Sept. 21, 2022 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
01:14:23
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
The American people will come first once again. | |
| With respect, the respect that we deserve. | ||
| From this day forward, it's going to be only America first. | ||
| America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! | ||
|
unidentified
|
America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America | |
| First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America | ||
| First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! | ||
| America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! | ||
| America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! | ||
| America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! America First! Good | ||
| evening. | ||
| You're watching America First. | ||
| My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes. | ||
| We have a great show for you tonight. | ||
| Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Tuesday. | ||
| We have a lot to talk about tonight, a lot to get into. | ||
| We're gonna cover one of the stories we did not get to last night. | ||
| And our featured story tonight is about the Russia-Ukraine war. | ||
| Back in the news, And there is going to be a major development in this coming week, starting in a few days. | ||
| There will be two referendums held in Donbass, which is the region in eastern Ukraine. | ||
| That's what this whole war is about. | ||
| And so the two democratic republics of Luhansk and Donetsk will be holding a referendum starting on the 23rd, going on until the 27th, about whether or not to join Russia. | ||
| So this is the official formal annexation of the region Donbass and the sub-regions, the provinces Luhansk and Donetsk by Russia. | ||
| Huge development, totally changes the course of the war. | ||
| And we were supposed to get a statement by the Russian President Vladimir Putin tonight, but it was mysteriously postponed at the last minute. | ||
| And so now apparently we'll be getting a statement from the Russian president perhaps later tonight, like midnight, 1 a.m., 2 a.m. | ||
| Central Time. | ||
| They're saying it's to be expected, I think, 9 or 10 a.m. | ||
| Moscow time is when they're planning on giving the speech. | ||
| And it's going to be the Russian president, Putin, and then it is going to be his defense minister, Shoigu. | ||
| Shoigu? | ||
| The Defense Minister is speaking and what is anticipated is perhaps a declaration of war formally against Ukraine and maybe the announcement of a general mobilization of the Russian country against Ukraine. | ||
| So we'll talk about that tonight and what all that means. | ||
| Pretty interesting stuff. | ||
| Kind of changes the dynamic here. | ||
| Because right now you've got not a war but a special military operation And you don't have necessarily Russia fighting Ukraine so much as largely there is fighting by the militaries, the militias in Luhansk and Donetsk with the support of the Russians in Ukraine. | ||
| If they annex the two territories, then you'll have fighting technically within Russia. | ||
| If Luhansk and Donetsk become part of Russia, Then you've got Russians fighting Ukrainians in Russia. | ||
| And these militias of fighters in Luhansk and Donetsk become Russian military. | ||
| So it totally changes what's going on there. | ||
| And we'll get into what that means. | ||
| We'll also be talking tonight about a new poll for the 2022 midterms, which shows that Hispanics are still not going to be voting Republican. | ||
| The majority of them are supporting the Democrats, and the majority of Hispanics remain deeply entrenched on left-wing issues, particularly left-wing social and cultural issues. | ||
| They support abortion. | ||
| They support all this gay trans stuff. | ||
| I know everybody says Hispanics are supposed to be, what do they say, it's the empire of Guadalupe or something like that. | ||
| Well, it's not. | ||
| They're not coming in and making America a Catholic Integralist nation. | ||
| They're just liberal. | ||
| They support gun control. | ||
| They support mass legal immigration. | ||
| They support all this stuff. | ||
| So they support the Democrats and they support all this liberal politics which flies in the face of everything that we have been told for a long time by different people in various ways about how legal immigration is really nothing to be too worried about. | ||
| Or, I should put it another way, how the replacement of white people by non-white people is nothing to be too concerned about. | ||
| We're told that by all different kinds of people in many different kinds of ways, if it's not even about immigration itself per se, it's about how the non-white Replacement is not going to be a big deal. | ||
| And we were told decades ago that that's because they're actually natural conservatives. | ||
| And then we were told for a time that we can't alienate those people because they're going to be the future of the party. | ||
| We got to pander to them. | ||
| And more recently we've been told it's working because in Virginia they voted for Greg Yunkin in, what was that, 2021 or 2020? | ||
| I don't remember. | ||
| And they said that in 2020, the Hispanics voted 40% for Trump which shows, according to Steve Bannon, that we're gonna get these working class Mexicans and these working class blacks. | ||
| They would need to work for them to be working class. | ||
| More like non-working class. | ||
| Working class blacks? | ||
| That's an oxymoron. | ||
| What you really should call them is the un-working class. | ||
| The not-working class. | ||
| That's really what most blacks are, is the not working class. | ||
| They're the class of the people that ain't working. | ||
| We ain't working class. | ||
| Because they ain't working. | ||
| So we're being told, now that's just a random shot at blacks for no reason. | ||
| This is a show about Hispanics and just take a random attack on blacks for no reason. | ||
| Well, it's true. | ||
| We're told that we're going to win over these working class Hispanics and the ain't working blacks and that's going to fuel a political realignment and give Republicans control for a thousand years. | ||
| That's what Steve Bannon has been saying on his stupid show for years and it wasn't true in 2020 and it's not true now. | ||
| We're not gaining ground with Hispanics. | ||
| We're not gaining ground with blacks. | ||
| In fact, we're losing ground with whites. | ||
| That's the only thing that's happening. | ||
| As far as our performance with Hispanics, it's slightly worse. | ||
| Our performance with blacks is also worse. | ||
| Slightly. | ||
| The only major change is that we're losing college-educated whites by a lot. | ||
| And that is far more problematic. | ||
| So we'll talk about that, and that'll be our show. | ||
| Kind of a slow day. | ||
| Not too much going on. | ||
| I don't feel so good. | ||
| I have a little bit of a cough. | ||
| My head hurts, excuse me. | ||
| So I don't feel so hot. | ||
| I feel a little, I feel tired. | ||
| I don't know if it's my allergies. | ||
| I don't know what it is, but I'm just feeling a little under the weather. | ||
| Slight cough, headache. | ||
| So I'm gonna be really irritable during the Super Chats. | ||
| Please do not mess with me, alright? | ||
| Do not give me a hard time. | ||
| I don't feel well and I'm gonna be... I'm just telling you right now, I'm gonna be... I'm already pissed off. | ||
| I'm pissed off that I'm sitting here doing this show right now. | ||
| It's too hot in here. | ||
| I'm already mildly uncomfortable because of the temperature and I have a headache. | ||
| I know it's gonna get worse as the show goes on. | ||
| I'm already mad. | ||
| I'm already furious as I sit here and the show just started. | ||
| I'm already livid. | ||
| And I know that by the end of the show I'm just gonna be even more... I'm gonna be angrier. | ||
| Even angrier when the monologue wraps up. | ||
| So don't test me. | ||
| Don't even try me. | ||
| You're not gonna like what you get. | ||
| You're not gonna like it. | ||
| Okay, so with that being said... Nah, I'm in a great... I'm always in a great mood. | ||
| With that being said, before we dive into the news, Before we dive into the news, I want to remind you to follow me here on Cozy! | ||
| Smash the follow button. | ||
| Cozy.tv slash Nick. | ||
| Cozy.tv slash Nick. | ||
