Nick Fuentes argues Republicans are complicit in a "Jewish takeover," citing $12 billion in Israel aid and blocking critics from Ivy League schools. He highlights a letter from 20 House Democrats demanding disclosure of Israel's alleged 200 to 300 nuclear warheads, claiming strategic ambiguity risks World War III. Despite hating Democrats, Fuentes plans to vote for them in 2026 as a reactionary tactic to break GOP power and force nationalist challengers in 2028, asserting that only Democrats are pushing the U.S. toward nuclear conflict while enriching donors like Palantir. [Automatically generated summary]
What makes Christianity and Christ so different from the other religions is that our religion is based on the bearing of suffering for the sake of even those that persecute us.
An overflowing love, an overflowing of self-giving love.
So much of it.
It cannot be contained.
An unconditional, absolute standard of love for all of God's children, even those that are misguided, even those that persecute us, even the most heinous among us.
We have a tendency to unthinkingly always support the right wing.
Why?
Because the Republicans are better than the Democrats.
Here's a little perspective.
Let's say that Kamala Harris had won the election in 2024.
If Kamala doubled down on supporting Ukraine as Trump has, if Kamala bombed Iran, there'd be riots in the streets.
People would say our illegitimate president, who cheated her way into the nomination, she's expanding the war, she's expanding World War III into the Middle East.
Everybody would say this is illegitimate, this is like a crime.
But because it was Trump, 90% of Republicans supported Trump bombing Iran on Israel's behalf.
Because it was Trump.
If it was Kamala, do you think 90% of Republicans would have supported it?
Absolutely not.
Democrats wouldn't support it, independents wouldn't support it, and Republicans would not support it.
And it's time to just say it outright Donald Trump is the Matrix president, okay?
In 2016, Hillary Clinton was the Matrix candidate.
In 2020, Joe Biden was the matrix candidate.
But in 2024, Donald Trump was.
And why?
After October 7th, the Jews knew that the Republican Party, controlled by AIPAC, controlled by Israel, and with Trump in office, they were going to let Israel do whatever they wanted to do.
It's clear, it's obvious.
And the media is in on it.
Silicon Valley, Wall Street, and the media are all in on it because Trump is their matrix candidate.
That's why CNN is friendly to them.
That's why Silicon Valley gave him hundreds of millions of dollars.
That's why Wall Street did.
And Trump is just dispensing the favors.
Corporate tax cuts for Wall Street, bombing Iran for Israel.
This is the story of the 2024 election.
And here's the red pill that nobody's ready for JD Vance is the Matrix candidate.
They ordered Trump to nominate him.
Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and Tucker Carlson ordered Trump to pick JD Vance.
We live in a system that is controlled by one party, and they played the parties off of each other.
They've done it forever.
When Israel was under attack, They played into the right wing because they knew that the Republican Party would say things like, There's a Muslim takeover of America.
Trump said he was going to bomb Iran.
We're tough.
So they leaned into the Republican cultural stuff.
That's why Charlie Kirk says Islam is taking over America, because that kind of Islamophobic rhetoric plays well with the right wing.
That's why they did it.
There's no Muslim takeover of America, there's a Jewish takeover of America, obviously.
And the Republicans are involved in it just as much as the Democrats.
And this is what they don't want you to hear.
Jewish Takeover Reality00:02:38
unidentified
They are getting stronger.
I don't want to pretend, oh no, they're totally relevant.
people said, I just can't even imagine Trump bringing us to war in Iran for regime change.
That's insane, it's unimaginable.
And now it's inevitable.
Now it's unthinkable that we're not going to war.
And that is because of the coercive influence of organized inside of our country.
I think I'm Mother.
Kiss me, I'm Irish.
Americans are going to take our country back.
I won't even let death stop me.
unidentified
I can't see the time but I'm having the time of my life Chris Powell, the game on the line I'm dropping the dime on him He forced me to turn the point USA and beat it and that's why it's filled with gripe I'm trying to change for the better, it's dropping me fucking the same, hey He on the bed,
I'm on the cover, we not on the same pace I be from the bed, she gripping them covers like she on her last leg She look like she belong on the cover, this whole game covered everything I'm gonna buy a bottle, take a banana but she is not getting ready, rain He wants to interview Nick Puetta The word out.
Ten whole thousand is brilliant.
We just ate ten whole thousand for dinner.
I got a pent up type of aggression.
I'm about to go mental, trying to suppress it.
They don't make no noise.
He's suppressed.
I spent a whole life on my necklace.
Couldn't tell which one I like better, so I'm getting both kinds of that shit.
I'm taking that dead.
I got your whole crying off a month.
Not leaving the death.
We don't leave no sign of a stroke.
I'm chasing that big like I got my whole life on the line.
It's undeniable.
He's winning.
He's sort of undeniable in the space.
He's everywhere now.
He's enormously huge at this point.
He's on a generational run.
He is freaking on fire.
Clearly a Sunday.
It's spelled F U E N T E S. Very proud to present Nick Fuentes.
They use artificial intelligence to look at vast amounts of data and create insights.
If the government has an amount of data which is kind of unimaginable, if you've got every phone call, every email, every transaction, every photograph of a license plate on the highway, satellite data, it's too much data for a bureaucracy to sift through.
Palantir comes in and interprets the data using.
Algorithm using artificial intelligence, using software to make vast amounts of data usable.
That's what they are.
And so many of the people that worked with Elon that came into the government through Doge worked with Palantir.
Now that Doge is finished, Palantir seems to be just getting started.
This would be the third time that Israel has threatened to use nukes to force the United States to help them.
The first time was in 1973.
When Syria and Egypt launched a surprise attack on Israel, which started the Yom Kippur War on October 6th, 1973, almost 50 years exactly before October 7th, Israel was almost overrun.
And the United States was reluctant to provide them with the military support that they needed to defend themselves.
So the Prime Minister of Israel, Golda Meir, called up Nixon.
We're like the SWAT team of Free Thought, and I go in with this battle ram at the door, and then they come in with these laser beams and have that information.
Overflowing of love, an overflowing of self-giving love, so much of it cannot be contained.
An unconditional, absolute standard of love for all of God's children, even those that are misguided, even those that persecute us, even the most heinous among us.
That is what makes us different.
That's what makes us good.
ever since I got on the interceptor, ever since I got on a cardboard knife, shut the fuck up.
We have a tendency to unthinkingly always support the right wing.
Why?
Because the Republicans are better than the Democrats.
Here's a little perspective.
Let's say that Kamala Harris had won the election in 2024.
If Kamala doubled down on supporting Ukraine as Trump has, if Kamala bombed Iran, there'd be riots in the streets.
People would say our illegitimate president, who cheated her way into the nomination, she's expanding the war, she's expanding World War III into the Middle East.
Everybody would say this is illegitimate, this is like a crime.
But because it was Trump, 90% of Republicans supported Trump bombing Iran on Israel's behalf.
Because it was Trump.
If it was Kamala, do you think 90% of Republicans would have supported it?
Absolutely not.
Democrats wouldn't support it, independents wouldn't support it, and Republicans would not support it.
And it's time to just say it outright Donald Trump is the Matrix president, okay?
In 2016, Hillary Clinton was the Matrix candidate.
In 2020, Joe Biden was the matrix candidate.
But in 2024, Donald Trump was.
And why?
