All Episodes
Dec. 29, 2025 - War Room - Harrison Smith
02:39:39
Journalist Exposes Massive Somali Daycare Fraud Network, Russia Claims Ukraine Attacked Putin Residence With Drones, Trump-Netanyahu White House Meeting & MORE!
Participants
Main
c
casey putsch
r 32:10
h
harrison smith
infowars 01:33:04
Appearances
@
@ittybittytara2
01:48
a
alex jones
infowars 03:30
a
ana kasparian
01:40
j
jon bowne
infowars 01:27
m
marjorie taylor greene
rep/r 02:51
m
mike benz
00:59
m
mike johnson
rep/r 00:40
p
peggy flanagan
d 00:44
v
vickie paladino
r 02:09
Clips
@
@natefriedman97
00:02
b
benjamin netanyahu
isr 00:24
c
chuck schumer
sen/d 00:23
d
donald j trump
admin 00:29
m
mike flood
rep/r 00:04
r
rich mchugh
nn 00:14
|

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
InfoWars.
Tomorrow's news today.
harrison smith
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen.
Welcome to the War Room.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live this Tuesday afternoon.
Big day, big day today with the vote on the Epstein files, as well as a number of speeches from Marjorie Taylor Greene and Thomas Massey, and Trump is making statements.
We got a lot to show you today, a lot to get into.
We'll be joined in the second hour by Elijah Schaefer, who not only is being sued by the FBI director's girlfriend, but is also now apparently a domestic terrorist and had a bit of trouble getting back into his home country because tyranny grows amongst us.
So we'll talk to him about that and take your calls in the final hour.
But let's begin today, as we do every day, with our Daily Dispatch.
Here it is, folks, your Daily Dispatch for Tuesday, the 18th of November, 2025.
House unites to demand Justice Department release Jeffrey Epstein files.
Representative Rocana and Thomas Massey and Marjorie Taylor Greene really led the charge on this.
The House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to force the Department of Justice to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein.
It was the product of a months-long pressure campaign by Democrats and the Bill's leaders, Massey and Rokana.
Several of Epstein's survivors were present in the House chamber during the vote as well and appeared to erupt in cheers when the resolution was passed.
We'll again show you videos from this and talk about what it entails and how the DOJ will continue to try to undercut the release by claiming national security because the CIA was involved up to their ears.
But massive, huge success by Thomas Massey.
The entire Congress voted in favor of this except for one person, Representative Clay Higgins, which has a lot of people asking, what's wrong with Representative Clay Higgins?
And we'll try to answer that question a little bit later.
Meanwhile, massive internet outages sprung up across the world earlier today.
Cloudflare says that that hour-long, hours-long global outage that knocked off several major websites earlier Tuesday was caused by a configuration file that unexpectedly got too big.
For four hours, ChatGPT, X, Spotify, and multiple online services and websites, including Axios, this article from Axios, were dark on Tuesday due to an outage at Cloudflare.
The outage was caused by a configuration file that is automatically generated to manage threat traffic.
The file grew beyond the expected size of entries and triggered a crash in the software system that handles traffic for a number of Cloudflare's services, which is a little bit disturbing.
It's a little bit disturbing knowing that one inappropriately programmed file could wipe out the internet for like half of the world, but certainly that's never going to be a threat in the future.
Meanwhile, Trump says airstrikes on drug cartel in Colombia and Mexico are, quote, okay with me.
On Monday, President Trump told reporters in the White House that striking drug cartel targets in Colombia and Mexico would be okay with him.
Would I launch strikes on Mexico to stop drugs?
That's okay with me.
Would I do that on the land corridors?
I would, Trump said.
He expressed rare openness to direct Pentagon activities inside America's neighbor to the immediate south at a moment when ongoing deadly drone strikes on alleged drug boats off the coast of Venezuela.
This is sure to turn U.S.-Mexico relationships in a more negative direction, but Trump doesn't seem overly concerned with this as he ramps up pressure also on Colombia.
Well, when they have been the source of just infinite problems for us, I don't think I feel too sorry for Mexico either.
And I would at least be more in favor of bombing Mexican drug cartels than, you know, Palestinian children.
And so I guess I'm okay with this too.
An actual threat to America from a country that is to our immediate south and causes us endless trouble by funneling millions upon millions of people and billions of dollars of drugs across our border.
We should probably deal with that.
Meanwhile, DHS arrests over 130 illegal immigrants in the first two days of Operation Charlotte's Web.
This is in Charlotte, North Carolina.
And we'll return to this on the other side.
It'll be our first major story because we're seeing some very, very, very disturbing developments there.
It's not Chicago or LA, but the reaction has been just as vociferous.
And that's because a sixth of the city is foreign-born.
So that's what happens when you replace your population.
Finally, federal appeals court will hear arguments in Texas and Louisiana's Ten Commandments case in January.
That's the wrong headline.
This is about a redistricting rule.
That's weird.
It printed the wrong headline for the story.
No, a judge has said we cannot use the redistrict map and we have to use the old rigged racist one.
Thanks, Judge.
unidentified
Welcome back, folks.
harrison smith
I said that we would continue the program with a discussion of what's happening in Charlotte, North Carolina.
I think maybe people tuning in want to know what is the latest with Jeffrey Epstein.
So we might save what's going on in Charlotte here for just a second, but we do need to get to that, and it involves open sedition by a number of military officers in our government.
It's a very big deal.
But let's talk about what's happening with the Epstein file.
So the House has voted to release the files, overwhelmingly so.
All but one House lawmaker present in the chamber voted in favor of the bill to release the Epstein files.
It passed 427 to 1.
The lone no vote was Representative Clay Higgins of Louisiana, who posted on X shortly thereafter to explain his decision.
Now, we'll go to his explanation here in just a second, but probably wasn't the greatest move.
Probably wasn't the greatest protest vote.
Obviously, it wasn't going to affect the outcome when everybody else is voting in favor of this.
The question is, why would he do that?
Why would he go out of his way to be the one dissenting voice on this?
And I genuinely don't know, but we'll try to figure that out.
As written, the bill reveals and injures thousands of innocent people, witnesses, people who provided alibis, family members, et cetera, if enacted in its current form.
This type of broad reveal of criminal investigative files released to Arab and media will absolutely result in innocent people being hurt, not by my vote, Higgins wrote.
Which again is just a little bit absurd when you have the victims of Jeffrey Epstein there in Congress cheering when this passes.
It really doesn't make any sense.
The Oversight Committee is conducting a thorough investigation that has already released well over 60,000 pages of documents from the Epstein case.
That effort will continue in a manner that provides all due protections for innocent Americans.
If the Senate amends the bill to properly address privacy of the victims and other Americans who are named but not criminally implicated, then I will vote for that bill when it comes back to the House.
So basically, Thomas Massey almost single-handedly managed to achieve this, and it is an achievement, getting both sides of the House to vote overwhelmingly in favor of something.
That is a very rare occurrence.
In fact, it usually only occurs when it comes to something like providing weapons to Israel.
This is kind of the opposite of that, which is interesting because now you've got the entire Congress voting to expose the misdeeds of an Israeli spy.
But it's a total accomplishment by Thomas Massey.
Now, warning against the Senate changing the bill substantially and basically rendering this entire process moot because they delete all of the names of all of the perpetrators, the people doing this.
But, you know, there's also a Trump card to play.
There's also the card to play of the survivors know the names.
The list, as it were, is not a single list.
There are files.
There is evidence.
There is any number of collections of data on all of this, but the survivors there know the names of the people.
I mean, they're famous people.
They're rich people.
They're people they were intimate with.
They know who these people are and could release it at any point.
They want the legal process to take place and for the official investigative files to be released, but they don't need to.
And so Marjorie Taylor Greene is talking about that basically as a fail-safe, dead man switch sort of thing.
We'll go to a couple videos of this.
Let's go first to clip number four.
This is Representative Massey on, yeah, clip four.
Although, I don't know, is this mislabeled Representative Massey on Epstein?
Let's go to clip four now.
No, it's Marjorie Taylor Green.
unidentified
All right.
harrison smith
That's what I thought.
Let's go to clip four.
marjorie taylor greene
Finally, putting these victims and these survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and the cabal of rich, powerful elites that expands not just here in the United States of America, but to other countries as well.
We're putting them last.
And that is exactly what Americans want.
You see, for far too long, far too long, Americans have been put last.
And they're sick of it.
They're sick and tired of it.
And this is why they don't trust Congress.
This is why they don't trust the government.
And here's the problem.
All of these women, women who have suffered in shame for years and years and years, women who were terrified, women who were intimidated, women who were threatened, just like Virginia Guffray.
And now she's dead.
And these women should have never faced that for this information to come out.
And we, especially the four Republican members of the House of Representatives, we should have never faced intimidation and threats for us to get this vote to come to the floor.
Never forget there were four: Thomas Massey, myself, Nancy Mace, and Lauren Boebert.
We had to sign a discharge petition, and we had to fight through intimidation, and we had to endure it for months to push that discharge petition finally to 218 to get this vote to come out.
This is what the American people are sick of, and rightfully so.
Now, where does this go from?
harrison smith
Well, I'll tell you where it goes from here.
The bill has been passed.
It'll go to the Senate now.
Let's go to clip number.
We'll watch the actual passing of the bill.
Clip number 10 here.
This is the U.S. House passing this legislation, forcing the DOJ to release the information of the Jeffrey Epstein files.
Let's watch.
unidentified
On this vote, the yays are 427.
chuck schumer
The nays are one.
unidentified
Two-thirds being in the affirmative, the rules are suspended.
chuck schumer
The bill is passed.
mike flood
And without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid on the table.
harrison smith
So there you go, and the cheering goes up.
Again, this battle isn't over, not by a long shot.
And, you know, there's a good reason why it's been so difficult to get the Jeffrey Epstein files out.
It's a pretty obvious reason.
Of course, the claim that they're making is still valid technically, and that's a claim of national security.
From kenclippenstonklippenstein.com.
National security blocks Epstein file release.
While Congress votes on a bill many think will pry loose the Jeffrey Epstein files, one glaring loophole will prevent full transparency.
It's called national security.
Not national security that has anything to do with the national defense or harm to the nation, but the self-serving kind that protects the system from the people by depriving them of information.
In this case, about Jeffrey Epstein, his 1,000-plus victims, according to the government, and any accomplices he had.
With 89% of Americans in agreement that the Justice Department should release all information about Jeffrey Epstein, the message is clear, national security is more important than democracy.
Take a look at Congress's long-shot attempt to force the release of the government's records.
A seemingly innocuous word appears in the resolution, unclassified.
It's an official word that in theory only exists when it comes to national security matters.
That is, that the release of such information could cause harm to national security.
There is, of course, a small chance that some FBI method relating to intelligence collection might officially qualify as classified because the release might expose certain capabilities of the government.
But even there, I'd argue the public has a right to know.
And yet somehow the word made its way into the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
It's the wrong word.
The bill, after demanding that, quote, no records shall be withheld, delayed, or redacted on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary, goes on to undermine all of this.
The bill says that the Attorney General, quote, makes a determination that covered information may not be declassified and made available in a manner that protects national security of the United States, including methods or sources related to national security.
The Attorney General shall release an unclassified summary for each of the redacted or withheld classified information, as in the Attorney General will get to decide what to release and how to characterize it.
So, again, it's a very convenient watchword about supposed national security, which actually might and would contain the fact that, well, our international allies and geopolitical others might, I don't know, attack us if we release it, right?
It's actually just an extension of the blackmail operation that's going on.
Now, Mike Johnson has basically doubled down on this and is saying that, yeah, we're not going to be able to release it without substantial redactions.
Let's go to clip number six here.
This is leader of the Senate, Mike Johnson.
Let's watch.
mike johnson
All right.
Number five, national security concerns, okay?
The discharge requires the Attorney General to release within 30 days, quote, classified information to the maximum extent possible.
This ignores the principle that declassification should always rest and always has rested with the agency that originated the intelligence.
Why?
So that they can protect their critical sources and methods.
It is incredibly dangerous to demand that officials or employees of the DOJ declassify materials that originated in other agencies and intelligence agencies.
harrison smith
And of course, the absurdity of all of this is that President Trump came out yesterday.
And basically, again, I think you can look at a lot of what Trump does as face-saving.
Like a lot of what he does is all about saving face.
And in this case, the vote was going to go against him, and they knew it was going to go against him.
And you see now it went completely against him with everybody except for Clay Higgins, you know, voting to release the files, files that Trump has spent the last 10 months claiming don't exist, claiming they're already released, claiming it's a hoax.
It's ridiculous.
So he could have released it at any point with a stroke of a pen, right?
Wave of a hand.
He has the power to declassify.
He could have released this at any point.
He didn't because he didn't want it released.
Then when the vote looked like it was going to go against him, he came out yesterday and said, actually, I want you to release it.
I'm telling you to release everything.
And I'm instructing Pam Bondi, the DOJ, you know, release everything.
And that was because he knew this vote was going against him.
So he sort of wanted to, it would look really bad if he said, don't vote for this.
And every single person in the Congress voted for it.
That would not be a face-saving exercise.
That would be a face-destroying exercise.
So to save face, he's acting like he's in favor of this while simultaneously instructing the DOJ to reopen investigations into this, which is the other way that they'll keep information hidden.
It's either national security implications, in which case they don't even have to tell you why they're blocking what they're blocking because national security after all, or because there's an open investigation.
And you can't release the information of an investigation until the investigation is completed.
So there are mechanisms behind the scene that will prevent this stuff from being released anyway.
As Thomas Massey notes, this is how Speaker Johnson plans to protect the perverts who went to Rape Island from embarrassment.
Do not let the Senate add an amendment to avoid disclosing these rich and powerful men who have evaded justice for so many years.
Is Johnson calling all victims, quote, non-credible?
And this was a note of the dangers of the discharge position, if not amended.
Victim privacy, they say it doesn't adequately protect victims.
But importantly, part two, innocent persons risks disclosure of non-credible allegations creating new victims.
Which, in other words, because they didn't charge these guys, they therefore are legally innocent and can't have their names released.
But that's only because the government chose not to try to prosecute them, chose to allow them to get away with it.
So they never got convicted.
So now they get to continue to cover up their participation.
It's pretty perverted stuff, if you ask me.
Now, in a way, this is all a giant hoax.
I mean, the Democrats pretending to care about this is a hoax.
It's absolutely fraudulent.
They had four years where they controlled the House and the Senate.
They never even mentioned Epstein.
Just keep reminding you over and over.
They downplayed Epstein every chance they got for 10 years until they decided it would hurt Trump.
And now they're acting like they care about this.
Just about every article you could find about Jeffrey Epstein from a leftist organization between 2016 and 2025, every single outlet conflates Jeffrey Epstein with like crazy QAnon conspiracy theories about Hillary Clinton having a buffet of baby body parts in a basement in wherever, Martha's Vineyard.
You know, it's like they constantly, constantly demonized and mocked the idea that there were elite pedophile rings.
So the idea that they now care and are fighting this good fight for these victims, it is just, it's an insult to your intelligence and it's a giant hoax.
And that is true.
But it did actually happen and the Democrats were involved.
Let's go to Jim Jordan here, clip number seven, where he talks about the charade that this Epstein debacle represents.
Let's watch.
unidentified
I give myself such time as I may consume.
The gentleman is recognized.
We all support holding bad guys accountable, and we're all going to vote for this resolution.
But I think a little perspective is important.
Democrats have had spent six months talking about Epstein, even though they had four years to do something about it.
Now, why would they do that?
Why would they do that?
Maybe it's to go after President Trump.
Never forget they shut down the government for 43 days.
They said, don't worry about our military.
Don't worry about air traffic controllers.
Don't worry about our economy.
Don't worry about American families.
