Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 16, 2022 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:37:48

America First Ep. 1062America First Ep. 1062

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:28:22

Appearances

Clips

ben shapiro

00:54

jeremy boring

00:17

matt walsh

00:28

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Good evening, everybody.
		You're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
unidentified		We have a great show for you tonight.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Not defamation, though, if it's true sometimes.
		And the ADL is typically known as a left-wing group, the ZOA as a right-wing group, and the ZOA is calling out the ADL because they say that the ADL is pushing anti-white critical race theory.
		And it's true!
		That so much of the anti-white critical race theory curriculum, which is designed for schools and for the workplace, and even how it guides content moderation policies on social media, so much of that is created by the ADL.
		Which, go figure.
		You know, we talk about CRT, CRT, Democrats, so on.
		Yeah, well, it's the ADL making it.
		It's a Jewish organization.
		And so the ZOA is calling them out and saying, hey, enough with the anti-white propaganda.
		Now, is that a good thing?
		Does that mean that these guys are on our side, on the right-wing Jewish organization?
		Well, not quite.
		And so we'll get into all that tonight.
		I want to talk about the two organizations.
		It's very interesting because if you look at their mission statements, they both say exactly the same thing.
		And although they're considered as doing two different things, or being separate, and sometimes even people will say they are separate, and I'll get into what I mean by that, they're actually very much the same.
		They both hate me, and they both do the same thing.
		And they're both same people.
		So we'll talk about that tonight.
		That'll be our feature story.
		I have like a hair in my face.
		What's going on with that?
		That'll be our feature story.
		We'll also be talking tonight about the imminent Trump indictment which is coming very soon.
		And you recall back in August we talked about the FBI raid in Mar-a-Lago.
		And people are wondering what's the status of all that.
		Well, The Trump legal team has been fighting a legal battle to try to get what's called a special master appointed to mediate in this case.
		And the special master is an attorney who is going to go through what the DOJ seized from Trump's residence.
		And they will determine to what extent documents that were seized are protected by attorney-client privilege or protected by executive privilege.
		And so this attorney will go through and sort through all those files.
		And while that is going on, the DOJ investigation is suspended.
		Even though the DOJ already went through everything, they took it, they went through it, they photographed it, they've got it.
		Now this attorney is going to look through all of that.
		And in the meantime, it just slows up the whole process.
		So there's no word on how long this is going to take but it's going to drag things out.
		So we'll talk about that and how that affects the primary which will be beginning shortly after these midterms.
		So those will be our two big stories.
		That's going to be our show.
		Before we get into all that though, Excuse me.
		I'm a little gassy here.
		I just ate dinner.
		I said I was shooting for 9.30 and then I had a late dinner.
		Okay, not my fault.
		We're working on it.
		We're getting there.
		Yesterday was 11.
		Today it's like, you know, 10.50 or I should say 9.50.
		Huge improvement, right?
		70 minute improvement in one day.
		Just wait.
		By Monday it's gonna be so close to 9.30 it's somehow not 9.30.
		That's how close we're gonna... it's gonna go... the show's gonna start at 7.30 on Monday.
		All right.
		Follow me here on Cozy.
		Smash the follow button to get a push notification whenever I go live.
		Make sure you do it.
		I just hit 20,000.
		I expect to see a million by the end of the week.
		Also, follow me on Gab Telegram and True Social.
		Links are down below.
		Be sure to check all those out.
		Follow me on all of the different alternative apps.
		This freaking chair.
	You know, I got like a carpet under here and it's kind of goofing up.
	It's goofing up my chair mat.
	Anyway.
	So make sure to follow me on all those.
	I think that's everything.
	Not much else to say.
	Oh yeah, I'm not doing a show tomorrow.
	Just so you know.
	I'll be back Monday, but I'm not doing a show tomorrow.
	I got a thing planned for tomorrow.
	So I will not be here to do a show, but I'll be back Monday.
	So...
	Unanticipated, but no show tomorrow.
	Back Monday, so don't get pressed.
	Don't say, hey, where's Nick?
	Tomorrow, because there's no show tomorrow, okay?
	What else?
	What else is going on?
	Not much going on in my world, quite honestly.
	Sort of a long day working on stuff, and people hit me up on my phone.
	It's like, you know, some weeks everybody just likes to just go off on me.
unidentified		And it's okay, because I'm a good guy.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I like to talk to people.
		But there are some people, there's a few people like this, and I'm not talking about any one person in particular, but you know, I get in text conversations, and here's how I like to play.
		Maybe this is, maybe I'm autistic.
		I think I am.
		I think I just don't really know how to get along, so I just kind of imitate what other people do and create these heuristics and rules that maybe other people don't really observe and aren't reasonable.
		You tell me what you think.
		When I get in a text conversation, I like to send a text, and then a text comes back, and then I try to respond with a proportionally length text, for the most part.
		If somebody sends me a little text, I reply with a little text.
		If someone sends me three texts, I like to probably, you know, two or three texts.
		I don't like when it's wildly disproportionate, like when you send a lot and you get one word, or they send a lot and But some people I text and they just like text me like a hundred times before I reply once and I'm like how I don't even it's like I just I get a blue screen it's like I blue screen like I don't know what to do in this situation do I reply to some of it do I reply to all of it do I have to write a hundred texts do I have to wait and come back later do I interject like I don't know what to do
		So it's been a few it's not just it's like having a few times this week where I'm sitting on the phone She's like waiting.
		It's like okay.
		I'm gonna check back when they're not typing So that's very stressful for me because then I feel guilty then I'm like, oh I'm blowing them off But also it's like I don't know how to play here So, you know, these are the practical problems that I live with so is that I went out.
		I got a salad today.
		You know, I felt guilty because I've just been eating garbage all the time.
		So, I went out and I said, I want to get something... I needed to get something fast because I was out late running errands and I was racing back home to start the show on time.
		And I thought, well, I don't have time to sit down and eat.
		I'll go through a drive-thru.
		But what can I get that's healthy through a drive-thru?
		Like, nothing.
		I thought, oh, I'll get a salad.
		I got a salad from Chick-fil-A.
		And, uh, you know, and I have this theory.
		I was sitting there eating this salad before I went live, and let me know what you think about this.
		I'm sitting here eating this, and I'm like, this is really just, uh, lettuce.
		This is really just lettuce.
		It's not filling at all.
		And I thought, you know, I think the science of it is, I think it's designed to trick you into thinking you're eating something when you're really not eating anything.
		Because I'm sitting there like I'm not getting any fuller here.
		There's nothing good.
		You cannot tell me that in terms of weight this is as sating as a burger or a steak or something.
		But I think that it's just meant to be time consuming.
		I think it's just meant to be something that you're like you're chewing a lot and you're doing a lot of this and a lot of chewing and something's going in and you're you're chewing and you're raising the fork and it's time consuming like it takes time to complete it because you know you're like it's just I I'm too impatient.
		I want to pick something up and eat it.
		I don't want to mess with I have to pierce lettuce.
		It's such a trick, you know, in a game to scoop shit up and... It's like they put things deliberately in the salad that you can't pick up with a fork.
		Lettuce, which is impossible to puncture.
		Tomatoes, which are impossible to puncture.
		Nuts, impossi- right?
		And so it's like, this is really just a big fucking charade waste of time to trick your brain into thinking you're doing and performing the act of eating while not really eating anything at all.
		So I don't think I'm ever gonna have a salad ever again.
		I think I'm just done with that as a premise.
		I did it.
		I tried it once.
		I thought it was better.
		You know what?
		If a quarter pounder makes me get fat and die, I just won't eat.
		I just won't eat then.
		Because I'm not playing that game anymore.
		I won't do it.
		I don't even finish.
		I get frustrated.
		I eat like half of it, and then I say, you know what?
		It's just not even worth the effort.
		I'm gonna have to spend the next 30 minutes trying to eat this, and it doesn't even taste that good, and it's not even filling me up.
		Forget it!
		I'll just go and get a bag of chips, or an apple, or anything else.
		I'm sick of it.
		I'm just done playing that game.
		I'm done with that.
		And I was also sitting there, and this is sort of my program, is I'm on the one meal a day program.
		You know, I just sort of check myself out and I say, if my belly looks a little bit bigger, I just will stop eating for a time.
		That's kind of how, I don't have a scale, I don't weigh myself, I don't go to the doctor ever.
		So I just kind of judge by, does my face, does my belly look bigger?
	And if I look and feel like I'm getting unhealthy, I'll just stop eating.
	If I look like I'm skinny, then I say, okay, I can eat a little bit more.
	And I was explaining this to my parents the other day, and correct me if I'm wrong, you tell me what's up, because based upon what you say, I'm going to change my life.
	So I casually brought this up to my parents and I said, yeah, I'm really just eating like one meal a day.
unidentified		And my dad is like, no, you can't do that.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Because if you eat one meal a day, he says, your body will think you're starving.
		And if your body thinks you're starving, then it's going to hang on to all the food and it's actually going to make you get fatter.
		And I said, that doesn't make any sense.