After October 7th, the Jews knew that the Republican Party, controlled by AIPAC, controlled by Israel, and with Trump in office, they were going to let Israel do whatever they wanted to do.
It's clear, it's obvious.
And the media is in on it.
Silicon Valley, Wall Street, and the media are all in on it because Trump is their matrix candidate.
That's why CNN is friendly to them.
That's why Silicon Valley gave him hundreds of millions of dollars.
That's why Wall Street did.
And Trump is just dispensing the favors.
Corporate tax cuts for Wall Street, bombing Iran for Israel.
This is the story of the 2024 election.
And here's the red pill that nobody's ready for JD Vance is the Matrix candidate.
They ordered Trump to nominate him.
Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and Tucker Carlson ordered Trump to pick JD Vance.
We live in a system that is controlled by one party, and they play the parties off of each other.
When Israel was under attack, They played into the right wing because they knew that the Republican Party would say things like, There's a Muslim takeover of America.
Trump said he was going to bomb Iran.
We're tough.
So they leaned into the Republican cultural stuff.
That's why Charlie Kirk says Islam is taking over America, because that kind of Islamophobic rhetoric plays well with the right wing.
That's why they did it.
There's no Muslim takeover of America, there's a Jewish takeover of America, obviously.
And the Republicans are involved in it just as much as the Democrats.
And this is what they don't want you to hear.
unidentified
Just what she pleases.
She's happy on her own.
She picks up all the pieces.
She's going home.
Baby, I'm home.
I'm home.
I'm home.
Yeah, she's going home.
Baby, I'm home.
I'm home.
I'm home.
She's going home.
She's going home.
They are getting stronger.
I don't want to pretend, oh no, they're totally relevant.
Part of why I'm so proud now to be a Democrat in 2026.
And our featured story is all about a group of House Democrats led by Joaquin Castro, another Hispanic Latino Democrat.
They wrote a letter to the Trump government and they are now demanding that the U.S. government expose and acknowledge that Israel maintains an arsenal of nuclear weapons.
Holy based?
How could anybody vote Republican?
How could anybody be a Republican in 2026?
What do they even do?
What do they even do other than exonerate Jewish pedophiles, steal money, give amnesty to illegal aliens?
What does the GOP even do?
This is why I'm a proud Afro Latino Democrat.
Yes, a group of 20 House Democrats sent a letter to the White House and they say they will.
Publish the president's response.
And they say that it is a national security risk to maintain the ongoing policy of ambiguity regarding Israel's nuclear arsenal.
Because, as you may or may not know, Israel does maintain a nuclear arsenal, 200 to 300 nuclear warheads deliverable by missiles, potentially also submarines.
I don't believe they have a full triad, they don't have a strategic air force, but they do have Jericho missiles and submarines.
To deliver warheads.
And they've had this capability since the mid 1960s.
It has been the official policy of the U.S. government since the Nixon administration.
We're basically in league with Israel.
We have agreed with them to not disclose the existence of their arsenal.
And so to this day, even though it is established fact that they have nuclear bombs, we will not acknowledge it as a matter of policy.
And this gives them more options, more maneuverability from a strategic point of view against their enemies over the years, like the Egyptians, the Syrians, and then eventually the Iraqis and the Iranians.
The Democrats now say that in this current conflict with Iran, to not acknowledge or disclose Israel's nuclear status actually increases the risk of a strategic miscalculation.
It's impossible for us or for any nation to know what Israel's red lines are in a conflict because we're unsure of their capabilities.
We won't acknowledge them.
And so, for example, what happens if Israel's air defenses are overwhelmed, missiles are raining down on Israel, maybe even Iranian missiles are attacking Israel's nuclear facilities?
Question At what point does Israel deploy a nuclear weapon in that scenario?
How overwhelmed?
What constitutes an existential threat?
Which of their capabilities would need to be imperiled or compromised?
When does Israel use that red button?
When do they use the nuclear option?
It's almost impossible for anybody to even speculate as long as there is not transparency.
And this is jeopardizing diplomacy.
It increases the risk of miscalculation.
And it makes the entire situation far more dangerous for the United States and American soldiers in the region.
This is the argument from the Democrats.
So they are demanding that the Trump administration change the policy and disclose to the whole world and acknowledge.
That Israel is a nuclear power, that they are not a signatory on the NPT, and they've got weapons.
It's a pretty big deal.
And it's not a lot of Democrats, but like I said, it's about 20 Democrats in the House that sent the letter.
And this is part of overall a change in the Democratic Party posture.
It's been going on since the Biden administration.
They're trying to meaningfully restrain Israel by shutting down the types of weapons we give them and how much foreign aid we give them and scrutinizing.
Their actions in Gaza or Lebanon, up to and including now, even putting pressure on this nuclear ambiguity policy.
Just another reason I'm proud to be a Democrat.
Every day they make me proud.
I'm more and more pleased with my decision.
So we're going to talk all about that.
That'll be our featured story.
We're also going to talk tonight about the war in Iran, which looks like it may be winding down, although we have no idea.
It could be winding down, it could be winding up.
They say it's over, but technically it's still going on.
They might be saying that for legal reasons.
We have no idea.
Trump says that a peace agreement is imminent.
And I think that is literally the fifth time in the past nine weeks that the press has said a diplomatic breakthrough is imminent.
I saw that on Twitter somewhere.
I think they said, I don't know the exact formulation.
I think they said that's the fifth time in nine weeks.
That they've said a peace deal is going to happen any day now.
At the same time, we're also threatening to resume bombing in a week.
The big development came today.
The Trump administration has submitted a new proposal to Iran to end the war.
We expect a response from Iran in the next 24 hours.
Trump says that Iran now has one week to work out a deal, or else we're going to, we're going back to war and bombing them.
So it was a 48 hour deadline, a five day deadline, a 10 day deadline, 24 hour deadline, a two week ceasefire, an indefinite ceasefire.
Now, today, we have another proposal.
We're expecting the response in a day, but we're giving them a week.
And the new proposal goes something like this it says that Iran will agree to a 12 year moratorium on enrichment, they will receive immediate sanctions relief.
We will remove the blockade of the strait as long as they open up the strait to commercial shipping.
Trump administration says we're so close to a deal.
It's literally, we're just, we're looping.
We're looping.
Trump says Iran really wants a deal more than anybody knows, more than anyone even knows.
He said they really want a deal.
And what does Iran say?
Iran says the U.S. has given them a wish list of American demands.
So that doesn't sound too optimistic.
A new operation was announced on Sunday, Operation Freedom, where the U.S. was going to escort commercial vessels out of the Persian Gulf through the Strait.
That was canceled after two days.
We now learn that the reason this happened is because Saudi Arabia and Kuwait would not allow us to use their airspace to enforce the new operation.
Saudi Arabia now, before they wanted us to.
Keep the war going.
Now they want us to continue to pursue diplomacy through Pakistan.
So it's a lot of bullshit.
Okay.
Nobody knows.
The Secretary of State doesn't even know.
There's no plan here.
It's cooked.
It's cooked and it's over and it's a joke.
But we'll talk about it a little bit tonight.
We're going to get into it.
All of this might need to be resolved by May 12th.
Trump is supposed to visit Beijing.
In a trip to China.
It was initially scheduled for the end of March, beginning of April, but they pushed it back because of the war.
Trump is going out to China next week, and they say he wants this wrapped up or some progress by the time of that trip.
