Alex Jones claims Klaus Schwab’s WEF exit proves globalist opposition to Trump, citing documents like SPARS 2020 and Operation Lockstep as evidence of hidden control agendas. Meanwhile, Owen Shroyer mocks climate protesters at Trump Tower for hypocrisy, praises Amish flood recovery, and slams Harvard’s admissions while defending Trump’s executive orders—from revoking DOJ school discipline policies to boosting apprenticeships and AI training. Trump highlights tariffs cutting China’s fentanyl trade losses by billions, energy price drops from $100 to $65, and Ukraine negotiations over Crimea in exchange for rare earth minerals, dismissing Democratic lawsuits like Keith Ellison’s transgender sports claims as absurd. Shroyer condemns YMCA gender identity policies after an indecent exposure incident and defends a Jewish student blocked by protesters at Yale, contrasting with Jones’ Cybertruck contest and anti-globalist product push—all framing a broader culture war against progressive overreach. [Automatically generated summary]
Klaus Schwab, Mr. Eat the Bugs, you'll owe nothing, be happy, a bust of linen on his desk.
He first resigns as the chairman.
He's still on the board.
Then he gets off the board.
A month ago, and I said, watch, I predict he'll be completely gone and kicked out of it.
Following my recent announcement that I am into my 88th year, I have decided to step down from the position of chair as a member of the board of trustees with imminent effect.
He's out of the WEF because all the big money's cut off by Trump.
He was getting out of USA and the EPA and other groups.
And people don't want to go to it now.
An attendance is way down because it's identified as an enemy.
So people assume we are just going back to the good old world which we had, and everything will be normal again.
This is, let's say, fiction.
It will not happen.
unidentified
We have to understand that these are people that are very smart, they're very well resourced, and they have a very sort of strategic idea of how they want to see the world develop.
You expose their project, and as it goes from beta to operational in 2020, it'll be so horrible, everyone will turn against it.
I said that thousands of times the last two decades, and it happened.
All the corporate media would do is say, oh, it doesn't exist, there's no global government, there's no New World Order, there's no global governance conferences, there's no plan to ban your gas stoves and cut your son's genitals off, there's no plan to ban most farming.
That when they finally took off the mask and went from Operation Agenda 21 to Agenda 2030 in 2020 like they said they would.
I mean, they said in all those documents.
The SPARS 2020 and Operation Lockstep and the actual treaty plan.
We are going to go operational in 2020.
I kept telling you, if you think stuff's been bad so far, you just wait till 2020.
And they say their main thing will be a new virus.
unidentified
This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset.
This is our chance to accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts to reimagine economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality, and climate change.
They seem to be pretty productive, upstanding members of society and civilization, even more so than they get credit for.
Like this story that's surfacing, the Amish are doing more to repair flood damage than even the government is.
So, how could that be possible?
Well... Those Amish are pretty incredible folks.
Maybe I identify as Amish.
You know, they say I look Amish.
There might be some Amish-nish in my heritage dating back to Pennsylvania in the 1600s.
There maybe are some Amish in there.
I don't know.
But that's pretty incredible.
We'll talk about that later.
Let me tell you what we have coming up aside from that.
This whole...
Fiasco inside the White House, which I'll continue to explain.
Trump likes the chaos.
So now you keep seeing these stories.
So the media is misrepresenting most of it.
Especially these stories centered around Musk today.
But yeah, there are definitely tensions flaring in the White House.
There are definitely tensions flaring in the Trump administration.
There are some knives being drawn, if you will.
And yes, Musk was always planning on getting out of the White House in May of this year, next month.
That was always supposed to be the plan.
Maybe now it's more of a dire situation considering the news at Tesla.
But I'll tell you all about that.
I'll tell you the truth about it and then how the media is spinning it, of course.
It's kind of like a story that they had in the New York Times today.
I don't even have it on my desk.
I wasn't going to cover it.
But it's like it's the same spin where they reach out for a comment from me.
And I shared my entire statement on X today just because I wanted to make sure people understood the context of it.
But they asked me about engagement on X. And then they made the story.
Basically an anti-Musk story, which, fine, I get it.
It's part of the nature of what they're trying to do right now.
But then it's like, oh, I'm criticizing Musk.
Well, no, I didn't criticize Musk.
And actually, to Thompson's credit, the writer, he even said in his statement that I didn't criticize Musk.
So the headline is Musk Criticism, and then it's about me and my...
Reach on X and it's like, oh look, see, you're criticizing Musk.
You're anti-Musk.
No. You didn't read the story.
And then I shared my entire statement that I provided to the New York Times to provide clarity.
So it's like the same thing.
It's trying to reframe it and re-angle it.
So it's like, did I comment about suppression on X?
Yes. But was it about Musk?
Did I criticize Musk?
No. So it's kind of the same thing that's going on now with Doge is a disaster and Musk is leaving.
It's like, no, Doge is having some problems right now and Musk is leaving, but that was always part of the plan.
So they always try to spin it.
But I'll tell you what's really going on.
And then we've got some other political developments here as well.
Including this Supreme Court situation, it's actually even worse than I originally thought.
The Democrats are pushing, and I suppose you could kind of sense it.
The Democrats on the Supreme Court as well, or whatever Katenji Brown-Jackson is, she's a complete embarrassment, honestly.
It's a sad state of affairs.
She's just a complete clown.
She sounds like a valley girl trying to sound smart, and so it's even more painful.
It's just, ugh.
But see, we're going to have a clip of what she said.
No, the Democrats want, this is stunning stuff.
They want to be able to teach, this case is about three to five-year-olds.
We're talking pre-kindergarten.
And they want to teach them about Gay sex and gay marriage.
And you won't believe the arguments that Katenji Brown-Jackson is making in support of this.
So we'll look at that and show you what an absolute fallacy her logic is.
But it doesn't matter.
She doesn't know what a woman is.
She's thespian valley girl, diversity on the Supreme Court.
It's an embarrassment.
It's a shame what they've done.
It's horrible what Joe Biden did with that appointment.
She so clearly doesn't belong there.
It'd be like watching the NBA and a four-foot third grader comes out there.
And you'd say, what is that?
Oh, that's the new center.
That's young Johnny Johnson.
Well, he looks a little young.
He's four foot tall.
Well, how dare you criticize him?
How dare you?
He has earned this.
He belongs.
It's a clown show.
And then why?
You know, they love talking about the economy, if they can spin it and make it so that Trump gets the blame.
But where were they?
The Wall Street Journal.
The rich got richer more so than ever under Joe Biden, but they're not...
Oh, where...
Are they going to talk about that at the fight the oligarchy rallies with Bernie Sanders and AOC?
The Democrat talking point?
Trump's making his rich friends richer.
Actually, that was Joe Biden.
Are they going to talk about that?
I've got this stack of news.
It's really just incredible, the violence that we're witnessing here.
And now, in wealthy neighborhoods in Chicago, people are just getting robbed at gunpoint on their front lawn, on their front porch.
I mean, you can't even believe it.
So you've got that going on.
You've got Jasmine Crockett continuing to Crockett.
You've got Pete Hegseth with a pretty strong statement today as well that will show you.
Michelle Obama's complaining.
She's complaining because she's a black woman.
Wasn't that her choice to be a black woman, though?
I thought, well, anyway, she's upset about her status as a black woman.
It's amazing.
You get a podcast deal that nobody listens to.
Maybe that's why she's upset.
Oh, and Europe, in the geopolitical news today, Europe is considering the old Bill Gates' plan of blocking out the sun.
That has to be the most demonic thing I've ever heard in my life.
And then we've got some big Ukraine news with that deal falling apart.
How is blocking out the sun not the most...
I mean, let's chalk it up there.
You've got the child sacrifice.
They call it abortion.
You've got the mutilation of children.
They call it trans kids.
I'm just trying to think.
What are the most satanic things we witness politically here?
Okay, now you're blocking out the sun.
What is wrong with you?
Who doesn't like the sun?
I guess some people don't like the sun, but it's kind of like the giver of life.
It's kind of a necessity.
It's like, gee, what's responsible for all life on planet Earth?
Why, it's the sun.
Oh, brilliant.
I think I'll block it.
I think I'll...
Come up with a plan to block the sun.
That's what I'm going to do.
It's the giver of life.
We're going to stop it.
Hmm. Okay.
All right.
So that's what they want to do.
Right out of the Bill Gates playbook.
What is that about?
That's just crazy.
And then more lawsuits against the Trump administration.
They just can't help themselves.
So we got tons of stuff to cover today.
Now let's dive in here.
The Simpsons had it again, huh?
Yeah. Who's been more accurate to a ridiculous level?
Is it Matt Groening with The Simpsons?
Or is it Matt Stone and Trey Parker with South Park?
Most recently, the Kanye West gay fish.
I don't know if you saw that.
I don't really care to mention it.
Looks like the Kanye West gay fish situation was future prediction there.
If you didn't see that one, whoa.
So, I don't know, but blotting out the sun.
Simpsons predicted it, now they want to do it.
Okay, let's talk about what's going on in the White House here.
Musk vs.
Besant dispute erupted into West Wing shouting match.
It was two billionaire middle-aged men thinking it was WWE in the hall of the West Wing.
Sounds great.
One witness said of the argument last week.
