Owen Shroyer Live - Owen Report - 10-30-2025 - Trump Threatens To Bring Back Nuclear Bomb Testing

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 30, 2025 - Owen Shroyer Live

03:00:24

Owen Report - 10-30-2025 - Trump Threatens To Bring Back Nuclear Bomb Testing

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Ladies and gentlemen, it is Thursday, October 30th, 2025, and here's what's coming up on the Owen Report today.
	Well, Trump, President Trump, that is, making a lot of headlines today.
	After his trip to Asia, he has just touched down in Washington, D.C. He's back stateside here, making headlines before he took off, making headlines right after he landed.
	Talking a lot about some military stuff, like bringing back nuclear bomb testing.
	Why would President Trump announce he wants to bring back nuclear weapons testing?
	That's on the backdrop of the claims that Russia was testing nuclear weapons, which they have now offered a response to these reports.
	And then there's some other background noise happening as well, as far as what President Trump is doing with the military, or maybe more noticeably, why members of the Trump administration are now moving onto military bases.
	Why would that be going on?
	As the Pentagon claims it's readying reaction forces, anticipating a big event coming soon to the United States of America.
	So what is up with all of this information?
	We'll try to explain it as there's been some other moves in the military and more news on what appears to be this strife and struggle between Cash Patel and Tulsi Gabber.
	And you have to wonder what's going on with that as more stuff is starting to hit the surface.
	Then you have Republicans are still angry.
	Republicans get angry, but they never seem to do anything about it.
	They're angry, though.
	They're angry because Jack Smith is corrupt and a criminal.
	And now they've discovered that almost the entire Republican Party was targeted by the Biden administration.
	Shocking.
	Shocking.
	And they're furious.
	And now they want to impeach the judge, Bo Asberg, who was cooperating with all of this and then was telling people inside, we can't let them know we're spying on them.
	We can't let them know we're investigating them because they're traitors to the country.
	Wow.
	That's some heavy stuff.
	But the question remains.
	So what?
	What are you going to do about it, Republicans?
	You complain a lot about it and you never do anything about it.
	So the political debate right now that is the biggest debate in American politics is the issue of foreign policy, specifically around Israel's influence over our foreign policy.
	It's all over the mainstream media now.
	And last night, much to J.D. Vance's credit, you've got to give Vice President Vance credit, whether you liked his responses or not.
	He took uncensored questions at a Turning Point USA event last night at Ole Miss campus, and he took them uncensored on Palantir, on Israel, on Marion Adelson.
	And he stood right up there and he answered him.
	So whether you like the answers or not, he did it.
	And I think it was the best he's looked since he's been vice president.
	Again, whether you liked it or not, he stood up there.
	He took the questions.
	He didn't shy away and he enjoyed it.
	I think he looked good.
	Now, this is not just a big issue in America.
	They'd like you to not look around the world at what's going on with this story, but it's also there's some things happening in Europe.
	There's some things happening in Israel today that'll give you an even better idea just how dominant this issue is as far as Israel and its influence over foreign policy in America and Europe.
	And it looks like the Europeans and the Americans have something in common here, folks.
	We're sick of being involved in other people's wars.
	This news update was brought to you by the 1776 Law Center, the official legal team of the Owen Report.
	Ladies and gentlemen, your new home for political play-by-play, the Owen Report.
	Well, day 30 of the government shutdown, and the whole thing continues to just be a clown show, quite frankly.
	Really, it just seems like that's kind of the story.
	The entire political process, the entire political body seems to be a bit of a clown show these days when you have all these Democrats like Chuck Schumer, just about an hour ago, Chuck Schumer complaining, saying it's the Republican shutdown.
	Chuck Schumer says it's the Republican shutdown.
	Chuck, your dirty rat stinking ass voted 13 times for the shutdown.
	You dirty stinking rat.
	You voted for the shutdown 13 times.
	And it's insane that you even have to explain this, but hey, the average American is almost wholly politically ignorant.
	So you do have to.
	It's pretty simple.
	Simple math.
	Maybe it's not so simple these days.
	I don't know.
	Used to be simple math.
	You need 60 votes to reopen the government.
	The Republicans have 53 members in the Senate.
	And with every vote, there have been 13.
	There have been 53 votes to reopen the government, all 53 being Republicans.
	So that would mean that every single Democrat has voted against reopening the government every single vote.
	And then they come out today: Corey Booker, Chuck Schumer, the left-wing media, and they call it the Republican shutdown.
	Now, you know where I stand on this.
	I'm actually pro-shutdown.
	I don't want to see the military go unpaid, and I don't want to see the chaos with air traffic control, as there have been many delays, a lot of cancellations.
	Sounds like it might get worse today.
	Now, people are wondering if they're even going to come back to work because they're not sure they're going to get paid.
	So, there's real issues with this.
	We won't ignore the real issues, but we all know that mostly the government shutdown is just a political football game that our politicians play pretty much every administration.
	And sometimes the game goes into overtime, and sometimes people get, let's say, hurt, maybe.
	But it's still just a political football.
	The foreign aid continues, the foreign wars and the military support for those continue.
	So, it's not a real government shutdown.
	The government isn't actually shut down.
	For some reason, they pick and choose whatever gets affected by this stuff based off of the way they fund it with these continued resolutions and these budget bills.
	So, it's all just a political football game.
	And it is frustrating that we as a country, we're trying to move on.
	We're trying to move on.
	We're trying to have real conversations.
	We're trying to have real debates.
	We're trying to get into real issues.
	And here's the Democrats, just dirty, rotten, stinking liars, just rotting, festering demons that continue to occupy our body politic.
	So, we can't even really have real results from the real debates that are going on right now, which mostly revolve around foreign policy.
	You could say foreign aid, but I think it's just spending more at large.
	Foreign aid is a giant part of it, but it's just spending.
	What are we spending our money on?
	What are we doing with the taxes?
	The American taxpayer, 30% of the money they make taxed by the government, stolen by the government, and then spent all around the world on all these stupid little things.
	It's like we want to move on from this.
	I don't want to sit here and have to look at that dirty rat, Chuck Schumer, write his little pork into these bills, like studying shrimp in Malaysia, whatever the hell else they put in this crap.
	Transgender studies for Argentina.
	Why are we still doing this?
	Let's have real debates about real issues that real Americans care about, and we can't even move on.
	The Democrats keep us in the political abyss, the Democrats keep us in the political dungeon, the sewers, if you will.
	So, I get it why so many people, because I'm the same way.
	People are sick of it.
	They don't want to hear about the left-right.
	They don't want to hear about the Democrats and the Republicans, and we shouldn't have to.
	Quite frankly, the Republicans should just be steamrolling the Democrat Party at every turn.
	And then I have to tune in today to the new government shutdown press conference with J.D. Vance and Sean Duffy and a team of Republicans.
	It's like, whatever.
	All right, here we go.
	Here comes the daily government shutdown press conference.
	Here comes the daily left-right paradigm propaganda.
	It's like, okay, here we go.
	And I like Sean Duffy.
	You can argue or not whether you think he's doing a good job.
	Certainly know where Elon Musk stands on the issue.
	And he gets up there today and says, we shouldn't be holding Americans hostage over a government shutdown.
	And I just, it's like an automated body reaction.
	My head goes down, my eyes close, and I start shaking.
	I'm like, oh my God.
	Like, oh, my God, here we go.
	Who is holding Americans hostage?
	I'm sorry.
	You're talking about the welfare recipients?
	Yeah.
	You're talking about the charity that's holding them hostage.
	The American people are so generous, perhaps unwillingly, perhaps unwittingly, but they're so generous that we're willing to give almost $10 billion a month so that people can feed themselves and their families.
	Now, it turns out that most of this goes to subsidizing some of these big brands like Coca-Cola and all the junk food producers and manufacturers that get their stuff on the shelves.
	Turns out that's the case, and they have lobbyists in D.C., so you know how it goes.
	But all that aside, holding the American people hostage.
	These are welfare recipients.
	These are charity cases.
	Have you ever worked at a food bank?
	Have you ever worked at a soup kitchen?
	I actually have.
	Can you imagine?
	Because it kind of depends.
	I did a lot of, I've actually spent a lot of time in the past at a food bank.
	I've never done a soup kitchen, but I worked at a food bank.
	And you never really know what it's going to be like as far as your inventory is concerned.
	Now, you've got your regulars that come in and they get their regular stuff, and you have your prepared bag that you usually give out the same thing to most people, but you never know how much inventory you're going to have and what you're going to have and what you're not going to have.
	Now, most people I dealt with were always very kind.
	I never had any issues with that.
	But I can't even imagine if somebody came in, and this was all private sector.
	This wasn't government-funded stuff.
	This is a local food bank in St. Louis way back in the day that I used to do volunteer work at.
	And I can't imagine if somebody came in and said, Hey, do you have my bag of food today?
	And I said, I'm sorry.
	I don't have it today.
	You're going to have to wait.
	Why are you holding me hostage?
	I'm sorry, what?
	Why are you holding me hostage?
	Nobody made you come to the food bank.
	You decided to do that.
	So it's the same thing here with these snap benefits.
	Holding Americans hostage, come on.
	They're lucky that the American people allow this welfare to continue.
	There's no hostage situation here.
	Nobody's being held hostage.
	And then this gets projected at the American taxpayer that is already sick of it all.
	The American taxpayer that's already living paycheck to paycheck.
	The American taxpayer is looking down at their most recent paycheck and the taxes coming out of it and their bank account and their bills and everything else.
	And they're saying, oh, boy, it's tough out there.
	We're going to be a little close this month.
	And then it's, oh my gosh, the welfare recipients are being held hostage.
	Nobody's making them be welfare recipients.
	Nobody's making them reliant on government welfare.
	But this is the slop.
	This is the crap you get.
	So, hey, I get it.
	You don't want to sound cold-hearted and you want to win elections, and maybe you think these people might vote for you sometime.
	Maybe you think a welfare recipient might vote Republican one time.
	And so you want to be nice.
	You want to be gracious.
	You want to feed them.
	You want to tell them you care.
	You want to communicate that, hoping they're listening.
	They're not, by the way, they're not listening.
	They're not.
	And it's this giant game.
	So the Republicans say Democrats are holding welfare recipients hostage.
	And then the Democrats say, Republicans are shutting the government down.
	And then what does the average American say?
	Hey, do you think maybe you guys could like cut my taxes a little bit?
	Do you think maybe we could stop doing the never-ending foreign wars and expanding them and finding new countries to start new wars in?
	Do you think maybe we could do that?
	Do you think maybe we could do something about all the corruption in this country?
	Arresting the corrupt politicians, the inside traders, the traitors, the traitors, and then the traitors.
	No, no, no, no.
	You're going to hear about the government shutdown.
	You're going to be stuck in the stands of the political football game known as the government shutdown.
	Ex-Trump official on president's snap concern, Miles Taylor.
	This is the energy I want, by the way.
	They think this is like bad press.
	Miles Taylor, who was a deputy chief of staff for the Department of Homeland Security during the first Trump administration, went after President Trump as the government shutdown endangers the distribution of the supplemental nutrition assistance program.
	You know, they make a nice supplemental nutrition assistance program.
	No, it's American taxpayer welfare.
	It's American taxpayer subsidizing people that are poor.
	That's what it is.
	So you can like it or not, but it's supplemental nutrition assistance program.
	They always have their little buzzwords.
	So Miles Taylor says that President Trump doesn't give a shit about the snap concern.
	More of that.
	Is that true, by the way?
	Do you think that's even true?
	Where's that energy?
	Where's that Trump?
	Where's that administration?
	Oh, no.
	He doesn't give a shit.
	Good.
	Good.
	You know, maybe it's time for some cold-hearted people to get involved here.
	Oh, no.
	Oh, oh, what's more cold-hearted?
	Here, let me ask you this: what do you think is more cold-hearted as a policy or a political attitude?
	What do you think?
	What do you think is more cold-hearted?
	Sending bombs all over the world to kill people.
	They just came out, they've blown up 15 of these narco-terrorist boats that they say are drug dealers.
	They've blown up 15 of them, they've killed 60 people.
	Supporting the war in Ukraine, probably a million dead, supporting these wars in the Middle East, probably 100,000 dead, bombing these boats, 60 dead that we know of.
	What's more politically cold?
	Being directly involved with killing people or saying, sorry, there is no more government charity.
	Sorry.
	What's more cold-hearted?
	And then what gets presented as more cold-hearted?
	What are you shamed on?
	What are you guilt-tripped on?
	Oh my gosh.
	You don't want to feed hungry people?
	That's not what I said.
	I said, I don't want there to be a government charity.
	I don't want there to be government welfare.
	We have plenty of rich Americans that are more than happy to give to charitable causes, more than happy to help feed the poor.
	There's plenty of jobs you can go work, by the way.
	Sure, absolutely.
	You can get a job if you want one.
	Doesn't mean you're still going to be financially struggling probably in the country with the economy and the state it's in, but because that's the real big story.
	The real big story isn't the government shutdown.
	The real big story isn't does Trump care or not?
	The real big story isn't who's voting for the shutdown, who's to blame for the shutdown.
	That's not the story here.
	The story is that the American economy is so bad that people have to have government charity just to eat.
	Is that the case?
	And I wonder too, maybe we need to start looking at that.
	Is that really how bad it is?
	Because, you know, there's a lot of evidence out there that a lot of these welfare programs, not just SNAP, but a lot of these welfare programs, these people just take advantage of them.
	In fact, did you know, and I've seen this firsthand, a lot of people that get the SNAP benefits, they actually resell, they resell the things they go buy at the grocery store with their EBT cards.
	Did you know that?
	Yeah, some of them, some of them receive the SNAP benefits.
	They own their own stores.
	They go to the grocery stores where they can spend their snap money.
	They buy a bunch of stuff and then they put it on the shelves at their own stores, at their own little corner stores and markets, convenience stores.
	Nice.
	Did you know that some people go to the grocery store and they buy a bunch of candy and junk food and then they set up a stand on the corner of a street downtown and they sell it that candy bar that they bought for 50 cents, they sell it for two bucks on the streets.
	They go to the local hangouts, the local parks, the local pools, wherever, and they resell.
	Straight cash, homie.
	Did you know that?
	How bad is it, really?
	How many of these people would really starve without the SNAP benefits?
	It's an honest question.
	Maybe we should find out.
	Now, of course, they're threatening to riot if they don't get their benefits.
	That's what's happening now.
	You know, if you're so ungrateful and you're so entitled and you're so unwilling to solve your own problems, then maybe you don't deserve government welfare.
	Oh my gosh, you're so cold.
	Stop it.
	Stop it.
	Let's stop pretending like we're preschoolers here.
	The U.S. government and the military bomb people all over the planet.
	Stop it because I don't want there to be government welfare.
	Stop it.
	You're not going to guilt trip.
	We're not going to be guilt-tripped anymore.
	We're not going to be shamed anymore.
	No.
	How many of these politicians cheat on their spouses regularly?
	How many of these politicians are doing insider trading?
	How many of these politicians are on an Epstein list or something similar?
	And then you're going to shame us, the American people, that are sick of paying for welfare and say, you're so cold.
	You're so bad.
	You're so immoral.
	I don't think so.
	No, I don't think so, bud.
	Not going to happen.
	And you know what?
	If you really care, if you really care about these people getting their snap benefits at $8 billion a month, well, let's see.
