Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 31, 2022 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:46:12

TOTAL CENSORSHIP, 1984??? Truth Social BANNED From ALL ANDROID PHONES | America First Ep. 1051TOTAL CENSORSHIP, 1984??? Truth Social BANNED From ALL ANDROID PHONES | America First Ep. 1051

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:37:23

Appearances

Clips

alex jones

00:29

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		The American people will come first once again.
unidentified		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		From this day forward, it's going to be only America First. America First. America First. America First. America
unidentified		First. America
		First. America First.
		Thank you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Good evening, everybody.
		You are watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Tuesday.
		We have a lot to talk about.
		Lots to get into.
		I'm trying to fix my hair before the show starts.
		And it's just not happening.
		I don't know if it's too short.
		Not used to it.
		You know, you get your hair cut.
		It's tricky to style.
		But I swear I'm like this close to putting my fucking hand through the wall because I can't get my hair right.
		And I'm pissed off about it.
unidentified		So anyway, so anyway, how does it look?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Is it okay?
		Not a great note to start the show on, but I gotta be real.
		I gotta be honest where I'm coming from here.
		Big show!
		Big show tonight!
		Featured story, we're talking about Truth Social, which is perfect timing.
		Last night we talked all about this issue, and particularly about the censorship of Andrew Tate, and I talked about how it's kind of like a major black pill on censorship.
		Censorship is total, it's absolute, it's crushing, And there's no solution.
		The only solution is regime change.
		That's it.
		Take over the government.
		Those are your options.
		Otherwise, we're just finished.
		Okay?
		If we're toast online, we're toast.
		And unless we change the government, we're toast online.
		And that's what it is.
		And our featured story tonight is more about that.
		True Social banned on the Google Play Store.
		Because of their content moderation policy or lack of content moderation policies.
		And so what this means essentially is that the 42% of mobile users that have an Android are not able to download the proprietary truth social software onto their Android phones because they're banned from putting their software on the App Store.
		And I talked about this last night and I'm sure everybody here knows about this, but probably most regular conservatives don't know about this.
		These are the levels of censorship which are insurmountable.
		This is a This is a level, this is a degree, this is a place that you get in censorship where there is no alternative, there is no lawsuit, there's no way around it.
		You just come up against a brick wall.
		And the brick wall is called the regime.
		And in this case we're talking about the monopoly which is wielded by a couple of companies.
		Apple App Store, Google Play Store, that's it.
		They're the gatekeepers for all the software on all the mobile phones.
		And there are exceptions.
		There's, of course, there are some imperfect and honestly bad ways around this.
		But that is effectively, though those are the important facts of the situation, is that you've got a monopoly here.
		Google Play, Apple App Store, they're going to gatekeep who is allowed to have their proprietary software downloaded onto all the phones, or the vast majority of phones, in America.
		And so you see how Donald Trump is banned from Twitter, which is one level of censorship, and so he'll make his own platform.
		Well then you run into problems like this, where you make your own site, and you make your own app, What happens when Apple and Google ban you from their app stores?
		Well, what do you do then?
		Make your own phone with its own store?
		And at a certain point, you're gonna have to just make your own country.
		Well, we already have a country.
		I have no intention to move somewhere else.
		I have no intention to go to some island and quite literally rebuild the wheel.
		We need our ideas, we need our rights, we need our speech on the phones in America, on the app stores in America, on the major platforms in America that everybody uses.
		And the only way we're going to do that That's it.
		You can't make another phone with another app store with another site and another DDoS protection and another credit card to process on other banks We need to change the law to force the existing companies to serve us, or we need the government to change how they interpret existing laws to force them to serve us.
		That's it.
		And we've known that for a long time.
		But we'll talk about that tonight.
		We've all seen this coming.
		It should come as a surprise to nobody.
		We'll also be talking tonight about American Express, which I guess it's related.
		It's similar in some ways.
		There is a major class action lawsuit being brought against American Express by an employee who alleges that the company has an anti-white culture.
