Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy unveil DOGE, a plan to slash Washington’s waste—$1.7T in bloated spending, including Pentagon inefficiencies and Biden’s $60B Ukraine aid while denying FEMA’s $200 window repair. Owen Shroyer mocks liberal hypocrisy on pardons, "trans kids" studies, and media reactions to the UnitedHealthcare CEO shooting, while Jesse Lee Peterson warns of California/NY’s open-border policies fueling suburban chaos. Alex Jones pivots to Infowars’ legal battles, urging $30/month VIP memberships to fund anti-"globalist" operations. The episode ties bureaucratic excess and cultural shifts to a broader collapse narrative, demanding radical reform or escape. [Automatically generated summary]
Nobody has been able to identify the source of the Bitcoin algorithm.
It was originally published in a white paper on Halloween of 2008. Just as the economy was crashing, Bitcoin was put into practice by its own users who proceeded to get insanely rich and spread the word of cryptocurrency.
But the true origin of cryptocurrency can be found in the early days of Silicon Valley, with the CIA, Mossad, and their pedophile blackmail operations, managing the operation from the start.
In 1997, the NSA published How to Make a Mint, The Cryptography of Anonymous Electronic Cash.
Ripple was formed in 2004 by a member of the INSA and a descendant of one of the most powerful banking families of Europe.
Four years later, in 2008, the banks crash and the Bitcoin white paper is introduced to the public.
Four years after that, in 2012, Ripple XRP is released to the public, and today it is being considered for its new stablecoin.
Stablecoins, such as Ripple's RLUSD, are digital versions of fiat currencies.
While Bitcoin may arguably be a decentralized currency, stablecoins can be programmed and tracked as easy as any CBDC can.
It's the same thing, just a different name.
And it appears as if this is the direction the Trump administration will be going.
Preparations for a cashless society go back for well over a century.
It was once considered to be the biggest threat in America.
But now, people will be happy enough to just get the men out of the girls' bathroom.
Based on the team surrounding Trump 47 so far, it is clear that nobody in power is resisting the AI world being built around us.
Peter Thiel, who is clearly a proxy of the CIA, has not only pioneered digital money, he is the front man for Palantir, which was funded by the CIA. Palantir is a technology that is now being used in predicting who will commit a crime.
It has access to everyone's private devices and is used by both military and police.
unidentified
Next, our commander wants to disrupt enemy communications.
This will allow ground forces to more safely maneuver and help ensure that enemy equipment stays in position.
AIP automatically identifies and pairs all of the validated enemy communication nodes with a disruption capability.
Assign jammers to each of the validated high priority communications targets.
An electronic warfare specialist initiates the jamming operation.
Initiate jamming operation.
AIP confirms the jamming order has been initiated.
With enemy communication disrupted, our ground forces are cleared to move into position and destroy the enemy equipment.
It has also been revealed recently that data harvested from the game Pokemon has been used to train artificial intelligence to achieve spatial intelligence.
unidentified
You can sneak around them or you can get them really close.
Getting closer makes it a bit easier to get those great or excellent throws with your Pokeball, but if you move too fast, the Pokemon are going to get scared and they're going to bolt off.
If you can get close enough without spooking them, expert handler mode kicks in, giving you a small catch rate bonus along with some extra XP and Stardust at the end.
You had Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy in D.C. today having meetings.
With congressmen and women about Doge, they are getting support from people on both sides of the aisle.
We'll give you an update on that.
And it's pretty clear that there has already been a lot of groundwork done as far as where all the waste in government is, the wasteful spending, things that need to be cut, things that need to be done, basically day one.
These are things that shouldn't even be up for debate, quite frankly, what they are revealing.
Aside from just the agenda on government waste, which we have plenty of examples of here, I think the attitude needs to just not be about waste.
It needs to be about just the size, the scope, and how out of control the federal government is.
It's too big.
It's too powerful.
It runs too much interference in the transactions of Americans' lives.
The private sector...
And that really should be the approach beyond just all of the waste.
You'll cut the waste and cut into the waste naturally just by approaching it like that.
So we will tell you about what's going on as far as those Doge meetings and then what people are saying on both sides of the aisle after the meetings today.
You had a Secret Service hearing with Ron Rowe, who's now the acting director of Secret Service, and things got spicy.
To say the least.
And as the next continued resolution is about to be voted on, it looks like Thomas Massey was correct all along and that Johnson was just delaying and he was going to get all the spending that they wanted anyway.
And then they would use the backdrop of Christmas to get it done.
So we've got that going on.
The drama around Pete Hegseth And you're hearing conflicting reports.
Some are saying Hegseth has the votes.
Others are saying he doesn't have the votes.
Some have gone public that they are not in support of Hegseth, but he's going to take it all the way.
And I think that that's a good thing, whether he gets confirmed or not, just to go through that process.
But it's almost just become this humiliation ritual where they just sit you up there and try to embarrass you if you're not part of the club like they do to Brett Kavanaugh.
And they just try to embarrass you so that they can just weed people out before the process even starts like Matt Gaetz.
But Egzeth says he's going to go through with it and I'm sure things will get nasty.
But just today, Senator Mike Lee said, no, Hegseth will be confirmed.
He will have the votes, even though Joni Ernst is saying she is not so sure.
So we got that.
But what about Joe Biden?
What is Joe Biden up to?
Well, he's running around Africa, giving them billions of dollars so that they can build a military base over there.
But he's announcing all this great work, all this money that he's given to Africa.
What is he doing for North Carolina?
What is he doing for North Carolina?
Well, we'll tell you.
And then another interesting ripple in the shooting of the healthcare CEO, United Healthcare CEO, in the streets of New York.
Some other interesting things developing there.
And our guests yesterday, and what they were analyzing as far as the shooter is concerned, has now been confirmed by local law enforcement that yes, this was not a professional, but maybe what they're calling an amateur professional, meaning somebody might have paid him, but he was not well trained, and that is clear.
This is my greatest hope in the next administration is that we can cut this government down to size.
It needs to be cut in at least half.
These federal bureaucracies that are out of control need to be brought to heel.
We need the government out of our lives.
And yeah, getting rid of waste is one thing, but getting rid of corruption and overreach is the more important thing.
So Musk and Ramaswamy, we're on Capitol Hill today.
Elon Musk brings Trump's government efficiency push to Capitol Hill, and they have to win Congress over.
They have to get the support of Congress to initiate a lot of this stuff, otherwise they won't be able to get it done.
Musk and Ramoswamy visit Capitol Hill to discuss Trump's Doge vision for cutting government waste.
Top Doge Elon Musk House Speaker balk at Senate report showing only 6% of federal workers show up in person on full-time basis.
How is that even possible?
6%.
Of federal workers show up in person on a full-time basis.
So what are they doing exactly?
Well, Musk says it's actually even worse.
And you see, this is the proof that they've already done a lot of this research.
And they're behind the scenes crunching a lot of this information and a lot of these numbers.
We're not even in the next administration yet, and they already have a lot of this stuff.
Imagine when they really get into the weeds of it.
Imagine when they're hanging out in D.C. every day.
So 6% of federal workers show up in person on a full-time basis.
Musk says, in the deeper research, if you exclude security guards and maintenance personnel, so, you know, maids, janitors, whatever, the number of government workers who show up in person and do 40 hours of work a week is closer to 1%.
One percent!
One percent of government workers show up for work and do 40 hours in the office.
Musk and Ramaswamy adding federal remote work policies to help slash two trillion dollars from the budget.
They're ready to just cut all these jobs immediately.
And I don't know too much about all of Musk's different companies.
I know some people that work for SpaceX.
I mean, he is here in Texas.
They are here in Austin.
I have neighbors that work at Tesla.
You work in the office.
Everybody works in the office.
I don't know much about X. I do know somebody that works at SpaceX.
Same deal.
They go to the office.
I'm sure that's how Ramaswamy has run his businesses in the past.
So they're just seeing this and they're just saying, why don't you show up for work?
And it really is the office space moment.
What is it that you say you do here?
So they're just looking at this and they're just saying, if you don't show up for work, you don't have a job.
You're done.
But think about how crazy it is.
We've already seen the...
They're finding out what kind of marine life gets drunk off tequila or gin.
They're testing shrimp on treadmills.
I mean, all these ridiculous experiments and nonsense that they spend millions of dollars on.
Cut it out immediately.
They're going to find so much waste, it's going to be unbelievable.
And then you're going to have this federal workforce that doesn't even work, doesn't even show up.
They're going to be fired.
But that's just the beginning.
Gutting these corrupt federal bureaucracies like the FBI and the CIA, that's going to be even more important.
So maybe if you just look at it from a waste standpoint, if that's how you get it done, whatever.
The IRS, just abolish it altogether.
Doge big ideas include ending remote work and daylight savings changes.
Let's be very careful.
You know, I've been a big advocate against the changing of the clocks, but we better make sure we get this right.
I don't want to get tricked on this daylight saving things.
I just don't want the sun to ever set...
Before 7 p.m.
So if we have to move the clocks to accommodate that, then that's fine.
But I like it in the summer when the sun's up until almost 9. I don't want to have this weird deal where they keep us in whatever thing we're in now where the sun's setting at 5 o'clock.
But they're going to talk about that.
Now, he's getting support.
Musk, well, and Ramaswamy, I should say.
Doge is getting support on both sides of the aisle today.
And Democrat Representative Ro Khanna is one of them.
He's one of the—if there are any good Democrats out there that are still Democrats, he's probably maybe the only one of them, a small handful that are still Democrats.
Ro Khanna made this statement.
He says, I'm ready to work with Doge, Elon Musk, and Vivek Ramaswamy to slash waste— I have a track record of doing so.
I led the charge to get TransDigem to refund $16 million after investigative reporting exposed price gouging.