| Follow me up on here. | ||
| Receive a push notification whenever the show goes live. | ||
| Follow me here. | ||
| Get notified when the show begins. | ||
| Great feature we've got. | ||
| Also, be sure to follow me on Gab Telegram and True Social. | ||
| Links are down below. | ||
| Follow me up on all those. | ||
| Make sure to follow me. | ||
| Gab, True Social, Telegram. | ||
| Links down below. | ||
| What else? | ||
| Not much else. | ||
| Not much else going on. | ||
| What else is going on in the news? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's really nothing. | |
| The only major development is the Russia story and then this... | ||
| This poll that we're going to talk about is honestly like filler from yesterday. | ||
| Yesterday's filler left over until today. | ||
| I don't envy you! | ||
| I don't envy me! | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's another boring week. | |
| You know what's going on? | ||
| There's a big controversy on Twitch. | ||
| I guess Twitch just banned gambling on the platform, where Twitch was doing all these gambling streams where these big creators were doing slot machines and things like that. | ||
| And now they got rid of it. | ||
| And I don't even know. | ||
| Somebody on the forum was posting about this the other day, saying how there's a big war where there were gambling streamers, and then there was some Twitch streamer that sexually assaulted some girl, like touched her boob. | ||
| So funny. | ||
| This is what goes on, and people say our drama is stupid, and then in Twitch world, one of their biggest streamers, I guess, uh, was with some girl who was drunk, and he was trying to, like, resuscitate her, or something, so he grabbed her boob. | ||
| Something like that is the story. | ||
| I don't know if that's exactly it, but again, somebody posted about it, and the Twitch community has exploded over it. | ||
| That was like the Franz Ferdinand of the Twitch universe, is that some girl got drunk or something, and a guy was caring for her and grabbed her boob. | ||
| Start performing CPR! | ||
| Okay! | ||
| Alright! | ||
| I'm on it! | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm performing CPR. | |
| And so anyway so that happened a long time ago and then this has been brought back to light and in this gambling controversy so now there's people attacking some people because they took it easy on this guy that grabbed a girl's boob and those people are attacking the gambling streamers for for being gamblers or something selling it to kids I don't know And so now Twitch is at war. | ||
| It's a war of the worlds. | ||
| It's Hasan, it's XQC, it's Trainwrecks, it's these other people. | ||
| And now Twitch has announced there's no gambling on the platform. | ||
| So I guess that, I mean, that's like a huge deal in the streaming world, but I'm not even in that world. | ||
| It just sucks so hard to not be on the platforms. | ||
| Because I go on Twitch, and XQC has got 160,000 live viewers. | ||
| And Hassan, 120,000 live viewers. | ||
| And I like XQC. | ||
| I don't like Hassan. | ||
| But it's like, you know, Twitch is just, they're partnered with Amazon. | ||
| They just, they got there first. | ||
| They got freaking a billion people on there. | ||
| And it's like, we're not allowed to even play the game? | ||
| We're not even allowed to play? | ||
| It just sucks so hard. | ||
| Because not only can't I stream on there, not only can I not make a Twitch channel and stream, or a YouTube channel, but even better, I'm thinking about me this summer, I get on a panel with Sneeko and Destiny and Jadeon and these other guys, Don and Abba, And it's a huge stream on YouTube, 25,000 people watching across all platforms or something like that. | ||
| And it's like, okay, so I can't be on the platforms and I can't, I can't be on any of them. | ||
| I can't be on Twitter, I can't be on Twitch, I can't be on YouTube, I can't write, I can't use any platform and so nobody can hear about me, can't be on TikTok, can't mention me on TikTok. | ||
| But then, you know, the few times you're able to break... ...again, Abba and Jadion say, oh, well, he was racist, the few times you're able to break... ...again, Abba and Jadion say, oh, well, he was racist, And then Sneeko says, oh, I can't talk to you anymore because he gets a strike on his channel for hosting me. | ||
| And then Destiny makes up this BS about, oh, your friend reported my friend, and then in an unrelated way, my friend got banned. | ||
| So now I'm not talking to you anymore. | ||
| So it's like, really? | ||
| That just sucks. | ||
| So anyway I'm just now I'm just complaining but I'm not in that world so I don't even know what the drama is about but apparently there's like freaking millions of people that are watching this gambling drama go on. | ||
| It does say something though that the biggest streamers and the biggest streams and the biggest content is just Sin. | ||
| And I don't mean to be that guy. | ||
| I don't mean to be that guy over here who's like, oh you're gambling. | ||
| But it's true. | ||
| Twitch is probably the youngest platform. | ||
| I would say that I don't know, I haven't looked at it, but I would assume that if you took the average age of the most active users on all the platforms, I would guess that Twitch is one of, if not the youngest, right there with TikTok. | ||
| Facebook and Twitter skew older for sure. | ||
| Instagram lately is skewing older. | ||
| I think that TikTok and Twitch have got to be the youngest. | ||
| And the most viral, the biggest content on Twitch, on the front page, it's porn and it's gambling. | ||
| And I don't even use Twitch very much, but I go there from time to time and I watch like Trainwrecks, who I was on his panel a few years ago, and he's just doing a slot machine. | ||
| It's just online gambling. | ||
| And then it's these they call them pool streams or hot tub streams where girls are in bathing suits and because they can't do regular porn they can't just it's not a porn site technically so they'll just go down to their bathing suit and hang and hang out in the pool and these are the biggest streams on Twitch and again I hate to be that guy that's like you know | ||
| But there is something to be said about the fact that that is, and I get it, sex sells, and I guess gambling sells as well, but consider the fact that I'm banned from these platforms. | ||
| Nobody will talk to me. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because I believe in race, because I think that race is real, and I think the Jews run everything, and you know, I'm being a little simplistic here, but That's what I'm known for is, oh he's racist and he thinks the Jews run everything. | ||
| It's like, okay, but porn stars and gambling? | ||
| Seriously? | ||
| Brilliant genius ideas and humor not allowed. | ||
| Ban him. | ||
| Put it in the Senate. | ||
| I know, I know. | ||
| A lot of this stuff is very generic, is very lame, but it's just... It's just true and it's frustrating. | ||
| Like, consider the Senate will hold multiple hearings about so-called extremist content because I go on there and say, hey, 9-11 was done by Israel. | ||
| That is worthy of the attention of the U.S. | ||
| Senate. | ||
| That is a threat to the general welfare. | ||
| Pornography isn't. | ||
| Gambling isn't. | ||
| Drugs. | ||
| And by the way, all those three things go together. | ||
| A lot of people think that they don't, or maybe that was just me for a long time, but they do. | ||
| They absolutely all go together, and I know from my own experience in Illinois, they legalized gambling recently. | ||
| And now it's like every other restaurant and even convenience stores have slot machines in them. | ||
| And it's just sad. | ||
| It's like hidden. | ||
| I think there's regulations where it has to be obscured from public view like you can't see it from the outside. | ||
| So you'll have these little back rooms and little curtained off areas and you just get these zombies there that just go there and just hit the slots. | ||
| And it's all bound up by this misery which just pervades the land, which just saturates the land. | ||
| That's just our country now. | ||
| It's just a bunch of miserable people drowning it out in drugs, gambling, and porn slash sex. | ||
| And that's not worthy of attention. | ||
| You don't put that's not in the Senate hearing. | ||
| The Senate doesn't care about that. | ||
