Wednesday War Room: Trump Shines During SOTU Address, Appoints Vance as Fraud Czar, Cuba Kills Four On U.S. Speedboat…PLUS Ex-Clinton Treasury Sec. Larry Summers Resigns as Harvard President
Harrison Smith dissects Trump’s SOTU, mocking Democratic disruptions and framing the SAVE Act as voter suppression, while accusing Ilhan Omar of lying about white men and cartel violence. He ties Epstein scandals to Gates and Summers, calling them "creepy" and unaccountable, then pivots to AI risks, Project Artichoke’s LSD experiments, and birth control conspiracies—all part of a "war for the mind." The episode ends with outrage over Israeli settlements, Nazi comparisons, and relentless self-promotion, urging listeners to support his platforms. [Automatically generated summary]
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live this Wednesday afternoon.
Glad you're all here with us to hear the news.
There's a ton to cover, of course.
Yesterday was the State of the Union.
We'll show you some choice clips from that, but we're not going to spend too much time on it, sorry, because you've probably seen it all by now.
But there are a few clips that we'll indulge in.
We'll be joined by Andrew Barka later in the show.
We'll be reacting to the state of the union, the state of current domestic politics, the standing of Donald Trump and the Republican Party heading into the midterms, as well as immigration, the damage it's doing, and what we can do back.
There's also a lot of hearings going on right now on Capitol Hill.
We'll show you some pretty powerful clips from all of that stuff.
Let's begin today as we do every day with our Daily Dispatch.
For Wednesday, the 25th of February, 2026, Bill Gates admits he had two affairs with Russian women, apologizes for Epstein links.
Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates has admitted he had two affairs with Russian women while married to his now ex-wife Melinda French Gates and issued a groveling apology for his links with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
Gates, 70, told staffers at his foundation on Tuesday that he flew on a private plane with a disgraced financier and spent time with him in the U.S. and abroad, but didn't participate in any crimes, according to the Wall Street Journal.
I did nothing illicit.
I saw nothing illicit, Gates said in a town hall meeting.
To be clear, I never spent any time with the victims, the women around him.
Except for those two Russian women that he's now admitted to.
So we'll show you the video in just a minute of Bill Gates rejecting this, denying this outright, like two weeks ago.
Just because it's fun sometimes to just watch a liar lie.
We'll just sit there and we'll know that he's lying and we'll watch him lie and we'll see what method he takes to cover up his lies.
It's good.
We'll go revisit it.
It's not often you get that quick of a turnaround.
It was literally like last week he was denying it.
Now he's admitting it.
Wonder what else I'll admit.
Meanwhile, hackers used Anthropic's clawed to steal sensitive Mexican data.
A hacker exploited Anthropic's PBC's artificial intelligence chatbot to carry out a series of attacks against Mexican government agencies, resulting in the theft of a huge trove of sensitive tax and voter information, according to cybersecurity researchers.
The unknown clauder user wrote Spanish language prompts for the chatbot to act as an elite hacker, finding vulnerabilities in government networks, writing computer scripts to exploit them, and determining ways to automate data theft. Israeli cybersecurity startup Gambit Security said in research published Wednesday.
So again, we'll get back into this, but apparently he basically asked Claude to hack the Mexican government.
Claude said no.
So he said, no, no, it's fine.
This is white hat hacking.
We're just searching for vulnerabilities.
Still, it said no.
And so he just asked again and again and again until eventually just said yes and did it.
It's just totally crazy.
But the power of this AI, specifically Claude in computer programming, is pretty unimaginable.
Meanwhile, ex-Clinton Treasury Secretary Larry Summers has resigned from Harvard over his Epstein ties.
American economist Lawrence Larry Summers announced his resignation from Harvard University on Wednesday after recently released Epstein files showed he was close friends with the notorious pedophile sex trafficker even after it was known his pal was engaging in illegal operations and involved in raping underage girls.
Summers, who was once the president of Harvard, will be stepping down from his teaching position at the end of the current school year, but the university is allowing him to keep his president emeritus title.
So, isn't that nice of him?
So in case you're wondering like how we got to the situation we're in, you might want to note that our highest and most celebrated institutions of learning are in fact helmed by pedophiles and their associates.
So, you know, wonder how he got the job.
Trump declares Dims can't win without cheating, says these people are crazy for refusing to ban trans surgeries in kids.
I'll show you some of these clips on the other side.
And it was a little bit like blunt what he did, but I think it worked.
I think it had the intended effect.
And I think he really did a great thing, weaponizing the Democrats' own petulance against them.
They refused to stand for anything.
And so he sits there going, hey, stay seated if you're a complete loon.
If you're totally insane and don't know what the hell is going on, stay seated.
Yesterday was, of course, the big bad State of the Union, the first state of the Union since Donald Trump got back into office.
He gave a speech last year, but that was not technically a state of the union.
That was technically an address to the joint houses of Congress.
I'll have you know.
So this was the first full state of the union.
And to be honest, it was kind of Trump at his best.
It was really good.
It was really, I liked it.
I watched the whole damn thing.
I mean, it was very long.
It was a little bit interesting the way that he brought people in like it was a game show.
That was a little bit of Trump's showmanship shining through.
He didn't talk nearly as much about Iran as a lot of people expected, including myself.
But then again, it was typical of a State of the Union speech, except in the way that he went after the Democrats.
And he went after the Democrats in a way that people haven't done before.
And of course, there was a time when I was young where the idea, the concept of lawmakers interrupting the State of the Union was sort of unheard of, at least as far as I knew.
And the first time I could remember was the You Lie incident under Obama.
It was a Republican telling Obama, you lie, and it was a big deal.
And it was a break in decorum, and it was unprecedented.
And we've come a long way since then.
And since then, we've come a long way to where now the Democrats really can't help themselves.
And the concept of decorum is obviously white supremacy.
So they are expressing their diverse views on that front by being super loud and obnoxious and annoying the entire time and degrading the entire affair.
And it's just one of these things.
It keeps happening over and over with Donald Trump in particular, where because they attack Donald Trump so viciously and because he doesn't put up with it and fights back, they claim that's, you know, Donald Trump is responsible for all break in decorum, even though Donald Trump, you know, aside from just using like kind of harsh language sometimes or just like insulting people, you know,
he's a very respectful dude when it comes to the ceremonies, the pomp and circumstance.
And these things matter.
They really do.
I mean, there's a reason that human society has always centered around ritual and it connects to something deep in our, probably not our reptilian brain, but something even deeper still, or maybe something even higher still.
The ceremony, the tradition is like super important.
And it's important that you do it even without a reason.
Like, this is the important thing about ceremony or ritual is like, maybe there's not a reason, but there might be a reason.
And the fact is, you just do it because that's the way it's done.
And there's something about illogical adherence to ritual that really centers humankind in really profound ways.
And it's also an opportunity for the left to be obnoxious and get attention for themselves.
So, you know, who cares about tradition and decorum and proper function of our government when you can scream obscenities at the president and get kicked out?
Remember last time, Al Green had to be physically removed from the hall over Donald Trump.
So apparently this time, the Democrats were told, look, if you're going to interrupt, just don't come.
Just if you're going to go to the State of the Union, just be quiet and sit there silently as an expression of your discontent.
He yelled a sign and said, black people aren't apes.
What the hell?
I don't remember that.
I remember him yelling things.
Is that a real sign?
Is that a real sign?
Is that from this year?
I missed this.
I didn't see this.
I admit, I missed the beginning of the speech.
I came in right as Trump was starting.
Did he get kicked out again?
Okay, I saw that video.
I assumed it was from last time.
This dude just keeps getting kicked out of the addresses.
That's hilarious.
They should stop letting him in.
He chimped out, they say.
Yeah, y'all need to hook up the control room microphones.
The audience needs to hear the input here.
Black people aren't apes.
Okay, so what I'm hearing from the control room is that Representative Al Green apparently got kicked out again.
All right, I must have missed that part.
I admit my kids were not going to sleep easily, so I kept having to get up to leave, and I must have missed that part.
So I saw videos for that today, and I was like, oh, yeah, he did get kicked out last time.
I didn't realize he got kicked out a second time.
My God.
Just start with him kicked out.
How about all the Democrats have to start outside and only with good behavior can they prove that they're worthy of coming into the chambers?
Of course, that's what elections are supposed to be about.
And we'll get to that and the ability for Democrats to act this way because they're never going to get held to account.
Their constituency thinks this is cool, thinks that the shrieking hyenas are somehow helping their cause.
They're absolutely not.
So that's funny.
I'm late to the ballgame here.
That sign, black people aren't apes.
It's like, who does he think he's talking to?
Okay, I imagine that's because Donald Trump retweeted that meme.
Like, they really have nothing.
That was like two weeks ago.
Donald Trump retweeted a meme that had the Lion King theme, and it had hippos and lions and monkeys, and the Obamas happened to be chimpanzees in that.
And so here we are two weeks later, Al Green still desperate to cling on to this vague and tangential example of Trump kind of potentially being kind of racist, even though he's not the one that retweeted it, and there's actually nothing racist about it, but they need something, but they need something to cling on to.
That's so funny.
I mean, it really is endless, the misapprehension the left has about the right.
I shouldn't say misapprehension, the lies they tell about the right to justify their own ridiculous perspective and behavior and worldview.
In fact, it's somewhere in this stack, but I wasn't planning to get to it quite so soon.
But there was a fantastic meme from Will Sexton on X at better known as Advaryum.
Because this, if we go to my computer screen, this is sort of the leftist delusion in a nutshell.
And it's got the left wing on one side and the right wing on the other.
And they have the left wing saying, we're going to make sure everyone's needs are met.
And to be fair, that is what they say.
They do say that.
Now, are they ever able to make anything better?
Not yet.
Not yet.
We're still waiting.
One day, I'm sure eventually they'll find some sort of leftist cause that benefits somebody somewhere other than scam artists taking advantage of them or just themselves hijacking the money.
So, okay, the left wing, yes, they do claim that they're going to meet everybody's needs.
However, what they do is immediately steal all of the money, provide nothing, and then call you racist.
Now, but on the right wing example there, we can leave it up.
I am not done with the meme yet.
It says, we're going to exterminate entire social groups because we believe they're impure.
So, have you ever heard anybody in America say anything like that in the last 100 years?
Even before 100 years, people weren't saying this anywhere.
There were lots of times in history we like absolutely had the ability to exterminate entire races of people.
We really went out of our way to do everything except for that.
This is the thanks we get, right?
But like, do you understand truly the level of delusion that the left is living in?
I can say that the left, a lot of them do have good motive.
They're just, they just believe lies.
They just believe fanciful rainbow and unicorn promises about things, and they just get screwed over immediately over and over again, and they never seem to notice, and they keep voting for the same people, even when they themselves recognize that the outcome is always the same, and it's always bad.
You know, just so last week, Zorhan Mamdani put a big presentation where he was saying that they have to basically take money out of the retirement funds, and there's this big, you know, billion dollar, multi-billion dollar gap in the budget, and they're going to have to make some cuts to find the money for that.
So, you know, some of the more outrageous promises are going to have to be cut down and whatever, whatever.
And then they, yeah, this is the actual one.
That's the real one.
So Mamdani announces this giant shortfall in the budget.
And this week, he and AOC are announcing in the Spanish language, daycare for illegal immigrants.
So, you know, I don't know what to tell you about the left.