	You know, I'm not the best at math, but I think I could do some basic math here on the spot.
	Let's see.
	We've given $200 billion to Ukraine in the last three years.
	About right?
	$200 billion?
	Okay, $200 billion.
	That would be more than a year of snap benefits.
	And by the way, with all the different government shutdowns, the Ukraine money never stopped.
	The support for Ukraine, the military support, the financial support never stopped.
	And we all know Ukraine is not the only benefactor of this, obviously.
	$40 billion to Israel since Trump has been in office.
	$40 billion to Argentina.
	So the number here, let's just look at three countries between Argentina, Israel, and Ukraine.
	What are we looking at here, guys?
	About $300 billion?
	We're looking at about $300 billion that our government gives to foreign countries, mostly just for war.
	Most of that money is just for war.
	The vast majority of that is for killing people.
	Okay.
	That could be more than two years of SNAP benefits.
	And then I'm going to be shamed.
	The American people, we're going to be shamed.
	We're going to be guilt-tripped because we don't want to do foreign aid anymore.
	We don't want to do foreign wars anymore.
	$200 billion.
	It's probably really, if we're looking at it all, we're probably at about $400 billion just since the year 2020 in foreign aid.
	Probably more.
	But you're the bad guy.
	You're shamed.
	If you're against supporting Israel, if you're against supporting Ukraine, if you're against the foreign aid to Argentina, you're the bad guy.
	And then if you don't want to do the snap benefits, you're cold-hearted, you're cold-blooded.
	No, that's not going to fly anymore.
	That's not how we're going to do business here anymore.
	If you want to guilt trip, if you want to guilt trip us, we're going to hold up the mirror to you and we're going to say, oh, oh, if you really care, and maybe you don't, you probably don't.
	And that's fine.
	I don't either.
	But if you really care and you want to guilt trip us and say, oh my goodness, you don't want to feed the poor in America.
	No, wrong.
	You don't want to feed the poor in America.
	Not me.
	I don't either.
	But it's you.
	You, you in Washington, D.C., you, the Republican, you, the Democrat, you, the White House official, you are the ones, not us.
	Not us.
	You are the ones that have given five years of snap benefits to foreign countries, mostly for killing people.
	You've given five years' worth of snap benefits since 2020.
	You, the Republican, you, the Democrat, you, the White House official, you've given five years of snap benefits away in foreign aid and military aid for killing people, and then you're going to guilt trip us because the American people are sick of it.
	That's not how this is going to go.
	So, if anybody's going to get the blame for this, it's all of you.
	It's all of you, including the Republicans, all of you, including the White House, including this administration.
	You are all to blame.
	You make the policies, you vote on the policies, you decide where the foreign aid goes, you decide where the welfare money goes.
	You make those decisions, not us.
	Because here's the truth: if you put it up to a vote, if you took these issues as a standalone issue, if we lived in a pure democracy and you said, okay, we're going to have a vote with the American people.
	Simple vote, one issue, go to the polls and vote.
	Do you want to financially and military support for Ukraine?
	How do you think that vote would go?
	I guarantee you.
	I guarantee you, the American people would vote against funding and arming Ukraine.
	Guarantee you.
	I don't even think it would be close.
	I think it'd be more than 70% would vote against aiding Ukraine.
	But that never stops.
	And apply this to anything.
	Apply this to foreign aid for Israel.
	Apply it to foreign aid for Argentina.
	Apply it to all these different things.
	And the American people, left and right, will vote against it every single time.
	And these dirtbag politicians will still do it.
	Both sides of the aisle.
	And then they have their petty little political fights.
	It results in a government shutdown.
	And then they say, oh my gosh, people aren't going to get their snap benefits.
	What are we doing?
	We're holding them hostage.
	No, no, no, no, no.
	You did this.
	You did this.
	The American people have nothing to do with this.
	You did this.
	You guys did this.
	And you guys took the lobbyists' money so that this welfare program could benefit some of the biggest companies in this country that are worth billions of dollars.
	Yes, our government, our politicians are subsidizing the biggest companies in this country with your tax dollars.
	Who do you think benefits from the SNAP programs?
	Of course, the people get to eat the food.
	Do they get it at, do the people, when they go and use their EBT cards to purchase the food, do they get it at the same price that the producers pay for it?
	So if the company that makes the candy bar pays a nickel, if it costs them a nickel to put that candy bar on the shelf, does the person with the EBT card, do they pay a nickel or do they pay a dollar?
	Oh, they pay a dollar?
	We're sick of it.
	We're sick of it.
	And we're not going to have the finger shoved into our chest and guilt-tripped about this crap.
	And so this is why things are so out of whack.
	This is why the whole thing is just like everybody is going crazy because none of it makes sense.
	It's all so corrupt.
	J.D. Vance to meet with Duffy and aviation leaders as shutdown gravely impacts crucial industry.
	Your government can find a way to stick a missile up a camel's ass from 10,000 miles away.
	But they can't figure out a way to fund the government, guys.
	They just can't do it.
	They have no idea.
	Just no idea.
	And everybody's going to be guilt-tripped, and everybody's going to have their fingers pointed at them and the finger wagging and everything else.
	Meanwhile, the real corruption never stops.
	The real corruption never stops.
	And here's a golden opportunity: here's a golden opportunity for the Republicans to actually do something meaningful.
	Here's a golden opportunity that the Republicans have to actually institute some serious change in this country and stop some of the corruption.
	And they have no interest in doing it.
	They'd rather sit here and point the finger at Chuck Schumer.
	They'd rather sit here and play political football as the foreign aid continues and the American people continue to suffer.
	And they want you to talk about some government shutdown and snap benefits and feel bad because people that rely on the government that they're dependent on the U.S. taxpayer to subsidize their lives.
	And this is what I have to hear about all day.
	Why don't you do something meaningful?
	It's really simple.
	Call up your friends.
	Here's an idea.
	Why don't you call up your friend Marion Adelson?
	She seems to have so much money to spend on politics.
	She seems to really be a great person.
	She cares so much about people that she spends hundreds of millions of dollars of her husband's money on politics.
	Maybe Marion Adelson can bail out these people for a month, right?
	She has no problem bailing out Israel with her millions of dollars.
	Maybe she could be interested in bailing out the American people that are starving, Marion.
	They're starving, Mrs. Adelson.
	Oh, no.
	Hey, give us some money.
	We're going to build a new ballroom.
	No problem.
	Where do I sign up?
	Do I get my name on the plaque?
	Yes, you do.
	You, the traitor to America.
	You, the traitor to humanity, you, the person that helped steal an election in 2020.
	Just give us some money.
	We'll put your name on a plaque and we'll give you the honors of being cemented into White House and American history forever.
	Cool.
	And by the way, your stocks are up 25% this year.
	How do you like that?
	That should cover it, right?
	That should cover it.
	Your stock portfolio went up about 50 million.
	So just, you know, pay it forward and we'll put your name on the White House.
	Thank you very much.
	And then it's, oh my gosh, snap.
	Oh, my gosh.
	We don't have the money.
	Oh, no.
	The people are going to starve.
	We have to sign this bill.
	Sick of it all.
	So here we go.
	If the snap benefits cut off results and violence, it wouldn't be the first time.
	So there's this trend now on social media.
	You've probably seen some of it where these individuals are talking about if their snap cards get rejected, they're going to start stealing.
	They're going to start organizing and doing like these mass robberies, like a flash robbery at Walmart.
	Yeah.
	And we're just going to put up with it, by the way.
	We're just going to sit here.
	We're going to watch it happen.
	We're going to endure it.
	And your politicians are going to sit there and grandstand about it and make it a political issue.
	And they could solve the whole thing.
	They could solve the whole thing overnight.
	They could stop all of it if they really wanted to.
	If they really cared, they could stop all of it.
	Now, this is going to hit this weekend.
	People seem to get a little weird over Halloween weekend already.
	So this could just add to that.
	So, no, I'm not going to play this game.
	If we cross this threshold, which it looks like we're going to, I don't know.
	I don't see any movement from the Democrats to do this.
	And I would say there might be a couple Democrats.
	I would say John Fetterman is probably one of them.
	But there might be a couple Democrat senators that would probably like to reopen the government.
	But see, they're all measured too.
	So Fetterman could easily come out.
	And I think Fetterman would like to vote to reopen the government.
	I actually do believe that.
	But Fetterman, he's thinking, well, gee, because you know what's going on behind the scenes, right?
	Fetterman could go when they do the 14th vote and vote to reopen the government and get the votes to 54.
	But in Federman's mind, pragmatic for his own interests, Federman says, well, what's the point?
	Because if I go vote to reopen the government, it's still not going to reopen the government.
	And then Chuck Schumer is going to give me a call.
	And the DNC is going to give me a call.
	And you know what they're going to say?
	They're going to say, John, good luck.
	You're on your own.
	And when you're up for reelection, we can't help you.
	And when you need campaign funding, we won't have any for you.
	So Fetterman's not going to do it, even though he would like to.
	That's how it goes.
	So, yeah, Schumer and the Democrat Party are the ones holding it hostage.
	There's no doubt about that.
	But they don't bear all the blame for this.
	If our politicians actually cared about this country, they would solve this deal overnight.
	They would get it done.
	They would find the money.
	If anything, they would just repatriate all the foreign aid.
	But they don't want to.
	They don't want to.
	So when you see the rioting this weekend, if it goes that way, when you see the rioting this weekend, just know, don't let the Republicans put all the blame on the Democrats.
	Could the Democrats reopen it?
	Yes.
	In this moment, in a single action, is it the Democrats' fault?
	Yes.
	Yes, that is true.
	And it's Senator Schumer and the DNC holding the Democrats hostage to not vote for the reopening.
	But this is all the politicians.
	No, you Republicans are not going to get away with this.
	I'm not going to let you get away with this.
	I'm going to hold your feet to the fire because I vote for you.
	And we've done a lot of work for you.
	And we've suffered a lot for you.
	I'm not going to let you get away with this.
	I'm going to hold your feet to the fire.
	I'm not going to let you lazy bums.
	I'm not going to let you corrupt political scumbags play this game with the American people.
	I'm not going to let you get away with it.
	You're not going to sit here and point the finger at the Democrat Party for not releasing snap benefits.
	I'm not going to let you sit here and blame the Democrats because you can't get $8 billion for the welfare state in this country when you will gladly send another $8 billion to a foreign country tomorrow if the opportunity presented itself.
	No, no, not going to allow that to happen.
	And if any of you really cared, and again, I don't care.
	I don't mind being, I don't mind being the cold person here.
	I don't care.
	End the snap program altogether.
	Just end it.
	But if you do care so much, it's very simple.
	Pick up the phone, maybe call Zelensky.
	Say, hey, hey, hey, hey, Z. Hey, Z.
	Yes.
	Hey, Z, could you put down the?
	Are you with Hunter right now?
	Could you just hold on, Z is that Hunter right here in the back?
	Hold on, Z, Z, Z, Z, are you with me, Z?
	Yes, yes, I'm here.
	I'm here.
	Oh, Z. Hey, Z.
	We got a bunch of Americans that are set to starve.
	It's probably not even true, but okay.
	We got a bunch of Americans that are about to starve.
	And, you know, we've done a lot for you guys in these last couple of years.
	Do you think we could get some of that money back, maybe?
	Oh, no, no, no, no.
	We have no actually.
	Could we get some money?
	Oh.
	Oh, you guys need money?
	Yes, yes, we need more money.
	We need it.
	Oh, well, I called you because we need money.
	No, I know, I know, but we need money.
	We need the money.
	Oh, okay.
	All right.
	Well, I guess we'll give you guys more money then.
	Oh, great.
	Oh, yes.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Maybe it's Malay.
	Maybe it's Netanyahu.
	I don't know.
	Just call them up.
	Call one of them.
	They got billions of dollars of our cash.
	Maybe one of them can help us out for once.
	You know, if these Americans are really about to starve and be without food, which again, I don't even believe that, but let's just say, maybe one of these countries that we bail out, maybe one of these countries that we give hundreds of billions of dollars to, maybe one of them can step up one time for us.
	Maybe one time, any of you countries that take all of our money, maybe you can step up one time, one time for us and help us out and bail our people out.
	No, you can't.
	No, you want more money.
	Got it.
	So don't give me this crap.
	So I hope, I actually hope President Trump doesn't give a shit.
	I do.
	And when they bring this issue to Trump, because notice he's been pretty quiet on it.
	And when they bring this issue to Trump and they say, oh, President Trump, you know, we can't get this bill.
	We can't reopen.
	I hope President Trump says, I don't care.
	Leave me alone.
	Leave me alone.
	I'm done.
	I'm done.
	I don't want to hear about it anymore.
	If you guys can't figure it out, screw you.
	I don't care.
	I have nothing to do with it.
	I got my own agenda, whatever it is.
	I'm doing trips to do global trade.
	I'm doing trips to try to get world peace.
	I don't want to listen to Chuck Schumer and John Thune play political tiddlywinks together.
	I'm good.
	But Mr. President, the snap, the snap benefits, the people will starve.
	I don't give a shit.
	Bye.
	I actually hope that's how it goes when they bring this up to President Trump.
	But don't try.
	Don't let them do this to us.
	Don't let them do this to us.
	Now, if the people riot because they don't get their EBT cards, if the people riot because they can't get their snap benefits, okay, those are criminals.
	They should be dealt with.
	But don't do not let the corrupt political class bully you and shame you and point the finger at the other guy when they could have solved this issue overnight if they wanted to.
	So don't let them get away with it.
	No, specifically the Republicans.
	I don't care about the Democrats.
	They have no power.
	I'm talking about the Republicans.
	I don't want to hear it.
	I don't want to hear it.
	When they start rioting this weekend because they don't get their snap cards, I don't want to hear a damn Republican stand up and say boo-hoo.
	I don't want to hear a damn single one.
	Every single one of you has been sending hundreds of billions of dollars to foreign countries.
	I don't want to hear a damn word out of your mouths about the Democrats causing the snap benefits to run out.
	I don't want to hear a damn word from you.
	Don't do it.
	Don't go on TV.
	Don't go on Fox News.
	Don't say a damn word about it.
	The only thing I want to hear from you is we're going to repatriate all the foreign aid or we're going to shut down the welfare programs.
	Anything other than that, I don't want to hear from a damn Republican this weekend.
	I don't want to hear a damn word.
	Go play golf for all I care.
	Go hop on a jet ski in a lake for all I care.
	Don't go in front of the camera.
	Oh my gosh, the poor people.
	It's the Democrats.
	I don't want to hear it.
	Either go play golf or go on a vacation, or if you're going to go in front of the media, you better say we're repatriating the foreign aid or we're shutting down the welfare programs.
	Otherwise, I don't want to hear a damn word.
	Not interested.
	Don't talk to me.
	Don't want to hear it, you know, and I feel like most people probably agree with that.
	Refugees will be among the first to lose food stamps under federal changes.
	Have you been seeing these numbers, by the way?
	It's actually crazy.
	So these aren't even Americans.
	They're not even Americans.
	And this story goes on to talk about it's all these refugees and asylum seekers and all these non-citizens that are the biggest benefactors of the SNAP programs.
	They're not even Americans.
	They're not even Americans.
	In fact, from 2005 to 2019, U.S. taxpayers spent $457 billion on refugees and asylum seekers welfare for refugees and asylum seekers from 2005 to 2019.
