Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
The silent majority is no longer silent. | |
| This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer. | ||
| Please stand by for further details. | ||
| We return you now to your regularly scheduled program. | ||
| *Dramatic Music* | ||
| Hello and welcome back to the War Room. | ||
| I am Mel Kay sitting in today a special to take you through what's going on right now in the world. | ||
| First and foremost, thank you for joining us. | ||
| And a lot is happening on many different levels, so it's hard to keep track of what really matters. | ||
| But I'm going to start with something that maybe people aren't talking about. | ||
| There's a lot of attention on Jerome Powell, the chairman of the Federal Reserve. | ||
| Today, Russ Vought put a letter out, a strongly word letter, basically saying that he has grossly mismanaged the Fed while continuing to run a deficit since 23, that the Fed is way over budget on the renovation of its headquarters, to which he testified last week. | ||
| It is now $2.5 billion, up from $700 million. | ||
| These renovations are extreme and many would say unnecessary. | ||
| At this point, Powell is being questioned from all sides, including from President Trump, as you have seen over many days, as well as from the chairman of the housing and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Pulte has been calling out Jerome Powell as well. | ||
| Well, what has happened on that end is that the Bank of International Settlements, which I've talked about a lot on my show, the Mel Kay Show, and I know Alex has brought it up here as other people have. | ||
| The Bank of International Settlements is a private bank, as is our Federal Reserve. | ||
| And Jerome Powell happens to sit on the board of the Bank of International Settlements, not just our Federal Reserve Board, as well as being the chair of the Global Economy Meeting and the Economic Consulting Committee of the Bank of International Settlements. | ||
| So while he's running our financial system in America from above, he's also beholden to the Bank of International Settlements, the EU, and what I call the international banking cartel. | ||
| So today I was a little surprised to see that the Bank of International Settlements has put out a statement. | ||
| They have put out a statement, particularly because Donald Trump is tangling with Jerome Powell, their guy in America. | ||
| The Bank of International Settlements has publicly defended the independence of central banks, warning about the growing risks of political interference in monetary policy. | ||
| Well, that might make you wonder, well, why is a foreign bank even worried about our monetary policy? | ||
| Well, maybe it's because we aren't a sovereign nation when it comes to our financial situation. | ||
| And right now, they are pulling up and saying that what is happening between Donald Trump and Jerome Powell could have real problems. | ||
| Trump is demanding rapid rate cuts despite persistent inflation is what the Bank of International Sentiment is saying, obviously siding with Jerome Powell. | ||
| In their annual report, they emphasize the crucial role of independent monetary policy, stating that central banks must be able to act according to their assessments, even if it contradicts government wishes. | ||
| Well, in the United States of America, we were supposedly having an independent sovereign nation that is not connected to other countries, especially in terms of our financial policy. | ||
| But still to this day, since 1913, the Federal Reserve is above our country, is not beholden to the United States of America. | ||
| And frankly, at this point, we should be asking why are we in a situation where an international bank and mainly that is aligned with the EU and Brussels and the World Economic Forum and the UN and all of the tentacles of the UN and the international NGOs has so much say over my financial policy in the United States of America. | ||
| It is time for people to really look into what the Bank of International Settlements is. | ||
| Briefly, from the book Tower of Basil, Adam Laboor really went into it. | ||
| His book before that, Hitler's Secret Bankers, also adds context to it. | ||
| During the 40s, near the end of World War II, before the surrender of Hitler, the Bank of International Settlements was run by an American named Thomas McKittrick, and he was working hand in hand with Alan Dulles from OSS, who ended up being the head of the CIA, as many people know. | ||
| This bank was accused of laundering money for the Nazis, the Bank of International Settlements was. | ||
| But in the meantime, nothing happened to it. | ||
| And what did happen, though, as time went on is the Bank of International Settlements was afforded immunity. | ||
| You might not know that the Bank of International Settlements has total immunity and somewhat a situation similar to the Vatican. | ||
| But not just the Bank of International Settlements, the World Bank, the IMF, the central banks, the Federal Reserve, insurers and payment systems also are afforded immunities through the banking system that is international. | ||
| It is not American. | ||
| And all of these people are basically off limits for the United States of America to audit, to look into anything, to do anything legally. | ||
| And that causes a big problem. | ||
| Okay, on that point, I want people to know that the United States has given 76 international organizations immunities, privileges, and tax exemptions dating back to 1946. | ||
| And possibly it's time for us to reevaluate that, which is what I believe Donald Trump is actually doing. | ||
| The bigger picture of everything, all the way back to the Great Reset, was always about the financial system, the international banking system set up after World War II that has been a total looting and laundering operation on the American taxpayers, as we've been paying for most of this. | ||
| And at this point, most things are being reshuffled, but it's time for the people of the United States to start asking questions as to where our money goes, why it's going to international institutions, and why we are a part of them anyway, if we are a sovereign nation and want to run by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, which the rest of the world does not have and does not respect. | ||
| Moving on from there, of course, we have the Jeffrey Epstein case. | ||
| Everyone's very upset about what is happening with the DOJ, FBI, and everyone else. | ||
| I do want to remind everyone that Jeffrey Epstein back in 2007, 2008 claimed that he had started the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Global Initiative to help him in his 2007 case. | ||
| A 23-page letter was written by Alan Dershowitz and another lawyer that was to help him hopefully get a plea deal back then. | ||
| Whatever the case may be, he said that he conceived the original group of the Clinton Global Initiative, as we know, which he described as a project bringing together a community of global leaders to devise and implement innovative solutions to some of the world's most pressing challenges. | ||
| It sounds a lot like the many groups that Jeffrey Epstein was a part of, including the Council of Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the Rockefeller Institute, and many, many NGOs which he started, not to mention his relationships at Harvard and MIT, and then all of the banking institutions. | ||
| So right now, people are questioning why the Clintons have not been questioned, nor anyone involved with the Clinton Foundation or Clinton Global Initiative, about Jeffrey Epstein and the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and the Clinton family, particularly Bill Clinton. | ||
| And on top of that, recently there was an article published about Epstein's flights around the world while Bill Clinton was president. | ||
| So what is becoming more and more clear is that people are being protected at the highest levels. | ||
| There's actually a manifest list of a flight of Jeffrey Epstein's in Japan that picked up Bill Clinton and a whole bunch of people in Japan and flew them basically around the world, including many of the women that were blocked from being prosecuted that were his henchmen. | ||
| But at the same time, we have a lot of names coming up about world leaders, not just from Israel, but from Japan, from China, from the Cayman Islands, and everywhere else. | ||
| So what is the deal with Jeffrey Epstein and the Clintons? | ||
| Also, during 1997, Clinton's final term as president, a woman filed a lawsuit, Miss USA named Shannon Markitch, sued Jeffrey Epstein and the Sultan of Brunei for $10 million, claiming that she and six other women had been hired for over $100,000 each to travel to Brunei for professional appearances, supposedly involving intellectual conversations with visiting dignitaries. | ||
| She claims that they ended up being used as sex slaves. | ||
| The entire situation was obviously just disappeared because nobody really knew about it. | ||
| When he arrived to visit Bill Clinton, he basically told the Sultan of Brunei and the rest of the people that they were going to take care of it. | ||
| And all we know is that that went away. | ||
| What did happen, though, the Sultan of Brunei gave a ton of money to the Clinton Foundation. | ||
| And from then on, it was never brought up again. | ||
| So there's a lot to ask the Clintons about the relationship with Jeffrey Epstein from the very beginning, particularly when he was in office. | ||
| And not to forget that Jeffrey Epstein also had connections to Air America and Les Wexner, as well as many people talk about his relationship with Khashoggi, the arms dealer, and his relations with Prince Andrew, who was also involved in arms deals. | ||
| So the situation with Jeffrey Epstein is far bigger than people want to even imagine. | ||
| And it goes back to the 80s. | ||
| So what we are dealing with now is a huge cover-up of many, many powerful people all around the world, not one nation, but it is looking clearer and clearer that Jeffrey Epstein was working at the top level of the international banking cartel, all the way up to the Bank of International Settlements and the tentacles of the IMF and the World Bank and the World Trade Organization. | ||
| And yet here we are all these years later being told there's nothing to see here. | ||
| Not to mention that J.P. Morgan Chase had to pay $365 million to the victims of Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
| Other banks did as well. | ||
| But what happened was nobody apparently is on the other side of those transactions. | ||
| The U.S. Virgin Islands also was about to open yet another case into banks in America when Joe Biden went down and visited the governor of the U.S. Virgin Islands. | ||
| And promptly a few days later, similar to the Burisma situation, Denise George, the prosecutor in the U.S. Virgin Islands, was taken off of the Epstein case. | ||
| And that was just last year. | ||
| So this keeps evolving and we keep getting no answers that we want. | ||
| I saw that Alan Dershowitz is out there saying that he knows exactly who's implicated and he doesn't understand why it's not being released. | ||
| And now we have Jeffrey Epstein's brother out there insinuating that there might be things about Trump in there. | ||
| So we are at a place where this is not going away. | ||
| There needs to be something done to hold people accountable. | ||
| And frankly, I don't think the American people have given up on this and I haven't either. | ||
| But we do have to seriously look at what is going on with the Clinton Global Initiative, the Clinton Foundation, and particularly the Clinton whistleblowers still have a case in tax court, I believe, that is playing out. | ||
| And we want to know what is happening with the Clintons and why have they not been questioned? | ||
| At this point, we are now at a place where we have to also wonder what was going on with the disclosure to begin with. | ||
| What happened in the beginning was that we were looking for information and then Pam Bandi invited these influencers. | ||
| They didn't know that they were getting these kind of bogus binders with no new information in them. | ||
| And now a lot of them are mad. | ||
| You've seen them on TV being very upset about this. | ||
| So we at this point need to have answers because the United States of America isn't the only country that was affected by this. | ||
| And if there is blackmail of world leaders and other, probably at the highest levels of banking on an international level, then who knows what we've done or what has been done by the U.S. or other countries because of that blackmail? | ||
| As well as Whitney Webb's book, One Nation Under Blackmail, has gone through exactly how this happens. | ||
| It goes back and it's probably still happening. | ||
| A lot of people think maybe some of this information was destroyed, but there are multiple agencies and multiple people. | ||
| So I find that very hard to believe. | ||
| So we'll stay on top of that. | ||
| In the meantime, speaking of CIA, which I didn't, but speaking of CIA, now we have a big deal going on, of course, with John Brennan. | ||
| We have a clip of John Brennan yesterday on Nicole Wallace's show. | ||
| Very upset that he is having an investigation opened into him and Comey regarding Russia Gate. | ||
| Let's take a look at the video of John Brennan yesterday with Nicole Wallace, if we have that. | ||
| But for more than three decades, I have also had the tremendous fortune to travel the world. | ||
| And as part of that experience, to learn about the goodness and beauty of Islam. | ||
| Like the President during his childhood years in Jakarta, I came to see Islam, not how it is often misrepresented, but for what it is, how it is practiced every day by well over a billion Muslims worldwide, a faith of peace and tolerance and great diversity. | ||
| There is an Arabian in the American Union in Qahira. | ||
| This is in the year 1975 and 1976. | ||
| And the Urdan, Palestine, Al-Quds in Tunis, and other in Miser, second in the Al-Shakal Aset, about six years. | ||
| And during a 25-year career in government, I was privileged to serve in positions across the Middle East, as a political officer with the State Department and as a CIA station chief in Saudi Arabia. | ||
| In Saudi Arabia, I saw how our Saudi partners fulfilled their duty as custodian of the two holy mosques of Mecca and Medina. | ||
| I marveled at the majesty of the Hajj and the devotion of those who fulfilled their duty as Muslims by making that privilege, a pilgrimage. | ||
| Well, there we have it. | ||
| But that was the wrong video, but that was the right video for where I was going because what is happening now is there are a lot of questions coming out about where Obama was in all of this and Obama's long-term relationship with Brennan. | ||
| There's suggestions that he was involved with him before he was even president, but now we are looking at Brennan's full career as we never have before. | ||
| And though he's sitting there and acting like there's nothing to see here, there are questions about his years in Saudi Arabia, his conversion to Islam, and that when Obama came in, he hired Brennan to be the head of the CIA. | ||
| And next thing you knew, we had the Arab Spring, the overthrow of, of course, of Mubarak in Egypt, the installation by Obama's regime of the Muslim Brotherhood, then the ousting of the Muslim Brotherhood, which also led to, obviously, lots of problems. | ||
| We had many things also in Libya, in Syria, many things under Obama. | ||
| And Brennan seems to be the one that was leading a lot of this stuff. | ||
| So questions go back to the beginning with Brennan. | ||
| And now we're at a place where he is being called out for everything that he was involved in with RussiaGate, starting with when he was bumping people prior to the 2016 election. | ||
| Apparently, before the election, what is coming out and what Matt Taibi and others have put out there is that they were bumping people, meaning 26 people were listed, including Donald Trump and people on his campaign. | ||
| And they were going around the world and making the illusion of collusion so that they could open the case. | ||
| At this point, of course, Obama is still president. | ||
| And what happened next was that John Brennan found out that Hillary Clinton and the Clinton campaign and her lawyers and John Podesta were working with Christopher Steele to put together hip pieces and fraud, basically, the Steele dossier and the rest of it to attack Trump during the campaign. | ||
| Well, Brennan found out. | ||
| He went in apparently and told Obama. | ||
| And just a few days later, they opened an investigation on Trump, not on Hillary Clinton. | ||
| They never opened an investigation on Hillary Clinton, as a matter of fact, when it came to Russia and her situation. | ||
| She did get a election fine from the election and all of that, but nobody ever started looking into her relationship with Russia or Uranium One or the Clinton Foundation or anything else. | ||
| So where we are now is basically the CIA is being called out by the new CIA director, John Ratcliffe, for the intelligence community assessment, which was completely bogus and made up, though John Brennan said that it had high confidence that it was reliable at the time when all the other CIA agents that were around were basically saying it was unreliable. | ||
| He also rushed for publication in the last days of the Obama administration and drafted all of this stuff. | ||
| It looks like Brennan, Clapper, and Comey were the main players here. | ||
| In the new review, a lot of people, frankly, are saying that it's a whitewash of what really happened. | ||
| First of all, because it acts like this new report by Ratcliffe that the ICA was legitimate or that what was in it was legitimate, that Russia was trying to help Donald Trump win the election. | ||
| That is not true. | ||
| And it was actually proven untrue by Durham. | ||
| But beyond that, it says that there were procedural anomalies and that Russia, but it did not debunk that Russia and Vladimir Putin were launching an effort to influence the election for Donald Trump. | ||
| That never happened. | ||
| And frankly, what happened here looks like that by December of 2016 in an email, a senior CIA official warned Brennan that including the dossier in any context would taint the entire paper. | ||
| But Brennan pushed for it anyway and said that he really needed that in there no matter what, that it showed a preference for narrative consistency, they're saying, over analytical soundness, and that Brennan wanted to stick with the narrative that Donald Trump was being helped by the Kremlin. | ||
| Well, what that makes you look at also is what was happening before the election, because what is the biggest problem here for me is that we've never gotten to the bottom of the spying on Donald Trump while he was a candidate, let alone during the transition period. | ||
| And going back all the way back, if you look at 2008, when Hillary Clinton became the Secretary of State and Obama became the president, there seemed to have been a quid pro quo that it would go to Hillary Clinton in 2016 and that they were preparing for that. | ||
| So a lot of what was happening in the last few months of the Obama administration into the transition period to Donald Trump is a tremendous amount of criminality. | ||
| It looks like it happened between that time. | ||
| And not just that, it looks like the FBI, DOJ, and CIA were actually helping Hillary Clinton by opening the crossfire hurricane and then by continuing with the insurance policy, which was, of course, investigating crossfire hurricane and Russia collusion after Donald Trump went into office. | ||
| If you remember, the surveillance happened using access to an NSA database. | ||
| I believe that it was Admiral Rogers who first gave the heads up to the Trump campaign and the Trump team that somebody was accessing the NSA database from an FBI portal. | ||
| Later, we found out that the Clinton lawyers at Perkins Cooey had an FBI portal, and nobody's quite sure what happened there, but it appears that the NSA database was exploited, and FBI contractors, mainly the ones hired by the Clinton team, were accessing that database to go after Donald Trump and everyone around him. | ||