Elon Musk and Treasury Secretary Scott Besant got into a heated shouting match in earshot of President Trump and other officials in the White House last week during a dispute about the IRS.
Two witnesses and three sources briefed on the matter tell Axios, well, they should both be screaming to shut it down.
Now, again, the White House has even spoken in support of these.
I've told you that Trump likes this.
Press Secretary Caroline Levitt said, It's no secret Trump has put together a team of people who are incredibly passionate about the issues impacting our country.
Disagreements are a normal part of any healthy process, and ultimately everyone knows they serve at the pleasure of President Trump.
So, Trump likes the chaos, and good, healthy debate on serious issues moving in the right direction is a good thing.
So this isn't the negative story that they're trying to make it out, but I do think Musk might be feeling a little disenfranchised now because he's probably closer to us in the belief that,
yeah, we need to radically, radically slash the size and scope and scale of government.
And he was serious about that.
And now they're having some issues and some upheaval.
And Musk and his team put in a lot of work.
Musk himself has sacrificed a lot.
Some of the other stories here.
Musk wants to leave politics because he's tired of attacks from the left, according to reports.
Well, there may be an element of truth to that, but that's not a new thing.
They've been attacking him since the election, since the campaign.
Musk says he will keep pushing for lower tariffs as Tesla profits drop 71%.
So I think this is where it stands.
So I understand from Musk's standpoint, he's saying, look, I came in here, I sacrificed a lot, and this part's probably true as well.
I don't know if he would say it, but Musk is more responsible for getting Trump into the White House than probably any member of his administration.
I'm not sure there's a single member of Trump's administration that you can point to and say, wow, you were huge in getting Trump elected.
I mean, maybe RFK Jr. might be the only other one.
Tulsi Gabbard.
But was it as big as Musk?
I don't know.
But the point is, Musk can make that claim, but then he can make a claim that nobody else can make, which is he's lost a lot.
He's lost a lot.
Probably billions.
When it's all said and done.
Now, I do think Musk is a true believer in the idea that all the money that I make, all the products that I make, all the dreams, the visions I have for the future, it'll all be worthless if we don't save the country anyway.
So you're kind of playing your hand like that, knowing you're going to suffer, but ultimately you're going to exist, you're going to have a future versus what it would have been.
So I think Musk is kind of walking around, you know, with big balls, pun intended, saying, hey, I helped get Trump elected, and I have suffered greatly for it.
I'm continuing to pay the price for this.
I'd like to see the work at Doge get a little more respect and follow through to conclusion.
And I'd like for some of the policy arguments I have to be heard by the president and followed up on.
Now the policy stuff, that's going to be a tougher win for him since he's not an official cabinet member or the treasury secretary.
So when he's talking about tariffs with Howard Lutnick or Scott Besant, yeah, he's probably not going to have too much impact other than just his opinion, him voicing his opinion on the matter, whether it's right or wrong.
And of course, he's directly impacted by all these policies as well.
It's a fraction of the success that it should have been.
That's the direction we're heading in, which is upsetting.
It's upsetting for Musk, and it's upsetting for a lot of people that were following the work of Doge, expecting a trillion dollars in cuts, and expecting the forensic auditors to go find where all this money was going, and really we want to see arrests.
We're talking about hundreds of billions, maybe trillions over time, of our tax dollars stolen, looted from us.
And Musk knows it.
The Doe's team knows it.
They need the forensic auditors to follow the job.
And now the grumblings are, okay, maybe it's time to expire Doe's.
You've saved us a couple hundred billion dollars.
You know, way to go.
Pat on the back.
Be on your merry way.
And I don't think Musk is really a big fan of that.
And I don't think that's a good plan either.
Now, if Musk has to go deal with the business issues, that's one thing.
He's got a team of people that can finish the job.
The tracks have already been laid.
They need the forensic auditor to try to find out where all this money went.
But how do you not at least have hearings and say, because this should be easy to find out.
Why is it that we had these payment systems set up where there was no follow-up and there was no oversight of where the money was going?
It was just automated.
And it was just like the machine would just kick out money.
To these different programs, and then there was it.
You don't know where it goes.
And there's no oversight, and they can't track it, and they can't trace it.
Why aren't you having hearings to find out whose policy was this?
Who implemented this?
I mean, you should be having hearings.
Whose idea was it to give millions of dollars for gay this and gay that and research here and research, all this nonsense?
This isn't just...
We don't just want the cuts.
That's half of it.
We want investigations.
We want to know who was stealing our money.
This is ridiculous.
But you know what?
It looks like at the very least we'll probably get $200 billion, give or take, from the Doge cuts.
And then I think maybe even more valuable than that...
Is the exposure.
All the things that Doge is exposing with the wasteful spending and the contracts and everything else and just outright fraud with things like Social Security and the Small Business Administration.
So the exposure of all that corruption is probably more valuable than the cuts are going to be.
You'd have to get the cuts to a trillion to really make that as valuable.
So that's the back and forth there.
Was it as big of a success as it should have been?
No. But was it still a success?
Absolutely. Absolutely.
And it was really the most popular thing, which is upsetting if they're not going to totally follow through with it.
And then Musk is going to leave next month, and they're going to say, wow, look at the fallout.
Oh my gosh.
So they're just spinning all of it.
And it's just more anti-Musk stuff, and it's just trying to get people...
On the inside fighting with each other, on the outside fighting with each other.
But Musk at this point, now Tesla, 71% of stocks, or 71% of the profits going down, the stocks took a pretty big hit.
They're kind of balancing.
It's still big, but it took a hit.
So now Musk has to go back there and try to correct this issue.
But that was kind of a bad situation for Musk already.
I'll explain why on the other side.
And then the Hegseth situation as well.
So the plan was always for Musk to leave this month, or next month rather, but they're going to spin it and claim it's a total fallout, total disaster.
Everything was a massive disaster.
It's all horrible.
Everyone hates one another.
And it's mostly BS.
And I can't even imagine if you're...
In the Trump administration, it's kind of like we deal with it here at Infowars.
The chatter about Infowars or Alex that's just wild, just completely inaccurate.
And it's like we work here every day.
We know the truth.
And so you see that stuff and you just kind of laugh at how inaccurate people are.
So you learn from that and you try to avoid it.
But absolutely, that's what's going on in the White House.
Is there heated debate?
Are there disagreements?
Are there things that some people wish got done that didn't?
Absolutely. Is it total disaster, fallout, hatred, fighting all the time?
No. No.
And they know that.
And I think that that's why, you know, Hegseth kind of gets taken out of context when dealing with this stuff.
Some people are good at...
Emulating Trump and how he deals with the media.
Ron DeSantis, he's great at it.
Stephen Miller, A-plus at it.
Hegseth is kind of, he's real direct.
And he's kind of rough around the edges with it.
He's not as polished.
It's like the statement he made today, then I'll play for you.
But that's, that's what it is.
So I can't imagine they're sitting back behind the scenes watching the press go on about this.
So that's why when Hegseth goes to the media, he's so frustrated.
He's like, you guys sit here and you print these stories about what's going on in my department and you're just wrong about everything.
So he calls them hoaxers because they just get it all wrong.
So how do you even address the madness?
It's like people that are probably well-meaning, and I get it, we've been lying to our whole lives.
Starlink probably has like 80% now of coverage of civilized society, of civilization, Starlink, and expanding.
Now they're even getting into remote areas.
And he's got other endeavors that are doing well, but I think to a certain level, Tesla, there's a little bit of pride and joy in Tesla, and he doesn't like to see it tanking.
But this was kind of always doomed, unfortunately.
Because if you look at the electric vehicle market, most of the consumers are liberals.
Most electric vehicle drivers are liberals.
Which, of course, is ironic.
They're attacking their own cars.
They're attacking the cars that they drive.
So that's just a level of the irony to these psychos.
But so once he came out in support of Trump and then came out against the left, that was always going to be a big risk considering most Tesla drivers are liberals.
Now, because of Musk and Musk's popularity rise on the right, now some conservatives are buying Tesla, specifically the Cybertruck.
That seems to be the one they like.
And I guess it makes sense.
Conservatives like buying trucks.
Liberals hate trucks.
You know, the gas guzzlers.
So now liberals have to mark their Teslas so that some other liberal doesn't come up and bash the windows in or slash the tires with these bumper stickers that you see.
You see them everywhere in Austin.
They've got the Amazon reviews.
Look at this.
This is funny.
This is the...
Hold on, guys.
What is the bumper sticker here?
I bought this before Elon went crazy.
Is that the one?
So this is on Amazon.
I bought this before Elon went crazy.
Five stars.
Jeez, we should be selling these.
I'd like to believe this sticker is vandalism prevention.
I've had so many people take photos and have a giggle.
Quality sticker.
Liberals have to buy a sticker to put on their car to stop other liberals from damaging it.
It's Musk on why Tesla is getting dished and targeted.
It's a shame.
Oh, yes!
It's Musk.
It's not the psychotic liberals.
It's not the Democrats encouraging it.
It's not the Soros front groups mapping it out.
Yes, it's Musk.
This is hilarious.
They all go in here and they write the five-star review.
So I guess then, is it working?
Is that what they're saying?
It's pretty effective?
Hmm. So they can't just drive their Teslas anymore.
They have to mark it.
This person has the Tesla Powerwall at their house.
They...
