All Episodes
Sept. 20, 2022 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
01:44:23
MASS DEPORTATIONS: Based LIBERALS Deport BROWN PEASANTS From Pleasure Island | America First Ep 1063MASS DEPORTATIONS: Based LIBERALS Deport BROWN PEASANTS From Pleasure Island | America First Ep 1063
Participants
Main voices
n
nick fuentes
01:37:46
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
Thank you.
nick fuentes
You're watching America First.
My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
We have a great show for you tonight.
Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Monday.
We have a lot to talk about tonight.
Lots to get into.
Big show.
Big immigration show.
And our featured story tonight is about Martha's Vineyard deporting 50 illegal immigrants from their pleasure island, vacation island.
And I'm sure all of you have heard about this story.
When's the last time I did a show?
I didn't do a show Friday.
We had a long weekend.
So I guess I haven't even had an opportunity to cover it.
I wasn't gonna cover it.
I think it happened last Thursday.
I remember I think somebody asking about it in the super chats if I'm not mistaken.
And anyway, the point is, when this story first happened, I wasn't going to cover it.
And the reason why is because I already covered the Greg Abbott migrant caravans, which to me is very similar, or so I thought.
We covered the Texas governor, Greg Abbott, shipping illegal immigrants from the border in Texas to New York City, Washington D.C., and then now Chicago as of August.
I think we covered that twice.
And so, last week, the Florida governor, Ron DeSantis, did something similar.
He rounded up a bunch of illegal immigrants from Venezuela, and he shipped them to Martha's Vineyard, which is an extremely wealthy vacation destination.
It's an island in Massachusetts on the East Coast, and this is a vacation spot for the elite.
A lot of rich people.
Barack Obama famously has a house there.
And so DeSantis sent 50 immigrants there and I wasn't going to cover it because I said it's really the same thing.
Abbott shipping them to DC and New York and Chicago, DeSantis shipping them to Martha's Vineyard, and my view on the Abbott caravans is that it really wasn't good policy and it's not good politics.
Abbott is... Well, you know what?
I'll get into all that.
I don't want to do this show right away.
I'm just introducing the story, but initially I thought they were the same, but I realized they're different.
They're very different.
And so tonight I want to cover that.
That'll be our featured story.
I want to discuss the differences, because there are some key differences between the Abbott buses going to the liberal cities and the DeSantis buses going to Martha's Vineyard.
I didn't like the Abbott busing.
I hate to say it, because I don't care for Ron DeSantis running for president, but I like shipping them to Martha's Vineyard.
I think it was perfect.
And I talked a little bit about that on Telegram.
I say that, again, reluctantly.
Now don't go saying, oh, now Nick supports DeSantis.
I don't!
I don't support DeSantis for president.
I barely even support him as governor.
I think we don't really know who he is.
I think that he's liked by all the wrong people.
He's the perfect guy that they're getting ready to appoint as the anti-Trump or the counter-Trump in 24.
So I'm not supporting him for 24, okay?
Let's just get that straight.
But I, unfortunately, this is perfect.
Shipping the illegals to Martha's Vineyard was perfect.
And specifically tonight, I want to talk not just about the differences between that busing episode and the Abbott busing, but I also want to talk, and this cues you in to the difference, I also want to talk specifically about the fact that all these illegals Got put right back on a bus and shipped off the island.
That's the funniest part about it.
DeSantis rounds them all up, sends them to Martha's Vineyard, which is an island vacation destination, and they were there for literally 44 hours before the local government got them all in a bus and shipped them right back onto the mainland.
Which is That, that is why it's good.
That's why it's awesome.
That's why it's perfect.
It's the perfect optics.
They put him right back on the bus and they took care of him for less than two days.
The illegals got there and they, the community rallied and brought him dinner and put him up in a shelter and brought him blankets and hung out with them.
For 44 hours, okay?
Before they shipped them right back across the border, before they packed them up on a bus and sent them right back where they came from.
Pretty classic.
So we'll talk about that.
We'll also be talking tonight about a new poll which comes to us from the New York Times about Hispanics and how they vote.
And how it's looking for the 2022 midterms.
Spoiler alert!
Not looking so hot for Republicans.
And this has been a debate ever since 2020.
And we'll get into all this.
Sort of a big subject.
But...
It's really the same subject which we've been talking about in all kinds of different ways for as long as I've been doing the show, which is five years.
And it's something which has been talked about even before that.
And that is the question concerning assimilation, and specifically the assimilability, if that's a word, or the ability to assimilate all of these Hispanics which have been pouring into our country Specifically over the last 30 years, by the millions, and now accumulating in the American Southwest, but also now spilling out everywhere.
And that question has taken a different shape over the years.
But in 2016, of course, Donald Trump came on the national stage and changed the conversation, and changed the strategy by saying, look, we need to build a wall.
And he never said this, but underlying his strategy was this basic premise, which Ann Coulter had talked about previously, and before her, Sam Francis, and before Sam Francis, many other people, which is that the Republican Party should really play for white people.
If we play for white people, we don't have to win a much higher percentage of whites to start winning much more votes and then start winning elections.
As opposed to this other strategy of accepting demographic change and desperately trying to increase our share of far fewer minority votes or non-white votes from Hispanics and Blacks.
And obviously Trump won in 2016.
You know what?
I'm already doing it, but I want to get into these attitudes The new poll about these midterms shows that Trump was right in 2016 to do that, he was wrong in 2020 to go against that, and Republicans have been wrong ever since 2020, thinking that we're going to win over all these Hispanics and this is a viable strategy for the American right, because it isn't.
And this new poll from the New York Times shows that.
It shows that Democrats still have the Hispanics, and more importantly, Hispanics are still deeply entrenched on social and cultural issues in favor of the left.
So it's not just a party affiliation, it's an ideological position as well, or an ideological entrenchment.
So we'll talk about that too.
Those will be our big stories.
Before we get into all that though, I want to remind you to follow me here on Cozy.
Smash the follow button to get a push notification whenever I go live.
Also, follow me on Gab Telegram and True Social.
Links are down below.
So make sure to check me out on all those.
Also, I'm trying a new suit tonight.
What do you think?
It's not the first time I've worn it.
I've had this suit for a little while, but, you know, normally I just wear the same two suits every show for, like, five years.
What do you think?
I don't know if I love it.
I think maybe the tie combination's not working.
What do you think?
I think maybe I shouldn't have worn it with this tie.
Maybe a blue tie would have been better.
I think the tie's too red.
Yeah, it's not working for me.
What do you think, though?
Let me know what you think in the comments.
Let me know what you think in the Super Chats.
What do we think about the jacket?
What do we think about the combo?
Jacket good, tie bad?
Jacket bad?
Or is it good on both fronts?
Let me know.
We're experimenting a little bit.
Let's see.
What do we... in the live chat.
Looks great, nods good.
Bussin.
Black tie?
No, it's not.
No, you don't do that.
W suit, tie mid, okay?
Blue tie, W, needs tailoring?
Yeah, I think so.
Well, you know what?
I took it to a tailor, but they were Hispanic, so I think they fucked it up.
You know, I was running late for something, I was flying out the next day, I got this suit, I took it there, they didn't speak English, I tried to explain what I wanted, they had fucking dogs there?
They had dogs!
I went to the tailor and they had dogs just hanging out in the store.
And there was dog hair on everything.
I'm like, what kind of place is this?
What kind of place are you running here?
You got dogs running around?
Like, dogs and babies.
What the fuck?
I'm sorry for the language, but it's like, I'm here to get this suit tailored and it's like a, it's like a, it's like a playpen here.
It's like a pig pen.
What, you got dogs and babies?
Like, what, are you trying to run a business here or what?
Plain house.
There was some little girl, not a little girl, she was like a teenager probably, but some Hispanic girl took the measurements and everything.
Or you know what I mean, you put the bobby pins in or whatever it is, how you, or safety pins?
I don't know.
And uh, and so I walk in there and I'm like, look, this is the only place I need to fly out.
Like, I need a rush job here.
Of course, wait until the last minute.
So I got it all jazzed up.
Anyway, I get the suit back and it's like covered in dog hair.
I'm like, are you kidding me?
Idiot.
It didn't, I didn't give it to you a dog hair.
It was the dog that was in the store when I got it tailored.
You idiot.
unidentified
Maybe keep the dog away from the clothes.
nick fuentes
It was a total freak show, so maybe I gotta get it tailored again.
Anyway, whatever.
You know what?
I don't know.
I think I'm just gonna... Should I just change back in?
Should I just change back in right now?
I don't feel confident.
I don't feel confident in the suit.
if I'm not confident I can't do the show well.
unidentified
I don't know.
nick fuentes
I don't think it's that bad, right?
unidentified
What do you think?
Does it work?
nick fuentes
Is it good for now?
Cringe, change, no.
unidentified
No.
nick fuentes
People are saying no.
It looks bustin'.
Some are saying change.
Change the tie?
Nick, change.