So who knows?
Maybe we'll see a breakthrough by next week.
I don't know.
Nobody knows.
So we'll get into that.
It's going to be a good show.
Before we get into it, I want to remind you to smash the follow button on Rumble, smash the like button, leave a comment.
Let me know what you think about the show.
Check out our merch store at Fuentes.store.
We have our spring and summer collection.
Part two, imminent.
Part two, spring and summer collection.
Might be coming out maybe in about a month.
Who knows?
We'll see.
But check it out.
It's Fuentes.store.
If you want to support the show, subscribe at AmericaFirst.plus.
$15 a month to get access to the archive.
$100 a month to get access to the group chat with me.
And I was in there all day today.
I was in there all day chopping it up with the niggas, doing voice messages.
I was in there all day just chilling.
So if you want to just hang out with me, the low price of $100 every month at America First.plus, it's only for rich people.
This is for drop shippers.
This is for sports bettors.
This is for polymarket winners.
This is for winners.
This is not for broke people.
You know, the other day I responded to a super chat.
Somebody said, Why does everybody hate the boomers?
And I said, honestly, it's cope.
It's young people that are coping for being broke.
I said, it's actually easy to make money.
You're just not smart enough to do it.
And oh my gosh, everybody crashed out in the replies.
People said, easy for you to say you're just begging online for donations.
That's not true.
It's actually really hard.
No, it's not.
It's easy.
You're just too stupid and lazy.
It's called the elect.
It's called, you were chosen by God to be poor.
You know, those that have shall have more.
Those that have less, even what little they have, it will be taken from them.
Here's a little piece of advice.
Those that have shall have more.
Those that have less, even the little they have, will be taken from them.
Okay, listen and learn.
So, this is for rich.
This is not for complainers, whiners, people that hate boomers.
We don't hate boomers.
We're celebrating every day with boomers.
We used to dream about times like this, okay?
We used to wish for times like this.
We're celebrating with boomers.
It's not for whiners and complainers and losers.
It's for winners and drop shippers.
This is for people.
This is for day traders.
This is for people that create digital brands.
This is for the rich.
You know, the rich don't really get enough credit these days.
Everybody's trying to kill them.
The rich are honestly the landlords, the rich.
They honestly don't get enough credit.
Everybody's trying to kill them right now.
Luigi Mangione's trying to kill them.
People are trying to burn their houses down in the Palisades successfully, I will add.
A lot of beautiful, wonderful people had their houses destroyed in the Palisades fire because some resentful, poor person tried to kill all of them.
Zoran Momdani wants to take all their money and waste it on free public buses and grocery stores for drug addicts and vagabonds.
It's honestly disgusting.
What is this, a Soviet Union?
So, this is just a nice treat.
It's a treat.
You get to talk to me as a treat, and it's only for the rich.
It's really special.
No, we're having fun.
We're having fun with it.
That's America First.plus.
I also want to talk a little bit about this.
Before we get into the news, dude, everybody is so mad at me for being a Democrat.
What is going on?
Cancel culture is back in full force.
Think about it.
The Republican Party is like the new Democrat Party.
What am I, a slave?
What am I, what am I, a nigger on the plantation?
That's how it feels.
Because I remember there was a time 10 years ago, remember this?
Republicans went to black people and said, Hey, what do you have to lose?
Republicans came to the black Democrats and said, Just because you're black doesn't mean you need to vote Democrat.
They said, The Democrats don't own your vote.
They come into the ghetto every four years asking for your vote, and then they do nothing for you.
What do you have to lose?
Try it.
Vote Republican.
And do you remember any black person that put on the MAGA hat was lynched, was lynched by the Democrats and canceled.
And lately, I've been flirting.
Who told you I flirted?
I've been flirting with this idea of becoming a Democrat, and now Republicans want to lynch me.
Republicans literally want to come to Berwin at my house where I live, and they literally want to lynch me because I want to vote for the Democrats.
So I say this week, I said, look, I'm a moderate Democrat.
I'm a moderate Democrat.
I want an immigration moratorium.
I want Jewish media to be destroyed.
I want Israel defunded.
I'm a moderate Democrat, okay?
I'm an Afro Latino moderate Democrat.
I want the Trump administration to be impeached.
I want this criminal enterprise to be shut down.
And all day today, I'm just getting attacked.
He came out as a Democrat.
He's a shill.
We always knew he's a traitor, this and that.
You guys are taking this way too seriously.
The partisanship is out of control.
And honestly, here's just what I would say to anybody that doesn't get it this is just true.
And to be a little bit serious here for a second, what exactly do the Republicans do for any of us?
Here's a question.
What have the Republicans done for any of us right now?
We got Israel's wet dream, which is regime change war in Iran.
Probably literally the last thing we needed.
What else?
They promised us mass deportations, the largest mass deportation operation in history.
Remember that?
What did they announce today?
Well, they're shelving the program to fast track new ICE agents.
That's canceled.
That's done.
And at the same time, what else did they announce?
They're considering legalizing DACA recipients and farm workers that are here illegally.
The Trump administration is once again considering giving an amnesty in the form of H 1A visas or.
Seasonal farm work visas to illegal aliens working in the agricultural sector and giving amnesty to the DACA recipients, deferred action on childhood arrivals, the Dreamers.
And obviously, we have no mass deportations.
That got rolled up a few months ago and it really never even got off the ground.
Now, Tom Holman is going out there and saying, It's coming, it's coming.
Okay, when?
After the midterms, when Democrats control the House?
After they shut down DHS for a few months just to deprive ICE of funding to shut exactly that program down?
How are you going to do that?
So, what else?
They promised us disclosure on the Epstein files, on 9 11, on the Kennedy assassination.
They still have 3 million Epstein files they never released.
And the 3 million that they did release were heavily redacted.
And the Trump administration says, They're not opening any new investigations.
They're not pursuing anybody in connection with those files.
They're not going to pursue any leads from the files.
How about indictments?
They said they were going after Fauci, Obama, the Clintons.
Trump himself said they're letting Bill Clinton off the hook.
Obama, has he been indicted?
Remember last year, Tulsi Gabbard came out and said there's going to be something on that?
Today, they said they're going to let the statute of limitations on Fauci run out.
They have no interest in going after him.
So, they have given us nothing.
Absolutely nothing.
Not no new wars, no mass deportations, no disclosure on the Epstein files, no indictments of our enemies.
We have gotten nothing.
But the donors have gotten everything.
Israel is very happy.
They're very happy campers.
They have gotten their wars, they've gotten their foreign aid.
AI and little tech, they are very happy.
Palantir is now in four departments and agencies.
Andoril is getting contracts from the Pentagon, and so are all those companies.
Anthropic is out, and OpenAI is in.
There's a moratorium on AI regulation being pushed around in many different states.
And how about Wall Street?
They got their permanent corporate tax cut last year.
So that's the deal when you vote Republican.
That's the program.
The voters get nothing.
The donors get everything.
The donors get betrayed on literally every issue.
We get none of what we asked for and everything we didn't want.
And the donors get absolutely everything.
So, what are we supposed to do at this point in time?
Here we are at the midpoint in this presidential term.
That is how it has gone.
What exactly are we supposed to do?
Vote Republican harder?
Vote Republican more?
Why would we?
And hey, there's only two parties.
So, what are we supposed to do?
Stay home?