I'm sorry, I did not plan on this, but this is a great find by the crew.
This is too entertaining.
So this psychotic liberal, he had to mark his own Tesla Powerwall because he might walk into his own garage and go psycho.
This liberal is so deranged.
He could walk into his own garage at any given moment and find a sharp object or a baseball bat or some other heavy blunt object and destroy his own power source.
So he had to remind himself this liberal had to say, hey, any time now I could go crazy.
I could bash in my own power source.
At any moment here, I could walk into my garage, see that Tesla Powerwall.
And just go off.
So he had to purchase a bumper sticker to stick on his own power.
He was a threat to his own property.
All right.
So getting back to it, though, that was good find for the crew.
Yeah, don't put it back on air.
I'll get distracted again.
So he's thinking, Musk is thinking, tariffs are going to hurt his profits even worse, potentially.
So he's trying to help that.
And unfortunately for Musk, his case is not going to go over very well in the administration, but I'm sure he's either saying it or thinking it like, look, you've got to scratch my back here.
I have done enormous amounts of work to get you elected and since.
Can you scratch my back here?
I'm getting crushed at Tesla.
And the administration is probably just saying, Look, we can work with you, but you're not going to have any influence.
This is going to come down to what Trump wants.
So, take it to the big guy.
Which maybe Musk isn't getting as much access as he once was, so he's forced to talk to Besant, and then they get into the shouting match.
But it was always a bad situation for Musk, simply because of the market for electric vehicles.
It's mostly liberals.
I don't know if that'll ever change.
I don't know if you can come up with a strategy to get conservatives to buy Teslas that aren't a Cybertruck.
But that was kind of always a situation that was never going to go well for him.
All right, so then there's Pete Hegseth, and the same thing is going on here.
Now, the situation at the Pentagon with Pete Hegseth, I think, is a little more serious than...
The tension and debate and chaos inside of the Trump administration, which Trump kind of cultivates himself.
The vicious rivalries tearing apart Pete Hegseth's Pentagon.
I think the problem for Hegseth personally, not just the attacks that are being lobbed against him every day, and we'll get a statement from him momentarily, I think the problem for Hegseth is that he's in there actually trying to do a job.
And he might have his own vision and his own policies.
Who knows how often he's even in contact with the White House.
But he has to deal with the Pentagon every day.
The Pentagon is one of the most deep state, I mean deep state, establishments in Washington, D.C., especially when it comes to foreign policy.
So you got the military and industrial complex loyalist.
You've got the neocon hawks.
You've got all these people that are there just forever that always want war, always looking for the next war, the next place for military spending and involvement and weapons contracts and everything else.
And then you have Hegzeth and his top advisors that are like, look, our agenda is to rebuild the military.
Through policy, through equipment, but we're not looking for war.
We're trying to stay out of war.
And he says peace through strength.
So he's saying we're going to make his agenda with his top advisors, make the military as strong as it's ever been, and then use that strength to keep the peace.
But the deep state people inside the Pentagon got other ideas.
So that's where the real knife fight is going on.
And Hegseth...
And this isn't an insult to Hexeth.
I'm just looking at it and I'm thinking, he's not an executive type.
He's a warrior type.
He's a front lines type.
He's not the executive type that is thinking about how he can delegate and scheme things into existence.
He's just front facing.
I've got my agenda.
I've got my goals.
I'm just going to go out and do it.
So he's, you know, the stuff going on behind the scenes, he's not thinking about dealing with it.
He doesn't want to deal with it.
He probably wasn't anticipating it would be this bad.
And then he's got the fake media attacks he has to address every day.
But that's what's going on.
And you see all these different stories.
They never tell you.
To me, it's all illegal.
They say unnamed Pentagon officials.
That's what they always go with.
Unnamed Pentagon officials say this about Pete Hegseth.
Say this about Pete Hegseth advisors.
Remove three of Pete Hegseth's top advisors.
Well, you have a right to meet your accuser.
They still haven't...
The people that they walked out, the big public names, by the way, those aren't the only people that have been walked out.
But you notice that's the only...
The three people that were anti-war, Hegseth's top advisors, the three ones that were anti-war, those are the ones they made the big story about.
And this is...
Probably all by design, too.
So then when Hegseth comes out and talks about leakers and disgruntled former employees, then you think he's talking about those three guys.
Folks, they have fired more than just those three guys.
There have probably been dozens.
But that's not who Hegseth is talking about.
But those three men that were anti-wart and Hegseth's top advisors, they have still not gotten...
Any explanation for why they were escorted out of the building.
They have not met their accusers, let alone even know what they're accused of.
But that's not even who Hegseth is talking about.
So Hegseth is really kind of up the creek without a paddle.
But doing a great job.
I still think he's doing a great job, and I hope he doesn't go anywhere.
Because I think his vision is correct.
Of course the military-industrial complex is going to be trying to sabotage him.
Of course the neocons are going to be trying to sabotage him.
And of course those two forces combined are going to try to remove any voices that get access to Hegseth that are promoting the idea, hey, we don't need to get involved in another war.
statement about what his vision is and how they've accomplished it.
Cleaning up the military, he says this in clip one.
unidentified
Thank you.
At the Defense Department, that means no more distractions.
So I think Hegseth just needs to keep facing forward, keep doing what he's doing, and just try his best to just ignore all the noise.
And I don't know if he's even thinking about what it is that's trying to sabotage him.
Or if he kind of just puts it into the category of fake news and leftist woke bullshit, as he says.
It's a little deeper than that at the Pentagon.
But I hope he's...
Working in confidence knowing that Trump has his back and he's not going anywhere.
I hope, because certainly all these headlines attacking him, now they're going after his wife.
It's hard to ignore that.
It's hard to go to work every day with that noise clanging around and stay focused and mission-oriented.
So you know what?
I pray for Pete Hegseth.
And I pray for the military.
And I hope he can stay mission-oriented and clean it up as he wants to do and not get too offset by all of the hit pieces and the lies and now going after his family.
They're just sick people, man.
And it's amazing, considering that it's coming from the left publicly, you've got to be a little more discerning.
And get your political microscope out to understand what's going on at the Pentagon against him.
But it's funny, you know, this is the left going after him just because they can't help themselves.
He's trying to stop us from getting into another war that the entire left was against in the Bush years.
That's the number one thing that got Barack Obama elected, was being anti-war and being a public critic.
Of George Bush and the wars of Bush's presidency.
That was the top thing that got Barack Obama elected.
And now it's the same leftists that would tell you Barack Obama was the greatest thing ever, and it's the same leftists tearing down Pete Hegseth who doesn't want those wars anymore.
Who, by the way, fought in those wars, has friends that fought in those wars, had friends that died in those wars, has friends that lost limbs.
Had their lives changed forever in those wars, so it's a little personal to him.
And these same leftists, they just can't help themselves.
Oh, well, our latest hit piece didn't get to Hegseth.
He's still mission-oriented.
So what should we do?
Oh, I know.
Let's go after his wife.
Yeah, that'll do it.
That'll throw him off.
They just can't help themselves.
And it's like, you can't even come out in support of him when he's trying to stop the U.S. from getting into more forever wars?
And you still can't at least support him on that?
And then the aides that are saying, hey, you know what?
We'll look into this Supreme Court case that's ongoing with some just stunning sound.
Katenji Brown-Jackson belongs nowhere near the Supreme Court.
It's unbelievable what's going on with that clown.
But we'll show you the arguments that she's trying to make at the Supreme Court level as to why it should be okay.
For three- to five-year-olds in school to be taught about LGBTQ plus activities.
Yeah. That's what she's into.
Now, this craziness about Abrego Garcia and now the Democrats hanging out in El Salvador.
Who knows?
Maybe more will go down there.
They probably will.
So the GOP is taking advantage of this madness.
And they just decided to run this ad specifically in the districts, in House districts, where they're hoping to flip some seats in the upcoming midterms.
So you like to see this strategy, strong strategy here.
25 vulnerable House Democrats targeted by GOP ad blitz offering airfare to El Salvador.
It's very nice.
Here it is, clip three.
unidentified
Welcome to El Salvador, home to breathtaking sunsets, world-class surf breaks, and gangbanger Kilmer Abrego Garcia.
El Salvador is the destination for Democrats seeking the thrill of bringing violent criminal illegal aliens back to America.
Come witness Trump derangement syndrome in its purest form.
From Chris Van Hollen to Cory Booker, you may even see John Ossoff.
So what are you waiting for, Senate Democrats?
Join your colleagues and step into the rhythm of rescue today.
And then you get a nice piece of InfoWars memorabilia.
Patriot memorabilia.
This could be a little more than that if it's the last time we ever get to use this logo.
So a little bit more limited there.
A little bit more importance there with this limited edition coin.
We did just cut the price on it at TheAlexJonesStore.com.
You get a bigger discount when you're a VIP member.
TheAlexJonesStore.com slash VIP to get an even bigger discount.
And when you purchase this coin, you will get multiple entries.
into the one of one, the only one that exists, the Alex Jones edition Cybertruck.
So you get your Alex Jones silver coin, could be the last InfoWars coin ever, and then you get entered to win the one of one, the only Alex Jones Cybertruck.
Jasmine Crockett.
You know, I'll give her enough credit that she knows, she knows her brand.
