Thursday War Room LIVE! Epstein Files Claim Another Scalp: President of World Economic Forum Resigns, As Hillary Clinton Attacks Trump/Musk During Testimony… PLUS, Risk of War Looms After U.S.-Iran Nuclear Talks Wrap Up With No Deal Announced - FULL SHOW - 02.26.2026
Harrison Smith’s Thursday War Room LIVE! (02.26.2026) dissects Borgay Brindi’s sudden resignation as WEF president amid Epstein ties, mocking Hillary Clinton’s deposition claims while alleging a "cabal" of elites—including Bohemian Grove members like Conan O’Brien and Eric Schmidt—operates with impunity. Secretary Noam’s DHS revelations—hidden SCIF offices, Wuhan lab scientist records, and spyware—spark accusations of treason and CIA orchestration, yet Smith dismisses her as a pawn in a system he calls "infiltrated by traitors." Shifting to Iran’s stalled nuclear talks and staged military threats, he frames geopolitical tensions as performative distractions from domestic chaos: Democratic policies like abolishing ICE, releasing violent criminals via elderly parole, and leftist crime denialism ("restorative justice" as dogma) while Gen Z mocks traditional values without alternatives. The episode culminates in a conspiracy-laden rant about Epstein, Clinton, and "feminist dykes" hijacking equality for gender-based extremism, all while hawking supplements from thealochimpstore.com as tools to "conquer the new world order." [Automatically generated summary]
We have an absolutely gigantic show for you today.
We'll be joined by Ben Bankus in the next hour.
Very funny comedian.
We'll be talking about all sorts of not funny things, but we'll do our best.
We'll do our best to squeeze the humor out of just relentless horror, because that's a lot of what's on offer today.
I regret to inform you, it's no different than any other day.
We got a lot to talk about, including Hillary Clinton testifying and the not testifying for Jeffrey Epstein and a lot of videos, including one that broke an hour ago, that we got to spend some time on because Christy Noam just like very casually is referencing just insane treason going on in the DHS.
I'm blown away by a video I'll show you in the next segment.
But let's begin today, as we do every day, with our Daily Dispatch.
All right, here it is, folks, your Daily Dispatch for Thursday, the 26th of February, 2026.
World Economic Forum chief resigns over Epstein ties.
Borgay Brindi, the chief executive and president of the World Economic Forum, said on Thursday that he would resign after an independent investigation by the group into his ties to the convicted sex vendor Jeffrey Epstein.
Okay, I was a little confused.
I keep seeing headlines about this guy resigning, and it's like, is he ever going to resign?
I feel like I'm stuck in a time wharf where I'm like, well, this guy resigned like last week.
And it's like, no, all these headlines are brand new.
So it was last week he started an investigation into himself and this week he's resigning.
It's like, did you not know?
Were you not aware of your own actions and what would be discovered if you investigated yourself?
He's like, I'm very disturbed by the findings of my own activities.
Well, he's retired and gone now, and I'm sure that will drastically change the direction the World Economic Forum goes.
Certainly they won't just slot in another member of the international pedophile cabal and continue operations as normal.
Hey, speaking of, Bohemian Grove celebrity member list allegedly revealed some members of an elite super secretive men's club based in California wine country have allegedly been leaked with names ranging from former late night host Conan O'Brien and billionaire former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg to ex-Google CEO Eric Schmidt.
The membership list of the Bohemian Grove, a private 2,700-acre campground in Sonoma County that hosts an annual two-week retreat and that has a clubhouse in San Francisco, was allegedly obtained by an independent journalist and confirmed by a club member according to San Francisco Standard.
And so, of course, the cabal operations continue fairly unabated so far.
And I guess they're getting ready for their big mock human sacrifice later in the year.
Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton says she had, quote, no idea of Epstein's crimes, which I don't believe, which nobody in the world, including she herself, nobody believes this for even a single moment.
Okay.
Just want to lay that out there.
Hillary Clinton testifies to House Committee she had no idea about Epstein's crimes, which this is the thing about the Epstein list.
This is the thing about the Epstein crimes and the people involved.
I mean, they're all the most powerful people in the history of the world, and they all got to these positions by being incredibly capable and competent.
And so they're sort of damned if they do, damned if they don't admit to knowing about Jeffrey Epstein.
Either you were in on it and probably involved in the criminal activity, aware of it and doing nothing to stop it, or as Secretary of State, you were a dumbass that didn't know about the people hanging out with your husband the whole time, which is not believable and would be kind of scary if it was true.
If somehow we knew that Jeffrey Epstein was a perverted freak globalist and she didn't, how does that happen?
How does the Secretary of the United States have less information than me, a dude with the internet?
That doesn't make any sense.
So it's like, all right, you didn't know about all of his crimes, then you're an idiot.
Or you did know about his crimes and you're a criminal.
I think the truth is just a criminal idiot.
Trump claims Iran is developing missiles to hit the U.S., contradicting Intel reports with nuclear talks hanging in the balance, the potential of another U.S. war of choice in the Middle East.
President Donald Trump escalated rhetoric Tuesday night, warning that Iran is moving beyond just regional missiles, missile capabilities, and setting its sites further west.
You can find that story at Infowars.com.
We also have this.
Senator Thune quashes the talking filibuster move to pass the SAVE Act.
He's too busy having little dog parades for fun.
He's just far too busy doing a dog parade.
I'm serious.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is The War Room.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
We got a lot stories to cover today.
And I have just piles and piles of news stories to get to.
And each one of these stories could and probably, you know, should, we probably should spend an hour on every single one of them.
We'll try to get to as many as possible.
But I got to go to this video that just broke about an hour ago.
Christy Noam was on with Patrick Bette David.
And in this like two-minute clip, she reveals the craziest things about the DHS.
And it's weird because it's almost like she like kind of doesn't realize what she's saying, or maybe she does, but like the way she delivers this news is so casual.
And it's like, no, what you're revealing is like insane levels of treason at the highest levels of our government.
I'll just go to the video here.
This is Christy Noam.
It was posted an hour ago.
I got the clip from Nick Sortor.
She's on with Patrick Bette David.
And this clip was titled that Christy Noam reveals that Elon Musk helped her find spyware that had been implanted on her phone by DHS employees, which is a big deal.
I think the other stuff she reveals in this is even bigger of deals.
I can't believe what I found since I've been in this department.
I just found the other day a whole room on this campus that was a secret SCIF secure facility that had files nobody knew existed.
So we just happened to have an employee walk by a door and wonder what it was and started asking questions.
We went in there.
There was individuals working there that had secret files that nobody knew about on some of these most controversial topics like that.
And now I've got that turned over to attorneys and we're getting to the bottom of what exactly happened there.
You know, we have CBP, which is customs and border protection.
They know every traveler that comes into this country, every good that comes in.
They're the ones who assess and collect all of the tariffs.
But the information that they had on travelers that came in during COVID, what our national labs, which I also have national labs under my jurisdiction, they're scientists that participated with that Wuhan lab, how they were traveling back and forth between each other and working on those experiments.
It's been eye-opening.
And I'll tell you, Patrick, even from the time I came into this office, it was, you know, Elon and his team were extremely helpful to me.
They helped me identify that some of my own employees in my department had downloaded software on my phone and my laptop to spy on me.
And that was something that if you didn't have those technology experts here in the department looking at all of our laptops and our phones and recognizing that kind of software, it would still be happening today.
So, one of the things I need to do and continue to do is partner with technology companies and experts to bring them in and help us.
Because many times in government, and especially in this department, which was extremely neglected, we were just behind and not up to the standard we should be at.
I remember the first four months, I couldn't even send a PowerPoint over email from the Department of Homeland Security servers that was longer than six pages long.
So, the backwards thinking of protecting our country was extremely detrimental to keeping us safe.
And many times, the deep state, I think, what I tell people most of the time is: I always believed when people talked about the deep state before that it existed.
I never would have dreamed that it was as bad as it is.
It's, it is, I'm still every day trying to dig out people who don't love America that not just work at this department, but also work throughout the federal government.
That may have been one of the craziest clips I've ever seen from an American politician.
She just dropped three insane bombshells that she just like kind of brushes over.
Like, do you get what I mean?
That she's just like, casually, like, yeah, we found a hidden skiff that we didn't know about that had people inside working in it.
Like, what?
Imagine you were a year into a job.
I'm not sure if you said four months in or something.
And, like, there's a building that you're in every day, and all of your employees operate out of that building.
And one day, an employee comes and is like, What's that door?
And you're like, I don't know.
It doesn't have any labels on it.
It's not on any of the manifests.
Like, I don't know.
Let's see if we can get it open.
You get it open, and there's just like an office.
There's like just people working in there that you've never seen before.
And it's a skiff.
It's a secure area.
And she just didn't know about it.
And it's just operating as part of the DHS, but totally without the knowledge of the director of the DHS.
Okay, that's a pretty big deal, I would think.
You know, unless you're teaching at Hogwarts, having a mysterious room full of people you've never seen before in your building, it seems like a big deal.
That seems like bigger than, like, huh, weird.
We just found a secret room with a bunch of guys we've never seen before working crazy Mondays.
Anyway, it's like, well, what?
No, that's like crazy.
All right.
That's first.
Then she casually references, oh, yeah, you know, CBP, they are in charge of manifest and traveling in and out of the country.
So we have all these records of all these scientists working with the Wuhan lab and carrying out these experiments.
She doesn't elaborate, so I can only assume she means creating the virus that caused COVID that shut the world down.
So like, what?
She just casually drops that they have the travel records of the scientists that created COVID going back and forth from Wuhan to America during the pandemic before the pandemic.
I don't know.
She just kind of casually drops that.
That's kind of like a crime against humanity.
That was kind of like a crazy, like, what?
It's like, it's like, yeah, you know, the DHS is a crazy place.
I found Saddam and Osama playing cards next to a nuclear bomb in the basement.
And also they hacked my phone.
It's like, what?
No, you have the scientists that created COVID traveling to and from Wuhan on business ahead of this, and you just casually drop that and move on to the next thing, which is also crazy.
So, the third thing she says is that people in the DHS put spyware on her phone and her laptop to spy, to listen into her meetings and read her communications.
That's treason.
That means you're being spied on, probably by another country, at the very least, by some sort of stay-behind network.
I mean, this is like the craziest video I've ever seen.
And it's like just being treated like, hey, that's kind of weird.
What the hell?
What the hell did we just watch?
Christy Noam, head of the DHS, just announced that there was a secret skiff that they didn't discover for months that had people working inside full-time that she'd never seen before.
The DHS employees secretly inspire spyware on her phone and her laptop that Elon Musk had to discover to help her fix it.
And that she has records of the scientists that created COVID traveling back and forth from the lab.
Have you found anything else, Christy Noam?
Like, do you realize what you're saying right now and what a giant deal this is?
That you just revealed that the Department of Homeland Security that oversees some of the most sensitive and important things in our national security apparatus is just filled with traitors, just has spies and traitors operating totally independent of any oversight by anybody elected.
And she says, you know, they did this to a lot of the politicals.
The politicals.
You mean the people that are actually accountable to the American people?
You mean the people that are supposed to be in charge of the organization?
They're all being spied on by some sort of malevolent force inside the organization that nobody's voted on, that is apparently secret, and apparently operating in complete contradiction to the well-being of the American people.
What are we doing about this, Christy Noam?
What are we doing?
Are you arresting all of them and trying them all for treason?