Cancel proof.
Paul says you have to feel confident.
Well, I could, but you gotta gas me up.
If it's good, tell me it's good and I'll feel confident.
Take a break, change a suit, come back energized.
Keep it!
People are saying keep it.
Some are saying, okay, one for keep, two for change.
We have to do a poll.
One for keep, two for change.
One for keep, two for change.
Whatever the poll says, that's what I'll do.
One keep, Two change.
I can't.
There's too much variation with the words.
I can't tell.
One for keep, two change.
Okay, it's very mixed.
A lot of ones though.
I will say it is a lot of ones.
A lot of ones.
You know what?
Okay, the majority has spoken.
unidentified
Now I'm seeing a lot of twos though.
nick fuentes
Now I'm seeing a lot of twos.
Let me look at it really quickly.
It's this stupid-ass knit tie.
That's what it is.
That's what's killing me.
You know what?
Alright.
I'm gonna change it.
I'm gonna change it.
Let me roll out of here.
Let me roll out of here.
Let me roll back with my blue suit on, okay?
I'll be back.
Give me one sec.
You got in my head.
I got in my head.
I got it on my own head.
unidentified
I got it on my own head.
I got it on my own head.
nick fuentes
All right, all right, all right.
Okay, I'm back.
unidentified
Let me dodge all these monster cans on the floor.
Whoops.
nick fuentes
All right, okay.
unidentified
See that?
nick fuentes
Now that's better, right?
That's a bet.
Now that's a winner.
That's a winning combo right there.
I don't care.
It's a winning fit.
It's a winning combo.
Okay.
See, that feels a lot more comfortable.
Alright.
Yeah, see?
Now we're talking.
Isn't that much better?
This isn't even my nice suit.
This is just my Model UN suit.
How's that?
Better?
Okay.
How's the hair?
More importantly.
How's the hair?
Look at that.
Look at that.
unidentified
Boom.
nick fuentes
How's the hair?
unidentified
Good?
What do you think?
nick fuentes
Okay.
Alright.
Okay.
The show can go on.
Alright.
The show can go on.
Let's go.
So let's do it.
Okay.
What do we... Where were we?
Okay.
Okay.
Show.
News.
Follow me on Cozy.
Get a push notification when I go live.
The rest is down below.
Okay.
Hope everybody had a good weekend.
unidentified
Yeah.
nick fuentes
See, it's been a little while.
I'm a little bit out of sorts.
Guess I'm a little out of sorts, because it's been a few days.
Yeah, I hope you enjoyed the long... Well, it wasn't really a long weekend.
I just didn't do a show on Friday.
Well, get this.
I had something planned on Friday.
I was supposed to do something.
And then, basically, it got cancelled.
Because of something outside of my control, which pissed me off.
Which is whatever.
But that happened on Friday.
But I said, you know what?
I already canceled the show.
I'm gonna take the day off.
Took the day off.
Didn't do anything.
Didn't do anything.
Chilled out.
You know, I did a little work, but I didn't do anything spectacular.
Pretty uneventful, boring weekend.
Just been...
It's been hanging out.
Just been hanging out.
But, alright, okay.
You know, whatever.
It's not even... Nothing even interesting happened to me this weekend, so why is it even... You know, I'm even trying to think.
I don't think one interesting thing... I don't even think one event happened this whole weekend.
Sleep schedule is boring.
Sleep schedule is normal and boring.
I'm back on a good sleep schedule.
I feel good.
I feel healthy.
I feel energetic, but I also feel bad.
I also feel plain.
I feel plain Jane and boring.
I feel gray.
I want to be up all night.
I want to be up all night.
I want to be depressed.
I want to feel manic.
I want to feel crazy.
I want to be throwing up and puking everywhere.
I want to be driving late at night, see the sun come up, you know, this stuff.
Go to bed at night, wake up in the morning, self-cringe.
I don't know how you people, I don't know how anybody does it.
But that's all of your lives.
That's all of your boring little lives.
You wake up, You wake up in the morning.
You drink your coffee.
You drive to work.
Oh, I'm going to work.
And you do your little wage job.
And then you drive home.
You go to bed at night.
There's gotta be, there's gotta be, there's gotta be a better way.
There's gotta be something else.
I'm not feeling it, okay?
I'm a creative.
I'm not feeling it.
I'm feeling the lunar, I'm feeling the 3 a.m.
The good news is the days are getting shorter, the nights are getting longer, starting with the equinox, which is in four days.
So, maybe that'll, maybe I can have the best of both worlds.
Keep a good schedule, get more of the night.
Anyway, that was my weekend.
But I'm back now.
Nothing really eventful to talk about.
There was one thing.
Oh yeah.
There was one thing I wanted to talk about.
I put this on my telegram earlier today.
A couple things.
I put this on my telegram earlier today.
So funny.
So today was the Queen's funeral.
Maybe you guys saw that.
And the one thing I'll say about the Queen dying is this 10 days of mourning has been incredible.
You know, they've got the Queen dies and then they enter into an official period of mourning for 10 days and there's ceremonies and the Queen's coffin is laying in Westminster Palace, is it?
Or Westminster Hall?
I don't know.
And the one thing that I will say is the majesty of the whole thing.
You get to see the costumes, and the military, and the fanfare, and the cathedrals, and the palaces, and the flags, and you see a real national character, and a real culture, and a real identity where you could say that is British.
And there's something, we don't see that anymore.
We, particularly Americans, never see that.
And most Europeans, well I don't know, I'm not European, but at least in America we don't see images of Europe like that.
What we're told, like a week before the Queen died, when they announced a new government led by Liz Truss, they were gloating about how it was the first time that the top four positions in government were not held by white men.
And that's who we are.
That's what Britain is.
A week before the Queen died they were gloating and saying that England is different now, Britain is different now, the UK is different now, and what it means to be English?
Well apparently it could be a guy from Ghana, and a guy from Sierra Leone, and some woman from Jamaica, or wherever she was from, the third minister I forget, And that's the constant, I don't know, I'm not saying anything groundbreaking here, but that's obviously the constant drum.
That's the constant propaganda.
Who are we?
Nothing.
Anything and nothing, anything and nothing at all.
No race, no flag, no song, no hero, no holiday, no history.
We're everything and we're nothing.
Right?
And it's extraordinary that they even say that in Europe because in Europe they clearly, or I should say more clearly than in the United States, more explicitly and more clearly and distinctively have a deep identity and culture and history and all those things.
We have that in America, but it's less distinct as it is in Europe for obvious reasons.
And so to see the Queen It's sad that she died, but to then see these national symbols, again, it's the dress, it's the song, it's the architecture, it's the military, it's an expression of nationality, it's an expression of identity, it's an expression of culture, and it's unquestionably, distinctively, European.
It's white.
It's English.
And I'm not even English.
I'm Italian, Irish, and Mexican.
It's not even my culture.
I'm not even trying to own that.
I'm not trying to claim that at all.
What I am saying is it is refreshing to see that appreciation and celebration of identity or even just the expression of identity in a white country for once.
And that's what is so sorely missing.
You look at that and you could say, I would not be, or maybe I'd be less miserable in a country like that.
That is the way that a country should get along.
As opposed to what we have going on here.
Is that not obviously preferable to the melting pot?
Is that not so obviously head and shoulders above this national myth that we tell ourselves about ourselves in America?
Which is that we take the best and brightest workers from everywhere and then we all live in a big stinky city like New York where it smells like dirty garbage everywhere.
Or to see in England they're shooting cannons and they've got the fancy hats and all of that.
It's head and shoulders better.
I wish we had something like that that would unite all of us together.
And we do have that, it's just something that's been suppressed.
And anyway, so now, now, keep that in mind.
That's not even what I want to talk about.
I want to talk about this.
But first we have to understand that premise that I just talked about.
So I'm on Telegram and on one of the popular Telegram channels somebody posted a tweet by some liberal and some liberal took a screenshot of the ceremony today.
And you got the British flags, and you got the military in the ceremonial uniforms, and they're on horses, and it's a beautiful picture.
You don't see pictures like that of white countries in the 21st century anymore.
You see videos of black, naked, homeless people breaking stuff at McDonald's.
You see videos of Fat black people slap fighting each other in airports.
You see videos in Europe of black people landing on the shore on a raft and then just running.
And then they just start running.
And they start running through the streets.
You know, you don't see pictures anymore of high refined civilization and expressions of ancient white identity.
You see all this, you know, Negro nonsense going on.
So some liberal posts a picture of the British ceremony today and he says something to the effect of, wow, looks a lot like 1930s Germany.
I'll pull it up.
I think I can find it real quick.
It's on my channel here.
Yeah.
Does this look a bit Germany-ish?
Circa 1938?
Does this look a bit Germany-ish?
Circa 1938?
You know, Nazis?
You know, that... I love when they like...
Why is it, and I want to kill these, well I don't want to kill anybody, but when I see people on the internet, it's not even what they're saying, it's how they're saying it.