| This is a major crime and should be investigated. | ||
| If we are still on the topic, that's one place we should go. | ||
| Also, when the Clinton campaign launched the Russia collusion, they originally used Fusion GPS and Glenn Simpson, which, of course, allowed them to leak to the press and to put all this information out when it was still unverified. | ||
| And John Brennan had already briefed Barack Obama that it was actually Hillary Clinton that was creating this false dossier with steel. | ||
| So where we are right now is that Obama is implicated in a lot of this stuff. | ||
| And the Russia collusion hoax is not just a Russia collusion hoax. | ||
| The truth is that in 2014, the Obama administration, particularly Victoria Newland, Sullivan, John McCain, a lot of different folks in that realm, went in and overthrew the duly elected government of Ukraine. | ||
| The CIA installed one, two, and then Zelensky, three puppets in a row. | ||
| And then Donald Trump coming in was a big, big problem because things had been done in Ukraine that they did not want people to know about. | ||
| So what we got was an immediate launch of a Russia collusion investigation and a special counsel named Robert Mueller and Andrew Weissman. | ||
| But if you look into Robert Moeller and Andrew Weissman now in context, what you realize is that they knew that the entire crossfire hurricane, Russia collusion narrative was false, was a fraud. | ||
| So why did 16 members of the Weissman-Mueller team investigate for months and months and months, taking up all of the media over Trump-Russia collusion when they already knew there wasn't? | ||
| It's looking more and more like the Weissman-Mueller investigation and the entire report was a cover-up for the initial crossfire hurricane. | ||
| And we can't forget at all that Susan Rice on her last day, on the last day that they were there, the day Donald Trump was inaugurated, had written a note to herself that President Obama wanted everything to be done by the book, that they wanted to investigate Trump's collusion with Russia or possibility of it. | ||
| They even talk about not giving information to Donald Trump, the now sitting president, because it wasn't, it might be a risk to national security. | ||
| The levels to which they did damage, not just to the United States, this crime was a conspiracy to defraud the people of the United States of America, but more than that, of the world. | ||
| Because what happened in 2014 in Ukraine, when Donald Trump came in in 2016, he could have been dealing with Russia and Ukraine and NATO and all of the nations in Europe. | ||
| But instead, because of Obama and then them going to the insurance policy of continuing down the path to investigate Trump and Russia, which was a total fraud, they made it that Donald Trump could not talk to Russia, could not talk to Ukraine, could not talk to the European Union, could not really talk to the international banks that control them all without them looking like Trump was doing something wrong. | ||
| So essentially, they took away the ability of Trump in his first four years in office to do anything positive with the rest of the world, particularly Russia. | ||
| So if you think about it on the larger scale of the international damage that Russia Gate did and that the CIA director Brennan was involved, what is even more disturbing is that Donald Trump put in Pompeo into the CIA and Pompeo did not tell Trump anything about this. | ||
| Worse than that, all the Five Eyes nations were involved, particularly in the bumping situation. | ||
| And instead of going after that, Pompeo then told Donald Trump to replace him with Gina Haspel, who was, of course, John Brennan's right-hand woman in the UK. | ||
| We know that the UK was very involved in the entire Russia collusion hoax, certainly in the FISA court stuff. | ||
| And now we're waiting to know, but I really am with the people right now that think that this CIA document from Radcliffe is a whitewash and that there's a lot more information out there that we need to see. | ||
| Also, the Federalists reported, as did Matt Taibbi and the public, that Brennan and the ICA authors embellished their conclusion by upgrading unreliable sources to reliable. | ||
| Investigation found three or four instances in which they couldn't find a credible historic reporting line for source in the ICA report and found the source ratings had been changed. | ||
| Dissent, even within Brennan's group of 24 handpicked analysts, not the 17 agencies we heard about, only three was overruled. | ||
| And the HPSCI investigators looked at the report and the sourcing they used to evaluate the sourcing. | ||
| When they dug into it further, they saw that there was really nothing there. | ||
| So we do have to get back to what damage this did, not just to America, but to the world and to the relationship between America and Russia and how much that has to do with the war that is raging over there in the EU. | ||
| They're pushing forward into World War III. | ||
| They want to continue down the path of destroying Russia, though they say that Russia is going to invade. | ||
| That's not really the case. | ||
| And the last thing that we do have to remember about the EU and the entire situation with NATO is that back in 1993, George Soros and the International Banking Cartel and the rest of them called the future the NATO world order. | ||
| So of course, NATO is no longer a defensive force. | ||
| And they seem to want to continue down this path that Donald Trump, the United States of America, and the people here do not want to continue down the path of war. | ||
| So right now, we really do have to be very honest about where we are and what is going on. | ||
| And if the ties between us, the EU, the international banks, and NATO benefit the United States of America at all, or if they are really harming our country, our sovereignty, and our future. | ||
| On that note, I will pick up after the break, but I do want everyone to remind you that I am Mel Kay. | ||
| My show is the Mail Kay Show at mailcase show.com. | ||
| We are also every morning, 12 to 1:30 live on Rumble and X. And I have a great book, Americans Anonymous, I would love for everyone to check out. | ||
| So go to themailcasehow.com and look around over there. | ||
| Be sure to follow, like, subscribe, all that stuff. | ||
| And we will continue to dig into it every single day over there. | ||
| In the meantime, I also wanted to mention that we will be in Washington, D.C. on July 27th. | ||
| Dr. Stella Emmanuel and the frontline doctors are celebrating their five-year anniversary of speaking in front of the Supreme Court during COVID when Dr. Zelenko, Dr. Stone, Dr. Stella, Dr. Gold, all of those people were warning America that there were definitely treatments to take before that early treatment was going to save people. | ||
| They rejected the CDC and all of that. | ||
| And you know what happened after then? | ||
| They were canceled, smeared, and now they have proven to be the real heroes. | ||
| So on the 27th, we will be in D.C. on the Supreme Court steps at 4 o'clock, celebrating those brave doctors and everything that they did for all these years for all of us. | ||
| And I hope that you will come meet us in D.C. then. | ||
| You can go to my website, themlkayshow.com, and look at the events page. | ||
| And you can find the events right there. | ||
| And come, we're ready to talk it out. | ||
| Also, Tom Renz will be joining us, Dr. Tenpenny, and many other great people hosted by Dr. Stella Emmanuel. | ||
| So we will see you after this break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hello there. | |
| I am not Owen Schroyer. | ||
| I am Mel Kay. | ||
| And thank you. | ||
| I am here today for Owen Schroyer. | ||
| And I really am enjoying it. | ||
| I hope you are too. | ||
| And I want to jump into some other stuff that, of course, all of us thought that the great reset and the international cartel and everyone, all these international NGOs were almost done with us. | ||
| But that is not true. | ||
| And that is not what is happening. | ||
| I was very glad to see, as many people were, that USAID, which is not aid, it's international development, Marco Rubio has ended USAID all over the world, which has a lot of the world very happy because most people thought that it was synonymous with regime change and total control and putting under the guise of democracy going into foreign countries that didn't want us there and trying to manipulate them into the direction that apparently USAID, | ||
| Samantha Power, and the rest of the international people that run the NGOs wanted. | ||
| But it turns out that that firing is not the end of the road. | ||
| It is being reported right now that former USAID employees and State Department employees around the world, including at embassies all over, are joining together to fight back against Trump overseas. | ||
| This would be called treason and sedition if it is actually true. | ||
| But what we are finding is that former USAID ambassador, embassy employees, and also maybe some current government State Department officials have said that they are working together to basically destroy Donald Trump. | ||
| They are democracy building experts, don't forget, and people that run color revolutions largely. | ||
| So as we have been in our own color revolution, I believe since 2016, now they are taking their skills from USAID and their past and working together. | ||
| They are saying that they are well-trained individuals that are embedded in populations around the world, speaking under anonymity, of course. | ||
| The former director of USAID's Center for Democracy, Human Rights, and Governance has said that if you kept our offices going and had us play solitaire in the office, it might have been safer for your regime. | ||
| In the meantime, she's now teaching these workshops called Authoritarianism 101, coming straight from the lawfare and Brookings playbook of, of course, Norm Eisen, the king of the color revolution in America. | ||
| So this former USAID head is running Authoritarian 101, Ways to Resist It, getting people to understand that it's part of the process, is the training, she told these people. | ||
| She says, why are we going to get ice? | ||
| Why are we going to get ice cream? | ||
| You're building up the muscles and the bravery and all of that. | ||
| We're working together to, for years to come, fight back against authoritarianism and Donald Trump. | ||
| So they are plotting against him largely overseas, it seems. | ||
| And at this point, we have to be very aware that the international community is not done with trying to control the world. | ||
| Agenda 2030 is still alive and well for these people. | ||
| And they just had their Beijing Young Champions Conference known as Summer Davos in China. | ||
| And it was announced just yesterday that the World Economic Forum and the UAE have teamed up to launch yet another regulatory platform through the global public-private partnership of the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, and the misinformation, disinformation NGOs. | ||
| So it has been announced now that the World Economic Forum, also overseas, has teamed up with the United Arab Emirates to launch Global Regulatory Innovation Platform, a two-year initiative aimed at shaping how artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and other advanced technologies will be governed worldwide. | ||
| Again, trying to come up with global governance as Agenda 2030 is a global governance model based on full track and trace surveillance from birth to death of all people in a technocratic, efficient manner, run out of basically Brussels and Switzerland or wherever they want in the EU at this point. | ||
| That's where they're going with this. | ||
| But they have framed this effort to help governments keep pace with fast-moving innovation. | ||
| But GRIP, as it's called, positions the World Economic Forum yet again to exert significant pressure over national regulatory demands. | ||
| The project stated deliverables include global regulatory playbook, a regulatory futures readiness index, a global regulatory innovation hub, all of which are designed to influence how states craft their policies with new Technology on a global scale. | ||
| The new head that has replaced Klaus Schwab at the World Economic Forum has said that innovation moves fast, regulation must too. | ||
| GRIP enables governments to co-create policy frameworks that are agile, anticipatory, and ready for technologies that are shaping our future. | ||
| This goes along the lines with the fourth industrial revolution, of course, and the transhumanism goals of meshing man and internet with the full internet of things, internet of bodies, track and trace surveillance, and basically the entire model that is already running in China for the entire world. | ||
| The question here that I'm asking, and a lot of people should be asking about this, is at what point does the United States of America remain sovereign in terms of our Constitution and our Bill of Rights if they are building a global public infrastructure? | ||
| With everything that was announced, I call it Skynet, but by Larry Ellison and all the rest of the tech guys, including Palantir, all these people, Eric Schmidt that were just at Bilderberg, they're all talking about a global public infrastructure. | ||
| But the United States has borders, not just on the ground, but we should certainly have borders in cyberspace and AI and everything else. | ||
| And while we're making deals all over the world, shouldn't we be making sure that the Constitution and the Bill of Rights and the sovereignty of the United States is safe in cyberspace as well? | ||
| I don't really hear that many people asking these questions about that. | ||
| We might very well get back our sovereign and our southern and northern borders, but on the ground, that's great. | ||
| But I don't know if we are going to maintain our sovereignty in cyberspace or if Palantir is making deals both with NATO and the EU and the U.S. Are these separate deals? | ||
| Do we have a sovereign border when it comes to all of this international data sharing and investigations? | ||
| So when I see the World Economic Forum putting out with the UAE, which just made lots of deals, obviously, when Donald Trump was over there, my question is, are the American people going to maintain our Constitution and our Bill of Rights, which is sadly on its last legs thanks to the unconstitutional Patriot Act? | ||
| But we are at a place where we have to start asking the questions about cyberspace and sovereignty. | ||
| And I am not hearing that. | ||
| Here, the World Economic Forum is also talking about that they want to be the neutral facilitator, stepping in to help governments, for God's sakes, and that they are also, they want to have greater regulation. | ||
| This is also the UN is saying the same thing of the internet, framing free expression concerns as secondary to the need to combat misinformation and harmful content, particularly when you are calling out the international institutions and the banks. | ||
| They also have put out a blueprint, an initiative blueprint, and it will, of course, as always, convene public and private stakeholders to pilot the program in many countries. | ||
| I would like to say that I believe that anyone participating in this in the government of the United States of America should no longer be in the government of the United States of America. | ||
| But doesn't stop there with the globalists. | ||
| No, it doesn't, because the United Nations also has problems with us right now. | ||
| The United Nations, of course, part of their Agenda 2030-17 development goals is education for all. | ||
| But what we haven't been told is that this has been going on for decades through UNESCO. | ||
| UNESCO created by the other Robert Moeller and obviously his attention and connections with Alice Bailey and the Lucis Trust and all of that created the world curriculum, which I believe became the Common Core curriculum, which of course participated in the dumbing down of the American child and now the American college student. | ||
| So we're at a place where Education International is totally infused and infested in our unions, which are all kind of out of control and anti-Trump at this point anyway. | ||
| So the United Nations has apparently come out to investigate the U.S. The United Nations is saying that the U.S. education, parental rights, state and national sovereignty, and the Constitution are creating a problem and they are putting out a country report. | ||
| The U.N. director of the Human Rights Council is now saying basically that the United States is attacking education, their education. | ||
| They're blasting Trump's efforts to shut down or at least reduce the U.S. Department of Education. | ||
| The UN is saying that this would hurt low-income students, weaken civil rights, disrupt higher learning, and produce other alleged dramas and horrors for our children and the world. | ||
| The special repertoire at the UN, her name is Farida Shaheed. | ||
| She says the loss of federal oversight could deepen inequalities and inequities, harm marginalized students, and undermine social mobility. | ||
| Of course, she is judging us from Pakistan. | ||
| She's a radical Pakistani activist that investigates the United States. | ||
| Very interesting. | ||
| The final report does not acknowledge that under the U.S. Constitution's 10th Amendment, education is not a federal responsibility. | ||
| As per the 10th Amendment, anything not in the Constitution should be decided by the states and therefore the people. | ||
| And that is how we actually participate in our children's education. | ||
| But that is not what the UN wants, nor Education International, nor the aligned teachers' unions, which are out there wreaking havoc on us as it is. | ||
| The UN in their report also stated that Florida and Texas were singled out for passing laws trying to protect students. | ||
| Of course, it's the opposite. | ||
| They say that they are interfering with diversity, equity, inclusion, gender ideology, and sexually explicit materials. | ||
| Basically, they don't want those removed. | ||
| Shaheed said the laws produce a chilling effect, undermining inclusive education. | ||
| Basically, at this point, she says censorship laws restricting classroom discussions on race, gender identity, and other disruptive concepts limit students' access to critical knowledge. | ||
| She blasted the United States' efforts to protect children, apparently. | ||
| She doesn't think that that's right, and censorship shouldn't happen. | ||
| She also goes on to repeat the lie about book bans in America, laying out that children are hurt By book bans, preventing students from accessing a full and accurate understanding of history and social dynamics, and marginalized voices is what she is accusing Donald Trump and the administration of doing with wanting to do away with the Department of Education. | ||
| So, at this point, we are dealing with multi-layers of international organizations interfering in the United States of America. | ||
| Again, the theme of this show is, are we a sovereign nation or are we not? | ||
| And if we are, then why are all these international organizations and international banks have so much control over what we do? | ||
| And why do they think that they can put out reports claiming that something is wrong with America wanting to better educate our children, but you are being failed by the, not just the universities, but frankly, by the teachers' unions? | ||
| Speaking of teachers' unions, I also would like to mention that the NEA has put out a whole new list of their upcoming priorities. | ||
| And as you know, as I, oh, if you had watched my show, I had reported yesterday that Corey DeAngelis got his hands on some of the NEA's newest working papers. | ||
| And first and foremost, a new business item in the largest teachers union, the NEA declares its support for and participation in mass democratic movement against Trump's authoritarian and violations of human rights. | ||