		They have a company culture of anti-white racism and discrimination, promoting blacks at the expense of whites, company leadership telling people that if they're white it's going to get in the way of their career and in the way of their promotions, all kinds of critical race theory training programs, racial sensitivity, outright rants.
		And of course this is at American Express.
		We're not talking about some small company.
		We're not talking about a gay bookstore.
		We're talking about American Express.
		We're talking about one of the most major financial institutions in the United States.
		And this is the kind of thing that's going on probably in almost every major corporation.
		This is just a corporation where you've got a class action lawsuit.
		So we'll talk about that too.
		It's pretty ironic, of course, because, you know, we all know this.
		We all know about the anti-white stuff, which is just so obvious.
		But what is incredible, and this is the double-think that goes on, is on the one hand everybody knows this is an anti-white society that bullies white people, hates white people, lectures white people and white children, and at the same time that that's going on, if you tried to say that to like your average person, maybe like your average liberal I guess, They would balk.
	And probably even your average conservative would say something to the effect that it's black people that are still being discriminated against.
	And this is just amazing to me.
	Because it's almost like the phony and non-existent oppression of black people That, ironically, is the thing that's being used to do the very real, present oppression of white people.
	So if you went out there and said, hey, I'm being discriminated against for being white, there's no discrimination against black people.
	People would laugh at that and say, what?
	If anything, blacks are discriminated against by whites like you.
	And I know we all know how it goes, but Pretty amazing.
	Pretty amazing that we're still living in this situation.
	But I feel like people are starting to wake up.
	People are starting to get the message.
	Five years ago, you couldn't talk about white.
	Couldn't talk about anti-white.
	But now it's becoming mainstream.
	To talk about white people being discriminated against in racial terms?
	It's on Fox News now.
	We won.
	I remember when I started doing this five years ago, If you talked about white and anti-white, if you said, why doesn't Trump talk about the white unemployment rate?
	You are alt-right, you are radioactive, you're untouchable, you're a neo-Nazi.
	Even five years ago, or I should say at this point like seven, six years ago, And now the anti-anti-white is on Fox News, it's on Tucker, it's all over TikTok, it's everywhere.
	So I guess that is some progress.
	And apparently it's now the subject of this major lawsuit.
	So we'll talk about that.
	Should be a pretty good show.
	Kind of a slow, it's slow man, still slow.
	We're coming up into the midterms and then hopefully things will really kick in in January when we get the Trump announcement.
	that he's going to run for president.
	Because, man, I went away for a week and I come back and I'm like, damn, there's still nothing, there's still nothing going on.
	Today, Mikhail Gorbachev died.
	That's kind of big news.
	But who cares?
	You know, I don't mean to be, you know, I don't mean to be impolite about that, but it's like, that's the big headline.
	That's a big story.
	I I get it's of some significance or something, but it's like, what am I gonna sit here and talk about freaking Mikhail Gorbachev tonight?
	I mean, the dude was 91.
	He hasn't been relevant in 30 years.
	So anyway...
	We're gonna dive into the show, but first I want to remind you to check out our mini documentary which is now airing on mymoviesplus.com.
	Movies Plus, that's a subscription-based service that we're using to distribute the film.
	Six dollars for a one-month subscription.
	Very cheap.
	And so you can sign up at MyMoviesPlus.com and watch the America First mini-documentary.
	The reviews are in and everybody loves it.
	We've got 90% 10 out of 10 ratings on IMDb.
	Everybody, and by the way, go to IMDb.com and review the film, okay?
	Give it a 10 out of 10.
	Share it with your friends and family.
	Share it on social media.
	It's a very important story.
	This is a big deal, okay?
	I was put on the no-fly list.
	Now I'm off.
	I am under investigation by the FBI.
	Assets seized.
	This is a big deal.
	All for just telling the truth.
	And it's pretty interesting that nobody really cares.
	Not that anybody cares, by the way.
	I mean, to some extent, look, I know how it goes, okay?
	I'm the radioactive guy because, you know, I talk about Jews and race, and I say a lot of controversial things.
