Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Oh say can you see by the dawn's early light | |
| What so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming Whose broad stripes and bright stars through the perilous fight O'er the ramparts we watched were so gallantly streaming | ||
| And the rocket's red glare, the bombs bursting in air Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there | ||
| O say does that star-spangled banner yet wave | ||
| O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave | ||
| And the home of the brave? | ||
| I mean, she cusses so much in this thing. | ||
| It is censored. | ||
| Then you know what? Let's go with clip seven. | ||
| And maybe we can do them both. | ||
| Maybe we can do clip seven and then clip four. | ||
| And then I've got tons of news, folks. | ||
| So let's listen to the PCR inventor in the 90s talk about what a know-nothing dirtbag was. | ||
| Anthony Fauci is. What is it about humanity that wants to go to all the details and stuff and listen? | ||
| You know, these guys like Fauci get up there and start talking. | ||
| You know, he doesn't know anything really about anything. | ||
| And I'd say that to his face. | ||
| Nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope. | ||
| And if it's got a virus in there, you'll know it. | ||
| He doesn't understand electron microscopy. | ||
| He doesn't understand medicine. | ||
| He should not be in a position like he's in. | ||
| Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people and they don't know anything about what's going on at the bottom. | ||
| You know, those guys have got an agenda, which is not What we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health and someone. | ||
| They've got a personal kind of agenda. | ||
| They make up their own rules as they go. | ||
| They change them when they want to. | ||
| And they smugly, like Tony Fauci, does not mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera. | ||
| You can't expect the sheep to really respect the best and the brightest. | ||
| They don't know the difference, really. | ||
| I mean, I like humans, don't get me wrong, but basically there's a vast majority of them do not possess the ability to judge who is and who isn't a really good scientist. | ||
| I mean, that's the problem, that's the main problem actually with science, I'd say, in this century because Science is being judged by people. | ||
| Funding is being done by people who don't understand it. | ||
| Who do we trust? Fauci? | ||
| Fauci doesn't know enough to... | ||
| If Fauci wants to get on television with somebody who knows a little bit about this stuff and debate him, he could easily do it, because he's been asked. | ||
| I mean, I've had a lot of people... | ||
| President of the University of South Carolina asked Fauci if he'd come down there and debate me on the stage in front of the student body because I wanted somebody who was from the other side to come down there and balance my... | ||
| Because I felt like, well, these guys can listen to me, but I need to have somebody else down here that's going to tell me the other side. | ||
| But I wish he didn't want to do it. | ||
| You know, it's an interesting thing he says there about, you know, just the layman, the average person. | ||
| How do you know who's a good scientist? | ||
| How do you know if you can trust Gates or not, or Fauci or not? | ||
| They're on TV. You know, the same thing kind of goes for media. | ||
| How do you know you can trust any of these people on TV? How do you know you can trust me? | ||
| Well, I guess you just have to find out for yourself or we could have debates, but there's always one side that doesn't show up I've got some really exciting good news, and I've also got some bad news InfoWars is getting the highest traffic we have ever gotten since the election in 2016. | ||
| Despite all the bans, all of the system trying to censor us and suppress us, you with your word of mouth have overridden that, and they are so scared of InfoWars.com and Band.Video, and they're so scared of you being able to communicate and share the truth. | ||
| But... We're bringing in the same amount of money we brought in last December right now. | ||
| This is our most important month to be able to fund ourselves in the next year. | ||
| And I understand the economy shut down. | ||
| I understand there's not as much money as it used to be. | ||
| They're trying to kill Trump's recovery. | ||
| But Infowars really needs your support. | ||
| You just buy great items, do your Christmas shopping at Infowarsstore.com with huge sales, amazing products, and then you know you're funding the Infowar and not funding Amazon and Jeff Bezos. | ||
| and the globalists that are openly trying to destroy small businesses. | ||
| Continue to fund the Second American Revolution while getting great products at the same time at InfoWarsTore.com. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
[♪ music playing ♪ ♪ and crowd cheering ♪ ♪ | |
| Ladies and gentlemen, it's Thursday, December 10th, 2020. | ||
| This is the InfoWars War Room. | ||
| I'm your host, Owen Troyer, with you for the next two hours. | ||
| And then Harrison Smith will be taking over. | ||
| And I will be headed to the Washington District of Criminals, the swamp. | ||
| And it's funny that I would be heading back to the swamp on this weekend. | ||
| Yesterday was the one-year anniversary of one of our great crew members here. | ||
| And it was also the one-year Nadlerversity. | ||
| Nadlerversity was yesterday. | ||
| So I guess I might as well go back to the swamp. | ||
| And I don't want to get into the details because it's really irrelevant to you. | ||
| It's just more of the Democrat torturous interference in our lives. | ||
| They are still harassing me over this. | ||
| And they're trying to bring in medical tyranny on me over this as well. | ||
| So I'll just leave it at that. But folks, I've got so much news that I need to get to here. | ||
| We've got Jack Hatfield coming up with an exclusive of what's happening in Arizona right now. | ||
| We've got Robert Barnes on the second hour who is going to be talking about The 21 states who have now joined in on the Texas lawsuit in front of the Supreme Court that the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia had illegal elections, which they did. | ||
| By law, they broke it. | ||
| Hey, if the law says you have to stop at a red light and then you run the red light, you broke the law. | ||
| I may or may not break that law frequently, but that's none of your business. | ||
| But so now there are 21 states who are joining this case on the Supreme Court that Michigan and Wisconsin and Pennsylvania and Georgia had illegal elections. | ||
| Which again, by law, they did. | ||
| They broke the state's constitutional law. | ||
| Those states joining Texas are... | ||
| Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Arizona, Utah, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Indiana, Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Ohio, West Virginia, and Florida. | ||
| So that's now 21 states. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Who else will join? | |
| Will Ohio? | ||
| Will Kentucky? | ||
| Who else will join? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Will Iowa? We will find out. | |
| But now you have 21 states. | ||
| You also have Rudy Giuliani and others talking about individuals, naming individuals for subpoena. | ||
| Who were involved in what appears to be criminal activity on election night in their polling places. | ||
| And of course this is on video. | ||
| Some of it is even on audio. | ||
| But I'm going to have the great guest to cover that. | ||
| So I want to talk about what's up with the mandatory vaccine that's coming and with President Trump. | ||
| It's hard to imagine us going back to any semblance of normal after this. | ||
| The whole COVID fake pandemic. | ||
| And then really what is just a cold civil war. | ||
| I mean, the best way to put it would say between Democrats and Republicans. | ||
| It's well beyond that. | ||
| It's much more complex and diverse than that. | ||
| But that's just the simplest way to put it. | ||
| And so you have headlines out of the New York Daily News and other leftist, Democrat, globalist publications with headlines today like this. | ||
| Trump's meddling was a failed coup. | ||
| So they're saying, oh, Trump is the one meddling in the election. | ||
| Trump is the one engaged in illegal activity. | ||
| And so I don't like this tactic from President Donald Trump, but he's President Donald Trump, the multi-billionaire. | ||
| You know, he wrote the book, Art of the Deal, not Owen Troyer. | ||
| That was Donald John Trump. | ||
| But I don't like this strategy of Trump's, where he sits back and lets them play games, saying, oh, they won't be able to blame me for any of this now. | ||
| Kind of like what he did with the Russian collusion probe and everything. | ||
| He just says, okay, well, I'm just not going to get involved. | ||
| You play your little games, and then they can't blame me. | ||
| No, they blame you anyway. | ||
| They're blaming you anyway. | ||
| And so now, President Trump has said that he's going to get behind this lawsuit that's in the Supreme Court. | ||
| But I don't understand the strategy of Trump sitting back, letting them play their games, and then saying, well, this way they can't blame me or they won't come after me. | ||
| No, they always will. But then the president put this out on Twitter. | ||
| The fact that our country is being stolen, a coup is taking place in front of our eyes, and the public can't take this anymore. | ||
| And that was a quote from a Trump supporter at the rally in Georgia. | ||
| It's funny, though. I'm reading that quote, and I'm like... | ||
| That sounds familiar. | ||
| Oh yeah, that was me a year ago in the impeachment hearing. | ||
| No, Jerry Nadler! | ||
| It's you and the Democrats that are committing treason. | ||
| It's you and Joe Biden that have initiated a coup. | ||
| So how do you go back to normal? | ||
| When you've got two versions of reality, politically speaking, and each side of the aisle says the other one is doing a coup against their country, how do you go back to normal? | ||
| Can you believe that was a year ago? | ||
| That is crazy. But how do you go back to normal when there's two versions, people are living in two different realities right now, politically speaking, and even with COVID? Some people are deathly afraid. | ||
| Some people think it's totally fake. | ||
| Some people think Trump's the worst thing ever. | ||
| Some people think he's the best thing ever. | ||
| How do you go back to normal? | ||
| How do you sort this out? | ||
| Now, the problem is, as you understand, it's really just an issue of All the people we're dealing with that are suffering from Stockholm Syndrome and are victims of psychological warfare and psychological warfare operations that they just have no clue what's going on. | ||
| And then you just have the masses that are just completely indifferent. | ||
| So just whatever pops in front of their TV or cell phone is whatever they're going to believe, whatever was on their last. | ||
| But it's hard to imagine I mean, I don't see the left ever giving up on their lies. | ||
| I don't see the Democrats ever giving up or giving in on their lies. | ||
| And I don't see Trump supporters backing down from what we know has happened in the last four years either. | ||
| The multiple coup attempts against President Trump. | ||
| All the censorship. | ||
| All the attacks. All the lies. | ||
| The fake news. All of it. | ||
| We're not just going to let that go. | ||
| You've destroyed many people's lives. | ||
| You have destroyed the fabric of America and Americans getting along. | ||
| And so we can't really forget that. | ||
| Maybe we could forgive that. | ||
| But they would have to back off and that's just, I just don't see that happening. | ||
| I just don't see that happening. | ||
| When you have Biden doing these fake little press conferences talking about how he's going to have Fauci in charge and they're going to have mandatory face masks forever and mandatory vaccines, you'll have to get at least three probably. | ||
| What the hell? But see, then they say Trump's the tyrant, Trump's the authoritarian, Trump's the Nazi. | ||
| As they literally come, To your door with poison to force inject you with a foreign chemical. | ||
| Chemical rape. And they steal elections. | ||
| Alright, I'm going to do 20 minutes of news blitz here in the next... | ||
| Two segments. And then Jack Hatfield is going to join me from National File with exclusive breaking news out of Arizona. | ||
| Then Robert Barnes with his expert legal analysis on all the breaking news that's happening right now with the case that's being brought in front of the Supreme Court. | ||
| But let me get to some of this vaccine news with the fake pandemic and then some culture news. | ||
| So, yes, Yes, we have been vindicated again. | ||
| The mandatory vaccinations are coming. | ||
| They'll start in New York, probably in California. | ||
| And if Biden gets in the White House, then they will go nationwide. | ||
| And of course, you're seeing what's happening in the rest of the world, in the UK, where they're beginning their mandatory vaccines. | ||
| And people are dying. | ||
| You've had multiple deaths in the COVID vaccine trials. | ||
| You've had multiple paralysis and other such injuries. | ||
| And then they just say, oh, it's a... | ||
| That has nothing to do with the vaccine. | ||
| Bell's palsy? Really, that's really rare. | ||
| And it's the people that just took your vaccine that got it. | ||
| Well, no. | ||
| No, safe and effective. | ||
| Oh, yeah, there was another death... | ||
| On all the different vaccine trials, all the companies that are doing the COVID vaccines, you've had deaths. | ||
| No, he's fine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He's just taking a nap. Just fine. | |
| The story is at Infowars.com. | ||
| New York lawmaker introduces Bill to make vaccination mandatory. | ||
| That was the B-roll you were seeing there. | ||
| State Assembly Member for Manhattan's West Side has introduced legislation that would make it compulsory for residents to get vaccinated against coronavirus. | ||
| 99.9% survivability. | ||
| Reasoning that there has been a concerning uptick in dangerous anti-science, anti-vax rhetoric. | ||
| Or a dangerous concerning uptick in human freedom. | ||
| Freedom of speech. | ||
| Freedom of thought. | ||
| Freedom of activity. My body, my choice. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Not anymore. You want to kill your baby? | |
| That's not your body, but that's your choice. | ||
| You want to get a vaccine? | ||
| That is your body, but that's not your choice. | ||
| This is the Democrat. | ||
| Liberal logic. | ||
| They'll chant, my body, my choice, over a body that's not theirs that they want to kill. | ||
| Don't debate me on this. | ||
| Please check the science. | ||
| One body, one heart. | ||
| Two hearts, two bodies. | ||
| It's basic biology. | ||
| So that's not your body, but your choice to kill it. | ||
| That's abortion, my body, my choice. | ||
| Forced vaccination, that is your body, but that's not your choice. | ||
| If Democrat Party politics didn't have hypocrisy, they'd have no leg to stand on. | ||
| And of course, whether the government does it or the corporate government does it, that's what's coming. | ||
| AirAsia CEO, this is another CEO of an airline, says they won't let anybody on without a vaccination. | ||
| So you won't be able to fly, you won't be able to travel, you won't be able to go to work. | ||
| And it's just a loving... | ||
| It's just a loving planetary genetic override. | ||
| Story at Infowars.com. | ||
| The big picture behind COVID mRNA vaccines. | ||
| Rewrites your genetic code. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And then you become the property of Bill Gates. | |
| And guess what? This is already in the law. | ||
| If there is a DNA, let's say it rewrites your DNA or rewrites the human genome, a vaccine, They wrote, it was actually Clarence Thomas that wrote the opinion on this, that said, well look, it was for some other gene editing they were doing, and it said, if it is not out of nature, then you can patent it. | ||