| We support the No Kings movement and the Los Angeles-based movement to defeat Trump's attempts to use federal force against the state of California and other states and communities. | ||
| We stand with millions of activists and protesters of this movement in the defense of democracy, the unity of country, free speech, civil rights, labor, independent trade union rights, due process, and the popular democratic norms of the Constitution, securing the sovereignty of we the people. | ||
| So this is the National Education Association has put this out in their own words on their own website, basically saying that they do not endorse or fascism, meaning that Donald Trump, their fight now is against fascism and that Donald Trump is an authoritarian and they will be putting out to their 2.8 million members. | ||
| That's approximately 70% of public school teachers being NEA members, that their 2025 campaign is basically an anti-Trump campaign that will be moving into schools. | ||
| They have pledged the National Education Association has pledged to defend democracy against Trump's embrace of fascism by using the term fascism in all National Education Association materials to correctly characterize Donald Trump program and actions. | ||
| The members and material resources of the National Education Association must be committed to the defense of the democratic and educational conditions required by our hopes for a just society and the survival of civilization itself by stating the truth. | ||
| Now, these are 70% of public school teachers in America belong to this union. | ||
| And this union is putting out in their own documents, in their own paperwork, they are also organizing on their own website to join the resistance against Donald Trump. | ||
| Our children are in major danger and this is another level of it. | ||
| The 2025 teacher of the year from the union realized that the teaching profession is deeply political and that they can no longer stay on the sidelines because America's children are being overtaken by Trump's authoritarianism. | ||
| If this is what we are allowing in our schools, we really have to take a look at our country from the inside out. | ||
| Again, also last weekend, they had the socialism conference of 2025. | ||
| Now, this is the precursor, of course, to the Democratic Socialist of America conference that's coming up in August. | ||
| These are socialist groups, but many of them are actually communist groups, full Marxist groups. | ||
| They're all getting together and they're radicalizing through the unions. | ||
| We have to understand that the unions are very much pushing this resistance. | ||
| And it's not just the teachers' unions. | ||
| It's the SEIU. | ||
| It's also at the socialism conference. | ||
| They had almost everyone that attended this conference also happened to be teachers, but also university professors all talking about getting radicalized and the coming revolution. | ||
| We also had teachers from Madison, Wisconsin, from University of California, from University of Minnesota, University of Texas speaking at the socialism conference about the future of socialism and Marxism in this country, as we are about to probably get a Marxist Muslim Brotherhood aligned mayor in New York City, and yet enough isn't being done. | ||
| DHS, apparently, though, is looking into this. | ||
| But at the same time, we really do have to realize that unions are completely and totally basically immune from being questioned in America at this point, and yet they're getting more and more power and radicalizing through the unions. | ||
| We have this situation also where we have found out that there is a group of 40 U.S. groups. | ||
| I have it on the screen right now. | ||
| 40 U.S. groups sponsored a protest in D.C. with death, death to the IDF. | ||
| And this brings me back to, if you're not familiar with Rich Higgins and his memo that he gave Donald Trump during the first term, which got him fired by H.R. McMaster, it's a good time to go check out that document now. | ||
| It is online. | ||
| It's the Rich Higgins document from 2017. | ||
| It's called POTUS and Political Warfare, and it's pretty much summing up what we're dealing with now. | ||
| Unfortunately, he passed away, but I do highly recommend that people go look up. | ||
| He also wrote a book called The Memo. | ||
| The background of it is that he gave this to Donald Trump in 2017. | ||
| He said that the Trump administration basically is being inundated by a group of aligned red-green access. | ||
| So he's saying that basically at its core, these campaigns run on multiple lines of effort, serve as the nonviolent line of effort of a wider movement, and execute political warfare agendas that reflect cultural Marxist outcomes. | ||
| The campaign operates through narratives because the hard left is Aligned with the Islamic organizations at local Antifa, working with Muslim Brotherhood, doing business with the Muslim Student Association and CARE. | ||
| National, the ACLU, is working with Black Lives Matter, working also with the Muslim Students Association and CARE, and on the international level, which would be the OIC, working with the UN and the UN agencies, all together to recognize the fact that this is seamless operation on many different levels, all carrying the same narrative. | ||
| It says right here, in candidate Trump, the opposition saw a threat to the politically correct enforcement narratives they've meticulously laid out over the past few decades. | ||
| In President Trump, they see a latent threat to continue that effort to ruin its effect, and that retaliatory response reflects that fear. | ||
| And he goes straight through this, which we should all be paying attention to. | ||
| So Azra Nomani is doing great work at identifying the groups involved, which of course include CARE, the Muslim Students Association, the Party for Socialism and Liberation, the Democratic Socialists of America, AMP, and also Code Pink and others. | ||
| So as she has laid out very meticulously, all of these groups are aligned in what Higgins was trying to warn Trump about, which is kind of a red-green access. | ||
| But we did find that there is a video of one of the leaders of this movement. | ||
| His name is Texas Iman Yasir Qadi, and he has been training people for years. | ||
| And now he has the Epic City Project in Plano, Texas, which was being investigated. | ||
| And we got a video of him talking about his plans in America for politics. | ||
| And we are seeing this with Mamdani. | ||
| I think we should play that video so people understand what we're talking about here. | ||
| We need to stand for election. | ||
| We need to take charge of our country. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If we don't do something, these seculars, the liberals are going to come. | |
| So they started giving fun to us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
One of the most famous one amongst them said, I used to say that democracy is haram. | |
| Now I say participation in democracy is our jihad. | ||
| That's our jihad. | ||
| We're going to fight not through the bullets, but the balas. | ||
| He literally made that phrase in Arabic. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's going to be our jihad, going to the polls and making sure that we win. | |
| What is your duty as a member of the ummah now that you are also an American? | ||
| It is our physical jihad duty to fight the entire earth until we enter into the ummah. | ||
| So that is the imam that is in Plano, Texas at Epoch City. | ||
| Apparently, the DOJ dropped the investigation into Epoch City, but it continues anyway, as reported by Amy Meck. | ||
| Endlessly, her work is tireless at the Rare Foundation. | ||
| But if we want to become Europe, then we're going to just ignore this. | ||
| In the meantime, Iran has put out 100 Muslim scholars to claim Trump is an enemy against God. | ||
| So today, the Iranian state media promoted a letter like the 51 intelligence agents, a group of 100 Muslims and scholars and intellectuals condemning President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as enemies against God and warning Muslim leaders that compromised normalization of relations or collaboration with the U.S. or Israel is haram, like he was talking about in that video. | ||
| The report also said that any ongoing normalization process between America and Syria under jihadist President Ahmad al-Shahra would be met with resistance from the rest of the Muslim community. | ||
| And frankly, they are also threatening anything and anyone that participates in any expansion of the Abrahamic Accords. | ||
| It says right here that 100 Muslim scholars who reportedly curse Trump and Netanyahu as anti-jihadist leaders while offering full and unwavering support for the Iranian supreme leader, Khomeini. | ||
| So we have this happening in our country, and of course, people are pushing it. | ||
| Now we have the teachers' unions pushing for Memdani. | ||
| We already have Bass in L.A. We have also Johnson in Chicago and we're about to have Memdani in New York and they are all aligned. | ||
| The one thing that they hate the most, of course, is the U.S. Constitution. | ||
| They are with the Obama fundamentally transforming America into not America and are aligned with the globalist causes around there. | ||
| So where we are right now is the people of the United States need to realize that this is a local problem in everyone's backyard. | ||
| And as much as we want the swamp to be drained in Washington, D.C., the real problem is local. | ||
| It is in your school boards. | ||
| It is in your city councils. | ||
| It is in your election commission. | ||
| This is what is happening. | ||
| We're being infiltrated. | ||
| It's actually been going on for decades, but the infiltration is no longer being hidden. | ||
| They are speaking about it in conferences. | ||
| They are going around the country. | ||
| They are organizing with the unions who are already brilliant organizers, and they are using all the tools that they have, both here and internationally, to break the United States as fast as they can. | ||
| We have the 2026 midterms coming up, and I don't see enough people out there really working to make sure that that election is as legit as it possibly can be, because we all know that what is happening is they are going around and they are putting in candidates, candidates as independents, | ||
| some candidates as Democrats, but they are actually aligned with the socialist Democrats of America, and they should not even be able to run for office as their platform is no constitution, no Bill of Rights, no borders, and yet we continue to allow the squad to add more and more people to their pack that are infiltrating all of our local governments all over the country. | ||
| I think we will take a break in a minute. | ||
| So that is it for now, and I'll be back on the other side. | ||
| Hello, and welcome back. | ||
| We are going to also get back into what is going on. | ||
| There's breaking news Continually about the new investigation into Russia Gate of both James Comey and John Brennan, but also Mark Elias. | ||
| Most of you know Mark Elias as the lawyer for the Clinton campaign that was involved in the entire Russia collusion hoax and the steel dossier. | ||
| And he's been out there as well as Brennan went on TV last night with Nicole Wallace on Intel Television, MSNBC, to kind of act like he has no idea what's going on. | ||
| I wanted to play the clip of Brennan on Nicole Wallace last night, if we could. | ||
| What does it mean that this happened now? | ||
| Well, it means, from my perspective, that the women and men of the CIA deserve stronger, better, apolitical, nonpartisan leadership at such a challenging time of our national security globally with everything that's going on. | ||
| And it's clear that Mr. Ratcliffe decided that he was going to initiate this. | ||
| I think, again, to try to satisfy the interest, the urge of Donald Trump, who continues to claim that the assessment of Russian interference in the 2016 election was a hoax. | ||
| It was not. | ||
| It clearly was not. | ||
| Russia interfered. | ||
| They tried to help Donald Trump. | ||
| They tried to hurt Hillary Clinton. | ||
| They tried to undermine the democratic foundations of our country in terms of our election integrity. | ||
| This has been validated over and over again. | ||
| Move on, get over it. | ||
| But clearly, Donald Trump believes that this is something that I think continues to need to be looked at and criticized. | ||
| But again, I stand behind the assessment. | ||
| I think the assessment has stood the test of time. | ||
| And again, I point to those reviews that were done in a political and nonpartisan fashion. | ||
| It's almost unbelievable that this man is saying that when everyone knows that that's not true at this point. | ||
| I guess not if you watch MSNBC or Nicole Wallace or any of these delusional people. | ||
| But he looks to me pretty scared, which is a good thing because frankly, what this man has done to this country, like I said earlier, the relationship with during Trump's first term in Europe, particularly between Ukraine and Trump and Russia and Trump, really could have taken this in a very different direction. | ||
| And we might not be on the door of World War III in Europe right now if that didn't happen. | ||
| I also want to talk a little bit about that there is a lot of evidence that we have not seen yet. | ||
| And there has been a letter sent in by Rep Crawford, Eric Crawford. | ||
| He's now the head of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. | ||
| He actually wrote a letter to Donald Trump and the CIA saying basically that the intelligence community assessment tradecraft review that was just put in is a whitewash. | ||
| He is saying basically that the CIA has in its possessions a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence staff report that exposes the truth about the politically driven Obama-era assessment, that Putin and the Russian government developed a clear preference for Donald Trump. | ||
| The report was produced during the 116th Congress. | ||
| We all remember the Nunes memo, of course, and who was leading the Nunes team that was investigating it? | ||
| Cash Patel. | ||
| And it says that under the leadership of Devin Nunes, despite extraordinary restrictions imposed by the CIA, among those restrictions are prohibition of transporting the final document to our secure spaces on Capitol Hill. | ||
| As a result, very few people have reviewed it. | ||
| He is asking for that document to be released, at least to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. | ||
| It also says that he is very disappointed that the agency was permitted to whitewash the full extent of their problems. | ||
| Our analytic tradecraft concerns are not limited to a single aspect of 2016's ICA and include matters under current investigation by House Permanent Select Committee, such as CIA's work on anomalous health incidents and COVID. | ||
| He says that he wants that assessment, and I believe that Donald Trump is transporting that assessment as we speak. | ||
| But there are also a lot of 302s that were never released as well. | ||
| And we hope that we will get all of that. | ||
| Okay, we are back. | ||
| And also, I wanted to also play a clip. | ||
| We have a clip of the Clinton campaign lawyer, Mark Elias, that has been going around the country since, basically trying to change election laws, trying to take away people's bar license for questioning the 2020 election. | ||
| He's also up in arms, and he'd like us to ignore everything that is going on in the investigations surrounding him and the entire Russia gate-Russia collusion. | ||
| Let's take a look at the panic that is setting in over with Mark Elias as well. | ||
| Utmost caution, care, and integrity. | ||
| Mark Elias. | ||
| Oh, I'm sorry. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| And look, if you want to know why so many Democrats for so long have gotten so angry about all of this, it's because in 2016, the Russian Federation hacked into the Democratic National Committee service. | ||
| It is because Hillary Clinton was vilified by Russia. | ||
| It is because Donald Trump took to a stage and asked for Russia to do his bidding. | ||
| And then what happened after that is Donald Trump became president and he appointed John Durham. | ||
| He appointed Bill Barr, who chose John Durham to facilitate a legitimization that was Donald Trump's fevered dream, that somehow Russia did not intervene in the 2016 election to help him. | ||
| And John Durham then got special counsel protection on the way out, as the Trump administration came to an end on the way out the door, he got special counsel protection. | ||
| And he brought three cases, Nicole. | ||
| One of them was the low-level plea that you mentioned by a low-level person. | ||
| The other two were acquittals. | ||
| John Durham brought two nonsense cases that juries threw out of court. | ||
| Then he wrote a Fantastical report to try to make something, anything, out of a bunch of nothing. | ||
| Because the fact is, it was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats who had been the victims, not Donald Trump. | ||
| And so Donald Trump is now back in office. | ||
| And the same people who are peddling the same nonsense, who are once again trying to make Donald Trump the victim of something that was actually Donald Trump encouraging the Russians from the stage to release hacked emails, are now once again leaking and suggesting and otherwise saying maybe now it's not this person, it's now John Brennan. | ||
| When the fact remains, the Russian Federation wanted Donald Trump to win in 2016. | ||
| Donald Trump gleefully, gleefully took advantage of that fact and ever since has been peddling this misinformation, these lies, and having his minions open this investigation and that investigation, one after another, that ultimately either conclude that what he is saying is not true or that end, as John Durhams did, in failure and efforts to prove cases that never existed. | ||
| I just think it's a break, but I want to impress both of you on what it is almost unbelievable the extent to which Mark Elias is absolutely contradicting everything that has come out, not just the Durham report, but the entire nothing that came out of the Mueller Weissman cover-up of Crossfire Hurricane. | ||
| At this point, I mean, Mark Elias is saying every, it's opposite day over there with Mark Elias. | ||
| I do want to remind people that what really happened here was that Mark Elias was involved, as was the Hillary Clinton campaign. | ||
| They also got fined for what they did. | ||
| They have never been held accountable. | ||
| But instead of the truth, which both, as you saw, Mark Elias, but also John Brennan lied about, it is already proven fact that John Brennan found out that Hillary Clinton and John Podesta and Mark Elias, that they had contacted Fusion GPS with Nellie Orr and the whole crew to team up with Steele to put together the totally fake, | ||
| discredited Steele dossier, and then to put that in the ICA report, which Brennan pushed and Comey pushed in order to make Trump look bad. | ||
| At the same time, they had already believed that not only was Hillary Clinton going to be president in 2016, but they were already setting up. | ||
| We still don't have an explanation of Loretta Lynch's tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton right before her case just kind of disappeared. | ||
| James Comey stood in and kind of exonerated her without even an investigation. | ||
| The investigation when Brennan came and told Obama that he found out that Hillary Clinton was trying to get the steel dossier going to implicate Trump as having relations with Russia, that all of the sudden we're supposed to believe that they would have opened a case into looking into Hillary's relationship with Russia and what she was doing there. | ||
| But instead, John Brennan decided to double down, take Hillary's lead, and open a fake investigation into Donald Trump that stole his term and might have led to where we are now on the verge of World War III, because Donald Trump could not have a normal relationship with Europe or with Russia at all during those years, let alone be able to look into Ukraine as the sitting president. | ||