	I know, I know.
	So I know that, like, I'm banned on Fox News, and Steve Bannon hates me, and everybody hates me, okay?
	But quite frankly, it is total... nevertheless, In spite of this, irregardless, irregardless, it is frankly bullshit that Republicans will grift for as long as they have been for years about cancel culture and even this January 6th Inquisition, DOJ, the gulags, all of it.
	And they're gonna have on Andrew Tate?
	Okay.
	They're gonna have on Andrew Tate, who's like a professional porn pimp, to talk about how he got banned for saying that boys are boys and girls are girls.
	I was on the freaking no-fly list for a year!
	This is insane!
	And the FBI froze my assets.
unidentified		And people are like, oh yeah, I'm like, if people are being put on the no-fly list, people should look into that.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		How about you look into it?
		You're a freaking show host!
		So, you know, whatever, that's okay, but we made a documentary about it, so you're gonna want to watch it because this matters.
		This is an important, I'm an important guy, and this is the most important story in the world.
		You're gonna want to watch what happened to me.
		Okay, mymoviesplus.com, $6.
		Leave a review on IMDB.
		It's all your favorites!
		The third episode of the documentary, which has not been released publicly up until now, it goes over AFPAC 3 and Beardson's in it, Vince is in it, Kai Klipsch is in it.
		Tyler Russell is in there.
		Everybody's in there.
		Wooza's in there.
		I think the third episode was the best by far.
		My humble opinion.
		And I'm not just saying that because I'm selling it to you right now.
		It is the best episode.
		Fun.
		Family-friendly.
		It's PG.
		It's G-rated, honestly.
		So check that out.
		Also, our super chat system is fixed, just in case you didn't catch the show yesterday.
		Super chat system has been broken for like months, unbeknownst to me.
unidentified		Everything's freaking broken all the time.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		But our super chat system is now fixed.
		So if you click the send a super chat button and you go to the super chat website, I know people are having difficulty before they couldn't make user accounts on this site.
		Now you can.
		So you make a user account and the confirmation email may go to your spam folder, but people are now able to make user accounts again and the super chats are working.
		Just so you know.
		Just so you know.
		Just in case anybody wants to do that, partake in that.
		With that out of the way, I think that's everything.
		That's all my updates for you.
		Like I said, it's just been kind of a slow week.
		Not too much going on.
		In E-drama news, here's what I want to talk about, okay?
		We may not even get into the news tonight because there's a lot of E-drama to cover, which is very important.
		So I'm going to shelve the news, which is frankly a little bit boring and kind of stale, and I want to get into the latest E-drama.
		Huge victory in the battle of ideas.
		In case you haven't noticed, I have been talking a lot more to my best friend in the whole world, Stephen Bunnell II, otherwise known as Destiny.
		It all started this year when we got together and we did the Russia-Ukraine debate back in March.
		It was a great debate.
		Everybody loved it.
		And people were actually surprised how civil it was.
		It was informative.
		It was civil.
		It was entertaining.
		It was fun.
		And there was a begrudging respect between the two opponents.
		And the debate, people raved about it all night and into the next day.
		And we started to do more collaborations and talking and things like that.
		And over the past week, I visited Destiny a couple of times in Miami.
		And now there's all this drama.
		Now everybody's mad at Destiny because he talks to me.
		And if you've been on social media, it's been all over Twitter.
		And all of these histrionic Jews and leftists and others, they're all attacking Destiny and saying, you're platforming a Nazi.
		You're giving a platform to a horrible person with horrible views.
		And it's completely irresponsible.
		And you invited him into your home.
		You're going to eat chicken and waffles with him.
		You know, you could debate the guy, but to sit down and eat lunch, that crosses the line.
		I mean, these people, they really think It's like they're living on another planet.
		Like there was one tweet that went viral, and it said, there's an old saying in Germany that if 10 people sit down for dinner with a Nazi, there's 11 Nazis at the table.
		And it's like, come on, really?