So she just figures, I'll just be as ratchet as possible, and that's how I'll build my brand.
And it's worked!
Because she got the invite on to Jimmy Kimmel.
We got a couple clips from that.
She's, um...
Well... First, didn't she originally say, like, a week or two ago, originally she wanted to be an astronaut?
I didn't realize Jasmine Crockett was a genius.
She had us all fooled.
Didn't she?
Apparently she was a genius.
I believe she originally said she wanted to be an astronaut, and then maybe she blamed racism why she couldn't do it.
Who knows?
Well, now she's got a news story.
She tells Jimmy Kimmel what did she originally want to do with herself before she got into politics, clip five.
unidentified
I actually wanted to be an anesthesiologist, so I've always been really good at math and science, but I didn't want to talk to people.
You wanted to put people to sleep, and you kind of are doing the opposite thing now.
Probably got a good education at that very expensive school in St. Louis.
She had us all fooled, though.
Do you agree the crew is saying this in my ear?
I didn't really think of it, but did she change her...
Did she code switch here?
Is Jasmine code switching on Jimmy Kimmel?
Is that because he's white?
Oh, wait, no.
Is he white or is he...
Yes, he's white.
But no, he's Jewish, right?
Is Kimmel Jewish?
I think that's a little offensive for her to code switch like that.
Now, she comments on...
Ellen Mux here.
She's so smart.
Maybe she could work for old Ellen Mux, as she says.
He's the dumb one, though.
Crockett, when you think about high IQ genius, you think Jasmine Crockett, not Elon Musk.
So here she is referring to Musk as an idiot.
Clip six.
unidentified
The level of incompetence is almost, like, incomprehensible.
It is so bad, and when you bring up the idiot known as Elon Musk, um...
The idiot.
He is not only, like, very sinister and has no idea what he's doing, and people are like, oh, no, he absolutely knows, because he's the richest man in the world.
Like, yes, he knows how to hire smart people, but don't conflate that and believe that he is the genius, because he ain't.
Yeah, Elon Musk, not that smart, just a genius entrepreneur, inventor, innovator, you know, the guy that possibly the most impressive invention of the 21st century, a rocket that can land.
She's the genius.
I mean, yeah, you think about genius, you think about Jasmine Crockett, not Elon Musk.
She's really making, she's setting us straight there.
And then there's Michelle Obama.
There's a lot of confusion coming from this clip, but apparently she is just struggling, and she's hurting, and you're just not respecting her pain here in clip eight.
I'm going to have to come back and respond to this on the other side.
Guys, should we bury that or should I respond to that?
It's a lot to unpack there.
And that's not double entendre, but it might be.
But I didn't realize Michelle Obama was suffering so much.
Did you know that?
She's not articulating her pain.
If I could hear more from Michelle Obama about her pain, maybe her podcast would get an audience.
All right, I'm going to bury that Michelle Obama clip for now, and we'll maybe revisit later because there's other more important news to get to, like the big developments with the Ukraine peace negotiations and then the Supreme Court case.
Let's get to the Supreme Court case now with this audio.
You have to understand, folks, the fact that we're even having this discussion and that it's made it to the Supreme Court is a story in and of itself.
Like, why are we talking about...
Why are we talking about books that are sexual in nature for kids aged 3 to 5?
Why are we doing that?
And, you know, there's kind of this film over all of these debates.
It's like, if you are providing something that people like, then it's not going to be much of an issue.
If it's not a political agenda that people like, then it's not much of an issue.
Like, what am I talking about?
Well, one big thing you see right now in conservative commentary is how they're remaking all of these movies and they're replacing the white characters with black characters.
Most recently, the Snow White deal, which maybe has a little bit of that.
I think it's more because of the things that the actress said politically more so than is she white or not.
But there's cases where you look at like the most recent Gladiator film.
Denzel Washington is in there.
There was some other movie.
I can't remember what it was.
I think I watched it recently and it didn't even hit me.
There's some other movie where they replaced one of the main characters that was a white character with a black character.
But nobody talked about it because it was like it was a good movie.
It wasn't an agenda.
It wasn't political.
The character fit right in.
Actually, Denzel Washington did that before with Magnificent Seven.
I didn't even think of that until just now.
So it's like as long as it's not political in nature without an agenda and you're providing something that's good, people don't really complain.
So it's like if you're a parent and you're watching...
A cartoon or Spongebob or something.
And Spongebob is on the screen in a dress.
You're not saying, oh my gosh, why would Spongebob be in a dress?
This is trans propaganda.
This is LGBTQ plus propaganda.
No, it's a funny cartoon.
There's no agenda.
But when you want to put books...
On the shelves in the library and in the classroom, in this Supreme Court case, for three- to five-year-olds, that's an agenda.
That's an overt targeting of the youth with LGBTQ plus propaganda.
That's the difference.
So this case is at the Supreme Court.
Sotomayor spars with Alito during LGBTQ Classroom's book case.
Yeah, Sotomayor, another blowhard.
And Alito is just like, this is just insane that we're even having this conversation.
And it is insane.
And then they end up talking over one another.
Supreme Court likely to rule for parental opt-out on LGBTQ books in schools.
And it's funny, when you look into this news...
Nobody really talks about how this is a case for five and under.
We're not talking about grade school or high school or college.
Tiny little children that these leftists are trying to introduce to LGBTQ plus propaganda.
The fact that we're even here is stunning.
The fact we're even having this debate in the Supreme Court is stunning.
And so, it's looking right now, it'll probably be 7-2 with Sotomayor and Brown Jackson saying, yes, you can put gay books on the bookshelves for kids.
And what's the reasoning?
Well, it's an indefensible thing.
And... You know, the left isn't really about freedom.
The left is about they know better than you, so they should make decisions for you.
So if you don't like your kids learning about LGBTQ plus propaganda, well, that's because you're a bigot, and so they need to remove you from the picture, and the teacher needs to be in control, or whoever is controlling the school board or the education department, which they want, of course, to be a radical leftist.
So it's really an indefensible stance to take.
So they kind of...
This is the first time you'll ever see liberals, modern-day liberals, erring on the side of small government involvement.
So you'll never hear a leftist judge in their interpretation of the Constitution because it's not about upholding the Constitution.
Now they view themselves as the arbiters of what the Constitution even means and says.
But you notice, you don't see the left erring on the side of, well, we shouldn't get government involved with this.
We should limit government involvement with these things.
You never hear that.
They're all for bigger government, more involvement, more control over your life.
But since teaching three-year-olds about gay sex is not really a defensible thing, now they're erring on the side of, well, I don't know if the government should get involved here.
Oh, how convenient.
Brown Jackson.
Listen to her excuse, trying to figure out, well, is this really something that we need to be talking about and concerned about?
Here's... It's honestly embarrassing.
It's an insult to the Supreme Court.
This woman, she doesn't belong anywhere near it.
Here's her reasoning why.
Maybe this isn't such a big deal, clip four.
unidentified
But I need you to focus on my question.
This is a preliminary injunction.
I appreciate that.
When you seek a preliminary injunction, you actually have to have a factual record that is the basis for the court to make a determination in your favor that some conduct that you're complaining about...
Needs to be enjoined.
And what's confusing to me, and hard, really hard, in this situation, is that we have a lot of sincerely held beliefs and concerns and children and principles, and I see all of those things, and so really want to be careful about making the pronouncement that relates to this.
I don't understand how we can do it on this record.
There was a statistic that came out, it was a statistical graph that came out, and it had words uttered by the Supreme Court the last time they were in sessions.
Words uttered by the Supreme Court justice, the justices, last time they were in session.
And the smartest man on the Supreme Court, Clarence Thomas, had the least amount of words said.
And the dumbest person on the Supreme Court who just arrived, Katenji Brown Jackson, had the most words said.
Now we just played, what was that, about 30 seconds of this clip, guys?
We just played 39 seconds of this clip.
Did Supreme Court Justice Katenji Brown Jackson say anything?
Did she say anything at all?
Did any of that land, did any of it have any meaning or purpose whatsoever?
No. This woman is so not serious.
She just talks because she likes to hear herself talk.
She just talks because things are rattling around in her head, so she just speaks it thinking, I'm a Supreme Court justice.
I must be a genius now, so I'm just going to say everything that's rattling around in my head.
It's a joke.
She talks more than any other Supreme Court justice and says nothing, and she's been there the shortest amount of time.
So if you're listening and you're saying, what is she even saying?
She's saying nothing, okay?
She'll eventually get to her point.
She could have summarized her point in 30 seconds.
It took her two minutes and ten seconds to do it.
If you want to do a podcast, go do a podcast.
Get off the Supreme Court bench.
You're wasting everybody's time with your rattling around.
You're an embarrassment.
She'll eventually land the ship, I promise you.
But just, you know, just notice this.
This is where we're at.
A woman on the Supreme Court that just talks to talk and says nothing.
Go ahead.
unidentified
I don't understand how we can do it on this record.
And I, again, will refer you to the district court transcript at 63. So you're saying the Fourth Circuit is wrong when it says, quote, we don't have any information about how any teacher or school employee has actually used any of the books?
The Court of Appeals did not dispute that some of the books have to be used.
And we have all of the teachers' instructions that the board's not disputed.
I understand that.
But the Fourth Circuit made a ruling that we don't...
No, quote, what any child has been taught in conjunction with their use.