| The Senate doesn't care about... The Senate should investigate the gambling streams. | ||
| ...conservatives to call out the Jew, Dave Portnoy. | ||
| And the only reason I say that is because the guy's straight-up evil. | ||
| That's why I say the Jew. | ||
| Because he's straight-up evil. | ||
| He is pushing on kids' sex, Gambling, drugs, and everybody and he's beloved. | ||
| He's beloved on TikTok. | ||
| He's beloved in the culture by really like a conservative audience. | ||
| He's like frat guys, sports heads, young white men. | ||
| They all look up to him. | ||
| Well guess what? | ||
| Dave Portnoy is not white, and he's not a patriot, and he's not a Christian. | ||
| The guy's a straight-up man-child Jew who pushes on kids, which I wasn't even aware of that this is what he's known for, is sports betting, and then promoting on a show. | ||
| He's sitting around on a panel with the TikTokers that do all this softcore type stuff. | ||
| And talking about how they smoke pot and all this, and they call it Andrew Tate and so on. | ||
| Anyway, it skits at what I was talking about the other night. | ||
| We looked at the Queen's funeral and how they called that Hitler. | ||
| It's like the same story with social media. | ||
| There is who they go after, and that's telling, and it's equally telling who they do not go after. | ||
| It's telling that they raise the alarm and they raise a red flag about the guy who's telling people, among other things, things that are considered fringe. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sure, race realism, conspiracy theories, all day. | |
| But among those things, get married, go to church, go to school, go to college, save your money, get involved, be an activist. | ||
| That's who they go after, and people can debate whether that's a result of bias or not, whether that's warranted or not, but what is unseen is those that are not gone after. | ||
| We can say, oh well sure the senators are reasonable to look into political extremism, but not kids being lured into gambling and porn and drugs? | ||
| Wrong. | ||
| It's wrong. | ||
| I should be promoted on Twitch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Not these gamblers, not these porn stars. | |
| Anti-Semitic racists should be promoted on Twitch. | ||
| Not all these porn star Jews and gambling addicts, alright? | ||
| That's a dip. | ||
| Not all these swindlers, not all these swindlers and thieves and accusers. | ||
| Anyway. | ||
| A lot of that's tongue-in-cheek, you know that, but So that's what's going on. | ||
| That's the real, that's the big picture on Twitch. | ||
| That's the big picture. | ||
| You want to form a tribunal about social media? | ||
| Drag forward OnlyFans CEO and Dave Portnoy first. | ||
| Drag Death Penalty, bring it forth for the CEO of OnlyFans and the CEO of GamblingSportsBetting.com for Dave Portnoy. | ||
| Death Penalty! | ||
| Death Penalty! | ||
| Bring it forth! | ||
| I am calling for Dave Portnoy to be tried for treason. | ||
| He should receive it. | ||
| Death penalty! | ||
| Bring it forth! | ||
| Not necessarily Dave Portnoy, but the OnlyFans... What's the CEO of OnlyFans? | ||
| He's Jewish, by the way. | ||
| Shlomo Rubashkin or something like that. | ||
| Real though, the CEO of OnlyFans is Jewish. | ||
| And so is Dave Portnoy. | ||
| Go figure. | ||
| Go figure. | ||
| Anyway! | ||
| Anyway! | ||
| So that's what's going on in the normie world. | ||
| No oversight, no scrutiny on that. | ||
| That's fine. | ||
| But you start saying who these people are and what they're about, suddenly you're an extremist, you're a political activist, you gotta go, you gotta get banned, no one can talk to you. | ||
| So anyway, that's just what's going on. | ||
| But we're gonna get into the news here. | ||
| Let's just dive right into it. | ||
| So our first story is about this poll about Hispanics. | ||
| And I don't know how much of you guys hear about this. | ||
| I don't know how much of the conservative space you all follow. | ||
| But this has been a persistent narrative, I'm sure as everybody knows, for decades now. | ||
| Which is, the country, well, nobody talks about this, but it is true, the country is becoming less white. | ||
| We all know that. | ||
| And it's largely a result of mass immigration from primarily Latin America, but increasingly more from Asia as well. | ||
| And this is something that they don't want people to notice, they don't talk about very much. | ||
| But people are noticing, and they're subconsciously and unconsciously becoming uncomfortable about it and becoming aware of the way in which the country is changing. | ||
| And people are trying to find the words for it, and it's clashing with their anti-racist programming. | ||
| How do we acknowledge our white race and our white country and how it's evolving? | ||
| Or devolving, how it's involuting. | ||
| But without breaking our anti-racist programming, this is how we come up with things like Make America Great Again and all that. | ||
| Anyway, Republicans have been trying to hold back the white constituency in America, their white voting constituency, by reassuring them that Hispanics are actually, not only are they going to be great in America, but also they're not going to threaten political control. | ||
| Because there's really kind of two things going on here. | ||
| The country is becoming less white and that's changing the country. | ||
| That's changing the neighborhoods, that's changing the schools, the workplaces, the cities. | ||
| It's just changing everything because they're not like us. | ||
| I am Hispanic, but, you know, my Hispanic ancestors came here four or five generations ago. | ||
| The people that are coming here are, on average, they have an IQ of 85, they're a different skin color, they don't speak English, they are not educated, they do not have skills, they do not have capital. | ||
| So we are talking about as poor people with an IQ, a standard deviation lower than the average in America, coming in, and they don't even share our culture. | ||
| So that's going on on one level. | ||
| On another level, it is threatening the political control enjoyed by American conservatives, which increasingly are white people. | ||
| They've always been white people, but increasingly it's only white people. | ||
| And what I mean by that is the Democratic Party is like half or the majority of them are non-white now. | ||
| Of course, that wasn't the case when the country was 90% white. | ||
| And the Republican Party is 90% white. | ||
| 90% of the people that voted for Trump in 2016 were white. | ||
| And so Republicans have been reassuring us on two levels. | ||
| They're reassuring us that this demographic change is going to be good because these Hispanics are just like us, if not better they say. | ||
| They're better than us. | ||
| Because they're more hard-working and they want it more. | ||
| Who deserves the American Dream more? | ||
| Someone who was just born here and takes it for granted, or someone who moved here, who sought it out? | ||
| Someone who traveled here because they were hungry for that American Dream? | ||
| You know, so they say it on that level. | ||
| And then they also say at the same time that we need, as conservatives, We need not worry about the changing demographics for our political influence because these Hispanics are naturally conservative. | ||
| We've heard this in varying forms for decades. | ||
| We heard decades ago that, like I said, they're natural conservatives. | ||
| They're religious people. | ||
| They're hard-working people. | ||
| So that means they're going to want their taxes lowered and they're going to want Christian social values. | ||
| And then, We've heard more recently. | ||
| I got into a big debate back in December, almost a full year ago, with some of the new luminaries of the conservative movement. | ||
| People like Nate Hockman at the National Review, and Yoram Hazony's son, as well as Luca Cacciatore, who's at, I believe, Newsmax. | ||
| I got a big argument with all these young... the new generation of people to promulgate this lie. | ||
| And they're spinning the usual stuff about how that's still true. | ||
| The Hispanics still are the natural conservatives. | ||
| How do we know that? | ||
| Because in 2020, 40% of Hispanics voted for Trump. | ||
| Trump gained 8% with Hispanics. | ||
| And because in the Virginia governor's race, a majority, I believe, or half of Hispanics voted for the Republican candidate for governor. | ||