		But these are, these are all like basically mental children.
		The mental equivalent, in many cases literally it's children.
		It's like low IQ teenagers.
		People, trannies and freaks.
		Minds warped by pills and hormones.
		A lot of them minorities.
		A lot of them just profoundly stupid people.
		I don't even think that is a saying.
		Correct me if I'm totally off base on this, but that just sounds like something some faggot made up online.
		When somebody says, there's an old German saying, it's like when Hillary Clinton was going around saying there's an old African proverb.
		If you want to go quickly, go alone.
		You know, there's an old German... Oh, what?
		You go to Germany a lot?
		You're on tranny pills, okay?
		You're drinking the fluoridated tab water and you're on tranny pills.
		That's something that you imagine, probably.
		Anyway.
		So they're saying all this crazy stuff.
		They're saying that there's this pedophile Jew who goes on Destiny's stream and says that I'm gonna be going to power and kill this guy's whole family and the blood is gonna be on Destiny's hands because he ate chicken and waffles with me one time.
		And here's what I have to say on all this.
		I have to give a lot of respect to the D-man, okay?
		Big respect to the D-man, Stephen Bunnell, my best friend.
		He's constantly earning my friendship, you know that?
		It started out kind of as a joke, but the joke has become real.
	Started out as tongue-in-cheek and fun, and I'll come on the stream and say, hey, my best friend ever, hi!
	But you know what?
	That's my nigga, okay?
	That's my bestest friend ever.
	And it was a joke before, now it's real.
	Me and Steven Bunnell were like this, okay?
	And here's why I have a lot of respect for him.
	Over the past two days in particular, there's been like a revolution on his subreddit.
	And all these people have come out of the woodwork, it's very targeted, and they're on his subreddit, and there's posts with thousands of upvotes, And they're pleading with Destiny.
	Please, call Nick Fuentes a Nazi.
	Call him a Nazi.
	Disavow him.
	Disassociate.
	You need to acknowledge that he's evil, acknowledge that he's a Nazi, and that's the only thing you can talk to him about.
	Every time you talk to him, you gotta be mean to him, and you gotta impress him that he's a Nazi.
	And Destiny will not back down.
	He is banning everybody that posts that on his subreddit.
	He bans.
	And so there are people that have been in his community for like years and they're on the subreddit and you almost gotta feel bad for these poor bastards.
	They're in Destiny's subreddit.
	I guess they thought he was some crazy lefty.
	And they're in there pleading with him.
	Destiny, please!
	Nick Fuentes said this and this and this.
	Please just say he's a Nazi.
	Say it.
	Say he's a Nazi.
	And the DMAM just bans it.
	Wiped out.
	Your account, you've been a part of the community for years, you're gone.
	Wiped out.
	So much so, Destiny titled his stream today, said, The Purge.
	He's quite literally, in defense of me and my ideas, he is purging his community.
	He's wiping out.
	He is exterminating parts of his community.
	Nah, it's a joke.
	That's a tongue-in-cheek joke.
	He is wiping out and purging The elements of his community which are demanding that he call me a Nazi.
	He refuses to call me a Nazi and refuses to disengage.
	I'm being a little bit tongue-in-cheek about it, but it is honestly very respectable because for what it's worth, as you all know, I am not a Nazi.
	And I'm not saying that to appease anybody.
	I'm not saying that so that left-wing people will like me.
	Okay, look.
	I'm illiberal.
	I don't believe in democracy.
	I do not believe in universal suffrage.
	I don't support women's rights.
	I don't support LGBT rights.
	I believe in race and gender essentialism.
	I'm Catholic.
	I'm a Catholic reactionary.
	I believe that organized Jewry is extremely influential in the United States and pushes America towards an open society, liberalism, internationalism, for their own benefit at the expense of America.
	I think they do that corporately.
	These are all things that I believe.
	But I'm not I don't identify as a National Socialist.
	I don't identify particularly with the National Socialist movement led by Hitler in Germany in the 30s and 40s.
	I identify as a Christian American Nationalist.