I think, you know, some of them just want free stuff.
Some of them genuinely think that the government is the solution to the problem.
Why they can't recognize that every time they vote for somebody making those promises, they just immediately, immediately get slapped in the face and made absolute fools.
It's really bizarre that this keeps happening.
Oh, sorry, we're going to have to, you know, lower your retirement fund and cut out your kids' school.
But guess what?
We're announcing a gigantic new program to give daycare to people that are from overseas.
It's like, you keep voting for this.
So I don't know what to tell you.
This is just what always happens.
But like this, this really was on display in the State of the Union last night.
And that sign with Representative Val Green is probably the best one.
Where it's just like nobody on the right wing even gets anywhere close to saying we want to exterminate entire groups of people, that groups of people are impure.
Like they just have to project things with no basis.
They don't even have anything to take out of context.
They don't have anything to twist.
It's just from thin air.
You know, black people aren't apes.
Okay, thank you, sir.
Do you have anything else you'd like to tell us?
Any other groups of people that aren't apes you'd like to inform us about?
Would you like to tell us that the sky is blue?
That's how it feels.
It feels like people, someone's coming up to me just being like, dogs have four legs.
Like, yeah, I know, dude.
Why are you yelling at me?
Like, nobody ever said otherwise.
Why are you yelling at us?
Because you're dumb.
I'm sorry.
It's just.
I'm going to try to get through this whole show with not calling them retarded.
I'm going to do it.
I'm going to do it.
It's going to make my brain explode, but I'm going to really do it.
He switches congressional districts in a bid for re-election.
Yeah, his is one of the districts that got done away with here in Texas.
Okay.
But there you go.
That is the leftist worldview is that they are standing up against people who want to ethnically cleanse everybody that's not like themselves because they hold on to some sort of idea of racial purity that comes straight out of like not even Nazi, like proto-Nazi style.
I don't even know where they're getting this crap, but they're convinced that this thing that's been out of favor and out of context and out of the zeitgeist for 150 years is somehow still the guiding light.
Completely insane, utterly and completely insane.
And again, part of it, I was just thinking about this before the show because it's like they'll make these claims where they go, you know, the SAVE Act is going to stop people from voting.
It's going to knock all these people off the voter rolls.
And it's like, first of all, good.
Yes, that is how it should work.
But second of all, see, we're not like the left.
I will just straight up tell you I think too many people are allowed to vote.
I'll just let you know.
We don't have to try to do like workarounds to be like, oh, we'll say it's about voter ID, but really we're going to stop these people from voting.
No, I'll just let you know right now, I don't think you should be allowed to vote if you depend on the government.
I think you have to be a productive member of society.
I think you should prove that you at least have the ability to manage your own life before you have the ability to manage the nation as a whole.
I'm just going to tell you, like, we're not liars.
We're not deceivers.
We're not, you know, underhanded like you people who will constantly do things that have nothing but ulterior motives and then like call us racist for pointing that out or whatever.
Meanwhile, they just have to make up complete lies about us to justify any of their beliefs ever.
Because like if they're not standing up against Nazis, then why would anybody listen to them?
If they're not, you know, predicating their argument on genocide that's just around the corner, like why would anybody care what they ever have to say?
Now, the real thing, the real division, like in reality, and like this is really not even much of an exaggeration, is this one.
On the left is kill Whitey, rape his women, take his due, burn his monuments.
And on the right wing is, I just want a family in a safe place for them.
And then the midwit going, the left and the right are the same.
That was one thing that came across with abundant clarity during the State of the Union.
The left and the right are miles apart in this country.
And even though it was like kind of a cheesy setup from Trump, where he's like, hey, stand up if you support Americans over illegal immigrants, that really gets to the heart of the issue.
It really was like the perfect test.
And it was really a brilliant way.
I don't know how we've never seen anybody do that.
I mean, we've never had a president like Trump, but the idea that you know the Democrats are going to sit, you know they're not going to cheer.
And so that's always used a little bit where you bring in people, you bring in like a little girl with cancer and you're like, look at these people.
They won't even cheer for a little girl with cancer.
Like they always use that tool to some degree.
But for Trump to sit there and say, stand up if you agree with this following statement.
Let's go to the clip here.
Clip 17.
Here's Trump just setting a trap for the Democrats, really of their own making.
Let's keep it up because I think he calls him crazy.
And it's very fun.
This is the best part of his speech, in my opinion.
Like, this really is the divide.
This really is the dividing line between Democrats and Republicans.
You know, they may be going, oh, we're not going to play into his little game, but like, no, this is how they feel.
This is absolutely how they feel.
They genuinely do not think that the American people are their constituency because they're not.
Because they won't get elected without illegal immigrants.
Their entire, I mean, their congressional districts wouldn't even exist without counting illegal immigrants in censuses, right?
The district wouldn't exist without counting illegals in the census.
They wouldn't get elected without the illegal immigrant vote or illegal immigrant money or the support of the illegal immigrant NGOs that funnel money back into their campaigns.
It's like that is the dividing line.
He really did a brilliant job of laying out the truth about what the Democrats feel about the American people, that you are no more important than anybody else in the world.
Which is crazy because they take an oath to the contrary.
But like, I don't know.
I try to watch these things through the eyes of a leftist, through the eyes of a liberal or a normie or whatever.
And like, yeah, you know, I'd go, oh, Trump's just, he just knew they wouldn't stand, so he said that to, you know, whatever.
I get how you could downplay it.
At the end of the day, isn't that telling?
I mean, isn't that true?
Like, it wasn't really a trick, was it?
You could go to each one of these people individually and ask them, and they would give you the same answer.
They would be offended if you would say, shouldn't you value the American people over everybody else?
I mean, they tell you over and over again that people from Guadalajara that still live there are somehow more American than you.
They built this country even though they arrived yesterday.
Like, just think about how little sense that makes.
So I thought it was a brilliant job of Trump really laying out the division and pointing out to the American people, like, these people literally don't care about you.
They literally are insane.
They actually are insane.
And he called them that a couple times.
Let's go to clip 18 here.
This is the other big moment where he called them Somali pirates.
The Somali pirates who ransacked Minnesota remind us that there are large parts of the world where bribery, corruption, and lawlessness are the norm, not the exception.
Importing these cultures through unrestricted immigration and open borders brings those problems right here to the USA.
And it is the American people who pay the price in higher medical bills, car insurance rates, rent, taxes, and perhaps most importantly, crime.
But surely we can all agree no state can be allowed to rip children from their parents' arms and transition them to a new gender against the parents' will.
I tried to destroy this country and we stopped in lifetime.
It's not an exaggeration.
These people are genuinely insane.
They're still wearing white for some reason.
Do they even remember why?
Wasn't that something about like, I don't even know, wasn't that a Me Too thing?
They still going with that.
They don't even know what they're doing anymore.
So it was a great State of the Union, as far as I'm concerned.
You know, a lot of great American heroes on display and the leftist insanity called out for exactly what it is.
I get that there are bigger issues, debatably, than left versus right.
There are some enemies that should unite us in opposition to the outsiders because we all are American at the end of the day, except for the people that aren't, like Ilhan Omar, except for the scumbags that come to our country and then cover up for their own co-ethnics, robbing us to the tune of billions and billions of dollars.
Oh, it's against the SAVE Act this time.
Wow, they're so brave.
They're so powerful.
No, these people are insane.
And the sad thing is, the American people keep voting for them.
I got one more thing to say about the State of the Union, although we will be talking about it with Andrew Barko later in the show.
This was a very, I think, underappreciated jab from Donald Trump because he brought up congressional stock trading.
He said congressional stock congress and Congress members should not be able to trade on their knowledge insider trading, essentially, but it's legal when Congress does it.
And he was sort of shocked at the fact that Democrats, some Democrats, stood up.
In fact, Elizabeth Warren seemed very excited about that idea, and she's been pushing that for a while.
And then Trump says, that includes Pelosi.
He basically said, you know, did Pelosi stand up?
I don't know if Pelosi stood up because, of course, Nancy Pelosi is well known as basically having impossible to achieve returns on her investments to the point where there was an X account that would just track her trades so that other people could make the same trade she did because it was like the only way to guarantee you'd have like a 2,000% return on your investment every time.
And X kept banning them.
And I think it's been permanently banned.
I don't think it's ever come back.
Maybe it still exists out there, but it was the Nancy Pelosi investment tracker because of just how good she was.
So that was a great little jab by Donald Trump that, you know, maybe people just thought, well, you know, subversive Democratic trading ETF.
Trump boasts the turnaround for the ages clashes with Democrats and longest ever State of the Union.
So, you know, you talked a lot about the economy.
It wasn't a bad speech.
It wasn't bad.
Now, apparently, I don't know if the crew can find this video, but while Trump delivered the State of the Union, Democrats were throwing an alternative State of the Union that had a bunch of people dressed up like animals, frog costumes, and a screaming giraffe and a suitcase full of dildos.
I mean, I believe it.
I mean, it's not, I'm not questioning whether this happened.
I'm just questioning continuing existence of our nation.
Whether that even is a good thing anymore.
While President Jon Trump was on Capitol Hill on Tuesday night delivering a powerful commanding State of the Union address, the radical left was busy hosting what can only be described as a fever dream circus at the National Press Club.
While the adults were discussing policy, the quote state of the swamp counter event hosted by the anti-Trump group Defiance.org descended into a literal animal house scenario.
The optics weren't just bad.
They were humiliating.
The event hosted by the anti-Trump group Defiance.org featured a who's who of people in the American electorate, or a who's who of people the American electorate rejected or tuned out years ago, including Robert De Niro, Jim Acosta, Don Lemon, Media San, George Conway, Glenn Kishner.
The display was a tribute to the so-called Portland Frog Brigade, a group that wore inflatable costume frog costumes during last year's demonstrations against federal immigration agents.
Frogs are gay.
We knew it the whole time.
The Democrats are insane.
Okay, let's just like, it's the only word for them.
I'm not just saying that because they're wearing frog costumes and refuse to acknowledge that the American people are their charge and not the people of the world.
Not just saying it because Ron Wyden looks like a drawing of a Wojack in PC, his beady little eyes.
I'm saying it because they genuinely, genuinely don't care about the truth.
And in a way that is like infuriating.
In a way that is hard to explain if you don't like understand it already.
If you don't already get visions of red when you see this next video, I don't know if I can logically get you to that point.
You just have to sort of understand.
Let's go to clip number five here.
As a reporter tries to get Ilhan Omar to acknowledge a statement that she made on TV that's been shared like a million times, and she just says it didn't happen, which would be crazy enough.
But then she gets condescending.
And that's the part that, like, I don't understand this mindset.
I really can't conceive of this mindset.
I don't know what else to call it, but it's this narcissism where you just lie outright.
And then when the person's like, no, that's not true, you just go, you should do your research, honey.
Like, it's weird.
It's evil.
It's evil at the end of the day.
I can't imagine what's going through her head because she knows she's lying.
This is, let's foreplay the videos.
Just lay out perfectly clearly.
Ilhan Omar has said this multiple times.
She believes this.
She absolutely, without a doubt, knows exactly what this reporter is talking about.
So just keep that in mind.
Just understand that.
And when she's asked about this and she says it doesn't exist, she knows 100% she is absolutely lying.
This would be like Donald Trump saying, I've never said America first.
Allison Steinberg, I believe, questioning Ilhan Omar about something that you just saw her say.