So are you saying that you do have affidavits and information about teachers in the classroom and what they've taught children of different ages about these books?
Yes, we do.
All of our clients have, in their declarations, they describe which books are going to be read to their children.
Were the clients in the classroom?
They were not in the classroom, but they know...
And again, we don't have to wait until the injury has happened to get relief.
The point of a preliminary injunction is that we can...
Is anybody even using these books, or are they just sitting on the shelf gathering dust?
As if that makes it okay.
As if somehow that logic is enough to say, okay, we don't need to rule in this case.
Keep the LGBTQ plus propaganda in the classroom.
Nobody's looking at it.
Okay, so with that logic then, I'm going to bring a bunch of guns to the classroom.
Well, you can't bring guns to the classroom.
Why? They're just sitting over there.
Nobody's touching them.
Nobody's using them.
They're just collecting dust.
Just guns.
Are they loaded?
It doesn't matter.
Nobody's touching them.
What, I brought a bunch of guns to the classroom?
So what?
Nobody touches the guns.
They're just sitting over there.
That's her logic.
Or maybe it's drugs.
Yeah. Yeah.
Maybe I'll bring a bunch of cocaine to the kindergarten classroom today.
And if some lawyer says, hey, you can't bring cocaine to the classroom, I'm going to call up Katenji Brown Jackson, and I'm going to say, but Judge Jackson, nobody's using the cocaine.
It's just sitting on the desk.
It's just a big bag of cocaine sitting on the desk.
Nobody's using it.
Come on!
That's her logic.
And then it's like, did she even do any of the necessary groundwork for this case?
Like, later on in the hearing, you hear Alito talking about how he read the books, and then Sotomayor doesn't even seem to know what books he's talking about.
He's like, these are the books.
Do they even do their job?
Do they even know what's going on?
And she's like, well, how do we know that this is the case?
And the lawyer explains, this is...
We're trying to stop it from being the case.
And she's like, oh, this woman is an embarrassment.
She's embarrassing herself.
She's embarrassing the country.
We've sunk into...
You know, you always hear it...
How do they say it?
It's not even decorum.
It's like, maintain the prestigiousness of these institutions.
The prestigiousness of the Supreme Court and the seriousness of the Supreme Court.
We need to respect this stuff.
And then you put Katenji Brown Jackson on there, who doesn't even understand basic constitutional issues, doesn't even do her job to research these cases, and sounds like a high school valley girl yapping in the cafeteria.
Sir, the first executive order we have prepared for your attention.
There are currently laws on the books requiring certain disclosures of universities when they accept large foreign gifts.
We believe that certain universities, including, for example, Harvard, Have routinely violated this law and this law has not been effectively enforced.
So this executive order charges your departments and agencies with enforcing the laws on the books with respect to foreign gifts to American universities.
University accreditation is currently a process controlled.
By a number of third-party organizations, that's by statute, by law.
Many of those third-party accreditors have relied on sort of woke ideology to accredit universities instead of accrediting based on merit and performance.
But the basic idea is to force accreditation to be focused on the merit and the actual results that these universities are providing, as opposed to how woke these universities have gotten.
So we're setting up new accreditation pathways.
We're charging the Department of Education to really look holistically at this accreditation mess and hopefully make it much better.
When universities are not performing appropriately, whether that's in admissions or whether that's in their actual instructional activities, that's certainly something that accreditors should be considering, that right now we believe they're not doing a good enough job of.
unidentified
And I think Secretary McMahon could probably speak to that.
They're allowing people into school, they can't do math, and yet kids who've worked really hard and number one in their class in a high school someplace in New Jersey or in...
Mississippi, they can't get into the best schools.
What is that all about?
unidentified
Yeah, and I think that gets to your policy, sir, of meritocracy, that we should be looking at those who have real merit to get in, and we have to look harder at those universities that aren't enforcing that.
This next executive order relates The basic idea of this executive order is to ensure that we properly train the workforce of the future by ensuring that school children,
young Americans, are adequately trained in AI tools so that they can be competitive in the economy years from now into the future as AI becomes a bigger and bigger deal.
Next year, we have an executive order on workforce development.
This executive order is going to charge numerous departments and agencies within the government to reshape the way that we do workforce development.
One example from the executive order, for instance, we're looking to get the total number of apprenticeships, new apprenticeships, up to a million in the country to ensure that in critical jobs areas, in areas where we currently don't have enough trained workers,
That we're recreating that pipeline to ensure that, particularly as we onshore industrial jobs and new industries, that those industries have the workforce they need to be competitive globally.
So all those factories that you're bringing in because of your trade policy, we're going to train people in tradecraft, bring back tradecraft to America so that people can work in these factories with great paying jobs, and we're going to train them, and we're going to remake the American dream.
For all these people, we're working together.
unidentified
Right, Lori?
Absolutely. This plays right into America at Work Tour, which I have kicked off.
We will work with our state partners and work with our businesses to see exactly who they need in that workforce, and we will skill and upskill these apprentices so they can get right to work and get in the field and build back this economy.
Next, sir, we have an executive order on school discipline policies.
Under, I believe it was the Biden administration, first Obama and then Biden, the Department of Justice issued guidance that made it almost impossible for schools to enforce adequate disciplinary policies.
This created issues in the classroom for teachers and students alike.
Basically they focused on CRT and sort of diversity ideology.
Instead of actually just enforcing the rules in classrooms to ensure a safe learning environment, this executive order revokes that prior guidance and puts us back in a place where hopefully the Department of Education can focus on education and teachers can focus on teaching in a safe environment.
This is a theory that underlies a lot of the modern DEI and CRT-driven diversity culture.
The basic idea here is instructing your departments and agencies to no longer rely on disparate impact theory as they're regulating, as they're issuing guidance, as they're making rules.
We want to focus on results.
We want to focus on actual fairness.
We want to focus on merit, not things like disparate impact theory and the whole sort of diversity, equity, and inclusion cult.
I know you're a former Charlotte Mecklenburg school teacher.
I'm a North Carolina girl, so it's nice to be here.
Thank you so much for having me.
Thank you so much.
I am so honored to be here.
This has been an eight-year journey for me to raise awareness to the violence that's in public schools and the critical need to address violence in public schools.
Again, been doing it eight years because most administrations like to keep the violence hidden.
We have three students that should be here with us today.
We have Austin McCalf, I'm sorry if I say his name wrong, Serenity Baker, and Nyxia Taylor from Charlotte, North Carolina, who was shot in the back as he was getting off of a school bus because they thought he was a part of a big brawl that happened inside a public high school.
So this is very important and critical.
That we have to keep our educators safe, we have to keep our students safe, and public schools have to be safe environments.
So I think, like I said, I've done this journey along, I've been on it, but I have a whole team behind me now.
I spoke at the RNC, and I told millions that Donald Trump and his administration was going to make schools great again, and I feel that we're on the right path, and I'm just honored to be here.
This is my husband, Michael, and so many of our dear, dear friends who are here today.
Many of them have met you, sir, in your first administration in the hospital many times at Walter Reed.
And they've had long recoveries.
Tomorrow, for my husband, marks 15 years since he was wounded in Afghanistan.
And on that day, about six years ago, he had his 120th surgery post-Afghanistan.
And you came to see him at Walter Reed.
And so many others.
And we saw great reform in the VA.
Access, same-day access to prosthetics, mental health care.
And we know that that is back.
We're going to.
These gentlemen were saying, Alex here earlier was saying, in the last few years when he's gone to get a wheelchair, the VA has asked him, this gentleman, they've asked him to prove that he still has his injuries.
A lot of good people watching that believe in you.
They happen to be the media, but they believe very much in you.
unidentified
Oh, I love this.
Mr. President, we're very happy with the energy that this administration is bringing, and it's an administration that does what it promises, and so we're behind you, we believe in you, and I think we all love you.
You know, we were losing almost $5 billion a year.
No country can do that.
And now we have it down almost even, maybe even better than even, because of the tariffs on cars and aluminum and steel.
We have tariffs 25% on cars, aluminum and steel.
There's a rush to build new steel plants, a rush to build new aluminum plants, and the biggest rush I've ever seen that we've ever seen.
To build car plants.
We have like 11 of them or something.
Big ones.
Where you guys maybe work.
Maybe you won't want to work.
You'll do something else instead of that.
But if you like cars, you'd like to work on one of these plants.
The biggest plants in the world.
Three of them have left Mexico before construction started.
One of them during construction.
And they're coming to this country.
They're coming back.
Don't forget.
And we get along great with Mexico.
But Mexico took 32% of our car building business.
It's amazing what's happened.
Remember this number?
Anywhere from three to five billion dollars a day.
That's not million dollars, that's billion dollars a day.
Nobody can even imagine it.
And that's what we were losing.
And, you know, hence we have 36 trillion dollars in debt and everything else.
And in the end, I think what's going to happen is we're going to have a great deal.
And by the way, if we don't have a deal with a company or a country, we're going to set the tariff.
We just set the tariff.
It's something that we think that will happen, I'd say, over the next couple of weeks.
Wouldn't you say?
I think so.
Over the next two, three weeks, we'll be setting the number.
And we're going to pick, could be for China, too.
Could be for China.
We'll be dealing with almost all of them.
Too many to fully deal with, but we're going to be fair to them.