	I'm not a Socialist.
	I'm not a National Socialist.
	I'm not German, ethnically, nationally.
	And I don't have any affinity for that.
	And again, I don't say that because I'm trying to trick anybody or I'm trying to win anybody over.
	It's just factually, if you look at the body of my work, it's not about that.
	What it is about is evangelizing people into the Catholic faith.
	It's about Raising a white racial consciousness and creating a white identity politics in America.
	It's against liberalism and enlightenment.
	It's sort of counter-enlightenment.
	It's illiberal.
	But those are my views.
	And the thing is Destiny, I think, knows that.
	I think he's talked to me enough and I think he's seen enough of my stuff to know that that is the case.
	I think he knows everything I've just said.
	These are my views.
	This is what they are.
	This is what they are not.
	And obviously, you know, liberals like to say that anything... everything's Nazism to them.
	Everything is... if you talk about Jews, you're Nazi.
	If you don't like, necessarily, liberalism or democracy, Nazi.
	If you believe in race, Nazi.
	But that's, of course, not true.
	Probably every people and every time has believed in race, has believed that races are real and race matters and it's a meaningful distinction between people.
	So it's not particular to the National Socialists.
	Probably most people in most times in history believed in strong hierarchical authority coming from the government.
	Again, that's not particular to the National Socialists in Germany.
	Even criticism of organized Jewry is something that has been around for as long as there have been Jews.
	Okay?
	It has been like this in America.
	It is like this now in... throughout the Muslim world.
	It is like this in Eastern Europe.
	It is like this in Asia.
	It is like this in the Western Hemisphere outside of America and Canada.
	None of this is particular to National Socialists.
	Point being is, Destiny knows that and he's willing to stand up for the truth even though there's all this retard pressure coming from people that are really just kind of crazy and hysterical.
	And I have to say, I have a lot of respect for him for that, because he could very easily just cave and say, alright, fine, he's a Nazi.
	Because it would cost him very little, and the argument is kind of nuanced and maybe to some extent in his community not really that important.
	I mean...
	For a DGG-er, like, where is the daylight between a so-called Nazi and, like, a Christian nationalist?
	I think gay people and trannies think that everybody that isn't down with their business is a Nazi.
	Or just as bad as a Nazi, if they don't call themselves that.
	But he's willing to go out there, he's going out to bat for the truth, and he's losing a lot of cred, he's losing a lot of support for doing it.
	And I have to say, I respect him for it.
	I have to say, begrudgingly, because we have a very contentious dynamic, but begrudgingly, I respect it.
	So let's get some 07s in the chat.
	Let's get some 07s or maybe some 0 slashes.
	Maybe some Romans in the chat.
	Let's get some 07s for the D-man, Steven Bonnell.
	Big shout out.
	We appreciate that.
	I appreciate him sticking up for me for once.
	And if nothing else, it's just kind of funny, honestly.
	If nothing else, it's just funny that the entire left-wing side of the internet is at war over me and Destiny eating chicken and waffles with his wife and then getting ice cream afterward.
	Because they're like, you cannot eat with him.
	He's only pretending to be a dorky schizoid incel.
unidentified		But secretly, It's like, no man.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		What you see is what you get, okay?
		And me and Stephen Bunnell?
		Best friends forever.
		Deal with it.
		And you're gonna have to live with that.
		Because that's the fact of the matter.
		But, anyway.
		That's the latest E-Drama.
		I don't know what your thoughts are on that.
		I don't know what your reaction is.
		See, here's the thing.
		Some people are saying, oh Destiny's a total liberal and he's a degenerate and all.
		I get a little pushback, not a ton, but some people are pushing back a little bit on my collaborations with Destiny.
		But I think it's actually really helpful and here's why.
		And I think Destiny recognizes this too.
		There is a very strong tendency among online political communities to just become more and more self-referential and insular over time.
		And I've seen this.
		I've been doing this now for five years.
		And I'm at that point now where it's... I'm at risk of going in that direction.