Let's look at the Truman Committee and ensure Americans get their money's worth with the DOD spending.
How Representative Ro Khanna got a price gouging defense contractor to return $16 million to the Pentagon.
Oh, defense contractors.
Yeah, you want to stop spending...
The military-industrial complex is a great place to start.
And no-bid contracts, another great place to start.
All these green energy deals that are nothing but a scam that get the friends and family members of politicians rich in these companies.
There's another great place to start.
Here's what Ro Khanna said today.
Talking about wasteful spending in clip two.
unidentified
There's others who say, hey, this is showing us that we have to live a little differently.
We have to make sure we reach out across the aisle.
I know you've been in touch with Elon Musk, who obviously has been very involved in the Trump administration on this.
What's the outreach?
What's the message that you get back and forth when you're in touch with Elon?
Well, I try to call balls and strikes based on what I believe.
So when I talk to Elon Musk, if he's for looking at the defense budget and looking at the five primes who've had a monopoly on the defense budget and wants to make cuts there, then I'm going to say let's work together on that.
It's hypocritical for progressive Democrats who've been calling for defense cuts and holding defense contractors accountable to suddenly say, no, we don't want to do it because Elon Musk wants to do it.
On the other hand, Elon Musk and I have a disagreement on the CFPB, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and I have let him know that I think that's an agency that's saving Americans money and helping Americans not get credit card fees.
So, you know, you have to engage, in my view, in a rational conversation.
Tell people where they agree, where you agree and work together, and where you disagree, make the case why you disagree.
Boy, Democrats engaging in a rational conversation, that's a rarity.
Ro Khanna gives us hope.
And here's another one.
Democrat Representative Jared Moskowitz saying very similar things here in Clip 3. Look, I think the time for staying in safe spaces is over.
unidentified
We should be able to go in spaces and have that conversation.
I joined with a specific focus, because I've been working on it for years, trying to get FEMA out of the Department of Homeland Security.
I think the Department of Homeland Security was a great idea.
I think it's still necessary.
But I think over the last 20 years, it's become too big.
And so I think FEMA needs to be a direct report to the White House like it was when it was originally created.
I think there's evidence that Secret Service probably should come out of DHS and also be a direct report to the White House.
So that's where these conversations are going to have, and so I'm willing to go there and have it.
I'm sure there's going to be things that Elon and Vivek are going to come up with That I'm vehemently going to disagree on, and I will make sure that I'm a loud voice voting against that stuff.
But we got to go to where the conversations are happening.
The idea that we're not going to go to these places and just pretend the conversations aren't happening is not a way to conduct business here.
Well, we've got more on wasteful spending, and we've got more from Ro Khanna coming up as well.
But, you know, he mentions the Secret Service there, and Moskowitz was on one of the committees investigating the Secret Service, and he was one of the few people asking legitimate questions.
There was another hearing today at the Senate level into the Secret Service.
Ron Rowe was testifying.
And there wasn't much there.
There's still not much coming out.
These FOIA requests are getting little to nothing.
In fact, we successfully, myself and my attorney, successfully were able to get communications logs and documents in a FOIA request, and it's just all redacted.
And I really haven't even bothered dealing with it because it's just redacted.
And so that's the story.
We were finally able to get the communications logs and it's just everything's redacted.
So make of that what you will.
But there was one moment here that I think really exposed Ron Rowe.
And I want to tell you what kind of led to this.
But it was Pat Fallon in his time...
Secret Service Director Ron Rowe loses his cool, and this was the only thing that really made its way out of the hearing today that had any relevance.
And so, listen to Ron Rowe lose it when he's being questioned about his role and what he was doing on September 11th in Clip 6. Yes, sir, I do.
unidentified
Is that the remembrance of September 11th?
It was.
Was it in New York?
It was at ground zero.
Okay.
Who's usually at an event like this closest to the president of the United States?
Security wise?
The sack of the detail.
Special agent in charge of the detail.
Were you the special agent in charge of the detail that day?
Actually, let me address this.
Could you please, staff, leave that one up with a circle around me.
Thank you.
So actually, Congressman, what you're not seeing is the sack of the detail out of the picture's view.
And that is the day where we remember the more than 3,000 people that have died on 9-11.
I actually responded to Ground Zero.
I was there going through the ashes of the Royal Trade Center.
I was there at Fresh Kills.
I'm not asking you that.
I'm asking you!
I was there to show respect for a secret service member that died on 9-11.
Do not invoke 9-11 for political purposes.
Oh, I'm not.
I'm invoking this war.
You are, sir.
And you are out of line.
I would like to ask him a question.
You are out of line.
Don't try to bully me.
I am an elected member of Congress and I'm asking you a serious question and you are playing politics.
I am a public servant who has served this nation and spent time on our country's darkest day.
I'm asking you serious questions for the American people and they're very simple, they're not true questions.
Were you the special agent in charge that day?
No, I wasn't.
I was there representing the United States Secret Service, sir.
Mr. Ballin, your time's expired.
It did not affect protective options.
I know why you were there.
Because you wanted to be visible because you weren't listening for this job.
I was there to pay respect for a foreign member of this agency.
You are out of line, Congressman.
Vice President Harris' life because you put those agents out of position.
And that was at the House of Representatives, not the Senate.
But if you go back in a moment there, and you'll see Barely anybody even showed up to the hearing, folks.
Barely anybody was even there.
And that's what's so interesting to me about this.
Because I was talking to my lawyer last night just about some other things.
You know, the IRS coming after me and everything else.
And we were like, you know, do we want to push on with these FOIA requests?
Do we want to do anything with these documents that are redacted?
It's like, well, where's the will of Congress?
Where's the will of even the president-elect?
It's like, Two assassination attempts on the president, and it's like, it's barely even a blip on the radar anymore.
But that's just an aside.
So what really happened here?
Why was Representative Pat Fallon engaged in this line of questioning and have that image?
Well, there are whistleblowers that are speaking to these members of Congress.
And I would guess Pat Fallon.
And they told him, or somehow through the grapevine, said, you need to look at this detail on September 11th and find out what Ron Rowe was doing there.
And so somebody believes it was a publicity stunt, likely inside of Secret Service.
They gave this intel or opinion to Pat Fallon, and they said, here it is.
He was out of position.
He was trying to do a publicity stunt.
You should question him on this.
And then, of course, Ron Rowe goes completely ballistic, likely because Fallon hit a pressure point and because there was probably already internal pressure inside of Secret Service about that day.
And they're basically claiming that he was out of line.
He was out of position.
He was trying for a photo op.
He wasn't taking care of his duties that day.
Instead, trying to make a photo op.
And the reason he probably went ballistic is because there were already internal grumblings about that.
And he'd been sick and tired of it.
And once Fallon brought it up, he had a sensitive spot.
And so Ron Rowe blows up.
But then for Ron Rowe to say, oh, you're out of line.
No, this is Congress's job.
This is actually their job, is oversight here.
Now, Ron Rowe seems to be getting most of the fingers pointed at him as far as Let's say negligence, dereliction of duty, failing on the job, whatever.
Along with Kim Cheadle, who's now gone.
You know, Ron Rowe was having fingers pointed at him as well.
And I think this comes internally from Secret Service.
They're using the House of Representatives as their voice box.
They're using other former Secret Service agents that are going on Fox News saying similar things.
Dan Bongino saying similar things on his show.
They don't seem to like Ron Rowe.
Kim Cheadle already stepped down and kind of was the fall gal for this, but maybe Ron Rowe is up next.
And I don't think Ron Rowe is going to make it through the next administration.
So why, if Ron Rowe can't even maintain his calm in a hearing like this, then he certainly shouldn't be leading secret service if he can't even keep his cool during a hearing.
So there's something deeply disturbing about that.
Speaking of Ro Khanna, a Democrat that's willing to talk and has some common sense, here he is talking about one of the dirtiest things in politics and that's special interest money and PAC money in clip one.
The reality is that in 2024, 150 billionaires spent 1.9 billion dollars on this election.
72% of Americans, Republicans, independents, and Democrats are outraged with money in politics.
We did not fight a revolution to be spectators in a game of billionaires putting ads on our television sets and on our mobile phones.
We have more dignity, we have more power as American citizens.
Our founders would be rolling over in their graves if they saw what has become of modern American democracy.
$2.7 billion of super PAC spending.
And let me tell you something, only 1%, only 1% of Americans gave more than $200.
Who has more than $200 to give to politicians?
The money has become more important than votes.
Surely we could agree in this body to ban super PACs and overturn Citizens United.
Short of that, surely we could agree what Maine did overwhelmingly to restrict contributions to super PACs.
Why should it be that a politician can only receive a contribution up to $3,300, but somehow super PACs should be allowed to get millions of dollars?
We need to make sure, like Maine in every state, that at the very least super PACs are restricted so billionaires aren't buying our elections.
I founded the no PAC caucus in the United States Congress.
We need to end PAC money, lobbyist money, that is corrupting the soul of our democracy.
We may not agree on every issue, but when you look at why politicians sold our jobs overseas, why Wall Street raided our manufacturers and hollowed out industry after industry to worship shareholder profits, Then you have to look at the influence billionaires have had on our democracy.
Let's return power to our citizens.
Let's ban super PACs.
Let's at least regulate billionaires from contributing to super PACs.
Let's ban members from accepting PAC and lobbyist money.
At least the premise here, I don't think anybody could disagree with.
The only persons that wouldn't like the final result, I suppose, would be the D.C. swamp and its owners.
But why are elections worth billions of dollars?
Why...
Whether it's super PACs, billionaires, special interest groups, whatever.
Why are they willing to spend so much money on elections?
Well, because that's how much power results from the elections.
And that is the inherent problem here.
And that's because our government has gotten so out of control and so big, so involved in our lives, every transaction you make...
That yes, every election now means power for whoever wins.
