Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
The silent majority is no longer silent. | |
| This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer. | ||
| Please stand by for further details. | ||
| We return you now to your regularly scheduled program. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, it's Thursday, April 24th, 2025. | ||
| This is the InfoWars War Room. | ||
| The fastest three hours on the internet starts now. | ||
| First, though, we go to the latest from the O'Keefe Media Group draining the deep state. | ||
| Department of Defense branch chief calls President Trump illegitimate, vows to resist him and everything he does, and more. | ||
| This is the deep state that is trying to sabotage Trump. | ||
| The O'Keefe Media Group has exposed it yet again. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The same guy who tried to overthrow an election is just like truly setting us down a path with a potato chip. | |
| He's illegitimate. | ||
| He's generally immoral, breaking every war. | ||
| We're going to resist him. | ||
| James O'Keefe here in Arlington, Virginia, in front of the Pentagon, the branch chief inside the Pentagon, saying on hidden camera he's going to resist against Trump and Hegseth. | ||
| Now, since President Trump was elected and assigned Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense, the DOD has faced a number of leaks in the past few months from employees inside the Pentagon. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There's some type of deep state forces that want to make sure you don't stay there. | |
| They've come after me from day one, just like they've come after President Trump. | ||
| I mean, I've gotten a fraction of what President Trump got in that first term. | ||
| The Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, has been going on media interviews expressing that there are people within the Pentagon who want to resist the president and | ||
| I know exactly why I'm here. | ||
| To rip out the insidious ideologies and not... | ||
| To compromise and not back down. | ||
| To reestablish standards and accountability. | ||
| Nicholas Terza, a branch chief within the DOD, expressed dissatisfaction with his new boss, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, claiming he is too young for the job. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm assuming that your boss isn't Pete Hegseth. | |
| Ultimately, he is my boss. | ||
| But this is insane. | ||
| I actually know Pete Hegseth. | ||
| You do? | ||
| Like, personally? | ||
| This is so crazy. | ||
| Like, that's not a good reflection on me. | ||
| That's a bad reflection on Trump. | ||
| Like, nobody I know should be the secretary to the boss. | ||
| Oh, no. | ||
| Like, he's insanely... | ||
| Oh, did you guys work together? | ||
| Oh. Now, Nicholas Terza claims that he knows Hegseth from the D.C. National Guard, | ||
| but we spoke to a senior official at the Pentagon who said that's not true, that Hegseth has not ever heard of this man or seen him. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But what do you think the intent is? | |
| Is it like, do they want to hurt America? | ||
| I think they don't care who they vote. | ||
| To enact the change that they see, making America a populist, conservative framework, more traditional, even if that means being better. | ||
| Terza also saying on the hidden camera he did not know he was being recorded that Trump is an illegitimate president, an immoral dictator, and they plan to resist everything Trump does. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The same guy who tried to overthrow an election was just like truly setting us down to back with dictatorship. | |
| He's illegitimate. | ||
| He's terribly immoral, breaking every war. | ||
| We're gonna resist him. | ||
| Everything he does. | ||
| I'm a very patriotic person, and I've never been lost patriotic. | ||
| Now, the reason this is concerning, the Department of Defense is often directly responsible for the president's safety in the event of travel, events, campaign rallies, and everything else. | ||
| Should the president's safety be entrusted with... | ||
| who believe that he is illegitimate and immoral. | ||
| And here we have a field trip. | ||
| Let's take a look. | ||
| People are coming in. | ||
| Hello, everyone. | ||
| So great work again here by James O'Keefe. | ||
| I love how the left plays the moral high ground as if they had it. | ||
| Oh, Trump's lack of morals. | ||
| Shut the hell up. | ||
| You guys like mutilating children. | ||
| You're into killing babies. | ||
| Okay? Excuse me. | ||
| I don't mean to start off the show this way, but pardon my French. | ||
| Shut the fuck up. | ||
| You have no morals. | ||
| You have none. | ||
| Sit down. | ||
| All right, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| You just heard the latest O'Keefe Media Group report. | ||
| Yet another deep state actor anti-Trump. | ||
| And look. | ||
| I think in fairness, you have to take a lot of this stuff with a grain of salt. | ||
| How much influence do these individuals actually have? | ||
| Are they just out on a date showing off because they think this is how they can, you know, get lucky? | ||
| But even considering that, the attitude is obviously prevalent in Washington, D.C. It's... | ||
| Pervasive inside of the Trump administration. | ||
| And so this is what they're dealing with. | ||
| And it's definitely happening at the FBI and the DOJ. | ||
| I think the problem is it's going to take bold action and nobody wants to be that kind of lead dog. | ||
| I think Musk liked being that lead dog, but then the knives and the arrows came for him. | ||
| Now, I don't know if he necessarily wants to back off, but the things going on with his private business enterprises, I'm sure, rattling around in his head, flying around in his ear like a gnat, starting to become a little bothersome. | ||
| I also feel like Musk was trying to take that leading edge with Doge, and a lot of people just didn't follow suit. | ||
| And I was wondering, and I don't look at this as... | ||
| This is not an attack on Dan Bongino, as I've said. | ||
| We got as good as it's going to get, probably. | ||
| We'll see what the results are with Patel and Bongino at the FBI. | ||
| And I know there's problems there. | ||
| But, you know, Bongino, who is a major investor in Rumble, took Rumble and its stocks to unprecedented levels as a platform as well. | ||
| And then, obviously, with the leading show there. | ||
| But then he erased all of his Rumble archives after he became the deputy director. | ||
| And so I didn't really understand that. | ||
| Didn't make sense from a business perspective, but whatever. | ||
| He made the decision for whatever reason it was. | ||
| Well, now, people are going into the archives. | ||
| And, I mean, there's all these viral clips of Bongino now where he's talking about how everyone at the FBI needs to be fired. | ||
| So... I hope Dan Bongino takes Dan Bongino's advice. | ||
| The problem is, when you look at these institutions, it's like a load-bearing wall in a house that you can't remove. | ||
| Well, maybe the house needs to come down. | ||
| Oh, well, who talked about the house coming down at the FBI? | ||
| Oh, that's right, it was Kash Patel. | ||
| There's no doubt. | ||
| People are starting to scratch their heads and get a little impatient. | ||
| But I think what needs to be done now, all these different, they need to be in communication with Project Veritas. | ||
| They need to be in communication with the O'Keefe Media Group and they need to say, alright, can you give us a list? | ||
| Or they can just go do the research themselves. | ||
| I'm sure the O'Keefe Media Group would be happy to assist in this. | ||
| They say, give us the list. | ||
| Of all these different agency officials that have talked about the different ways that they want to sabotage the Trump administration or a member, the chair of the House Oversight Committee could do this as well. | ||
| The weaponization of government team can do this and say, all right, we're going to call them in for hearings and we're going to figure out exactly what's going on. | ||
| Why would they not want to do that? | ||
| The Republicans have control of Congress. | ||
| Why would you not be calling this Department of Defense official who's on tape talking about sabotaging the President of the United States? | ||
| It's insubordination. | ||
| At the very least, you should be fired. | ||
| But, okay, if you want to... | ||
| Oh, well, let's give him his due process. | ||
| It's funny, the anti-war... | ||
| Advisors to Pete Hegseth never got their due process. | ||
| They got escorted out of the building. | ||
| They don't even know what they're accused of or who's accusing them. | ||
| But, okay, that's another story. | ||
| It's not what winning looks like, but this is where we're at. | ||
| Why aren't there hearings asking all of these bureaucrats, hey, you know, you said that your agency is hiding money from the Trump administration. | ||
| You said that your agency is trying to sabotage Trump and his agenda. | ||
| Would you like to explain more and exactly how you're doing that? | ||
| Where are the hearings? | ||
| How are these hearings not being called? | ||
| I've always wondered why they never do that. | ||
| And yet here we are. | ||
| So that's just the intro video for the show. | ||
| Let me tell you what else. | ||
| We do have a stack of just some political developments out of Washington, D.C., some economic developments as well. | ||
| Boy, I'm trying to stay patient. | ||
| I really am. | ||
| But when I see now FBI raids happening at people that were protesting Palestinian activists or pro-Palestine activists on a college campus getting FBI raids, no warrant shown, | ||
| ramming the door in. | ||
| And, of course, you have the left who's talking about how illegal it is and everything else. | ||
| Now, they didn't say a damn word when it was innocent January 6 victims of the weaponized government, but, of course, they're all up in arms about this. | ||
| Regardless of that, tell me why I don't see videos of the FBI ramming in the door of the deep state actors and agents. | ||
| Tell me why. | ||
| Tell me why I don't have FBI officials ramming down the doors of Epstein's clients. | ||
| Tell me why I don't have FBI agents ramming down the doors of the COVID scam artists. | ||
| So regardless of how you feel about those protests, or whether or not... | ||
| You believe that it's justified to send an FBI invasion team to the home of a protester. | ||
| Now, they're claiming it has to do with... | ||
| I believe they called it multi-jurisdictional vandalism. | ||
| So I guess they're accusing them of doing some damage to a college campus. | ||
| So you need an FBI raid? | ||
|
unidentified
|
You need a full... | |
| Basically SWAT team to go in there and ram the door down. | ||
| But if you were a deep state actor that lied to the entire country and lied to impeach President Trump, or you were a COVID scam artist or helped create the virus, or you were an open border agent that facilitated the invasion of this country by the tens of millions. | ||
| You're not getting your door rammed in. | ||
| No, FBI agents aren't showing up at your door ramming it in with guns drawn. | ||
| Nope. But if you're a college protester, oh yeah, baby. | ||
| Oh yeah, we're sending in the feds. | ||
| It's ridiculous. | ||
| It's absolutely ridiculous. | ||
| But don't worry, you can be in the DOD or the DOJ or any of these other federal bureaucracies and you can talk about how you're sabotaging Trump and hiding money. | ||
| You won't even get a subpoena for a hearing. | ||
| No. But you're a college protester? | ||
| The FBI's coming to ram your door down. | ||
| Literally. Might as well get into it since... | ||
| We're already talking about activists. | ||
| Say Southeast Michigan police raids are targeting pro-Palestinian protesters. | ||
| Apparently this is happening in more than one home of these protesters. | ||
| I've only just seen the one video that we shared. | ||
| Again, they say it's a vandalism investigation. | ||
| I've never heard of a vandalism investigation with an FBI raid like this, though. | ||
| And just... | ||
| Next door to Michigan in Minnesota, you had the Tesla vandalism, at least four incidents. | ||
| He got released. | ||
| So you can go out and do all kinds of vandalism and terrorism. | ||
| They won't do an FBI raid at your house. | ||
| But if you're a college protester, oh yeah. | ||
| I just can't make sense of it. | ||
| Now, of course... | ||
| The logical conclusion people are reaching, which is unavoidable now, is to say that whatever the interests of Israel are, are being prioritized. | ||
| Or the Israeli lobby, however you want to boil it down, the Zionists, they bring a hundred different names, or they love blaming the Jews, whatever it is. | ||
| How can you argue? | ||
| How can you land on any other conclusion right now? | ||
| No deep state raids. | ||
| No COVID raids. | ||
| No Doge money laundering fraud raids. | ||
| No open border raids. | ||
| No Epstein raids. | ||
| They don't even raid the Tesla terrorists. | ||
| No. None of that. | ||
| But you were pro-Palestine on a college campus? | ||
| You're getting raided. | ||
| You're getting deported. | ||
| You're going to jail. | ||
| Swiftly. Earnestly. | ||
| Nobody talks about due process. | ||
| So I say, well, why is that? | ||
| What other conclusion are people to reach? | ||
| What are they prioritizing? | ||
| Is it the things you voted for? | ||
| Not me. | ||
| I didn't vote for that. | ||
| I didn't vote for the federal government to be prioritizing college protesters. | ||
| Hope it changes. | ||
| Otherwise, MAGA's going to have some problems. | ||
| Won't be my problem. | ||
| FBI and police raid homes of Palestinian activists in Michigan. | ||
| Put it on the screen one more time so they can see this with the audio. | ||
| So this is multiple homes. | ||
| Ann Arbor. | ||
| Ypsilanti. Canton. | ||
| And more. | ||
| So they're just sitting there filming this one. | ||
| I guess nobody else filmed it. | ||
| Guns-drawn raid. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let them go! | |
| Let them go! | ||
| So I get it. | ||
| If you are on the pro-Israel side of MAGA, that's fine. | ||
| But how can you justify this? | ||
| And how can you, and even further, even if you want to justify that... | ||
| How can you justify the federal government making that a priority over the real issues we voted for? | ||
| The deep state treason, the open borders, the COVID scam artists. | ||
| I mean, you can go down the list. | ||
| The Epstein list. | ||
| No raids, no arrests, no federal cases. | ||
| Even the Tesla terrorists are getting let go. | ||
| In Democrat-run states. | ||
| Is this what you voted for? | ||
| Is this MAGA? | ||
| Is this the priorities that we want? | ||
| Not me. | ||
| That's what we get. | ||
| That's what we're getting. | ||
| Trend isn't changing. | ||
| We're almost 100 days in. | ||
| It's not a good look. | ||
| It's not a good look, folks. | ||
| Here's an example of where the priority should be. | ||
| Dems panic as Trump executive order targeting ActBlue Democrat fundraising platform looms. | ||
| And then Elon Musk follows it up, calling it criminal, a giant scam. | ||
| So what are we talking about here? | ||
| We're talking about the giant money laundering operation that Doge has exposed, all the fraud, waste, and abuse that Doge has exposed. | ||
| And you just get no arrests. | ||
| Nothing. Where are the investigations? | ||
| Where are the FBI teams? | ||
| Quite frankly, I think Musk is getting frustrated. | ||
| Quite frankly, I think Musk is getting impatient. | ||
| And he's probably looking at it now, saying... | ||
| You know, I don't mind the losses at my businesses. | ||
| I anticipated that, and I look at the margins, and I figure it's worth the price to save America, because without America, I'm not going to have anything anyway. | ||
| So I don't think Musk is that panicked over the business situation, but I think now he's looking at it saying, If we're only, because now, look, don't jump to any conclusions about the reports you're seeing about Musk, | ||
| and don't jump to any conclusions about the reports you're seeing about the final numbers. | ||
| But, but, if they don't cut at least a trillion dollars of waste, fraud, and abuse from the federal government, And they don't track down the people that were stealing the money in the waste, | ||
| fraud, and abuse. | ||
| Then I think Musk looks at this and says, what am I doing here? | ||
| Why am I even doing this? | ||
| Now, if you want to repurpose some of the money, as Trump is doing, for military spending, that's one thing. | ||
| But when your goal is a trillion in waste, fraud, and abuse, and you're at... | ||
| Over $200 billion now. | ||
| And you're saying, well, maybe this is enough. | ||
| And again, this isn't to run cover for President Trump or offer excuses. | ||
| He's delegating a lot of these duties to people that he trusts. | ||
| He can't do everything. | ||
| It's impossible for him to do everything. | ||