		It's simple.
		It's caloric intake and caloric output.
		If you burn more calories than you eat, you will lose weight.
		If you eat more calories than you burn, you will gain weight.
		It's a simple equation and nothing... I honestly don't even really believe in macros or... I think everything is just burned down and mostly it doesn't matter.
		That's my theory.
		And my dad goes, no, that's totally wrong.
		If you eat one meal a day, your body will enter a certain state where it thinks it's starving.
		Now, how does that even make sense?
		First of all, your body can't think.
		So, I don't know what it means.
		Your body doesn't know anything.
		That's one.
		Two, that's just impossible.
		If you're burning more calories than you consumed, what do you mean it's gonna hang on to them?
		It can't.
		It's gonna burn them up.
		It's going to burn them up in the stasis functions of your body to achieve homeostasis.
		Heartbeat, brain function, other activities.
		So you tell me, am I right on this?
		Am I wrong?
		Let me know in the super chats.
		Let me know what you think in the live chat.
		Because I don't know.
		I'm not a scientist, but I think that's a load of shit.
		Honestly.
		You know me.
		I'm not a doctor.
		I'm not a scientist.
		I don't really know what I'm talking about here, but that's what sounds right to me.
		You're right, says somebody.
		Nick is right.
unidentified		Right.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You're right.
		Nick is right.
		Nick vindicated.
		Real and true.
		So true.
		Nick won me over.
		Nick is right.
		Yeah, see, I knew it.
		Some are saying I'm wrong.
		Yeah, give me a dub as dad BTFO.
		Yeah, absolutely.
		Absolutely!
		My dad and my sister were there at the dinner table telling me, no, no, actually, you're gonna starve.
unidentified		Your body's gonna get tricked into thinking you're starving.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That doesn't even make any sense.
		What does that even... So what, should I trick my body?
		What does that even mean?
		You know, your body thinks this and thinks that.
		What, am I gonna have a dialogue?
		Body thinks.
unidentified		Or I tell it to think!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm right here.
		There is, yeah, my body is thinking.
		It's called my brain.
		It's called, hello, I don't think I'm starving.
		I know exactly what I'm doing.
		Your body will think.
		Who's my, I'm me.
		I'm my body.
		The brain does the thinking and that's me.
		Your body will think.
		I don't think I'm starving.
		Who thinks I'm, who else is here?
		That's getting confused.
		Your body will think, I'm the only one here!
		I'm the only one in this, in this bitch.
		Not calling myself a bitch, but you know, in this thing, in this thing here, I'm the only one here.
		And I don't, I'm not confused at all.
		I know I'm eating a meal a day.
		Anyway.
		So I will continue.
		So based on the response from the live chat, based on a sampling from the live chat, I will continue what I am doing, which is eating one meal a day.
		And, you know, I don't think there's anything wrong with that at all.
		I don't think that's unhealthy.
		I think that's perfectly normal.
		Anyway, so that's maybe you're not even interested in that.
unidentified		That's just what goes on.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So I'm done with the salad.
		You know what?
		I think I'll just stick to the one meal a day thing.
		And if I get a quarter pounder meal, you know, that's like 1,100 calories.
		That's not bad.
		I live a sedentary lifestyle.
		I probably burn 2,000 calories a day.
		So if I eat a Big Mac meal or a quarter pounder meal, I'm good.
		One a day.
		One quarter pounder a day keeps the weight off.
		And maybe instead of the soda, I'll drink water even better.
unidentified		Perfect.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Perfect deal.
		Maybe I'll throw in a banana.
		How's that?
		Throw in a banana for dinner.
		Quarter pounder for lunch, banana for dinner.
		Okay, and an onion for breakfast.
		That's my diet.
		Onion for breakfast, quarter pounder meal for lunch, and a banana and an apple for dinner.
		Tell me that's harmful.
		And a multivitamin.
		Can't beat that.
		Nobody can beat that.
		I don't, you know, I don't care what you tell me.
		No one can beat that one.
		Alright, okay, let's get into it.
		So our first story, we're gonna talk about this Trump indictment, which is coming in hot.
		And we've talked about this for a little while now, ever since around August, when the FBI raid was conducted on Trump's residence in Mar-a-Lago.
		And we've been following that and I've been blackmailing you guys telling you how badly this is gonna go.
		In case you are not aware of the details, I'll just fill you in real quickly.
		So at the beginning of the year, the National Archives, which is a federal agency, reaches out to the Trump team and says, Hey, you've got classified documents from the White House that you took with you to your residence, and we're going to need those to be secured. you've got classified documents from the White House that you And we're going to need some of them back.
		And the Trump team is cooperative, and so they give them what they ask for and so on.
		And later in the year, the National Archives reaches back out and says, Hey, listen, we think that the files that you possess are not secured.
		May we come and install a lock on the documents that you possess in your storage room?
		And the Trump team says, yeah, absolutely.
		Come right in.
		National Archives goes out to Mar-a-Lago.
		They install a lock on the container where the files are in the storage room.
		Okay.
		They come back again in June.
		and say hey actually now we want to install cameras and we want to do this and this and the Trump team says whoa whoa whoa slow down there we don't want cameras you can check out whatever you need whatever you want you can take whatever you want to inspect you can come by but we gave you the lock what more do you want
		So the National Archives goes to the DOJ and says we think that the Trump team is not being forthcoming based on their interactions with the Trump team, which is kind of ridiculous to say.
		Because the Trump team was nothing but cooperative.
		National Archives goes to DOJ and says, we think that the Trump team is not fully cooperating.
		They are concealing documents.
		They're not showing us everything they have.
		They're hiding things.
		They're not allowing us access to everything.
		And so they go to the DOJ.
		The DOJ obtains a search warrant from a judge.
		And then the FBI is deployed in August, and 50 FBI agents go into Mar-a-Lago when Trump is out of town, and they lock down the whole place.
		They don't let anybody come in and supervise.
		Not legal counsel, not Trump family, or Trump team.
		They lock down the whole place, they raid the bedroom, they raid the kids' bedroom, they raid the storage room, Trump's office, they raid everything.
		They come out with 40 boxes full of documents and throw them in a truck and take it back to DC.
		They don't even announce it, if you recall.
		Donald Trump issues a press release that evening and informs the world what has gone on, which has never happened ever in the history of the United States.
		Federal law enforcement has never searched the residence of a former president.
		It's the first time that's ever happened.
		And it was Trump that broke the news.
		And it wasn't until later that evening that then the federal government came out and verified that it happened, and then they came out and gave a statement the following day, and then they released a copy of the search warrant later in that week, and other documents have been disclosed since then.
		And they've announced now, and it's interesting because initially they said they were searching the Trump residence because they were investigating him for three federal statutes all pertaining to the illicit possession, handling, and disposal of classified documents.
		In other words, the wrongdoing that they're investigating is that Trump has the documents or is storing them or discarding them improperly.
		Those are the criminal charges.
		That is how they obtained the search warrant.
		Well, then they came out last week and said actually what the Department of Justice is probing is an obstruction of justice charge.
		So, apparently, they may not even be necessarily investigating wrongdoing pertaining to the files themselves, but rather saying that because Trump was, in their interpretation, less than cooperative with the National Archives, that that constituted an obstruction of justice.
		Again, and I went over this maybe a week or two ago, it's very similar to the impeachment, the first impeachment over the Ukraine phone call.
		Where they couldn't get him on abuse of power because there's no evidence of wrongdoing.
		So instead, they said, well, he obstructed justice in our investigation.
		Can't get him on abuse of power because there's no evidence.
		But, well, when we were investigating the crime for which there was no wrongdoing and no evidence, well, they were less than cooperative.
		So he was obstructing.
		Even if there was no crime, he obstructed our investigation.
		That's the crime.
	Same deal here.
	DOJ says that's the charge.
	They've said that they are not going to make any announcements about the status of the investigation 60 days out from the midterm election because they don't want to influence the outcome of the election like they did in 2016 and they probably will not be making any announcements within 60 days either.
	So we're not going to hear anything about this until after the midterms.
	But where we are now is that the Trump legal team has requested a special, what is it called?
	A special master to come in.
	And the special master is an attorney who comes in and mediates this essentially.
	And this is approved and selected by the judge.
	And this attorney goes in and reviews all the files that were seized by the Department of Justice that they took from Mar-a-Lago.
	and the special master will determine if any or all of the documents are attorney-client protected, or privileged rather, or if any of them are privileged with the president's executive privilege.
	And so this is a story from BBC.
	It says, quote, US Federal Judge Raymond Deary has been chosen to review the files seized in the FBI's search of former President Donald Trump's home.
	Mr. Deary will be, quote, the special master and decide whether any documents are off-limits in any legal proceedings.
	He had been proposed by Mr. Trump's team and the U.S.
	Department of Justice previously said that it did not object.
	Department of Justice officials previously said the documents stored in Mr. Trump's Florida home were likely to have been concealed as part of an effort to obstruct an FBI investigation.
	See, again, it's... First it was, he can't have the documents.
	That fell apart.