And then for whoever wins, the people that own those candidates dictate policy and dictate what happens next.
And so that's the inherent problem here.
You shouldn't have a situation...
Where our lives really change that much or the flow of money or regulations really change that much based off an election.
But it does now and that's why people spend billions of dollars every election cycle.
So yeah, just getting rid of these spendings from super PACs and foreign lobbyists and special interest groups is one way to do it.
But really, the proper way to do it is to get rid of this government as it stands.
Get rid of the federal government.
Get rid of all the regulations.
Get rid of all the taxes.
Get rid of all the means and mechanisms that the government has to control your life that gives these people that buy our elections those powers.
Not enough people sound like Ro Khanna.
Not enough people.
Now, quickly on the Ukraine situation, because Mike Johnson was commenting on this today.
By the way, Antony Blinken is a real piece of garbage.
This is human trash.
Antony Blinken is a piece of you-know-what.
Blinken says Ukraine needs to get younger people fighting Russia.
They've already lost hundreds of thousands.
They've already lost young men, old men.
They've gotten so desperate that they're pulling old men out of their homes, dragging them into the battlefields.
Most of the rich that aren't in Kiev have fled the country because they don't want to get scooped up.
I mean, it's a disaster.
Ukraine is losing land.
They're losing men.
They're losing the war.
And the swamp is winning.
And they're just laundering money.
And instead of coming to the negotiation table or trying to find peace or backing NATO off, Blinken says, no, Ukraine needs to send more young men to die.
That man is a disgusting piece of human excrement.
That is absolute filth.
And the people of Ukraine, the men and women of Ukraine, should be disgusted that an absolute warmongering pig like Antony Blinken would say, go send more young men to fight and die in our wars.
They are the lowest among the human life form are people like Antony Blinken telling Ukraine to send young men to die fighting Russia because of their little geopolitical spat, their little money laundering operation, their little human trafficking operations, bio labs, weapons laundering.
And that soulless piece of crap says go send young men to die.
Excuse me.
Here's Mike Johnson, if you believe him, saying no more money from, no more money for Ukraine under Biden, clip four.
I think, as we predicted, and as I said to all of you weeks before the election, if Donald Trump is elected, it will change the dynamic of the Russia war on Ukraine.
And we're seeing that happen.
So it is not the place of Joe Biden to make that decision now.
We have a newly elected president and we're going to wait and take the new commander in chief's direction on all of that.
Well, that's too bad because Biden has already pledged billions more to Ukraine and there was not a congressional vote and there was not A package in the continued resolution.
And I guarantee you, if there was, Mike Johnson would still vote for it, just like he did last time.
Just like he did last time.
Oh, but he's going to tough guy now.
After sending hundreds of billions of dollars to Ukraine.
After the pork barrel spending they get into these continued resolutions that Mike Johnson has supported.
And now we got another one coming up.
Oh yeah, I'm sure he'll tough guy now.
I'm sure he'll stop it now.
Oh, the dynamic has changed.
Not really.
No, the dynamic hasn't changed.
Maybe out of the White House leadership, it will change, but not amongst the American people.
We never wanted to fund this garbage.
We never wanted to fund a war in Ukraine.
We never wanted to fund NATO. Hell, I bet you half the people in America don't even know what NATO stands for.
Probably couldn't even spell it.
Oh, let's see.
I don't see Mike Johnson.
I don't see the Republicans on the steps of the Capitol protesting about Biden's latest spending packages to Ukraine.
I don't see that, do you?
I don't see them stopping the latest $775 million.
I don't see them stopping the latest $6 billion.
Where's the outrage?
What do you mean no more funding for Ukraine under Biden?
They're still doing it.
Oh, you're not going to let them pork barrel into the next continued resolution?
Well, they don't need to, do they?
By the way, speaking of the continued resolution, here's Representative Andy Biggs talking about this coming up for a vote in the House in Clip 7. Hi, Congressman Andy Biggs here from Arizona's 5th Congressional District.
I hope all of you had wonderful Thanksgiving with your family and friends.
You know, with less than a month remaining until government spending expires, Congress is set for another spending fight.
And government funding expires on December 20th, just five days before Christmas this year.
Congress is once again poised to pass the 35th continuing resolution of CR That we've done in the last 10 years.
Congress' perpetual problem of relying on a CR to fund the government violates the Budget Control and Impoundment Act of 1974. That act requires that we specifically pass 12 appropriations bills and get them to the Senate by June 30th of every year.
That's the way you're supposed to fund federal government.
They then do their process, send it back over here.
That's the law.
But the House hasn't accomplished that in decades.
Because of our persistent failure to follow the law, we've seen this ridiculous increase in our structural deficit.
Every year, we spend $2 trillion plus, more than we generate in federal revenue.
Not only would another CR continue to violate the law, it would continue funding the Biden-Harris regime's woke programs and their priorities, including, for instance, Planned Parenthood.
Taxpayer-funded abortions is a phrase that should never be spoken because it never happens.
But it does happen.
We continue to fund the Center for Disease Control, participate in the World Health Organization, United Nations, and other anti-US international institutions aspiring to steal our sovereignty.
The weaponization of the federal government against the American people would continue to be funded.
Instead of perpetuating Congress's chronic inability to follow the appropriations process by passing yet another CR this December, the House must return to regular order and continue working on and ultimately pass the remaining 12 individual appropriations bills.
That's what we should be doing.
I'm actually okay if we have a funding lapse from December 20th till we get the new administration in January.
We have to refuse to comply with the D.C. cartel simply because it's the easiest route.
So let's just see what happens as there was a bit of a struggle with the last continued resolution, but Johnson got it through anyway.
Thomas Massey predicted exactly how it would go.
And now here we are where he predicted we would be right before Christmas.
And then they'll use that backdrop to say, hey, we got to pass this so we can be home for Christmas.
Well, actually, you don't.
And you shouldn't.
And Andy Biggs is right.
But this is the lawlessness.
This is the swamp.
And, you know, there could be two big changes that we see to our political science, if you will.
And this is what people like Thomas Massey have been pushing for.
Matt Gaetz had been pushing for.
You need to have single issue bills.
Instead of delivering to members of Congress these long legalese books of spending bills and appropriations and everything else that they get like five hours to review and then go vote on, you should have single issue bills.
Single issue.
Three pages max.
But no, they load it all up.
They load it all up with the pork barrel spending.
They load it all up with the special interest spending.
They load it all up so that people can't see it, can't notice it.
Nobody wants to read it.
And then you go vote and it's like, well, if you don't vote for this bill, then we don't get this defense spending.
Yeah, but over here it says you want to spend money on Ukraine or you want to spend money on transgender bathrooms for the Capitol or you want to spend money on all this other garbage.
Well, yeah, but you got to vote so we have the defense spending.
And then they go vote and they get their pork barrel spending.
Here he is explaining in Clip 8. Hi, Andy Biggs here from Arizona's 5th Congressional District.
We all remember the first assassination attempt on President Donald Trump's life on July 13th of this summer.
And there was a second attempt.
And Secret Service had numerous failures related to that.
But a lot of people don't understand that the structure of Secret Service has something like 40% of the agency isn't in protective duties, but they were doing some financial fraud cases and looking at those, and they were on that.
Well, it's my position firmly that that belongs in a different agency.
That the purpose of the Secret Service really needs to be realigned so that they are providing protective detail to those who we expect them to protect and be able to do it adequately.
Not just adequately, because this has to be perfect every time.
They have to be able to do this perfectly every time.
And I also think that they're being overburdened.
So I've introduced legislation today realigning U.S. Secret Service and several other police agencies.
I would also tell you that I'm working with my friend Chip Roy from Texas, who is also working on a very similar approach, and we're going to combine our approaches together because it is really critical That we as the United States of America know that we can protect our elected officials and those who we must protect.
It's a dangerous world and this is a 100% perfect execution requirement mission every time for the U.S. Secret Service.
That's why we're doing these bills and that's why I'm working with Rep Roy of Texas.
You have Joe Biden today bragging about how much he's given to Africa, and he's been visiting Africa.
He says, two years ago, I pledged to deliver $55 billion in new investments in Africa.
And then he's talking about how much they need aid and investment, and America's going to come through with tens of billions of dollars.
Okay.
Well, what's he doing for the people of Africa?
Western North Carolina.
Well, he's giving them a phone call.
He's giving them a phone call.
So if you're in Africa, not part of the United States, you get tens of billions of dollars.
If you're an American in North Carolina, after the hurricane, you are in the country.
You get a phone call from Joe Biden.
And these FEMA stories are crazy.
Listen to what's happened with one lady in Asheville in clip 12. You didn't know when you opened that brewery it was going to be a place where you're going to save people's lives a little bit, did you?
Oh, that's...
Oh, okay, that's Biden calling the people.
I'm sorry.
unidentified
Here it is in clip 10. All she had was a crack in her window.
So she thought since FEMA is helping out people ride damage from Helene in Mecklenburg County, maybe she could tap into some funds from that agency.
FEMA said no, but FEMA did offer to put her and three others in a hotel, including the South Park Marriott, for up to a month.
This little crack from Helene led to a situation that has 74-year-old Susan Lewis cracking up in disbelief.
I kept rereading it thinking, what am I missing here?
This makes no sense.
The damaged window was in her Forest Ridge condo.
Since FEMA is offering Mecklenburg County residents Helene assistance, she applied for funding to fix it.
She says FEMA denied the claim and told her to submit it to her home insurance.
Hunter Biden Pardon Claims00:13:29
unidentified
She ended up having to pay $200 for the repair out of her own pocket because she has a $1,000 deductible.
I'm living in Social Security.
I'm a 74-year-old woman.
And, you know, all these little extra expenses really add up.
While FEMA wouldn't fix the window, she says the agency offered her something else.
A month stay for up to four people in a hotel.