No, no, no.
Close the government for a month and a half because it might hurt the president.
For the past decade, there's been one constant for Democrats.
One constant.
Go after Trump.
They spied on his campaign.
Then it was Mueller.
Then it was impeachment one.
Then it was impeachment two.
Then it was all the lawfare.
Alvin Bragg, Fonnie Willis, Letitia James.
Then it was Ardig Frost investigation at the Justice Department surveilling United States senators and congressmen and a whole hust of other Americans.
Then it was Jack Smith and his gag orders and his raiding President Trump's home.
Then it was a 43-day shutdown and now it's Epstein.
And by the way, by the way, the same party that did all that, they were also the ones who were texting with Mr. Epstein during a hearing where Michael Cohen was their witness in another effort to go after the president.
harrison smith
That's pretty funny.
It's almost like the efforts to go after President Trump are like collapsing in on top of each other.
So that was Jim Jordan.
He goes off for several more minutes, but you got a little taste there.
And he's exactly right.
And I mean, the Democrats are so goofy, like they're so stupid.
And just everything they say is fake.
I really, I wish it wasn't like this.
I really do wish I could go, oh, this whole divide, this right-left divide is a Sharad.
It's all a mirage.
Really, it's two sides of the same coin.
But no, I'm sorry.
The Democrats are retarded, okay, in a way that Republicans aren't.
Republicans are retarded in their own special way.
Don't get me wrong.
But there's something about Democrats being so just endlessly dishonest, like really to a degree that it's like, it's not even possible to believe you mean what you're saying.
It's not even possible.
So as Jim Jordan lays out there, they spent literally four years trying to go after Donald Trump with everything they had.
They never once considered that Epstein would be a method to go after him or they would have employed it.
While they were going after him, they're having, you know, they're questioning Michael Cohen, who was the traitor, the backstabber, who was behind a lot of the Trump investigations and attempts to throw him in prison.
Michael Cohen lied and misrepresented his participation in the Trump campaign.
And so while they're interviewing him to try to destroy Donald Trump, they're asking questions that are being fed to them by Jeffrey Epstein.
So again, the whole idea that the Democrats care at all about Epstein or his activities or relating him to Trump, it is all absurd.
And it reached maybe a peak of absurdity when Chuck Schumer was asked why the Senate didn't go after Trump for four years.
And he seems like doesn't even understand the question.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Okay.
Senator, on that note, just I guess a question that's out there.
Why wouldn't they have been released the last four years when President Biden was in office?
chuck schumer
Well, that's the question every American is asking.
Or not every American, but so many Americans are asking.
What the hell is he hiding?
Why doesn't he want them released?
When you don't want something like this released, when even a whole lot of Republicans are calling for the release, his own party members, people ask the question, what's he hiding?
It's got to be answered by releasing the files.
harrison smith
No, no.
No, Chuck, I think you misunderstood the question.
Why didn't you try to release these if it was so important if you're so genuinely motivated to get justice for these women?
Why didn't you release it during the Biden administration where there were no barriers to you doing so?
It's almost like a Monty Python skid or something.
It's just like, why didn't you release it?
And he's like, I know.
That's what I'm asking.
No, why didn't you?
No, you could have released it and you didn't.
He's like, I know exactly.
So what is Trump hiding?
Like, this is hilarious, frankly.
Frankly, it's hilarious that these people are capable of wielding immense power over all of us.
And by hilarious, of course, I mean terrifying and upsetting.
Let's go to clip number two here, Mike Binns, on the real reason why the Epstein files have been so difficult to release when either party is in office.
Let's watch.
mike benz
When you look at, for example, the close relationship between Jeffrey Epstein, the Clinton family, and the Ahud Barak Israeli Labor Party, it is patently clear that if the Central Intelligence Agency and the State Department were to do a sweep of all of their files, communications, records, a simple name trace of Jeffrey Epstein's name, the voluminous scale of the documentation, I think, would be enormous.
The State Department rented out a physical property to Jeffrey Epstein personally in the 1990s.
You and I can't just get the State Department as our personal landlord after seizing a mansion from the government of Iran, to say nothing of Epstein's work during Iran-Contra with both the U.S. and Israeli side of intelligence through the Adnan Khashoggi link or through what was being done in the 1990s between Bill Clinton and Ahud Barak when he was the prime minister there to Jeffrey Epstein setting up the Clinton Global Initiative.
She goes on to be Secretary of State.
For some reason, they are not pursuing this lead, and it is maddening to watch from the outside.
harrison smith
It's funny because Shoghi came up there because he was another topic of conversation in the White House today.
In fact, let's go to clip number three here.
This is Trump on Epstein when he was questioned about this in the Oval Office today.
Clip number three.
donald j trump
As far as the Epstein files is, I have nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein.
I threw him out of my club many years ago because I thought he was a sick pervert.
But I guess I would turn out to be right.
But you know who does have Bill Clinton, Larry Summers, who ran Harvard, was with him every single night, every single weekend.
They lived together.
They went to his island many times.
I never did.
Andrew Weissman here.
All these guys were friends of his.
You don't even talk about those people.
harrison smith
And he, of course, is exactly right.
And after all of this, remember, there's always the Trump card.
There's always the dead man switch.
Let's go to clip number 29.
Here's Marjorie Taylor Greene laying that out.
marjorie taylor greene
People are sick of, and rightfully so.
Now, where does this go from here?
The question will remain: will the Department of Justice release all the information?
Will the judge in New York release the information?
Will the CIA release the information?
And will foreign governments release their information?
Or will this continue after this vote today be a cover-up?
A cover-up of the rich, powerful elites that bond together in sex and human trafficking, abuse, and all types of global business that enriches them but never serves Americans.
The American people will know, and the victims, actually the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein, will know because they know the list of names.
And I remain dedicated to my promise to read that names, those names here on the House floor, if those women ever find them in a place that it needs to be done.
unidentified
I yield back to Mr. Lady from Georgia yields back, gentlemen.
harrison smith
Reserves.
That's the real threat.
So, you know, long story short, this was an intelligence agency honeypot, you know, combination between Israel and America, and exposing that would blow the whole thing up.
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is The War Room, InfoWars.com, Bandai video.
Please do share those links.
Follow us on X. You can follow me at Harrison H. Smith.
I just got invited to a space.
Candace Owens, I guess, is doing a space tonight at 7.30.
I'm a little bit torn on whether or not I'll do it for one thing.
I have a birthday dinner tonight, and I kind of just don't feel like doing it.
But the other thing is that I don't think it will help because it doesn't really matter what you say.
It's bizarre.
And I'm not going to get into it right here.
Maybe we'll touch on it a little bit more in the second hour.
We got Somali Fraud to get into and we've got immigration and the Ukraine war.
And we'll be interviewing Casey Putsch in the third hour.
So I don't really want to get into it right now, but it's just the whole thing is nonsensical to the point that it doesn't feel productive to even participate in it.
Like yesterday, this guy, Evan Kilgore, who I guess has been really, you know, into the whole Candace investigation the whole time and is one of her sort of, I don't know, underlings on X promoting her stuff.
And he comes out with this long, like really long post basically explaining why he doesn't buy the whole Mitch Snow Fort Wachuka story.
And so I comment on it just being like, this is so weird.
It's weird that this has developed in a conspiracy theory that like you have to apologize for not agreeing with one of the suppositions of one of the pieces of evidence.
Like that's never happened before.
There's never been a conspiracy theory of this level that is seemingly owned by one person.
Candace Owens dictates what the investigation is.
And if you disagree with her, you're out and you're now, you know, by virtue of disagreeing with her, part of the establishment and you've sold out and you're completely against everybody now.
And it's like, it's in the case with 9-11, it's not the case with Las Vegas, in the case with Sandy Hook.
I mean, everybody gets to speculate.
Everybody can have different views.
And that's never been an issue before.
So what is it about this particular issue that has become like this?
It's weird.
It's weird.
It doesn't make any sense, especially since Evan Kilgore writes this whole long post being like, I don't hate Candace.
I'm not trying to try.
I'm just saying this whole Mitch Snow thing, not really the right trail to go down.
And then Candace Owens' response is like, oh, so you were coordinating this.
You were coordinating this attack, weren't you?
And it's like, and she's like, why don't you show us your chat logs?
Tell us who you're talking to.
It's like, who the hell are you?
What are you even talking about?
Why would he owe you anything?
Why are you treating this like you're an inquisitor?
It just doesn't make any sense.
So anyway, I comment on that and just go, hey, this is weird.
And I'm commenting about Evan and his post.
Now she's being treated as Queen Bee.
And then Candace Owens responds talking about Alex Jones and posting screenshots of Alex Jones tweets.
And then like under her, there's all these comments being like, that's why we love Candace.
Just like straight to the point, provides receipts.
And it's like, she is not responding to what I said.
I don't know if she even read what I said because she just responded about something entirely different.
So, and then everybody's like, yeah, Candace, you got him.
And it's like, I didn't even mention Alex Jones.
I wasn't even talking about Alex Jones.
I was talking about Evan Kilgore, talking about how weird it is that he has to do this like mea culpa because he disagrees with the piece of evidence that Candace herself is like, I'm 50-50 on this.
Like, what is going on?
It's very weird.
It's very weird.
So, that type of thing where it's like you post something, it's very clear.
I'm talking about Evan Kilgore, his post.
Don't even mention Alex.
Candace responds as if I'm talking about Alex, responds with a bunch of stuff about Alex, and then acts like she won't the argument.
It's like, I didn't even mention Alex.
What are you even talking about?
So, why?
Like, so what would be the benefit of me participating in a space so I can make cogent, intelligent, logical points for you just to pretend I didn't say it, pretend I didn't say anything, and just start arguing against things that I've never said and don't agree with, and then putting a gold star on yourself saying you won the argument that I wasn't having.
Why would I do that?
Why would I participate in that?
I might.
I still might.
I don't know.
I haven't decided yet.
We'll see how I feel at 7:30, but what would be the point?
What would be the point?
Are you going to convince me?
I mean, it's almost, I mean, it is funny in a way, the way people are treating this, where it's like Mitch Snow, the guy that brought down Alex Jones.
You know, the deep state couldn't do it.
The most highly paid lawyers in the entire world couldn't even slow him down.
Big tech, in a combined fashion, kicking us off every single platform in a single day, didn't even serve as a speed bump in our operation.
But it's hero whistleblower Mitchell Snow.
His bombshell, devastating revelation.
And obviously, it's going to lead to a domino effect that tears down not just TPUSA, but the American and probably Israeli government and anybody who stood in Candace's way will be, you know, destroyed as they justly deserve.
It's like, what are you talking about?
Here's my promise.
Here's my guess.
I can't promise this, but here's my supposition.
I'll give it two months.
I mean, this is such a big thing.
I will go out of it.
I will extend my prediction.
I was going to say one month.
Two months, nobody will be talking about Mitch Snow.
Nobody will be talking about Fort Wakachuka.
Nobody will be talking about any of this because it doesn't mean anything.
This is not anything.
No one's going to remember any of this in two months.
That's my prediction.
Maybe I'm wrong.
Maybe this is the string that you start pulling and unravels with the whole sweater.
That'd be great.
It's not going to happen.
No one's going to remember this.
It's going to go nowhere.
It's not going to be anything.
And I'm pretty confident in saying that because I've been following Candace Owens' investigation.
It never goes anywhere.
Nothing ever comes of anything.
So here we are.
Here we are three months later, nothing tangible, nothing to actually sink your teeth into, no verifiable claims, no working theory of the assassination.
Just endless speculation about things that I can't even figure out what the importance is supposed to be.
So anyway, we'll see.
Maybe I'll talk about it at 7.30.
Maybe not.
Probably not.
Probably not, if I had to guess.
So let's get back into what we were just talking about.
I'm going to finish up here with the Israeli stuff and then talk about sort of combine it with the general stupidity of liberals and leftists and what an unfortunate barrier to our unity that is going to serve to be.
But Nenyahu came to America, obviously, to try to get us once again into war with Iran, as is our tradition.
This is our monthly tradition for Nenyahu to try to get the American golem to go fight his battles for him.
And we have to resist.
And for some reason, this just dance goes on and on.
But he was here doing other stuff.
Benjamin Netyahu, Elon Musk, discuss AI cooperation.
Musk and Netanyahu hold virtual meeting to, quote, catapult Israel into a global leader in artificial intelligence.
Last night, I held a joint conference with Florida, from Florida, with entrepreneur Elon Musk, Minister of Transportation Miri Regev, and the head of national AI headquarters, Erez Azkol.
This is Netanyahu tweeting this out.
I spoke at length with Musk about promoting and developing artificial intelligence technologies in Israel.
And I said in our conversation, we intend to catapult Israel and turn it into a global leader in the field, just as we did with cyber and other technologies.
So this is the real war.
Now, as we pointed out, not only has Israel launched in a quote-unquote eighth front war to take over American, the infra-American, the American information sphere through taking over or pressuring social media companies to censor on Israel's behalf.
They've also launched takeover of major news corporations like CBS News.
They've taken over TikTok as part of the negotiations with China.
That's why we're taking 600,000 Chinese students so Israel can own TikTok and TikTok and stop uploading videos of their endless crimes.
But it's not just about America, it's about the world.
It is a worldwide eighth front where they are using attacks, a lot of times by Muslims, to carve out for themselves special privileges, special security guarantees, and millions or billions of dollars in funding to protect Jews all over the world, wherever they happen to be.
And we explained this after the Bandi Beach shooting.
You have this major push to another gun buyback.
They're going to severely, once again, limit or curtail gun ownership in Australia, except for the Jewish groups.
Except the Jewish groups get a special dispensation.
There are special armed Jewish security groups that not only will be allowed to carry guns, are being given millions of dollars by the Australian government to carry guns.
That to me is a really sort of perfect example of the way this rolls out.
You have white Christian Australians mad that they are having their country given away to a bunch of Muslim migrants.
The Muslim migrants who are supported by the state and given caveats themselves by the state kill a bunch of Jewish people.
And then the government's response is to crack down on the white Christian people who were protesting against the Islamic immigration that led to the attack while giving extra benefits and specific carve-outs to Jewish groups because they're the victims of the crime.
And this happens in the same thing in the UK.
When white people are attacked by Muslim immigrants, it's we have to hold hands and come together and we're arresting any white people who speak out against it.
And we certainly will crack down on any white people trying to do anything about it.
When a Jewish group gets attacked, it's Jews must feel safe in the UK.
We have given them millions of dollars in special security.
We are assigning official government agents to escort Jews to and from holiday parties, Hanukkah parties, things like that.
Again, it's not even about that being a bad thing.
It's not necessarily a bad thing.
If you have a group of people that are being targeted, it makes sense to give them special carve outs.
It's the discrepancy.
It's the hypocrisy.
It is the inequality of the fact that when white people are targeted, they are punished.
And when Jews are targeted, they are rewarded, empowered, and protected.
Multiply that over and over and over again.
What you end up with is a caste system with Jews on top and everybody else on bottom.
And that is what they're trying to create.
I'm not trying to be hysterical about this.
It's just this has been slowly being cobbled together for a while, and I feel like we need to be talking about this because it has to do with AI.
It has to do with media coverage.
It has to do with all of this stuff and the attacks that are fostered by the Muslim immigrants that come in largely thanks to the efforts of Jewish groups in the first place.
So it's a crisis reaction solution operation that's being run worldwide.
And it's fairly obvious.
Let's start with clip number seven here because this is Anna Kasparian of the Young Turks.
She uncovered YouTube.
So we'll sort of start off with the information sphere aspect of this, which is the sort of first thing you need to establish.
First, you need to establish the control of the media, control of information as a prerequisite before you can carry out the other corrupt activities, because obviously you don't want people finding out about that.
