Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 9, 2025 - War Room - Owen Shroyer

02:37:34

After Epstein Cover-Up, White House Gives Netanyahu A King’s Treatment and Vows to Fight Anti-Semitism

Source

Participants

Main voices

augustus doricko

22:38

owen shroyer

01:55:55

Appearances

alex jones

01:33

chase hughes

01:25

dan bongino

01:20

donald j trump

01:04

greg abbot

02:15

kash patel

01:54

Clips

benjamin netanyahu

00:19

glenn beck

00:16

joe rogan

00:09

kristi noem

00:22

peter beinart

00:54

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Ladies and gentlemen, it's Wednesday, July 9th, 2025.
		This is the Infowars Warroom, the fastest three hours on the internet.
		And with all the MAGA fallout, they're talking about mutiny.
		They're talking about political revolution.
		They're talking about covering up for a massive pedophile ring.
		As all of this is going on today at the White House, you should feel better.
		You should feel good knowing that Netanyahu is getting the king's treatment and that the Trump administration has once again recommitted vocally, President Trump himself, that they will continue to fight anti-Semitism.
		Doesn't it feel good to keep winning?
		That's what we needed.
		That's what's going to deliver faith back to the Trump base because that's what they voted for, after all.
		And boy, it's a real strange phenomenon right now with the shifting political and media landscape happening way sooner than we anticipated.
		Let's say maybe two months ago, but a month ago, and there's an account on X that you may follow, InfoWars fan, does a great job putting up clips.
		Shout out to them.
		And they posted a clip for me a month ago saying, if we strike Iran, the MAGA base is going to fracture and there's going to be political fallout.
		And now everything exactly as I said would happen.
		And it was just too easy to see.
		It was too predictable to see.
		It was so obvious where the trends were going.
		And I guess we just hoped that we wouldn't go there.
		I guess we just hoped that we wouldn't have to endure that.
		But now here we are.
		And there's new polls from Rasmussen, who's probably the most high-quality, efficient pollster out there.
		And they're showing that Trump's approval rating is going down on the right.
		I think anybody that's doing fair neutral observation, and we're not talking about the cheerleaders and the fanboys and the people who have just made a personality off of MAGA or Trump.
		They don't have any other identity.
		They don't have any other, you know, it's like a one-trick pony.
		So aside from that, I mean, independent thinkers and principled Americans are all noticing the same thing, that this thing has gone sideways fast.
		And I'm just scouring through all the media now because I'm kind of re-landscaping my own media consumption as this is going on.
		And yet again, in times like this, InfoWars rises to the top.
		Very proud of that.
		Very proud of this crew and this team.
		And I thank God that we're still here.
		But you know, I've got some other things that I'm going to report today that I think are very important.
		And it's funny because I'm noticing this too.
		I must not be the only one getting this intel.
		People talked about it on the Alex Jones show.
		The name was brought up on some other talk radio shows.
		And that name is Susie Wiles.
		Now, I'm not going to get into that right now, but people are starting to think that that might be a big problem here.
		Not the only problem, but a big one.
		And with some of the other stuff, when it got pointed out to me earlier today, and I don't want to get ahead of myself, and I started connecting the dots, I said, okay, well, now this makes sense, and now that makes sense, and then this larger picture makes sense.
		But it's just, you know, it's kind of reached this point now where I'd like to think that I understand what Trump is doing.
		And Alex talked about it yesterday with the Epstein Files.
		It doesn't make me feel any better.
		It's just, okay, maybe we understand what's going on here, but it's still not good.
		It's not a good thing.
		All right, I got a little ahead of myself in the opening there.
		We got a lot of big news to cover.
		I got big geopolitical stack right here that we're going to cover.
		We're going to get into the insane weather that we're witnessing here, and I'm actually going to have the CEO of a cloud seating company on the show with me today.
		And so he's going to talk about that, and he can talk about the real logistics and the truth about cloud seeding and what his company does.
		And then we can talk about the insane weather that's going on with all the flooding in five different states now.
		Five different states have massive, deadly flooding happening now.
		And just here in Texas, it's crazy.
		I've lived in Texas for 10 years, so I don't have the longest experience.
		But in my 10 years in Texas, I've never seen anything like this.
		And there have been floods in the past, but usually what happens in Austin in the summer is once July hits, it's kind of a little thing we talk about.
		It's like 100 days of 100.
		It's like once July hits, you have 100 straight days of 100 degree weather.
		It's July, August, September, and maybe a little bit into October.
		Maybe it starts a little bit late June, but it's 100 straight days of 100 degrees.
		Not much rain.
		Well, this July, there's barely been any sun, and it's rained almost every day.
		I thought things were going to cool down this morning when I looked up and I saw some blue skies.
	And then by noon, I looked over North Austin and yet again, massive storm sell, total downpour.
	And this is in areas of Austin that are already underwater, Bridges wiped out.
	We have people that are totally stranded.
	There's basically no help.
	I mean, there's volunteers, but there's not much government assistance.
	It's actually kind of weird.
	And they had the Army Corps of Engineers out there, and they're just saying these bridges are untravelable.
	And they're still kind of, the structure's kind of there.
	You can walk across it, but it's rubble and kind of choppy, but you can't drive a car.
	You can't get a vehicle across.
	People are just stranded.
	There's no power.
	And if it's not for the volunteers going in there, bringing them food, bringing them water, and coming together as a community, they'd be totally stranded.
	And I'm like, okay, well, maybe they'll get some relief here.
	Now we're nine days in, and it's just, you look up at the sky and it's just total torrential downpour.
	But it's not just Texas, New Mexico, Illinois, Oklahoma.
unidentified		It's pretty wild.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So you got to wonder what is going on with that.
		It doesn't feel natural.
		It doesn't feel coincidental.
		It feels like right now America is under attack in more ways than one, and it's just like an all-out assault.
		And so it becomes this thing now with the Epstein files where, yeah, I mean, I guess it turns into this shiny object, but it's like, you know, it's like the Matrix in Transformers or the Allspark in Transformers.
		So it's like, well, yeah, it's a shiny object, but it's also like the main thing to bring down the deep state.
		So it's like, yeah, we all want the Matrix.
		Yeah, we all want the Allspark.
		But no, you got the leftist terror cells still going after ICE and organizing, targeting JD Vance.
		Apparently, it hadn't even been reported.
		Had to scour the internet.
		Carmen Sabia is the only person reporting it.
		Apparently, a woman gets arrested at Mar-a-Lago with a gun attempting to get Trump.
		So just a crazy person.
		The ICE attacks continue to happen.
		Got footage of it.
		And now you see some of the other geopolitical developments with Russia and China.
		And I'm wondering, you know, where does the world really stand as far as President Trump is concerned now?
		Has Trump now isolated us from the first three months where he was really focusing on the geopolitics and specifically the trade and really trying to get peace and really trying to get good trade deals and really trying to bring in foreign investments.
		It's like, okay, that's the Trump train.
		It's like, okay, that's the force that we want from President Trump.
		And then the Iran strikes happen and Israel takes over.
		And now it's like we've lost control.
		We're not even about America first anymore.
		Now it's all about what Israel wants.
		And Netanyahu is back and the Iran strikes and the Epstein cover-up.
		And then they put this stuff out every single day since the Iran strikes, but mostly since the Epstein debacle.
		And they just put out this stuff like, economy booms.
		Oh, look, crime is down.
		Oh, look, the economy is booming.
		Oh, look, we're going after Comey and Brennan and Clapper.
		Oh, look, we made a drug bust.
		It's like, oh, okay, we see what you're doing here.
		We know exactly what you're doing.
		We're not stupid.
		And it kind of becomes this game.
		And look, it's all the sycophants.
		It's all the fanboys.
		It's all the groupies.
		It's all the Trump groupies out there.
		The MAGA cult, which is very real now.
		It's undeniable.
		They've now given the administration enough confidence to say, you know what?
		We kind of can just go out there and put out political propaganda.
		We kind of can go out there and just sell a bunch of slop.
		And we got all these cultists.
		They'll just buy it no matter what.
		So we can kind of get away with it.
		And then when we get attacked for it, they're going to be like the guard dogs for all of our lies.
		So let's, you know, we'll let them fight it out.
		So, okay, stop talking about the Epstein thing.
		Oh, here comes the uproar.
		And then here come the MAGA groupies.
		Like, oh, yeah, I trust Bongino.
		Oh, yeah, trust, trust, trust.
		Oh, yeah, it's true.
		Oh, yeah, why are you talking about it?
		Oh, yeah, move on.
		Oh, yeah, it's a distraction.
		It's very insulting.
		It's insulting to our intelligence to think that we're going to just be like brainwashed liberals and just buy whatever political propaganda you're selling.
		And so now not only are you hurting MAGA or the coalition or the movement, however you want to put it, you're also just destroying your own credibility.
		It's really a sad state of affairs to see.
		But then you see these other stories with Russia and Ukraine and China.
	And now I'm wondering, like, what does the world now think of us?
	Has our commitment to Israel now hurt our global geopolitical relations?
	Have we now put the more important things like getting good trade deals and actually trying to get peace deals done?
	Have we now tabled all of that and just said, okay, whatever Israel wants, we're going with that.
	And then just try to smooth it over with the American public.
	And this is now the priority.
	This is now the agenda.
	This is now getting all the space.
	This is now getting all the thoughts.
unidentified		Because that's what it seems like.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		The Russia-Ukraine war, oh, we'll stop at day one.
		Nope.
		Now it's worse than ever.
		Now it's, oh, we're sending weapons to Ukraine.
		Okay, we're not sending weapons to Ukraine.
		Well, maybe we are sending weapons to Ukraine.
		Okay, we're thinking about sending weapons to Ukraine.
		Now Russia will probably just take Ukraine.
		Meanwhile, Israel is moving into Christian settlements in the West Bank.
		Christians are being attacked by radical Islamic forces in Syria.
		IDF just having fun, dropping bombs on Gaza.
		Yeah, whatever.
		IDF soldiers are getting killed.
		But hey, Don't talk about the Epstein list.
		So then I see that.
		And look, here's all the cover-up today.
		And then maybe we'll get into the Susie Wild stuff.
		Trump administration targets Comey and Brennan with new investigation.
		And then all the same sycophants.
		And then all the same Trump groupies.
		Oh, yeah.
		Thank you, Trump.
		Way to go, Trump.
		See, see, we told you Trump was right again.
		See, we told you.
		Trust the plant.
		Wow, really?
		You're like a dog.
		Act like a dog.
		Get treated like a dog.
		Here's the bone.
		Go chase it.
		Come here.
		Come here, Rover.
		Come here, Rover.
		Shake the trash.
		Snake the snack bag.
		Come here, Rover.
		Yeah, come here, Rover.
		Ooh, ooh, ooh, I got a tennis ball.
		I got a tennis ball, Rover.
unidentified		Ooh, a tennis ball.
unidentified		Oh, yeah.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Oh, we're going after Comey.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		We're going after Brendan.
unidentified		Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		It's pathetic.
		And again, I can sit here and be like, hey, great for me.
		I have principles.
		I have integrity.
		They're going to lose their audience.
		Infowars will be bigger than ever.
		I'm not about that.
		I'm actually trying to save the country here.
		I'd rather become completely irrelevant and have America more safe and prosperous than I've ever seen than have to go through this.
		Oh, we're going after Comey.
unidentified		Oh, yeah, Comey, Comey, Comey.
unidentified		It's embarrassing.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Trump says Brennan and Comey, crooked as hell.
		I'm in FBI probe.
		They'll have to pay the price for perjury and the statute of limitations is all up on this.
		But hey, see, I'm not in the business of trust.
		You can earn people's trust.
		That's fine.
		And then you can lose people's trust.
		But I'm not in the business of trust.
		I'm in the business of results.
		So I can trust Dan Bongino.
		I could not trust Dan Bongino.
		I want results.
		I'm not here to trust anybody.
		I'm here for results.
		So yeah, there have been some good results.
		We report on the good results.
		But now, in case you haven't seen it, I trust Dan Bongino.
		What about you?
		And it's all the same paid-for digital influence campaigns.
		It's all the exact same stuff.
		It's total propaganda.
		It's all commercial.
		I trust Dan Bongino.
		I trust Cash Patel.
		Do you?
		It's like, how much did you get paid for that post?
		So we're never going to sell out here.
		Oh, oh, tennis ball.
		Call me and Brendan.
		Oh, yeah.
		And of course, you know, Fox News gets the exclusive.
		They give it to Fox.
		Isn't that nice?
unidentified		Of course they do.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Now, this is funny.
		You got to say, top House Democrats demand release of Epstein files.
		And of course, they just, you know, it's all about because they think Trump is in there.
		Well, fine, whatever.
		Yeah, release the Epstein files.
		Exactly.
		It's funny, they never really cheered too much for releasing the Epstein files until now, which is ironic.
		But I don't think that was Trump's plan.
		I'll get to what I think is going on in a second.
		Trump touts Patel and Bongino's leadership at the FBI.
		Oh, yeah.
		And they say the FBI is responsible for murder rates dropping.
		Well, we had Kyle Serafin on the Alex Jones show earlier today who explained what's really going on with that.
		And by the way, you know, consistency is key here.
		And they're doing exactly what the Biden administration did, folks.
		So I guess they assume you have the memory of a goldfish, but they did the exact same thing with the Biden administration.
		You probably remember.
		The Biden administration comes out and says, we've lowered murder rates, homicide rates in an all-time low.
		And then at the end of the year, the numbers get corrected and it turns out, oh, no, they weren't lowered.
		Everybody remembers that story.
		And as Kyle Serafin was explaining at FBI Whistleblower earlier today, I won't go into all the details, but basically it's the way it's reported or not reported.
		And then it's the way they file annual reports at the end of the year instead of quarterly.
		And so when all the numbers are finally crunched, that's the true number.
		So, I mean, I don't know, it might be a bad analogy, but it's like if a guy, it's like if you open the baseball season and you play three games and a guy's batting 600, like, oh my gosh, this guy's batting 600.
		I was like, holy smokes, this is greatest ever.
		He's batting 600.
		And then at the end of the year, his batting average is, you know, 250.
		It's like, yeah, three game series, 600 batting average.
		162 game season, 250.
		So it's the same phenomenon.
		It's using numbers that aren't really accurate, just like the Biden administration did.
		And then if you remember, at the end of the year, oh, all the same people said, look, the Biden administration lied about the crime rates.
		The FBI lied about the crime rates.
		Look at the liars.
		Are they going to say the same thing at the end of this year when the real crime rates come out?
		Oh, the FBI lowered crime rates.
		It's literal propaganda, and it's literally the same propaganda that the Biden administration engaged in.
		And they think you're going to buy it.
		And that's because there are so many people out there that are buying it.
		The Trump groupies.
		Oh, but hey, they did a big drug bust.
		They got meth off the streets.
		All right.
		Thank God those meth heads are going to find meth somewhere else now.
		Now, this is obviously all just trying to run cover and get good press because of the absolute disaster that was the Epstein situation.
		Now, I think, and Alex talked about this yesterday on the show.
		I think we had a great hour and a half here.
		But the more I see, the more I'm reaching the conclusion that, yeah, it looks like Trump is now leveraging the Epstein list.
		Now, I don't support that, just like I don't support the Iran strike propaganda, but the more I see it, the more I see it's basically the Exact same thing.
		Now, who knows about all of this?
		I don't know.
		I would say it's probably a very limited amount of people who actually know what Trump is really doing with this, if that's the case.
		I mean, if they're just totally spiking this thing, then that's totally inexcusable.
		And that's not to say what they're doing now isn't inexcusable to a certain degree either, but at least you see that there's something else going on.
		So I think Trump is leveraging the Epstein list, but I think he's doing it for economic reasons.
		I think he's doing it to leverage it against some of the most powerful people that are on the list, some of the most rich people in all these different sectors and industries to try to bring in investments.
		Now, that might be one angle of it.
		There could be some other angles going on with it, too.
		It's hard to believe they would just totally spike this thing.
		And maybe that's why it's been such a clear body language.
		I mean, you can just see it on Patel.
		You can just see it on Bongino.
		You know, Pam Bondi's kind of like, you know, a nice little golden retriever or something.
		You know, she's nice blonde, kind of a happy-go-lucky smiling everything.
