Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
unidentified
|
Respect the respect that we deserve. | |
From this day forward, it's going to be only America First. | ||
America First. America First. | ||
America First. | ||
America First. | ||
Thank you. | ||
Good evening, everybody. | ||
You are watching America First. | ||
My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes. | ||
We have a great show for you tonight. | ||
Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Thursday. | ||
We have a lot to talk about tonight. | ||
Lots to get into. | ||
Big show. | ||
Big, funny... Well, really a funny day. | ||
I had such a funny day today. | ||
I love to laugh. | ||
So I had a very funny, hilarious day and You know, maybe I'll tell you about it in October or something. | ||
Sort of like a surprise. | ||
Sort of like an October surprise. | ||
But I had a very funny day today. | ||
So I had a funny day, but we have a funny show too and a featured story which is gonna blow you away. | ||
Featured story tonight is about Iran. | ||
And a major color revolution which is underway right now. | ||
And there are massive protests that have rocked the nation over the killing of some woman who was arrested by the morality police for not wearing her hijab, which is her head covering, her headscarf. | ||
And it's disputed what happened. | ||
She wasn't wearing her headscarf against the law. | ||
She gets arrested, then dies. | ||
Now the masses of people in the public Who came out of nowhere, say that she was beaten to death by the religious police because she was wearing her hijab, or was not wearing her hijab. | ||
So now they're all out protesting the brutality of the morality police against the women. | ||
Well, the Iranian government, who I'm inclined to believe and trust, they say that she died in custody and it had nothing to do with them. | ||
They didn't beat her up, wasn't their fault. | ||
And to me, this sounds exactly like the death of Freddie Gray. | ||
This is like BLM but for women in Iran. | ||
It's like the same thing. | ||
George Floyd was trying to use counterfeit money and he was high. | ||
Cops tried to arrest him. | ||
They killed him. | ||
You know what? | ||
Don't use counterfeit money and be a drug dealer. | ||
Well, now in Iran, some woman, not wearing her hijab, gets arrested by the police. | ||
Dies. | ||
Here's how you avoid entanglements with the religious police. | ||
Wear the hijab. | ||
Wear the covering. | ||
But it looks like all the prototypical signs of Western intervention, another color revolution in the midst of a global world war around Ukraine, and Iran presumably is being targeted because of their support for Russia, So we'll talk about that. | ||
That'll be our featured story. | ||
We'll also be talking tonight about the German police who put out a statement today saying that they use right-wing social media accounts to trick gullible people into entrapping themselves with law enforcement. | ||
And so you've probably heard on the show we talk about feds. | ||
We say that's, you sound like a fed. | ||
That's fed talk. | ||
I don't mean to sound like a Fed. | ||
I don't mean to Fed Post. | ||
When we say that, Fed is short for Federal. | ||
Federal Government. | ||
Federal Law Enforcement. | ||
And what that is, is we're talking about how Federal Law Enforcement is actively using counterintelligence tactics Cointel, counterintelligence tactics to infiltrate and subvert what they consider to be right-wing extremist movements by posing as right-wing Americans, by posing as one of us. | ||
And this is what federal law enforcement does. | ||
People on the payroll of the government, people working in Washington DC or elsewhere, they are paid, they are part of law enforcement, and they are part of a concerted effort To pretend to be like us, gain our trust, talk to us, get in our group chats, get in our Discord servers or wherever, and then once they've gained trust and perhaps compromised people with their identities or other things, they begin to encourage people to partake in criminal activity. | ||
And then when they see enough evidence that someone is willing to carry something out when a crime has been committed, that threshold has been crossed, then they show up with their badge and say, ha, gotcha, you're arrested. | ||
And that is part of their counter-terror Homeland Security strategy. | ||
Now that's what we're referring to. | ||
When we say that's feds, you're fed posting, we're referring to that's the kind of thing that a subversive federal law enforcement officer would say. | ||
And there's a lot of skepticism that that's going on or to the extent that that's going on. | ||
We have a news story today from Germany where the German Federal Police straight-up said, since 2019 we have had more people than you could even imagine doing exactly this. | ||
And saying that's a big part of their strategy and you wouldn't even know it but we're everywhere. | ||
And it just goes to show you cannot be careful enough online. | ||
Do not talk about criminal activity. | ||
Don't engage in criminal activity. | ||
You can't trust anybody. | ||
Can't trust anybody. | ||
So anybody talks about violence, stay far away from it because that's what's going on. | ||
We'll cover that. | ||
That'll be our other story. | ||
We'll be talking about that. | ||
Before we get into our news, I want to remind you to follow me on Cozy. | ||
Smash the follow button now! | ||
Hurtling towards a million subscribers. | ||
I can't believe we made it so quickly. | ||
A million! | ||
And we're closing in on it so quickly. | ||
We're sitting at about 20,000. | ||
So, any day now. | ||
Like I said, I was expecting end of the week this week. | ||
It might be next week, I think. | ||
But make sure to follow me here and receive a push notification on Telegram whenever the show starts. | ||
Follow me on Gab Telegram, True Social. | ||
Links are down below. | ||
Click the buttons, follow me up. | ||
What else? | ||
Not much else. | ||
Yeah, not many other announcements. | ||
Pretty regular day. | ||
I had a long day today. | ||
I had a long day. | ||
A lot of driving. | ||
But a fun day. | ||
unidentified
|
Hanging out with some friends. | |
And hit the driving range. | ||
I hit the driving range today. | ||
A little golf action. | ||
And I haven't played golf in probably 10 or 15 years, but I still remember the fundamentals. | ||
I could still hit the ball pretty good. | ||
So that was fun. | ||
Had some lunch. | ||
And stuff like that. | ||
Pretty good day. | ||
Pretty blessed day. | ||
Kind of mundane though. | ||
I have to say I'm on this good sleep schedule and now I just feel like a normie. | ||
I feel like a total normie. | ||
I wake up, I do my dance, do my thing. | ||
Grown man doing my grown dance. | ||
I do my show. | ||
I go to bed. | ||
I just feel like so normal now. | ||
Not cool. | ||
So, nothing too interesting going on in my world. | ||
The one thing I wanted to get into before we dive into the news, I don't want to spend too much time on this, but it's a little bit interesting. | ||
Ever since this mobilization was announced in Russia, we covered it last night, Russian President yesterday announced, I guess two nights ago. | ||
Announced the mobilization of 300,000 reserve troops to be sent to Ukraine to aid in the war effort. | ||
And we covered that last night. | ||
We talked about how the war is changing and how they're annexing territory starting tomorrow, I believe, is when the referendums begin in Donbass. | ||
And now there's all this propaganda all over the media about how Russians are protesting this. | ||
That's the propaganda they're going with. | ||
Is Russia calling into action all these troops? | ||
And so check out any of the mainstream media. | ||
They're all talking about how Russians are protesting, and they hate it, and they're fleeing on the border of Finland and Georgia. | ||
And people are posting flight tracker outside of the Moscow airport, how people are flying out of Moscow. | ||
And I was a little bit disappointed to see Revolver pushing this. | ||
or cities to dodge what could be a draft. | ||
And this is just being promulgated by all of the neocons for obvious reasons. | ||
They're trying to say that the war effort is just deeply unpopular in Russia, and they're trying to impose pain on Russia for mobilizing their army, which is what they have to do to win. | ||
And I was a little bit disappointed to see Revolver pushing this. | ||
And I said this earlier, excuse me, earlier in the year, there was all this propaganda around the springtime about how Russia was failing and Ukraine was going to win and Russia had all these casualties and so on. | ||
And it was in Revolver. | ||
However, And now here we are again in this stuff about this color revolution in Iran in Revolver. | ||
And it's like, what's going on? | ||
Are you guys patriots? | ||
Are you guys with Russia? | ||
Are you with Iran? | ||
unidentified
|
Or are you with these dogs in NATO? | |
Time to choose a side. | ||
I'm a little bit disappointed because their coverage is mixed. | ||
When the Western media isn't covering the Russian war, Revolver is favorable towards Russia, but when the Western media is injecting their propaganda about officers being killed, or a higher than reported casualty count, or when they're reporting about fleeing on the border, then they're all over it. | ||
unidentified
|
It's like, the heck? | |
So I don't know. | ||
I still love Revolver. | ||
I read Revolver every day. | ||
And I love Darren Beattie, but I saw even Darren quote tweeted the flight pattern thing. | ||
And I'm like, what's going on? | ||
He said something like... He said people in Russia and America aren't gonna fight the stupid wars for these crooks. | ||