	Now, imagine that number once Biden got in.
	You probably spent double that.
	So I would say it's fair to say, it's fair to estimate the U.S. taxpayer has spent $1 trillion on welfare for non-citizens living in this country.
	$1 trillion.
	And that's why I just don't want to hear a damn word.
	That's why I don't want to hear a damn word from these Republicans because they allow this to happen.
	They vote for this stuff to happen.
	And then they pretend like they care.
	They want to do something about it.
	They don't.
	They don't.
	I don't want to hear a damn word of it.
	But what about the open border?
	Biden brought him in.
	F you, man.
	And what are you doing about it?
	What are you doing about it?
	Hmm?
	What are you doing about the Biden border invasion?
	Are you going to call Maorkis for congressional testimony?
	Are you going to investigate Mayorkis for aiding and abetting in human trafficking?
	No?
	Then shut the hell up.
	I don't want to hear from you.
	It's obnoxious.
	A trillion dollars.
	So this is what I'm saying.
	Maybe this is the solution.
	You know, maybe we have to rethink this, actually.
	Maybe it's time to rethink the whole messaging here.
	I think it might be time to think about an entirely new system here, folks.
	I think it's time to talk about having an entirely new system.
	It's time to take some power away.
	Well, really, we should take most power away from DC, but maybe it's time to take some power away from these politicians in Congress, too.
	And maybe these things that they vote on, maybe we should vote on them.
	It's very simple.
	Instead of Congress voting on whether we should send another $100 billion to Ukraine, maybe we, the people, should vote on that instead.
	How about that?
	I like that.
	How about instead of another $40 billion in foreign aid to Argentina?
	How about we, the people, vote on whether we want that or not?
	We'll just take a vote amongst the Americans and say, do you want to send $40 billion in foreign aid to Argentina?
	And let's just take a vote, see what the American people think about that.
	Let's just take a vote.
	What was the number?
	30 billion, I think, they sent to Israel after Trump got in.
	Let's just take a vote.
	Just ask the American: do you want to send $30 billion in aid to Israel?
	Let them vote on it and let's see how it goes.
	And this is, see, this is, if you want to talk about the real problem with this country politically, if you want to try to boil it down and simplify it and put it on a nice plate for people to understand why this country is so screwed up politically, that's why, right there.
	Because 90% of the stuff that happens in DC, the American people would never vote for if they could.
	Never.
	They would never vote for it.
	But they don't get a choice.
	They get to vote for the fake two-party system.
	They get to vote for one corrupt politician versus the other.
	And if they're not corrupt when you vote for them, they become corrupt over time.
	And then they screw you over.
	I guarantee you, if the American people actually got to decide what happened with their money, none of this stuff would go on.
	All the stuff that Congress votes on and passes, the American people would never vote for it.
	It would never pass.
	You wouldn't see a dime of foreign aid.
	If it was up to the American people, I don't think there'd be a dime of foreign aid.
	If you sat down and you had the list of every single country that receives foreign aid from the United States and the American people got a vote with every single country, you can have every country and the dollar amount that they receive in foreign aid from the U.S. taxpayer, and we just had one vote on each deal.
	I don't think a single foreign country would get a single dime if the American people could vote on it.
	But we don't get to vote on it.
	Our corrupt Congress gets to vote on it.
	And they vote to send out the foreign aid every single time.
	And there in lies the problem.
	We, the people, have no real representation.
	We don't.
	And you could maybe argue.
	You could maybe argue that Donald Trump is the closest thing to real representation we've had in DC for a long time.
	I would be open-minded to that argument.
	But he still doesn't represent the American people.
	He still represents the global political system.
	And it's a perfect case and example.
	You vote for the guy, and then they get corrupted over time.
	And don't sit here and tell me President Trump hasn't gotten politically corrupted.
	You're fooling yourself, folks.
	You're fooling yourself if you believe that.
	Just live in reality.
	Join the rest of us.
	It's okay.
	It's okay.
	Don't exist in a cult.
	It's okay to criticize the president of the United States.
	It's okay.
	It's okay not to agree with everything somebody does.
	It's okay.
	It's all right.
	Don't freak out.
	Don't get emotional.
	It's perfectly normal.
	But that's what it is.
	Where is the representation?
	All of these things, if they were left up to a vote for the American people, none of it would ever pass.
	None of it.
	But it passes every single time in Congress.
	And there's your disconnect and there's your problem.
	And that's why so many people divorce themselves entirely from the political process because it is so corrupt, because it is so disgusting, because it's so infuriating.
	They just throw their hands up and they're like, oh my God, I'm out.
	I don't even want to follow it.
	I don't want to know about it.
	It disgusts me.
	I want nothing to do with it.
	And then the politicians see that and they're like, ooh, you mean we're the most powerful people in this country and we run the government and the American people don't even pay attention to what we do?
	The American people don't even know what we're up to out here.
	Oh, this is great.
	This is fantastic.
	Because God knows what would happen if they did.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	So that's what you get.
	And then here you go.
	Here you go with the political slop of government shutdown, and we don't have money.
	We don't have any money to pay people.
	We don't have money to take care of the troops and we don't have money to take care of air traffic controllers and we don't have money because of this welfare program that nobody voted for.
	And you need to feel bad because the political process in DC is so pure.
	The political process in Doshi, there's no corruption.
	We're all good people.
	So you need to feel bad when things don't go right.
	You need to feel bad when we can't continue to screw you over.
	You need to feel bad about that.
	Sorry, we don't.
	And isn't really, isn't that why Trump became so popular?
	Isn't that why we voted for Donald Trump?
	Now, I don't think it's the Donald Trump we voted for in 2016, but it's still Donald Trump.
	But isn't that the Donald Trump vote a middle finger to the political establishment?
	Wasn't that the 2016 Trump campaign?
	The whole establishment is corrupt.
	Screw them all.
	We're voting Donald Trump.
	Wasn't that what we voted for?
	I thought that's what MAGA wanted.
	But they've fallen right back into the process.
	And now they're not even asking for simple change.
	They're not even demanding getting rid of obvious corruption.
	They're just falling right into line, eating the slop.
	And you watch.
	It'll be so predictable.
	If they start rioting or doing these group therapy sessions of mass organized retail theft, the Republicans will point the finger at Chuck Schumer.
	The media will come out and pick which side that they're on.
	And the real issue, the real problems, won't even get a look.
	Won't even get a mention.
	And somehow the American people will somehow, you'll get blamed and you'll have to bail it all out once again.
	And we're just, we're so sick of it.
	We voted for Donald Trump in 2016, but now we're right back on course.
	Right back on course.
	no different.
	And it's too bad.
	I don't know.
	I don't know if we're ever going to have an opportunity like this ever again.
	You can't, it's not guaranteed.
	You definitely can't guarantee it.
	This is the perfect opportunity for President Trump, his administration, and the Republican Party to actually institute real change in Washington, D.C.
	And as President Trump promised in his original inaugural address, to give the country back to we the people.
	This is the golden opportunity, but they're not going to do it.
	And they have no interest in doing it.
	And that sucks.
	And that sucks for all of us.
	But that's what it is.
	Well, you know, I hate to say it, but it's true.
	Maybe these people need some emergency food supplies.
	I'm just saying.
	Maybe they need to go and get some emergency food supplies.
	And then they wouldn't have to worry about running out of food with the government shutdown.
	Just an idea.
	Just an idea.
	Our friends over at MyPatriot Food Supply.
	Go to mypatriotsupply.com/slash Owen.
	The special is still live, folks, but it's going to be gone.
	It's not going to last much longer.
	I want to let you know they have a countdown on their website right now.
	You've got just over a day to take advantage of the winter prep special, three-month emergency food kit with $400 in free gifts.
	Now, as you know, as I've been telling you, if you've been listening, and this is the special thing that's in there: that's the Vesda space heater, the Vesda space heater, which does not use electricity.
	It runs on canned heat, which is an indoor safe fuel.
	And not only is it an electricity-free indoor-safe space heater, it also can be used to boil water or cook food in an emergency.
	So that's the real cool thing about this winter prep package.
	It's a little depressing here to hear that word winter if you're me.
	I'm not a big fan of the cold weather, but nowadays, if I'm getting up early in the morning at like 6 or 7 a.m., it's kind of cold out.
	It's a little windy.
	I'm getting a little upset.
	But it is winter.
	It's undeniable.
	The cold weather is coming, if not already here.
	And so you need to be prepared for winter emergencies, which seem to be more common.
	The power going out, grocery stores closed, whatever the case is.
	Make sure you and your family are prepared.
	Go to mypatriotsupply.com/slash Owen.
	And this is the final day with a little change.
	This is the final day with some change to take advantage of this special.
	So normally, with the normal rates for all the goods in this three-month emergency food kit, the emergency food, the different things that are in there, like the space heater, the water filter, so much more.
	This discount will be gone in one day, eight hours, and 59 minutes.
	So go to mypatriotsupply.com/slash Owen.
	Take advantage of this, folks.
	You got one day left.
	Take advantage of this because this winter prep special is gone after this weekend.
	It will no longer be there.
	So if you've been thinking about it or sitting on the fence or waiting, can't wait any longer.
	Comes to an end this weekend.
	Mypatriotsupply.com slash Owen.
	So take advantage of that.
	And don't be these people that rely on the government for everything.
	Become self-sustaining.
	Have an emergency plan.
	Have an emergency food kit.
	Have an emergency preparedness kit.
	And go to mypatriotsupply.com/slash Owen to do so.
	Thank you to our friends at MyPatriot Supply.
	All right.
	That does it for our number one.
	We're going to come back and look at what Trump is doing right now with the military.
	You're listening to the Owen Report on the Wynn Network.
	nuclear bombs navigating between the sane and insane it It's the Owen Report with Owen Schroyer.
	Hold on, are you seeing this?
	Kamala Harris is now doing hit pieces on Joe Biden.
	Wow.
	Loyalty in DC.
	It's almost like it doesn't even exist.
	All right, what is Kamala Harris doing attacking Joe Biden?
	That is not a...
	That is not an empty move.
	She's working something.
	She's working an angle.
	I don't know what it is, but that's an angle.
	To do a sit-down interview attacking Joe Biden and then trying to rejuvenate your political career off of this.
	What is Kamala Harris up to?
	What has she got planned?
	What does she have up her sleeve?
	That's not a one-off gesture.
	That's something else.
	Well, of course, it's really easy to go after Joe Biden right now.
	He's probably in an iron lung.
	He's drooling out of his mouth.
	I don't even know where he is.
	I don't know who he is.
	And somebody said this today.
	They were like, gee, it's funny.
	The Democrats, they didn't pick up the phone to call Joe Biden to help them in New Jersey or Virginia or New York.
	They didn't pick up the phone to call Joe Biden.
	They called Barack Obama.
	I can only imagine.
	Obama's probably so sick of it at this point.
	He's like, man, I made you guys cool for eight years.
	I made you guys cool.
	And now you've made the Democrats losers again.
	So I don't even want to do it.
	But, you know, it's all blackmail.
	It's all reputational blackmail.
	So he's going along unwittingly, or unwillingly, I guess I should say.
	And you can see it when he's doing these promos, when he's doing the campaigning for these Democrat candidates.
	You can tell he doesn't want to do it.
	You can tell he's being forced to do it.
	It's kind of funny.
	But isn't it?
	It is.
	So, okay, well, they didn't call Joe Biden because he's undergoing cancer treatments right now.
	So Joe Biden is not really available to help campaign.
	But I'll tell you what the significant one here is.
	It's not that they're not calling Joe Biden.
	It's not that they are calling Barack Obama.
	That's not surprising.
	No, it's why aren't they calling Kamala Harris?
	Why are the Democrats calling Obama and not Kamala Harris to help them campaign in New York, in Virginia, in New Jersey?
	Hmm.
	And then you see Kamala's now doing anti-Joe Biden pieces.
	I sense something brewing here.
	I sense something brewing.
	I think Kamala might have a chip on her shoulder.
	I feel like Kamala has a little, she feels a little betrayed.
	Come on, Kamala.
	You got to be smarter than that.
	I guess she was kind of naive heading into this deal, huh?
	You really thought that you were dealing with honest people?
	Come on.
	Come on, Kamala.
	What is Kamala working right now?
	There's something going on there.
	There's something going on there.
	The Democrats not picking up the phone and asking her to campaign, and then she's doing a Joe Biden hit piece.
	There's something working.
	Something's going on with that deal.
	I don't know what it is, but it's something.
	I'll tell you that.
	All right.
	So Trump making headlines today.
	How do you feel about this one?
	This is like out of nowhere, by the way.
	It's like, where did this come from?
	Trump directs nuclear weapons testing to resume for the first time in over 30 years.
	Maybe this is why Bill Gates is backing off the man-made climate change thing.
	How do you think nuclear weapons testing helps Earth's environment?
	How do you think that does for the Earth and its atmosphere?
	You think that's any good?
	You notice they never complain about that.
	It's funny because it's all controlled, obviously.
	All the climate change activists.
	It's funny.
	You guys never mention all the wars.
	You don't seem to be anti-war as just a general stance.
	Is war good for the climate?
	I'm just curious.
	Do you think war is good for the climate?
	How much carbon do you think is emitted over a war?
	Hmm.
	How much carbon do you think is emitted when we blow up nuclear weapons?
	I don't hear any of you guys talking about that.
	So, okay, out of nowhere, Trump directs nuclear weapons testing to resume.
	Now, when you understand how Trump operates, this is obviously some sort of political chest pumping.
	This is political chest puffing up.
	I don't know if there's any real desire to start nuclear weapons testing again.
	I kind of doubt it.
	But if there is, folks, that's a bad sign.
	Don't you think that's a bad sign?
	And what happened to the Trump from the first administration that wanted to denuclearize the entire world?
	Remember that, Trump?
	Remember when Trump was pushing to denuclearize the entire world and its militaries?
	Well, I guess that's no longer on the agenda.
	Now we're going to start nuclear weapons testing again.
	So is this President Trump just puffing up his chest because of the drills that Russia is doing and North Korea is doing and China is doing?
	And they're kind of puffing up their chest a little bit.
	Now, of course, Trump is ignoring this for obvious reasons, but now Israel is saying that Iran's got nuclear weapons again.
	Oh, who could have seen it coming?
	You mean, I thought we blew up their nuclear weapons facility.
	By the way, can I tell you, here's what I think went down.
	And Trump has done this before, by the way.
	He's admitted he's done this before.
	I think Trump, and he's probably, I think he's mostly friends with the Israeli lobbyists.
	I think he's friends with these people.
	I think he's friends with Marion Adelson.
	I think they get along.
	I think they like each other.
	And it's really the entire, you know, Israel first wing, let's say.
	And we all know who they are.
	So that's fine.
	That's their issue.
	And I think Trump is friends with them.
	They have a good relationship.
	But he knows they're basically foaming at the mouth.
	I mean, they're foaming at the mouth psychotics on Middle East policy.
	And they have a lot of hatred in their heart.
	So I think Trump calls up Iran and he's like, look, I got the Israeli lobby foaming at the mouth, drooling all over me to bomb you guys.
	Okay?
	They won't shut up.
	They won't leave me alone.
	They're the only people Susie Wiles allows in my office.
	And I'm kind of getting tired of it.
	So here's the deal.
	All right.