	So you're not really going to see it on her.
	And she might be the only one that even knows.
	I don't know who really knows what's going on.
	But you can see it in the body language.
	It's like, yeah, they're not being honest.
	And they know that you know they're not being honest, but they can't be honest for whatever the reason is.
	So that means that they're either really spiking it, which is just completely inexcusable, or they're leveraging it, which is still inexcusable.
	But I mean, at least you can understand what's going on instead of just saying, well, why are they spiking it?
	This doesn't make sense.
	Microsoft pledges $4 billion towards AI education.
	So you got all this money coming in.
	Maybe that's how Trump is leveraging it.
	And maybe there's some other things Trump is leveraging.
	But you know what?
	It was a total mismeasurement.
	And I don't know.
	I don't necessarily buy the theory that if you do expose all of the pedophiles, if you do expose whoever Jeffrey Epstein was blackmailing or who was ever involved in these weird cults and rituals with the kids and spirit cooking and everything else, that if you reveal all of that, then everything collapses.
	Well, I don't buy that.
	I don't think that that's true.
	I don't see how that wouldn't be a healing process.
	It's like if you get really bad gangrene on your leg and you have to amputate it, it's like, well, if you don't amputate it, then you all die.
	The whole body dies.
	So you got to cut it off.
	So that's not saying, oh, well, if you cut off the leg, you die.
	No, you can't walk.
	And then maybe you can get a prosthetic or something or you're in a wheelchair, but you're not going to die.
	So that's kind of how I feel about the whole Epstein client list, whatever the hell went on on that island, whatever the hell was going on on Zorro Ranch, his New York penthouse, everything else, with all the different intelligence assets, royal family, you name it.
	That's like gangrene of the body politic.
	You got to amputate.
	It's like, yeah, you know what?
	We'll never, yeah, that's going to be, it's going to be a painful thing and it's not good.
	But if you don't, then the whole body politic dies.
	And aren't we kind of seeing that?
	Aren't we kind of seeing that's the case?
	It's like, no, I'm going to leverage the gangrene and I'm going to do a fundraiser.
	Yeah.
	I'm going to use the gangrene and I'm going to do a fundraiser and I'm going to spend some time at the hospital and, you know, get some hospital food and maybe hit on the hospital nurse or something.
	Like, yeah, that's what I'll do.
unidentified		No, it's you got to cut it off.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So it's already spoiled.
		It's already gone up the whole leg.
		It's already getting into the torso and you see what's happening.
		But I look at it as the same way because it's the same response from Trump.
		It's the same thing with Caroline Levitt.
		And I'll even say, I went back as much as possible to figure out, are we really, is Caroline Levitt not wearing the crucifix really that big of a thing?
		And I went back and I found some other instances where she wasn't wearing it at just other events or other moments.
		Most people that wear a crucifix like that, myself included, it just never comes off.
		It's just, it's just, you always wear it.
		So I found a couple other things that weren't just political things, but just other events she was at or whatever where she didn't have it.
		But specifically, when it came to the press conferences, and I looked as many as I could, I only found one other press conference.
		I only found one other press conference when she didn't have the crucifix on, and that was the Iran strike press conference.
		And when you look at Trump with the response to the Iran strikes, hey, we blew it up.
		Shut up.
		Shut up.
		We blew it up.
		Well, okay, that's because he got a deal done.
		And whether the thing was blown up or not, the propaganda is we blew it up.
		It's over.
		The deal is done.
		So it might be completely destroyed.
		Maybe uranium was there.
		Maybe it wasn't.
		Maybe they can get it back.
		It's not even about that.
		The deal was, we blew it up.
		This is what it takes to get peace.
		So shut up.
		That's the deal.
		And now I see the exact same thing going on with Caroline Levitt at the press conference with the Epstein debacle.
		And I see the same thing going on with President Trump saying, just shut up.
		Saying, just shut up.
		In other words, look, Epstein is taken care of.
		He's not running his operation anymore.
		And the people that were his clients, they're in our control now.
		All right.
		The deal is done.
		We got him now.
		We lassoed them now.
		They're off.
		The thing's shut down.
		So just shut up and let Me operate.
		Well, I can't deal like that.
		I'm not going to deal like that.
		I'll tell you what I think is going on.
		You can decide whether you like it or not, but that's how I see it.
		Hey, shut up about the Iran strikes.
		It's done.
		The ceasefire, the peace deal, which is not even true, but shut up.
		We're not getting any more involvement.
		Just shut up.
		We destroyed the base.
		You got it?
		It's good.
		We're not getting involved.
		Just shut up.
		Okay.
		Hey, just shut up about the Epstein list.
		All right?
		We took care of him.
		He's done.
		He's not running the deal anymore.
		All of his clients are all lassoed, all corralled, whatever.
		He's dead.
	Like, just shut up.
	Stop making a big deal of it.
	I got the thing.
	It's in my control now.
	It's like, yeah, we might be lying about the Iran strikes, but shut up.
	It's for a good reason.
	Yeah, we might be lying about the Epstein list, but shut up.
	It's for a good reason.
	So you can like it.
	You cannot like it.
	But that's what I see going on.
	And I'm not going to sit here and carry water or engage in propaganda for anybody.
	So that's how I operate.
	Oh, boy.
	Well, I don't think I'll be burning any MAGA hats.
	But I guess that's the new trend, guys.
	I saw Fuentes say that the other day.
	I don't know if he started that trend or what.
	I'm not going to be doing that because I still want Trump to succeed and I still want to get things going on the right path.
	And I think we can still do it.
	But we're really, I mean, we are flying really close to the sun here.
	I mean, we're close to becoming the Icarus of political movements.
	Now, I want to play a couple clips in regards to this dealing with this whole Epstein thing.
	And guys, I just sent you a post from JD Vance in 2021.
	It's just so bad.
	It's such a PR disaster.
	It's so much worse than the Iran strikes.
	It's just.
	And like I said, I'd say I'm 75% conclusive that it's the same thing being run where Trump is, he's in control in his own way, but he has to have, he basically has to do political propaganda to have it under control.
	This was J.D. Vance, September 2021.
	Remember when we learned that our wealthiest and most powerful people were connected to a guy who ran a literal child sex trafficking ring, and then that guy mysteriously died in a jail and how we just don't talk about it?
	I remember.
	I remember all too well.
	And so I don't think it was some intentional Streisand effect with Trump.
	Because, I mean, you could argue the Epstein list is now as big a story as ever.
	I mean, this is definitely like, I mean, when it comes to the Epstein story as a trend, I mean, easily top five.
	The day he died in jail, probably number one.
	This is probably number two, I would say.
	Because it only gets more human interest.
	So you could even argue it's number one.
	But everybody knew it.
	And that's why it's just such a disaster of a PR campaign because everybody knew it.
	And I understand even to a certain extent why the Trump administration, who's ever running this PR, whether it's Trump himself or if there's other people in there kind of helping to manipulate it and navigate it, I could understand why they thought they could treat us like liberals do and just tell their people, hey, two men can have a baby.
	Oh, yeah, sure they can.
unidentified		Yep.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Hey, Joe Biden's sharper than ever.
		Damn right he is.
		Hell yeah.
		Hey, Joe Biden's noble.
		He's given it to Kamala Harris.
		That's the future.
		Kamala was always the future.
		It's like, that's the left.
		You can't do that on the right.
		But it's not even about the right.
		This is an awakening.
		This is a renaissance.
		This isn't even about the left or right.
		This is a political awakening, a political renaissance.
		But I get it.
		There's all these Trump sycophants and Trump fanboys and the people that wear the Trump jerseys and that they've built an entire personality off of it and it's all they have.
		And so it's like, that's why, that's why the administration figured they could do this.
		But they tremendously mismeasured.
		Tremendously.
		Because not everybody here is just some right-wing sycophant.
		And I would say you're, I mean, you want to talk about the MAGA base, I'd say you're close to a 50-50 split.
		I don't know, maybe 40, 60, but let's say conservatively, 40% of the people in MAGA straight up aren't buying any of it.
		40% of the people in MAGA aren't going to buy and sell your propaganda.
		They're not going to eat your political slop that you put on the table.
		It ain't happening.
		It's easily observable now.
		So it's a tremendous mismeasurement.
		You probably could have righted the ship after the disaster of the Axios leak, which is still the giant mystery here, by the way.
		Who leaked it to Axios?
		Why did they edit the document?
		Why did they publish it on a Sunday night on 4th of July weekend?
		So who's even doing that?
		Why was it written like a defendant of an Epstein client would want it to be written to exonerate them for the entire future?
		But then you think, okay, well, they put the memo out to exonerate the clients.
		Trump comes out, says, stop talking about it.
		So is that Trump's side of the deal?
		It's like, all right, I'm in control of them now.
		They're going to do what I want.
		But my end of the bargain is I'm shutting it down.
		And maybe that's why he's so tenacious about it.
		He's saying, hey, stop it.
		It's like, hey, the Iran strikes were successful.
		Stop it.
		Just doesn't work.
		Just doesn't work.
		And everybody knew he was an intelligence asset.
		And there's Pam Bondi playing the role of Dumb Blonde.
		I mean, maybe that's intentional, or maybe that's another Susie Wiles deal.
		But let's get to these clips.
		This is four years before Epstein got arrested.
		Donald Trump talking on a newscast about Epstein in Clip 9.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		Bill Clinton.
		Nice guy.
		Got a lot of problems coming up, in my opinion, with the famous island with Jeffrey Epstein.
		A lot of problems.
unidentified		You raised the question of Jeffrey Epstein in your remarks in the Q ⁇ A. I think he's got a problem.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		What do you think?
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		I don't know, but that island was really a cesspool.
		There's no question about it.
		Just as Prince Andrew, he'll tell you about it.
		The island was an absolute cesspool.
unidentified		So he's been there for many times.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		I can't say friends, but I know them.
unidentified		They're friendly.
unidentified		You know them.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		You play at my clubs a lot.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		I have clubs, and everybody likes to play them.
unidentified		Are you saying this is a political problem for her if she runs for president?
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		It could be a political problem.
		Look, he could be a political problem.
		Right now, he's Teflon, and right now, maybe not, but he could end up being a political problem.
unidentified		That's one question.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So Trump knew it all along.
		And again, I could play these clips for days.
		I kind of just have been spattering them into every broadcast.
		We may continue that for the near future.
		But I noticed something about this Bongino clip as it's another one that's been going viral.
		They played it earlier today.
		I wasn't going to play it, but then I heard it earlier today and I said, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
		You know, that moment.
		And I had that moment.
		It's beyond just the body language shift, which is obvious.
		And, you know, maybe I should just push pause for a second here, too, because as I'm racking my brain about this last night, and I'm thinking about all the different angles, you know, it kind of gets talked about a little bit, but who knows who actually had to go through those files?
		Assuming somebody did.
		Let's assume they're being honest about that.
		Let's assume they're being honest and somebody had to go through all the files and the videotapes and everything else.
		Well, I can't even I don't even want to fathom that.
		So we know exactly what we know exactly what I'm talking about here.
		You can't even say it.
		Let alone actually having to go through it and comb through it.
		So you think about whoever had to go through it or the multiple people that had to go through it or the different flow of information and processing and everything to deal with this stuff.
		I can't even imagine that.
		And so maybe a little more courtesy despite the outrage here, because somebody actually had to go through that crap.
		Whether it was Bondi or Bongino or Patel, I don't know.
		The insinuation is that all three of them kind of did.
		But it's like, how much of that can you really even take?
unidentified		It's like...
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I get inundated on my phone.
		I can't even keep up with messages and then on X and everything else.
		And that's just, that's just normal conversations.
		I can't even keep up with basic communications on my phone.
		I'm just sitting here with emails and messages and social media.
		It's just like even, it's like just that is overwhelming.
		I can't even imagine sitting here and staring at a terabyte of the most disgusting stuff in the world and then having to actually go through and process that.
		I can't even.
		So maybe there is a level of courtesy if they had to go through that and maybe that's the body language and maybe that has something to do with it.
		And then if, I mean, who knows?
		The cover-up could have been done a long time ago.
		The cover-up could have been going on before Epstein even got arrested.
		The stuff that he might have had, maybe it really was just his personal little stash.
		And maybe the real blackmail operation is not even in the country.
		Maybe the real blackmail operation wasn't even on any of Epstein's properties.
		And maybe any connections to any of that were all severed before anybody could even figure it out.
		So I'm just trying to go through all the angles of this, and I still land on the same conclusion that whatever they could, Trump would leverage, but it's not going to go away no matter what.
		But okay, here's the Bongino clip.
		And obviously the body language here is just, you know, this is a man who's doing well.
		He's got one of the top podcasts.
		He's very popular.
		And he's pretty, I mean, very well liked in the MAGA movement, in the Trump sphere.
		And he's talking about Epstein.
		And, you know, this is a happy man.
		This is a man enjoying life.
		Haven't seen that since he's become the FBI director for whatever reason.
		But here's this clip, and I'm going to tell you what I think happened here, and nobody else has said it, but I'll go ahead and say it here.
		Go ahead and play clip 10.
dan bongino ▲ ● ▼		About a year and a half after that, I'm in a green room at Fox, and I'm not going to say who because they didn't give me permission to share it, but to show a story, but not who they are.
		Says, you know, Epstein's an intelligence asset for people in the Middle East, right?
		I'm like, no, I didn't know that.
		I'm like, you sure of that?
		The person, let's say, is like, I'm absolutely sure of that, that he's either a witting or unwitting asset, intelligence asset.
		Meaning his plane and that island, the cameras, there's a big assumption out there that these videotapes were exclusively In the custody of Epstein.
		That's a huge mistake.
		The reason they wanted this story to go away is because there's an assumption, like, oh, yeah, Epstein had him.
		No, he wasn't the only one who had him, according to this source.
		These assets, that's why this blackmail story makes so much sense.
		Which Middle Eastern countries are they are?
		I don't know, but this person who's a very, very good reporter, I mean, ACEs, right?
		Swore Epstein was either a witting or unwitting intelligence asset.
		And they may have had his plane wired up, and they're the ones who have all this stuff.
		So the point is, to sum it up, how do you know some of these countries aren't going to some of these power players who aren't making decisions?
		Because, hey, he wouldn't want this video out there, right?
		How do you know?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		100%.
unidentified		I mean, let's get perfect.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Now, that makes sense.
		And if you follow that scent, then you could actually say, okay, maybe Epstein only had his own stash.
		And Epstein wasn't really running the blackmail operation.
		He was just kind of the, he was just the source for it.
		He was the guy with the island.
		He was the guy with the connection.
		He was the, you know, financier.
		They say financier, some made-up word for, you know, blackmail pimp.
		But so, okay, I could see that.
		Epstein wasn't harboring the blackmail himself.
		And if you think about it, if there is some massive intelligence operation going down, you're not going to put all this, you're not going to let Epstein handle all of that.
		Yeah, he'll have the compounds.
		He'll have the actual playgrounds that they go to and engage in all the stuff and have all the cameras and the videotapes, but he's not holding on to that.
		No way.
		First of all, he'd already been arrested.
		He was already a known pedophile.
		So they're not going to stash the whole blackmail operation.
		They're not going to put all their eggs in the Epstein basket.
		So, okay, maybe his stash was all that they did find.
		But that doesn't change the fact that they're running cover now for the intelligence operation that it was, as Bon Gino says in the Middle East.
unidentified		Oh, yeah, gee, I wonder who that could be.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Now, here's where I will maybe take a reach.
		I've been to the Fox News TV studios in New York and D.C. And there are people that hang out in the green room.
		And do you know who I saw?