	Then it turned into, well, he blocked us from seeing if he had the documents that he can have.
unidentified		Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		The authorities say these documents should have been handed over to the National Archives, which US presidents are legally obliged to do upon leaving office.
		Which again, it's not necessarily true.
		If the documents are confidential, but Trump takes them, that means that he effectively declassifies them.
		And the classification schedule, as I've said before on the show, is entirely, entirely, completely, indisputably, unambiguously within the jurisdiction of the U.S.
		President alone.
		So, you know, some people are out there saying, well, if Trump was going to declassify them he should have told somebody or he needed approval or permission.
		No, he does not.
		The classification schedule is strictly the purview of the Commander-in-Chief.
		He is the highest and final and unilateral authority over what is classified and what classification it receives.
		And that is not disputed.
		That's not a question.
		There's not even any ambiguity.
		If the president says it's declassified, it's declassified.
		And who would outrank the president?
		The president is the chief enforcer of the laws and the commander-in-chief of the military.
		So what argument exactly What legal argument exactly would anyone have to say that he would not possess that authority?
		National security?
		Who's in charge of national security?
		The commander-in-chief of the armed forces?
		He couldn't do it because it's some kind of bureaucratic procedure.
		It's something that is the purview of the executive bureaucracy.
		Who is the chief law enforcement official in the United States?
		The President of the United States.
		So there is not a theoretical, there is not a de facto, there is not a de jure, there is not a formal argument.
		I want to stress that because they, throughout August, they said he can.
		Yes, he can.
		If he takes them out as the president, when the president gets in Marine One and flies away from the White House as president, if he takes 50 boxes full of documents with him to Mar-a-Lago, they are all declassified in his capacity as the president.
		And then he's got them.
		And then he's got a bunch of declassified materials.
		What can you do?
		They can get mad and say, that was reckless.
		He shouldn't have done that.
		He shouldn't have declassified those things.
		Okay, all of that is fine.
		None of those things are a crime.
		So now the DOJ says, well, fine.
		They're saying, alright, fine.
		Well, he obstructed justice because when the National Archives asked for the things that he doesn't need to give them, he hid those things from the National Archives, and that's the crime.
		They were investigating a crime that didn't happen, and he obstructed that investigation, in their view.
		Anyway, so the whole the whole thing is just a fraud and And I guess we'll get into it more in a moment.
		We're not even finished with the article.
		We're just sort of back to the premise here.
		But it just goes to show how ridiculous.
		It's objectively true that this is a witch hunt.
		Because let's say, and I think this is almost completely going to happen.
		The DOJ charges Trump after these midterms.
		Let's say the DOJ charges Trump after the midterms or maybe in 2023.
		This is going to have a significant effect on the next presidential election.
		A significant effect.
		And it's over nothing.
		So we've got, effectively, federal law enforcement intervening in an election.
		Intervening and meaningfully changing the proceeding and the outcome of the election based on garbage, based on nonsense.
		They say that you cannot impeach the president unless it's for a so-called high crime or a misdemeanor.
		In other words, the president cannot be impeached or charged because of, I believe, things like battery or so-called petty crimes.
		You can only bring down the president for a very serious crime.
		That's the only way the president can be indicted.
		For obvious reasons.
		You're not going to charge the president for something frivolous.
		Chief law enforcement officer, head of government, head of state.
		It isn't done.
		How different is it, then, to charge an ex-president, running for president, going to be the nominee?
		I know it shouldn't be a discretionary call, but it kind of is.
		Is this not an abject failure of discretion and judgment of the DOJ?
		I mean, I know we're beyond that, but it is just objectively wrong.
	I don't care what anybody says for them to intervene in that capacity.
	It just isn't right.
	It would be one thing if he killed a guy.
	It'd be one thing if we were talking about, I don't know, he embezzled money or something crazy.
	We're talking about a filing error.
	I mean, we're talking about a clerical error.
	A clerical error when a president leaves the White House and you're dealing with millions of documents.
	Oh whoops he had 50 papers he shouldn't have had and then he didn't give them up right away or something like that.
	Really?
	Now the FBI's and the DOJ are going to intervene in a presidential election?
	Give me a break.
	So there's no room for argument on that.
	I know everybody, some people like to concede and say oh well maybe he shouldn't have.
	There's no argument here.
unidentified		Anyway.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So, that's what it is.
		But, let's get into the Special Master.
		So, it says, quote, The request for a Special Master, an independent lawyer who decides if any of the records are covered by attorney-client or executive privilege, was made by Trump's team.
		Earlier this month, a judge granted Mr. Trump's request and banned the U.S.
		government from reviewing or using the seized materials for its investigation until the Special Master's independent review has been completed.
		On Thursday, U.S.
		Federal Judge Aileen Cannon appointed Mr. Deary and also ruled that the DOJ was not allowed to resume the file's review.
		The department had earlier said it would take the case to an appeals court if Judge Cannon ruled against their request.
		This means the Justice Department's ongoing criminal investigation will now be slowed down because the government cannot review or seize materials for its investigation until the review has been completed.
		By the special master, that is.
		The Department of Justice resisted Mr. Trump's request saying that any records seized in the FBI's August 8th search belong to the United States, not the former president.
		Which is, again, another ridiculous statement.
		It is not clear how long the special master's review will take.
		Mr. Trump's lawyers have argued some of the documents are covered by attorney-client privilege.
		His legal team also claimed executive privilege over the documents, which allows presidents to keep certain communications under wraps.
		However, some legal experts argue that these moves are merely a tactic to delay proceedings, since the documents have already been looked at.
		And I think that's exactly what it is.
		I think that Trump, and he's within his rights to do this, is using every legal mechanism simply to slow the process down and delay it so that he'll have time to announce, which I think the appropriate time to do that would be upon the completion of this cycle, which would be January 6, 2023.
		So really the earliest that Trump can announce is January.
		I would bet that he's trying to slow this down probably until then or maybe just try to delay it indefinitely for as long as possible for obvious reasons.
		The announcement of an indictment against Trump and the investigation of Trump, these are things which are going to harm him in the primary and they're going to harm him in the general too.
		And so the longer that Trump can go without that happening, without that being official, and if Trump can get his announcement in in January after the new Congress is seated and sworn in, and before the DOJ can announce the indictment, that's going to be better for him.
		So that's what I think is going on here.
		It's also true probably that much of what the DOJ seized, they were not allowed to take.
		Because again, they came in there and it wasn't like They treat this guy like he's a black guy.
		They treat this guy like he's just any like a black thug off the street or something.
		We're talking about the president.
		And they go into the Mar-a-Lago residence and they close it all off, they lock it down, they don't let any lawyers supervise.
		They came in there like it was Bernie Madoff's residence.
		They went in there at the break of dawn with 50 guys and pulled up in trucks And didn't announce it, didn't tell anybody, they just pulled up, burst through the door, we got a warrant, everybody out, locked down the door, take the shit, drive to DC, treating them like an N-word.
		They're treating them like a you know.
		And they can't just do that.
		Of course.
		They got a search warrant for these documents.
		That doesn't allow them to take whatever they want.
		No contest.
		No lawyer present.
		No supervision.
		And without a doubt, I'm sure they took things that belonged to the President.
		They said themselves that the classified documents were mixed in with all kinds of things.
		Personal notes.
		Documents were not classified, so they took a ton of stuff that I'm sure is subject to privilege, both the attorney-client privilege and the executive privilege.
		So it is a stalling tactic probably but I'm sure there's validity to it as well.
		They're gonna find a ton of stuff that they've got to give back.
		They're gonna find a ton of stuff that they probably did not have the jurisdiction to take.
		And maybe the special master will find everything is protected by executive privilege or something.
		We don't know.
		We'll have to wait and see.
		The big picture of course is how all of this is going to affect the 2024 election because it is As far as I know, what I have heard is that Trump is going to run.
		And that is 99% going to happen.
		And then, there are probably going to be people that run regardless of whether Trump runs or not.
		It's still, as far as I know, not 100%, but it's extremely likely.
		And some people are waiting to see if he announces some people are gonna run anyway Mike Pompeo is gonna run Nikki Haley's gonna run Larry Hogan and Maryland is going to run Chris Christie is going to run and then people like Ron DeSantis perhaps Josh Hawley
		People that probably would draw on the MAGA vote, maybe they're waiting to see what the prospects are like if Trump runs, or maybe if he does, if he's going to do poorly, or if he's going to do well.
		They're going to wait and see.
		And the big picture is how all of this will play into that initial primary contest, which will start, I believe, very early in 2023.
		And then, if Trump wins the primary, how that is going to affect the general election between him and whoever the Democrat will be.
		We've looked at all the polling and it's all overwhelmingly pro-Trump.
		There's not really anybody within striking distance.
		Even the best polls for Ron DeSantis have him double digits behind Trump.
		You know, 15, 20, 25 percent.
		His best polls have him like 25 percent behind Trump.
		So there's not really, as far as we know at this point, anybody that can beat Trump in the primary.
		But how much will the indictment play a role?
	And here's why it matters.