	I'm sending over a bomber and we're going to drop a couple bombs on you.
	All right.
	We're going to have to do it.
	I got to get them out of my face.
	I got to get them out of my office.
	I think they're becoming psychotic.
	They're foaming at the mouth.
	I got to bomb you guys.
	So we're going to run a bomber in, drop a couple bombs and get out of there.
	And there's signs that show Iran was actually anticipating this and there was a lot of activity before the bombing happened.
	So maybe somebody gave them a tip.
	So then it happens and then it's supposed to be over, right?
	So Trump can come out.
	He can take his victory lap and he can say, all right, we did it.
	We bombed Iran.
	You're welcome.
	We bombed Iran.
	We bombed the terrorists.
	We bombed the bad guys.
	The Israeli lobby celebrates.
	They clap their hands.
	They got to see people they hate blow up and die.
	They love it.
	And Trump's like, okay, I can move on from this.
	I can move on.
	I can do some other things.
	Let's put this behind me.
	I can deal with other business.
	All right.
	Everything's great, right?
	We blew it up.
	We destroyed it.
	Everybody happy?
	You guys happy?
	Can you wipe the foam off of your lips?
	Okay, Levin?
	Can you clean up your face?
	You're covered in your own foam here.
	You're frothing at the mouth.
	Okay, we're good.
	We blew up Iran.
	You good?
	Okay.
	And then it didn't take a month.
	Iran has a nuclear weapon.
	We have to strike Iran.
	We have to take it.
	Oh, okay.
	So what is it?
	Why is Trump saying this?
	Is it pumping up the chest or are we actually entering a very serious problem here?
	Because this is no joke.
	Now, again, I understand how Trump operates and I understand how he uses the media and headlines to move chess pieces around on the board before he decides to make his next move.
	I probably would say the odds are that that's what this is.
	This is Trump making headlines and saying something ahead of some other move he wants to make.
	But folks, if this is serious, if we're talking about ramping up nuclear weapons testing and getting ready to potentially use nuclear weapons again, because why else would you test?
	That's kind of a big deal, don't you think?
	It's kind of not a minor thing to talk about using nuclear weapons.
	That's kind of like one of the biggest deals, actually.
	So what's going on here, man?
	Peacetime president wants a Nobel Peace Prize.
	Sorry.
	I can love President Trump as much as anybody.
	But I'm not going to be delusional.
	I'm not going to turn into just a liar.
	If Donald Trump can accomplish what he wants to and get peace deals done and actually stop these wars, then okay, I will talk about Donald Trump getting a Nobel Peace Prize.
	But right now, they're killing people left and right.
	There's no peace prize in the conversation here.
	Stop it.
	I'm sorry.
	President Trump might want a Nobel Peace Prize, and he might be doing work so that he can fall into the category of winning a Nobel Peace Prize.
	Of course, the whole thing is bastardized.
	The whole Nobel Peace Prize thing is fake now, anyway.
	It's all political.
	They gave one to Obama while he was killing people.
	So the Nobel Peace Prize really has lost all meaning.
	But let's pretend it has some.
	Let's pretend it has some value.
	So President Trump might want the Nobel Peace Prize, and he might be doing things to try to put himself in a position to actually earn it.
	But stop this.
	Donald Trump's name does not belong anywhere near this conversation.
	Not when he's killing people coming over here on boats.
	Not when he's sending military aid to Israel and Ukraine.
	Sorry.
	No.
	No.
	It's ridiculous.
	And now we're talking about nuclear testing for weapons?
	Nuclear weapons testing?
	Stop it.
	There's no Nobel Peace Prize in this conversation.
	Stop lying to yourself.
	Say, come back down to reality.
	It's okay to support Trump, but also be an honest person.
	Seems like more people are having trouble with that lately, actually.
	You know, maybe that's how it is.
	It seems like a lot of Trump supporters are having trouble supporting Trump and still being honest at the same time.
	Seems to be an issue.
	So, sorry, if I think nuclear weapons testing is a bad sign, seems a little foreshadowing, if you ask me.
	I think it's mostly rhetoric.
	I think it's mostly saber rattling and chest bumping.
	But at the 1% chance it's not, that's a little frightening, especially since Russia and China and North Korea, whatever that's worth, all of them doing the same saber rattling.
	I don't like that.
	If Thomas Massey wants to run for president, folks, he'll run and he'll be a serious contender.
	This is the issue right here.
	And this is what people are sick of on both the left and the right.
	The military-industrial complex, as we were warned from Dwight Eisenhower.
	The military-industrial complex demands about $50 billion per year in war.
	As soon as we quit spending $50 billion per year in Afghanistan, we started spending $50 billion per year in Ukraine.
	Watch where the next $50 billion per year goes when we stop sending it to Ukraine.
	The military-industrial complex is always hungry.
	Thomas Massey is right.
	And that's the rhetoric that will win the next presidential election.
	Do not doubt me on this.
	That is the rhetoric that will win the next presidential election.
	Now, what will happen is, once all the other candidates realize that this is the most popular thing that you can say, and you'll draw votes from the left and the right on this issue and standing against it, then all the other politicians will say it too and just lie about it.
	And as soon as they get in, they'll continue the military-industrial complex spending.
	This is how it always goes.
	And the proof is right there in front of you: Barack Obama, Donald Trump.
	Exact same story.
	Both were anti-war candidates.
	Both campaigned as anti-war candidates.
	And then as soon as they got back in, the wars kept going.
	Now, look, Trump is nowhere near as bad as other presidents have been, especially Barack Obama.
	So before the, you know, before the Trump cultists out there start ripping their hair out and flipping their desks and screaming at inanimate objects, calm down, lower your blood pressure.
	Trump is nowhere near the war hawk that all the other presidents have been.
	All right.
	Calm down.
	So just calm down.
	Lower your blood pressure.
	I know you're freaking out.
	Some things tend to trigger you guys.
	You're kind of like the woke left now.
	But let's not pretend like Trump isn't supporting the military-industrial complex.
	Let's also not be delusional here.
	Trump hasn't stopped sending money to Ukraine.
	Trump hasn't stopped sending money to Israel.
	It's all still going on.
	All right.
	Now, Trump, I think, extremely hesitantly bombs Iran.
	I think Trump extremely hesitantly in his first administration bombed Syria.
	I don't think he wanted to do it.
	I don't think he liked doing it, but he made the decision to do it.
	But I don't think he liked it.
	And I think he tried as best as he could to limit loss of life or reactionary response to it to make it worse.
	But the military-industrial complex is very strong today.
	It's doing very well.
	But the proof is in the pudding.
	Barack Obama won.
	He got votes from the left and the right because he was against the wars and he won.
	Now he got in.
	The wars continued.
	Donald Trump, anti-war candidate.
	2016, anti-war candidate.
	All during the Bush years, Trump was against the foreign intervention in the Middle East, wins the election, gets in office, military-industrial complex continues.
	Now, Massey could be one to stop it.
	I don't know.
	But this is going to be the winning message.
	Just like it was when Obama won, just like it was when Trump won.
	This will be the winning message.
	The anti-war candidate will always surge to the top.
	It happens every time.
	Now, most candidates are scared to go there because there's so much money for war and there's so many political contributions that come in for supporting the wars.
	So most candidates are too afraid to even be anti-war because the money stops coming in.
	But then once somebody else kind of breaks that, breaks that glass wall, then the rest of them will pretend to be anti-war, even though they really aren't.
	Russia says it did not test a nuclear weapon, but if the U.S. does, it would too.
	So what is this?
	Why are we nuclear war?
	What are we doing?
	Who is talking about nuclear war?
	Who wants nuclear war?
	Are we really doing this?
	What do you think is going to be worse?
	Here, let's set this up in an entirely different perspective.
	How about that?
	Let's look at a different mindset.
	What do you think would be worse?
	People that receive snap benefits not getting their snap benefits anymore, or somebody using a nuclear weapon?
	What do you think would be worse?
	What do you think is a bigger deal?
	Somebody not giving government welfare or a government using a nuclear weapon?
	What do you think is a bigger deal?
	And which one's getting all the attention?
	Yeah.
	I think that sums it up.
	Now, here's some of the weird stuff that's going on.
	And I mean, you can read these stories, and it's all very gray.
	It's all very inexplicit.
	Top Trump officials are moving on to military bases.
	Stephen Miller, Marco Rubio, Christy Noem, and others have taken over homes that until recently housed senior officers.
	The former White House advisor, Katie Miller, mother of three young children and wife of the presidential right-hand man, Stephen Miller, walked out of her front door one Thursday morning last month and was confronted by a woman she did not know.
	When she told this story on Fox News, she described the encounter as a protest that crossed a line.
	And so this radical, probably liberal, was basically threatening and intimidating her.
	But this seems a little, is this the decision that they're making for some of the top Trump cabinet officials because they need to do this for safety?
	And whatever normal precautions that they're taking for safety aren't enough or it's becoming too complex.
	That seems like the simple answer.
	I would say that's a simple answer.
	And that's kind of the presentation that you get in the stories on this today.
	But I wonder if there isn't something else happening here.
	Like they're afraid that it's going to get worse because they're planning on doing something.
	I don't know.
	That's the more conspiratorial side of me.
	The simple answer to this is that, yes, it's an increased risk of violence from the Democrat left.
	And so the normal protocols for safety and security, it's just too complex.
	It's too hard now.
	So just move them onto a military base and it kind of takes care of itself.
	Or is there a reason they're anticipating an increase in violence?
	Is there a reason why they think it's necessary right now to get them onto military bases because they're anticipating something or they know something is going to go down that's going to cause these radical leftists to get violent again?
	And when you see stories like this start to point that direction, Pentagon readying thousands of guard reaction forces as U.S. mission widens.
	The Pentagon has ordered thousands of specialized National Guard personnel to complete civil unrest mission training over the next several months, an indication that the Trump administration's effort to send uniformed military forces into urban centers once reserved for extraordinary emergencies could become the norm.
	No, I would say it's an extraordinary emergency that we have right now.
	We just had an invasion of the country.
	20 million people come in here illegally, many of them violent criminals.
	There's a deportation effort underway to get them out, but there are radical left-wing terrorists that are stopping them.
	So, no, I would say we're in a pretty extraordinary emergency, actually, Washington Post.
	But to me, you look at these two stories, I think something big is about to happen.
	Either they're about to launch a massive deportation deal, or Trump's about to occupy some, maybe some entire cities to try to stop the crime.
	I don't know.
	But I mean, you combine both of those stories, and it tells me something's going down.
	That's what that tells me.
	Something's going down.
	Those are not minor things in my eyes.
	People are complaining about this, but you won't hear a complaint from me.
	Trump swaps decorated admiral with 33-year-old Doge staffer.
	I actually like this one.
	The highly unorthodox personnel change affects a critical government research role.
	Well, you got all these admirals in there, they got a bunch of medals and everything else, but they don't really fight or win wars.
	They're just political, political people.
	And so they give them all that brass to try to make them look authoritative.
	I am okay with this.
	More Doge.
	I can't get enough Doge.
	More Doge, anyway, every way.
	I want more.
	Let does just run everything.
	Kash Patel looks to block Tulsi Gabbard's rise as Trump team Intel split intensifies.
	This is getting very interesting.
	We had the stories developing earlier this week with Cash Patel shutting down Tulsi Gabbard and Joe Kent from investigating potential foreign involvement in Charlie Kirk's assassination.
	And now, this sharp divide at the top of America's national security apparatus is bursting into public view.
	As the FBI has told Congress, it strongly opposed a plan that would hand the nation's counterintelligence reigns to the office of the director of national intelligence.
	That's Tulsi Gabbard.
	The Bureau reported, the Bureau reportedly warned lawmakers against expanding the authority of Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard.
	A letter obtained by the New York Times showed Gabbard's office would gain sweeping new power under the proposal that was shot down by Congress, highlighting growing unease and division across federal agencies.
	Well, no, it mostly just seems to be between Patel and Gabbard, is where that seems to be focused.
	Gabbard's team reportedly planned to promote the changes, putting them in another letter in its note.
	The FBI challenged claims from Gabbard's office that the broader intelligence community was unified in backing a plan that would place her office at the forefront of counterintelligence operations.
	All right, so it goes on, and they don't mention this in this story, but I think it's kind of the elephant in the room here.
	And they get back into the Joe Kent story and everything else.
	And then, you know, how Susie Wiles is kind of deciding who gets access to Trump throughout this entire debate.
	Now, I'm not saying that this has anything to do with the Charlie Kirk assassination.
	I think that you can have two things going on.
	Now, I could see the FBI using the Charlie Kirk assassination as the excuse, let's say, as the opportunity to maybe push Gabbard out of a lot of different things.
	What I think, and I think a lot of people believe this too, is you have members of this administration that don't like Tulsi Gabbard, and it has nothing to do with her being a Democrat senator.
	Nothing to do with that.
	The reason they don't like Tulsi Gabbard is because she's not a dyed-in-the-wool Zionist.
	The reason why they don't like Tulsi Gabbard is because she's not an Israeli loyalist.
	That's why.
	This is my conspiracy theory.
	And so she's the only one in there that doesn't have the dual loyalty to Israel.
	She's the only one in there that doesn't have the boomer Zionist mindset when it comes to foreign policy.
	And there's people in there that don't like that, and that scares them.
	And I think that's why they're pushing her out.
	And I think that's why they're sending letters to basically try to demote her or decrease her role.
	And I don't think that's too much of a reach as a conspiracy theory considering everything else that's going on with this administration.
	I'd say, in fact, that's a pretty high likelihood that that's exactly what's going on.
	And you know what else Tulsi Gabbard has always been?
	Anti-war.
	And they don't really like that in D.C. either.
	And so maybe it's that simple.
	Maybe it's just that simple.
	Now, this is where we're going to eventually reach a point where it's going to be impossible not to talk about this.
	We're going to reach a point where the conversation is going to be impossible to avoid.
	New FBI files reveal Jack Smith targeted the entire political apparatus.
	Spark calls for Judge Boasberg's impeachment.
	So Boasberg was cooperating with Smith, and then Boasberg was running his own kind of silence, let's say, campaign, chilling effect campaign, trying to make sure that whoever was in the know about this spying, whoever was in the know about this political persecution, Boasberg was kind of the delivery boy to tell them, hey, keep this secret.
	We can't let this get to the public.
	And the way he was presenting it is that, you know, Republicans are traitors and anybody that supports Trump is a foreign agent.
	And so therefore, we cannot, we cannot, this has to be basically all secret.
	This has to all be secret and it may be even illegal, but we're doing it to protect the country is what they were basically telling people behind the scenes.
	So now this is all coming out.
	Now, the Republicans have been calling for impeachment of Boasberg and other judges for months.
	Are they impeached yet?
	The answer is no.
	Ted Cruz calls on House to impeach federal judge over subpoenas of Republicans.
	GOP senators push for Judge Boasberg's impeachment.
	So folks, eventually, and I don't know, you know, you've got the Trump loyalists out there that they're afraid to say anything negative about Trump, or they're just paid to say positive things about Trump.
	But you have to understand, even those people at the end of the day want deep state arrests.
	They do.
	And if you put aside the public statements, social media posts, and you sit down and you talk with them, they'll tell you they want the deep state arrests.
	And they'll even probably go as far as to say, if there are no deep state arrests, then this entire administration was a waste of time and worthless.
	And that might be true.