| So, they say, because of Trump's performance with Hispanics in 2020, because of Greg Yunkin's performance with Hispanics in Virginia, | ||
| And because of a whole host of other things, people have these fantasies about Hispanics are going to bring Catholic integralism, and people talk about this book called White Shift, about how Hispanics are actually becoming white, they're identifying as white, they're moving, they're intermixing with whites, and their kids are becoming white, and they're leveling up economically and becoming middle class, so they're shifting, whiteness is shifting to encapsulate now Hispanics. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Well, we're finding out that none of that is true. | ||
| That's not true. | ||
| That's not happening. | ||
| That lie has once again been stopped dead in its tracks according to a new poll, and that's our news today. | ||
| And this is from the New York Times. | ||
| It says, quote, Since Donald Trump made surprising gains with Hispanic voters, but Republican dreams of a major realignment of Latino voters drawn to GOP stances on crime and social issues have failed to materialize, according to a new poll by the New York Times and Siena College. | ||
| The poll, one of the largest non-partisan surveys of Latino voters since the 2020 election, found that Democrats had maintained a grip on the majority of Latino voters, driven in part by women and the belief that Democrats remain the party of the working class. | ||
| Overall, Hispanic voters are more likely to agree with Democrats on many issues, such as immigration, gun policy, climate, They're also more likely to see Republicans as the party of the elite, and it's holding extreme views. | ||
| A majority of Hispanic voters, 56%, plan to vote for Democrats, compared with just 32% for Republicans. | ||
| Hispanic voters are playing a pivotal role in the battle for Congress, making up a significant slice of voters as high as 20% in two of the states likeliest to determine control of the Senate, Arizona and Nevada. | ||
| Latinos also make up more than 20% of registered voters in more than a dozen highly competitive House races in California, Colorado, Florida, and Texas. | ||
| The 2020 election results, in which Mr. Trump gained an estimated 8 percentage points among Hispanics compared to 2016, began changing both parties' outlooks. | ||
| The Times poll shows that historic allegiances and beliefs on core issues remain entrenched, however. | ||
| While majorities of Hispanic voters side with the Democrats on social and cultural issues, sizable shares hold beliefs aligned with Republicans. | ||
| More than a third of Hispanic voters say they agree with the GOP on crime and policing. | ||
| Four out of ten Hispanic voters have concerns that the Democratic Party has gone too far on race and gender. | ||
| Hispanic voters view economic issues as the most important factor determining their vote this year and are evenly split on which party they agree with more on the economy. | ||
| On social and cultural issues, Hispanic voters remain aligned with the Democrats. | ||
| The majority, 58%, have a favorable view of BLM. | ||
| 45% say the same about Blue Lives Matter. | ||
| A majority believe that abortion should be legal in all or most cases, even among Republican Hispanics. | ||
| Four in ten oppose the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. | ||
| Support for BLM and abortion rights is propelled largely by young people. | ||
| When asked whom they agree with more on gun policy, 49% said Democrats, while 34% said Republicans. | ||
| So, here we are. | ||
| 34% said Republicans. | ||
| So here we are. | ||
| It's 2022. | ||
| The Hard Seller Immigration Act was passed in 1965. | ||
| The other major immigration act was passed in 1990. | ||
| We have had massive uncontrolled immigration coming across our southern border now for 60 years. | ||
| And we still have never, as Republicans, won the majority of Hispanics. | ||
| Not in 2016, not in 2020, not in 2022. | ||
| not in 2020 not in 2022 not even close and we're still not winning them over on the issues and the young people seem to be more liberal than their parents all All the while, the clock is ticking. | ||
| They still continue to pour over the board, and they still continue to comprise a larger and larger proportion of the voting base in swing states. | ||
| And every state. | ||
| Not just the swing states. | ||
| They're turning states that weren't swing states into swing states. | ||
| The entire West is not going to be in play in 10 years because of Hispanic immigration. | ||
| Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, these were once Republican states. | ||
| California too, you could throw in. | ||
| But these were all once Republican states and then they were purple states and now they're becoming blue states. | ||
| Arizona is a purple, becoming a blue state. | ||
| New Mexico was a purple, has become a blue state. | ||
| Colorado was a purple, has become a blue state. | ||
| Nevada was purple, is I should say is purple, is now becoming a blue state. | ||
| That's the entire West. | ||
| Texas is a red state. | ||
| Just this year became majority non-white. | ||
| And once those people get registered to vote, and as they continue to increase their share of the electorate, Texas will become a purple state and then a blue state. | ||
| It's happening in the southeast. | ||
| In Georgia, in Florida, in Virginia, in North Carolina. | ||
| Where are the states where Republicans are going to win? | ||
| Where are the states where white people are going to reside? | ||
| The entire West, not gonna happen. | ||
| Washington State, Oregon are Asian. | ||
| They've got whites in the East, but the population centers are Asian. | ||
| California, Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, did I say Nevada? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Those are all blue. | |
| Texas is gonna be blue, Florida's gonna be blue, Georgia's gonna be blue, Virginia, all the Northeast, the entire- which there used to be some, used to be able to maybe win Maryland or New Hampshire, that's all going blue. | ||
| What are we gonna have? | ||
| You would be able to count on two hands how many states Republicans are even gonna be able to win reliably, much less be competitive in, in the future. | ||
| And people have been, and I know all of you know this, people have been sounding the alarm bell on this for decades, and here's the point. | ||
| People are still being tricked. | ||
| I can't believe it. | ||
| Because I thought we defeated this logic in 2016. | ||
| I thought that when Trump won in 2016, that shut them all up. | ||
| Because they had been saying this for decades, the neocons, the GOP establishment. | ||
| They have been saying for decades, nothing to worry about, country's changing, and it's getting better. | ||
| That should have decisively finished off that argument, that we want a revanchist, traditional party that's based on the historic demographics of America, based on white people. | ||
| That doesn't mean that we don't want Hispanics in the coalition, it doesn't mean we don't want blacks in the coalition, but the core of the Republican coalition is going to be white people. | ||
| That's who's going to win these elections, is the white people. | ||
| And we should be primarily focused on winning over more college-educated and non-college-educated white people than bending over backwards for blacks and Hispanics by changing our policies on immigration in particular, or crime for that matter. | ||
| Should have been it. | ||
| A law and order, anti-immigration, Culturally white message, right? | ||
| A culturally white-lash message, which is what Van Jones said, and it was true, won the election for the Republicans for the first time since Bush. | ||
| Since Bush's disastrous run. | ||
| And this is why I'm covering it. | ||
| For some reason, in the six years since that victory, we have unlearned what we all collectively were supposed to have learned in 2016. | ||
| And this is where we get, like I said a year ago, I'm in a Twitter space debating with the future of the movement, people at Newsmax and ISI and NatCon, And National Review and all the rest, all these young guys, a couple of them Jewish, saying that, well now they've got new arguments. | ||
| They've got new arguments as to why legal immigration is awesome and no, we need to pander to minorities. | ||