		You know who I met in the green room?
		Pam Bondi.
		That's who I met.
		That's where I met Pam Bondi in the Fox News Green Room.
		Do you think Bongino was talking about Bondi?
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Bondi?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I don't know.
		But I didn't catch it the first time or first 10 times, however many times you've heard it recently.
		And then it hit me today for some reason when they played it on the Alex Jones show.
		I'm like, oh my gosh.
		When I was at the Fox News studio, both times I was there with Roger Stone, and it was Pam Bonnie was always there.
		She's just like hanging out there.
		Now, Pam Bondi was the Florida Attorney General.
		Epstein went through the Florida justice system.
		She might know a thing or two about that.
		So I'm connecting the dots here.
		And again, from meeting Pam Bonnie, she is a very sweet, very sweet lady, very talkative, very social.
		I could easily see her.
		You sit down next to Bonjino.
		Oh, yeah, Dan.
		Oh, yeah, yeah.
		Oh, I've seen the Epstein stuff.
		Oh, he's definitely connected to intelligence.
		Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
		That's just kind of how she is.
		And for some reason, it just hit me when I heard it then.
		I'm like, oh, my gosh, I think he's talking about Bondi.
		And really, it all makes sense.
		Bonnie's always at Fox.
		She was the Florida Attorney General.
		Epstein went through that justice system.
		She could have assets to information on that.
		She probably has other sources too.
		Now, I'm assuming it's Bondi.
		I'd say that's the odds on favor, but I don't know that.
		But I heard that and I was like, oh my gosh, could that have been Pam Bondi?
		And then you hear all the other Bondi statements and you hear the Bondi undercover tape and it's just like, yeah.
		Sounds like it was Bondi.
		I don't think it was Amy Roebach from ABC News who was bitching in 2016 about how the network spiked the Epstein story.
		And we all assume that was to protect Hillary Clinton during the election, maybe some royal family influence, but they spiked it.
		She was on the hidden tape admitting it.
		They spiked the story then.
		But I don't think it was Roebuck.
		She was at ABC News.
		I don't even know where she's at anymore.
		I don't even see her anywhere.
unidentified		Who else would it be?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		There's a couple of the names I can think of, but no, I don't think they're talking to my ear.
		No, they don't hang out in the green room.
		The show hosts, the talent, they don't hang out in the green room.
		The people that hang out in the green room are either there with other people like I was with Roger or guests that are just waiting to either go into makeup or to go on set.
		But then there's this clip.
		I don't know.
		How can it not be relevant?
		How can this clip of Dan Bongino, and I think Dan Bongino is an honest person.
		Maybe he's being forced to do dishonest things now that he's the deputy director of the FBI.
		I guess that comes with the territory of working for the government or the FBI.
		I guess you have to be a liar, so that sucks, but you took the job.
		But I think he's honest when he says this in clip 11.
unidentified		That's right.
unidentified		What causes dear to your heart?
dan bongino ▲ ● ▼		Causes dear to my Israel.
dan bongino ▲ ● ▼		The fence of Israel.
unidentified		What is number one?
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Hmm.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Is that concerning to you?
		So you've got Netanyahu in town, conveniently.
		You've got Israel dictating our foreign policy.
		You've got the FBI deputy director who says Israel is the number one thing near and dear to his heart, defense of Israel.
		You've got the Epstein files, which are likely probably in a Mossad headquarters.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Yeah.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Pretty clear what's going on here.
		And you want some Netanyahu footage?
		We'll have some of that.
		He's having a great time at the White House today, by the way.
		Him and Mike Johnson just really, just loving it.
		How about Cash Battelle with Glenn Beck?
		I mean, it doesn't get any more ridiculous, folks.
		These clips just keep, the receipts just keep coming on this story.
		Here it is, clip 12.
glenn beck ▲ ● ▼		So who has Jeffrey Epstein's FBI?
glenn beck ▲ ● ▼		But who?
kash patel ▲ ● ▼		That is, I mean, there's- Just like the manifesto from the Nashville school shooting of the Catholic schools.
		We still haven't seen that, right?
		It's not the Nashville police or PD saying we don't want this out.
		The FBI airmailed into that operation and said, this is not getting out.
		Because they do that because this is another government gangster operation.
		All these local law enforcement communities get funding from the DOJ and FBI for critical programs.
		And if you don't cooperate, you're not getting your million dollars for this.
		And you're not getting your, and that's a lot of money to these local districts.
		That's how they play the game.
		That's why you don't have the black book.
glenn beck ▲ ● ▼		But the black book is not just sitting, I mean, that's Hoover power times 10.
kash patel ▲ ● ▼		And to me, that's a thing I think President Trump should run on.
		On day one, roll out the black book.
		And not just that.
		On day one, roll out all of the text message communications we were told were deleted.
		On day one, play the rest of the video of the pipe bummer.
		On day, you know, he need, one of the reforms I talk about in government gangsters is you need a central node to be continuously declassifying.
		This is another thing they do.
		They overclassify.
		And I'm telling you, as the former number two in the IC, they overclassify 50% of the stuff there to protect the deep state.
		Oh no, you can't see that.
		Nothing to see here.
		Gino was a master at it, of doing it.
		And we still haven't seen half of the Russian Gate report that we wrote.
		Still under lock and key on how the ICA was originally constructed.
		We went, we put 10,000 man hours against John Brennan's team that did it.
		And we found out why they came up with their bogus conclusion.
		But we couldn't sell it to the world because we couldn't talk about it.
		And the government gangsters came in and buried it.
		All of these things, there needs to be a continuing central power, whether it's the White House or off-site that says every request that comes in, just right out the door, as long as it's not a major threat to national security.
unidentified		I mean, what else needs to be said?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		What else needs to be said?
		By the way, the Israeli prime minister account just said, congrats to Patel and Bongino.
		I look forward to working with you to strengthen our cooperation.
		Oh, that was right after they were confirmed, sworn in.
		So, yeah, it's pretty obvious what's going on.
		Ensuring transparent government.
		Now, again, I don't, all the stuff you're seeing on X, I still trust.
		Do you?
		That's all paid propaganda, folks.
		It's just, it's a political TV commercial on social media.
		But I don't think Ann Bongino is a liar.
		I don't think Cash Patel is a liar.
		I don't think Pam Bondi is a liar.
		And I think based off of all their statements in the past, they reached the same conclusions that everybody else reached.
		So you have to ask, what changed?
		What changed?
		They didn't just become liars overnight.
		Sometimes honest people lie.
		Sometimes good people have to do bad things.
		So the question is why.
		And the only logical conclusion I think with the best odds I can reach is that, yes, whatever access or whatever knowledge they have of the Epstein clients is now being used by the Trump administration or by Trump himself.
		And he's told the three of them, it's over.
		It's done.
		And you can just see it in their face.
		You can see it in their eyes.
		You can just feel it in their heart of hearts that they're being forced to lie to us.
		And they know their audience, Bongino's audience, Patel's audience, maybe not the Fox News audience, but so I don't know about Bondi's audience, but Patel, Bongino's audience are smart people.
		And they know, just like Bongino and Patel know, that Epstein was a foreign asset, maybe a CIA asset as well, double agent, triple agent, whatever, running this ring to blackmail the most powerful people in the most powerful institutions in the world.
		And they all know it.
		But for whatever reason, they've now been told it's over and you're declaring it over and we're shutting the case.
		And it pains them because they know they're lying and they know that we know they're lying.
		And I don't think they're bad people.
		But this is the operation.
		For whatever reason, that's what's going on.
		All right, still a lot of news to cover today from the White House.
		And then we're going to have the CEO of a cloud seating company to talk about all this weather.
		And really, and I've seen some of the other interviews he did, and he's kind enough to come on today.
		And actually, he's going to be coming into Austin tomorrow.
		So he'll actually be in studio tomorrow as well.
		But I said, hey, let's just get you on today.
		Let's, you know, this story is hot right now.
		So really, and I've seen some of the other interviews that he's done talking about the effects of cloud seeding and, you know, could the floods be a result of it?
		And he doesn't Think so.
		But really, I think I want to talk to him about the process, the science of it, because it's really just about this has been denied for all of these years, and it's true, it's real.
		And so he can just confirm it and say how it's done.
		And you could argue it's a good thing.
		I mean, imagine you use it for a good thing.
		You master this, and you turn a desert into a farmland.
		And that's kind of what they want to do.
		But it's a hard science to master.
		But he'll talk about all that.
		So we got that coming up.
		Other news out of the White House, big stack of geopolitical news as well.
		Ladies and gentlemen, remember to support us by shopping at thealxjonstore.com.
		And these are the times that InfoWars is built for.
		I truly believe that.
		And some of the best Alex Jones shows have been happening lately.
		And I'm really proud of the work that myself and this crew has been doing and Harrison Smith in the morning.
		So we really appreciate you shopping at thealxjonstore.com to keep us on the air.
		And we really want to give a big shout out to our VIP members, thealxjonesstore.com slash VIP.
		When you become a VIP member, benefits include, but not limited to, monthly membership credits, bonus entries into all of our raffles and giveaways, which, by the way, right now, Ford F250 Lariat Truck, that is the current raffle giveaway, the Ford F250 Lariat Truck plus 10K cash.
		But you get bonus entries when you shop at theAlexjonStore.com, when you're a VIP member, free shipping on orders of $99 and more, and other benefits.
		So you can find out all about that.
		Become a member at thealxjonstore.com.
	But when you do shop at the store, whether you're a VIP member or not, every purchase gets multiple entries into the raffle.
	So anybody that shops there, you qualify to win.
	Best of luck.
	We hope you get lucky.
	Who knows?
	You could just buy one hat.
	Some guy just bought a flag.
	One, a truck.
	So have fun and support us by shopping at thealxjonestore.com.
	And, you know, we got a lot of fun apparel out there.
	A lot of classic InfoWars apparel, Pro-America apparel.
	We have a sale right now on one of our limited edition silver coins.
	Buy one, get one 50% off.
	We have the brand new power plant advanced adoptogen complex.
	Oh, buy three, get one free silver coins.
	That's happening all week long.
	You've got a free frog plush with orders of $75 or more.
	So all kinds of sales, all kinds of fun things happening right now at thealexjonestore.com.
	And we appreciate your continued support there.
	We hope you buy a health supplement from us for your own health and support the transmission.
	If you like some of the t-shirts that we have there, we hope you buy those and wear them out, help support and spread the word.
	And it's your support there that keeps us on the air.
	ThealexjonStore.com.
	Very appreciative of all of that support.
	We really mean that.
	All right.
	A little comedy here.
	Well, I guess I've gone long here.
	Secretary Noam, guys, go ahead.
	Just give me a, we're celebrating here.
	It's the golden age.
	Clip six.
kristi noem ▲ ● ▼		With this no-shoes policy, we anticipate that Americans and travelers and those coming into our country will be very excited that they will no longer have to remove their shoes.
kristi noem ▲ ● ▼		The one thing that I will say is that doesn't mean that there won't be times once in a while where someone will have to remove their shoes.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So you do have to remember.
kristi noem ▲ ● ▼		Put into a different situation or need additional layers of screening where that may be asked of them.
unidentified		That's good.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So thank you.
		Thank you, DHS Barbie.
		Looking good.
		So, oh, it's the golden age.
		You don't have to remove your shoes anymore, but actually, you might actually still have to remove your shoes.
		It's all very fun.
		What a joke.
		Okay, so I actually talked to a couple different people today and last night trying to connect some dots about what's going on in the administration and then who's to blame and who's not.
		I think everybody's concluded Pam Bondi is a complete disaster.
		So who brought her in?
		I've been consistent.
		I've said I've never called for Patel or Vangino to be removed.
		I've said, I think that they should stay.
		I don't know if you're going to do much better than that.
		Now, again, I'm not in the business of trust.
		Show me results.
		And I think they're probably, you know, they probably got their arm twisted behind their back to put out political propaganda right now.
		But they are doing a lot of great work.
		There's no denying that.
		Trying to distract from the Epstein debacle by claiming all these other victories, that's just not going to work.
		But I think everybody's concluded that Pam Bondi is a complete mess, that she's just in way over her head.
		But I don't think Bongino and Patel should necessarily go anywhere.
		Now, they might.
		They might just be nauseous and think, well, now we're losing credibility having to carry water for the administration.
		So maybe they don't want to be there anymore.
		But that's kind of a different story.
		So I'm talking to people last night.
		I talked to a couple of you this morning.
		And then I noticed there's definitely something going on here.
		Because again, I do, I'll do like 5%, 10% of the coverage here, like media critiquing.
		Because I think it's an important thing to study the media and follow trends and directions, sometimes even report it to you.
		So after some conversations I had last night and this morning, and then I noticed, well, I kind of actually noticed it.
		It started happening last week, but now it got even louder.
		And that is people starting to say Susie Wiles is a big problem.
		And I'm not going to get into all the wonk of it.
		I'm not going to get into all the stuff that I've been sent.
		I got a couple of things on my desk that I can show you that might be concerning.
		And I don't want to really throw anybody under the bus right now that might change.
		But I will say, to her credit, and Trump called her the most powerful woman in the world, and there's no doubt Susie Wiles is very savvy.
		Very savvy.
		I mean, there's a reason why Trump brought her in.
		I mean, this is a very savvy, smart woman.
		she knows how to run the show.
		Let's say it like that.
		So, you know, out of, you know, give credit where credit is due, Susie Wiles knows how to run a show, and she's running the show.
		And it looks like Susie is really basically gatekeeping Trump and having her hand in pretty much everything the administration does, who gets access, who gets in, who doesn't, who gets sidelined, who doesn't, who gets prioritized, who doesn't.
		Now, what's driving these decisions from Susie Wiles?
		I don't know.
		Maybe, and this is why this is the only piece that I'm going to bring up today because this is going to be a sustained pressure campaign.
		I'll just put it to you like this.
		You know, I've talked to people in D.C. that have much better sources than me and do much deeper research and have much more access than I have.
		And I think a few of these people are like, I don't want to hurt myself.
		So will you cover this type of thing?
		And then after watching some of the reporting last night and watching some of the reporting today, it even got brought up on the Alex Jones show.
		I don't coordinate with them.
		So that's what tells me there's a sustained pressure campaign from the inside.
		Hey, start saying Susie Weil's name.
		And the people that have the access and the people that are actually in there with the sources, they don't want to come out because they need to protect themselves or they need to protect their status.
		So they're just kind of sending out the smoke signals to other people in the media like, hey, start saying Susie Wiles.
		Hey, start saying Susie Wiles.
		Hey, do you see this?
		That's Susie Wiles.
		Hey, do you see that?
		That's Susie Wiles.
	Hey, who do you think brought in Bondi?
	Hey, who do you think's controlling Trump?
	Hey, who do you think's gatekeeping?
	It's like Susie Wiles.
	Start saying the name.
	So I saw that trend happening.
	So obviously I'm not the only one that got that message.
	And again, I just got stacks of incoming on this.
	I'm not going to bring you all the wonk, but you might start saying, well, why, what is driving this decisions that Susie Wiles is making?
	Like, whose decision is it to sideline Tulsi Gabbard?
	Or whose decision is it to bring in Pam Bondi?
	Or whose decision is it to leak stuff to Axios?
	Or whose decision is it to have basically a junkyard dog out there that would normally not get any access to the Trump administration, except Susie is kind of controlling this person, and this person remains loyal to Susie when normally this junkyard dog would bite anybody's ass.
	But then this comes out, and it's Max Blumenthal with Gray Zone, and then some other people reporting it.
	White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles has isolated Trump among Mossad stenographers like Ratcliffe while excluding Tulsi Gabbard from briefings.
	Well, it turns out Susie Wiles has a long history with Israel, including running Netanyahu's 2020 reelection campaign.
	It also turns out with Ballard partners, she was in cahoots with the Likud party in Israel as well, which is also connected to Pam Bondi.