		I think there's a real... When you put in a lot of time, the chance that this happens, the draw for that kind of thing becomes greater.
		And what I mean by that is, we all get into politics as normies.
		You know, everybody who's in this thing is pretty young.
		And when I got into politics, I was very young.
		And when people start off in politics, they start off probably with very common political opinions or resources.
		You watch TV, you watch Fox News, you watch the nightly news, you talk to your parents, teacher, you read something in history class, you watch a YouTube video.
		A very cursory, superficial kind of thing.
		And so for example when I started my show I was talking to a very mainstream audience about very mainstream things like about Trump and you know whether or not immigration is good or bad as an example.
		It's a debate about is immigration good or bad.
		I'm gonna go on my show and give the case why immigration is bad.
		But over time you see that people don't want to retread the same kind of the same surface level conversations and people start I'm debating with other people that kind of agree with them on the fundamentals.
		If the first debate is, if the first position is I go out and do a show in year one about why immigration is bad, eventually over time I'm in a community with a lot of other people that agree that immigration is bad.
		And then I'm debating with other people that think immigration is bad about maybe why immigration is bad or what the particulars of immigration restriction should be.
		And then eventually, and over time, you kind of get, it gets narrower and narrower and narrower, and five, ten years in, you're debating with people that agree to a very fine level of detail about very Very fine things that probably most people don't even agree with or haven't even heard of.
		And this is where you get, I think, where the alt-right went.
		Where you had these crazy debates about... I saw it the other day on Telegram.
		Wignats are debating about whether or not people should make predictions on the internet.
		And it's like, at that point, you kind of lost the plot.
		And so, to return to the original point, I feel like when we go out and do this dialogue with Destiny, it brings it back It brings, I think, the political discourse back to a pragmatic place.
		We're speaking a common language where most people are.
		When I talk to Sneko, when I talk to Destiny, I'm talking to two people that are representative of probably what most people are thinking about or talking about.
		And what I mean by that is when I jump on with Sneko and he says, hey what's your best conspiracy?
		And I'm like 9-11.
		Now, maybe that's a little bit out there, but that's kind of like a more entry level.
		That's something that is... He's asking questions that people you know are asking.
		We're having a conversation that people you know might have that conversation.
		We're not talking about the particularities of, you know, well... I don't know, some of the more autistic stuff that we get into.
		And so anyway, I think that when we engage with these bigger More outside type people, we're bringing the movement back into a place, and it's so important, it's so important that everybody's on the same page on this, that we remember what we're trying to do here.
		And what we're trying to do is create a mass movement and change, not everybody's minds, but we're trying to get a lot of people to change their mind on fundamentals.
		And so, there's a tendency in this thing to kind of get, again, these very narrow, fine, almost basically irrelevant debates.
		What we're trying to do is win over your average conservative.
		We're trying to go for the Ben Shapiro listener.
		We're trying to go for the Turning Point USA member.
		We're trying to go for the Steven Crowder listener, the Donald Trump supporter.
		We're trying to win those people over based on their values.
		Because the thing is, we've got the real right wing.
		We've got the real...
		The real America first.
		And a lot of people might not really understand why that is because a lot of people don't know as much as we do.
		You know, they don't know, for example, that Kevin McCarthy and Mitch McConnell are running cover for Google.
		They don't know that the GOP establishment is in favor of mass immigration.
		They don't know that 90% of the people that voted for Trump were white.
		You know, they don't know a lot of these relevant facts which show why we're kind of really the real, tenable, authentic opposition in the country.
		And it's not even to some extent what Trump is saying or maybe 100% what Tucker Carlson is saying.
		You know, we're 100% of the real opposition.
	What we say constitutes, it's 100% set against the status quo.
	It's 100% set against liberalism and globalism and corruption.
	And we got to remember at the end of the day, we're trying to take that message and not make it too broad, but make it broad enough where, you know, a lot of people are going to be able to come in and understand I'm looking at the Destiny crowd and thinking, you know, we want to bring in people from the Destiny crowd.
	word on that.