What I am doing in this election is voting Democrat.
I'm telling other people to vote Democrat and.
I'm not liberal.
I'm not progressive.
I'm not left wing in any way, as you know.
Democrats have literally condemned me on the Senate floor.
Democrats in the House Select Committee subpoenaed me and deposed me and froze my money and put me on the no fly list.
So I don't love the Democratic Party.
And I'm not left wing at all.
And I wouldn't even call myself a liberal.
I'm illiberal.
I'm a reactionary.
But partisanship is not a permanent part of your identity.
It's something that you do.
And this is about taking the power back from the Republicans.
The Republicans think that they have us boxed in.
They think that we are hostages and they think they can get away with anything because we have no other options.
Am I wrong?
The Republicans fuck us over every single time because they know that most of you are too stupid or too loyal or too naive to think that you have another option.
They will tell you every year.
What are you going to do?
Vote for a Democrat?
What are we going to do?
Let the Democrats win?
And so we are expected to endlessly swallow a shit sandwich because they believe we are a captive audience, that we are a hostage.
We have no other options.
There's nowhere else to go.
We're totally boxed in.
So we have to keep voting for these terrible candidates.
We have to keep voting no matter how much they betray us, how many promises they break.
We're going to dutifully show up.
Hold our noses and pull the lever for the Republicans because that's the only way it can ever go.
So, why am I doing this radical, controversial, provocative thing?
Why is the most far right person voting for the left wing party?
To demonstrate that we still have the power, actually.
We do have options.
You have options.
We are not hostages, we are not boxed in.
You can leave at any time.
They tell us, what are you going to do?
Vote for a Democrat?
Yeah, that's exactly what I'm going to do.
I'm going to do exactly that.
And they're going to say, but that's going to hurt you.
That's going to be bad for you.
Well, it can't be much worse than the insult and the betrayal that we have been expected to swallow for the past two, four, six, 10 years.
Where's our border wall?
We're still in Iraq.
Where's our tariff schedule?
Where's our infrastructure bill?
Where's anything that we've been promised since 2016, since 2012 for that matter?
We still have Obamacare.
And they say, What are you going to do?
Vote for Democrat?
Yeah, I am.
For no reason other than it's a fuck you to the GOP.
And we can afford to lose this one.
This is an acceptable loss.
I'm going to tell you why.
In a state like Ohio, where we're going to vote Democrat against Vivek Ramaswamy, Republicans have a supermajority in both chambers of their legislature.
It should be really easy for the Republican Party to get me back, shouldn't it?
Why should anyone in my demographic profile ever even consider voting Democrat?
Why would that even be the case?
Only unless you have fucked it up that badly.
So I'm voting Democrat based on the results of the past two years.
And if conditions improve, if we get a good candidate in 28, if we get a good platform in 28, maybe I'll consider coming back.
But I'm not, I'm uncommitted right now.
And that's where everybody needs to be.
This is called taking the power back, taking your leverage back.
Why would we give away all of the leverage?
The second you tell somebody, I'm never going to leave, no matter what, you got me, no matter what, I'm buying from you, I'm voting for you.
I'm staying with you in any negotiation, in any relationship, in any situation.
When you tell somebody or some entity, no matter what happens, I'm with you, all you're telling them is you can treat me any way you want.
And there is no cost, there's no risk.
And that's how you lose a negotiation every single time.
That's what we're doing with the GOP.
No matter what, we'll vote for you.
Give us the shittiest candidates, break every promise, do everything you said you wouldn't do.
We'll still be there.
We'll be angry.
We'll be there reluctantly, but we'll be there.
Because you're right, we can never let the Democrats win, so you got us.
That's why it is the way it is.
That's why it is the way it is.
So I see everybody freaking out.
They're saying, you know, we can't go that far.
I don't like all this Democrat stuff.
Well, you know what?
I don't like what we're getting.
I don't like what we're getting from the Republicans, and I actually have dignity.
At least voting for Democrats is affirming something that is good, which is we're punishing the people that have betrayed us.
I'm not going to get stabbed in the back six million times and then say, oh, here's my vote.
Maybe you'll get back on track next time.
I'm not doing it.
I won't do it.
I won't help these people even a little bit.
Donald Trump is promoting Mark Levin and Laura Loomer and saying that Tucker and Candace and Megyn Kelly are not MAGA.
We all like Tucker and Candace and Megyn Kelly.
I don't always get along with them, but the things that they're saying are the things we all believe in for the most part.
So every day, Trump is attacking us, the people that represent us, and elevating the people that hate us and represent everything that we despise.
We're going to vote.
We're going to reward this?
You would have to be a complete idiot.
Do the logic.
And then people say, well, I'm just not going to vote.
Do the logical thing.
Vote for the party that is going to visit pain and punishment on the people that have sold us out and betrayed us.
I'm voting for the wrecking ball, I'm voting for destruction.
I'm voting for the destroyer.
I'm voting for Vishnu.
Not Vivek, I'm voting for Vishnu.
I'm voting for Bain.
I'm voting for a reckoning against the GOP.
That's all that is.
Burn it down.
I want this administration and everybody in it to be destroyed so that, so that in 28, the Republican primary field will be open for a genuine challenger because that's going to be the next story.
Everybody that was in this administration is a failure.
Vance, Rubio, Hegseth, they're all failures.
They're all complicit in this.
They have to be weakened so that they cannot win the primary in 28.
They have to be sufficiently weakened so that an insurgent dark horse has a chance, has an opportunity at running as an outsider in 28 against the legacy of this garbage administration.
That is the only thing that is going to work.
And I know a lot of people are not riding with that, but frankly, those people don't know the first thing about politics.
I see people saying, why is he going for a Democrat?
And, like I said at the top of the show, I actually haven't seen any big news about this.
You know, I read all the papers, I read the New York Times, I read the Wall Street Journal, Axios.
I did not see this anywhere.
This was in the Washington Post today.
A group of 20 Democrats in the House of Representatives have written a letter to the White House demanding that this Trump administration disclose that Israel maintains a nuclear arsenal.
And this is a huge deal.
For those that don't know, Israel is a nuclear armed country.
I think everybody knows this at this point.
There's only about a dozen nuclear armed countries in the world, and you probably know them.
It's the US, Russia, China, France, the United Kingdom, India, Pakistan, North Korea, and Israel.
But the difference is unlike all these other countries, every other country in the world discloses and acknowledges that they have nuclear weapons.
We know that France has nuclear weapons because they have declared them.
We know that Russia has nuclear weapons because they have declared them.
And so everybody knows what everybody has.
The one country that this does not apply to is Israel.
Israel has, since the mid 1960s, okay, so for 60 years, Israel has maintained a clandestine, undeclared nuclear arsenal.
We don't know the exact size, but it's estimated to be anywhere between 200 and 300 nuclear bombs, nuclear warheads.
And they have two methods of delivery they have missiles.
They're Jericho missiles and they have submarines.
There's speculation that they have submarine launched ballistic missiles that can carry a nuclear warhead.
So people talk about the means of delivery.
Israel's got two out of the three in the nuclear triad, the other being a strategic air force.
Israel does not have that.
So it is known, by the way, in the international community, and it is established and it's known among the public that Israel has nuclear weapons.
But it has never been officially disclosed by Israel and.
Maybe more concerning, the United States has never acknowledged that Israel has a nuclear weapons program.