| So they can stick you with a vaccine, rewrite your DNA, it will be an unnatural vaccine. | ||
| Never seen before DNA sequence in the human genome and so by law Microsoft or Bill Gates or whoever will have a patent on this new DNA that they already have the patent on and now you're their property and now you are officially a slave but see you should be so lucky to be a Bill Gates slave a useless eater like you You're killing the planet. | ||
| You're lucky that they just don't put you into a meat grinder. | ||
| Yeah. And again, look at the twisting of the logic. | ||
| I covered this yesterday, but I didn't really have time to hone in on how dangerous this is. | ||
| So... The story is from RT. The headline is, Workers' Right to Die. | ||
| If companies fail to adequately shield staff from COVID-19, they don't deserve protection from lawsuits. | ||
| So think about this. | ||
| They're saying, if you go to work and you get sick... | ||
| How could you even prove it came from work? | ||
| I mean, I guess that would be a tough one to prove. | ||
| I mean, who's the burden of proof on there? | ||
| But forget about it. It's COVID. So it's just whatever is the fear-mongering medical tyranny stance, you just go with that. | ||
| So, okay, you go to work, you get sick, and you now want to blame the business. | ||
| I mean, again, this is just the most cuckery, nonsensical, weak-kneed, pathetic nanny state bullcrap you could ever hear. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Everyone's just a little, oh my god, like, oh, I'm afraid of everything. | |
| I want to sue everybody. | ||
| I need my mommy. I need my daddy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I need my binky. I have no personal responsibility or accountability for anything. | |
| And then you just blame the corporate government, the corporations for everything. | ||
| Then they say, okay, fine, we'll be the corporate government. | ||
| And then they just run your life. | ||
| And then it just happens overnight. | ||
| You don't even know what happened. So imagine the irony here. | ||
| You go to work, you get sick, and then you say, oh, I blame the business. | ||
| I blame the company. | ||
| They didn't protect me from COVID. As if now that's every business's burden, which it is. | ||
| They have to spend thousands of dollars on plexiglass barriers and masks and the whole thing and the tape on the ground. | ||
| And so they do everything now. | ||
| So now it's not just their business to serve you food or, you know, whatever they're doing. | ||
| Now it's their business to make sure that you don't get sick. | ||
| And that's your right as a worker or a consumer. | ||
| And if you get sick, well, then just sue the business. | ||
| And that's what they're saying. | ||
| That's what the left is now saying. | ||
| And it's just another way to attack businesses that didn't go under, that don't want to enforce masks or force vaccinations. | ||
| It's just all about killing the little guy. | ||
| It's all about killing the independent small business. | ||
| That doesn't want to be in a big corporate government, that wants to be in charge of their own policy and their own space. | ||
| But think about the irony that they say you should be able to sue a business. | ||
| If you work at a company and you get sick, they should not be above the law. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But if a vaccine gets you sick... | |
| They are above the law. | ||
| Think about the irony of that. | ||
| Who does that protect? Again, it's all about killing the little guy. | ||
| It's all about killing the independent citizen. | ||
| It's all about removing power from the independent citizen and giving all the power to the corporate government. | ||
| So vaccine manufacturers can legally kill you with a vaccine. | ||
| You know, I just... I'm going to get into this cultural news here. | ||
| I just can't get over the... | ||
| It's not even irony. | ||
| It's just... It's so ludicrous. | ||
| It's so out of this world that small businesses can't or can be sued if someone gets sick, they're saying now because of COVID. It's all COVID. Oh, you got COVID. Oh, sue your business. | ||
| Sue your employer. That'll get them. | ||
| You know, you'll be out of a job, but hey. | ||
| But the major vaccine manufacturers worth trillions of dollars Are not liable for any damages because of their vaccine. | ||
| I mean, you want to know who runs the world? | ||
| There you go, right there. | ||
| That's who runs the world. | ||
| Not you, not the small business guy. | ||
| You get nothing. You get sued. | ||
| You get destroyed. But if you're big pharma worth trillions of dollars and your vaccines kill, hell, millions of people, you're good. | ||
| In fact, good for you. You may have killed a million potential of your clients, but that's alright. | ||
| They're useless eaters to you anyway. | ||
| I just can't. | ||
| I mean, I can't make the leap. | ||
| I can't make the leap over this hurdle intellectually. | ||
| This is so ridiculous to say. | ||
| Vaccine manufacturers are not legally liable for any vaccine damages when their vaccines kill people. | ||
| But if you go to work and you get sick and you get COVID, you can sue your business. | ||
| It's their fault. Ridonkulous. | ||
| Oh, and by the way, I guess I might as well do this now since we're going in the cultural news because this is cultural. | ||
| There is a new thing that has just came out called the... | ||
| I think it's called the turtle face mask. | ||
| Guys, see if you can do it. | ||
| I'm not plugging this... | ||
| I have nothing to do with this company, but I'm seeing their commercials run on news stations. | ||
| It's called like the turtle mask or something. | ||
| Basically, it's a plastic cage type of thing that you put over your face like a mask, but it goes under your mask. | ||
| So you can breathe. | ||
| So the whole commercial is like, oh, are you sick of your mask? | ||
| You can't breathe. You're sweating. | ||
| You're breaking out with acne. | ||
| Your makeup is smearing. | ||
| You know, all this ridiculous stuff that happens when you wear this stupid mask all day. | ||
| Which everybody agrees is ridiculous. | ||
| Except for there's the most brainwashed liberals that just do it as a political virtue signaling statement. | ||
| So they now have this thing. | ||
| No, guys, it's not actually a mask. | ||
| I forget what it's called. It's turtle something. | ||
| I just know that because I'm a turtle guy. | ||
| Everybody knows about that. So there it is. | ||
| Yeah. Cool turtle. | ||
| So you put it under your mask and it's a whole thing. | ||
| Are you sick of wearing a mask and being unable to breathe? | ||
| Are you sick of having your makeup smeared or sweating or breaking out or dying from wearing a mask? | ||
| Well, good news. | ||
| We've got a workaround for you. | ||
| Wear the mask without actually wearing the mask. | ||
| It's the new cool turtle. | ||
| Again, this is not a plug. | ||
| I'm not... I have no connections or talking to these people. | ||
| I'm just saying this is how ridiculous it is now. | ||
| That there's now a market for a product that's basically an end around of wearing the mask so that you can talk and you can breathe. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Look at this, man. | |
| I'm telling you. It's just... | ||
|
unidentified
|
We are living in the clown world, man. | |
| The clown world. | ||
| So, hey, the mask never stopped COVID before, so you might as well wear the cool turtle. | ||
| You might as well put a plastic thing under it so that you can actually breathe with the mask on. | ||
| I mean, this is just... | ||
| I mean, come on. | ||
| So... But again, it's just another thing. | ||
| The mask was never about the virus. | ||
| The mask was never about health. | ||
| The mask was never about safety. | ||
| The mask was always about a psychological operation. | ||
| The mask was always about a virtue signal. | ||
| The mask was always a political statement. | ||
| And now it's a fashion statement, too. | ||
| Whoopee! Let me get into the rest of this cultural news. | ||
| Kyle Biederman... | ||
| Says this, the federal government, and I do believe he's a state legislature here in Texas, right guys? | ||
| Anyway, basically, he is filing legislation that would make Texas an independent nation again. | ||
| So, what do you think about that? | ||
| Texas again. Should we get a new flag? | ||
| A seventh Texas flag? | ||
| Oh, this is a funny one. | ||
| So AOC, you know that commie, was selling $60 hoodies. | ||
| I mean, maybe they're nice hoodies. | ||
| Maybe they're worth $60. I'm just saying, you know, that's a capitalist hoodie price. | ||
| I mean, let's be honest. That's $60 for a hoodie? | ||
| That's a capitalist hoodie. It's probably a good hoodie. | ||
| But so she's selling hoodies or sweatshirts for $60. | ||
| Now get this. | ||
| Two specific sizes... | ||
| If sold out at AOC's website, two specific sizes, extra small for boys, so men's extra small, and women's XXL. So the AOC hoodies, the official AOC hoodies, if you are a men's extra small, the soy boy is sold out. | ||
| Or if you're a women's XXL, the whale, the walrus commie, you can't get one. | ||
| So you may have to go with the XXXL. Oh my gosh, you can't make this stuff up. | ||
| I don't know which one it is, guys. | ||
| They're looking at all these sweaters. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But how funny is that? | |
| The Soy Boy AOC commie sweater is sold out and the Walrus Whale Commie female sweater is sold out. | ||
| So for all you commies out there, for all you whale-loving blubbermouthed The triple XL is sold out too! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh my god! It's literally, click a large. | |
| So yeah, like all, yeah. | ||
| Medium, good. Large, good. | ||
| Is extra large there too? | ||
| So, I mean, this is just hilarious. | ||
| Alright, I better move on. Ben and Jerry's teams up with Colin Kaepernick to unveil vegan ice cream. | ||
| Yeah, that's not gonna sell. | ||
| I was actually hanging out with somebody who used to be a vegan. | ||
| And just last night, they were like, yeah, I gave that up. | ||
| Meat is really good. | ||
| Pretty good. | ||
| Nice juicy steak. Pretty, pretty good. | ||
| But Ben and Jerry's teams up with Colin Kaepernick, unveils a vegan ice cream that will fight to dismantle systems of oppression. | ||
| Yes, that will do it. | ||
| The vegan ice cream will do it. | ||
| In fact, guys, we've done it. | ||
| Guys, let's, I mean, what are we doing? | ||
| Let's celebrate, man. We have defeated racism. | ||
| We have dismantled systems of oppression, and all it took was vegan ice cream. | ||
| Well, that's great. So now Kaepernick can go back to sucking at football, I guess, and we can get back to our normal lives now that he's defeated racism with ice cream. | ||
| Oh, thank God. | ||
| But they're still fighting. | ||
| In Virginia, a school board has erased the name of Thomas Jefferson Elementary. | ||
| It's no longer Thomas Jefferson Elementary. | ||
| It's now George Mason High. | ||
| I mean, you know. So, yeah. | ||
| Jefferson, though. He is a real bad guy. | ||
| Just created the free world. | ||
| But, yeah. Whatever. Black Google researcher claims she was fired because she discovered AI is racist. | ||
| Now, here's the irony. Remember how I told you they're making AI racist? | ||
| I mean, that's just how it's going to go. | ||
| Well, this lady is claiming that the AI is racist against black people and brown people because it's just the same thing. | ||
| Everything is racist to these people. | ||
| And so she gets fired. | ||
| Now, I have a feeling that this lady is going to be back. | ||
| And this whole thing, they're going to say, oh, she was fired because of racism, and she's going to make sure that AI isn't racist, and she'll probably be back and be a hero soon. | ||
| But she says, AI is racist against black and brown people. | ||
| It's amazing, isn't it? You didn't even know it. | ||
| How could you? You know, this is... | ||
| I want to talk about what Matthew McConaughey was talking about on a podcast with... | ||
| What's that guy's name? I can't see it. | ||
| It's the English actor. | ||
| Yes, thank you. Russell Brand. | ||
| And then Rose McGowan replied, you know, it's nice to see people in Hollywood. | ||
| You know, I don't care if people have different politics. | ||
| It's just nice to see people in Hollywood that have different politics but say, hey, you know, why are we so vitriolic? | ||
| And what is going on in D.C. with all the lying and everything? | ||
| So it's just kind of a neutral thing. | ||
| And McConaughey does live in Austin. | ||
| By the way, Visa and MasterCard are no longer processing payments on Pornhub because of unlawful content. | ||
| Oh, what's that, Diane? Oh, Diane Feinstein. | ||
| Diane Feinjiang. Driven around by a Chinese spy for 20 years. | ||
| I'm sorry. These people are just so stupid. | ||
| But then what does that make us? | ||
| My God. I mean, look, it's got to be tough on a guy like Eric Swalwell to, you know, get lucky. | ||
| So I'm sure when Fang Fang was giving him the old howdy doody, he probably fell head over heels. | ||
| To his credit, though, I believe he is married with two kids. | ||
| So maybe there's some other trouble going on there. | ||
| All right, we're switching back into election news now. | ||
| Folks, by the way, you know, we're prioritizing all the news and information here that we don't even pay the bills. | ||
| Alex Jones barely even plugged today on his show. | ||
| I haven't even plugged yet. Folks, please do your Christmas shopping at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Give the gift of clean water. | ||
| Give the gift of clean air. | ||
| Emergency food supplies, hats, supplements. | ||
| Give the gift of health. It's all at Infowarsstore.com and the Christmas specials are live right now. | ||
| That keeps us on the air and we cannot say thank you enough. | ||
| So Merry Christmas to you from Infowars and we hope you will shop with us this Christmas season at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Okay. Jack Hatfield is with me from NationalFile.com. | ||
| Let me just cram through these headlines, Jack, and then you get into the details here and what you know is developing right now in Arizona. | ||
| Arizona joins Texas SCOTUS lawsuit. | ||
| So they're in on it too. | ||
| That's interesting because they're having their own problems, but they're in on this lawsuit now. | ||
| Arizona Senate will hold official legislative hearing into election fraud complete with subpoena power. | ||
| That's big. | ||
| That's big. GOP Chair Kelly Ward calls for immediate legislative hearing into voter fraud. | ||
| She got it. Now they have the subpoena power as well. | ||
| So they've been going back and forth, basically. | ||
| Are they going to have the hearing? Are they going to have subpoena power? | ||
| Now they do have the hearing. They do have subpoena power. | ||
| And also, Sharpiegate. | ||
| We have an expert witness now reporting and confirming Sharpiegate was one of the ways that they meddled with this election. | ||
| Jack Hatfield, you're covering breaking all of this down at NationalFile.com. | ||
| You've got some information out of Arizona right now. | ||
| Did he freeze? Is he frozen in time? | ||
| Frozen in time. | ||
| Jack Hatfield. | ||
| A man. | ||
| Frozen. Hey, sometimes with Skype, you just don't know, you know? | ||
| You just don't know. | ||
| Alright, we'll get Hatfield back connected here as he was frozen in digital time space. | ||
| That's amazing. You know, by the way, while we're getting Jack reconnected, we're going to be in D.C. this weekend. | ||
| And, you know, we had probably a million people in D.C. I forget the date, but it was probably almost a month ago. | ||
| We had a million people in D.C. I actually think it would be more important for people to be in D.C. this weekend in front of the Supreme Court now that the case is actually live in the Supreme Court. | ||
| So if you can make it to D.C. and bring friends and family, get your body on the street, get out in front of the Supreme Court, let them know that if they turn their back and betray America, who they're dealing with. | ||
| Okay, Jack Hatfield, again, I give you the platform here. | ||
| What is going on in Arizona? | ||