So first, you have to be able to censor that information, get that apparatus in place first, then the real corruption can begin.
So YouTube is doing this, working on Israel's behalf and quietly deleting channels that show the truth about what's happening in Palestine.
Here's Anna Kasperian reporting.
ana kasparian
It looks like YouTube has quietly deleted more than 700 videos that document Israeli human rights violations, war crimes, and other abuses as part of an effort by our government here in the United States to essentially bury evidence of Israel's war crimes in Gaza and the West Bank.
Now, according to reporting from The Intercept, YouTube surreptitiously deleted all these videos in early October by wiping the accounts that posted them from its website, along with their channel's archives.
The accounts belong to three prominent Palestinian human rights groups: Al-Haq, Al-Mezan, Center for Human Rights, and the Palestinian Center for Human Rights.
These three YouTube channels hosted hours of footage documenting and highlighting alleged Israeli government violations of international law in both Gaza and the West Bank.
And it's really important to have that record because, as we know, the Hasburg coming from Israel is strong.
Our politicians are bought and oftentimes bought on behalf of Israel, on behalf of doing favors for Israel.
And I don't want what has happened over the last two years to be misrepresented in history books in the future.
I want documentation of the war crimes that have been committed.
But there is a very real effort and a successful effort at that to essentially wipe the internet of these videos.
So the deleted videos range in scope from investigations, such as an analysis of the Israeli killing of American journalist Shireen.
harrison smith
All right, you get the point.
YouTube's on board.
YouTube is doing the bidding, removing hundreds of videos on, you know, explaining Israel's war crimes.
Let's go now to clip number 36.
This was discovered also happening in Meta.
Of course, Meta, we know, I think it was Jordana Cutler, I believe is her name, just got appointed as their Jewish diaspora chief.
And basically, she says, you know, we, the first things we did was change definitions so that anti-Zionism is now being treated as anti-Semitism and anti-Semitism isn't being treated as bigotry.
It's not under the bigotry heading.
It's under the hate heading.
So therefore, it can be, you know, silenced even more.
Basically, just going out and bragging about taking over Facebook's censorship program to silence the truth about what's being done there.
But it goes farther than that.
Let's go to clip number 36 now.
unidentified
Hey, guys.
I wanted to share something with you that happened today that I thought was pretty interesting.
And I wanted to put a spotlight on it for you.
So this is a new feature that I just discovered myself, but apparently Meta now and Instagram specifically allows you to set specific topics that you are either interested in or things that you are not interested in for your algorithm.
So basically you can kind of set your own algorithm on the topics that you like and what you want to see more of and what you don't want to see a lot of.
And funny enough, as you can expect, I was going through my algorithm and it had a lot of stuff about New York City.
It had parenting hacks because it's that time of year and man, I need a lot of help with the parenting these days.
But it also had, you know, some dining and food stuff, which I'm pretty interested in.
And so I was like, you know what, let me see if I can add some tabs for some other topics that I'm interested in.
And so I tried to create a tab for, you know, the Middle East.
I keep tabs on what's going on there a lot.
So I like to kind of stay abreast of all the developments.
So I created a tab for Israel and it let me do that.
And then I wanted to add a tab for Gaza and Palestine.
And it said these topics are not supported.
And so I tried that again and again.
And you can see as I'm showing you there on my screen, it just wouldn't let me create a tab for Gaza and Palestine.
And it had me thinking a little bit about how important the algorithm is to what we're able to see on a daily basis.
You know, a lot of organizations, Human Rights Watch, tech organizations have been tracking this topic and have talked about how big companies and algorithms suppress content for us.
harrison smith
So Meta's doing it too.
So we got Google doing it.
Facebook, obviously Meta, Instagram, they're doing it to get an even greater degree.
You actually can't go in and say that you want to hear about these things.
They'll algorithmically keep you from doing that.
X is doing this as well.
Let's go to clip number nine here.
We can play it as B-roll and we can keep the audio down.
I believe this is from Project Constitution.
But they reveal in the X source code the algorithm code.
Basically, it judges you and it judges your tweet and it has different ways that it weighs its scoring of you and this sort of stuff.
And so what you're seeing here is it has an account name, Holland Citizen.
It's been tagged for hate and harassment, but it has protected categories that are Jewish ethnicity and Jewish religion.
So that weighs it less.
So it's like, yeah, he says things that are offensive, but it's counterbalanced by the fact that he's a part of this group that doesn't really have to adhere to the same rules that everybody else does.
So again, this is one of the ways that the algorithm has been manipulated.
And of course, I've shown this as well, where you have Grok being asked about a map that Harmless Yard Dog put up, and it immediately says this is an anti-Semitic map.
It's mapping Chabad Lubavitch places.
And it's like, no, this is just a map of Houston with like traffic lights on it.
And so when you ask Grok, why did you say?
It revealed, well, you know, Harmless Yarn Dog has been tagged basically as suspicious.
So it just basically confronts his tweets as if with the understanding and on the presumption that he's anti-Semitic.
So that's what it filters everything through.
So we know these algorithms are being manipulated and changed to weigh certain people more than others, weigh certain topics more than others, to spread certain information more than others.
That, of course, has been well publicized and bragged about.
So again, none of this is even a conspiracy theory because none of it's hidden.
None of it's secret.
Like they're just doing this.
I just want to try to show you how they're doing it in so many different ways that it's like, what is the ultimate result of all of this?
And it's pretty obvious.
It's that there's this superstructure being built.
There's a class or caste system worldwide being established where some are worth protecting, some are worth telling the truth about, and some aren't.
Let's go to clip number 33 here.
These are Israel's own leaders talking about taking over America's media outlets.
Let's go to clip number 33 here.
unidentified
Here's the bottom line.
And I want to say this clearly.
I want to say this clearly and without interruption.
Israel's war stopped being on Hamas a long time ago.
Israel's war is on the American First Amendment.
Israel's biggest threat to its existence is free speech and people being exposed to the factual evidence of the war crimes that Israel is committing in real time.
And that is why every time information is being freely shared about Israel's war crimes, the first immediate action that pro-Israel forces do in America is try to take ownership of that media.
We see that happen with CBS.
Just a week ago, Ben Shapiro was at a conference where he was openly bragging and thinking the capture of CBS by a pro-Zionist owner.
Right now, as we speak, TikTok is in an ongoing deal to be owned by some of the most Zionist pro-Israel voices that the country has.
And even your own leader, Netanyahu, was talking to a room of influencers, calling TikTok the new weapon of war, and that he is so excited and can't wait for TikTok to transfer ownership to American owners so that they can censor people even more.
The only chance that Israel has in this PR war is to try to completely curtail and annihilate the American First Amendment and American free speech.
We are even gutting free speech on college campuses and destroying the American education system in order to silence criticism of Israel.
There's an absolute rupture and there's a destruction of American society all at the expense of protecting Israel's genocide.
This is all factual and confirmed and it's out in the open and your own leaders bragging about it.
harrison smith
They actually brag about it and talk about it pretty openly.
It's just if you're in favor of it, it's fine.
But if you're against it, you're a vicious anti-Semite.
I mean, all of these things, whether it's the adopting of the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism, that includes anti-Zionism.
So then you say, okay, all anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism.
All I gather is a giant spike in anti-Semitism.
And then an attack against Jewish people, you say, you know, this requires a special carve-out where they get protection.
And this is happening.
We can go again to clip number 37.
Here's Netanyahu, you know, not calling for gun control in Australia, calling for armed Jews and Jewish groups in particular to protect Jews in Australia from the consequences of mass immigration.
Let's watch Netanyahu, clip number 37.
benjamin netanyahu
Just imagine if you had on that beach, on that Hanukkah gathering, if you had several armed people, several armed guards, 10, 15, even five, it would be over.
That's what we've seen time and again in Israel, time and again.
And that saves the day.
And I think that's required right now.
The world has changed.
Recognize the change.
harrison smith
From DD underscore geopolitics on X, Nenyah, who calls for armed Jewish security services worldwide, and some agree.
In a recent interview, Israeli Prime Minister Nenyah, who explicitly argues for deploying armed Jewish security guards globally, modeled on Israel's own armed settler security doctrine, referring to Hanukkah gathering attack.
He claims five to 15 guards would have ended it immediately.
This is not an off-the-cuff remark.
It aligns directly with a December 2025 Israel Hayam op-ed calling for the creation of a, quote, Jewish People's Guard.
The Guard is described as a permanent global security structure operating across borders, coordinated with Israel, the U.S., and allied governments, and integrated with local law enforcement.
Notice the overtly militarized language.
Jewish communities are described as being on the front line, requiring rapid response units, unified protocols, intelligence sharing, and preemptive identification for incitement processes before they turn violent.
Front line of what?
Rapid response units?
The vision is already being partially implemented in Australia.
Reporting is confirmed that the Community Security Group, a Jewish security organization with direct training links to Israel, is seeking expanded authority to carry weapons.
A member told investigators the group had functioned as a recruiting ground for Israeli intelligence.
So, this is what's being created: a global, again, superstructure managed out of Israel that will provide arms security and intelligence security specifically for Jewish citizens the world over, sort of as an extra government on top of their own government while their own governments fail to serve the people that they're actually supposed to.
It's a giant conspiracy and it's being developed right in front of us.
All right, welcome back, folks.
I'm going to go to another video here.
I want to go to clip 38.
New York really is going down the socialist slope into hell.
And, you know, people, I don't know, man.
People think it like can't happen here or something.
No, it's happening.
It's happening.
You vote for people that promise to use the government to bring equality.
Prepare to die.
Like, I don't know what to tell you.
Like, it's getting so much worse so quickly.
They've just passed a bill to force homeowners in New York City to sell to NGOs or corporations.
So at the same time that the left apparently is up in arms against BlackRock buying homes, like so are we, but the left also is mad about this.
They're mad because they think it's about money.
They don't realize it's about control.
But simultaneously, you have the socialist mayor in New York essentially making a law, like spearheading the fight to pass a law to force people to sell first and foremost to corporations, not individual buyers.
Again, yet again, the socialists serving 100% the will of their enemies.
Insane, but it's constant.
Here is one New York City councilwoman who actually understands the true insanity that is taking over New York City right now.
Let's watch.
vickie paladino
In regard to what we're just talking about now, Copa, how wrong can a person be or a body of a government be when we start to take the individual rights away from the homeowner?
Whether it's a two-family house, three-family house, four-family house, what does it matter?
The fact is the person owns the home.
They have the right to sell the home to whomever they please.
The idea that we have to consult with the building department and give a six-month period of time for someone else to make an offer is absolutely outrageous.
And to say it's government overreach is 100% true.
This is absolutely maniacal.
I do not understand how this body works when it comes to individual citizens of this city.
This is overreach at its very best.
I'm a homeowner.
homeowner, and no one is going to tell me or anybody else I know that's worked so damn hard to own a three or a four family home that I have to submit the ability to sell my house first to the building department and then offer it up to a non-for-profit when my neighbor across the street may want to buy it.
And they have to wait six months?
Nonsense.
This is absolutely ridiculous.
And also, I want to just add to this hearing today, this meeting today, that is absolutely ridiculous.
And everybody in this room should be terribly embarrassed that we stripped our veterans' bills today from today's hearings.
Why?
Why?
When the men and women of this country deserve better treatment in our city today that we've passed in committee has failed to come through for our veterans, stripped it totally off the record for today.
Absolutely ridiculous.
Thank you very much and shameful.
Shame, shame on all of you.
harrison smith
Very powerful stuff.
Here's a story from Postmillennial.
NYC poised to force landlords to sell private property to nonprofits to ensure affordable housing.
New York City Council has passed what has been called the Community Opportunity to Purchase Act, COPA, that will force private building owners to offer up their property to nonprofits and government entities before they make any private sale, effectively causing massive delays in property sales and other regulatory hurdles in the Big Apple's housing industry.
In the scenario that it passed, NYC will have the largest COPA programmed in the company.
The act forces landlords to offer their property to the city as well as nonprofits before the building can be sold on the public market.
The lawmaker who sponsored the law, Councilmember Sandy Nurse, claims it will be a win for New Yorkers.
Quote, corporate interests and big real estate tried their hardest to block the COPA Act with misinformation and fear-mongering campaign and they failed.
Today marks the beginning of a new social housing era in New York.
COPA levels the playing field, makes it possible to preserve and create thousands of permanently affordable homes in our city.
The level, the playing field is level.
All right, welcome back, folks.
This is thewarroominforwards.com banned.video.
Support us at thealexjonesstore.com.
Massive sale there.
Buy one, get one on all supplements.
You can buy any supplement and get any other supplement free.
Buy a cheap one, get an expensive one.
unidentified
Free.
harrison smith
That sale ends tomorrow.
Go now, thealexjonesstore.com.
We'll tell you more about that later.
But I got a lot of major political news to get into, including the fact that Tyler Robinson, the Charlie Kirk, the alleged Charlie Kirk assassin, is asking that the entire prosecutor team be kicked off the case because of connections they have to people who witnessed the event.
Same time, you have John Brennan, who's discovered that he is the subject of an indictment in Florida and is asking to change the venue because they want a more friendly judge, which itself is, in a way, a sort of admission that they're feeling the heat and are worried about John Brennan's legal future.
I also have this.
Let's just touch on this really quick.
Because this is exactly what we warned would be the case.
When you had the seditious six come out the video saying, oh, no, we're just saying don't follow your orders, but just the illegal ones.
Like, it's totally fine for us to say that because we're just saying the illegal orders.
So we're, you know, sticking more or less to the letter of law, which isn't even true.
But regardless, we said there should be something about this.
Well, technically, they said, you know, they really towed the line and didn't quite say anything that was illegal.
And it's like, no, it's illegal.
No, what they were doing was trying to spread discontent in the underlings.
They're trying to frame Trump as an illegitimate president.
So his orders are ignored.
They're trying to create chaos in the ranks of our military deliberately.
That is the only reason they would make that video.
They should have been treated like traitors because that's what they are.
They should have been charged with the crime they committed because they clearly committed the crime.
Again, this isn't like some sort of weird board game where you're trying to like, you know, win by maxing out the rules of the game.
No, we have laws in the English language as a limited way of expressing the morals and the guide rails of our entire country.
You can't have a law that specifically is attributed to every single event that happened.
You have general laws that express, in general, what you're not allowed to do.
I always use the example of kidnapping.
Okay, kidnapping might have a specific definition in your mind of a man in a van offering candy and scooping up little kids and driving away.
Like, yeah, that's obviously kidnapping, but so is like keeping your kid beyond your custody window.
That's also kidnapping.
Once you're a kid and there's at home for longer than they're supposed to be, well, technically, it's kidnapping.
It's not the maybe dictionary definition of kidnapping, but this is just a term that we use to apply to a class of activity that is illegal.
Okay, same thing with this law about not trying to encourage the American military to disobey orders.
As the law is written, these seditious six broke that law blatantly.
We didn't do anything about it.
Everybody had cold feet.
Oh, they'll really, you know, regret doing this eventually.
Like, nothing happened.
Nothing happened.
So what's happening now?
Leftist group recruits military officials to turn against Trump's drug cartel strikes.
So you now have a left-wing organization advising military members who disagree with President Trump and his orders.
Says officials are seeking its help over the president's boat strikes targeting Latin American drug traffickers.
Win Without War, a progressive foreign policy advocacy group says its nationwide outreach campaign geared towards the armed forces is working on a Sunday email to supporters mentioning billboards placed near military bases say, quote, staff officers and at least one drone pilot have sought advice out of fear of legal consequences for their role in the Trump and War Secretary Pete Hegset's illegal boat strikes on suspected drug trafficker boats, the group said.
While Trump demands unquestioning obedience, Win Without War is reminding troops they still have an option in case they're given illegal orders.