And this has been a matter of policy since the Nixon administration.
President Nixon and Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir came to a secret agreement in the late 1960s that the United States would effectively participate in Israel's strategic ambiguity, meaning Israel would never declare its nuclear weapons program and we would never.
We would never acknowledge that they have nuclear weapons, even though everybody knows that they do, and we know that they do.
We won't talk about it.
And why is that the case?
Well, Israel does not want to declare their nuclear arsenal because they want something called strategic ambiguity.
They want their neighbors and their rivals in the Middle East not to know whether they have nuclear weapons or how many nuclear weapons they have or where they are or how they can deliver them.
And why would that be beneficial for Israel?
Israel to maintain this ambiguity so that all these other countries would be a little bit more careful.
A nuclear country realistically cannot lose a war.
And it doesn't mean that they literally can't lose.
It means you don't want them to lose a war.
Because if a nuclear country loses a war or is at risk of losing a total war against a non nuclear country, well, the nuclear country will use its nukes.
So let's say, for example, that Syria and Egypt invade Israel.
And Israel fears that it might lose the war and become occupied and maybe erased from the map.
Well, then Israel will use their weapon of last resort and they will just nuke Egypt and Syria.
And that came very close to happening in the Yom Kippur War in 1973.
Syria and Egypt simultaneously invaded Israel.
Israel was caught completely by surprise.
They were late in mobilizing their reserve ground forces, and it looked like maybe Israel might fall.
Israel was begging the United States for support.
We were dragging our feet.
And so, what did their prime minister do, Golda Meir?
She exposed their nuclear weapons in full view of our satellites for us to see.
And the implication was that if we didn't airlift supplies to Israel, they would use their nuclear weapons against Egypt and Syria, which we definitely did not want to happen.
So, then we launched the biggest airlift of weapons and supplies to Israel since World War II, or maybe in history.
I don't know exactly the numbers.
But that is part of their ambiguity.
They don't want other countries to know what they're capable of so that they're not going to push Israel too far.
They might not want to win so decisively.
They might not want to threaten Israel too much.
It is to create uncertainty so that, in order not to risk miscalculation, their rivals will be less aggressive.
Let's say, in a modern context, if Saddam Hussein Does not know where Israel's red line is, when they're going to use their nuclear weapons, Iraq has to do some guesswork.
Where is that red line?
Is it here?
Is it there?
And obviously, if you don't want to get nuked, you're going to be pretty conservative in your calculations.
If you're guessing where that red line is, you don't want to say it's too far when actually it's closer because you don't want to trip it.
You don't want to cross the threshold.
So that means that Iraq or Iran or any other adversary, they're going to be a little bit less aggressive.
To prevent a miscalculation that results in them being hit with a nuclear strike.
So, this is the thinking here.
And the United States will not acknowledge their nuclear program because we're helping them.
We are, in a sense, helping them maintain this deception.
We're helping them maintain this ambiguity for their benefit.
And it's not really for our benefit.
It's actually better for the United States that every party in the conflict knows where the red lines are.
It's also actually better for every party, including the United States.
To know what Israel has in the context of a nuclear negotiation.
So let's talk about, for example, the negotiation over Iran's nuclear arsenal.
Why does Iran seek a nuclear hedge?
Why do they want centrifuges?
Why do they engage in nuclear enrichment?
Why are they enriching uranium to weapons grade?
It's because they fear that Israel and the United States will attack them.
Israel and the United States are nuclear powers.
So, in order for Iran to deter an attack from nuclear armed powers, they have to achieve parity.
They have to get on our level and have the same strategic capability, which is a nuclear arsenal.
Or at the minimum, 80% of the way towards a nuclear arsenal so they could quickly build one.
So, you could say, in a way, that the only reason Iran wants a nuclear weapon in any scenario is because Israel already has one.
And that actually would be good for everybody to know.
How can we convince Iran that they cannot have a nuclear weapon?
You have no right to enrichment.
You have no right to nuclear, highly enriched uranium.
You have no right even to a nuclear weapon.
But Israel does.
Israel does, but we won't acknowledge it.
We're going to be complicit in their illegal, undeclared nuclear weapons program.
But you can't have anything.
You can't have a peaceful nuclear program.
You can't have enrichment at any level.
You can't have a centrifuge.
You can't have weapons.
Forget even about that.
It's just not even honest.
So it impedes the ability of countries in the Middle East to calculate effectively, and it also is hindering diplomacy.
So, to this end, a group of 20 Democrats have written a letter to the White House, and they have said for these reasons, this policy needs to end.
This is not America first.
This is helping Israel at our expense.
This is helping Israel at the expense of actually every country in the Middle East.
We're not being honest with Saudi Arabia and the UAE and Iran.
Therefore, it's hindering diplomacy.
It's also increasing the risk of some miscalculation that could result in a nuclear war that gets Americans killed.
So the Democrats are demanding that the White House change this policy of ambiguity and acknowledge Israel has nukes.
And this is a story from the Washington Post, or pardon me, I think this is from another source quoting the Post.
It says, A group of House Democrats is urging the Trump administration to publicly acknowledge Israel's undeclared nuclear weapons program.
In a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, more than two dozen lawmakers, led by Representative Joaquin Castro, say that Washington's silence on the program is indefensible amid the war in Iran and the acute threat of military escalation.
The lawmakers wrote The risks of miscalculation, escalation, and nuclear use in this environment are not theoretical.
Congress has a constitutional responsibility to be fully informed about the nuclear balance in the Middle East, the risk of escalation by any party to the conflict, and the administration's planning and contingencies for such scenarios.
Israel does not acknowledge its nuclear weapons program built in secret beginning in the late 1950s and has no publicly stated doctrine on how it might use those weapons.
Castro, in an interview with The Post, said the United States should not refuse to disclose this information about a foreign nation.
Simply out of courtesy when there is so much at stake for our own service members, our economy, and the country.
He said U.S. officials speak candidly about the nuclear weapons programs of the United Kingdom, France, India, Pakistan, Russia, North Korea, and China, and Israel should be no different.
Last month, a record 40 Senate Democrats voted to block weapons transfers to Israel.
According to Pew Research Center, 80% of Democrats now view Israel unfavorably, up from 53% in 2022.
Think of that.
80% of Democrats view Israel unfavorably.
They shut down weapons transfers to Israel.
They vote against foreign aid to Israel.
They want to block technology sharing with Israel.
And now they want us to disclose Israel's nuclear weapons program.
Shapiro says many, perhaps most Democrats, this is an analyst, at this point want to see fundamental changes in the U.S. Israeli relationship.
The first change that these Democrats want to see is.
Is for the U.S. to hold Israel to the same standards as other countries on issues such as nuclear weapons.
Now, once again, you hate to say it, but this is the America First policy, and it's coming from the Democrats.
And by the way, this is the key that unlocks the entire dilemma in the Middle East.
What exactly is the root of this current conflict?
All of the current conflicts in Lebanon, in Gaza, in Yemen, in Iran.
The root of this conflict really is Israel's undeclared nuclear arsenal.
Israel has a stockpile of nuclear weapons that they will not acknowledge exists.
At the same time, Israel is prosecuting a proxy war against Iran and all of its allies against Hezbollah, against the Assad regime at one time, against Hamas, against the Houthis, and against Iran.
Israel is in Iran.