Whatever.
You want to say that Britain is Nazis?
unidentified
Fine.
nick fuentes
I don't really care.
Why can't they just say it, ever?
Do you know what I'm talking about?
Why is it, and it's not even just liberals, it's like, maybe it's a generational thing, it's also like a dispositional thing, If this guy just said, these British people are Nazis, I would say, okay, fine.
Yeah, they are.
We can entertain that, we can debate that.
But why do they always have to bring this snark?
Why does it always have to be this passive-aggressive, did anybody think this looks a little, I don't know, Germany-ish, like around 1938, ring a bell?
You mean, oh, you're comparing it to Hitler?
Oh, you're comparing it to Hitler?
You're in a roundabout way... I don't know.
I see this all the time.
And it's not even always political.
Sometimes it's just about anything.
It's just about other stuff.
People that are snarky like this should receive the fullest death penalty.
That's what I support.
Not even- I don't even care if you're a liberal.
It's not even about what he said.
It's how he said it.
Does this look a bit Germany-ish?
Um, I don't know, around like 1938?
You know what I mean?
Like as if- Oh, you're talking about Hitler.
Oh, yes, yes.
You're talking- Yeah, we all- Okay, got it.
Yeah, we know.
But just say it then.
Just say, yeah, this looks like Hitler.
This looks like Nazis.
Why does it always have to be like, you know, I don't know.
What is that?
What is that tone?
Is that snark?
What do you call that?
Is it sarcasm?
It's not even, it's just, is it passive?
What would you even call that?
I don't even know what to call that precisely, because I want to know what to call it so that we could give that the death penalty.
I want to know what you call that.
I want to define it.
I want to name it.
And then I want to affix A label on the lapel of anyone who does it.
And then I want them to be arrested and imprisoned.
And I want them to live in separate neighborhoods and we throw rocks at them.
Whoever talks like that, whoever, not, and I'm not even making, this is not even like a Jewish dog whistle, I mean people that talk like that are just rats, scum, they belong underground.
Either in graves, or in mines, or at the bottom of the ocean, but they don't belong on the internet typing that stuff.
Just say it!
Just say they look... Because, you know, if I saw stuff like that, I wouldn't do some gay.
I would just be like, this is total white supremacy.
This is awesome.
I wouldn't be out there like, doesn't it look a little, I don't know, freaking awesome?
You know what I mean?
What do you call that?
And it's also trying to sound smart.
It's also trying to say... It's like... It's like when people make allusions to 1984.
Like that's a real deep read.
Like you're a real deep reader if you read a dystopian fiction novel.
You know?
It's like the same... It's the same like... Because when they... When he puts out there... Does this look a little Germany-ish?
unidentified
You know?
nick fuentes
I don't know.
Around 1938?
It's almost like trying to show... Like, oh I know...
Like, I'm a bookworm.
I'm like a historian.
You're calling them Nazis.
You're an idiot, dude.
Dude, you're a Nazi.
Like, you're an idiot.
But if you throw in there, it looks like the little Germany 1938.
You know what I'm saying?
So there's a little, like, that is in there as well.
It's not all of it, but that's a piece of it, too.
I don't know, I hate it.
Anyway, that's besides the point.
That's totally besides the point.
I just hate when people talk like that.
Just be direct.
I'm direct.
People don't like that about me.
I may joke about it, I'm a little ironic, but I'm very direct.
And people don't like that about me sometimes.
Because I'm confrontational.
Like, I get in fights with people about this all the time.
You know, we're playing Sea of Thieves.
I'm barking orders at everybody.
I'm like, hey, what are you doing?
Get the sales right!
I'm not like, you know, get these, um, Veda, do these sales look a little bit funny to you?
I say, hey, asshole, what are you doing?
Fix the sales!
We're playing the pirate video game.
I don't go up to the sales and say, um, attention crew, anybody see anything wrong with these sales?
Like, um, I don't know, they're not pointed the right...
I'm like, hey!
Anyway.
But that's really besides the point.
That's not what I want to focus on.
The big picture, to arrive at my point, to arrive at my main point, to arrive at the important point, I've been saying this for years.
Here is why we need to understand World War II.
Okay?
I'm gonna leave it there.
This is why we need to understand World War II.
This is the salience of why we really need to understand.
When people say that the British flag looks like 1930s Germany, that's the salience of why we really need to peel back the layers and say, yeah, what exactly was going on?
Because everything seems to be compared to it.
This is why we can't have this.
We can't have a proud expression of white heritage in the modern or contemporary period because always it's compared to Hitler.
When Trump runs for president and says, America first!
Make America great again!
Why could we not do that?
It's Islamophobic, xenophobic, racist, sexist, right?
It's Nazi.
Sarah Silverman, Jewish comedian, makes a joke on a late night show.
She says that she had a boyfriend who was conservative and he was putting up an American flag in the front lawn and it made her think of 1930s Germany, okay?
And then you see things like this over and over and over again.
Putin, proud, revanchist, nationalist, Conservative, frankly a normative leader.
If you look at world history and all the nations all across the world over all times, the way Putin behaves is like a normative, normal statesman.
That's what a normal statesman looks like.
Not what we have.
He's compared to Hitler.
Assad, compared to Hitler.
Orban, compared to Hitler.
It's why we can't have it.
Why?
Well, it's not just because, like, Hitler.
What does that mean?
It's particular.
It doesn't just mean authoritarian, although that's part of it.
It means a few things.
When people say, we can't have Trump because he's Hitler-like, we can't have Putin because he's Hitler-like, we can't have British identity because it looks like Hitler, what do they mean?
Well, let's look at the picture.
It's British flags, it's in a white country, it's the military.
Strength, unity, pride, heritage, whiteness, all these things bound up together are synonymous in the minds of most people with the Nazis, with fascism.
If you have a strong government, a unified country, if the country is white, If the leaders are, you could say, something like indignant or unconventional or something like that, it's Hitler.
And the opposite of Hitler, of course, is what?
Not strong, not coherent or unified, not white.
This This idea casts such a long shadow over modern politics.
It always goes back to that.
We can't have a reactionary politics because it's racist and because it's like the Nazis.
And why is racism and why is Nazism?
Why does that cast a long shadow?
Because the Nazis exterminated 6 million Jews in gas chambers.
Why was that so bad compared to other genocides?
Because there were other genocides.
There were other genocides where more people were killed.
There were more massacres in World War II that were arguably more brutal.
When you look at the rape of Nanking, that was pretty bad.
But nobody ever talks about that.
Nobody talks about the Armenian Genocide.
Nobody talks about the fact that people were put into concentration camps around the world.
The Japanese were put into camps in America.
The Germans were put into camps in Europe.
People were put in camps in the Soviet Union.
But it was the Holocaust, that's why.
The Holocaust is what makes the Nazis unique.
And the Nazis, with their historical uniqueness, cast a long shadow across continents, across decades, across a century.
And that's why we can't have strong nationalism or pride or any kind of white identity, because it always goes back to, why can we not have that?
Why is that outside the scope of politics?
Not even something that is considered, you know, against the mainstream or something, but it's considered outside the scope of respectability.
Kill Nazis.
Punch Nazis.
Nazi Zombies.
This kind of thing.
Shoot them up in Inglorious Bastards.
They're the villains in all the movies and the video games.
Why are they so like that?
Because of the uniqueness of the Holocaust, and any political views that are too nationalistic, too identitarian for whites, it's always going to be pushed to, that's evil because it could lead to the Holocaust, it could lead to Hitler, it could lead to Nazis.
That's why they don't want a strong So they can't have an autocrat, they can't have one leader, as opposed to a lame politician, a president, as opposed to an oligarchy.
You cannot have one leader, and that's an important part of it.
We cannot have one leader, we cannot have a strong national identity, we cannot have white pride.
Because all these things, again, Reducible to Hitler.
Hitler committed the Holocaust.
The most unique, worst genocide ever.
And work your way backwards.
That's why we can't have strong leaders, and we can't have these things.
But when you think about it, none of these things are intrinsically bad.
None of these things intrinsically or necessarily need to lead to an historically unique genocide.
It doesn't have...
What about pride in your heritage would lead to that?
What about having a strong leader would lead to that?
What about having a strong national identity would necessarily lead to that?
And that's really the question.
You have to start to think about why might there be other reasons why we can't have those things.
Putin, as an example.
They don't like Putin.
They say that Putin's a thug.
They attack his legitimacy as a ruler.
Even though he's elected, and they technically have a democracy, even though he's elected, and even though maybe you think the elections aren't fair, he's still wildly popular.
And that is just true.
You could think the elections are fake.
If they were real, he would be winning the elections.
He's wildly popular.
He's elected.
He presides over a legitimate government, especially compared to everything that came between the Tsardom, which fell in 1917, and when Putin was elected in 2000.
The federal government of Russia is far more legitimate, far more efficacious than the government After the Soviet Union fell from 1991 until Putin comes to power, as well as the ridiculous pariah state of the Soviet Union, which went on from 1922 until 1991.