One of the hotels is the South Park Marriott.
The average rate is nearly $200 a night.
The hotel even told her she could get two roofs if she needed space for four.
Instead of paying $200 for the window, she says FEMA offered to spend $1,000 on a hotel she didn't need.
Who's benefiting and profiting off of this policy?
Oh, we can't fix a window for $200,000, but here's $14,000 for a hotel stay.
Somebody makes sense of that.
The laptop?
The Hunter Biden laptop is not real.
Oh, I'm going to pardon Hunter Biden for the stuff on his laptop.
That's the series of events there.
It only took four years.
This stuff is getting crazy.
As people are digging deeper into liberal commentary, Democrat commentary on Trump's final days in office with the pardons, where he didn't pardon his family, but they were scolding him, saying he was going to, including one Adam Schiff.
Now, the rumor is Adam Schiff and others have requested a pardon from Joe Biden after he gave the blanket pardon to Hunter for crimes he hasn't even been Officially accused of or charged with.
So it's like a, oh, you're pardoned for anything type of situation, anything that might come up.
So now Adam Schiff and others are saying, hey, wait a second, can I get one of those?
But it was Adam Schiff who went on MSNBC. And was scolding Trump, insinuating Trump might do something like this, and how bad it was, and now Schiff wants to benefit from the very thing.
Isn't that something?
unidentified
This is December 2020, clip 13. Barack Obama never had to think about whether he needed to pardon Sasha and Malia, and yet Donald Trump is reportedly discussing pardons for his kids.
And the Democrats on our side were now, there were some that were gleeful calling it, like, now he's a convicted felon and those things.
And now for our party, we were talking about criminal justice and we're now talking about second chances.
And now all of a sudden, now you're like, well, he's a convicted felon and all these things.
And now clearly, again, both of those trails, the Hunter Biden one and the trial in New York for Trump, that was clearly, that was politically motivated.
And those kinds of charges would have never been brought unless one side could then realize that they could weaponize that.
Senator, many of Trump's Now, of course, he's wrong about the Hunter Biden thing.
Tell me how it's politicized.
Republicans aren't in power.
Republicans don't run the DOJ. So what's politicized about it?
Who's politicizing it against Hunter Biden?
By the way, these are known charges with actual records that he has pled guilty to.
What is political about that?
The gun charge.
The tax charge.
He pled guilty.
Those are real trials, real evidence, real cases.
There's nothing political.
Trump's cases didn't exist until he became political.
Trump's cases didn't exist until he ran for president.
The statute of limitations running out.
A state attorney general going for federal election crimes.
None of it is even registering in fairness.
So no, the Hunter Biden trials were not political.
The Trump trials were.
But at least he's half right.
So you give him credit for that.
He got it half right.
It's better than most liberals.
Alright, uh...
Oh, okay.
I'll tell you what.
Let's go to this one, and then we'll look at some of this trans kids.
I mean, you can't believe we're having to have this discussion.
Here's one more, though.
Here's one more of shameless liberals on television.
Stephanie Ruhle, one of the worst.
Hey, it's bad when Trump does it.
It's great when Biden does it.
Clip 20. Alright, we're having a little technical snafu with that video.
That's no problem, guys.
So we'll just go ahead and move on.
We'll get back to that later.
So yesterday, there's...
Oh, we have it?
Well, okay, then go ahead.
unidentified
Their latest attack has been that Joe Biden has politicized and weaponized the DOJ, right?
That was the whole argument around Donald Trump's conviction.
And this week, of course, Hunter Biden was found guilty, and Joe Biden has very clearly said he would not pardon his son, he would not commute his sentence.
How can Republicans keep making this argument now that Joe Biden has really put it out there?
For four years, Fox News has been, where's Hunter?
And he stood there in a courtroom, flanked by his family, and he's accepted his sentence.
Now, we have heard a lot of takes about this pardon over the last day.
But it is important to remember a few things.
This has absolutely no impact on what Donald Trump has done or will do in the future.
It just gives him a new talking point for the next few days.
President Biden has a right to do this.
It is in the Constitution.
If you win the White House, you win the power of the pardon.
Promoting using a praying mantis for a, quote, weird skin abnormality.
So it looks like it's a praying mantis, like chewing up, like a wart or something.
And it shows these videos.
Let's not put it on.
It's very gross.
So we don't need to put it on, guys.
Just go ahead and take it off the screen.
So it's being seen tens of millions of times.
So X Community Notes comes into play here.
And this is why I really wanted to show this.
And it says, regardless of the skin abnormality, it is a horrible idea to have any animal gnaw on it as a method of removal.
This is just leaving an open wound susceptible to infections.
Okay.
So you shouldn't need that in a community note.
That you shouldn't have an animal gnaw on a skin abnormality.
But they add it.
I guess people are crazy.
They drink Clorox bleach and stuff and eat Tide Pods.
So X feels it needs to put this disclaimer.
Don't let a bug gnaw on your skin and leave an open wound.
Okay.
So I'm thinking...
This same thing should apply to trans kids.
Every trans kid post that goes up on X regarding minors, every trans kid post, whatever the circumstances, they've had the surgeries, they're having the drugs, the chemical castrations, anything, there should be a community note that gets put on every single one of those.
There is no such thing as a transgender kid It is child abuse.
And the idea of transgenderism is a concept.
You cannot change your biology.
Something like that.
That's off the top of my head.
Something a little more polished.
And they should put that community note on every single post about trans kids.
It's like, hey, yeah, no kidding.
If you have a wart on your leg, you shouldn't let a bug gnaw on it.
It's like, yeah, no kidding.
A kid cannot change its gender just because some psychotic freak doctor wants to remove a healthy body part.
Just because some psychotic pervert gender wants to remove genitalia or chop skin off of a limb and turn it into some makeshift genitalia, you are not changing your gender.
That is a made-up concept.
You should have that in the community notes.
If you can do it for a bug gnawing on a wart, why can't you do it for something that's probably a lot more dangerous and also leaves an open wound, by the way?
Here's the freak ACLU lawyer arguing and talking about transgenderism.
I think...
I forget which cable news network this was on.
This is what you have.
CNN, guys, you said?
ACLU lawyers, transgender lawyers...
Arguing for trans kids' rights at the Supreme Court, getting taken seriously on CNN. Chase, thanks so much for being here.
When 26 states have passed laws restricting healthcare treatments for transgender youth, according to a CNN analysis of data from the nonprofit think tank Movement Advancement Project.
So how do you plan to argue before the U.S. Supreme Court in a case that could have wide-ranging implications beyond the state of Tennessee?
unidentified
Thank you for having me, Jake.
And obviously this is a critical inflection point for transgender people across the country.
We're coming off of an election season where transgender people played an outside role in people's consciousness in terms of the way in which we were situated as a threat to others.
And when we look at the map of states that ban this type of evidence-based healthcare, We went from zero states that had these bans in 2020 to now more than half the country.
So before the court tomorrow, the question is really a simple one as I see it.
This is a law that bans medical treatment only when it is prescribed inconsistent with an individual's sex.
Our argument is that that treats people differently because of their sex, and therefore the court has to treat it like all other forms of sex discrimination, and that's why it's unconstitutional.
So attorneys representing the state of Tennessee told the U.S. Supreme Court, quote, if the government's theory holds, men who identify as women could claim constitutionally-based access to women's bathrooms, women's locker rooms, and women's sports, accepting that theory would perversely erode women's rights and jeopardize landmark statutes protecting women's equal access to schools, winners' podiums, and beyond.
What's your response to that?
unidentified
Well, I obviously disagree with that premise that allowing transgender women into women's sports or women's bathroom is a threat to women, but it is also not the question before the court in this case.
And in fact, it is a totally independent question about whether a law that bans medical care for transgender adolescents discriminates against people based on sex versus these separate cases that preceded any of these health care bans will continue to be litigated in the court regardless of the outcome here.
This is why we have to just leave liberals behind, folks.
They can't be taken seriously.
They're not serious people.
Words are supposed to have meaning.
And because of modern day liberalism, words no longer have any meaning.
Health care.
Transing a kid is not healthcare.
These are healthy children.
If they have some form of a mental disorder, there are outlets and therapies that can help them.
Cutting off healthy body parts is not healthcare.
Do you see what they do?
Words have meaning.
And you don't know the meaning of the words you're using.
But that's all intentional.
Strangio.
You're strange.
We get it.
No, that's not healthcare.
Aborting a baby because you don't want it is not healthcare.
These are not healthcare.
And they use that as like a guilt trip.
You're denying someone healthcare.
It's not healthcare.
It's not, oh, there's no threat.
Of a man competing against a woman?
Really?
Then why did we have different divisions for men and women?
Why did a woman have her skull cracked by a man in a MMA fight?
Why was it two men competing for the women's boxing Olympics title?
Why did a woman have her nose broken by a man spiking the volleyball?
These are not serious people.
They shouldn't be taken seriously.
Go ahead with the rest of Strange Yo.
unidentified
So that clearly is conflating a bunch of different questions.
The question before the court tomorrow is about whether banning medical care, overriding the consent of parents, the recommendations of doctors is a violation of equal protection.
What do you say to physicians who are sensitive and supportive of trans kids?
Obviously don't want suicidal ideation, etc.
But wonder if there is enough data as of now to prove that it is beneficial to allow these sort of treatments before the age of 18. So I would say three things.
And the suicide rates actually increase after the so-called trans care.
Multiple scientific studies.
Now, they did one specifically in the Netherlands, and this was the first one.
This was the big one.
And the American journals and doctors refused to publish it because it went against their ideology.
So, oh, follow the science!
Follow the science!
Until it goes against their ideology, then they don't want to follow the science.
And they send some freak show up there named Strangio, saying trans kids is healthcare.
I'm sick of these people being taken seriously.