| This is incredible. Sometimes Skype just... | ||
| There he is, frozen in time. | ||
| Let me see if I can do a London accent. | ||
| I need to listen to one. | ||
| Hey, cheerio, mate! | ||
| Hey, yeah, so there's some stuff happening in Arizona, mate! | ||
| See, I can't even do it. I need to hear one first. | ||
| Or just pretend I'm Austin Powers, maybe. | ||
| Guys, I'm assuming we're trying to get reconnected. | ||
| Okay. That's alright. | ||
| Let me go through some of this other news, and when we get him back, just let me know. | ||
| But he wants to get into the details of what's happening in Arizona. | ||
| Again, they're flip-flopping back and forth. | ||
| Are we having hearings? Are we not having hearings? | ||
| Are they going to have subpoena power? | ||
| Are they not? Should we be doing this? | ||
| What happened with the Sharpies? | ||
| And so now it is confirmed. | ||
| They will have the hearings. They will have subpoena power. | ||
| And yes, they basically used Sharpiegate to nullify anything that came in as a Trump vote. | ||
| They would just count for Biden. | ||
| Oh, I don't know. The Sharpie bled. | ||
| What do you think? It's like, clearly Trump. | ||
| Oh, it bled. I think it's Biden. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, okay. Magic. | |
| Sharpie. Magic. | ||
| And I'm going to get into this, though, with Robert Barnes, who's going to be joining me coming up. | ||
| 106 Republican House members just filed an amicus brief in support of Texas' bid to overturn Biden's win in the Supreme Court. | ||
| Well, he hasn't won. | ||
| It's just to basically sanction the illegal vote in states that illegally certified him as the winner of those states. | ||
| Rudy Giuliani identifies Ruby Freeman, Shea Moss calls for them to be subpoenaed. | ||
| And these are some of the people in Georgia that were caught on video doing some nefarious shenanigans. | ||
| And then I really want to hear Barnes' take on this. | ||
| And I've heard a couple other legal experts take on this. | ||
| Facebook should be in major, major trouble. | ||
| I mean, along with YouTube and Google and Twitter and the rest for in-kind contributions that they've never actually reported, I mean, I would say the value of the censorship by YouTube and Twitter and Facebook, I mean, honestly, the value of that, how much is an election worth? | ||
| A trillion dollars? | ||
| I mean... You can make that argument that it's worth a trillion dollars. | ||
| When you talk about how much money goes out during a presidential campaign or during a presidential four years with just all the money that gets out? | ||
| I mean, how much is the presidential election worth? | ||
| How can you put a value... | ||
| On the in-kind contributions from Facebook and Twitter and YouTube and Google and the rest who censored... | ||
| I mean, just look at the New York Post story for one. | ||
| And I guess it was Trump's team or somebody did some poll of independence that had never heard of the Hunter Biden story. | ||
| And I forget what it is, but it's like, yeah, people, now that they know about Hunter Biden, would have not voted for Biden. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Of course! I mean, this is a no-brainer. | |
| Joe Biden in bed with China? | ||
| Hunter Biden? James Biden? | ||
| A rat hole? A mole? | ||
| A mule? Little prom boy, Eric Swalwell? | ||
| Dianne Feinstein, all with Chinese spies, all running the Democrat Party? | ||
| Remember how they had the Trump with the PP gate, fake news, and then the The pee-grab tape that was, oh, oh my gosh, oh, the pee-grab. | ||
| But, you know, Hunter Biden with little girls in China and Joe Biden showering inappropriately with his daughter and then her suffering psychological trauma because of it. | ||
| Yeah, no, that's fine, though. Trump says, hey, I'm a billionaire and, you know, women really like me and, you know, not so bad, huh? | ||
| Yeah, what can I say? I'm worth a billion dollars. | ||
| I got fancy cars and women run up to me and they just let me grab them by the, you know. | ||
| Oh my gosh! | ||
| How uncouth! | ||
| How sordid! He can never be president! | ||
| We will never! We're better than this! | ||
| I'm such a person! | ||
| I'm so high on integrity and honor and I can just never have such a person! | ||
| Oh, but then there's Joe Biden. | ||
| Hunter Biden involved with Russian oligarchs who run child sex trafficking. | ||
| Hunter Biden involved with Chinese communists getting millions of dollars that run death camps. | ||
| Biden openly bragging about his bribery using taxpayer dollars to get a prosecutor fired in Ukraine and get his son on an oil board. | ||
| I mean, it's all just, you know, that's fine. | ||
| Trump jokes about how rich, how women like rich men, which is taught in human psychology, by the way. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Taught. It's called resources. | |
| Yeah. Go take a college-level psychology course. | ||
| Upper level. They teach you. | ||
| What do women find sexually attractive? | ||
| Resources is number one. | ||
| Resources. Yeah, you know what that is? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Money. It's no secret. | |
| Oh, I mean, why would that even? | ||
| It's not even a bad thing. So Trump makes jokes about it. | ||
| Oh, well, you know, he's the worst person ever. | ||
| Oh, but Hunter Biden's smoking crack with Chinese hookers and Joe Biden, you know, with Hunter and incest and all this stuff. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, we just don't even. He's a better person. | |
| Keep telling yourselves that, libtards. | ||
| Alright, what's Jack's story, guys? | ||
| Are we just no good? Okay, well, unfortunately, I guess we're only going to be able to do five minutes with Jack. | ||
| Jack, just tease what we have coming up here. | ||
| Short break and then a short five-minute segment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What you're going to break down. Yeah, exactly. | |
| As you mentioned earlier, there's been today announced a full legislative hearing that we're going to get in Arizona tomorrow, we believe, at 9 a.m. | ||
| their time. Obviously, this is different to the hearing that they had with Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis a few weeks ago, because this will have full subpoena powers. | ||
| They'll be able to... | ||
| All right, this is great news. This is great news. | ||
| This is a domino to fall. We'll be right back. | ||
| Yeah, baby! All right, I don't have enough time to really have fun with this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's funny, though. Oh, behave. | |
| All right, but we have to get focused with Jack Hatfield here. | ||
| He's got huge breaking news. | ||
| Jack, I'm going to give you, I've got four minutes here. | ||
| I'm sorry we had that Skype connection issue, man. | ||
| But just take the four minutes, explain what's happening in Arizona and why it's so key. | ||
| Exactly. Well, I'll be able to – well, thankfully, I've got everything in front of me now, so I should be able to run through it as quickly, concisely, and as clearly as possible. | ||
| Now, there will be a legislative hearing in the Arizona Senate starting tomorrow at 9. | ||
| We've got top GOP sources in Arizona telling us at National File that – They could subpoena people. | ||
| They could subpoena Eric Coomer from Dominion. | ||
| They could subpoena the entire Dominion people. | ||
| Which means they could no longer skip these hearings, which they refused to show up. | ||
| They refused to testify. They refused to answer a phone call, return a text, nothing. | ||
| Yes, yes, clearly. And that's been the difference between this and the other previous hearing, in that they have the subpoena power, and they will actually bring them in and get them to talking about, well, Sharpiegate, because really, that's the difference between Arizona. | ||
| And that's why Arizona was able to join Texas in their lawsuit against the other states, because the lawsuits that Texas has Against Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin is mostly focused on the stuff dealing with the mail-in ballots and the unconstitutional changes that were done by the secretaries of state without the consent of the legislator. | ||
| Now, Arizona has had a very strong mail-in system We're good to go. | ||
| Who confirmed that they had seen, you know, that they had a witness who saw people hitting a green button all day on the voting machines, which caused them, which caused the ballots to be spoiled potentially and then adjudicated. | ||
| Well, we've got so much information on this, but to give a quick rundown, just in where we had... | ||
| The green button being hit on the machines. | ||
| The expert witness said this would cause them to be duplicated and adjudicated. | ||
| And that's where Kelly Ward, who's the head of the Arizona GOP, caught two ballots being changed from, well, one being changed from Trump to Biden and one vote being taken away from Trump, making a 3% fraud difference. | ||
| We were actually able to do some analysis on that, working out that Trump would only need an adjudication rate of around 10.3% to take back Arizona. | ||
| Now on that green button, we actually have more sources telling us that we don't actually know what was going on with those votes. | ||
| We don't know where those votes have gone. | ||
| So this is very concerning. | ||
| So while Arizona may not have problems with mail-in ballots like the other states, and didn't unconstitutionally change the rulings like these other states, there are still serious things going on. | ||
| And that's why it's so important that we've had this legislative hearing. | ||
| This is something that Kelly Ward, again, who's the head of the Arizona GOP, has been pushing for since at least last week. | ||
| She's been hitting everybody hard online. | ||
| Now this hearing was called in the Senate, so it'll be done by the Senate President, Karen Fan. | ||
| The other person who could have called the legislative hearing would have been Speaker Rusty Bowers in the House. | ||
| Speaker Bowers, along with Fan and a couple other people, have called for an audit of the Dominion voting machines. | ||
| However, Bowers actually put out a statement only a few days ago where he said where he wouldn't commit to calling this legislative hearing. | ||
| And he also claims they couldn't enforce the Constitution in ways that they could. | ||
| In fact, he was slammed by various constitutional experts and other members of the Arizona legislature. | ||
| So it's no surprise that the hearing is coming in the Senate rather than the House. | ||
| It's pretty clear that Rusty Bowers and other people, again, like Governor Doug Ducey, he's supposed to be a Republican. | ||
| It seems there's some sort of Republican civil war brewing within Arizona where you have strong people like Kelly Ward and Paul Gosar against Rusty Bowers and Doug Ducey. | ||
| So we'll have to see what's... | ||
| The full story is at NationalFile.com. | ||
| Jack, thank you for joining us. | ||
| Thank you. And that... | ||
| Is what a peaceful transition of power looks like, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| I can see Bob Barnes enjoys that. | ||
| Robert Barnes is joining me here on The War Room. | ||
| He's going to be with me for the next three segments, and I'm going to give him the platform here. | ||
| He's the legal scholar. | ||
| He's the academic scholar on Constitution law. | ||
| And there's really so much to break down right now. | ||
| Bob, let's start with... | ||
| The now 21 states that have gotten behind Texas in the Supreme Court lawsuit. | ||
| Let's talk about the weight of this. | ||
| Let's talk about the historical impact of this. | ||
| And let's talk about, I mean, quite frankly, the odds. | ||
| What are the odds of success for Trump or not success at this level? | ||
| Constitutional Attorney Bob Barnes. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, it is by far the best chance that the president has. | ||
| So either the Supreme Court's going to get involved, they're going to get involved in this case now. | ||
| All of the other cases had less power and persuasion behind them. | ||
| This is both the easiest case for the Supreme Court to take and the hardest case for them to turn down. | ||
| You now have 21 states joining in requesting this original action be taken. | ||
| You now have over 105 Congress members joining in. | ||
| You now have state legislators from the relevant states joining in. | ||
| You have a range of citizens joining in under the Amistad Project's filing today. | ||
| And on top of that, of course, you have the president himself joining in. | ||
| So there's no question that this is really the decisive, determinative case. | ||
| And the question is whether the Supreme Court will fulfill its constitutional role and take up the case. | ||
| The first step is, do they take the case? | ||
| The second step is whether they find a violation occurred. | ||
| And the third will be what the remedy is. | ||
| And so I think there is a good chance that they take the case. | ||
| This is definitely the only case that will be taken to resolve the election. | ||
| If they don't take this case, game over in terms of Supreme Court. | ||
| Congress, you still have an option there, but that's it effectively because the state legislatures as bodies have not been able to take remedial action. | ||
| But the core issue is the states got together and they said, let's do a contract with each other about how we're going to govern ourselves in a national government. | ||
| And the main issue was how do we decide the presidency? | ||
| And they said, okay, well, we're going to pick one particular branch of each state government to choose electors. | ||
| They didn't say the states could. | ||
| They said the state legislatures exclusively could. | ||
| And the reason for that was they wanted to make sure the choice of the president was as close to the people as possible while still having some representative component to it. | ||
| So it was the most democratic option of the options present. | ||
| And what happened here—and by definition, they're the signatories. | ||
| People tend to forget the Constitution is just a compact among states. | ||
| It's a group of governments getting together, deciding how they're going to govern each other in a national government. | ||
| It's not United America. | ||
| It's not United Americans. | ||
| It's United States of America. | ||
| And consequently, the original signatories to this constitutional contract— Are the states themselves? | ||
| And who better to enforce that? | ||
| Who better to have standing to resolve that than the states themselves? | ||
| And the Supreme Court even set up – I mean the Constitution even set up a remedy mechanism. | ||
| It said if there's a controversy between the states, between the signatories to this constitutional contract – Then the means of resolution is exclusively the Supreme Court of the United States. | ||
| They have original jurisdiction. | ||
| They are the trial court and the appellate court and the Supreme Court when it comes to a legal dispute between the states about the Constitution. | ||
| So, while they filed a motion for leave to be able to file their original complaint, that frankly should be seen more as a formality than as a substantive barrier, because the whole point and purpose of this constitution was that the states would have remedy if one of them decided to go AWOL, particularly as to the most important aspect of what they agreed to, which was the electors clause to the US constitution. | ||
| And Justice Scalia, Justice Thomas, Justice Rehnquist explained all of this in Bush v. | ||
| Gore in their concurring opinion in 2000, and the Supreme Court current constitution is much more in aligned with their collective thinking than were, say, Kennedy or O'Connor back in the day. | ||
| So that's the guidepost. | ||
| This case is directly within that concurring opinion guidepost, which said when it's a presidential election, when it concerns the electors' clause, we, the Supreme Court, should be the ones to step in and decide the issue. | ||
| So the first big hurdle is getting the Supreme Court to take the case. | ||
| I believe they should. | ||
| I believe the Constitution mandates that they must. | ||