But yet they undermine his legitimacy, even though he's popular, even though he's technically democratically elected.
So he has the support of the people, the consent of the government, he's got popular support, technically has the formal legitimacy of the election, he's in a federal government, which is more legitimate than anything in Russia since the Tsar, since a real autocrat, but yet they say he's a gangster.
They say he's a plutocrat, or a kleptocrat.
A government run by stealing.
A government run by thieves and criminals.
He's a thug.
He's a KGB agent.
They say he's a kleptocrat.
They attack his legitimacy.
They compare him to Hitler.
They say he's a dictator.
But what did Putin do?
After the Soviet Union fell in 1991, Russia entered this period of democratization, liberalization, and all the state-owned enterprises, which were the biggest enterprises, that was all the productive capacities of a giant economy across many countries, not just Russia, but Kazakhstan that was all the productive capacities of a giant economy across many countries, not just Russia, but Kazakhstan and They were all sold off to rich corporations.
And organized crime ran rampant in Russia.
People were getting, politicians were getting assassinated all the time in St. Petersburg, literally getting gunned down in the streets.
The president was an alcoholic.
It was madness.
And what did Putin do?
He came to power, he brought the oligarchs under the control of the government, and yeah, he's a strongman leader.
He is popular and he is elected, but he's probably, you could say, a dictator.
But there's order, the government is efficacious, poverty has gone down, unemployment has gone down, GDP has gone up, HDI has gone up, human development's gone up, organized crime is under control, Terrorism is under control?
Russia is once again a world power?
All of this because of Putin.
Now, could you imagine a reason?
Again, one of the reasons, one of the things that we can't have because of Hitler is autocracy, is strongman leadership.
One man with lots of popular support overpowering the other institutions like a legislature, the courts, or bureaucracy.
The reason we can't have that is because Hitler.
Or is there another reason why we can't have that?
They call Putin Hitler.
Hitler has all those characteristics.
Or Putin has all those characteristics.
But it looks like that worked out for Russia.
The same is true in other countries like Syria.
The same is true in countries like China, or Turkey, or Brazil.
Where you've got a strong man leader that fights through and pierces through corruption.
And this is not true in all these cases.
Maybe there's another reason why certain entities don't want us to have a beloved popular leader.
As opposed to these other systems.
Other than that, it could potentially lead to people getting tricked into going into a shower, but it turns out it's a gas chamber.
You know what I'm saying?
And the same goes for the other.
Is the only reason why we can't have pride in our country because then people might get carried away and say, we should exterminate people who don't look like us?
Or is it for some other reason?
And same thing with national pride.
Is there a reason?
Is there maybe another reason why we can't say America first?
Other than that, it has a racist history and it could lead to the Holocaust.
Or is there some other reason that people might not want us to say, America first, our nation first, the benefit of our people first, as opposed to other countries, or companies, or billionaires, or the market, or the stock market, or something?
It all goes back to that.
You look at Britain, and again, Put together what I've said so far, we haven't even gotten into the news, but put together what I've said so far, you look at a picture of the Queen's funeral, and it's the dying gasp, and it's a reminder Of what Western European civilization used to be like, and it's refreshing compared to the filth we have now.
The vulgarity and the crassness and how low standards have gotten.
The illiteracy, the carelessness, the irresponsibility, the apathy.
When you see people, when you see soldiers in their state uniforms, on their horses, with the flags, In the town square with the people mourning on the streets and the palace behind them.
It's all positive.
That's beautiful.
That's what human society should look like.
That's what large scale human organization should look like.
Families and communities and nations or kingdoms or something.
But things that people can take pride in.
People can take pride in beautiful ceremonies that punctuate the passing of the generations and the passing of kings and queens and ages and eons and things like that.
It's all very human.
It's all, we all see that and we intuitively recognize it's good.
It's desirable.
We all have an intuitive appetite for that when we see it.
And you've got, and tellingly, liberals will look at it and say, that looks like Nazis.
And Nazis are the, that is, in terms of our, or the mainstream, in terms of the moral paradigm of our regime, it's the worst thing it could be.
I look at that and I feel the aesthetic emotion.
We understand there's something that we can say represents high civilization when we see this picture, but to them, represents the worst evil.
They think Nazis are worse than killers and rapists.
Literally.
Killers and rapists are on TV.
Literally!
People that kill and rape are celebrities!
People that have killed, like O.J.
Simpson.
Do people think that O.J.
Simpson is worse than Nazis?
Is O.J.
Simpson treated worse than Nazis?
He's a killer!
But he's treated better than... So they literally think that being a Nazi is worse than being a murderer.
Worse than literally killing somebody in cold blood.
They think being a Nazi is being worse than committing an abortion, killing a baby.
They think that being a Nazi is worse than being a rapist or a pervert.
Although it's close, but you've got rapists that are celebrated.
Bill Clinton is a rapist and nobody cares.
Nobody cares.
Some people do, but most people don't even care.
Even if people were willing to accept that Bill Clinton is a rapist, do you think they would treat him worse than they treat Nazis?
Or other people that have had legitimate rape allegations?
Of course not.
So, Baby murderers, regular murderers, rapists.
It's just to demonstrate something's going on here.
Something really curious is going on.
We've got a society, and we all know this and we've just deduced it, That considers Nazis as the worst evil, the worst thing, and because it's the furthest extreme, it defines the paradigm.
The paradigm is defined by the two poles.
What's the highest good?
What's the worst evil?
That defines the moral landscape.
It defines the values between them.
If Hitler and the Nazis are the worst evil, then what else is evil?
Racism.
And what else could then be considered as leading to evil, or an occasion for evil?
Maybe like a racial consciousness, or like a white racial consciousness might be an occasion to the evil of racism, which can only be perpetrated by white people, and which could then lead to hate speech, which could lead to incitement, which could lead to genocide.
unidentified
Again, Something's going on here.
nick fuentes
We look at this picture and see something that we want to recover for our civilization, probably the pinnacle of what a civilization should look like, and they see it as the evil which defines their morality.
That's why this kind of stuff about, you know, oh, Democrats are the real Nazis, it doesn't work.
Nazi's not part of my paradigm.
It isn't.
Now, murder is, but murder is a part of my paradigm insofar as it's against the Ten Commandments.
Not because Hitler murdered people.
unidentified
In other words, don't murder people.
nick fuentes
Not, don't have pride in your race.
Not, don't have national pride.
Not, don't have a popular leader that is accountable to the people, that is running the country formally, And actually, in name and in effect.
Those things are not evil in my paradigm.
Now, if that leader started killing people, then yeah, that would be evil.
So, those are just some thoughts on that.
It really tells you a lot, doesn't it?
When the country is, to our sensibility, even if you're not a philosopher, even if you're not, even if you can't really put it into words, we all have a conscience.
And what we see, we know in our heart of hearts is wrong.
It offends us.
It offends our sensibilities to see perversion and to see filth and vulgarity and people wearing sweatpants to the store.
We know it's wrong.
Schools.
Not giving children discipline or not giving children A's and B's, as I said, counting participation.
We know it's wrong.
We know it's wrong to give participation trophies.
We know it's wrong to run from the cops.
We know it's wrong to do all these kinds of things.
Society is getting worse, but we're being told that it's becoming better, that it's becoming more... we're progressing and that it's becoming more moral or something.
And then on the flip side, we look back to our ancient past and see something that's good and long for it and we're told, that was heinous evil.
Or covering up heinous evil.
And until people understand that or really internalize that, And overcome this moral imperialism imposed on us?
We're never going to have what we want.
I don't want to have what we have now in any way, shape, or form.
I don't want to have a moderated form of it.
I don't want to have an ameliorated form of it.
I don't want to have a form of it, but with like 10% less.
I want what we had, which was totally different.
So anyway, so that's that.
Just some thoughts on that post, but not a huge story.
But anyway.
Okay, so how long have I even been live right now?
I've been live for a full hour.
We haven't even gotten to the news.
Okay, let's get into the news.
You know what?
I am going to skip the... Forgive me.
I am gonna have to skip the first story because Hey listen, I have a lot to say about it, and you know, I want to get to all of it, but I also have a lot to say about the second story.
So if I do, if I say everything that I need to say, we'll be here for another hour before we even get into the Super Chats.
So I'm gonna save the first story for tomorrow, it's gonna move that one, it's gonna push that one up, and we're just gonna do the second story.
I know, I know.
I wasn't even planning on talking about the Britain thing, but I just got carried away.
Because there's... Because people really need to think about this.
Why?
People need to ask, why are liberals saying that the Queen's funeral looks like Hitler?
They're right in a way.
unidentified
They are right in a way, aren't they?
nick fuentes
They're not saying that for no reason.
They're not saying that because they're crazy or because they're blind.
Because they can't see the picture.
And so they can't identify that there are no similarities.
There are similarities.
What are the similarities?
Why does it look like Hitler?