But we're dealing with a lot of countries right now, and it could be with China, but maybe we'll make a special, you know, a deal, and we'll see what it will be.
Right now, it's 145 percent.
That's very high.
It got there because of the fentanyl.
They're sending, you know, massive amounts of fentanyl into our country and killing a lot of people, probably 200,000-plus a year, wiping them out.
You probably all have friends who were killed.
Somebody was killed in your family or your friends.
with fentanyl and somehow it's made almost exclusively in China and as you know we essentially taxed them 10 and then another 10. We also taxed Mexico 25 and we taxed Canada 25 and that's the kind of money that's what's pouring into our country right now and it's gotten us down from losing three to five billion dollars a day to Actually making money,
but breaking even, let's say, but we're going to make a lot of money.
And that money is going to be used to reduce taxes.
We're going to get big, big tax breaks.
You know, there was a time, I said it this morning, I think some of you were there.
There was a time from 1870 to 1913.
It was a long time ago.
We were an all-tariff nation.
Foreign nations pay taxes.
They paid money to us in the form of tariffs.
And that was when we were the wealthiest.
We were the wealthiest proportionately that we ever were.
And they formed committees in 1887 in particular, but they formed committees to determine what we should do with all the money.
We had so much money.
You guys would have loved it.
We had so much money, they didn't know what to do with it.
We gave it away to different causes.
You haven't seen that too much anymore, although we give plenty away, but now we shouldn't be giving it away.
We have to take care of ourselves first, right?
Absolutely. But we were very wealthy and proportionately the wealthiest we ever were.
We built the Panama Canal.
Jimmy Carter gave that away for $1, by the way.
One of the most profitable things ever built, the Panama Canal, we gave it away for $1 to Panama.
Why? I don't know.
Nobody knows, but that's what we had.
We had people like that sitting behind this desk.
And that shouldn't have happened.
Panama Canal, we spent...
It was the most expensive thing ever built by our country in history.
I'm talking relative dollars.
We've never built anything so expensive.
I think it was the equivalent of $1.7 billion.
And we've never built anything like that.
We built a lot of things, but never so expensive.
Then we started building other things.
We had a lot of money to do it.
All based on foreign countries coming in and paying the tariffs.
And we're doing that again.
And I think we're going to make so much that we're going to be able to reduce taxes in this country by a lot.
And we're also going to treat those countries very fairly.
But if we don't make a deal, which is possible, we're going to just set the price.
Because you remember, they have to come in.
They want to come in here and they want to do business with the United States.
So we want to set a fair price.
And we'll do that.
We're going to be very fair.
But we'll set a fair price.
And then they can make a determination as to whether or not they want to do business with the United States.
And I think most of them will.
And I think we're going to treat them very fairly.
unidentified
Were you worried about what the 145 percent tariffs were doing to small businesses here in the U.S.?
I believe the travel schedule for Trump is he's leaving on Friday for the Pope's funeral, but then also coming back right after Saturday evening, so it'll be a short trip.
We'll announce it probably this evening or tomorrow.
First Lady's going.
And some people are coming with me from staff.
But we'll have a number of people going.
I'm sure it's going to be a beautiful ceremony.
unidentified
I wanted to ask you about the cuts that have been made, including with the VA.
Can you assure that veterans like these men here, those that have been suffering from mental health issues or burn pits, for example, will be taken care of even with the cuts?
They will tell you it's been better with me than any president in history.
We had a 92% approval rating, which is unheard of, up 50 points from the previous administration in my first four years, and we're doing better now.
In fact, now they have something, the call-in doctor stuff, where it's really become modernized and great, where you don't have to go and travel sometimes long distances to get to a clinic or get to the VA.
And I just heard this morning, I was listening to Doug Collins, who's the secretary, who was being interviewed, and the numbers are incredible.
The approval ratings are the highest.
I've never heard numbers like this.
It's better than the first four years.
So, no, there's nobody, there's no group of people more important than the people in this room.
And I'm not talking about the media.
I'm talking about these people right here.
There's no group, and they're going to be taken.
Really well cared.
It's very important to me.
unidentified
And on the war in Ukraine, are you going to be meeting with President Zelensky?
What is his advice we're not going to present to the committee?
Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, during the Biden administration in the campaign, with inflation raging...
He lowered interest rates two times.
Now, with two consecutive months of inflation being down, all economic theory you learn in the eighth grade says it's time to cut rates when inflation is down.
For those of us that live here in the district, you said when you came in you were going to make Washington, D.C. great again.
Right. One of the issues we've got right now is we understand there might be an imminent deal between the owner of the Washington football team, whatever you want to call them now, commanders, and locally in getting...
The Redskins back to D.C. and RFK Stadium.
That's on federal property.
Right. Are you going to be involved in that negotiation?
And would one of the stipulations be they change their name back to that Redskins?
If they're both happy, they both sign an agreement.
I have no favorites.
I don't want to have any favorites.
I want to have a deal done.
I want to save their lives.
Now, with that being said, we're spending...
Hundreds of billions of dollars through Biden.
Biden should have never let that war happen.
We're spending hundreds of billions, maybe $350 billion we've given to Ukraine.
And we could use that money right here.
So I'd like to see that.
But most importantly right now is when I see the pictures, the satellite pictures of the battlefield, if I can stop that because of an ability I have to do things, I want to see if I can do that.
unidentified
Mr. President, on tariffs, you just mentioned that 25% could go up in cars in terms of Canada.
Does that mean that you're considering changes to the auto tariffs and auto parts?
No, we're not considering it now, but at some point it could go up.
Yeah, because, again, we don't really want Canada to make cars for us, to put it bluntly.
We want to make our own cars, and we're now equipped to do that.
They took a lot of our car business.
Mexico, too, took a lot of our car business.
We want to make the cars here.
I'm running this country.
I'm not running Canada.
And that's why I asked Trudeau, who I call Governor Trudeau, affectionately, but I asked him, why are we spending $200 billion to support Canada, to subsidize Canada?
And he was unable to answer the question.
I mean, why are we doing that?
I have to be honest.
As a state, it works great.
As a nation, considering the fact that most of the nation, you know, 95% of Canada, what they do is they buy from us.
And they sell to us.
They sell to us.
If we didn't buy their oil, if we didn't buy their...
And we don't need their oil.
They have more oil than anyone.
But we don't need their oil.
We don't need their lumber.
We don't need their cars.
We don't need anything.
So I said, why are we doing this?
Why are we spending $200 billion?
It doesn't make sense.
If we needed something, that would be a different subject.
That had to be over an hour, at least around an hour.
Now, he mentioned the Ukraine situation, and there is some developing news on that.
Trump released this statement early this morning.
Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky is boasting on the front page of the Wall Street Journal.
That Ukraine will not legally recognize the occupation of Crimea.
There's nothing to talk about here.
This statement is very harmful to the peace negotiations with Russia in that Crimea was lost years ago under the auspices of President Barack Hussein Obama and is not even a point of discussion.
Nobody is asking Zelensky to recognize Crimea as Russia territory, but if he wants Crimea, why didn't they fight for it 11 years ago when it was handed over to Russia without a shot being fired?
The area also houses, for many years before, the Obama handover major Russian submarine bases.
It's inflammatory statements like Zelensky's that makes it so difficult to settle this war.
He has nothing to boast about.
The situation for Ukraine is dire.
He can have peace or he can fight for another three years before losing the whole country.
I have nothing to do with Russia, but have much to do with wanting to save on average 5,000 Russian and Ukrainian soldiers a week.
Who are dying for no reason whatsoever.
The statement made by Zelensky today, we'll do nothing but prolong the killing field and nobody wants that.
We are very close to a deal, but the man with no cards to play should now finally get it done.
I look forward to being able to help Ukraine and Russia get out of this complete and total mess that would have never started if I were president.
Now you have to wonder what the hell Zelensky is thinking.
He's a desperate man.
Ukraine, as Trump says, is in a dire situation.
The death is overwhelming the country.
And I guess maybe Zelensky's looking at this so different and desperate.
He's saying, okay, well, let me make a play for Crimea, trying to pull some victory from the jaws of defeat here, and it's just not going to happen.
And now the exact opposite is going to end up happening because of it.
Who is advising Zelensky?
Who is running Zelensky?
Because none of this makes any sense.
It doesn't help Ukraine.
None of this has benefited Ukraine.
And every decision Zelensky is making is hurting Ukraine.
Is it the Ukrainian oligarchs?
Is it the CIA?
It's certainly not Zelensky himself, you wouldn't think.
Here's some of the other headlines.
Vance outlines U.S. plan for Ukraine that sharply favors Russia.
Now they'll use this to, you know, say Trump's, you know, Putin's puppet.
Zelensky defiant over Trump administration pressure for a quick peace deal.
Trump claims Zelensky is jeopardizing imminent Ukraine peace deal.
Trump peace plan requires Ukraine to accept Russia occupation, and so that is Crimea, and then parts of eastern Ukraine as well.
U.S. to recognize Crimea as Russian in future Ukraine peace deal.
Now, the only interest that the United States has in Ukraine at this point is the fact that we have sent all the military and financial aid somewhere around $300 billion, maybe more.
How do we get any return on that?
And so Crimea is a...
Area that has resources and rare earth materials.
And there's other areas of Ukraine that have the similar status as well.