	I think a lot of people would probably feel that way.
	So the question is, it's kind of like with the Epstein list.
	Now, that deal is probably, that deal is probably dead in the water.
	I think that they've made that loud and clear.
	You're not getting the Epstein list.
	They're going to just go ahead and cover that up or whatever's going on with that.
	So maybe they can get away with that one.
	Maybe they can get away with that one.
	But deep state arrests, folks, the more this stuff happens and the more we find out about the criminal activity from the Biden administration and nobody gets arrested, eventually this dam is going to break.
	And there's no amount of paid social media accounts that can just put nothing but positive news out there.
	There's no amount that can stop this dam from breaking.
	And you know, maybe I should jump ahead here.
	In fact, let me jump ahead here.
	Let me jump ahead to this.
	So Dinesh D'Souza says this earlier today.
	And let me just get something clear here about Dinesh D'Souza.
	I really like Dinesh D'Souza.
	I think Dinesh D'Souza is a good person.
	I think that the crimes that they charged him with, I think it was all politically motivated.
	And even though I really disagree with Dinesh D'Souza on this issue, I think the body of his work has been extraordinarily positive.
	And I salute Dinesh D'Souza because he never backs down from a debate and he never backs down from a disagreement and he never goes low.
	Okay?
	So let me just say that about Dinesh D'Souza.
	I have a lot of respect for Dinesh, but he's totally wrong on this issue.
	So he says, we need a unified MAGA to fight this menace.
	And he's talking about the corruption of the Biden administration.
	He's talking about the corruption of Jack Smith.
	So we all agree.
	We need a unified MAGA to fight this menace.
	Do you expect conservative Jews and Christians who love Israel and Republicans, who want nothing to do with anti-Semitism, to simply say, no worries, we'll team up with Tucker and Fuenez to take on the left who created this divide?
	Now, I responded to this.
	I can read my response, but and then Dinesh D'Souza responded to me.
	Again, because he does talk.
	He doesn't shy away when I disagree with him.
	And he's debated Nick Fuentes.
	But see, this is there's when you deconstruct this and you understand the mindset and then the political action or lack thereof, you understand the problem here.
	Okay, so let's deconstruct.
	You need a unified MAGA to fight this menace.
	Who is the one that divorced the MAGA movement?
	Who is responsible?
	Because this insinuation is that MAGA is no longer unified, which I agree with, by the way.
	I mean, you could even say MAGA is dead, quite frankly.
	Trump doesn't say it anymore.
	Nobody really says it anymore.
	So you could even argue that MAGA is dead.
	Doesn't hit.
	Doesn't really hit anymore.
	In fact, if you want some easy rage bait on X, just post MAGA and you'll see that you could probably say MAGA's dead.
	So what happened?
	Why is there not a unified MAGA?
	There's not a unified MAGA because there is no MAGA.
	There's not a unified MAGA because the people that were supporting Trump in 2015 and 2016, their movement has now been co-opted and turned into something else.
	And all of the things that MAGA was supposed to represent got sidelined almost day one by what?
	The same foreign interests and foreign policies in the same Middle East wars that we just seemingly can't get out of.
	So then he says, do you expect conservative Jews and Christians who love Israel and Republicans who want nothing to do with anti-Semitism to simply say, no worries, we'll team up with Tucker and Fuenez to take on the left?
	Hold on a second.
	Hold on a second.
	You just said it, Dinesh, and you don't even realize it.
	Conservative Jews and Christians who love Israel.
	Dinesh, what country am I in?
	What country am I in, Dinesh?
	What country is Donald Trump the president of, Dinesh?
	Do you get it?
	So you're admitting, you might not realize it, but you just admitted the entire problem.
	Why isn't MAGA unified?
	Because it's not MAGA.
	It's all about Israel.
	And now the new MAGA and the new Trump loyalty test is: do you support Israel?
	And guess what?
	Most people don't.
	They don't care.
	Doesn't mean they hate Israel.
	They just don't care.
	You just admitted the whole thing.
	It's all about love for Israel.
	That's not MAGA.
	Love for Israel and Israel first and Israel foreign policy was not supposed to be MAGA.
	MAGA was supposed to be MAGA.
	And it just like just like didn't barely take a month before we're right back involved, bombing Iran, everything else, Netanyahu here, weapons of mass destruction, the whole damn same thing that we were all sick of.
	Throw the Epstein list in there if you want.
	We all know who Epstein was working for.
	And so there it is.
	So wait a second.
	So Dinesh, you just admitted right there, it's all about love for Israel.
	And if you don't pass the test of love for Israel, then you don't count.
	You're out of the picture.
	You're not MAGA anymore.
	You just admitted it.
	So who created that divide, Dinesh?
	And they say, and so he says, we'll team up with Tucker and Fuenes to take on the left.
	Dinesh, we're not talking about taking on the left, are we?
	We're talking about taking on Iran.
	We're talking about taking on the Muslim Brotherhood.
	We're talking about taking on Islam.
	We're not talking about taking on the left anymore, Dinesh.
	Do you see the problem here?
	So, yeah, the dam is going to break eventually, folks.
	Either this administration and the Republican Party is going to prioritize taking on the left and arresting the deep state or not.
	Or not.
	But you know who has stayed committed to that?
	Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes.
	That's never changed.
	What changed?
	Israel being the priority.
	That's what's changed.
	But because Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuenes won't make Israel the priority, they're the problem of why we can't deal with the left.
	None of this makes logical sense.
	None of it is make America great again.
	And at the end of the day, when this damn breaks and there's no deep state arrests, who are you going to blame?
	You can't put the blame on Fuentes and Carlson.
	You can't put the blame on the people that you claim are anti-Semites, which aren't, by the way, they're not anti-Semites.
	They just don't like our foreign policy.
	And maybe they have an issue with Netanyahu or the Israeli government, which I thought was a perfectly normal thing, but apparently not in this new movement.
	So what do you mean?
	So you just admitted the whole problem, Dinesh, is that the new gatekeeping test, the new access test, the new loyalty test is, do you love Israel?
	And if the answer is no, you're out.
	So it's not Tucker and Nick that are refusing to team up to take on the left, Dinesh.
	That's not who it is.
	It's Tucker and Nick and everyone else that want to prioritize taking on the left, that want to prioritizing arresting the deep state, that want to prioritizing draining the swamp.
	And now we're sitting here waiting in line because we're dealing with Israel again and we're dealing with Iran again and we're dealing with more foreign aid and more foreign wars again.
	We're not, we don't, we will work with you actually.
	I have no problem in working with all the Israeli loyalists.
	I have no problem in working with the Israeli lobby.
	No problem at all to take on the deep state and get deep state arrests and destroy the left politically.
	In fact, I thought that's what we were going to do.
	But then no, is it?
	No, instead it was you better prioritize Israel and dealing with the deep state and the left.
	Maybe we'll get to it.
	But if you're not with us now, then we're not going to do that.
	And who created that divide?
	So you're not going to be able to put this on us, folks.
	You're not going to be able to put this at the feet of Carlson.
	You're not going to be able to put this at the feet of Fuentes.
	They were the ones that are told they're out.
	Fuentes and Carlson are not the ones saying, hey, I don't want to work with you to destroy the left politically and arrest the deep state if you support Israel.
	No, I don't think they care.
	But I won't speak for them.
	I'll speak for myself.
	I don't like our foreign policy and I don't like Netanyahu.
	But I'll tell you right now, all the Israeli lobbyists, all the Israeli loyalists, I have no problem working with them.
	I have no problem having my differences with them.
	I'll team up with all of them right now to destroy the left politically.
	I'll team up with all of them right now to have deep state arrests.
	I will do it right now.
	I'll go to the front of the line and I'll put my neck out there again to deal with the corrupted left, to deal with the corrupted Democrat Party.
	You guys are the ones that don't want to do it.
	You guys are the ones telling us to wait in line.
	We are the ones trying to arrest the deep state.
	We are the ones trying to destroy the left politically.
	You guys are the ones trying to help Israel out any way you possibly can.
	That's you guys, not us.
	So you're not going to be able to put this at our feet.
	You can try as much as you want and you can try to name call as much as you want.
	None of it's going to work.
	And at the end of the day, when this damn breaks and there's no deep state arrests, do you really think that the people that are frustrated, do you really think the American people are going to look at Tucker Carlson and blame him because there's no deep state arrests?
	Do you really think the people are going to look at Nick Fuentes and say, geez, Nick, there's no deep state arrests.
	We didn't drain the swamp.
	We didn't take on the Democrat criminals.
	Gosh, Nick.
	That's your fault, Nick.
	Trump didn't arrest the deep state.
	Trump didn't drain the swamp.
	Trump didn't go after Jack Smith.
	Trump didn't go after Judge Boisberg.
	And now the Democrats won the midterms.
	And now the Democrats won in 2028.
	Gosh, Nick, it's all Nick Fuentes' fault.
	Do you really think that's going to work?
	You're not that delusional, are you?
	But maybe they are.
	I actually think they might be that delusional.
	Because let me find the response from Dinesh here.
	So I said, this is a swing and a miss at a ball in the dirt, Dinesh.
	The woke right label people who disagree just like the woke left.
	It doesn't stick.
	The majority of people on the right outside of the DC political bubble think more like Fuentes and Carlson than you realize.
	It's not just them.
	So he says, prove it.
	I think you're just pulling your mom's basement dwelling pals.
	Let me just be clear about one thing.
	I don't think I have any friends that live with their parents.
	All right.
	Just to be clear, okay?
	I'm a 36-year-old man.
	I have a lot of friends.
	I happen to be a very popular guy in Austin.
	Got a lot of friends.
	And I don't think any of them live with their parents, by the way.
	Okay.
	So nice try with the insult.
	That shows you're losing the debate.
	He then says the vast majority of the GOP is someplace else, and their regard for Tucker is based on the old Tucker, not the new one.
	Dinesh, I don't know who you hang out with.
	I don't know who you talk to.
	Okay.
	But I have a pretty normal, I would say, maybe robust social life.
	It's probably not fair to say robust because I really don't have time to do a social life, but I have social activities that I do.
	So this morning, I was at the gym by 8 o'clock, and then I was in the cafe at 10 o'clock after the gym, having a little breakfast.
	And I talked to probably a dozen people today, people that recognize me, people that I know.
	And I'm telling you right now, Dinesh, nobody thinks like you.
	None of them.
	None of them.
	So you say, prove it.
	Dinesh, I live in the real world.
	I talk to people.
	I have a relatively normy lifestyle.
	I go to breakfast.
	I go to bars.
	I go to restaurants.
	I go to sporting games.
	I go to concerts.
	I go to parties.
	I talk to normal people.
	I live in reality.
	I don't live in a DC bubble.
	I don't live in a political bubble.
	What do you mean, prove it?
	The real world is proof, Dinesh.
	I live in the real world.
	I don't know what world you live in.
	I don't know about your social life.
	I'm telling you, nobody thinks like you.
	And you can you can say, oh, it's basement dwellers.
	You're deluding yourself.
	You're deluding yourself.
	I talk to people that own businesses.
	I talk to people that are extremely successful, by the way, in Austin.
	I talk to professional athletes.
	Nobody thinks like you, Dinesh.
	What do you mean, polls?
	I live in the real world.
	But what's even crazier, this is what's even crazier.
	Go into Dinesh D'Souza's replies on his posts.
	Dinesh, they're 98% negative against you, brother.
	So what are you talking about?
	So I say this from a place of respect and love for Dinesh D'Souza.
	But you're so delusional that it's concerning, actually.
	And I say this with nothing but love and respect.
	Look at your replies on X, Dinesh.
	And fine, I agree.
	That's not a fair place.
	I wouldn't base reality off of X either, but let's not discount it.
	98% of the replies to you are negative, Dinesh.
	Okay?
	And almost 100% of the people that I talk to think more like Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes than whoever else.
	That's my real world.
	So I don't know what world you're living in.
	I don't know who you're talking to.
	I don't know where you think this anti-Fuentes Carlson stuff is coming from.
	It's not in the real world, brother.
	It's not.
	Doesn't exist.
	Period.
	But here's how it's going to go.
	When you don't get any deep state arrests, nobody's going to blame Tucker Carlson and nobody's going to blame Nick Fuentes.
	Nobody.
	They might blame you, actually.
	If anybody's going to get the blame in the media, they might blame you.
	But it's not going to be Carlson.
	It's not going to be Fuentes.
	No.
	But the real awakening, the real wake-up call will be if Democrats start winning elections again.
	That will be the real wake-up call.
	And you'll scratch your head, just like they're doing with Mom Donnie right now.
	They'll cross their eyes and they'll.
	How could they win?
	How could, because you just don't get it.
	You refuse to live in reality.
	You refuse to be honest about what the Trump voting base actually wants and what they're actually getting.
	So, no.
	If this administration does not result in deep state arrests, if this administration does not result in draining the swamp, if this administration does not result in all of Epstein clients being exposed and imprisoned, if this administration does not result in the military-industrial complex being crippled, they're not going to blame Carlson.
	They're not going to blame Fuentes.
	They won't even think of their names.
	Won't even come to the top of their head.
	And then the Democrats are going to take back political power.
	And then they're going to come after you again.
	And I know you've been through it before, Dinesh, so I know you know what it's like.
	But most of the people on your side have no idea what it's like because they're not a fighter like you, Dinesh.
	I know you're a fighter.
	But most of the people on your side, they're not fighters like you, Dinesh.
	They're going to go hide in a hole.
	They're going to be gone.
	And you'll be on an island and all of them will have abandoned you.
	And the people that would stand side by side and fight with you, they'll be gone too because you didn't want anything to do with them.
	And you threw them overboard and you called them basement dwellers and anti-Semites.
	None of which is true.
	It's going to be a real rude awakening.
	Because I'm telling you right now, all the people asking me, hey, why don't you get back out into the streets?
	Why aren't you covering these protests?
	Why aren't you out there mucking it up again?
	Folks, isn't it obvious?
	It's not even about me.
	I mean, I could sit here and easily make the case that I think I've done enough in the streets in the last 10 years.
	I could make the case that I've done enough in the last 10 years with all the persecution and the punishment that I've taken for my politics, but I don't care.
	I would gladly do it tomorrow.
	I'd gladly stick my neck right back out there tomorrow if I thought this movement was actually going to benefit me.
	Then I'd gladly step right to that front of the line again.
	But clearly it's not.
	So why would I?
	Why would I go back out there?
	And why would I stick my neck out there and risk my life for a movement that's going to throw me overboard the minute they get political power?
	Why would I do that?
	Say, because it's for the country.
	It's not helping the country.
	So I actually feel bad.
	I do.
	And I hope this doesn't happen because I do care about the country.
	So I hope this doesn't happen.
	But I'm going to tell you right now: if the Democrats get back power, they're going to be just as aggressive as they have ever been against their political opposition.
	And all the people that you think are friendly to you, and all the people that are all of a sudden the biggest Trumpers out there, not a single one of them will step foot in the streets.
	Not a single one of them will stick their neck out there.
	Not a single one of them would dare enter the arena if there was a potential of any loss involved.
	None of them are fighters.
	Trust me, I know I was in the arena.
	I was there in 2015, 16, 17, 18, 2020, 2021, jail in 2022.
	None of them, none of them were there, Dinesh.
	None of them.
	None of them.
	They're not going to be there, Dinesh.
	And the Democrats are going to come just as hard as ever.