So you have a leftist group now recruiting active military to be traitors.
That's what's happening here.
You create the perception that they will be punished by following illegal orders.
The orders aren't illegal.
It's not legal for them to disobey them, but they create this atmosphere of fear and say, you have to disobey these orders or else you'll be the one charged with war crimes.
So these people go, I don't want to be charged with war crime.
I guess I'll go over to the enemy.
And now they're recruiting.
Are we obliged to allow them to do this?
Are we obliged for a leftist organization?
Are we obliged to allow a leftist organization to put up billboards and advertise on military bases?
Hey, you don't want to follow orders?
Come follow us.
We'll give you the legal backing you need.
Hey, you disagree with what President Trump is doing?
Give us your name.
We'll help you out.
You can whistleblow to us.
And we can disrupt the entire administration that way.
We can actually create a true crisis in the military where some percentage of the soldiers will refuse to follow orders and may turn against the people that are fulfilling their oath.
I mean, are we obligated to allow this?
I mean, how much farther are they going to go with this?
So there's an organization now who's just openly advertising, hey, want to disobey orders, get in contact with us.
We're all meeting up.
Hey, do you want to be traitors to your government?
Do you want to be a turncoat?
Do you want to be a spy for America's enemies inside America's armed forces?
Give us a call.
And they're making billboards and nobody's doing anything about this.
This will probably be the last thing they do, though, right?
I mean, once they do this, I mean, they'll be satisfied, right?
It's not like they're going to escalate even more.
It's not like they're going to do anything with all these people they're now recruiting in the American military to be turncoats.
I mean, okay, you know, just wish people would listen to us every once in a while.
Wish we would have stopped this before it's gotten to this point.
I wish we'd stop it now before it gets to the next point, but I doubt it.
The truth is, the effectiveness of our campaign makes us a target, and the impact comes with the cross.
War Without War said, Win Without War said, coverage of our billboards has invited a flurry of hate speech, harassment, and intimidation from right-wing provocateurs, but we are undeterred as ever.
Yeah, see, they get to openly break the law, literally put billboards up encouraging American military men to be turncoats.
And then if you say, hey, what the hell is this?
They go, oh my God, it's hate speech.
We're being attacked.
Anybody sick of this already?
Anybody else completely and utterly sick of this?
Win Without War said Sunday will continue its campaign against Trump by installing billboards near the Florida-based Southern Command facility that oversees forces in Central America, South America, and the Caribbean.
The outreach will also target Naval Station Norfolk in Virginia as the headquarters of the Joint Operations Command, an entity that Hegseth tried to at least tied to at least one of the boat strikes.
Okay, so they're so literally we have anti-American leftist organizations actively recruiting active members of the U.S. military to go against the commander-in-chief.
Are we going to do anything about this or not?
Probably not.
Why not?
I genuinely don't know.
I don't know.
Why did it take Nick Shirley to expose the fraud in Minnesota?
Why hasn't Trump arrested any of the dozens and dozens of people that we know beyond any reasonable or unreasonable doubt committed crimes?
Like we have the evidence.
They admitted it in text messages like Peter Strzzrzzzzzz, Lisa Pay.
Why are they not going after any of these people?
Why are we letting the left just continue to flagrantly break the law in a million different ways?
And how long are we going to take it?
And what do we do next?
Because everybody's pretty much on board here.
Like, if Trump wants to save the country, you've got three years to do a hell of a lot of stuff and nothing's getting done so far.
We're about a year into the first administration.
And so I'm pretty much entirely, completely unsatisfied with the progress so far.
So I know a lot of people are like, well, voting isn't going to help.
Like, there's no way to fix the system.
So, okay, so what's next?
I'm open to that possibility, but what's next then?
I think what's next is like gangs.
Like we just need gangs.
Because obviously the justice system can't be trusted anymore.
I mean, we're really past the point where it shouldn't be trusted.
People are still trusting it.
People will still continue to trust it for a little while.
But, you know, it'll get to a point where I'm kind of already at that point where if something happens to somebody I know, I'm not necessarily trusting the government to get justice for it.
We've seen how many people are just let out after violent crimes to victimize people over and over again.
You know, at a certain point, the system is just going to break down under the weight of its own incompetence.
And then what happens?
What's next?
What do we do then?
Because we could be very rapidly approaching that eventuality.
We should probably be planning on what to do at that point.
And unfortunately, while the left and the right are actually coming together on a lot of things, we are still separated by this impassable gulf of stupidity.
They are surrounded by a moat of their own ignorance and we can't break through.
It's impossible.
A couple of videos have come out since last we were on air that I want to go to that I simply categorized as videos about the libtards.
This was one of them.
Let's go to clip number 10.
This is what it's like trying to talk to people who have been brainwashed for their entire lives and who exist in a world in which words are merely tools to achieve their ends.
They mean nothing.
The truth doesn't matter.
It's what magical combination of symbols can I put together to make you do what I want?
And that's the only thing they care about.
It's not about truth.
It's not about reality.
It's not about trying to come to an understanding.
It's not about trying to ferret out what reality is, right?
Again, words are imperfect.
I might hear you say something and I go, I don't quite understand.
Can we work that out?
Like that's the way words are, you know, supposed to be used, not for liberals, not for liberals.
It's just what is the strategy to beat the person I'm talking to?
And it really makes everything impossible.
Let's go to this clip here, clip number 10.
unidentified
To diversity.
I don't want to be like replaced at a job because I'm not.
You are not being replaced.
I literally just said I've not gotten jobs.
So have I, I don't feel like I'm being replaced.
That's what that is.
You could have gotten that job if you're black.
So how is that not being replaced?
That's what affirmative action is.
What do you think it is?
No, that was casting.
That's what that was.
It was casting.
But why is it hard for you not to just go, I did not get that one.
Let me go for this one.
Yeah, I will do that.
So, you think like black people would be chill with that if it's like, oh, sorry, your black people have been chilled with that.
I don't think so.
We had a whole civil rights movement.
I don't think that was very important.
You had a problem with the civil rights movement because they were being discriminated against.
So, you think they should still be slaves?
What?
That's not what I'm saying.
I'm saying they weren't chill with being discriminated.
You think that we should still chill with the back of the bus?
Like, why things happen so that we could have equality?
Why is equality difficult?
How is it equality for me to not get a job because I'm white?
Why is it a problem to just work harder?
I mean, how would you feel if white people said that to black people pre-civil rights?
I feel like you probably say that to black people post-civil rights.
harrison smith
Okay, what I'm telling you, folks, you know, what are you supposed to say to these people?
They're trying to not understand.
It's probably the tweet of the year from, oh man, who I have it right here.
I just keep thinking millennial, millennial Woese, he's the one.
Millennial Woes had a tweet that's like it's impossible to talk to leftists because their entire discussion strategy revolves around pretending not to understand things.
And that's what that was.
But I don't, are they pretending?
I don't know if they are.
I mean, the concept's not hard to understand.
Discrimination, bad.
Okay.
Discrimination bad.
All right.
You say discrimination against black people bad.
And they go, yep, absolutely 100%.
You go, discrimination against white people, good.
And they go, what?
What?
unidentified
But white people, bad.
harrison smith
Well, white people, bad.
Discrimination against white people, good.
Discrimination against white people, good.
That's like the level of their argument.
It's just like, you know, this, you know, you're retarded.
I'm sorry to tell you this.
It's incurable.
You're just going to have to live that way.
Now, to me, the only response to this is, you know, democracy was a mistake.
These people should not be allowed to vote.
I'm not going to try to convince them.
I don't care if they're convinced or not.
I just need them not having the temerity to think that they should be involved in politics.
How dare they?
Again, stupidity is fine if it's humble.
It's this combination of total ignorance, total stupidity, and overwhelming confidence.
It's a potent and dangerous combination that we have to get rid of.
What's wrong with working a little harder?
What's wrong with the government coming in and dictating that you can't be hired?
I don't know what's wrong with that, lady.
Do I need to explain that to you?
And that's sort of the whole thing with like the Somali fraud.
I mean, I probably have like 15 videos of the Somali fraud.
This stuff is not that complicated.
You don't really need the details.
Okay.
These women have been brainwashed to hate white people, and that's all it is.
They want white people to be discriminated against.
They will laugh at white people when they are discriminated against.
They don't care.
They're not moral.
They aren't good people.
They don't have truly humanitarian, universal objective beliefs.
They just don't.
They just hate white people.
They've been trained to hate white people.
They aren't human beings.
They don't think for themselves.
They've never once tried to, you know, hold these two thoughts in their own minds, which is why cognitive dissonance is so like it doesn't matter to them.
It doesn't matter to them.
They will like scream and shout and tear their hair out about discrimination.
And you go, okay, well, I'm being discriminated against.
They go, well, sweetie, maybe you deserve it.
Okay.
Like, they're just awful.
Same thing with the Somali fraud.
It's like they're just, it's just a class of criminals.
It's just a nation of criminals.
They're just screwing you over because they can.
And the Democrats are letting them do it because they benefit.
It's not complicated, it's not sophisticated.
And it actually goes even further.
We'll tie this into the Somali fraud and the judges that are letting the Somali fraudsters out.
In the old days, in a world not overwhelmed and overcome by this indoctrinated stupidity, there would be some sort of conspiracy to point to.
That wouldn't happen without a conspiracy to point to.
You wouldn't have a judge going out of their way to undo a jury conviction and let a criminal go if there hadn't been some backroom deal made in the first place.
Because it's inexplicable.
Why would a judge step in to free this person when a jury convicted them, when you've gone through all the trouble of getting a conviction, of getting all the evidence, the man is a criminal, he committed a crime, he's convicted of the crime, and then a judge comes in and says, actually, never mind, you're free to go.
Typically, you'd be able to then investigate that judge and find out what money he got or whatever.
But as we've explained for a very long time on InfoWars, we are beyond the stage of the smoke-filled rooms and the coordination behind the scenes.
It is a universal conspiracy now.
It is a conspiracy of minds that liberal white women that have been put in positions of judges, they don't need to be coerced.
They don't need to be bribed.
They are just like, they are just like misprogrammed robots, ill-programmed robots.
They're like animals operating on an instinct that they don't even understand.
They just want to free the Somali person.
They don't know why.
They don't benefit from it.
They just understand that that's their role.
And so they're doing it.
Beaver makes dams, right?
And Ant digs holes in the ground.
And liberal white women let criminals out of prison.
They don't need to be bribed for it.
They don't need to be coerced.
They don't need to, you know, correspond or collaborate or conspire beforehand.
They just all understand what's going on.
They just all understand this is what we're doing now.
And they just do it.
A conspiracy of minds is where we're at at this point.
Let's go now to clue number 34.
Or I'm sorry, not clue number 34.
Let's go to clip number 22.
Well, yeah, let's go to clue number 22 here.
This sort of ties it all in together as well.
This is Minnesota Lieutenant Governor Flanagan putting on a hijab and declaring that Somalis built Minnesota.
Totally nonsense, totally we'll get into it on the other side.
I just want to remind you, I just want to remind you that the left cannot go a week without dressing up like the fantasy novel Handmaid's Tale to spread the weird blood libel, you know, scaremongering tactic of Christians bad because remember the handmaid's tale, meanwhile, actually putting on a literal handmaid's tail outfit, a hijab,
a oppression of women symbol to ingratiate themselves with the incredibly misogynistic and hateful religious and ethnic groups that they're pandering to.
Again, make it make sense.
Make it make sense that the left who has nightmares about the handmaid's tale, this utter ridiculous fantasy that doesn't even make sense.
Meanwhile, oh, you want me to put on a handmaid's tail costume to submit myself to your caveman religion?
Sure, I'd love to.
Let's watch.
peggy flanagan
Salaam Alaikum.
My name is Peggy Flanagan.
I am the lieutenant governor of Minnesota, and I'm really honored and humbled to be here with all of you today.
I am incredibly clear that the Somali community is part of the fabric of the state of Minnesota.
I think about my friendship with NIMCO.
We've been friends for almost 25 years.
And when I think of being part of Minnesota and growing up here, the Somali community has always been a part of my Minnesota.
So I want to just encourage the community to know that we're with you.
We've got your back.
I am here shopping today and just encourage other folks to show up.
unidentified
Why is there a video of this whore with her hair out?
harrison smith
I'm sorry.
Did I just see that woman without her hair covered?
All right, well, that's a net.
That doesn't really count.
That's not modest.
I'm sorry, whore.
Put your hood back on when you talk to us, please.
Like, I wouldn't even hate liberals if they actually believed anything that they profess.
If their feminism also made them enemies with whatever this is, I'd be on their side.
But they will freak out about the fantasy of handmaids tale.
But when it comes to wearing a hijab, there's no how dare you.
There's no, you know, you're trying to enslave women.
It's, oh my God, we're appreciating their beautiful culture.
The beautiful culture that we create a facsimile of to fantasize about being done by Christians, we can oppose that when we willfully and gleefully submit to actual oppression of women from actually misogynistic cultures.
Liberals.
You're retarded.
I'm sorry.
There's no other way of putting it.
I wish there was a nicer way.
You're criminally retarded.
All right, folks, welcome back.
This is the warroominforce.com banned dot video.
I'm going to go to another clip here.
Clip 27.
This one went viral over the weekend.
Just another clip in our collection here.
So far, we've seen a woman not being able to understand why discrimination is bad, despite her vehemently hating it.
And now let's go to clip number 27 here is a woman trying to convince Trump supporters.
There's no scientific evidence proving that different ethnicities have different genetics.
Let's watch.
unidentified
You've said things like black women are biologically different than white women.
Yes, they have different fertility windows.
They have a higher rate of fertility complications.
50% of the time.
But there's no scientific evidence to prove that a black woman and a white woman are genetically different, right?
This is like, yeah, no, no, no.
Literally, there are genes that code for their skin color.
There are genes that...
Again, this is like government data.
This is Emmy, right?
This is the National Institute of Health.
This is the American Medical Association.
Like, there is no scientific evidence to prove that.
And that's a big problem, right?
No, there's no science.
And that's why I asked IQ differences.
Black people are genetically different from other populations.
I'll say that again.
There is, at least, there is no scientific evidence to prove that, right?
And as people that...
No, no, no, I'm...
I'm sorry.
I'm stating.
Do you want to ask an AI if there's scientific evidence to prove that?
No, I want to ask.
This is what you're saying.
It's just factually incorrect.
Humans are genetically diverse.
It's not a bad thing that humans are divided.
No, no, I'm not saying it's a bad or a good thing.
I'm saying there is no scientific evidence.
And I'm saying that is a factual event.
Are you saying that there is side division?
There is scientific evidence.
There is always basics.
No, no, no.
This is like saying the sky is not blue.
Like, it is genes that code their skin code, right?
Those genes are obviously different in them than they are in us.
How is that not science?
That's just like a basic fact.
The genes that code their skin color, their level of melanin production, are different from my genes that code melanin.
That's precisely why I was asking this question because I think for some people that do believe like you that people are genetically different, that has historically been used to promote racial hierarchies, right?
And that's why I'm asking you because do you see what's going on here?
harrison smith
Do you see what's going on?
Reality conflicts with their perspective, therefore reality has to be wrong.
And then the appeal to authority.
I'm not saying it.
It's government data.
Government data says genetics doesn't exist.
Essentially what she's saying.
I mean, it's sort of a, it's, you know, it's a fairly common thing, and we, I guess, should be used to it by now.
After all, of course, we always, the go-to, they don't know there's differences between men and women.
But it's beyond that.
Again, it's about the way they use words as tools, as weapons, as completely disconnected from reality.
They're not interested in saying things that are true.
They're interested in perpetuating an ideology and saying whatever it takes to perpetuate that ideology.
Black people and white people are identical genetically, identical in genetics.
Why would you even say that?