And so that's how Trump is trying to get the return.
So at this point, it looks like they figured we might as well move the ball down the field on Russia's side of things because we can make a deal with Russia.
And The territory that Russia has taken, if we declare it Russia and we can cut a peace deal with Russia and start having good geopolitical relations with Russia, we can cut a deal with them for rare earth minerals and Ukraine will just be cut out of the picture and they'll lose a bunch of territory.
So it looks like that's the play from the Trump administration.
Whether they view it as a permanent situation or they're just doing this to try to move along the peace negotiations, maybe we'll find out.
But it looks like that's going to be the play.
They look at Zelensky now.
He's not willing to make a deal.
He's not budging an inch.
He's acting completely petulant.
So they're just saying, fine.
You've made your bed.
You're going to have to lie in it.
Ukraine is going to lose all of this land.
And then we're going to end up cutting deals with Russia.
That are going to benefit us, benefit them, and you'll get nothing.
And then you'll have to go back to the Ukrainian people and explain why half a million Ukrainians died for nothing.
So that's the bed you're going to lie in.
But I don't think Zelensky's going to budge, and I think that's clear.
And even when the White House kind of threw him a bone a couple weeks ago, and they were speaking positively, saying, hey, we're going to get a deal done, we're going to get the rare earths done.
Zelensky's going to save the country.
And they tried to throw him that bone, and it looks like that was all just giving him the opportunity to do the right thing for the peace deal, and then he never had any intentions of it anyway.
But I'd say that's where it's going.
And it is too bad for the people of Ukraine, but it's going to end up being better for the world.
It's going to be better for us.
They're not going to cut a deal with us, which is just disgusting.
After everything we gave to Ukraine, they're not going to cut a deal with us.
So fine.
Then we can have better relations with Russia, and that'll put NATO on its heels and shaking at the knees that, oh, maybe the U.S. won't fund us anymore.
That'll panic them.
So this is where those negotiations are moving.
Big developments in India.
There was a big terror attack there.
And now they've had some follow-up developments.
After Kashmir attack leaves 26 dead, it was a big tourist center.
India revokes key treaty, tells Pakistani nationals to leave.
India shuts border with Pakistan after Pahalagam attack.
So those tensions are raising there.
And they're telling all Pakistanis you have to get out.
And shutting the border.
So you can do things.
You can shut the border.
You can have the Alien Enemies Act.
The New York Times today is claiming that Mexico is becoming a beacon for Americans to go who are seeking relief from U.S. politics and culture.
There is an element of truth to that.
You kind of hear jokes sometimes like...
Mexico City is now wider than Texas.
I don't know if that's statistically true.
I think it's more of a cultural thing.
Mexico obviously has its political problems, but I think its culture is a little more conservative.
I mean, aside from, I mean, I guess living in some parts of Mexico, you live in some parts of America, you're kind of taking the same risks.
But I think it's just more of a...
Cultural relief thing.
I think people are just trying to get out of the political culture, the radical left culture that's engulfing everything here.
And Mexico just kind of seems to be an escape from it.
You know, I've got this big stack of AI news I've been meaning to cover all week.
It's not going anywhere.
And Trump went long today at the Oval Office as we're up against the final break of the show.
So I'm probably going to come back and hit these video clips.
Because like I said, the AI news isn't going anywhere, and it's more of just a general discussion with some of the developments, how AI is about to be implemented into different government systems.
And is anybody really taking the proper measurements to kind of keep the risk low?
Or is it just...
AI light speed development first one to the egg wins, and we're not even thinking about the risks that come along with it.
But we'll come back and hit the rest of the news for today on the other side.
All right, final segment here.
Ladies and gentlemen, please continue to support us by shopping at thealexjonesstore.com.
We really appreciate that support.
We really appreciate our VIP members at thealexjonesstore.com.
Go there to find out all the benefits of becoming a member that include, but not limited to, monthly membership credits, bonus entries into our giveaways, and so much more.
And we really appreciate those VIP members.
That sustained membership helps budget us into the future.
So yes, when you shop at thealexjonesstore.com and you're a VIP member, you get bonus entries into our giveaways, which include right now the one of one, the one and only.
There's only one that exists.
That is the Alex Jones Cybertruck.
That's right.
There's only one of them.
It can be yours.
When you shop at thealexjonesstore.com and get those bonus entries.
So when you get the Sheila Jeet gummies or the CMOS gummies that are so great, I'm pretty proud.
You know, we talked about discipline earlier with Trump.
I've been pretty good, guys.
I have not destroyed this bottle of CMOS gummies sitting on my desk right here.
I've been pretty good, actually.
A couple days I reached in there and grabbed a handful.
It's true.
I can't deny it.
The taste is so great.
But you've got to be careful.
The taste is almost too good, actually.
But when you get that at thealexjonesstore.com, multiple entries to win the one-of-one Alex Jones Cybertruck.
Don't forget about all the apparel as well, the hats, the t-shirts, the hoodies.
Everything else at thealexjonesstore.com, and everything you purchase there qualifies you with multiple entries for the Cybertruck.
All right.
By the way, one of the most corrupt senators from the state of Illinois, Dick Durbin, has announced he will not be running for re-election.
Does that leave a seat open, potentially losing the power of the incumbent?
Well, it's probably unlikely, but, you know, it does increase the odds for Republicans to pick up a seat there.
This is actually, there's, oh my gosh, this is actually really embarrassing.
You have to understand, a lot of them just sue Donald Trump just to say they sued Donald Trump.
It's like a little, it's like giving themselves a medal.
Like, ooh, I sued Donald Trump.
But how ironic is it?
He's now taking action against Pam Bondi.
Is it fair to say now that the Democrats have launched more legal action against Pam Bondi than she has enacted against them?
That's fair to say, right?
That's pretty stunning.
That's a development right there.
So Pam Bondi, who can't seem to do anything about deep state arrests and Democrat terrorists at the top level, and now she's getting sued.
Now she's getting sick.
So I would say, Pam Bondi, take note.
You know?
Take note.
Do as the Democrats do.
Something. All right, continue.
unidentified
Department of Justice, here is the opening line of our lawsuit.
Minnesota brings this lawsuit to stop President Trump and his administration from bullying vulnerable children in this state.
Bullying? How did we get here?
You might wonder.
In January and February, President Trump issued a series of executive orders targeting transgender people.
One in particular banned transgender girls and women for participating on sports teams with other girls and women.
On February 20th, I issued a formal legal opinion saying that the executive order does not override Minnesota's protections against discrimination.
In fact, complying with the sports executive order from the president would violate Minnesota Human Rights Act.
That opinion is legally binding in Minnesota unless a court of law says otherwise.
On February 25th of this year, our office got this letter from the Department of Justice stating that it would sue us if we didn't comply with the executive order.
We've got another letter right here, April 8th, dated April 8th.
And on that, in this April 8th letter and in an April 16th press conference, the Department of Justice threatened to withhold funds from Minnesota and, quote, seek judicial resolution, unquote.
I'm not going to sit around waiting for the Trump administration to sue Minnesota.
Today, Minnesota is suing him.
And his administration because we will not participate in this shameful bullying.
Thank you so much for standing against bullying so that boys don't go beat up girls competing in sports.
Thank you, Keith.
You absolute piece of trash.
Such a noble stand these Democrats are taking.
So now what you're going to see is you're going to have Minnesota and Maine.
Maybe these two things get lumped together.
But you're going to have Minnesota and Maine.
I bet you other Democrat states follow.
Yeah. I'd say that's a safe bet.
You'll probably have a handful of them.
It'll probably all end up at the Supreme Court.
You know, maybe they'll look at a Tenth Amendment issue.
I don't know.
But that's just ridiculous.
This is not even a constitutional thing.
You're just denying the fact that there are two genders.
And look, there's really nowhere else to logically go anymore discussing this subject material.
Who was it the other day?
Somebody the other day talking about trans kids' rights.
It's like they just want an excuse to abuse kids.
I don't know how else to...
I don't know where this ends other than that.
Do you think these people really give a damn about children's sporting events?
I mean, come on, folks.
Come on.
This is all about propping up the legitimacy of the LGBTQ youth so that they can abuse kids.
There's no other rationale where you can make sense of this.
This is indefensible that men should be competing with girls.
Like, what?
Why do you have a woman's professional soccer league and a man's professional soccer league?
Why do you have a woman's professional basketball league and a man's professional basketball league?
Everybody knows the answer to that.
So they just use this thing like, oh, it's totally normal.
Yeah! I can go chop up a man and he's a woman.
He can compete with girls now.
Please. You don't actually believe that.
No. Because at the end of the day, that's just part of the whole charade so that they can get into the classroom, like is that the Supreme Court right now, so they can get into the classroom and tell five-year-olds about all their sexual perversions.
So they can get them to the doctor's office and mangle them and chop them up.
That's all this is.
I will not be convinced of anything else.
It doesn't make any sense.
It's against all common sense, all logic, all reasoning, basic science.
The Democrats, for whatever reason, you can ask them, just want an excuse to abuse children.
That's all it is.
Even California is abiding by the executive order.
Well, let's see how long that lasts.
I can't...
Is there any other logic here?
The Democrats just want an excuse to abuse kids.
So they have to go all in.
So they have to pretend like, oh, it's totally normal for boys and girls to be competing.