| I also want to remind you that Donald Trump filed a lawsuit that named all of these people. | ||
| The lawsuit was filed against specific people, if you recall, and it was all of these people were listed, Hillary Clinton, Mark Elias, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, John Podesta, Jake Sullivan, Robbie Mook, Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS, Nellie Orr and Bruce Orr. | ||
| Nellie Orr of what we just learned more and more, how in-depth and involved she was with her ham radio and her interactions with the sub source and with Christopher Steele and others. | ||
| Lisa McCabe, I mean, Lisa Page, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok. | ||
| The lawsuit, basically, you can find it on my website at themlkashow.com resource page, leaves out, leaves exactly what happened here very, very clear. | ||
| I want to also say that Donald Trump did put in not just the executive order to release all the documents, but before he left office, he also put in on January 20th, while Susan Rice was covering her butt with the buy the book letter, Donald Trump put out a memorandum for the Attorney General to Privacy Act review of certain declassified materials related to the FBI's crossfire hurricane investigation. | ||
| Many of those we still have yet to see, and this is not over, and it's got nothing to do with Donald Trump. | ||
| It has to do with criminality on the highest level. | ||
| As you remember, we got unredacted text between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, for which then they sued and I think won a million dollars each. | ||
| But if you really think about it, we haven't gotten much information. | ||
| There had to have been 302s filled out for every interview they did, not just for Andrew McCabe and Bruce Orr, but there must have been 302s for interviews with Christopher Steele and Igor Duchenko and Rodney Jaffe and the rest of them. | ||
| All of those 302s should be released. | ||
| They never have been released to this day, including that House Permanent Select Committee classified document that Crawford is asking for now. | ||
| We have that as well. | ||
| We are going to have to put out all of the information because frankly, we can have Mark Elias and John Brennan rewriting history about what really happened. | ||
| And of course, Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton don't only come into play with the Epstein case, they're totally in play with this as well and have not been held accountable. | ||
| I also want to mention that the records and evidence that were unredacted and declassified are only one part. | ||
| But the DOJ National Security Division also had all kinds of documents as well. | ||
| But you would also think since they tapped the Five Eyes nations, we know about Halper and Miffstud and situations in Australia, Italy, and UK related to crossfire hurricane and the Russian collusion, Russia gate, Russia nonsense. | ||
| So all of those international agencies should actually have all of this information as well. | ||
| And we should be requesting all of that. | ||
| And if you also remember, it was Admiral Rogers again who went and told everyone that the NSA database was being tapped into during the campaign by FBI contractors searching U.S. citizens during the 2016 presidential primary. | ||
| Many people think that that was happening out of a portal in Mark Elias's law firm, Perkins Cooey. | ||
| As you know, Donald Trump has put out executive orders naming the lawfare crew, Eisen, Weissman, McCord, Elias, all of these people, but also a lot of these law firms. | ||
| Many of them are multinational and have worked across many jurisdictions all to collaborate on this. | ||
| We would also like to know what Admiral Rogers did find and all the documents that were used when Admiral Rogers, I believe, went and told the Trump team that they were being spied on at Trump Tower, which made them move to Bedminster at that time. | ||
| Of course, we had the very bizarre and unjustified raid that happened at Mar-a-Lago, where they were looking apparently for some kind of binder. | ||
| I don't know if they found such a binder, but they lied about everything having to do with it. | ||
| And the fully unredacted 99-page FISA court opinion detailing the substance of the NSA compromised by FBI officials and contractors, including names, dates, illegal surveillance, all of that is still classified as well. | ||
| So as John Radcliffe said, thousands of pages that were declassified by President Trump were given, but there's still much more, including the work product of John Durham. | ||
| And at the end of the day, the John Durham case, if you know about what was going on there, was he was not allowed to look inside the government. | ||
| Apparently, since 1963 and the murder of President JFK, we have never looked inside the government. | ||
| Nobody inside the government, as Cash would call the government gangsters, have basically ever been held accountable for any crime. | ||
| We don't have any answers to anything. | ||
| And we're just starting to find out about JFK all these years later. | ||
| But frankly, people have questions about 9-11, about Oklahoma City, about Las Vegas, about COVID, about the 2020 election, about the 2016 interference of RussiaGate. | ||
| And we have yet to see anyone held accountable over decades of criminality. | ||
| And then, of course, they promote the people involved in the criminality. | ||
| We are hoping that this time it's different. | ||
| But right now, we are not sure what's going to happen. | ||
| Other than that, some of the points that people are not looking at, I don't think, is that the spying on the people during the campaign and then during the transition should be considered, I would think, sedition or some kind of treasonous activity. | ||
| All of the intel and all of the metadata was captured by the NSA and searched by FBI contractors, possibly even Fusion GPS, and then passed along to benefit Hillary Clinton. | ||
| And yet you have Mark Elias right here saying Hillary Clinton was the victim when we have the documents from John Brennan saying, no, the opposite, that it was Hillary Clinton creating the illusion of collusion and at the same time working with Steele and working with all of them. | ||
| And of course, they also buried, you know, Uranium One and then they buried everything about Hillary Clinton's server and they buried everything about her emails. | ||
| And we've still never seen any of that. | ||
| And when the Clinton campaign launched this whole thing originally with Fusion GPS and Glenn Simpson, we don't have any of the information on that. | ||
| So this is not over as much as Mark Elias would like it to be. | ||
| But we do need two documents. | ||
| The two documents that have been pointed out are the 2017 99 page opinion of FISA court presiding judge Collier covering 2016 FBI contractor abuse of the NSA database. | ||
| Tulsi Gabbard needs to get that unredacted version, read it and declassify it as per the conservative treehouse as laid out over and over. | ||
| We also need the NSA audit logs, which hopefully were preserved by NSA Director Mike Rogers that outline his testimony. | ||
| There are many other documents out there that we can get to look into this, but it is going to be up to the people of the United States to keep pushing hard that we want accountability here. | ||
| We want this to be exposed. | ||
| We want full transparency or we don't want we can't move forward. | ||
| Again, I do want to remind everyone that there is plenty of evidence online and particularly there are a lot of the things that Mark Elias was saying there have been proven to be lies. | ||
| I will just go through a couple of them. | ||
| But one is that there's a lot of reports that indicate that the timeline of events also interconnect with what happened with Julian Assange. | ||
| So they're saying right there that the DNC server was hacked by the Russians. | ||
| There's absolutely no evidence that that happened. | ||
| And again, Fusion GPS are the ones, I believe, that looked into this, and yet they never turned over those documents. | ||
| So according to the narrative, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange announced the publication of Democratic Party emails not only before he received the documents, but before he even communicated with the source that provided them. | ||
| There's also suggestions because Mueller blamed two Russian hackers, Gussifer 2.0 and another one, that they supplied the emails to Julian Assange, which he said wasn't true. | ||
| Then also, Mueller didn't interview Julian Assange. | ||
| Why didn't Mueller interview Julian Assange? | ||
| And yet, then we also all know that a lot of people still have questions about Seth Rich's laptop and how it ended up at Perkins Cooey and how it ended up also that the FBI said for years they had no information on Seth Rich or his murder or his relationship or if he had anything to do, even though Julian Assange largely basically hinted that it was an inside job, particularly pointed at him. | ||
| And yet we still have no answers about that. | ||
| I believe Ty Clevenger is still waiting. | ||
| They were supposed to turn that over in March and they turned it over. | ||
| It looks like An index and no information. | ||
| Beyond that, we also have the U.S. intelligence officials cannot make definitive collusions about if there was a hacking at all of the DNC computer servers. | ||
| Oh, it was CrowdStrike, not Fusion GPS. | ||
| CrowdStrike were the ones that did the forensic, a private company that the DNC hired, but they wouldn't let the FBI look at the server. | ||
| They wanted a neutral party that was being, I mean, this is all so crazy. | ||
| And the government allowed CrowdStrike and the Democratic Party's legal counsel to submit redacted records, meaning CrowdStrike and not the government decided how they were going to run that entire investigation, which leads everyone to believe that Comey, | ||
| Clapper, Obama, Brennan, all of them were actually in the bag for Hillary Clinton, making all of the evidence about Hillary Clinton go away, creating evidence about Donald Trump, and then using that false evidence from Hillary Clinton and her campaign to then interfere in his entire first term and basically stand in the way of any progress he could make in Europe, | ||
| in Russia, in Ukraine, because they had started the fake Mueller Weissman investigation, which of course came up with no collusion, A. And B, it seems that the Weissman-Moeller team knew already that there was no outside hack of the DNC server, that there was no collusion between Donald Trump and Russia, that the Alpha Bank story that Hillary Clinton and Jake Sullivan pushed was a lie. | ||
| All of this is out there, and yet they are still pushing that it's not a big deal and we should just let it go. | ||
| And I am completely against that. | ||
| And just to remind you, Brennan was then the director of the CIA, and he played a very big role in all of this. | ||
| And like I said, there's a lot of questions about Brennan and Obama's relationship and Brennan's relationship when he was in the Middle East and what was going on all those years. | ||
| Then after Obama comes in, a lot of moves were made to move closer to the Muslim Brotherhood. | ||
| He had obviously he had converted to Islam. | ||
| He's said that he was a committed communist when he was younger, and yet somehow he's put in as the head of the CIA. | ||
| And now he wants us to think that he's totally innocent and has never done anything wrong. | ||
| Yet we know that he has. | ||
| So the core findings of the Mueller report said that there was basically no Trump collusion, but it did continue and double down, just like the ICA doubled down this week from Ratcliffe, that there was in fact Russia hacking of the server. | ||
| So as I've said over and over, I would love to see Julian Assange get immunity and come to and a pardon from Donald Trump and come actually tell the truth. | ||
| He's the one person that can actually bring clarity to all of this, not to mention the creepy John Podesta emails that are still unexplained. | ||
| But it is very important that we stay on this and that we make sure that we get all of this information because a lot of these people are still embedded in the FBI, in the DOJ, in the CIA and elsewhere. | ||
| As I was talking about earlier, our embassies around the country have become hotbeds of resistance against Trump, pro-globalism, pro-global governance, really tripling down on the sustainable development goals all through our embassies, all over the world. | ||
| And yet it doesn't appear that the embassies are being cleaned out from the people that were there during the Obama and Clinton years at this juncture so far with Donald Trump. | ||
| So in foreign policy right now, we have a lot of these people that colluded to basically run a coup in America in 2016 and then kick off a now almost 10-year color revolution to destroy America from within, divide and conquer, and yet nobody's been held accountable. | ||
| And I am looking forward to that. | ||
| I believe that is coming. | ||
| I hope that is coming. | ||
| But again, we have a lot of questions that need to be answered and we need to keep fighting. | ||
| And that's where we are right now when it comes to this entire situation. | ||
| Moving forward, though, I do want to mention for those of you out there, including myself and obviously Alex Jones and everyone else, we have a new investigation going on into one of the worst of the worst of the censors and silencers of conservative voices and alternative voices. | ||
| The Southern Poverty Law Center looks like they're in a little trouble. | ||
| And I wanted to mention that before we go to break today. | ||
| So the Southern Poverty Law Center apparently has an endowment of $700 million. | ||
| And they are also organizing in America and with the ACLU and the resistance and pushing back. | ||
| But it turns out that they have a $700 million endowment and possess more than $30 million in offshore accounts. | ||
| Finally, somebody is about to look into the Southern Poverty Law Center. | ||
| The ACLU could get a real looking at too as well. | ||
| But it turns out that it looks like it has been reported that in the Cayman Islands, the Southern Poverty Law Center has $30 million in Central America, according to Matt Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Council. | ||
| The Cayman Islands has always been known by Jeffrey Epstein too as one of these places that people select to hide their money from the government. | ||
| But this is a public charity and they should explain to the public why do they have money in the Cayman Islands in offshore accounts to the tune of $30 million. | ||
| If you remember, Southern Poverty Law Center had the hate map and declared everyone from Zero Heads to Breitbart to InfoWars as hate on their hate map as also fake news. | ||
| They included mainstream conservatives, Christian nonprofits alongside the Ku Klux Klan. | ||
| And they work, of course, with the Democracy Alliance and all of the dark money that goes through the Arabella partners and all of that. | ||
| They are funding a bunch of these lawsuits along with Norm Eisen and Democracy Dockett, which is, of course, Mark Elias, but States United is one of them and also State Democracy Defenders. | ||
| So that's all The blue state attorney generals that have signed up with Norm Eisen and his color revolution team to file lawsuits nonstop all through this second term of Donald Trump. | ||
| As you remember, Mary McCord, almost seven months before the election of 2024, said on MSNBC that her and the lawfare crew, particularly the people that work over at Brookings and Weissman, McCord, Eisen, all the usual suspects, that they were getting together and having weekly meetings and calls to look at everything that Donald Trump might do in his second term and to be ready to file lawsuits and impeachments. | ||
| So this is not going to stop until the Supreme Court actually makes it stop. | ||
| But in the meantime, looking, seeing that there's investigations being opened into the Southern Poverty Law Center finally, hopefully that will lead into investigations being opened into Tides Foundation and the Arabella partner, Tentacles, also that fund a lot of this stuff. | ||
| And we'll see you on the other side. | ||
| You were just telling me that you had a brain disease. | ||
| And you, what did you do to fix it? | ||
| I found this guy, he's a functional medicine guy, and he got me on methylene blue. | ||
| And that instantly stopped everything. | ||
| I'd take it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Yeah. | ||
| I take it every day as well. | ||
| And RFK Jr. told me about it. | ||
| Yeah, man, it's fantastic. | ||
| And so this guy's injecting in 1890, injects these rats with it and then does an autopsy on these things. | ||
| And their brain, their brainstem, every single nerve is blue. | ||
| So he discovered this methylene blue has an affinity for neuronal tissue. | ||
| So he says, well, it's sucking into neurons and working in the body. | ||
| So he started putting it in humans. | ||
| And we found out it's an MAOI, which helps with depression and anxiety and all kinds of life stress and stuff. | ||
| It is so incredible that it acts as an electron donor to mitochondria, especially your neuronal mitochondria. | ||
| So it helps you produce more ATP and it helps you get rid of this stuff called reactive oxygen species. | ||
| So you have an oxygen molecule that should have two hydrogens on it and like your body's job is to convert stuff into water so you can pee it out. | ||
| So if you get an oxygen molecule, it's got four, five, one, it's a reactive oxygen, which we call free radicals. | ||
| So methylene blue goes in there and balances a lot of those things out in your brain and your nervous system. | ||
| So it is a miracle. | ||
| It's been proven for 100 years. | ||
| It's one of the most well-proven drugs out there. | ||
| The strongest medical grade methylene blue. | ||
| And this is what I'm on. | ||
| Total mitochondria cleaning, next level energy. | ||
| This is amazing. | ||
| And you want to what I'm on? | ||
| Irace Simos Chilogy. | ||
| This right here, look at that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That is power. | |
| I'm on intermittent fasting. | ||
| I'm eight at three o'clock today. | ||
| And I stopped eating crap food, stopped drinking. | ||
| That's what I'm on right there, baby. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Okay. | ||
| Well, doesn't Alex Jones look great? | ||
| I got to get myself some methylene blue immediately, if not sooner. | ||
| Thank you for staying with me, Mel Kay, filling in for Owen Schroer today. | ||
| It's my first time, so thanks for sticking with me. | ||
| A little return to sanity news. | ||
| The Justice Department has just issued 20 subpoenas to doctors and clinics involved in performing transgender medical procedures on children. | ||
| They announced yesterday. | ||
| So it looks like the Justice Department made the announcement during the FTC workshop on the dangers of gender affirming care for minors in Washington, D.C. It was an incredible, unbelievable group of people there yesterday speaking up, including detransitioners, doctors from all over. | ||
| Again, we are still waiting also for a complete investigation and some indictments when it comes to COVID, but this is just as bad, and I'm hoping that we will see this. | ||
| So 20 subpoenas went out against clinics who are engaged in transgender transition attempts, noting that the DOJ's investigation includes healthcare fraud, false statements, and more. | ||
| They said that they are encouraging Americans to come forward if they could provide information about deceptive practices in the transgender medicine industry. | ||
| If you are someone who has been harmed, please come forward and let us know, said a statement by the DOJ. | ||
| After following this, many survivors spoke about what they have been through. | ||