	That's why I think it's productive.
	And I think the Destiny maybe feels similarly too.
	I'm looking at the Destiny crowd and thinking, you know, we want to bring in people from the Destiny crowd.
	We want to get this debate in front of average conservatives to see what we're about.
	And just like Destiny wants to reach out to, you know, not these psycho nutjobs that watch Vosh who think that everyone's going to form a worker co-op and like there's a transgenocide going on and all this other crazy stuff.
	So I think everybody wins.
	I think we're getting back into... it feels like 2016 again in a lot of ways.
	It's kind of happening on the margins of the major platforms.
	So anyway, So it's all good.
	So it's all good stuff on that front.
	That's the latest drama.
	So anyway, another 07 to Stephen Bunnell.
	We appreciate him defending me.
	Look, I'm not a Nazi.
	I am a conservative, okay?
	I am a nationalist.
	I am Catholic.
	I am conservative.
	All we want is what has existed in most places in most of human history.
	That's what we want.
	And we want the kind of society that we had in America like 30 years ago.
	Well, maybe like 100 years ago.
	I guess it'd be better.
	Minus the chattel, race-based slavery, obviously.
	Minus...
	You know, some of the other abuses that went on.
	We want an ordinary, conservative, traditional, faith-based society.
	You know, we want to keep the good things that have changed over the past 100 years.
	We want to get back to the fundamentals that have been lost, which are causing a lot of problems.
	So anyway, with all that being said, I want to dive into our news here and Why don't we talk first about this American Express story.
	Big class action lawsuit by an American Express employee against the company alleging systemic anti-white racism at the company.
	And, you know, this is nothing new to anybody that watches the show, but it's good to see that this is happening.
	And I guess I'll just dive into the article and talk about some of the accusations.
	It says, quote, a former American Express employee filed a class-action lawsuit complaint on Tuesday alleging that the credit card company exhibited, quote, callous indifference to civil rights law by terminating him because he is white and spoke out against its racially discriminatory policies.
	Brian Netzel, who worked a decade for Amex until he was terminated in 2020, told Fox Business that he sued the company on behalf of himself and potentially thousands of similarly situated employees following an avalanche of bad things coming to white people in that company once George Floyd was killed.
	And this is not a surprise because we said this was happening two years ago.
	After George Floyd died, every company was doing this.
	And you know, I mean you all work for companies for the most part.
	You all remember what it was like.
	I don't because I didn't have a job back then.
	I was doing this.
	And we didn't have any, you know, we didn't react to George Floyd killing at America First Foundation by discriminating against white people.
	We reacted to the George Floyd killing by discriminating... No, I'm kidding!
	I'm not gonna say anything that's gonna get me in trouble there.
	But you know what it was like.
	Every company was doing this.
	They were giving out grants to BLM.
	They were putting in place all kinds of programs, mentoring black employees, scouting out potential black recruits, promoting black employees, setting quotas in executive positions for black people.
	So it's no surprise that two years later you've got a class action lawsuit.
	This was going on everywhere, and it still is going on.
	The lawsuit alleges that amid the racial tensions roiling the U.S.
	in 2020, Amex implemented anti-racism policies throughout its corporate structure that, quote, gave preferential treatment to individuals for being black and unambiguously signaled to white employees that their race was an impediment to getting ahead in the company.
	Sound familiar?
	Probably it does for most people.
	Netzel said such policies fostered a workplace rife with, quote, a tremendous amount of animosity in which white people were unfairly punished or passed over for promotions, while some black employees were promoted merely to meet racial quotas, and employees were encouraged to root out in McCarthy-era fashion people who did not agree with this overall philosophy.
	That's all maintained that this created an atmosphere in which white employees were treated disparately and forced to undergo trainings in which they were told to treat black co-workers differently.
	He said, quote, we weren't allowed to talk before they talked in a meeting.
	They were explicitly advised against things such as touching black people's hair as if that were a frequent occurrence.
	I love when... this is like a common thing you hear all the time.
	Don't touch my hair!