	And they're going to look at the people like me that have been in the streets.
	And they're going to look at the people like Fuenes that have been in the streets.
	And they're going to say, where are you?
	I'm going to say, what do you mean?
	Where am I?
	What do you mean, where am I?
	Oh, you want me to go out there and fight for you that threw me overboard?
	Huh?
	Good luck.
	They'll all be gone.
	They'll all disappear.
	Oh, they're loud now.
	Oh, they're strong now.
	Oh, they're fighters now.
	Soon as the political power is gone, they will be too gone.
	I don't want to see that, but that's how it's going to go.
	And they're not going to blame me.
	It's not going to be my fault.
	But that's how it's going to go.
	And there's going to be a lot of people in for a rude awakening.
	A real rude awakening.
	And I guess I would close it out like this.
	I'll close it out like this.
	I got a couple other things on this topic, but I'll close it out like this.
	You know, I talked to a lot of January 6ers.
	I won't get too specific.
	Talked to some last night.
	But I talked to a lot of January 6ers.
	And the vast majority of them sound exactly like me.
	Okay?
	So these are the people that have suffered.
	These are the people that have actually paid the price.
	These are the people that have actually gambled with their own life, their own treasure to fight for this country.
	And now they're the ones being put in the back of the bus.
	They're the ones being told to get in the back of the line.
	And they're not happy about it, Dinesh.
	They're not happy.
	And they don't like where this administration is going.
	But these are the fighters.
	These are the people that will go out into the streets.
	These are the people that will actually muck it up with the violent left.
	These are the people that will actually be fighters for this country when it's needed.
	But guess what?
	When the Democrats take back power and they're ready to politically start persecuting people, all those fighters, they're not going to be there.
	They're not going to be there, Dinesh.
	And we all know why.
	Because they were thrown under the bus.
	They were thrown overboard.
	They were told to get in line.
	So they're out.
	They're out.
	And it's going to be a rude awakening for all you new MAGA, all you Johnny come lately Trump supporters that are feeling real cool, real strong, real powerful.
	Let's see.
	Let's see what happens when the Democrats get back in power and you're in their sightline.
	Let's see what happens when the Democrats get back in power and they put you in the trenches, in the prisons, in the courtrooms, in the censorship dungeons.
	Let's see how you like it.
	Because I can tell you from experience, it sucks.
	And all the people that were willing to do it for God and for country, they're not going to do it for you because you never did it for us.
	And that's the bottom line.
	You're listening to The Owen Report on the Wynn Network.
	Third and final hour of today's Owen report.
	Maybe is that a little heavy?
	Do we need to lighten it up?
	I don't know.
	I got other news on this.
	We got a little long-winded there.
	But I do have other news on this.
	We may decide to go there.
	We may decide to open the phone lines.
	I really do enjoy taking the calls after I kind of get a little hot and heavy like that.
	It's nice to just kind of open the phone lines, let you guys respond to that.
	You know, we opened the phone lines yesterday and we had a caller call in about his Cove Pure countertop reverse osmosis water filter right now available at a discount.
	When you use CovePure.com/slash Owen, CovePure.com/slash Owen, you can get the Cove Pure CP16 water filter for a huge discount.
	And he called in and he was extremely thrilled.
	His family was extremely thrilled.
	You will be too.
	Find out for yourself.
	Don't take my word for it.
	Don't take the caller's word for it.
	Find out for yourself.
	Go to co-pure.com slash Owen and you'll find out why we're so happy with this water filter.
	And I know it's like, there's no way.
	There's no way the water is that much better.
	There's no way that you can taste the difference.
	Oh, yes, you can.
	Yes, you absolutely can.
	I have no doubt if you lined up five glasses of water, I can tell you which one was from the Cove Pure water filter.
	I have no doubt about it.
	Now, the great thing about this system is it's not just a water filtration system.
	It's like in the future.
	This is like the most high-tech water filtration system that you can get.
	I love the fact that this is actually, I did an instant coffee.
	This is actually instant coffee.
	I put my instant coffee in the bottom of the cup, and then I just got my scalding hot water out of the Cove Pure water filter.
	Just one, well, I guess technically two buttons.
	One button, you hit the hot water, and then you push how much water you want to come out, and it's piping hot water.
	My instant coffee melts, ready to go, takes 20 seconds.
	So very convenient for that.
	If you want cold water, it'll give you ice-cold water.
	You don't even need an ice cube.
	It'll give you ice-cold water right there, push of a button.
	So that's how high-tech this thing is.
	Now, the other thing about water filters, especially when you talk about reverse osmosis water filter, and this is again what separates the Cove Pure water filter.
	A lot of them, you filter the water and it gets rid of the pH balance, the alkaline, the stuff that's normally in the water that's good when you do reverse osmosis.
	It basically gets rid of that stuff.
	This does reverse osmosis and then re-alkalizes the water.
	So it does the most pure effective filtration process that you can get, and then it re-alkalizes the water before it puts it in your glass, in your filter, in your cooler, wherever it is it ends up.
	So you can learn all about this.
	Go to co-pure.com/slash Owen.
	But I'm telling you, bring your water filtration into the future with the Co-Pure water filter.
	I've done it.
	Everybody that does it loves it.
	I've not heard anybody say anything negative about it.
	They all love it.
	And you'll find out why.
	But right now, you go to Co-Pure.com/slash Owen, and you can get this filtration system at a big discount.
	$200 off for the listeners of this show.
	That's right.
	You heard it right.
	$200 off for listeners of this show.
	It also comes with a pitcher.
	It's attached to the machine that fills itself up automatically.
	Fills itself up automatically.
	So can't beat it.
	Go to co-pure.com slash Owen.
	And we thank our friends at CovePure.com for sponsoring the show.
	So thank you guys.
	And thank you for the best water filter I've ever had as well.
	All right.
	It's hard to do another hour after you just get hot and heavy like that and really just knock it out of the park.
	It's like a grand slam.
	Speaking of, you know, we had the caller yesterday that asked who I thought would win the World Series.
	And remember, I said, I said, I got to go with my original Dodgers in six, even though I feel like because the Blue Jays won the night before, I kind of think it'll be the Blue Jays in six now, but I have to stick with my original.
	So I stuck with the original.
	I didn't switch it up.
	But now it looks like the analysis was right.
	I think that 18-inning victory actually killed the Dodgers.
	I think it did.
	And it's ironic that way.
	The 18-inning victory you think would be the momentum builder to win the series.
	And I think it's actually going to end up doing the exact opposite.
	But you always have to have a hero.
	And so the Blue Jays had a 22-year-old pitcher do something that only two of the greatest pitchers in the history of baseball have done.
	I don't even know the kid's name.
	22-year-old pitcher.
	I've never even heard of this kid.
	22 years old in the World Series, and he did something that only Bob Gibson and Randy Johnson have done in a World Series.
	I would say Bob Gibson is the greatest pitcher in the history of baseball.
	And I think it was, I think it was seven innings and 10 strikeouts in a World Series game.
	I think that's what it was.
	I can't remember what the benchmark was, but he got 12 strikeouts.
	And that's what you got to do if you're going to win a World Series.
	You have to have an unknown hero come up and put together a performance that changes everything.
	And that's what the kid did last night.
	Now, my problem is the Dodgers are kind of the evil empire in baseball now.
	And I'll leave it at that.
	And I actually, if you're a Dodgers fan, then good for you.
	And I do mean that.
	If you're a Dodgers fan, good for you.
	I don't know if there's a better team to be a fan of right now in baseball than the Dodgers.
	Probably the best it gets.
	The Dodgers do a great job with everything.
	They buy the best talent in baseball.
	And then I think they do the best ballgame presentation where you're not hearing blaring obnoxious music the whole time.
	They're actually on the organ still.
	So it's just like, man, I give credit to the Dodgers.
	They're the evil empire.
	And, you know, they've been a rival of my hometown team for years, but I give credit where credit's due.
	Probably the best time to be a Dodgers fan as ever, but they are kind of the evil empire.
	But I'm torn because I don't want a Canadian team to win the World Series.
	I'm an American.
	I don't want these, I don't want these Canucks in Toronto to celebrate a World Series victory.
	I don't want that.
	I want the World Series to stay in America, even if it is in Los Angeles.
	So I'm torn.
	I'm torn.
	But now I think now it actually probably will go seven games.
	I'd be shocked if the Dodgers didn't force this into a game seven, but who knows?
	Maybe the maybe that 18 inning victory just crushed them.
	Maybe that's how it went.
	All right.
	Do we want to go back into this topic?
	You know what?
	Let me go into this.
	Let me maybe just loosen it up a little bit, though.
	So you had Katie Miller.
	And by the way, I think Stephen Miller is one of the best in the Trump administration.
	And I also like Katie, his wife, too.
	And she's a little more, she gets a little more into the opinionated.
	And she hosts a podcast.
	So she gets a little more into the opinionated stuff.
	And so whatever props her lover or hater for opinion, but she does it.
	She goes into those waters.
	And she's on Piers Morgan.
	Now, I know people are going to want me to react to what she says here, but I'm going to do, there's going to be a little twist.
	I'm going to have a little twist on this.
	We're going to have a little different take on what goes down in this little debate with Katie Miller and Shank Uyger.
	But it's kind of hard because they're yelling.
	But basically, it sounds like she's threatening to deport Shank because he's an immigrant.
	So listen to this.
	Hold on.
	So all the pogroms were just going to be that Israel.
	Hold on.
	So all the pogroms.
	So, okay, obviously, Sank Uyger, very anti-Israel.
	Katie Miller, very pro-Israel.
	I would imagine Stephen Miller might be pro-Israel too.
	I don't know.
	He doesn't really make a big fuss about it.
	Stephen Miller, to me, from my perspective, Stephen Miller is just like, he just throws nothing but 110 mile per hour fastballs right down the plate in American politics.
	So he might be very pro-Israel.
	I don't know.
	He doesn't really, he doesn't really go out on that limb too much.
	Katie does.
	But okay, so you know, there's the attitude of, you know, if you don't support Israel, we're going to deport you.
	But put that aside, because this is actually what I took out of this.
	And I noticed, again, most people are like, oh, look, it's, you know, oh, look, it's a Jew threatening to deport somebody for not supporting Israel again.
	It's like, that's kind of the angle most people took, which I just look at it.
	It's a political debate.
	I just look at it.
	I don't take political debates personally.
	It's a political debate.
	She had her part.
	Sank had her part.
	I don't really, I'm not throwing any flags on that.
	I'm not throwing any flags.
	Heated political debate.
	All fine as far as I'm concerned.
	This is what I take out of it.
	You see, when the left gets into political power, they use it.
	They use their political power.
	They do.
	Many of us have felt the force of it, even.
	The left gets into political power and they use that power.
	They use it.
	And you know what?
	So do the Zionists.
	Oh, yeah, absolutely.
	And this is maybe this is another connection between the woke left and the woke right.
	But they use their power.
	You can't deny it.
	The people that are loyal to Israel and the people that love Israel that get into political power, they use it to benefit Israel.
	So I don't blame them for that.
	I actually, I always tip my cap.
	I say, yeah, they do it.
	But you know who never does?
	You know who never seems to use their political power to actually do what needs to be done?
	Conservatives.
	Republicans.
	They never do.
	Just look at this administration as the total case in point.
	We got strikes on Iran.
	We got regime change in Syria.
	We're carving up land in five different countries to give it to Israel.
	We got more military and financial aid to Israel.
	So, hey, the Zionists got in there.
	They got what they wanted.
	They got the political power and they got what they wanted out of it.
	Hey, good for you.
	I wish.
	I wish I could do that.
	I wish conservatives would do that.
	I wish Republicans would do that.
	What do conservatives want?
	What do Republican voters want?
	What do America First Patriots want?
	What do MAGA Trump supporters want?
	They want deep state arrests.
	None.
	They want to drain the swamp.
	Not drained.
	They want the Epstein list.
	Not getting it.
	It's a hoax now.
	Isn't it amazing?
	Isn't it amazing?
	It's like the only group.
	And honestly, it probably, if you could point to a cause or answer the question of why, it's probably because conservatives are actually the, if there is a morally superior group of people politically, it is conservatives.
	If such a thing exists of moral superiority in the political spectrum, conservatives are at the top of that totem pole.
	100%.
	But ironically, that's their ultimate problem.
	And that's why ultimately conservatives never get anything done politically and they never get any of the things that they want politically because they are just too good.
	They're just too good to do it.
	The left's morals, I don't even know if they have any.
	The Zionist morals is whatever it is to support Israel.
	Everything is fair game.
	Kill 100,000 Palestinians, whatever it's in support of Israel, fair game.
	So I just give credit.
	I give credit.
	I'm in the game.
	I'm playing the game.
	And I look at the people that are in the game that get things done.
	I say, good job.
	You know, if I play, if I play a baseball game and I'm a pitcher and I'm pitching against a hitter and he hits two home runs after me, after the game, I say, hey, shake his hands, say, good game.
	Got two home runs off me.
	You beat me today.
	So I give him credit.
	I give him credit.
	The left gets into power.
	They get what they want.
	They don't have the morals.
	The Zionists get into power, whatever they want.
	More money for Israel, more war for it, whatever it is.
	They get what they want.
	But conservatives and Christians and Republican voters and America first and everything, it's like we get into power and there's just nothing there.
	Just dead on arrival.
	Nobody wants to do anything.
	Nobody gets anything done.
	Everybody else gets prioritized.
	And then, oh, time's up.
	Sorry, you didn't get anything.
	So it's like a catch-22.
	It's like Christian conservatives are probably, if there is, if you even believe such a thing exists, and I'm not even sure I'm convinced it does, but if there is such a thing as moral superiority in politics, Christian conservatives have the moral high ground, but that's also why they never get anything they want because they're too good.
	They're too nice.
	They don't want to impose their will.
	They don't even want to flirt with potentially doing something wrong or unconstitutional.
	So they never get anything they want.
	And even when you get the candidate like Donald Trump that you think is finally going to be your wrecking ball, who sweeps in and gets everything they want?
	Is it the Christian conservatives?
	No.
	Now, I still think now this, this last night might have changed this, but I've always said, even though I like J.D. Vance, I do like J.D. Vance.
	I like him.
	And I also am, I'm also very much inclined to support younger people getting into power.
	I don't like it on the left.
	It's like I wouldn't support a young communist getting in there, but like there's part of me that's just like, man, we need to get these, we need to get these boomers.
	We got to get these people out.
	They just suck.
	I'm sorry.
	I love all you boomers out there.
	I love you all.
	And I'm not, I don't do the generational warfare and I don't make the blanket statements.
	I know a lot of you listening call.
	I love you.
	We're all in the same mindset.
	All right.
	But I can't help it.
	Part of my political inclination now is like, if you're over 50 years old, I want you out.
	I'm just, I want you out.
	We need fresh ideas.
	We need fresh blood.
	We need a reset of the system.
	Like, you got to go, man.
	I'm sorry.
	You guys, you guys have had way too much political power and nothing has gone right.
	Everything's gotten worse.
	So it's like, I just don't want you guys in.
	I just want you guys out.
	Now, I'd rather have a, you know, a Rand Paul or a Ron Johnson than an AOC, obviously.
	But what I'm saying is I like the fact that Vance is young.
	But last night, I think it was the best J.D. Vance has been as vice president last night.