| And he is right now mostly negotiating trade. | ||
| He's delegated some of the peace negotiations now. | ||
| But when it's time for a big discussion, he'll pick up the phone. | ||
| But he's probably fielding 50-plus phone calls a day from international leaders, business, diplomatic, talking about trade deals. | ||
| So that's his priority. | ||
| And, of course, also at the same time, dealing with American business leaders. | ||
| But that's where he's focused. | ||
| He's acting as a chief executive. | ||
| He's acting as a businessman. | ||
| He's approaching it that way. | ||
| That's where his priorities are. | ||
| I think we will see the results of that by the end of the year as the engine starts to turn on. | ||
| But the point is, he can't sit here and babysit everybody all the time. | ||
| He can't babysit the FBI. | ||
| He can't babysit the DOJ. | ||
| And really, I think this is why they hate Hegseth so much, because Hegseth is doing such a great job. | ||
| I mean, you start to look at this. | ||
| I did the report card a couple weeks ago. | ||
| Maybe we'll do another one after 100 days. | ||
| But it's like you can tell who's in there doing their job and then who we're kind of looking at like, wait, where are the results here? | ||
| And I think Musk is starting to reach that point as well. | ||
| So that could be the determining factor whether he decides he wants to stick around and help with Doge or not. | ||
| Now, he's already got the team that's going to stay there because it is acting in official government capacity. | ||
| But Musk himself is on a limited contract. | ||
| So that could determine. | ||
| And then he'll just say, okay, well, we did all this work. | ||
| We're not getting the results that... | ||
| Are desired or necessary here, so I'm just going to have to go back and try to save my businesses that are taking the heat right now. | ||
| Which, of course, they're going to make fun of him for that. | ||
| Here's a real... | ||
| It's hilarious, this woman. | ||
| Molly Jong Fast. | ||
| Look, I will tell you this. | ||
| I've been more and more, I've kind of said this before, I've been more and more tuning in to MSNBC and CNN because CNN has some decent stuff on there now when they have some of these panels. | ||
| It gets a little fun. | ||
| It's kind of like classic political TV. | ||
| You don't get as much of it anymore. | ||
| MSNBC is legitimately hilarious. | ||
| Like, you want a good laugh at night? | ||
| I don't know if they, I mean, unless they're rolling like an old sitcom from the 90s or something, probably nothing good on TV. | ||
| If you want something to laugh at, MSNBC is right there. | ||
| Even if you don't have the volume on. | ||
| I mean, just look at this character. | ||
| But listen to what she says about Musk here in clip six. | ||
| That package. | ||
| He seems to be leaving with a bit of a whimper here. | ||
| We played some audio from earlier on the Tesla call. | ||
| He said he'd still be around now and then, day here, day there. | ||
| But clearly his role is drawing down. | ||
| And let's just talk about the legacy of Doge, where it has plenty of job cuts, plenty of chaos, but nowhere near the savings, Musk promised. | ||
| I mean, not even close. | ||
| By a factor of a lot, they missed their goals. | ||
| And a lot of it, even they said they've accomplished, they got wrong. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. I mean, it was a lot of drama for not a lot of savings. | |
| And I think that's the top one. | ||
| Not a lot of savings. | ||
| Now, let's correct the record. | ||
| They're at $200 billion in savings. | ||
| Okay? $200 billion. | ||
| Just a year ago, you said $200 billion would solve world hunger. | ||
| Do we all remember this? | ||
| So, when Musk is worth $200 billion, they say, Geez, he could solve world hunger. | ||
| Unbelievable. Now he saves $200 billion and they say it's not a lot of money. | ||
| What? Make up your mind. | ||
| It is a lot of money. | ||
| It's not what is necessary, but it is a lot of money. | ||
| Let's not be liars here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Continue. The reason why now Elon is in the defensive is because Tesla's profits were down 71%. | |
| That is a crazy number. | ||
| I mean, that is, like, just... | ||
| I mean, I don't... | ||
| Is there a huge precedent for that? | ||
| That seems enormous to me. | ||
| And I think, look, he's now had to step back from this. | ||
| And remember, they had numbers that were going to be humongous. | ||
| So, again, folks, the Tesla numbers being down... | ||
| It's liberals that buy electric vehicles. | ||
| And liberals now hate Musk. | ||
| So... In fact, if you were to put a percentage on it and you would say, what percentage of Tesla drivers are liberals? | ||
| Do you think 70% would be a fair estimate? | ||
| Say, probably about 70%. | ||
| Profits down 70%. | ||
| I mean, it's really not that shocking of a number other than just how large it is. | ||
| So, I mean, that's just a liberal boycott boycotting a product that they like. | ||
| Which, of course, is ironic. | ||
| But I'm not... | ||
| No, no, no. | ||
| Even if they just get $200 billion, we're not letting the left win on this thing. | ||
| That's not a win. | ||
| That's a success. | ||
| It's not the success it should have been, but that's still a lot of money. | ||
| You said it would cure world hunger. | ||
| By the way, this is breaking right now. | ||
| Detectives show up at home of O'Keefe, James O'Keefe, the O'Keefe Media Group, after the State Farm... | ||
| Expose that they put. | ||
| I think he's put out a video. | ||
| I'm working with the crew in the break here because I'm actually, I'm trying to send them some audio from the Supreme Court hearings as we're getting more information about this LGBTQ indoctrination that the left is trying to bring to children in schools. | ||
| I mean, it's like daycare. | ||
| As young as three years old. | ||
| And we're starting to learn more about how they're doing this. | ||
| And then... | ||
| Their defense of it is actually exposing them, and I'm trying to get that audio to them, but they're saying, oh, no, this is... | ||
| So, like, they'll have a math program, and it'll be like, oh, if you, you know, one drag queen plus one leather daddy kink equals two. | ||
| And they'll say, no, this is part of the math curriculum. | ||
| Dead serious, that's what they're doing. | ||
| And they got it in the English curriculum, or they're like, find the leather daddy, find the drag queen. | ||
| They say, oh no, no, no, that's English. | ||
| Oh, that's English, yeah. | ||
| Like, again, I'm sorry to be regretful, but it's like, A is for anal, B is for blowjob, C is for, you know, use your imagination. | ||
| That's where they're taking it. | ||
| And then they say, oh, you're against vocabulary? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. | |
| No, you know exactly what they're doing. | ||
| And their argument against the opt-out is, well, if you let the parents opt their kids out, then there won't be anybody left in the classroom and the schools can't handle putting them into another room. | ||
| There's not enough space in the school. | ||
| Wow! So you admit no parent actually wants this? | ||
| Incredible stuff. | ||
| So I'm working with the crew to get all that audio. | ||
| But do we have the O'Keefe video? | ||
| We can roll for them? | ||
| Okay, I'm going to hold off on the Supreme Court stuff for now. | ||
| I want to go down this political news. | ||
| But let's get this statement from James O'Keefe. | ||
| We played his report. | ||
| Another DOD anti-Trump official talking about how they're going to sabotage the administration. | ||
| Needs to be subpoenaed for a hearing. | ||
| Probably won't be. | ||
| Republicans in Congress are pathetic. | ||
| But here he is reporting on the detectives that showed up to his house, and I'm assuming explaining what happened and why. | ||
| We just found out that detectives have come to the home of one of our undercover journalists. | ||
| Apparently, the vice president of State Farm has filed a criminal complaint. | ||
| This just happened. | ||
| We just found out that they went to the door of one of the homes of our undercover journalists. | ||
| This is apparently over the State Farm insurance story that we did. | ||
| The vice president of State Farm was fired from State Farm for what he said on hidden camera. | ||
| This is apparently over the Illinois... | ||
| Eavesdropping law, the anti-recording law, but we recorded this in a place where there's no expectation of privacy. | ||
| This is a First Amendment issue. | ||
| They're trying to intimidate my team. | ||
| We need a defense attorney in Cook County, Illinois. | ||
| We're calling on all attorneys. | ||
| Again, we need good lawyers to come to our defense. | ||
| Please email us at legal at okfamediagroup.com. | ||
| That's legal@O'KeefeMediaGroup.com, L-E-G-A-L at O'KeefeMediaGroup.com. | ||
| We need lawyers who care. | ||
| They're trying to intimidate us. | ||
| They're trying to scare our undercover journalists. | ||
| We will have the backs of our reporters. | ||
| We did not break the law. | ||
| There's nothing wrong with what we did. | ||
| This is a powerful insurance company. | ||
| The vice president of State Farm filed a complaint, but we're going to have... | ||
| Well, if you are a criminal defense attorney in Cook County listening to this show, why don't you send him an email? | ||
| Tell him that I sent you. | ||
| Maybe the 1776 Law Center has an attorney there. | ||
| Because we found out when we filed the FOIA, which, by the way, we should be getting a response within a couple days based off the laws in Tennessee. | ||
| But when we first filed, we didn't know it at the time. | ||
| In Tennessee, you have to actually live in that district or practice in that district in order to file a FOIA. | ||
| So they replied to our original request and said, hey, we will reply to your request, but it has to come from inside the district. | ||
| Well, it just so happened the 1776 Law Center that does my legal defense and offense had an attorney in that district. | ||
| So we refiled. | ||
| We should have that FOIA on. | ||
| Abrego Garcia being pulled over in Tennessee in 2022 on the suspected human trafficking situation. | ||
| We should have that by the end of next week. | ||
| I would say that's almost a certain thing. | ||
| So maybe they know somebody in Chicago, too. | ||
| But regardless, I think he lays it out there. | ||
| There's different laws in different states as far as private recordings are concerned, whether you can do it in somebody's private residence or not, whether you can do it in public or not. | ||
| There's all kinds of things. | ||
| Obviously, O'Keefe has been doing this for over a decade. | ||
| He knows the laws. | ||
| But they've fought and won cases very similar to this before anyway. | ||
| So I would anticipate it's going to be another victory, but they've got to go through the process and fight it. | ||
| But it is an intimidation tactic, absolutely. | ||
| Okay, so we brought you that. | ||
| Breaking news. | ||
| Let me just handle it like this. | ||
| Guys, we'll re... | ||
| Because I still got to send you... | ||
| I sent you the two Gorsuch clips. | ||
| I need to send you the Kavanaugh clip that I'm looking forward to. | ||
| And so we'll revisit the Supreme Court situation when I can kind of sort that out with the crew in a break coming up. | ||
| So we'll do that. | ||
| Let me just kind of pile drive through the rest of this news here, though. | ||
| Wife of wrongly deported Maryland man Kilmar Abrego Garcia forced into safe house. | ||
| After government posts address online. | ||
| So now they're acting like, oh, this is a one-of-a-kind situation, and now she's being tormented and tortured. | ||
| Well, it's all ironic, isn't it? | ||
| Where are these same media outlets, when she's filing the wife of Garcia, these protective orders? | ||
| Because of alleged abuse. | ||
| That she's in fear. | ||
| Did she have to go to a safe house when Garcia was in the country? | ||
| Will she have to go to a safe house if the Democrats bring Garcia back into the country? | ||
| Who's tormenting her? | ||
| Is it gang members? | ||
| Why does she need to go to a safe house? | ||
| By the way... | ||
| It's been explained a dozen times. | ||
| It'll probably have to be explained a dozen more. | ||
| Because the legal fights continue here. | ||
| Corrupt Clinton judge partially blocks Trump election integrity executive order, including proof of citizenship. | ||
| Well, that's just in my stack. | ||
| That's not related to this, but there it is. | ||
| Trump appointed judge orders administration to return second deported illegal immigrant. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Now, apparently... | |
| There's even some infighting inside of the Republican Party on this situation now. | ||
| And some are saying, yeah, he shouldn't have been deported. | ||
| The stay order, and a lot of this is just, when you go through the prison system, you understand it a little better. | ||
| The reason he had the stay order was to protect him from gangs. | ||
| In El Salvador. | ||
| So as Stephen Miller has come out and explained, the gang that the stay order existed to protect him from no longer exists. | ||
| Therefore, the stay order is null and void. | ||
| There is no stay order. | ||
| But... Okay, even if you want to go down that route, you have to admit, you have to admit then, that Garcia is here illegally. | ||
| Oh! So first it's, he is not here illegally. | ||
| Yes, he is. | ||
| Okay, he is. | ||
| But there's a stay order for his deportation. | ||
| No, there's not. | ||
| The gang is null and void. | ||
| The stay order is also null and void. | ||
| So see how they keep moving the goalposts? | ||
| Oh, he's here illegally. | ||
| No, he's not. | ||
| Yes, he is. | ||
| Oh, okay, he is. | ||
| But there's a stay order. | ||
| You can't deport him. | ||
| No, he was ordered for deportation. | ||
| The stay order was because of this gang. | ||
| This gang is now in prison. | ||
| The stay order is null and void. | ||
| And now his wife is apparently going into hiding. | ||
| Again, is that because of gang activity, or what is that about? | ||
| Or is she afraid he's coming back, maybe? | ||
| You know, with that whole history. | ||
| But yeah, you know, Trump can't even get election integrity without the Democrats blocking him. | ||
| This Clinton judge, a federal judge, on Thursday partially blocked Trump's executive order on election integrity, including the requirement to add proof of citizenship to federal voter registration forms. | ||
| Isn't that amazing? | ||
| March 25th preserving and protecting the integrity of America's election executive order mandates, voter ID and documentary proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections. | ||
| So you can point to all kinds of issues with our elections. | ||
| And you can debate the effectiveness of this executive order. | ||
| Really, you'd have to wait and see what happens with future elections. | ||
| But the Democrats are already in there trying to stop it. | ||
| So now, look, we covered it. | ||
| We read a lot of the text of the executive order on the air. | ||
| The election integrity executive order was very strong. | ||
| Very strong. | ||
| And it might not be exactly what... | ||
| We're looking for 100%, but it was strong. | ||
| Now this is proof how effective it would have been. | ||
| The Democrats are now trying to block it because of how effective it would have been. | ||
| It's the same thing. | ||
| You see it all over now with public statements from Democrats. | ||
| Demanding voter ID is voter suppression. | ||
| Well, whose vote are you suppressing? | ||
| You're suppressing illegal votes. | ||
| Why would the Democrats be upset that illegal votes are being suppressed? | ||
| Because the Democrats rely on illegal votes to win elections. | ||
| There it is. | ||
| Basic math. | ||
| Maybe I can make it into Yale. | ||
| That's elementary school level math. | ||
| You're now getting a Yale math. | ||
| Of course, right here. | ||
| Remedial math. | ||
| DNI Tulsi Gabbard refers intel officials to Department of Justice for prosecution over alleged leaks of classified information. | ||
| Now, there's not much detail on this or the individuals. | ||
| I think this is separate from the situation with the Hegseth advisors. | ||
| Because they don't know what they're accused of or who's accusing them. | ||
| That was all coming out of the Pentagon. | ||
| This is coming directly from Tulsi Gabbard and she's saying it was two members of the intelligence community. | ||
| So I don't think advisors to Hegseth are really considered members of the intelligence community. | ||
| They're considered advisors. | ||
| But uh-oh. | ||
| Does Tulsi Gabbard know that she just sent the criminal referral into a black hole known as Pam Bondi's desk? | ||
| Has anything sent to Pam Bondi's desk materialized? | ||
| I'm serious. | ||
| Can anybody point to one thing that doesn't involve a college protest that has been sent to Pam Bondi's desk that has materialized? | ||
