic speed and scale.
Even the United Nations has acknowledged this achievement is unprecedented.
These results have set the stage for the next phase.
Now, I'm not even here to disagree that the levels of humanitarian aid getting into Gaza because of the Trump administration are probably better than they have ever been.
I'm not disagreeing with that.
Trump has just kind of, he's just become this bloviating president that cried wolf.
It's like, if everything is the biggest and the greatest and the best of all time, then nothing is.
So it just, it just gets old, man.
It's just, it's just old and it's just not true.
This one might be true.
But it's like when everything else is like that, it's just like, it's just, it's the boy that cried wolf.
So, but this is the interesting part.
As chairman of the board of peace, I am backing a newly appointed Palestinian technocratic government.
What does that mean?
Well, I'll tell you what I think it means.
Let's finish the statement.
The National Committee for the Administration of Gaza, supported by the board's high representative to govern Gaza during its transition, these Palestinian leaders are unwaveringly committed to a peaceful future.
Well, what Palestinian leaders?
You're literally going to put Jared Kushner in charge of it.
I think I know what they're going to do here, folks.
Now, Trump is the kind of guy who will with this deal try to have his cake and eat it too.
And I think he's going to eventually piss Netanyahu off with this deal because I think that Trump is going to give American Jews the control of Palestine.
And of course, Netanyahu wants it for himself, and Netanyahu wants Israel to take the Gaza strip and to take Palestine.
And I think Trump is saying, no, no, no.
We're giving it to the American Jews.
We're going to control Palestine, not you, not Israel, not Netanyahu.
We're going to give it to Kushner and the American Jews.
And, you know, there is a little, there is a little strife between these two groups.
Let's not leave that out of the conversation.
And I know in the geopolitical world and Marion Adelson and Netanyahu and everything else, it seems that they're all connected and a well-operating machine.
The American Jews and the Israeli Jews, when they get to these top levels, folks, sometimes it's not so smooth.
So this to me, this is Trump signaling he's going to give Palestine to the American Jews.
But, you know, they'll have Palestinian leadership.
They'll have Palestinian government.
And it sounds like that's the deal.
So, okay, here's the deal.
We're going to protect you from Israel.
You're not going to have Netanyahu.
You're not going to have the IDF.
So we'll free you from Israel.
But the American Jews are going to come in here.
It'll be your country.
You can have it.
You can have the Gaza Strip, but we're going to come in here and we're going to basically build the infrastructure.
We'll bring in BlackRock.
We'll bring in Jared Kushner.
And what you're going to have is a technocratic government.
They're going to have the first AI government.
They're going to have the first fully technological, advanced run government.
And, you know, it'll just be the American Jews, tech, infrastructure, all of that stuff.
And then the Palestinians will have like the political leadership, the political say, but it'll be really the American Jews that are kind of running the show in charge of infrastructure, in charge of technology, in charge of resources.
But the political leadership, the face, the voice, all of that will be Palestinians.
But that's to me what this sounds like.
It sounds like they're going to try for the first AI-run country, if you will, whatever that means.
It sounds like that's what they're doing in Gaza.
It sounds like that's the plan for the Gaza Strip.
I don't know how else to interpret that, quite frankly.
Perhaps your interpretation is different, but that's how I see it.
Hey, Trump-endorsed Representative Maria Salazar introduces the Dignity Act offering conditional legal status to undocumented immigrants present in the United States for five plus years.
Oh, so Trump endorsed Salazar says, nope, we're actually going to keep the illegal aliens in America.
Now, she's doing that because she wants to win re-election in Florida, but there you go.
Do you know?
So I just wish, I really wish conservatives were actually conservative.
I really do.
Because they're really not at all.
We should be outraged at what's going on in California.
And, you know, maybe I kind of segue this back to the ICE stuff with Minnesota and the deportations.
But anyway, so California, you know, they have this mansion tax.
Now, they deny it.
They say, oh, California doesn't have a mansion tax.
Well, these local jurisdictions do, like Los Angeles.
So you got all these property sales.
This is the mansion tax.
You see them all on the screen.
If you own a property over three or over $5 million, over $10 million, it's an added tax, all this stuff.
You know, they also have a jock tax in some of these states.
They have a jock tax in California.
If you play sports, if you're a professional athlete, they tax you higher.
They call it a jock tax.
I mean, this is all un-American.
This is all disgusting.
So, anyway, so they're doing this.