Flags?
Flags?
Military?
Uniforms?
Okay, so there are similarities.
What's wrong with those?
Oh, well they say because those things, with their association with Hitler, could lead to the genocide of the Jews.
Well wait, why that?
Don't other things lead to genocides?
Like, you know, communism, and Islam, and all kinds of things.
All kinds of things lead to genocides.
But why is it just this thing?
Why is it just Hitler's name that we know?
We don't know Mao's name.
We don't know Stalin's name.
We don't know the other names of all the other horrible things that went on.
Why just that one?
And then it's very particular.
It's very particular about white people and it's also very particular about Jewish people.
And it's very particular about these countries.
It's very particular about New York and America.
And it's very particular about Western Europe and St.
Petersburg.
And it's all very particular.
We like to think it's very general and it's very universal, but it's actually very particular.
Why can't the white people have their country?
Why can't the white people have their leader?
Because the last time the white people had a country, the last time the white people had their leader, they went crazy and killed all these Jewish people.
Right.
So we can't have white countries.
That's why we gotta have immigrant countries because immigrants make the Jewish people feel more comfortable.
Right.
Well, why is that?
Well, we could spend a lot of time on that But that's why it's essential to understand World War II.
It's essential.
If World War II casts such a long shadow over our politics, if that, if this antiquated and anachronistic term, Nazi, slain for National Socialists, if that term is still in use today to define the ultimate political evil, we better understand it.
We better understand why it has that position.
You know, why is it on that end of the spectrum?
Why is it charged?
Why is it relevant in America in this century?
Why?
Because of that thing that happened then?
Well, you know, then we gotta know what we're talking about.
We kinda gotta know what we're talking about.
We gotta know what's going on here!
And once you start to think in these ways, it changes your whole...
That's called taking the red pill.
It's realizing that you don't know what you don't know.
unidentified
You don't know what you don't know.
nick fuentes
And the things that you think you know, the things that you really think you know, think about what you know and unknow it.
Because it was probably a lie.
Why are they comparing the Queen's funeral to Hitler?
Well, they're right.
They're right.
And what does that tell you?
Now I'm not saying that means we're pro-Hitler.
I'm not saying that.
But I am saying that we are pro-nation.
We want a nation.
We want an American nation.
I want an American palace.
I want an American ceremonial military dress.
I want American soldiers on horses.
And trumpets, and cannons, and people lining the streets, and a public square, and I want there to be fanfare when the president or the king dies or whatever.
I want nationality.
They think it's evil.
They're wrong.
Nationality is a good thing.
You know what's evil?
Killing Tsar Nicholas II.
That's evil.
You know what's evil?
Communism.
You know what's evil?
Looting Russia in the 1990s.
You know what's good?
Putin getting in there and breaking the backs of the oligarchs and forming a legitimate government and for 20 years, for 22 years now, being the What do they call those people that help a pregnant woman?
You know, what do they call that when they help the baby be born?
Putin is doing that for a real Russia, rebuilding after really like 150 years of chaos.
150 years of chaos so So you got a totally you got a flip you got a flip your whole mentality Alright, alright.
Enough about that.
I don't want to ramble too much.
But that's all very important stuff.
Okay, midwife.
He's a midwife for the country.
Alright, alright.
But let's move on.
Let's get on into the news.
We want a... and nobody understands this.
Who else is saying this?
Who else is saying this?
People will say this, but they're not really saying this, okay?
They're not really saying this.
Our country, we cannot have a Queen's funeral and the English can barely have a Queen's funeral because these people don't feel comfortable.
That's what it's about.
Bret Stephens of the Jerusalem Post, and now the conservative columnist of the New York Times, said in a debate with a rabbi about whether or not Donald Trump was good for the Jews, whatever that means, that's a really... think about that one for a sec.
He said in that debate with a rabbi arguing against, in the negative, He said that Trump has been hostile to those, quote, liberal international principles that have been so good to us as Jews.
Just saying. - I'm.
Pogroms in Russia.
Ghettos in Poland.
Holocaust in Germany.
Inquisitions in Spain.
Expulsions elsewhere.
And they come to America and they say, uh, yeah, you know, time for a change.
And they say, we can't let that happen, you know, so it's sort of like, you know, there's like... HELLO!
THERE'S A WHOLE HISTORY HERE!
THERE'S A WHOLE HISTORY HERE!
People don't.
You need to understand the big picture here.
This is the big picture.
This is big picture stuff we're talking about here.
We need to have a country.
And we can have a country that's hospitable to ethnic and religious minorities, but we need a country.
There are other countries that are hospitable.
Iran is hospitable to its ethnic and religious minorities, the Armenians.
We can have a strong country with a national identity and a national religion and we can have a popular patriotic leader and a patriotic government and still have dignity and respect and equality.
For ethnic, racial, religious minorities, we can.
But what we cannot do is destroy a real country, destroy a real country, and destroy a real nation out of fear that minority groups are going to be marginalized.
We can't do that.
That's so wrong.
But that seems to be what is going on here.
Is that the people that are in power are a paranoid group, they're a paranoid alien group, extremely self-conscious of their alienation, and they want to resolve this by making our country an alien nation.
That's what they want to do.
The alien will feel more comfortable in a country where everyone's an alien, where it's not a motherland for anybody.
The alien is afraid that the natives will get together and identify the alien and recognize them and do bad things to them.
So the alien in these positions of power just sort of, maybe sometimes consciously, maybe sometimes less than consciously, but conscientiously nevertheless says, well it would be good if there were more aliens here.
I would feel safer.
It would be better.
Sort of like what goes on.
And what's the argument for that?
Well, when these people, when these people in their country get too powerful and they get too amped up, well horrible things start to happen.
They start doing things like that have never been done before.
Really?
That's why there are Islamo-Nazis in the Middle East?
That's why there are Nazis over here?
unidentified
It's what it is.
nick fuentes
Anyway, all right.
All right, but let's move on and this is stuff.
They'll like the you know Boomers are not ready for that.
Okay.
Well, let's move on.
I want to get into the illegal immigration.
This is funny stuff You got all that And by the way, and I do I do mean that we want a country that is hospitable to all and people can be integrated and and You know, a great country, a large country, a large country in terms of population and territory is not always going to be homogeneous.
Never really has been, in a sense.
That doesn't mean it's not a nation, but it just means that it... Look at all these other countries that we could say are still identifiable and distinguishable.
They're not necessarily 100% homogeneous.
We can integrate non-traditional, non-normative communities.
We can do that and we can provide welcoming.
Tolerance is a fine thing to some extent.
But again, what we cannot do is disintegrate the whole.
unidentified
That's what we can't do.
nick fuentes
Can't unravel the whole.
Alright, if that makes sense.
But we're going to move on.
Now I'm rambling.
We're going to move on.
I want to get on to our featured story.
Let's get to the news.
Because otherwise we're just not going to have time for anything.
Our featured story is about this Martha's Vineyard busing situation.
And like I said at the top of the show, I didn't want to cover this.
Because it's so similar to the Greg Abbott's story.
We covered this back in August.
If you haven't been following it, the Texas Republican governor, Greg Abbott, instead of solving the border crisis, worst border crisis in American history, instead of executing his constitutional authority to close the border as the governor of the state, which he has a jurisdiction to do,
He's instead doing this political gimmick where he's using taxpayer money to rent out these Greyhound buses and rounding up a couple hundred illegals and sending them to Democrat cities like DC, New York, and Chicago.
And I criticized that.
I said, I don't think this is good policy.
It's not good politics.
He's not shipping a meaningful amount of immigrants out of the country, or rather out of Texas.
If anything, all he's doing is just moving illegals further into the interior.
You move illegals from the border to Chicago, and they're never leaving.
And in fact, they're gonna leave Chicago and go to Wisconsin, and they're gonna have kids.
And them and their kids are then gonna vote for Democrats.
So, if anything, it's hurting.
Greg Abbott putting them on buses, he's just helping them get to swing states.
That's how I see it.
And the other thing is, these blue cities, it is causing problems for them, but they don't care.
They are sanctuary cities.
If they cared about the problems caused by refugees or illegals, they would not be sanctuary cities.
So what's the big...
What's the idea there?
Me, a Republican governor, I'm gonna send these illegals to your Democrat cities, and the Democrats, they're sanctuary cities!
They do it all the time!
You think that's the first greyhound bus full of illegals that got to Union Station in Chicago?
You're dreaming.
That probably happens all the time.
And you know what they did?
Lori Lightfoot, or I think it was J.B.
Pritzker, put those illegals up at a hotel in the suburbs, in the white suburbs.
So what was really achieved there?
Nothing.
They took them in and if anything it just makes the Republicans look like jerks.
Close the border.
That would be way better.
It's not putting pressure on the government at all.
It's not doing what they... it's not an optical win really.
It doesn't achieve anything.
It's not going to change the Biden immigration policy, and it's not going to alleviate the immigration crisis in Texas, so it's not doing anything.