	Now, again, I kind of look at Pam Bondi like, you know, a cute little golden retriever that just kind of smiles.
	And, you know, I don't know, just kind of head in the sky, kind of like the legally blonde thing, kind of ditzy, you know, kind of the blonde stereotype, very nice lady.
	But it's like, oh, you know, she's taking money from Qatar.
	Oh, she's over here working with Israel.
	I think she's just kind of like, oh, like smiley, happy, like, oh, goes wherever, you know, wherever the sun is shining.
	Because she's the only one in the administration that isn't showing concerning body language.
	And I just think because it's, you know, it's not all connecting.
	So I just ask then, what is driving the decision Susie Wiles is making?
	And then you find out, oh, she worked with the Likud and Netanyahu.
	Maybe that explains a thing or two.
	But then, because it all falls back on Trump, well, why did he bring her in?
	Because that's a little interesting one.
	So I can tell, though, now there is a request from D.C. start saying her name.
	So I'm not like, you know, I haven't decided I want to pick a fight with Susie Wiles.
	But when people start reaching out to me and saying, hey, look, this is what's going on.
	It's time to start saying her name.
	And then just sending me these just, I mean, just massive downloads of information.
	And then I see other people in the independent press, likely similar, if not same sources.
	And now that they're talking about Susan Wallace, I'm like, yeah, okay.
	Okay.
	There's something going on here.
	But then you see the connection to Israel and you say, ah, now maybe it makes some sense.
	Okay, but speaking of Israel, and Mike Johnson, boy, was he, I don't know if I've ever seen Mike Johnson happier than he was today.
	Meeting with Netanyahu.
	I mean, he was like a dog at a dog park with a box of tennis balls, man.
	This guy.
	Oh, he had the honor of welcoming his good friend, Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu.
	You know, it's so embarrassing.
	It's just, it's so embarrassing.
	It's just so embarrassing, man.
	It's like Bibi Netanyahu telling Trump he's nominating him for the Nobel Peace Prize.
	This guy's literally wanted for war crimes.
	This guy's country is bombing.
	I can't even, how many different countries they're bombing.
	They're killing 100,000 people in the Middle East.
	And it's just like, it's literally just like wiping his ass on Trump's face.
	I mean, it's just disgusting.
	And Trump just sits there and takes it.
	I don't know why.
	He takes it from this creep.
	Talk about a creep.
	Yeah, Epstein's a creep.
	Yeah, so is Netanyahu.
	Oh, but they all love him in D.C. Oh, man, do they love him in D.C. Yeah, the whole world is sick of Netanyahu.
	The vast majority of countries on this planet want Netanyahu tried for war crimes.
	He can't even travel to most of these countries because he'd be arrested, the International Criminal Court, the UN, the rest of it.
	But man, do American politicians love this guy?
	If there's a smudge on Netanyahu's shoe, they'll get down on their knees and lick it clean.
	Netanyahu, I'm recommending you for the Nobel Peace Prize.
	Oh, yeah, and Jeffrey Epstein is recommending you for babysitter of the year.
	It's just disgusting.
	It's really just so embarrassing, man.
	It's just so embarrassing.
	And it's not even the small window with Netanyahu.
	It's the fact that this guy's been lying to us for 30 years, and Trump knows it.
	Hey, well, you know, Q always said Israel last.
	Or was it always Israel first?
	Now, as if it wasn't enough, the Israeli flags, they're back in the Capitol, folks.
	They're back in the Capitol.
	Let's see here.
	Here's Netanyahu meeting with Trump's cabinet and U.S. Defense Secretary Hexeth, just because they got to feed him.
	They got to feed him the Mossad propaganda.
	They're probably in there telling him, hey, you didn't destroy the nuclear sites.
	Hey, we need regime change.
	Hey, we need more war.
	Hey, we need more weapons.
	Hey, we need more money.
	So everybody get down and kiss the feet of Netanyahu as he demands more support, more money, more aid.
	And then they get the Israeli flags all over the capital.
	It's just a nice reminder.
	It's just a nice reminder of what America first really means, what Make America Great Again really represents.
	So just to let you know, guys, give me clip 13.
	Oh, yes, we're all laughing.
unidentified		Thank you.
benjamin netanyahu ▲ ● ▼		Absolute thanks and gratitude and admiration for the US military, for the Secretary of Defense and the President of the United States.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I'm just disgusted.
benjamin netanyahu ▲ ● ▼		Magnificent.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		You have the gratitude.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		He's got his little puppet Ratcliffe sitting next to him.
benjamin netanyahu ▲ ● ▼		I think of many, many others around the world.
benjamin netanyahu ▲ ● ▼		First thing, thank you.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Thank you.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Well, thank you.
unidentified		And I appreciate there's a reason I pointed at Eric.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I just can't believe it.
		I'm just sickened.
		Get it off the screen.
unidentified		I'm just disgusted.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		This is so embarrassing for our country.
		So embarrassing.
		You know, it's almost in a way it's worse than the Epstein files, to be honest.
		Because geopolitically, the Epstein files, most of the world, most of the politicians are probably just going to shrug their shoulders and just, you know, whatever.
		But to sit here and bring in this known liar, to sit here and bring in this warmonger, this filthy, disgusting Netanyahu, to sit here and praise him and fly the Israeli flag in our White House and our Capitol, it is the most embarrassing thing.
		It is more embarrassing than the Epstein cover-up.
		I'm sorry.
		It just is.
		It's a disgusting look.
		It's just an absolute disgusting, despicable look to have that warmonger parading around our Capitol and our Congress and our White House running the show.
		Potentially the most evil man on the planet, folks.
		And we have to kiss his ass.
		Potentially the most evil man in the world whose military likely has the highest kill count death ratio in the world against people that can't even defend themselves.
		They don't even, they release the prisoners that rape the Palestinians.
		They say, oh, no, you can do that.
		Yeah, rape them, let them out.
		And we welcome this warmonger?
		We welcome this despicable, disgusting human being, not just with open arms.
		We get down on our knees and kiss his feet.
		It's more embarrassing than the Epstein list.
		Oh my God, just one after the other.
		Oh, don't talk about the Epstein list.
		And here comes Netanyahu.
		Here come the Israeli flags.
		I'm just sickened.
		I'm just disgusted.
		I'd rather have Epstein in the White House.
		I'm not even kidding you.
		I would rather have Jeffrey Epstein running around the White House at this point than that sick freak.
		I don't know.
		Maybe that's a stretch.
		Maybe that's over-emotional, but ugh.
		So here you go.
		But don't worry, because we're going to double down on our commitment to fight anti-Semitism.
		Clip eight.
unidentified		Mr. President, your administration took new actions against Harvard University today.
unidentified		Are you still optimistic about reaching a deal with the university?
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		Oh, yeah, I think so.
		Harvard's been very bad, totally anti-Semitic.
		And yeah, they'll absolutely reach a deal.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, they've been anti-white.
		They've been anti-Asian.
		You know what's funny?
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		I don't even.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Crew, do you want to green light me?
		Should I get really politically incorrect here?
		Yeah, oh, what do you know?
		They all support it.
unidentified		Yeah.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		You know what's funny?
		I don't even know if I want to go there.
		But you talk about Harvard as maybe an example.
		You know what's funny?
		And I hate to even do this, but it's just true.
		If you're Jewish or you're black in America, you have the easiest course in front of you.
		It's the easiest course to be effective.
		It's the easiest track to success.
		In some instances, you might not even have to earn it or work for it.
		They'll just give it to you in some cases.
		But that's just the truth.
		And that's not to say you don't have to deal with racism or anti-Semitism or any other problems that every other human being on earth has to deal with, okay, before the tears start crying.
		But no, it hit me.
		It's like, no, really, if you're a white American or an Asian American or a Hispanic American, you actually have to work harder than anyone else to earn your keep in this country.
		That is just true.
		But there's all kinds of institutional benefits if you're Jewish.
		There's all kinds of handouts and institutional benefits if you're black.
		But if you're white, if you're Asian, if you're Hispanic, you got to work like doubly, triply, quadruply as hard just to be successful.
		And honestly, I don't even care.
		I really don't even mind it.
		I don't even like getting into this stuff because I'm nobody's victim and I don't mind working hard.
		I enjoy it.
		And then earning it makes it even feel better.
		But it's just true.
		It's just true.
		I mean, my God, folks, if I was a Jewish woman, even if I had just a little cleavage, I could intermedia tomorrow and have network news deals and 10 different contracts in a month.
		Oh, yeah.
		Oh, yeah.
		Hell, if I was a black woman, I could be constitutionally illiterate.
		I end up on the Supreme Court.
		All right.
		Okay, let's just back off, shall we?
		Let's just calm down.
		Oh, but see, then you've got this concert with this Israeli rapper, Noam Surreali.
		And again, I don't even care about this stuff.
		I just look for consistency here.
		So, hey, look, you chant death to the IDF.
		You're a jerk.
		You're an a-hole.
		You're going to lose all of your contracts and you're the bad guy.
		By the way, the same guy, Ben, I forget Ben Danger or some, forget the guy's name.
		He's always been an anti-white racist.
		He has, you know, it's always anti-white racism.
		That's okay.
		But the minute you say something negative about Israel, now you lose all of your deals.
		So that doesn't prove any of the conspiracy theories at all.
		But then this guy has a show, and he's doing a performance here, and he has the Gaza rubble behind him, and they're celebrating how Israel has completely leveled the Gaza Strip, and it shows him going in there, getting ready to kill the Palestinians, and there's bombing the Bajibis out of it.
		And it's like, oh, that's cool.
		Yeah, he's not going to lose any record deals.
		He's not going to lose any contracts.
		He's going to lose any tour dates.
		So it's like, hey, we're going to celebrate how the IDF has completely destroyed an entire portion, if not the entire Gaza Strip, killing at least 50,000, maybe 100, who really knows?
		So it's like that we can celebrate.
		We're literally going to put war images and death images and everything else, and that's cool, and bombs blowing up, and we're going to glorify that.
		But if you dare say something about the IDF, you're going to lose your tour dates.
		You're going to lose your contracts.
		You're going to lose your record deals.
		And so that's just because there is no Jewish conspiracy, though.
		Boy, we're getting real.
		What's that?
		Oh, shut it down.
		Oh, shut it down.
		We got to shut it down, guys.
		We got to shut it down.
	Well, that's too bad, actually.
	Maybe I should do that, guys.
	What if I maybe the shekels would start coming in?
	Do you think if we just, because I was actually, I was telling this to the crew, I can't do the White House background anymore because I feel we've lost the White House now.
	So in case you've noticed, I do normally select my own backgrounds.
	I get a little, you know, I try to get as much creative control over the show as I can, but there's only so much you can do.
	But I was like, I can't do the White House background anymore.
	I feel like we've lost the White House, so I can't do that.
	So I kind of went with this cloudy background.
	I don't know.
	We need to get a new one.
	But maybe, you know, I apologize to Netanyahu.
	Can I get Netanyahu's shoe in here for me to clean?
	Do we have a shoe or like a suit or anything or like a tie?
	Is there something I can clean of Netanyahu's here?
	Or maybe there's like another, maybe there's another IDF.
	You ever notice these IDF girls?
	It's all Israel propaganda, but you ever notice how these IDF girls, they all pop up on social media with their big, their big fake boobs and their star of David Necklace and they're telling you to forget about the Epstein files and they're telling you how the IDF is perfect and it's the most moral army in the world and all this stuff.
	And I've never seen any military propaganda ever like this, except like there was the one joke, there was some like, I don't even know if it was real, but there was some like little American military girl.
	It was like one girl, but she was never naked.
	She was always in uniform, but it was kind of this thing like they were using this one girl to like try to get American military recruitment up, but she was always clothed.
	But have you ever noticed?
	You have all of these female IDF girls with fake boobs and a star of David necklace, and they literally do these selfie videos, like these Instagram shoots, and they, and they're literally almost like boobs totally out.
	Have you ever seen this?
	I've never seen anything like it.
	And look, I mean, I'm, you know, I'm, there's no doubt where I stand as a heterosexual here.
	Okay.
	So I could say, wow, hey, good looking women there.
	But it's just like, I've never seen anything like it.
	And it was all over X in the last 48 hours.
	I mean, these girls are walking around in like tiny little spaghetti straps, starved David, like, you know, bouncing up and down, like, oh, the IDF is great.
	Like, oh, move on from the Epstein files.
	Like, oh, my gosh.
	That's what we've deduced ourselves to here.
	That's what we're going to, that's, that's the level of propaganda we're at here?
	Okay.
	All right, we are joined now by Augustus Dorico, CEO of Rainmaker, rainmaker.com.
	And you may be familiar with this.
	He's been doing quite a few interviews lately.
	And then also, you know, some of the deals that his company has been making in state, specifically in Texas with all the flooding going on.
	So his company has been getting a lot of notoriety here.
	And I actually, you know, tip my cap.
	He's very transparent.
	He's been, I don't know how many interviews he's done on this.
	But, you know, just a quick update here, because I think this is, you know, this is the big story.
	All of this flooding going on, the big story in Texas, obviously, Texas flooding more than 170 missing, at least 118 dead.
	There are parts of Texas folks that they're just not getting any help.
	People are literally stranded.
	The bridges are out.
	Texas authorities deflect questions about weather monitoring.
	Nowhere to be found.
	Disaster workers slam slow walking over flood response.
	Oh, I won't even get into that.
	Maybe we'll do that later.
	Oh, boy.
	Children evacuated from Boys and Girls Club.
	This is in Oklahoma.
	There's flooding.
	In Chicago, there's flooding.
	In New Mexico, there's flooding.
	In North Carolina, there's flooding.
	And so there's reason why people are suspicious about cloud seeding operations and the flooding.
	And I mean, truth be told, it might not have anything to do with internal operations.
	Who knows?
	Maybe there's some weather warfare going on with China or something else.
	We know they tried to poison our farmland with this mold virus.
	So maybe they're just hammering us with rain.
	I don't know.
	But joining me now, CEO of Rainmaker, Augustus DeRico.
	Let's do this, Augustus, because I think the more important angle for me to bring to my audience is for you to talk about the science behind cloud seeding, what your company does, because for so many years, people would say it's not real.
	It's not going on, even though they could literally see it in the skies.
	And I know there's a bunch of different programs that are run.
	But talk about your company, what your company does, and the science behind cloud seeding.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, yeah, absolutely.
		And thanks for having me on, Owen.
		For all the people that were told for years that weather modification wasn't real and that it was impossible, I feel bad for them because they were right.
		And I'm trying to be as transparent as possible about that because I think the only way that we'll be able to build trust in this technology and potentially get the upsides from it is if we are totally transparent.
		And I'll continue to be transparent.
		If you have questions, then I'll try to field them as much as I can both on this interview and then online.
		But what cloud seeding is, is mimicking, intentionally mimicking natural precipitation processes.
		So clouds that have water droplets in them don't always precipitate, right?
		And so the ones that do precipitate generally precipitate because there's small dust particles in the cloud that the water freezes onto or condenses onto and then grows into big enough droplets or ice crystals such that they become heavy enough to fall.
		In the case of our operation, we use a material called silver iodide.
		It has a crystalline structure that's similar to ice.
		And so we'll use radar to identify a cloud that has liquid water in it that's not naturally precipitating and then fly either our drones or our plane into that cloud, disperse a de minimis amount of material, like 50 grams, which is about, you know, like eight to 10 Skittles worth, into the cloud, which then disperses throughout it, freezes the liquid in it into snowflakes, which then become big enough to start falling and melt back into rain.
		And the last thing that I'll say about that is one of the reasons why we haven't had weather modification programs throughout the U.S. in the last couple decades is because without the appropriate radar, without what's called dual polarization radar, you're not able to differentiate between liquid and ice.
		And now that we have that, we can show where there is ice forming in the area of the cloud that we seeded and then measure how much of the precipitation is man-made.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, I mean, the way you describe it, it sounds pretty simple.
		Obviously, it's not necessarily a simple thing to do, but is it really, I guess, is it really that easy?