	And he was at a TPUSA event in Ole Miss.
	And he stood up there and took questions from the audience for like over an hour, uncensored.
	And I was stunned because I'm like, there's no way.
	There's no way they're going to let him take uncensored, unfettered questions, right?
	It's the vice president.
	It's way too big.
	There's no way.
	He did it.
	He took totally uncensored questions from the audience.
	And he took the tough ones, folks, and he didn't shy away.
	You might not have liked his answer, but he took them.
	He took the tough questions on Palantir.
	He took the tough questions on Israel.
	He took tough questions even directly about Marion Adelson.
	He did it.
	And you may have liked his answers.
	You might not have, but he went up there and he took them.
	And I think he spoke.
	I think he spoke for the most part from his heart.
	I think that he probably catered his message a little bit, knowing he's the vice president, knowing where the political establishment is at right now.
	So I do think there was a little bit of a catered delivery.
	But for the most part, he came off as genuine.
	He came off as honest.
	Whether you believe him or not, that's, I'd say, what the average consumer of that event came away with.
	It was the best he's looked as VP.
	Now, depending on the results of the administration, I'm still of the mindset where things stand now.
	Nobody from the Trump administration is going to be electable.
	I still believe that, including J.D. Vance, and including even after last night.
	Now, you end up getting deep state arrests and everything else that we want out of this administration.
	Then whoever comes out of it and wants to get elected is a shoe-in, is a shoe-in.
	If you get deep state arrests, if you drain the swamp, if you end the military-industrial complex, all that good stuff, whoever from this administration that they tap to run and win, guaranteed victory, 100% guaranteed victory.
	But if you don't get those things, nobody from this administration will be electable.
	Nobody, because nobody will trust you.
	What are you going to run on if you're from this administration?
	Arresting the deep state?
	You didn't do it.
	It's like the Kamala Harris problem.
	Joe Biden was unpopular.
	Nobody liked Joe Biden.
	So they ran Kamala Harris.
	Well, that was basically Joe Biden.
	So when Kamala Harris went up there and said she wanted to do all this stuff, people were like, hey, you were just in there for four years and none of it got done.
	So what are we doing here?
	And it'll be the exact same thing with Vance or whoever it is if this administration does not do what we voted for it to do.
	So I would still say at this stage in the game, anybody from this administration is still unelectable.
	But Vance, I think, was the best he's been last night.
	That's where he thrives.
	And if this administration does end up draining the swamp, arresting the deep state, ending the military-industrial complex, repatriating all the foreign aid, everything else, then whoever runs out of this administration, 100% guaranteed they'll win.
	But if you fall short on these things, what are you going to run on?
	You can't run on those things because you were just in there and you didn't do it.
	So it's not going to happen.
	And maybe that's why Kamala Harris is separating herself from Joe Biden now in a very aggressive way.
	Because she wants to run again, but she doesn't want to have to answer those questions about, hey, but you were vice president for Joe Biden.
	Why didn't it get done?
	So she's probably going to have to go full on anti-Biden.
	And I mean, you know, he might be a vegetable in four years, so it may not even matter.
	But I'd say credit to J.D. Vance and TPUSA.
	Great event last night.
	Truly.
	Well done.
	I don't know.
	I'm over this issue.
	I don't think I can do it again.
	Let me just move on.
	Trump makes this statement.
	Virginia and New Jersey.
	Vote Republican if you want massive energy cost and crime reductions.
	The Democrats will double and even triple your energy costs, and crime will be rampant.
	A vote for the Democrats is a death wish.
	Vote Republican.
	Okay, President Trump weighing in, trying to get Republicans across the line in New Jersey and Virginia could help.
	But you know whose name was left off that?
	You know who didn't get a shout out there, didn't get a mention, didn't get the Trump boost?
	Curtis Sleewa.
	And I know why.
	It's not as bad as it looks.
	It's not about the Cuomo thing and everything going on with that.
	It's because Trump doesn't want to endorse somebody that's not going to win.
	So I understand why he left Sleewa out.
	But, you know, isn't it sad?
	Isn't it sad?
	And it's the same.
	It's like it's the same phenomenon that I was just ranting on in the second hour.
	It's the same.
	It's the same issue.
	It's like, here's Curtis Sleewa, who's literally out there in the streets fighting for New York City.
	Dedicated his life, you could say, to fighting for New York City.
	And then what do the Republicans do?
	They endorse the Democrat, Chris Cuomo.
	Excuse me, Andrew Cuomo.
	Not Chris, his brother, Andrew.
	It's just, it's the disloyalty factor, the grift.
	And Sleewa's not backing down.
	He's taking it.
	He's got a smile on his face and the whole thing.
	But it's just like, this is why Republican politics is just, it's just, at the end of the day, it's barely better than the left.
	Policy-wise, 100 times better than the left.
	Actually, like policy and issues, Republicans, 100 times better than the left.
	But like actual execution and loyalty and fortitude, it's probably worse than the left in those regards.
	This is the perfect example.
	Curtis Sleewa, the guy who dares to run as a Republican.
	Curtis Sleewa, the guy who dares to go on the streets of New York City.
	Curtis Sleewa, the guy who's dedicated his life to the city of New York and trying to keep things safe.
	And he's running for mayor again.
	Trump won't even mention his name.
	And the big Republican influencers in New York are campaigning for Cuomo, a Democrat, an anti-Trump, COVID tyranny Democrat.
	Can't even mention Sleewa's name.
	Sad.
	It's really sad.
	And then they'll say, well, Sleewa had no chance.
	Oh, gee, I wonder why.
	Why does Sleewa have no chance?
	Well, because you're campaigning for Cuomo.
	That's why.
	Because you're endorsing Cuomo.
	And the GOP can't even muster enough of a backbone to try to get any GOP leadership to back Sleewa.
	And they say he doesn't have a chance to win.
	Well, you're certainly not helping, are you?
	You're certainly hurting his chances to win, aren't you?
	Now, I still think Mom Dani is going to walk away with it, but I do think it's funny because I actually want I don't live in New York, so it's not going to impact me.
	So take it with a grain of salt.
	But part of me wants to see Cuomo win just so we can watch the Republicans that celebrate Cuomo winning and know to never, ever listen to anything they say ever again.
	As if you don't know that already.
	But that'll be the moment.
	That'll be the real moment.
	I want to see all of the grifters, all of the frauds celebrate should Cuomo win.
	I want to watch it.
	I want to watch all you phonies out there, you fake conservatives, you fake Republicans, all you grifting political trash.
	I want to watch you celebrate Cuomo win, and I want everybody to watch it.
	I want everybody to see who you really are.
	So for that reason, I kind of want to see Cuomo win just so you can finally have that moment of exposure and everybody can say, huh, you're not a Republican, are you?
	Huh?
	You're not a conservative, are you?
	You're a sellout.
	You're a grifter.
	Thank you for letting us know.
	Marjorie Taylor Green is apparently going to go on the view.
	This should be interesting, should it work out?
	The view sets Marjorie Taylor Greene as guest after co-host call for more Republicans on the show.
	The Republican Congresswoman will visit the ABC talk show on Tuesday.
	Now, look, I'm going to tell you something, and maybe I can go to the view.
	Actually, I was going to, I was not going to go to this clip because I just want to move on from the subject, but I guess I could go back from it now.
	So they're going to try to get her on.
	And I'm going to tell you how this is going to go and what the results will be should it happen.
	And this is going to cause such a panic.
	This is going to cause such a reaction.
	It's going to blow your mind.
	It will blow your mind.
	Because what's going to happen if Marjorie Taylor Greene goes on there is eventually they're going to go into the Israel subject.
	And eventually, what will come of it, either in that moment or eventually sometime down the road, what will come of it is that the vast majority of people on the left and on the right are going to end up coming together over a common cause, which generally speaking is the cause of foreign aid, but specifically speaking, on the cause of America divorcing itself from Israel.
	And there hasn't really been that kind of breakthrough moment.
	You kind of have the signs of it.
	And you kind of have some people in the political world talking about it and, you know, putting out memes and stuff about it.
	It's like it has a presence, but it's not a, it hasn't really had that break through the wall realization mainstream moment where it'll become overtly clear and obvious that both the left and the right have a common cause in ending foreign support for Israel.
	And this could be the moment that does it.
	And the amount of panic, you think it's bad, the attacks on Tucker Carlson now?
	You think that's bad now?
	If this happens, wait till you see what they do to Marjorie Taylor Greene.
	It will be more panicked.
	It will be a more vitriolic response than to anything Tucker Carlson or Dave Smith or Nick Fuenes have ever done or said.
	Because at the end of the day, this is what's clear.
	There is a very powerful political body that has a ton of money and a ton of influence, but not a ton of people.
	It's a very small group of people, but they have a ton of money and a ton of influence.
	And their number one political cause is Israel.
	This is not a secret.
	Trump says it directly even with people like Marion Adelson.
	So it's not even a secret.
	It's very public.
	But they still kind of have this aspersion cast on the American people that, no, it's popular and everybody likes it and it's the good thing.
	So it's not really just quite clear what there's a lot of fog over the issue right now.
	But when and if that happens, the amount of attack that Marjorie Taylor Green is about to endure will be unlike anything you've ever seen.
	Because the Americans, whose number one political cause is Israel, which everybody can see it now, they will be forced to come out and attack in unison, unlike anything you've ever seen.
	And it's hard for me to really get a grasp on it.
	It's like I can understand why a Jewish American would love Israel.
	I could understand that.
	You know, I can't relate to that.
	And I don't like that as a, let's say, a policy approach that because you have a loyalty to Israel, that that becomes an American policy, but that's the reality of the situation.
	And so, hey, fine.
	You're an American Jew.
	You love Israel.
	You have loyalty to Israel.
	All right, that's your thing.
	It's not my thing.
	That's not the majority of Americans' thing, but that's the thing.
	Okay.
	But see, what is becoming clear, specifically on the right, what has become clear is that at the end of the day, the issue of Israel and America supporting Israel is actually more important than any other issue to this political body.
	They will sacrifice anything.
	They would drop.
	If you could make abortion legal, but promise that America would always support Israel till the end of time, every single one of these people would accept that.
	Every single one.
	And so that's why this whole thing, what people are realizing, it's like, hey, gee, why don't they like America first?
	Well, because America first means no Israel.
	So what?
	Well, why does that bother you?
	Well, that's because Israel is your number one issue.
	If Marjorie Taylor Greene goes on the view and they go there and they have a moment of unity, watch out.
	This thing is going to blow up.
	And you will never see a more coordinated, vicious attack in American politics than what Marjorie Taylor Greene is about to endure.
	You've seen the worst probably aimed at Tucker Carlson, maybe Dave Smith, maybe Nick Fuentes.
	Combine all of that, and that will be what Marjorie Taylor Greene gets should it go down like that.
	And she, if anybody would be the one to do it, It would be her.
	It would be her.
	Now, all right, let me play this clip because I think this is from the view.
	Cynthia something, I think, is this woman's name.
	Famous actress.
	I believe this is from the view.
	Now, again, you can listen to what she says.
	You can take what she says and listen to what she says and like it or not.
	I'm going to have a completely different angle because, again, it's one of those things where I see everybody, they consume a piece of media and they kind of all have this response to what they're saying and they're missing an alternative angle.
	So I'm going to provide you an alternative angle on this, but I'm going to play the clip so that I can have the best approach here.
	But so here's this clip.
	She can speak for herself, this actress.
	And so you can like what she's saying or not.
	It doesn't really make any difference to me, quite frankly.
	She is a liberal.
	So you can listen to what she says, put whatever stake you want in what she says, but I'm going to have a different approach to this.
	Once we finish this clip, I'm going to have a different approach to this that I'm not really hearing anybody else taking.
	So just listen to this quickly from the view.
	Listen to what she says, and then you're going to hear a different take on this than I think anybody else out there.
	I am the mother of two Jewish children whose grandparents are Holocaust survivors.
	And my oldest son in particular, he really has been reaching out to my wife and I and asking us, imploring us really, to say, use your voice to affirm as loudly as you can that never again means never again for anyone.
	We have seen the deaths of over 16,000 civilians, Palestinians in Gaza, which include over 7,000 children.
	And to put that in some kind of a context, that is more civilians than were killed by the U.S. and its allies in almost 20 years of war in Afghanistan.
	And the images coming out of Gaza, the children who are, who have no water, who have no food, who have no homes, who have no shelter of any kind, weeping over the bodies of their slain parents.
	We need a permanent ceasefire right now.
	I think this is really a moment for moral clarity.
	And I think we need to look into our hearts and ask ourselves, do Palestinian children deserve the same safety as all other children do?
	And that's true.
	And of course, the answer is, I would hope, yes, they do.
	I'll say this one thing.
	That the amount of children who have been killed, Palestinian children who have been killed, is now twice as many children as were killed across two dozen war zones in all of last year in just eight weeks.
	These are not regular human casualties.
	This is off the chart.
	Okay.
	Now, again, I'm not even really going to comment on what she says.
	You can agree, disagree, whatever.
	I'm not here to comment on what she actually says.
	Here's what I'm here to comment on.
	Here's the angle I'm taking.
	All right.
	So that's liberal actress.
	I think her name is Cynthia something.
	I forget it.
	But, you know, liberal actress, leftist actress, whatever, Democrat actress.
	Okay.
	So people will hear that.
	And instead of actually listening to what she says, which I don't know, again, I'm not here to comment on what she says, but can you disagree with anything she says?
	Is there anything that she says there?
	If you just isolate what she says there, you don't know who says it.
	Can you really disagree with anything she says?
	Is anything she said really bad?
	Is that kind of like, yeah, that's kind of a universal thing that most people should agree with?
	Here's what I'm saying.
	And this is where the right wing is really, really in a bad place, some of them.
	People will hear that and they'll say, oh, she's a liberal, so I'm just going to reject it.
	Or they'll hear that and say, oh, she's a liberal.
	So I'm just going to take the opposite response.
	And this has been the approach on this issue specifically for such a long time on the right.
	And that's why one of the first waves of attacks that you get, it's kind of dead now, but it used to be the first wave.
	And it's kind of, you still kind of see it every once in a while.
	But the first wave is, oh, you're just like the left.
	So it used to be, and you still kind of see it.
	If you say something like, hey, I don't support Netanyahu.
	Oh, you're just like the left.
	If you say, hey, I don't want to have any foreign aid or funding for Israel or their military.
	Oh, you sound like a leftist.
	You're just a liberal.
	That's what you call the tail wagging the dog.
	And even though you think you're beating the brainwashing or you think you're beating the propaganda, in that moment, you are just as brainwashed and just as propagandized as the person that you think is your enemy.
	Because if you're of the cemented mindset that anything that person says, no matter what, I'm against it, then how are you any different than the left?
	And people like to make the joke and they say, if Trump says air is bad, then liberals will put a bag over their head and suffocate.
	But that's you on the Israel issue.
	A leftist says they don't like Israel.
	So therefore, I'm pro-Israel.
	It's the exact same.
	It's the exact same psychological phenomenon of a liberal just doing anything against Trump and you doing anything against a liberal.
	It's the exact same psychology.
	So just remember that.
	Don't fall into that trap.
	You know what?
	Maybe a liberal might be right about something every once in a while.
	Maybe a Democrat might be right about something every once in a while.
	I don't know.
	Maybe, maybe, maybe don't jump to any conclusions.