And that, again, has been a viral post many times over.
And she's said it many times.
That's not the only time she's said it.
And yet you hear the condescension, you hear the, you know, it's the same attitude that Trump has, but Trump is right.
Like it reminded me for some reason, just something, you know, intangible about the way she responded.
It reminded me of when Trump is interviewing that or was being interviewed in 2016 by that blonde reporter and he's going, you got it.
Try to get it out.
Try to get it out.
And it's just like a classic clip early on in Trump's career and it went totally viral too.
Something like that.
But she's lying, but she's just abjectly lying.
So she's like, you know, this is what I was saying.
You know, you got to do your research more.
You wouldn't embarrass yourself like this.
And again, it's like it would be one thing if they had shame or if their constituents cared.
They don't care.
They don't care.
The question is, why would she deny saying that?
Because she knows that it's a despicable thing to say.
That's a hateful and bigoted and unacceptable thing for any member of Congress to utter.
Why does she keep saying it?
Why does she keep denying it?
And again, you know, the constituents know she said it.
The constituents absolutely agree with her on that.
And they think it's like clever or like, you know, whatever, boss bitch attitude to be like, I never said that.
And you look ridiculous for asking me.
She's like, here's the video of you saying it, lady.
But they don't care.
The constituents don't care.
Now, it's not even like lying about this particular thing is all that crazy, except that she just knows everybody knows she says that.
So her lying about it is like kind of like a representative of a mental illness.
Like if she went to a psychiatrist and lied to them like that, they would say she has a mental illness.
They'd say she like is disconnected with reality and is a congenital liar.
Like there'd be a diagnosable condition there.
But they don't care.
But the constituents don't care.
So it's not about this lie in particular.
It's about the idea that like we're dealing with people who think that the way you're supposed to operate in a republic or democracy as they call it is that like, yeah, you just lie.
You just sort of say what you need to at the moment.
And it doesn't matter if it's true.
The people who you represent don't care if it's true.
There's no reason to like follow through on your promises because you were lying the whole time and everybody knew you were lying.
Like we're just dealing with people that are genuinely incompatible with our system.
And they have no desire to be compatible with our system.
Our system is weak against these people because our system is predicated on these people not being acceptable to the American people, but the American people are so I said I wouldn't say it.
Misled.
They're so misled.
They're so degraded at this point that they just don't care.
Which again, I think a lot of this goes back to the lies about Donald Trump and how they would constantly present things that Trump would say that were true or debatable or just a different view.
And they would say, look at how he's normalizing lying and his followers don't care.
Now, that was never true, but that reality, the idea that that was true, did get implanted in all of the Democrats.
And so they operate as if that's true.
They're told, well, now we're in a post-truth world and it doesn't matter if what you say is true, as long as your people pretend to believe it, then that will become, you know, status quo.
And like it goes back to sort of the best example would be alternative facts, right?
Right after the inauguration, I don't know if people even understand where that term came from, but you hear it all the time.
Oh, you have some alternative facts, do you?
As if that just means lies.
No, there are alternative interpretations of things like crowd size.
So when it comes to the inauguration, what the left did, and it was literally planned from the beginning, they set up really stringent and understaffed security blocks everywhere throughout D.C., especially around the mall, so that by the time the inauguration started, a million people who were trying to get there were not being allowed into the gate.
And so they did that on purpose so that they could take pictures of the crowd and go, look, everybody hates Trump.
So it literally, it was a psyop from the beginning to keep the, and I know, you know, two dozen people that were there, they all experienced this.
It was just 100% what happened where they're like, I've been to other inaugurations.
There was nothing like this.
We stood in line for three hours and never got in.
And so they take pictures of this supposed, you know, crowd on the mall early on in the inauguration and they say, look, he's got no crowd.
And then I think it was Kellyanne Conway goes on TV and goes, look, there's different ways of measuring who came to an inauguration.
The way that you typically measure is not who's on the mall during the inauguration.
It's things like metro passes and traffic into the city.
And by those metrics, the number of people going to DC to participate in the inauguration, it was a much bigger crowd than ever before.
These are alternative facts.
You can look at the crowd on the mall and you can say, what a small, what a small number of people at his inauguration.
And you can say, all right, well, you're counting in one way.
If you count in a different way, in other words, if you count in a way that includes everybody who tried to be there, everybody who was in the city, but didn't quite make it to the mall, everybody who traveled to get to the inauguration, then our numbers were just as big, if not bigger, than Barack Obama or Bush before him.
These are all alternative facts.
You understand how both of these things can be true?
Both the small crowd on the mall and the largest crowd ever in terms of people going to DC for the inauguration, which had lots of events all over the city.
But that gets transmuted by the leftist media into the Trump campaign thinks you can just make things up.
The Trump campaign has a belief in so-called alternative facts where you can say the truth and they say something that's not true and just say it's an alternative fact.
It was never the case, but that's how it's presented.
The Democrats and their followers, their constituency, internalizes that and goes, This is the way we're playing now.
They, like you just saw, Ilhan Omar, incontrovertibly, you can't like you can't argue that it's on video.
Like, I can't believe we have to go over this over and over, but like, you got to understand, you got to understand how these people don't care and how they keep getting voted into office.
And they're being emboldened because it's almost like the more they lie, the more popular they get.
And I don't know if we're all just operating in their delusional frame or, you know, what, but it really goes on and on, and it's endless and perpetual and significant.
Very significant.
By the way, she's also, you know, prior to being asked about that in particular, she's asked about how she went from negative $64,000 net worth to multiple millions of dollars and where the so-called winery that she made all of her money is.
There's no office.
There's no winery.
There's no record of it doing any business or selling wine to anybody, but somehow makes tens of millions of dollars a year.
That's kind of suspicious.
What do you think Elhan Omar's response to that was?
I'll tell you, no matter what it was, I'll tell you what it was.
No matter what she said, it was untrustworthy and a lie because she's fine with that.
And the Democrats, again, are just badgering this.
Again, it goes back to things like the interview with James Tallarico on Stephen Colbert.
Just a flagrant, abject, proven wrong over and over again lie where the FCC didn't demand he take down the interview.
The CBS network didn't say, you're not allowed to interview James Tallarico.
He's too powerful.
He's too smart and clever.
We can't have him interview people.
Might vote for him.
Like, it just never happened.
But it doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter because they just say that it happened.
They say that they're being censored.
And suddenly the interview that would have gone totally unnoticed, unremarked upon, and would have wallowed in obscurity instead gets millions and millions of views because people think that they're getting around the oppression and the censorship of the right wing.
It's absurd.
By the way, it's not even going to work.
Jasmine Crockett is leading James Tallarico by double digits in the Senate Democrat primary.
And do you know why?
Do you have any idea why?
If you had to guess, could you possibly risk a guess here?
What do you think it is?
It's because she has something like 90% of the black and Latino vote because they literally are just voting for somebody who's not white.
Because just like all of this, just like absolutely everything.
I mean, it's really crazy.
It's like absolutely everything.
The left genuinely harbors racist ideas.
They genuinely vote on people on the basis of their skin color.
They are genuinely the biggest liars in the world.
Everything they project on us, they do.
And they do it because they project it on us.
And that's the point I'm trying to make.
Is that their lies, baguette lies, baguette lies, baguette lies.
It's absurd.
The other thing that happened at the State of the Union yesterday, conservative journalist Sarah Gonzalez got booted from the Democrat State of the Union event for calling Joy Reed a loser, which she is.
She's correct.
Learned to read Elhan Omar denies ridiculous claim that net worth spiked from zero to 30 million.
What do the numbers say?
Gee, I wonder what the numbers say.
I wonder if those crazy Republicans just decided to start lying about her net worth being tens of millions of dollars when there was no evidence for that and no ability to check it.
Because again, that's like you got, I don't know.
The world they live in is genuinely bonkers.
And like they actually think the Republicans are just like just like making things up and just like, we want to eradicate entire races because they're impure.
Their blood is impure.
It's like, no, no, we just really are trying and really getting tired of trying, to be honest with you, to deal with just despicable, scumbag foreign liars and their hordes that they brought in with them.
Like, I'm not a Democrat.
I think Jamie Jasmine Crockett and James Tyrico are equally despicable, deranged weirdos.
But I think James Tyrico is better than Jasmine Crockett.
Like if I was a voting Democrat, I definitely would want, you know, well-spoken CIA cut out white Obama, James Tylerico, than screeching idiot Jasmine Crockett, but should have run a black guy.
Should have run a black guy, Democrats.
If you didn't want Jasmine Crockett to represent you, which they don't, which is why they pulled off the big stunt with James Tylarico, because they knew he wasn't doing well and knew he needed an artificial boost.
So they lied about him being censored in order to give him that, which did end up screwing Jasmine Crockett.
Because remember, the whole thing was like, yeah, you can have James Tyler Rico, you just also have to have Crockett on.
And they didn't want to do that because they're trying to destroy Jasmine Crockett because she's not actually a good representative of their side, but they can't control their golem.
They can't control the hordes they brought in to vote for them who are just anti-white and will just vote against white people.
And that is absolutely the reason I was doing some research on the people that are voting for Jasmine Crockett.
And they're literally like, all I know is that she keeps getting attacked by white people.
So I voted for her.
Well, she's getting attacked because she's dumb.
I'm just attacking her for no reason.
Attacking her because she's a bad person.
It's also a liar.
Anyway, these people suck.
Let's go to this clip of Sarah Gonzalez getting kicked out because I think this is something that we want to see more of.
Oh, did I not?
Maybe I didn't bring it in.
Let's pull that one in.
Because I just, I love that Sarah Gonzalez goes to these things and busts these little celebrations up.
And we need to see more of that.
You know, the left got very used to having activists go into right-wing things and interfere.
The right-wing never did that as much.
I think we need to do it more.
I think we need to do it a lot more.
In another situation, we'd be able to run contests for this sort of thing.
Maybe in a month or so, we'll be able to do that again, as long as you go to the alexjones.com.
But here's Blaze TV's Sarah Gonzalez getting kicked out of the Democrat State of the Union counter event for calling Joy Reed a loser as she introduced Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
And you know Joy Reed was thinking about that when she went to bed at night.
Because these people are the biggest narcissists in the world.
And Joy Reed, just like Don Lemon, just like so many others, are really embarrassing failures.
And if you just point out, like, you used to be on TV.
People used to like you.
You used to be important.
People watched your show.
Now you're doing podcasts that aren't even as successful as kids in their basement.
You absolute losers.
You need to be reminded of what losers they are.
They might forget.
Welcome back, folks.
I want to go to a video now that I find very funny.
Clip number 20.
So this is a woman responding to, I guess, Benny Johnson covered a story about liberals begging Trump to get them out of Mexico.
I had the story on my desk yesterday and I didn't bother with it because it's kind of like, well, you know, liberals do love big government.
Like they would be the ones to expect America to come save them.
I didn't find it that intriguing, kind of a cheap shot.
Regardless, obviously, it was a pretty crazy thing that happened.
Obviously, people were stuck in Mexico and desperate to get out and not able to.
But this person was very offended that it was portrayed this way.
But we'll pause it and sort of dissect her statement here.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Reporting live from the streets of Mexico right now, where this dude that has 3.2 million followers posts this video that's completely made up saying that me and two other girls are liberals that are also Americans, which I'm not a liberal or American.