| I also want to mention that there has been a lot of concern coming out of the therapy world in terms of counselors out there who have been inserted into all different schools and communities that are pushing puberty blockers and transgender care before they are even assessing a child's psychological makeup. | ||
| So what has been happening certainly over the last three years is that children that are going into therapy are being affirmed with whatever they believe about their gender and then encouraged to go on puberty blockers and without first being tested for things like schizophrenia, bipolar, any of the autism spectrum. | ||
| So basically they have replaced traditional therapy in many, many places around the country, particularly through schools, with gender affirming care. | ||
| On top of that, Donald Trump is supposed to be cutting the funding for Planned Parenthood, but a lot of people have not been made aware yet that Planned Parenthood is the number one provider of gender medicine, basically puberty blockers. | ||
| And the other part of that is that many of these people are making decisions at a very young age, and then they are harmed for life. | ||
| They also become patients for life. | ||
| So it is a huge business as well. | ||
| And the people behind a lot of this transgender push are not the people you would think. | ||
| Many of them are also related with the transhumanism movement. | ||
| And that has been something that we've talked about a lot on my show. | ||
| And I know that it's been talked about a lot here. | ||
| But all of this is together. | ||
| And frankly, they're not just bringing in doctors. | ||
| They're also going to bring in whistleblowers and survivors and all these People that have fought back and had basically their lives and careers destroyed for not wanting to participate in what they essentially believe to be sterilization and child mutilation. | ||
| And that is a very big deal. | ||
| And we are hoping that that will turn into something else. | ||
| The Federal Trade Commission is also investigating at the same time. | ||
| They believe that the process should be long, but that people should be held accountable for what they have done. | ||
| The problem is that there are many children out there who have already been damaged for life, and we have to give them voices and support them. | ||
| At the same time, we have Hollywood and again, the teachers' unions fighting back and saying that this is egregious and that they are harming children. | ||
| There's absolutely no evidence, as per a psychiatrist on my show recently, that the not going for puberty blockers or any of this gender care, particularly before 18, has caused any uptick in suicidal tendencies or anything else. | ||
| Much of the stuff is bogus, as we know when we have gone through many people, including on this show, the documents that lay it all out, particularly the Tavistock Institute in the UK has stopped completely and other countries have as well. | ||
| So hopefully that is coming. | ||
| But at the same time, as I told you, the education unions are fighting back on this too. | ||
| So the National Education Association and American Federation for Teachers are mobilizing to make sure that LGBTQ plus students are protected and fighting against Trump not wanting to have DEI and LGBTQ plus and all of that in the schools. | ||
| So now we have not only is the DOJ suing California, but it looks like many other schools around the country will also be sued. | ||
| The U.S. Department of Education is supposed to be either eliminated or greatly reduced. | ||
| But as of right now, we don't know how much of that is happening yet. | ||
| But we do know that the dismantling of the Department of Education involves hundreds of millions of dollars. | ||
| And 90% of the children in America and 95% of students with disabilities are educated in the public school system. | ||
| So they're using this as a excuse to continue down the path of resistance and saying that removing LGBTQ plus and gender care from schools that have been put in over the last four years will damage children. | ||
| And of course, that goes along the line with the social-emotional learning that has replaced most education around the country. | ||
| Now, on the university level, there is a little bit of action in that realm as well. | ||
| DHS sends administrative subpoenas to Harvard University. | ||
| So the situation at Harvard is also bubbling up. | ||
| On Wednesday, the Department of Homeland Security announced that it would send subpoenas to Harvard University regarding its student visitor and exchange program. | ||
| As you know, there have been multiple arrests recently from university campuses of people, particularly members of the Chinese Communist Party and others, of taking information and being involved in research at these labs. | ||
| And many of them are funded by the government. | ||
| But right now, it looks like they are going to, Christy Noam announced that Harvard provide information about the criminality and misconduct of foreign students on campuses and turn over the records of foreign students and students on visitor visas and exchange programs to the United States Department of Homeland Security for review. | ||
| Of course, this is not sitting well over there either, but at this point, we do really have to look into what is going on at universities. | ||
| Something that I found that I don't think a lot of people are aware of is that the universities during the last four years of the open border, many of these universities have also allowed for their campuses to become Every Campus a Refuge. | ||
| So that's an NGO that works at university campuses. | ||
| And what we found out is that many universities, dozens of colleges and universities have gotten involved in this movement called Every Campus a Refuge. | ||
| It is basically they are using campuses to house illegals all over the country, and then they mix in with the population. | ||
| So 15 million, say, illegal immigrants came into the country, 75,000 special interest aliens, all of these people, and then they have been funneled into multiple universities around the country. | ||
| Many of them were single men between 18 and 24 traveling alone that then got housing at these campuses. | ||
| Many colleges and university campuses have been utilizing their dorms, gyms, and off-campus student housing to house illegal immigrants and refugees. | ||
| So much so that the House passed H.R. 3941, Students Not Shelter Act, that was introduced on June 9th of 2023 to prevent federal funding to K through 12 schools and colleges who provide support and housing to migrants. | ||
| Basically, this is above and beyond the already affordable housing, the vouchers, the Section 8, the rental assistance, but also college campuses. | ||
| At the same time, many college campuses that were giving housing and refuge to supposed refugees also gave them free education. | ||
| And at this point, they're all meshing in. | ||
| So like I talked about earlier, the red-green access is being fomented in college campus housing at this point. | ||
| And that's something that they should be looking into immediately, if not sooner, not just at Harvard, but all over the country. | ||
| And we are now seeing that Harvard itself is fighting back. | ||
| But now Donald Trump is talking about putting a tax on endowments and ending a lot of the funding going to universities. | ||
| But as we've talked about many times, we have to realize that the whole model of universities has been completely turned upside down. | ||
| And at this point, what is happening is many people are going into the workforce. | ||
| And this month, we had a huge surplus of new jobs for American citizens as opposed to what was happening Before. | ||
| So that is happening as we speak. | ||
| And moving on from there, I am looking at. | ||
| So we are talking about now in New York, it looks like Mamdani is leading everyone in the New York race. | ||
| It looks like Eric Adams is number four at this point, and Mom Dani is at the top. | ||
| And I think it's important for us to think about what he is representing, including that we found out that he, during COVID, wanted to see people taken out of their homes and had homeless people put into housing. | ||
| And so now we have Democrats, even younger Democrats, sounding the alarm that they're in serious trouble. | ||
| Members of the group called Majority Democrats are attempting to recruit new candidates and develop new messaging to fight back against the far left in the party. | ||
| Of course, they've allowed the Democrat Socialists of America and the former Bernie Bros to go far, far, far left. | ||
| But Democrat Minnesota rep Angie Craig came out and said, if we don't build the big tent party that can win majorities, we're on the path to being the party of the permanent minority from a national election perspective. | ||
| I would say that that's absolutely true. | ||
| So what we're dealing with right now is that the majority Democrats consist of around 30 Democratic leaders from all levels of government that are very concerned about the Democratic Party's direction. | ||
| And they're speaking out about their fear of the 2028 White House race. | ||
| We still are looking into the midterms, but they are looking even further. | ||
| It turns out that they were hoping on Gavin Newsom, but he's doing a tour around the country that is not going so well, particularly because the Pacific Palisades have not been rebuilt, and yet he is signing $100 million for low-income housing to go into that area again. | ||
| And that is not playing well with the people that already did support him. | ||
| But it says right here that they are looking around the country to find new Democratic Party members that are not so far left. | ||
| I think that they probably failed already in that endeavor. | ||
| Other than that, we also have 20, oh Lord, JP Morgan is out there now talking about their relationship. | ||
| This is just coming over Wall Street Journal. | ||
| JP Morgan is admitting their relationship with Epstein all the way back to the beginning. | ||
| And as I told you, JP Morgan had to pay the victims $365 million to the victims. | ||
| And then also one of the JP Morgan former private bankers of Jeffrey Epstein, who was also at Barclays, Jess Staley, is back in the news again. | ||
| Of course, also, Jamie Dimon was supposed to, I guess, be questioned about this, and he has not been yet. | ||
| But JP Morgan basically put out a statement that they don't deny that they did business with him, but that they ended that business after his arrest. | ||
| But like I said, Jess Staley is one of the people that there are emails that are very suspicious, and he has been on the stand in the UK, and people are asking why he hasn't been questioned in America. | ||
| They're also pointing to, at this point coming out, the Leon Black from Apollo Capital. | ||
| He paid Jeffrey Epstein $150 million, and people are wondering exactly what that was for. | ||
| This is going on and on. | ||
| And at this point, JP Morgan has said that they've handed over all of the documentation detailing any interactions between Epstein and more than 20 employees and executives at JPMorgan. | ||
| Many of them have given sworn testimonies, depositions, and Mr. Diamond, the CEO, they said, was supposed to give a deposition, but it's not clear if that ever happened. | ||
| But why some of these are not being put out is not clear either. | ||
| We also found out that there is another person that has been questioned a lot because last week in the Diddy case, of course, it is still being questioned why James Comey's daughter, Maureen Comey, handled the Epstein case, the Maxwell case, and the Diddy case. | ||
| All of three of them are considered or have been suggested to be assets of either FBI, the CIA, both, or some other intelligence agency. | ||
| And then, of course, that James Comey's daughter would be the person that would be trying these seems like a conflict of interest, but such is the Southern District of New York. | ||
| But it turns out that Epstein also had somebody come up in the Diddy case. | ||
| So in the Diddy case, they were talking about Highbridge Capital investing in Diddy's TV network. | ||
| Well, that would be Glenn Dubin. | ||
| And Glenn Dubin and his wife, Eva Dubin, she's a doctor. | ||
| They both come up over and over in the Epstein depositions. | ||
| And people would like to see all of these people questioned in America at the very least, have depositions taken from them of their relationships with Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
| JP Morgan, again, bought a controlling stake in Glenn Dubin's Highbridge in 2004 for more than a billion dollars. | ||
| Epstein earned a finder's fee on that transaction of $15 million. | ||
| And we are still looking at that. | ||
| And then, of course, last but not least, there is still a bank in the U.S. Virgin Islands that Southern Trust that apparently is connected to Epstein that is still functioning. | ||
| And people are wondering about that. | ||
| And again, the U.S. Virgin Islands lawsuit also names Staley as a person that was involved in sex trafficking, suggests that Staley may have been involved in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation. | ||
| The suit out of the Virgin Islands alleges Epstein wired money to a woman around the time that Mr. Staley stayed with Epstein in Palm Beach at the mansion, and then again to the same woman when Mr. Staley told Epstein he would be in London. | ||
| So the question now is, why aren't the white-collar transactions being followed? | ||
| If all of this money was being transferred, particularly through JPMorgan, why can't we, I mean, then they know who the transactions were between. | ||
| They know who the buyers and sellers were. | ||
| And I believe that JP Morgan got away with a lot back in 2008. | ||
| I think they played $11 billion fine, but thanks to Eric Holder's collateral consequences memo, not one banker went to jail for the controlled demolition of the financial system in 2008 and 2009. | ||
| And here we are again with JPMorgan completely caught up in the Jeffrey Epstein case. | ||
| And yet again, no banker is being held accountable. | ||
| And this is the real problem with the Jeffrey Epstein case is that it seems to go to the highest levels of the international banking system that has been running the world since World War II. | ||
| And I believe that, like everyone else is saying, not only was he a blackmailer, but a lot of these people are concerned because they say that they did business with him. | ||
| All the doctors basically from Harvard that he was funding from the Human Genome Project and the CRISPR technology that he was doing there and the nanotechnology he was involved in. | ||
| All of those people basically say that they had nothing to do with the sex trafficking. | ||
| They might have gone to his island or gone to his place in New Mexico, but that doesn't make them guilty. | ||
| And so the excuse that people are giving right now that they think is plausible is that there are too many bystanders or as Eric Holder called collateral consequences to releasing these files. | ||
| But what I have to say is when Pam Bondi says that there's not a third party that can be charged in this case, all of these economic transactions, these white collar crimes are crimes that can obviously be followed through to a third party to be charged. | ||
| There's also some suggestion that the women that helped procure victims for Jeffrey Epstein, well over a thousand, they say, and this actually was going on since the early 90s, if not the late 80s, until he was arrested. | ||
| It didn't stop after he went to jail. | ||
| And there were many women, including Sarah Callan, Nicole Younkerman, the woman that he had, that was a pilot that he adopted, I guess, when she was a teenager. | ||
| So there's a lot out there that can be looked into. | ||
| There certainly should be grand juries. | ||
| Everyone is very upset that the Clintons yet again strike again. | ||
| And then, of course, yesterday in the middle of this, Chelsea Clinton put out an entire web posting that her Clinton Global Initiative is on the ground in Texas helping people. | ||
| And we all just think of Haiti when we think of that. | ||
| So as always, what is coming back is that the elitists, not elites, because they're elitists that are invested and funding and totally have been involved in the controlled demolition of the United States of America over the last decade are all involved in every single one of these things. | ||
| So if we don't get to the bottom of it at this point, I don't know how anyone can go forward without some of the truth. | ||
| And I do want to remind people that there is a lot of victims out there that deserve to know exactly who these people are, what they did, and hold them accountable. | ||
| Again, I want to remind you that Epstein had parties at his house with celebrities and that's come out and none of those people have been questioned. | ||
| As far as I can see, there's no grand jury yet. | ||
| So on that note, we are going to go and tell you a little bit about my book here. | ||
| It's called Americans Anonymous. | ||
| Before I go, I want to make sure that I tell you a little bit about my book. | ||
| It's called Americans Anonymous, Restoring Power to the People One Citizen at a Time. | ||
| I wrote this because I feel that our country, for the reasons that I'm talking about, particularly no accountability and responsibility and justice for decades in this country, has left us basically at rock bottom. | ||
| So I have a 12-step program for every American citizen out there who wants to get involved, how to get involved, how to become a champion and a hero where you are, because local action is the only way. | ||
| This is not something where one man, Donald Trump, is going to come into office and all of a sudden things are going to turn around. | ||
| The battle is just beginning and the battle is for your brain. | ||
| And my book is very much about deprogramming yourself, taking about your individual sovereignty, your critical thinking, your autonomy to really understand what this country is about, how important liberty and privacy and auto-determination are. | ||
| So every chapter of this book really is about how we got here, who they are. | ||
| I talk about the addiction our country is facing, which is, to me, it's an addiction to conflict and chaos. | ||
| How we got here? | ||
| Who are the dealers? | ||
| Who are the suppliers? | ||
| What do they want? | ||
| I talk quite a bit about the international banking cartel and the global public-private partnership that I call the parent company, because right now I am convinced that we have a parent company running the planet Earth that feels that the 8 billion of the humans are just lucky that they let us be here. | ||
| And we are the real problem they are trying to solve when it's actually just the opposite. | ||
| So please do go to themailcasehow.com and check out Americans Anonymous. | ||
| Also, I have a free resource page where I have lots of documents. | ||
| I call them opposition playbooks, but everything from Norm Eisen's, you know, Democracy Matters documents to CIA documents to the NATO cognitive warfare document, a lot of things about mind control and about education, great resources, great people that I go to. | ||
| I think it should help you. | ||
| Everyone should be their own hero, their own champion, their own investigator. | ||
| If the more of us get out there, the tsunami of truth cannot be stopped. | ||
| And of course, InfoWars is working every day to make sure that that's the case. | ||
| And thank you so much. | ||
| I am Mel Kay at themelkayshow.com. | ||
| Every day on Rumble and X, I have a live news show. | ||
| Thank you for entertaining me today as I try to, you know, do my thing here at InfoWars. | ||
| I'm so honored to be here today. | ||
| And thank you so much, everyone. | ||
| I will see you next time. | ||
| Really appreciate it. | ||
| You know, I'd like to know what happened to this Cash Patel. | ||
| You know, it's the same thing with Epstein's list. | ||
| It's like, what the hell are these Republicans doing? | ||
| Oh, I saw you give out. | ||
| I saw you make news this morning about that. | ||