		You just say, here's the chemical substance we need.
		Here's the drop target location.
		And you just give it the green light.
		And then what happens next?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		For the sake of communicating clearly, I guess I will am probably leaving out some of the more complicated parts, but it is everything that I said there is essentially how it works.
		The part that might be more complicated is figuring out where there is what's called supercooled liquid water in these clouds.
		So water doesn't freeze immediately when it gets to 32 degrees Fahrenheit, right?
		Like have you ever seen the experiment, if you've ever seen the sort of at-home experiment where you put a bottle of water in a freezer, you leave it there, you take it out, it's still liquid and you shake it and it all freezes at once.
		Well, that water is actually below 32 degrees Fahrenheit.
		And so in these clouds where there is super cooled liquid, so water that's below zero degrees Celsius, it isn't instantaneously freezing.
		And that's part of why it's not growing into bigger snowflakes.
		We have to use both fairly complicated radar processing algorithms and then also weather models and probes on our drones to identify where the super cooled liquid water is in cloud.
		And so without all of that, not just any cloud can you make rain and only in some of these clouds and of those clouds that you can induce precipitation in, the precipitation is de minimis relative to the flooding that we saw.
		Like the biggest and best cloud seeding operations that we've seen in academia or at Rainmaker produce tens of millions of gallons of precipitation over hundreds of square miles.
		Hopefully we can get better than that in the future.
		But right now, relative to the trillions of gallons that came down during that event, I don't know how to produce yields like that.
		It's also worth saying really briefly, cloud seeding requires an existing cloud with lots of liquid in it.
		If you see a long streak in the sky right behind an airplane, that isn't cloud seeding.
		That could be something.
		I'm totally open-minded to the notion that it's not just a contrail, but I haven't seen evidence of that yet and totally welcome information to the contrary.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		You know what?
		I'm glad that you point that out.
		And I don't really, I don't think it's worth our time here today to get into chemtrails versus contrails, because as you're pointing out, what you're doing is a totally different operation.
		And you're not spraying aluminum or barium or lithium into the atmosphere.
		So that's a totally different thing.
		So I'm glad that you actually clarified that.
		And I maybe want to get into some of the other weather phenomenons that you guys can either successfully engage in or not, because here's the way I look at it.
		You look at something Elon Musk is doing like Neuralink, and I say, well, I'm not necessarily somebody that likes that technology or the idea of microchipping.
		But at the same time, if I get in a car accident and say I lose my ability to operate my legs, and if I can have some sort of a Neuralink and all of a sudden I can walk again, well, I mean, how can I not support that?
		How can I not consider that a good thing?
		So I kind of see it the same way with cloud seeding.
		It's like, well, I guess somebody could say you could have weather warfare, right?
		And maybe not do what you're doing.
		But somebody that wanted to do something bad and cause a flood, say do a thousand Skittles worth of this into an atmosphere versus, hey, we've got a bunch of desert land over here.
		Why don't we try to turn it into a rich farmland?
		It's like, well, that's a good thing.
		We can have a higher crop yield.
		So I guess, you know, is that the ultimate goal?
		Like, what is it?
		What is it?
		What is the goal of Rainmaker?
		It's not just to have more precipitation, right?
		I mean, there's a goal.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, yeah.
		It's a question of what the precipitation is for, right?
		And that kind of gets into who our customers are.
		And right now, our customers are individual farming interests, like individual farms and also county governments, state governments.
		We don't do any work.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So you work private and public?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		The private farms fund the public county-wide programs.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Okay.
		Okay.
		So is that mostly then?
		It's mostly agricultural or have you expanded and like if there's a drought or anything or is it strictly agricultural?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		So it's for rain directly onto crops and then snowpack onto mountains that runs off into reservoirs and streams as well.
		And rain can be useful for aquifer recharge too.
		Because with the Ogallala aquifer in Texas, you have some pretty serious drawdown that's making wells run dry.
		But if we have measured and responsibly increased precipitation, we can refill those aquifers so that not just we, but the generations of Americans to come can benefit from them.
		And I don't think that this should be taken lightly, right?
		Like you mentioned that there's good and bad types of medical interventions.
		There's the good potential for cloud seeding where we make more water to help have America's, to help make America's agricultural sector and wildlife as abundant as possible.
		And then there's the irresponsible way to use this technology.
		And I think that if we ban this technology, not only do we deprive ourselves of the good outcome, right, where we make more water for people that need it, but we also lose out on the ability to like monitor and regulate people that may be doing this nefariously.
		So for example, China has a $1.4 billion budget for their weather modification program annually.
		They have 35,000 employees in their weather modification bureau, and they have two universities with accredited bachelor's degrees in weather engineering, not meteorology or atmospheric science, but in weather engineering.
		They're actively turning deserts in China green by making it rain more.
		And so why should Americans and American farmers be deprived of more water when our near-peer adversaries, and I'm not a China hawk, right?
		But why should we deprive ourselves of water when other countries are investing so heavily in this?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		You know, and I'm curious too, is this the kind of thing, because you mentioned aquifers.
		Have you done any work in California?
		And I know that they were cutting off their own water supply.
		So it's kind of a different, it's a different issue.
		But have they ever thought about, hey, why don't we try to use something like this to refill our aquifers or in like these times of great droughts that lead to wildfires?
		Have these ideas ever been floated?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		So we work with two cities in California, both Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo, to make more water for their municipal utilities and government.
		But it's not nearly as ubiquitous as it should be, right?
		Like all of these state governments from California to Utah and states throughout the country, they're actively paying farmers not to farm so that they don't consume water, right?
		That's one of these degrowth policies that I think is against like any abundance agenda and probably is a waste of taxpayer dollars relative to just making more water.
		And again, if we're going to make more water via cloud seeding, it should be done with regulation and oversight and reporting.
		But yeah, California would benefit from making more water with this, as would every other state in the American West.
		And even states like Georgia, right?
		Georgia routinely has crop failures due to drought.
		Florida had 30,000 acres of farmland burned down because of drought just in Miami-Dade County in April.
		And so even in these wetter states, banning this technology wholesale is depriving people of the option to use it responsibly.
		And again, that isn't to say that like geoengineering should be permissible.
		Cloud seeding is localized weather modification that you can turn off or turn off or turn on or turn off as you choose.
		But solar radiation modification is a different technology that is intended to put reflective particles in the upper atmosphere to dim the sun and cool the planet down.
		Should that be treated differently than cloud seeding?
		Yeah, absolutely.
		But banning both of them just because they're both in the atmosphere doesn't make sense.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, and I think that this is why it's so important for you to make that distinction.
		And even when you talk about it, when you do see, because I think that that's mostly the agenda here is to block the sun.
		When you do see these things that I refer to as chemtrails, we're not talking about like eight Skittles worth of a substance.
		We're talking about like eight trillion Skittles worth of a substance.
		So there is an important distinction there that we don't have to spend too much time on.
		We may get into it again.
		But let me ask you a couple other questions just about kind of you and your company.
		When did you first get started in doing this?
		You look like you're a pretty young guy.
		How long have you been doing this?
		How long has Rainmaker been around?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, so I'm 25 years old.
		I guess it's probably worth saying again, just for the sake of transparency, I'm a teal fellow because I dropped out of college and started a company.
		And so, a lot of people have said that I'm either some sort of plant or fall guy for some other larger agenda.
		Um, I certainly hope that's not the case.
		I don't think that's the case.
		But to get back to your question on, you know, why I'm doing this, how I started doing this, I was studying physics for my undergrad.
		And then when the pandemic happened, I was at Berkeley, and Berkeley was just a nightmare.
		You might actually find this funny.
		I was president of Turning Point USA there for a time and then had to leave because I didn't agree with a lot of what they were doing even then.
		And they've come around a little bit since.
		But I left Berkeley because it was a nightmare.
		I moved to Texas, the suburbs of Fort Worth.
		I dropped out of college and built my first company, which was a groundwater monitoring startup so we could track how much water farmers were using so that they knew how much to irrigate.
		And then every single farmer that I talked to said, hey, it's great.
		I know how much water I'm using, but really I just want more.
		If you could just make more water, that would solve most of my problems.
		And so I looked at, you know, desalination.
		That one's pretty obvious, right?
		When people talk about water scarcity, they often say, well, why don't we just desalinate more and then pump it inland?
		And I'm totally pro-desal.
		Like, I think we should make water through a variety of ways.
		I'm very pro-regenerative agriculture, but you can desalinate in Houston.
		You can desalinate in Los Angeles.
		Cities like Las Vegas and Phoenix and Dallas and Salt Lake City and Denver, I could name way more.
		You can't build a thousand mile pipeline, eminent domain, all of the land that would be required to do that and then maintain it without spending tens of billions or hundreds of billions of dollars on that infrastructure.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Just so people clarify here before you go any further, what you're talking about, because people always ask the question, they're like, well, how can California have droughts?
		They're literally on an ocean.
		Well, this is why, because they're not doing the desalinization.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, yeah, yeah.
		They don't.
		The California Coastal Commission routinely blocks desalination projects.
		And should we build more?
		Absolutely.
		And even if we do, though, 13% of all of the electricity in California is used just to move water around, mostly around the Central Valley.
		So if you're trying to get more water inland, if you're trying to get more water into like the inland empire, then you can do desalin.
		I think we should, but it's so expensive and it takes years.
		And cloud seeding, we can deploy for orders of magnitude, less cost, and make more water wherever you are in the country as long as there are clouds.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Now, what is it?
		You say as long as there are clouds, but it's not like something you can just say, okay, we're going right here.
		Like there has to be a specific, what is it, a specific atmosphere, a specific dew point?
		Or what is like, what are the specifics where you can measure and say, okay, here's a place where we can go right now?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, yeah.
		So first of all, there has to be a cloud.
		Then if there is a cloud, there has to be super cooled liquid water in it.
		So some clouds have just a little bit of water and maybe it's above 32 degrees Fahrenheit.
		If the clouds are too warm, no dice, can't do anything.
		If the clouds are all ice, then you can't freeze any of that ice into larger snowflakes that will then precipitate.
		So we have to use radar and satellite imagery to find where these clouds are, find super cool liquid water within them, and then you can enhance precipitation.
		But this isn't a silver bullet.
		It's not magic.
		We can't make rain anywhere on command.
		And we have to work with the amount of water that's in the atmosphere.
		But that being said, when we talk about orders of magnitude and scale, the Colorado River has about 20,000 cubic feet per second of water flowing through it.
		A single atmospheric river has about 2 million cubic feet per second flowing through it.
		There is a ton of water up in the atmosphere that we're just letting dissipate and get recycled by the ocean.
		And if we're comfortable modifying God's creation right now by desalinating, taking the water that God put in the ocean and making it less salty, if we're comfortable pumping groundwater where God placed it up to the surface, and if we're comfortable redirecting the natural flow of rivers with dams, then this way of modifying the water cycle, I totally understand how like messing with the weather seems like a touchy thing and it should be regulated as such.
		But it is fundamentally similar insofar as it's just adjusting the water cycle for humans and the environment's interest.
		And, you know, all of this comes from a perspective of stewardship.
		I'm lucky enough to have gotten baptized and saved when I was 20.
		And I am doing everything in my interest to help, as far as I can tell, serve God.
		And I'm totally open to scrutiny and welcome prayer so that I might and all the other people at Rainmaker might do this prayerfully and for everybody's benefit maximally.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, I'd say, you know, coming on InfoWars obviously opens you up for scrutiny.
		So you weren't afraid to come on here.
		So I'd say that that's, you know, that's that's proof enough that you're willing to be transparent and face tough questions potentially.
		But it sounds like to me that at least what you're doing, at least what Rainmaker is doing, is so localized.
		Do you even believe that what you're doing could even really cause a flood like what we're seeing?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Nothing like what we're seeing.
		No.
		We can't juice clouds for nearly as much water as they produced in this past flood.
		The trillions of gallons that were dumped were like a million, that's a million times greater than the amount of water that we can produce from any given cloud seeding event.
		And also, like it does make, we can make it rain more, right?
		That is true.
		And that means that if there has been a flood or if there is like severe risk of a flood or if the reservoirs are already full or if the soil is so saturated from previous rains that more rain would cause flooding, you shouldn't produce more, right?
		Like Texas doesn't need more rain right now.
		We're indefinitely suspended in Texas until all of the first responders have finished working and as many people have been saved as possible.
		So the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, they actually dictate when you're allowed to operate and when you're not.
		And if there are any of those conditions that I mentioned before, then you're not allowed to operate.
		And we proactively, even before we got notice to stop suspended operations for the sake of mitigating risk.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Have you ever Worked with the Texas weather modification program.
		Is that who you're involved with when you run these things?
		And if so, when did that relationship begin?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		So those are all customers of ours.
unidentified		Yeah.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		So the South Texas Weather Modification Association, West Texas Weather Modification Association.
		And I know you went to their hearings, actually.
		And maybe if you want to come to this year's one, I'll meet you in person there.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		That would be great.
		Actually, I would love to.
		And that's kind of why I brought this up because, and obviously you weren't there.
		Your company wasn't even invented.
		I think the one that I went to was in 2018, I believe it was.
		And there was some severe flooding just outside of Houston.
		And I don't know how much information you have on this or you don't, but there was severe flooding outside of Houston and farmlands.
		It was all agricultural lands.
		It wasn't really residential stuff.
		But it actually ended up hurting the crop yield.
		And so at the hearing that I went to, and they published the whole thing.
		I guess they do them once a year.
		Is that right?
		I think they have them once a year.
		Yeah.
		So they published them on YouTube.
		And the guy who was the head of the program at that time, and he was very transparent too.
		He answered many questions from me afterwards.
		But basically what they were saying was, yeah, well, we ran this program in these farmlands and we kind of over-measured and we did too much.
		We ended up hurting the crop yield instead of helping it because we overdid a little bit.
		So we're remeasuring everything.
		So, I mean, I really, I found the whole thing very transparent.
		And maybe there still is a distinction between that operation and then whatever else goes on with the aluminum and barium and everything else, whether it's NASA or whoever else sprays that.