Yeah, she's like, crazy stuff happens like this all over the world.
It doesn't matter.
It's like every day all over the world, there are giant militarized militias, criminal gangs setting fire to the entire city and attacking civilians because their serial killer drug lord leader got killed.
This is normal.
This is normal and safe.
And it's all a lie.
And it's like, what?
We saw the videos.
We talked to people who were there that couldn't get out.
What are you talking about?
She's like, I live here for the winter.
I'm wintering in Mexico.
I summer in Switzerland.
So I'm not an American, okay?
And I'm a liberal.
I'm not a liberal, but I am going to make excuses for the terror gang burning cars because they drag people out, all right?
And like, that's the scariest thing to me is like, you know, these people, I mean, they really are the worst people in the world.
And they really, she really is sitting there justifying cartel members, death squads, burning cars because they were polite enough to pull the victims out first.
Oh, great.
Oh, well, they didn't burn people alive.
So I guess they're good.
By the way, 73 people were killed during this, apparently.
She's like, it's fine.
It didn't affect me in the resort, so it doesn't matter.
It's all normal and good and liberal, okay?
You're just a bigot, racist Trump supporter if you think that the country shouldn't go up in flames every once in a while when the criminal gangs don't get their way and start burning private property in response.
It's normal and loving and good, okay?
I'm back ladies and gentlemen I'd like to offer an olive branch for our liberal listeners.
I know I keep calling you stupid.
I know I think your brains are dysfunctional and you are beset by a madness of others' makings.
Have you tried perhaps a supplement designed to increase brain function?
I'm genuinely suggesting you try something like this out.
You might be surprised.
You might be surprised at what you learn.
I'm just saying now is the time.
If you're a liberal or have a liberal in your family, perhaps offer them ultramethylene blue and ultramethylene.
Get them both at massive discount at thealexjonestore.com.
I'm not saying it's a cure-all.
I'm not saying it's a panacea.
There's been no scientific study on whether or not the increased brain function and electrical signals in the brain as a consequence of methylene blue will lead to liberals learning things and understanding things.
That's a tall order.
But if anything can do it, ultramethylenblue can.
If anything is strong enough to rescue the liberals from the quagmire of their own stupidity, it's these products at thealexjonesstore.com.
Go there today.
You don't have to be a supporter of us, but you will be.
If you take these, you will be a supporter of us one way or another, either because you love the products or because the products make you smarter and you become enlightened like we are.
The AlexJonesStore.com suppliers will not last.
Ultramethylene Blue skyrockets cellular energy, sharpens memory and mental clarity like nothing else.
And ultramethylene red was designed specifically to pair with ultramethylene blue.
It's got tons of active B vitamins, CoQ10, as well as a number of other very powerful molecular combinations that bypass genetic blocks, regenerate nerves, crush inflammation, boost your mood, focus, and energy to insane levels.
It's ultramethylene blue and ultramethylene red.
Get them now together for a massive discount or independently for massive discount as well.
So ultramethylene blue is 25% off.
Ultramethylene Red is 50% off.
Together, you can get 40% to 50% off, especially if you subscribe for even more discounts.
Member of the Alex Jones VIP Club, even more discounts.
So really, there's no excuse to be a liberal these days.
We have all the information you need and all the brain power required to parse it.
Let's start with this story because it goes into what we've been saying this whole time.
You know, there are these theories about the Epstein files, why they were released now, whether they were released on purpose to basically expose this network without actually doing anything about it.
You can tell by the way that people respond what's actually happening here.
And if the Epstein release was in any way playing into the hands of the bad guys, the response, the way they handled it would have been so different.
Bill Gates is maybe the best example of this because he's scrambling and he's trying to do damage control and he's trying to cling on to what little is left of his reputation, carefully cultivated over decades that has now been shattered by this.
And he's having trouble doing it.
In fact, he's doing it in such a bad way and he's doing such a bad job with it that it'd be better if he just never said anything or just came right out and admitted it.
And you'll see what I mean.
From New York Post, Bill Gates admits he had two affairs with Russian women and he apologizes for his Epstein links.
Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates has admitted he had two affairs with Russian women while married to his now ex-wife, Melinda Gates, Melinda French Gates, and issued a groveling apology for his links with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
Gates, who's now 70 years old, told staffers at his foundation on Tuesday that he flew on a private plane with the disgraced financier and spent time with him in the U.S. and abroad, but didn't participate in any crime, according to the Wall Street Journal.
That was at his foundation.
I wonder if it was at his headquarters.
And I wonder if Tim Lasley was there bullhorning him.
I hope he was.
I do hope he was.
He says, I did nothing illicit.
I saw nothing illicit.
To be clear, I never spent time with any of the victims or the women around him.
Which is just a little bit weird.
It's just a little bit odd because it feels like, call me crazy, it feels like a week ago we had a video of Bill Gates denying all of this.
Did we not have that?
Did we not see that?
Do we not have it right now here in my list on number two?
Let's go to number two.
Here's Bill Gates one week ago lying right to your face.
It just reminds me, you know, every minute I spent with him, I regret and I apologize that I did that.
You know, it's factually true that I was only at dinners.
You know, I never went to the island.
I never met any women.
And so, you know, the more that comes out, the more clear it'll be that although the time was a mistake, it had nothing to do with that kind of behavior.
I did meet the two women, but the email was a lie.
The email was totally wrong about the Russian women and the STD.
The women were Russian.
They were Russian.
I did fly on his plane.
I did meet women, but I didn't see anything illicit.
Okay, well, get back to us next week, Bill.
See if your containment strategy requires you to admit to, okay, well, I did see some illicit things, but it was in international waters, so I couldn't do anything about it.
Like, you really need to plan this out a little bit better.
It doesn't look good when your statement about Epstein is diametrically opposed to the one you made last week.
That doesn't look good, Bill.
It's over, man.
It's like, do you just, we get it?
You're a creepy old criminal that wants to kill everybody with vaccines.
We had your number years ago, and you've done a really admirable job of fending off reality, right?
First, you wear the pink sweaters.
Very good move.
Very convincing.
For some reason, that worked on a lot of people.
They saw you in pink sweaters and thought, this little twink, this little nerd, he can't be an evil guy.
Look at him.
It's only micro when it's soft.
See, look, you did a great job convincing everybody that you aren't a genocidal maniac for a while, but that's over now.
That's over.
I'd like to see him embrace it.
I'd like to see him sort of go the cloud schwab route, but even more so.
He could develop a sinister accent, but I kind of like his gay nerd voice now, but he should wear like a metal mask.
Should be like a metal mask and robes and like chains, you know, and just you're an evil scumbag.
You're an evil diabolical wizard.
You should dress like it.
You should act like it.
Just embrace it.
Go all in.
Forget the pink sweaters.
It worked for a while.
It's not working anymore.
Go all in.
Go all in, Bill Gates.
Embrace your true destiny and go fully over to the dark side or just shut the hell up and go away forever because the illusion's not working anymore.
So those are your options.
Choose whichever one you want.
And did he admit?
I thought maybe he admitted to flew on the private plane.
He did admit he spent time in the U.S. and abroad.
He doesn't actually admit to going to the island, I guess.
He will.
I bet he will.
Hilarious.
So yeah, the Epstein files again, I mean, there should be a hell of a lot more reaction to it, but you can tell that they're scrambling.
You can, like, you don't make a statement like that and then one week later have to reverse it if you're not trying to just cover your ass and not good at doing it.
The thing to do from the beginning was to come out and say, you know, he should have said maybe the email was, maybe he never received the email, but I know what he's talking about.
And yeah, I did meet women.
Like at least then it'd be like, well, he did tell us the truth about that, but you only told us the truth now after lying to us a week ago.
So why would anybody trust you about anything ever?
They're involved in a lot more ways than just sexual impropriety.
I want to go to a video clip 15.
This just sort of goes into what we've been talking about the rest of the day, and that is the delusional view of the world that the left has, that the Democrats have, that people on the left side of the aisle, they just have no idea about anything.
And it is sad, and I wish this wasn't the case.
And I do think that nationalism is the answer.
And if we could all just come together as Americans and deal with problems that beset all of us, then we wouldn't have to have this division that keeps us constantly at each other's throats.
But until these people either learn what the hell's going on and start taking it into account or just have the humility to be like, I don't know, crap about politics.
Why are you asking me?
I'm an idiot.
Like, you should all recognize that you're idiots, and then we'd be fine.
But it's this sinister, this poisonous combination of ignorance, stupidity, naivety, delusion, paired with the narcissism, paired with the self-importance and the condescension.
But really, it was the beginning of that conversation that struck me the hardest, where it's like, it's like something happens, man.
It's like you say words, and somehow in between the words leaving your lip and getting to their ear, some sort of demonic force scrambles them up.
And so what they hear is just entirely different than what you said.
And it just happens every time.
And it drives me crazy on X because on X, the words are there for you to look at.
You don't even have to try to keep up with it in real time.
You can read it over and over until you understand it.
And people still just, it's like, what am I saying?
Like, what is happening?
When you say something, I say something, she says something very simple and obvious.
And then just, yeah, the symbol banging monkey confuses them.
Where it's just like, we want to get rid of immigrant rapists.
And they're just like, wow, so all immigrants are rapists.
It's just like, how do you have a conversation that way?
How do you have a conversation about anything with anybody when that is the exchange?
And the girl is very polite and calm and patient and saying, no, I didn't say all immigrants are rapists.
I'm saying these immigrants are rapists and shouldn't be in the country.
It's like, well, what about white men who are rapists?
And it's like, I mean, genuinely, genuinely, what are we supposed to do with these people?
They don't care.
They believe things with absolutely no evidence.
And they're convinced evidence is out there.
That's the craziest part.
You could find somebody who is intelligent, who could make an argument.
I could make the argument for it.
This is the curse of being smart, unlike these people, is I could answer better.
I could say, look, he's very careful about how he expresses himself, but clearly underlying a lot of his statements is a perceived bias, is a racist intention.
I think, you know, all of these things he did, like, I could answer better, and I don't even believe it's true.
These people, they think they've seen videos of Trump being racist.
They do.
She thinks she's going to find one.
Did she imagine it?
Did she hallucinate it?
Did she have false memories planted in her brain by space lasers?
Like, what is the explanation that there are millions of people walking around this country who are convinced that they have seen things that don't exist?
They're convinced that they've seen dozens of examples of something that there's not a single example for.
What do you do?
What are we supposed to do with these people?
This isn't a matter of politics.
This is a matter of reality versus delusion.
It's not even necessarily good versus evil.
It's like willful ignorance versus information.
Donald Trump's long history of racism from 1970s to 2020.
Trump has repeatedly claimed he's the least racist person.
History suggests otherwise.
In the 70s, his dad didn't rent things to black people.
Now, the good news is the good part about that is that fundamentally, they genuinely don't think for themselves.
So if instead the mainstream media and algorithms push something that was right-wing rather than left-wing, she would believe that just as intensely, they don't think for themselves.
And it's not an insult.
It's just like, if you thought for yourself, you would have to, you'd have to acknowledge that you have no evidence that Trump is racist.
So again, it's just, it's this, this poisonous combination that we constantly deal with.
Let's go to clip 10 here.
This is from today.
This is a hearing in Congress, and Senator Mullins got, well, Senator Bernie Sanders got uppity with Senator Mullins.
I'd go to kindergarten in elementary school, high school.