| And now there's 21 states in agreement. | ||
| There's now over 105 congressmen in agreement. | ||
| There's now leading state legislators from those states that are at issue in agreement. | ||
| There's now a range of legal scholars and others in agreement, and there's private citizens filing amicus briefs and the president himself filing his motion to intervene. | ||
| So you look at that, there's no more compelling case than this case. | ||
| There's no better opportunity to get the Supreme Court to resolve it than this case, and it's probably do or die with the Supreme Court with whether or not they take this case. | ||
| If they take it, Then the next question is, do they agree that the electors' clause was violated, and do they agree on what the remedy should be? | ||
| And whether the electors' clause was violated is very simple. | ||
| Did someone other than the state legislatures choose the electors to the presidency in this election? | ||
| Well, I mean, let's call it what it is. | ||
| The law was broke. I mean, that's cut and dry. | ||
| I mean, there's no debate about that. | ||
| I mean, they can get into... I mean, you presented the weight of this case. | ||
| The Supreme Court has to hear it, or their derelict of duty. | ||
| Now, when it comes to the actual application of law here, to me, it's cut and dry. | ||
| Oh, yeah. I mean, there's no doubt, frankly, the genius of this suit was you don't have to go down rabbit holes about Dominion or technology or foreign governments or any of that. | ||
| You don't even have to prove fraud. | ||
| All you have to do is, did the state legislatures choose electors or not in those states? | ||
| And we all know they didn't. | ||
| The secretaries of state, the governors, various local election clerks, they chose the presidency because they changed the rules about which ballots counted and which ones didn't. | ||
| And that happened in Pennsylvania, that happened in Georgia, that happened in Michigan, that happened in Wisconsin. | ||
| And that's, of course, he only needs three of the four to deny Biden a majority of the Electoral College. | ||
| And so I think there's no doubt they violated it. | ||
| They have various excuses as to why they don't think they violated it, but that's a secondary question after whether or not the Supreme Court takes the case. | ||
| I think there's clear evidence that they violated the Elector's Clause. | ||
| Again, they decided to change the rules of the game. | ||
| They're like referees in the middle of the game, decide, you know what, we're going to change the rules because we don't like who's winning, even though they didn't have the right to write the rules in the first place. | ||
| And that's what happened. | ||
| And the Constitution said if that occurs, one, only the state legislatures can write the rules. | ||
| If anybody else does, then it's got to be thrown out. | ||
| That's what three justices said in the Supreme Court in Bush v. | ||
| Gore. And the mindset of those three justices is reflected in six of the current Supreme Court justices. | ||
| Second, we said if there's a controversy, the place to come is the Supreme Court of the United States. | ||
| And it's the only place you can come. | ||
| And then third, the 12th Amendment establishes a remedy. | ||
| Now, they have alternative remedies they can provide. | ||
| They can say, well, we're going to send this back to the states, and the states can have a new election. | ||
| We're going to send it back to the states, and the legislators can pick. | ||
| But my view is the best remedy is the 12th Amendment to the United States Constitution, which said if for any reason there is not a majority of electors properly chosen by the date, then the remedy is you go to the House of Representatives and you vote by state delegation. | ||
| So this is not a majority House vote. | ||
| This is a state delegation vote where, of course, Trump has a substantial advantage. | ||
| And that's part of the democratic process. | ||
| This isn't throwing out votes. | ||
| This is making the votes for the House matter. | ||
| Because when people vote for Congress, they know one of the powers they give them is, if we ever have a contested presidential election, you, by state delegation, will have the power to choose who the president is. | ||
| And the only reason we have a contested election is because a bunch of states decided not to follow the rules they agreed to at the very beginning in the constitutional compact itself. | ||
| Nobody forced them to do that. | ||
| Like, their excuse now is, well, golly gee, we got away with it, so now we should be able to permanently get away with it. | ||
| That's not the Constitution. | ||
| That's not what our country is about. | ||
| That's why the Supreme Court must take remedy if the Supreme Court is going to make our Constitution still enforceable and still a living governing document of our American experiment. | ||
| All right, I want to talk about some of the other laws that were violated, and I'm going to ask Robert Barnes if he thinks this will be brought up or presented as evidence as well. | ||
| We're back here in the InfoWars War Room, brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Constitutional attorney, legal expert Robert Barnes is on with us. | ||
| Before I ask you about the implications That are also law that says there have to be poll watchers present when they count votes, and they didn't. | ||
| And ironically enough, it's the four states. | ||
| It's the same graph, all the states. | ||
| Trump is winning all day, all night, and then they close the polls and stop counting, except then magically there's hundreds of thousands of votes for Biden overnight. | ||
| Nobody sees no poll watchers. | ||
| Oh, Biden wins, they stop counting. | ||
| I mean, could those potentially be nullified? | ||
| But before we even get into that, going back to hone in on what you were just talking about, Again, I mean, the weight of this case now, with all the people behind it, you'd think the Supreme Court would have to take it. | ||
| It would just be too much of a statement not to take it at this point. | ||
| And then based on the law, they would have to overturn it. | ||
| But let's say, so if they do overturn it, you're saying that the option would then go back to the states or it would go to the House. | ||
| But let's say that they don't overturn it. | ||
| I mean, what kind of precedent does that set? | ||
| A very perilous precedent. | ||
| I mean, particularly if they don't take the case. | ||
| If they don't take the case, then who has standing to enforce the electors clause of the U.S. Constitution? | ||
| Because they've already said individuals can't sue. | ||
| They've already said campaigns can't sue. | ||
| They've already said candidates can't sue. | ||
| They've already said individual state actors can't sue. | ||
| So now the states can't sue? | ||
| That means nobody can sue. | ||
| And if you have a right without a remedy, you don't have a right at all. | ||
| Just like if you have a rule without punishment, you have no rule at all. | ||
| So if we're going to have a rule of law, if we're going to have a constitutionally governed civil society, particularly as to something as consequential as the presidential election, particularly as to something that was laid out in the Constitution, here's how we're going to pick And it's important to note, they could have said states can pick however they want. | ||
| That's not what they did. | ||
| They did do that in other contexts. | ||
| They did not do that for the presidency. | ||
| They said only the state legislatures can pick. | ||
| And so what happens when somebody other than the state legislature picks? | ||
| So the defense of Pennsylvania and these other states is, you know what? | ||
| That law is unenforceable. | ||
| It's whatever we decide. It's whatever we have the power to do. | ||
| And that's not what the Constitution called for. | ||
| They didn't go out of their way to have the state legislatures be the exclusive means of choosing electors to the presidency if there's no consequence when someone other than the state legislatures pick the electors to the presidency. | ||
| Well, and that's what I'm afraid of, too, is this will be like the new gerrymandering. | ||
| Well, they'll just come up with new rules for voting, whatever works for them. | ||
| I mean, they could do something or say, well, we're doing text-in voting now. | ||
| We're going to have text-in voting, and they could have someone rig up some tech, and you'll have 100 million votes in Pennsylvania all of a sudden. | ||
| 100 million people voted in Pennsylvania for text-in voting. | ||
| Oh, nothing to see here, and the Supreme Court won't hear it. | ||
| So, yeah, I agree that that is a very perilous precedent. | ||
| Now, I am just curious if, you know, when this case gets to the Supreme Court, how much evidence is going to be presented? | ||
| I brought this up earlier. I'm curious, though, do you think, I mean, what about the poll watchers law? | ||
| In these four states, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan, there is a law that says there have to be poll watchers. | ||
| It may be all states. I just know it in those states because it's been in the news. | ||
| So if you have ballots that are counted without a single poll watcher, I mean, they could make the argument in Pennsylvania that during the day, oh, yeah, they still had poll watchers. | ||
| I mean, they had the binoculars. | ||
| They had a telescope out just to see the room. | ||
| But they could probably make the argument. | ||
| They say, oh, they had poll watchers, but not at 5 a.m. | ||
| when the votes flipped. So, I mean, what about that as a potential argument to nullify those votes from, you know, 5 a.m. | ||
| to 6 a.m. that all went for Biden? | ||
| Do you think that may get brought up? | ||
| I think the better remedy here is to say that if at all the election was decided by something other than the rules set down by the state legislature, your electors can't count. | ||
| The reason for that is we don't necessarily want a situation where we give people an incentive because theoretically down the road these could be a whole bunch of Trump votes or votes for someone that was legitimately elected and they invalidate them by simply not allowing monitors to be present when they count them. | ||
| So we don't necessarily want throwing out votes to be the remedy. | ||
| We want that if it involves the presidency The remedy is go to the House of Representatives because that's still a little d democratic and constitutional remedy. | ||
| That's still recognizing and respecting people's votes. | ||
| So you're saying basically the vote totals aren't going to change or will really just be irrelevant. | ||
| It'll come down to the new administrators of the vote essentially, which will be the state legislators. | ||
| Right, exactly. It's two different bodies. | ||
| They could either send it back to the state legislatures and say, you get to pick who the electors are, or what the Constitution came up with. | ||
| They recognized this was a problem after 1800, and that's why they passed the 12th Amendment in 1803. | ||
| They said, okay, if we ever have a dispute in the future where we don't know who won the electors from a particular state— Or where they're in controversy or dispute, or where the legislature wasn't the one to actually choose them because there was something irregular done in the manner and method by which they were selected, then the remedy is we go to the House by state delegation. | ||
| And everybody knows those rules. | ||
| Everybody knows in advance. | ||
| All these states that are now complaining, golly gee, you shouldn't throw out our electors, they knew the rules were if they didn't abide by what the legislature chose in those states, then the remedy was going to be it was going to go to the House to vote by state delegation. | ||
| And that's why I think that should be the remedy, because that's what the Constitution provides for. | ||
| The Constitution says if for any reason there is not a majority of electors present for either candidate, then it goes to the House to vote by state delegation, and everybody who voted in 2020 Knew as part of their power, now maybe they cognitively knew it, maybe they didn't, but they were on notice of it, of the Constitution. | ||
| Part of the power you give your member of the House is if for any reason the presidential election is contested, they as part of each state delegation are going to get to elect the next president of the United States. | ||
| And that's what the Constitution called for because it was a balanced remedy that had a role for the state legislatures, a role for the Supreme Court, and a role for the House to vote by state delegation. | ||
| It was a carefully balanced set of remedies designed to deal with precisely these set of circumstances to make sure the appropriate body each had a role. | ||
| And that it balanced interests of republicanism and democratic politics of representative government and the people's will of the judicial role, the executive role, and the legislative role. | ||
| So it's a really carefully calibrated structure meant to solve these problems that we established in 1804. | ||
| So why abandon or abscond from this resolution mechanism now? | ||
| Just because they don't like the fact that Trump is going to win if it goes to the House. | ||
| I mean, Pennsylvania... | ||
| I guess the official case is Pennsylvania versus Michigan, Wisconsin, or excuse me, Texas versus Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia. | ||
| I mean, are we looking at a landmark case here that's going to be studied throughout American history? | ||
| Yes. I mean, we designed the Constitution to solve this problem, and it just took 200-plus years for the problem to arise. | ||
| But does the constitutional framework continue to operate or not? | ||
| Because if the Supreme Court doesn't take the case, then we've basically scrapped the entire constitutional framework at its core, which is how do you choose the president of the United States? | ||
| And so if this is still not enforceable, we are in a post-constitutional age. | ||
| And that, again, is the precedent that I'm so concerned about here, because then it's just, I mean, nothing will stop the Democrats or anybody from cheating. | ||
| I mean, forget about it, whether you like Democrats or Republicans, whatever. | ||
| Anybody who wants to cheat, I'm telling you, they'll do email in your vote, text in your vote, you know, shout from your window. | ||
| I vote Biden. Oh, I heard someone. | ||
| They said it. That counts, you know. | ||
| I mean, it's just, it's totally ridiculous. | ||
| All right, when we get back, I'm going to change lanes a little bit, though. | ||
| And I'm going to talk about big tech's involvement in this election, and they may be punished. | ||
| And we've got constitutional law expert Robert Barnes on with us. | ||
| The one other thing I wanted to talk to him about with the implications of our elections... | ||
| Would be this new hearing in Arizona that now has subpoena power, which means Dominion will no longer be able to skirt doing live testimony under oath. | ||
| If I have time in the segment, I want to get to that. | ||
| But I wanted to ask Robert Barnes something else first. | ||
| And NPR has this story, and it's funny that they're bragging about this. | ||
| I remember when I heard about this, I was ranting and raving on air like a lunatic. | ||
| But their headline is, Now, there was also a witness to this. | ||
| He's also a lawyer, Robert. | ||
| I forget his name. You may know this gentleman. | ||
| He's been around for a while. And he specializes in non-profit law. | ||
| There's a lot of gray area there. | ||
| I won't go too much into what he was talking about. | ||
| But basically what he said was... | ||
| Facebook essentially broke the law in 2020 when it came to what they did with their non-profit, I forget what it was called, where they gave hundreds of millions of dollars to save the vote or something like that and protect the vote, these other things. Oh, we're going to give them masks. | ||
| We're going to make sure people get out to vote. | ||
| We're going to make sure people get registered. | ||
| And so the thing is, when you make donations like that, in particular, political, it has to be fair. | ||