People in America don't want to fight the drag queen wars, and people in Russia don't want to fight this war. | ||
No one's fighting these crooks wars. | ||
We're done being scammed. | ||
And... | ||
Again, I deeply respect Darren. | ||
He actually just did a fantastic interview. | ||
I forget the publication. | ||
It was sort of obscure, but he just did a fantastic interview. | ||
I quoted it like the entire thing on my telegram because it was so excellent. | ||
So I love the guy. | ||
I think he's brilliant. | ||
I think he's a genius. | ||
He is almost a hundred percent spot-on the money, like a hundred percent. | ||
But he quote tweeted that flight tracker thing today. | ||
And this has been going around on Twitter. | ||
They look at the flight tracker and they watch all the flights departing from Moscow and they say this is indicative of people fleeing. | ||
But really, if you look at any airport flight tracker and you control for departing flights, it's going to look like people are fleeing. | ||
If you look at the New York airport and look at departing flights, guess what you're going to see a lot of? | ||
Flights leaving New York! | ||
Does that mean people are fleeing New York? | ||
No, you're just looking at all the flights leaving the city that day. | ||
Same thing in Moscow. | ||
And so I think it was Ian Bremmer, who's a hardcore neocon, who tweeted that out and said, this is evidence of fleeing. | ||
And Darren Coats tweets this and says, yeah, no one's fighting these crooks wars. | ||
And I have to disagree with that. | ||
I think the war in Russia is totally different than the wars that America is waging. | ||
At the minimum, you could say that it's defensible. | ||
And what I mean by that is maybe you think that the Russian war, that Russia's war, Moscow's war in Ukraine, you can make the argument that it's for the elite and people don't want to fight these wars and so on, but at least it's defensible on the grounds of legitimate national interest. | ||
You might not agree with that argument, but there is a legitimate argument that It's necessary for Russia to invade Ukraine to protect the homeland. | ||
Like, that's a valid... Again, even if you disagree with that argument, it's still a valid argument to say that Russia must invade Ukraine to secure its western border, to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO and encirclement and this imposition of NATO missiles on the Russian-Ukrainian border. | ||
Might not agree with it, but that's a valid argument. | ||
Totally different than Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction, so we need a ground war in the Middle East as Americans. | ||
Those are two, and so I have a problem with the false equivalency. | ||
I think there's a false equivalency to say that the wars that our crooks expect us to fight are equally as futile or equally as unnecessary as the Russian war in Ukraine. | ||
They're not comparable. | ||
They're not similar. | ||
You may be against both of them, but they're not the same. | ||
You may, for different reasons, say the war in Iraq was a mistake, but there's not a very strong argument that we needed to do that once you take away the WMD thing. | ||
And the same goes for Russia. | ||
I mean, you may disagree with the war, but there's a real argument that that's a valid conflict. | ||
So I saw that and I was just a little bit confused. | ||
Again, it's not personal, I'm not attacking the guy, but I just saw that and I was like, really? | ||
I don't think they're equivalent like that. | ||
Otherwise, I was a little bit surprised too because Darren is almost always more in favor of America's adversaries than anybody else. | ||
You know, like Scott Greer. | ||
He says on his podcast, he says, if anything, Darren is too pro-China. | ||
And I'd probably lean more towards Darren. | ||
I'm way pro-China. | ||
I'm pro-Russia. | ||
So, you know, Darren has his reputation as being probably a little bit more zealous about supporting America's adversaries than most people that he... the kinds of people that he runs in those circles with. | ||
So that... once you take that into consideration as well, it was also like... | ||
Yeah, I wonder where this is coming from, but... But anyway, I don't know. | ||
I'll have to check the timeline, see if he fleshes that out. | ||
I respect his opinion, so I'm interested to see what he has to say about it. | ||
I would like to see him flesh that out, because... I actually haven't read too much of his stuff on the Russian war. | ||
I'd be curious. | ||
Because he disagrees. | ||
I'm not blasting him. | ||
I'm just saying I'd be interested to hear him flesh that out because he's a brilliant... I agree with him on almost everything. | ||
But I saw that and I was like, I thought we were pro-China, man. | ||
I thought we were on the same page. | ||
I thought we loved this. | ||
But I'd be curious to see what he has to say. | ||
So anyway... And that's not... | ||
There's that, and then there's this total Western propaganda, as always, comes out right when Russia's gonna make a move that, oh, people aren't fleeing. | ||
Yeah, of course people are fleeing. | ||
Ukraine had to pass a law that they would kill people for trying to leave the country. | ||
Literally. | ||
So, separately, and that's got nothing to do with Revolver, but the Western media at large A writ large, I should say. | ||
They're out there today saying, and it's got varying degrees of legitimacy, they're saying that Russians are fleeing. | ||
A lot of it's overblown, some of it was proven to be a hoax. | ||
Like they showed some footage where they said that Russians are driving out of the border with Finland, and that turned out to be a very old video. | ||
But there are some traffic reports which show that there was a lot of congestion in the Russian-Georgia border, so maybe there's Fleeing there? | ||
And I would say that to the extent that there is fleeing, is that really an argument that the war is unpopular or something? | ||
Because in Ukraine, they're fleeing. | ||
And the Ukrainian government infamously, over the past six months, has been passing laws that not only are they making it tougher on deserters, but also they passed a law that said that adult men cannot leave Ukraine. | ||
So, you know, the Western media is gonna go and say Russia starts this partial conscription and Russians are fleeing and that indicates that the war effort is just a disaster and falling apart. | ||
But Ukraine, months ago, passed a law saying that they would kill adult men leaving the country. | ||
It's an arrestable offense to be an adult male and leave the country because they need to be able to conscript everybody. | ||
But that doesn't get covered. | ||
Nobody talks about that. | ||
And the bottom line is to recognize that the press is regulated. | ||
And I don't want to get into this whole thing because we're not covering Russia tonight in great detail. | ||
But the bottom line, what you can irrefutably demonstrate based on that, and I like to do this every so often, is to show that that is, again, irrefutable, unambiguous, definitive proof that the press is taking a side. | ||
And what they say in the press is just as much of a weapon in their arsenal as tanks and missiles and intelligence and everything. | ||
When the media goes out there and says these things about Russia or says these things about Ukraine, they're not out there earnestly reporting updates from the battlefield. | ||
That's propaganda. | ||
That is wartime propaganda by a partisan that is a participant in the war. | ||
The United States and NATO are a participant in the war. | ||
And so the United States-NATO media is putting out media that is going to help their war effort. | ||
It's not informational. | ||
It's for the purpose of propaganda. | ||
It's for the purpose of manipulating public opinion. | ||
And if they can create a perception that the Russian war effort is failing, insofar as that hurts Russian morale or the morale of the Russian side, that benefits the war effort. | ||
And insofar as they publish things hyping up Ukraine and that boosts Ukrainian morale, or it creates a political imperative to give more money to Ukraine and that supports the Ukrainian side, it's good for their war effort. | ||
And so this is where these regime apologists like Destiny or others We're out there taking what the government and what the private institutions say about these things at face value. | ||
It's why you can't do it. | ||
And that's really the difference. | ||
We're the ones out here who are going to say, look, the media is taking a side. | ||
They're not telling the truth. | ||
And you can demonstrate it every so often. | ||
You get a clear-cut case where they're just telling a lie. | ||
I remember back in 2017, I think it was back in I believe March or April 2017, Vladimir Putin did an interview with Megyn Kelly. | ||
And I watched the interview, and it was a very famous interview. | ||
And it was about the allegations of Russian hacking of the 2016 election. | ||
And Megyn Kelly was pressing him on it, and he said something like, it wasn't done by the Russian state, they had arrested some people in Michigan who were Russian nationals. | ||
And he said, well, they had nothing to do with the Russian government, and he goes, we don't even know if they are really even Russian. | ||
I mean, they're Russian nationals, he goes, but are they Tatars? | ||
Are they Caucasians? | ||
Are they Chechens? | ||
Are they Jews? | ||
You know, we don't even know that they are Russians. | ||
And then, the next day, the media went all over and said Putin said they were Jews. | ||
Putin said, in an anti-Semitic rant, that it was Jews that hacked the election. | ||
And it was like, we watched the interview, it's not what he said. | ||