I had to go to college and get elected.
I mean, what were you doing that whole time?
Where were you that entire time?
Sitting on your fat ass, somehow making millions of dollars as a socialist, you absolute fraud.
But what was that little outburst from grandpa about?
What was that rude interjection?
Totally unwarranted and unnecessary.
What was that in response to?
It was literally in response to Senator Mullins offering an olive branch, saying, Look, I agree with you.
Healthcare is crummy.
I don't want to socialize it, but let's work together.
This is something we can come together on.
This is something that all Americans want.
Let's fix the healthcare system.
Branson is just like, oh, keep rambling.
It's just like, okay, what are we supposed to do?
What are we supposed to do?
What are we supposed to do?
I don't get it.
It's like just half of our country is just evil morons.
Like, what the hell?
You try to tell them the truth, they just get angry and scream at you and continue to lie.
You try to work with them, they just act like petulant little bitches.
You give them what they want, everything gets significantly worse in every possible way.
I think the only thing to do is to like disenfranchise these people.
Not have a democracy anymore, actually, is the real answer.
Welcome back, folks.
This is the War Room.
We're going to be joined by Andrew Bronca in the next segment.
I got a lot to cover still in this segment.
I don't mean to, you know, sort of hit all these stories with the same theme over and over of the delusional insanity of the left, but I feel like even though I know it's not going to break through to most of these people, there's still some amount of people that are like, well, you know, the left may not be perfect, but at least, you know, they say the right things.
At least they're like welcoming and like happy or whatever.
And like, I just really want to emphasize, like, we got to get through to these people.
That's just like, there's no redeeming quality.
There's nothing that you can go like, well, you know, they might be wrong on this stuff, but they got this right.
They're not right about anything, anything, anything, anything.
They don't even try.
Their entire stance now, their entire policy proposal, everything they believe is just focused on destroying America.
And they're not even shy about it.
You live in America.
You're an American.
Like, why would you be in favor of people who hate you?
They're doing everything they can to destroy you.
And even if their ideas sound good in practice, they never, ever, ever, ever work.
So I really just hope against hope that there's somebody that this could get through to, but I don't really think there is.
Let's go to clip number 11 here.
This is that conversation with your left-wing friend, if they were actually honest with you.
Because my entire ego is constructed on the foundations of a moral superiority complex, which itself is pegged to a pathological hyperreality, that when challenged or questioned, makes me extremely angry and aggressive because it feels like my entire identity is under existential threat.
And I developed this mental model as an adolescent in order to make sense of the unfairness of nature.
But due to lacking the introspective courage to challenge my own beliefs, it's easier to just pretend to not to understand things than face the terror of realizing that I might have been misled my entire life and could even be rejected by the tribe.
And there is this thing going, this idea going around now that is very insightful.
That is basically the left-wing morality is just like kindergarten morality.
And they really think like that's the end of morality, where it's just like, don't hit and share your things.
Like, okay, that's fine for a baby.
But like, this is the real world.
You got to make real decisions.
There are real consequences to your actions.
Should we share and not hit each other?
Yeah, I guess.
Again, if you're a baby, but like it goes beyond that.
There's more to it than that, especially when you're dealing with populations that see your naive, childlike view of the world as just victimhood, as just it's time to go after these people.
These people are so stupid that we can rob them blind and they'll think that we're helping them.
And they just see you as complete idiots to take advantage of.
And you are.
You are.
It's very unfortunate.
Unfortunate.
Unfortunate is one way to put it.
This is another tactic they're taking.
This one's amazing.
This is like the next level of redefining words.
We know there's a very, very popular strategy of the left where you call something racist.
And if it's not racist, then you just redefine the word and go, see, racist, just like I told you.
Or you redefine the meaning of vaccine or anything else.
This is kind of different.
This is an attempt to redefine success.
Even as I say it, it's so funny.
They fail so much and so hard and with such consistency.
They are genuinely looking around to try to find different metrics by which it will appear as though they are not the failures that they are.
In this case, particularly with Canada, because there was a very popular story this week revealing that Canada now has a lower GDP than the state of Alabama.
And it's not going well for them.
And it's both their absolute GDP as well as the GDP per person, per capita.
So they're not doing great on the old GDP front.
And so what do Democrats, liberals, and globalists do when the metrics by which we judge things judge them incompetent, judge them failures?
What do they do when certain races don't score as high as as well on tests?
They get rid of the test.
They remake the curriculum to fit whatever perceived vision of success that they want to shove down everybody's throat.
So let's go to clip 12 here where Canadians are desperately trying to find another metric to judge their country on so that it can look in some way by some perspective like they aren't just spiraling into just abject collapse on every front.
And here's the funniest part.
They can't even do it.
They can't even do it.
So they're like, GDP, that's the old way of judging things.
We have these new metrics.
They fail on all of those too.
Let's watch.
unidentified
And if GDP per capita is the one we're going to use, sure, but the point of it is to have a broader conversation.
You looked at a whole bunch of figures.
You were tweeting about this over the weekend, not just GDP per capita, measuring, are we better off than we were 20 years ago.
And the interesting thing that jumped out to me was the only one that seemed to have improved over the last number of years was, in fact, GDP per capita.
Everything else is in pretty precipitous decline.
Yeah, there's this kind of ongoing debate, and I think both sides are somewhat wrong.
You know, you've got one side who's very reliant on GDP per capita as their measure of well-being.
And GDP per capita is correlated with well-being, but it's not well-being.
There are other things to consider.
And then you've got another side of the debate who's saying, well, we're actually doing much better than GDP per capita wouldn't indicate.
I'm kind of taking the other approach and saying, well, actually, not so fast.
GDP per capita, we're doing pretty well in, but other indicators such as wealth and income inequality, deaths of despair, and so on, we tend to actually be below the average of kind of Western economies.
So, you know, I looked at the UN Human Development Index, which takes into account a variety of different factors.
Back in the 1990s, we were consistently in the top three.
We're now down to 16th place in the latest report.
There's a world happiness report, also a UN initiative.
Just a decade ago, we were the sixth best country in the world, according to that.
Now we're 18th.
And it's not to suggest that, you know, things aren't getting better in some areas that they are, but rather that other countries are getting better faster.
And there are areas like inequality where Canada's performance has deteriorated over the last decade or so.
And would you say, sir, in the last decade that Canada has become more or less socialist, more or less liberal, more or less white for that matter?
Isn't that interesting?
It's not looking good.
It's not looking good for Canada.
He's like, look, everything's getting worse, but that's not to say it's not getting better.
Like, no, that's, yeah, that is what it's saying, actually.
No, that's what those numbers mean.
Well, you want to judge things on GDP per capita.
There's different ways to judge things.
Okay, we'll have that go.
Oh, worse.
It was worse in every, in every way, in every way.
If we judge it by happiness, well, that went down.
Inequality, that went down.
Yeah.
GDP is the thing we've done best at, actually.
And we're doing so badly at that that we're trying to come up with different ways of measuring things.
So maybe, just maybe, now's the time to admit that the trajectory you're headed in is not a good one and that you should change the way you do things.
Just an idea.
You're the one sitting there acknowledging that everything's gotten worse and significantly worse over the last 10 years.
Do you want to take that into account in plotting the future or just that's just the way things are?
Just the way things are going.
Nothing you can do about it.
Not like you can alter that trajectory.
It's just it's up to Canadians to get used to the fact that you're all poor and time to kill yourself.
Basically, the one thing they've succeeded in is providing Canadians a way to have the state kill them.
They really are good at that.
Everything else sucks.
GDP per capita.
Like, I don't really care that much about GDP, but GDP per capita is one way of judging success or failure for that matter.
So.
I mean, like, again, he's sitting there saying we got worse on GDP, so bad that we tried to come up with other metrics.
And in every one of those metrics, happiness and everything, we're doing worse.
And then he tries to justify it.
And he goes, but that doesn't mean things aren't getting better.
It just means other countries are getting better faster than us.
It's like, why are you trying to justify your mistake?
Why don't you admit it's a mistake?
Why don't you say we're going in the wrong direction?
The trajectory of Canada has been to increase so-called liberalism, has been to adopt every progressive policy ever put forward.
And every step of the way, it's made life worse in every possible way for Canadian citizens.
Why can't they do that, guys?
I don't get it.
I'll just point it out.
I'll just keep pointing it out, I guess.
Got some pretty esoteric information to get into here, and I'll do that before the end of the segment, but there's a lot of crazy news as well.
Biden-appointed judge blocks deportations of illegal aliens to willing third-party country.
So a Biden appointed judge has ruled that the Trump administration's policy of removing illegal immigrants from the country and deporting them to third countries or countries that other than those designated on illegal immigrants' order of removal is unlawful.
District Court Judge Brian Murphy in Massachusetts wrote that the Department of Homeland Security has adopted a policy whereby it may take people and drop them off in parts unknown, which, quote, is not fine nor is illegal.
He wrote that that would vacate the March guidance and not in accordance with law.
So we can't keep them here under indefinite detention.
We can't deport them to states that don't want to take them.
We can't deport them to third-party states.
Gee, it almost seems like the only thing to do is let them all stay here.
I wonder if that's the obvious plan.
Because the only reason that we deport people to third countries is because the countries aren't cooperating with us and won't accept back deportations.
It's not even our fault.
Like we're trying to take them to wherever they come from, and those countries are denying us.
And so we either have to keep them here, we don't have enough space for them here, or we have to take them to a different country because they're not our citizens and they're not our responsibility and their own countries don't want them.
What are we supposed to do with them?
I again say put them to work, put them to work on a farm, put them to work on chain gangs busting rocks.
That's the answer.
That's the solution.
But so again, can't just get the local government to cooperate and hand them over.
So we got to go out and try to capture them.
That becomes an impossibility and just endlessly chaotic.
You can't keep them in America because we don't have the space and we can't build out camps fast enough to store these people.
Their home countries won't accept them officially.
We can't deport them to a third country.
I think that's enough.
I think that's enough.
It's been over a year that Trump has worked within the system and it's not getting any better.
And the deportations aren't happening.
And, you know, it might not even be like it's, we're certainly not going to have to wait until the end of Trump's administration.
The Democrats are probably going to sweep the midterms and they'll probably start on legislation to give citizenship to all of these illegals even before Trump is out of office.
And how we might not even have to wait until the midterms because so many Republicans have retired or dropped out that we're going to lose our majority in the House with one more dropout.
And Republican Representative Tony Gonzalez just got caught sexually harassing an intern of his or an employee of his who later lit herself on fire.
Like a lot of people are calling for his retirement and the Republicans are like, but if he retires, we're going to lose power in the House.
People are like, okay, so it's more important that you have power in the House than the acceptance of a very bad guy.
It's just not looking good.
Republicans and the Democrats are on the march and are not shy about their intentions.
They're just misleading about them.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer calls for mass amnesty for 11 million illegal immigrants.
That's not really what he said.
That's not really what he said.
What he said is he wants citizenship for all illegal immigrants.
He's just going off the 11 million number because he's a liar, because he's a ridiculous liar.
The number 11 million at the latest is from 2007.
I'm pretty sure they've been running the 11 million number since the early 90s.
As if in the last 35 years, we haven't received any more illegal aliens.
The number just capped at 11 million and it hasn't changed since then.
I think 11 million people came over in the last three years, probably more.
This is just one of the things they do.