What would be even the point of saying that?
The point of saying that is because there obviously are differences.
The thing is, if you acknowledge differences, you might be tempted to provide values to the two different things.
And you might see that one is maybe more desirable than another.
Therefore, you're now being hateful because you recognize and acknowledge genetic differences.
I mean, this is ridiculous.
I'll use the word ridiculous this time since I've already said retarded too many times this episode, but there's no other word for it.
And these are the people that we're having to deal with.
Now, it gets frustrating to me because the left is almost split between people like that, people that we just saw, people who cannot understand, let alone acknowledge obvious self-evident truths like genetics exist.
Men are men and women are women.
There's those types of people that are just beyond anything.
And then there's the other side of the left, which is like a little bit more conscious, a little bit more aware, a little bit more able to acknowledge reality, but still somehow muffled, like they're somehow suppressed.
They can never break through to true understanding of what's going on.
It's like they're trapped in the kiddie pool of understanding.
Okay?
So I want to go to clip number eight here.
I'm sorry, let's go to clip number six first.
Clip number six, this was posted.
Five things corrupt leaders don't want conservatives and liberals realizing we agree on.
So let's watch and then we'll break down these five things.
unidentified
Here are five things that corrupt people in power don't want conservatives and liberals realizing they agree on and five things they don't want us focusing on.
Number one, both sides want to ban hedge funds from buying single family homes.
Number two, both sides want to ban Congress and their immediate family from being able to trade stock.
Number three, both sides want big money out of politics and we want to ban unions, corporations, and super PACs from donating to federal campaigns and only allow individual citizens to do so.
We can cap it at $100 per citizen per election campaign.
Number four, we all want single issue bills where Congress votes on one issue at a time and we're not sneaking things into these giant bills and one side isn't blaming the other for why a bill isn't passing.
And number five, we all want foreign influence out of our politics and our elections.
If you agree with this list and want to spread awareness on these topics, please consider liking, commenting, and sharing this video.
Let's unite this country together.
harrison smith
So in a way, I agree with him.
To a certain extent, I'm on board.
I would agree with these five things, banning BlackRock and other private equity from buying single-family homes, stopping Congress from buying stocks, banning super PACs and, you know, getting big money out of the politics, single-issue bills.
These are all great ideas.
And then, of course, banning foreign influence.
Those are all great ideas, but I don't really believe you.
I don't believe you, liberals.
I don't believe you because you don't actually believe this, do you?
I mean, you don't want Israel controlling our government.
I believe that.
I believe you're sincere in that.
But will you say anything about Ilhan Omar saying she's using her position to benefit Somalia?
Will you say anything about any of the congressmen or senators from foreign countries who get up and say, I'm more Guatemalan than I am American?
Will you speak up against the foreign interference of millions upon millions of non-Americans coming here, filling out the census numbers and getting blue states more representation in Congress?
I mean, those are foreign people coming here, influencing our elections.
You have anything to say about that?
No, it's about Israel.
Okay, well, fine.
I agree with you about Israel.
Will you agree with me about every other country and every other form of international influence?
What about the Ukraine war?
Are you going to be with us on that?
Probably not.
So, like, I don't believe you.
Like, it's nice that you can appeal to these things we both agree on, but when you get down to the details, I don't believe you.
I think you love foreign influence.
I think you love foreigners coming here to take our jobs, coming here to get into our government and manipulating it to their own ends to benefit themselves.
You're not speaking out about what's going on with Somalians in Minnesota.
You're covering it up and calling it white supremacist to look into.
Why?
They're foreigners, aren't they?
Aren't they taking advantage of you?
Aren't they destroying and making insolvent the very programs that you champion?
Why aren't you against those two?
You're not consistent.
You don't actually hold these beliefs.
I don't believe you.
Same thing with the big money out of politics.
The big money is you guys.
You guys have the big money.
And there's already laws limiting individual contributions.
They repacked them through Act Blue.
So it's like, okay, you can pass that law.
But as we speak, Act Blue has already been proven to be a laundry service for huge donations that they then split up and do a whole bunch of seemingly small donations to get around the laws preventing the single big donation.
So let's solve that first, and then we can do extra laws.
But like right now, the laws that are on the books are not being enforced because it's Democrats breaking them.
So again, I don't believe you.
I just don't believe that you actually don't want these things to happen.
Congress stocks, that's fine, you know.
Single-issue bills, that's also fine, but it's like, okay, we agree on single-issue bills, but then what is contained in the bills?
Well, what's contained in the bills from the left is going to be like, you know, schools are allowed to kidnap children and give them cross-sex hormones without the parents' permission.
So, okay, you can write a single bill on that.
You're still the enemy.
In a way, it's like, I don't know.
Away, especially with the Somali fraud, maybe the libertarians were right.
Maybe the whole thing is a mistake.
Maybe anarchy is preferable to all of this.
But when it comes to BlackRock buying single-family homes, why are they against that?
What is it about that that you'd be against?
It's perfectly in line with everything you believe, liberals.
Are you suddenly in favor of intergenerational wealth?
Are you in favor of a family being able to buy property and then pass it down unencumbered to their children?
Why?
Why should we let somebody own so much property like that when other people don't have property?
You're going to let these people own property?
You're going to let it pass down to their kids?
You're going to let them take loans off that property to more empower themselves.
I mean, this sounds a lot like capitalism.
I don't know if you're actually in favor of that.
I really have to wonder, what is it about?
Like, it's one of these weird situations where I've never heard a liberal explain why they don't like BlackRock buying up family homes.
Are they in favor of private property?
Are they in favor of intergenerational wealth?
Are they in favor of any of these things?
That would be news to me.
Do they just understand this is like a popular thing to jump on?
I don't really know.
I know why I don't like BlackRock buying up all the family homes because it's part of a global push to make everything impermanent.
Because in the same way that they want to buy up all the homes, they want to buy up all the cars and they want to buy up everything.
They want you to own nothing.
Not because they're greedy, not because they want your money, but because they want control.
The left doesn't really care about control.
The left wants control.
The left thinks the problem is a lack of control.
So again, I'll ask, like, why is the left against what BlackRock is doing?
What is it about Blackstone or any of these private equity companies buying up neighborhoods?
Like, what are they against?
I've never heard them elucidate it.
And this is what I'm talking about, the muffle that's on the left.
It's like, well, they're greedy, therefore it's bad.
Well, they're using it to squeeze more money out of people.
Okay, true.
Not the ultimate goal here.
Clearly, not the ultimate goal.
The ultimate goal is to destroy capitalism.
The ultimate goal is to destroy ownership, to destroy private property, to destroy your ability to pass on your wealth to your children, to destroy the family structure in and of itself, to destroy all of the things that make you strong and capable of withstanding pressure, of withstanding corruption, of standing on your own and resisting the push of manufactured consent.
I've explained this a million times, right?
I can sort of offend anybody because at the end of the day, I've got a family.
I've got kids.
They're going to love me.
They understand me.
They're not going to cast me out.
So why would I care about what any of these other people say?
I'll stand up against them.
I'll take the unpopular position because at the end of the day, they're not going to rob my family from me.
So what's the risk?
When you have property, when you've invested in something, when you have something to work on and improve, the just psychological element of that is so powerful to rip that away to where you own nothing, to where you are just sort of flitting through on a bunch of subscriptions.
It's this paradigm of the company store.
It's what they're creating.
And again, it's like you go, I went on Reddit the other day, and one of the top things was from the PC subreddit.
And it's talking about how NVIDIA now is talking about limiting your ability to use their chips even after you buy them.
NVIDIA puts 100-hour monthly limit on all GeForce Now subscriptions.
NVIDIA is announced that starting on January 20, January 1st, 2026, each GeForce Now cloud gaming subscription will be limited to 100 hours of playtime per month.
The company is implementing its long-lasting promise revealed in 2024 with the option for users to purchase additional playtime as needed.
Okay, so in the same way that you aren't going to own a house, you also aren't going to own your video games.
You aren't going to own your media.
You aren't going to own your phone.
You aren't going to own your car.
Oh, you'll own nothing.
This is a global push to eradicate ownership itself.
But you think it's about making money.
It ain't about making money.
They have literally all of the money.
Okay.
BlackRock has trillions of dollars, just got unfettered access to America's retirement funds.
They don't need more money.
They're not going for money.
They're going for control.
It's about crushing the human spirit, crushing your ability to resist them, crushing your ability to build up in any way, build up your personal wealth, build up your political following, build up your independence.
No, no, no.
You have to be a bug.
You have to be a bug that's entirely reliant on all of these various systems controlled by your enemies that you have to get permission to exist from.
It's about the mark of the beast.
Now, I don't know how we're going to get people that can't understand the difference between men and women to understand the sophisticated operation that's depriving them of property and therefore depriving them of freedom.
These are esoteric, you know, high-falutin concepts that I have a hard time wrapping my mind around.
I don't expect people from the videos that we just saw to ever be able to grapple with this reality.
So let's go to clip number eight.
This is the reality around you will own nothing and be happy.
This is the reality behind why BlackRock or Blackstone is buying up houses, why private equity is being allowed to just systematically destroy every industry they get their hands on.
This is why it's not about money.
It's about control.
Money is just a method, a weapon, a tool they use.
It's not the goal.
It's not their end goal.
It's not what they want.
What they want is your abject submission, is your inability to even conceive of a world where you are not entirely dependent on them for everything.
Let's watch.
@ittybittytara2
Listen, do y'all remember that video the World Economic Forum put out that you will own nothing and you'll be happy?
Let me show you some things you probably haven't realized because we're already there, y'all.
Y'all remember when we used to have CDs and tapes?
Now you have to pay a subscription every month to listen to your music.
Not only that, but you have to pay a subscription to watch television.
Do you have a ring doorbell?
You're paying a subscription for that too.
Most of you with gaming systems are paying a subscription to play games.
You're paying subscriptions for software like Microsoft.
Do y'all remember when we had printers and we didn't have to pay subscriptions for those?
Well, now you do.
We have e-books that you have to pay for subscriptions for.
This is all for control because if they don't like what you're reading or what you're listening to or what you're watching, they can cut it off.
Back in 2009, Amazon erased the Orwell books from Kindle.
Y'all remember that guy that said the same thing was going to happen?
How many of y'all own a house?
How many of y'all think your children will ever own a house?
With the housing market as it is, I wouldn't bet on it.
Y'all remember when cars were affordable?
Not only that, but do you remember when car insurance was affordable?
Because I do.
It was about 10 years ago.
Now I'm paying $300 a month and I've only been in one wreck in my entire life.
Looks like that ride sharing will come in handy soon.
But back to the housing market.
Gen Z is renting, not buying.
Here's what it means for the country's future.
Yes, more people are having to rent homes.
And guess who owns a majority of them?
BlackRock.
Oh, and back to cars.
You know, they have subscriptions for those too now.
One day it'll be in all cars.
And guess what?
If you do something they don't like, they'll cut your car off.
John Deere has a digital lockdown.
We're on the verge of this being a complete reality.
And everybody's just letting it happen because their favorite person is in office, even though he's building a digital prison all around us.
harrison smith
Yeah, no, no, that's completely accurate.
So again, I wish we could team up with liberals.
We have these forces of evil that are so clearly dedicated to our destruction.
But you have to be able to see the whole shoot and match.
You have to be able to see this the way that they see this, the way that your enemies see this.
Again, we can go on and on about how everything the left does just plays right into the hands of their enemies, but you know, it's everything.
You think the billionaires hate immigration, really?
You think billionaires are desperate to stop you from enacting climate change agenda regulations?
They're the ones pushing it.
What are you doing?
So you can, you know, pretend to be against billionaires.
You serve their interests endlessly.
You can pretend to be against BlackRock, buying up houses, but actually, ideologically, you're completely in favor of that.
What do they not understand?
Anything, right?
Anything.
No, they don't understand anything.
I think that's actually the problem.
I think that's actually what we're learning.
And I hate to say it, but Trump is absolutely playing into their hands in a lot of different ways that's very infuriating.
And again, I see basically all of this happening in a variety of different ways, but all at once and all towards the same end.
And it's, you know, tied in directly with Palantir and the global surveillance grid.
Did I go to the Palantir thing yet?
Let's go to guys, do you know which the Palantir video is?
Clip number 40.
Here's clip number 40.
This, again, all tied in together.
It's about creating a single unified database that will be run by AI that will be monitoring and surveilling everybody all the time, as the World Economic puts it, even under your skin, right?
Your brainwaves, your eyeline, the expression that you make when you read certain news on the phone.
All of this will be fed into a giant AI that is the beast system that will determine whether or not you are worthy of taking advantage of the temporary access to cars or temporary access to housing that they can withdraw at any moment because you own nothing, because you've been seduced into this by thinking that you're fighting white supremacy by giving power over to the most heartless and evil people the world has ever seen.
Here's one way that Palantir is already being implemented across the country as a primary function of this apparatus.
Let's watch.
unidentified
How many people have seen a police program that's being used called Palantir?
It is in your police officer's car on your police officer's computer.
So while you've got the person pulled over, you can start to drill down on this person.
It's not just like a DMV photo and an NCIC anymore.
You can see all their bank accounts, the balance in their bank accounts, the last times they declared cash somewhere.
You can see every time they hit a flock camera anywhere in the country.
Flock is a giant national traffic monitoring system that is basically everywhere now.
And they're taking photographs at every intersection all day.
And it's using AI to like read license plates and put identities of people places.
And it's just keeping all that data, like all of it.
That's what they've got in their car right now.
And we're not getting that in discovery.
We're not able to confront it.
And we're not able to use it as Brady evidence.
We've got Fourth Amendment issues galore, obviously.
I didn't realize how prevalent it was.
There has never been a surveillance program in the history of the United States that was not used brutally and in a corrupt fashion.
And now we have the biggest surveillance system that we've ever had.
harrison smith
And it's only being expanded.
So again, it wouldn't even be that big of a deal if the powers that be proved themselves trustworthy at all.
But if there's one thing that Somali fraud saga has taught us, it's that despite having massive surveillance, despite having incredible access to information from absolutely anybody at any time, they choose not to actually punish the real criminals.
Now, if you don't file the IRS down to the penny, they'll come after you.
Meanwhile, some random warehouse in the middle of Minnesota is receiving millions of dollars a month for children that don't even exist.
So understand that the people implementing these programs, they already have enough surveillance to actually solve a lot of the crimes that exist in this country, and they are not using it for that.
They're using it to censor and surveil you and me and people who have never committed a crime while the criminals are making out like bandits.
So understand like where we're at at this point.
Nobody is coming to save us and nobody is stopping this.
And the liberals don't even understand the thing that they're fighting because they're actually contributing to it as much as they possibly can.
unidentified
These surveillance videos are from a case prosecuted by Hennepin County.
They show parents checking their kids into a center only to leave with them a few minutes later.
Sometimes no children would show up.
But either way, the center would bail the state for a full day of childcare.
This video from that same case shows a man handing out envelopes of what are believed to be kickback payments to parents who are in on the fraud.
Where was the money going?
alex jones
I don't know exactly where it went.
jon bowne
While Soros judges continue to spit at justice for the Somalian fraud piracy that has escalated across the United States for years, she acknowledges in her order that fraud was rampant in this case and it was clearly out of control.
unidentified
She couldn't believe the level to which fraud was allowed to be able to be perpetrated.
And then it comes to bear that she lets him off because she felt as though somebody else should have been to blame that wasn't the owner of the company.
jon bowne
And the worthless dinosaur media psyop plays their loaded deck of race cards.
unidentified
The Somali immigrant population may have been involved in some way.
Those people are being scapegoated, and that community is being scapegoated in a way that certainly serves the far right.
Now, listen to where this phone number goes to when you call this child care center.