Well, in Los Angeles, they've taken it a step further now.
They've taken the mansion tax and they've raised hundreds of millions of dollars here.
And think about it like this, too.
All you have to do in California is rig the market.
So you say, oh, okay, we're going to put a number out.
Oh, it's arbitrary.
And we're going to put a number out.
Okay, anything over 5 million, you're mansion tax now.
Oh, well, now you just, oh, all these properties are 5 million.
So you synthetically, you synthetically increase the market value.
And then all of a sudden, everybody's above this bar and you say, oh, you have to pay more taxes.
So they get hundreds of millions of dollars with this tax.
And guess what they're doing in the wealthy areas in the Palisades where they just burned everything down?
They're building quote unquote affordable housing.
So they've now wiped out the private homes, the family homes, and they're building these massive affordable housing, like Section 8 housing projects.
And they're building these things all over California.
And it's all being funded with the mansion tax.
It's totally crazy.
And so I'm sitting here.
I'm looking at what's going on in Minnesota.
I'm looking at what's going on in California.
And I'm thinking, because we got to, you know, what are solutions to this?
We've been trying the same thing and nothing is working.
Do the same thing over and over again, expect a different result.
I think I would try this if I was Trump.
I'd say, okay, here's how we're going to do this.
We are getting resistance in these blue states to our policies.
We're getting resistance when it comes to regulation or slashing it.
We're getting resistance when it comes to taxes and slashing it.
We're getting resistance when it comes to deportations and ICE operations.
And it's really not going well.
We're not getting any cooperation and it's just not working.
So here's what I would do: I'd say, okay, okay.
If Minnesota doesn't want to deport its illegal aliens, if California, if all these states maybe make it a single issue and make it about deportations, you could make it about taxes, regulations, whatever.
You're starting, it's starting to get a little hairy there.
And depending on how far you want to go, you could even go as far as to say, all right, if you're not going to support us with the deportations, we're cutting all federal funding.
Now, Trump has not really shown that he has that backbone.
He has not shown the testicular fortitude to engage in that measurement yet.
Maybe he could, but maybe you don't have to do that.
And then just say, okay, fine.
So here's how it's going to go.
And then come out and make an announcement and say, all right, guys, here's the deal.
These Democrat states are not going to cooperate with ICE.
And now our ICE agents' lives are being put in danger.
So we're calling it off.
If you live in a blue state, if you live in a Democrat state, by the way, Minnesota is like almost the prime example.
You haven't had a Republican win in a statewide election.
Because they brought in all the illegal immigrants.
Because they have how many millions of foreigners have moved to Minnesota in the last 20 years that the Democrats engage in fraud and corruption with so that they can get their votes and stay in power.
So Minnesota is like the case and example of how Democrats import voters, engage in fraud and theft, and then win elections every election cycle.
So I'm just coming out and I'm Trump and I'm saying, all right, here's the deal.
The blue states are not cooperating with deportations.
We're not going to put ICE agents' lives in danger anymore.
And the measurements that we would have to take at this point are just too extreme.
You could cut federal funding if he wants to do that.
I don't know if he would.
He threatens it, never does.
So just say, here's what we're going to do.
We are now refocusing all of ICE efforts into the governors, the red states that will cooperate with ICE, will have their local police, everybody, whatever state troopers, whatever it is, these red states, they're going to cooperate with the deportations.
So we're focusing all of our efforts on that.
And if you think about it, it's actually brilliant.
Now, it sucks.
If you live in a blue state, it sucks.
So maybe time to get out.
I know it's not fun.
It's, you know, that's kind of tough.
But think about how perfect this would work.
All of the red states would become illegal alien-free.
They'd all be gone.
They would either voluntarily move to a blue state or they'd be deported.
Either way, they're out of the red states.
So the red states would thrive.
The red states would pick up business.
Maybe people start moving from the blue states into the red states.
At some point, you know, it's like you don't want a civil war, but at some point you say, okay, we'll do a cold civil war.
I didn't see any proof that IDF was out there or it was, you know, I know that they train some of our military people or some of our law enforcement people.
But I didn't realize that they were actually using Israeli spyware in these operations.
So, okay, I wonder if that's the surface or if that's the bottom.
So you could say, well, maybe it's not such a crazy thing to ask.
You've been involved in Israel your whole life with his time there growing up and the IDF and everything else.
The Kamala Harris campaign tried to keep an Israeli agent off of the ticket.