| And here's the new argument. | ||
| It's something like multi-racial working class populism. | ||
| Or economic nationalism. | ||
| And the idea is that we're going to win over these Hispanics and these Blacks and it's not going to matter that we've got mass immigration. | ||
| It's just not going to matter. | ||
| We're going to win these people over because we're going to appeal to them not as Hispanics or Blacks but as the working people. | ||
| As the working people. | ||
| And we're going to appeal to them by cutting their taxes and supporting so-called industrial policy and trade protection and so on. | ||
| And Not only are they not gonna hurt our political future, but they're not gonna hurt America because they're just gonna become like us white people anyway. | ||
| There's a white shift going on and these Hispanics are gonna become white just like white people. | ||
| Gonna become indistinguishable. | ||
| And it's like, no they're not. | ||
| They're not becoming white. | ||
| If anything, they're becoming like black people. | ||
| If anything, If you look at the urban, young Hispanic people, particularly the women, they're becoming like black people. | ||
| They're not becoming like white people at all. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If anything, we're all becoming like black people. | |
| White people are becoming like black people, and Hispanics are becoming... There is no way that the white population is increasing. | ||
| Not in reality. | ||
| And not by the expansion of what is considered white? | ||
| Uh-uh. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. | |
| Everyone's becoming less white. | ||
| That's not happening. | ||
| And it completely ignores the underlying reality, by the way, that Hispanics are not whites. | ||
| They're not whites and won't be whites. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because they're indigenous. | ||
| The people that are coming across the border are racially mostly not white. | ||
| Racially. | ||
| And there are a lot of white people in Mexico. | ||
| That descend from the Spanish. | ||
| But the people that are crossing the border are not those people. | ||
| The people that are crossing the border are Indians. | ||
| They're dark people. | ||
| They're racially... The reason they have black hair and brown skin and they look Mexican and if they're coming from Nicaragua or Central America, even more so. | ||
| If they're coming from Venezuela, even more so. | ||
| It's because they're racially not white. | ||
| They're racially not white. | ||
| And it's not just like, well, they look more similar to us than blacks or something. | ||
| They're not European. | ||
| So they're just, they're not us. | ||
| But yet, still to this day, the Trump campaign and young people in the conservative movement continue to unlearn the lessons from 2016. | ||
| I thought race realism was on the rise. | ||
| I thought we were getting these things. | ||
| And it seems like, as always, it's being diverted now by a new class of neocons. | ||
| Trying to appeal to a new audience. | ||
| That's really how you have to see this. | ||
| It's the same scam. | ||
| Look at what we were being told by John McCain and Mitt Romney and Kevin McCarthy and Eric Cantor and all these people back then. | ||
| Think about what we were being sold by the neocons and the GOP establishment of the 2000s and compare it to what we're being sold by the national conservatives or publicly gave them a wedgie. | ||
| Trump humiliated them in like a deep way. | ||
| And in a way he humiliated everybody that opposed him from that side. | ||
| So you couldn't be a neocon. | ||
| That was just untenable after 2016. | ||
| So they came up with this new garbage. | ||
| They came up with this new name, and this new story, and these new people. | ||
| And it's a lot of the old people too, though, to sell you a lot of the same stuff, which is, we're pushing this compassionate conservatism, and Hispanics are gonna be better Americans. | ||
| They used to say they're gonna be better Americans because the American Dream. | ||
| Now they're saying they're better Americans because they're gonna be Catholic, and all these kinds of things. | ||
| And they used to say, it doesn't matter, they're enriching our culture. | ||
| Now they're saying, well, they're becoming white anyway. | ||
| But it's a lot of the same stuff. | ||
| They're pushing neoliberalism, they're pushing open markets, open borders, and global government. | ||
| It's the same. | ||
| It's the same, but they just changed the words around a little bit. | ||
| And it's the same Jews, it's the same Zionists doing it. | ||
| Instead of Bill Kristol, now we got Yoram Hazoni. | ||
| Instead of Ben Shapiro, now we got, uh, whoever, now we got Indians. | ||
| Now you get all these Indians like, uh, who's the one on that show with Crystal Ball? | ||
| Is that her name, Crystal Ball? | ||
| And, uh, that Indian guy? | ||
| What the hell is it? | ||
| No, Crystal Ball's on MSNBC. | ||
| Who am I thinking of? | ||
| What's his, I can't, they all are sort of shawarma to me. | ||
| Who's the other one? | ||
| His name is, he's on the Hills Morning Show. | ||
| Help me out here. | ||
| What the freak is his name? | ||
| Sagar and Jetty. | ||
| Sagar and Jetty, and Saurabh, and the other one, and... And it's all the same. | ||
| It's the same conservative movement. | ||
| But guess what? | ||
| It has the same answers. | ||
| Stop. | ||
| Build a wall. | ||
| Deport all illegals. | ||
| Stop immigration. | ||
| It's the same message. | ||
| They're not white. | ||
| That's okay. | ||
| They can still vote for us. | ||
| But we support a border wall and no immigration. | ||
| And we want to win white people. | ||
| And Hispanics, that's fine too, but I'm not going to pretend they're white. | ||
| I'm not going to pretend that That they're going to make America into a Catholic Integralist Empire, because they're not. | ||
| I'm not going to pretend that they're going to constitute a large bulk of the electorate that's going to save the GOP. | ||
| The only way it's going to save the GOP is by winning over more white people. | ||
| That's the only thing we're going to do. | ||
| And we can win over more Hispanics, sure, but we're never going to hit a majority. | ||
| That's never going to be in the cards for us. | ||
| We've hit our ceiling, clearly. | ||
| We hit the high watermark in Virginia in 2020 or 2018 or whatever, whenever that election was. | ||
| And now it's clearly stagnating. | ||
| And here's why, and here's the thing. | ||
| People say, oh, Republicans gotta get real. | ||
| There's a pathway for us to rule America for a hundred years, and it's not involve diluting ourselves into thinking that winning over more Hispanics is gonna get us there. | ||
| It's not. | ||
| There's a few pathways to victory and none of them entail trying to make Hispanics like us more so they'll vote for us more. | ||
| That's just not one of the pathways. | ||
| The road to a total victory does not run through that option. | ||
| Well you see, Republicans are just not doing a good enough job pandering to minorities. | ||
| It's like, hey ass, we're banned from all social media and you think that, well Hispanics? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hello, cart before the horse. | |
| So that's a really great idea. | ||
| Nah, I think it starts with, I think it starts with we need to have something like a white uprising, politically speaking, gain control of social media, maybe just get rid of Congress altogether after that happens. | ||
| Here's the pathway. | ||
| We have one more election where white people can make the decision. | ||
| The white people gotta make the right decision and then Trump's gotta get in there and never leave. | ||
| That, to me at this point, is a pathway. | ||
| Otherwise, we gotta go. | ||
| Otherwise, it's like Yoda. | ||
| It's like Yoda slipping off of the thing in the Senate, and he drops into the ship of Bill Organa and says, failed, I have time to go into hiding for a generation. | ||
| Like, that's where we're at. | ||
| Yoda can defeat Palpatine here, okay? | ||
| Trump can defeat the regime once and for all here and end it all and save the Republic. | ||
| Or else, we all gotta go into hiding and wait for the next Nick Flints to be born in 100 years. | ||
| And I gotta train him. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| So that's that. | ||