Chase Strange.
The guy's name is, the woman's, fake dude's name is literally Chase Strange.
Are you serious?
You're being played!
At the Supreme Court, you're being played!
Chase Strange, guys.
A trans ACLU lawyer gets taken seriously in the Supreme Court.
And it's all a big joke.
You're being played.
You're being played.
It's a game, and they're playing us.
And they should never be taken seriously.
But that's what this is.
It's like a...
It's like a serial killer in the movies that likes to play these little games with the detective because it's fun.
That's what you have with these liberals.
Chase Strange.
Oh, I'm an ACLU lawyer.
I do HIV rights.
I'm a man.
And then gets all the way up to the Supreme Court to argue that genital mutilation of children is somehow a constitutional right in health care.
And we have to sit here and take it seriously because we still are caught in this trap of taking liberals seriously when we shouldn't.
And our country suffers because of it.
Speaking of trans people, here's trans actress Leslie Jones complaining about white people and Trump to Gavin Newsom in clip 22. To me, I just feel like all this shit is being revealed now.
unidentified
Trump brought out all those people who really are racist because most white people are.
They just don't understand that they have that microaggression.
Y'all mostly are.
You don't even understand some of the racist shit you do by accident just from being a white entitled mother.
I didn't even know I was a racist this whole time.
What can I do now?
What will I do now that Leslie Jones, famous trans actress, has informed me that I've been a racist all along?
I've been living as a racist.
I didn't even know it.
I didn't care about people's skin color.
I was a racist the whole time.
She's speaking With the governor of California.
And what is it really all about?
Of course that's a joke.
But what is it really all about?
If you don't bow down to whatever racial group they tell you to, in this case it's black people, so if you don't bow down to black people, or if you don't bow down to the leftist Democrat agenda, then you're a racist.
There's nothing to do with if you like black people or white people.
Chase Strange is being taken seriously at the Supreme Court.
And Leslie Jones, just getting to call everybody a racist, is getting taken seriously by the governor of California.
That's where we're at as a civilization.
I hope we don't have to live the rest of our lives like this.
I really don't.
Because that would be truly tragic.
That clowns, non-serious people, are being taken seriously.
Go ahead, listen to Gavin Newsom taking this woman seriously.
Everybody that votes Trump is a racist.
They just don't know it.
unidentified
Seriously.
And that shit's starting to show now, and it's getting so bad.
Like, oh, we don't want you to see your history and all of that.
I think people are just waking up to the shit that's been going on, and now we're waking up.
What do you think?
I mean, do you think there's this current sort of more of the extreme of what you're just saying and sort of distillation in the last few years, I sense in particular, was a reaction to George Floyd?
It was sort of a reaction sort of in that sort of COVID framework.
I mean, this is sort of a boomerang that really exposes it at a whole nother level.
Froot Loops Gyrating Madness00:10:14
unidentified
Yeah, I think that COVID fucked us up.
I think that when we had that pandemic and was inside for a little while, I think that some of us lost our fucking mind.
Trans activists, they're all over D.C. If you're in D.C., you've probably seen some trans walking around.
And if you went into the women's bathroom at the Capitol today, you would see some men in there.
So how are they responding to all of this?
Oh, but by the way, notice how they ignore.
We showed some of it yesterday.
There was a anti-grooming rally, anti-trans kid, genital mutilation of children, grooming rally outside of the Supreme Court where young girls who were deceived by doctors and went through some of the trans stuff at a young age are now speaking out about their regret, grooming rally outside of the Supreme Court where young girls who were deceived by doctors and went through some of the trans stuff at a But notice, nobody wants to talk about them.
Nobody wants to give them a platform.
These are the actual victims.
These are the actual individuals who have gone through with these procedures when they were kids and now live to regret it.
But they don't get the platform.
Nobody highlights them.
So, they're protesting in D.C. at the Capitol.
Somebody let them in.
They won't be arrested.
A man can go into the woman's bathroom and will not get arrested.
I get arrested with a piece of tape over my mouth.
So here you have it.
Leftists holding a dance party in the women's bathroom for trans kids' rights.
If you want to be sure You better go part of your nose Go on and part of your nose Cause you want to look good When you step on the floor That's why I gotta meet you in the ladies' room Somebody tell me why there's men in the women's room, please.
I'll be back real soon I gotta meet you in the ladies' room Sir, what are you doing in here?
And They're wearing pajamas, men gyrating, dancing around in the women's room.
It's like, what are their little t-shirts saying?
That is so disturbing.
Every time they put that on the screen, I can't deal with it.
Please, just stop.
See if you can find out what that t-shirt says.
Remember, they were wearing the pink pussy hats.
I mean, what's next with these freaks?
You know, they came to Austin in 2016. We went to a rally.
Flush the hate, not our rights.
Oh, yeah.
If you disagree with these people, you're hateful.
Okay, gotcha.
Yeah, you disagree with a liberal, that means you're hateful.
You don't want us chopping up little boys and girls?
Well, you're just a hateful racist.
Guys, if you're listening...
I can't even believe I'm describing this.
If you're listening, this is the Women's Room...
At the Capitol in Washington, D.C., there are men, bearded men, gyrating and humping in the women's room to stick it to conservatives, to stick it to bills against trans kids.
Men gyrating in the women's room.
Wow.
You win.
You've done it.
Your intellectual prowess...
Has conquered all ideologies.
Men gyrating in the women's room for trans kids rights.
Or I'll tell you what, just in the nature of talking about Froot Loops.
Yes, Froot Loops.
These are Froot Loops.
Froot Loops sales are down.
Here's the health babe, Vani Hari, with their boycott of Kellogg's for all the toxic food dives, talking about Froot Loops sales being down in clip nine.
American companies will no longer be able to get away with selling us ingredients they don't use in other countries, using more toxic poisonous chemicals and cereals here in America.
Americans are rising up and the data is right there.
The story yesterday, the attempted, well, the successful assassination, if you will, the successful shooting of the UnitedHealthcare CEO, as more information is coming out on this, Defend, or delay, deny, defend.
Deny, defend, depose.
Possible meaning behind CEO killer's apparent message on the bullet casings.
Brian Thompson bullet casings at Midtown Hilton is the Daily Beast headline.
And then this is the book, Delay, Deny, Defend, Why Insurance Companies Don't Pay Claims and What You Can Do About It.
And it's all about big insurance companies and corruption.
And there is definitely a real issue there.
Now, the question is, is this just a...
Is this a distraction to throw off the scent of what was really going on?
Was it really a disgruntled insurance customer, someone whose grandma was denied?
Was this a hit because the UnitedHealthcare CEO, Brian Thompson, knew too much and there was a DOJ investigation and maybe insider trading and some other issues?
So it's a big human interest story and there are all kinds of conspiracies swirling about.
The latest is people don't believe these images that are being put out.
I don't fall into that camp.
Some people around here do.
They think that the images don't add up.
I think it's the same guy in all the images.
But the police have put out images now, and people are analyzing them, saying it's not the same guy.
I would guess it is the same guy, probably in different clothes.
I don't know why the New York police would put out an image of two different people.
They probably tracked this guy's movements in a 24- to 48-hour period, and these are the best images they have, and they've put them out.
But is the message on the casings really meant to point to this book so that people see that it's about corrupt insurance agencies?
Or is that just something to throw detectives, investigators off the scent that this was actually a hit on Thompson because of other things that were going on that he might have known too much about or been involved in himself?
But that's the latest there.
But they've got a couple images of the guy, pretty clear facial images.
If you know the guy, you probably recognize him.
His face right on camera.
He is in some winter gear and he's got kind of a, some of his face is covered, others the face covering is down beneath his neck.
But certainly somebody you think would be able to recognize him.
Certainly even with facial recognition technology, you'd think something would be able to pick it up.
But I wonder too, because the police have virtually confirmed, yesterday we had the guests, we had former FBI agent Cal Serafin, and then we had gun expert trainer Michael Cargill, and they both said the same thing.
It looks like kind of an amateur, if it's a guy that got paid or professional, looks like he's kind of a rank amateur the way things went down.
The cops did agree.
And release that in their statement.
But I do wonder if the whole thing where it looked like the gun was jamming or whatever, if that wasn't part of the act to get these bullet casings to fall where he wanted them to so that they could see the message.
And that would throw them off the scent of what was really behind this.
But then again, showing his face on the cameras and not doing it in a clean way.
There's a lot of things that still don't add up about this.
But obviously the conspiracy theories are all about.
Now here's what's crazy.
Leftists are celebrating this.
They're celebrating this because this guy was...
Well, he was rich and he was...
An insurance company CEO. And so there's all kinds of leftists on the internet celebrating this.
Here's just one example.
You could find hundreds of these.
Here's one example of somebody celebrating it and saying, no, I don't even feel bad about it.
unidentified
Clip 16. So the CEO of the multi-billion dollar United Healthcare Insurance Company was shot and killed this morning in New York City.
And I will say that it is pretty tragic that the shooter was only able to get one of them.
But it's a good start.
I mean, it's a good foundation.
We can only move up from here.
And before any of you come at me with, oh my god, I can't believe you'd say that, go fuck yourself.
Seriously.
Go fuck yourselves.
How many husbands do you think have had to bury their wives because their wives' cancer treatment was denied?
How many parents do you think have had to bury their children because whatever healthcare treatment the child needed was denied or they had to jump through hoop after hoop after hoop after hoop until finally the treatment, the sickness had progressed so far.
The treatment just wasn't an option anymore.
So yeah, I would say that this is probably a good start.
You think we should send Taylor an angry Alex Jones Santa sweater?
I think she would wear it.
I think it would look good on her, actually.
Let's see if we can't facilitate her an angry Alex Jones Santa sweater from thealexjonesstore.com.
See if we can make that happen.
She could turn it into a mask if she wanted.