| Is there a single thing? | ||
| I can't think of one. | ||
| Everything that goes to her desk disappears. | ||
| Everything that goes to her desk, it stops right there. | ||
| Not in the good way. | ||
| The buck stops with me. | ||
| Well, not in the good way at Pam Bondi's desk. | ||
| Folks, look. | ||
| They got problems at the FBI. | ||
| Okay? I'm not... | ||
| Telling you a big secret. | ||
| Everybody knows that. | ||
| But, I mean, you know, I'm telling you they got problems. | ||
| So they're dealing with that. | ||
| But when you are sending criminal referrals to the Attorney General that need rapid response and they don't get it, at what point do these other... | ||
| Do these other agency heads start to look in Pambani's direction and say, what happened to that criminal referral I sent you? | ||
| Do you remember that? | ||
| Anything? I'm not sure what she's doing. | ||
| She hasn't been on Fox News in a couple nights now. | ||
| So I'm not sure what she's even doing. | ||
| So, okay, guys. | ||
| So last week it was the Letitia James criminal referral. | ||
| Nothing has materialized on that. | ||
| Now you have Gabbard with Intelligence Community Leakers criminal referral. | ||
| What are the odds that I'm sitting here a week from today, just like a week ago, With Letitia James' criminal referral, what are the odds I'm sitting here a week from today and there's nothing more on this? | ||
| Do you think there'll be an FBI raid? | ||
| Do you think the FBI will be raiding the criminal leakers? | ||
| Do you think the FBI will be raiding Letitia James? | ||
| Do you think the FBI will be raiding Act Blue? | ||
| Do you think the FBI will be raiding a college protester? | ||
| That's your multiple choice exam. | ||
| Which one you think is going to happen and which one do you think should happen first? | ||
| Crazy, man. | ||
| Just absolutely crazy that this is what's going on. | ||
| And it doesn't seem to be moving in the right direction either. | ||
|
unidentified
|
there. | |
| Either. All right. | ||
| Well, tell you what. | ||
| Let's go to... | ||
| Well, I'll save that for the short segment. | ||
| Let's go to some news from the desk of President Trump. | ||
| Now, the Atlantic known anti-Trump rag... | ||
| Did I sue the Atlantic? | ||
| I might have sued the Atlantic. | ||
| I don't even remember. | ||
| We're going on the legal offense now around here. | ||
| I'm sick of all the libel. | ||
| Against me. | ||
| So Trump had this to say. | ||
| today, I will be meeting with, of all people, Jeffrey Goldberg, you know, the guy that got into that signal text, the editor of The Atlantic and the person responsible for many fictional stories about me, including the made up hoax on suckers and losers and Signalgate, something | ||
| he was somewhat more successful with. | ||
| Jeffrey is bringing with him Michael Scherer and Ashley Parker, not exactly pro Trump writers either. | ||
| To put it mildly, the story they are writing, they have told my representatives, will be entitled The Most Consequential President of This Century. | ||
| That's probably an accurate title, but, I mean, Donald, you know what they're going to do to you. | ||
| I am doing this interview out of curiosity, as a competition with myself, just to see if it's possible for the Atlantic to be truthful. | ||
| Are they capable of writing a fair story on Trump, the way I look at it? | ||
| What can be so bad? | ||
| I won. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I won. | |
| Oh my gosh. | ||
| It's actually hilarious that Trump is doing this. | ||
| You know, he's the one that talks about the snake poem. | ||
| He's bringing three snakes into the White House here. | ||
| Let me make a bold prediction. | ||
| I mean, I'm going way out there with this. | ||
| They're going to write a negative story about you, Mr. President. | ||
| I know, I know. | ||
| Bold prediction. | ||
| Really sticking my neck out there with this one. | ||
| But I think it's going to be negative. | ||
| However, I think there's a different angle. | ||
| I don't think Trump is necessarily too concerned about the nature of this story. | ||
| He knows it's going to be negative. | ||
| I think what Trump is more concerned about is getting that little rat. | ||
| Goldberg in there and saying, hey, I let you in here. | ||
| I'll do your interview. | ||
| But you know what? | ||
| I'd like to know how you got into that message. | ||
| Start making changes at the China-loving Wall Street Journal. | ||
| It sucks. | ||
| President Trump. | ||
| This morning. | ||
| I've... Part of me gets the Fox News appeal. | ||
| I do. | ||
| But another part of me is like, Especially after this. | ||
| Now I don't. | ||
| Now after this, I will not understand why Trump continues to give Fox News more exclusive interviews than anybody else. | ||
| And I think the strategy during the campaign was great. | ||
| He did hit Fox News. | ||
| He had to in a campaign. | ||
| But he was hitting all the other independent podcasts and shows and everything else. | ||
| He can still be inviting those people to do interviews at the White House, and it'll have a much better impact. | ||
| But no, he's always giving Hannity the exclusives, and he's always doing Fox News exclusives. | ||
| Fox was anti-Trump in 2015 and 2016, and now they say, oh, I'm such a great friend of Trump. | ||
| No, you were anti-Trump. | ||
| They helped the Democrats steal the election from Trump. | ||
| They purged their on-air talent that dared question the election. | ||
| No, I'm not even going to get into the vaccine mandates. | ||
| So I don't get it. | ||
| He'll put this out and then he'll go on Hannity later this week. | ||
| I'm being facetious. | ||
| I don't know if that's lined up, but, you know, it's a pretty good bet it'll happen. | ||
| So, Donald, quit going on Fox News. | ||
| You're saying it right here. | ||
| They have been stabbing you in the back for years. | ||
| Why do you continue to show them your back? | ||
| You know they're going to stab it. | ||
| Go somewhere else that's not going to stab you in the back. | ||
| But there it is. | ||
| By the way, a couple trolls from Trump today. | ||
| Trump 28. I've got a Trump 28 hat. | ||
| They're now selling a Trump 2028 hat. | ||
| I think that's just a troll more than anything. | ||
| But he does want to put two 100-foot flagpoles with a giant American flag on the White House lawn. | ||
| And he made that announcement earlier today, clip two. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're putting up a beautiful, almost 100-foot tall American flag on this side and another one on the other side. | |
| Two flags, top of the line. | ||
| And they've needed flagpoles for 200 years. | ||
| It was something I've often said, you know, they don't have a flagpole, per se. | ||
| So we're putting one right where you saw us, and we're putting another one on the other side, on top of the mounds. | ||
| It's going to be two beautiful poles. | ||
| You know, they've got, like, building restrictions in D.C. I don't know what it is, but there's, like, a certain... | ||
| Height you can't build above. | ||
| I think it might be the Washington Monument. | ||
| You can't make it higher than that. | ||
| It's something weird like that. | ||
| He should just have them as big as possible. | ||
| Or sign some exemptions so they're bigger than anything else. | ||
| So the tallest thing in D.C. will be an American flag. | ||
| Flying. That'd be really sending a message, wouldn't it? | ||
| So we'll see when that happens. | ||
| That'll be fun. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Just finished our first hour here of the Infowars War Room. | ||
| Remember, we got the Supreme Court case coming up here and more. | ||
| We want to continue to thank our supporters at thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP. | ||
| It's that sustained membership that budgets us into the future. | ||
| All the benefits that come along with being a VIP member you can find for yourself at thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP, including but not limited to monthly membership credits that you can spend at the store. | ||
| Bonus entries into the raffle giveaways. | ||
| Like right now, the one of one, the only Alex Jones Cybertruck. | ||
| When you shop at thealexjonesstore.com, you get multiple entries to win the Cybertruck. | ||
| But you get more entries if you're a VIP member. | ||
| So we thank our VIPs. | ||
| We thank you for continuing to support us at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| That's what will keep Alex and the rest of the team on the air. | ||
| You know, we haven't played anything from the great freedom tunes lately, but their latest cartoon really sums up the situation with the media reporting on Abrego Garcia and the violent criminal illegal aliens that the Trump administration is trying to deport. | ||
| Great depiction here in clip one. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Extra, extra! | |
| Trump deported a U.S. citizen who didn't even break the law. | ||
| No way! | ||
| Really? Yeah. | ||
| Okay, but did that really happen? | ||
| Well, technically. | ||
| Technically. He was an undocumented U.S. citizen, and he did break the law, but only in the sense that arson is still illegal. | ||
| Technically. Technically. | ||
| Well, I'm already feeling emotions, so none of those distinctions matter. | ||
| What? The story was a complete lie. | ||
| A lie? | ||
| Because of some technicality? | ||
| How about this? | ||
| Trump deported a community organizer even though they were born here and never broke the law just because they were Hispanic. | ||
| Oh, my gosh. | ||
| I'm so emotional about that. | ||
| And when you say he was born here... | ||
| The world! | ||
| He was born in this world, human like the rest of us, technically. | ||
| And he wasn't in a gang. | ||
| Oh, I get it. | ||
| When white people do it, it's community organizing, but when a Venezuelan does it, he's in MS-13, technically. | ||
| Yeah, seriously. | ||
| You've got to be kidding me. | ||
| Oh, you just want to blow that off? | ||
| Well, how's this, you monster? | ||
| Trump deported an aspiring nuclear physicist whose family had been here since the Mayflower simply because he got a tan last summer and looked a little brown. | ||
| I feel I need to ask for clarity. | ||
| Clarity? I think it's clear you're going to hell. | ||
| By here since the Mayflower, do you mean he's of Aztec descent? | ||
| Technically. Technically. | ||
| He was also technically----technically----technically----tobeckly technically----chechnya. | ||
| --a child trafficker. | ||
| We're done here. | ||
| Just another uninformed voter with his fake news. | ||
| Thank you for watching it. | ||
| Yeah, it's every damn time with these people. | ||
| What is the solution? | ||
| What is the solution With the courts acting against the executive, and it is really unprecedented, not that it's never happened, but not to this volume. | ||
| The court's blocking Trump's executive orders on deportations, blocking his executive orders on stopping the DEI agenda, blocking Doge from the cuts. | ||
| I mean, it's just everything, these corrupt judges. | ||
| And... | ||
| And I'm not a Q person, obviously. | ||
| But it's like, if you believe that, and maybe this is what the Q people are saying, then you've successfully identified all of the Democrat corrupt judges. | ||
| It's like, if this is a giant smoke-out, and you're trying to smoke out all the rats, I mean, you've done it. | ||
| You've done it. | ||
| You've exposed them all. | ||
| You've exposed them all inside the Democrat Party. | ||
| You've exposed them all inside the judicial. | ||
| It's just like, how much longer do we have to deal with this? | ||
| And are we really going to be sitting here after this Trump administration and nothing changes? | ||
| Yeah, you're right. | ||
| It's going to take radical reformation to save this country. | ||
| It is. | ||
| And it's going to take controversial decisions. | ||
| By Trump to save this country. | ||
| It's been done before. | ||
| Lincoln might be the best example. | ||
| FDR and others have done it. | ||
| They go down as some of the greatest presidents of all time, whether you like them or not. | ||
| That's just the fact. | ||
| But you've got them. | ||
| You know all the corrupt judges now. | ||
| You know the corrupt lawyers now. | ||
| You've got to remove them from the picture. | ||
| It's out of control. | ||
| They're acting as executives. | ||
| They know they're corrupt judges, they get into their courtrooms, and then they win. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Let's hit the geopolitical stack, and then at the bottom of the hour, review the Supreme Court stories. | ||
| I'll start with this statement from President Trump. | ||
| And then when he was meeting with... | ||
| The leader of Norway and the diplomatic team he brought with him, the press was shouting questions at him, and he virtually said the exact same thing outside of the White House that he says here on Truth earlier this morning. | ||
| I am not happy with Russian strikes on Kiev. | ||
| Not necessary and very bad timing. | ||
| Vladimir, stop. | ||
| 5,000 soldiers a week are dying. | ||
| Let's get the peace deal done. | ||
| Now, Vladimir, stop. | ||
| Of course, the anti-Trump media is making fun of that. | ||
| Vladimir, stop. | ||
| But wasn't that a Joe Biden thing? | ||
| I think this is Trump trolling, actually. | ||
| Didn't Joe Biden... | ||
| Somebody asked Joe Biden about... | ||
| It might have been Israel, Gaza. | ||
| I can't remember. | ||
| And Joe Biden just said, stop. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Stop. Stop. | |
| And, of course, the... | ||
| Fake news media was like, oh my gosh, how profound! | ||
| Joe Biden's done it again! | ||
| Oh wow, so powerful! | ||
| So I really think Trump is just trolling with the stop thing. | ||
| And I think it's pretty clear at this point, and Trump has virtually said it, said it yesterday, that his relations with Putin are better than with Zelensky. | ||
| Now let me hit these headlines and then kind of give you the breakdown. | ||
| Massive Russian strike on Ukraine's capital kills several people, injures dozens as peace talk apparently stalls. | ||
| Russia bombs Kiev after missile strikes in Ukraine's south. | ||
| And then it's all the headlines making fun of Trump saying stop to Putin, which I think was a troll. | ||
| Now, this is probably the most significant development in this war. | ||
| Since Russia invaded. | ||
| You could even argue it's more significant than that. | ||
| And I think this is strategic from Vladimir Putin for two reasons. | ||
| One, he now knows he has the upper hand as far as the White House is concerned. | ||
| So not just on the battlefield where they've maintained the upper hand, he now has it diplomatically in relations with Donald Trump. | ||
| I mean, he sends the portrait over. | ||
| I mean, you know, come on. | ||
| He's smoothing. | ||
| So he knows that. | ||
| He's got the heart, if you will, of Donald Trump. | ||
| Zelensky is not in good favors right now. | ||
| And he won't even, Zelensky won't even make a common sense deal to save his country at this point. | ||
| And do you know what even worst? | ||
| You know what's even worse? | ||
| Do you know where Zelensky is right now? | ||
| He's not in Ukraine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He's in South Africa. | |
| But guess what? | ||
| Now, he's going to have to come back from South Africa. | ||
| Now, what have we been telling you and what has been the case with this war the entire time? | ||
| How is it Zelensky has been able to stay in power? | ||
| How is it that Zelensky now, a totally illegitimate president, Emergency war powers on his election have expired. | ||
| He is, by definition, an illegitimate president. | ||
| By definition. | ||
| And the people that cry about democracy say nothing about the fact that he's not even an elected president anymore. | ||
| And even the emergency orders on his presidency in wartime have expired. | ||
| So he is the definition of illegitimate. | ||
| But how is he able to stay in power? | ||
| With all the Ukrainians dying, with Russia winning the war, nobody in Ukraine even wants to fight anymore. | ||
| How is he able to maintain power? | ||
| Because, to at least up to this point, he's been able to isolate Kiev from the war. | ||
| So all the rich oligarchs, all the people, you want to know where our money is going? | ||
| It's all going into Kiev. | ||
| And then a lot of those people... | ||
| They might be Ukrainian and live in Kiev, but they spend most of their time touring around Europe. | ||
| And it's a well-known story. | ||
| We've covered it. | ||
| You go to a lot of these fancy European hot spots, and you'll see Rolls-Royce and Bentleys and Ferraris riding around with Ukrainian plates. | ||
| Those are the Ukrainian oligarchs. | ||
| They live in Kiev. | ||
| They're getting all the money. | ||
| So that's how Zelensky has been able to remain in power while he's destroying the country of Ukraine and not even elected. | ||