Like, oh, that's not really their issue.
They don't care about that.
They want the sexual indoctrination.
They want the access to the children sexually.
That's what it's really all about.
Everything else is just kind of like...
Window dressing to make it appear like they really care.
No, folks.
These Democrats just want the excuse to abuse children.
It's outrageous.
We have rockets that can land themselves and you have Democrats that are claiming men are women.
Boy, is that the paradox.
It's like we have the most, as far as we know, as far as we're told, we have the most advanced civilization technologically in the history of the world.
Now you can debate that, but for the sake of this conversation, we're living in the most advanced technological civilization ever, but we also don't even know what a woman is.
You know who is repairing and rebuilding more than the government?
The Amish from Pennsylvania.
unidentified
Listen to this incredible report in clip 11. We work mostly in Chimney Rock, some down in Batcave.
These volunteers are members of the Great Needs Trust, an Amish community in Pennsylvania, offering not just their skilled hands and their time, but their compassion as well.
We wanted to help the people that had the disaster.
Yeah, our heart just felt drawn to come help.
Since the storm, more than 2,000 volunteers have stepped in to help rebuild, and donations have poured in.
Kindness from strangers, helping their neighbors.
All of the building material that's going into rebuilding these stores has been donated up to this point.
And it's just been a tremendous recovery story that is ongoing.
They are not just fixing buildings in Chimney Rock.
They are rebuilding a sense of community.
One nail at a time.
It's just inspiring to me to see how people can pull together.
And work together and get something done.
It just fills my heart with joy just watching people just get their life back again.
There's still plenty of work ahead.
But for Chimney Rock, recovery is clearly in motion.
And now these volunteers from hundreds of miles away have become part of this mountain town's future.
Man at Kansas City YMCA enters the women's locker room.
That was just the beginning.
unidentified
Listen to what happens next, clip 13. It was less than 10 days ago when a Metro mother and her daughter had finished up swimming lessons where she says hundreds of children attended.
They went to the women's locker room to change.
That's when she says she heard a man's voice.
She then decided to leave.
But as she and her child walked out of the stall, they encountered a naked man, his privates on full display.
She asked what in the world he was doing.
The woman claims he said something to the effect of, quote, honey, I'm a woman.
She and her child then sprinted out of the locker room.
That woman spoke to Fox 4 on Monday, and she says they were not the only ones who saw.
My 11-year-old does use that locker room, especially after we go to the pool.
And in there, you either have the closed-down showers or you kind of try to change as quickly as possible.
So it's definitely shocking and something that we'll be looking out for a little bit more.
The YMCA tells Fox 4 it's investigating the matter, saying in part, we follow all state and local laws and individuals are allowed to use the locker room or restroom that they identify with.
At the North Kansas City YMCA, we also have four private universal changing rooms available, separate from the larger shared locker rooms, for anyone who prefers the privacy they offer.
The police department says they are investigating a report of indecent exposure that occurred on April 12, 2025 at the YMCA located in North Kansas City.
The Democrats know exactly what they're doing, folks.
They know they're opening this door for perverts and pedophiles to get access to children.
Of course that's what it is.
They don't give a damn about this sports stuff.
You could even argue it's...
I don't even care.
Argue it's even inconsequential, other than just a ridiculous concept.
Now we're talking about outright child abuse, and they have the cover of LGBTQ plus rights.
And we're so insane here, a man walks into the women's locker room, exposes himself in front of women, And we can't even arrest him because of the potential implications of LGBTQ plus discrimination.
Unbelievable. This can't go on.
So the Trump administration tries to stop it and the Democrats sue him.
You know, the Democrats are about the party of the 1% now.
But really, you want the pedophile vote?
Is that what you're doing here?
You want the child abuser vote?
Is that where you're leaning?
Just scraping and clawing for any vote you can?
It's like, hey, you know, there's pedophiles out there that vote too, so we should think about them.
There's child abusers that vote too, and they might want to go into the women's locker room and, you know, flash their genitalia in front of little children.
They vote too.
Is that what they're thinking?
What are they thinking with this crap?
Certainly they don't believe it.
No. Nobody can believe that.
Alright, then this happened at Yale.
This is Nathaniel Crispy, and this is how you handle it.
So now you've got the Palestinian leftists at it again.
Blocking a Jewish student's access to a school building.
This is how it's done.
This is perfectly executed.
You make these idiots look like the fools that they are trying to block you entry.
This is how you win the debate.
Cracking down on speech and treating these people like terrorists is how you lose the debate that should be easily winnable.
That's how you lose the winnable debate.
This is how you win the debate.
Oh, you're going to block him?
So look how Nathaniel Crispy handles this so perfectly as they try to block him access in clip 12. So he's just standing there saying,
hi, can I get through, please?
And they just sit there, lock arms, and parrot talking points like zombies.
So, the Department of Justice and the Trump administration has gone way overboard on how they're handling these protests, and it's gone so overboard now that even people like myself that would fully say that Nathaniel Crispy is handling this perfectly,
as he is, and now campus police should get involved and arrest every single person that's blocking him.
But see, they've gone so overboard now with treating them and calling them terrorists and having huge Department of Justice operations on these campuses that now it's like you've gone so authoritarian with it.
How do you find the balance now that you've gone so heavy-handed?
That's the situation where you move right there.
Making a federal case out of it is the wrong choice.
They occupy a building.
You go in and arrest all their asses.
They can spend a night in a jail cell and rethink their lives.
You're standing blocking a student's access to a school building.
He's a student at the school.
Yeah, that's illegal.
That's crime.
Go spend a night in jail and rethink your life.
That's how it should be handled.
Not this proactive thing where it's like, oh, anybody that protests Israel is a terrorist and so we need to treat them as such.
No. When they commit the crime, you arrest them.
But now the whole thing is so out of touch with how it should be handled, it's impossible to even bring it back to reality.
But good for him.
That's how you do it.
That's how you do it.
Oh, a bunch of people are out here blocking access.
I'm going to go out there.
And of course, this guy happens to be Jewish, if you're just listening.
So he's got his yarmulke on.
He looks like an Orthodox Jew.
So he just sits there nicely and just says, Hi, I'm a student.
Can I please get through?
And they reject him and reject him and reject him.
So now if I were him, I would press charges too.
I'd press charges.
Now, they might not do anything.
By the way, they used to do this to us.
We would go out to some of these events at a public park and they would do the exact same thing to us and they'd lock arms.
And so you just stand there, you make them look like the asses that they are, you expose them as the ass clowns that they are, and then you go about your business and you tell law enforcement to do their job.
You know, of course, if he tried to physically break through their arms that he'd probably be the bad guy there, even though he'd be well within his right to do so.
So I'd like to see more of that.
We don't need the federal government making a federal case out of this.
This guy handles it perfectly.
And then that's when campus police should move in and disperse or take some people to jail and say, you know what?
Why don't you just spend a night in jail and rethink some things here?
That's how to handle these goofball college students.
Not a federal case.
Because that just makes the whole thing worse.
All right.
We got to a lot of the news.
We had to miss some of it because Trump went long from the Oval Office.
But... We'll do it all again tomorrow.
21-hour break.
Remember, continue to support us at thealexjonesstore.com so that we can be back here and do it all again in 21 hours.
You've famously seen us take it out to the Tesla protest, really drive the Soros anti-American communists completely insane.
You've got to go read the specs on this baby, the armored windshield, the front wheel, rear wheel driving.
I mean, it's a big vehicle, but it drives like a race car.
It can beat a lot of race cars from zero to 60 in just four seconds.
Again, the turning ratio of this thing, the smoothness of it, and just the overall coolness of it is amazing.
And you've got the globalists trying to bankrupt Tesla, trying to bankrupt the U.S. stock markets of Trump's tariffs, trying to drive Elon into quitting, which he's not doing.
This is an economic war.
So when you back what we're doing, you back Trump, you back Elon, you back your own future.
So it is a win-win.
The most incredible supplements, like the very strongest, best pharmaceutical grade, ultra-methylene
And I love meeting each month.
We're now doing these super off-road vehicle giveaways once a month.
I love meeting just the randomness of our listeners and viewers because everybody has been so cool.
So I look forward to having the next winner in studio if you want.
The last three have all wanted to come to the studio.
So you will be the next winner as well.
And I hope to be talking to you very, very soon.
But regardless, thanks for keeping us in the fight against the globalists.
You are funding the second American Revolution worldwide.
Quite frankly, I didn't develop Optimal Human when Bigly came on as a big sponsor.
And I told them the supplements I wanted from the companies I wanted.
They went out and did what I wanted.
People love them and they're incredible.
The turmeric, the Shilogy, the Irish Seamoss, all of it.
But they'd had this out for years and I thought, my green caps are great and this other company I use is great because your green superfoods are amazing.
And then I finally took it, and Harrison Smith took it, and I was like, my God.
And by then, we've been selling it four or five months, and it was already a top seller.
The problem is there's so many ingredients, and it's so hard to source, and it's so clean, high standards, that it's sold out most of the time.
We finally got a decent shipment of it in, but we never offered it for subscription.
Because we just couldn't keep it.
When you subscribe at TheAlexShowStore.com and then they keep it back for you so it never sells out.
So go to TheAlexShowStore.com and get your Optimal Human and so many other incredible products today.