	The Democrats are out there saying that if Trump gets indicted, he can't run.
	And is that going to factor into the minds of Republican voters?
	Are they going to say, here's a guy who we like, but we have questions about, one, his viability, but also even his eligibility.
	We have questions about whether he'll be able to beat the Democrat, whoever that may be, but also if he'll even be eligible to compete, because there are people on the left saying that if he gets indicted, he can't run, although that's not true.
	Even if he gets indicted, he can still run.
	People are saying that, and the DOJ, you know, people are saying there's a statute that says, to my knowledge, there are people saying that that is true, but to my knowledge, it is not true that if he's indicted, he can't run.
	Of course he can run.
	But that will be, but it's contentious, and that's something that the voters are going to have to think about again in the primary, but they're also going to have to think in the primary about how voters will think about it in the general, and that's going to affect the primary.
	So it will affect both stages of the race.
	It's going to be a long primary.
	It's going to start very early, and it's going to go on then, of course, for over a year.
	It'll start in January and the final primary contest doesn't happen until June 2024.
	So it's going to be literally a 18 month primary race.
	It's going to be grueling.
	And if that is going on while Trump's resources and attention are being diverted by A big investigation, and if that is going to be an issue that is developing and unfolding during the primary, it's not good for Trump.
	It's not going to be good in the debates, it's not going to be good during the contests, and it's going to perhaps open up the door for somebody to hurt Trump.
	I'll also say this, you don't just have that, but you've also got the fact that he's banned from all social media, which is going to be a huge problem for him, and then you've also got the issue of fundraising.
	So many of the donors and billionaires, as we discussed yesterday, are jumping ship on Trump and joining up with DeSantis.
	So suffice to say, all of these forces, Big Tech, DeSantis, the donors, the billionaires, the DOJ, the Biden regime, they are all conspiring to knock Trump out of the race.
	And they really do have a chance.
	They have more of a chance than I think a lot of Trump supporters are willing to admit.
	Because like I said, all these things individually may not be so bad, but taken together, an investigation, a long, crowded, competitive primary, the deplatforming...
	The money troubles and finances, all of this taken together it takes Trump from being the presumptive nominee essentially out of the gate to now it's a little bit more competitive.
	So we'll see how this plays out.
	I do believe it's in the best interest of the Trump legal team to just resist everything, throw up as much.
	That's gonna piss me off if he comes back.
	There he is.
unidentified		Seriously?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		it, shut it down, fight back, whatever.
		They should not obviously just take it laying down.
		They should delay it to the extent that they can and try and get that presidential announcement out of the way that first week in January.
		Are you kidding me?
		There's a fly in here.
unidentified		That's going to piss me off if he comes back.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		There he is.
unidentified		Seriously?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Get the fuck out of here.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Anyway, there he is again.
unidentified		All right, he flew out of the room.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, and stay in, stay out.
unidentified		Better not come back in here.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Now I'm a little paranoid.
		How do I regain my train of thought after that?
		Anyway, so that's the election or whatever.
		I totally just lost my train of thought because of the stupid fly.
unidentified		Anyway.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So we'll be watching and we'll see what happens with that.
		Okay, but we're gonna move on.
		I want to get on into our featured story.
		We've been over all this stuff.
		Let's get into our featured story.
		I want to talk about these Jewish groups.
		How's my hair doing, by the way?
		It looks like my hair is sort of failing.
		Looks like the hair is failing a little bit tonight.
unidentified		So puffy.
unidentified		Can we just... I need a haircut, honestly.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I just scheduled a haircut appointment.
unidentified		Oh, my.
unidentified		Oh, dear.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Oh no, I made it worse.
unidentified		Hang on.
		I just have to like push it to one side and then back?
		Kind of like that?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		How's that?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's not perfect, but we just got to get through the show and have a mirror in front of me.
unidentified		I wish I had a mirror like right here.
unidentified		I wish I had like a little handheld mirror.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I got to get one of those.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Remind me of that.
unidentified		Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So we're going to move on.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I want to get on into our featured story, and this is a good one.
unidentified		This is about these Jews, and this little... these Jews.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You know?
		The older I get, the more I realize, like, yeah, that's kind of like sort of a big part of what it's all about.
		I was on TikTok today, and I saw this TikTok of an Orthodox Jew.
		And he's going through all of their traditional practices, And they're wrapping this bracelet around their arm, and they've got this cube on their head.
		They literally have a freaking black cube on their forehead.
		And they're mumbling these spells, casting spells with their cube on their head, and they've got... It's all this goofy stuff.
		They're like, we gotta wash our hands a certain way, and I got a little scroll tape to the wall, and I got a cube on my head, and I have an apron with eight strings, and I have a little hat and then a big hat on top of a little hat, and I can't pick up my phone on this day, and we're singing this song, and I got this cup that's overflowing, and you realize these people are literally Pharisees.
		Hello?
		Wake up and smell the coffee.
		How do people not make this connection?
		Shame on people for not making this connection.
		They are the Pharisees.
		That's what they are.
		You know, people talk about this Judeo-Christian.
		What do we have in common with these people?
		They crucified Jesus.
		We worship Jesus.
		It's as simple as that.
		They are the Pharisees still living with the old ways, thinking that if we follow a certain set of rules, We can save ourselves and we can become good.
		And we're here saying, no, you cannot save yourself.
		Only God can save you.
		Only Christ's blood can save you, actually.
		Only the sacrifice on the cross can redeem your sins.
unidentified		Nothing else.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Not you washing your hands a certain way and keeping a little scroll on the wall and worshipping a cube or whatever.
		But here they are, 2,000 years later, And consider the impact of this.
		Consider the significance.
		These are the same people that killed Jesus because Jesus came and said, no, it's time for a new covenant.
		No more.
		No more sacrifices.
		No more of these laws.
		I'm going up on the cross to forgive the sins.
		And these people put him there.
		And they're the same people.
		They're the same people doing the same things for 5,000 years.
		2,000 years after the After the death of Christ.
		And I saw that on TikTok and it just... I'm just wondering where people are missing this.
		If you're a Christian, you gotta wake up.
		If you're a Christian, time to wake up.
		Because this Jewish presence in government, in media, in Hollywood, it literally cannot be benign.
		If you believe in Jesus, if you believe that Jesus, if you believe the Gospel, and if you believe that Jesus was put up on that cross, like it says in the Gospel by the Pharisees, that said, free Barabbas and crucify Jesus, or kill Jesus, then said, how are we going to kill him?
		Crucify him!
		Okay, well, the blood's on your hands.
		They said, yep, absolutely.
		They said yes.
		They affirmed it.
		They said, yep, blood's on our hands.
		Make no mistake about it.
		Yeah, hello.
		And here we are 2,000 years later, and the people with the cubes on their head, and the people with the little hat and the big hat and all the usual stuff, They're the ones that are making the films and making the porn and they're the ones lobbying the government and they've got a whole country over there in the Middle East and exerting influence on the government.
		If you're a Christian, you cannot believe that that is benign.
		You cannot believe that that is something that is not Worthy of acknowledgement at the minimum, at the minimum.
		Maybe concern at the most.
		Concern would be the next level, I guess.
		Concern and in interest.
		And so anyway, that's not what our feature story is.
		But I did see this on TikTok and I'm watching these and it's one after the other and it's...
		Oh, I put a glass of chocolate milk on my head and stand on one foot and sing the Bikini Bottom National Anthem.
		That doesn't save you, Jews.
		There's only one thing that's gonna save you.
		Christ.
		Christ's blood.
		The New Covenant.
		And that's what our country should be based on, not these people that think that we're animals and they're God's chosen and they have all these rules and we're just these cattle or something.
		Yeah, F that!
		Especially not when they got the blood of Jesus on their hands.
		Anyway, so I saw that, interesting, and it's just one of those things where day after day I'm reminded that, yeah, like that's the thing.
		We look at National Conservatism Conference and it's Yoram Hazoni running the show.
		You look at CPAC and it's the same story.
		Daily Wire.
unidentified		Hello!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Breitbart founded in Israel with Bibi Netanyahu and homosexual Jim Hoft and that whole crew.
		And Paul Singer and I mean you name it like so it's just everywhere and people have told me my entire career don't talk about that you're wrong either it's not true or if it is true it's not important to talk about nah it's definitely true and it's definitely one of the most important things it goes back to the very basic Curistic.
		If you can't criticize them, they're probably in charge.
		Anyway, we're gonna get into our featured story here tonight, and this one's interesting.
		This is from Russia Today, and it talks about this admonishment.
		Admonition?
		The Zionist Organization of America, which is a Jewish Zionist group, has admonished the ADL, another Jewish group, the Anti-Defamation League, and the ZOA says that the ADL has to stop creating all of this anti-white propaganda in the schools.
		And it's like, wait a second, I thought that was a conspiracy.
		I thought critical race theory was cooked up by cultural Marxists.
		Cultural Marxists.
		That's what we're told, isn't it?
		That the curriculum in the schools isn't necessarily anti-white.
		I'm not saying that.
		That's what they're saying.
		That's what the leading critics of critical race theory say.