Doing cyber attacks, industrial sabotage, high level assassinations.
And as of last year, with the United States carrying out an all out air campaign, a naval campaign.
And Iran has no means or ability to defend itself.
Why?
Because Iran does not have a nuclear capability and Israel does.
And that's really the root of the problem.
Iran understands that Israel wants regime change in Iran.
Israel ultimately seeks to totally dominate the Middle East.
And so that means that every country is going to be subordinated to Israel or will be destroyed.
And Iran is a big nation 90 million people, huge territory, huge middle class, huge economy supported by natural energy resources.
And so Iran is a natural rival of Israel, it's never going to submit to Israel.
And so Israel has to destroy Iran.
And Israel is perfectly capable of doing this because Israel has weapons of mass destruction and Iran doesn't.
So, this is why Iran is in this push to maintain some kind of nuclear hedge.
This is at the center of this three way problem between Israel, Iran, and the United States.
Israel pursues regime change against Iran.
So Iran is in a race to a nuclear hedge.
That race towards a nuclear hedge triggers a non proliferation impulse from the United States.
We cannot allow other countries to get nuclear weapons because there tends to be a domino effect.
Israel gets nukes, so all their neighbors want them.
Syria wants them.
Iraq wants them.
Libya wants them.
So we have to destroy all those countries.
Iran wants them.
What happens if Iran gets a nuclear weapon?
Well, then Saudi Arabia is going to want a nuclear weapon because they're in a proxy war with Iran.
And then the Emirates is going to want a nuclear weapon.
And what happens then when there are four nuclear countries in the Middle East?
Then you got Israel, Iran, Saudi Arabia, the UAE.
And then other countries are going to want nuclear weapons.
Maybe Turkey will want nuclear weapons.
Maybe then Ethiopia, Egypt will want nuclear weapons.
This is how this goes out of control.
And the more nations have nuclear weapons, one, we are at a disadvantage then strategically against every other country that has them.
But also, there's a greater risk of nuclear terrorism.
There's a greater risk of nuclear war.
And so that triggers.
Our grand strategy, our geopolitical imperative, which is to suppress the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
You see?
So Israel wants regime change in Iran.
So Iran needs a nuclear hedge.
Because they're pursuing a nuclear hedge, now we have to intervene to prevent them from getting one.
And what does that look like?
Well, that is the current diplomacy with Iran.
In this conversation between Washington and Tehran, we are telling them, why are we at war with you?
Because you cannot have centrifuges.
Because centrifuges enrich uranium.
And if you're able to enrich uranium, then you can create weapons grade uranium that can be used as fuel for a nuclear bomb.
So that's why you can't have any kind of nuclear program.
You can't have any enrichment, any centrifuges.
You have to destroy what you have under our supervision.
You have to surrender your stockpile of already highly enriched uranium.
And that is something that Iran will never do, that is something they will never give up.
Because the second that they give up their nuclear hedge, they are completely vulnerable to regime change from Israel.
And we cannot accept anything less than those things because, as long as Iran has enrichment and as long as Israel is seeking regime change, then on a long enough timeline, Iran is going to acquire a nuclear bomb.
And that is something we can never allow because then again, it triggers this arms race.
And then you've got an arms race in the Persian Gulf and the UAE is next and Saudi Arabia after that.
They're going to get their blueprints from Pakistan.
And now the whole Middle East is nuclear armed.
This is where we are.
So people say, what do we do about Iran?
How do we extricate ourselves from the war?
Well, Iran is telling us they will not accept a short term truce.
Why is that?
Because they know that if we end the war with Iran today, all we are going to do, the United States and Israel, is we're going to build more weapons to attack them.
All we're going to do is stabilize the economy.
We're going to get gas prices back down.
We're going to get through the midterms.
We're going to build more missile interceptors.
We're going to repair our bases.
We're going to repair our carriers.
We're going to replenish our armed forces that are deployed there.
And then we're going to take another crack at it and invade again or attack again, which might include an invasion.
And Iran is telling us we are not going to let you off the hook unless we get an agreement on the root causes of the conflict.
We don't ever want to fight you again.
And what that means from Iran's perspective is an acknowledgement that they can enrich uranium.
That they can have centrifuges.
In other words, that they can have their nuclear hedge.
And why do they need that nuclear hedge?
Because they don't trust us.
Because they know that we can never restrain Israel, which is a nuclear armed power.
Iran doesn't know that Israel will never nuke them.
Iran doesn't know that Israel will never try regime change.
And they will be insulated from any kind of retaliation because they have a nuclear arsenal, which is always their plan B.
So, how do we get out of our war with Iran?
Well, the only way that we can deal honestly and honorably with Iran, how do you get them to give up their right to enrich, their right to have a nuclear program?
If we are complicit in Israel's illegal, undeclared nuclear program, we can't.
They're never going to trust us.
They're never going to deal with us in good faith.
And they're never going to build enough rapport that they'll ever agree to concessions that are acceptable to us.
So, what must be involved in the process is that we actually have to treat Israel and Iran somewhat equally and fairly.
We have to restrain Israel.
If regime change from Israel is what Iran fears, if a nuclear armed Israel attacking Iran is what Iran fears, then we have to put Israel in their place.
You have to start by acknowledging, yeah, they're a nuclear armed power, it really isn't fair.
How can we expect Iran to give up their enrichment?
They don't even have bombs.
They don't even have a bomb yet.
They don't even have a method of delivery.
Iran is not able to miniaturize a nuclear warhead and put it on a ballistic missile.
They don't even have a method of delivery yet.
They don't have a strategic air force.
They don't have submarines that can launch a submarine launch ballistic missile.
They don't have miniaturization.
Israel has 300 warheads on missiles, on submarines, ready to go.
How can we tell Iran?
You can't even have the centrifuges that make the enriched uranium that go into a bomb.
They don't even have delivery yet when we are lying about Israel's undeclared program.
You can't.
So it starts with some honesty where you say, yes, Israel is a nuclear armed country.
They have 300 nuclear warheads pointed at Iran.
That is how they're able to engage in all these risky foreign policy decisions that they've been doing for the past 10 years or 20 years.
And maybe there needs to be some kind of a reckoning about that.
Maybe an agreement from Iran to give up their centrifuges involves restrictions on Israel's nuclear program.
Maybe let's start with disclosure.
Maybe let's start with some kind of nuclear doctrine.
We don't even know how Israel would use their nuclear weapons.
Do they have any articulable doctrine on under what conditions or circumstances they would consider using weapons of mass destruction?
Because we do.
Russia does.
We promulgate a strategic doctrine that says only under these circumstances will we use nuclear weapons.
And this is meant to reassure other countries with these world ending weapons.
Israel, nobody knows what they have, how many they have, that they have them.
And maybe more importantly, we don't even know under what conditions they would use them and how they would use them and against whom.
Would they just use them against Iran or would they use them against the whole world?
Would they use them against every nuclear power?
We don't know.
And under what circumstances?
We don't know.
That might be a step in the right direction.
If we can impose limitations or transparency on Israel's program, maybe then Iran would come to the table.
And at the minimum, forget even about that, I think that would make everybody feel a lot safer.
When Israel is bombing Iran and assassinating all their leadership, and when Israel is bombing their civilian infrastructure, and when we're bombing their military and we're bombing everything, and Iran is launching missiles at Israel's nuclear facilities.