Did you track down who planted the software on your phone?
And are you torturing them to find out who they're working for?
Like, what are we talking about?
My mind is blown.
I saw that video about five minutes before I went live.
And I'm just like, what are you talking about?
The recent revelation involving Secretary of Homeland Security Christy Noam and tech entrepreneur Elon Musk unveils a troubling situation within the DHS.
Allegations of espionage with claims that spyware was secretly installed on Noam's personal device by her own employees raises critical questions about security and trust inside a federal agency.
No, no, I think it answers some critical questions, actually.
I don't think this is the beginning of an investigation.
I think it sounds like you have all of the evidence you need.
It sounds like you're just acknowledging and kind of somehow okay with the fact that the deep state is very real and still running things in our country.
As in the unelected, unvisible, basically, like just there are people that are operating at the highest levels of our national security system that the director of their organization just doesn't know exists.
They're operating against her.
They're apparently spying on her.
Like, I wonder why.
I wonder what has been the consequence of, at least for some period of time, sensitive conversations between the secretary and maybe the president are being listened in on by somebody, foreigners, Americans, we don't know.
Christy Noam doesn't say she just drops this stuff as if it's like a fun anecdote.
Like, you want to hear how crazy the DHS is?
Well, guess what?
It's like, they're poisoning Americans with plutonium for fun.
So anyway, what else do you want to talk about?
It's like what you just revealed is so incredibly dangerous for America, like that we have these spies apparently everywhere throughout our entire DHS office.
And it's just, I guess, have you checked the other doors?
Like, have you followed up?
Okay, there's one door that you didn't know what it was.
Apparently it was a skiff with an office with people working inside that you didn't know were there and you don't know what they're doing.
And nobody ever told you what was behind that door.
Have you checked the other doors?
Have you checked the other?
Now, listen, just because a door might say service or like, you know, electrical, maybe it says closet.
Like, go ahead and open the door, Christy.
You want to check that door.
Even if it's labeled closet, it might be another skiff.
It might be an entire another office of subversive foreigners that are operating inside your building.
So, Christy, do me a favor.
Go check all the other doors real quick.
Can you do that?
Send somebody around?
Just make sure that you don't have any other skiffs operating that you don't know about, that there's not like a pizza hut operating, you know, under the ground somewhere in the DHS.
Like, what is going on in our government?
What is happening?
Why did we not get a handle on this?
Is it because people like Christy Noam?
Like, I just, her reaction.
Why is this not a bigger deal?
Am I the crazy one?
This all sounds insane to me.
And Christy Noam is just like, just moves on.
I think we need to watch this again.
I think I need, I think I might be going insane.
I think I need to watch it again.
This was a different one.
This was the FBI, which I don't, it's the same thing over and over.
Like, these are, if you're, if you're going to go and become the head of some sort of national security agency like the DHS, here's what you need to do.
First, check all the doors.
Can we check all the doors in the building?
Make sure there's not any offices running that you don't know about.
Okay.
That would be step one.
Step two would be check personnel.
Can we check the personnel?
You know, it's like, I feel like there's a, how do you spell personnel?
There's a movie or something.
I don't know, where it's like, hmm, you know, gee, somebody has stolen the ice cream and it's like a pan across of all the kids and one of the kids is just covered in ice cream.
And they're just like, wasn't me.
Like, I have the feeling you're going to see that type of thing.
Like, you're going to go through the DHS and you're going to be able to look down the line of all the employees and one of the employees is just going to be like shifty and shady and like, he's got like a fake mustache that's half hanging off.
And they're just like, hmm, which one could it be?
Like, okay, so you're going to want to check the architecture of your building.
Do you have a room of requirements, a la Harry Potter, that pops up if and when you need it, perhaps?
I don't know.
It might be magical.
Maybe bring in a wizard if we're having this much trouble getting a handle on the buildings that we operate in.
I don't know if you need like an architect, pull up the old blueprints, a wizard, perhaps a Native American shaman could do some sort of sage cleansing ritual.
I mean, this is stuff that people do when they move into their apartments.
Maybe try doing that when you move in to the DHS.
And then you're going to want to ask all of the personnel.
And this is a good start.
Just ask them.
She'd be like, hey, do you hate America?
And if they say yes, you should fire them immediately.
Okay.
Just quick blanket thing.
Hey, raise your hand if you hate America.
And whoever raises their hand, you need to fire them.
You need to get them out.
And here's the trick: they might not tell you that they hate America.
So you need to double check.
You need to not take them on their word.
Okay, the guy with the fake mustache hanging half off of his face and the shirt with Chairman Mao's face on it.
The guy with like the tattoo that shows the Trump assassination and it says like we won't miss next time.
And it's just like prominently displayed on his arm.
If he sits there and is like, actually, I love America and I love Trump.
Like, well, but you have a tattoo of him bleeding to death on your arm.
That's kind of weird.
But anyway, back to work, sir.
Like, you just, you need to not take them on their word, not take them, you know, at their word.
You need to make sure that they actually do love America.
You make sure they're not operating some sort of room of requirement, Dumbledore's army type situation.
Stay behind network, okay?
And yeah, check your phones.
Tell you what, if one of your employees, probably this same guy, there's probably like 10 of them, one of the guys, one of the ladies that you have with like the short purple hair and the septum piercing and the tattoo of AOC with hearts around it.
When she comes up and is like, hey, I need to upgrade your phone.
And then she takes your phone for a few minutes and comes back with an app that's called just like a normal phone app, you know, or just like, yeah, I downloaded Candy Crush, but don't touch the icon.
Don't press it.
Don't ever touch the icon because it's not the normal Candy Crush.
And she clicks Candy Crush and it's just like, you know, welcome to the transmission communication zone.
Who would you like to spy on today?
And she's like, this is a weird version of Candy Crush.
I've never played this before.
So when the communist infiltrator takes your phone to install mysterious apps on it, go ahead and delete those apps.
Just go ahead and delete those.
Just go ahead and do that.
Go ahead and run an antivirus software just to make sure that you don't have some sort of foreign subversive elements just with access to your personal devices planting apps to spy on you there.
Any other advice I have for perhaps the Kash Patel types out there, the Christy Gnome types out there, when you're taking over a federal organization, you're going to want to double check these things, folks.
Please, for the love of God, what are we doing here?
So I didn't mean to spend an entire segment on that, but I don't think this revelation is having the impact that it probably should.
Who were the scientists that were working in Wuhan Lab?
How often did they travel back and forth?
What did they take with them when they traveled back and forth?
Who sent them there?
Who were they communicating with here in America?
These are questions that you apparently have the answer to.
Will you do something about that, please?
You might have forgotten.
It was a long time ago, but all the way back in 2020, there was a man-made virus that was deliberately leaked from Wuhan Lab by Peter Dasek, who himself admitted being instructed by the CIA to do this.
And then that virus, it actually spread all over the world and killed a bunch of people directly by infecting them with a virus when they had other conditions or a low immune system already.
And it killed a lot of people.
It also sort of destroyed the world in a lot of ways.
Its impact in the negative is unimaginable from just the lack of education, the shutdown of the economy.
I mean, I don't know if you remember this, Christy Noam.
Was like a crime against humanity.
It was like a massive attack.
It was like a chemical attack on the entire world and it killed millions of people and caused just endless suffering.
No, you apparently know the people that did that to us.
So do you see where I'm going with this?
Do you see where I'm going with this?
That those people should probably be arrested and held to account.
And at the very least, at the very, very, very least, Christy Noam, I know that there are these stay-behind networks.
There is this deep state.
It is hard to get things done officially.
Tell you what, you're on a talk show.
Why don't you say what you've learned?
Why don't you do the investigation yourself or get a trustworthy intern, okay?
This means an intern that is not secretly implanting spy apps on your phone.
And what happened to them?
Did you do anything to them?
Did you fire them?
Why did you not make it a big deal?
Again, how big of a deal do you think it would be if I secretly, during one of Alex's segments on the show, I snuck in, I got his phone, and I planted a listening app so that I could access his microphone.
Do you have any idea what would happen to me if I did that?
Again, it's not like, but like, I'm just trying to put this in context.
Anybody doing this to their boss would be committing a crime.
They'd be sent to jail.
They would 100% lose their job at the very least and probably never be hired by anybody ever again.
Who does that?
Apparently, people at the DHS do that.
Did they even get fired?
Did you even investigate it?
When did this happen?
Elon Musk hasn't been there for a year.
So I assume a year ago you discovered that, like, just what are we doing?
Can somebody explain this to me?
How is it that the secretary of the DHS just admitted there was a secret skiff she didn't know about with people working in it?
That they have the manifest and the travel logs of the people who created the virus that was released from Wuhan, COVID-19, and that her own personal devices were planted with spyware by people at the DHS.
I know I'm just repeating myself at this point, but, like, the hell is going on?
Yeah, I guess we can move on now.
I guess we can move on with that sort of as a foundation, as the understanding that, like, our government just is the deep state, and that the people that we've elected and the appointments that Trump has made to go in are, I think it's normal.
I don't know.
I'm like speechless at what we just heard.
Yeah, I feel like I'm going crazy.
We'll move on, folks.
We will move on to other stuff, but uh, but I don't know.
I don't know what else to say.
We'll be right back, folks.
I just, um, yeah, there's other crazy stuff.
But if anybody knows Christy Noam, tell her to give me a call and give her some advice.
It's very simple advice, but apparently nobody's told her yet.
Okay, yeah, we'll be right back.
Stay with us, folks.
Just crazy news coming up.
All right, welcome back, folks.
I got some more videos to play you.
And I think combined, like these videos should give you a good example.
Like, I don't know, a good cross-section of like what's going on in this world.
I got a couple of these.
I guess let's go to clip number 15 first.
Little out of left field, but this is the governor of Oklahoma talking about illegal immigration.
And this particular clip highlights the inability of Republicans, especially sort of establishment Republicans, to get their heads out of their asses and to realize what time it is and what the hell is going on in this world.
I don't understand the world they think they live in or who they think they're dealing with here, but people like this, the governor of Oklahoma, Stitt or something, Kevin Stitt.
This guy's the problem.
These people in the GOP, these types of people in the Republican Party are the reason we can't get anything done.
They're the reason nothing ever happens.
There's the reason that no matter how insane the Democrats get, they never respond in kind.
And no matter how much support from the people they get to do whatever they possibly can, they just choose not to do it.
And this is what is killing our country is this level of weakness.
This is infuriating, but like there's problems on all sides.
This is our problem.
This is the albatross around our neck.
People like Kevin Stitt, the governor of Oklahoma.
So like my genuine question is, like, what has given you that impression?
From what data are you deriving the conclusion that the Democrats are not bringing in illegal immigrants to replace Americans?
Where are you getting that from?
Who is telling you that?
They say that's what they're doing.
That is what they're doing.
Chuck Schumer has made like three speeches in the last two days saying that's exactly what they're doing.
I've got like four videos today of Democrats saying that's what they're doing.
What is happening?
Where are you coming up with this?
The only thing I can possibly imagine is that sincere dumbasses like Mr. Stitt here, Governor Stitt, get calls from slimy subversives like Tim Wallace who go, us bringing in immigrants to replace Americans?
Never.
And gullible old Kevin Stitt goes, yeah, it does sound crazy, doesn't it?
And you're a good man.
You wouldn't do that.
And Tim Wallace is like, yeah, totally.