		Like James Lindsay and that other fella whose name I always forget.
		Those two, you can look through their Twitter.
		They go out there explicitly as the leading opponents of Critical Race Theory.
		They will say that Critical Race Theory is not anti-white.
		If anything, it may be anti-white and anti-Asian and anti-other things, but really, broadly, it's just plainly racist, they say.
		Universally, generally racist.
		Not against whites, per se, but against anyone and everyone.
		That's what the leading critics who have brought it to the attention of Tucker Carlson and Trump say about it.
		That's what we're told about critical race theory.
		When they're teaching this curriculum in schools, which is very decidedly anti-white, the content of the curriculum is this.
		White people, genocide of the natives, Enslaved the blacks, then brought the blacks over here, freed the blacks, then mistreated the blacks, then mistreated all the people for a time, and lynched them, and killed them, and strung them up, and prevented them from voting.
		Then they killed Emmett Till, then they killed MLK, then they killed Rodney King, then they killed Trayvon Martin, and then Freddie Gray, and Michael Brown, and George Floyd, and now the KKK is the cops, and now Trump is the new Hitler, and so on.
		And in other words, the content of the curriculum is this, scapegoat and vilify white people.
		White people and white civilization is evil.
		That is what critical race theory teaches.
		It doesn't teach a neutral view of race, it teaches a particularist view of race from the perspective of so-called oppressed minority groups, historic minority groups in the United States against the oppressor and the historic majority, the white man.
		And the critics of it, then we all know this is going on and this is not just in the curriculum in the school, but it's also in the media, it's in the news media, it's in the entertainment media, it's in the films, it's on social media, permitted by social media.
		It is in the workforce and it takes the shape of these environmental social governance guidelines as well as the Diversity, equity, and inclusion guidelines or racial sensitivity trainings and other kinds of trainings that employees are forced to go through in the private and public sector.
		It has taken over the country and it's all anti-white.
		But we're told by its critics, one, it's not really anti-white.
		The real victims are the minorities because it teaches them a victim mindset that they cannot achieve on their own merit.
		It's against them, not the people that the curriculum says are evil bigots who genocided everybody.
		That's the one thing they'll say, is that the content is not anti-white.
		And the second thing that they'll tell us is that it's being promulgated by white liberals.
		Racist, white, self-hating liberals.
		It's this fly in here, I swear.
		Who put that there?
		It's them!
		It's the ZOA!
		There he is!
		Ah, son of a... I wish I could just grab him, but he's flying way over me.
		Get out of here!
		I swear I'm gonna... I wish... He's just all the way up there.
		I couldn't even reach him if I wanted to.
		Get out!
unidentified		Do I have anything I could hit him with?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		How about this sword?
		Think I could get him out of here with this sword?
		That I keep here in case someone tries to attack me?
		What if I knock this little bastard right out of the air with this sword?
		Would I not be the biggest hero ever?
		All right.
		Anyway, this is my Roman Gladius, because, you know, I'm a Roman.
unidentified		Make no mistake about it, I'm a Roman.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		The Romans, where are they today?
unidentified		You're looking at them, asshole.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You lookin' at him, asshole?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, Athens and Jerusalem?
unidentified		How about Rome?!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's for Leo Strauss.
		There he is!
		There's that fly again.
		That's on- That's for Leo's- This is- This is for you, Leo Strauss.
		Ah!
		Athens and Jerusalem?
		You forgot one.
		It's called Rome, bitch.
		Hail Rome.
		Aue.
		Hail Caesar and hail Christ.
		Bow down to Rome.
		Alright, anyway.
		So, where was I?
unidentified		So, look.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So the first thing that they tell us about CRT is that the content is not anti-white.
		It's critical race theory.
		It's super sophisticated and way too complicated.
		And then the other thing that they say about critical race theory is that it is created by self-hating white liberals or Democrats or the Frankfurt School, the cultural Marxists, all this kind of stuff.
		And you want to know a dirty little secret, by the way, about the cultural Marxists?
		They were all Jews.
		That's the dirty little secret.
		When they come out there and they say, it's cultural, we gotta look into it as the Frankfurt School.
		Cultural Marxism.
		Yeah, why did they have to leave Germany?
		Why is it called the Frankfurt School?
		Because it started in Frankfurt.
		Why did they come over here?
		They were chased out by Hitler.
		Well why?
		I thought they were German.
		Okay.
		Why do they call it the Frankfurt School?
		And if it started in Frankfurt, how'd they wind up at Columbia?
		Oh yeah.
		They got chased out.
		By Hitler.
		Why do you think that was?
		Because they were German?
unidentified		No.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's because they were all Jews.
		And that's just common sense.
		I'm not even trying to be edgy or anything, but think about it.
		All these conservatives will say, cultural Marxists, cultural Marxists.
		That's what Ben Carson and Jordan Peterson say.
		It's these post-modern neo-Marxists.
		Okay.
		Where do they come from?
		Columbia.
		No really.
		Frankfurt.
		Why'd they leave?
		Hitler came to power.
		Why did they leave?
		Because Hitler came to... Oh.
unidentified		Oh.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		That's why.
		But no one will say that.
		And this tells you a little something.
		It tells you actually a lot of something about why things are the way they are.
		And it tells you a little bit more about, doesn't that, just for openers, illuminate the conversation just a little bit?
		That you've got this massive anti-white doctrine, that no one will call anti-white, promulgated by people, that everyone is told are white people, but really aren't white.
		That's the level of obfuscation of the conversation.
		Most normie conservatives who really are the opposition to this corrupt, globalist regime, they're being force-fed every day that the power doesn't hate white people, it's not anti-white, and the power is white, when it really is anti-white and it's really not promulgated by white people.
		Some of them are, but a lot of them aren't.
		We're being told CRT is an anti-black phenomenon promulgated by racist white liberals who left the KKK and joined the Democratic Party.
		When in actuality, it is a straight-up anti-white, anti-Christian curriculum promulgated by Jews that left Frankfurt and came to Colombia because Hitler chased them out.
		Totally different story, isn't it?
		Isn't that it completely?
		But it's true!
		But no one will sit here and tell me that the Frankfurt School wasn't all Jews, and no one can tell me that CRT isn't anti-white.
		But that's not what they say on Fox News.
		That's not what James Lindsay and that other guy from the Manhattan Institute are telling you about all of it.
		And it's a fundamental distortion about what's going on, is it not?
		Does that not fundamentally change the conversation if the people pushing it are not white and the curriculum is in fact anti-white rather than what we're told?
unidentified		Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Now all of this is relevant because the news today is that the ZOA, the Zionist group, Zionist Organization of America, is now straight up calling out the ADL, another Jewish group, a left-wing Jewish group, and saying that they made all of the CRT curriculum. and saying that they made all of the CRT curriculum.
		And it's true.
		The ADL does design the critical race theory curriculum for schools.
		Once again, it's not racist liberals, racist white liberals.
		It's left-wing Jews.
		And this is the article here from Russia Today.
		It wasn't even reported on by American media.
		Wonder why.
		From Russia Today.
		Russia, the enemy, the bad guy.
		Russia Today reports, quote, the conservative Jewish advocacy group Zionist Organization of America has demanded That its liberal Jewish counterpart, the Anti-Defamation League, fire its CEO, Jonathan Greenblatt, accusing him in a statement released on Monday of turning the organization into a hive of woke leftism and anti-Israel sentiment, and propagandizing schoolchildren with anti-bias educational programs.
		Citing a recent Fox News investigation, the ZOA charged the ADL with promoting far-left and critical race theory concepts such as white privilege and systemic racism through their educational materials, which have reportedly been taught to 1.4 million children in 1,600 schools.
		The group's promotion of the white privilege concept has already been weaponized against Jews, they point out, by none other than Greenblatt himself, who as early as 2016 was accusing American Jews of benefiting from it.
		The ADL's lesson plans, often available free of charge to cash-strapped school districts, characterize denying white privilege as a biased attitude and, quote, encourage white students to view themselves as oppressors, condemnation.
		Claims the ZOA, including by using a definition of racism that would make it impossible for a white person to be on the receiving end of it.
		The group only substituted a less inflammatory definition of the word earlier this year as criticism of anti-racist dogma heated up in school board meetings across the nation.
		So the ADL is making curriculum for American school children, Jewish left-wing group, creating free curriculum for poor schools They teach that white people cannot be discriminated against and that white people discriminate against others.
		That whites should view themselves as oppressors and non-whites should view themselves as oppressed by white people.
		Jews are teaching poor school children, free of charge, this garbage.
		And they're being called up at the ZOA.
		Does that make the ZOA great?
		Not necessarily.
		That says, quote, in response to the Fox News expose, the ADL announced its plan to review its educational materials and to realign with its values and strategy, a solution the ZOA insists is too little and too late.
		Greenblatt has, they claim, replaced the ADL's primary stated mission of combating antisemitism with, quote, far-left partisan political, legal, and educational advocacy, leaving the group no choice but to fire him if it seeks to retain even a sliver of credibility.
		So does that make the ZOA good?