| It has to be balanced. You're a non-profit. | ||
| Well, Facebook, all that money only went to Democrat areas, specifically in Atlanta or Philadelphia, the places they stole. | ||
| So that's where it went. No masks or protective gear or anything were ever purchased. | ||
| So... There's the one aspect of in-kind contributions of the censorship that's immeasurable, really. | ||
| I mean, trillions of dollars of value, honestly, to me. | ||
| But who knows if that'll ever get brought up. | ||
| But this has been brought up in hearings, and this is, to me, open shut. | ||
| So when you're Facebook, hundreds of millions of dollars, it's supposed to be spread out equally, and they only go to Democrat-run areas to register voters to vote Democrat. | ||
| I mean, how is there not more fuss over this, Robert? | ||
| There's no doubt that there's issues because you have 501c3s and 501c4s, and depending on how they're structured, they were structured as a true charity, apparently, which means you're not supposed to be involved in political activity, and it's clear that they were, and for partisan purposes. | ||
| So that's problem one, an internal IRS kind of problem, though they tend to have disparate and discriminatory standards as to when they apply those rules. | ||
| But the second part of it is the Amistad Project is raising this as a violation of the Elector's Clause as well. | ||
| Because what happened is you effectively delegated duties that were constitutionally obligated to be performed by certain state officials through the state legislature were essentially co-opted by private actors. | ||
| So you had big tech companies, sometimes directly, sometimes disguised through so-called charities, basically co-opt the election process and decide who actually got elected in many of these states in manners often contrary to the plain language of the law the state legislatures had established in the first place, including training election officials, paying election officials, being the source of actual election officials. Imagine if the Trump Organization had gone around paying | ||
| election officials, had gone around directing election officials how to operate. | ||
| Bob, I'm sorry I have to cut you off there because this is so hilarious. | ||
| I didn't even see this. Because it's the same thing. | ||
| Facebook, it says right there on NPR, Facebook funds NPR! So it's like the same thing. | ||
| It's like, oh, you have a whole news story about how great Facebook is, and then at the bottom it says, by the way, this was paid for by Facebook. | ||
| That's what they're doing, though. | ||
| That's exactly what they're doing. | ||
| I mean, it's like Bill Gates getting fact-checked in his favor by organizations that he donates to. | ||
| I mean, it's completely a crock. | ||
| I mean, it's Pravda times 10. | ||
| And then when you add to that, so you have probably the illicit involvement of big tech directly in the election. | ||
| And this doesn't even include what you're talking about, the illicit, undisclosed, in-kind contributions where they laundered money in multiple ways to influence the election without making it a proper campaign donation, outside of proper disclosure, without being in excess, greatly in excess, billions of dollars in excess of the limits that are allowed for companies to influence elections. | ||
| But the other way they did so, of course, is through algorithmic manipulation and Google searches, targeting certain voters in certain locations and Facebook notifications, Instagram notifications, various Snapchat notifications. | ||
| Basically, if you were considered a potential Democrat, big tech used their data to send you a message, register, vote, register, vote, register, vote, every single day, while they were promoting anti-Trump, pro-Biden stories. | ||
| And one of the biggest ones was they, it is the biggest big media, big tech, big money, influence in a presidential election ever, but also the biggest suppression of a scandal involving a lead presidential candidate in our history. | ||
| This is invaluable. | ||
| I'm serious. I mean, we're talking about trillions of dollars in kind. | ||
| If you really wanted to do the math, I would make that argument. | ||
| By the way, just to cover this, I want to change lanes back with Robert before we both depart here. | ||
| 46 states FTC file antitrust charges against Facebook, led by New York Attorney General Letitia James. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, she is a controlled asset, and she is going to protect them. | ||
| Her being in charge of this case means she's protecting them from these antitrust charges, so just be aware of that. | ||
| Now, my final point for you here, Robert, we have three minutes left. | ||
| The new hearing in Arizona has subpoena power, which means potentially you could have Dominion, you know, you already had Dominion contractors testify, but actual Dominion potential executives or, you know, whoever does their tech stuff would have to come testify. | ||
| What about implications of that? | ||
| I mean, under oath, I mean, we're getting real into hairy territory now. | ||
| Yes, and I think they should start to exercise that power in multiple contexts. | ||
| The election contest also had that potential power. | ||
| I know the one in Georgia brought by the Trump campaign is very detailed, very substantial. | ||
| They can use the court's compulsory process to discover things. | ||
| In the Texas suit, if the Supreme Court accepts it, They're actually a trial court, and if they want to, they can allow the subpoenas to be issued. | ||
| They can allow actual verbal testimony to take place. | ||
| It's up to them, but that's actually happened before. | ||
| The Supreme Court becomes the trial court if they want to exercise that power. | ||
| Technically, they're supposed to if there's any facts that are in controversy or in dispute. | ||
| So you could actually have a Supreme Court trial on these kind of issues if the Supreme Court will step up to the plate. | ||
| And I think it would be good for the country to see it. | ||
| See all the irregularities that took place. | ||
| See all the problems that took place. | ||
| See all the issues that took place. | ||
| So that people, I mean, already we're to the point where about half the country has no confidence in the election. | ||
| Yeah, but let me ask you this though. | ||
| That's the highest number ever. | ||
| Let me ask you this though. The angle, because all the focus is around the 2020 election and rightfully so, but maybe the angle here needs to be Not even worried about the 2020 elections, but in general, we don't want these machines doing any elections anymore. | ||
| I mean, it's almost like throw out the 2020 thing when it comes to this hearing and just say, look, you know, first of all, answer questions under oath. | ||
| But then just as a whole nation, we just need to say we're done with Dominion. | ||
| I mean, this is we did complain about Russian collusion. | ||
| I mean, give me a break. Dominion is run by foreign nations. | ||
| So, I mean, could that be the angle that they push for future to just say, look, we're done with Dominion here? | ||
| What we should have is we should use this as an opportunity to create real election law reform all across the country so that we have clean, open, transparent elections, borrow the same standards we impose on the rest of the world. | ||
| So I'll give one example. | ||
| On the rest of the world, you have to announce the total number of votes as soon as the polls close. | ||
| You can't keep finding votes and finding votes and finding votes for hours and days. | ||
| Boy, that would hurt the Democrats. | ||
| They found him in closets a month after the election. | ||
| They found him in drawers. | ||
| I heard Hunter Biden... | ||
| Oh, look, another 20 votes. Look here, another 12. | ||
| Hunter Biden actually found some up his keister. | ||
| A judicious no comment. | ||
| But there's no question. | ||
| I mean, there's just been a range of insane provisions. | ||
| Our elections make third world elections look good. | ||
| No, it really is a joke. | ||
| I remember someone from Iraq was like, yeah, you guys came in and made our elections actually like a democracy, but now your elections are more out of control than ours in Iraq. | ||
| Incredible. Robert Barnes... | ||
| Thank you so much for coming on. | ||
| By the way, folks, you can see Robert Barnes more on InfoWars at night, 7 to 9 p.m., Taking Back America Live. | ||
| Robert Barnes is also co-hosting that most of the night. | ||
| So, Robert, thank you so much. | ||
| Great stuff as always. God bless, brother. | ||
| Absolutely. Glad to be here, man. Okay, ladies and gentlemen, I am about to jet set to Washington District of Criminals, the swamp. | ||
| Harrison Smith is going to take over. | ||
| He's got news and other great guests. | ||
| I hope I see you in D.C. this weekend. | ||
| It's going to be a big one in front of the Capitol. | ||
| Remember, folks, Infowarsstore.com makes everything we do here possible. | ||
| Infowarsstore.com. Welcome back to the program, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| It's The War Room on Infowars.com. | ||
| My name is Harrison Smith. I'll be sitting in for Owen Schroer for this last hour as he makes the final preparations of the great move to Washington, D.C. for all of the protests this weekend. | ||
| I'll also be hosting tomorrow, and I'm hoping to line up some very good guests, some very big guests, some guests I'm very excited about. | ||
| So we're reaching out to them right now, and hopefully we'll have them on tomorrow. | ||
| And if nothing else, we'll at least be doing the Headbangers Hour, which is always a heck of a lot of fun, breaking down the latest in culture and news with some very intelligent musicians. | ||
| A lot to talk about here today, and of course, I'll be welcoming my guest Vish Burra in the next segment, and we'll be talking about COVID mandates and all sorts of silliness that we're experiencing. | ||
| Over the last couple days, I've been compiling news stories for the past year because I like to, at the end of the year, here in December, look back at the year that has been and try to come to some conclusions. | ||
| Try to frame some narratives in terms of the arc that we've taken over the last year. | ||
| And, of course, what a year it was. | ||
| I did this in 2019. | ||
| I called it the year the mask came off. | ||
| And I think it was good in a way just to go over what has happened. | ||
| Because so often, I mean, especially these days, it seems like every hour, there's some new incredible breaking story that just shatters reality for everybody. | ||
| And nobody knows what to make of it. | ||
| And then next hour, there's another story that once again throws your entire brain into convulsions as you try to piece together exactly how we got to this point and where we go from here. | ||
| And so I think it's a very valuable story. | ||
| Exercise. To sit down, take an hour... | ||
| And go over the last year and just remember where we started. | ||
| What was happening when? | ||
| You know, as InfoWars was reporting on COVID-19 and this mysterious virus that seemed to be breaking out from China and warning people, this may look like it's going to get bad. | ||
| Maybe we should be shutting the borders down. | ||
| Maybe we should be looking into this. | ||
| Meanwhile, of course, you had the impeachment going on. | ||
| you had very strong words being bandied about. | ||
| It's amazing how often we Republicans are demonized and told that we're destroying the nation, destroying democracy. | ||
| We're a threat to our very existence. | ||
| And there's some existential crisis that just has to be handled right now. | ||
| And then of course, it passes. | ||
| It was all based off nothing. | ||
| Most of the time, it was in fact, very blatant projection from the Democrats of something that they were actually doing that was about to be uncovered, that then they have to shift blame onto Republicans. | ||
| It's just amazing how over and over and over again, these crisis moments are brought out and the whole brain dead legions of America fall for it and think, oh my God, democracy is dying, democracy is dying. Then it fails because democracy is actually pretty strong here. | ||
| We're not actually a democracy, we're actually a republic. | ||
| So we actually are able to withstand the vicissitudes of the mindless masses being just controlled like puppets by the mainstream media. But it's just amazing how much has gone on in the last year. I remember three months into last year, I was like, man, I should do a quarterly report. | ||
| I thought, it's not going to be enough just to do once a year to go back and look over. | ||
| I need to have a little update every three months. | ||
| It turns out it was just too much news. | ||
| It was just too much news happened in the first three months with no idea what was coming for the next nine months. | ||
| What insanity we would be experiencing. | ||
| What depths of tyranny we would descend to. | ||
| It was... Really incredible. | ||
| So, yesterday I just went through January. | ||
| Just through January. | ||
| And I have over 300 stories from the month of January. | ||
| Just the top of the top. Just the cream of the cream. | ||
| Cream of the crop. Just the best, most important, or most emblematic, most symbolic. | ||
| You know, just the best stories. | ||
| 300 stories from a single month. | ||
| So I don't know how I'm going to do a whole year. | ||
| I honestly don't know how. | ||
| Maybe I'll try to put it into like a long-form, feature-length documentary format. | ||
| You know, telling the story. | ||
| of 2020 in a narrative way so we can go back through the last 12 months and follow the story of how everything progressed how the lies at the beginning were believed and that led to the tyranny at the end I mean it's it's really incredible and And again, I'm trying to just take the best of the best because you could go down any number of rabbit holes. | ||
| Just a single story, you could spend an hour on and unravel it and look into, okay, who is doing this? | ||
| Why are they doing it? What impetus is there to get this done? | ||
| Why is the media framing it? | ||
| I mean, you could go on and on and on for every single story. | ||
| Well, I have 300 for a single month. | ||
| What am I supposed to do with this? | ||
| So here's some of the... | ||
| Here's some of the topics that I have. | ||
| I've separated them into several sort of headlines. | ||
| You've got culture, politics, censorship, crime, race, coronavirus, climate change, health, the great reset, and the world. | ||
| I think I'm going to cover them a little bit differently than you may expect because I think what needs to be told is like the story of coronavirus as it actually happened. | ||
| You know the story of, here's where the first person was infected. | ||
| Here's how they got into America. | ||
| Here's how the virus spread in America. | ||
| Here's when the governors of New Jersey and New York and some other states sent infected people into nursing homes. | ||
| And here's the number of people infected through that. | ||
| Because I think when you just look at coronavirus, separate from the lockdowns, separate from the mask orders, separate from all of the other nonsense swirling around coronavirus, what you actually find is that there was an outbreak that Of the flu. | ||
| There was a particularly virulent flu season this year, and that's essentially what the story of coronavirus is. | ||
| So that'll be one timeline that we're tracing is what actually happened with coronavirus, the numbers, how they grew, where they shrank, just the numbers, just the sickness itself. | ||
| That'll be one timeline. | ||
| Parallel to that timeline is the insanity that was justified by the coronavirus. | ||
| And you'll see a severe disconnect between the severity of the virus and the severity of the lockdowns. | ||
| The problems caused and the threat of the virus and the problems caused and the threat of the lockdowns. | ||
| These are two very different things. | ||
| So I want to trace both of these separately, but sort of on parallel paths. | ||
| And we'll see what conclusions we can come to. | ||
| And I think if you've been watching Infowars for the past year, you've experienced this in real time. | ||