Now, that was my take on that.
And I saw this news story where Ron DeSantis did something similar.
He packed up a bus full of migrants and shipped them to Martha's Vineyard, which is a vacation island off the coast of Massachusetts.
It's Super wealthy.
Obama has a house there.
Other famous, powerful people have houses there.
This is one of those zip codes where it's the elite of the elite.
You know, this is like... I don't even know!
I don't even know they're the richest places, but this is a very elite place.
And it's an island, which is important.
So I initially saw that and I said, oh yeah, big whip.
DeSantis is just stealing Greg Abbott's bit, shipping illegals from Florida to another state.
So what?
They're gonna go move to New Hampshire.
But I was thinking about it more and more and I actually think it's perfect.
And this is the story.
I'll just read this to you so you are up to speed here.
This is from CNN.
It says, quote,
Located off the coast of Massachusetts and long known as a posh summer destination for wealthy vacationers, Martha's Vineyard provided an unusual place for the migrants to be sent.
US Attorney for Massachusetts Rachel Rollins told reporters on Thursday that she will be speaking with members of the DOJ about DeSantis sending the migrants, saying she did not yet have enough information to say whether he broke any laws.
An estimated 50 migrants arrived on Martha's Vineyard Wednesday on two planes.
I guess there are planes, not buses.
Two planes arrived just after 3 p.m.
Eastern Time and white vans took the migrants to Martha's Vineyard Community Services.
James Haggerty, the Edgartown town administrator, told CNN that officials believed all the migrants are from Venezuela and a local fire chief said earlier in the day that the migrants include seven families with four children ranging from three to eight years old.
He said, quote, there was no advance notice to anyone in Martha's Vineyard or Massachusetts that these migrants were arriving to my knowledge.
Yeah, imagine that.
Now, the reason that this works perfectly is because it is, number one, I guess first and foremost, it's more specific.
unidentified
And this just is logistical.
nick fuentes
Lori Lightfoot doesn't live in Chicago.
She lives in a neighborhood.
but she doesn't really live in Chicago.
I believe she lives in Hyde Park.
She lives in a neighborhood.
Because what is Chicago?
Chicago's a very big city.
So what does that mean?
Lives downtown, lives on the south side, the west side, the north side.
It's all very diverse.
So Greg Abbott's sending a bus full of illegals from a red state to a blue city.
What does this really mean?
We don't really have red states and blue states.
We don't really have that.
That's not meaningfully how people are organized.
We've really got almost all blue cities and then red interior is what we have.
That's more like it.
And it's really less about Republican and Democrat.
It's really about rural and urban.
Seems to be the more meaningful divide.
And also, we don't live in cities, we live in neighborhoods in cities.
People don't just live in the city, they live in a neighborhood.
There's not just- because the cities are segregated.
The cities are segregated by class and are segregated by race.
And so when Greg Abbott sends these people to the liberal city, it betrays the inadequacy of party affiliation, lame party affiliation, as the way that we're thinking about the country.
Republicans and Democrats.
unidentified
We took these illegals from a Republican state and sent them to a Democrat state.
nick fuentes
Okay, so what?
The Democrat states are that way because they have all these immigrants in the first place.
So, you know, that doesn't inconvenience anybody.
There's already illegals all throughout Chicago.
There's already homeless people all throughout Chicago.
You think sending a few more illegals really changes anything?
And you think that even if that puts stress on the institutions that that would matter?
There's no cops in this city!
There's like a thousand cops resigned this year and 50 cops got brought on the force.
You think that putting strain on the government is like a different... like that's not a regular day in Chicago?
Self-inflicted problems are causing strain on government resources.
That is what defines politically the city and this entire state.
So you think putting a little bit more strain on the government by making liberals live up to their values?
That's called the day in the life!
They do that all the time.
And, okay, well the illegals are in Chicago so they're gonna inconvenience the people.
Once again, Do you think that inconveniencing the people with a little bit more diversity?
People are already inconvenienced by diversity all the time.
People are getting carjacked in the middle of downtown.
They're getting shot on Lakeshore Drive for no reason at all.
They're getting executed in Lincoln Park after they give some 16-year-old black kid their phone and the password to their phone.
Executed after they give them what they want.
And they still, in Iowa, or was it in California?
In Iowa, Mollie Tibbetts A young girl was decapitated by an illegal immigrant, chopped up in pieces and thrown in the garbage, and her dad, her dad of the victim, said that he forgives the killer, and he loves Mexicans, and as far as he's concerned, they're like whites with better food.
Okay, so consider that an illegal can kill a white liberal's freaking daughter, and he'll still be a faggot liberal.
But you think that the whole state could be impoverished, and the whole city could be run into the ground, and you think that adding a little bit more strain on the government, forcing them to live up to their principles, or making them out to be hypocrites, it just doesn't work.
Because they will dutifully fall on that sword and say, we'll take care of these illegals.
Just like they've been taking care of everybody for a billion years.
So it just doesn't work.
It's not about Texas and Chicago.
This is why the Martha's Vineyard one works.
Because this is their neighborhood.
This is their neck of the woods and it's an island.
They go on vacation there and it's only them there.
There's no black people in Martha's Vineyard or, well, the Obamas, right?
There's no gangbangers.
None of that riffraff is coming over to Martha's Vineyard.
I doubt they'd even let them drive over the bridge or take the ferry.
You have to take a ferry to get there.
There are not even roads!
Do you want to know why there's no roads to Martha's Vineyard?
Now, I don't know.
Maybe it's because it's too far off the coast.
I don't know the real reason.
But it's probably so that poor brown people can't drive there.
That's probably a big reason.
Just like a lot of private communities are deliberately made inaccessible by homeowners association fees, by high taxes, by arduous transportation and indirect segregation municipal policy.
DeSantis put them in their neighborhood, which is a little bit different, and said, you know, you like these illegals so much, okay, you can live with them.
Not, not we're sending them to the Democrat city.
Not, not we're gonna send them so they're the problem of the Democrat government.
No, we're gonna put them where you live.
Cuz it's the people, cuz the people that run the country are people.
They have homes, they have neighborhoods.
That's what it's really about.
It's not about Republicans and Democrats or red states and blue states.
It's about people.
And it's about the people that have no power and it's about the people that have power.
Some people make no decisions about what happens in the country.
There are about 10,000 of the people in the country that really affect decisions that impact everybody.
I'll say that again.
Most people in this country make no decisions.
They have no decision-making power about what goes on in America.
Very little.
And there are about, you know, 1 to 10,000 people that have a lot of influence.
Or they are the decision makers themselves about how it's going to be for everybody in the country.
That's just a fact.
Now maybe it's not one person pulling the lever, although sometimes it is, but it's people that are paying for the politicians, it's people that are writing the bills, it's high-powered lawyers, it's high-powered executives.
And so there are... so these are people.
It's not about Republicans and Democrats.
There's people that are not making decisions.
There are people that are making decisions.
People that are making the decisions, who are they?
Well, they're rich, they're politically connected, they're liberal, and they live in particular neighborhoods with the other rich people.
They're rich and they afford to go live on an island.
or in a wealthy zip code or something and they get to avoid the riffraff because they've got a front desk in their condo building with intense security and they've got a chauffeur and so when they need to go out into the public away from the private enclave away from the bubble they get in a car with tinted windows and a driver and they drive through it and they're sort of ferried around
They're escorted around by security and there's this bifurcated world where you've got the public, you've got the open world which we have to live in when we drive to work and we drive to school and we walk in the city and we take our kids to the park and send our kids to a school.
And then there's the private world inside the limousine driving through the neighborhood, inside the gated community, inside the residential condo complex, inside Paid for, of course, by money.
Paid for, of course, by money.
Security, tax, homeowner's association, property value, right?
Company car, that kind of thing.
And again, the reason why the Martha's Vineyard one was more successful is because that highlights the more salient division in the country, which is not between red states and blue cities or between Republicans and Democrats.
But between the people that make the decisions and the people that don't.
You put these people in Chicago and yeah, okay.
Do you think Lori Lightfoot lives near Union Station?
She doesn't live near Union Station where these people were dropped off.
She lives, again, I think in Hyde Park.
J.B.
Pritzker doesn't live there either.
Neither do any of the rich people.
They don't live by Union Station.
The billionaires don't even live in Chicago.
The billionaires live in New York and LA.
And so you send them to New York.
Do you think that the illegals are getting out and billionaires row?
Do you think the billionaires are going to be affected by that?
They're not.
But if you put them in Martha's Vineyard, that's where they are.
You put them in their bubble.
You put the illegals in their world.
You put them in their sphere.
That's why it was successful.
That's at the basic operational level.
Here's the other reason why it works, and this is beautiful.
They had to get them out.
They had to remove them.
And it forced this...and I hate to say this because liberal hypocrisy or whatever, but it is really good.
You put these illegals in Martha's Vineyard and of course they're not going to keep them there.