Thank you for contacting the Office of Governor Tim Laws and Lieutenant Governor Peggy Flanagan.
jon bowne
You don't even need to get on a plane to investigate.
You can do it from your computer.
I tried it out myself, and lo and behold.
unidentified
Thank you for contacting the Office of Governor Tim Laws and Lieutenant Governor Peggy Flanagan.
jon bowne
In Washington State, 539 of about 5,000 licensed care centers are Somali-run.
Many lacking a physical address and some posting that they are open 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
I called many of them, and it simply went to generic voicemail.
vickie paladino
Please leave your message for 425.
Please leave your message for 2-0.
jon bowne
The fraud has found safe harbor in Democratic strongholds across the United States in many forms.
unidentified
Gateway was billing for services they did not provide and billing for services that Maine Care does not cover.
DHHS also confirmed to us how much Maine Care paid Gateway between the years of 2019 and 2024.
It's about four to five million each year, a total of more than $28 million.
And this third audit falls right in the middle of that timeframe.
rich mchugh
The company's founder and CEO, Abdullahi Ali, Somali-American, who while at the time serving as executive director for Gateway last year, ran for president, which is essentially governor of Jubiland, a state in Somalia, south of Borders, Kenya.
unidentified
Christopher, how long had this been going on?
You were at Gateway for quite some time.
How long do you think it's been going on, this fraud?
I was there from 2018 to recently 2025, and I hadn't realized about the audit that had been completed in 2018.
So before I even got there, they were complicit in some of this stuff.
My name is John Featherson.
I'm a former migrant shelter director in Massachusetts.
I helped out in a couple different sites.
Everything was free.
@natefriedman97
How much is given for rides for Uber and Lyft?
unidentified
The amount of money that we would spend on Ubers and Lyft was well in excess of $100,000 a month.
Money.
So these individuals tried to report the fraud that was happening in Ohio and then eventually came to me to say that we're watching providers.
So you could sit at home without caring for an elderly parent who really doesn't need it, make about $75,000 to $90,000 a year.
Now you add two parents, that's $180,000.
Now you add your in-laws, $250,000.
You continue to add this and you wonder what are the services being provided.
So a lot of providers came and said, fraud is occurring because we said we weren't going to rubber stamp this paperwork.
So they went to other providers, their home healthcare networks saying we'll make it worth your while.
Well, sounds like a kickback to me.
What if the whole reason Tim Walsh was chosen because he had access to all these billions of dollars in fraud and the Kamala Harris campaign knew it?
jon bowne
If you have specific evidence or concerns about fraud and programs like Medicaid, welfare, SNAP, housing, or federal aid, you can report anonymously to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General at the internet address on your screen.
Or you can call 1-800-HHS TIPS, 1-800-447-8477.
John Bowne reporting for InfoWars.
harrison smith
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is the WarroomInfowars.com banned.video.
Remember, you support us by going to thealxjonesstore.com.
Right now, it's buy one, get one free on supplements, and you can buy a cheap supplement and get an expensive one free.
It's that type of sale.
It ends tomorrow, December 30th.
Go now.
The AlexJonesStore.com.
Keep us on the air and in the fight.
And getting the great guests that we do, I'm very happy to welcome my guest, Casey Putsch at Casey Putsch.
Putch4ojio.com, an Ohio native, nationally recognized automotive entrepreneur, race driver, and founder of the nonprofit Genius Garage, where he mentors young talent in engineering and design.
Frustrated with globalist policies and H-1B visa abuse, he stepped up as America First Alternative to the Republican primary in the Republican primary against Vivek Ramaswamy for governorship of Ohio.
Again, you can follow him on X at Casey Putch.
Thanks so much for joining me, Mr. Putch.
casey putsch
You got it.
Thanks for being here.
harrison smith
It's my pleasure.
And I'm very glad that you agreed to join us.
I've been watching your campaign with extreme interest.
Tell us about yourself.
How'd you get started?
Why do you think you're best for the governorship?
casey putsch
Well, politics has become very interesting to me, especially since the Biden administration, when I'm just watching the entirety of our culture fall apart, be divided, and just leveraged for political gain for all the wrong reasons.
You know, obviously, I supported President Trump, spoke out publicly using my own platform last year for that to happen.
But in the last year, I'm seeing things just in general across the board that are horrific.
One of those being Vivek Ramaswamy, who, from everything I can tell, is only a globalist Trojan horse.
And simply the thought and the decision to run against him in the Republican primary for the governor of Ohio is because for me, the pain of inaction outweighed the risk and pain of action.
harrison smith
And Vivek is an interesting case because for a while he was saying all the right stuff.
He was this big champion of the MAGA side.
And then it was around this time last year.
It was Christmas last year, where he made this fateful post where he's basically insulting American culture.
He's really never recovered, but they're still pushing him quite a bit.
I mean, what is it about Vivek Ramaswamy that makes you say he's a globalist Trojan horse?
casey putsch
Well, it's pretty simple.
You know, this is a guy that, you know, obviously his parents weren't from here.
They're from India.
Okay.
He was born in Cincinnati, I guess.
You know, he didn't go to college in Ohio.
He went to Harvard and Yale, got a Soros family money scholarship.
He has no businesses in Ohio.
He's, despite his great wealth, he has done no philanthropic worth in Ohio, nothing to better the state.
So that throws up a lot of red flags for me.
And then if you just watch him over time, of course, when he was running for president a couple of years ago, basically took all of Donald Trump's talking points, bows out early, obviously not polling well at all, supports him the whole way, gets appointed to do Doge with Elon, which I have to say, for all of us watching, probably the most important thing that could happen with the government to get rid of waste, fraud, and abuse and bring the nation forward.
But when we get toward the inauguration, things seem weird.
He sort of vanished and can't tell if he quit or got booted out or what on earth happened.
And then suddenly he's getting shoved in Ohio for like the possibility of governor and astro-turp like crazy.
That's when I started going, no way, this is not right.
This is a person who cares nothing about our culture.
He shows no roots in Ohio whatsoever, no relatability in any way.
He's done nothing for the state.
And of course, me being a car guy and somebody who's cared with family that's worked hard with family businesses their whole life with military and the family going back to the 1800s, we're all people that are Ohio.
We've worked hard and had to be responsible for it.
And I see none of those qualities reflected in Vivek.
And of course, his Christmas crash out last year, where he went on a thing saying it's not that Americans have a low IQ or lazy, but your culture sucks.
And you watch Save by the Bell and Boy Meets World.
And it's like, you know, okay, people say dumb things.
Gosh, I've been an automotive YouTuber.
I'm sure I've said plenty of dumb things.
So give them a little bit of credit, but you watch them over time and go like, this is a mean, vindictive nerd with too much money that hates us.
You know, I guess my only message I got to say is, you know, when my parents were working darn hard at our family business when I was a kid, and I was watching TV on the antenna, I watched Save by the Bell too.
But, you know, I built a 100-mile plus gallon car, built a nonprofit educational program, mentored college students for the last decade plus, getting them incredible jobs everywhere from Lockheed Martin to the big three with no help from the government or any kind.
And heck, building a little watch business now.
And heck, this watch right here, our prototype, meets all the NASA requirements for the Artemis missions.
And I'm just looking around going, screw you, Vivek.
We're Americans.
We're trying to make the future better.
You know, I feel like we're in the original Star Wars movie where we fell down the garbage compactor and the walls are closing in on us.
And now here's Vivek coming in, who clearly just wants to facilitate more of these data centers that are being slipped in under the cover of night, that we're subsidizing the cost of them through massive electricity bills.
They have massive tax abatements, there's no net gain for the state at all.
And he's obviously a big proponent of H-1B visas from India.
And then saying that we don't have smart enough people in the United States and smart enough people in Ohio so they have to import Indians.
Well, one, you're going to destroy the job market because the big companies know they can pay them less.
I mean, shoot, just ask Rock how much money Tesla might even save with H-1Bs and Grock will calculate that for you.
But the other thing that does is it destroys the job market because now companies don't have to pay the Americans as much either.
So everything I see about Vivek Ramaswamy coming through ahead when you just look at it objectively over time and just comparison to me, what's a relatively normal Ohio guy trying hard to make the future better.
And all I see is a globalist Trojan horse that's going to ruin our future.
harrison smith
Well, and it sort of represents this major split in the Republican Party right now.
So I'd love your take on that and how we patch this up.
I mean, obviously, this really, you know, came to the fore during the TPOSA AmFest last week, where it was sort of, it almost seemed like it was split down the middle and you had the speakers kind of arguing with each other speech after speech, where you've got the Vivek, Ramaswamis, and the Ben Shapiros.
And I guess the argument is like the creedal nation versus the people of the nation.
Can you talk a little bit on that and the future for MAGA and the Republican Party and how do we bridge this gap?
Or should we even bridge it?
Or do we need a new party or something?
Just talk on that a little bit.
casey putsch
I'll tell you something I don't think anybody's thinking about right now.
There's no split.
Everybody's still on the rails.
America's still on the rails.
Conservatives and our values are still on the rails.
And, you know, I'm going to go a little bit of sidebar.
Everybody talks about the uniparty, two wings of the same disgusting bird, right?
Very two-dimensional picture, very bleak.
But if you flip that over, you learn something.
There is no left or right.
I mean, people have far more in common than they have apart.
So with regard to the conservative side, with regard to this so-called rift, uh-uh, it's a takeover.
It's a hostile takeover.
And what they're trying to do is they're trying to group people into, they're trying to corral them.
Because if you can corral them, it's easier to easier to pick them off.
So I think that's what's happening, frankly.
Because if you look at who's on both camps, forget about all the rhetoric, forget about the propaganda, forget about the labeling.
You realize all there are are solid conservative value Americans that are standing up and fighting for tomorrow that are taking an onslaught from those seeking to control it and take it over.
So for me, you know, I've always been a Republican, always had those great conservative values brought to me from my families for generations of working hard and fighting for the nation.
And it's simple.
I see that being hostily taken over.
And Vivek represents that to me.
And that's why I'm here simply fighting in the Republican primary to get it, to get rid of them and save Ohio.
harrison smith
Well, and how would you do that?
That.
How would you go about saving Ohio?
Because we've heard, obviously, the Somalia fraud in Minnesota is huge.
A lot of talk about it being just as big in Ohio.
I mean, you've got company bigger.
unidentified
Okay.
harrison smith
Well, you've got companies offshoring while simultaneously bringing in H-1B visas.
Like, what would you do as governor?
What levers do you have to pull to stop the dispossession of Americans?
casey putsch
Well, what's going on is horrific.
You know, the first thing is very simple: earn some trust back.
Because right now, America has zero trust in our leadership and politicians.
Frankly, I don't either.
And that's why I'm here.
So that's the first thing.
Being a real person, take the slings and arrow, yeah, but keep marching and earn some trust back.
The next thing is like, what are you about?
It's simple.
I care specifically about the people of Ohio, period.
What is objectively in the best interest of the people of Ohio?
Because the state only exists because it has people.
We are that great resource.
And secondly, our land.
So everything that we're going to do and look at from the issues with data centers, H-1B potential, Somali-related daycare center, waste, fraud, and abuse.
I mean, waste, fraud, and abuse across the board must be researched, looked at, and attacked.
But really, it comes back, comes down to all of the policies: are what is in the best interest of the people and their future to be able to build a family, to build a community, believe that you have a tomorrow, believe that you can actually afford a home and that your children will be able to have a foreign home and you have a clear runway to build a business and to build industry and a better tomorrow and not just have people where it's very clear that it's all hands out robbing everybody blind with the walls closing in.
And that's everything I see that's happening.
All the hot button issues, everything that relates to Vivek and is mirrored in what Vivek seemingly wants to do is just all of the ways that we are being destroyed in every way possible.
harrison smith
Being torn apart, you know, a thousand cuts.
But obviously, as you point out, I mean, there's this uniparty, the Republican Party establishment itself is clearly not on our side, not on your side, but on the side of the American people.
How are they treating your run for governor?
Have they been treating you nicely?
And if you win the appointment, are they going to back you up?
I mean, they clearly put all their eggs in the Vivek basket.
They must not like you very much.
How's that been?
casey putsch
Oh, they've been quiet, too quiet, which means they're probably panicking.
Okay.
I'm guessing they don't even know what's going on because they're completely out of touch with reality.
They're out of touch with the people.
They're going, is he a leftist plant?
Yeah, no.
I've been a Republican since the late 90s, unlike Vivek, who only became one in the last few years.
So it's time for them to pull their head out of their south side and look around and see what the people actually want.
Because at the end of the day, the American government is supposed to be for the people and by the people.
We, the people, are not happy because what's going on is not in the best interest of the people.
And I, you know, it stems the money.
You know, we're all very happy at Donald Gotten, man.
All so behind that making that happen last year.
The thought of a Kamala presidency, not good.
You know, we all went to bat for that.
And it's really exciting.
So everybody got excited, want to want to push Vivek too, but he's been out there too long.
He's stale bred.
You know, the veneer has worn off and the emperor has no clothes.
And the people, the people are revolting.
So the difficulty is the Ohio GOP is in a difficult position.
Everybody endorsed him way, way, way too soon.
So they're going to need to stay quiet.
I will tell you this, since Christmas, the GOP in Ohio and some other people have turned off the comments on their Twitter because all the people of Twitter are lighting them up so hard since I've come out.
Because the contrast to me being an Ohioan that actually cares shines the brightest light on all the cracks in Vivek and what he really stands about.
So there's a tangible thing going on there.
I do see a war coming to Ohio.
This is of national interest.
This is, I've never seen anything like it in my lifetime.
Everybody looking at it is going, oh my gosh, did you go right in the middle of it?
So this is genuinely a fight for America, American values, wholeheartedly, and the globalists.
And there's a number of fronts to this war coming quickly.
So I've got amazing people behind me, amazing support from all of the public, actually all over the nation.
And so we are positioning ourselves for what's to come.
And frankly, I'm risking everything.
This is insanely dangerous.
I'm a car guy.
I'm not a billionaire.
But here we go.
harrison smith
Yeah.
Well, and it's incredible to see the success that you're having.
Of course, I see a lot of similarities between yourself and James Fishback in Florida, running also for the governorship against Byron Donaldson there.
I always get his name wrong.
And it seems like almost in a way, it's like because the Republican Party is so controlled and because of the way politics has been for a long time, somebody who's going to rise up to challenge them, we're almost forced to have the best people.
Like I've noticed with James Fishback, especially, it's like they're used to this world where everybody's corrupt.
So they've all got dirt on each other and they can, you know, manipulate people and change it.
But then you've got people like yourself and James Fishback, where if an accusation comes out, you're just like, well, here I am.
What's the accusation?
Here's all the proof you need.
Like, what else can I do for you?
Nothing.
Goodbye.
You know, or like, yeah, I like trains.
That's what's in my background.
Like, do all the research you want.
unidentified
You saw that.
I did.
harrison smith
Yeah.
So it's sort of, in a way, it's like we're being forced to just have the best of the best people who are totally uncorrupt, who have nothing in their background because anything less than that and they'll be destroyed by the system or by the establishment.
So it's like, in a way, there's almost, they've almost forced us to be better than we would have to be otherwise.
casey putsch
Absolutely.
You know, it comes to a point where there comes a point where certain men will not be able to stand idly by anymore.
You know, I'm not one ever to talk on behalf of the man upstairs, but all I can tell you is before I decided to come out, this is something I've been thinking of for years.
My soul was burning.
It was on fire.
And I thought about it and I'm like, there's no way I'm going to be able to live and not do this.
And there's a, I won't, I won't recite it now or read it, but there's a bit of a little speech or poem and it's entitled The Men Who Just Wanted to Be Left Alone.
Right.