		Because throughout my career, I've heard something very similar like this.
		I've heard from the so-called conservative Jews I don't know if you've ever heard that before, but I've heard this quite a bit ever since I got into politics, and I've heard it from the horse's mouth.
		Every time I go to DC, I get a Jewish guy up in my face, sticking their finger in my lapel and saying how I just don't understand That my real beef is with all these left-wing Jews like those at the ADL or the New York Times or whatever.
unidentified		And it's these Zionists like me that are your closest ally!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And we're your best friends ever.
		It's all them.
		They're not even real Jews.
		We're the real Jews.
		And every time I go to DC, that's what I'm told by people like Nadav Eisenman, who works for Peter Thiel.
		Nadav Eisenman, the Jewish film producer who works at a film company that Peter Thiel funds to produce major documentaries.
		He's delivered that to me.
		He's accused me of being an Iranian spy.
		And he threatened one time to punch me in the face because I was saying that Israel did the USS Liberty deliberately.
		And all sorts of other people.
		I can't name every single one off the top of my head, but I hear that all the time.
		Where are your closest allies?
		Why don't you shut the fuck up about Israel?
		They're all fake.
		Whatever.
		And they will tell me that.
		They will tell me that Ben Shapiro isn't even really Jewish.
		Actually.
		Do they believe that?
		No, they don't believe that.
		They know that he's Jewish.
		He's Jewish.
		They know he's Jewish.
		They're just lying.
		They're just lying.
		He's not even real.
		Whoever you don't like or they don't agree with isn't even really Jewish.
		Oh really?
		Except for on Shabbat, right?
		Then they're all Jewish.
		Anyway, so I get told that out.
		We're your real friends.
		And things like this may convince you of that fact.
		Because people like Ben Shapiro present as right-wing.
		Ben Shapiro is a religious Zionist Jew.
		And so he presents as conservative.
		He goes out there and says, listen, I'm right-wing and I support conservatism and all this.
		And I'm not anti-Christian.
		I'm not anti-white.
		I'm like right-wing like you guys.
		See, I'm religious.
		I have my religion.
		See, I'm a nationalist.
		I have my own nation and so on.
		And you can point to like this example where the ZOA is calling out the ADL.
		But read into why they're criticizing the ADL.
		The ADL is out there promulgating anti-white hatred and why does the ZOA attack them?
		In their statement they say that they've turned the ADL into a hive of woke leftism and anti-Israel sentiment.
		And it also says that it promotes far-left and critical race theory concepts such as white privilege And it points out that the ADL's promotion of the white privilege concept has been weaponized against Jews.
		So the ZOA, the so-called conservative Zionist Jewish group, is calling out the liberal Zionist Jewish group because the conservative Jewish group says that the liberal Jewish group is pushing anti-white hatred.
		Why is that wrong?
		Because it's starting to affect us over here.
		Not because it's wrong in itself.
		They're not sticking up for white people.
		The ZOA isn't calling out the ADL for attacking white people.
		The ZOA is calling out the ADL because the ADL's attacks on white people are beginning to affect Jewish people.
		The ZOA is saying that the ADL's attacks on white people are being confused because people consider Jews to be white.
		And so when the ADL talks about white privilege, now Jews are being accused of having white privilege.
		And when the ADL talks about oppressors and colonialism, that is giving a lot of credence to the Palestinians who critique Israel as a colonial oppressive power.
		That's the basis upon which our close friends, the Zionist Jews, are critiquing the liberal Jews.
		In other words, it's all about them.
		And it only makes sense.
		They're interest groups.
		These are the mission statements of the two groups.
	And you'll find, I think, that actually they're quite similar.
	This is the mission statement of the Zionist Organization of America.
	It says, quote, Founded in 1897, the ZOA played a key role in the Jewish state's re-establishment.
	Today, ZOA is the leading major American Jewish organization, courageously defending Israel and the Jewish people, fighting against all forms of anti-Semitism, including anti-Jewish boycotts, and promoting the Jewish people's lawful right to live in and settle historic Jewish lands.
	ZOA exposes that a Palestinian state would endanger Israel's existence, presents the facts about the Arab-Islamic war against Israel, and combats the anti-Israel lie that Israel is an occupier of her own land.
	ZOA spearheaded long, successful battles to move the U.S.
	Embassy to Jerusalem, to obtain U.S.
	recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, to deport Nazi war criminals, to apply federal civil rights protections to Jews, and more.
	ZOA provides free legal assistance and programs to pro-Israel students in numerous college campuses.
	ZOA's bold, unapologetic voice has a significant impact on public discourse and policy.
	This is the ADL's mission statement, Anti-Defamation League.
	It says, quote, quote, A global leader in combating anti-Semitism, countering extremism, and battling bigotry wherever and whenever it happens, ADL works to protect democracy and ensure a just, inclusive society for all.
	ADL works to support a secure Jewish and democratic state of Israel living in peace and security with its neighbors.
	We work to educate and engage on the challenges and complexities Israel faces at home and around the globe.
	So they're both Jewish Zionist organizations and both have really nothing to do with us.
	We are Christian, we are white, we are American.
	There is nothing in any of these groups mission statements or documents about any of that.
	There's nothing about Christ.
	There's nothing about God.
	There's nothing about the historic white demographic of America, the founding stock of America, which did not come from Israel, came from England and Germany and other places in Northern Europe.
	Does not talk about America, the nation that it resides in.
	ADL and ZOA are American non-profits, but they don't talk about America in their mission statement.
	And so when I say that these groups are fundamentally concerned with how all of this benefits Jews, it's to be expected.
	That's their mission statement.
	That's who runs it.
	That's what it's there for.
	It's an interest group for Jews.
	But it's very interesting that when you really peel back the layers, there's not really a huge division here.
	Where you could say that you've got these left-wing Jews like you've got left-wing anything, and right-wing Jews like you have right-wing anything, and it's us right-wing people, including those right-wing Jews, against those left-wing people, including those left-wing Jews, It's not like that at all.
	It's really more like you've got Jewish people who are about themselves and Israel, and they've got their internal disputes about what's good for them and what's good for Israel, and, hey, you're pushing this too far, it's now hurting us and everyone else.
	And to the extent that we can help Israel, well then, we're on their side.
	Or to the extent that we can help combat anti-Semitism and extremism, we're on their side.
	But if we begin to point out things about the other side, well then they don't like it.
	In other words, the ZOA can point out that the Jewish ADL is pushing anti-white curriculum.
	I cannot.
	If I come out and do a show and says Jewish groups like the ADL are pushing anti-white hatred at schools, well that's an anti-Semitic statement.
	That every Jewish advocacy group from right to left would condemn.
	ZOA, ADL, Daily Wire, Jerusalem Post, they would all condemn that.
	Conversely, when Ilhan Omar comes out and says that support for Israel is all about the Benjamins, when she goes out there and attacks the Zionist cause from the left, when leftists at Columbia or Ivy League universities attack the cause of Israel from the left-wing perspective that the ADL pushes, the ADL disavows them!
	And says that's anti-Semitic, that's anti-Zionist, and so on.
	So, the ADL can point out the flaws in Israel.
	The ZOA can point out the flaws in liberal Jewry in America pushing anti-white.
	And they can point those things out about each other.
	But what can't happen is for any of us to talk about what's going on.
	How this nation is governed, to them, is a Jewish affair.
	And it's a big proxy war between liberal Jews and conservative Jews.
	And insofar as that is the dialectic, then they're perfectly happy with that.
	But the moment that one of us wants to jump in, a Christian, an American wants a seat at the table, well then they both get together to say, shh!
unidentified		Shut the fuck up!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You're banned from everything!
		You're an anti-Semite!
		You're out of here!
		You're gone!
		You're finished!
		You want the proof?
		Well the reason that I was banned from Twitter last July is because the ADL published an article called Five Things You Need to Know About Nick Fuentes talking about how I'm a white supremacist and an extremist and a hateful bigot and anti-Zionist and it just so happens that two years before that the Zionist Organization of America wrote a letter demanding that I be banned from Twitter as well.
		And I have it right in front of me.
		It was written by Mort Klein.
		It says, quote, the Zionist Organization of America urges Twitter to take immediate action against Nick Fuentes, an anti-Semite and white supremacist who denies the Holocaust and routinely spreads hate-filled and bigoted speech and remove his verified account from the platform.
		It is long overdue that Twitter, in addition to Facebook, YouTube, and other social media platforms, consider their role in perpetuating violent extremist hate speech, antisemitism, Holocaust denial, and other forms of bigotry.
		It is long overdue that Twitter, in addition to Facebook, YouTube, and other platforms, consider their role in perpetuating this speech.
		ZOA President Morton Klein said, it is astounding and inexplicable that the most powerful companies in the world have no problem ignoring this pure evil, let alone offering even more exposure than average as Twitter did by verifying Fuentes' account.
		I urge Twitter to stop cooperating with Holocaust deniers, anti-Semites, white supremacists, and racists, and to prevent them from having a platform to further spread their vile, hate-filled speech.
		Identical.