And they're not going to keep them there because rich people don't want to live with peasants.
It's just that simple.
They don't want to live with smelly people from Venezuela.
And I don't mean that Venezuelans are smelly, but look, you walk across a desert a thousand miles without a shower, you're going to smell bad.
They can take a shower and smell good, but You know, they went from Venezuela and now they're in Martha's Vineyard.
They had to get there.
So they don't want to live with all these people.
They don't want to live with these people who don't speak English.
They don't want to see these people in the grocery store.
They don't want to see these people on the beach.
They paid a lot of money to be on this island away from the scrum.
They paid a lot of money to be in Elysium.
They paid a lot of money to be floating above the Earth.
Floating away from all of us.
They had to get them out for that reason.
And the best is, they've got to justify it.
So all these articles come out, and the articles say, Well, we weren't prepared for these illegals!
Nobody told us they were coming!
Oh, really?
Kind of like what's happening to, like, America.
Did anybody tell America that 200,000 people are gonna cross in the month of August?
And then they say, well we don't have the resources to take care of them.
We were not equipped to deal with this.
Yeah, that's kind of like America.
Sort of like how America's not equipped to assimilate 30 million people in 30 years.
Quite similar, isn't it?
And they can come up with every excuse, pretty rich, but at the end of the day, at the end of two days, they pack them up in a bus and send them home.
And there is an article in CNN, and the headline is this.
You can't even find it.
I could not find the sentence that says the illegals were packed up and sent home.
They don't even report that anywhere.
Try and find it.
There's not one article that reports that the illegals were packed up and deported and shipped out.
But they are saying it this way.
way there's a headline in cnn and this is the article it says quote they enriched us the migrants 44 hour visit leaves indelible mark on martha's vineyard that's their that's their way of saying that they got their asses kicked out in less than two days they enriched us Migrants' 44-hour visit leaves indelible mark.
It's beyond parody.
It's beyond parody.
Their visit.
Their 44-hour visit.
They were only here for a short time before we kicked their brown asses out.
But they left a mark.
We'll never forget the 36 hours they were here before we shipped them back to Boston.
Before we shipped them back to Florida.
They're literally sending them back to Florida.
Oh, well.
It was fun.
It was nice.
We hung out with them for like a day.
Okay, now get these N-words out.
Get these Negroes out of here.
unidentified
Get these peasants out.
But they left such an indelible mark.
nick fuentes
Okay, bye now.
unidentified
Bye.
nick fuentes
Okay.
Bye.
Get the fuck out.
I mean... Now, again.
I'm not one for this, hey liberals are so hypocritical, but this is really good because it demonstrates And again, we're gonna need to get more serious than, hey, we made them hypocrites.
We need to get them out.
But it is good political theater.
It is good politics.
One, because it refocuses the conversation on immigration.
Everybody's now talking about immigration, and immigration is our issue.
Okay, so that's a winner right out of the gate for that reason.
Also, though, For anybody that is paying attention, this kind of political theater is valuable.
It is a bad look for them to deport them, because it tells everybody what we already know, which is nobody wants to live with these illegals.
These rich people that are inflicting immigration on us.
They're inflicting it.
That's what they're doing.
They're not saying we want, they're saying you're gonna have immigration.
We want you to have immigration.
They're not having the immigration.
Nobody's immigrating to Martha's Vineyard.
Nobody's immigrating to the wealthy zip codes in New York or DC or San Francisco or LA.
They want it for us.
They want them for us.
And so when they're faced with, oh, well, do you want to live with the illegals and get this strength that comes from diversity and get the culture, the culture?
Look, there's a There's a big parade.
There's some big Mexican thing going on.
That's culture.
Well, they don't want it in their vacation place.
They don't want to live next to it.
They don't want to live next to these stories that they read about in these tortured novels that you get in Barnes & Noble about Mexicans in LA or Chicago or whatever.
Urban literature.
No, of course they don't want to live near that.
They want to read about it while they're over here.
And I know it's very tri-liberal hypocrisy and so on, but it brings to light something that's even more interesting which is that it's not about Republicans and Democrats, it's about classes.
It's about classes and it's about, insofar as the races are different, Class and race are very similar things.
Now what do I mean by that?
We're told that it's like the Democrats want immigration and the Republicans don't.
And you've got Republicans and you've got Democrats.
Well really it's a little bit, it's not really quite like that because there's a lot of Republicans that want immigration.
A lot of rich Republican big agriculture, they want immigration.
And that's very different from the people that don't.
When Donald Trump got out there and said, no more immigration, he was condemned by all the Republican leadership that love immigration.
But the base, the voters, loved it.
So there's this divide within the party.
The party hated Trump for taking a hard line on immigration.
He was the only one that did.
Everybody else said, we want a pathway to citizenship and all this kind of stuff.
Gang of eight.
But Trump said no immigration.
Get these rapists out of here!
All the people loved him.
All the Republican people loved him when Trump got up there and said, Get these drug dealing fucking rapists out of our country and then build a wall so they can't come back!
And all the hillbillies were like, Hell yeah man!
Get them out of here!
And I mean that affectionately.
But it was all these other Republicans, and the think tanks, and in D.C., and big agriculture, and the donors that said, oh, oh no, you can't say that.
That's impolite.
That's quite rude.
Very different.
And it brings to light that it's not about Republicans and Democrats.
It's not about Texas being a red state.
If they hated immigration so much, they would stop it.
And it's not about Chicago being a blue city.
The story of America is about the upper class, the middle class, and the lower class.
But it's not just a class story, which I'll get into.
Martha's Vineyard is the upper class.
The illegals are the lower class.
The rest of us are the middle class.
And you've got these three classes in America where you've got, you could say, the elite who are rich and connected and decision makers.
You've got the middle who are citizens, law-abiding, work, pay taxes.
Then you've got lower class, the lower classes, which is not just illegal immigrants or immigrants, but the lower classes are, I would say it's economic, but it's also cultural.
It's like, you know, black people are lower class not just because they're poor, but because they engage in like poor people behavior.
Like they take government assistance.
People in the middle don't want to be on government assistance.
People in the middle want to get off government assistance and then work.
And they want to...
Have their children have a higher quality of life than they did, you know, by working and by getting educated and getting a better job and working.
Lower class people, it's not just that they're poor, it's like poverty is a lifestyle.
They don't want it.
Getting welfare is a lifestyle.
That's what you do.
It's lower class.
And they're sort of these alienated people.
What's another lower class behavior?
Immigrants, they'll have many families living in a single-family residence.
Middle-class people don't want to do that.
Middle-class people, I mean, they could do that, but they don't do that.
They don't want to do that.
They don't want to have ten families in one domicile.
They don't want to be cheating welfare.
They don't want to be on welfare.
They're not sending remittances to their home country.
They're not engaging in these things.
So there's these three distinctive groups and they're all really in three distinctive worlds where you've got the lower classes living in these increasingly public places where it's public housing, ghettos, public schools, taking advantage of public services, public transportation.
They're really comprising like the outer world, the public.
Middle class is running away from it.
Middle class is running away from it, going to the suburbs, trying to find these nice neighborhoods with the good schools, or going to Florida, or going to the rural Idaho, or the mountains, or rural areas, or wherever, where they can have safety, and where they can have good cost of living, and good schools, and so on.
They've got the rich people, which are just insulated from all of it, and they're living in the wealthiest zip codes.
Maybe they've got homes in multiple places, take vacations out of country, or not where they live.
And all three of them are living totally different lifestyles.
Of course, like I said, the underclass are relying on low-wage work, taking welfare.
Again, lots of families living in a single residence.
Crime is often a part of it.
If it's not black criminals, it's these foreigners that are sending remittances and they come here and go back.
People in the middle We're trying to make a living working to sponsor their kids to go to school and then graduate to the upper class generationally.
But it's about home ownership, education for the children, educating themselves, saving money, retirement.
Those are goals, lifestyle of the middle class.
And then you've got the upper class where, again, totally insulated.
Generational wealth, trust funds, want for nothing, don't really need to work, connected, get in a school based on legacy, get jobs based on legacy, that kind of thing.
And the story of America is this.
It's not about Republicans and Democrats, not about right and left.
It's about the elite teaming up with the lower classes against the middle.
It's the elite working together.
They're in cahoots.
They conspire with the lower classes for their mutual benefit at the expense of the middle and sabotaging the middle and therefore sabotaging any dignified good quality of life.
For anybody that isn't already rich.
That's what it's about.
Now how does this work?
Take an issue like immigration as an example.
The people in Martha's Vineyard are sponsoring the illegals to come to your neighborhood.
The top is working with the bottom to screw over the middle for their mutual benefit.
The elites own the firms.
The firms employ the people.
When the illegal immigrants come here, they cut the labor cost for the firm.
It increases the profits.
Profits for who?
The firm owners.
So the people that own the capital, the people that own the businesses, the people that are the investors, the people that are profit takers, not wage earners, they benefit from cheaper labor costs.