| I got to get to that. | ||
| You say that the FBI has Epstein's list. | ||
| They're sitting on it. | ||
| That doesn't seem like something you should do. | ||
| You're protecting the world's foremost predator. | ||
| That seems like an evil thing to do, regardless of who may be embarrassed in the release of that list. | ||
| Why is the FBI protecting the greatest pederist, the largest scale pederist in human history? | ||
| Simple, because of who's on that list. | ||
| Do you think that Bill Gates is lobbying Congress night and day to prevent the disclosure of that list? | ||
| And why is it that the Senate, you know, and good for Senator Blackburn to try to get it out, but then Dick Durbin comes over the top and says, no, we're not going to release the names. | ||
| I don't care about the list itself, but he've released the names, right? | ||
| What the hell are the House Republicans doing? | ||
| They have the majority. | ||
| You can't get the list. | ||
| You're going to accept Dick Durbin's word or whoever that guy is as to who is on that list and who isn't and that it can and can't be released. | ||
| Put on your big boy pants and let us know who the pedophiles are. | ||
| We have an election coming up and we need to adjudicate this matter at the polls. | ||
| God knows the FBI and DOJ aren't going to do anything. | ||
| But how are you going to reward the FBI with a new headquarters building after their illegal surveillance on Donald Trump continues with a reauthorization of FISA and we can't even get basic documents out? | ||
| This is why America hates Congress. | ||
| And this is why I'm tired of the Republican majority saying they're going to get the job done and failing. | ||
| Now, look, I could spend an entire show specifically just on Bongino and Patel saying virtually that exact same thing in 100 different ways for the last four years. | ||
| But you have to wonder what changed. | ||
| And the evidence didn't change. | ||
| The evidence didn't change at all. | ||
| Their reporting on it changed. | ||
| Their attitude on it changed. | ||
| And so we're just wondering why. | ||
| And I don't think it's unfair to ask. | ||
| Alex Jones rejoins me. | ||
| He just got his stack from the other studio here. | ||
| I got the story you were looking for there to your left as well. | ||
| Yeah, so I mean, they showed me the Ben Shapiro attacks and stuff before my show ended. | ||
| I just got distracted and didn't look into it. | ||
| But now that I saw those clips live when you heard them, I hadn't seen those yet. | ||
| And this is what this con man does. | ||
| You know, sorry, the facts show. | ||
| And you know, this kind of meeting, you dropped the gun. | ||
| You never had any facts. | ||
| You just speculated. | ||
| Yeah, I just broke the Jeffrey Epstein story like 18 years ago. | ||
| I just exposed the pedophile rings, you know, all of it. | ||
| So I sit here and I hear this type of crap. | ||
| Zavedy Brzezinski wrote books in the 70s when he was the national security advisor, how Western intelligence controlled pedophile rings to control politicians. | ||
| He wrote a book and had a whole chapter on it. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So stop acting like Israel doesn't do this. | ||
| Stop acting like MI6 doesn't do this. | ||
| Stop acting like the CIA doesn't do this. | ||
| Stop acting like this isn't going on. | ||
| You have the U.S. attorney in his first prosecution in Florida saying, I was told go easy, he's Intel. | ||
| So that, and listen, I can look at Shapiro and his billionaire funders out of North Texas, Zionist. | ||
| If I had to guess, and I'd bet my right arm, he is an actual Mossad agent. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| I mean, that guy is 100% bad news. | ||
| At the very least, he's an Israeli loyalist over America. | ||
| Oh, no. | ||
| I mean, he is. | ||
| Listen, he has meetings constantly with Netanyahu. | ||
| He heavily coordinates. | ||
| I mean, this is a very serious person. | ||
| But the point is, is that, oh, this isn't me. | ||
| This is the FBI. | ||
| There was no money. | ||
| You know, it's very reasonable. | ||
| Look at his money. | ||
| Well, now the FBI, these are people you trust. | ||
| Bon Gino, Danda, Cash Patel. | ||
| And so, you know, now that's them, not me. | ||
| You voted for them. | ||
| You put them in. | ||
| You voted. | ||
| Like he's talking to you, like you Americans. | ||
| This guy is so arrogant. | ||
| He's such a predator with his little talking points. | ||
| And then he gets up there. | ||
| And let me counter this. | ||
| We'll go to break and come back. | ||
| But that story about how I'm a performance artist is fake. | ||
| It's all a lie. | ||
| And I'll explain it when we come back. | ||
| Anybody can look that up in the actual court record. | ||
| Since when does the corporate media tell the truth? | ||
| But they've been saying since my divorce custody battle, God, that was like freaking 11, 12 years ago. | ||
| They have been saying that I am an actor and that everything I say is fake. | ||
| Well, God, this actor is sure everything he says comes true. | ||
| Total crap. | ||
| So I'll respond to that as well when we come back. | ||
| But Ben Shapiro is a anti-American enemy of this country. | ||
| And Alex Jones in studio with me for another segment here. | ||
| He's going to respond to the latest lies from that little weasel, Ben Shapiro, and then lay out the evidence, Alex. | ||
| And again, I hadn't seen these clips till we got in here. | ||
| I knew they were there. | ||
| And so I saw those live and I didn't know he said all this stuff. | ||
| I mean, what a trap he's laid for himself that there was never any evidence of Epstein doing anything wrong. | ||
| And you guys all just made all this up. | ||
| And now, boy, do you have Egg on your face? | ||
| But we didn't finish the clip. | ||
| You guys were telling me, I guess they've seen it, the crew. | ||
| He goes on to say, okay, so Jones is saying either Trump and Bongino are lying or he's lying. | ||
| I'm not lying about anything. | ||
| I have the court record of Ghislaine Maxwell, who's pretty much Epstein's boss, whose father was buried at the Mount of Olives as a Mossad agent who ran the giant MI6 Mossad pedophile rings on record. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So again, think about this. | ||
| It's either you're for Trump or you're for Alex Jones. | ||
| No, you remember everything they said and did. | ||
| You remember all of this. | ||
| And so this is the level of bull. | ||
| But I hadn't seen the full clip. | ||
| They were telling me he goes on to say what I just said. | ||
| Here it is. | ||
| You know, more power to you. | ||
| But if you're watching WWE and you think it's real, that makes you the stupid person. | ||
| Don't do it. | ||
| Don't do it. | ||
| Seriously, it makes you dumber. | ||
| It just makes you in the end. | ||
| You're responsible for the information that enters your brain and your independent judgment of that information. | ||
| But if people are consistently being inauthentic, if people openly acknowledge that what they're saying to you publicly and what they say privately are two different things on the same matters, well, then maybe you ought to take what they say with a grain of salt rather than suggesting that, for example, Donald Trump is lying to you about Jeffrey Epstein or Dan Bongino, with whom I am friends, is lying to you about Jeffrey Epstein or Cash Patel, the head of the FBI, is lying to you about Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
| Because those are your only two choices here. | ||
| Either Alex Jones, as his usual, blew a conspiracy theory out of proportion, and so did the rest of the internet, or Dan Bongino and Cash Patel and Donald Trump are all lying to you. | ||
| Those are your choices. | ||
| There is no third choice. | ||
| So I've been demonized as a figure by the corporate media so they can then take me and go, oh, he says there's chemicals in the water turning frogs gay, which is true, but oh, it's Alex Jones. | ||
| So here's what happened. | ||
| My ex-wife started divorcing me in 2013. | ||
| We had a custody battle after that, about a year and a half after that. | ||
| And they had a jury trial and all the rest of it. | ||
| And they tried to bring in evidence of me 15 years ago dressed up like the Joker saying, kids, drink fluoride. | ||
| It brain damages you. | ||
| Because, you know, the Joker in those movies and in the comic books puts chemicals in the water and stuff. | ||
| And this was right when the Dark Knight was popular. | ||
| So it was all cultural. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And so my lawyer, Randall Wilhyte, who literally writes the Texas family law, his name's on the Texas family law. | ||
| Every time they repass the law every two years, it's his name on the law. | ||
| He writes the law, top lawyer of Texas for family law. | ||
| He goes in and she wanted to enter into evidence for the jury, me with clown makeup on saying, I'm crazy, that's me. | ||
| And he said in the actual filing, not what CNN said that he was reading. | ||
| He didn't tell you the source, you know, they went, oh, his lawyer admitted in court. | ||
| It's all fake. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Everything. | |
| No, my lawyer went, this is not admissible to the jury because this is Alex Jones doing a parody of the Joker. | ||
| And when he does parodies, which is like 1% of what I do, that is separate. | ||
| Jack Nicholson is not really the Joker. | ||
| You can't take his kids away because he played the Joker. | ||
| Alex Jones has played the Joker in a parody, which is totally clear. | ||
| It's a parody, not my serious news. | ||
| Yeah, here it is. | ||
| And she wanted to show the jury this and say, take his kids away. | ||
| This is him. | ||
| And my lawyer went, no, that's him playing a part. | ||
| Not everything I do is a part. | ||
| And you notice, listeners always ask for it. | ||
| How much joking around do you see? | ||
| The last thing I did was Cookie Monster. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| As a joke about how they're targeting Elon Musk and driving him off of Trump, which they did. | ||
| Now, no one watching that thinks, oh, he's trying to trick us. | ||
| He's in a cookie monster outfit. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So now I do less than 1% of this. | ||
| He reads a CNN headline. | ||
| Doesn't tell you it's CNN deceiving you by way of deception. | ||
| We have Victory Mossad. | ||
| So that's what he's doing and saying there's no evidence. | ||
| It's all discredited. | ||
| All Epstein's money is legitimate. | ||
| No blackmail. | ||
| No nothing. | ||
| No little black book. | ||
| Well, here, article after article, Gives Lane Maxwell's little black book to remain secret. | ||
| The court made it secret. | ||
| And it goes on and on and on. | ||
| By the way, the book, 97 pages, names and contact details of at least 2,000 people. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And so, but there is no black book you just heard. | ||
| There is no client list. | ||
| There are no files. | ||
| Even though the AG and all of you said they have them, they raided the New York Fed office of the FBI because they wouldn't give it up. | ||
| They made the head of it resign. | ||
| All that happened. | ||
| We broke it with O'Boyle, the FBI whistleblower, before it even came out days before. | ||
| So all this is going on. | ||
| MTG saying, hey, we need to know about this. | ||
| Don't say there's not a little black book. | ||
| You know, we've got the fact that the CIA famously blackmails people with this. | ||
| There's Julian Assange. | ||
| Oh, don't trust him. | ||
| You've got the ABC News reporter famously saying, oh, we had all the files and knew who he was raping. | ||
| And you have McCain's wife even admitting it. | ||
| But none of this is going on. | ||
| There's no cover-up. | ||
| There's nothing happening. | ||
| There's nothing going on here. | ||
| There's nothing. | ||
| No, no, no. | ||
| There's nothing to look at. | ||
| And the evidence goes on and on and on. | ||
| So I'm going to take what Shapiro has said tomorrow, and I'm going to show the video clips, all of it, and I'm going to lay it all out. | ||
| Remember the Republicans in the last year before Trump won? | ||
| Don't shred anything, said Senator Josh Howley. | ||
| Keep all your files. | ||
| But now we're not supposed to look into all that. | ||
| We've got the handler of Prince Andrew saying, yeah, he did abuse underage girls. | ||
| All of that. | ||
| But oh, don't shoot. | ||
| I'm retarded. | ||
| Prove it. | ||
| There is no Epstein client list. | ||
| So that's where we are. | ||
| That's what's going on. | ||
| And we will continue to do this. | ||
| So they're trying to make it a popularity contest between Trump or Alex Jones. | ||
| Who do you trust more? | ||
| Well, I trust my memory. | ||
| I'm not at war with Trump, but I will not be part of some giant lie that Trump somehow has decided to now make himself an accessory after the fact to all the things that went on here. | ||
| And now if I sit here like Ben Shapiro is doing, a good little loyal Lakudnik, and I play along with this and, oh, it's Bondi's fault and all this other crap. | ||
| No, Trump has certified all this. | ||
| So I just hope this isn't a sign of things to come. | ||
| We'll continue to analyze it as it unfolds. | ||
| But, you know, again, to have Ben Shapiro up there doing that, no documents, no articles, no proof, no video, no nothing. | ||
| Just you pick Trump or you pick Alex Jones. | ||
| There is no money. | ||
| Don't investigate where he got his money. | ||
| Don't investigate after he died. | ||
| Billions of dollars being sucked out of his bank account. | ||
| Do not look into any of it. | ||
| Just know it's Alex Jones. | ||
| It's WWE. | ||
| He admits he's fake. | ||
| He admits it's all an act. | ||
| All of it. | ||
| All of the exposing. | ||
| None of it was real, even though it all came true, even though it was all accurate. | ||
| So that's what they're hinging this on. | ||
| And it's just something else. | ||
| And now it's blown up all over the media. | ||
| And of course, I hate the Democrats. | ||
| Can't stand them. | ||
| They're going to misrepresent what I've said and done. | ||
| Try to make it something to hurt Trump. | ||
| Trump hurt Trump. | ||
| And you saw his body language and his activity in Pambondi and that backpedaling and all of it. | ||
| And Trump, we're done. | ||
| It's over. | ||
| No, it's not over because you guys did this. | ||
| And I said months and months ago, I said, listen, I love the agenda overall. | ||
| The decisions made because of national security and the CIA being involved and the world leaders will bring the whole country down. | ||
| I said, I don't agree with that. | ||
| I think you should go ahead and justice be done by the heavens fall. | ||
| But if you do that, I can understand the psychology. | ||
| But I said, please don't then tell everybody, shut up as if you've got the authority because you're the big maverick that suddenly everyone will go, yes, sir, Mr. Trump. | ||
| We'll stop talking about it. | ||
| And you will now see that obviously that advice was terrible and whoever gave it to you was setting you up. | ||
| Oh, and that's my bottom line. | ||
| Well, I don't think we can ignore the fact that all of this takes place as Netanyahu lands in Washington, D.C. So literally they leaked the memo. | ||
| And a bunch of the victims that said Trump was never there. | ||
| They all magically died. | ||
| So they leaked the memo, Netanyahu lands, and Trump says, stop talking about it. | ||
| I don't think these are insignificant coincidences. | ||
| And let me go back to the Iran strikes for a second, Alex. | ||
| And I think that this is where this is where what Infowars does and what you have done is so important. | ||
| When we started, and they started attacking you and calling us names and all of this stuff, and it's the same people now saying, oh, no, you know, don't forget about the Epstein stuff. | ||
| It's Israeli operatives. | ||
| We saw where this was going. | ||
| And so it was. | ||
| Everyone's trying a total hostile takeover of the Trump administration. | ||
| Well, if anything, they've completed it and now they're just rubbing it in our face, quite frankly, is kind of what it feels like it's getting at, which makes me think that's why it's about to become retributionary. | ||
| The left put us in prison for speech. | ||
| Now the right's going to put us in prison for speech for calling this out. | ||
| But to back off of that for a second, everybody thought, oh, the Iran strikes, this will just be an isolated thing. | ||
| And then they said, oh, see, there's no world war and all this other stuff going on. | ||
| They missed it. | ||
| They missed the bigger picture. | ||
| They missed where all of this was going. | ||
| The spidey instincts that you have honed in so much with your experience. | ||
| I've gained so much experience working here as well. | ||
| We have great guests. | ||
| We have a very in-tune audience with reality. | ||
| We saw what was happening. | ||
| We saw it was more than just about a strike. | ||
| It was about something, the ship took a turn. | ||
| That's what it was about. | ||
| It was about, we just had, we just got blindsided. | ||
| A missile out of nowhere on the MAGA agenda just blindsided us. | ||
| And now the ship is veering off course. | ||
| And we were just saying, hey, we need to get this thing back on course. | ||
| And now it just continues to steer off the course. | ||
| The Australian operatives rush it even more and attack us. | ||
| So it's like you are, to me, you're like the 90-tour war veteran. | ||
| You've been in every tour. | ||
| You've seen every landscape. | ||
| You've seen every warfront. | ||
| You've seen all this stuff. | ||
| And it's just like, it's like going up to the oldest war vet who's literally seen every freaking battle in modern history and saying, you don't know what you're talking about. | ||
| Me, the social media guy, knows what I'm talking about. | ||
| Me, the guy that gets paid to support Trump, knows what I'm talking about. | ||
| Me, the guy that gets paid for social media. | ||
| And it's like, no, no, no, you're missing the picture. | ||
| This is a sign that things are going off course. | ||
| That's what we were concerned about. | ||
| It wasn't just about World War III or anything. | ||
| It was the whole thing. | ||
| It looks like, whoa, we're going off course. | ||
| Get this thing back. | ||
| And now. | ||
| And we say we hope there's not more. | ||
| And now it's violently going into it. | ||
| Now it's sinking. | ||
| Now it's like we got holes in the ship. | ||
| And this is the other analogy I made earlier because you and Fuenes were talking about this too. | ||
| It's like, yeah, I think you were saying the Democrat ship is on fire and it's like the piles of feces and needles and broken glass. | ||
| And it's like, okay, here's the Democrat ship. | ||
| And I've got the fires over here, but it's like, okay, I can see I'm going to avoid the fires. | ||
| I got a pile of feces over here. | ||
| Avoid that. | ||
| Broken glass over here. | ||
| Don't walk on that. | ||
| Now it's like the Republican ship is like a bunch of booby traps. | ||
| It's like, oh, if I step here, the floor is going to fall out. | ||
| Oh, if I step over here, an arrow is going to sling out of the wall. | ||
| It's like, oh, if I step here, I'm going to hit with a poison needle. | ||
| So now it's like, what in the, what ship are, what ship am I even on now? | ||
| That's why people are jumping off because they're like, I'm about to get booby trapped here. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| I'm going to be listening to you. | ||
| I'm going to go take care of stuff. | ||
| But look, God's in control, and I'm just going to tell the truth as best I can. | ||
| I make some mistakes. | ||
| I wish I was more on more because we're so right about it. | ||
| I appreciate you. | ||
| And please support us, folks. | ||
| It's how we stay on air. | ||
| It's you, and we really need Trump. | ||
| And I want all this to get better. | ||