And launching missiles at Israel's population centers, it would actually be better for America and American soldiers and everybody else in the region to know at what point do those attacks trigger a nuclear response.
That would be better for us to know because that would make us safer.
And that would make us better able to manage the situation and prevent it from escalating to a point where it becomes a nuclear confrontation.
That would be safer for the United States, safer for the soldiers in the Middle East.
Safer for our other allies in the region because we do have other allies.
Safer for Europe.
And where is this policy coming from?
It's coming from the Democrats.
Could you even imagine Republicans sending a letter like this?
Of course not.
Who are the Republicans?
Randy Fine, Lindsey Graham, Mark Levin, Laura Loomer, Donald Trump, Pete Hegseth, Mike Waltz is our UN ambassador.
Would this ever come from the Republicans?
It's time to acknowledge that from a national security point of view, the Democrats are at this point in time more America first than the Republicans.
And that's a tough pill to swallow, but it's true.
The Republicans have let government officials into the White House who are compromising vital U.S. intelligence and interests with Israel.
Our national security advisor, Mike Waltz from Florida, Who was chosen by Susie Wiles?
He was using an encrypted messaging app to talk to the prime minister of Israel.
That guy should be in jail.
That guy should be under the jail.
They didn't even get rid of him.
They took him out of that position and they gave him a new job as the UN ambassador.
How is that America first?
You're literally compromising national security at the highest levels.
Mike Waltz was in constant communication with Netanyahu, lobbying on behalf of Israel.
As the national security advisor to the White House, to the President of the United States.
And they didn't even fire him.
Dan Bongino, his phone was on Israel time, and he was the deputy director of the FBI.
This is who is in our government under the Trump administration.
Who are the Republican leadership in Congress from our side?
Well, it's Lindsey Graham, it's Randy Fine.
It's these kinds of Republicans.
Whereas on the Democrat side, throughout Biden's term, you had Democrats that were trying to get a memorandum passed that we wouldn't give Israel 2,000 pound bombs, that we would review whether they were using the weapons we give them in accordance with the laws of war so that we could stop sending them every class of weapons that they're asking for.
And there was enormous pressure inside the Biden administration to shut down their war in Gaza.
Confronted Iran, but never attacked them under Biden.
We tried to negotiate a deal with Iran.
And now there are 20 Democrats that want disclosure on Israel's nuclear arsenal.
When will people acknowledge?
I mean, let's just say it the Democrats are more America first on foreign policy than the Republicans right now, bar for bar.
All of that is true.
Everybody knows the Republican Party is the Israel controlled party.
And it's not to say the Democrats aren't pro Israel because they are.
And it's not to say the Democrats aren't influenced by Jewry, which they are.
Of course, Jonathan Greenblatt at the ADL is a Democrat.
So the SBLC is a very Jewish organization in bed with the Democrats.
The Democratic Party is a very Jewish institution and very pro Israel historically.
But let's be honest their electorate is 80% against Israel.
And there is a progressive faction of the Democratic Party that wants to restrain Israel.
And maybe not necessarily always for the right reasons or exactly the same reasons, but it's way more than you can say about the Republicans.
And for that, you got to give them credit and say, you know what?
Maybe that alone deserves a vote.
Because this war in Iran, everything else, it's a really big deal.
Think about everything the Republicans have done to this country since they've taken power in 2025.
They have blackballed Harvard and Yale and Columbia.
And UPenn, all the Ivy League universities have been basically shut down by the Department of Education unless they accept a pro Israel curriculum in their Middle Eastern studies departments, and unless they shut down all pro Palestine organizations and protests.
And they won't even admit people at Northwestern University unless they undergo some kind of pro Israel re education.
That is what is happening under Republican rule at the Ivy League and other highly selective schools and universities.
The State Department, Department of Homeland Security, they're reviewing 50,000 visas and visa holders looking at their social media.
If you have ever criticized Israel, they're going to revoke your visa or maybe even denaturalize you as a citizen.
So now residency and maybe even citizenship in the United States is contingent on whether you support Israel.
Homeland Security says you cannot go to the World Cup this summer.
Google it.
You cannot buy a ticket and attend a World Cup match if on your social media you've been identified as an Israel critical activist.
Okay?
Our Department of War is out there in Iran, fighting Iran, fighting the Houthis in Yemen.
We gave Israel $12 billion in foreign aid last year alone.
The State Department reviewed every country that receives foreign aid and Put an injunction on it, subject to that review, except for Israel.
Every other country got their foreign aid paused, except for Israel.
This is under the Trump government.
So, if you don't support Israel, you cannot have citizenship.
You cannot have residency.
You can't go to the World Cup.
You can't attend Harvard or Northwestern.
We're fighting Israel's wars.
We're giving them foreign aid, whereas every other country can't get it.
We have a national security advisor that's lobbying on behalf of the prime minister of Israel.
This is your Republican Party.
And that's just a small sampling.
There's tons of other examples.
There's that Israeli minister who was caught in a sting.
Trying to sexually abuse a minor that the FBI just let him go, just let him go from Nevada.
There are countless examples like this.
That's your Republican Party, and that's the antithesis of America First.
How anybody could support that is beyond me.
You cannot hold your nose and vote for that.
You can't overlook that.
That's not one issue among others.
Well, you know, they're good on some things and bad on other things.
They're bad on what?
We're going to be some kind of pro Israel vassal state?
Other than that, they're great on everything else.
So, once again, the message needs to be if the Republican Party is not America first, Republicans shouldn't vote for Republicans.
I'm going to vote for the party that is putting America first.
If Democrats are going to disclose Israel's nuclear program, if they're going to end the war in Iran, if they're going to stop foreign aid or sending 2,000 pound bombs to Israel, force Israel into some kind of agreement with Hamas and Gaza, then I'm going to vote for the Democrats.
Absolutely.
People say, what about immigration?
Honestly, what about immigration?
You see anything about immigration these days, or is it all about Israel?
When's the last time Trump posted something about immigration?
All I see him is glazing Mark Levin and Laura Loomer and talking about blowing up Iran and annihilating Persian civilization.
People say, what about immigration?
Yeah, I don't know.
Good question.
Where are those mass deportations?
I don't see them.
Where is that border wall?
It's still not built.
And by the way, they're not going to build it.
They're done with that.
That's over.
So there's just no more excuses anymore.
I think that's over.
So huge congratulations to the Democrats.
See, this is what we need to see from Republicans.
How hard is that?
Where is the America First caucus in the GOP?
There isn't, I think there's literally one.
You got Randy, or excuse me, not Randy, fine.
You've got Thomas Massey, and that's it.
You got 20 Democrats arguably in the House that are going to stand up to Israel.
You got one Republican.
And AIPAC is spending upwards of $10 million, maybe $20 million to try to get rid of them.
And Trump is working to make that happen.
And so are many other Republicans.
He got one.
That's where we stand right now.
So big ups to the Democrats for trying to thwart Israel.
I'm telling you guys.
This is the new wave.
It is what it is.
This is where we find ourselves.
And you know what?
If we weren't in a war with Iran, maybe this wouldn't be as big of a deal.
Republicans are going to get slaughtered in the midterms because of this war.
People said, You're obsessed with Israel.
It's not really that big of a deal.
No, it's the Republicans' obsession with Israel that is sabotaging everything.
It is their fixation, their obsession, their preoccupation with putting Israel first that is sabotaging every other issue, poisoning the well with everything in the country.