It's the only thing I can imagine.
The only thing I can imagine is that basically the Democrats just lie to Kevin Stitt and he just believes them.
Because they must be lying to him personally because they don't say this in public.
In public, they say, we're replacing Americans and we're going to make all the illegals citizens.
So where is he getting like, And you can see it in action right there.
It's what we talk about continuously.
He's sitting there going, you know, the Democrats claim that we don't want illegal immigrants because we hate immigrants.
But what he means is that, like, this guy is still stuck in this old mindset.
He is absolutely terrified and like genuinely so of being called racist.
He thinks it's the worst thing ever.
And he really doesn't want anybody to think he is.
And he really wants to do whatever he can to not seem racist.
And so he's like, no, no, we, you know, there's economic arguments against immigrants and we don't hate immigrants.
And that's a lie.
And so they, they, you know, claim that we have the bad motives and that's not true.
It's like, yeah, because you're like a decent person that actually doesn't hate anybody and that is sincere about what you're saying.
Stop projecting that onto them.
So he takes this experience he's had where he's like, they say it's because I'm racist, but I'm not.
You know, these right-wingers say that they're trying to bring in illegal immigrants because they want to replace Americans.
That's similar.
These two things are the same.
We're ascribing motive, even though we don't have it.
And it's like, dude, this is the difference.
They are liars.
They do have ulterior motives.
They're not even ulterior.
They announce it.
They tell you they're doing it.
But sure, ulterior motives.
They lie to your face.
And it's just like the perfect example of the dumbass gullible Republican that both falls for their, you know, psyop, their fear psyop of, oh, I can't resist immigration or else I'm a racist.
And then also projects baselessly onto Democrats that actually I'm going to assume they have the best intentions, even though their actions directly contribute to the destruction of my country in a deliberate way.
I'm just going to assume the best of them.
I'm just going to assume that that's all a mistake and a smear, even though they don't deny it.
And I'm just going to assume that they also are just like me and don't want America to be replaced because that's crazy.
And it's like, yeah, they're crazy.
They hate you.
They're replacing your people on purpose.
They're saying it to your face and you're not believing them for some reason.
You're just choosing to believe that they are just like you.
Why, dude?
What is wrong with you?
Why are we run by gullible idiots?
Do you, do you want me to show you some videos?
Do you want me to show you videos?
These freaking scumbags.
Clip 38 here.
Illinois congressional candidate Kate Abuga Blagog talking about giving backdoor citizenship to every criminal that scrabbled their way across the border in the last four years.
Why do you think this isn't happening, you absolute morons?
Let's watch.
unidentified
Abolish and prosecute ICE.
We need to repeal the Patriot Act.
We need to lift refugee caps.
And we need to offer complete amnesty and citizenship to any immigrant here who has not committed a violent crime.
Additionally, we need trials.
There is no moving forward without justice.
Stern words for Greg Bovino aren't enough.
Body cameras aren't enough.
We need people willing to put everything on the line, not when it's politically convenient and not have their hands in their pockets.
And again, she's just reflecting what Chuck Schumer himself, leader of the Democratic Senate, keeps giving speeches about.
We're going to give citizenship to everybody who's here illegally.
And we've got Republicans who are just like, they don't really believe that.
Why would they say it?
What are you talking about?
Of course they're going to do that.
And the scariest thing is that these silly, silly Republicans, trying not to curse, are going to be this way Up to and past the point that the Democrats get exactly what they want,
which means that the ICE officers right now that are putting their lives on the line and going out and arresting some of the most dangerous people in the world, following lawful orders, fulfilling the demands as laid out by the law written and codified by Congress,
despite doing everything legally, despite complying to an absurd degree with every intervention from any leftist activist judge, when the Democrats get in power, they're going to send the police to those people's houses.
These people, these men in ICE who have families, who have done nothing wrong, who have served their country, are going to be hauled off in chains and spend the rest of their lives in prison.
And the whole time, Republicans like the governor of Oklahoma are going to be going, well, you know, we do have the rule of law in this country.
And if, you know, we got to let the process play out.
We got to, you know, if they're innocent, I have faith in our system.
And I think, you know, if they were obeying their orders, then they'll get away.
And it's like, so half the country, half the Democrats are just like, we're destroying America.
We're giving citizenship to anybody who came over here.
We're going to support them their entire lives.
And we're going to arrest our political opponents for behaving lawfully.
We are going to use the power of the government to arrest our political enemies.
You, you people and your supporters, we're going to arrest all of you for daring to be a part of a government program that we disagree with.
Because obviously they recognize that this is a clash of civilizations.
This is a full-fledged, soft civil war taking place right now.
And they don't care about the rule of law.
They don't give a damn about oppression or any of this crap.
Obviously, they never have before.
Suddenly they care about the Fourth Amendment.
Suddenly they give a damn about the First Amendment or the increasing militarization of our domestic police forces.
They don't care about this stuff.
They just want to use it against us.
And they want to make sure that we can't ever use it against them by punishing anybody who follows orders because they know it's not about punishing people that did bad things.
They want to punish people that didn't do anything as a lesson to all of the rest of them of, hey, if you even help the Democrats, we will throw you in prison.
I mean, if you even help the Republicans, we will throw you in prison.
If you follow the orders of Donald Trump, might not be today, might not be tomorrow, but they say it.
The governor of Pennsylvania has said there's no statute of limitations on murder.
Everybody in ICE will be a part of a RICO statute to charge all of them with any murder that any ICE officer commits.
And there's no statute of limitations.
They get into office next year.
It'll be then.
If they get into office 10 years from now, it'll be then.
One way or another, they're going to arrest ICE officers for following orders.
Lawful orders.
Not just, you know, approved of, but obligated by the Constitution.
And dumbass Republicans like Governor Stitt will just sit there and go, you know, I know I don't want them to go to jail.
So why would I think that they're just trying to use their power to throw their political enemies in prison?
I wouldn't do that.
And I think we need to stop looking at the worst and everybody.
And it's just like, you're a bigger problem than they are.
We can handle them, not with people like you leading us.
We could deal with the left in an instant if we had people like this not just giving them every benefit of the doubt, ignoring them when they say exactly what they're going to do, and just Capitulating at every pass on some sort of weird delusion that they're just like us and we're all we all agree on the same thing, really, at the end of the day.
And they're just like, we are replacing all of the white people with Mexicans because we hate you.
And they're just like, you don't mean that.
Okay, whatever.
Whatever, dude.
It's just, it's like, this is the problem.
These, these people are the problem.
Senator Thune's the same thing.
How did it get to be all of them?
Why is it all of them?
Because people like Thomas Massey and Marjorie Tyler Greene, that aren't like this, get ousted by them.
Beyond infuriating.
But obviously, the right wing doesn't have a monopoly on stupidity.
Let's go to clip 36 here.
This one set me off this morning when I first saw it.
Democrats, man, as bad as Republicans are.
These damn Democrats.
Here's Bill Maher, like kind of pretending to understand what the Epstein files are about, but then doing his best to downplay and undercut the severity of what we actually learned.
QAnon said there's this vast elites around the world conspiracy to, you know, traffic kids and pedophiles, and they were more right than I let on than I thought they were.
Okay, so that's what I'm giving you.
And it wasn't just Prince Andrew in the parlor with the dildo, okay?
And then the proof came out that you were wrong and you want to act like it's a virtue for you to admit it.
We don't need you to admit it.
We always knew you were wrong.
Now we have the evidence.
It only makes sense that you would acknowledge that at a certain point.
He's like, they were more right than not about the Epstein stuff.
Okay, so for the last 10 years, that so-called QAnon, aka people who just knew what was actually happening, the correct people, people that understood what was really going on, were talking about elite pedophile sex trafficking networks.
And for 10 years, you've been laughing at it and covering it up and ignoring it and mocking anybody that talked about it, allowing these very networks to continue operation probably till this day.
But certainly, you know, you were operating in service of them.
Now you realize 10 years later, you were wrong the entire time, but there's no sort of mea culpa about it.
There's no like actual revelation of like, oh my God, they were right.
I was wrong.
Every time they told me something and I laughed and scoffed at them, I should have been paying attention.
And hey, if we are right about the details, if we are right about just in general, what was happening, might we be right about the motivations?
Might we be right about the stuff not yet exposed in the files, censored in the files, hinted at, but not made explicit in the files?
So you're willing to believe that there is a network of international elite that traffic humans, that engage in torture, that engage in sex trafficking with underage people, that almost certainly engage in murder, since there is explicit talk of dead bodies and murder victims and killing people in the Epstein files.
Oh, but eating people.
Oh, that's, oh, that's a bridge too far.
Cannibalism?
No way.
I'll never believe that.
So Lauren Bobert should have said, it was like, look, you're apologizing now.
You'll apologize again in a couple of years when I'm right about this too.
Where does this arrogance come from?
That he actually still feels like he's the superior one.
He's the condescending one.
When what he's actually doing is admitting that his entire worldview is built on a faulty foundation and that he was abjectly wrong about one of the most important things happening in our entire society for the last 10 years.
He's like, you won't meet me halfway?
I was trying to figure out like, what does that even mean, meet me halfway?
How about I was wrong?
Please tell me what else you know.
How about I was completely blind to this obvious, glaring reality, which should have been slapping me in my face.
If you were right about this, gee, might you have been right about other stuff?
What more do I need to know?
How about a shred of humility, you condescending jackass who's wrong, who's wrong about everything?
Here I am saying I was wrong and you won't meet me halfway.
They're eating babies, Bill.
And why are you covering up for them eating babies?
Why is that so far out of the realm of possibility?
You ever seen a popular show called Dahmer?
Do you not know that cannibalism is still a fairly wide, widely enjoyed fetish for degenerates and insane evil people?
So he's willing to admit that there's an elite pedophile ring for which the QAnon supporters tried to make public, tried to get people to care about for 10 years.
But you're still the wrong ones for what?
Not like capitulating to their demands that you stop talking about stuff that we know is true.
So, again, this is just these, these are the two issues.
You've got Republicans that are right morally, that are right factually, and that are just cowards and idiots and won't ever act on their knowledge, won't ever step out of the approved path to just do what's necessary.
And then you have Democrats that are complete dumbasses, that don't know anything, that are wrong about everything, and that are so unbelievably confident and condescending and act with extreme aggressiveness on all of their wildest whims.
And it's like, how did it get to be this way?
Why is it this way?
It should actually be the opposite way.
The Republicans should be ruthlessly crushing the Democrats at every pass because everything they believe are lies, everything they claim to support is bullshit.
And the liberals need to have some humility and shut the hell up after you admit that you're wrong about everything.
After you admit that for 10 years you've been mocking something that was absolutely true and that, in effect, you were covering it up and helping it to continue.
We're in a pincer move of stupidity and confidence.
And we're going to be joined by Ben Bankus in the next hour.
So we'll lighten up a little bit.
She's got to say, first couple of videos today, not very conducive to a sanity-filled broadcast because of the overwhelming insanity on every level, at every angle.
We'll go to a video of Ben Bankus in the first five so you can get a taste of his stand-up comedy if we have that censored.
And in the meantime, I do want to remind you to go to thealxjonesstore.com.
We have a ton of great supplements there.
And folks, it's back.
It's back.
We've all been waiting for it.
The crowds have not stopped chanting it.
They demand it.
They cry for it.
They scream for it.
It's BOGO SUPS.
That's right, folks.