		It's identical.
		What the left-wing ADL and the so-called right-wing ZOA published are identical.
		They both hate me.
		But wait a second.
		What I say about the ADL, the ZOA now says about the ADL.
		And what I say about Israel, there are some liberal Jews that will say the same thing about Israel.
		The problem is not that those things are being said, the problem is who is saying them.
		They can criticize each other.
		The dialectic and the dialogue in this country is a Jewish affair.
		But when one of us tries to get in the ring, then it becomes a problem.
		It's sort of like, I can bully my little brother, but you can't.
		I can bully and make fun of my family, but you can't.
		It's sort of the same premise here.
		And so there's this false dichotomy which has been created where we've got this political right and left in America, and we've all been on this journey over the past six years realizing that that's really not true at all.
		That right and left ideology are not the meaningful ways in which power is exercised.
		It's not a tug of war between right and left-wing people.
		More accurately, it's a tug of war between different factions of elites.
		And you'll have billionaires, and firm owners, and bureaucrats, and academics, and you also have a whole lot of Jews there as well.
		And some are Zionists, and some are Zionist and maybe more liberal, but still Zionist.
		And so when you try to look at the political conversation and look for allies and say, well, we've got some allies in Ben Shapiro because he's anti-abortion and I'm anti-abortion and he's against gay marriage and I'm against gay marriage and he's a fiscal conservative and I'm a fiscal conservative.
		But at the end of the day, we believe that we're redeemed by Christ's blood and Ben Shapiro thinks that he's redeemed by performing rituals.
		We believe that this is a Christian nation and that matters, that we are all equal before God and we all can join the new covenant and become the new Israel.
		And Ben Shapiro thinks that he is the chosen people, that he is chosen because of his maternal birth.
		And that's actually the real meaningful distinction.
		and his mother's lineage, that he's the chosen people by virtue of that, and that there is an Israel, but it's a country in the Middle East, and citizenship is dependent on your birth.
		And that's actually the real meaningful distinction.
		And that way, Ben Shapiro, like Morton Klein, has more in common with the people at the ADL and the people at the New York Times and the people, all these other liberals, than they have with us, who broadly agree on some partisan than they have with us, who broadly agree on some partisan issues and have a conservative
		These things matter and when you think there's this right and left Jewish war going on it's happening within the Jewish community and the broader story Is that it's Jewish people wanting to have these conversations, and nobody else is able to enter into the equation.
		Bret Stephens and a rabbi can argue whether Trump is good for the Jewish people, but to merely mention that that happened is somehow hateful, anti-Semitic, and you're not allowed to say it.
		We need to get smart about what's going on in our country.
		And the people that are making these decisions, and the people that are governing the country, and its foreign policy, and its domestic policy, and the people that are writing the TOS, and the people that are Determining the guidelines on the platforms and controlling what is considered acceptable or unacceptable political discourse.
		There are people that have nothing in common with us.
		There are people that don't believe in our God.
		They don't believe in our Lord.
		There are people that don't even have allegiance to our country.
		There are people that are not our kin.
		There are people that are not related to us by blood and they're not similar to us by culture.
		There are people that don't consider us, in some cases, even human beings.
		And that's a problem.
		And if you're a Christian, and if you're American, it should be a problem for you that people that don't believe in Christ, and maybe hate Christ, and have no allegiance to America, but in fact to another country, have so much influence over how our country is run.
		And you don't even need to look very far to see where that's going on, which is all over the place.
		Just look at the National Conservatism Conference.
		National Conservatism Conference.
		This is a huge new project funded by Peter Thiel who's the single biggest donor in this cycle.
		Single biggest individual donor in this election cycle in America.
		Tens of millions of dollars pouring into races and millions of dollars poured into conferences and think tanks and alternative tech media projects and venture capital with Rumble and Odyssey and so on.
		Getter.
		And the National Conservatism Conference, which has all of the biggest pundits from the New York Times, and from the think tanks, and from Manhattan Institute, and all the biggest politicians like Senator Ted Cruz, and Senator Josh Hawley, and Governor Ron DeSantis, and so on.
		And Mench's mold bug, and others.
	That conference is run by a dual citizen, Jewish Zionist, an Israeli named Yoram Hazoni, who went before that conference of, you could say, the most influential conservatives in America today, and he controls it, and said that conservatism is tikkun olam, which is a Hebrew expression for the repairing of the world through the activism of the Jewish people.
	That's what conservatism is.
	A conference which I'm banned from, which Peter Brimelow is banned from?
	Why is that?
	I'm a national conservative.
	I'm a nationalist conservative.
	So is Peter Brimelow.
	Why are we not allowed?
	Oh yeah, not our nation, not our conservatism.
	You don't even need to look very far.
	You see things like that.
	You see things like the Republican Jewish Congress attacking Marjorie Taylor Greene for speaking at AFPAC.
	And the list goes on and it goes on and it goes on and all you need to do is just take a little cursory look at the early life on any of these people's Wikipedia pages or take a look at some of the prominent organizations and some of where the money comes from and all the rest and you realize that that is going to be a big detriment to making America what we all think it is and we all think it ought to be, which is a Christian
	Historically American nation.
	It's fundamentally at odds with that when you got people that aren't Christian and don't believe in the cause of a legacy America run in the conservative movement.
	That's just a fact.
	And I don't want, I don't mean to come off as prejudiced or hateful.
	I'm not prejudiced and I'm not hateful.
	But the Disposition and the worldview of the people in power matters.
	I want people that are Christian to be in power and Jewish people are not Christian.
	I want people that are Christian to be making the laws and enforcing the laws and leading the conservative movement.
	Now does that mean that I don't want Jewish people commenting on it and speaking at the event or attending the event or participating in some capacity?
	No, I don't think that's always wrong.
	I don't think there's anything wrong with that.
	But when it comes down to it, if you're a Christian and you believe that Jesus Christ is God, then we want the church to be the soul of the state.
	We want the church and the state to be like the soul and the body.
	The Christian church, not the synagogue, not the Pharisees that killed our God.
	It's in the gospel.
	I'm not telling any tales out of school.
	That's the gospel.
	We want the church and the state to be like the soul and the body.
	And we want the church and its religious and moral teachings to inform the law.
	As the law is the instructor of the society.
	And how are we going to get that kind of a society that aligns with our metaphysical, philosophical, religious worldview if we've got this level and these layers of obfuscation and deception for openers?
	And when you begin to peel back the layers, you find a whole lot of people that do not share that fundamental worldview.
	It's fine, people can disagree, but this is a Christian country, and we're Christian.
	You can disagree, you cannot like it, but hey, the good news is there's a Jewish country all the way over there.
	You don't like it, there's a Jewish country for you.
	Otherwise, you're gonna have to live in a Christian country.
	Simple as that.
	That's why all this matters.
	Why can we not have a free America?
	Why can we not have a Christian America?
	Well, it's being run by people that support Israel and it's being run by people that don't believe in Jesus Christ, to put it lightly.
	That's why.
	It's a big part of it.
	It's a big part of it.
	And you start to talk like this and people don't like it.
	People shy away from this because it has certain connotations and this has a certain flavor.
	Tell me where I'm wrong here.
	Tell me where I'm wrong.
	I don't hate anybody.
	I don't want to kill anybody.
	But I want people that believe that we're saved by God's grace and Christ's blood to be running America.
	That's it.
	And certainly they should be running the Christian nationalist movement.
	They should be running the conservative movement.
	And not have people telling us it's about Tikkun Olam and then they go fly back to Israel.
	Sorry, you should, you know, maybe you should consider staying there.
	If you believe in Tikkun Olam and all that, guess what?
	I hear Israel's really nice this time of year.
	Live there.
	This is America.
	A country founded by Christians, for Christians, for our people.
	And we don't want it to be a Chinese country, and we don't want it to be a Muslim country, and you know what else we don't want it to be?
	We also don't want it to be some Pharisee, Rabbinical, Talmudic Jewish country either, to tell you the truth.
	You know, Jews don't have a problem with contraception.
	They don't really have a problem with abortion.
	They don't have a problem with a lot of things that are a big problem.
	So anyway, that's that.
	ZOA vs ADL?
	We have a word for that, it's called KFOB.
	ADL vs ZOA is about as real as Triple H vs Randy Orton.
	It's about as real as any rigged boxing match or anything like that.
	It is a family affair.
	It is a family affair.
	Don't you forget that.
	Don't you forget that Jeffrey Epstein, who palled around with Bill Clinton, was a Mossad agent.
	So there's your nexus between liberal politics and the State of Israel, which we're supposed to believe represent two separate spheres, but are in fact one.
	Are in fact connected in some ways.
	Or Harvey Weinstein.
	A liberal Jewish Hollywood director who hired a private investigator firm made up a form of Mossad agents from Israel to hunt down and silence his accusers.
	Once again, a little bit of a nexus there.
	Don't forget it.
	So...
	So that's that.
	That's the ADL, that's the ZOA.
	I guess it's true, the ADL is creating all the anti-white curriculum, but only the Zionists can say that.
	We can't.