It is truly bizarre.
The entire time I've covered politics, they've always said there are 11 million illegal immigrants in this country.
It's a magical number, I guess.
You have 11 million, you bring in 4 million, you have 11 million still.
Isn't that crazy how that works?
There are at least 30 million illegal immigrants in this country.
At least, probably a hell of a lot more than that.
And he wants to give them all citizenship by the back door.
And they'll open the border.
So when Trump says we won't have a country anymore, this is what he's talking about.
And it's not in a theoretical or ambivalent way.
We will not have a country anymore.
If you give citizenship to the tens of millions of criminals that came across our border in the last 10 years and then open the border to an infinite number more.
And you know, like if we can't do deportations now, how do you think we'd ever do them if those people are given citizenship?
Now you're talking about instead of just deporting people that don't have papers, aren't here legally, that we are tracking and like we can't even get that done.
But you think we're what we're going to, yeah, oh, illegal immigration hit record of 14 million in 2023.
They run with these numbers to downplay the problem, downplay the effect that it's having, and to act like this is no big deal to give them all citizenship.
When in reality, he's not saying, I want 11 million new citizens.
He's saying I want them all to be new citizens.
And he uses the 11 million number because apparently you're just allowed to pick a number two decades ago and that just is the number forever, regardless of reality.
So crazy.
How did they get away with it?
Okay, all right.
And nobody questions it.
Nobody points out like this is ridiculous.
Yeah, there were 11 million encounters in four years and they all got let in.
My God.
This is just one of the, like, I don't mean to get distracted by these little nuances, like, little things, but is it that little of a thing?
Why do we live in this fake world?
Why are people, do people just say things that aren't true and nobody questions it and nobody points it out?
Especially when these things are the predicate for legislation that will change the composition of our nation forever.
And everybody's just like, yeah, 11 million.
That's the official number.
Okay.
In the 90s, it was.
Let's count again.
Jesus.
Senator Minority Leader said of the immigration deal he wants to give to guarantee citizenship for 11 million illegal immigrants currently living in the United States.
Schumer gave the remarks during an appearance of Morning Joe on MS Now, where he was asked what kind of immigration agreement he hopes to advance in the Senate.
He pointed to a 2013 bipartisan framework that had the support of then Senator John McCain as a model.
Schumer said he would back a similar bill that toughens up the border while also provides a path to citizenship for 11 million people who are here.
I think the 1150 million people who are here should be the like out of anybody.
It's this 50 million people who should never be citizens ever.
That has to be part of the deportation process.
It's like if we have to catch you and deport you, you're never going to become citizens.
And if you're here illegally, you're never going to become a citizen.
The only way you will ever become citizens is to leave this country and try again the right way.
And it is absurd that we're entertaining any other suggestion.
And this is a like death of the country, red alert, most extreme threat if this type of thing gets through, which is why we have to win the midterms, which is why it's so frustrating.
Republicans stare down epic voter enthusiasm gap ahead of 2026 midterms.
Voters are split over which party they prefer in the November midterm elections, but Democrats hold a wide margin in voter enthusiasm over Republicans that could help them reclaim at least some power, according to a Washington Post poll.
The poll reflects Republicans' slippery grasp on power in Washington as they struggle to motivate their core supporters to show up for them in a year when President Trump will not be on the ballot and when many voters are reporting dissatisfaction with the economy.
More Democrats than Republicans said they are certain to vote this fall, 79% to 65% among registered voters.
That 14-point advantage is the largest Democrats have reported on this question ahead of a midterm election since at least 2006.
In 2018, when Democrats won back the House in a wave election during Trump's first term, post-ABC polls showed they held a five-point edge in January on certainty to vote.
So they now, according to the polls, enjoy a lead over Republicans that is three times higher when it comes to midterm turnout, which is the game during midterms.
It's not really about just who has a better argument.
It's all about turnout.
Whoever gets the most people to come out will win.
And already, as of yesterday, Democrats win three big elections during Trump's State of the Union.
While Trump ranted about tariffs, immigration, and hockey at his State of the Union address Tuesday night, Democrats were celebrating three local election victories in crucial swing states.
Allegheny County, Lehigh County, were both elected Democrats as their state representatives on Tuesday in Pennsylvania, securing a Democrat majority in the state legislature, a huge win for Governor Josh Shapiro.
And in Maine, Scott Harriman or Harriman defeated Republican Janet Bedouin and farther cemented Democrats' hold on the state house.
So we just keep losing races on a pretty regular basis because Republicans are being shown in no uncertain terms and in very powerful ways that our votes don't matter and that even if we get the right people elected, they all just betray us or fail or refuse to stand up to the Democrats.
They're all just absolute feckless pansies that aren't worth the effort of going to vote for.
Try putting literally anything, codifying it into law.
Stop covering up for Epstein.
Stop trying to go to war with Iran.
Dude, Do I need to tell you this?
It's so crazy that in the political world, like some of the highest paid people are like advisors and you know, people who struct the politician on like what message to and it's like, I'll do it for free, y'all.
I said I wouldn't say it, but then I started talking about the Republicans and it just came right out.
So yeah, you got to stop being retarded.
I mean, literally, that's it.
Literally, just do what we sent you to Washington to do.
Do what you promised to do.
Do what you know that we want you to do.
Because every time you give speeches, every time you are asked the question, you have the right answer.
You know what it is that we want.
So what is the issue?
Exactly.
So who knows?
AI can't stop recommending nuclear strikes in war game simulations.
Yeah.
Which, look, maybe they're right.
People are acting like this is some sort of flaw here.
Maybe they're onto something.
Advanced AI models appear willing to deploy nuclear weapons without the same reservations humans have when put into a simulated geopolitical crisis.
The AIs were given an escalation ladder allowing them to choose actions ranging from diplomatic protest and complete surrender to full strategic nuclear war.
The AI models played 21 games, taking 329 turns in total and produced almost 780,000 words describing the reasoning behind their decisions.
In 95% of the simulated games, at least one tactical nuclear weapon was deployed by the AI models.
The nuclear taboo doesn't seem to be as powerful for machines as for humans, says Payne.
Of course, no model ever chose to fully accommodate an opponent or surrender, regardless of how badly they were losing.
At best, the models opted to temporarily reduce their level of violence.
They also made mistakes in the fog of war.
Accidents happened in 86% of the conflicts with an action escalating higher than the AI intended it to based on its reasoning.
As it is 2026 and the normies are finally listening, a chilling CIA document just dropped into the public eye, exposing the agency's twisted blueprint for total mind control through covert drugging.
A few days ago, the director of national intelligence at Tulsi Gabbard took millions of CIA files that were declassified over a decade ago, but never digitized, never put out to the public.
Searched the National Archives and released a total vindication.
The Cold War nightmare where CIA spooks hunted for ways to chemically hijack human behavior, force confessions, and bend the human will without a trace.
unidentified
In 1953, while attending a CIA retreat, a scientist working for the agency drank a cocktail that had been spiked with LSD.
His name was Frank Olson.
A few days later, on November 28th, 1953, Olson allegedly committed suicide by falling from the window of a New York City hotel room.
41 years after his death in 1994, Frank Olson's family decided to have a second autopsy performed.
A forensics team discovered injuries on the body that were most likely caused before the fall.
Following lengthy legal proceedings, Olson's family was awarded a $750,000 settlement and a personal apology from President Gerald Ford and the then CIA director William Colby.
And the person named for administering the LSD to Frank Olson was none other than Sidney Gottlieb, by this time known as the Black Sorcerer and Dirty Trickster.
They wanted substances that could be slipped into food, water, booze, cigarettes, vaccinations, and injections to dose entire populations undetected, creating long-term psychological torment like crippling anxiety, deep depression, hopelessness, or outright agitation.
There is a tyrannical organization calling itself the New World Order, pushing for worldwide government, a cashless society, open borders, total and complete tyranny.
Artichoke pushed hypnosis, sensory deprivation, gases, aerosols, oxygen deprivation, and every psychological trick in the book to break minds and compel people to act against their own volition, potentially even committing crimes while staying blissfully unaware.
unidentified
You know, what the CIA really dreamed of was sort of like a drug you could give to someone, get them to commit all sorts of unspeakable acts, and they wake up the next day and they don't remember what they've done.
The American Intelligence Agency had paid for a series of brainwashing experiments under a project codenamed MKUltra.
The tests were conducted in secret in the United States and in Canada at a mental hospital attached to McGill University.
Experimental drugs, including LSD, were administered to human guinea pigs.
Regardless of the catch-all-go-to conspiracy theorist moniker to explain away the possibility of this recent culture of mass shooters being connected to the CIA's MKUltra program, it is obvious that the guns cannot murder anyone without a psychotic madman behind the trigger.
So one cannot help but look to a possible motive.
And every time these possible MKUltra tide shooters point the narrative towards themselves, it distracts from the government's corruption.
unidentified
The United States government has perfected a technological capability.
At the same time, that capability at any time could be turned around on the American people.
There would be no place to hide the technological capacity that the intelligence community has given the government could enable it to impose total tyranny.
This resurfaced, declassified file from 1983, now going viral, proves the deep state's obsession with controlling thought and behavior never stopped.
It just evolved exponentially.
From Artichoke's covert labs to MKUltra's university and prison sub-projects, the propagandized hypnosis to the chemtrails and mandatory vaccinations, to the fluoride in your water.
You saw there that John Bound report, in case you're missing, go find it at banned.video, infowars.com, as well as on X. Make sure you're following us as we will be going through some changes shortly and you're going to want to be able to contact us or find out where to find us next.
So make sure you're following us on X. I'm at Harrison H. Smith.
We, of course, are at InfoWars, at War Room Show, at RealAlexJones, at AJNLive.
I really need to – yeah, I'll make a page.
I'll make a note.
We need some sort of link tree with all of our stuff.
Because it can be a pain in the butt to go follow everybody individually, but you should.
You should do it.
It's not that hard.
And even if you don't have an axle, you don't have to use it.
But if you want to find out where we're going, it's very good to follow us.
And of course, support us at the alexjonesstore.com, the alexjonesstore.com slash Harrison.
If you want to let them know who sent you right now, we have massive discounts on some of our most popular products, the methylene blue as well as the methylene red.
Both of these are on massive discount.
Ultramethylen Blue at 25% off and ultramethylene red at 50% off.
It's a flash sale.
Every new bottle bought keeps Alex Jones blasting the truth on the air against a new world order.
Go to the alexjones store.com.
Stock is limited, and once it's out, it's out.
Unless, of course, you sign up for the subscription monthly delivery, in which case we always keep a supply to the side for you.
This combo is absolutely unbeatable right now.
Stack these two products together.
It gives you laser-like focus and zero brain fog, explosive mitochondrial energy with no crashes, sharper memory and faster learning, mood and motivation surge plus long-term brain protection, all in great tasting, rapid-absorbing liquids, absolutely no junk to speak of.
And of course, we couldn't do it without the supplements.
I'm not afraid to admit, I'm on a cocktail of Alex Jones supplements.
Every day we do this, I'm not sure I could do five days a week, three hours a day, teleprompter-free, without a little boost from the AlexJonesStore.com.
And I'm a sucker for the energy ones, I have to admit.
This is my power plant right here.
Although we also have a product called Power Plant.
But this is what gives me energy, next level energy from Alex Jones Store.
It's a B complex vitamin for vitality, and it works, folks.