But this is when you get these clear-cut instances where the media is using narrative control for the purpose of benefiting the national security apparatus. | ||
They're pushing a narrative from the national security state Because they're part of it. | ||
They're part of that whole system. | ||
That's what we talk about when we say conspiracies. | ||
Why does the media report about people fleeing Russia, but not talk about Ukraine making it illegal for people to leave? | ||
Because they're partisan. | ||
So you can't take their side. | ||
Or rather, you can't take it at face value, what they're saying. | ||
So anyway, That's also going on. | ||
There was something in BBC. | ||
This was like a headline in the BBC. | ||
It said, a little boy cried out, I'm gonna miss you dad. | ||
That was a headline on the BBC. | ||
That a little boy said that as his father was conscripted. | ||
Yeah, you know, that happens. | ||
It's a war. | ||
But why is that a headline? | ||
Why is that being published? | ||
We're giving you a little story from Russia. | ||
Tales from it. | ||
It's so blatantly propaganda. | ||
And if you can't see how you're being manipulated, like with that dead kid that washed up on the shore of Turkey, During the Syrian Civil War, or the chemical weapons in Syria, or when they said Russia would use chemical weapons in Russia, or when they said Russia was bombing maternity wards. | ||
Remember Bucha? | ||
Remember prayers for Bucha? | ||
And how quickly everybody forgot about that? | ||
If you can't see how you are being manipulated by the media so that narratives that benefit the national security state ...are promulgated across the country, you're just not paying attention. | ||
And how people just so gullibly are like, and you'll have these left-wing faggot journalists from BBC or Vice or whatever, we went in on the inside, we got the inside scoop, stories from war-torn Yemen or whatever, and they make it out like it's so artistic or it's some United Nations thing. | ||
And it's literally State Department propaganda. | ||
It's literally, they just shoveled State Department, Pentagon propaganda. | ||
Why are we seeing a child? | ||
Why are we seeing crying women? | ||
Why are we seeing this stuff? | ||
So that we will be emotionally manipulated into supporting whatever NATO wants. | ||
Whether that's regime change in Libya, regime change in Syria, regime change in Russia. | ||
Crying kid, here's why NATO should bomb Libya and topple the government of Muammar Gaddafi. | ||
Like, think of how sick that is. | ||
What we're talking about is war and dropping bombs and destabilizing countries and slaughtering people and destabilizing an entire region and causing a host of problems. | ||
For geostrategic, great chessboard maneuvers. | ||
And you're just being tricked into supporting that because it's like, crying kid! | ||
Topple the government in Libya. | ||
Topple the government in Syria. | ||
Topple the government in Russia. | ||
Will the consequences be? | ||
I don't know, but, you know, hashtag support. | ||
Pray for Bucha. | ||
Prayers up for Buchi. | ||
Whatever. | ||
Bucha. | ||
Buchi. | ||
All these...and the faggot liberals, they always know. | ||
They always have the vocab sheet, too. | ||
It's Kiev! | ||
It's... People that didn't know where... They couldn't point to Ukraine on a map 10 months ago. | ||
It's Kiev! | ||
Because that's the historical... The Russians are imperializing the language. | ||
It's Kiev... Really? | ||
You didn't even know what Ukraine was until February. | ||
Now you know it's... Prayers for Butcha. | ||
Oh, really? | ||
You couldn't distinguish Butcha from Kombucha, nigga. | ||
They could go and say hashtag pray for Nigga and they'd believe it. | ||
Pray for Nigga. | ||
Nigga is a small town in Ukraine. | ||
Pray for Nigga. | ||
Nigga was just the victim of a brutal Russian bombing campaign. | ||
A billion Africans were killed. | ||
Pray for hashtag Nigga. | ||
They would eat it up. | ||
They'd be like, I have a PhD in Ukraine. | ||
Alright, anyway, so that's that. | ||
That's typical stuff, but We're gonna move on. | ||
My hair's a little wild today. | ||
I was in the convertible all day so my hair's a little bit wild. | ||
We're gonna move on. | ||
We're gonna get into the news here and we'll start with this story about Germany. | ||
I just can't. | ||
People are... You would think it's obvious. | ||
Sometimes I feel like I'm being trite by saying, yeah, the government lies. | ||
Yeah, the government creates false flags. | ||
Of course. | ||
Of course the media is in bed with the national security state. | ||
I feel like I'm being trite. | ||
I feel like it's redundant to say that. | ||
But then you really get these educated whites Who have good jobs and they've got degrees and they will just lap up this military propaganda that will just lap up propaganda by the people that make bombs. | ||
And they'll read these stories about a struggle for a women's band camp in Afghanistan. | ||
Read about the kick-ass punk rock women of Afghanistan that started a garage band. | ||
It's like that's not real! | ||
unidentified
|
That was probably made by Harvey Weinstein. | |
That was made on a Hollywood set by Harvey Weinstein and Black Cube LLC. | ||
unidentified
|
That probably isn't even real! | |
Meet inside the story of the kick-ass. | ||
And it's not even far from the truth. | ||
I mean, I know that sounds like a parody. | ||
It's not even far. | ||
Like with the Kurds. | ||
Remember when it was the Kurds? | ||
Remember when it was their turn to be the thing? | ||
The Trump administration has abandoned the Kurds. | ||
They were our allies. | ||
The Kurds are throwing rocks at our tanks, retreating. | ||
America's abandoning our allies. | ||
And it's like, you know, you didn't know about the Kurds before and you never thought about them since. | ||
You're just getting gassed up and constantly manipulated by this kind of regime media. | ||
And it's always some kind of sob story. | ||
It's always some kind of artisan, indie. | ||
It's always indie. | ||
It's always, you know... | ||
It's always some liberal with like those glasses and like a green jacket and skinny jeans and they're in there like, so tell me about your garage band in Afghanistan. | ||
Tell me about the women's school for punk rock in Afghanistan that just got decapitated by the Taliban. | ||
But of course, what is the feeling they want to generate? | ||
unidentified
|
War! | |
We need more war! | ||
Don't you understand the connection? | ||
The people that claim to be advocates for human rights, it's really in the service of war, all-consuming war. | ||
Read about the punk rock indie women of Afghanistan that just can't catch a break from the Taliban. | ||
Solution? | ||
unidentified
|
War! | |
A never-ending war and we're gonna leave the vehicles idling for 20 years and trillions of dollars of waste and abuse and funds that we don't even know where they go and really it's about being on the border with China and it's about, you know, God only knows. | ||
So... I don't know. | ||
It's... | ||
And again, I feel like I'm being fake edgy for saying that, but it's just frustrating because there are still people that don't really grasp that there's a fundamental deception happening there. | ||
So anyway, so that's that. | ||
But I want to move on. | ||
I want to get into... It's just, you know, it never ends with that kind of thing. | ||
Meet the punk rock band of Afghanistan. | ||
I hate that! | ||
And they were doing it! | ||
I remember when Biden, and hail Biden by the way, raise your right hand! | ||
I swear I'm gonna vote for Joe Biden. | ||
Kidding, of course. | ||
We hate Joe Biden, but... | ||
When Joe Biden completed the withdrawal of Afghanistan, I called it. | ||
I called it, and not like it was some genius call. | ||
It was obvious. | ||
But I said, based on the propaganda, like, watch. | ||
There's going to be a false flag. | ||
They're going to demand we stay. | ||
Whatever. | ||
And I said, they're reporting that the Taliban is taking towns. | ||
I said, and watch, you're gonna get all these sob stories about the women and the voting and their band camps. | ||
And within a week, in the BBC, there was an article about how an all-girls music school in Afghanistan is gonna have to close because the Taliban's back. | ||
So predictable. | ||
And they eat it up. | ||
And they have this tasteful conversation at dinner about, like they're worldly. | ||
Did you hear about what happened in Afghanistan? | ||
Oh, those poor souls. | ||
Pro-Taliban! | ||
Pro-Russia! | ||
Pro-Iran! | ||
Pro-Communist Chinese! | ||
We're pro order. | ||
I'm pro Saddam Hussein. | ||
I'm pro Muammar Gaddafi. | ||
Muammar Gaddafi, God rest his soul. | ||
unidentified
|
Saddam Hussein, pray for him. | |
Pray for the repose of his soul. | ||
God bless. | ||
And Donald Rumsfeld is going to hell. | ||
John McCain and his father are both in the lake of fire, the flames licking at them. | ||
They are burning in hell. | ||
With George H.W. | ||
Bush. | ||
George H.W. | ||
Bush, John McCain, and John McCain Sr., they're all, they're in the nether, they are deep in the lake of lava with the, uh, what do they call those big ones that shoot the fireballs? | ||
unidentified
|
They're down there with those guys. | |
I refuse to believe in an afterlife where Saddam Hussein and Mubarak Gaddafi are being punished and John McCain Jr. | ||
and Sr. | ||
are not. | ||
If that's not happening, then I have some serious doubts about my faith. | ||
I refuse to believe in a just universe where Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi are being punished in the afterlife, but John McCain Jr. | ||
and Sr. | ||
are not being punished far worse. | ||
I would have to become an atheist or something. | ||