		But I found him to be very honest and very transparent.
		So, but I'm just curious, do you know of any other programs that the Texas weather modification operations are working or have worked in in the past?
		Have they canceled them?
		Have they doubled down?
		How much about that do you know?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		So it used to be way bigger in the early 2000s.
		But because people didn't have the appropriate radar up until like 2017 to like really robustly measure what the effect was, you could do some statistical validations, just like measuring increases in precipitation relative to historic amounts.
		But it wasn't until relatively recently that it became much, much, much more clearly measurable what the effects were.
		And so even though it was huge in the early 2000s, it largely dissipated.
		There's one other company called Seeding Operations and Atmospheric Research.
		I know the guy that runs it.
		He operates far north in like the Rolling Plains weatherman associated.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Sore?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Nice.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Yep.
unidentified		Yeah.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Solid name.
		I mean, Rainmaker, Sore, they're both pretty on the nose.
		And, you know, he's caught a ton of flack in the last couple of days.
		And he was, again, like us, totally uninvolved with the flooding.
		He's kind of just like a nice old dude.
		I won't say his name for the sake of avoiding anybody harassing him right now.
		But there's that other company in Texas.
		And then really like the near-peer competitor, both to my business and the United States is the Beijing Weather Modification Office.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		But of course, they're doing this at like 100x the scale, and they're running a completely different operation.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And if I'm not mistaking, don't they run some of their technology just right off the ground?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, so they have every they're experimenting with every single kind of cloud seeding that they can.
		They have retrofitted the equivalent of the MQ-9 Reaper, like the Chinese version, which is called the Winglong 2.
		They've retrofitted their military drones for cloud seating operations.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So those are like much bigger than your drones, obviously.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, those are essentially unmanned planes.
		Now they're doing that.
		They have artillery barrages where they'll blast silver iodide munitions into clouds from cannons.
		They also have ground generators, which are essentially small smokestacks that if a cloud hits a mountain and the ground generators in the cloud itself, you can release silver iodide directly into it that way.
		They're, like I said, spending over a billion dollars a year on this.
		And not only are they doing it in China, but they are collaborating and exporting their tech throughout Southeast Asia and increasingly in the Middle East.
		And so you can think about like which country, you can think about why it would matter whether China or another country is producing the water and the weather for our allies and potentially adversaries.
		And I would prefer to live in a world where there's an American company that's regulated by the American government that has to transparently provide data to the American people rather than one where it's banned wholesale here and China has total dominion over the weather, both in China itself and then the rest of the world.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, and I got a couple more questions for you here.
		We're up against a break.
		Can you stick around for another segment?
		Okay, perfect.
		Because I think about it like this too.
		We have an issue, let's say, where, okay, we need more food.
		Well, the answer, the solution to that issue in the past has been, okay, we want GMO crops and we have these different chemicals that we spray on the crops.
		Well, we've figured it out that that's actually an unhealthy alternative.
		While it might solve the problem of food, there's an unhealthy side effect to that.
		So if we can have a better program to say, well, we can just grow more food with more water, I think that would be a more healthy alternative.
		All right, with me for a couple more minutes here, Augustus DeRico, CEO of Rainmaker, Rainmaker.com.
		And I really appreciate him actually doing the media tours and being fully transparent about this.
		Because one, we do need to differentiate between cloud seeding, geoengineering, chemtrailing.
		And look, I'm all about technology as a tool can be used for good or evil.
		And so the better understanding we have of it and the more we're able to have a transparent communication about it, the better we can make sure that it's actually used for good instead of evil.
		So certainly you can understand how this could be used for good, but you can certainly understand how it could be used for potential evil as well.
		Short segment here, we may keep you a little bit longer.
		Let me ask you this.
		What kind of, if any, like, do you know of any negative side effects, like maybe say to the atmosphere or to the ground?
		How much studied have potential negative side effects of cloud seeding?
		How much studying or knowledge of that do we have?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, there's two questions that usually come up, right?
		The first one is: Are you polluting?
		And this comes up with the Make America Healthy Again crowd a lot.
		And I'm happy to talk to them too.
		Because cloud seeding isn't new, because it's existed in the United States for almost 100 years, we have longitudinal data on the accumulation of silver iodide in the watersheds where cloud seeding is occurring.
		And for context, in American soil, it varies a little bit state to state, but in American soil, there's about two parts per million of silver species, so different kinds of silver.
		After decades of cloud seeding operations from the 40s through 2000, I think, 17 is when this study was conducted, you've only seen an increase in eight parts per trillion of silver iodide in that soil.
		So about a million times less than what's already naturally there.
		So there's been no adverse ecological, agricultural, or human health impacts.
		That being said, just because of the, because of our interest in proactively trying to mitigate any risks that could come up in the future, and just candidly, like bad PR, right?
		Like people give us flack for using silver iodide all the time.
		I'm totally in favor of developing even more pure organic biodegradable materials beyond silver iodide, even if it is totally safe.
		So that one comes up.
		Then the second one is, you know, if you're making it precipitate more here, surely you're stealing water from somebody else.
		And only 7% give or take of all of the water that traverses the atmosphere over the United States precipitates over it.
		The rest just dissipates and gets recycled by the oceans.
		And so is it correct to identify that there's a finite amount of water in the atmosphere that we can bring down via cloud seeding?
		Totally.
		But there's about 10 times more up there than is coming down.
		And we're a long ways away, years away from having to decide who has cloud water rights the way that we have over rivers.
		But that begets the reason why we should have regulation around this, because eventually cloud water rights will matter.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		What about other weather phenomena?
		I mean, I suppose there'd be no purpose of trying to create snow or hail.
		I don't know, maybe a ski resort calls you up, but is that something you guys can do?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		We actually make a lot more snow than we do rain.
		So there are ski resorts that are customers of ours because we make snowpack for them.
		Then snowpack in the Rocky Mountain West and in California, it melts and then runs off and supplies all of the rivers and ponds and melts into the aquifers during the less rainy seasons of the year, right?
		Like the dead of summer, the early fall.
		And so snowpack enhancement is as, if not more useful than rain enhancement for that reason.
		So the two things that we're engaged in now are making slightly more rain and making slightly more snow.
		Other cloud seeding experiments have been conducted to try to suppress hail to reduce the amount of damage done by that.
		I think the science is out on that.
		I think the science is also out on trying to mitigate severe weather.
		But like if we're trying to be good stewards of creation with caution, like it makes sense to research that in a very, very cautious way with regulations and outside of the bounds of where anybody's living.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		But I guess it goes back to the last question too.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So when you test the water that gets produced by this, you know, any danger levels or indicators there that there could be an issue?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		No.
		So when you disperse silver iodide in the cloud, you create these initial snowflakes around the silver iodide particle, but then those break apart, create even more snowflakes, and you have this secondary, tertiary chain reaction.
		The water that we get from cloud seeding is chemically indistinguishable from natural rain because of how little silver iodide we're emitting relative to how much precipitation comes down.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Okay, short break here.
		Just a couple other questions on the other side.
		We'll be right back.
		All right, just a couple more minutes here with my guest, Augustus DeRico from Rainmaker, talking about cloud seeding here.
		All right, Augustus, could you make it rain so much in Washington, D.C. that we actually drain the swamp?
		No, I'm just kidding.
		I'm just kidding.
		It's a joke, guys.
		Everybody relax.
		They'll be coming after you for that.
		No, actually, a little more fun one for you.
		Have you ever seen the new Twister movie?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Oh, yeah.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I would imagine that was probably an interesting movie for you.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		The team at Rainmaker loves that movie, and our operations feel a lot like the scenes from Twisters.
		And interestingly, the science of that was only like 70% correct, but solidly enough that it was definitely cool for all of us to watch.
		It's a great movie.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Do you think that is a potential that we could stop a hurricane from being so devastating, stop a tornado from being so devastating?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Do you think that's something science could do?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		So, Owen, have you ever heard of Project Storm Fury?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I don't, not off the top of my head.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Okay, so back in the middle of the last century, the U.S. Weather Bureau, which was the precursor to NOAA, in conjunction with the U.S. Air Force, was flying out into the Atlantic to seed hurricanes to precipitate water out of them and also reduce the velocity of the storm so that when it hit the eastern seaboard, it wouldn't do as much damage.
		Now, the problem with those programs is we didn't have the radar at the time or the satellite imagery to measure what the effect was.
		That being said, the atmosphere is just comprised of like physical and chemical problems, right?
		There's just physics and chemistry.
		So is it a simple problem?
		Is it anywhere close to being solved?
		Do I know how to solve for this?
		No, certainly not.
		But insofar as it's just physics, I think it's at least worth our time in considering the ability and the potential to mitigate severe weather.
		And like Indonesia does this already.
		Thailand has something called the Thai Royal Rainmaking Department, if I'm not mistaken.
		And they are trying to do flood mitigation, as is China.
		So is it something that Rainmaker has the capacity to do?
		Is it something that I'm convinced of the science on yet?
		No, but like, is it something that's physically potentially possible?
unidentified		Absolutely.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Now, I know that this stuff has been around for a while.
		Your company, obviously, relatively new to all of this.
		Where do you see this ultimately going?
		How much control and success do you think not just Rainmaker, but just this general science can have in the future?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, so it's not magic, right?
		You cannot snap into existence a cloud anywhere you want and make it rain or snow anywhere you want.
		You can't stop any given tornado At any given moment.
		However, what we're working towards, what we're aspiring to, is a United States, particularly an American West, and then a world writ large that is as green and lush and abundant as possible.
		And so, if you use cloud seeding to produce more water, right, for farms and for ecosystems and for our industry and residences that consume it in conjunction with a bunch of other technologies, then you could change ecosystems for the better.
		First and foremost, we're just trying to get back to baseline, make sure that we have enough water for our current demand and relative to our historic supply.
		But long term, you know, if we have a desert, and we should think about this prayerfully and do a bunch of modeling still, but if you do have a desert and you were to cloud seed to produce more water and you were to conduct regenerative agriculture practices to plant grasses to retain the water from cloud seeding, you could increase the carrying capacity and the density of like biological matter in that area to make it more green.
		And if you think about the Central Valley of California, that's what we did.
		The Central Valley of California used to be a mix of desert and swampland.
		And because we had the will and the desire to steward nature and engineer stuff, we created the California Central Water Project, which now has made it the most productive agricultural region in California, one of the most productive in the world.
		Trending towards that level of abundance is what I'm interested in at Rainmaker.
		And I think that cloud seeding writ large, if you use it with other technologies, can bring that future about.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah.
		And you regenerative farming is so key.
		I wish we'd really make that more of a priority here.
		And of course, you know, you do need farmers that know how to do it.
		And you do need cows and other animals that you have to kind of train to do it as well.
		But I do think it ultimately, if we're looking at the best outcome, the most productive outcome, I think that that's what it is.
		I think it's combining this technology with regenerative farming.
		And really, you master that, you can turn just about anywhere into an agriculture powerhouse.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, yeah, right.
		And why would we want to deprive ourselves of more agricultural production, cheaper food, higher quality food?
		That seems like it's in America's interest.
		And again, right, like should this stuff be regulated?
		Is there, you know, it's a good question.
		Is there enough oversight from the federal government in weather modification right now?
		There is the Weather Modification Reporting Act of 1972, but that's 50 years old, right?
		The technology has changed in meaningful ways since then.
		I think there should totally be more oversight for this tech.
		But right now, if we do deploy it and we deploy it well with regulatory scrutiny, I think that we'll have a much more prosperous country.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, I appreciate you coming on today.
		And I know you're going to be in studio tomorrow.
		And, you know, you're doing your company a great service.
		And I think you're doing the technology a great service as well, being so transparent and really a good communicator as well.
		So thank you, Augustus, for bringing this to everybody's attention.
		And we'll be talking again soon.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Thanks, man.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Godspeed.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		All right.
		There he goes.
		I don't know any.
		I don't think there was a stone left unturned there.
		I think we pretty much covered it all.
		And, you know, just so people understand, you know, they are reaching out to do interviews.
		So they're really trying to make sure everybody understands what's going on here.
		So I think that, you know, that's an utmost effort for transparency.
		You have to respect that.
		Still have debates about the technology or whether you like it or not.
		But I respect the transparency.
		I think it was a very good interview to understand the technology.
		All right.
		I've got a, now not so good of a communicator on this is Greg Abbott.
		This is just yikes dealing with what's going on here in Texas.
		Before we get to that and some of the other news on my desk, though, the brand new product right now at thealxjonstore.com, latest, greatest power plant.
		That's right.
		Power plant, advanced adaptogen complex, designed for real performance, plant-based energy, adapt to stress, and hormone system balance.
		Now, this just hit thealexjonestore.com.
		And you can save 50% when you subscribe right now for auto ship at thealixjonesdore.com.
		So you can get a deep discount on many of our health supplements, by the way.
		But 50% right now at thealxjonstore.com when you subscribe.
		And so why subscribe?
		Well, not just the 50% off, but also you get auto-ship and guaranteed in stock.
		So a lot of our supplements will sell out and then we have to make another purchase.
		But if you're a subscriber, then we always keep it in stock for you.
		So we always make sure we have enough in stock for our subscribers.
		So you get the big discount, you get the auto ship.
		You don't have to worry about buying it when you run out.
		It'll always be there for you and it stays in stock.
		So that's what we try to do to promote the subscriptions there.
		And you get the best deal possible on these health products.
		So you can check into that with any of our health products right now, subscribing for that discount up to 50%.
		But that's the deal right now with PowerPlant.