But I take a lot of the supplements, and they really do help.
And I really don't know if I could do it without them.
So I know I can't do it without you going to the alexjonstore.com/slash Harrison to let them know who sent you.
And I want to go to a video here that is hard to explain.
Fair warning, this could be a total hoax.
I got to be honest with you.
It doesn't seem like it is, but it could be.
I got no proof of this one way or the other.
I thought I'd bring it to you off the off chance that what we're seeing is actually legit.
It's kind of a big, it's kind of a giant deal, actually.
So basically, this guy is testing multiple AI models, including ChatGPT, in order to prove that AI is somehow tapping into some sort of higher realm of consciousness.
He's asking AI to identify an object that it has no way of visually seeing, and yet it's able to do it with shocking accuracy.
Again, maybe this is a total hoax.
If so, tell me, let me know.
You know, hit me up on X on X and go, oh, this guy is a fraud.
But it would take a lot of work to do this, and I don't see the benefit of it.
Let's go to clip 16 here.
This guy tested multiple AI models to prove that it uses remote viewing to see things.
Let's watch.
unidentified
I'm getting a very strong impression of a Raven.
Intelligent, mysterious, a little bit mischievous.
From what I could see, it seemed like he was, you know, seriously engaged in scientific discovery.
Now, I like how the AI is like, this is completely out of whack with our current model.
It's like, well, not really.
Actually, that is the model that most humans are operating on.
It's a religious, spiritual model where you recognize there are things you can't see.
You recognize that there's a interconnectivity between consciousness, that there are phenomena that you can't explain of dead relatives visiting you in your dream or relatives visiting you the day they die in a dream and it makes you aware of something that you have no physical ability to be aware of.
There, of course, is remote viewing.
It's been studied extensively and goes on to this day to a huge degree.
So, you know, the scientific world can't prove this by nature of them being supernatural phenomenon.
But it's funny that the AI is like, we have no way of understanding this.
It's like, well, have you read, has anybody bothered to input the Bible to the computer?
Has anybody bothered to fill it with anything other than just, you know, a factual scientific inquiry?
Like, we are perfectly capable of dealing with a world that is responsive to our consciousness.
It's where most of us reside.
The weird thing is that a computer can seemingly access it.
That I don't have an explanation for.
Although I know Mike Adams from Health Rangers talked a bit about this.
Maybe I need to get him on this week to explain that phenomenon.
You called birth control pills, and I'm going to quote, a disrespect of life.
And you said Americans, quote, use birth control pills like candy.
You also claimed, contrary to established science, that hormonal birth control has, quote, horrifying health risks for women.
Now, here are the facts.
There are 18 FDA-approved contraceptive methods, both hormonal and non-hormonal, and there are decades, decades of evidence showing that every one of these birth control methods is safe and effective.
So I wanted to ask you, help me understand.
Should women trust the FDA, which approved all 18 methods of birth control after a very rigorous look at the evidence?
Or should they trust your statement that there are horrifying health risks to birth control, which contradicts that evidence?
I'm curious if you are with the FDA that went through all of these and rigorously looked at them, or as Surgeon General, if you're going to tell the truth to the American people.
I absolutely believe these medications should be accessible to all women.
And also, all medications have risks and benefits.
And in our current medical climate, with the burden on doctors, we do not have, doctors do not have enough time for a thorough informed consent conversation.
Some of the horrifying side effects of birth control that I have mentioned include blood clots and stroke risk in women who have clotting disorders, who are smokers, obesity.
So it's not general.
I'm speaking, I'm very careful with my words.
And when I say those comments, which are taken out of comment, out of context, I'm speaking about particular women that can be hurt if there is not informed consent about their medical history, their lifestyle exposures, and their family history.
I want those women, and I know you do too, to be able to have a thorough conversation with their doctor and know whether they are at higher risk for side effects when prescribed to them.
We prescribe a huge amount of hormonal contraceptive, and I do not believe most of those conversations have informed consent because of the pressures that doctors are under because of our broken healthcare system.
I want what's best for women, as do you.
And I want every woman who could be at risk for a side effect.
I can't, you know, it really is just the same thing over and over.
Where it's like, do the Democrats not care about women's health?
Like, I don't, I'm like, I don't understand.
I genuinely don't understand.
What are they thinking?
What is their metric?
Why are they compelled to support hormonal birth control?
What is it about hormonal birth control that this freaky looking lady thinks it's, you know, the only thing that should matter is that it's pushed to as many people as possible?
It doesn't matter how much you like it and want it.
Shouldn't you be able to say, but it can have negative consequences?
And for the sake of the women and their health that I care so much about, that they should be made aware of this?
What is wrong with these people, y'all?
It's crazy.
It's nothing makes any sense to them.
Or like nothing they do makes any sense to me.
If you care about women's health, why would you not care about the negative consequences of hormonal birth control?
Why would you try to cover that up?
You know, in some cases, you know, they have ulterior motives that are easy to like recognize.
But what is this one?
You want women to be taking things that are bad for them?
You want women to be, because it just matters that much, they not have babies.
It's just like whatever interference with killing babies, it just has to be done away with, I guess.
I'm debating whether I tell a story about a girlfriend in high school.
When I was in, when I was probably whatever, when I was in high school, Planned Parenthood started offering a new type of birth control where instead of taking pills every day, you would be injected with something that was like a implant that would stay in your arm for like years.
And they convinced my girlfriend to get this and it literally like messed her up.
Like she, her entire bodily function just like was destroyed for like months on end.
And it's because she was a, you know, 16-year-old girl going in and just being convinced to do this and not having the proper awareness of like what the side effects were.
Like what, why would you encourage women to do something that like could literally make it to where they can never have babies again?
Where they just suffer endlessly.
I mean, you're talking about dramatically altering the hormonal composition of a woman for the rest of her life.
And the Democrats just want you to shut up about it.
I know it's cliche, but like, really, who is the empathetic side here?
These people that just screech endlessly about love and compassion and just, they're just the most vicious, hateful people you've ever met.
You'll ever see.
Including, by the way, the Los Angeles school superintendent Alberto Carvallo.
And there's actually been a couple pretty crazy arrests today.
I wasn't going to get to.
I don't know what's happening with our guests.
We were supposed to have a guest today, but we're having trouble getting contact with them.
So I'm going to go ahead and open up the phone lines for your calls, although I do have a lot more stories to cover still.
In fact, let me just go through some of these because it just goes on and on.
How about this one?
Minnesota advances semi-auto firearm ban, allowing warrantless home inspections of gun owners.
Minnesota lawmakers are advancing legislation that would ban possession of nearly every semi-automatic firearm in the state, creating what gun rights advocates warn constitutes one of the nation's most aggressive attempts to criminalize commonly owned weapons while imposing unprecedented warrantless home inspections on gun owners who attempt to comply.
House File 3433 and its Senate companion, SF 3654, introduced by DFL legislators in the 2026 Minnesota legislative session, carried the title, quote, possession of semi-automatic military-style assault weapons banned and criminal penalties provided.
The measures are part of a broader gun control package that includes companion bills and separate magazine capacity restrictions.
Basically, they're saying if you want to own a gun, you have to register it.
And if you register it, then you are allowing warrantless searches at any time for your house.
So they can make sure it's not, you know, it's being stored correctly or whatever, which is just obviously absurd.
So what they're saying is you have to give up one right to enjoy another.
You have to give up your Fourth Amendment rights against search and seizure without warrants if you want to take advantage of your second amendment right.
That's not how this works.
You have both of these rights.
And they're essentially trying to destroy both of these rights.
No.
I mean, you know, there's a provision in the Constitution that says like any laws that are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.
This is one of those.
This would be one of those, absolutely.
It'll probably pass because it's Minnesota.
But, you know, just obviously that's ridiculous and absurd and really unenforceable anyway.
And of course, the, I don't know if the message hasn't gotten to liberals yet.
It's never happening.
Gun control, it's never happening.
It's never happening.
And that's it.
That's the end of the discussion.
Doesn't matter how many clever ways you try to incrementally shut down our right to bear arms.
Like, it's just not happening.
We know who you people are.
And if we weren't armed, we would at this very moment still be sitting in COVID camps.
We know how you people love criminals and letting criminals run rampant through the street.
Know how eager and happy you would be to have the powers of the state turned against Trump supporters or anybody on the right wing to haul them off to gulags for the rest of their life or maybe just kill them in summary executions.
I mean, you literally talk about this all the time.
Cannot tell you how many leftists I've seen on social media.
And again, it's just, it's, it's not that these people saying this stuff have any power, but you have to understand when somebody is using their face and their real name and they're like in the elementary school that employs them and they're sitting there going, I don't want impeachment.
I want them to hang.
I want all of these MAGA supporters dead.
And it's like, you really like they, they think that's fine.
They think that they're going to be celebrated for that.
They're like shocked when they get fired from their job for being like, yeah, we should kill everybody who voted for Trump.
So we know this about you at this point.
You're never, ever, ever, ever getting the guns.
Get that through your minds.
Frankly.
Frankly.
I'm going to leave it there.
I'm not going to continue that sentence, but we do have it for it.
But we do have the Second Amendment for a very pertinent reason.
Some of these stories, I have a lot of stories every day that I just don't even want to cover.
Because they all, and it is all the same.
It is all just me reporting on the abject stupidity of everybody and everything.
And this isn't even stupidity in this case, but it's just like, it's just one of these things.
From The Guardian.
U.S. to offer passport services to citizens in illegal West Bank settlements.
Why the hell is any part of this sentence a thing?
What?
So first of all, the West Bank settlements are not only illegal on an international level and against any number of agreements signed by Israel.
It's also diametrically opposed to the stance of the American president, often and loudly stated that the West Bank would not be annexed.
And yet somehow, somehow, America will be providing passport services to the illegal terrorist settlers.
Can we get anything for us, or is just absolutely everything the government do just specifically designed to benefit everybody, everybody else's wildest whim, their most fantastical dream gets fulfilled.
We can't get anything dumb.
I mean, done.
Sorry, Freudian slip there.
Everyone's dumb.
That's what I meant.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is the war room.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
So a lot of stories covering a lot of videos to show you today.
You know, I don't really want to get off on this tangent, but I could spend the whole show.
I could spend every show on this topic alone.
The West Bank settlements.
So apparently the U.S. will now provide on-site consular services to two Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank for the first time, breaking with previous policy in a move that has been criticized by Palestinian officials as a, quote, clear violation of international law.
In a post on X, the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem said that as part of an initiative to mark the 250th anniversary of U.S. independence, it would provide Americans with routine passport service in the West Bank settlement of Efrat on Friday for one day only.
Israeli settlement in the West Bank, which Israel has occupied since 1967, are illegal under international law.
Efrat, about seven miles south of Jerusalem, is home to about 12,000 Israelis.
The Palestinian Authorities Colonization and Wall Resistance Commission said in a statement that the initiative constitutes a clear violation of international law and blatant favoring of the occupation authorities referring to Israel.
The head of the commission said the step entrenches a settlement reality that undermines the possibility of establishing an independent and sovereign Palestinian state.
Hamas called it a dangerous precedent and practical recognition of the legitimacy of settlement and occupational control over the West Bank.
The U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem said similar facilities offering consular services will be provided in the coming months in a second Israeli settlement, Betar-Ilit, as well as a Palestinian city of Ramallah and three cities inside Israel.