I would have to become a skeptic. | ||
I'm joining the skeptic community. | ||
If I don't, you know... Fatima confirmed that Mussolini's in heaven. | ||
We're gonna need some confirmation on Saddam Hussein and the others as well. | ||
Okay. | ||
So that's that, but I wanna move on. | ||
So that's that, but I wanna move on. | ||
You don't even know what a scumbag McCain is. | ||
It's worse than people even realize. | ||
There's a great article about it in UN's review. | ||
And I see Ryan Dawson in chat. | ||
Shout out Ryan Dawson! | ||
A brilliant guy. | ||
I'm sure he knows a story about John McCain and his role with the Vietnamese and the blackmail against him and so on. | ||
Alright, but let's get into our news here. | ||
Our first story is about this German federal police And like I said at the top of the show, when we talk about Fed posting, it sounds like a meme and it sounds like a joke, but it's very real. | ||
The reality is that federal law enforcement does pay people to infiltrate our circles. | ||
No doubt, no doubt, you and I have talked to members of federal law enforcement on social media unknowingly before. | ||
Because they are pervasive. | ||
They are good at what they do. | ||
I think. | ||
I imagine. | ||
You have to assume. | ||
We know that they have that operation. | ||
We know that the federal law enforcement is running that operation. | ||
We know that they do that. | ||
That is part of their counter-intelligence, counter-terror strategy, is to send agents into the field, or informants, or whatever. | ||
They have people in these circles that pretend to be right-wing, pretend to be Trump supporters, they monitor our language, and they try to skillfully Become like a chameleon and adopt our way of speaking and our vernacular and the memes and the images we use. | ||
We know that they do that. | ||
And we know that they are successful to some extent because they're in the Proud Boys, they're in the Oath Keepers, they're in the organizations. | ||
And if that kind of operation is happening and it is extensive, then you have to assume that you're gonna come into contact with it. | ||
Do you understand how that logic works? | ||
Because you might think to yourself, well I don't know anybody like that, well I don't think I saw anybody like that. | ||
If we know what's going on, you must assume that you may fall victim to it, that you may encounter it. | ||
That's how you have to operate. | ||
If it's going on, you have to assume, you have to be alert. | ||
And so we talk about Fed posting and that means that you're a federal agent posing as an earnest, authentic, right-wing person for the purpose of entrapping right-wing people. | ||
And so this is part of their counter-terror strategy where, and the logic goes like this, they say instead of waiting for terrorists to become radicalized and create plans and carry them out and we try to intercept or catch them, Instead, we will infiltrate the far-right or extremist communities, and we will become the nodes of organization of extremism. | ||
And so anybody who is heading towards this radicalization path, anybody that may carry out a violent plan, if they're seeking that out, if they're a part of those communities, if they're looking for that, then the feds want to become a magnet for that. | ||
So rather than catching them when it's too late or in the aftermath, so the logic goes, we will attract them with honey and entrap them that way. | ||
And they've done this. | ||
And the perfect example of this was the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot. | ||
And this happened shortly before the 2020 election. | ||
Where a bunch of guys in Michigan were arrested allegedly because they plotted to kidnap the governor of Michigan and kill her or bomb the government or something like that because of the mask mandates. | ||
That was the claim and that came out a month before the election and the way it was portrayed in the media was pro-Trump, right-wing, anti-government group, creates terror plot. | ||
And that impacted the election, I'm sure, because it took place in a swing state. | ||
It took place in Michigan. | ||
And it wasn't until months later in 2021, way after the fact, that court documents came out and revealed that that conspiracy was heavily infiltrated by federal agents. | ||
And the story that we were told in October 2020 was that you had an anti-government group that tried to kill the governor. | ||
Well then court documents came out months later and they show that actually federal agents in Wisconsin put together an event. | ||
Where they were going to organize right-wing anti-maskers. | ||
And they rented a hotel conference room. | ||
And they put out flyers. | ||
And they advertised on social media. | ||
And they bought pizzas. | ||
And they arranged transportation. | ||
Federal agents organized all of that. | ||
And they brought together this group. | ||
And I think they were affiliated with the Three Percenters or the Oath Keepers. | ||
And that was the basis of the group that would then go on and do the plot. | ||
That's how it was formed. | ||
All those people met Because federal agents set up some kind of workshop, they paid for the hotel, they paid for food, they advertised it, and then it was federal agents that suggested the plot. | ||
It was federal agents that were going to supply the bombs. | ||
Federal agents that were going to handle the transportation. | ||
Federal agents that were going to handle the head of security for the whole organization. | ||
And fully half of the people involved in the organization were undercover informants or federal agents. | ||
Half of the people in the plot and the most important people. | ||
Those that were the defendants, the real people that they were trying to trap, were bums. | ||
One guy was living in some basement apartment he couldn't afford, couldn't get a job, couldn't come up with $2,000 to buy the explosives from the federal agent. | ||
And it turns out these guys were a bunch of LARPing just losers, basically, for lack of a better word. | ||
And a lot of them got acquitted. | ||
They wound up getting some convictions recently, I think in the past few weeks. | ||
But a lot of them were acquitted on the major charges because they were entrapped so thoroughly. | ||
At any rate, the point is to say that that's an example, that's a very visible, that's a very notable example where You've got federal law enforcement tricking people to get into these things, and then what they'll do, they serve as a magnet, they infiltrate, and then they begin to suggest these illegal activities. | ||
And that's where they're going to catch sort of like that movie. | ||
What's that movie where they catch the criminals before they commit the crime? | ||
Old sci-fi movie? | ||
Minority Report? | ||
unidentified
|
Is that a thing of the right one? | |
It's a movie I haven't seen, but I know the premise of it. | ||
And anyway, it's like that. | ||
And what they a lot of times will get into is they will then just start catching people that probably wouldn't have done crimes because they need to create the image that this is going on. | ||
And anyway, the news today, the reason why we're talking about this, the news, is that a German law enforcement agency came right out and said, yep, that's what we do. | ||
That's a core part of our counter-terror effort. | ||
We're doing it thoroughly. | ||
We're doing it all the time. | ||
We've been doing it since 2019. | ||
And this is the report. | ||
It says, quote, German domestic intelligence agencies are operating hundreds of fake right-wing extremist accounts on social media, according to a report by German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung. | ||
These fake agents are inciting both hatred and violence. | ||
It says, quote, this is the future of information gathering, said an agent. | ||
The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, or BFV, echoed the same remarks, arguing that the accounts are necessary to gather information. | ||
But according to critics, these accounts could be actively promoting and encouraging radicalism. | ||
The newspaper's research found out that the government has heavily invested in, quote, virtual agents since 2019. | ||
The BFV says that the agents operating the fake accounts have to play a little right-wing radical to gain the trust of real extremists. | ||
Therefore, the agents probably spread propaganda and engage in crimes, such as incitement to hatred. | ||
It is not clear what exactly the fake agents do due to a complete lack of oversight. | ||
An agent who joined the BFV to, quote, do something against right-wing extremists said, quote, in order to be really credible, it is not enough to share or like what others say. | ||
You also have to make statements yourself. | ||
That means that the agents also bully and agitate. | ||
The newspaper reported that there are so many fake accounts run by different agencies that there is a need for a nationwide agreement so that agents do not target each other. | ||
So this is an admission by one of the German law enforcement agencies that they've got hundreds. | ||
And how big do you think the extremist community is in Germany? | ||
A country of what, 80 million people? | ||
How many active, online, far-right accounts? | ||
I doubt it's in the millions. | ||
So hundreds, hundreds of provocative agents makes a big difference. | ||
And if that's going on in Germany, which they openly admit, and that's one agency, probably it's happening in other agencies. | ||
And you can assume, based on that policy, that probably the United States has got something far more extensive and far more sophisticated, if that's what the Germans are doing. | ||