| You've joined us as it's unfolding. | ||
| And so, not much of this will be news to you. | ||
| But what is important is going back and just reminding yourself of what happened. | ||
| Of all the little things that occurred. | ||
| Even little things that maybe didn't seem like that big of a deal at the time. | ||
| And then later, you know, what actually happened with it. | ||
| It's a very valuable... | ||
| Exercise to take. | ||
| We've got anti-Christianism, transgenderism, gay sex education, impeachment, leftist violence, the presidential election, treason, international relations, big tech censorship, the social engineering of big tech, the censorship carried out by the government and universities, and of course crime may be our biggest issue. | ||
| Story here, the criminal justice reform that has absolutely laid waste to American cities as all of a sudden this year, everybody decided to defund the police. | ||
| But even before defund the police, and this is kind of the amazing thing, is that as I'm looking through January, I'm seeing all these stories that would have fit in in July or June because they're defunding the police. | ||
| They're slashing millions from the police budget. | ||
| They're reforming the criminal justice and bail laws to let out criminals. | ||
| All this sort of stuff that later they say, well, it's because of Black Lives Matter. | ||
| It's because of this great new movement that we had. | ||
| It's like, well, that's weird because when I look back to January, you were already putting this stuff in place. | ||
| You were already laying all of this stuff down. | ||
| Same thing with coronavirus. | ||
| You had places like, I believe it was a school in Minneapolis, I think, maybe Michigan. | ||
| I can't quite remember, but they were already implementing essentially what would become contact tracing. | ||
| They were making all of their students download an app onto their phone so they could track them wherever they go. | ||
| So it's just amazing that as we're in January, as I'm looking through this, January 2020, there's all these little things happening, all these little seeds being planted that we eventually see how they grow. | ||
| We see the culmination of all of these little plants Little timelines that were set loose in January. | ||
| And yet we're told it's because of events that didn't happen until long past January. | ||
| So anyway, it'll all be very interesting. | ||
| And I just want you all to know the struggle that I'm going through behind the scenes as I try to make sense of what has happened over the last year. | ||
| And just the sheer tidal wave of stories that we have to deal with literally every single week. | ||
| Of course, white supremacy. | ||
| I'll enumerate all the hate crime hoaxes. | ||
| You know, we learned a lot of things were white supremacy this year. | ||
| We learned being nice was white supremacy. | ||
| We learned hiking and camping were white supremacy. | ||
| We learned that YouTube itself is white supremacy. | ||
| Being a mother is white supremacy. | ||
| Being on time is white supremacy. | ||
| We learned all these things over the last year. | ||
| And so this will be sort of our year-end wrap-up. | ||
| And maybe I'll get into it a little bit tomorrow when I host the show. | ||
| But what a year it has been, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| And at the end of the day, what I can say is that more people have their eyes open. | ||
| More people are awake. | ||
| More people are willing to step out and question the things that they're told than ever before. | ||
| More people recognize that the stuff Infowars has been saying for the last decade is true than ever before. | ||
| Humanity is rising. | ||
| So as crazy as the last year has been, it's also been a major victory. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hi, Steve Adler. | |
| Stay home, home, home, home, home. | ||
| Plato wrote that one of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors. | ||
| Subversive legislation, illegal votes, destroyed ballots, machine glitches, poll watchers denied entry while windows are blocked with cardboard, and thousands of sworn affidavits. | ||
| While covering up the biggest flood of election fraud evidence in U.S. history, CNN admits to taking orders from the Democrat Party. | ||
| The two-party system was a product of the Civil War and devolved into a rigged two-party system set upon destroying our American birthright from within, using election fraud as its primary method of infiltration. | ||
| Strong evidence of voter fraud in favor of George W. Bush occurred in 2000. | ||
| And after Al Gore got the Florida courts to order a recount, the Supreme Court put a stop to it after determining the recount to be unconstitutional. | ||
| What makes you think the Supreme Court will rule in favor of Trump? | ||
| Attorney General William Barr seems to be defending the corrupt establishment. | ||
| How many actual patriots are there in the Trump administration? | ||
| And if Biden is inaugurated as president in January, we already know what to expect. | ||
| While vacationing in Cabo, Austin Mayor Adler told residents to stay home. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Trying to do contact tracing to see if We may have to close things down if we're not careful. | |
| If we're going to be closing things down, it would be great to be able to do it in a really surgical way. | ||
| Pfizer today said that they think they have a vaccine, but know that even when those vaccines are available, the CEO of Pfizer was reminding us that we're going to be wearing masking and social distancing and being disciplined well into 2021, so everybody just needs to get mentally prepared for that. | ||
| L.A. residents have been ordered to stay in their homes. | ||
| Michigan Governor Whitmer tells her constituents not to travel for Christmas. | ||
|
unidentified
|
An American couple was charged with second-degree reckless endangerment for attempting to fly home after testing positive for COVID-19. | |
| And a bar owner was arrested in Staten Island for simply trying to run his own business. | ||
| We have been told by several doctors that the testing being used for COVID doesn't work, including the inventor of the test himself. | ||
| And when the Pfizer vaccine comes, we can expect the real horror. | ||
| A top EU scientist has found that the new experimental mRNA vaccine will likely cause sterilization in women. | ||
| The globalist depopulation agenda is now in full view. | ||
| And the actual end of America is now seen on the horizon. | ||
| If you care about the future of the Republic, if you care about preserving your children's birthright, then get yourself to Washington, D.C. this Saturday. | ||
| This is when the real draining of the swamp begins. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Our fight to drain the Washington swamp and reclaim America's destiny has just begun. | |
| We will not bend. We will not break. | ||
| We will not yield. We will never give in. | ||
| We will never give up. | ||
| And we will never back down. | ||
| We will never, ever surrender. | ||
| Because we are Americans and our hearts bleed red, white, and blue. | ||
| Join together this Saturday in D.C. Stop the steel and drain the swamp. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Our lives depend on it. | |
| All right, folks, I won't be there on Saturday, unfortunately, because I got to be here holding down the fort, but that's because better men than me are leading the charge there. | ||
| So I hope if it is at all possible for you, you too will be there in Washington, D.C. on Saturday for yet another monumental showing of American pride. | ||
| Now, when we get back, I will welcome my guest, Vish Burra. | ||
| He's the president of the Young Republicans Club of New York, and he's causing trouble, unfortunately. | ||
| He's causing a lot of trouble. | ||
| We're going to take him to task for daring to defy the orders of the great king of New York, Andrew Cuomo. | ||
| So we'll be back on the other side with Vish Burra. | ||
| Don't go anywhere, folks. It's the War Room. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. It's the third hour of The War Room here on InfoWars.com, band.video. | ||
| Of course, we are brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com, where you can go to support this show and all that we do here, and get some fantastic products for yourself. | ||
| It is the 10th of December, the year 2020. | ||
| It's 5.06 p.m. | ||
| Central Standard Time, and I thank you so much for being here with us. | ||
| My guest is Vish And you can follow him on Twitter at Vish Burra. | ||
| That's V-I-S-H-B-U-R-R-A. And he's the vice president of the New York Young Republicans. | ||
| May have given him an unearned promotion there in the last one. | ||
| I called him the president. I have been corrected. | ||
| Vice president of the New York Young Republicans. | ||
| Still a very well-respected position to hold. | ||
| Thank you so much for coming on, sir. | ||
| Thank you. So I have this story here. | ||
| You're causing problems. | ||
| You've ignited a political dispute over COVID-19 restrictions with your Young Republican gala that featured a lot of really prominent and fantastic conservatives, including Matt Gaetz, including James O'Keefe. | ||
| I think I see Ashley St. | ||
| Clair in there, if I'm not mistaken, and a few other influencers. | ||
| It looks like you're having a great time with a bunch of just well-dressed, passionate Republicans, and they can't have that. | ||
| They don't want that. They have to demonize you somehow. | ||
| This time, of course, it was for violating the mask laws. | ||
| Can you explain what this was, what the event was and what the trouble is that you caused? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. So it was our 108th annual gala. | |
| We've been doing this gala over 100 years. | ||
| That's through two world wars and the Spanish flu. | ||
| So yeah, we've been doing this for a long time. | ||
| And this year we felt no different. | ||
| We wanted to execute the gala, make sure it was planned and it was going to happen. | ||
| And we intended to make sure that we carried on our traditions and preserve our traditions. | ||
| So with all our heart, we put this together. | ||
| Sarah Palin was the original scheduled speaker, but she had to cancel the last moment. | ||
| And so we brought in Congressman Matt Gaetz, who is no pushover himself. | ||
| And we just went on with having a party now. | ||
| Originally, what happened was that the Antifa and the criminal leftist elements had thought that this party was going to take place in New York, and it made it all the way up to the governor's office. | ||
| Governor Cuomo thought it was going to be in New York, issued a statement urging us to shut it down, and we defied that. | ||
| Because we actually ended up crossing the river and doing the event in New Jersey. | ||
| And we did it, you know, we went off about a hitch. | ||
| But the next morning, we obviously caught the eye of New Jersey Governor Bill Murphy, who then proceeded to say all sorts of outrageous things about Congressman Gates, about our club, about our party. | ||
| And he's just incensed that he managed to do this in his backyard, I guess without asking for his permission or something, and accusing us of running a unhealthy, miscellaneous, illegal gas company. | ||
| That's simply not true. | ||
| We followed all the rules. | ||
| But unfortunately, we're still under criminal investigation for throwing this party. | ||
| And the venue that hosted us has been shut down. | ||
| Oh my gosh. | ||
| Wow. For hosting you, they were shut down? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Correct. First of all, the Jersey City mayor had commented, basically stating that we had done something wrong in his backyard. | |
| Unfortunately for him, the venue actually is located in Liberty State Park, which makes it under state's jurisdiction, so it comes under the purview of the Murphy. | ||
| But the New Jersey police were present that night at the party. | ||
| And we're making sure we were complying to the rules. | ||
| So if New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy alleges that we did something wrong, what he's actually saying Is that the New Jersey State Police did not do their job because they were on site that night. | ||
| Do I agree with him on that? | ||
| Absolutely not. I think that the New Jersey State Police, the venue owners, did a great job and worked with us to make sure we complied with the rules. | ||
| And the venue owners are now at just the bad end of punitive measures just so Phil Murphy could try to take some of his manlyhood back or something like that because there's nothing he can do at this point. | ||
| Well, you know, what you represent and what we're seeing here as the pictures flash across the screen, what you represent is a major threat to their monopoly on cool, I have to say. | ||
| They want to portray Republicans as just, you know, country bumpkins, like uncool, whatever. | ||
| Like, they despise those people and they want to lump all Republicans in with sort of middle America people who, obviously, we here celebrate and love these people. | ||
| But it's really nice to see pictures of just good-looking, young people, well-dressed, just having a great time. | ||
| That is so damaging to their portrayal of us, of Republicans in general. | ||
| I think that was your major crime here. | ||
| But I want to read a quick statement from this story. | ||
| This is actually from the president of your club. | ||
| This is from Gavin Wax. He says, quote, We embrace life and living while you all cower in your pods, worried about a disease with a 99% plus survivability rate, he wrote in one tweet. | ||
| The left wants you to live in a world where socializing and being with friends and loved ones is a crime and a sin. | ||
| They claim isolation is a virtue. | ||
| It's sick. | ||
| I completely agree with that. | ||
| And on top of that, I think you bring up a good point where you're just like, hey, we just are doing what we've always done. | ||
| We've done this for over 100 years, and this year is going to be no different. | ||
| And I feel like that's the right mindset, because one of the most pernicious effects of all of these laws is that everybody's wondering what they have permission to do. | ||
| Oh, can I go in here without a mask? | ||
| Can I do this? | ||
| Am I allowed to do this? | ||
| and it's forcing us and ourselves to put limitations on ourself just out of an overabundance of caution because we're scared of violating some norm that they have decided to just clamp down on us for some reason. So I think what y'all did and just the way you express it is so key because it's about just breaking out of that mindset and going, no, I'm going to do whatever I want. | ||
| If you want to come complain about it later, that's fine. | ||
| We can deal with it. But you're not letting, you're not doing their job for them at least, right? | ||
| You're not going, oh, I'm going to limit myself and censor myself and shut myself down because they might want me to do that. | ||
| And I think that's just the best mindset to have. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, thank you. I mean, and look, we have to stand tough in the face of all this adversity. | |
| I mean, and where are you going to draw a line eventually? | ||
| I mean, now they're saying, you know, you got to wear that mask when you're inside the venue. | ||
| I believe I heard Newsom saying you should keep your mask on in between bites. | ||
| You know, and then what? | ||
| We can't even take a picture without a mask. | ||
| You know, we can't go to sleep without a mask. | ||
| You never know where this is going to lead. | ||
| And this sort of slippery slope, sort of, you know, arguments being made and sort of impositions being made on our liberties is really dangerous and we need to draw the line and we need to stop being the silent majority and we need to start expressing ourselves the way we expressed ourselves at that gala the other night. | ||
| We need to start expressing ourselves loudly and proudly with pride And be patriots and stand up for what we believe in. | ||