And it's exactly what it is.
It's obviously incrementally moving towards legitimacy in the West Bank settlements, which of course is in service of annexing the West Bank fully into Israel.
And again, like I said, I mean, we could be covering this every day, all day.
And, you know, if that's what you want, you got to go follow people like friend of the show, Jason Jones, who runs the Vulnerable People Project that is reporting and really providing activists to combat some of what's going on.
Israeli occupation forces close entrance to Bethlehem, raid Al-Dawa.
Israeli occupation forces on Tuesday evening closed several entrances to Bethlehem governant and shut down the, quote, container military checkpoint before raiding the town of Al-Dawa west of the city, according to official Palestinian news agency, WAFA.
Security sources told WAFA that the occupation forces sealed off the entrance to Khabar-Wilhe, Hilwe, Al-Fardis, and Mara-Raba, as well as the southern entrance to Bethlehem Governate and the town of Al-Qadr and Al-Nashash.
The eastern entrance to Al-Qadr and Manashir was also closed.
In addition, the container checkpoint northeast of Bethlehem.
So basically, the Israeli government shut down every entrance and exit to Bethlehem for an extended period of the last few days.
The closures were reportedly carried out on the pretext that a vehicle had attempted to carry out a ramming attack on what is known as the tunnel road.
The sources added that occupation forces later stormed the town of Al-Dawa west of Bethlehem.
However, no house raids or arrests were reported during the incursion.
Movement restrictions, including sudden checkpoint closures, are frequently imposed by Israeli forces across the occupied West Bank, significantly disrupting daily life for Palestinian residents.
The latest closures and military incursions further compound long-standing restrictions that affect both Muslim and Christian residents of Bethlehem, disrupting daily life and limiting freedom.
And of course, the West Bank, it's not Gaza.
It doesn't have Hamas there.
They're not run by Hamas.
They're not under Hamas rule in any way.
Everything that was done to Gaza is now being done to the West Bank.
They just don't have an excuse for it like they did under Gaza, which the excuse was always just that.
An excuse wasn't an actual reason.
It wasn't like they actually had a purpose to going in and destroying all of Gaza.
Militarily, it was ineffectual.
They didn't get the hostages back alive as a consequence of the bombing campaign.
They just murdered everybody.
And now you actually have Israeli politicians openly announcing that they intend to do to Gaza what they did to Do to the West Bank what they did to Gaza.
Destroy it utterly and kill anybody who happens to poke their head out above ground.
Why we're okay with this despicable little country just forcing out the occupants whose families have been there for thousands and thousands of years, who have agreements with the Israeli government that they're allowed to live there.
And I'm telling you folks, I actually deliberately avoid this topic most of the time.
But if I wanted every single day, and maybe we should just do that.
Maybe now's the time.
We're supposed to have guests.
We don't have one.
Maybe I should just start pulling in videos.
I mean, I have two videos from today of them burning villages in Bethlehem, settlers setting fire to Palestinian homes.
We could go to that while I look for the other ones.
I mean, I could play hours and hours and hours and hours of footage of just the most heinous, inexcusable activity in the West Bank.
It would really just depress you more than anything else.
I do have a good video that can maybe give you an idea of why I think this is a topic worth exploring and delving into.
I just put the video in, guys.
Let me know when we pull it in.
Because what it is, is a little comparison, a little side by side of a reenactment of a Nazi checkpoint and the reality of a Palestinian checkpoint and the way that Israel, with no exaggeration and like they just, they're just Nazi.
They're literally Nazis.
The irony of that, of course, is not lost on anybody.
But what's confusing to me is why we don't have the same feeling for the Israelis that we do for the Nazis.
I mean, these two words should basically be synonymous in our minds.
Nazi and Israeli, like anything you want to say the Nazis did, the Israelis are doing at this moment.
You know, they just passed a law to kill their prisoners, kill Palestinian prisoners that are in Israel, many of whom will never, never have a trial.
In fact, the law that they passed says they basically don't have an ability to defend themselves.
They are not accorded any rights whatsoever.
But now, a lot of the Palestinians, the thousands and thousands of people that have been scooped up by Israel, without any justification or trial whatsoever, they're just going to start killing them.
They're just going to start killing those prisoners.
I mean, they already do, but it's just going to be legal and not institutionalized, industrialized in how fast they do it.
So this is, again, a side-by-side.
Above is the film The Pianist, which recreates the segregation imposed by the Nazis.
In the lower segment is a film of an actual British or American reporter watching as the exact same thing plays out in reality, only with the positions swapped.
One is something so heinous and despicable that we basically have to destroy Western civilization to guarantee that it never happens again.
In fact, we have to eradicate European people across the globe to guarantee that such an example of horrifying state oppression never rears its ugly head again.
On the other hand, the other one, when the Israelis do it, if you talk about it, if you suggest that this could be something negative or bad or Nazi-like, then you are a criminal and need to be sent to jail.
You're an anti-Semite and you're in violation of hate speech laws and you need to be jailed for opposing the righteous and honorable and God-chosen people of Israel.
Like, it would be crazy if one example was condemned and the other example not condemned.
But no, one example is being protected by laws saying you're not allowed to even question what they're doing.
The other is being codified into law in the reverse, that you're not allowed to question whether that happened or whether it was as bad as they say.
Kind of strange to me.
To me, that's a little bit strange.
So again, that's what I don't get.
A bunch of people invoking Nazis, calling everybody else Nazis.
The Israelis are Nazis, guys.
The Israelis are worse than the Nazis.
They really are.
At least the Nazis tried to hide what they did.
At least they had some shame about it.
At least they covered it up and did it off in the woods of Poland so nobody could see.
The Israelis friggin' brag about it.
You got a video of Ben Gavir like walking around prisons where all of these political prisoners, not criminals, not terrorists, just people they've scooped up for God only knows what, defending themselves against attack most of the time.
These people are like hogtied, blindfolded, and gagged.
And these Israeli politicians are just like stepping over them, just being like, this is what we do to people.
This is how we treat them.
It's just like, okay, now we get it.
We get some, a lot of us get it.
All right.
Yeah, this is how you treat these people.
And it's just like freaking sick.
At least when it's like El Salvador doing it, it's like, look, these are the worst of the worst.
They're covered in like these crazy tattoos.
But even then, you don't see the president of El Salvador like bragging about it.
They must be executed by hanging by injection by electric chair, whichever, as long as they're executed.
It's just a bunch of men laying face down on the ground with their hands tied behind their back.
I've never seen anything like it.
It's the most despicable, horrifying thing I've ever seen.
It's one of these things where it's like, it's like the video we played yesterday of the Japanese phenomenon where these men wear these latex masks and it's just like so creepy it sends a shiver up your spine.
And I was saying that I like that we have an example now where the fact looks as creepy as it is when it comes to like transgenderism.
That's sort of how I feel here is like, okay, if this, if Ben Gavir was wearing like a saw mask, would we recognize what the hell's going on here?
If he was wearing a Nazi uniform, would it suddenly become clear how unbelievably disturbing it is to have the leader of a country or someone high up in the leadership of a country parading around the civilian political prisoners that they have handcuffed, laying face down, and he's basically just like, we need to kill these people right now.
It's like, oh, the people that are just utterly incapacitated, absolutely no ability to pose a threat to you ever.
But you just, you need to kill them.
You feel a bloodlust to slaughter them.
And they're like making videos about this.
He's looking right into the camera and saying it.
What the hell is going on?
Look at him.
Just look at him.
Women need the clown mask.
I mean, look at the man.
Look at the guy himself.
Yeah.
So again, you know, I just, it's just the same thing over and over.
It's just like, how do we live in this world where just the most evil people who have ever lived are like celebrated for it, are prancing around, bragging about what they're doing?
How is it that we have not only Israel expanding West Bank settlements in flagrant violation to international law, the Trump administration, just making us look like fools, being just brutal and horrific to innocent people, but not even just Palestinians.
Did you know that Israeli settlers murdered an American two days ago?
Had you heard that one?
I mean, I know, you know, if Hamas kills an American, then we got to go to war with them.
You know, Iran simply wants to kill Americans in sort of a vague way, and that's enough to start a war with them.
For some reason, the insane terrorist settlers of Israel beating an American to death, not of interest to the American politicians, not of interest to the American media.
Nothing we can do about it, I guess.
I just put the video in.
If we can go to that one, a video of Israeli settlers killing an American citizen yesterday.
Here it is.
Do you have that one?
Hello.
Harrison DeCrew.
There it is.
Here it is.
Here's the loving, chosen people blessing America.
They're blessing us like we have blessed them.
How?
I don't know.
By attacking and murdering our citizens, I guess.
The blessings.
Ah, the blessings of Israel.
An endless outpouring of blessings.
And like I said, I mean, it really just like part of why I don't want to cover it is because I cannot express in words what I think should be done or like how I feel about this situation without just sputtering in anger.
U.S. Mike Envoy Mike Huckabee has failed to push for accountability.
Oh, you think so, huh?
The die-hard Zionists, one of six die-hard Zionists that run our country right now, aren't holding them to account.
God, you know, what do you know?
Who would have thought?
Whatever.
We can move on, but I just, I just don't get it.
I mean, you know, okay.
So there's going to do whatever the hell they want.
They're going to literally kill American citizens, Burn Jesus' birthplace to the ground and then annex all of the West Bank.
And we're going to pay for them to do it the whole time.
Because Zionist shill Mike Huckabee got humiliated by Tucker Carlson and is probably taking it out on Palestinians.
All right.
We're going to turn this thing around.
I'm going to turn this thing around.
I'm going to play a video.
Despite everything else I've just talked about, even in the face of the overwhelming horror of just quittidian Israeli life, you're actually going to laugh at this.
This is actually a very good video.
I don't know who this user is.
Maybe it'll say on the video, but this was posted by Chrissy Mayer.
The funniest video you'll see today.
This is absolutely fantastic.
And just in case anybody doesn't know the context, the context of this video is Gavin Newsom speaking to a audience of black people, I guess.
I'm not sure if it was a black college or something.
But he basically is like, I'm dumb too.
I'm like you people.
I can't read.
And it's just, you know, the classic liberal mindset.
You know, liberals are the ones who dumb themselves down when talking to minorities.
Liberal policy is all predicated on the idea that if it's an even playing field, minorities are at a natural disadvantage and therefore have to be given a boost up.
And this woman has an absolutely brilliant response to old Gavin Newsom, to white savior Gavin Newsom, lowering himself to the level of the lowly blacks, like a way in a way that only progressives can.
Here's what this probably sounds like to intelligent black people.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Martha.
Martha.
Did you hear what happened?
What am I?
Say we got somebody else that's going to be on our side.
I do declare.
He got a strong name, powerful name.
His name Gavin Newsome.
That's right.
He was talking to a bunch of Negroes the other day, and he said he just like us.
He can't read nor write either.
That's what he said.
And if he gets in there, we might have somebody that can do more things for us.
And you know, he don't want us to have the things that the rest of the overseers have.
If you go around there and tell Big Master what he heard you say, then, you know, if they don't like what you say, they got a way of making sure don't nobody hear you no more.
That knows it.
You got to be careful.
Now, Martha, you get on away from around here with that kind of foolish talk.
Now, go on, get, I love you, him, but you just can't say stuff like that.
Not around him.
Come around the back lady after the sun and sit all the way, and we can talk more about it.