| Because he's protected the oligarchs. | ||
| So they've protected him, essentially. | ||
| Well, now Kiev gets hit. | ||
| Game over. | ||
| So I think that's Russia sending a message now and Putin saying, all right, we've got the military upper hand. | ||
| There's no debate about that. | ||
| Now we've got the diplomatic upper hand with the White House. | ||
| It's time to send a message like, you got one last chance, Zelensky. | ||
| You got one last chance. | ||
| He bombs Kiev, kills a dozen people, Putin, the Russian military, which has been out of play up to this point. | ||
| Now he hits Kiev. | ||
| And Zelensky's got to fly back. | ||
| He's got to end his South Africa trip. | ||
| And he's got to fly back. | ||
| Great job by the crew, by the way. | ||
| Pulling all this up as I'm talking about it. | ||
| I mean, just fantastic stuff. | ||
| So now Zelensky's got to fly back. | ||
| And how do you think that's going to go? | ||
| Now, how is he going to explain to the people of Kiev that have been living the high life, folks? | ||
| Living the high life. | ||
| How is he going to explain now that Kiev is getting hit? | ||
| The entire situation has changed. | ||
| Now, not only does Zelensky have no cards, he is like, the cards are all against him now. | ||
| So that was Putin's, I think, final warning of, alright, do you see what we can do now? | ||
| We will obliterate Kiev if we have to. | ||
| And there is nothing you can do to stop it. | ||
| And you can't go crying back to the White House. | ||
| You already blew that opportunity. | ||
| That's done. | ||
| That shot. | ||
| Who else is going to help you? | ||
| NATO? NATO's scared of its own shadow. | ||
| NATO won't do anything without the green light from Trump. | ||
| Now, Stoltenberg was at the White House today. | ||
| I'm sure they talked about this. | ||
| NATO is not going to budge an inch without approval from Donald Trump. | ||
| And you know why that is? | ||
| Because they need our money. | ||
| So, all the cards are against Zelensky. | ||
| And if the oligarchs in Kiev turn against him, now he basically has two decisions. | ||
| Sign whatever peace deal is available to him, or run for his life. | ||
| Maybe politically, maybe figuratively, maybe literally. | ||
| Because if Putin and Russia starts attacking Kiev, then Zelensky has no more allies. | ||
| And his CIA handlers will take him out. | ||
| Or they'll allow him to get Gaddafied. | ||
| That'll be it. | ||
| So to me, that was like the final warning shot. | ||
| It's like, hey buddy. | ||
| We know where all the money is. | ||
| We know where all your friends are. | ||
| We know where your illegitimate power is being secured. | ||
| We will obliterate it. | ||
| So, we can have peace and you're going to negotiate on our terms or sayonara, sucker. | ||
| And quite frankly, they may have already decided on the latter. | ||
| Russia may have already decided on sayonara, sucker. | ||
| And as stupid as it is and as trolling as it is for Trump to just say stop, it might actually work. | ||
| I mean, Zelensky should probably be calling Donald Trump, begging and pleading and thanking him for even saying stop. | ||
| Which was probably most likely a troll, but Vladimir will probably say, okay, we'll stop for now. | ||
| But if that little punk tyrant doesn't sign a peace deal... | ||
| Bye-bye, Kiev. | ||
| Now, I don't think Russia really wants to do that. | ||
| Kiev actually means a lot to Russia and to Putin. | ||
| He's described the historical significance of it before. | ||
| But at the same time, Russia has lost hundreds of thousands of men in this war. | ||
| And they've lost a lot in geopolitical relations as well. | ||
| So Russia's paid a very steep price. | ||
| Putin is not going to come out of this without a positive outcome. | ||
| And the only positive outcome for Zelensky now is to stop the death and save his life, likely. | ||
| So this is, to me, the biggest development in that war since the original invasion. | ||
| Now we'll see what happens next. | ||
| Meanwhile... Jair Bolsonaro, health of former Brazilian president has worsened since surgery. | ||
| I don't remember if we played that video after he had his surgery where he was struggling to even walk. | ||
| Eventually he was able to walk on his own, but it was not a pretty picture. | ||
| And now his health has declined. | ||
| This is very unfortunate for the Brazilian people. | ||
| Very unfortunate for Brazil. | ||
| The communists are loving this. | ||
| They certainly don't want Bolsonaro to run for president again. | ||
| And in case you didn't know, Bolsonaro was stabbed, I believe it was 2018, while he was on the campaign. | ||
| He was stabbed by a commie. | ||
| So they tried to assassinate Bolsonaro. | ||
| He survived it. | ||
| But now, because of the injuries sustained from that stabbing, he's still having complications. | ||
| And the most recent surgery has been tough. | ||
| Hope he pulls through. | ||
| Hope he pulls through for himself and for Brazil. | ||
| Brazil, as corrupt as it is here, Brazil might even be more corrupt. | ||
| Brazil is probably more corrupt, the judicial system more corrupt, than even America is. | ||
| I mean, they stole that election. | ||
| They literally freed a political criminal, Lula, from prison. | ||
| Just to steal the election from Bolsonaro. | ||
| So, hope Bolsonaro makes it. | ||
| That would be, I mean, talk about they tried to kill Trump. | ||
| He lives, becomes president of the United States. | ||
| They try to kill Bolsonaro. | ||
| They steal the election from him just like they did Trump. | ||
| And maybe he can come back and win it. | ||
| That would be the ultimate redemption. | ||
| But things are looking pretty gruesome. | ||
| For Bolsonaro. | ||
| Very unfortunate. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Let's cover some other odds and ends. | ||
| And then we're going to do the Supreme Court story coming up next. | ||
| John Legend. | ||
| He's got something to say about Donald Trump. | ||
| It may not surprise you. | ||
| But notice how he doesn't provide any evidence. | ||
| For what he's saying. | ||
| So yesterday it was Al Gore calls Donald Trump a Nazi. | ||
| Wow, Al. | ||
| What an original thought. | ||
| I'd never heard that one before. | ||
| And now it's John Legend calling him a racist. | ||
| Another one I've never heard before in clip five. | ||
|
unidentified
|
America made a decision that I strongly disagree with and it seems that we are reaping the whirlwind right now. | |
| Putting someone who is a terrible leader, especially in crisis, he's already out blaming people, misinforming people, dividing people, when a smart and responsible and good political way to handle it would have been to bring people together. | ||
| Oh, absolutely. | ||
| That's what you want. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Be a comforter and chief, you know? | |
| Why do you think that he's latched on to diversity so much? | ||
| Oh, he's a bigot, so... | ||
| It's a belief that there's a hierarchy of racial groups. | ||
| And that his group is superior, genetically superior. | ||
| He believes that. | ||
| Whenever he talks about competence and qualifications, any white man will do for him. | ||
| Look at the last guy who was Secretary of Defense. | ||
| He was a four-star general, supremely qualified black man. | ||
| And then see who he puts in after him. | ||
| That's the level of bigotry that he has. | ||
| Any white man is better than that. | ||
| Hey, John, can you tell me a single accomplishment of Lloyd Austin? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I bet you couldn't, other than he's black. | |
| Now, why do I play this clip of John Legend, who's obviously politically retarded and not even worth your time? | ||
| Notice how he says, oh, he's dividing people. | ||
| He's dividing. | ||
| John, you're dividing. | ||
| You're the one dividing. | ||
| That's what you're doing right now. | ||
| But I want you to... | ||
| I want you to maybe re-listen to what he's saying, because when you understand this about the Democrats, about modern-day liberal progressives, you understand everything. | ||
| Everything he's accusing Donald Trump of being, he is. | ||
| He is the racist. | ||
| He is the one who believes that he is superior because of his skin color. | ||
| He is the one that only wants to see black people in power. | ||
| He is the one that hates white people. | ||
| So now that you kind of have that lens to view this through, and maybe fast forward it like 15 seconds so we get rid of that fluff at the beginning, listen to it again with that context. | ||
| Everything John Legend is saying is projection. | ||
| Every single thing he's accusing Trump of, he is guilty of. | ||
| And when you understand that context, then you see where he's really coming from and it makes sense. | ||
| So go ahead. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Blaming people, misinforming people, dividing people when a smart and responsible and good political way to handle it would have been to bring people together. | |
| Oh, absolutely. | ||
| That's what you want. | ||
| Be a comforter and chief, you know? | ||
| Why do you think that he's latched on to diversity so much? | ||
| Oh, he's a bigot, so... | ||
| It's a belief that there's a hierarchy of racial groups and that his group is superior, genetically superior. | ||
| He believes that. | ||
| Whenever he talks about competence and qualifications, any white man will do for him. | ||
| Look at the last guy who was secretary of defense. | ||
| He was a four-star general, supremely qualified black man. | ||
| And then see who he puts in after him. | ||
| That's the level of bigotry that he has. | ||
| Any white man is better than that. | ||
| So, everything he just said is projection. | ||
| He's the divider. | ||
| He's the bigot. | ||
| He's the racist against white people. | ||
| Understand? Good. | ||
| Just wanted to make sure we have that clear. | ||
| Couldn't be more obvious, by the way. | ||
| We have breaking news right now. | ||
| Hot off the presses. | ||
| Pete Hegseth's chief of staff to leave Pentagon. | ||
| A former longtime chief of staff to... | ||
| Indicted Rep Duncan Hunter. | ||
| Casper was a leading figure in the firings of Senior Advisor Dan Caldwell. | ||
| You know what? | ||
| These people, whoever wrote this is so retarded. | ||
| I can't even read this. | ||
| Does anybody have editorial standards at all anymore? | ||
| Does anybody? | ||
| Where is the lead here? | ||
| You don't even say the guy's name. | ||
| You put his last name. | ||
| You're supposed to put his first name and his full name before you just say his last name. | ||
| I'm sorry. | ||
| There's a reason why I don't like reading stories on the air. | ||
| Because most of these writers have no skill, no training, and apparently no editorial oversight. | ||
| This is first grade level writing. | ||
| You suck, whoever wrote this at the Politico. | ||
| Okay, I'm going to try to read this retard work. | ||
| So just reset it for the breaking news clip, guys. | ||
| But it's just like, whoever wrote this, they don't even know how to write. | ||
| They don't even have the right lead. | ||
| They don't even say the guy's name. | ||
| So we'll struggle through this together, my God. | ||
| All right, here we go. | ||
| Breaking news, hot off the press. | ||
| Controversial Hegseth Chief of Staff to leave Pentagon. | ||
| Oh, controversial. | ||
| A former longtime Chief of Staff to indicted Representative Duncan Hunter. | ||
| Casper was a leading figure in the firings of Senior Advisor Dan Caldwell. | ||
| Hegseth Deputy of Staff Darren Selnick and Colin Carroll, the Chief of Staff to Deputy Defense Secretary Steven Feinberg. | ||
| The trio were ousted last week in a leak investigation. | ||
| Some officials saw the wave of firings as a bid by Casper to consolidate power. | ||
| They still haven't even said his full name in this video. | ||
| I'm sorry. | ||
| It's just, it's like, did you get any journalism training at all? | ||
| Casper did not like those guys, that those guys had the secretary's ear, a person familiar with the dynamics said. | ||
| He did not like that they had walk-in and hang-out privileges in the office. | ||
| He wanted them out. | ||
| It was a knife fight. | ||
| The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment. | ||
| Hegzeth confirmed Tuesday on Fox& Friends that Casper would move into a different role at the Pentagon, but he insisted that his top aide had not been fired and reaffirmed support for him. | ||
| Hegzeth said, Joe is a great guy and a great American. | ||
| He has done a fantastic job for us at the Defense Department. | ||
| You can make changes over time, and we're grateful for everything Joe's done. | ||
| So, I wouldn't take any of this at face value. | ||
| This might be a good sign, actually. | ||
| This is like the reverse of those quote-unquote leakers that were relieved of their duties and marched out. | ||
| So now, since we never knew who their accuser was, they don't even know who their accuser was or what they were accused of, maybe now we know their accuser was Joe Casper. | ||
| And they were accused of leaking. | ||
| And maybe Hegzeth, who brought these guys in, said, wait a second. | ||
| Where is any evidence that they're leaking? | ||
| And what did they leak? | ||
| And Casper couldn't provide an example. | ||
| And so he's leaving the Pentagon. | ||
| Now, this is just breaking right now, so I'm kind of responding to this in live time. | ||
| But he's still going to stay at the Pentagon. | ||
| So, okay, so was this your unconfirmed Pentagon official? | ||
| Do the three men that got escorted out without even knowing why or who their accuser was, now do they know? | ||
| So this could be a good move from Hegseth. | ||
| It's a little confusing because whoever wrote this has no training in journalism. | ||
| You know what? | ||
| Let me just, if there's any aspiring writers or journalists out there, let me just give you like 101 Crash Course. | ||
| When you are referencing an individual in a story, the first time the individual is mentioned in your story, you always say the full name. | ||
| So I guess at Politico, nobody ever taught them that. | ||
| So they go right in with Casper. | ||
| So now immediately you're confused. | ||
| Their whole first, also in your opening, you want to kind of stick to your lead. | ||
| So they go in about Duncan Hunter, who's not even part of this story. | ||
| So right out of the gate, they leave you confused. | ||
| They don't even do proper journalistic writing here because they don't even use his full name. | ||
| I'm sorry to do this on the air. | ||
| It's just this stuff drives me nuts, man. | ||
| It's why I don't read these stories on air, because half these people don't even know how to write. | ||
| It's like the same thing. | ||
| Whenever you're going to use an acronym in a story, you always put the full name, and then you can use the acronym after that. | ||
| So, I'm just, you know what, this is just a free lesson. | ||
| Anybody aspiring to be a writer out there, just basic journalism 101. | ||
| But if you want to work at Politico or be an editor there, you don't need to know any of this. | ||
| You can just do whatever the hell you want and just butcher a big story. | ||
| Incredible work, guys. | ||
| Just fantastic. | ||
| Alright, well... | ||
| We have to correct the record here. | ||
| It wasn't the retards at Politico. | ||
| It was the retards in my own crew. | ||
| They don't know how to print, apparently. | ||
| And they didn't even print the first page when they brought me the story. | ||
| So, as upon further review, they did go with normal journalistic writing standards. | ||
| But my crew did not go with normal printing standards. | ||
| So the crew did a great job with the Ukraine stuff, and then they bring me a halfway missing story. | ||
| But actually, I can't blame the crew. | ||
| I have to blame myself. | ||
| I shouldn't have trusted them. | ||
| That's on me. | ||
| That one's on me, guys. | ||
| Nonetheless, the story remains the same. | ||
| All right, we're going to get into... | ||
| Oh, my gosh. | ||
| And then because I was dealing with that in the break, we didn't even coordinate on the Supreme Court situation. | ||
| So we're going to have to pause that now and I'll just cover the rest of it. | ||
| Yeah. See what we deal with here? | ||
| Trump gets sabotaged by his own people. | ||
| Hegseth gets sabotaged by his own people. | ||
| I get sabotaged by my own people. | ||
| It's unbelievable. | ||
| Who puts them up to this? | ||
| Are you working for Qatar? | ||
| Okay. Having a little fun on a Thursday afternoon. | ||
| Thank you for joining us. | ||
| Why not have some more fun, huh? | ||
| Why not have some more fun with a stuffed frog? | ||
| That's about as fun as it gets right there. | ||
| That's about as fun as it gets. | ||
| You can get your limited edition. | ||
| By the way, we just cut the price on this. | ||
| We just lowered the price on the stuffed frog. | ||
| If you got kids at home, you got a little baby at home, a toddler that loves stuffed animals, they're going to love this. | ||