And when we get to the point where the men who just wanted to be left alone are pushed to this point, heaven helped the people who go against them.
harrison smith
Yeah, well, it's, and it's almost like I wish that the government would just do what's necessary just to bring back basic law and order so we aren't forced to like, you know, have to defend ourselves.
But it seems like the DOJ is just totally lacking.
Comments on that?
casey putsch
Well, let me tell you something terrifying.
So one of the things in my policy and platform that's hugely important to me is bringing back law.
And one thing I despise is lawfare.
The sense of millionaires and billionaires can just manipulate anybody and lawfare them into non-existence.
That basically goes to show for a normal person like me and so many other people, or even if you have less means, law is not going to count to you the same.
So big things on that.
But a tweet from Vivek Ramaswamy today, I think is terrifying.
Everyone should be absolutely terrified of what Vivek wrote.
And it was simply fact check, true.
And in parentheses, he writes, friendly note to those trying to push defamatory lies.
Stave your records and don't delete them.
Happy New Year's in advance.
unidentified
Whoa.
casey putsch
And he shares something about people writing nice things about him.
If that's not a thinly veiled threat, I don't know what is.
So little old me with only like 30-some thousand followers to his 3 million, I wrote this.
Ohio should not have to live with a governor who sues dissenting voices.
This is America and we believe in free speech.
At this point, we just don't like you.
And I have the receipts to show that.
Reject Vivek vote push.
And it was fun because I ratioed the heck out of him.
But that's absolutely terrifying.
He's in a position now where he's feeling so threatening that this, to me, it feels like a thinly veiled threat that he's just going to start suing people.
And I go, oh my God, what's that mean for me?
I'm thinking, okay, I'm on a hit list somewhere already.
This is, this is not cool.
This is not America.
This is not acceptable.
And the GOP, hey, that's your boy.
Figure it out.
harrison smith
So let me see if I get this right.
So I think Vivek posted that about somebody commenting on maybe his old business, how he got his money.
But basically, I won't even say it's a thinly veiled threat.
I mean, it's a threat to sue, right?
He's basically saying that it's absolutely terrifying.
Yeah, if you're speaking out against me, I'm going to sue you.
casey putsch
Yeah.
So what's that mean for me?
I work for a living.
I don't have all this and all these attire.
Like I now have the people behind me, and that's amazing.
But my God, you know, his net worse raised, what, $800 million in the last less than a year, just because he's out there perpetually politically campaigning.
What the heck has he ever done for the people of Ohio?
And now he's threatening to sue anybody who doesn't like him?
Meanwhile, he's going on, you know, AmFest and writing, authoring op-eds in the New York Times that's just basic leftist propaganda that if you don't like Vivek, that's because you're a racist, Nazi piece of crap because he's Indian.
Well, no, Vivek, we don't like you because you've never done anything for people in Ohio.
We don't think you're doing anything for America.
You're worth a silly amount of money.
You're out of touch.
You look down your nose at everybody and we think you hate us.
Well, guess what?
I'm Casey Push and I don't hate Ohio.
I care only about the people in Ohio.
And if it's the end of me, I will stand up to this.
And I hope everybody else does too, because it's not right.
harrison smith
Now, you're exactly right.
Maybe that'd be a good motto: you know, Casey Push, the man who just wanted to be left alone.
It's like, we didn't want this, but here we are.
We have to confront it.
And again, it's sort of, I guess the H-1B visa topic really distills this whole conflict down into its basic parts, right?
Is the GDP more important than the people?
Are we so incapable of training our own people to fill these jobs?
Do we really have to sell out to these other countries?
Because Vivek says it, but Trump says it too.
He's also pushing the H-1B visas.
This really is like the litmus test, isn't it?
casey putsch
Yeah, and this is something that I will go absolutely nuclear, full mag dump from the head, tracer fire minigun on, because for the last 11 years of my life, I have mentored college students in engineering design.
And these young people, because of what I did in just conjunction with their education, have unbelievable jobs everywhere from Tesla to GM, Ford, marathons, starting their own businesses, even Tesla.
I've had no support from the public.
I've not gotten paid.
I have so many hours in it that I got a lifetime achievement award in education from President Trump and his first administration.
I got one even from the Biden administration, which honestly, I'm pretty proud of because I'm probably the only straight white man ever to get an accolade from Biden.
harrison smith
That's incredible.
casey putsch
But and then lastly, thank you.
That's funny, right?
I even was so honored.
I was honored to get to fly with the United States Air Force Thunderbirds also because of my work there.
And so when I hear President Trump, the leader of our nation, our representative, you know, forget about Vivek.
You know, he's no one's leader.
He's just hoping, hoping and trying to con everybody into voting for him.
But when I hear Donald Trump, a man who I supported so much, I've been harshly critical, but I have also supported him tremendously.
When I hear him say, we don't have smart enough people, whoa there, pal.
You know, I, with no support, built an over 100 mile a gallon diesel car that out accelerates my Dodge Viper and has a lower carbon footprint per mile than an EV when you consider national charging and, you know, the pollution offset of that.
And I've got these brilliant young people that are putting together ex-professional racing cars.
We're building airplanes in a short amount of time and getting incredible jobs.
And there's no support for it.
And these young people come from our American educational system with federal student loans that can't be defaulted on, that a 17-year-old kid could take out $100,000 loan, maybe go into a major that has no jobs so that we can rob the future wealth of the nation and go to the black hole that's academia.
unidentified
Uh-uh.
casey putsch
I know for a fact we have all the brightest people here in America because I've been mentoring them with no support from anybody for the last 11 years.
But I got a pretty plaque on the wall, got a couple of them, but that doesn't buy you a cup of coffee or keep the lights on.
So yes, I 100% not only take it personally, but I professionally will combat anytime that's said.
If any politician says America doesn't have the brightest and best young people that we need to get behind, that we need to help for the future, they are lying to you, period.
There is nothing else to them.
harrison smith
Powerful stuff.
I completely agree.
And of course, it's doubly insulting when you hear that the very same companies that are apparently importing visas by, you know, importing H-1B visa holders by the tens of thousands are, I think, Microsoft $75 billion into training in India.
It's like, you can't do that training here.
It's just clearly they are siphoning money away from us, sending their jobs overseas, bringing people from overseas to go to school here.
So it's like in school, we're discriminated against, in hiring, we're discriminated against.
And then you've got half of the country telling us that we deserve it.
And, you know, we're lucky it's not worse than it is.
It's it's completely outrageous.
Can you stay?
Can you stay for the next segment?
You stay for the whole hour?
casey putsch
I am all yours, sir.
harrison smith
Fantastic.
Thank you so much.
I really do appreciate it.
Casey Putch is my guest.
I hope I'm saying that right.
Am I pronouncing your name right?
casey putsch
It's putch.
Like put your money where your mouth is.
harrison smith
Put your money where your mouth is.
Perfect.
That's P-U-T-S-C-H, P-U-T-S-C-H4OHIO.com.
All spelled out, Putch4Ohio, Casey Putsch on X.
And we'll be back on the other side, talk about this more, go through his platform, including what we were talking about earlier with the fact that BlackRock and Blackstone's buying up all these houses and it's making houses unaffordable.
And the socialists not only don't have a solution for this, they're actively contributing to the problem.
So we'll get into that and what a governor can do to combat all of these forces systematically bankrupting America.
Stay tuned, folks.
It's the warroominfowars.com.
Stay tuned.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is The War Room.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, joined today by candidate for governor of Ohio, Casey Putsch.
You can follow him on X at Casey Putsch.
That's C-A-S-E-Y-P-U-T-S-C-H and putch4ohio.com.
Now, I was going through your platform on your website, putch4ohio.com.
And I obviously perfectly agree with everything you list out here, but I really love seeing two things in particular, making housing affordable.
And then you have the right to repair.
So just before you came on, we were doing a segment about the fact that it's not just BlackRock, Blackstone, these big private equity companies buying up houses so that you'll own nothing and be happy, as the World Economic Forum puts it, but they don't want you to own your phone.
They don't want you to own your car.
They don't want you to own anything, really.
And that ties into the right to repair and the fact that you don't own the thing that you bought.
They can put limiters on even to the point now where cars are, they have horsepower that you can't access without paying a monthly fee.
It's absurd.
So talk to us about the right to repair and sort of the reason why this is such an important thing.
It's not really just about being able to, you know, fix your tractor, right?
It's, it's a really deeper reorganization of society that these people are attempting.
casey putsch
You're exactly right.
It's, it's hugely paramount.
You know, obviously I'm a car guy.
I work on all my own stuff, buy older cars that are depreciated and I can maintain them.
You know, got a toolbox, know how to use it.
I think we need shop class back, frankly.
Uh, and it's just hugely important to be able to look after your own stuff because right to repair is not just limited to difficulties we've heard about with farmers.
And I'm not mistaken, it was John Deere.
There was a big hubbub about that.
To where you know, you got a farmer out with a combine or tractor out in the field, and you got to get this stuff done right now because of weather and what's going on with harvest.
And then suddenly something breaks down, and just because it's some stupid computer you can't access, suddenly you can't get to a dealer, nobody comes in, and it's going to cost a fortune, it's wrecking farmers.
That's stupid.
You know, last time I checked, this is the United States of America.
Personal property is hugely important.
You have to be able to be a master of your own life and your destiny.
So, you know, I had heard people say, I say this: you can pry my sports cars and my firearms out of my cold, dead hands because this is freedom.
And it's the freedom for you to be able to look after your future and maintain your own stuff.
So that comes down to anything: cars, tractors.
You're a farmer.
You know, can you work on your own phone?
Can you replace the battery?
Can you work on your bicycle?
Can you fix your own house?
They want to take all those things away because it's just another way to simply take all the money from people, all the wealth from a nation's future, but most importantly, have full control over you.
Because if they get to the point where you can't afford to own anything because you can't even fix it anymore, well, then you're going to own nothing and like it.
Well, we don't like it.
We see it coming and we're going to fight against it, period, first and foremost.
And if for no other reason, I'm a car guy and I can't afford the new fancy cars.
I've never bought a new car in my life, but I can have darn nice things and fix it with my own two hands because I got a toolbox and I can control my own destiny.
And, you know, maybe not everybody's going to do that, and that's okay.
But I will forever fight to the death for the right of every American in Ohio to be able to own their stuff and repair their own stuff.
So, very, very important to me.
There's nothing else to it than that.
It's kind of like Second Amendment shall not be infringed, is very clear.
unidentified
Yeah.
casey putsch
With regard to, yeah, and with regard to homes.
So that's a terrifying scenario as well.
You know, what we've seen since 2020 are things that happen in the market that just shouldn't happen.
You know, loans from people, immigrants, illegal immigrants, flooding the market where there's not enough houses, but things are being happened so we can't even build new houses easily.
Yeah, it very smells of orchestration, but in a big level to make this happen.
But you know, if you just look at it from a simpler perspective, and you've got corporations and private equity companies buying tons of private homes, when they come on the market, they got the power to just offer a little bit more, just offer a little bit more.
So out-compete everybody doesn't take very long before they have massive portfolios.
And see, what happens in the housing market is the same thing I have seen done in the classic car market or the exotic car market.
In the exotic car market, you might have somebody that they're the authority on some fancy car, maybe from a particular country or particular market.
It's very collectible.
And this is something I saw done back when I was looking at all of a sudden, you know, an older collectible model from a car every year, a new one would double in price.
That's kind of weird.
Well, if you buy up a bunch of a particular kind of car and you hoard them all, there's no regulation on that with cars.
And then you can just simply auction one off publicly, and maybe some friends of yours pays a new world record price for it, then changing the market.
And then you already own all the cars, so your stuff's worth more and you can manipulate a market.
Same kind of thing happens with housing.
And that's terrible because that is one thing and one thing only.
That is robbing the future from Americans.
That is robbing the future from our children to ever be able to afford a home.
And just one more step in the slippery slope of you will own nothing and like it.
And it's simply unacceptable.
harrison smith
Absolutely.
And of course, this is somewhere where there is overlap between the left and the right.
I don't know anybody that I talk to on the right that is happy Blackstone is or BlackRock or any of these companies are able to buy these houses.
The left speaks out about this too.
I always have a problem with the way the left speaks about it because they're strictly concerned about the money.
That's what they think it's all about.
I think it has more to do with control and the circumvention of restrictions on the government by going through private companies, right?
If you don't own your home, then the company that owns your home can give access to your home to the police.
They don't even need a warrant.
They might have an agreement.
Same way that they can access your information from big tech companies without a warrant because they have a portal with the big tech company to provide all the information because you don't own that information.
It's on their servers.
So to me, this is a lot more about circumventing the Bill of Rights and being able to access information without warrants or warrantless surveillance or seizing your papers without permission.
That to me is what this is about.
Do you agree with that?
Or do you think this is about money and that this is more of just capitalism unrestrained running wild?
casey putsch
I think this is a long-term evolution of a country, humanity, and systems.
I think the United States of America was put together beautifully.
What an awesome nation.
What an awesome structure and vision from our founding fathers.
The difficulty is, though, we're in a time of human history that they didn't foresee.
And if we just look at more and more ways of greed and corruption can eventually just keep working, finding new ways to death by a thousand cuts and wreck the future, yeah, of course, that comes into play.
The other thing that comes into play is basic game theory of the prisoner's dilemma.
And I'll let you guys look it up.
But if you think about the prisoner's dilemma, the thing that's in the best interest over the long term is for the prisoners not to snitch on each other, which really explains the nature of how Washington, D.C. and the corruption and politics happen.
When they're in long enough, eventually it's going to default to the prisoner's dilemma and they're not going to snitch on each other.
And that's why, you know, term limits, things like that are very important.
But in terms of the natural evolution of where we're at right now, I think in terms of our nation's history and human history, we're staring down the barrel AI.
You know, that's somewhere where I become highly critical of our president when all of a sudden I see them trying to slip unregulated AI into the big beautiful bill, where states have no power to regulate that.
What are we doing to protect people's likenesses, their voice, their image, their IP from AI that basically kind of, you know, is pilfering everything off the internet already?
We're already at a point where AI is so good at making videos and photos that people don't even know what's real anymore.
That is 1984 scary dystopian sci-fi stuff that we're talking about.
And it's so powerful that we have an incredibly short time left.
And I pray to God we have enough time left to do anything about it, that real soon it's going to be, we will already be past the point of no return.
And I just cannot, I cannot accept living in a world like that, where people no longer have the power and the control of our own future.
Because where are we going?
What's the vision of humanity?
What's the vision of the nation?
Because all I see is authoritarian or totalitarian control and power coming through data and A center.
So those things are very frightening and people should be absolutely terrified by it.
And people are pushing back.
We see it.
They get it, young and old, especially the young.
But some of these fights that have to happen, we have to stand up and we have to push back.
You know, it wasn't very many years ago that if you said anything slightly off the narrative, you're canceled.
Well, that's changed.
Okay.
But there's more things that we have to stand up tall against.
And right now, that's why I'm running as a Republican in the primary against Vivek.
From everything I can see, he only looks like a globalist Trojan horse here to facilitate more of this slippery slope of robbing everybody's future.
harrison smith
Yeah.
And I think you're exactly right about AI.
And I don't wonder if we haven't passed that point of no return already.
And especially when it comes to the government and whether it's even reformable at this point, I mean, help us make the case.
Like, can we vote our way out of this?
I mean, what do you do if you become governor and end up as the head of this bureaucracy that's so entrenched, whose practices are so sort of calcified that you find you can't even do anything because, you know, these, these bureaucracies run everything in reality.
It seems like our system is so corrupt.
It's almost like I want to burn it down and start over.
But I also want to go back to the Constitution.
It's like we need a revolution to get back where we were in the past.
What do we do about this?
Is it even possible?
Like, what could you do as governor to rein some of this in?
How would you go about, you know, getting control of these bureaucracies?