| We gotta let it be known. If we are going to allow these people to basically, you know, mask us and muzzle us, then we're gonna be shouted down and drowned out. | ||
| So we have to stand up, speak loud and proud and do what's on your face. | ||
| Yeah, and I think the key difference is that if you want to ask me politely to put on a mask, if you want to say, I think it's your best interest and I'd really like if you wear a mask, I'm a polite guy, I care about health, I'll probably wear a mask. | ||
| But when you come to me and say, put on the mask or you're going to jail, put on the mask or something horrible will happen, that's when I take the mask off. | ||
| And that's, you know, that's just my right as an American. | ||
| And it's a distinction that I think is lost in the mainstream media where they go, either you comply to our strict limits or you hate everybody and you want everybody to die. | ||
| But it's really about the core fundamental concept of the government doesn't have a right to tell us these types of things. | ||
| Even if they think it's for our own good, they aren't the ones that... | ||
| Make that call. And so we're about to go to break, but when we get back, we're going to show a video of you actually introducing Matt Gaetz, which must have been really an incredible honor because he is such a powerful force fighting for our country right now. | ||
| And it just, you know, I'd love to meet him one day. | ||
| I'm a little bit jealous of you. We'll show that video of you meeting Matt Gaetz. | ||
| My guest is Vish Burra. | ||
| You can follow him on Twitter at Vish Burra, V-I-S-H-B-U-R-R-A. And we'll show that clip shortly. | ||
| When we get back on the other side, has your organization come under fire or legally? | ||
| Are you guys under investigation right now? | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're currently under criminal investigation. | |
| My God. All right. It's absurd, but I guess predictable in this modern world. | ||
| I guess people in New York need to stand up and contact their local government and tell them, hey, leave these people alone. | ||
| They didn't do anything wrong. We'll be right back with Vishborough on the other side, folks. | ||
| Don't go anywhere. It's Infowars.com. | ||
| It's The War Room. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| It's the War Room. Harrison Smith sitting in for Owen Schroer. | ||
| My guest is Vish Burra. | ||
| He's the vice president of the New York Young Republicans who is coming under fire by Democrats in that state in New York City or New York State and New Jersey as well for hosting a party. | ||
| And even though they adhered to all of the laws laid down, they posted pictures of themselves not wearing masks and therefore they must be punished. | ||
| But Vish, is this not just a extension of really what is becoming political persecution of Republicans? I know that sounds a little bit extreme, like we don't like playing the victim here and that's not what we're doing. We're not looking for sympathy points, but we have to recognize the sheer just hatred that is being leveled on Republicans and they'll take any excuse they can get to try to demonize us or shut us down or punish us legally, send us to jail | ||
| because of our political beliefs. | ||
| And so this is, to me, just another example of you can have Democratic governors just completely flaunting the laws and, oh, how dare you even talk about that? | ||
| They're working very hard. They're heroes. | ||
| How dare you? Whereas you guys have a party, you're adhering to all the rules, but they're going to bring the hammer down on you. | ||
| Now you're actually under investigation. | ||
| So this really isn't something funny. | ||
| This really isn't something that just can be brushed off as, well, Democrats are mad. | ||
| No, this is a part of a pattern of literally political persecution of Republicans that we're seeing Democrats now become more and more brave about, more and more willing to come out and say, yeah, we need to politically punish Trump supporters or Republicans. | ||
| That's a very dangerous door to open, isn't it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It absolutely is. | |
| And actually, there was a segment where Stephanie Rule was talking about our party, and she had Governor Phil Murphy on. | ||
| And Stephanie Rule was essentially urging Phil Murphy as to why he hasn't We're good to go. | ||
| To do a story or a segment and have the governor come on and comment about it, it's because that's the word around Washington, D.C. Hey, these young Republicans threw a party and they totally did it in an in-your-face way to both Cuomo and And Murphy. | ||
| And they're just, you know, they're not paying any consequences. | ||
| You know, we think this is messed up because we think here in D.C., the whole country should be locked down in a way where Republicans anywhere should not be having parties or having fun. | ||
| And so I think that what we're seeing now is that especially the sort of, you know, the washing, the swamp, as we call it, is totally okay. | ||
| With watching people be persecuted for simply enjoying their freedoms or even trying to pursue happiness or pursue work, pursue property. | ||
| Venue owners have basically had their venue shut down and their way of life shut down because of this party and their attempt to pursue wealth. | ||
| And then we are being persecuted because of our attempt to pursue happiness. | ||
| And so you're seeing a sort of full-on assault by these people. | ||
| And here, in the swamp, they don't care, right? | ||
| In a time of crisis, the economy in D.C. is booming. | ||
| They get to print all the money. | ||
| They get to touch all the money first. | ||
| They get to decide where all the money actually goes. | ||
| And so for them, they do not care about the way the rest of America is dealing with this pandemic. | ||
| And if they Can trample every freedom on Earth to get what they want. | ||
| They will do so, and they will do so brazenly. | ||
| They don't care about how they look through all this. | ||
| They just do it. | ||
| And so, you know, I think at this point, especially with our party, Cuomo and Murphy are mad that they can't, they weren't able to do anything with us. | ||
| We managed to throw this party unscathed. | ||
| We faked out Cuomo, and then we dunked on Murphy, and they're just mad about it, bro. | ||
| Yeah, I think you're exactly right. | ||
| And I think your big mistake was not burning the city down. | ||
| I think then they maybe would have joined you. | ||
| Then they would have celebrated you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, you know, if we went to the Maritime Park and let ourselves in using bricks as keys through the window and then, you know, barged in a thousand or more, ignoring any occupancy rules, and then just made sure all our speech ended with hashtag Black Lives Matter, I would bet that Phil Murphy would have been on the phone trying to get himself an invite to the party, right? | |
| Absolutely. I think this is nonsense. | ||
| And again, it's total hypocrisy. | ||
| And we just wanted to have some good, clean fun. | ||
| We did it. We love each other. | ||
| We came together, had fun, and they just can't stand it. | ||
| Yeah, I think you're exactly right. | ||
| And it's just the sheer hypocrisy in itself is ridiculous. | ||
| But then on top of that, the fact that they aren't just complaining, they aren't just doing things like using MSNBC to pressure the governor, then they actually are opening criminal investigations. | ||
| So, you know, it's one thing and it's great to stand up and go, hey, we're going to do what we want. | ||
| And, you know, you can go jump in the river if you say otherwise. | ||
| Like, that's great. But they also have the reins of power and are actually using it to actually punish you in real life. | ||
| So... It's incredibly frustrating. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, all those reins of power, apparently they couldn't figure out where the party was. | |
| Hey, well, that's a skill right there. | ||
| And again, it's another thing, and I guess, you know, we just sort of laugh at stuff here because, you know, it's all so ridiculous. | ||
| You have to laugh or you go crazy. | ||
| But, you know, I was in, I went to the Night of Freedom in New York City. | ||
| Somebody got stabbed outside of it because Antifa was going crazy, like literal zombies. | ||
| I mean, they were on the other side of a chain link fence, and they're just like... | ||
| Like hanging on the fence, shaking it, screaming. | ||
| And yeah, somebody, one of our guys got stabbed walking outside. | ||
| So it's really not funny. | ||
| It really is dangerous. And it really is incredible that just to hold like a fun gala for the New York Young Republicans, you have to take these like counterintelligence moves to try to avoid being attacked. | ||
| I mean, what the hell, man? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I know. Just to have fun, these are the things that we have to go through. | |
| But it's okay. We know who we are. | ||
| In New York City, we are Republicans. | ||
| If that makes us bandits, then we will roll like bandits. | ||
| And we will have our fun like bandits. | ||
| And we will come and plunder your city of Jersey City and have fun and drink all the alcohol and eat all your food and then throw your women all over our shoulders and then, you know, sail back to... | ||
| To Manhattan and finish our party there. | ||
| And we'll be back, too. | ||
| We'll be back in Jersey. | ||
| I guarantee it. | ||
| Well, it sounds like I need an invite next time. | ||
| That sounds like the type of toxic masculinity I could get behind for sure. | ||
| So what is next for your organization? | ||
| Where do you go from here? What is your next event? | ||
| Or what are you supporting next? | ||
| Or how can people find you and help support you? | ||
| And maybe even donate to a legal fund in case this actually goes to court or something. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So we're very lucky. We have a ton of help amongst our board. | |
| You can find us at nyyrc.com. | ||
| Please donate. We're always taking donations, trying to put together more and more events, trying to create and become a creative and cultural hub in New York City for the entire conservative movement across America. | ||
| We want to be that, and that's what we're working towards. | ||
| We are obviously effective. | ||
| If we can break the internet, the party. | ||
| So please, you know, support our cause, support our movement. | ||
| And, you know, we just want to help fight. | ||
| That's all we care to do. | ||
| And we will continue doing it. | ||
| It's Vish Burra from the New York Young Republicans Club, the website nyyrc.com. | ||
| Please go support them. Thank you very much for coming on, sir. | ||
| And I better get an invite to that next party. | ||
| I'll wear a tux. I'll bring my wife. | ||
| It'll be great. It'll be a grand old time. | ||
| Thanks for coming on, sir. Guys, you remember that story from the Bible? | ||
| Jesus walks into the temple and he sees the money changers are there. | ||
| And they're taking advantage of the people that are there to make their absolutions, that are there to make their sacrifices. | ||
| And he sees these money changers in the temple. | ||
| Do you remember what happened next? | ||
| Do you remember what happened after that? | ||
| He called the money changers together and he said, let's join each other. | ||
| Let's help each other out. | ||
| Now that you're in control of the money, I want to help you use it to shape the world in the way that you see fit. | ||
| I'm pretty sure that's what happened, isn't it? | ||
| Am I missing a part of this story? | ||
| I don't know. I'm a little confused because, you see, I follow Pope Francis, and maybe he has a little bit of a different reading on the Bible than other people. | ||
| Oh, no, that's right. Oh, no, that's right. | ||
| He chased them out of the temple with a whip. | ||
| That's right. That's what he did to the money changers. | ||
| He whipped them as he chased them across the temple. | ||
| It's the only time Jesus got mad in the Bible, I'm fairly sure. | ||
| Maybe the Pope needs to brush up on this old Jesus fellow he's supposed to be the representative of on Earth. | ||
| Because Pope Francis has joined the likes of That's right. | ||
| As long as I say inclusive, then I can enslave you, but it's a good thing and you'll support that. | ||
| It's truly incredible. | ||
| The people involved in this is truly shocking. | ||
| My grandparents are Catholic. | ||
| A lot of my family is Catholic, and I have a lot of respect for Catholics. | ||
| I think their church is very beautiful. | ||
| I think their ceremonies are incredible. | ||
| I love their tradition. They've been a really powerful force in maintaining morality in America back when we actually had that, back when there were things like standards in movies and TV, things that prevented pornographic or otherwise immoral things from being depicted on television. | ||
| Back when that actually mattered, back when we had decency laws, they were largely put forward by the Catholics, and that's an incredible thing. | ||
| I'm not knocking all Catholics here, but you've got to ask yourself the question, what the hell, and I use that word deliberately, is the head of my church doing? | ||
| Is the vicar of God on earth doing when he's teaming up with the likes of Mark Benioff and Lynn Rothschild? | ||
| Huh, what's going on here? | ||
| I truly wonder. | ||
| I think it's about time pretty much everybody became Orthodox. | ||
| I think that might be the only solution here. | ||
| Because, you know, God forbid you start looking into what the Protestants are doing, what the Episcopalians are doing. | ||
| I mean, they've gone full SJW. The Catholics at least pay some lip service to their tradition, but here we see it completely being undermined. | ||
| It's the Council for Inclusive Capitalism with the Vatican, a group of businesses, investors, and other groups that represent $2.1 trillion in market cap and 200 million employees. | ||
| 200 million employees. | ||
| That's almost as many employees as there are people in the United States. | ||
| You have any idea how powerful these people are? | ||
| They control forces stronger than nations. | ||
| These are the people that are actually running the world. | ||
| And now they're teaming up with Pope Francis, the black pope, the last pope, right? | ||
| Do y'all remember that? Do y'all remember seeing prophecies before Pope became, before Francis became pope that said, you know, the next pope will be the so-called black pope. | ||
| It'll be the last pope of the Catholic Church. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Y'all remember seeing those prophecies? | |
| Huh, maybe I should revisit some of those now that we're seeing it come to fruition. | ||
| The group has announced pledges towards environmental and sustainable business goals that fit within the ESG movement with Francis's blessing. | ||
| The group is the brainchild of Lynn Forrester de Rothschild, a businesswoman who's backed ventures to promote so-called inclusive capitalism in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis. | ||
| Mark Vinioff is another very interesting person to include in this group because you'll remember a little document that's referred to on the right side of the aisle as the lockstep document That, of course, was the document that predicted the coronavirus and explained how the controllers of the world can use a virus like this to get their own way. | ||
| And in this, they say things like, we need to work together to get rid of the so-called traditional barriers to profit. | ||
| The traditional barriers to growing the economy. | ||
| What are the things that they identify as a traditional barrier to profit? | ||
| Well, it would be things like... | ||
| Having a wife stay at home and take care of the children. | ||
| Why? She could be out in a cubicle working for a wage. | ||
| Isn't her desire to be a mother a barrier to her economic improvement in these people's eyes? | ||
| In the lockstep document they literally talk about convincing Indian people to no longer worship the Ganges River because then they could use it for hydroelectric dams. | ||