| Very huggable, very soft, very cute, very fun. | ||
| The Save the Frogs Plush Frog. | ||
| Available exclusively at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| We just lowered the price, by the way. | ||
| You can get an even deeper discount when you're a VIP member. | ||
| The price is cut even more. | ||
| It's limited edition. | ||
| We had one run of this. | ||
| It sold out. | ||
| This one will sell out as well. | ||
| Very popular. | ||
| Very fun. | ||
| Your kids at home will love it. | ||
| Or just a fun part of the InfoWars. | ||
| Memorabilia as well. | ||
| Limited edition Save the Frogs collectible fundraiser plush. | ||
| Available exclusively at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| And don't forget about the limited edition Alex Jones coin selling out fast. | ||
| This silver coin could be the last time we're able to use the InfoWars logo on any coin or even any apparel. | ||
| So this limited edition coin is a little more limited edition than the rest. | ||
| The Alex Jones portrait. | ||
| With the American flag on the front and then the InfoWars logo with the stars behind it on the back. | ||
| Get yours at thealexjonesstore.com and that supports us to keep us on the air. | ||
| Not to mention all the other InfoWars and patriotic and Trump apparel at thealexjonesstore.com as well. | ||
| We really appreciate you shopping there and supporting us so that we can stay on the air. | ||
| Alright. Amidst the chaos, Did you hear the Trump administration thinking about the $5,000 | ||
| baby bonus? | ||
| Now, I came out immediately upon that and said I didn't like it. | ||
| Just cut taxes. | ||
| But Sonny Hostin of The View, she had a different approach to why she didn't support it. | ||
| Would you like to take a guess as to why? | ||
| Would you like, would you like, you want a little extra bonus time before we play it? | ||
| Why do you think The View host, Sonny Hostin, doesn't support the $5,000 baby bonus? | ||
| All right, guesses are in. | ||
| Play clip seven. | ||
| Because when I look at something like this, these proposals, I want to know why, and I want to know who's making them. | ||
| And so when I looked into that, they're saying that the U.S. birth rate is declining. | ||
| However, in 2024, there was a 1% increase in U.S. births. | ||
| But that increase was with Hispanic mothers and Asian mothers. | ||
| So they don't seem to be concerned about that increase. | ||
| They seem to be more concerned about a decrease in other populations. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Say it. | |
| Say it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And so, well, it's just based on a study. | |
| And so the other thing, I will... | ||
|
unidentified
|
But have they said that anywhere? | |
| I mean, I feel like it should be fair. | ||
| Yeah, it's just... | ||
| Fair to hope. | ||
| Have they said that this is to target only white families? | ||
| Oh, I didn't say that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You have to read the stats. | |
| Oh, she didn't say that. | ||
| I'm not going to say it. | ||
| They're wanting people to pay in. | ||
| I'm just giving... | ||
| So even everyone on The View was like, just say what you want to say. | ||
| Just say you're race baiting on this. | ||
| Just say it's all about how you hate white people. | ||
| Just say it. | ||
| It's all white people surrounding you are saying it. | ||
| They're like, just say you hate white people. | ||
| Who knows? | ||
| Maybe the white hosts on The View are sick of the anti-white bigotry from the left. | ||
| Maybe. I don't know. | ||
| I doubt it. | ||
| Because they usually take part in it. | ||
| But look, I think it's a dumb idea. | ||
| I don't like it at all. | ||
| And it's not that it wouldn't work if you wanted to increase birth rates, but I don't think it gets your desired outcome. | ||
| Now, a Doge dividend check, that I'd be more supportive of, but you've got to get the trillion in cuts. | ||
| But let's give this some fair analysis here. | ||
| Yeah, look at that evil white baby that Sonny Hostin hates so much. | ||
| Actually, you know what's funny? | ||
| It's just like John Legend. | ||
| Everything they say is projection. | ||
| The truth is that Sonny Hostin doesn't want any more white babies. | ||
| So she's afraid that if there's this $5,000 baby bonus that there might be more white babies. | ||
| And that drives her nuts because she hates white people. | ||
| Which probably, maybe, who knows if that's even true or not, but, you know. | ||
| That's how she wants to project her coverage because she thinks that's what will make you popular on the left with non-white liberals and some white liberals too. | ||
| But regardless of that, what do you think the result of a $5,000 baby bonus would actually be? | ||
| Who do you think is really going to have more babies? | ||
| Do you think it's going to be white people? | ||
| Do you think it's going to be Hispanic people? | ||
| Do you think it's going to be black people? | ||
| Do you think it's going to be Asian people? | ||
| Do you think it's going to be young people? | ||
| Do you think it's going to be old people? | ||
| Do you think it's going to be rich people? | ||
| Do you think it's going to be poor people? | ||
| We already have a bit of a case study. | ||
| With what the Democrats did inside the black community to promote to black mothers, get rid of your husband. | ||
| And live off the welfare state. | ||
| Do you really think this plan, $5,000 baby bonus, is going to result in a good baby boom? | ||
| It reminds me of idiocracy, where you have the well-to-do family, successful man, successful woman, married. | ||
| Loyal to one another, but they keep putting off having a baby because of this reason or that reason. | ||
| They want to make sure everything's perfect and the environment is right and everything. | ||
| And then the husband dies, and then the wife can't have kids, and so they end up having no kids. | ||
| And then on the other side, you have the low IQ, class clown, white trash. | ||
| Type of person who has 12 kids by four different moms and just keeps having the kids and they keep living off the state. | ||
| Now, I'm not anti having kids, obviously. | ||
| I just don't think this is a good idea. | ||
| A tax break? | ||
| I could support a tax break. | ||
| Then that might actually encourage rich people to have babies. | ||
| That might encourage people that are actually working. | ||
| And making money. | ||
| They're busy working to have babies if they can get a $5,000 tax break per kid. | ||
| That I would support. | ||
| But again, why do we have to do all this crap? | ||
| Why don't we just cut taxes? | ||
| If the issue is that Americans don't have enough money, then stop taxing us. | ||
| It's that simple. | ||
| Why do we have to play these rope-a-dope games? | ||
| It's like, no, just cut taxes, period. | ||
| So it reminds me of that. | ||
| I don't think this has the outcome that you want. | ||
| But you know what? | ||
| They would never do this. | ||
| But what if Trump actually came out and said, for two white people... | ||
| That are married and have kids, $5,000. | ||
| Only for the whites, though. | ||
| Only for the whites. | ||
| That would go crazy for that. | ||
| But if you did that for non-whites, they'd celebrate it. | ||
| Tell me I'm wrong. | ||
| Tell me I'm wrong. | ||
| You know damn well if Barack Obama or any liberal Democrat said, $5,000 for black families to have babies, they would all support it. | ||
| Every single one of them. | ||
| You know that's true! | ||
| But notice how she can't even help herself. | ||
| This $5,000 baby bonus, I guarantee you, forget about even per capita, it would not be white people taking it. | ||
| Now, it would mostly probably be poorer people that think they can take advantage of this, but it won't be white people, generally speaking. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And it won't be successful people. | |
| So really, I don't even like the concept. | ||
| But she just couldn't help herself. | ||
| Just the idea that something might incentivize white people to have children makes her angry. | ||
| But you know damn well if the exact same plan was proposed and it was going to be used to increase black birth rates, they would all love it, they would all support it, and they would all say how great it is. | ||
| And you know damn well that's the truth. | ||
| And you know, speaking of the financial situation, we've got some other financial news here. | ||
| We mentioned this yesterday. | ||
| But see, they always say, oh, Trump is looking out for the wealthiest. | ||
| You know, the wealthiest got richer under Joe Biden than any other president. | ||
| America's richest 19 households control a record share of the wealth. | ||
| The rise of the ultra-wealthy. | ||
| And this Wall Street Journal story by Juliet Chung. | ||
| It's funny, Trump says they're controlled by China and Juliet Chung. | ||
| No, but she covers it. | ||
| Here you go. | ||
| The wealthiest have gotten richer and a record of control share of America's wealth. | ||
| New data suggests $1 trillion of wealth was created for the 19 richest American households alone in 2024. | ||
| Guys, who was president in 2024? | ||
| I'm just... | ||
| I'm having a moment here. | ||
| I can't... | ||
| Was it Joe Biden? | ||
| I think it was Joe Biden. | ||
| Is Joe Biden a Democrat? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh. Oh. | |
| So are the liberal Democrats in the media going to say anything about that? | ||
| The biggest transfer of wealth of all time in Joe Biden's final year in office? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Are we going to get crickets on that one? | |
| Again, if that happened under Donald Trump's administration, oh my gosh, can you even imagine the headlines? | ||
| Can you even imagine the attention it would get? | ||
| Can you even imagine the accusations that would be flying? | ||
| But when it's under Joe Biden, a liberal Democrat, nah, we don't need to talk about that. | ||
| We don't need to talk about that. | ||
| It's not worth covering. | ||
| But if it was Trump, and by the way, you know, there is an element of truth to the tariff coverage about Americans paying more. | ||
| But if there's any other talk about a transfer of wealth, you realize ultimately this tariff plan will hurt the richest and it will help the middle class? | ||
| Absolutely it will. | ||
| Because at the end of the day, will consumers be forced to pay a little more for goods? | ||
| Maybe. But, also at the end of the day, The market's going to respond to what people are willing to pay. | ||
| And so, if they're not willing to pay the high prices, then nothing's going to sell. | ||
| They're going to have to lower the prices. | ||
| So who's going to end up paying that tax? | ||
| It's the ultra-rich. | ||
| Trump is trying to bring wealth back to the middle class, folks. | ||
| He's trying to rebuild the middle class. | ||
| I just, you know, it's really unfortunate. | ||
| That these Democrats are so brainwashed and filled with hate? | ||
| I'm not saying you have to like Donald Trump or everything he does. | ||
| But can you just not be blinded by your hatred for just one second? | ||
| Can you not fall for the propaganda for just one second and just look at something and see what the results are? | ||
| Is it even possible for these Democrats anymore? | ||
| Or is their brain just completely gone at this point? | ||
| Any logic, reasoning, common sense just gone? | ||
| See, this is one of those stories where you could go out any liberal area and say, hey, did you hear that the biggest transfer of wealth to the richest people in America happened under Donald Trump? | ||
| Say, my God! | ||
| Of course it did! | ||
| See, I knew it. | ||
| I knew Donald Trump was looking out for the richest people. | ||
| I knew Donald Trump was only for the rich. | ||
| I knew it. | ||
| I knew it. | ||
| This is why I hate him. | ||
| He's the worst. | ||
| Say, oh, I'm sorry. | ||
| Did I say Trump? | ||
| I meant Biden. | ||
| What were you saying? | ||
| Oh, oh, it was Biden? | ||
| Oh, well, I... | ||
| March home sales dropped to lowest... | ||
| Slowest pace since 2009. | ||
| That was the Obama economy. | ||
| That was the broken Obama economy. | ||
| It's not good. | ||
| Housing market is just insane. | ||
| Housing market stalls as homeowners struggle to sell. | ||
| We're really bleeding. | ||
| 42% of younger Americans say they're barely getting by. | ||
| Yeah, the new numbers are... | ||
| And some of this might have to do with lifestyle, but it's not the sole reason. | ||
| Six-figure-a-year earners are living paycheck to paycheck. | ||
| These were all stories during the Biden administration. | ||
| First time ever six-figure earners in America were living paycheck to paycheck, the majority of them. | ||
| First time ever in modern American history that the majority of Americans didn't even have $1,000 in a savings account. | ||
| And then, of course, the record high credit card debt and everything else under the Biden administration. | ||
| But the 1% got richer! | ||
| And not a single liberal Democrat will say a damn word about it. | ||
| But that's kind of... | ||
| See, the rich know where the real wealth is. | ||
| Like, it's not really even money. | ||
| Rich people don't sit on money. | ||
| They might have a lot of money in the bank account, but that's not their wealth. | ||
| Their wealth is in land. | ||
| Their wealth is in assets. | ||
| So this is all by design to keep you out of the asset column. | ||
| So what happens? | ||
| So the 1% that Biden made more rich than ever, they own all the property. | ||
| They own all the houses. | ||
| And you can't afford a house. | ||
| But they'll rent it to you. | ||
| And then they'll get richer. | ||
| And you won't get any equity. | ||
| And you will be, as the story says, bleeding out. | ||
| Now here's an example in a very revealing line graph of where wages or household income is at. | ||
| So household income is going to be the blue line on this graph. | ||
| And then rent price is going to be the red line. | ||
| And if you want to see why... | ||
| People can't afford to buy a house anymore. | ||
| This graph tells you everything. | ||
| Go ahead, guys, and give me clip 14. We can see this on the screen now. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So, there you go. | |
| Household income barely grows. | ||
| I don't know why Smash Mouth is playing, but I'm not going to complain. | ||
| Great band. | ||
| Patriots. Rest in peace. | ||
| But, okay. | ||
| So you see this? | ||
| Rent keeps going up and up and up and up and up off the chart, literally off the chart. | ||
| And household income barely even raises up 10%. | ||
| So the price of living goes up 110, 150%. | ||
| The household income goes up about 10%. | ||
| So this is all done via policy, folks. | ||
| It's all done via policy. | ||
| Tax policy, trade policy, financial policy, economic policy. | ||
| But see, you've got all these other issues where it's like, well, how do you handle that? | ||
| Well, yeah, well, how do you handle a group like Vanguard or BlackRock? | ||
| Buying up all the homes so that you can't afford them. | ||
| And then controlling the market. | ||
| That's a monopoly. | ||
| Oh no. | ||
| That's too controversial. | ||
| You can't do anything about that. | ||
| We're free market capitalists. | ||
| Okay. But we also do have laws against monopolies. | ||
| And Google is finding that out in multiple lawsuits right now. | ||
| So what are you supposed to do? | ||
| The cost of living goes up. | ||
| Your wage is not going up. | ||
| The price to afford a house, to buy a house goes up, but your income isn't going up. | ||
| So Trump is trying to make policies to finally reverse that and get money back to the middle class and get money back into the American economy instead of bleeding it out to foreign nations that make all of our goods. | ||
| And then impose tariffs on us. | ||
| But the Democrats, they're the party of the little guy. | ||
| They're the party of the middle class. | ||
| What an absolute... | ||
| What an absolute crock of crap. | ||
| And then in Texas... | ||
| Be careful. | ||
| Are they doing this to you? | ||
| By the way, they're raising our taxes again in Texas. | ||
| The rhinos that run this state. | ||
| It's a red state. | ||
| As far as the people, but the Republican Party here are Democrats, folks. | ||
| It's crazy. | ||
| They're also getting rid of high school economics. | ||
| Somebody call Scott Besant. | ||
| Remember Scott Besant the other day said, we need to be promoting financial literacy. | ||
| We need to be teaching financial literacy. | ||
| Well, in Texas, they're getting rid of economics in high school. | ||
| Great. Nice. | ||
| So now the Democrats that run this state, Absolutely nuts. | ||
| Absolutely insane what goes on in Texas. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You wouldn't even believe it. | |
| But hey. | ||
| The Democrats say they have popular policies. | ||
| Like Jason Crow. | ||
| Representative Crow claims, hey. | ||