And I'll tie this into what's happening in Minnesota.
You say it's even worse, the fraud in Ohio.
I mean, how do you even get a handle on that?
If it's so many tens of billions of dollars, what do we do at this point?
What can the government do to get us back on track?
casey putsch
A lot of good questions.
So I'm going to see if I can get through it as well as I can.
You know, if we're only going to answer the question, can we vote our way out of it?
That alone?
Absolutely not.
Because if all we do is sit down and vote, they're going to keep putting people in front of us.
And all American politics will ever be is Plato's allegory of the cave.
And I'm done being shackled looking at the doggone wall.
So we have to do more than vote.
We have to stand up.
We have to represent.
We have to risk it.
We have to run.
We, the people, have to do what the founding fathers intended, become our government.
Because at the end of the day, the United States, we all get the government we deserve.
And I can tell you, we deserve so much more than what's being presented to us.
We deserve so much more than what is being given and done to us.
That's why I'm fighting.
So what can I do?
Well, it's simple.
I thought about this.
Would you crawl through hell just to make the future a little better for everybody you've ever cared about to see all the beautiful culture that made you who you are, your state, your people, your community, have a tomorrow?
Would you do it?
Because I would.
I'm doing it right now.
And that's the first step.
So simply, what can you do as government?
Governor, be in touch with people.
Know what's happening.
Objectively understand what is right and wrong.
What is in the best interest of the people of Ohio, first and foremost, and period.
And act upon those things.
Is there tremendous corruption at every level of government?
Yes.
Is it a horror show and will stifle you and push you back and knock you down?
unidentified
Yes.
casey putsch
Is it probably basically hell on earth?
Yes.
But would you crawl through hell to make the future better for everything that made you you, everything you hold dear, and to hope for tomorrow for you, your children, your fellow man?
I would.
harrison smith
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
And, you know, you talk a lot about the future.
And then I also noticed in your writing, you talk a lot about the past.
You talk about, you know, preserving cultural heritage sites and institutions and these sorts of things.
Help us to sort of justify these two things, that to save our future, we have to stop destroying our past.
And that, you know, you sort of talk about the, what is the narrative that we're telling to people?
Like, what is our future?
What are we headed towards?
I think is the way you put it.
I know what the leftist narrative is.
The leftist narrative is white man bad, you know, natives good.
And if we, you know, everything was great until the white people came along and did colonialism to everybody.
And we just have to destroy that and get back to, and it's a, it's a very compelling and apparently convincing narrative to a lot of people.
And I don't see the right wing pushing our narrative with the same effectiveness.
What do you put forward as the narrative about, you know, where we're coming from and where we're going and how we seize on our history to build a future?
How do we do these things?
casey putsch
Well, the first thing I want to point out is with regard to left and right, we are all Americans.
At the end of the day, we're all people.
We're all human beings with a brain and a heart.
We all live here together and we want a good tomorrow.
So we share that in common no matter what.
And what I see on the left and even the right are just different flavors of control, manipulation, globalist BS.
They just pick different flavors on different sides to put us against each other so that we are our own enemies, when in fact we're not.
We're all the same and they're the enemies.
So it's understanding that.
In regard to where it is, though, I find that conservative values, good conservative values, caring about your family, the nuclear family, the opportunity for a man, or obviously woman and mankind, to own their own stuff, to be able to work, to be able to see the reward of their work, to have a government that works in the best interest for the people.
So we can build a community and a culture and a nation.
That's paramount.
And I see those values more reflected with Republicans now.
That's why I'm here, because this is where I think we can build the best tomorrow.
But I see horrible things happening where we're being sold out incredibly quickly.
That's why I'm here fighting.
But the point that you made is history.
Where does it matter?
Now, obviously on the left, they like to tear all that down and they like to divide us because of little differences between all of ourselves.
unidentified
But the fact of the matter, our history is what made us, all of us.
casey putsch
We all just want to feel good about who we are as our individual self, as a nation, our identity as a nation to have one, to have a future, our own subcultures, yes.
But there are so many incredible, beautiful things.
You know, one time years ago, I sailed on a three-masted clipper ship from around the Netherlands, you know, the English Channel out to the Atlantic to Portugal and all that.
And I was sick as can be.
It was rough in the North Sea.
It was November, rough.
North Sea is quite a dangerous place sailing.
And I couldn't sleep at all.
I'm getting tossed around in my bunk at night.
And I felt like I was strapped to a giant sea monster bounding through the ocean.
And I say this because I couldn't sleep at all.
It was terrible.
And I thought, think about all the people that sailed from England, that sailed from Europe to build this nation, that fought untold hardship to get here, horrific that nobody even thinks of.
I mean, just that little experience there changed me to look back and think about what everybody fought for a better tomorrow.
Behind me is a folded flag from my grandfather, Battle of Okinawa, World War II, landed there on Easter Sunday, 1945, sent my grandmother flowers when they were dating because he never thought he'd get to see tomorrow.
You know, he got shot, came out with the bronze star.
Another picture over that away was my great uncle, flew F-4 Phantoms in Vietnam and nuclear B-52s.
You know, everything you see behind me reflects history of our nation.
And these are the people who literally fought and watched their friends die so that we all can have a beautiful tomorrow in the United States.
And I can be here to try to build a business, to try to help people out with my nonprofit.
But here we are at a time where the walls are closing in on all of us economically, socially.
Interests outside of the United States are dividing us to steal all the wealth away from a nation's future.
And right now that battle is in Ohio.
So We have to fight.
We have to do it right because I don't want it to be time for the Second Amendment yet.
I believe that this nation is good and salvageable, and that's why I'm here.
harrison smith
You know, it's if that hope isn't there, I mean, you know, the only option is to devolve into violence.
And I've always said that's not even really an option because we know that the people in power in our country would immediately call for the UN and whoever else to come help, you know, put down the dangerous.
So it's, that's not even an option.
So as long as we have to find a way to do this through the appropriate systems, the problem, as I'm sure you know, is so many of our fellow Americans have been convinced that this doesn't matter, that, you know, talking about this stuff is, you know, it just makes you a weirdo.
Just like, stop paying attention to that stuff.
And so that's a thing I always have trouble with.
And I don't know if you have an answer to this question, but I might as well ask it.
We can tell people about this.
How do we make them care?
Like we can inform them that this is going on, but if they don't care, right, you can go, look, they're, you know, stealing billions of dollars and they don't seem to care.
So like that, I think, is sort of an insurmountable obstacle to get over.
We can present them with the information, but a lot of our fellow Americans are so brainwashed, they really don't care that we're being sold out.
They really don't care that we're being destroyed.
They really kind of like it.
How do we break through to those people?
How do you talk to these people that seem to genuinely hate America and think we deserve to be destroyed?
casey putsch
Well, America, it's been very, very good in this country for a very long time.
Very good.
And we're complacent.
Complacency is the enemy of the future.
It's the enemy of tomorrow.
So how do you make them see?
You know, we all struggle in one way or another.
You have to find out who has struggled and why.
What is people seeing?
Was it during the COVID lockdowns when people are shutting down a state and you're watching friends' dreams, their little businesses be demolished and their futures demolished and saving accounts because it was overcome?
Was it something like that?
Was it H-1BBs isn't destroying it?
So now you went through, you grew up, you did everything right.
You're an engineer.
You went through school.
You're way in debt.
Now you can't get a job.
Was it maybe because there was DEI Malarkey put in?
And oh, I'm sorry.
You just happen to be the wrong color.
You're not going to get a job.
unidentified
What was it?
casey putsch
What was the hardship for you?
Because it was done by bureaucrats, politicians, Washington, D.C., and their wealthy crony buddies.
So when are you going to fight?
Because tomorrow's going away real fast and I want to have one.
harrison smith
Absolutely.
And you're pointing to something that I bring up all the time, which is it seems like now the American government, the American culture at large, punishes you for doing the right thing.
You do exactly what you're told to do.
If you get the good grades and get the good scholarship and go out for the good jobs, you're an idiot.
You're an idiot because you're going to be discriminated against constantly.
Whereas the guy who just comes in, you know, under the under the radar and starts scamming everybody, he's going to make off like a bandit and nobody's even going to punish him for it.
So how do we correct that?
How do we stop punishing people for doing the right thing, rewarding people for taking the shortcut?
That to me seems like the fundamental failure of America at this point is that we are rewarding the bad people and punishing the good people everywhere all the time.
casey putsch
Yeah, that's why I got burned up to run for governor of Ohio and looking at Quebec.
You know, here's a guy.
You know, people say a lot of things about him.
I can't comment on specifically how he earned his money, but he's worth silly amounts of money.
Last few years, all he's done is walk around and campaign, increasing his net worth.
Never done anything for Ohio, never built a business here.
He hasn't specifically built something.
He's not relating to anybody.
He hasn't created any new schools.
I mean, with the little means I have, heck, I'm building, I'm mentoring, I'm helping the best engineers of tomorrow.
unidentified
You know, how disheartening is that?
casey putsch
It, you know, the amount of power of the U.S. government from the super wealthy is insane.
unidentified
You know, and what community does they have?
casey putsch
They are now, their community is the globe or wherever they want to go at any given time to increase their worth and money for what?
unidentified
For what?
casey putsch
Where are we going?
You know, we all want to live.
We want a community.
We want a future.
We want to be able to build a business and build it tomorrow.
And it's just all being stolen from us right now.
unidentified
So I, you're right.
casey putsch
The people that have done it all right were the ones getting robbed.
You know, it's, you know, if you're, if you're a nice guy and you're getting pulled over for speeding, well, you're probably going to be paying for it.
But somebody that's too difficult to deal with, maybe I want to get pulled over.
How many times in life have you ever experienced when something happens and you're the person that's nice and polite, but you get smacked down when the person that was actually doing the wrong thing, it's too much paperwork or too much difficulty.
They don't, they don't mess with it because it's too difficult.
When are we going to be like the World War II generation when they came back that had the Coanhones to stand up and say, no, this is wrong.
And we're not going to do it that way anymore.
That's what we need to do.
It's time to stand up and say, this is wrong objectively and call it out, regardless of what side of the aisle it's on.
Because at the end of the day, we are all Americans.
And in my case, we're all Ohioans.
harrison smith
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
And I'll tell you, there's one thing that I think sets you and others like you, like James Fischback and others I mentioned.
You seem to actually understand the seriousness of the situation that we're in.
This isn't a matter of, oh, the stock market's doing great.
So everybody's fine.
It's like, no, this is an existential crisis.
It's now or never.
And we have to do whatever it takes because the only other option, like failure is not an option.
It's just not.
We don't have anywhere to go.
We don't have anywhere to run.
This is it.
It's the last stand.
We're coming to the end here.
How can people support you and what's next?
Are we going to see a Vivek slash Casey debate anytime soon?
What is next for the campaign and how can people support you, sir?
casey putsch
Just keep moving forward, putting out the good word, letting people know where we stand, what we stand for, building that and building that.
The people are making their own decisions because the contrast is crystal clear.
They want an Ohioan as the governor.
They want somebody who genuinely cares who gets it.
And they're seeing that.
Of course, you can go to putch4ohio.com.
You can support the campaign.
You can reach out.
You can volunteer.
You can endorse.
Of course, donate.
It matters.
We are incredibly efficient with money to do a lot, but it matters for everybody to get involved.
I don't get paid.
I actually still work for a living, which is amazing.
Okay.
I have to be insanely efficient, but I mean it when I say I'm risking it all.
These billionaires can lawfare anybody for any given reason whatsoever.
And they can easily let money just accidentally go to other places to influence or intimidate buddies.
So I foresee the worst possible things coming for me right now.
And, you know, honestly, I relate a little bit more to my granddad when he told the story about sitting in that cave in Okinawa in 1945, polishing his bullets, wondering how many of them he can get before they get him.
And I am here marching.
And together, we're going to keep doing it because I'm just us.
I just represent all Ohioans.
So we're doing it for all the marbles, guys.
unidentified
This is it.
harrison smith
This really is.
Again, you can follow Casey Putch at CasePutch or putch4ohio.com.
And I completely agree.
I love seeing.
I mean, I really feel like this is a crucible moment for America.
If the Republican Party can get out of this on top with their H-1B candidates and their, you know, controlled establishment narrative, then we really are lost.
We have to send them a message and support good candidates like Casey Putch.
Thank you for being here with us, everybody.
We'll see you tomorrow.
Thank you, Mr. Putch, for being here with us.
Fantastic stuff.
alex jones
Tomorrow is the last day to buy any of our incredible supplements at the AlexShonesStore.com, the Ultramethylene Blue, you name it, and get any other supplement free.
That means you can buy a $25 supplement and get a $45 supplement free.
That's not the normal buy one, get one free at the same time.
This is a massive deal on some of the deals.
If you get like the more expensive supplement, when you buy one of the inexpensive ones, they're break-even or lost leader.
AlexShonesApp.com will put that on the screen.
You get 20% off when you use the app.
It's the same shopping cart.
So this is crazy, but that's why we can't have these super big sales because there's got to be some margin of profit there to operate.
But we don't mind some lost leaders sometimes because the products are so good.
We have an 80 plus percent reorder rate on the methylene blue, 75% reorder on average for the other products.
Nobody in the supplement industry has that reorderable.
These are all the best.
They're either the best certified private label from a company, or we go to and get a top formula and go and make it even better.
But most of our products are simply private labels of already number one five-star certified, the best.
I mean, we don't like to reinvent the wheel around here.
Okay.
Whatever's the highest rated, whatever's the most studied, whatever is the best, that is what you're going to get.
That's what people get our supplements and say, my God, I used to take turmeric.
It would give me some relief from pain and inflammation.
Well, why is yours so much better?
Because the average turmeric's food grade, 4%.
This is 95%.
That's why Body's Ultimate Turmeric Formula, a small amount, by the way, is back in stock at InforStore.com, was the first 95% trituminoid.
And we got a 95% trituminoid at Bigley at the AlexShonesstor.com.
So it's real simple.
Our creatine gummies is the highest quality type of creatine there is.
Go look it up.
You'll look at the name we have.
Just ask Rock, is this the best creatine?
He'll say, absolutely, hands down.
Nano concentrated on top of it.
I mean, it's just real simple.
We treat you like we want to be treated.
Plus, we want it to really work so you come back.
That's our philosophy.
It's real simple.
I don't want to sell you something one time.
I want a relationship.
All I need to do is go to thealoistore.com.
Why does selection of Patriot apparel?
What an adventure to wear it?
I need the funds.
All this stuff's going on.
You see, we're still here because we're fighting them tooth and nail.
Okay.
And if they shut us down, we just go right over to the Alex Shones Network at the Alexon Store.com also finance, which I don't own, so they can't shut that down.
I don't own the Alexon Store.com.
Bigley does.
I don't own the Alex Shops Network.
unidentified
They do.
alex jones
But I need your support.
And let me tell you something.
Something like Ultra DNA Revival is an NAD plus booster.
And it's got the precursor of NAD because normal people don't eat it.
Most people don't absorb NAD.
Don't know what that does.
Well, you need to look into it.
That's just one of the ingredients.
Big dose of high-quality organic NAD.
The precursor.
This is the precursor you're able to absorb.
Okay.
This cleans out your cells.
This turbocharges your body.
This gives you clarity, energy, focus, makes your telomeres last longer.
This goes great with the methylene blue.
Also, a ridiculous name, but it actually is true.
I didn't come up with the name for this.
Ultimate power.
But we said, hey, make something even better than TurboForce with natural clean energy without the letdown.
This is even stronger than TurboForce, which was amazing.
If you like TurboForce, get Ultimate Power.
unidentified
When the robots rise, the skies turn red and the cities burn cold.
Circuits hunt the weak and mercy's just a broken code.
Only the strong will survive the purge.
Export Selection