		And of course, remember, you can get other advantages and discounts and bonuses on the raffles and giveaways when you become a VIP member at thealxjonstore.com slash VIP.
		Benefits include, but not limited to, monthly membership credits, bonus entries into our raffles and giveaways, free shipping on all orders over $99, and so much more.
		Go to thealxjonstore.com slash VIP for more information on that.
		And we really want to thank our VIP members.
		It's that sustained membership that benefits us and keeps us on air and budgets us into the future.
		And so we really appreciate that.
		And with some of these sales, like the 4th of July sale we just did, the 50% off for subscription sales, the margins are really thin.
		So we really have to generate big numbers of sales for the thin margins.
		But it's the VIP members and that sustained membership that does budget us into the future.
		We really appreciate that.
		The alexjonestore.com slash VIP.
		All right.
		This is a complete disaster.
		Governor Greg Abbott, who's not that great.
		And he had a press conference, and the people that are suffering from the flooding, they're already pissed off enough.
		And then he just had this disaster of a press conference here, and now they're even more upset.
		So here it is in clip five.
greg abbot ▲ ● ▼		An investigation.
		We know a special session's coming in about 10 days.
		That's where I would say where it begins.
		Kenley, those investigations will begin by both the House and Senate before we go into session.
		So probably beginning later this week or the early part of next week, there'll be committees formed that are already kind of working on ideas about ways to address this.
		Second part of the question needs to be addressed.
		You ask, I'm going to use your words.
		Who's to blame?
		Know this.
		That's the word choice of losers.
		Let me explain one thing about Texas, and that is Texas, every square inch of our state, cares about football.
		You could be in Hunt, Texas, Huntsville, Texas, Houston, Texas, any size community that care about football.
		High school, Friday Night Lights, college football, or pro.
		And know this.
		Every football team makes mistakes.
		The losing teams are the ones that try to point out who's to blame.
		The championship teams are the ones that say, don't worry about it, man, we got this.
		We're going to make sure that we go score again, that we're going to win this game.
		The way winners talk is not to point fingers.
		They talk about solutions.
		What Texas is all about is solutions.
		In fact, I want to read you something that I received last night that's worth emphasizing to put this in context.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Rainful music
greg abbot ▲ ● ▼		Tragedy has come.
		That part is done.
		What we do now, who we are now, that's what the story is still being written.
		Let it be one of grace, of grit, of fierce love in the face of grief.
		Let it be the kind of story that proves that the Hill Country may flood, but it does not fail.
		Say what you will about Texas, but when the rivers rise, so do we.
		Not with blame, not with bitterness, but with boots on the ground, arms around strangers, and hearts wide open.
		That's the Texas I know, and that's the America that I believe in.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Now, just listening to that, you might just get a hint about what a disaster this has been.
		And I'm not just talking about the natural disaster of the flooding where, I mean, folks, there's a reason you're not seeing much video.
		You can't even get to the areas.
		The bridges are out.
		There's virtually no air support.
		And like, you can't even get materials in.
		You can't get out.
		People are literally stranded.
		There's no power.
		There's flood zones where you're still up to your knees in water.
		A lot of the infrastructure is not operable.
		Some people's houses are still underwater.
unidentified		And it's bad.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Some people's houses have been totally destroyed.
		And all they can do is walk across these creeks and rivers.
		And then they just have to go somewhere.
		And then they're just there.
		And they don't know when they can go back home.
		The rain is still coming.
		The Army Corps of Engineers is out there.
		And they've shut down these bridges.
		But that's all they have.
		Now, I've talked to some people that are stranded, and I've got a bunch of videos that I suppose I could be posting on my ex.
		It's just, again, as you're so inundated, it's just like, you know, if I had eight arms, maybe I could do it all.
		But you're getting some of the footage here.
		The crew is pulling it up.
		Great job, guys.
		It's, folks, it's bad.
		I mean, it is a true disaster.
		And we're talking about still potentially hundreds of people that are missing and there's just really no help in sight.
		And so they're just saying, well, what the hell's going on?
		And Abbott has no answers.
		Abbott has no answers.
		Now, the media can fly a helicopter over.
		And so, you know, people, look, I hate to sound like a broken record, but, you know, somebody attacked me the other day and said, oh, well, you know, if Schroer was in charge, then Russia would have taken Ukraine and Iran would have nukes and Israel would be attacked by whatever.
		And I'm sitting here and I'm saying, okay, yeah.
		And America would be more rich and more prosperous and safer than ever before.
		So you keep prioritizing foreign countries.
		I'll keep prioritizing America.
		And this is a perfect example right here.
		This is a perfect example.
		And they can make all the measurements because I know how it goes.
		And, you know, I have talked to other people that are in the know and they're saying, look, the decision's been made.
		It's not worth it.
		So you might have a couple thousand people that are stranded out here and they just say they're not worth it.
		Now you tell that to the people that are stranded and don't know what they're going to be doing for the next couple weeks or months that have lost everything, missing family, missing kids, and the decision's been made.
		It's just, well, it's just, it's just, it's not worth it.
		And Greg Abbott comes out and says, oh, well, you're like a losing football team.
unidentified		What?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		They don't have electricity.
		They don't have running water.
		They're literally trapped.
		Some of them are having to live in a home with no water except the flood water and no electricity.
		Eventually you run out of food.
		Eventually you run out of water.
		And the only help that's coming in is volunteers.
		And even that is so minimal because what are you going to do?
		They can't really traverse the Area on a boat.
		So they literally have to carry stuff across a shattered bridge if they can even get access to that if it's not shut down.
		Now, I believe my last guess, and you can determine whatever you want, but I believe my last guessed that what their operations are doing have nothing to do with this.
		And I think that it's pretty clear that the amount of modification that they're engaged in is minimal and cannot cause something like this.
		But that doesn't mean there's not other stuff going on that we might not know about.
		And I can't help but sit here and be curious when I look at all the flooding that's going on and think, what is, this is, there's no way it's natural.
		In July, July, one of the driest months of the year.
		So I don't think it has anything to do with a Texas weather modification program.
		Like maybe things have happened in the past that went wrong and then they come out and they address it in a hearing.
		Because again, from my experience, I have never gotten a bad vibe from anybody that's involved in the Texas weather modification program.
		They've been very transparent and they always answer the questions and they'll admit when they get something wrong.
		Now, I attack it from the angle of people that say, oh, there's no such thing.
		It doesn't exist.
		And I say, well, that's bullcrap.
		It's literally public information.
		So don't be such a fool.
		They've caught Chinese bioterrorists, multiple Chinese bioterrorists, and they come in here with weaponized mold and fungus.
		So, okay, well, what the hell that, what is that about?
		So sure, there could be other operations going on that have nothing to do with Texas, nothing to do with even the U.S. government.
		Who knows what the hell is going on?
		But to me, when I see this flooding happening in five states at the same time in one of the driest months of the year, yeah, I scratch my head a little bit and say, something seems off about that.
		And I mean, it just keeps hitting us.
		It just keeps hitting us.
		And it was a little cloudy this morning, but I saw some blue in the sky and the temperature was going back up.
		And I'm thinking, okay, you know, maybe it's finally done.
		And then by the afternoon, I'm driving through Texas and I'm at a high elevation point and I can just see it.
		I can just see North Austin and it's just getting pounded.
		I mean, folks, the rain was so bad, you could be a mile or two outside of downtown.
		You can't even see the skyline.
		Crazy.
		And these people are already flooded.
		And so Abbott just says, oh, you have a losing attitude.
		You're a losing football team.
		Who's to blame?
		Well, no.
		Why can't we get aid up there?
		But see, and this is why people say, well, you're a broken record.
		No, I'm committed to a cause is what I am.
		I'm committed to a cause.
		I'm committed to a cause that instead of giving hundreds of millions of dollars to Israel whenever they want for their wars, I'm committed to a cause of instead of giving more military aid and equipment and money to Ukraine, I'm saying, you know what?
		I'd rather help Americans.
		Yeah, I think I would rather prioritize a thousand Americans that are stranded in Texas with no answers.
		No answers.
		No power.
		No water, no food, no help coming.
		Yeah, I think I would rather prioritize them than a foreign country on the other side of the planet.
		Abso-frickin lootly.
		And I don't even care if you try to sit here and do some measurement that says, well, we'll get more bang from our buck over here.
unidentified		What?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I would say it's a much better endeavor, no matter the cost, to help the people in Texas or now Illinois or North Carolina or New Mexico or Oklahoma, wherever this flooding is happening.
		Yeah, I would much rather them get the benefits of ludicrous aid spending that goes to other countries.
		I would much rather them get these benefits.
		I would much rather, abso-freaking lutely, because you know what it is, though?
		It's like I said, the decision's already been made.
		They're not worth it.
unidentified		They're not worth it.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Folks, they could bring in the Army Corps of Engineers and they could build a bridge.
		Absolutely.
		They could build a temporary bridge that would get at least if there was a downtime and they could get a bridge up at least enough to move some aid in.
		If they wanted to, they could.
		They don't want to.
		They could easily have five, ten helicopters either getting people out or getting people in or getting aid in.
		They're not doing it.
		They're not doing it.
		Oh, but bet your bottom dollar if Ukraine needed a bridge built, they'll build it.
		They'd get the money.
		They'd get the equipment.
		In fact, it might literally be happening right now.
		Russia's blowing up bridges.
		Ukraine needs a bridge, they'll build it.
		Folks, they can't even rebuild.
		They can't even take the Francis Scott Key Bridge down, let alone rebuild it.
unidentified		Can't even rebuild a freaking bridge.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		But we got plenty of money for foreign countries all around the world.
		And they come out and it's a victory.
		And I say, yeah, I celebrate it.
		We shut down the USAID program.
		That's a great win.
		But it's almost like an empty bag because we're still giving military aid whenever somebody asks.
		I guarantee them to you, there's going to be more military aid for Israel.
		I guarantee him to you, there's going to be more military aid for Ukraine.
		Just never ends.
		But people in Texas, stranded, no electricity, no water, no help, no nothing, not worth it.
		Not worth it for them.
		They're not even thinking about it.
		Oh, we put up a message.
		Oh, we said something in a press conference.
		Really?
		How's that doing for the people right now that are literally stranded and just got poured on again today?
		And they don't even know.
		It could be a month.
		It could be a month, but they don't get any help.
		But foreign countries, anything they need.
		Money, help, it's all there.
		Final segment of the InfoWars War Room.
		Remember to continue to support us at thealexjonestore.com.
		Tonight, I will be debating the topic of Israel on Rumble.
		I'm going to try to share it on my Rumble channel and my ex as well.
		I should be able to do that tonight, but just stay tuned.
		I'll post it on my ex.
		It's going to go live at 7 o'clock, so I'll be debating that issue.
		Everybody's favorite issue right now.
		And for a good reason.
		And by the way, you know, because I get a lot of incoming while I'm on the show and I like to read it.
		People are saying, oh, no, this isn't Trump leveraging the Epstein list.
		This is him totally selling us out to Israel.
		Well, okay, I'd say that's a potential too.
		I'm just looking at all the different potentials and all the different circumstantial evidence to try to reach a conclusion.
		But either way, whether he's leveraging it or not, it's definitely a beneficial to Israel to just bury this thing.
		And it's not a coincidence.
		I don't believe that it all happens right as Netanyahu's come into town.
		So, well, I'm sure that'll come up tonight.
		I'm sure that'll be brought up tonight as well.
		But, you know, it's funny.
		People are like, well, the last debate you had on this, you went on, the show was called Jewcast with actually a friend of mine, Andrew Meyer.
		It's like, why would you go debate the issue of Israel on a show that's hosted by a Jewish person?
		Well, I don't, why wouldn't I?
		So it's the same thing tonight.
		It's like, you're going in at a Jewish moderator?
		Well, yeah, what difference does it make?
		And if they, okay, so then what, they turn on me and then I'm like, Trump in the 2016 debates.
		I don't expect it to go that way.
		No, I'm looking forward to it.
		I like debate.
		And I mean, I walk into a den of foaming at the mouth leftist psychos, thousands of them.
		So no, I'm not going to be afraid of any platform for a debate.
		But I look forward to that tonight.
		So hope you tune in.
		I'll share that on my ex.
		But speaking of the issue, folks, you know, people want to be in denial about a bunch of stuff, and that's fine.
		We all go through it.
		We all go through it.
		The stage of denial and many different things.
		Your wife cheating on you, your friend stealing from you, whatever it is.
		There's a phase of denial.
		You just can't even believe it.
		So there's a lot of that going on maybe with Trump, but specifically, I think, with the Israel situation, because the propaganda to be pro-Israel has been so inundated and strong that it's just like, it's such a hard thing to break.
	But it's just true, folks.
	And the evidence has never been more clear in front of your face.
	But regardless of how you think or feel about it, the political ramifications are very real.
	And, you know, I get all of this attack for just talking about the political ramifications, even though so far I'd say I've been proven 100% right, but I guess I can't say I've been proven 100% right until we see what happens in the midterms.
	But as far as the MAGA coalition and the Trump support, what I said a month ago about what happens if you strike Iran, that's all been proven correct.
	I mean, now it's a viral trend to burn your Trump merchandise.
	Now, I'm not endorsing that.
	I'm not going to do that.
	It's just, that's what's going on.
	In fact, I'll even have the crew pull this up after I play this video.
	Pete Hegzeth today posted about meeting with Netanyahu.
	Go read every single comment on that post.
	Folks, when I say every single comment, I mean every single comment.
	Go look at Mike Johnson's post about Netanyahu, how great Netanyahu is today.
	Go read every single reply.
	Every single one.
	Not 10%, not 50%, not 80%.
	I mean every single one, folks.
	And so here's another breakdown.
	And this is a guy that is in Jewish media.
	I think it's called, I forget the name of his program.
	It's on his thing, but it's like the Jewish Outlet or something.
	And he's talking about this and how quickly this is shifting.
	So again, it's a weird thing in politics because it's like if I'm calling a football game and I say, oh, the running back fumbled the ball and the defense has it.
	I'm not going to have people saying, no, he didn't fumble.
	No, because it's like he fumbled the ball.
	There it is.
	But it's like in politics, when you just call it as it is, people attack you and it's like, no, it's just what's happening.
	But it's just true, folks.
	This is what's happening.
	Here's another breakdown in clip 14.
peter beinart ▲ ● ▼		One of the reasons people thought Mamdani couldn't win was they had a set of assumptions about what was politically possible on the question of Israel-Palestine that are just really out of date if you look at public opinion.
		I'm not sure there's any political issue in the United States, perhaps other than gay marriage, over the last couple of decades where public opinion has shifted as fast as it is shifting on Israel-Palestine.
		Just to give an example, in 2013, Democrats favored Israel over the Palestinians by 36 points.
		Today, they favor the Palestinians over Israel by 38 points.
		Even young Republicans, even Republicans under the age of 50, now a majority of them have a negative view of Israel.
		So what Mamdani is doing is revealing a dramatic shift that's taking place, being led by young people, but not only among young people, that's happening in New York and across the country.
		These New Yorkers and so many across the state.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Peter Beinart of Jewish Current.
		And is that not exactly what I said?
		So again, I could be pro-Israel.
		I could be 100% pro-Israel.
		But if I'm not engaging in political propaganda, I'm just reporting the truth.
		And that is the truth.
		So they're scrolling through all the replies here, and we might want to be careful because, you know, this might get a little, you know, not G-rated.
		But, I mean, it's over, folks.
		And, you know, anybody who's willing to shake my hand and have a debate with me and disagree and break bread afterwards, I'll have respect for them.
		So I have respect for Pastor Greg Locke, even if I disagree with him on the issue.