If that's what they're doing, that probably means that that is standard in the intelligence communities in the Western developed countries. | ||
That's probably common in all these intelligence-sharing countries and where their intelligence agencies cooperate and work together, NATO countries. | ||
And the point is, where do you think these people are going? | ||
Do you think these people are going... Because when I think about it, I fall into the habit of thinking, oh well, I'm obviously not an extremist. | ||
I'm obviously just a right-wing Trump supporter. | ||
So, I've probably never seen these guys. | ||
These guys are in the underworld. | ||
They're on the dark web. | ||
They're on something that I'm not on. | ||
Where do you think these accounts are? | ||
If they're looking to promulgate right-wing extremism, what kinds of platforms do you think they're going on? | ||
Which communities? | ||
They're on Telegram! | ||
They're on Telegram. | ||
They're on Twitter. | ||
They're on Gab, I'm sure. | ||
They're on TruSocial. | ||
They're on anywhere that we are, they probably are. | ||
And I feel like a lot of people may fall into the habit of thinking, well, we're not on those platforms. | ||
They're somewhere else. | ||
They're in some group chat that I'm not in. | ||
What would make you so sure? | ||
What would make you so confident that that is the case? | ||
If they're looking for right-wing extremism, they're looking for anti-vax, they're looking for pro-Russia, they're looking for anti-war, they're looking for anti-BLM, or whatever. | ||
All the various causes that we represent and take up, that's of interest to them. | ||
And here's the thing about all of that. | ||
I said earlier, this is what they say. | ||
This is their logic. | ||
That they're going to catch the terrorists before they become terrorists. | ||
But that is not actually any longer, if it ever was, what they do. | ||
That is their logic. | ||
That is what they say to the press. | ||
That is the official narrative. | ||
Is that they are manning hundreds of fake right-wing Twitter accounts to catch the many extremists that want to do violence. | ||
Oh, thank God they're looking out for us, right? | ||
Thank God they're doing that. | ||
Thank God they're catching these people. | ||
They're being a honeypot so that this so-called stochastic lone wolf terrorism is being arrested and apprehended before it can really flourish. | ||
Well, that is just what they say. | ||
That is what they say in their press releases, that is what they say in their white papers, but that is not, in actuality, what is going on. | ||
What is really going on is now they're taking the role of straight-up agitators, and they're going into places where there was not true radicalism, or where there was not, you could say another way, a true appetite for violence, or a penchant for criminality, and they're creating it. | ||
They're creating it where it wasn't there. | ||
And so they'll go into these communities and say, we need to do something. | ||
We need to take action. | ||
There's no political solution. | ||
Are we really going to vote our way out of this? | ||
We're not going to solve this at the ballot box. | ||
And so where the argument is, they're going into communities where people want to do violence and drawing them in and catching them. | ||
What they're really doing is coming into places where there was no violence and they're agitating. | ||
And like this guy said, it's not enough to like the posts and observe the posts and repeat the posts. | ||
They've got to create their own statements. | ||
They've got to participate in the bullying. | ||
They've got to create novel initiatives. | ||
And what is their job? | ||
Their law enforcement. | ||
Their job is to find lawbreakers. | ||
So in their In their effort as undercover agents, what kind of initiatives do you think they're getting out there? | ||
Do you think they're regurgitating messages like I say on my show where I say, don't do crimes, get involved, work for 20 years in the system, Play it close to the chest. | ||
Don't tell anybody. | ||
Work slowly. | ||
Do you think they're saying that? | ||
Or do you think as people principally concerned with lawbreaking, do you think that the theme of their initiatives is going to be to attract lawbreakers, i.e. | ||
agitating for criminality? | ||
They're going in there and that's their job, is to look for criminals, so when they're creating novel statements, it's to get people on board with criminal behavior so that they can then catch them. | ||
And it creates this cycle, which you could say it's the cycle is what's perpetuating it. | ||
I think it's an agenda. | ||
But what they do is they set out to create right-wing extremism where there wasn't any, or where there wasn't as much. | ||
And then that becomes the self-serving justification for more counter-terror. | ||
They send these guys in who go in and say, let's do right-wing extremism. | ||
A bunch of, you know, a gullible autistic kid who's 18 and on pills and SSRIs is gonna say, hey man, yeah, okay, eff it, let's do it. | ||
And then they get him, and then they say, look, see, we got our right-wing terrorists, here he is. | ||
Double our budget. | ||
Double our budget. | ||
This is a pattern. | ||
This is a problem. | ||
Be afraid. | ||
The real terrorism comes from Riddler, Joker-like figures, the hacker known as 4chan, incels, etc. | ||
This is the real threat. | ||
And do you see then how this vicious cycle is created? | ||
And again, I don't even want to say vicious cycle because that almost implies that it's an impersonal force that is driving this. | ||
Do you understand? | ||
When I say a vicious cycle, what that implies is that an incentive system has been created. | ||
And the system, you could say, has a mind of its own. | ||
If I were to say that they went out, in good faith, looked for right-wing extremists, and maybe found people where there wouldn't be any, and they really thought, oh look, this is a big problem we thought, we need another budget, and they keep doing this, and they're sort of slaves to this impersonal cycle driving them forward, of looking for a self-fulfilling prophecy, and then fulfilling it, and then furthering it. | ||
But that is not, it is a cycle, but it's not impersonal. | ||
And it's not just a system. | ||
And it's not just incentives. | ||
It's very personal. | ||
They're doing this deliberately. | ||
They're creating the enemy. | ||
They're creating the scapegoat that they want. | ||
They didn't set out and accidentally create this. | ||
They sought out to create this. | ||
They sought out to go out and create fake right-wing extremism. | ||
To create a real pretext. | ||
To crack down on it, to turn the surveillance and the national security state inwards. | ||
They created a fake right-wing threat to create a real counter-threat, which is to turn everything that they built up in the past 20 years to use against Al Qaeda and ISIS against people that voted for Trump, and people that don't trust the government, and people that don't trust the media. | ||
Now if you don't agree with the media narrative, and if you post things that are against the TOS on Twitter, you're not just a Conservative. | ||
You're not just an independent thinker, now you're a disinformation spreader. | ||
Now you're a misinformation spreader. | ||
Now you're pushing narratives that could lead to violence. | ||
Now you're undermining faith in our public institutions. | ||
It used to be the case that you could distrust the liberal media and vote for an anti-establishment person. | ||
Now if you push those opinions, you're undermining faith in the institutions, which is an anti-democratic action. | ||
So we need to start spying on you. | ||
So we need DHS and we need NSA and we need FBI to get involved in this, to look into your situation. | ||
And where, and where there are limits to the jurisdiction of federal law enforcement, they will bring on their good friends. | ||
Facebook, Google, They'll bring on Clearview AI, facial recognition, and so where the government has limits to its jurisdiction because we have constitutional rights to privacy, where there are limits to what the government can do to spy on you or infiltrate your group chat or whatever, they will contract the work that they can't do out to private companies such as Google. | ||
Who are creating a very sophisticated suite of artificial intelligence algorithms that are able to track so much data online. | ||
Or artificial intelligence companies like Clearview AI, funded by Peter Thiel, which was used in part by the FBI to identify capital rioters on January 6th. | ||
And this is where you get into how it's all connected here and how it's driven from the government like this. | ||
It's driven from the national security state. | ||
And then it ripples in ways that you can't even really begin to fathom. | ||
Where a few hundred provocateurs will go out there and create a fake right-wing threat and they'll find some autistic sucker and rope him into something and then arrest him for something and they begin to create these patterns and then they'll get their friends the ADL and SPLC to do a report about look at this pattern of right-wing terror plots that were foiled and then those reports are then published by the mainstream media. | ||
So it goes from FBI initiative of a few hundred guys, you know, federal law enforcement initiative of a few hundred guys, to a report by the extremist watchers, and that report then gets published by the mainstream media like the Washington Post and the New York Times, and then that is cited by television, NBC, ABC, CBS, and passed off as mainstream, unbiased, objective, you know, this is the news. | ||
And then it even ripples in ways you don't realize. | ||