She'd just tie it on her face and struggle to breathe so she doesn't have to raw dog the air.
So you can find yours, though.
She likes sweaters.
That's what I'm saying.
She's a big sweater gal.
Let's send her a sweater from thealexjonesstore.com.
We got options for you.
We got options for you, sweetheart.
You got the Bad Santa Alex Jones sweater.
We got all kinds of different Christmas sweaters going on.
The Nakatami Plaza sweater.
I mean, it just goes on and on.
So much new merchandise right now at thealexjonesstore.com.
I suggest you get there.
Get some now, before Christmas celebrations begin.
Get your Christmas sweatshirts from thealexjonesstore.com to wear to all of your Christmas parties.
I mean, every single one.
Hey, are you a fan of the Netflix series Squid Game?
You guys know about this?
I watch the Squid Games.
Is it Squid Games?
I think it's Squid Games.
They did a season.
It was a South Korean series.
Very popular.
It became popular in America as well.
English dubbed over it.
Well, they have a second season coming out, and they're already making headlines.
Squid Game Season 2 sparks backlash because it's introducing a trans woman character.
So apparently one of the characters in the Squid Games is joining the games to pay for her trans surgery.
Now, a lot of...
Let's say conservatives see stuff like this in some of the modern culture, some of the modern, let's say, TV shows, and they take it like it's liberal propaganda.
Some of it definitely is.
I think there's other instances where it's just, I mean, this stuff is really going on, and I think it's kind of them injecting that, but also, in a way, making fun of it.
So not everything, just when you see it, is propaganda.
I mean, some of it is just, it's really happening in our life, unfortunately, and then some of it is making fun of it.
So they're bringing in a trans character into the SWID games, but what's the problem?
Oh, the dare, the dirty producers would dare hire a man for the trans role.
Can you believe this?
They hired a man for For the role of the trans character.
So now...
The liberals are pissed.
Because it's a man and not an actual trans person...
Missouri lawmaker proposes bounty system to report migrants.
A bill introduced in the Missouri Senate would give residents a $1,000 payout for reporting migrants who entered the country illegally.
The proposal is one of at least seven bills introduced in the state's legislature to focus on immigration, all sponsored by Republican legislators.
Senator-elect David Gregory proposed the legislation which would create an online portal for people to make reports to the State Highway Patrol and be eligible for the payout.
Senate Bill 72 would also develop Missouri Illegal Alien Certified Bounty Hunter Program, which would certify people to be bounty hunters for the specific purpose of finding and detaining immigrants without proper documents.
Strap up, Missouri.
You're bounty hunters now.
All right, we are about to be joined by the one, the only, Jesse Lee Peterson.
Coming up shortly.
Remember, folks, when you shop at thealexjonesstore.com, you get multiple entries into the Monster Truck Raffle.
That's right.
The Monster Truck Raffle is back.
Guys, pull up for me the Christmas sweaters, would you please?
It's very popular.
You go to a Christmas party.
They call them ugly Christmas sweater parties.
You may have been invited to one or two.
Well, get your...
They're not really ugly, but, you know, call it an ugly Christmas sweater and wear it to your ugly sweater party.
It's fun.
It'll start a conversation when you shop at thealexjonesstore.com.
And there are many options for you there.
We've got the MAGA Tour sweatshirt.
Let's see here.
You got Trump as Santa, and then some of his appointments behind him.
You got J.D. Vance there, Musk, all wearing different Santa outfits, Christmas outfits.
So there's one for you.
You got the Bad Santa, Alex Jones one, the Merry Christmas one, Daddy's Home.
I like the Nakatomi Plaza sweatshirt.
I'm a big fan of that one.
You can start up the debate.
You go to your Christmas party.
Is Die Hard a Christmas movie?
Oh, man.
You know what?
There might be one thing that's more volatile than Then a debate on abortion, and that's a debate on whether Die Hard is a Christmas movie or not.
It's the only thing that is more dangerous than an abortion debate at a Christmas party is the debate about Die Hard being a Christmas movie.
You can start that debate.
You can be the center of attention when you get the Nakatomi Plaza sweatshirt from TheAlexJonesStore.com.
And of course, with every purchase, you get multiple entries.
To the Monster Truck Raffle.
That's all happening right now at thealexjonesstore.com.
All right, guys, what is our status on Jesse?
Oh, is Jesse ready to go?
All right, we were having some audio issues, but I'm hearing now that Jesse is ready to go.
You guys have been amazing to us and thank you so much.
We wish you well.
And secondly, in California, it's the same as it is in New York and all of the blue states.
They can care less that we're paying for the illegal aliens.
They don't care that we're housing them.
We're giving them free phones.
We're giving them free medical care, free food and everything.
And they don't care.
They literally don't care.
And they have lied to us.
And they have proven over and over and over again that they don't care.
And that's why they lost.
One of the reasons they lost this year is because the American people, even in California, they recognize now that we've been lied to and crime is through the roof.
Everything is bad.
Nothing is good under this administration.
So no, they don't care.
If they can get away with it again, they would do the same thing over because they don't care.
The worst of it is you can go to downtown California, downtown New York, Any of these big cities, any of these Democrat cities, you'll see homelessness, you'll see poverty, even veterans that are living homeless.
It's really bad here in Austin now as well.
They don't get these services.
They can't go and sign up and live for free in these complexes, hotels, wherever, for months, years.
Free rent in apartments now we're discovering as well in small cities across the country living off welfare.
The other day, the city council of Los Angeles passed a bill or something that they're not going to cooperate with Donald Trump when he comes for the illegal aliens to send them back home.
That includes all of them, the criminals and everybody.
They're saying out loud, the government, our local government is saying out loud that we are not going to work for you The citizens of California, we're going to work for the illegal aliens.
We're going to protect the criminals, the people who are coming into our state, our city.
They have brought in crime.
I mean, crime through the roof, man.
Homelessness everywhere.
And they're saying that we're going to make sure That we do not work with Donald Trump when they try to make things better for the citizens of California.
We're letting you know we're not gonna do anything about it.
We're gonna work against you instead of for you.
And that's the most insane thing I ever heard of.
How do you tell your employees That your boss is going to work against you and we're going to bring in foreigners to help them but not you.
It's insane.
For some reason, they know Well, maybe hopefully now they've learned a lesson.
But for some reason, they know that the liberal voters and those who agree with them, I guess, are going to vote for them no matter how bad.
The food prices, the gas prices, the crime.
Every day, some home is being broken into over and over again.
Not just one time, two and three times.
The police don't show up.
And when the police show up, they come in after the criminals have gone, as though they're waiting around the corner until the criminals come and leave.
They don't care, man.
They just don't care.
And I've never seen my government act this way before, the way they have acted in the last four years.
They care about the vote and not the people.
They just want your vote and that's it.
And if the voters here don't understand this, and I think they'll catch it on, it's just gonna get worse and not better.
They give these people free everything.
Free education, free everything.
But the American citizens have to pay buku money to get an education.
I think California is the most expensive state to live in.
I mean, it's definitely in the top five, if not number one.
So you got to work hard.
A lot of people in California, you know, they live in shared apartments, whatever.
They're sharing bedrooms just to make rent.
But these illegals come in here and they get everything for free.
And I don't know, it might be a different bill that you're talking about, but Gavin Newsom wants $25 million in the state's budget to, quote, Trump-proof California.
And it's his plan to block the deportation of the illegal aliens, the criminal aliens.
I barely hear about it at all in the local media, and I have been paying attention just to see.
And the media, when the media does report on it, they're in favor of it.
It seems as though they're supporting the governor in joining us.
I just don't know what happened to the mindset of the government that they can say out loud, we're going to make sure we protect the criminal over you.
We're going to make sure we get money.
We need your tax dollars To protect the criminal.
Donald Trump wants to come and clean house.
He want to make it better for you, the taxpayer, the citizens of the city or the state.
But we're going to make sure that you don't get it.
You're not protected.
We don't care about you.
And then Gavin Newsom is being reported that there is a possibility that he's thinking of running it for president.
Yeah, it looked like he's definitely wanting to, but I don't know how, what does he expect to get from the people?
Are they going to turn around and vote for him again?
When you have said to your citizens, you're not even hiding it.
You have said to them, we're not going to protect you.
We don't care about you.
We care about the aliens because we need their vote.
I remember when the Chinese virus happened and they put California on a lockdown, just plain old lockdown, and they told the citizens, you got to stay home.
No family members, no church, no parties.
And to the neighbors, let me know if someone party at their home or they have some other zone.
Then we find out that Gavin Newsom is partying it up.
He's at an amazing cafe, laid back with his friends, and just having a good time while locking down the American citizens of this state.
I hope that they haven't forgotten that.
And the people need to start remembering And instead of forgetting, because we get the kind of government we deserve.
If we vote in these people and we keep voting them in, that's all we're going to get.
Your life only changes when you make a change in your life.
And if the voters don't continue and continue to make these little changes, it's only going to get worse.
I do want you to know, man, is that A whole lot of folks are surprised, including the government, that so many people in California voted for Donald Trump.
They didn't know that.
For some reason, they didn't think that would happen.
California is like, especially in the suburbs there, the outer areas there, and even in the city, right here in the city, it's a little rarer than it was prior to Donald Trump coming in.
So I think it may mean a lot.
I think things will change, especially if the great white hope Does the job that he says he's going to do make America great again?
I think we're going to be satisfied for a long time.
And maybe people even come back to live if we can get more real Republicans in to control the government, run the government here in the city.
They were out popping bottles and smoking cigars and going around on their yachts.
So rules for thee, not for me.
But, you know, what I've noticed is the liberals actually like that.
Democrat voters actually like that.
It's like they want to be dominated.
They want to have some form of like this deity figure, because I guess maybe they don't believe in God, but it's like they want some form of authority, some figurehead of authority that they kind of worship.