It's BOGO SUPS at theAlexJonesStore.com.
If you listen closely, you can hear the fireworks going off right now.
It's happening.
Bo Go Sups, folks.
If you don't know what BOGO SUPS is, let me explain.
Buy one, get one free supplements.
Get a free bottle of CMOS or Shila Jit Gummies with the purchase of creatine powder.
So buy yourself the ultimate creatine at thealxjonesstore.com and you get absolutely free a bottle of CMOS gummies or Shila Jit Gummies.
It's buy one, get one, supplements, aka BOGO sups.
Plus, you're getting 25% off all apparel.
That means t-shirts, hats, and hoodies.
This sale ends midnight, Wednesday, March 4th.
But do not wait.
Go now to thealxjonesstore.com and shop happy knowing that not only you're getting BOGO SUPS, you're keeping us on air and in the fight against stupidity of all stripes.
One of the products I've been taking on a regular basis for a while, actually, ever since Rex introduced it, I've been taking the Power Drive combo.
That includes PowerPlant and Methyl Drive, but together they really maximize their power.
Power Plant in particular is a extremely powerful supplement that really doesn't get enough love from us.
It's an advanced adaptogen complex, which is sort of like a new super male vitality, but it's called PowerPlant.
To unlock your human potential, PowerPlant drives more oxygen to your cells, controls cortisol under pressure, and supports both total and free testosterone.
Three of the most important levers in human performance in one formula.
Built to stack with methylene blue to take it farther, it's PowerPlant at the AlexJonesStore.com.
Are you tired of stubborn fat that just won't budge no matter how hard you diet?
Well, let me introduce you to Ultimate Burn, the most powerful science-backed fat-torching formula available today.
Inside every capsule of Ultimate Burn is 200 milligrams of glucovantage dihydroberine, a supercharged form of berberine that clinical studies show slashes insulin resistance, blocks new fat storage, and helps your body burn fat for fuel.
Then we crank the heat with a massive 120 milligrams of calorie burn GP grains of paradise, packing a full 15 milligrams of active six peridol.
Human trials prove it fires up your brown fat, ramping your daily calorie burn by up to 200 extra calories a day.
Then we finish it with cinnamon, polyphenols, and bioperin to make sure every milligram hits your system hard.
The result is faster fat loss, smaller waste, better blood sugar, and energy that lasts all day.
Ignite your results with the real deal.
Grab Ultimate Burn now and watch your body finally start burning fat like it's supposed to.
Stock is limited.
Get yours before it's gone.
It's Ultimate Burn.
Light the fire at the AlexJonesStore.com.
unidentified
Whatever the future may hold, InfoWars will always live forever.
The fight will continue.
Be sure to follow us on X at RealAlexJones and at AJN Live.
And now you can download the number one news app in the world.
Go to alexjonesapp.com and let the Democrat Deep State Party know that we will never be silenced.
The worse things are, the more people need to laugh.
And, you know, if you've ever been to, you know, the worst moments, you know, a funeral or something like that, there's somebody, somebody's got to laugh.
There's got to be a moment of brevity.
And, you know, I think my comedy is cathartic for people who come out and, you know, want to laugh.
And, you know, yeah, there's always going to be people who are horrified and upset.
And, you know, those people have a tough time going through life.
Let's be honest.
If you can't laugh at a joke, you saw the United States hockey team, you know, the blowback or whatever from, they laughed at Trump's joke.
And that's the big question from the media.
Why would you do that?
That's not a question that a rational person asks somebody.
Why would you laugh at that?
How could, you know, I get it.
Maybe your wife, how could you laugh at that?
But laughing is not necessarily something you can control.
You're just going to be giggling at everything as soon as you have a major victory on the world stage that will last for all of history.
So, like, they're laughing because they're giggly.
Half the time, I can't figure out whether I'm laughing because, you know, I'm being sarcastic and, you know, I'm sort of laughing at myself or if I'm just like, it's just a coping mechanism for not going insane because, I mean, this stuff that we deal with on a daily basis.
So, you know, one of the things you talked about in the set we just watched, or, you know, one of the sets we just watched. was like late-term abortion.
And it's just like, how did this ever become a thing?
Who made the argument to get here?
Like, what is this?
And is it funny or am I just laughing because it's too horrible to actually like deal with?
Which I guess, I mean, I guess that's a good thing about comedy is it can help you deal with stuff like that.
Is there any risk that you're like downplaying some of that stuff just by laughing at it?
Should we be more serious in the face of all this?
I think almost everything should be downplayed if you're able, if you, you know, unless you want to go through life angry and upset at every small thing or a big thing.
You know, and I don't think that, you know, the people who don't want to laugh at things and don't want, you know, want to make an excuse, oh, I only laughed because I was nervous or because I felt uncomfortable or, you know, these are all excuses, fake excuses you give when the truth is, I thought it was funny, but I can't tell you that because you can't handle that.
And my comedy isn't for people who can't handle the truth.
And, you know, the truth is funny.
You know, you can laugh at something that you genuinely, you know, think might be a bad thing or something that you genuinely don't agree with, but you laugh at it because it's funny.
And we, you know, America is a country that, you know, free speech is a huge part of America.
And we, you know, you can't lose it.
I mean, look at Canada.
They're actually hammering those hockey players even harder than anybody in the U.S. media about how dare you laugh at that.
And, you know, they don't want to come out and say it.
But in reality, the media views Trump as a fascist, at least in Canada, for sure.
I know the left-wing media in America also, but they are kind of now pulling back a bit because they're getting people killed by saying that.
But they think that Trump's a fascist in Canada, but they also don't want to come out and say it.
But it's, you know, they're not living in the same reality, so they won't understand the same jokes.
I do think there is something like if you can laugh at something, even laughing at yourself, there's just something about it that it just means that you're like, you're just an open person and you're not rigid.
You're not stuck in your ways.
Like I can believe something and also kind of, you know, laugh at the implications of it.
And it seems like this is, we have a lot of dividing lines.
You know, obviously you got Republican Democrat, you got whatever else.
I think one of the major dividing lines is like, who has a sense of humor and who doesn't?
Who can laugh at themselves and who can't?
And like this comes about a lot with the hockey team, but also with the Olympics, there's this discussion now online, very important discussion, which it actually kind of is because it metaphysically gets this divide I'm talking about between Alyssa Liu and Eileen Gu, I think her name is.
And it's like there are all these women being like, but Eileen Gu is so beautiful.
She looks like a model.
She's so much prettier than Alyssa Liu.
But all of the men love Alyssa Liu because she seems bubbly and happy.
And it's just like something comes across.
And so, you know, all the right-wingers love this Alyssa Liu figure skater.
And all the left is like, no, you're supposed to hate her.
She's a progressive.
But we just like that she's bubbly and seems happy and joyful.
And Eileen Gu seems kind of like a frigid woman.
So I think, you know, there's a weird divide going on here that's highlighted again in another Olympic situation.
I mean, you know, she is obviously very intelligent.
I mean, maybe too intelligent sometimes.
Maybe I should, you know, they asked her a question.
How come you answer questions so quickly?
And I didn't really like that question, but then she answered it and I was like, oh, well, you know, I don't know.
Maybe there is too happy.
You know, I get it.
She's 22, whatever.
She's half American, half Chinese, but she chose to, you know, be on the team that has people in concentration camps.
So, and that's Team China, by the way, unless you're a Democrat, then I guess that's Team America.
But well, they think the ICE facilities are concentration camps or, you know, or Australian COVID facilities were probably closer to that than an ICE facility.
But look, if you take away people's ability, if you take away people's senses of humor, they're much easier to control.
If people aren't able to joke freely and understand the nuances of life and of moments, that how could you laugh in this moment?
It's like, you know, how I could laugh in this moment.
You're not asking an honest question of how could you?
You're asked, the real question is, why aren't you liberal?
That's the question that they want to ask.
Why aren't you a far leftist?
If you were a far leftist, you wouldn't have laughed.
You would have left the room.
You wouldn't have accepted.
Yeah, but not everybody is that.
And what happened to the whole coexist thing?
It's not about coexisting.
It's about one side needs to be right and the other side needs to be wrong and laughing at things.
Like if you're, remember when you're a kid and you're in the class and the teacher says something, you're like, and then who's who's laughing at that?
Where are those teachers now still teaching, being losers?
So, like, you know, it's a sign.
You said it's a sign of being open.
It's a sign of intelligence.
If you can't laugh at something, if you're not a person in a, you know, when you're in a room, it doesn't matter what it is.
Say you're at the DMV, something happens, somebody makes a comment.
There's somebody, you make eye contact with another intelligent person and you go, and you roll your eyes and they, both of you know exactly what's going on.
That's a sign of intelligence.
But if you look at somebody and you roll your eyes and they look at you like, what, that's not very funny, that person's an idiot.
I'm sorry, but that's just, this is common sense and people need to be reminded of this.
And it's sad to see the leftist reaction to everything the way it is because deep down, I think that they know they're wrong.
And that's why they're so upset.
Because if they knew they were right, they wouldn't be that mad.
You know, it's easy to control people with the lie that they're doing.
So they, and they've convinced so many people to believe the lie that it doesn't make sense for them to backtrack.
The lie and all of these, you know, hypersensitivities to every little thing and colonialism.
And I saw a statue and it made me, I had, I had generational trauma about marginalized communities and there's a, you know, all these new words.
Every, if you're using one of these words that they invented in the last five, seven years, marginalized and, you know, normalized and we need, you know, all these, you're, you can't be taken, you shouldn't be taken seriously because these are not normal ways of communicating.
They're ways of that we just invented.
And people say, well, that's progressivism.
It's, we had to come up with the syllabus there was no problem to begin with.
And the reason all of these words exist is because universities, if you go to a university, you want to write an article or sorry, you want to write an essay, they ran out of things to write essays about like 10 years ago or 15 years ago.
And I remember when I was being prepped for university and I had this gay high school teacher that he was like, if you're ever worried about what to write about, just talk about marginalized, just talk about, you know, and it's that easy because you just go, here's the story.
Okay, there's this community, they're marginalized, here's proof, boom, there's my essay, A plus.
And so those people kept doing that.
But then instead of just getting the degree and going into the real world and becoming successful at something, a lot of those people either didn't do anything with the degree and are upset or they continued their education, became masters or PhD students.
And then they just stayed in the university system and then started teaching those things as if they were like serious.
And then they started affecting policy.
And it's an unfortunate thing.
And I don't really know how we're going to backtrack because so much of the population, especially the young female population, has been trained from a young age by these universities and other public schools that, you know, your emotions are valid, even if it's not, you know, okay, the truth, who cares about the truth?
How do you feel?
And that is why we're in this situation.
You have a bunch of brainwashed people that genuinely need help, but aren't willing to get it.
And at the same time, the people who represent them, the politicians are encouraging the behavior.
They're encouraging it.
You saw it after Charlie Kirk.
They encouraged, you know, Ilhan Omar went on TV after Charlie Kirk was murdered and said, you know, oh, yes, it is bad that he was killed, but he was racist.
It's like, who says something like that after that type of incident?
Only somebody who thinks that what happened should happen to people who feel that way.
And the people who are, look at the trans shooters.
Oh, you know, in Canada, the trans shooter and in that state or province in Canada, BC, they have these tribunals around free speech that some professor or high school principal was, he's fined $750,000.
Luckily, it's Canadians, it's less.
But he was fined all this money because he only believed in two genders.