Don't tell me that's not true.
And even many Republicans agree.
They're saying Trump is squandering the generational coalition he built.
And in some sense, they're right.
We could have been using this political capital for the mass deportations.
If we're going to lose the midterms this badly, if Trump is going to have record low favorability, If he's going to have record low approval, if we're going to do this, right?
If we're going to blow ourselves up, because that's what we're doing, Trump is more unpopular than he's ever been, more unpopular than Biden, more unpopular than he was in his first term.
We're blowing the midterms.
That's just not even going to happen.
He has squandered his support with the podcast bros, with Hispanics, with Generation Z, with America First Foreign Policy people, with Muslims, with Catholics.
If we're going to do this, if we're going to become that unpopular, why would we not?
Blow our political capital doing the deportations.
I mean, is that a crazy thing to say?
If Trump is committing political suicide for a war against Iran, why would we not commit political suicide to achieve mass deportations?
Didn't they tell us we can't do mass deportations because it's too unpopular?
We can't do mass deportations, it's too unpopular.
We looked at the data, we're losing the voters.
The podcast bros are turning against us.
We're going to lose the midterms, so we can't say the word mass deportations and we can't do them.
Well, I don't know if you know this, but the war in Iran is extremely unpopular, making us lose the midterms, killing our approval and favorability.
So if we're going to do it anyway, why not blow it on an issue that actually matters?
You see what Trump will do for Israel.
Why can't he do that for us?
It's wishful thinking.
You are not in love with Trump.
You're in love with what you want Trump to be.
You see?
People are saying, well, we need to vote for Trump because of immigration.
We're not getting immigration.
That's never going to happen.
You know, we're voting for Trump because even though he sold this out to Israel, we're getting immigration.
You're not getting that.
But you're not getting that, though.
And then people make excuses.
They say, well, we're not getting it because of this, that, and the other.
It's like, did those excuses stop him from launching a war in Iran?
He said that the far right is actually the far left.
Nick Fuentes is voting for Democrats.
Do not let Ben Shapiro tell you that.
In 2016, Ben Shapiro was a never trumper.
You know what that means?
Ben Shapiro was perfectly willing.
To let Donald Trump lose and Hillary Clinton become president of the United States.
Why?
Because he did not believe that Trump was sufficiently pro Israel.
So the next time one of these Republican analysts says, you can't vote Democrat, you can't stay home, you have to vote Republican, do not forget that almost to a man, all of the conservative pundits, intellectuals, the same ones that are pro Trump now, they were never Trumpers in 16.
They were perfectly willing to let Hillary Clinton become the president of the United States, and they were fine with that.
They preferred that.
They thought it would be better.
They were all like that.
Ben Shapiro intentionally tried to make Trump lose the election.
He would have had Hillary Clinton sweep the White House, House, and Senate.
And now he tells us 10 years later oh, you can never vote Democrat?
Don't even listen to these people.
They play both sides every single time when it concerns Israel.
Don't let them tell you you can't play both sides when it concerns America.
That's 100% true.
So, anyway.
Yeah, now Shapiro's going to call me out.
Oh, Nick Fluentis is a Democrat.
He finally admits it.
I'm sorry.
You wanted Clinton for president because Trump said he would deal with Israel and Palestine fairly.
I do, and I think he's an honest guy, and I appreciate that he's going to give me the opportunity to engage with him on the subject, but.
And I hope he doesn't take this personally.
In my opinion, I think he's a little bit caught up in partisanship because I said, I'm a non woke moderate Democrat.
I'm an Afro Latino.
Now, obviously, I am voting Democrat, but I said that in a joking way.
Like, obviously, the premise is funny.
The premise is that the most far right person is going to call themselves a moderate Democrat.
That's funny.
Saying Nick Fuentes is a moderate Latino Democrat, like, saying it in that way, it's a comedic premise.
Of course, I'm voting Democrat, though.
And he says, Oh, really?
You're a moderate Democrat?
Well, there are no moderate Democrats, blah, blah, blah.
And it's like, listen, man, listen.
I've explained it many times.
If the situation, and let me put it, well, I don't want to spoil the show, but I will just say this.
If the situation were as follows, let's say we're in a presidential election year and it's really competitive with the presidency, the House, and the Senate, would I want the Democrats to have a clean sweep?
Absolutely not.
And if that were the case, I would absolutely not be a Democrat at all.
Honest to God.
Because if the Democrats have a unified government, then we're fucked.
And I totally get that, okay?
But that's not the situation.
The situation in 2026 is that most likely Republicans keep the Senate.
And even if they don't, it's going to be very close.
And we're going to have the White House for two more years.
And we have six, maybe seven seats on the Supreme Court, right?
Who are the liberal?
Well, I guess you only have five or six, I should say, right?
You got Sotomayor, Katanji Jackson.
And do you still have Breyer or did he retire?
So you still got five, sometimes six seats on the Supreme Court.
That's pretty good.
And so I'm comfortable with us losing the House.
And I'm comfortable with us losing some other choice races because there's checks and balances.
So that's what I'm comfortable with.
When he says, you know, there are no moderate Democrats, like, I agree with you, bro.
Travis Bickle is, I watched that movie and I'm like, dude, he's literally me.
What does he do?
He drives around all the time, drives around all the time at night, eats junk food, does pull ups sometimes, totally alone, no friends, watches TV, interested in politics, but in like kind of a crazy way.
Like he's kind of insane.
He's just like, Wants to burn it all down.
He's just like mad.
He's just like taking out his societal dislocation on the political system.
So, yeah, there's like, yeah, we're very similar.
Not in the way that we're trying to save prostitutes or like kill politicians, but the other stuff for sure.
A child should not have to live and see that normalized.
And, you know, there's something like scandalous about that.
You're scandalizing the child.
You know, it would be like a polycule.
It'd be, you know, where does it end?
We're going to bring a child into a polycule where everybody's having sex with each other, or I don't know, some other kind of like immoral arrangement.
So, yeah, I think it's like corrosive to a child's soul to be.
Crowder did a 20 minute segment on you being a Democrat and invited you to the show.
Collab win?
P.S. Rape Gerald.
Foy Annihilator sent $20.
Nicholas, I've just started thinking.
Been having troubles.
Any help with some beginner level thoughts to get started?
Some nigga sent $20.
Democrat in 26.
It's gonna feel good to win.
Any thoughts on Minnesota governor election?
Show's been on fire since the return.
Chatter sent $100.
Even if the Trump administration capitulates to the Iranian 14 point peace proposal, or any sort of peace proposal with Iran, Israel will just end up breaking the ceasefire anyway and the U.S. goes back to square one.
Jews were right, fuck M. Netanyahu, if you can hear me.
Maxwell St. Polish Chud sent $20, having to explain yourself and dumb it down kind of pointless.
Hugo Nigga just lead charge, can't hold every sub 80 IQ hand.
Buffalo Bat sent $20, white ass nigga is going dem as fuck.
New alt right sent $20, I am Catholic and live in a town of 1,200 people in the Midwest.
I have not gone back to church because our priest is from African Americania and I can't understand him.
The closest church has an Indian priest.
Bibi Shapiro Stein sent $20, have you seen the clip on X of Jake Shields and some military bro Dane Chisholm saying AF needs new muscular Christian leadership, and how you're not that guy.