	Otherwise it's anti-Semitic.
	Go figure.
	But the ZOA and the ADL, they both hate Nicholas J. Fuentes.
	That's what they have in common.
	They may bicker, they may fight at Shabbat, but they can all come together and say, Nick Fuentes is a dangerous extremist who should be banned from Twitter.
	And that tells you all you need to know.
	So that's that, but I want to move on.
	I want to get on into our Super Chats and see what you guys have to say about all this before somebody kills me here.
	So we'll see what you got.
	Let me know what you think.
	It's true.
unidentified		It's true.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't mean to sound like a crazy person, but listen, it's just, it's real.
		It's enough to make you crazy.
		Because once you see it, you can't unsee it, and it's so obvious.
		What's going on?
		But if you begin to talk about it, it's like you're the worst person in the world.
		Do I seem like a bad guy?
		Do I seem like a really angry guy?
		I'm not!
		I'm a happy-go-lucky, lovey guy.
		I'm a lovey... I'm a lovey, sweetie, cutie guy.
		And I'm a big... I'm a big friend to all, and a lover of all.
		And I just have a smile in my heart, and a laughter in my soul, and I'm just really a joyful, sweet kid.
unidentified		Who...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Doesn't have any problems with anybody.
unidentified		Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		But you begin to just look at the obvious here.
		Mencius Moldbag, my dad was a Jewish diplomat, so I grew up as an international Jew.
		And he's going out there studying power and says, the elite doesn't have any ethnicity or religion.
		It's totally decentralized.
		And Jewish power is totally fake.
		Take my word for it.
unidentified		Oh, okay.
		Okay, sure.
		Okay. - Yay!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I'm in the Italian Mafia, and let me tell you, the Italian Mafia is not real.
		My dad was in the Mafia, and I'm an Italian Mafioso, and take my word for it.
		Italian Mafia, it's not real.
		The Italian Mafia doesn't run Chicago.
		The outfit doesn't run Chicago.
		That's all anti-Italian hate.
		Take my word for it.
		I'm an Italian.
		Mafia member paid by an Italian billionaire to go speak at a conference directed by a dual citizen of Italy.
		Like, that's the level of subversion we're on.
		But because it's Jew, and it's just a matter of fact that because the Jews have such influence over everything, the mere utterance What's going on and people recoil?
		Oh, you know, oh, you're one of those people.
		Oh, yeah I'm one of those people that fucking reads I'm one of those people that fucking reads the paper and Reads books and has eyes that see So yeah, I'm one of those people actually I'm not one of those people who thinks it's the damn Democrats or whatever you believe For crying out loud makes me crazy
		Yeah, Mencius Moldbug, and Kostin Elimeriu, and Paul Singer, and Claremont, and the RJC, and the ZOA, and the ADL, and the Daily Wire, and the... that whole deal.
		There was a clip the other day.
		I'll play this for you.
		I think this is so funny This is from and then we'll get into the super chats, but I just want to play this because I just find this hilarious I This is from a... we reacted to this on the show once before.
		This is a clip from the Daily Wire backstage show.
		So, they get all the contributors to Daily Wire together.
		Is it backstage?
		I don't know what it is, but I want to play you a clip from a Daily Wire show, and it's Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh, the owner of Daily Wire, Jeremy Boring, Michael Knowles, And they're all there on a panel smoking their cigars and they're talking about politics, holding court on a live stream, and all these faggots, you know, get off to this crap.
		And I want to play a clip from that show.
		Daily Wire is a company that brings in $100 million a year, supported by billionaires with seed money.
		Ben Shapiro creation of billionaires.
		I don't want to play a clip at their backstage interview.
		It's going to seem outrageous, okay?
		I'm not going to show you the video, but this is Matt Walsh speaking and then this is Jeremy Boring and then Ben Shapiro interrupting.
		I'm going to play this clip and you tell me what you think.
matt walsh ▲ ● ▼		Hang on.
unidentified		There we go.
matt walsh ▲ ● ▼		...annoys them is when they see, I think, I don't remember who tweeted.
		Someone tweeted something like, if you're an American patriot, it means you're pro-Israel or something like that.
		Yeah.
		Right.
		This idea that, like, it is your patriotic duty to have this particular feeling about another country, no matter what the other country is.
		I don't care what country it is.
		So that goes too far on that side of it.
		And I think they're kind of reacting.
		It's kind of what you're saying.
unidentified		Yep.
matt walsh ▲ ● ▼		They're reacting to that.
jeremy boring ▲ ● ▼		I do think that there is something patriotic about supporting our allies, because we form alliances because it's in our national interest to form alliances, and having formed those alliances, and if we're all operating in a kind of good faith where those alliances are concerned, then there is a kind of patriotism.
unidentified		Yeah, but you don't have a patriotic...
matt walsh ▲ ● ▼		You do not have a patriotic duty to support any country that is not your own.
ben shapiro ▲ ● ▼		So I will say that I think that what that statement is missing is the phrase at the end, right now.
		Okay, so I don't think you have a patriotic duty to eternally support any other country because circumstances change.
		The country, I mean, how many times have we seen alliances change and people end up on the other side of those alliances?
		But the idea that in a conflict between a democratic ally and an actual terror group, That it doesn't connect to any sort of... We're not talking about nationalism now, which is just attachment to country.
		We're talking about patriotism, which goes to underlying principle, that you have no duty at all to support a fellow democracy that is an ally in its own battle for survival.
		That seems to me to raise some patriotism principles, in the same way that it raised patriotism principles to say that if Hitler were about to overrun Britain, Okay.
		So... I mean, do you not see what's going on here?
		Is it not obvious?
		Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So, I mean, do you not see what's going on here?
		Is it not obvious?
		Is it not plain as day?
		So, Matt Walsh says, well, I think it goes too far to say that you have a patriotic duty to support Israel.
		That's what he said.
		He says, I think it's too far to say that you have a patriotic duty to support Israel.
		You do not have a patriotic duty to support any country other than the United States.
		And they literally are tripping over themselves to interrupt him.
		And say, well actually, idiot, you do have a patriotic duty to support America's allies!
		That's that hillbilly protestant faggot.
unidentified		You do have a responsibility to support America's allies.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Such as Israel.
		Really?
		That doesn't even make any sense, idiot one.
		And then Shapiro jumps in, oh I think what that's missing is right now at the end.
		I think what that's missing is right now.
		Oh, that's really clever, Ben.
		That's really clever.
		No, fuck you.
		We don't have an obligation to support Israel at all.
		There's nothing patriotic about supporting Israel at all.
		What's Israel got to do with us?
		They speak a different language.
		They write a different language.
		They practice a different religion.
		They're from a different part of the world.
		They read their books from right to left.
		What has that got to do with us?
		Well, because they're a democracy.
		Oh, really?
		Because they're a democracy, is that it?
		Yeah, what if Hitler were over on Britain?
		Oh, there'd be a patriotic duty there, alright.
		So, um, yeah, I mean if that's not just totally transparent, if that's not just totally transparent, I don't know, man.
		You're just not paying attention.
		You're just not, you're just not in good faith.
		Once you see it, you can't unsee it.
		Once you see it, you can't unsee it.
		Patriotic duty.
		That's all Matt Wallace said.
		Matt Wallace, to his credit, said, yeah, I think people have a problem when you say that we have a patriotic duty to support Israel.
		And they're literally tripping over themselves to say, uh-uh-uh, stop right there.
		Yes, you do.
		Yes, you do have a patriotic duty to support us right now.
		No, we don't.
		Ben Shapiro also said that you're an anti-Semite if you're not a Zionist because the Jews can't survive without a country, so if you don't support their country, you support them all dying.
		That's what he said.
		One of his writers said the Europeans are inherently anti-Semitic.
		I think two of his writers said that.
		I think Josh Hammer said that and Elliot Hamilton said that.
		They both said that Europeans are inherently anti-Semitic.
		So, I mean, these people hate us.
		They hate Europeans, they hate Christians, and they hate America.
		Ben Shapiro will never say America first.
		Ben Shapiro will never, ever, ever say America first.
		Ever.
		Why not?
		Because he's not America first.
		He's Israel first.
		And so is the ZOA and so does the ADL.
unidentified		So, that's my view on that.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Alright, let's take a look at our Super Chats.
		Should I smash this Coke can?
		People are saying smash the can.
		Let's see, would I be able to hack it?
		I don't want to damage the desk though.
		Am I gonna be able to hack it up?
		Let's see.
		Is it sharp?
		I just don't want to spill it everywhere.
unidentified		That's the issue here.
		I just cut a big... Yeah, that's exactly what I didn't want to do is carve a big scratch in here.
		That'll buff out.
		That'll buff right out.
		So anyway, we're not getting that flying.
		That fly is long gone.
		Can you see that scratch here?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		No, you can't.
unidentified		Okay, that's good.
unidentified		Whoops!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Oops!
		Mistakes were made!
		Mistakes were made!
		Whoops!
unidentified		Whoa!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Okay, let's take a look at the Super Chats.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We'll see what you guys... What do you have to say?

▲