So we all knew that it was like, okay, well, he's Jewish and that's not a good running partner.
But now it's a little deeper than that.
It's no, we didn't want an Israeli agent on the ticket, not a Jewish person, an Israeli agent is how they were looking at it.
The EU has new sanctions on Iran.
The EU condemns human rights abuses in Iran as well as Iran's nuclear proliferation activities and its military support for Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine.
It has adopted a number of sanctions in this regard.
Okay, so the EU, it's standing up to the evil Iranians.
But it's funny because during their hearings on this specifically, during their hearings, a couple of members of the EU stepped up and said, hey, how can we sanction Iran for human rights abuses and killing people?
And we still haven't sanctioned Israel for these things.
So those are some interesting moments at the EU.
As Trump threatens Iran strikes, Netanyahu sees golden opportunity.
And what opportunity is that?
Well, Netanyahu came out and made some pretty extreme threats to Iran.
I'm not going to play it because he's not speaking in English here.
Orthodox Jews Rally Against Forced Conscription00:02:22
So he speaks in English when he's propagandizing the American people.
He speaks to the Israelis.
He doesn't speak in English, but he basically threatened Iran and said, if you guys do anything, we're going to basically nuke you is what he said there, which makes sense.
And I think Trump has alluded to this, actually, when he says, we struck Iran to stop World War III.
I think that's because Netanyahu told Trump, if you don't strike Iran, we're going to nuke them.
So we're going to nuke Iran, so you better strike him.
And I think that's why Trump called Iran and said, they're going to nuke you.
You got to let us come in and bomb this place or it's going to be World War III.
And so they did it and they stopped World War III.
But no, of course, not Israel.
Israel would never do anything like that.
No, Israel is preparing for something.
Thousands rally in Jerusalem to demand ultra-Orthodox IDF enlistment.
So Orthodox Jews are not forced into conscription in the IDF.
And, you know, I don't know if I could say most.
It seems most.
My interpretation is that most Orthodox Jews are against Israel or against the IDF or against Netanyahu.
So then there were protests against the forced conscription.
And there were way more Orthodox Jews.
They said a million.
They said a million Orthodox Jews showed up in protest of Netanyahu, the IDF, and the idea of forced conscription into the military.
So that's what you're seeing right here.
You can see they're all in the Orthodox garb.
That's why it's all blacked out there.
So way more Orthodox Jews showed up for that than the other rally that said they need to serve in the IDF.
Now, of course, we can all take this in the direction, the obvious direction of blackmail, the Israeli blackmail operation that Jeffrey Epstein was running.
But she doesn't want to answer the question.
She doesn't want to answer the question, and she's kind of laughing and giggling about it.
There's no point in playing the rest of it because it's basically this guy having to fill the time because she refuses to answer.
So that's all she says.
So he says, hey, you are very powerful.
You basically control American politics and you cut all the checks, but it's more than that.
And she says, oh, I'm not going to answer what the more of that is.
It's probably blackmail.
Now, I don't know if she has anything to do with the Epstein network or not, but she's probably acutely aware that, yeah, there's more than just the influence.
She's the bankroller, but she's not really the controller.
She's just the bankroller.
She's not running blackmail operations.
She just has all the money.
I feel like this moment was very telling, though.
And obviously, I don't know Marion Adelson personally, and there are plenty of people that do.
But I found this moment to be very revealing of who and what Marion Adelson is.
And you know what?
She's probably a nice lady.
You know, she's probably, and maybe you know somebody like this.
Maybe we all know somebody like this.
It's an old lady, you know, husband is dead and just has money, just has a ton of money and just doesn't really have any concern with spending it wherever she wants.
You know, anybody comes up and says, hey, I need some money.
She gives him money, especially in the world of politics.
I've met some women like this in local politics.
There's one woman specifically.
Same thing, all kinds of money and just funds people in politics that she likes.
And when I started to show up some of the stuff before the Republicans basically blackballed me, she was like, she would fund anything I wanted to do.
She was like, my checkbook is yours.
I'll fund anything you want to do.
You want to run for office, get involved, whatever.
I wasn't really interested in that.
But it seems like that's kind of who Marion Adelson is.
And that's why I think Israel is doing everything it can in this small period of time.
And I think Trump is going along with it.
They are pressing the gas because they know they only have a limited amount of time to reach that finish line.
And so they're pumping the gas and they're going as fast as possible to cross that finish line before the funds, before the support, before all of it runs out.