| We've got the popular policies. | ||
| Listen to this in clip four. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That is true. | |
| I mean, listen, you can't lose In vast swaths of the country with folks who will benefit from your policies, actually. | ||
| If you just ask people what policies they support, they overwhelmingly support the things that we support. | ||
| So a lot of this is about respect. | ||
| It's about culture. | ||
| It's about a sense of belonging. | ||
| And that requires an honest conversation. | ||
| It requires authenticity. | ||
| When I grew up, I worked in construction growing up. | ||
| I started working when I was 15. I worked at Arby's and McDonald's and I worked in construction to put my way through school. | ||
| And you know, when you get onto that construction site, you shake someone's hand, you're feeling their hands, right? | ||
| You're trying to figure out, are they one of me? | ||
| I was going to make a point here. | ||
| I'm a little confused. | ||
| When you're shaking someone's hand, are you thinking about, like, how their hand feels? | ||
| What is he talking about? | ||
| It's like, ooh, that's a soft hand. | ||
| I bet it would feel good on my back. | ||
| What is he talking about? | ||
| When you meet someone, are you like, hey, do you shower in the morning or at night? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What? What is this guy talking about? | |
| So I get lost in translation with this madness. | ||
| Oh, your policies are so popular, really. | ||
| What policies exactly are so popular? | ||
| Could you maybe reference one? | ||
| Is it the open border policy? | ||
| Is it the bring back violent criminal illegal immigrants policy? | ||
| Is it the trans kid policy, mutilating children policy? | ||
| Is it the boys in girls locker room policy? | ||
| Is it the raising taxes and regulation policy? | ||
| I'm just, what is the policies you're talking about that are so popular? | ||
| Representative Crowe? | ||
| Yeah. Do you have policies to bring back Smash Mouth on the radio? | ||
| That might be popular. | ||
| Maybe. Well, you've heard of the manosphere. | ||
| This is how the left has targeted, labeled, and demonized masculinists, if you will, pro-man conservatives, you know, that like to eat healthy and work out, be informed on stuff. | ||
| So they say, oh, manosphere. | ||
| So they label it, then they target it. | ||
| Well, now they're going after what they call the womanosphere. | ||
| Listen to this. | ||
| Now comes the womanosphere, the anti-feminist media telling women to be thin, fertile, and Republican. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh! Yeah. | |
| So what? | ||
| So you understand? | ||
| The left wants women to be fat, infertile, and Democrat. | ||
| Get it? | ||
| So here comes this group of conservative females gaining popularity. | ||
| They mention Brett Cooper, Candace Owens, the Evie magazine. | ||
| And I guess they have a big female following, and they're targeting... | ||
| Young females with this type of conservative commentary and content. | ||
| And now it's the womanosphere. | ||
| Well, this is very detrimental to the Democrat Party agenda, you see. | ||
| They just admit the whole thing right there. | ||
| Now imagine, if I come up to a woman, and I'm a Democrat, and I want you to be a Democrat, and this young woman says, well, What is your vision for women? | ||
| I'm a young woman. | ||
| I'm coming up in the world. | ||
| Maybe I'm not sure what I want to do with my life. | ||
| Tell me, Mr. Democrat. | ||
| Tell me, Mrs. Democrat. | ||
| What is your vision for the future female in the United States of America? | ||
| Well, we, the Democrats, want you to be fat and infertile. | ||
| It's what we want. | ||
| Does that sound appealing? | ||
| Guys, come on. | ||
| Is that appealing? | ||
| Is that appealing to women? | ||
| We want you to be fat and infertile. | ||
| Now that goes against all of your female instincts, by the way. | ||
| Your female instincts are you want to be thin and you want to be fertile. | ||
| You can't even... | ||
| So this whole thing of body positivity and promoting abortion, it's all demonic. | ||
| It's all satanic. | ||
| Against your female intuition. | ||
| Against your true femininity. | ||
| This isn't to say that you can't have a couple extra pounds or whatever. | ||
| I'm not insulting anybody that is overweight. | ||
| I'm just saying they know it's against your intuition. | ||
| They know it's against your feminine intuition. | ||
| And so they say, no, no, no, no. | ||
| It's okay. | ||
| Body positivity. | ||
| Be fat as a whale. | ||
| No, it's okay. | ||
| You don't want to be fertile. | ||
| And if you do have a kid, you want to kill that kid. | ||
| It's total satanic operations against women. | ||
| So now there's this rise of popular young females that have a massive young female audience and they're saying, hey, be thin, be feminine, have babies. | ||
| And the Democrats are like, my God! | ||
| Oh my God! | ||
| We can't be telling women to be thin! | ||
| We can't be telling women to be fertile and want to have children. | ||
| We can't be telling women to want to be feminine. | ||
| And God forbid! | ||
| We tell a woman that she should be submissive to a man or her husband. | ||
| I mean, oh my God! | ||
| That is the worst thing ever! | ||
| So, you understand, this is the perfect reverse reality I've ever seen. | ||
| The Democrat Party wants women to be fat and infertile. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| I'm so glad. | ||
| So, you're out of the bag. | ||
| Make your choice. | ||
| Well, I can only assume what the womanosphere is telling these women because the Democrats are panicking. | ||
| It's kind of like with men, though. | ||
| And this is just the truth. | ||
| And they have scientific studies to back it up. | ||
| Men that are more physically fit, physically active, tend to lean conservative and vote Republican. | ||
| Men that have higher testosterone counts tend to lean conservative and vote Republican. | ||
| That is a scientifically proven fact. | ||
| Low testosterone men vote Democrat. | ||
| So there's a reason why they first attacked the quote-unquote manosphere. | ||
| That's promoting masculinity and promoting being fit and being strong and informed. | ||
| It's because those type of men tend to vote Republican. | ||
| And it's actually an amazing theory that I buy into more and more because I run into people at the gym all the time that recognize me. | ||
| And I hear it from people all the time. | ||
| If you put liberal men on testosterone replacement therapy, they will not be liberal after 12 months. | ||
| And maybe you kind of see that with Zuckerberg and Bezos. | ||
| In fact, Bezos was even featured in a story basically asserting that same thing. | ||
| Just today. | ||
| It's like the real MAGA Bezos. | ||
| And it's Bezos up there, you know, looking jacked. | ||
| It's like, yeah, Bezos... | ||
| Hit the gym, probably took TRT, and no longer is a liberal cuck. | ||
| What do you know? | ||
| Maybe the same story with Zuckerberg. | ||
| So that theory is actually scientifically proven to be a real phenomenon. | ||
| Look at that. | ||
| Testosterone administration induces a redshift in Democrats. | ||
| So, you understand, the satanic system, for you as a man, the satanic system wants you... | ||
| Soft, weak, effeminate, and low T. Not a man. | ||
| So then this manosphere comes up and they say, hey, be a man. | ||
| Be strong. | ||
| Be independent. | ||
| Be healthy. | ||
| And they label it so that they can target it and they can demonize it because they know it's a threat to their political power. | ||
| So now the same thing is happening with women because they know it's a threat to their political power if these women aren't voting Democrat anymore. | ||
| But I don't know what... | ||
| I don't know what the womanosphere is telling them other than whatever is represented in this story. | ||
| So it's bad to be thin and fertile. | ||
| It's good to be fat and infertile. | ||
| I'll tell you what, though. | ||
| Since we're on the topic... | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because we have a... | |
| For political talk shows, our audience here... | ||
| It has one of the largest female demographics for political talk shows. | ||
| And so for the females, I will give you the best advice you'll ever get from the manosphere right here. | ||
| Men are really simple creatures at the end of the day. | ||
| Very simple. | ||
| You know what we like. | ||
| We know what we like. | ||
| If you are trying to attract A man for a long-term relationship, if that's what you're looking for, I've got the three pieces of advice, and you'll never need any other advice. | ||
| And you will find a man who wants to spend the rest of his life with you. | ||
| Three things. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| Three things. | ||
| One. Sundress. | ||
| Two. Smile. | ||
| Three. Don't complain. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's it. | |
| And you can throw in other things like, you know, be healthy. | ||
| Certain skills, maybe cooking skills and stuff like that. | ||
| So maybe being fit, being healthy. | ||
| I'm not saying you have to be thin. | ||
| Some guys like thin guys. | ||
| Girls, some guys might like them thicker. | ||
| But I'm telling you right now. | ||
| Really sundress. | ||
| I guess just anything that is cute. | ||
| But sundress, smile, healthy, don't complain. | ||
| Done. That's it. | ||
| There's your advice right there. | ||
| I've given you all the advice you'll ever need to attract a life partner. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's it. | |
| You can learn how to cook. | ||
| Anybody can learn how to cook. | ||
| You can learn that in time. | ||
| Your feminine instincts will kick in. | ||
| You'll learn how to run a house and raise kids. | ||
| But if it's a liberal, a liberal man will tell you to be fat and infertile. | ||
| Oh. Wonder why they're all single. | ||
| Can't figure it out. | ||
| They're giving you the exact opposite of good advice. | ||
| All right, let's break away from this. | ||
| We've got the clips here. | ||
| I want to cover this Supreme Court story now. | ||
| We heard from Katenji Brown-Jackson, who's just a complete clown on the Supreme Court. | ||
| It's really insulting to all of us that she's up there speaking like a L.A. Valley girl. | ||
| It's pathetic. | ||
| But now we've got some sound from Gorsuch, and we've got some sound from Kavanaugh. | ||
| Let me frame this real quick and then go to some of this sound. | ||
| Because this is all being exposed now in this Supreme Court case, how the left is trying to infiltrate the education system with all of their LGBTQ indoctrination. | ||
| So in one case they're saying, and by the way, this is being introduced at three years old. | ||
| Three years old this is being introduced. | ||
| Now they get into it at some different grade levels too. | ||
| Like at one point they used it as an excuse that, well, once you get into middle school, you don't change teachers until you get into middle school. | ||
| You have the same teacher normally. | ||
| If you're in second, third, fourth grade, whatever, you have one teacher. | ||
| And so for that one teacher to be teaching sex ed in all the different classes, that's okay because it's the same teacher. | ||
| So at one point they're trying to justify it like that. | ||
| Then they also try to say, again, that this is not... | ||
| Sex ed. | ||
| This is math. | ||
| This is English. | ||
| Because they'll have a math pamphlet that's like one drag queen plus two drag queens equals three drag queens. | ||
| And it's like, oh no, that's math. | ||
| Or like in English, they'll say, match the leather daddy with the strap on. | ||
| And then you gotta match it. | ||
| And they say, oh no, that's English. | ||
| So they found these different ways to shoehorn LGBTQ indoctrination into Normal curriculum that people have been learning forever. | ||
| And now they just shoehorn all of it in there and they just say, oh no, it's math, it's English. | ||
| And then at one point, they say, well, if you let parents opt out of these programs, then there'll be nobody left in the class and the schools can't facilitate all the children that are going to opt out. | ||
| They don't have the resources. | ||
| They don't have the room. | ||
| So then they're admitting the parents, none of the parents even want this. | ||
| So it's beyond just like we're having a political debate. | ||
| The parents don't even want it. | ||
| So they're admitting the left that has taken over the education system destroyed it and now is turning into a sexual perversion indoctrination. | ||
| They admit nobody wants it, but they don't care. | ||
| Oh, they're so for the people. | ||
| Then the parents are like, hey, do you think you could maybe not include teaching five-year-olds how to use a dildo? | ||
| Do you think you could do that? | ||
| No, sorry, we can't do that. | ||
| That's part of the math curriculum. | ||
| What? Yeah, yeah, okay, well, we would like to opt out. | ||
| Well, sorry, you can't opt out because then if you opt out, all the other parents will opt out and then we can't teach your kids how to use a dildo. | ||
| That's where we're at. | ||
| So let's go to, where should we begin here, guys? | ||
| Let's start with, this is Kavanaugh. | ||
| No, actually, let's start with the Gorsuch clips. | ||
| We have the two Gorsuch clips. | ||
| Give me either one because the Kavanaugh clip is kind of like a perfect closer. | ||
| With a little bit of a historical context of where we're at now. | ||
| So let's start with Gorsuch questioning this lawyer about what's really going on with this sexual indoctrination of children. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So Pride Puppy was the book that was used for the pre-kindergarten curriculum. | |
| Oh, did you hear that? | ||
| Pause it real quick. | ||
| Pride Puppy used for pre-education. | ||
| Pre-K education. | ||
| Folks, you understand, like, this is what I'm saying. | ||
| We're in madness land. | ||
| We're in clown world. | ||
| We're in the twilight zone. | ||
| These Democrats want to teach your children how to use sex toys. | ||
| How to have gay sex. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And we're sitting here having a debate about due process? | |
| What are you doing? | ||
| Again, I'm sick of this idea that I'm supposed to show up for a fight, and it's supposed to be a fistfight, and my opponent has a rocket launcher, a laser beam, a knife, a gun, a grenade, and it's supposed to be a fistfight, | ||
| and I show up, and I have my fists, and then I'm like, oh, okay, well, can I get a rocket launcher? | ||
| No, you're not allowed to have a rocket launcher! | ||
| You can't do that! | ||
| I'm like, well, he's got a rocket launcher pointing right at me. | ||
| No, that's not what we got due process. | ||
| What? So I'm just going to get blown up with a rocket launcher because you're telling me to fight fair? | ||
| I'm sick of it, man. | ||
| Why do we have tolerance for these people? | ||
| Why am I being told to have tolerance for these people? | ||
| Due process. | ||
| Constitution. All this other stuff. | ||
| They want to teach your kids how to have gay sex. | ||
| They want to mutilate children if they don't get killed in the womb. | ||
| They want to have open borders. | ||
| They want to arrest you. | ||
| They want to censor you. | ||
| Why do you have any tolerance for these people? | ||
| Why do you sit here and listen to them when they talk about due process and all this other garbage? | ||
| I'm sick of it, man. | ||
| These are deranged freaks. | ||
| They belong in mental institutions. | ||
| They belong in prisons. | ||
| They don't belong in real political debate, conversation, or policy. | ||
| And we're going to be lectured? | ||
| We're going to be warned against like, oh, Project 2025 is too extreme. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know, Trump, he can't act like an authoritarian at all. | |
| Okay, cool then. | ||
| So just... | ||
| Put your child on the altar of the Democrat Party, and then that's it. | ||
| Then shut up. | ||
| If that's how you want to live. | ||
| So I'm sorry. | ||
| I'm cutting this off. | ||
| I can't even believe I'm dealing with this. | ||
| I had to play a video of a report where a man goes into the girls' locker room at the YMCA, waves his penis around, and then they can't even arrest him because he's trans. | ||
| What? 30 years ago, you would have been beaten to a bloody pulp and thrown in the jail and nobody would have asked a question. | ||
| But now, oh, it's liberal. | ||
| It's politically correct. | ||
| And this is another reason why they don't want men to have high testosterone levels. | ||
| Because those are the men that deal with a pervert in the girls' locker room. | ||
| I'm sorry. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
| Just start it over. | ||
| Let's hear about how the Democrats want to teach your three-year-old about gay pride puppy. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