| That's the poll. | ||
| But I wanna move on. | ||
| I wanna get into Russia. | ||
| I think you get the point. | ||
| I just lose my mind when I hear this stuff. | ||
| There are seriously Zoomers out there saying, we're gonna have working class populism! | ||
| You can take your working class populism and you could shove it up your asshole. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| Again, sorry for the language, but I'm just so... I can't stand it. | ||
| And people have just been tricked We're too stupid. | ||
| We deserve to die. | ||
| It's like that famous Baked Alaska message. | ||
| White people are too stupid. | ||
| We deserve to die out. | ||
| We're just getting tricked by the Jews again. | ||
| The Jews tricked us in the 2000s that they're natural conservatives. | ||
| Trump beat them back. | ||
| He defeated them all. | ||
| In a Faustian way. | ||
| In a Faustian, man-against-time sort of way. | ||
| And then the Jews got together and came up with a new thing and tricked us again. | ||
| And you get these gullible Italians. | ||
| You get these Uncle Tom Italians, this WAP, Luca Cacciatore, this freaking greaseball slave. | ||
| I like Luca, by the way, but he did get duped. | ||
| And he's gonna go and argue about the transmissibility of Anglo-American values and Hispanics becoming white. | ||
| Hispanics aren't becoming white! | ||
| Italians didn't even become white! | ||
| I never even became white! | ||
| I still do this show an hour late every night. | ||
| Nobody's becoming white. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Nobody that wasn't white is becoming white anytime soon. | |
| It didn't happen to blacks. | ||
| They were here for half of a thousand years. | ||
| They were on this continent for 400 years. | ||
| They didn't become white. | ||
| The Hispanics intermarried. | ||
| The indigenous intermarried with Spanish people for 500 years. | ||
| And they're not white either. | ||
| And the Italians came here and they learned the language and they still can't do a stupid livestream show on time. | ||
| Okay, so nobody's... So listen, Luca. | ||
| Listen, you freaking greaseball. | ||
| Listen up. | ||
| Listen up, you dago greaseball, Luca. | ||
| Nobody's becoming white anytime soon, least of all Hispanics. | ||
| So it's time to shut up, elect Trump one more time, and then stop having elections. | ||
| It's not gonna happen any other way. | ||
| It's certainly not gonna happen by pandering to Mexicans, okay? | ||
| I'm Mexican, and I like Hispanics, but let's just get real. | ||
| Let's just get real about what's realistically going to happen in real life in this century. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So, oh, no. | |
| But, yeah, we like Luca. | ||
| But, yeah, he just got tricked. | ||
| He's a silly bitch. | ||
| He's a silly bitch who got tricked by the Jews again by Nate Hockman of the National Review, as I like to call him, Gay Cockman. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And Hagar Hazoni. | |
| Does Hagar wear a cube? | ||
| Does Hagar bind his arm and wear a little cube in front of his head while he casts his spells? | ||
| While he talks in the devil's tongues? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Have to ask him next time I'm on a Twitter space. | ||
| I'll have to ask him. | ||
| Did they get this new trick from the devil when they came up with this national populism thing? | ||
| Did they get that from the devil too? | ||
| From Satan? | ||
| When they talk to Satan, as they do all the time? | ||
| Did they get this new trick from the devil? | ||
| From the fallen angel? | ||
| From the one that accuses us of our sins? | ||
| We'll have to ask him the next time we see him. | ||
| Alright. | ||
| Okay, anyway. | ||
| Well, you know what it really is? | ||
| It's a war between people that are living in reality and then these people that are just not living in reality. | ||
| That's what I'm trying to get at here. | ||
| We can live in reality and say, look, Jews are on the show, the country's becoming not white, we're becoming a peasant nation, our wealth is being taken, we don't make anything, Everybody's killing themselves. | ||
| It's what it is. | ||
| We need to get a dictator in control to set everything right. | ||
| Then you got all these other people that are like, well, we just aren't. | ||
| The GOP's just failing at dealing a scene. | ||
| Well, when you see here... | ||
| Well the thing is, Brett, listen here Brett, the thing is we just aren't capturing, we're just not doing enough minority outreach, and GOP's got to play a little bit harder in this next cycle to get these... You know, it's like, when are you going to shut the hell up and get real? | ||
| We're not failing at minority outreach. | ||
| These people have an average IQ of 85. | ||
| Why do we even have a democracy? | ||
| Okay, have you ever thought about it? | ||
| These people have an average IQ of 85, and you're talking about minorities. | ||
| We just didn't do a good enough job of convincing them. | ||
| We're banned from all the big tech. | ||
| What do you not understand about what's going on here? | ||
| Anyway, so that's that. | ||
| I want to move on. | ||
| I want to get into Russia, like I said, and our featured stories about Donbass, huge major development in the Russian-Ukrainian war here, It's been stagnating, I'm not gonna lie. | ||
| I'm not happy with the President of Russia. | ||
| It seems that the effort to take over Ukraine is suffering some setbacks. | ||
| They beat a retreat in Kharkov, is that what it is? | ||
| Or Kursan, I forget which province, but I think it's Kursan. | ||
| They retreated from Izyum as well in the north. | ||
| Ukrainians launching successful counter-offensives. | ||
| Counter-offensives. | ||
| Am I saying that right? | ||
| And the Russians are seemingly running out of equipment, maybe, running out of men. | ||
| There's talks about full mobilization. | ||
| And so it's in the midst of all this. | ||
| Russo-Ukrainian war dragging on until September, now approaching the winter when the strategic picture changes, of course. | ||
| And we talked about this a little bit last week. | ||
| The war itself has been stagnating, but the strategic situation is about to change, and here's why. | ||
| It was a local conflict. | ||
| Well, I guess it never was a local conflict, but at least the fighting was localized at one point. | ||
| Now the fighting is global. | ||
| And the reason the fighting is global is because now NATO is fully involved. | ||
| NATO is sending heavy equipment. | ||
| NATO is sending artillery. | ||
| They're sending missiles. | ||
| They're sending mercenaries. | ||
| They're providing intelligence support and logistical support. | ||
| They are fully underwriting the Ukrainian or the Kievan government's cause right now. | ||
| The capital of Kiev... Kiev would have fallen a long time ago. | ||
| the capital of Ukraine, Kiev, would have fallen a long time ago if it was not for the continued support by NATO and by particularly the United States. | ||
| And we know this. | ||
| And now that we're approaching the winter, and you see the fighting is taking other forms where Russia's cutting off the natural gas to the European Union countries and causing an energy crisis globally. | ||
| Causing an energy crisis and was up until a grain deal was struck recently causing a global food crisis. | ||
| Causing a food crisis causing an energy crisis before the winter. | ||
| It's now the strategic picture is changing although the fighting is stagnated although the actual fighting Ukraine is ground to a halt and there's a status quo that is emerged where Ukraine is shredding their people and their equipment's being destroyed and they're just getting more stuff on tap from from NATO all the time and Russia's just blowing it up and The strategic situation is about to be shaken up because Russia has cut off the natural gas to Europe. | ||
| And this is going to have a much more dramatic effect now that the winter has arrived because the temperatures are going to start to get cold. | ||
| And they're going to need lots of energy to heat their homes in Poland, in Czechia, in Germany. | ||
| In Italy, in the United Kingdom, and even countries like the United Kingdom that don't rely on Russia for the natural gas, they do rely on natural gas. | ||
| And Russia is the world's largest supplier of natural gas. | ||