| Essentially, your religion, your beliefs, your culture, your heritage, your traditions, if they prevent people from exploiting you, well they're bad and they need to be getting rid of for your own good, you see. | ||
| You're being held back by your traditions. | ||
| You're being held back by your beliefs. | ||
| You're being held back by your heritage. | ||
| You could be working all day. | ||
| You could be exploiting your natural resources. | ||
| You could be A slave to these large companies. | ||
| You could own nothing, right? | ||
| This is the Great Reset. This is all part of the Great Reset. | ||
| It's amazing. I mean, I mentioned earlier that I called 29, you know, the look back on 2019 was the year the mask came off. | ||
| It's like, This is really the year the mass came off. | ||
| This is the year that it's literally like the Vatican, the Rothschilds, and big banks like MasterCard and Visa and Bank of America just going, yeah, we're all going to work together to exploit the hell out of you. | ||
| Yeah, we don't like the way that you operate because it robs us of profit. | ||
| So we're going to all get together and religiously, we're going to install a religion of worshiping us and serving us and filling our dollars. | ||
| And oh, by the way, you'll own nothing, you'll have no privacy, and you'll be happy. | ||
| So this is really the mask absolutely coming off. | ||
| The group is the brainchild of Lynn Forrester de Rothschild. | ||
| How perfect is that? | ||
| This used to be the type of thing that the Rothschilds would promote and put forward, but they wouldn't put their name on it. | ||
| Now they're like, yeah, we are making a one-world government, actually. | ||
| Yeah, we are controlling you. | ||
| Yeah, we are exploiting you to the maximum amount. | ||
| Salesforce. Has anybody heard of Salesforce, this company, Salesforce? | ||
| Massive, massive company. | ||
| It was founded by Mark Binioff. Oh, wait. | ||
| Wait, I got off topic. Lockstep. | ||
| Sorry. Got a little bit off topic. | ||
| Lockstep was made in conjunction between the Rockefeller Foundation and another organization, which I believe was called GNI, I think. | ||
| Long story short, roundabout way of saying it, Mark Binioff was one of the key players in putting together the Lockstep document. | ||
| He was one of the funders. | ||
| He was one of the main people in it. | ||
| And if you go to offlimits.news and you watch my breakdown of the lockstep document, which I go through the entire thing, the fine-tooth comb, the whole beginning of that video is me actually looking into Mark Benioff and looking into the other authors of this white paper of what they call, what do they call it? | ||
| Simulation, strategic simulations or whatever they call it. | ||
| I can't remember what exactly the words are. | ||
| But long story short, It's all coming together. | ||
| It's all being exposed. It's all out in the open now. | ||
| You've got the Rothschilds. | ||
| You've got big money. You've got these massive Wall Street banks. | ||
| You've got the Vatican and the Pope. | ||
| They're writing documents about how they're going to release a massive virus on the earth and that will facilitate them destroying traditions and destroying heritage so they can bring us all into one monolithic, cultureless, exploitative plantation. | ||
| All coming together and saying this and planning it out and using their money and their power to entirely enslave you. | ||
| So this is literally the equivalent of Jesus Christ. | ||
| This is the Pope. | ||
| This is the God's vicar on earth coming down instead of driving the money changers out of the temple, sitting down with them and giving them control over the Christians. | ||
| That's where we are now. | ||
| That's where we've reached. So... | ||
| Leave the Vatican, leave these tyrants, leave these corrupted people, and join humanity as we fight this final battle of good versus evil. | ||
| Alright folks, you remember it. | ||
| It was a paper by the Rockefeller Foundation called The Scenario for the Future of Technology and International Development, known colloquially among us on the right wing as the Lockstep Document, because it was a segment of this document entitled Lockstep that laid out the way that a...to exactly what's going on right now. | ||
| Here's one of the, here's the quote from the lockstep. | ||
| This is quoting a guy named G.K. Bhatt. | ||
| He's Taru, leading edge India. | ||
| He says, quote, It is possible to discipline and control some societies for some time, but not the whole world all the time. | ||
| So this is the mindset of these people. | ||
| They think they're better than you. | ||
| They think they're smarter than you. | ||
| They think they're your parent. | ||
| They think it's their responsibility to discipline you, to punish you, and control you. | ||
| And they're upset that they can't do it to the whole world at once. | ||
| They're like, we're a little bit limited here on who we can discipline and control. | ||
| Because they know so much better than you. | ||
| You're just this stupid cattle. | ||
| You're just the humans here who are there to be exploited and taken advantage of. | ||
| And used to work for them. | ||
| And if you rebel against that, well, how dare you? | ||
| They're trying to discipline and control you and trying to figure out the best way to do that. | ||
| And of course, in each segment, they have a little cutaway here where they say, what is the role of philanthropy in lockstep? | ||
| What will the role of philanthropy be in this situation? | ||
| Because you understand all these organizations, the Clinton Foundation, right? | ||
| Right. The Rockefeller Foundation, the Rothschilds, the Ford Foundation, these are philanthropies. | ||
| George Soros' Open Societies, philanthropies. | ||
| They're philanthropic, right? | ||
| That's what they say. | ||
| What is philanthropy? Philanthropy is the code word they use to mean subverting the will of the people. | ||
| It means imposing, because of your money, because of your power, because of your influence, imposing your will Over the will of the people down below. | ||
| That's what they mean by philanthropy. | ||
| So the author of the lockstep document, this future scenarios planning, they say scenarios planning. | ||
| You know, just like event 201. | ||
| Yeah, just a little scenario planning. | ||
| We're going to do a little scenario planning where we just come up with this just crazy, you know, what if, I don't know, like a virus came out of Wuhan, it was like kind of like a SARS virus, and then like it spread around the world, like... | ||
| What would happen? I don't know. | ||
| I mean, gosh, can we figure it out? | ||
| And then they go, okay, well, obviously, if there's a virus sweeping over the world, the most important thing will be how to control information. | ||
| The most important thing, once this occurs, will be, do we have the internet shutdown switch in place? | ||
| Are we able to get all of the media on board to demonize people that dare to question us? | ||
| Can we get YouTube and Twitter and Facebook to adhere to the dictates of unelected, supranational, international, globalist think tanks like the World Health Organization over the will of the American people, the courts of the American people, or any governmental structure on the national level? | ||
| Do we have that stuff in place? See, because they care about you and they're philanthropists, so They're doing these just wild scenario plannings. | ||
| Just, I don't know, we'll just, I guess we'll like say that, you know, coronavirus breaks out, you know, maybe around January, you know, and it gets into America. | ||
| Like, okay, you're just really good at predicting, I guess. | ||
| Just super good at predicting. | ||
| Okay, sure, sure you are. | ||
| So they make this document of scenario planning, right? | ||
| Well, that was written by a man named Peter Schwartz. | ||
| Peter Schwartz, an American futurist, innovator, author, and co-founder of the Global Business Network, a corporate strategy firm specializing in future think and scenario planning. | ||
| The lockstep document was a joint project by the Rockefeller Foundation and GBN, the Global Business Network, which was founded by Peter Schwartz. | ||
| The document has a letter by Peter Schwartz introducing you to the concept of scenario planning and how it can be useful when planning your philanthropy that you're doing. | ||
| There's an interesting little sentence you see right here on the Wikipedia. | ||
| As of October 2011, he has served as Senior Vice President for Strategic Planning for Salesforce.com, based in San Francisco, California. | ||
| Salesforce.com is owned by Mark Benioff. | ||
| Mark Benioff is one of the key people in this cabal being put together by Lynn Forrest de Rothschild and the Pope, Pope Francis. | ||
| Are you starting to see how it all comes together? | ||
| The Rockefeller Foundation is in this little cabal. | ||
| The Rothschilds are in this little cabal. | ||
| Mark Benioff of Salesforce is in this little cabal. | ||
| Oh, by the way, his vice president, Peter Schwartz, is in charge of the company that created the lockstep document in coordination with the Rockefeller Foundation. | ||
| By the way, the World Economic Forum is the one charging the Great Reset, which is being spread by the By the royal families and the scientists from all over the world that's telling you you'll own nothing and you'll be happy. | ||
| Everything will be rented. They're still going to own everything. | ||
| Who do you think you're going to be renting it from? | ||
| Obviously, it's going to be them. | ||
| But you see, they're philanthropists. | ||
| They are involved in philanthropy. | ||
| What type of philanthropy is Mark Benioff involved in? | ||
| Well, he's a social activist, you know. | ||
| You know, I'm so glad I'm revisiting this now. | ||
| Benioff has said that businesses are the greatest platforms for change in the world. | ||
| He follows the World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab's stakeholder approach to leadership, which says that leaders should serve not only their shareholders, but etc., etc., etc. | ||
| So there you go. Isn't this great? | ||
| Now we get a little Klaus Schwab mention. | ||
| Of course, he's the leader of the World Economic Forum. | ||
| He's the one that's telling you you'll own nothing and you'll be happy. | ||
| It's literally this is the globalist cabal. | ||
| Like, it's these people. We're like, who do you mean by the globalist? | ||
| Well, Mark Benioff, Klaus Schwab, the Rothschilds, the Vatican, the Rockefeller Foundation, it's these people. | ||
| And they're the ones setting up a supranational... | ||
| That means over national. | ||
| It means it's over your national government. | ||
| It means you're supposed to live under laws that are decided by people that you get to have a say with. | ||
| You get to decide whether you like the laws they pass or not. | ||
| You get to vote them in or out of office. | ||
| That's democracy. That's a republic. | ||
| That is supposed to be the most powerful force on earth because we the people have a say in it. | ||
| No, no, no. Not anymore. | ||
| Now, the people that you're able to elect will now be subservient To the billionaires. | ||
| They will now be under the World Economic Forum, the World Health Organization, the UN, things that you don't get to vote for, things you don't get a say in, things that they don't have to justify their reasoning for you. | ||
| They don't have to appeal to you to make their case. | ||
| They do what they want to do. | ||
| They're tyrants. They're authoritarians. | ||
| And they're openly exploiting you and everyone on Earth, and they'll destroy anything that stands in their way. | ||
| And they're open about it. | ||
| In March 2015, Benioff announced Salesforce, this massive company, by the way, like every company, every major company like runs on Salesforce. | ||
| Salesforce is the company that handles like the data collection, the data manipulation, all the things you're mad at Facebook and Twitter and Amazon for doing and Google for doing, collecting data. | ||
| It's Salesforce is the underlying mechanism that they use to do that, by the way, in case you don't know. | ||
| Massive company, Benioff announced, Salesforce would cancel all employee programs and travel in the state of Indiana after the passing of SB 101, the Religious Freedoms Restoration Act, a controversial bill, which would allow companies and individuals to deny service to LGBT individuals based on religious beliefs. | ||
| As the largest tech employer in Indiana, it ultimately led to the Indiana State Legislature passing an amendment to the bill containing protections for the LGBT customers, tenants, and employees. | ||
| See, that's being a philanthropist, isn't it? | ||
| In the same way... Benioff led a similar movement in February 2016 against Georgia's HB 757, the First Amendment defense bill. | ||
| He announced that Salesforce would reduce investments in Georgia and cancel an annual conference if the bill was passed. | ||
| A month later, the governor vetoed the bill. | ||
| So this is the world that we're moving into. | ||
| Where no longer is it the will of the people, the will of every person in Indiana filtered through the electoral process into their legislature to make laws and make decisions. | ||
| All of their opinions, all of their decision-making capability is all superseded By some fat pervert named Mark Benioff from California. | ||
| He's the one that decides what your state does. | ||
| He's the one that decides what bills get passed in your state. | ||
| It's up to him, and he'll bankrupt your state if you go against him. | ||
| This is globalism, and he's now teamed up with Pope Francis. | ||
| So welcome to hell, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to the final days. | ||
| We have entered into... | ||
| Total globalist tyranny. | ||
| Total takeover. It's out in the open now. | ||
| So Mark Benioff, Peter Schwartz, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, and the Vatican are now openly coming together, teaming up in a cabal to carry out this so-called philanthropy to override your traditions, your heritage, and your religion to implement their own form of universal slavery beneath them. | ||
| It's incredible, folks. | ||
| And it just goes to show we've been right the entire time. | ||
| This is what we've been predicting. This is what we've been telling you they're doing. | ||
| So we either stop it now or this becomes codified. | ||
| This becomes permanent. | ||
| This becomes the prison planet we've talked about for so long. | ||
| Signing off, it's Harrison Smith. | ||
| I'll see you tomorrow, folks. The globalists are fighting as hard as they can to not just shut down InfoWars, but shut down every independent, pro-human, pro-America, pro-God, pro-family organization on the planet. | ||
| But out of all the organizations valiantly fighting back, InfoWars is the strongest. | ||
| InfoWars is the most informed and the most focused. | ||
| And we have the biggest audience of amazing activists of every race, color, and creed that is you. | ||
| So as they attack our freedom and attack our very nation and attack our electoral system and attack our election and as they attack our very genetics with a deadly mRNA sterilizing vaccine that's now confirmed, understand that it's always darkest before the dawn and now the enemy is out in the open. | ||
| So give the gift of information. | ||
| Give the gift of truth. Give the gift We're good to go. | ||
| Researchers and investigative journalists have the enemy's modus operandi. | ||
| We've got their number. | ||
| And all we've got to do is expose their whole operation and tell people what's coming next. | ||
| And when the next thing comes true, your credibility will skyrocket. | ||
| And then they'll really be listening to you and you'll be a leader in your area to help lead the resistance. | ||
| So word of mouth is key. | ||
| Prayer is key for an awakening which is happening. | ||
| But to accelerate it and financial support. | ||
| Please do your shopping for Christmas at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Great supplements, great books, great films, water filtration, air filtration. | ||
| It goes on and on. Huge sales, free shipping, double Patriot points, 60% off. | ||
| And if you order by the 18th, you'll get it before Christmas. |
Export Selection