Then Hollywood is looking for villains for their films. | ||
20 years ago they created a show like 24 with Jack Bauer and the enemy is the Muslim terrorists. | ||
Although not really because sometimes the Muslims were surprisingly the good guys and it was the white lady who was evil. | ||
That was the plot of I think season 2. | ||
Spoiler. | ||
Well now have you noticed That all the movies and all the TV shows have a new villain? | ||
Wasn't like this 10 years ago. | ||
But now, the villain in the Batman movie. | ||
The Joker. | ||
Green haired, crazy guy, right? | ||
Wrong. | ||
Now Joker is an incel. | ||
Joker is an incel. | ||
He's a lonely white man who can't get laid, who lives with his mom, and he's a little bit messed up, and he thinks that no one's paying attention to him, and he starts terrorism against the government. | ||
That was the plot of Joker, October 2019. | ||
And another Batman film, The Riddler. | ||
The Riddler was played by Jim Carrey 20 years ago and he was crazy. | ||
He wore a green leotard and he was flamboyant. | ||
He threw grenades in the bat lair. | ||
Now Riddler is a white incel live streamer. | ||
unidentified
|
A white incel live streamer orphan. | |
Who is streaming on Periscope his terrorist acts and talking about how he's got an army of lonely white guys and they're gonna have a vengeance against the black mayor of the city. | ||
And it's in Law & Order SVU where you've got an incel crime. | ||
unidentified
|
Chad and Stacey, Stacey and Chad. | |
And you've got all kinds of other 4chan-er characters. | ||
And it's even in the media then. | ||
And this is how we're all being manipulated by law enforcement to support the erosion of our freedom and our liberty in the country. | ||
And really it goes even beyond freedom. | ||
Because some people say freedom. | ||
It's like, listen, I don't need the freedom to just shut up and go about my day unmolested. | ||
We're not talking about, like, they're taking our freedom. | ||
It's like, no, it's not your freedom. | ||
It's about dissent. | ||
If you're a dissident, they'll, like, kill you. | ||
That's what we're talking about. | ||
They're taking our freedoms. | ||
It's like, it's not quite that. | ||
It's like, they're crushing all dissent. | ||
They've got a very evil policy program, and if you don't accept it, if you oppose it, they will use lots of power that you supported years ago to ruin your life. | ||
Because they're not coming for really just anybody's freedom. | ||
They're coming for like, they're coming for Trump's freedom, they're coming for my freedom, they're coming for the freedom of the activists. | ||
Everyone on this website has been deplatformed or debanked or had other problems visited upon them. | ||
That's a real issue. | ||
So, excuse me. | ||
And it's all very transparent how this works. | ||
It's a gang. | ||
These guys are the FBI and Hollywood and the media and the ADL. | ||
They're a gang. | ||
You see how this works? | ||
It's personal. | ||
They're personnel. | ||
It's personnel and it's people doing this. | ||
Everybody thinks it's like, oh, it's the Democrats or it's these institutions. | ||
It's like, no, you got these people in the FBI, got these people in the ADL, you got these people in the media, you got these people in Hollywood. | ||
And they're, like I said, these constitute across multiple domains of the regime. | ||
They're all working in tandem. | ||
And now does that mean that they all got together at the New World Order Summit at Doom Island and plotted all this out? | ||
No. | ||
But yet they're all playing their part. | ||
They're all playing their compartmental part. | ||
Driving forward this agenda. | ||
And that doesn't...and this is where it begins to...this is where your regime apologist will come in and say, oh so what? | ||
And they all got together at a meeting because they're evil and planned all this out. | ||
Not necessarily, but you can see how this policy is being driven forward by really a very small amount of elite-type people across these domains to achieve the same force. | ||
And it had nothing to do with any real thing going on in the world. | ||
It was agenda-driven. | ||
Because people like to say, oh well, the interracial advertisements are because that's just what people want. | ||
And Girl Jedi and Black Stormtrooper, they're just accommodating the tastes of the people. | ||
And the government pushing the terror threats, that's just a modern threat. | ||
And when the Hollywood pictures show that as a threat, once again, They're just earnestly looking at what goes on and responding to the tastes of the people, or the reality of the situation, and it's like it's a lot more agenda-driven by small amounts of people in the elite than anybody would like to admit. | ||
That we don't have a bottom-up society, we have a top-down society. | ||
And who we're told to scapegoat and who we're told to hate and who we're told to fear doesn't come from us and work its way up. | ||
And we say, hey, law enforcement, there's a creepy incel stalking me. | ||
And law enforcement goes, man, I can't sleep at night. | ||
I got into this business to protect the people. | ||
And this is so scary. | ||
Incels are ravaging the country. | ||
We got to assemble a response. | ||
It's like it doesn't it's it's not Mr. Smith goes to Washington bottom up. | ||
It's top down. | ||
Federal government says, this is what we need to create. | ||
unidentified
|
Give me 500 white terrorists on my desk tomorrow. | |
And then they work that through the media process. | ||
They launder that through the media. | ||
And then that's on people's nightly local news at 10 o'clock. | ||
unidentified
|
And they go, oh, did you hear about this incel thing going on? | |
And then they feed it back. | ||
So you know it's not we don't have a free it isn't I think it is probably impossible or very difficult To have a free, open society where the people are really autonomous. | ||
We're all living in authoritarian, totalitarian states. | ||
It's just that we can only recognize it from the outside looking in. | ||
If you're outside the North Korea matrix, you can identify that North Korea has a matrix. | ||
You can identify that it's kind of weird that all the buildings have a portrait of Kim Il-sung on them. | ||
Or Kim Jong-un, or whoever. | ||
You can identify that it's kind of weird that they ban Christianity and those things. | ||
But when you're in the American Matrix, a lot of people don't think it's weird that things are the way that they are here. | ||
And they have this illusion of, no, I chose this. | ||
This is what we support. | ||
This is what society wants. | ||
Anyway, so not to ramble too much, but that is... They're admitting it. | ||
That is what goes on. | ||
And with this admission, it has far-reaching implications. | ||
Like those which I just laid out. | ||
So that's that. | ||
But I want to move on. | ||
I want to get into our featured story and then we'll get into our Super Chats because we've been at it for a long time already. | ||
So we're going to move on and get into our featured story here about Iran and the color revolution here. | ||
And this is pretty rich. | ||
We're supposed to believe all this stuff is just popping off randomly at the same time. | ||
Like, you know, Russia's at war in Ukraine and all of a sudden the Azeris just decide to attack the Armenians. | ||
No reason. | ||
And they're getting shipments from Israel and that's a total coincidence. | ||
And Tajikistan just decides to attack Kyrgyzstan. | ||
No reason. | ||
And in Iran, now all of a sudden there's mass protests, mass women-led protests, big red flag over the hijab. | ||
Again, all this is just a big, all this turmoil in Central Asia is just the biggest coincidence ever. | ||
And so the big story out of Iran is that there is a major uprising going on because some woman was arrested by the religious police for not wearing her hijab and the people think that the police beat and killed her. | ||
And the police say that she died in custody. | ||
And now the United States is intervening and they're sanctioning the religious police, and they're sanctioning a whole host of new targets in Iran. | ||
And this is a story from Russia Today. | ||
It says, quote, the United States on Thursday imposed sanctions on Iran's so-called morality police, citing a woman's death in their custody as the reason. | ||
Amid spreading unrest in Iran over the alleged murder of Massa Amini, the U.S. | ||
Treasury also sanctioned seven senior officials of the Islamic Republic's security organizations. | ||
The Treasury Department said in a statement, quote, The morality police are responsible for the recent death of 22-year-old Massa Amini, who was arrested and detained for allegedly wearing a hijab improperly. | ||
Amini died in a hospital on September 16th, two days after being arrested. | ||
Law enforcement officials said her death was the result of a heart attack. | ||
However, multiple reports on social media suggested the young woman died of injuries sustained in custody. | ||
The claims prompted unrest in several cities with rights groups saying too many people have been killed by security services. | ||
unidentified
|
U.S. | |
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen described Amini's death as, quote, yet another act of brutality by the Iranian regime's security forces against its own people. | ||
Imposing sanctions on the morality police and Iranian security officials demonstrates the United States' clear commitment to stand up for human rights and the rights of women in Iran and globally, said Janet Yellen. | ||
The list of sanctioned individuals features the head of the Morality Police, Mohammad Rastami Chesmaghachi, Iran's intelligence minister, Esmail Khatib, and the commander of the Iranian Army's ground forces, Qumars Haidari. | ||