| And if the Germans can't buy natural gas from Russia, they're going to need to buy it from elsewhere. | ||
| And if there's less natural gas overall, the price is going to go up. | ||
| And that's why a lot of British people are looking at their energy bills and they're going to get killed. | ||
| And the government is subsidizing it for consumers, but businesses are getting slaughtered, and German businesses are getting slaughtered. | ||
| Germany is a manufacturing economy. | ||
| And the manufacturers can't keep the lights on if they don't have natural gas. | ||
| So, now this is causing some big problems for NATO. | ||
| Big decisions are going to need to be made. | ||
| This is the context of what's happening today. | ||
| And the big announcement was supposed to come from the Russian President today, but the speech was postponed. | ||
| There will now be a speech Later tonight it seems by the Russian president and the defense minister and we don't know exactly what they're gonna say but the big development is that the People's Republic of Luhansk or the Democratic Republic of Luhansk and of Donetsk are going to declare their intention to join Russia and be formally annexed by Russia and so they'll hold the referendum and | ||
| And people will vote about whether they want to join Russia or not. | ||
| That'll happen this week. | ||
| And this is a story from Russia Today. | ||
| It says, quote, referendums to join the Russian Federation will be held in the Luhansk and Donetsk People's Republics from September 23rd until the 27th, said the leaders of those states on Tuesday. | ||
| LPR head Leonid Pasechnik was the first to sign a law on holding a public referendum in the Republic on the inclusion of the region into the Russian Federation after its parliament unanimously supported the move and set a date for the vote. | ||
| The LPR's decision was soon followed by DPR leader Dennis Puschelin, who declared that his state would also be holding a similar referendum on the same date. | ||
| He said he had already introduced the relevant legislation in the DPR's parliament. | ||
| Russia recognized the two territories as independent in February, but most of the world still regards them as part of Ukraine. | ||
| However, Kiev lost de facto control of both in 2014, when the local populations rejected the outcome of the Western-backed Maidan coup. | ||
| Russia sent troops into Ukraine on February 24th, citing Kiev's failure to implement the Minsk agreements. | ||
| Designed to give the regions of Donetsk and Luhansk special status within the Ukrainian state. | ||
| The protocols brokered by Germany and France were signed in 2014. | ||
| Former Ukrainian President Pyotr Poroshenko has since admitted that Kiev's main goal was to use the ceasefire to buy time and create powerful armed forces. | ||
| In February 2022, the Kremlin recognized the Donbass Republics as independent states and demanded that Ukraine officially declare itself a neutral country that will never join any Western military bloc. | ||
| Kiev insists the Russian offensive was completely unprovoked. | ||
| So this is the big development, is that Luhansk and Donetsk, the two breakaway Donbass territories, are going to join Russia this week or next week. | ||
| They're gonna hold a referendum, the people are gonna vote to join Russia, and then Luhansk and Donetsk, like Crimea in 2014, will officially become part of Russia! | ||
| Which is awesome! | ||
| And really exciting to see Russia's border grow by conquest. | ||
| It's really exciting to see that Russia is expanding and NATO is contracting. | ||
| Well, I guess it expanded in Finland and Sweden. | ||
| Or Norway? | ||
| Which was it? | ||
| Finland and... Was it Finland and Sweden or Finland and Norway? | ||
| I think Finland and Norway. | ||
| Either way, it's good to see Russia growing, Russia taking territory from Ukraine by force. | ||
| I love to see this. | ||
| It's very awesome. | ||
| And so, we love to see that. | ||
| That's for openers. | ||
| But here's the impact. | ||
| The reason they're doing this now, it seems, they've got almost complete control of Luhansk, they control only about half of Donetsk, and the main city, the Ukrainian armed forces are not far from the main city in Donetsk. | ||
| But the reason that they're annexing these territories is really to raise the stakes, and it really is with an eye towards, in a way, escalating the conflict. | ||
| Because what we have right now, as I said, is not even technically a war. | ||
| Not technically. | ||
| When the invasion occurred in February, it was declared as a special military operation, which, I mean, it is really a war, but not officially a war. | ||
| War was never declared by Russia. | ||
| And so you've got these 200,000 troops that Russia sent in, but they're drawing on a lot of forces from Luhansk and Donetsk itself. | ||
| A lot of the forces doing the heavy fighting are the militias from Luhansk and Donetsk, which are technically Ukrainian, right, as of 2014 and to some as of February. | ||
| So you've got these militias fighting and Russia's bringing in people also from the Middle East and they're bringing people in from the Caucasus and there are some Russian fighters. | ||
| But Russia's not fully mobilized for a war. | ||
| They've not officially declared war, and they're not fully mobilized for a war. | ||
| They're not fully engaged in Ukraine. | ||
| It's a special military operation. | ||
| And what this does, by declaring Luhansk and Donetsk a part of Russia, as opposed to independent states, is now the fighting is happening in Russia. | ||
| If Ukraine is attacking Luhansk and Donetsk with artillery, they're attacking Russia. | ||
| They're attacking Russian soil and Russian citizens. | ||
| And when there's fighting in Donetsk, the Russians are fighting to secure control of Russian territory. | ||
| They're not fighting in another country. | ||
| And so, that would be like the difference between Americans fighting in Iraq, or Afghanistan, and Americans fighting for control over Texas, or Americans fighting for control over Alaska, or something like that. | ||
| Or maybe how the Americans would fight, maybe make a little bit more sense in NATO, in a NATO country like Germany, for control over a NATO country like Germany, or in South Korea where we've got a defense alliance. | ||
| And what this does is it changes the dynamic completely. | ||
| Now the Russians can fight a little bit more strongly. | ||
| Maybe they could begin to fight with air support, and they could begin to fight with heavy artillery. | ||
| They could mobilize more people than they could before. | ||
| One of the consequences of annexing these territories is now the people of Luhansk and Donetsk are going to become part of the Russian military. | ||
| The people that were fighting as militia are fighting in the LPR, DPR armed forces are now going to be fighting under the Russian armed forces. | ||
| So it's a little bit different. | ||
| It's different in terms of how the government is going to treat it, and how the fighters are going to be organized, and how the military is going to treat it. | ||
| So, it represents an escalation. | ||
| And then, of course, what comes next? | ||
| Well, probably you're going to see similar referendums take place in other regions along the South as well. | ||
| And I can't pronounce them, but I think it's a curse on which is north of Crimea and then the one east of that which has just like five Z's and So I don't know how to pronounce that one But are they going to annex? | ||
| Is Russia going to annex every territory east of the Dnieper River? | ||
| Are they going to annex the entire half of Ukraine, which is ethnically Russian, Russian-speaking, and honestly has a desire to join Russia? | ||
| Will they go further than that? | ||
| Will they cross the river? | ||
| Will they cut off Ukraine's access to the Black Sea? | ||
| Will they create a land bridge between Transnistria, the breakaway region in Moldova? | ||
| How far are they gonna go? | ||
| and connect that to Donbass and connect that to Russia. | ||
| How far are they going to go? | ||
| We don't know. | ||
| But annexing these territories certainly raises the stakes, and it changes it also for another reason on the other side of the conflict, because while the DPR and LPR militias will now be fighting in the Russian armed forces, | ||