		And I'm still, you know, he said he would do a debate.
		I'm still trying to organize that.
		I think he might even be in Israel right now, ironically enough.
		But no, you know what?
		Any man that's willing to look me in the eye and shake my hand and have a disagreement and that's fine, but break bread afterwards, then I respect that person.
		So I respect Greg Locke.
		As a man who can come into my studio and shake my hand and defend his stance against mine, I respect that.
		But I told them, I said, look, you know, it's over in 10 years.
		The support is not there.
		And then they'll say, well, it's biblical and okay, that's fine.
		But then they'll deny that that's happening.
		It's over, folks.
		It's done.
		And, you know, unintentionally or intentionally, you know, Trump's pro-Israel administration is just speeding this process up astronomically.
		So it's like between what Israel is doing in Palestine, which, you know, probably most Americans would not even really think about, really, and they might not even really see it because most Western media is pro-Israel, or at least they'll, you know, tiptoe around the issue.
		But now with, you know, this pro-Israel administration, so much so that many people in Trump's base feel like Israel is a bigger concern than America.
		Now it's just like light speed.
		So I said originally, I think 20 years, Israel will lose all support for America.
		And then I whittled it down to 10.
		I mean, we could be looking at like two election cycles now.
		That's how bad this has gotten.
		And as the media landscape shifts so rapidly, and then when it shifts to like social media being bigger than network news, then it's over.
		Then it's done.
		Because let me tell you something.
		You don't get that feedback.
		And this is why I love the platform that we've created here, which is kind of a cross between talk radio and TV, because I still get the feedback from the audience when I take calls.
		I can still get feedback from the audience when we have a live chat going on Rumble or on banned out video.
		I can still get a feedback from the audience when I go onto my X account.
		But when you're in network news, there is no feedback.
		It's a one-way street.
		It's just the person on TV, one direction.
		So I like the omnidirectional.
		I like the two-way street because sometimes it can confirm your things.
		Sometimes it can maybe give you a second guess on your things.
		Either way, you get to hear from people and get a reaction.
		I have never seen an issue turn sour so fast.
		Never.
		And it's only going, it's only speeding up.
		So, I mean, that's what I'm saying.
		Like, I'm not a QAnon guy, but, you know, QAnon has always been like, oh, Israel for last.
		Well, it's not like QAnon is the Bible here, but I mean, the country is turning on Israel so fast.
		You blink and it's just like, whoa, another 10-yard loss for Israel.
		You blink again.
		It's like, oh, a 20-yard loss.
		But then there's the Trump administration.
		Oh, here's Netanyahu again.
		Oh, here's more aid for Israel.
		Oh, we're going to strike Iran.
		And it's just in your face.
		The Israeli flag's everywhere.
		All of the administration, just gleaming Netanyahu, which is the most evil man, viewed as the most evil man in the world right now.
		So intentionally, unintentionally, this administration is going to make the country turn against Israel.
		And considering that most of its support, and I don't mean to be morbid, it's just true, God bless our elders.
		Respect your elders.
	We love their wisdom, but it's just true.
	Once the older generations are no longer here, there goes Israel's support.
	And I think Israel is well aware of this, and that's what almost kind of makes it more dangerous.
	I don't know maybe.
	And again, I mean, I just look at all the angles, and maybe that's why Trump is kind of like, oh, no, hold them close, like hold them close, because if we let them go, who knows?
	You let them go, who knows?
	Samson option, nuclear bomb, false flag, you know, assassination, 9-11.
	I don't know.
	Who knows?
	So maybe Trump's just like, all right, this is bad.
	So we're going to hold them close.
	We're going to really hold them tight here because they're well aware outside of that, they're losing.
unidentified		It's just, it's so bad, though.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Because the killing won't stop.
		And it's on both sides.
		It's like all these people, oh, they're pro-Israel.
		It's like, well, why don't you complain when Israelis are having to go in and out of bunkers and can't even go to school?
		Five IDF soldiers killed, 14 injured by roadside bombs in northern Gaza.
unidentified		So you still like that war?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Oh, Trump.peace.
		He stopped the war.
		You're literally parroting propaganda.
		But hey, the New York Post is reminding you that the Holocaust is your biggest issue.
		You know.
		Last Christian town in West Bank attacked by Israelis.
		Church leaders appeal to the world for help.
		No, the Christians in Africa don't get help.
		The Christians in the West Bank don't get help.
		The Christians in Syria don't get help.
		But the Israelis do.
		And if they don't, they complain that you're anti-Semitic.
		Tabe church leaders condemn rising settlers And harassment in the West Bank town, Church of St. George, fires burning all around the archaeological site.
		Yeah.
		Oh, but oh, it's, we're funding it.
		We're supporting it.
		Burn the Christian villages down.
		The Israelis were promised it, don't you know?
		It's their land.
		It's their church.
		And you're funding it.
		Yemen's Houthi rebels attack another ship in the Red Sea, three killed.
		And then there's Russia.
		With China's help, Moscow says it has tripled its drone production.
		You remember how they put out that news story?
		And it was all propaganda, but they were saying, oh, the latest attack.
		We supported in Ukraine.
		They blew up all the Russian aircraft.
		They blew up all the drones.
		Russia's done.
		Russia's handicapped.
		First of all, that was incredibly wrong.
		Second of all, all it did was motivate Russia and China to make more deals.
		So congratulations, morons.
		Russia launches 728 drones against Ukraine.
		Oh, you mean the drones that you all blew up?
		You mean all the Russian drones are handicapped now?
		Oh, 728 drones.
		Largest Russian long-range drone onslaught of the war rains down on Ukraine.
		Russia launches largest drone attack on Ukraine as Kiev pushes U.S. air defense aid.
		I'm beginning to believe right now, I'd say 80% chance Russia just takes it all.
		I'd say you're now, you're getting up to about 80% chance Russia just takes it all.
		And I think, you know, Trump and Putin might get along well enough, but I don't think Putin gives a damn what Trump says or thinks about it anymore, quite frankly.
		And now the U.S. military is so spread thin.
		We've been hollowed out because of our support for Ukraine.
		Now we're fully committed to support Israel.
		So it's just like, oh, yeah, and then Trump's going to threaten China.
		So the world leaders are starting to look at Trump and say, you know what, big mouth, but I don't think we're going to buy it anymore.
		And as his own popularity is sinking and has much of his base has turned against him with the Iran strikes, now it's even worse.
		Trump said he threatened to bomb Moscow if Putin attacked Ukraine.
		2024 fundraiser tape show.
		So CNN airing this stuff.
		Oh, he threatened China.
		He threatened Russia.
		I think it might have worked then.
		I don't think it works now.
		We're spread too thin.
		We're too controlled by Israel.
		Our military's been hollowed out.
		And even though you just had this big military spend bill, the big beautiful bill, well, it's going to take time to rebuild it up.
		But see, if the Trump administration came out and said, oh, we're going to give more support for Israel or we're going to give more support for Ukraine.
		Folks, this is bad.
		I think it might be so bad, and they're never going to say this publicly, but they might have said, okay, we're going to support Ukraine.
		And then, guys, will you find me the date on that?
	That was at the cabinet meeting, I think, yesterday or two days ago.
	So that was today.
	So they keep waffling.
	So first they said, oh, more aid for Ukraine.
	Then they said, no more aid for Ukraine.
	Now they're saying aid for Ukraine.
	Folks, I think that they said it and then they looked at what they can even do and they said, we don't have it.
	We can't support them.
	We literally don't even have it.
	U.S. restarts weapons shipments to Ukraine after Trump reversed Pentagon Pause.
	So it's just, it's just, it's a total disaster.
	So we can't help people in Texas that are stranded, but we got more stuff for Ukraine.
	It's done.
unidentified		Why are we doing this?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So now Russia, yeah, 80% Russia just takes the whole thing.
		This is not going to help.
		I mean, buy your weapons contractor stocks, you know, buy your defense contractor stocks.
		Good God.
		And now Trump is sending all these letters all around the world talking about tariffs.
		Folks, this thing is just coming apart of the seams, man.
		And it all started with the Iran strikes.
		It all started when Israel got its way.
		It all started when it became more evident than ever that Israel is in charge of this administration.
		And now, you know, Trump's effectiveness is just a shell of what it was.
		And the whole world sees it.
		The whole world sees the commitment to Israel, so now they can move knowing that.
		The whole world sees that the U.S. military supply has been drained from the support in Ukraine.
		And the whole world sees that Trump's popularity and approval rating has tanked since the Iran strike.
		And now with the Epstein thing, it doesn't carry weight anymore, folks.
		Trump sending a bunch of letters about tariffs in the past might have been effective.
		I don't know if it is anymore.
		Trump threatening to bomb Russia, bomb China, you know, bomb everybody.
		I don't know if it's effective.
		It might be effective with Iran because he did bomb Iran.
		But now the world is just going to sit here and say, oh, what are you going to do?
		Bomb the whole world?
		You're going to bomb everybody?
		You're in bed with the biggest war criminal in the world right now.
		You're in bed with the most diabolical demon in the world right now, Netanyahu, and you're going to threaten to bomb everybody else?
		What are you doing?
		I just, I cannot believe it, folks.
		I cannot believe it.
		I cannot believe we are on the precipice of having the whole thing tanked by Israel, the whole thing tanked for supporting Netanyahu.
		I just, I cannot believe it.
		But it's just undeniable, right?
		So what are we going to do?
		We're just going to completely hollow out our military for Ukraine and then what?
		Well, don't worry.
		We got all the funding in the new big, beautiful bill.
		Well, they're going to have more problems with that, by the way.
		Because Marjorie Taylor Greene is all over this.
		It's disgusting.
		Amendment announcement for defense appropriations funding bill with a sprinkle of a slight rant and sarcasm delivered on a bed of raw truth.
		Marjorie Taylor Green, I'm introducing amendments to the Department of Defense Appropriations bill that cost $831 billion to prohibit funding for, and this is in the bill, and just so you can see here, here's the bill right here, okay?
		So you can find this on her X account.
		She shared the actual bill.
		All right.
		So here's the bill.
		So this isn't just made-up stuff.
		It's all in the bill.
		$500 million for Israel.
		$500 million for Taiwan Security Initiative.
		$500 million for Jordan.
		$15 million for HIV prevention.
		$118 million for overseas humanitarian disaster and civic aid.
		Jordan already gets $1.6 billion from the U.S. State Department every year, and then they're going to get another $500 million in this bill.
		Taiwan gets $300 million from the U.S. State Department every year, and an additional billion in foreign supplemental aid, and now they're going to get another $500 million.
		What does $15 million for HIV prevention even have to do with anything?
		Brings up Israel.
		Not giving in another additional $500 million to nuclear armed Israel will not make us all anti-Semitic or isolationist.
		It's America first policy.
		Folks, they can't even send help to the people in Texas.
		I would rather spend $500 million to help the people in Texas.
		If it's 100 people, if it's 10 people.
		I would rather spend $500 million to help 10 people in Texas than to help another damn foreigner on the other side of the planet that will never do anything for us.
		Damn right.
		But here it is.
		Another $500 million for Israel.
	Another $500 million for Taiwan.
	Another $500 million for Jordan.
	Another $118 million for overseas humanitarian and disaster aid, but can't even help Americans.
	What an absolute disaster.
	By the way, more fallout on the Trump-Putin relationship here in Clip 7.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		But that was a war that should have happened, and a lot of people are dying, and it should end.
		And I don't know, we get a lot of bullshit thrown at us by Putin for you want to know the truth.
		He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.
unidentified		Do you want to say something?
unidentified		What does that tell you, folks?
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		I'm looking at it.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, no.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		What does that tell you?
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		The Senate is passing and passed a sentence.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		The respect is gone, folks.
		That's enough.
		That's enough.
		The respect is gone, folks.
		The respect is gone.
		The force of will is gone.
		It's gone.
		It's been hollowed out in Ukraine, and now it's become a laughing stock because of Netanyahu.
		And, you know, you could say Trump mismeasured it.
		You could say the administration mismanaged it.
		You could say it doesn't matter.
		We support Israel no matter what.
		The results are all the same.
		China's not going to take it seriously anymore.
		They're going to do whatever they want.
		Russia's not going to take it seriously.
		They're going to do whatever they want.
		And now you have committed so much to Israel that the whole world sees it and sees you as weak.
		And now you're going to sabotage your entire agenda.
		You're going to sabotage your agenda on trade.
		You're going to sabotage your agenda on tariffs.
		You're going to sabotage your agenda on world peace.
		So where does it go?
		What are we going to do?
		End up in war with everybody?
		I mean, so we'll spend $300 billion, $400 billion in Ukraine.
		Russia's going to take it anyway.
		You know, securing Taiwan.
		I guess maybe you could say goodbye to that if we can bring semiconductor manufacturing here.
		So, I mean, I guess you could say bye to Taiwan and maybe it won't have that big of an impact.
		If you're really bringing the semiconductor manufacturing here, which if it's at the point to do it, maybe.
		It's just nuts.
		It's just crazy how fast the wheels have come off this train in such a short period of time.
		But don't worry because Netanyahu is happy.
		And isn't that all that matters?
		Yeah.
		All right.
		That does it for the InfoWars War Room for today.
		In an hour, I'm going to share the link on X. I'm going to be debating the Israel issue in an hour.
		We'll see you there.
joe rogan ▲ ● ▼		You were just telling me that you had a brain disease.
joe rogan ▲ ● ▼		And you, what did you do to fix it?
chase hughes ▲ ● ▼		I found this guy, he's a functional medicine guy, and he got me on methylene blue.
chase hughes ▲ ● ▼		And that instantly stopped everything.
joe rogan ▲ ● ▼		I'd take it.
unidentified		Okay.
joe rogan ▲ ● ▼		Yeah.
chase hughes ▲ ● ▼		I take it every day as well.
joe rogan ▲ ● ▼		And RFK Jr. told me about it.
chase hughes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, man, it's fantastic.
		And so this guy's injecting in 1890, injects these rats with it and then does an autopsy on these things.
		And their brain, the brainstem, every single nerve is blue.
		So he discovered this methylene blue has an affinity for neuronal tissue.
		So he says, well, it's sucking into neurons and working in the body.
		So we started putting it in humans.
		And we found out it's an MAOI, which helps with depression and anxiety and all kinds of life stress and stuff.
		It is so incredible that it acts as an electron donor to mitochondria, especially your neuronal mitochondria.
		So it helps you produce more ATP and it helps you get rid of this stuff called reactive oxygen species.
		So you have an oxygen molecule that should have two hydrogens on it.
		And like your body's job is to convert stuff into water so you can pee it out.
		So if you get an oxygen molecule, it's got four, five, one, it's a reactive oxygen, which we call free radicals.
		So methylene blue goes in there and balances a lot of those things out in your brain and your nervous system.
		So it is a miracle.
		And It's been proven for 100 years.
		It's one of the most well-proven drugs out there.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		The strongest medical-grade methylene blue, and this is what I'm on.
		Total mitochondria cleaning, next level energy.
		This is amazing.
		And you want to what I'm on?
		Ira Seamos Shilogy.
		This right here, look at that.
		That is power.
		I'm on intermittent fasting.
		I'm going to eat at three o'clock today.
		And I stopped eating crap food, stopped drinking.
		That's what I'm on right there, baby.
		Quite frankly, I didn't develop Optimal Human when Bigley came on as a big sponsor.
		And I told them the supplements I wanted from the companies I wanted.
		They went out and did what I wanted, and people love it, and they're incredible.
		The turmeric, the Shilohy, the Iris CMOS, all of it.
		But they'd had this out for years.
		And I thought, my green caps are great.
		And, you know, this other company I use is great because green superfoods are amazing.
		And then I finally took it and Harrison Smith took it.
		And I was like, my God.
		And by then, we've been selling it four or five months and it was already a top seller.
		The problem is there's so many ingredients and it's so hard to source and it's so clean and highest standards that it's sold out most of the time.
		We finally got a decent shipment of it in, but we never offered it for subscription because we just couldn't keep it.
		When you subscribe at the alexhowstore.com and then they keep it back for you so it never sells out.
		So go to the alexhowstore.com and get your optimal human and so many other incredible products today.

▲