But then there's people who, but they're more concerned about the trans person who shot the people.
They're, you know, that make sure that we gender them properly on the news.
So I don't know who we're, whose feelings we're protecting here.
Otherwise, basically what the media is saying, we need to, we need to gender this person properly as to not upset more trans people and then they will do more damage.
And that's, I'm sorry, but that's not a way to make the population at large feel safe.
So it's, it's just, we're just living in this weird thing where the mainstream media is not representing the average person and they are feeding into the delusions of the mentally ill.
And the reason behind it is simple.
It's easier to control mentally ill people than it is to control not mentally ill people.
And that's one of those things that it's like, you know, you hear that the cops are worried about misgendering the mass murder and you're like, that's just intrinsically funny.
That's that's like a joke right there.
But also there's part of my brain that is like, what the hell is going on?
Like, this isn't funny at all.
What is happening to us?
So that's why I'm just like, I'm laughing, but I'm also like, well, what do we do?
Who do I need to punish for this?
Like, I don't know, man.
I'm just going insane.
Like, you have headlines like this.
Leonardo scrubs social media evidence as millions demand cannibal arrest for child meat horror.
And it's like, is this even real?
I don't even know if this is real anymore.
Are they trying to arrest Leonardo DiCaprio for eating people?
Half the time, I'm just like, I assume that's true.
I assume Leonardo Caprio is eating babies.
Why not?
Why wouldn't I assume that with everything going on?
But I have no freaking idea.
So everything is just insane.
I guess if you can't laugh at it, you're going to just go insane.
But that's the, it's like when they hear that, when they hear the police, like the liberals, when they hear the police are worried about, are correcting themselves saying, sorry, gun person, not gun men, nothing hits, nothing intersects with that in their brain that goes, wait, this is a little bit absurd.
I have the wrong priorities.
They're just on this path of retardation.
Can a comedy help them bring it back?
Is that the missing ingredient that we just need to show them so they can laugh and go, you know, I was being a little silly there.
Instead of attacking them, we need to, it's that spoonful of sugar, help the medicine go down.
I think it should help if they were willing to watch it and with an open mind.
And, you know, I'm sure some people who comment negatively on my videos have laughed and that pissed them off because I made them laugh at something that they held so dearly to themselves.
Yeah, I wanted to say something else that, you know, why doesn't something go off in their brain when they see that this is becoming so extreme and so crazy?
And the reason is because we have such a us versus them mentality on, I mean, on both sides, but I mean, for sure, on the Democrat side, where they're like, you know, I will 100% never agree with anything that a Republican does.
Whereas a Republican, sometimes a Democrat, we do agree.
I mean, certain things.
I mean, you know, I don't know, legalization of drugs.
I mean, you know, some drugs, weed and stuff like that.
You know, I don't necessarily think that there's no, you know, there's not a lot of pushback on that.
And even like abortion, like, you know, my thing is personally, like, do I think it should be illegal?
I don't know, but I think that at least you should have some shame if you're doing it.
You know, whether it should be illegal or not, I don't know.
But, you know, so the point is that they see this thing happening.
They're, they're gendering the killer properly and making that their, you know, their main goal, it seems like in that, in that press conference, over and above making families feel safe or whatever.
And why don't the Democrats speak up about it or liberals speak up about it?
Because they see this, they go, this is really bad for society, but I'm winning.
And that's what they think.
So they go, even though I think this is bad, I'm going to, I'm on side with it because it means our side is winning.
And that's what it is.
It's a tribalist, tribalism thing where it's us versus them.
They're not trying to be part of society in a functional way.
And it's really becoming like anarchy where, and they're pretty open about that.
Like in some ways, you know, we don't want police.
We don't want government, you know, to function properly.
We don't want, unless the only reason they want government is to give money to them and illegal immigrants and, you know, criminals shouldn't be, should be let out after, you know, let out of prison early or never go to prison, even if they killed somebody because they had a bad life.
You know, the people with these opinions generally are not wealthy people.
They're not rich people.
They're not people who are successful.
And what they don't realize is that the best form of protest is actually becoming a successful prominent individual.
And, You know, there are there's successful people on the left who are pushing this agenda, like Soros and other billionaires and multi-millionaires.
Yes, do they fully believe it?
I don't know.
I think that they also just part of this human tribal thing where it's haters, it's people who hate.
We hate those guys.
How are we going to get rid of them?
We're going to make up a bunch of bullshit and convince everybody about all this bullshit.
You can find tour dates for Ben on his website, binbankus.com.
You can also follow him on X at Ben Bankus and Instagram at BenBankus2.
That's B-A-N-K-A-S.
That's how you spell that last name.
Talking about comedy and the just the silliness of the world that we live in.
I think this may be one of the best examples, a very recent one, to what we're talking about, how just like things are just intrinsically funny if you look for them.
This is like the best example I could find recently.
And it's the fact that this meme has been going around for like 20 years.
And it's a map of Iran.
It says, of course, Iran wants war.
Look how close they put our country, put their country to our military bases.
The other thing I would point you to, however, is that Iran possesses a very large number of ballistic missiles, particularly short-range ballistic missiles that threaten the United States and our bases in the region and our partners in the region and all of our bases in the UAE, in Qatar, and Bahrain.
And they also possess naval assets that threaten shipping and try to threaten the U.S. Navy.
So I want everybody to understand that and beyond just a nuclear program, they possess these conventional weapons that are solely designed to attack America and attack Americans.
I think that, you know, in some ways, I agree with the joke in a sense that, you know, countries know what America's doing and what, and generally, why is America ever really attacking another country?
Is because they're not cooperating.
And, you know, and you can make the point: well, they have their own country.
Well, they have an Islamic regime that, you know, I mean, something that would make Mamdani proud going on over there.
And I mean, one of my best friends is Persian and has family there.
And Iranian people are very smart people.
Toronto, Canada, where I'm originally from, I think, some of the biggest pro free Iran, meaning pro America going in and freeing the country from the Islamic regime protests.
I think they had over 500,000 people in the streets.
So, you know, why?
What are these countries gaining from, you know, being an adversary of America versus working with America, working with the entire world for a better uh, for for a better future?
You know, eventually we want to go to space and I mean, we're in space, but humans going to Mars and the moon and and other solar systems and, and you know, it kind of who's gonna, who's gonna come with us?
That's the question.
Because who's gonna go?
Probably and I have a joke about this, I don't want to give away too much but probably white people, probably Jews, probably some Asians um, you know, I don't know how many other people are brought to to Mars based on how much they seem to just be entrenched in these ultra, ultra religious views um, that that are really, you know, and and look, religion's important,
but if you're, if you're, taking away people's rights I mean, Iran is not a free country and um, you know, it seems like they don't really want to be and they don't want to cooperate with the Us.
And you know, I think some of the tactics that are being used are to make, you know, threatening war.
Or I remember, in Trump's first presidency um, you know, with with North Korea, there was a big conversation, thank you.
There was a big conversation with North Korea.
Oh Trump's, he's gonna start World War III because he's sending ships to, to towards North Korea.
But no, it didn't cause World War III, it actually made the war not happen.
So sometimes yeah, you do have to have a show of strength and um, you know, there's military strategy behind that, and some of the greatest minds in the military minds and minds in general in the world are working towards, at the end of the day peace, and I think that's the main goal.
I mean to me, that seems like the main goal that Trump has had um throughout both of his presidencies is is to bring peace, and sometimes you have to do that through strength and scaring the out of people, and I mean that's true on every level.
It's true.
Why, why do you have a?
Uh the legal right to carry a firearm in America what?
You know, I'm less conspiratorial than probably you are.
I, you know, not to say that you're wrong, but I just look at it from the lens of, you know, not everything is a false flag, I don't think.
And I think that how many people did we kill with ISIS and in Iraq and in Syria and in, you know, all these wars that have happened over the 20 years?
And how many of those people that we killed were radicalized extremists who wanted to get into Europe or America and just didn't because they were killed.
So I, you know, maybe that's a pro war stance, but maybe I'm a little pro-war.
You know, for the reason of peace, not for the reason of just chaos.
No, I don't think that that's a good idea.
And look, has anything happened really yet with Iran?
In a way, I don't know if it's false flag, but it's the way that warfare is going is like, okay, the regime, the Ayatollah wants to be able to fire a rocket without getting a huge retaliation.
So the way they do it is, hey, we're going to fire a rocket right here.
And then they do it.
And then their, you know, I was going to call their citizens their fan base, but their citizens don't have the access to that information necessarily en masse.
So they just see it as our country is pushing back when really it's like a coordinated thing that's that's kind of letting they're letting the Americans know what they're going to do so that they don't get extremely blown up.
Yeah, that's what that's what's so weird about the whole thing is they're like, we have to respond to safe face, right?
We have to, we have to respond in kind or else we look weak.
But then it's like, it's just publicly acknowledged.
That's like, this is all kind of pretend.
We're just sort of pretending, but we are responding to safe face.
I'm sure it's portrayed differently to the Iranian public, but it just seems like so much of what happens, especially in the Middle East, is like this weird kind of game of show where it's like, okay, you bombed us, now we're going to bomb you, but don't worry, it's all for show.
It's like they announce it, but they still have to do it to like fulfill some sort of honor requirement or whatever.
What happens when it's not a bunch of humans involved and it's literally just Benjamin and Yahoo and Ayatollah Khomeini with their Xbox controllers and 10,000 Elon Musk bots attacking each other?
Things are about to get very weird the world over.
I don't know if you have or have tried full self-driving.
It's pretty cool.
It's pretty, it's pretty safe.
And, you know, I understand the concept of, you know, pushing back on it.
And I know, you know, the, you know, the term Luddite, right?
Like people who that was coined, I think at the beginning of the 19th or when it industrial revolution, one of the industrial revolutions where, you know, they were against the manufacturing.
It was taking away jobs from artisans because now what he could make and charge money more for somebody could make quicker more of them and charge less.
And people were against that.
So look, if robots are coming, then we better, I'd much rather have an Elon in charge of them than Bill Gates or, you know, whoever, Soros or some other person.
But I do think that it is necessary at a certain point that we're going to have to, you know, realize that if it, you know, car accidents are going to go down and for one thing with that, with the self-driving cars.
So what other things will improve?
I mean, yeah, maybe in 200 years, maybe the robots will kill us all.
But, you know, I mean, maybe the leftists will finally be happy about that.
That'll be, that'll solve a lot of their problems, right?
You mean the great strides we've made in civil rights to guarantee an equal opportunity for people like this.
It's funny, you mentioned this exactly.
Child predator dubbed, quote, monster parents fear most, cleared for release through California parole program.
A California child molester, once described by a judge as, quote, the monster parents fear the most, has been cleared for release under the state's elderly parole program, a decision local law enforcement says puts communities at risk.
And prosecutors are now scrambling to stop it.
The sheriff actually put out like a 20-minute video being like warning parents, being like, this guy is now on the loose.
Other states would have killed him.
We let him go for some reason.
Sentenced to three life terms, but now he's just been released.
So sorry to cut you off, but I think you're dead on the money here in terms of like the biggest threat.
Is the biggest threat child, you know, molesters and murderers, or is it the politicians who let them out on the street, right?
I mean, they sort of, it's a, it's a symbiosis that they operate in.
It starts with people going to university, learning all this bullshit, and then getting into politics and pushing it to the extreme.