| No, start over. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So, Pride Puppy was the book that was used for the pre-kindergarten curriculum. | |
| That's no longer in the curriculum. | ||
| That's the one where they are supposed to look for the leather and things and bondage, things like that. | ||
| It's not bondage. | ||
| It's a woman and a leather... | ||
| Sex worker, right? | ||
| No. No? | ||
| That's not correct. | ||
| No. Gosh, I read it. | ||
| Drag queen and drag queen. | ||
| Drag queen and drag queen. | ||
| So now it's just lying. | ||
| The lawyer's just lying. | ||
| What do you know? | ||
| A Democrat's lying. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And one of the words is drag queen in the search. | |
| And they're supposed to look for those. | ||
| It is an option at the end of the book, correct. | ||
| Yeah, okay. | ||
| It's like, so the book here that you want to show three-year-olds is featuring... | ||
| Leather kink daddies and drag queens. | ||
| No, no, that's not in the book. | ||
| Well, I read the book. | ||
| Actually, here it is right here, and then there's a word search. | ||
| Yeah, well, there's something at the end of the book that's optional. | ||
| The whole book is optional. | ||
| No, they want it to be mandatory. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh. My God. | |
| What do you think would happen? | ||
| I'm actually genuinely curious. | ||
| I'd say 30, 40 years ago, if you had some gay sexual content that you were showing a minor, what do you think would happen? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Would you go to jail for that? | |
| You'd probably go to jail for that, wouldn't you? | ||
| But when you put a pride flag on it... | ||
| And you say it's LGBTQ plus tolerance and education. | ||
| Then you do it and you make it mandatory for the kids. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What the hell is going on? | |
| Why is the United States of America being forced to submit to pedophiles? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| And then it's like you can't even take action against them? | ||
| You have to go fight it in the Supreme Court? | ||
| What in the hell? | ||
| Do we have the second Gorsuch clip? | ||
| Yeah. Let's go ahead and roll. | ||
| This one's a little bit longer. | ||
| Let's go roll the second Gorsuch clip now. | ||
| Okay, so that's the book. | ||
| They want to show your kids, make it mandatory. | ||
| Nice loving and liberal. | ||
| Here's more of an explainer of what's going on here. | ||
| Mrs. Gorsuch? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I just want to make sure I understand a few fact things and then a law question. | |
| What age do you in Montgomery County teach? | ||
| Students normally about human sexuality? | ||
| I think that it begins in either fourth or fifth grade. | ||
| The human sexuality class? | ||
| The family life and human sexuality curriculum. | ||
| I'm not entirely sure. | ||
| Starts in fourth or fifth grade, you think? | ||
| Is there anything you can point us to in the record on that? | ||
| I don't think so. | ||
| Okay. And second, these books are being used in English class. | ||
| The division between English class and other things in a second-grade classroom doesn't really exist. | ||
| You're sort of in a room with a teacher and sometimes... | ||
| No, I appreciate that. | ||
| I went to second grade, too, but... | ||
| So, pause it. | ||
| Did you hear his excuse there? | ||
| He said, well, it doesn't. | ||
| There's no distinguishable class at that age. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What an absolute liar! | |
| What an absolute liar! | ||
| They can't... | ||
| This is stunning stuff. | ||
| So they can't be honest, because if they're honest, nobody would support what they're trying to do. | ||
| So he says, well, you know, it's the same teacher all day, so it really doesn't matter. | ||
| Really? Because I remember there being distinct courses with different textbooks and different grades on my report card. | ||
| So it actually is a distinction. | ||
| Even if it's the same teacher, the bell rings, and we have a different class. | ||
| But he says, well, you know, it's the same teacher, so it's really just all the same stuff. | ||
| It's just one day, it's just all the same stuff. | ||
| So yeah, we want to talk about gay sex with your kids all day long. | ||
| Because it's just all the same. | ||
| No, it's not. | ||
| A lying... | ||
| This is what they do. | ||
| This is how they have to lie at the Supreme Court. | ||
| Why are you so desperate? | ||
| Why are you so desperate to teach children about LGBTQ plus sex? | ||
| Why? I'd love to hear that one answered. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Continue. English curriculum that these books are being used in. | |
| I thought that was... | ||
| Yeah, I'm not fighting the premise. | ||
| It's not the math class. | ||
| It's not the human sexuality class. | ||
| It's the English class. | ||
| It is certainly not the human sexuality class. | ||
| I'm just sort of fighting the premise that there's a neat distinction. | ||
| And they're being used in English language instruction at age three. | ||
| Some of them. | ||
| So Pride Puppy was the book that was used for the pre-kindergarten curriculum. | ||
| That's no longer in the curriculum. | ||
| That's the one where they are supposed to look for the leather and things and bondage, things like that. | ||
| It's not bondage. | ||
| It's a woman and a leather sex worker, right? | ||
| No. No? | ||
| That's not correct. | ||
| No. Gosh, I read it. | ||
| It's a drag queen and drag queen. | ||
| Drag queen and drag queen. | ||
| Correct. The leather that they're pointing to is a woman in a leather jacket, and one of the words is drag queen. | ||
| And they're supposed to look for those? | ||
| It is an option at the end of the book, correct. | ||
| Yeah, okay. | ||
| And you've included these in the English language curriculum rather than the human sexuality curriculum. | ||
| To influence students. | ||
| Is that fair? | ||
| That's what the district court found. | ||
| Do you agree with that? | ||
| I think to the extent the district court found that it was to influence, it was to influence them towards civility. | ||
| The natural consequence of being exposed. | ||
| Whatever, but to influence them? | ||
| In the manner that I just mentioned, yes. | ||
| And responding to parents who are concerned, do you agree that there was some intent? | ||
| Now pause this real quick, because this is another lie. | ||
| So he's pivoted now. | ||
| So the lawyer here that wants to make it mandatory for pre-K to learn about LGBTQ plus sex has now pivoted. | ||
| So now it's not, oh, it's not about sex education where he was leaning earlier. | ||
| It's, oh, well, this is, you know, this is sex education. | ||
| Now he's pivoting and he's saying, well, this is more about tolerance and inclusivity. | ||
| Hmm. Now, why would liberals want to bring that into the curriculum? | ||
| Now, you could argue there's ethics in schools, and your teacher is there to not promote bad activities. | ||
| But what is this inclusivity? | ||
| What is this tolerance you're talking about? | ||
| Could it possibly be when maybe, I don't know, some pervert decides he wants to make an inappropriate advance towards your kid and your kid's natural instincts are to feel very uncomfortable and intolerant with such an advance? | ||
| Is this to program those natural instincts out of your child? | ||
| Could that be it? | ||
| I'm just trying to find out why they would want to do it. | ||
| Seems like that's where it's going now. | ||
| So some pervert makes an advance on your kid and instinctually your kid is freaked out. | ||
| No. You need to be accepted and tolerate that. | ||
| Oh, it's liberal. | ||
| It's loving. | ||
| Oh, I get it. | ||
| Okay. And then guess who's getting the access to your kid all day long? | ||
| It's the liberal teacher with the gay pride flag. | ||
| With the puppy kink. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And the Grindr account. | |
| And we're expected to tolerate this as Americans. | ||
| Or we're going to be called bigots. | ||
| You can shove your political corruptness where you shove your Rabbi Shmully butt plug every night. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead. | |
| I don't know that those were responding to parents who were concerned. | ||
| This was after the fact for most of these comments. | ||
| And this was in a very public setting, which obviously got heated, and some intemperate comments were used, certainly. | ||
| And I want to understand your context that you were giving about the statement that some Muslim families — it's unfortunate that this issue put some Muslim families on the same side of an issue as white supremacists and outright bigots. | ||
| I think in response to Justice Sotomayor, you're trying to give some context to that? | ||
| I don't think I was speaking directly about that comment. | ||
| I think that comment was given or was made in June, which was several months after the decision to withdraw the opt-outs was made. | ||
| I don't have context for that statement, no. | ||
| Okay. And then the legal question. | ||
| Why isn't discrimination against religion a burden on religion? | ||
| If a state—now, this is hypothetical. | ||
| I'm moving away from there. | ||
| If state actors intentionally discriminate against religion, what secular purpose, valid secular purpose, could that serve? | ||
| And how wouldn't that be a burden? | ||
| So, I don't know. | ||
| I mean, it depends on the hypothetical, what the state is doing and whether there's a secular purpose. | ||
| That's hard to imagine one. | ||
| But if this state is discriminating... | ||
| Against Muslims or Catholics or Protestants or whatever. | ||
| I think this court has recognized that when... | ||
| We'll come back and finish the Supreme Court coverage. | ||
| All right, now, in the break, the crew was back there trolling me. | ||
| We were having some sex out here. | ||
| But no, if I went into a kindergarten classroom and I pulled up a video of Sidney Sweeney bouncing up and down, and I said, hey guys, how about that, huh? | ||
| What do we think about that? | ||
| That would be extremely inappropriate. | ||
| It would be condemned. | ||
| And you'd be called a pervert and not able to do it. | ||
| But if you go into a kindergarten classroom with a drag queen, with a bulge hanging out of his thong, and he gyrates for a lap dance, that's okay. | ||
| That's tolerance. | ||
| That's permitted. | ||
| So we don't need to... | ||
| Let's just... | ||
| Come on. | ||
| Stop distracting yourselves here. | ||
| We're going to go to the Kavanaugh clip now. | ||
| But see, it is the juxtaposition to just show how insane it is. | ||
| I mean, we've got our own footage. | ||
| Other people have gone to these drag queen sex time shows for kids. | ||
| And that's what I'm saying. | ||
| It's like, let's juxtapose this. | ||
| Just because you put a pride flag and call it liberal doesn't make it legal or appropriate. | ||
| But that's what the liberal left has done. | ||
| With their fake moral high ground, their fake political correctness, just like, hey, oh, whoa, whoa, you can't, hey, if you don't like a drag queen sex time for kids performance, you're a bigot. | ||
| Okay? If I drop an adult nudie magazine for men, In a kindergarten classroom and you got a problem with that, then you're a heterophobe. | ||
| Nobody would. | ||
| That's ridiculous. | ||
| You'd probably go to prison for doing that. | ||
| So it just shows how ludicrous this whole thing is. | ||
| Now, I think this is going to fail. | ||
| It'll probably be... | ||
| Coney Barrett, to be safe, will probably side with the parents because... | ||
| But really, see, this isn't even far enough. | ||
| It shouldn't be the ability to opt out. | ||
| It should be banned. | ||
| This court case should be about banning this material for children, really under 18. This content and material should be banned for children under 18. That's what it should be. | ||
| But no, it's like, well, if the parents don't want their kids to be sexually indoctrinated by perverts, they should be able to opt out. | ||
| No, it should be banned. | ||
| But I think this is probably going to go the right direction because it's just too easy. | ||
| And Coney Barrett, even though she would love, probably she would love to vote with the liberals on this, just because she's had such a bad voting record and conservatives can't stand her now, she'll probably side with the parents on this just to be safe, | ||
| especially if she knows the conservatives already have the votes. | ||
| With Gorsuch and Kavanaugh and Thomas and Roberts and Alito, then she'll probably just vote with the conservatives just to save face, even though she'd probably like to vote with the liberals here. | ||
| So I see this probably going six or seven in favor of the parents, but the process and the revelations going on in this case are the real story here, and it shouldn't be opt-out. | ||
| This stuff should be banned in any education really until college. | ||
| And then if you want to sign up for a course of some electorate like this, then that's a different deal. | ||
| Or elective, excuse me. | ||
| Let's go now to Kavanaugh's time here talking about this crap. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The country has opt-outs for all sorts of things. | |
| The county has opt-outs for all sorts of things. | ||
| The other Maryland counties have opt-outs for all sorts of things. | ||
| And yet, for this one thing... | ||
| They changed in mid-year and say no more opt-outs. | ||
| I'm just not understanding. | ||
| So, again, I think what's in the record is that with respect to these books, as they were deployed in the classroom, there was high absenteeism in some schools. | ||
| For example, dozens of students being opted out in, I think Mr. Baxter said, the average size of an elementary school in Montgomery County is 700 students, so each grade is 125. | ||
| If you have dozens of students walking out, making arrangements for those students to have adequate space and supervision and alternative instruction, I think, is infeasible. | ||
| So, the attorney supporting the sexual indoctrination here says, if we allow the opt-out, all the parents were opt-out, and there's nowhere for the kids to go, the school doesn't have the resources to be able to handle all these opt-outs. | ||
| So, in other words, none of the parents want this taught, and they want to force it to be taught, and if the parents want to opt out... | ||
| They're not going to be allowed to because the school can't handle all the opt-outs. | ||
| This is crazy stuff, man. | ||
| This is truly crazy stuff. | ||
| Which is kind of like a pure form of democracy, not in voting, but it's like, okay, we're at the school board meeting. | ||
| Got all the parents here. | ||
| All right. | ||
| All your kids will be going into kindergarten this year. | ||
| Here's a book called, you know, Pride March for Kids or whatever the book is called. | ||
| Does anybody want this to be part of the curriculum? | ||
| And every single parent says, no! | ||
| And then they say, okay, mandated for kindergartners. | ||
| It's the exact opposite of democracy. | ||
| And that's where we're at with the liberal left. | ||
| So he's saying, because every parent would opt out... | ||
| That they can't do it. | ||
| So then why are you introducing this when none of the parents want it? | ||
| It's unbelievable stuff. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Continue....for all sorts of other opt-outs. | |
| They don't do it for all sorts of other opt-outs. | ||
| There's a limited universe of things that students can opt out from. | ||
| The Family Life and Healthy Sexuality curriculum stands alone. | ||
| It is... | ||
| Oh, pause it! | ||
| Oh! Oh! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh! Healthy sexuality is what they're calling it, folks. | |
| Healthy sexuality. | ||
| What is the rate of AIDS amongst men that have anal sex? | ||
| I don't know the exact number, but I know it's higher than those that don't. | ||
| How is that healthy sexuality? | ||
| And why are we... | ||
| Talking about this to four-year-olds again. | ||
| This is unbelievable. | ||
| You know, I have to tell you, I don't know about you, but this is something that drains my brain quite often. | ||
| Can we even save this country at this point? | ||
| I'm serious. | ||
| Now, there's definitely things that we can do to improve the country. | ||
| One in six, by the way, is the answer to that question. | ||
| One in six. | ||
|
unidentified
|
healthy sex? | |
| And this drains my brain. | ||
| I think we can definitely improve the country. | ||
| There's no doubt. | ||
| Definitely with policy and financially and economics and, you know, even education and everything else. | ||
| But, I mean, at a certain point, you look at this at an intellectual level and you say, when we're debating the merits of teaching four-year-olds about gay sex and other unhealthy sex... | ||
| At a certain point, you've gone beyond the pale, and you're kind of already gone. | ||