And I think that really explains why it's so overt and in your face the blatant foreign policy and prioritizing Israel right now.
I think it's pretty obvious that's what's going on.
I mean, honestly, like they played, they played the internet.
They played the social media sphere.
They played the Zionists like a fiddle, like a fiddle.
They're getting exactly what they want.
And that's why it's so funny.
It's like it's so when you are, when you, when your enemy, however you want to put it, we'll say enemy, your opposition might be better.
I don't think enemy would be fair.
When your opposition is so easy to predict like this, when your opposition is in such a crazed state of mind, they're so easy to predict and they're so easy to play.
So they knew exactly, hey, do a video with Heil Hitler.
He says, I wonder why clubs don't issue apologize for music glorifying black on black violence.
Well, again, go look at any of these rap lyrics that talk about killing police, killing gang, all the violence, all the other stuff, beating women, whoring, pimping women, all of this stuff.
It's like, yeah, that's fine.
That's mainstream.
But, you know, yay's Hail Hitler.
That's the one thing, you know.
That's the one thing.
And again, what was it that Voltaire said about who you can't criticize?
BB won't stand a chance in non-Jay areas of Florida.
Well, I don't know what BB's not running for office down there.
Loomer is based out of Broward County.
Yeah, isn't that where she tried to run for office?
Fishback 2026, $0 from foreign money.
Telling you, that campaign is getting more ridiculous.
And James Fishback, no doubt, a long shot, but things are getting interesting.
Things are getting interesting.
We're quoting a certain someone.
Jew, A certain someone.
I don't know.
I've never seen that meme.
It's definitely not going viral on X. Nobody knows.
Epstein files implicate Israel.
Yeah, it implicates the intelligence agencies and all the blackmail.
So, yeah, we can't.
And all of the friends.
Jennifer, X users questioning the official Charlie Kirk narrative are also being censored since Elon owns X makes me think Israel is behind it.
Since, as you're saying, it's the number one thing you can't talk about.
I got to say, you might be right on that.
I just know how to beat the algorithm.
So it's, if I wanted to really pay attention to detail on this stuff, then I could look at the numbers, but I'm not, to be honest with you, I'm not.
I know how the game, I know how to rig the algorithm to get what I want.
So I see all the conspiracy theories.
I see all the people questioning the Charlie Kirk narrative.
I don't have any shortage of that on my X timeline.
And that's probably because I posted about it a lot in the beginning.
And it's probably because I open up the posts about it when it comes across my feed.
I think I explained that last week or two weeks ago.
Folks, I understand people have their issues with the X algorithm, but I'm telling you right now, it is the easiest thing to manipulate because it's so sensitive.
So if you want to see that stuff, just like a couple of the posts, just open a couple of the posts, read the whole thing.
I mean, it's literally scanning your face for reactions and everything.
So it's really sensitive.
So you can still rig the algorithm, but if you're not gaming it like that, then yeah, it'll probably control what you see and what you don't.
And that might be one of the things that it cuts the spread on.
South Florida is completely different from the rest of Florida.
Yeah, that's, I've been to Florida enough to see what you're saying with that.
Mark Levin's gold company now sponsors Nick Fuenes.
He said that.
He said that in one of the streams, but he said it wasn't a closed deal.
He said it was a seven-figure offer.
I mean, folks, that is, those are crazy numbers.
I don't know anybody that gets a seven-figure sponsorship.
I don't even know if I want to touch it, quite frankly.
I'll tell you here on the show.
In fact, I might as well even say this if you're a listener to the show.
Because, you know, just like anything in life, you got to pick and choose your battles and you have to be discerning about when you decide to engage in such things.
I found it was, what is B.B. Netanyahu's son's name?
Nair Netanyahu.
What is his name?
It's skipping my mind.
He actually, I believe, first coined the phrase woke right.
And he posted it on X, and it was the first thing I've ever seen on woke right.
And I found that, and I was like, oh, oh.
I didn't bother reposting.
I probably could have got a million views, but I was like, you know what?
I'm not, I'm not touching that one.
And somebody else could have coined it first.
So that's, I also don't know it was him that coined it, but that was the first instance that I could find of woke right was Netanyahu's son, who lives in South Florida.
But that's exactly what it is.
The woke right is just like the woke left.
The woke left, it's like, how do you, it's like, look at a case and say, okay, how is this woke left?