Think about it.
When you look at the two trillion dollar economic benefit which accrues to America from immigration, it accrues to two groups of people.
The people that own the firms and the immigrant workers.
And they extract value.
That value comes out of, at least a lot of it, comes out of the native worker.
The elite bring in the illegals to cut their labor cost, and that means that they can make a lot more money.
Or, you know, the politicians bring in the illegals so they can get more votes, which is another form of currency.
Point is, Whether it's corporations bringing in immigrants as workers, or politicians bringing in immigrants as voters, they're deriving a benefit from the immigration that is exclusive to them.
People don't benefit from votes.
People don't benefit from low wage costs.
Politicians benefit from votes.
Firm owners, capitalists, benefit from lower labor costs and higher profit.
Now the illegal immigrant gets a benefit too because they get from wherever they came from.
They get to come out of the scrum of India or Nicaragua or wherever and they get to go work in a farm or they get to go work in the tech field or something like that and so they're in cahoots.
The elite gets the benefit, the illegal or legal immigrant gets the benefit and they make it worse for everybody in between.
For The middle Americans that are paying for their kids to go to college so their kids can study computer engineering or any other engineering, they work their fingers to the bone to save a college fund or they take out loans that the parents and the students will be paying off their whole life.
They're doing that so their kids can go into a saturated marketplace that is filled up with Indian programmers, that is filled up with H-1B workers from Asia.
They're getting screwed over.
They're getting either competitively low wages because there's a glut of skilled workers, there's more competition which lowers their compensation, or they're just not even getting a job at all.
They're also competing for those university spots.
Very, very wealthy foreigners are paying for foreign students to go at these universities.
Who's paying the $55,000 tuition at Boston University?
Chinese oligarchs.
Regular Americans can't afford that, and a lot of regular Americans don't get scholarships.
So they're taking the spots in the university, then they're taking the jobs.
And then how about the high school graduates?
Maybe college isn't in the picture, but you just want a good, decent living to support your family.
Support home ownership and a wife and kids on a single income with a college degree.
Can't do that because the unskilled jobs and the unskilled compensation has also been competed away by illegal immigrants, by low-skilled workers.
Illegal immigrants pour in, take the agriculture jobs, take all the other jobs, all the other jobs that may have supported high school graduates are now being taken up by other people.
Again, It's the upper class and lower class conspiring together for their mutual benefit at the expense of the middle.
Same thing with crime.
Same thing with crime.
The upper class, and they don't even really get a benefit from this, I guess.
I would have to think about it.
But the upper class is, we need to let all these black people out of jail.
It's so... We need to get them out of jail.
This is so terrible.
It's so racist that we have all these blacks in jail.
We need to spring them out of jail.
And we need to stop killing George Floyd and all this.
And it's a crime spree and who does that affect?
It benefits the blacks that are getting thrown in jail and who are the criminals, frankly, most of the criminals, at the expense of the middle that are now getting destroyed by carjacking and all other forms of crime which are surging across the country in the big cities, which is ruining the transportation, ruining the affordable housing in the cities.
That's the story of the country.
And of course, A lot of people look at this and say, aha, so it's about class.
It's a class story.
The meaningful fault lines in America are class.
It's about the rich, the middle, and the poor.
And by the way, you know what's happening is that it's making it impossible for middle Americans to get ahead.
That's what anarcho-tyranny is too, by the way.
Where people that don't work get paid.
People that break the law Don't face any consequence.
And so as a result, the law-abiding working people, like why are they abiding by the laws and working?
Well, it's because they're under the domination of the upper class being subverted by the lower class.
Their quality of life is being sabotaged by the people that don't work, by the people that don't follow the laws.
That's why the communities aren't safe.
That's why the economy is collapsing.
But at the same time, they're expected to keep up their own of the bargain by the rich, so that plays into it as well.
There's also a racial dimension to it.
Because of the fact that the races are different, because of the fact that blacks are different than whites, whites different than Hispanics, Hispanics different from Asians, and so on, and because they're different, they're unequal.
They're unequal in their faculties, they're unequal in their provisions, they're unequal in many ways.
That's what difference is, is these No, they're dissimilar.
And so, you see these inequalities in IQ tests, you see these inequalities in aptitude, and so on, as consequences.
And so, who's going to populate these various classes?
Well, clearly, the underclasses are going to be populated by mostly blacks and lots of Hispanics.
The middle is going to be populated by some Hispanics and mostly whites, and some Asians as well.
And the upper class is going to be whites, Jews, and Asians.
And so it is a class conversation, but the classes are also forged by race too.
And so that's why in something like Martha's Vineyard, that's why when Trump announced, that's why we talk about law and order, that's why when you necessarily talk about anarcho-tyranny or the war against the middle, You also cannot speak about these things without getting into the salience of race.
That it's particular groups that are comprising these different classes.
It would be a different story if the lower classes were white.
It would be a different story.
It'd be a different story if the upper classes didn't have any Jews.
And I'm not saying like, hey, that's... I'm saying it just would be a different picture.
And so, you know, largely the underclass is the way it is because it's not just that they are poor and they're poor because they're low IQ.
They're also violent.
They're also violent and predatory because of a genetic predisposition to antisocial behavior, which is heritable, which we know is heritable.
So it's behavioral too.
And so all these things work together.
And you come up with a picture which is not, and it goes back, I guess the big picture point that I'm trying to make is that when Greg Abbott says he's illegals to Chicago, it doesn't work.
And it doesn't work because it's not party affiliation, it's just BS.
Some blue state, red state's BS.
What's going on in the country is a story of people.
And a story of different kinds of people.
and the people are genetically different.
And they're in different groups, and they're a part of different classes that have different privileges.
And how did they wind up in those places and what motivates them to make the decisions That's the fundamental question that we need to answer to understand what's going on in the country.
It's not these socialist, ignorant, liberal Democrats trying to socialize our country.
Rather, it's the capitalists, it's a lot of Jews, a lot of white people, Protestants largely, not a lot of Catholics.
Oh, there's some Catholics.
Screwing over the large white middle in America with these shock troops, which are a criminal black population and foreigners.
Foreigners that don't speak the language or first-generation or something trying to fit in.
And that's exemplified by what's going on in Martha's Vineyard.
The illegals are not intended to live in Martha's Vineyard.
They're intended to live with us.
They're intended to live in our world, not in their world.
And of course, it's only acceptable.
We're expected to bear the brunt of people coming in here without warning, and we don't have the resources to care for them, and they're really sort of undesirable.
We're expected to do that, but they, the people that are responsible for inflicting these policies, are not.
Barack Obama presided over mass immigration.
He lives in Martha's Vineyard, but he doesn't have to live with the immigration.
We do.
He is inflicting these illegals on us.
He benefits, they benefit, we pay the price.
And what's going to happen is the country is going to go from being a white Middle country to a country where you've got an upper crust of white Asians and Jews living in their bubble, and the rest is a hellscape!
The rest is gonna be a mocha colored hellscape of gangs, and La Raza, and drugs, and stupid people, stupid dummies, and I'm not talking even just about any particular race.
Everybody.
Everybody's just gonna be dumb, And then you're going to have some criminal populations and they're going to make it so that the quality of life is lower for everybody.
We're going to live in immigrant land.
We're going to live in George Floyd land.
We're going to have to go to the Popeyes like it's a bank teller with the plexiglass wall and the security vestibule to get a chicken sandwich.
We're going to have to live with that.
And there will be no middle.
There will be no whites.
There will be no middle.
There will just be the top, and the Jews will eat, and the goyim will work.
And they will be at the top, and their striving, fighting masses that have destroyed the public will be all over the place.
That's the kind of country they want.
The illegals are not supposed to live with them.
They're supposed to live with us.
And they live over there, and we live over here.
It's the Trump land and the Clinton archipelago.
They literally are two different countries.
And the Clinton Archipelago is waging war on Trump land by invading it with these illegals so they can rule it more effectively.
That's the story here.
And the Martha's Vineyard thing, it shows the liberal hypocrisy, but it also goes deeper than that.
It's not just liberals deporting these people, it's rich, powerful people saying, nope, we're not playing around with illegals, we're deporting their asses.
Imagine if America did to all the illegals what they just did to the illegals in Martha's Vineyard.
Can we do that?
Can we pack up all the illegals like they did at Martha's Vineyard and chip them out and say, hey, they left an indelible mark, but we just can't take care of them?
I wish we could do that.
But we're not the decision makers.
So that's that.
But we're gonna move on, we're gonna take a look at our Super Chats and see what you have to say about all this.
I don't know, is that rambly?
Did I make my point?
It's a long show.
It's a lot.
We're going to take a look and see what you guys have to say about all this.
unidentified
Let me get my water here.
nick fuentes
Let me get set up with my headset and then let me get my Wawa.
And then we'll take a look.
My can of LaCroix here.
Alright.
Okay, let's see She says as I think I made my point Yeah.
unidentified
All right.
Export Selection