| I just... | ||
| You don't recover from this stuff. | ||
| You either completely cut it out like the cancer that it is, or eventually it consumes you and you die. | ||
| It's like, yeah, we can do things to improve, and we can do things to make things a little more livable and tolerable. | ||
| But when you've reached such a low point in your civilization that this is being argued at the Supreme Court, not even if it should be allowed in the classroom or not, but whether or not a parent gets to opt out of it. | ||
| I mean, think about the premise of that. | ||
| So the education system gets to dictate what your kids are learning and the parents don't even have a choice? | ||
| What the hell is that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's like... | |
| A kidnapping racket. | ||
|
unidentified
|
A kidnapping racket. | |
| This is just madness, man. | ||
| And they admit it's not popular. | ||
| They admit none of the parents want this. | ||
| So what are we doing here? | ||
| What are we doing? | ||
| That's what I'm saying. | ||
| This is so ridiculous. | ||
| If we had a proper country... | ||
| If we had a proper country and we were actually like, you could actually save this country, then this would not be at the Supreme Court. | ||
| This would not be a debate. | ||
| This would be tossed and policy would be introduced to ban any of this in the education system until 18, until college. | ||
| So it's like, even the fact this is going on is like, we've got a terminal illness and we're not even really addressing it. | ||
| We're just kind of looking at it like, well, you know, it's... | ||
| Kind of moving over here and maybe over here. | ||
| But, you know, maybe if we just moved it over here a little bit, it would kill us slower. | ||
| This is a terminal illness. | ||
| I mean, it's like you got this policy. | ||
| We need to introduce a $5,000 baby bonus because we have a birth rate decline. | ||
| Well, here's an idea. | ||
| Have you seen the statistics recently on how many Gen Zers? | ||
| Are gay? | ||
| I don't know if this is taught in biology anymore, but you know, gay men can't have a baby. | ||
| At least not yet. | ||
| I mean, my God. | ||
| By the way, women, this whole thing is crazy. | ||
| What do you think happens when they start putting wombs in men? | ||
| That is like the most feminist stance you can take. | ||
| I would get ahead of that right now. | ||
| If a man can have a womb implanted and get pregnant, hi, where are the feminists? | ||
| Your most divine feminine power is about to be taken from you. | ||
| But I guess we're not there yet. | ||
| Might be close. | ||
| So you went from like 1% of people identifying as homosexual maybe 30, 40 years ago. | ||
| Now Gen Z is 23%. | ||
| And what do you think is going to happen when these perverts are in there telling them how great all of this stuff is? | ||
| When they're four. | ||
| And who knows? | ||
| You know, most gay men were sexually assaulted when they were younger. | ||
| What do you think this is, folks? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What do you think we're dealing with here? | |
| Hey, let's give you $5,000 if you have a baby. | ||
| Hey, I have an idea. | ||
| Let's stop making people gay. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go back to the clip Books that are | |
| being used and prohibiting opt-outs. | ||
| And I guess I'm just not understanding. | ||
| The whole goal, I think, of some of our religion precedents is to look for the win-win, to look for the situation where you can respect the religious beliefs and accommodate the religious beliefs while the state or city or whatever it may be can pursue its goals. | ||
| And here, they're not asking you to change what's taught in the classroom. | ||
| They're not asking you to change that at all. | ||
| A lot of the rhetoric suggests that they were trying to do that, but that's not what they're trying to do. | ||
| They're only seeking to be able to walk out so that the parents don't have their children exposed to these things that are contrary to their own beliefs. | ||
| I understand, Your Honor, and there may well be circumstances where... | ||
| It's like a girl that has to go compete against a man in... | ||
| Some female sports division and just decides, I'm not going to do it. | ||
| So what? | ||
| So you're going to force a girl to compete with the man and then what? | ||
| The man, you know, bashes their head in? | ||
| Hey, great win, liberals. | ||
| Way to go. | ||
| You're going to sexually indoctrinate these kids before they can barely, you know, think for themselves. | ||
| And so what? | ||
| You're going to create a bunch of victims? | ||
| That's all it is. | ||
| They're just creating victims with these policies. | ||
| It's exactly what they want. | ||
| And they always talk about the separation of church and state. | ||
| Is this not a religion? | ||
| This is a religion to the left. | ||
| This modern-day liberal progressivism is like a religion, and they're trying to mandate their religion into the classroom. | ||
| And they want you to worship at the altar of their religion. | ||
| And look, we can be constitutional conservatives but also be for common sense at the same time. | ||
| It's the same crap with these satanic worshippers that get access to state capitals and they get to put up like Baphomet statues and have Satan worshipping ceremonies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No! No! | |
| The Constitution! | ||
| Shut up! | ||
| You're not coming in here and worshiping Satan. | ||
| Shut up! | ||
| Well, watch out, you know, that's a slippery slope. | ||
| No, it's not! | ||
| The slippery slope is letting them do it! | ||
| This is stuff that's beyond the pale. | ||
| You have to realize, we've basically been invaded by aliens, man. | ||
| When they wrote the Constitution, everybody was like, Kind of normal. | ||
| Like, people didn't want to mess with you and mess with your kids and destroy everything. | ||
| So you could have a republic and a constitution, but then also just have common sense stuff that everybody agreed with. | ||
| Again, I'm not against the constitution. | ||
| I'm not like one of these liberal democrats that thinks it's a living document and it's supposed to be interpreted at every turn. | ||
| I'm an originalist. | ||
| But at the same time, that doesn't mean we tolerate crap because we're loyal to the Constitution. | ||
| Hey, you know, I like... | ||
| I've got a very diverse appetite. | ||
| I like eating everything. | ||
| I'll eat everything. | ||
| Okay, here's a crap sandwich. | ||
| Why don't you eat that? | ||
| No, I'm not going to eat a crap sandwich. | ||
| Well, you just said you'll eat anything. | ||
| I didn't mean a crap sandwich. | ||
| That's what this is. | ||
| No, this is like a religion to them. | ||
| And I'm sick of being bullied into this corner. | ||
| Like, we have to be some political purists and better than the left when that's exactly how they take advantage of us and that's exactly how they've gained all this ground on us. | ||
| We don't have to be tolerant. | ||
| No, we don't. | ||
| And then they're not going to shove the Constitution in our face when we're intolerant to their madness. | ||
| I'm done being bullied by these people. | ||
| This is a terminal illness on our country, and it needs to be treated as such. | ||
| So, hey, great. | ||
| Country will be much better under Donald Trump, no doubt about it. | ||
| But this modern-day liberalism and everything that's packaged along with it... | ||
| Is a terminal disease and it will kill our country, folks. | ||
| It will. | ||
| And again, I look at this and I'm like, we might already be dead. | ||
| And we can still have some borders. | ||
| And we can still have good policy that at least gives us a better life, better opportunities in the rest of the world. | ||
| But when you're sitting here having a debate about whether a parent has the right To reject sexual indoctrination on their four-year-old or not, you're kind of already dead, in a way. | ||
| It's just the truth. | ||
| RFK Jr. may pull COVID shot from CDC's vaccine schedule for kids. | ||
| I bet he does. | ||
| Hasn't done it yet, but I bet he does. | ||
| The rumors are already circulating he will. | ||
| He should. | ||
| And then, of course, there needs to be an investigation into the people that promoted the vaccine mandates. | ||
| And everything that came along with that. | ||
| So, when will the FBI be raiding the people that mandated this potentially deadly shot? | ||
| Nope, they got college protesters they need to take care of. | ||
| Boy, we got big culture problems. | ||
| I got this whole stack. | ||
| Knifing is now normal at high schools. | ||
| Now, when that story of Austin Metcalf first broke, I unfortunately knew from experience, but I told you, I was like, bringing a knife to school is part of the culture now. | ||
| That's part of the culture of these kids. | ||
| That's why a lot of the schools have introduced metal detectors, because it came so much a part of the culture. | ||
| So now you've got more of it, folks. | ||
| 16-year-old stabbed by a fellow student at West Potomac High School in Virginia, hospitalized with life-threatening injuries. | ||
| I believe he is deceased now. | ||
| Don't touch me or I'm going to stab you. | ||
| Security footage reveals questioning from lead detective in Kaysen Allison trial. | ||
| Now, this video has been all over the Internet. | ||
| You may have seen it. | ||
| I think I even sent you the video, guys. | ||
| It should be censored so they don't actually see the gruesomeness of it. | ||
| And it looks pretty clear what happened. | ||
| It looks like the one kid is being bullied, and at one point he's basically on the ground just getting beaten when one of his friends comes up and probably saves him from a serious concussion. | ||
| No, not that. | ||
| That's the teacher fight. | ||
| And so after his friend comes and stops him from getting his head bashed into the ground... | ||
| Yeah, there it is, guys. | ||
| So if you start it from the top... | ||
| So there... | ||
| So first... | ||
| He's got his other friend on the ground. | ||
| He's getting beat. | ||
| He's probably been bullying him. | ||
| So then his friend comes in and breaks it up. | ||
| The kid that had his head being beaten in the ground gets up, pulls out a knife, and then stabs the guy. | ||
| So it looks like you probably have a case of bullying here. | ||
| And maybe that's why the kid brought the knife. | ||
| Maybe there have been other incidents. | ||
| So he brings the knife to stand up for himself. | ||
| But this is going to be tough because... | ||
| He didn't stab him while he was basically on the ground in the fetal position getting his head busted in. | ||
| The fight would be called off at an MMA event. | ||
| Fight over. | ||
| You're done. | ||
| You lost. | ||
| It's after he's able to get up that he pulls out the knife and stabs him. | ||
| So that's going to be a tough defense there. | ||
| But I do believe the other kid actually died. | ||
| So, I mean, now it's a regular story. | ||
| There was another incident in France. | ||
| A kid stabbed a kid. | ||
| So now we just get knife fights. | ||
| What happened to the good old days where you had a fist fight and then that was it? | ||
| You know? | ||
| That's how it used to be. | ||
| Sure, you'd have fist fights in high school. | ||
| You'd probably have been in one. | ||
| Now it's just stabbings. | ||
| So they have to have metal detectors. | ||
| That's what I'm saying. | ||
| We have a cancer, folks. | ||
| We have a terminal illness. | ||
| It should not be this way. | ||
| Then you got students fighting with teachers. | ||
| Students charged after a fight with DeKalb County teacher that's in Georgia. | ||
| It's just crazy. | ||
| And all the students are standing around filming it, supporting it, cheering it on. | ||
| It's nuts. | ||
| If this continues homeschooling, it already is. | ||
| Homeschooling is going to be more popular than ever. | ||
| In fact... | ||
| I would even say if this stuff isn't addressed at a very serious level, then eventually homeschooling is going to become even more popular than public school. | ||
| And parents are going to be looking for a private school that is safe, and if they can't afford it, then they're just going to do homeschooling because some of these school districts are so out of control now and so violent. | ||
| And the Trump administration addressed it yesterday. | ||
| You remember that? | ||
| That was yesterday, right, at the Oval Office? | ||
| And the teacher came out and she said, you know, folks don't understand how violent it is at these schools. | ||
| She's like, I've been fighting it for 10 years. | ||
| Finally, the Trump administration is doing something about it. | ||
| That's why they brought back discipline. | ||
| So it's just nuts. | ||
| All right, we are out of time for today. | ||
| We'll take a 21-hour break. | ||
| We'll do it all again tomorrow. | ||
| Thanks to your support by shopping at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| Really appreciate that, folks. | ||
| That's how everything we do here is possible when you shop at TheAlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| The great supplements, the great apparel that's so popular, the Patriot apparel, the Trump apparel, the Infowars apparel, which might be limited edition or even gone soon. | ||
| I mean, really, all the Infowars apparel is limited edition now, including this could be the last Infowars-themed coin. | ||
| So any Infowars apparel could be limited edition or might just be final ever at TheAlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| So take advantage of that while it's still there. | ||
| And we really thank our VIP members. | ||
| Your VIP membership budgets us into the future. | ||
| We really appreciate that. | ||
| All right, I sign off, 21-hour break. | ||
| Hey, I'll be live on TikTok in about half an hour with End Wokeness if you want to check that out. | ||
| I want to make a massive announcement right now. | ||
| And I'm so blown away by this. | ||
| This is the most exciting thing, quote, supplement-wise. | ||
| I've ever done in decades, in my career, in my research, okay? | ||
| We've had the new Methylene Blue in, now available at the alexshownstore.com, for about a week, and I already had mine, and I'm like, yeah, I'm sure it's all USP, I'm sure it's great. | ||
| And I'm like, oh yeah, I'll remember to take, you know, mine, it was just another brand my doctor recommended. | ||
| And then yesterday at about 3 o'clock, I'm watching him shoot B-roll for our new Methylene Blue that's from one of the top makers in the United States that supplies. | ||
| The big box stores that have it and sell it for $10 more than we do. | ||
| It's a big bottle, too. | ||
| Ultra-methylene blue. | ||
| The highest-grade strength USP. | ||
| I take a dropper and put it in my iced tea. | ||
| And I'm not a placebo guy. | ||
| I'm like, okay, I'm taking methylene blue before. | ||
| I figure, you know, the one my doctor told me to get, I'm sure. | ||
| We'll see if it's as good. | ||
| 15 minutes later... | ||
| I feel my hair on my body standing up, and I feel actually an electric current through my fingers in my hands and running up my back. | ||
| And I start, I'll be honest, start itching. | ||
| And I go take my shirt off and look at the mirror because I'm itching. | ||
| And my skin wasn't like hives. | ||
| It wasn't a rash. | ||
| My skin turned red. | ||
| Not bright red, but red. | ||
| It was like glowing. | ||
| I was like, what the... | ||
| And Chase Guy was like, yeah... | ||
| Yeah, he looks like a mad scientist. | ||
| I've been taking a lot of it. | ||
| His hair is... | ||
| And I'm like, okay, okay. | ||
| And then I just, I mean, I swear to God. | ||
| I swear to God. | ||
| I'm just saying, I swear on my children. | ||
| It is just beyond spectacular. | ||
| Quite frankly, I didn't develop Optimal Human when Biggly came on as a big sponsor. | ||
| And I told them the supplements I wanted from the companies I wanted. | ||
| They went out and did what I wanted. | ||
| People love them, and they're incredible. | ||
| The turmeric, the Shilogy, the Irish Seamoss, all of it. | ||
| But they'd had this out for years, and I thought, my green caps are great, and this other company I used is great because green superfoods are amazing. | ||
| And then I finally took it, and Harrison Smith took it, and I was like, my God. | ||
| And by then, we'd been selling it four or five months, and it was already a top seller. | ||
| The problem is there's so many ingredients and it's so hard to source and it's so clean at high standards that it's sold out most of the time. | ||
| We finally got a decent shipment of it in, but we never offered it for subscription. | ||
| Because we just couldn't keep it. | ||
| When you subscribe at thealexshowstore.com and then they keep it back for you so it never sells out. | ||
| So go to thealexshowstore.com and get your Optimal Human and so many other incredible products today. | ||
| Check out all the great Patriot apparel. |
Export Selection