And the people who are in politics pushing these bad policies are protected by, you know, security guards at their house and black male pedophile stuff.
Well, I mean, Epstein stuff, which, you know, I, you know, I only got a few pages in, but the reality is, you know, the biggest threat to us is us and us not being on the same page about where we're trying to go.
And that's why I brought up earlier going to space and like my mom used to always say, you know, after 9-11 and stuff.
And, you know, when we went into Afghanistan and Canada was in Afghanistan as well.
And it wasn't in Iraq, but America was in Iraq at the same time.
And, you know, my mom was, she was a liberal generally, but she would say, you know, so how many satellites are they launching?
You know, because they're, they're out there believing in some primitive way of life while the rest of the world is trying to modernize.
And, you know, it's a clash of civilizations right now that we have where the, you know, you showed that picture with the troops at the border, because that's the civilizations that we've taken over.
All every part of the world is taken.
There's nowhere else to go.
So now all the civilizations are clashing.
And, you know, I don't think we're even going to, I don't think we're going to have a world war.
Their kindergartners kick our kindergartners' ass when it comes to dribbling a ball with both hands.
They're killing it in a lot of ways.
They still eat live mice.
So I don't know.
They're a weird one.
They're a tricky one, I feel.
You know, I really worry about obviously like the next generation.
And Gen Z seems alternatively just like completely, irrecoverably insane and just like based and way more like realistic than everybody else.
But clearly, like something has gone wrong with the youth.
And I wonder if there's not some sort of weird correlation between like the death of comedy that we were talking about, how sort of people don't want to laugh at stuff anymore.
So you can't laugh at that.
And the corresponding lack of sincerity, where like no young people actually have sincere belief, like they just want to laugh and mock sincere beliefs about God or life.
It's all a joke to them, but the actual jokes aren't there.
Is there a correlation, do you think, between the death of comedy and the death of sincerity?
And, you know, but now it's become this almost Soviet era type of comedy where it's only meant to make you agree with the party.
And the party is the Democrat Party.
There's no, there's no, I mean, Gutfeld is one example of a right-leaning late night comedy show, but generally, there's no exact show like a Jimmy Kimmel or whatnot, where the person doing the monologue is making light, is making fun of the Democrats, you know?
And so, and because mainstream media is still seen as the truth by a lot of people, it's creating, it's creating a divide.
And it makes people think, oh, you know, so you can be the most successful comedian in the world, but you will never be on late night TV because they don't agree with your comedy is not the type of free country energy I'm looking for.
If anything, they should be having more comedians on those shows that they disagree with.
Bring me on and make me look like an idiot then.
But they don't because they know that they won't make me look like an idiot and they'll look stupid.
I mean, it's really hard to be funny without the truth.
And it's, you know, if you can't convince people of something, the next best step is censorship and ridicule.
But it's, you know, you can be the best, you can be the best comedian and ever get on a late night show, or you can be the best late night show and not actually be funny because something has gone horribly wrong in our popular culture in America.
Well, because we have free speech, but the left has taken up arms essentially, not en masse.
Well, hopefully, but I mean, you know, with like the murder of Charlie Kirk or the attempted assassination of Trump, President Trump, these, you know, they're basically saying, okay, you can make your jokes or you can make your opinions or you can have your views, but somebody might kill you.
We have a lot more to talk about today and some breaking news as the testimony of Hillary Clinton is finally ended.
And we'll bring you some clips, some statements made by the politicians and herself here in just a second.
But I want to go to this video.
I thought this was fantastic.
This one was cracking me up.
I don't know who she is.
I wish I could give her credit.
But she posted this basically by saying, our country is upside down.
And she makes some damn good points.
Let's listen.
unidentified
Since I got on social media in 2023, I have been saying the same thing.
I have been saying the downfall of this country is too many women in charge.
Too many women in charge.
We have allowed a bunch of these feminist dykes to take over and they are destroying this country.
They are destroying this country and they're destroying it because they have gotten a lot of weak, spineless, ballist men to stand up behind them and support this bullcrap.
See, let me tell y'all something.
See, feminism was never supposed to be to try to take over, to try to get rid of men.
Feminism with women saying, hey, we want the same rights that men have.
We want to be able to work these jobs and get paid just like men.
We want to be able to walk through the front door and get a handshake and get the same respect that men get in these corporations.
But somewhere along the line, they have allowed these feminist dice to take over the feminist movement.
And this is where we are now.
This country is upside down.
We're upside down because too many weak men has allowed this to happen.
Y'all can get mad at me all y'all want.
Y'all can say what y'all want.
I don't care.
I stand on what I say.
Y'all have a lot of these feminist dice to come in and take over the cup.
We got too many women in government now that's that's that's screwing up everything, they're screwing up everything and they're able to screw up everything because they got a bunch of these bald and spineless men who are willing to stand up behind them.
See, these men are too afraid to be called a man, so instead of being called a man, they just want to step back and let these women just take over and ruin everything.
See, that's why so many people now, so many trans women are able to get in women's sports, are able to go into women's safe spaces, are able to take over jobs that women will usually have because y'all got these old feminists, these old butch feminists that has taken over.
They've taken over.
See, let me tell y'all something.
I'm gonna just keep it 100, y'all.
See, these so-called feminists, these new age feminists, see, they're mad with the world.
They mad with the world because they know deep down inside, don't know real man wants them.
They look like a bunch of circus clowns, some deranged circus clowns with all these tattoos and piercings and this pink, green, and blue hair.
So they mad with the world.
They're angry.
They're angry with the world because they know deep down inside that.
Listen, it's nobody want them.
So they mad with the world.
So they want to just mess up everything, throw a month of wrench and everything because they're angry.
They're angry with the world.
So they decided to take their anger out when they got into these positions.
They got in these positions.
They just decided to take their anger out on these men that don't want them.
You know, the real men, the men who was actually keeping the country in line.
But I'm going to tell y'all something.
I don't just blame these doggone feminist dykes.
I don't just blame them a lot.
I blame these weak, spineless men who walk around here tucking their balls, putting on these pink panties and standing back.
Because see, when these women start telling these men, y'all need to stay at home and be house husbands.
Y'all need to let me be the head of the house.
Y'all need to stay at home and be house husband.
And they fell in line with this.
That was the beginning of the end because they showed you how weak a lot of these new men are.
See, the men of the silent generation, the men of the generations before us that raised us, the Gen Z's and I mean the Gen X's and stuff.
See, a lot of them are no longer here.
So now we got a bunch of weak men who's willing to step back and allow these women to take over.
And that's why this country is upside down.
That's why this country is hanging on by a thread and we're getting ready to just fall off the cliff.
We're getting ready to fight because y'all get mad with me all y'all want y'all to know it's the truth.
So let me tell y'all something.
These men decided to stop being men and start to pick up purses.
That's why when I go in the stores, now I can't find no purse because I go to doggone feminist men got it.
Rules And Redactions00:16:02
unidentified
And let me tell y'all something.
All of y'all in the back who came here, I need y'all to come forward.
There's no such thing as a feminist man.
Men are not feminists.
They can't get in touch with their feminist side because that's not how God made them.
God made them to be men.
God made us a difference for a reason.
God made them to be strong enough to do the heavy lifting.
God gave us the ability to do the emotional.
And that's the problem.
Too many emotional women are in Congress.
These old dyke feminists are in the country turning everything upside down.
And I blame the men.
I blame the men because y'all allowed this.
Y'all allowed this because y'all don't want to be called toxic.
Y'all don't want to be called y'all hate women.
Y'all don't want to go against women instead of standing up, telling them women to get their ass somewhere and sit down.
I would just say one of the things I learned today is if you really have specific questions about the Clinton Global Initiative or the relationship between the Clintons and Jeffrey Epstein and Delaine Maxwell, you got to ask Bill Clinton.
Also, too, I think it's important to note that we have been working in a bipartisan fashion to make this as painless as possible for the people that we're bringing also to, ensuring that there's accountability and transparency.
You will hear a lot of spin, sometimes out of politicos in Washington, but the fact is that it's our goal and objective following this.
And we also too did ask for a follow-up from the Secretary on producing legislation that will help prevent this from ever happening again in the future.
Obviously, working to combat trafficking, which has been a cause incredibly important, not just to myself, to Chair McComer, to Representative Nancy Mace, but many new members of this oversight committee.
And so we are looking forward to continuing to provide that transparency.
First of all, I want to thank Secretary Clinton for being here for as many hours as she was here today.
She took every question from every single member.
I want to thank my colleagues on both sides of the aisle, Republicans and Democrats alike, for being here today and asking questions.
I very much look forward to speaking to her husband, former President Bill Clinton, tomorrow.
We have a lot of work to do.
Not surprised by some of the answers, surprised by some, and you'll get the transcript very soon, but I want to thank everyone who participated.
This is nowhere near from over.
And in making my notes today, I've got names of individuals that I believe we need to haul to the oversight committee and ask them their ask them questions, ask their perspective, ask them about other potential witnesses or victims or potential predators.
I think this is going to go on for a long time.
There are millions of files.
There are a lot of people involved.
And some of the gaps that have been seen, especially early on, are very evident after speaking with her today.
And I just want to thank everyone for their time.
And we have a lot of work to do.
And I'm willing to work with anyone who's willing to work with me.
I'll work with you on getting to the bottom of this, making sure that this doesn't ever happen again.
And when it does, those predators are held accountable to the fullest extent of the law.
If you've read the Epstein files, there's unspeakable evil in there.
And the American people and the victims deserve transparency and accountability.
The biggest thing I think we need to know is how do we strengthen laws to prevent human trafficking in America, if not the world, and how does someone with such evil infiltrate the highest levels of the U.S. government and world leaders.
Chairman, if I can just add in one question to follow up on that, though.
We asked specifically the victims, and we are all there, as well as the Speaker and the Democrat members of Congress, if the president was involved, and they exonerated him.
So why would we bring in the President of the United States, who's been exonerated, who cooperated with law enforcement, and who released the files when we had to fight?
We basically threatened to hold the Clintons in contempt if they didn't want to come in.
So to be clear, we had cooperation.
We asked the victims directly, and he was exonerated.
So I would encourage all of you to at least do the fair reporting and understanding that just like you would not publish false statements about the Clintons and some of the allegations that have been made about them, you would give the President of the United States the same respect.
Again, for the 15th time, this was a motion made by Democrats and Republicans in a subcommittee on Oversight.
There were a list of people to bring in, and Bill and Hillary Clinton were on the list.
I'm glad we brought Hillary Clinton in because she's never really answered questions until in the last week about her relationship with Epstein and Maxwell.
So she answered questions and hopefully they'll be helpful as we move forward.
Was that your main focus today with Secretary Clinton?
Do you feel like you've got the answers you were looking for?
Well, I don't want to disclose too much of what was said, but most of the questions that we asked about the Clinton Global Initiative, which were very specific questions.
Some of them were backed by emails and other documents that have been released by the Department of Justice.
She said that she was a senator and you would have to ask her husband that tomorrow.
So we have a lot of questions for her husband tomorrow, and I'm confident that deposition will last even longer than this one.
Got a pretty good rundown of everything that's happened.
Apparently, we'll have the video of that, I guess, by tomorrow, he said.
But they'll have the transcript out.
I wonder if there will be many, if any, redactions.
I do think this probably would have been more valuable to have happened live.
Now, we'll go to Hillary Clinton, who's made some statements.
Her statements are getting a lot more attention.