| But things are turning very, very quickly. | ||
| And now we're told the U.S. may attack Iran again. | ||
| So that's where we're at. | ||
| But little rat Ben Shapiro, man, you know, reading off CNN headlines, not telling you. | ||
| He didn't say CNN says, according to this, Alex Jones says he's fake. | ||
| Really, where is that? | ||
| Show the filing. | ||
| You're a lion sack of shit, Ben Shapiro. | ||
| And you're going to have to face God someday. | ||
| Your problem's God, not me, buddy. | ||
| All right, Alex Jones, appreciate you joining us today. | ||
| Over five hours live from Alex, but I mean, how can you not want to just try to figure all this out? | ||
| Because it's just total insanity. | ||
| Now, I do want to open up the phone lines. | ||
| I got news I can cover here, but it's just everything pales in comparison. | ||
| And it's not just this whole audience has invested a lot into getting Trump into office twice. | ||
| This whole audience has invested a lot into trying to save the country. | ||
| I mean, let's just say what it is. | ||
| We're trying to save the country, save the world in our eyes. | ||
| You can say, oh, this is grandiose. | ||
| Oh, this is all like, you know, playing like you think you're a superhero in a movie. | ||
| Hello, I think we all see America has been declining badly. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| I think we all see that not everything is on the up and up here for the United States of America and its citizens. | ||
| We got problems. | ||
| So yeah, I think it's a totally noble and legitimate thing to say, hey, let's try to save the country here. | ||
| And this is why we supported Trump so fervently. | ||
| This is why we supported him three different election cycles. | ||
| This is why we fought against the steel. | ||
| See, then you draw back and you say, okay. | ||
| As the new, the CIA director Ratcliffe basically whitewashes the whole Russagate thing. | ||
| It's like, oh yeah, they illegally spied on Trump. | ||
| Oh yeah, they made the whole Russagate thing up. | ||
| Well, yeah, we've known that for 10 years. | ||
| So it's like, okay, whatever. | ||
| They're covering up the Epstein thing. | ||
| What's new? | ||
| No, no, no. | ||
| They stole an election. | ||
| No arrests. | ||
| They illegally spied on Donald Trump. | ||
| No arrests. | ||
| And it's just like, you just go down the list. | ||
| How about the Auto Pen scandal? | ||
| So am I to believe we're going to see any justice there? | ||
| How about the invasion of our country? | ||
| That was an invasion. | ||
| That was treason. | ||
| Are we going to see any action on that? | ||
| So it's just like all faith is eroding. | ||
| All hope is eroding. | ||
| The handling of this Epstein thing has been a complete and utter disaster. | ||
| It doesn't make any sense to anybody. | ||
| And yeah, I mean, let's just be honest. | ||
| And I understand too because you'll get all the different things. | ||
| Oh, you're an Israeli shill. | ||
| Oh, you're covering up Israel's involvement. | ||
| And it's like, it's all nonsense. | ||
| But it's like, the lectern guy. | ||
| I can't believe I've served more time in federal prison for moving a lectern than any of Epstein clients. | ||
| Yeah, well, I guess I could say the same thing. | ||
| I didn't move a lectern, but I understand, you know, because I'm learning here. | ||
| And I understand it's like, man, the Israel issue is just so toxic. | ||
| It's been toxic for decades. | ||
| And you can't even win trying to cover it. | ||
| It's like you're either, you just cover it and you're an anti-semite or you're an israeli shield it's like just for covering it so it's just like good god but i mean it's reaching this point now where it's it's it's it's almost so in your face so undeniable it just feels like israel's just doing a victory lap and just rubbing it in our face it just feels like all the different mossad agents all the different israeli loyalists | ||
| Some of them literally straight out of the IDF and then just injected right into American politics. | ||
| Netanyahu's three White House visits, their strikes in Iran. | ||
| It's like they're doing their victory lap, shoving it in our face. | ||
| Yes, Israel runs your country. | ||
| Israel runs your government. | ||
| Israel runs your White House. | ||
| Here's all your reminders. | ||
| And then when you say it, they say, you're an anti-Semite. | ||
| You're a conspiracy theorist. | ||
| None of this is happening. | ||
| It's not going on. | ||
| And then meanwhile, it's all the pro-Israel celebrating everything that's going on. | ||
| It strikes for Iran. | ||
| It's covering up the Epstein list. | ||
| More funding, more aid for Israel. | ||
| And then imagine the irony. | ||
| Here comes Benjamin Netanyahu, who has been lying to the United States for 30 years. | ||
| Here comes Benjamin Netanyahu, whose lies have influenced our foreign policy to get involved in the Middle East, where tens of thousands of Americans died, not to mention hundreds of thousands of Middle Easterners, all off of Benjamin Netanyahu's lies. | ||
| And now this guy comes back and says, no, believe me now. | ||
| And then yesterday comes out and says, I'm recommending Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. | ||
| Benjamin Netanyahu, whose country Israel is currently bombing how many different countries? | ||
| I don't know, seven? | ||
| How many different countries is Israel bombing right now? | ||
| Iran, Lebanon, Jordan, Palestine. | ||
| I mean, how many? | ||
| This guy's country is bombing everybody. | ||
| So he's the least peaceful man on Earth. | ||
| He's literally wanted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court and the UN. | ||
| Most countries are seeking his arrest. | ||
| He can't even travel. | ||
| And then he's going to come and recommend the Nobel Peace Prize? | ||
| The least peaceful man on the planet? | ||
| The man who's wanted for international war crimes? | ||
| The man whose country is bombing more countries than anybody else on Earth combined? | ||
| And we continue to send them the money. | ||
| And we continue to send them the aid. | ||
| But don't even say it. | ||
| Don't even dare report on it. | ||
| Because then you're an anti-Semite. | ||
| And now they're passing laws where if you dare say it, you're an anti-Semite. | ||
| You might get deported. | ||
| You might get arrested. | ||
| You might get fined. | ||
| So it's just like, oh, boy, this is interesting. | ||
| All the influence that Israel has on our foreign policy. | ||
| Boy, this is interesting. | ||
| You know, Netanyahu continuing to control our foreign policy and so close with the White House. | ||
| And boy, this is interesting. | ||
| All of these Israeli loyalists that are now the only ones seeming to be happy about what's going on with MAGA. | ||
| Boy, it seems like this is really an Israeli-led administration now. | ||
| Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. | ||
| Anti-Semite. | ||
| So it's like they're literally waving Israeli flags. | ||
| There are literally Israeli flags all over Congress. | ||
| They literally put the Israeli flag on their lapel pin. | ||
| We literally put Israel first on foreign policy and get Israel policy first before we even get America first policy. | ||
| And they're just bragging about it. | ||
| Like it's in your face. | ||
| Just shoving it in your face. | ||
| And then they say, that's not going on. | ||
| You're just an anti-Semite. | ||
| As they're literally waving their flag in your face saying, ha ha, we control Trump now. | ||
| Ha ha, we control MAGA now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ha ha ha ha. | |
| And you say, gee, I don't like how much control Israel has over this now. | ||
| Shut up, anti-Semite. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So there you go. | |
| But here's Netanyahu. | ||
| Here's the man who's bombing more countries than anyone else. | ||
| Here's the man who's wanted for crimes by the international courts. | ||
| Here's him saying, oh, I'm going to give Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. | ||
| Clip five. | ||
| The president has already realized great opportunities. | ||
| He forged the Iran courts. | ||
| He's forging peace as we speak in one country, in one region after the other. | ||
| So I want to present to you, Mr. President, the letter I sent to the Nobel Prize Committee. | ||
| It's nominating you for the Peace Prize, which is well-deserved. | ||
| And you should get it. | ||
| Thank you very much. | ||
| This I didn't know. | ||
| Well. | ||
| He almost looks insulting. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Coming from you in particular, this is very meaningful. | |
| Thank you very much. | ||
| Thank you for everything you're doing. | ||
| Coming from the guy that's bombing all the countries, coming from the guy that's killing almost 100,000 people in Palestine, coming from the guy that is wanted for war crimes by the international court, coming from the guy that can't even travel to more than half the countries in the world because he'd be arrested, coming to the guy whose own country is sick of him and turning on him, coming from the guy that's about to draft Orthodox Jews into the military because they're losing so much support, coming from the guy who's causing a mass exodus of Israel because people don't feel safe there | ||
| anymore, coming from the guy who has his citizens going in and out of bomb shelters. | ||
| Yeah, that must mean a lot coming from him for the Nobel Peace Prize. | ||
| Must mean a lot. | ||
| It's just heartbreaking, man. | ||
| Oh, it's our greatest ally. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| It's like. | ||
| It's like coming home and you get home early from like a work trip or something and you go home. | ||
| You're going to surprise your wife. | ||
| And she's in bed with your best friend. | ||
| It's like, hey, honey, I got home early from the work trip. | ||
| This is great. | ||
| Let's go to dinner. | ||
| You walk into the bedroom and there she is in bed with your best friend. | ||
| They're both buck naked. | ||
| And then your wife and your friend stand up and they say, wow, we're so proud of you for being such a great husband and coming home early to say hello. | ||
| You're so loyal. | ||
| We're going to give you a loyalty reward. | ||
| Like I just caught you in bed cheating on me. | ||
| What do you mean you're going to give me a loyalty reward? | ||
| You're the least loyal person I've ever met. | ||
| met and you're gonna give me a loyalty award which is meaningless. | ||
| Now, look, I will say, because we do full spectrum analysis here, and I just, all the different directions our thought goes. | ||
| Intentional or not, Israel has never been more exposed in U.S. politics than ever before. | ||
| So, so, I mean, you could sit here and say, this is so bad, and this is so obvious from the Trump administration, from Trump himself. | ||
| It's like intentional. | ||
| It's like, it's almost like, it's so bad, it's almost intentional. | ||
| It's like if a quarterback or something is throwing a football game, it's like if Tom Brady goes out and goes, you know, two for 30 throwing the football, you're like, yeah, he's throwing the game. | ||
| It's like Michael Jordan went 0 for 30 from the fields. | ||
| Like, yeah, he's throwing the game. | ||
| So it's almost like this is like so bad. | ||
| It's almost like Trump is intentionally exposing what Israel is doing. | ||
| But I guess that's the conspiracy theory. | ||
| We're going to open up the phone lines on the other side of this break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The antidote to the establishment's lies. | |
| Welcome to the War Room. | ||
| Your host, Owen Schroyer. | ||
| Joining me now is one of the good guys, the great representative from the state of Missouri, Eric Burleson. | ||
| And well, Eric, I think we all know where the conversation is going. | ||
| And I'm curious from your perspective, not just a member of the declassification committee, but just a member of the House of Representatives, where a lot of the pressure on the DOJ has been coming from to release these files. | ||
| So before we get into some of the specifics, just in the 12 hours since this leak to Axios, what has the chatter been like in the House of Representatives? | ||
| What has kind of the response been from your colleagues? | ||
| Yeah, I would say, thank you, Owen. | ||
| Thanks for having me on. | ||
| I would say woefully disappointed. | ||
| And look, we're more so disappointed that we've had little to no communication from the DOJ on this topic. | ||
| You know, the task force was stood up. | ||
| We've been working with the White House on a number of efforts, but for some reason, the Epstein list, the Department of Justice has not been willing to work with us. | ||
| When they rolled out the embarrassing and disastrous couple hundred pages a few months ago, they did so with a bunch of social media people. | ||
| They didn't include any members of the task force or any members of Congress in that disclosure. | ||
| And look, we're not trying to get information ahead of anybody, but that should give you an idea. | ||
| At least you ought to be communicating, you know, in addition to the public communicating directly with members of the task force that has the task and the need to know what's going on with the Epstein list, which is why Ana Paulina Luna, myself, other members of the task force have submitted letters requesting information. | ||
| We have tried to use our bully pulpit to try to encourage the Department of Justice to move quickly and to be more transparent in the process. | ||
| But we are, at the end of the day, we've not had good communication. | ||
| And I think that we're highly disappointed in the outcome. | ||
| So let's talk about that, your role in the declassification task force. | ||
| And obviously you share whatever you can publicly. | ||
| But what is that role supposed to be? | ||
| And do you feel that it's being, how could I say this? | ||
| Do you feel it's being leapfrogged? | ||
| Do you feel like the role the declassification force is supposed to be playing is being skipped over? | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| We're being ignored. | ||
| I feel like the red-headed stepchild in this circumstance. | ||
| And that is different than the way that other agencies have worked with Oversight. | ||
| For example, Marjorie Taylor Greene's committee, I'm on the Doge committee, which is Marjorie's committee. | ||
| And they have worked hand in glove with the Doge effort, with Elon. | ||
| We've actually had meetings with Elon and his team. | ||
| We've not had the same level of courtesy with Pam Bondi and the Department of Justice when it comes to these issues, whenever it comes to disclosure. | ||
| And so I'm disappointed. | ||
| And look, I could be pleased if the results were good and there was information that was disclosed and we were able to actually have something to look at. | ||
| But this is pathetic. | ||
| Look, it's almost ignoring the facts of what really happened. | ||
| You have a very public individual in Virginia Guffery, right, who recently was quote unquote committed suicide, even though her social media posts said that she would never do that and that it was probably a homicide if she would be found dead. | ||
| There are photos. | ||
| There's evidence that Jeffrey Epstein pawned her off to Prince Andrew. | ||
| There's a reason why Prince Andrew paid tens of millions of pounds in a settlement. | ||
| There's a reason why he's no longer a prince. | ||
| You cannot tell me that this wasn't happening. | ||
| You cannot tell me that this, what we, with the mountain of evidence that's in the public, that the Department of Justice and the FBI can't find the individuals that Jeffrey Epstein used and make and that were part of this scheme. | ||
| It's total hogwash. | ||
| Nobody believes it. | ||
| And so either they're hiding something or they're inept or incompetent. | ||
| It's either, it's got to be one of those. | ||
| I don't see how you could land on any other conclusion. | ||
| What was the last thing that the declassification committee got from the DOJ in regard to the Epstein files? | ||
| Do you know the last communication or last information you got, the last exchange? | ||
| I don't believe I haven't, they would have directly communicated with Anna. | ||
| So they've not been communicating with me for sure. | ||
| So, and I don't believe, I know that from talking with Annapolina Luna that she's frustrated as well. | ||
| She doesn't feel like she's brought into the loop. | ||
| And that's just, you know, look, we cannot operate in isolation. | ||
| The Department of Justice cannot operate in isolation. | ||
| They have responsibility to report to members of Congress, to be accountable to members of Congress. | ||
| Look, if this was the Biden administration, we would have hauled their asses in front of our committee like yesterday. | ||
| And so we've given them a lot of grace because they're friendlies. | ||
| They're part of the Trump administration. | ||
| But that leash can only be so long or that level of grace can only go so far. | ||
| And so at some point, they need to put up and they need to demonstrate to the American people, show us your work. | ||
| When you say that there is no evidence, show us your work. | ||
| Show us how you came to that conclusion. | ||
| Right now, I don't see any of those results. | ||
| Do you anticipate there being hearings asking those questions of our current leaders at the FBI and DOJ? | ||
| Yeah, I hope it doesn't have to come to that. | ||
| I would hope that they would just start communicating with the task force, release the documents that we requested, release the information to the American people. | ||
| That's what this is all about. | ||
| We want disclosure. | ||
| The American people are sick and tired of being kept in the dark on this topic and all the topics. | ||
| But this one, I think, is more infuriating because it's right in our faces. | ||
| We're being led to believe that this did not happen when we all know that this was happening. | ||
| And you have multiple investigations that turned up nothing. | ||
| It's just, it's no one buys it at all. | ||
| Speaking of the American people, I know that all of our congressmen and women are getting flooded with messages and phone calls, emails, probably more than ever in the history of the United States Congress. | ||
| Have you been hearing from your constituents in Missouri in the last 12 hours about this? | ||
| Has your office been overwhelmed? | ||
| I constantly get questions about the Epstein list. | ||
| And usually people, whenever I talk to them, they're black pilled. | ||
| They've come to the point where their attitude is, well, I guess we're just never going to find out. | ||
| We're never going to know the truth. | ||
| And that's not a good place for the American people to be. | ||
| The American people need to have confidence in their federal government. | ||
| They need to have confidence that this system is transparent and that the system works for them. | ||
| Do you think Anna Paulina Luna will be trying to shake things up in the near future in response to the recent developments? | ||
| Should we anticipate something maybe loud from her soon? | ||
| Yes, I think so. | ||
| I mean, just knowing Anna, I know she's hot about this. | ||
| We've been texting back and forth, and I would not be surprised. | ||
| She's a fireball. | ||
| She's not somebody to mess with. | ||
| I wouldn't want to mess with Anna. | ||
| She's fantastic, and I think that she's like a pit bull. | ||
| She's not going to let go of this. | ||
| Well, I think what you said before is undeniably true, that if the past administration had been so shadowy in some of their handlings of some of the issues in the Biden years, whether it be with the border or some of the other big issues, obviously there would have been hearings and there would have been outrage. | ||
| How much of this kind of, let's say, aura of, hey, let's protect President Trump? | ||
| They tried to kill him. | ||
| They tried to put him in jail. | ||
| He's our guy. | ||