And really, they just want that person to dominate you is what it's all about.
It's like anything to hurt you is what I've noticed with the liberal psychology.
They'll just do anything to hurt you.
They don't even necessarily have any values except they just want to hurt you.
They just hate you.
So anything that pisses you off, they like.
So if you don't like a corrupt government, they love it.
You don't like a governor that says you have to be locked down, but I'm going out and popping bottles of champagne at restaurants with my friends.
They love it because you don't.
So I feel like there's a certain psychology with these liberals.
It doesn't bother them.
They are actually into it.
They like having a Gavin Newsom domineer over them simply because we don't like it.
So they sit there and they're like, yeah, Gavin, yeah, you do whatever you want and you tell us to do something else.
They love the thrill of pain, whether it's so-called happy pain or unhappy pain, misery.
They love misery.
And when you love misery, and all angry people love pain, they get a thrill out of being so-called happy.
And how to be sad.
They love the up and down life, but even more so, they love the pain of bringing on pain to other people.
If you are a man or a woman or a human being who is working your way out of this hell that you live in in your own mind, And you're feeling this freedom.
They don't like that.
They're gonna go after you, and they're gonna work overtime to try to bring you back into their hell.
And they get a thrill when they see that they made you angry, or they can control you to make you feel good.
Liberals love, just love the thrill of feeling pain.
Whether it's depression, suicidal thoughts, Loneliness, anger, emptiness, or feeling good or feeling bad.
They love those thrills, and that's why they love it when the government controls them.
When the government says to deliver, you got to stay home.
You can't function.
Don't get on your cell phone.
Don't complain about the illegal alien.
It brings thrills to them, and that's why they love socialism.
But no one, especially Republicans and our conservatives, they're not surprised by that because we don't trust We don't trust the polling thing here anymore.
We don't trust the Democrats.
The Democrats have been in control of California for a long time now, and it just made a mess of it.
And they're not willing to give up that power, and they would do anything to hold onto it.
But there is little or no discussion about it at all.
And no one...
The ones that I've spoken to, they are not surprised that that happened.
When you hear about it, they're like, oh, I'm not surprised.
They would have been stunned and surprised had the Republican, had the government been fair, the voting been fair, and the Republican warned, or they admitted that the Republican warned.
But no, there's no loud outcry about it.
There's no real talk about it, because most people were expecting it.
And they would have been surprised had it gone the right way.
So, no, the media doesn't care.
They love the Democrats.
They care nothing about the Republicans.
So they're not on the side.
They're not supporting the Republicans at all.
And especially knowing that Donald Trump had an influence on it in one way or another, they didn't want that to happen.
Well, and I guess also the concern would be – Could there be the real big one, like we saw in San Francisco decades ago?
So 7.0, not too much damage being reported, but I think, like you said, there's been some other small ones people are concerned, like, could the big one, as they say, hit?
Alright, Jesse Lee Peterson is my guest.
We're up against the break.
We're going to talk about some D.C. politics on the other side, and then there's been a development in the Daniel Penny case.
We'll update you on that as well.
Don't go anywhere with Jesse Lee Peterson on the InfoWars War Room.
When this whole situation began, when it started, I knew that Daniel Penney...
They were not going to treat him well because he's white.
And I said, if this man have to go to court, it's over for him.
White people do not have a chance in our court system today.
They do not have a chance.
This is about paying back Whatever, right?
But white people don't have a chance, especially when it was involved, a black man was involved in it.
A black man was killed and stuff like that.
It doesn't matter.
If the whole world was standing there looking at that opinion, protect the world from this guy, and this guy is black, he would still be in court going through what he's going through right now.
White people need to wake up and smell the coffee.
They don't have a chance in American day in their own country.
They don't have a chance because they're being blamed for everything, and it's about the money and the destruction of white Americans.
This man, from all that I've heard about, I wasn't there, I don't know all the story, but this man shouldn't even be going to court.
They should give him a medal for protecting the other people from potential danger, from harm on that train that day.
But instead, they'll punish him for no reason at all, based on all the information I've seen.
And as far as his parents, I don't know what the deal is, but you're right.
Had they cared about him, they would have gotten this boy, if they couldn't do it, they would have gotten this guy help a long time ago.
It was known, according to all the reports, that he had some type of issues going on in life, but no one seemed to have done anything to help him out.
But I'm not surprised.
White people don't have a chance in American day in the justice system.
It is not fair and balanced.
It is wrong.
And it's based on color and not what is fair or what is right.
We do not have an equal justice system in America anymore.
And it's unfortunate because white people are afraid to speak up.
They're afraid to say, no, this is wrong.
You're doing this because I'm white.
I'm not going to put up with this.
But I'm not surprised the way they're treating this man because he is white.
And that's the only reason.
It's because he's white.
We need to tell the truth about it.
Otherwise, it's going to only get worse and not get better.
Well, and I wonder, too, if we won't find out more Like we did with the George Floyd case, how a fentanyl overdose likely had more of the cause of death than anything the police officers did if you don't end up having a similar situation with Neely.
Yeah, and the story you're talking about was from November.
A defense pathologist says Jordan Neely didn't die of chokehold on New York City subway.
He thinks it was from some other health issues and maybe some synthetic marijuana, as the other person said it.
But this is what I've been kind of saying looking at this stuff.
I think maybe we're two generations away and, you know, you are my elder here.
I would say that, you know, if it was the age of my grandparents, for sure, I would say.
If this was a situation where my grandmother was on the train and there was somebody harassing her and others, she would be celebrating the person that took down this aggressor, this psychotic on the train.
And if it was my grandfather, I can assure you that it would be Men like my grandfather and probably most men of that generation would stand up and deal with the aggressor.
I don't even think it would be a second thought.
I think that that's kind of how culture, quite frankly, used to be.
Women would want the men to step up and protect them in public, and the men would feel the civil duty to do so.
Things are a lot more complicated now, and that really doesn't happen, and that's why this story has become such a human interest case.
Would you say that's true?
Would you say that that's a true and accurate analysis?
And I grew up on a plantation down in Alabama under the so-called Jim Crow law.
And the black adults, even in those days, which was amazing days, by the way, would not have agreed with this in that way at all.
If the black guy was wrong and a white man helped protect and save other people, protected other people from harm, they would have said, you know what?
The black guy shouldn't have done it.
He got what he deserved.
Thank God that the white man stood up.
Somebody needs to stand up.
And it wouldn't matter what color the man was, because in those days, in the good old days, it was based on what was right, what is wrong.
It was really based on...
They knew that our battle was a spiritual battle.
It had nothing to do with the person color.
Even when I was a teenager and younger, our parents would not let us play with other black children if their parents were known not to raise their children right.
They knew that these kids could get you in trouble.
They would not let you play with them or hang out at their home because they knew that they were a bad influence.
All this stuff is happening because They have lied and said that our battle is about racism and it's about white supremacy.
It's about all these things that are not true.
It's a spiritual battle.
But we have allowed the people to get away with blaming white people for everything that's wrong with the blacks.
We blame white people for everything, for money and power.
And that's why no one is standing up there, even the men.
I'm afraid to stand up now because they don't want to have, especially when it's black and white issue, they don't want to deal with this mess.
It's unfortunate, but we must overcome fear.
Fear is not of God.
The spirit of fear has not been given to us by God, and it's time out.
For allowing anger and fear to dictate and control your life.
The worst thing you can do is allow your life to be controlled by fear.
And in America today, men and women Of all colors, really.
Their whole lives are being dictated and controlled by fear.
Every area of their life.
I don't know how you expect to have perfect peace when you have fear.
And men, I don't care what they call you.
How they attack you, what they promise to take away from you.
Men, there's an order to God.
God and Christ, Christ and man, man over woman, woman over children.
Men are the light of the world.
And the salt of the earth.
But because they have fear, the flavor and the salt is gone out.
There's no light shining.
And so the women and the children are suffering from that.
You must overcome fear.
You're not supposed to have fear.
And that's what's going on in the world.
They have caused, especially white people, the whites have allowed the people of color to Put fear in them.
The fear of losing something.
The fear of being called racist.
The fear of being called a misogynist.
The fear of being called a gay hater.
Some type of fear.
I can give two cents.
about what someone thinks about me or say about me.
I love what's right with all my heart and soul and might and I'm not gonna give that up for anybody.
America was that way when I was growing up under the Jim Crow law and it wasn't as bad as the people said trying to pretend that that was.
We gotta overcome the fear, man.
You cannot have fear and perfect peace.
You gotta let the anger and the fear go.
And white people are afraid.
And Daniel Penny, look at his situation.
No other white man is going to stand up and try to protect the women and children if they're being caught in that same situation because they know what's happening with Daniel will happen with them as well.
They're not going to do anything.
The men will just sit back and allow this to happen.
It's unfortunate, but this is hell on earth where you have anger.
But you bring up this new phrase, I don't know when it came about, and that's people of color.
And I guess it was like, it was a reversal of what would now be considered racist to say colored person.
So that's politically incorrect.
You can't say colored person.
So now you say person of color.
Like, wow, that changes everything now.
The political correct brainwashing.
You just flip the words around and now it's not racist.
Okay, whatever.
Well, actually, what I realized, and I think this really hits home today, I'm going to play this clip of Jasmine Crockett ranting and raving at a house hearing today.
What I've learned is that basically now people of color is actually just an anti-white racist slur.
It's basically just saying everybody is more important than a white person.
That's what people of color really represents.
It shouldn't just be people.
I mean, people of color.
So it's really just a stupid thing.
Here's Jasmine Crockett ranting and raving about this.
And by the way, she gets her numbers wrong too, but go figure, she's not that bright.
Go ahead and play the clip.
unidentified
Where we were talking about how many voters.