She apparently talks about a number of things.
So we'll listen to her and what she has to say.
Apparently, tomorrow, Bill Clinton will be deposed.
And it's a little bit silly for her to say you'll have to ask my husband.
She really was the brains behind the operation, especially for the last decade that the Clinton machine really ran.
It was all Hillary.
I mean, once Bill was done being president, he wasn't so much the focus of attention as much as Hillary Clinton, senator, and then Secretary of State and then running for president.
I mean, she was the kingpin.
So I wonder if Bill's not going to go in and go, oh, you're going to have to ask my wife about that.
We're not going to get an answer.
I don't know.
But apparently, she answered all the questions from both sides of the aisle.
And here's what she had to say after the questioning during her press conference.
I answered every one of their questions as fully as I could based on what I knew.
And what I knew is what I said in my statement this morning.
I never met Jeffrey Epstein, never had any connection or communication with him.
I knew Delaine Maxwell casually as an acquaintance.
But whatever they asked me, I did my very best to respond.
It was disappointing that they refused to hold a public hearing, so I wouldn't have to be out here characterizing it for you.
You could have seen it for yourself.
We had asked for that.
We think it would have been better for the committee and its efforts to gather whatever information they are seeking.
We had a bit of a challenge in the beginning because we had agreed upon rules based on the fact it was going to be a closed hearing at their demand.
And one of the members violated that rule, which was very upsetting because it suggested that they might violate other of our agreements.
So we had to cease the hearing for a period of time until we could get assurances that no rules would be broken going forward.
And we returned to answer questions repetitively, literally over and over again.
I don't know how many times I had to say I did not know Jeffrey Epstein.
I never went to his island.
I never went to his homes.
I never went to his offices.
So it's on the record numerous times.
It then got at the end quite unusual because I started being asked about UFOs and a series of questions about Pizzagate, one of the most vile, bogus conspiracy theories that was propagated on the internet that was serving as the basis of a member's questions to me.
So I can only say that the best exchange that I had came at the very end when contrary to every other deposition they have taken, no Republican member asked any questions about Jeffrey Epstein or Delaine Maxwell to anyone else they have deposed.
And in fact, the Republican members didn't even show up for the deposition of Les Wexner.
And when I said that, I had to point out that the only questions that any Republican member asked of any of the people they deposed was of former Attorney General Bill Barr, when Chairman Comer asked him about the allegations, in his view,
about Russia's involvement in my election in 2016.
So at the very end of this hearing, after I made that point, I want to commend Chairman Comer for raising a series of significant questions that I responded to about the nature of the investigation and the areas that I thought should be explored.
So I appreciated that.
I want to see the truth come out.
So that was a reassuring way to end a very long, repetitive deposition.
unidentified
Madam Arms.
You spoke in your opening remarks about how heartbroken you have been for the Epstein survivors as these files to come out.
Can you talk to us a little bit about how you have processed and reacted to the fact that the former president, your husband Bill Clinton, is referencing the Epstein files you were including in some photos featuring women and how have you been listening in preparing for the deposition that is coming tomorrow?
Processing Truth00:14:04
unidentified
Are you 100% confident that there isn't anything that the former president knows about Epstein's crimes?
I am, and I think the chronology of the connection that he had with Epstein ended years, several years before anything about Epstein's criminal activities came to light and that he was charged and sadly given a sweetheart deal, which, as I said in my statement, had that not happened, perhaps his predatory behavior could have been stopped earlier.
But I think it is fair to say that the vast majority of people who had contact with him before his criminal pleas in 08 were like most people.
They did not know what he was doing.
And I think that that is exactly what my husband will testify to.
First of all, can we appreciate that she's not and never will be president?
Can we just marinate on the fact that This is like the only time we're going to have to watch her speak in like a decade.
That's nice.
We can just appreciate the fact that the path that the world took means that this woman is probably going to be more associated with Epstein than anything else at the end of the day.
Certainly not the first woman president of the United States, a position she did a lot of bad things to achieve and never got there.
So let's just appreciate that first and foremost.
That fact we're even talking about Hillary right now is sort of a one-off, and we're not going to have to do it much longer.
So that's a wonderful thing.
That's wonderful news about reality as it exists now.
But she's lying, but she's obviously lying about her husband's participation with Epstein.
Remember, it was an Epstein victim who said she was introduced to Epstein by Bill Clinton when Bill Clinton called him the king of America.
Jeffrey Epstein also visited the Bill Clinton White House multiple times as an official of some sort, as an advisor in some capacity.
Not only that, he, of course, is on the Plain Manifest quite a bit.
He is pointed out by the victims of Epstein, not just the one that said that Bill Clinton introduced him as King of America, but there were multiple victims that when asked, who else should we question about this, their first answer was Bill Clinton.
Not was Bill Clinton in on this?
And they said yes.
The open-ended question, who else should we ask?
Bill Clinton was the name that came to their mind.
So he was more involved than Hillary Clinton is obviously letting on.
She seems to be surprised or shocked that they would bring up Pizzagate, but of course, Pizzagate had a lot of, you know, similar characteristics as the Epstein files do, the strange code words around food, specifically pizza.
And it was Hillary Clinton, the DNC, and her campaign manager, John Podesta, where those emails existed, including emails from Hillary Clinton herself to Linda Rothschild saying, I owe you penance and I'll be sacrificing a chicken to Moloch in the backyard.
So again, for her to say this, this crazy conspiracy theory that spread over the internet, it's like the one that was confirmed in basically everything by the Epstein files.
Like, yeah, yeah, yeah, the Pizzagate conspiracy that was actually just the verbatim transcripts of your emails with very suspicious and, as of now, still unexplained code words and not even code words, but like discussions about dropping children off in hot tubs where they've been well trained for entertainment.
And then that got manipulated by the media to be, they think there's a sex ring out of a pizza parlor.
That was never the case.
That was the cover story that was ridiculous on purpose that they made ridiculous on purpose in order to disguise the reality of what's going on.
So very funny that she would bring that up as if that was discrediting when in fact it's the opposite.
That has all been basically confirmed and all the speculation confirmed as well.
And she says they asked about UFOs.
I don't really, I don't really get that particularly.
I wonder if they asked Hillary Clinton about her casual acquaintance that she didn't really know Ghislaine Maxwell being front and center at her daughter's wedding.
Remember, Chelsea Clinton's wedding has pictures of her walking down the aisle with Ghislaine Maxwell right there within arm's reach.
Maybe they were a little closer than she's letting on.
So I think she's absolutely full of it, but good on the reporters for actually asking good questions.
It's like, what about all those pictures of your husband with little girls?
And are you so sure that he's going to be so squeaky clean at the end of this?
But obviously, Bill and Hillary Clinton's involvement in the CIA and drug trafficking goes back to his time in Arkansas.
And this whole corrupt cabal that has been exposed by the Epstein files is a cabal in which they occupy very high positions.
So they're not going into this deposition unprepared or worried about the outcome.
They're protected and that protection has been all but guaranteed.
To be honest with you, I think that they have a point.
She has a point.
And a lot of people have a point about the fact that the Republicans refused to go question Howard Luttnick.
Not a single Republican went to question him, but they were all there for the Hillary Clinton questioning, which to me just brings into question the legitimacy of their motivation and whether they do see this as a real concern or whether it's all political for them.
Let's go back to Hillary Clinton here.
unidentified
Matter of Secretary, do you believe this was a fair hearing?
And do you still want to testify publicly, even though you gave his testimony?
You know, they had a chance to do it in public, and I wish they had done it in public.
And I think they're making the wrong decision, avoiding doing it in public.
I thought it was very repetitive.
I thought that they asked literally the same questions over and over again, which didn't seem to me to be very productive.
And then, as I said, toward the end, you know, there were other questions that were totally off subject.
So if they are going to fulfill their responsibilities to literally investigate the investigations, which is what they originally said was the scope of their work, I think they could have spent the day more productively.
They just asked her about Ghislaine Maxwell attending her daughter's wedding.
We'll see what she answers on the other side.
Stay with us.
All right, welcome back, folks.
We're going to finish off with this Hillary Clinton press conference following her deposition.
And we don't know if the Congress people asked her, but at least the reporters asked her: if you didn't know Ghillane Maxwell, why was she at your daughter's wedding?
Man, not the way she thought she would be talking to the press these days.
I'm just sorry, I'm just marinating on them.
I'm just enjoying that.
I'm just imagining, like, what did Hillary Clinton think her life would be like by now?
She would have thought she'd have at least two terms as president.
That would have ended last year.
She'd be on a book tour right now, plotting her presidential library.
Nope.
Nope.
Actually, we defeated her.
We defeated the machine.
We defeated the Bushes and the Clintons and the CIA and their corrupt dogs in the FBI.
We got Trump elected against all odds and changed the course of history.
So I'm just enjoying that for a moment, just thinking about the other timeline, the timeline that we could have been in.
Yes, the madam president timeline.
I'm just enjoying that we are not there, that we're not there and that we never will be.
And that instead of addressing us as a former president and best-selling author, Hillary Clinton, it's an accused pedophile associate questioned by Congress over her association to, yeah, various sex criminals.
Yeah, Epstein isn't the only one in their circle.
So I know Alex was going off on this on his show for a little while, and people do get confused.
We could, like, we are fighting a war.
We're fighting an information war.
And so we have won major victories.
We have won major battles.
Does that mean the war is over?
No.
Does that mean that we're even winning the war?
It's kind of debatable.
But over the last 10 years, there has been a steady momentum on our side.
And the victories that we have achieved seemed impossible 10 years ago, but we've achieved them and we continue to achieve them.
It doesn't mean everything's perfect.
It doesn't mean we've won.
It doesn't mean the war is over.
But in war, you've got to keep your morale up and you got to remind yourself, even though there is a lot of fighting still to go, we have won a lot.
We have gained a lot of land.
We have metaphorically slaughtered whole swaths of their armies and left the battlefield stinking with their corpses, metaphorically, but satisfactorily, but in a satisfying way.
And we'll continue to, and we'll continue to push.
And if there's one thing about this Epstein release, I think is pretty undeniable is that the people in power do not have the initiative.
They're on the back foot.
They are scrambling to figure out how to deal with this.
This isn't orchestrated by the Clintons and Bill Gates.
This is orchestrated by us, and they're having to dance to our tune now.
And that in and of itself is a victory for the ages.
And I hope that you can support Infowars as we've had an outsized influence on this trajectory.
And I've played the videos before, but I mean, they've had during the Connecticut trial, they had experts testify not only to the tens of thousands of individuals all over the country who are paid and whose full-time job, you know, in grad school or whatever, is to study us, is to study InfoWars, not for the purpose of scientific inquiry, but as you study the enemy, as one army might study the actions of an enemy army in order to defeat us,
in order to identify what makes us successful so that they can hamper us in the most efficient way.
And they still haven't succeeded.
So not only do you have whole literal armies of people arrayed against us, trying desperately to stop us when really they can't, they never will.
And the simple matter is we have the truth on our side, and that is in a battle of information, a super weapon.
But not only that, testifying to the fact that when it came to the 2016 election and even before, certainly getting Trump elected, Alex Jones and Infowars had an impact on the election that was bigger than The next top three right-wing pundits combined.
Literally, like Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, combined, didn't even come close to the amount of impact that we've had.
And that's science, folks.
They studied this.
They can provide you the charts, the influence network mapping paradigm.