| How much of this aura kind of starts to fade and congressmen and women say, hey, look, we got to do our job. | ||
| We got to call them in. | ||
| We got to have hearings. | ||
| Our constituents demand answers here. | ||
| Yeah, you know what? | ||
| And I bet if Trump were on here and he was, he would probably be honest that he's disappointed as well. | ||
| I would not be surprised if Trump is disappointed in these results. | ||
| And look, sometimes you hire some people that are great and sometimes you hire people that are a bad egg. | ||
| This may be one of those circumstances where Trump, you know, I'll tell you this. | ||
| If Matt Gates had been the attorney general, this would not have happened. | ||
| He would have been on this. | ||
| He would not have accepted these results. | ||
| He would have been diligent on this. | ||
| And I just don't see that level of intensity coming out of Pam right now. | ||
| Well, she's got plenty of time to go on Fox News, and I think there'll be a nice, lucrative job for her there when she's done at the DOJ, and good for her. | ||
| We're all capitalists, and we can celebrate that success. | ||
| But in the meantime, the Department of Justice is lacking leadership. | ||
| And I think that this most recent story proves it. | ||
| Now, when you're dealing with whether it's the Oversight Committee or the Judiciary Committee or the committees that you're in, the Doge Committee, the Declassification Committee, how much communication happens within those channels before you guys decide to come out maybe in unison with a message? | ||
| I guess what I'm asking is, are you guys already talking and saying, hey, let's maybe put public pressure on this first? | ||
| Or is it let's just go right to calling for hearings? | ||
| You know, and I need to talk with Anna about that, but she kind of early on when this Epstein stuff was kind of falling apart at the beginning, I was a little bit aggressive and I wanted to take action and formalize a letter. | ||
| And Ana had, you know, cooler head. | ||
| She really wanted to kind of give him some time, give him some space. | ||
| But I think that that time is over. | ||
| And so I'll be continuing to push. | ||
| I know that Anna feels the same way. | ||
| And so I think that at the end of the day, the question is, what will Trump do about this? | ||
| Is he going to tolerate this lack of effort, this lack of due diligence from his administration? | ||
| I don't think Trump will tolerate this. | ||
| At least I hope not. | ||
| Well, and I also, you know, you have to measure everything, right? | ||
| And maybe if there were some other things that happened, the backlash for, you know, the last big issue I think we had in this administration was the debate about should we strike Iran. | ||
| That has kind of come and passed. | ||
| The bombs have stopped dropping. | ||
| So we kind of sit back and we say, okay, the missiles have stopped flying. | ||
| Let's take that for what it is. | ||
| Well, now here comes the Epstein situation. | ||
| These things would be a lot easier, I think to keep things calm and timid, if there were other things happening, but we keep hearing about the 2020 election getting stolen, and yet we get no arrests. | ||
| We hear about the illegal spying on Donald Trump. | ||
| They just came out and quadruple confirmed that. | ||
| No arrests. | ||
| I mean, I can go on and on. | ||
| The lies about the COVID vaccines. | ||
| I mean, all these different issues that this campaign and this administration highlighted. | ||
| And it's just like we can't get any wins. | ||
| And then all of a sudden we get told, nope, no Epstein list. | ||
| So how much other areas do you guys think about applying pressure where there can still be victories and draining the swamp, arresting the deep state? | ||
| Yeah, you're absolutely right, Owen. | ||
| This is highly frustrating, particularly, look, oversight has some level of connection to the DOJ, but the Judiciary Committee has ultimate authority. | ||
| And it saddened me that the Judiciary Committee is not holding their feet to the fire on all of these things. | ||
| The FBI, they should have gone in and cleaned house in the FBI because it was clear that there is an organizational behavioral problem there. | ||
| It's clear that there's a deep rot, a deep level of corruption within the FBI. | ||
| Look, when you had FBI doing all the things, including spying on Catholics, spying on parents, declaring parents as terrorists because they went and spoke at a school board meeting, when had the FBI entrapping patriots who just wanted to protest on January 6th and all of the shenanigans that they pulled off there, we still don't know what happened to the pipe bombs that were deposited. | ||
| We still don't know any of that information. | ||
| It's time for some scrutiny to be placed, a heavy level of scrutiny to be placed on the FBI. | ||
| They've been gripped, you know, this administration, Vambondi, has given the FBI way too much latitude. | ||
| They need to be clean in the house, and the American people are expecting some perp walks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They're expecting some results. | |
| Now that the big, beautiful bill is passed, perhaps, you know, some of these House committees can start to rally around some of these issues. | ||
| I guess time will tell when you guys are back in session. | ||
| But on the big, beautiful bill, you know, that was quite a process for you guys to get through. | ||
| You finally got through it. | ||
| Speaker Johnson and the Trump administration took their victory lap right before the 4th of July. | ||
| What can the American people anticipate from this bill? | ||
| I've seen the good, I've seen the bad, but what do you think the actual results of this bill will be? | ||
| Where will the American people actually see the benefits of this or will they? | ||
| Yeah, Owen, you know, one of the things I would point to is look at Scott Bessett's recent comment. | ||
| He said that because of the work of the Freedom Caucus, that Freedom Caucus has shifted the center of gravity on mandatory spending in the United States. | ||
| And he's right. | ||
| We fought tooth and nail from the very beginning. | ||
| When we were told you can't touch Medicaid, it's too politically toxic to the moderates. | ||
| We forced them to get involved and roll up their sleeves and deal with the waste, fraud, and abuse of Medicaid. | ||
| When they said you can't cut all of these green energy tax credits, even though Trump wanted them all cut, we fought hard and was able to repeal nearly all of the green energy tax credits, at least phase them out by the end of the 10 years of the 10-year window. | ||
| The Trump administration, we sat down as it came out of the Senate and the Senate tried to water that bill down. | ||
| We sat down with the Trump administration for the entire day, walked through all of the objectives or objections that conservatives, fiscal hawks like myself had about the bill and what the Senate had done. | ||
| And we got to a level of assurity from the White House that they were in alignment with us, that they have a lot of latitude when it comes to executive powers in implementing these bills, and that our shared goals would be achieved. | ||
| And so that gives me a lot of comfort, that along with the fact that when it comes to the Doge efforts and our discretionary spending, it's getting ready to come up. | ||
| The White House is going to be very aggressive in finding more spending cuts in the discretionary area. | ||
| And the White House is going to be submitting some rescissions very soon, a large number of rescissions, which will bring us back into line with what we were before COVID. | ||
| So we're trying to right-size the ship, trying to make spending cuts. | ||
| But look, spending cuts in Washington, D.C. is almost impossible. | ||
| But we fought tooth and nail and were able to deliver on some of those. | ||
| And had it not been for the Freedom Caucus, I guarantee you we would have had a bill that would have blown our deficit even further and put us into more debt. | ||
| Well, we here celebrate the stubborn nature of the Freedom Caucus. | ||
| I know that you guys had a lot of what I assume are paid political attacks against you, but I think the people stand with your stubbornness. | ||
| It had to be done. | ||
| And as ugly as it gets, somebody has to do it. | ||
| You guys are the ones that decide to do it. | ||
| Do you think now, though, that the BBB has passed, and I'll skip through some of the other details here, but do you think now that the Big Beautiful Bill is passed, that some of these other committees can get back to work on getting some other answers for the American people? | ||
| I mean, we still have the oversight and the judiciary committee with the spreadsheets, the flowcharts of the payment to the Biden crime family. | ||
| I mean, this is just one example. | ||
| Are these the committees going to get back to work to getting answers and maybe some criminal referrals to even if it is an empty desk at the DOJ? | ||
| Yeah, I believe so. | ||
| I know Jamie Comer is doing a fantastic job. | ||
| James Comer is bringing in, and I forget the individual's name. | ||
| He was basically Kamala's work husband, bringing him in for a deposition this week. | ||
| And so they're going to continue that investigation regarding the level of abuse of a senior elderly individual in Joe Biden. | ||
| The Autopit. | ||
| Yeah, and taking advantage of his lack of cognitive ability to basically act as the president and use the Autopit. | ||
| So we are investigating that hot and heavy in the oversight committee. | ||
| Well, there's no doubt the Trump administration is feeling the heat and seeing the heat. | ||
| and I kind of said before, people that might have disagreed with the Iran strikes, there was an appetite for that, so you can kind of maybe smooth that over. | ||
| And now that the bombs have stopped dropping, you can say, Okay, you know what? | ||
| The bombs have stopped dropping, so it's a good thing. | ||
| This Epstein list is not going to go so well. | ||
| There's no appetite to cover this up, there's no appetite to say there's nothing to see here, move along. | ||
| Do you think that this gives some of these committee, some of these committees, maybe some momentum to say, all right, they need a win badly. | ||
| Let's get a win on the Auto Pen. | ||
| Let's get a win on the Biden crime family. | ||
| Because we know how this flow works in D.C. So could maybe there's some cooperation there? | ||
| Is there like, hey, this Epstein thing was so bad, we got to get a win here? | ||
| Do you think that gives you some momentum? | ||
| You know, I don't know that the Autopen stuff is going to satiate the American people and their desire to know what happened with Epstein. | ||
| I think that this scandal is one of the biggest scandals of our time. | ||
| And it's not, the American people are not going to be satisfied with these results, period. | ||
| And just like they were not satisfied with the JFK assassination explanation, and here we are 70 years later, still working on this and still investigating this. | ||
| It's time for our justice system to be transparent with the American people. | ||
| And that's why this is not going to go away. | ||
| I guarantee you, if this is the end, if this, they think that this might be the end of this, the American people are not going to be satisfied with this. | ||
| Yeah, they're saying it's like the black eye of the Trump administration. | ||
| Well, a black eye goes away after a couple weeks. | ||
| I hate to be graphic here, but this is probably going to be more like herpes and it's just going to keep popping up and it's just never going to go away. | ||
| Because like you said, we have been demanding answers on Epstein for nearly a decade. | ||
| A lot of people have been demanding answers on Epstein. | ||
| And it was part of this campaign that we were going to get the answers. | ||
| And now here we are six months in and they're saying case closed, nothing to see here. | ||
| So yeah, I do agree. | ||
| There's nothing that can satiate that. | ||
| Maybe they can get some wins to try to maybe ease things over. | ||
| But once you cover this up, because the belief is, this is what the people believe, it was a blackmail operation. | ||
| It was blackmailing people high level in banking, financing, politics, celebrity culture. | ||
| Who knows? | ||
| The royal family? | ||
| You know, this is the answers we'd like to know of what was really going on. | ||
| And now they're just telling us, oh, nothing to see here. | ||
| The whole thing stinks from the beginning to the end. | ||
| And I don't see how they can right this wrong at this point. | ||
| It seems like it's been permanently wronged. | ||
| It does. | ||
| It absolutely does. | ||
| And I would hate that it would have to come to this, but we're look, in order to get the JFK files released, Congress had to had to pass a law. | ||
| And then it took then an additional 20 years before the files started getting released. | ||
| And we're still, we've got most of them released. | ||
| We're still waiting on some. | ||
| But it took an act of Congress. | ||
| I would hate for a tech to take an act of Congress to pass something similar to the JFK Disclosure Act to get information about the Epstein list. | ||
| But it looks like that's something we're going to have to do. | ||
| All right, ladies and gentlemen, you just heard it there from Representative Eric Burleson in Missouri. | ||
| Before I let you go, though, you've got that beautiful piano behind you. | ||
| I got to put you on the spot here. | ||
| Is that your piano? | ||
| Do you play that piano? | ||
| It's my piano, but I do not. | ||
| I have no musical talent whatsoever. | ||
| My daughters play piano. | ||
| Okay, okay. | ||
| I was going to say, you should start tickling the ivory and posting on social media. | ||
| You know what you could do? | ||
| You could have your daughters playing in like the background and you could just kind of sit there and pretending it's you. | ||
| And, you know, I think people would fall for that. | ||
| We've seen people fall for worse. | ||
| Yeah, no, I really admire people that are able to play, you know, an instrument because to me, it's like magic. | ||
| I have no idea how it's done. | ||
| I have no talent whatsoever. | ||
| Well, you could have fooled me. | ||
| I saw that bad boy behind you. | ||
| I was like, Representative Burleson plays the piano? | ||
| Impressive. | ||
| But it's the daughters that have the musical talent. | ||
| I can't even sing on tune. | ||
| I wouldn't judge you. | ||
| I wouldn't judge you. | ||
| If you started playing and singing, even if it was awful, I'd tip my cap and say, hey, you know what? | ||
| At least he's trying. | ||
| All right, Representative Eric Burleson, thank you for your time. | ||
| God bless. | ||
| Godspeed. | ||
| Hope you and your family had a great independence weekend. | ||
| Thank you, Ellen. | ||
| All right, there goes Representative Burleson, one of the good guys in Congress. | ||
| We will support him at all costs. | ||
| All right, we hit the halfway point of the show. | ||
| You were just telling me that you had a brain disease. | ||
| And you, what did you do to fix it? | ||
| I found this guy as a functional medicine guy, and he got me on methylene blue. | ||
| And that instantly stopped everything. | ||
| I'd take it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Yeah. | ||
| I take it every day as well. | ||
| Yeah, RFK Jr. told me about it. | ||
| Yeah, man, it's fantastic. | ||
| And so this guy's injecting, in 1890, injects these rats with it and then does an autopsy on these things. | ||
| And their brain, the brainstem, every single nerve is blue. | ||
| So he discovered this methylene blue has an affinity for neuronal tissue. | ||
| So he says, well, it's sucking into neurons and working in the body. | ||
| So we started putting it in humans. | ||
| And we found out it's an MAOI, which helps with depression and anxiety and all kinds of life stress and stuff. | ||
| It is so incredible that it acts as an electron donor to mitochondria, especially your neuronal mitochondria. | ||
| So it helps you produce more ATP and it helps you get rid of this stuff called reactive oxygen species. | ||
| So you have an oxygen molecule that should have two hydrogens on it. | ||
| And like your body's job is to convert stuff into water so you can pee it out. | ||
| So if you get an oxygen molecule, it's got four, five, one, it's a reactive oxygen, which we call free radicals. | ||
| So methylene blue goes in there and balances a lot of those things out in your brain and your nervous system. | ||
| So it is a miracle. | ||
| It's been proven for 100 years. | ||
| It's one of the most well-proven drugs out there. | ||
| The strongest medical grade methylene blue. | ||
| And this is what I'm on. | ||
| You were just telling me that you had a brain disease. | ||
| And you, what did you do to fix it? | ||
| I found this guy, he's a functional medicine guy, and he got me on methylene blue. | ||
| And that instantly stopped everything. | ||
| I'd take it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Yeah. | ||
| I take it every day as well. | ||
| RFK Jr. told me about it. | ||
| Yeah, man, it's fantastic. | ||
| And so this guy's injecting in 1890, injects these rats with it and then does an autopsy on these things. | ||
| And their brain, the brainstem, every single nerve is blue. | ||
| So he discovered this methylene blue has an affinity for neuronal tissue. | ||
| So he says, well, it's sucking into neurons and working in the body. | ||
| So we started putting it in humans. | ||
| And we found out it's an MAOI, which helps with depression and anxiety and all kinds of life stress and stuff. | ||
| It is so incredible that it acts as an electron donor to mitochondria, especially your neuronal mitochondria. | ||
| So it helps you produce more ATP and it helps you get rid of this stuff called reactive oxygen species. | ||
| So you have an oxygen molecule that should have two hydrogens on it. | ||
| And like your body's job is to convert stuff into water so you can pee it out. | ||
| So if you get an oxygen molecule, it's got four, five, one, it's a reactive oxygen, which we call free radicals. | ||
| So methylene blue goes in there and balances a lot of those things out in your brain and your nervous system. | ||
| So it is a miracle. | ||
| It's been proven for 100 years. | ||
| It's one of the most well-proven drugs out there. | ||
| The strongest medical grade methylene blue. | ||
| And this is what I'm on. | ||
| Total mitochondria cleaning, next level energy. | ||
| This is amazing. | ||
| And you want to know what I'm on? | ||
| Iris CMOS shilogy. | ||
| This right here. | ||
| Look at that. | ||
| That is power. | ||
| I'm on intermittent fasting. | ||
| I'm going to eat at three o'clock today. | ||
| And I stopped eating crap food, stopped drinking. | ||
| That's what I'm on right there, baby. | ||
| Quite frankly, I didn't develop Optimal Human when Bigley came on as a big sponsor. | ||
| And I told them the supplements I wanted from the companies I wanted. | ||
| They went out and did what I wanted. | ||
| People love them. | ||
| And they're incredible. | ||
| The turmeric, the Shila G, the Irish Seamos, all of it. | ||
| But they'd had this out for years. | ||
| And I thought, my green caps are great. | ||
| And, you know, this other company I use is great because, you know, green superfoods are amazing. | ||
| And then I finally took it and Harrison Smith took it. | ||
| And I was like, my God. | ||
| And by then, we've been selling it four or five months and it was already a top seller. | ||
| The problem is there's so many ingredients and it's so hard to source and it's so clean and high standards that it sold out most of the time. | ||
| We finally got a decent shipment of it in, but we never offered it for subscription because we just couldn't keep it. | ||
| When you subscribe at the audit showstore.com and then they keep it back for you so it never sells out. | ||
| So go to the alexhowstore.com and get your optimal human and so many other incredible products today. |
Export Selection