Listen, when you're counting people, you're not just counting voters.
You count children, don't you?
Correct.
You count a lot of people that aren't necessarily voters.
And I want to make sure that we really get to the nitty gritty on Texas.
Because this is hilarious to me.
Texas added two seats.
In 2020, according to the census, and we know that there was a significant undercount, specifically in Texas for a combination of reasons.
Use our bodies to apportion us in an inaccurate way.
Wow!
You are not very bright.
But she even gets all the numbers wrong.
And it's like, I don't even know if I want to hash into all the political science of it that she just completely gets wrong.
I mean, briefly, the census she's talking about is counting non-citizens.
Okay?
We're talking about non-citizens.
And so, ironically enough, yes, those are quote-unquote people of color, non-whites, that want to come to a white country.
Ironically enough, an Anglo country, I guess, as she wants to call it now.
We're the Anglos.
But if she wants to talk about demographical mapping and district mapping, she thinks Republicans' math is wonky?
Have you ever seen Jasmine Crockett's district?
I'm just curious.
Have you ever seen how Houston, Texas districts out its congressional district maps?
These are shapes that you couldn't, a fifth grader would try to make up how to draw these shapes.
And why do they gerrymander?
So they can siphon votes out of white neighborhoods.
That's what they do!
So they're the ones that will literally take a majority black area and then spread out all these different districts to fight racism and they'll say, oh no, no, we're going to redraw the districts so this 90% Democrat district will bleed into all of these other areas and so we'll flip all of these seats.
So her entire analysis here is completely wrong.
Again, dropping the political science that she is batting 0% on.
It's one of the most nasty, evil, nasty female that I've seen in a while.
Amongst many other mothers in our government.
America is making a horrible mistake by allowing all these angry black females to get into our government.
They hate white people.
They use that as a means to get power and wealth.
They don't care what the white people think about them or say about them, but they know that being black female That they can say and do whatever they want to white Americans and get away with it.
And if you speak up against them, they're going to say, oh, you're a misogynist.
You ain't black women.
You are trying to tell me I'm wrong.
This woman is a nasty woman.
And we're making a mistake in America.
You think South Africa is bad?
It's female like this.
There's another black woman in Congress.
They said that she has jalapeno disease or something.
Yeah, it won't come to me right now, but she is a nasty one.
One of the representatives mentioned Martin Luther King Jr. name one time in one of the meetings, and she was like, you can't use Martin Luther King's name.
I dare you to use his name, as though she controlled the name or owned the name, right?
But these black females are the same female or like nature that are raising these black angry children to go after white people.
We, America, you are making a mistake putting these black females in your government.
They should not be in the police department.
They should not be city councilwomen.
They should not be congresswomen or senators or anything because these women are nasty.
They have no love and they are working overtime to make the white man or white people look like the enemy.
And they have managed over the last 20, 30, 40 years to bring the Hispanic into their people of color, the Asian into their people of color, everything but the white people.
And they make white people look like they're just plain old skinhead.
Yeah, but you could get a good look at your face in her chrome dome there if you needed to make sure your beard was straight or your hair needed to fix or something.
Even though Martin Luther King was probably a Republican voter, nonetheless.
So what I hear you describing is, and this is the case with liberals for whatever their ideology is, but specifically people like a Jasmine Crockett, they get in there and they look at it Let's call it social justice in their eyes, is okay, this is my opportunity, they might even look at it as their agenda, to get in there as a black woman and stick it to white people.
And that's what they, that's literally, they say, oh, you know, whites have done so many bad things to blacks, and so I'm here to finally bring in justice.
And that's what they look at their position of power to do, is to really just stick it to the whites.
And that's just the mindset that they take with them when they get power.
In all honesty, they know that it has nothing to do with racism.
They know that it has nothing to do with slavery and all that crap that they use.
They use that in order to get power and wealth for themselves.
Because when other black people hear them yelling and screaming and carrying on like that, especially liberal blacks, they're going to fall for it and vote these people in.
These people don't care about black people.
They don't care about white people or black people.
They care about power.
And when you disagree with them, they say, well, you can't disagree with a woman.
How are you going to speak up to a woman?
They use that, too, to control you.
It's all about power and wealth.
And we've been seeing this happen for the last 70 years or so, starting with Jesse Jackson and Louis Farrakhan and that wicked witch from the West with the low IQ, Maxine Waters.
We've been seeing this thing grow.
What a mess!
And we've been seeing this happening over the last 70 years.
And white people have fallen for it.
They have given into it.
And now they're afraid to stand up to the black woman.
They're afraid to be called names.
It's only going to get worse because you've allowed these kind of people to get into your government.
They can only make it worse because they...
Hunger and thirst for power and wealth.
And that's what they want.
They don't care whatever it takes, they're going to do it.
White people better hurry up and get over their fear and anger because if you doubt me, this is South Africa now.
And they have done the same thing to white people in South Africa.
And the white people are now living on the farmland.
They gave up the city.
They gave up the town to the blacks.
It's like, okay, blacks, you can have it.
And the blacks have destroyed the areas.
And now they're going out into the farmlands and robbing and stealing and killing and breaking into homes of the white people.
The same thing is happening in the suburbs in our country.
They're now going out into the suburbs and doing the same thing.
Lo and behold, they defund the police, they let out the criminals, and they are going after white people.
It's all about that and nothing else.
And unless white people overcome a fear, there's nowhere, unless Elon Musk come up with a way for whites to go up to the moon somewhere, there's nowhere to ride and nowhere to hide.
My fellow patriots, there are a lot of amazing patriot gear, supplements, you name it, at thealexjonesstore.com.
But we've now added a whole bunch of other really cool items.
There are a bunch of amazing campaign coins for Infowars for $17.76.
We're the fight for liberty on the site as low as $9.99.
Some of the challenge coins are $14.97.
They're great fundraisers for us.
They have a lot of weight in them.
They look great.
They're great conversation starters, great gifts, great keepsakes, mementos, and you know that you've supported the InfoWars.
So I want to thank you all for your past support and encourage you now to go to thealexjonesstore.com, our amazing sponsor, that will keep us on air one way or the other.
They're a great sponsor.
They're not owned by me.
And the bad guys won't be able to shut down the alexjonesstore.com.
So go there for the campaign coins and so much more today and keep me in the fight.
Thank you so much for your support.
Here's the facts in 60 seconds.
The Justice Department came into my bankruptcy and tried to shut us down twice since May.
The latest case was last week.
The judge shut them down.
They were thrown out of the building.
Crimes were committed.
It's very clear.
They're in a lot of trouble.
I've filed counter lawsuits.
You name it.
Infowarsstore.com is in limbo.
If you order there, you'll get your products.
But, thealexjonesstore.com is our great sponsors in Arkansas with t-shirts and great supplements that are funding not just Infowars, but the Alex Jones Network in case this gets shut down at another hearing next week.
So, a lot of people Aren't going to the AlexJonesStore.com right now.
We're getting messages, oh, we don't want to give money to The Onion.
The Onion didn't get InfoWars, and they don't own Alex Jones, and they don't own the Alex Jones Network.
I don't even own that.
It's the sponsor.
So again, when you go there and get great Trump gear, Alex Jones gear, Patriot gear, incredible supplements like Ultimate CMOS, Collectible posters, incredible designer knives, and more at thealexjonesstore.com.
You are keeping me on the air one way or another, and we need the funds.
Over the weekend, folks, we saw our funds cut in half and people told us, well, we don't want to give it to The Onion.
The Onion does not own me.
They do not own thealexjonesstore.com.
So thanks for your past support.
Get great products now.
I need your support now.
We're fighting the deep state at point-blank range.
Please go to thealexjonesstore.com right now and get some of the great products.
This fight is your fight.
We are taking on the New World Order.
We are reaching 50, 60, 70, 80 million people a day.
We are kicking New World Order ass and they are fighting us.
I can beat them, but not without your help.
Please visit thealexjonesstore.com right now.
I'm going to say it again.
It's not owned by me.
It's not owned by The Onion.
It's not owned by The Easter Bunny.
It's owned by great patriots in Arkansas with their own factories, making their own knives, t-shirts, and then private labeling top supplements and selling them to you.
It's thealexjonesstore.com.
It's the future one way or another.
Become a VIP for 30 bucks a month.
Cancel any time.
You get $40 to spend in the store.
So if you're going to support, you got to be a VIP member.
TheAlexJonesStore.com forward slash VIP. Now take action.
They're trying to shut us down.
We're fighting hard.
We're winning.
But the fight is close.
So we need your prayer, your word of mouth, and your support right now at thealexjonesstore.com.
And now it's more important than ever to keep the most powerful, effective voices at exposing the globalist agenda and promoting the Team Humanity agenda on air.
Now, ladies and gentlemen, our sponsor, thealexjonesstore.com, is owned by great patriots and some of the top makers of Patriot apparel.
So whatever happens to Infowars in the future, they are going to back us to stay on air at the Alex Jones Network at AJ and Live on X and at alexjones.network.
So when you go to thealexjonesstore.com and get any of the great apparel, any of the amazing supplements, you're keeping us on air.
Now, the t-shirts are affordable, the supplements are very competitively priced, and they're great.
But we've got some items on the store for folks that really want to support and have mementos of your support.
We have two new campaign coins.
Two different coins right here.
One is the answer to 1984 is $17.76.
And on one side, it's got the Gadsden flag.
On the other side, it's got yours truly.
The other great coin is 1776 limited edition coin with a Gadsden flag, don't tread on me, and 1776. Both are powerful coins, powerful coins.
Messages.
They weigh a lot.
They feel good.
They're a great gift.
They're a great memento.
They're a great keepsake.
They're a great conversation starter.
And both these coins are $14.97 at thealexjonesstore.com.
We can't do this without you.
We want to sell you products you love, so you come back again and again.