| and while Ukraine will now be attacking and while Ukraine will now be attacking Russian soil, and Russia will be securing Russian soil as opposed to fighting outside of it, as well, where NATO was sending these weapons, now NATO is sending in weapons to officially attack Russian soil. | ||
| It's not just Ukraine. | ||
| But at the same time, NATO sending in artillery, they're giving Ukraine artillery now to attack Russian soil as opposed to Russian forces in Ukraine. | ||
| Big difference. | ||
| Now NATO and the United States are responsible for sending in military equipment and mercenaries and officers and intelligence Huge difference. | ||
| And so, like I said, it's a fork in the road here. | ||
| on Russian soil as opposed to Russian forces on Ukrainian soil defending themselves. | ||
| Huge difference. | ||
| And so, like I said, it's a fork in the road here. | ||
| It represents an escalation for Russia, where Russia is going to become, you could say, more involved. | ||
| And NATO is going to have to make a decision. | ||
| Are they going to continue this when the stakes have been raised in this way? | ||
| Because it's forcing then NATO to either escalate or de-escalate. | ||
| Either NATO can escalate by, again, if they persist in what they are doing already, they're escalating. | ||
| By incorporating Luhansk and Donetsk, NATO equipment is still being used to attack those forces there, So they haven't changed anything, but it went from attacking Russians in Ukraine to Russians in Russia. | ||
| So they're forcing NATO, if they continue what they were doing, to escalate. | ||
| If they cease what they had been doing before, they're de-escalating. | ||
| If they say, well, we can't send supplies that are attacking Russia, If we don't want to escalate, that means that they're going to stop doing what they were doing before. | ||
| They're de-escalating. | ||
| So it's sort of forcing, and Putin is playing it very smart, he's sort of forcing the West out of the picture. | ||
| By cutting off the gas, and by annexing these territories, what is being done here is it's, these are moves designed politically to force NATO out of the conflict. | ||
| Cutting off the gas creates major problems for these western countries. | ||
| It creates problems in the form of civil unrest. | ||
| It creates problems for the economy. | ||
| It's going to induce a recession. | ||
| If energy prices go up a thousand percent, Are 100% like they are for consumers and for businesses? | ||
| Individual consumers and for businesses? | ||
| It will cause a recession in Germany. | ||
| And if there's a recession in Germany, there will be a recession across the Eurozone. | ||
| And it is causing 10% inflation in the UK and in continental Europe. | ||
| So it's causing political problems, it's causing societal, social problems, it's causing economic problems, and this is because of not just the Eurozone support for Ukraine, but their sanctions against Russia. | ||
| So this is a way to force them out. | ||
| And then by annexing the territory, again, it's another way of raising the stakes. | ||
| You want to support Ukraine? | ||
| Well, you can't get our gas, and you're going to be attacking Russian soil. | ||
| So it's a nice little counter. | ||
| And and we're seeing again this this Russia Ukraine thing it's not in the headlines every day But in a way it is because so much of what is going on is the shock waves and the ripple effect from this It's now a global conflict and you could see that in Armenia and Azerbaijan You can and it's to some extent now Serbia and Kosovo Turkey and Greece Turkey and Armenia | ||
| Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan are now at war. | ||
| There's border skirmishes. | ||
| So what was a local conflict is quite literally there's now like global conflict. | ||
| There's conflict happening on a global scale. | ||
| And then also the political and other effects of this are rippling in ways that aren't being talked about all the time. | ||
| If there's a recession in the eurozone, It's gonna trigger something in the United States, no doubt about it. | ||
| Just like it did with the sovereign debt crisis 12 years ago. | ||
| So this is, as far as my take on this, we have to stop. | ||
| I don't know what's the endgame here. | ||
| We think that we're making it costly for Russia. | ||
| We're making it costly for us, too. | ||
| Now, there is a strategic benefit that we're getting, which is that there's a strategic benefit for Washington. | ||
| Washington is bringing the European Union under its control, whereas China was subverting Europe for a long time with Huawei and 5G and Belt and Road Initiative. | ||
| Now, unquestionably, We are forcing Russia into China's arms, but at the same time, we're also sort of forcing Europe into the arms of Washington away from China. | ||
| So we're making it costly for them, we're making it costly for us. | ||
| We're forcing Russia into a relationship with China, we're forcing Europe into a relationship with the United States. | ||
| We're going to force the Russian economy to contract by 6%. | ||
| We're also forcing inflation to be 10% here and in Europe. | ||
| And not just with fuel and food, but also in everything else. | ||
| Housing and And precipitating all kinds of other economic disasters like a major recession and a stock market crash and layoffs. | ||
| So, the point is, none of this is good. | ||
| This should have been handled very quickly. | ||
| I mean, we should have sanctioned Russia. | ||
| I think you have to if you're Washington. | ||
| It should have never gotten to this point, if we're being honest. | ||
| Ukraine should have never been in the cards that Ukraine would join NATO. | ||
| But once Russia invades, at that point, you're Washington, you have to sanction. | ||
| But it should have been the same BS sanctions. | ||
| They should have let Russia get away with a lot and just be done with it. | ||
| But now it seems like this is going to end the whole world here. | ||
| Because I don't think the NATO is going to stop. | ||
| NATO is going to continue to attack and they're going to be attacking Russian soil. | ||
| They're going to escalate like they always do. | ||
| They're not going to back down with the natural gas thing. | ||
| You know, so there's really no good options here, but that's the current state of the war. | ||
| We're gonna watch and see how that plays out. | ||
| I hope that if Putin starts speaking at 1 a.m. | ||
| I might jump back on to cover it or something, but we still don't even know the full story because we're still waiting on a statement from the Russian president and the defense minister. | ||
| It's supposed to be a big speech about the war. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| the military operation and we're supposed to get that this evening but they pushed it back and there's rumors that it will happen now in a few hours which will be in the morning in in russia if not i don't know maybe we'll get it tomorrow night certainly we'll be watching how this plays out in the next two weeks as the referendum takes place in the next three days That's when it starts. | ||
| NATO is obviously condemned, the Germans, the French have condemned it, but who cares at this point? | ||
| It's World War with each other, so the condemnations don't mean too much, but... | ||
| That's really where we are with Russia. | ||
| But we're going to move on. | ||
| We're going to take a look at our Super Chats and see what you guys have to say about all this. | ||
| The rest of it we'll watch and see what happens later this week. | ||
| While you get my headset out, let me get my water. | ||
| And I'll pull up your Super Chats and let's take a look at what you all have to say. | ||
| I'm so curious what you guys have to say. | ||
| Really interested. | ||
| I bet it's just so interesting. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I bet it's just so interesting what you got going on okay my My head hurts. | |
| Still. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Alright. | |
| Hank sent $3. | ||
| Hi! | ||
| You should have seen us in the live chat today. | ||
| We were redpilling so many people smile. | ||
| Where? | ||
| Who's live chat? | ||
| Who was redpilling who and what live chat? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Real DJ Tito sent $3. | |
| Just want the record to show I'm not a total retard when it comes to the idea of blending NatSoak with the Constrep. | ||
| I'll get back to you once I've figured out how to condense the idea into 200 characters. |
Export Selection