This is what people have put God only knows how many man hours into figuring out.
And they figured out that Infowars is the strongest, the best, the most powerful.
And despite using and weaponizing that knowledge to try to kick us off every platform and sue us into oblivion, we're still here.
We're still here.
And Bill and Hillary Clinton are being hauled in to Congress to be questioned about their activity with the cabal of international pedophiles.
Our victories really are unparalleled and undeniable.
So I hope you can support us in this mission by going to the alexjonestore.com.
I told you a little bit about the power drive combo, which has power plant and methyl drive.
PowerPlant is, of course, the advanced adaptogen complex, kind of like a new super male vitality.
It's got cordyceps, golden root, zinc, and boron.
And golden root, I didn't realize, is an ancient supplement that Vikings used to use.
Viking and Norse warriors carried this powerhouse adaptogen on long campaigns as armor against the cold.
Goldenroot gives your body, helps your body keep cortisol in check under pressure.
It means calm focus, steady drive, and a performance edge you can actually feel.
Not a stimulant, something better, more long-lasting, and effective.
Methylene blue boosts your mitochondria, the cellular energy machine.
Power plant, however, boosts oxygen efficiency, cortisol control, and free testosterone.
It's a different angle, but the same goal.
If you combine them, stack them together.
You've covered both ends of the performance equation.
That's PowerPlant.
Of course, combine it with Methyl Drive, which is a mitochondrial support blend built to stack with both methylene blue and power plant.
Methyl drive's got CoQ10 and PQQ.
So it's similar to the DNA force product that we used to have on InfowarsStore.com.
You can get the PowerDrive bundle, which is PowerPlant and Methyl Drive and Methylene Blue right now.
Combine them all and really experience the power.
Right now, you can get BOGO sups.
That is buy one, get one free.
If you buy the creatine, you get a free CMOS gummy or Shilajit gummies, absolutely free.
And those are some of my favorite products.
The Shilajit gummies and the CMOS gummies are absolutely fantastic.
I keep them around for a little pick-me-up if I need one.
Plus, you're getting 25% off all apparel.
And like I said, everything you buy at thealexjonesstore.com goes directly to funding this mission, this outlet, and our continuing conquering drive over the new world order.
Thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison, if you want to let them know who sent you.
Now I want to talk about crime.
I want to talk about crime because people don't even know what it is anymore, and they don't know how to deal with it.
And this is a problem.
This is a big, big, glaring, gigantic, unavoidable problem.
I'm not going to play this whole thing, but I do want to go to a little bit of this conversation between a young woman and a person questioning her about crime, about what to do about murderers.
And I'm not saying that this ill-informed libtard is the be-all end-all of leftist ideology.
But I think what she expresses represents the real shallowness of the left's beliefs and their incompatibility with reality, their ahistoricity.
I mean, it really is a masterclass in how you have somebody who knows nothing, can't explain her views, can't justify her views, and yet feels as though she's the enlightened and informed one, even though she can't even express what she actually thinks.
Like, she doesn't even understand that that argument is completely against her beliefs.
Because I think they have this idea.
I mean, we kind of do too.
The truth is, our criminal justice system is terrible.
And prisons don't work.
And I'll explain why in a second, because she gets into the history and she doesn't even know it, so I'll explain it to you.
But it is a fallacy to think that you can take a criminal, put them into a concrete box, you know, jungle rape carnival for 10 years, and then they're just going to be like a good citizen all of a sudden.
Like that, that actually doesn't make sense.
But all that means is that like if it's a murder, they should just never get out.
And a lot of criminals should just never get out.
So she makes this argument of like, well, how many people have been released from jail and gone on to murder again?
It's like, okay, so they shouldn't be released from the jail.
What does she think they did before the modern prison system?
She doesn't know.
She thinks that there used to be quote-unquote restorative justice.
No, that still doesn't exist.
That's not a thing.
Never has been a thing.
It certainly wasn't a thing before the penitentiary system.
What she's describing is the penitentiary system.
And it actually came out of like the Amish, or like the Shakers and Quakers.
And the root word is penitent.
The idea was that you would separate somebody, imprison them, keep them away from the rest of society, obviously, so they couldn't hurt anybody or spread their evil, but that they would be isolated so that they could be penitent and repent and think about what they did wrong and read the Bible and clean their souls, right?
Heal their souls, and then emerge after having been penitent and ask for forgiveness and rejoin society.
So, you know, that is fairly new and has a sort of religious start to it, but we've sort of gone off the rails on that.
Prior to that, you just killed them.
Or you kept them in dungeons indefinitely forever.
Like, what does she think?
She thinks there used to be restorative justice.
Well, I'll let her keep going, but she really does.
She thinks that there used to be some sort of like hippie-dippy social welfare program for criminals.
I don't know where she's getting this.
No, for a millennia, one of the main reasons that Europe did so well, between 1788 and 1868, Britain used Australia as a massive penal colony.
Yeah, you'd send people just out of the country, right?
And that's been a punishment since, you know, ancient Rome.
A very common one.
Yeah, you just sent people somewhere else.
But also, like, have you ever heard of the Bastille lady?
You ever heard of, you know, the dungeon systems in France under the king?
Like, she just has no idea what she's talking about, but she's trying to make the case that murderers shouldn't be put into prison because there's got to be some better way.
And she's actually saying that history shows us the better way.
History shows us that really, if you want your nation to become incredible, you need to spend like a thousand years systematically murdering the, you know, most criminal 1 or 2% of your population.
That's what Europe did.
And if you were stealing, you were killed.
You were robbing horses.
You were killed.
If you killed somebody, you were tortured, then killed.
Have you ever heard of the wheel?
Does she know about breaking on the wheel?
Like, what does she, these people, man.
Do you want to go through some like medieval torture?
Like, okay, you'd put them in stocks for a while.
That would be one thing you would do.
Breaking on the wheel was they'd bring a big wagon wheel and they would use a stick and the spokes of the wheel, they'd tie you to the wheel and then they would break every bone in your body so that you could actually physically be tied like a knot onto the wheel and you would sit there with every bone in your body broken until you expired from hunger.
I just want to explain to these people that what we have going now might not be perfect, but what are you talking about?
About the past having restorative justice.
In the past, they system, I mean, they had like, it was like down to a science where they were like, we want to cause this person the most amount of pain.
So how do we cause them pain without killing them?
And they like.
So this dumbass, I don't know what she thinks happened before penitentiaries, but it was worse than penitentiaries.
Well, let's go back to her as she, again, tries to invoke some sort of non-existent history to make a case that is retarded on the face of it.
And that is the most liberal thing you'll hear in this whole thing.
That's the most iconic leftist progressive response to anything.
You ask them a very simple question that if they really believe what they believe, they'd be able to answer.
And then they act like you can't even understand their belief unless they give you a 10-hour lecture.
That you couldn't possibly understand their position on criminal justice without being fully indoctrinated into some sort of weird psychological nonsense that says that criminality is all the fault of the system.
It's like, this is so stupid.
It's the same thing with like transgenderism or you go, men are men, women are women.
And they're like, I don't have time to explain to you how wrong that is.
And it's just like anything that takes longer than five minutes to explain, it's probably not true.
When it's something as simple as this, you require, you know, hours of indoctrination to fully scramble somebody's brain before they're willing to listen to your nonsense, I guess.
But that's the biggest cop-out that you'll ever see.
I did want to get to that part where she says that poverty is the cause of violence because it's just so wrong.
It's just not even remotely correct.
I mean, it's obvious in any number of ways.
That guy points out one good example: crime rates in the black community are higher now than they were when the black community as a whole was significantly poorer, right?
But not just that.
It would be pretty obvious.
If that was it, if it was poverty, then it would be a direct correlation between the poorest counties in America and the most criminal counties in America.
That is absolutely not the case.
There's a lot of other things that go into it.
But that really lies at the heart of what we just saw.
She represents, I think, a very pure, like crystalline representation of the leftist mindset.
Because at the end of the day, you know, maybe if she'd given us that lecture on criminal justice, it would have sounded more thought out and, you know, fully realized.
I don't even think she could give that talk if she wanted to or had time to, but it doesn't matter because at the end of the day, that is the heart of it.
It's just like total ignorance, total nonsense, hasn't thought through any position whatsoever.
It's just like murderers should be free.
Really?
Well, not really, but they shouldn't have to go to jail.
Where should they have to go?
I don't know.
And it's just like, well, then you just don't know anything.
Then just shut up.
Why do you think you have an opinion if you don't know anything?
Who told you that you could speak on stuff when you don't even understand your own thoughts?
Like, this is sad.
This is really sad.
But it can't be the criminal's fault.
And, you know, criminals murdering people over again.
That's the fault of the system.
But it's not because the system's too harsh.
There should be restorative justice, which has never existed, but apparently she thinks it did.
And this is just all nonsense.
They believe absolute unrelenting nonsense about the most important things in our country, like crime, like things that affect you personally.
And this thread went viral recently, specifically this tweet in particular.
This person, Cassie Pritchard, says, like on the left, we fundamentally don't care about quote-unquote crime.
It's morally uninteresting to us.
It's just a thing that happens in the world, like the weather.
So we're willing to excuse mental people for theft, violence, etc.
It just happens.
You know, crime just happens.
Like, how could you possibly believe that?
Crime can only exist with a criminal, with a person doing it, right?
Tree falls on you.
That's not a crime.
There's no criminal committing it, right?
It was an accident.
It was something bad that happened to you.
Yes, bad things happen, like the weather.
You could get struck by lightning.
That's not a crime per se.
But crime always includes a person making a decision to do something to harm another person or to break the law that harms society at large in a less tangible way.
But no matter what, it is a person making a decision.
These people don't seem to understand that.
They think that human behavior can't be controlled, that humans don't have will.
It's just a very weird, totally disconnected, actually, like, it's not even anti-human, it's like a human, right?
Like it's a historical, it's like a, it's like against humanity, but not opposed to it, just outside of the realm of it.
Crime is just a thing that happens in the world like the weather.
This is a response from Kaiser von Longgram, Lohengram.
This is actually completely accurate to how leftists think.
In breaking down the phenomenon of crime to a leftist mind, you have the criminal, the victim, and law enforcement.
Crime is simply something that happens in regards to the victims of crime.
You can't truly feel any kind of injustice occurred to a victim anymore than you can for a lightning strike or a random stroke during prime health.
Crime simply happens to them.
But the criminals, however, this is who your sympathy is held for.
For anyone who could end up a criminal or committing a crime, to them, crime is a force of nature that simply sweeps up and possesses somebody to do bad things.
The true victim of that is the criminal who was simply swept up in this force of nature we call crime and had no agency or choice or responsibility in the matter.
And finally, we have law enforcement and those who seek to create safer societies.
These, to them, are the true criminals.
Crime is something that cannot be controlled.
It's just a force that exists.
And those who try to stop crime, to punish criminals, that is, are in fact choosing to harm the real victims who are the criminals.
And no amount of tough on crime or harsh sentencing or anything else can stop what is just a natural phenomenon from happening.
All that does is cause harm to the most vulnerable.
Remember the criminals.
You can't break this delusion with any amount of facts, statistics, results on punishing crime because this is religious dogma at the end of the day.
The only way it can be broken is if a leftist themselves is the victim of a crime, that could awaken them to the fact that criminals have agency and could be stopped.
But don't hold your breath, folks.
We'll see you tomorrow.
unidentified
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next.