We're struggling with the names. | ||
The Treasury said these officials oversee organizations that employ violence to suppress peaceful protesters and members of Iranian civil society, political dissidents, women's rights activists, and members of the Iranian Baha'i community. | ||
The sanctions involve blocking all property and interest of the targeted individuals and entities in the United States. | ||
The Morality Police are part of Iran's LEF, or Law Enforcement Forces. | ||
LEF was sanctioned by Washington in 2011 over a crackdown on protesters in the aftermath of the disputed 2009 presidential election. | ||
The Treasury sanctions announcement came as Iran's Revolutionary Guard called on the country's judiciary to identify those spreading false news and rumors. | ||
Amid the spreading protests over Amini's death, the Guard said that those endangering the psychological safety of society should be prosecuted. | ||
This to me is just so classic. | ||
This is what they always do. | ||
It's always these mass demonstrations and in particular whenever it's women's rights that is always a huge red flag. | ||
Students groups, women's rights groups, those two in particular are those are always the nexus for a western-backed color revolution. | ||
And the Color Revolutions, in case you don't know what this is, ever since the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, you've had these various so-called democratic uprisings, particularly in post-Soviet states, but also elsewhere in the Middle East and Asia. | ||
Where a pro-Russia or a communist government will be overthrown after a disputed election or some kind of a scandal like this, and they'll be overthrown by mass demonstrations in the Capitol, student troops, women's rights, pro-democracy, liberal forces, opposition parties, and they call them color revolutions because usually they take on a color. | ||
And the demonstrators wear a particular color, wave a particular colored flag. | ||
So, like in Ukraine, it was called the Orange Revolution in 2004. | ||
Orange was the color. | ||
And in, I think, Kyrgyzstan, they have the Tulip Revolution. | ||
And it was a tulip color. | ||
I don't know what color a tulip is, but it was a tulip revolution. | ||
And in Belarus, they had, I think it was called the Denim Revolution, where they were waving the denim material, blue jeans. | ||
It was solidarity with the West. | ||
And that one obviously failed. | ||
They still have Lukashenko, but... They all take on these various colors. | ||
They had them in Moldova, in Czechoslovakia, in Kazakhstan. | ||
There was one recently in Kazakhstan. | ||
And also, arguably, in the Middle East they've had similar... They had the Arab Spring there, though, a little bit different. | ||
They had the Green Revolution in Iran. | ||
And anyway, all of these revolutions are Western-backed. | ||
They're backed by Western intelligence agencies and by the NGOs. | ||
The NGOs, Non-Governmental Organizations, NGO, it's a classification of a corporation or a corporate entity. | ||
These NGOs are this There are a cadre of non-governmental organizations, corporations, which are funded by the State Department and funded by various aspects of the military or by NATO or they all get government money. | ||
But they operate outside of the purview of the official diplomatic mission of the government. | ||
So you've got things like, and we read them off the other day, like National Endowment for Democracy. | ||
And they all have names like that. | ||
It's all about democracy or human rights or that kind of thing. | ||
And they were all set up in the 70s or 80s or 90s. | ||
And these are the tool of the State Department. | ||
And they'll receive State Department money. | ||
They're headquartered in Foggy Bottom in Washington, D.C. | ||
And their staff of people formerly from the government are currently in the government. | ||
And that's a way that they can operate sort of part of the government but not officially as part of the government. | ||
And they funnel money into these groups in these countries. | ||
And this is a way that the government can clandestinely support opposition in other countries which is totally a violation of their sovereignty. | ||
What we're doing through that is what we accuse Russia and China of doing in our elections. | ||
We're going into Belarus and Czechoslovakia and Ukraine and Moldova and Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan and Georgia and all these countries and we're using our government to funnel money into the political opposition. | ||
unidentified
|
And that's a pretty big deal. | |
These are poor countries that don't have strong That's a huge difference maker in a situation where there's a disputed election or something like that. | ||
And always the nexus, like I said, is the student groups. | ||
support and just a boatload of cash from the richest country in the world, that's a huge difference maker in a situation where there's a disputed election or something like that. | ||
And always the nexus, like I said, is the student groups. | ||
That's always where they'll go in. | ||
The universities are a locus where the United States can enter in and where the money flows and it's these student groups and they gin up stupid kids, stupid kids. | ||
Stupid liberal kids. | ||
And that is the entry point for the NGOs and for the State Department to get in and they push their money in and they get their people in there and they get the students all riled up and the university becomes a locus of organization for anti-government sentiment because it's where all these kids go and a lot of people are. | ||
And then it's also the women's rights. | ||
Women's rights groups. | ||
Women are also the shock troops because women are gullible. | ||
And women organize and women have these organizations and that's another entry point. | ||
And so that's a huge red flag for a color revolution is when you see the students mobilized and when you see the women mobilized. | ||
Or the regular political opposition. | ||
And so when there's a big election or when there's some sort of flashpoint, when there's like a transition, anytime there's a perceived vulnerability in these institutions, that's when mass demonstrations happen and something goes viral on social media, astroturfed by US forces. | ||
And it's this blitzkrieg. | ||
Bodies in the Capitol, social media disinformation, media disinformation, money pouring into opposition parties, and they'll do things like the government will shut down the power lines in the opposition headquarters. | ||
That happened in one of the color revolutions. | ||
And the United States came in and brought and supplied emergency generators to keep the lights on, like that kind of thing. | ||
And, um, And all of this, of course, is to really, in a way that appears to be a triumph of democracy, it's meant as a foreign subversion to put in a puppet government. | ||
And so it's with this patina, this facade of the triumph of liberalization and democratization, look, this old strongman, this old communist, this old whoever got toppled because the people Made their voices heard. | ||
People went out and yelled in the Capitol and the people voiced their concerns on social media and they got a BS second round of the elections like in 2004 in Ukraine. | ||
They went in and they got a redo. | ||
They went in, they got the government like in Armenia. | ||
They got the Prime Minister that they wanted. | ||
But in actuality, even though that appears to be democratic, appears to be the triumph of liberalism and democracy, is really actually, not the word pro-democracy, but it's actually anti-democratic. | ||
It's foreign-funded, and it's really a few hundred provocative elements that gin up this fake, inorganic mob, and it's a mob of people in the Capitol mobilized by foreign agents that bring about these changes. | ||
And it's a very sophisticated, very clandestine, covert, foreign effort, but it appears to the world like liberalism triumphed. | ||
The people went out in the Capitol and they demonstrated and an election was held and we got a true voice of the people in charge. | ||
When in actuality it was like, no, the whole thing was funded by the foreign government. | ||
The whole thing was funded by foreign agents. | ||
It was organized by foreign agents. | ||
And to the extent that it was organic, it was a minority of people that mobbed up in the Capitol With the foreigners and just made it untenable for the current regime to continue. | ||
That's not very democratic. | ||
And it always has that narrative because, of course, we're the democracy. | ||
So it's an expansion of American influence. | ||
That was a triumph of our ideas. | ||
Our ideas are superior and our now new influence in this country is legitimate. | ||
The United States welcomes the rapprochement with the new democratic government of this post-Soviet shithole, which now has a favorable government, because we're now democracies, and democracies don't fight. | ||
And so that's what's going on, I think, in Iran. | ||
It happened in 2009. | ||
It happened in the end of 2018, I believe, in December 2018. | ||
There were widespread protests in Iran over something which I forget. | ||
Probably foreign-backed, and same thing here. | ||
At a time when Russia's at war with Ukraine and cutting off the gas to the European Union and annexing these territories, one of Russia's principal allies, Iran, oh now they've got all these protests from the women's groups. | ||
And it's interesting, so that's the architecture of how that works. | ||
That's honestly why I suspect it. | ||
But isn't it telling that women and students are the nexus for this? | ||