	Do not be brainwashed.
	Do not have a closed mind.
	Do not have a cemented mind.
	Again, agree or disagree.
	Whatever she says.
	I don't care.
	But you see it all the time.
	Oh, well, the left doesn't like Israel.
	So therefore, the right has to support Israel.
	You are no different than the liberal that goes and puts a plastic bag over their head because Trump said air is good.
	You are no different.
	You have the exact same psychology politically.
	So just know that.
	All right.
	You know, we're probably, oh my gosh, I got more on this issue too.
	I guess we'll just do it.
	We'll just go ahead and do it.
	I'm sick of talking about it myself, but it's on the desk anyway.
	Boomers want to axe property taxes.
	Millennials and Gen Z would pay for it.
	I'm sorry, what?
	I'm sorry, what?
	From Business Insider, boomers want to cut property taxes?
	Excuse me, since when are boomers cutting property taxes?
	Show me any tax cuts under the age of the boomers.
	Taxes have only gone up under the age of the boomers.
	It's the young people that want to cut taxes.
	Is Ron DeSantis a boomer?
	Ron DeSantis is a Gen Xer, if I'm not mistaken.
	DeSantis is the only one leading the way to cut property taxes.
	What do you mean, the boomers?
	No, but where's the boomer movement to cut taxes?
	So I don't know what that's about.
	But yeah, okay, I'm all for cutting property taxes.
	I don't care who does it.
	Let's get that done.
	That'd be nice.
	Here's a big win for Trump.
	Here's a huge win for Trump today.
	U.S. caps refugee admissions at 7,500.
	prioritizing South Africans.
	Now, Bloomberg loves to throw in that they're white so they can make some race argument here.
	The original cap was like, I think it was like 30,000 or something, or it might have been more than that.
	What was the original cap?
	Let me see if I can find it real quick.
	They're blocking me out of the story because I'm not a damn subscriber.
	But I have a screenshot here in my phone.
	Hold on a second.
	That's an interesting message in my inbox there.
	Okay.
	That should be interesting.
	Can't wait to open that.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	It was 125,000.
	Okay.
	So we had a cap of 125,000 refugees per year.
	Trump just cut it to 7,500.
	Huge victory.
	Great job.
	Great job, President Trump.
	Now, some people might want that at zero, but you know what?
	There's probably some people that really could come here and need to come here and can immediately benefit the country, like South African farmers.
	So great job.
	This was apology about.
	Now he's actually done it.
	125,000 refugees a year, which were mostly just welfare recipients, down to 7,500.
	And now there are actually people that are going to come here and work and make a living and contribute to the country.
	Great job, President Trump.
	This is a huge policy victory.
	Very well done.
	Good, good job.
	All right.
	Now, this is the proof that the issue of Israel is not just a major issue in America, but also in Europe.
	Now, Gert Wilders, I don't know if it'd be fair to say he's like the Trump of the Netherlands, but probably the best comparison you can make.
	Gert Wilders was basically the Trump of the Netherlands, you know, considered far-right, anti-establishment, populist.
	Kind of comes up, rises to power, gets much popularity.
	Well, his popularity is tanking now.
	His popularity is tanking now.
	Now, right now, in this process, where Europe is at, or specifically the Netherlands is at, they're like two years ahead of us.
	So like they're kind of going through like what would be Trump's midterms for a second administration.
	Netherlands is going through that right now with Wilders.
	So they're just like a year or two ahead of us as far as that's concerned.
	So take note of this.
	So Wilders has been wildly popular.
	And now they're facing major losses.
	Far-right party suffers big losses in Dutch election.
	Okay.
	Folks, this is exactly how it's going to go in the United States over the Israel issue.
	Gert Wilders is a major supporter of Israel.
	He's a very public supporter of Israel with his politics on his campaigns, just like Trump.
	Very popular, populist, very pro-Israel, start to lean into the pro-Israel stuff.
	And guess what?
	Now Gert Wilders is losing popularity and his party is losing power.
	Take note.
	Take note.
	Because I still predict the exact same thing is going to happen in America.
	The exact same thing.
	And the Republicans that prioritize Israel, they're not going to care.
	They just endorsed Cuomo.
	But this is going to happen, folks.
	This is going to happen.
	And it's, it's, you know, now this is the issue that you're going to get the most hate over.
	This is the issue that you're going to have the most threats to your life over.
	This is the most dangerous issue.
	And when I get off air tonight, I have an interview after the show.
	I'm going to be talking to Zeb Boykin in about 30 minutes.
	We've got 15 minutes left of the show.
	I'm going to be interviewing Zeb Boykin.
	He just did a ballistics report about what it looks like when you shoot a 30-odd six through a body.
	So we're going to really hone in on that tonight with Zeb for about 20 to 30 minutes.
	But I've been predicting this for years.
	A lot of these clips that you see of me going viral talking about this exact thing are from years ago, folks.
	Years ago.
	The clips where I'm talking about how Israel will lose all support in two, three, four election cycles, those are from years ago.
	Now, they don't put dates on them.
	So it looks like, oh, this guy just said this yesterday.
	Folks, those clips are from years ago.
	That was me predicting all of this years ago.
	And this was the next thing that I said.
	I said, look, this is not an opinion.
	This is not my opinion.
	You know my opinion, but this is not my opinion.
	I'm just telling you, if we continue to prioritize Israel on the right, you will lose elections.
	That is not my opinion.
	I could be the biggest Israel supporter out there.
	I could have the Israel flag tattooed on my forehead.
	Okay?
	This is not my opinion.
	I am telling you, the Republicans will lose elections if this administration continues to prioritize Israel.
	Now, we'll see.
	This is kind of the first test.
	It's a light test.
	It's probably more easily passable test with these special elections coming up in Virginia and New Jersey.
	But when you get to the big one, when you get to the midterms, it's going to be just like the Netherlands.
	And it's the exact same attitude.
	Gert Wilder's wildly popular.
	Can't lose.
	Populist, everybody on board.
	Comes out, big supporter of Israel, big proponent of Israel.
	And now they're losing elections.
	And the people are saying, what's going on?
	How could this be?
	Well, it's pretty simple.
	Israel is not the Netherlands.
	So you're prioritizing a foreign country.
	And guess what?
	The Dutch people don't like it.
	So they don't vote for you anymore.
	Again, this is not my opinion.
	And when you see those videos going viral of me online predicting this, those are from years ago, folks, from years ago.
	And people see them for the first time and they post them and they think I just said it yesterday.
	Those are from years ago.
	So I'm telling you, the exact thing that's happening in the Netherlands is going to happen in the midterms if this administration does not finally put the Israel issue aside.
	It's just the facts.
	This is not my policy thing.
	This is not, I'm, this is not my opinion.
	I'm telling you for a fact, that's how it's going to go.
	So you can call me all the names you want.
	You can have all the retorts, your blood pressure going, whatever.
	I'm just, that's exactly, that's how it's going to go.
	Okay.
	So respond accordingly, act accordingly, but that's how it's going to go.
	And I think the Netherlands is going to prove it.
	But the midterms will be the big, the big test.
	The midterms will be the real big test for us here in America.
	What else do we have here?
	200,000 ultra-Orthodox men block entry to Jerusalem, protest against serving in IDF.
	Now, this is a wild thing, and it's been building up for a while.
	So, you know, in Israel, you have to serve in the IDF, but there are exemptions for the Orthodox Jews.
	Now, the Orthodox Jews are very discriminated against, you might say.
	And they deal with all kinds of intimidation and physical threats because they don't serve in the military.
	The Orthodox Jews are probably the most discriminated people in Israel, maybe even more so than Christians and Muslims.
	And so they're trying to force them to serve in the IDF, which they don't support.
	And so now they're out protesting in the street.
	But mark my word, you won't see any of this in the Western media.
	You won't see any of it.
	Israel strikes Lebanon, killing three people.
	It's like a crackhead with crack, man.
	Israel just can't stop bombing people.
	Israeli troops kill municipal worker in South Lebanon raid.
	This is what your tax dollars are supporting.
	This is what your tax dollars are going to.
	Okay.
	Boy, oh boy, I don't know.
	Remember what I said the other day about the crypto Binance guy getting the pardon?
	Remember what I said about that?
	Was someone at the Wall Street Journal listening to me, or did they already have this scoop?
	How a billionaire felon boosted Trump's crypto company en route to a pardon?
	Uh-huh.
	Yep.
	We'll just go ahead and just fly on by that here.
	End of the show.
	This is disgusting.
	Video allegedly shows ex-Yavapai County judge urinating in public.
	Very nice stuff.
	I guess it's safe to say that she was probably intoxicated.
	Body camera video.
	Well, let me start.
	Newly released body camera video shows an encounter between Prescott police and a former judge who was reportedly caught urinating in public.
	Hey, judge, you're allowed to have a live too.
	Around 1:30 a.m. on October 4th, Prescott police said former judge Christine Schaff Olson was seen urinating in public.
	Oh, man.
	The judge urinates in public too, guys.
	You're not so bad.
	According to the police report, several witnesses flagged down an officer about what they saw.
	Body camera video shows one officer arriving at the scene as he witnesses Christine pulling herself off the ground behind a bush.
	What kind of bush?
	The officer noted in the police report that she appeared to have lost her balance, fell over in the bush.
	Again, what bush are we talking about here?
	It's not ideal for the women to pee in public, by the way.
	It's not, you know, you got a disadvantage there.
	What are you doing?
	The officer asked.
	This is disgusting.
	I'm waiting for an Uber, she said, slurring her words.
	The officer says, this is unacceptable.
	In the video, the former judge continues murmuring and slurring while telling officers her name.
	You know, oh, I'm a judge.
	As the two kept speaking, the husband approaches.
	He says, are you the husband?
	The officer asked, Jason replied, yes.
	And the officer asked if he can wait by the cab.
	Nope.
	Come on, Jason said, holding his hand out to his wife.
	Yes, you can because I'm conducting an investigation, the officer said.
	I just saw her puking and urinating, exposing herself.
	So now the husband is trying to save her ass.
	Oh, that wasn't her.
	And the officer wasn't having it.
	So eventually the guy had to obey the officer's command.
	But it got a little heated there as he was trying to save his wife from probably going to jail is how he saw it at that time.
	And then ultimately, that is exactly what happened.
	So, hey, you know what?
	I'm not going to judge the former judge here as if I've never, you know, taken care of duty.
	But you got to be very smart.
	You got to be very selective.
	Make sure nobody sees you.
	And if you're a woman, I just don't, I don't know how.
	Actually, I take it all back.
	I've never urinated in public once.
	I've never done it.
	And I don't suggest anybody else doing it ever.
	Don't do it.
	But man, that's tough.
	That's tough for the woman, huh?
	What do you do?
	What do you do if you're a woman and you got to go and there's just nowhere to go?
	And you fall into the bush.
	It's just, that's tough.
	Kim Kardashian insists the 1969 moon landing was fake and it didn't happen.
	By the way, Buzz Aldrin has said the exact same thing, in case you didn't know.
	And just because it's interesting, Neil Armstrong, if you take his first inensil and his last name and you spell it backwards, spells alien.
	But I'm sure that's just a coincidence.
	Kim Kardashian dropping, would you call that a red pill or a conspiracy theory?
	Is the moon landing was fake a red pill or a conspiracy theory?
	Ask Buzz Aldrin because he's answered these questions and he seems to insinuate it was fake too.
	Is that a red pill or a conspiracy theory?
	Here's how much exercise you need to feel a little bit better.
	You know, I want to endorse exercise.
	I want to tell you that it's true.
	I hope you get some physical activity.
	I hope you get some exercise.
	It is good for your mental and physical health.
	It'll make you feel better.
	It'll extend your life.
	But I want to add a caveat here because there's one physical activity I cannot endorse if you're younger than, let's say, 60.
	I'll be kind.
	I'll be kind.
	I'll say 60.
	And that is pickleball.
	And I might have to fly to Florida for this.
	I might have to get involved here.
	I might have to stick my neck out on this one.
	Community fights pickleball replacing basketball courts at South Florida Beachside Park.
	It's a famous basketball park.
	In fact, if you really know basketball culture or street basketball culture, then you know this park on the beach.
	And these arch, these arch hoops are famous.
	These arch hoops right here are famous.
	Famous basketball court.
	And they're about to tear them down and put in a pickleball court.
	This is outrageous.
	This is un-American.
	This is treasonous in my eyes.
	I might have to go.
	I might have to get involved here.
	I might have to go down there.
	Can we chain ourselves to the hoops?
	What do we have to do to stop this?
	They're doing it in Austin, too.
	It's so bad, man.
	This pickleball corporate propaganda takeover is so bad.
	And they did it too.
	I mean, you got to give them credit.
	The pickleball corporate propaganda worked.
	They turned it into a billion-dollar industry overnight.
	It used to be a sport for geriatrics.
	I'm not that literally what it was.
	It was a sport for people that are retired, 65 years old, and can't really move around, but want to do something physical.
	And Pickleball Inc.
	ran a propaganda campaign, a corporate propaganda campaign for a year.
	They teamed up with other corporate entities like big box gyms and other such things and community parks.
	And they turned pickleball from a lesser-known, if completely, if not completely unknown, sport for geriatrics above 65 into a billion-dollar enterprise that now young people are obsessed with.
	So I hate it.
	It disgusts me.
	It makes me sick.
	Another basketball court lost to the corporate propaganda of pickleball.
	And people fell for it, man.
	They fell for it.
	What a shame.
	Do we need to fly down there?
	Do I need to get involved in this?
	I'm not thrilled about it.
	I'm not from Florida, but I'm not happy about this one.
	I have to tell you.
	All right, last thing for any women listening, you may be interested in this.
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	79-year-old millionaire is looking for young women to give him a son to inherit his fortune and estate.
	Sir Benjamin Slade's property spans over 1,200 acres and includes a historic manor known as the Manzel House.
	Slade had previously advertised for a partner with some very specific requirements, preferably in the 20s or 30s, a go figure.
	Aristocratic or professional background, no taller than 5'6, and willing to produce a male heir.
	And here he is with his dogs.
	And is that a Tommy gun?
	Okay.
	So, any women interested in Sir Benjamin Slade?
	You got to take it at least once and hope you go one for one, but you might need to do multiple rounds there.
	All you got to do is make it make him a son.
	He just wants a son.
	Are you willing?
	Are you willing to step up?
	Are you willing to take one for the team, as they say?
	There you go.
	Now's your opportunity.
	Don't say I ever, don't, don't say I never did anything for you.
	The women's shirts are live at Owenschoyer.store, by the way.
	We do have female shirts at owenschroyer.store.
	So don't tell me I never did anything for you.
	All right, we think about the women a lot.
	Maybe too much we think about women, if we're being honest.
	But there you go.
	Don't say I've never done nothing for you.
	I just introduced you to Sir Slade, and I sell women's t-shirts at Owenschroyer.store.
	So, I mean, what more can you ask for me?
	What more is there to ask of a man?
	All right, that does it for today's transmission.
	We want to thank Cove Pure Water Filters and my Patriot Supply, Emergency Food and Supplies, for sponsoring today's show.
	Thank you very much.
	Support our sponsors.
	That's going to do it.
	I'll be back in 15 minutes with Zeb Boykin talking ballistics from the Charlie Kirk assassination, but this does it for the Owen Report today.
	Godspeed and God bless.

▲