Isn't it telling that objectively these kinds of mob rule regime changes are objectively bad? | ||
It's objectively bad to have mob rule overturn the government. | ||
It's objectively bad to have foreign agents overthrow your government. | ||
Like that's objectively bad and destabilizing and leads to And isn't it telling that it's the women and the students that are the gullible shock troops that bring that about? | ||
And what does that tell us about America? | ||
Because you could look at that and say, yeah, that's so ridiculous and so on. | ||
Look at Iran. | ||
It's the women are going to bring down a truly independent country. | ||
Iran was under the thumb of the CIA when they overthrew the Shah and installed... What happened? | ||
I don't even recall the history of Iran. | ||
It's been a long time since I looked into it. | ||
But they overthrew the Shah. | ||
They installed the CIA government. | ||
Or was it the Islamic government that... Mozadek? | ||
I don't remember. | ||
I don't remember all this going on. | ||
Iran was under the thumb after World War II by the CIA, and the government was oppressing Iran and all this, and they were trying to prevent Iran from becoming a communist country. | ||
And that's why they had regime change there. | ||
That's why they maintained the government there. | ||
And then in 1979, they have this Islamic Revolution against the liberal, American, CIA-installed government. | ||
They take hostages and they use their oil wealth. | ||
And they truly gain their independence. | ||
And they retain their culture, and they retain their religion, and they retain their...they have true sovereignty. | ||
And the Israelis and the Zog media in America say, Oh, the Iranians, they have a poor country. | ||
Their leadership is investing in nuclear weapons and not their people. | ||
That's called the sovereignty tax. | ||
They're pursuing a nuclear arsenal because that is going to guarantee their sovereignty. | ||
That's going to guarantee their security against the threat of Israel in the United States. | ||
It's the only way they can do it. | ||
They're investing in a bomb so they can protect themselves from Israel and America. | ||
And why are they made poor? | ||
It's not because they're spending all their money on the bomb and not the people. | ||
It's because they're being brutally sanctioned by America. | ||
And they're being brutally sanctioned by America because they're trying to secure their nation. | ||
So, it's like when Russia says, we'll take a hit on our GDP to fight in Ukraine, and that's the price we'll pay for sovereignty. | ||
That's our sovereignty tax. | ||
It's the same in Iran. | ||
Pursuing the arsenal and enduring the sanctions, that's the price they pay for sovereignty. | ||
That's the price they pay to not be under the thumb of America and Israel, like all the other Middle Eastern governments. | ||
Or most of them. | ||
And so when you see these revolutions happening in Iran, and it's the students and the women, they're the shock troops of vicious foreigners that don't care about Iranians. | ||
They don't want Iran to be free. | ||
They don't want Iran to be sovereign. | ||
They don't want Iran to be a stable, healthy country. | ||
They want Iran to be obliterated. | ||
They want Iran to be a non-threat. | ||
They want to loot Iran's resources and scatter them and break them apart, just like they're doing in Syria, just like they did to Iraq. | ||
And women and students are going to be the ones that facilitate that. | ||
Now, keep in mind, that is exactly what is happening in the United States. | ||
The color revolution policy of these mass protests, the media and social media disinformation, the logistical support for rioters and demonstrators, the mobilization of women and students and ethnic and religious minorities... | ||
That is the same way that they maintain control over America. | ||
By the way, what do you think Antifa is? | ||
BLM? | ||
The Women's March? | ||
The bail funds? | ||
What do you think that's all about? | ||
What do you think it's about when they control the social media in America and they say, we're gonna tamp down on disinformation during the midterms? | ||
It's the same thing! | ||
Women and their Women's March, and their March for Our Lives, and the March for Choice, they're going to deliver foreign intel agency control over our country just like they're delivering it for America in Iran, or just like in all these other countries like Pussy Riot in Russia, or all these other groups. | ||
Women are always the vulnerability. | ||
Same thing with the young people. | ||
Same thing with the religious and ethnic minorities. | ||
Now you see. | ||
Now you see what's going on here. | ||
What's the antidote? | ||
Have a strong patriarchal society. | ||
If women are led by men, then they can't be led by foreign agents. | ||
They can't be led by some other satan. | ||
They can't be led by the snake. | ||
If women are led by a strong husband or their father, and it should be one or the other, then they cannot be taken advantage of by the serpent, which is what is going on right now. | ||
And the same thing goes with the students. | ||
If the students are honoring their mother and their father, if the children are honoring their mother and their father, they can't be led astray by the serpent in the university or by these NGO-type groups. | ||
That is why the antidote to globalism and to this multinational control and corruption is a strong family-based society. | ||
That's a big part of why they want to break apart the family, or why the ideas they promote lead to the disintegration of the family. | ||
Individualism disintegrates the family. | ||
Women and men will not be husbands and wives and mothers and fathers, but they'll be voters and consumers and workers and taxpayers. | ||
Individually, separately. | ||
And they both can do whatever they want separately, independently of one another. | ||
They're not dependent, they're not destined for one another in complementary roles, but they're completely independent of each other doing independent things. | ||
Guess what? | ||
A woman, a career woman, don't need a man, and a woman can work a career just like a man, and she can vote just like a man, and have her same opinions, and so on. | ||
And so they don't need each other. | ||
They're out there, and the primary thing that they're focused on in career, in work, are things they don't need each other for. | ||
And so they're torn apart. | ||
And when that happens, there's no kids. | ||
And there's no families, and there's no communities, and there's no nothing. | ||
You just get these, it's like a group, you get Seinfeld. | ||
You just get these weird group of friends that are dating and just kind of hanging out and doing whatever. | ||
And that's where you get these, that's where you get the whole country is taken advantage of. | ||
That's when there's no real generational wealth, there's no real community, there's no real sovereignty, we don't get control over our destiny, because we're all just these individual cogs in the machine. | ||
So, but that's a whole other deal. | ||
There's a whole other show about that, but that's what's going on in Iran right now, and that's the same color revolution tactics they've been doing for 30 years that's going on in Iran, predictably. | ||
And by the way, it's going on all the time in the United States. | ||
That MO, that program is what they employ on the daily now in America to keep us down. | ||
Women's liberation, students' movements, ethnic and religious minorities, those are the vectors through which they are going to undermine a traditional nation, undermine national sovereignty. | ||
unidentified
|
So... | |
You want to protect against foreign influence that wants to come in and sink their claws in and take all your resources and your freedom? | ||
Build a family. | ||
Build a community. | ||
Get in power and make it easier for people to do that. | ||
Give it back to the family. | ||
Don't let women vote. | ||
Let their husbands vote for them. | ||
Let their father and their husband vote for them. | ||
You want to bring families together? | ||
Stop pushing politics in the household. | ||
The household is a delegation. | ||
Don't put politics in between the household. | ||
The household is a delegation. | ||
The father votes as the representative of the delegation of his household. | ||
The moment you introduce the suffrage of women and children, that's when the House is blown up and we're all political agents and the wife and the husband are going to be voting differently and they're going to be arguing at the dinner table over who they're going to vote for. | ||
Let the household send a delegation represented by the father and let the whole society be organized like this. | ||
The family is the fundamental building block, not the individual. | ||
We want a society where families are joined together, and that's how you build a society. | ||
Not based on individual workers. | ||
Families. | ||
And the family, of course, is made up of multiple individuals, but that's why they have a representative in the father. | ||
And that's how that's supposed to work. | ||
That's how you're supposed to have any kind of society. | ||
Otherwise, you don't really have anything resembling a society. | ||
You just have a lot of people living together. | ||
So, that's that. | ||
But I want to move on. | ||
I want to get on into our Super Chats because it's getting late and my ass is getting sweaty. | ||
So we're going to move on and we're going to take a look at our Super Chats and see what you guys have to say about all this. | ||
Let's see what we got here. | ||
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
Put my headset on. | ||
Get my water out. | ||
My water's not cold. |