	It's like I'm not talking... I am... I have no interest in touching your greasy ass frizzy hair, okay?
	Do you hear that?
	This is like the new thing.
	Like, I see this on TikTok all the time.
	I see this on TV.
	There's like this common trope now that white women in particular are just dying to touch black people's hair and that that's just totally inappropriate and such a faux pas and black people are like, you ain't touching my hair.
	It's like, where is that going on?
	Where have you ever seen that?
	And if anything, by the way, if anything, that is white people being nice.
	Okay?
	First of all, I don't think that even happens.
	Don't flatter yourself.
	The idea that white people are going out of their way to touch black people's hair is just preposterous to me.
	I've never seen that.
	I've never heard of that.
	Okay?
	I've never seen... Because here's the thing.
	I mean they braid their hair up.
	That's a very unsanitary practice.
	Okay, you see some of these black people with the cornrows and the braids and sometimes they'll leave them in there for like a long time and it gets stinky and I'm not touching that.
	That's one.
	Two, when white women give other black women compliments on their hair, they are trying to be nice.
	Okay, they're giving a compliment.
	They're looking for something to compliment.
	I love your nails.
	I love your hair.
	But black people hate white people so much that they're gonna take what is Even if it's inappropriate, even to the extent that that is happening, which I highly doubt, even if it is inappropriate, they're taking an innocent, well-intentioned gesture of kindness and flipping that into something to hate white people for.
	To ridicule, mock, and condescend.
	Okay, fine.
	Your hair is ugly.
	Happy?
	Fine.
	Oh, we're not touching your hair.
	Your hair is ugly, and your clothes are tacky, and your nails are tacky.
	Didn't anybody ever tell you that?
	Dressing up in a track suit isn't actually like a classy look?
	How's that?
	You like that better?
	Oh, but that's racist.
	So what it's really about is you just can't win.
	How are we supposed to treat these people?
	If you're mean to them, it's because you're a racist that hates black people.
	If you're nice to them, well you're trying too hard and that's because of internalized racism and oh but not like that, not like that.
	Oh you're a white savior, you're a white this.
	They just hate us.
	Okay?
	They just hate us.
	A lot of them, not all of them, but a lot of, and this is, we have to be honest, it's not everybody obviously, But a lot of black people, particularly these activists, they just hate white people.
	And probably the amount of black people that hate white people is overrepresented in these liberal activists.
	But we've got to be honest.
	That's just true.
	Black people, not all of them, but a lot of them, are just looking to be offended by anything.
	It's just resentment.
	It's grievance.
	It's resentment.
	And this is like a total detour, by the way, from the main story.
	But this is a thing I hear all the time.
	White women always trying to touch our hair.
	It's called they're trying to be nice.
	Really, we just can't win.
	Try and be nice, it's racist.
	Be mean, it's racist.
	Hire you because you're black.
	It's racist.
	Don't hire you because you're black.
	It's racist.
	Hire you because your qualifications.
	Racist.
	Don't hire you because your qualifications.
	Racist.
	Can we just treat them like people?
	Can we just?
	You know, sometimes I don't like black people.
	Not because they're black, but just because they're people.
	And sometimes I really like them.
	Not because they're black, because they're people.
	That's why I'm never bending over.
	That's why when people call me racist, I don't really care.
	Because I'm not really bending over backwards to try and get anybody to like me, because you're just losing.
	It's like I go on this debate panel the other week with Judeon and Abba and Don, and I'm trying to be as delicate as possible, but I'm saying, look, I believe in racial differences, and I want to marry a white woman, and I think that race is real and it matters.
	And I'm on there being very respectful and very polite and being honest, and they're in there saying, oh he racist, oh you racist, you're a Nazi, and it's like, you know what?
	Fuck you!
	I mean, sorry for the language, but at a certain point, that's a you problem.
	That's not a me problem.
	I'm polite.
	I'm considerate.
	I'm respectful of all people.
	But there's a lot of blacks out there that have gotten it in their head that there's really just, you just can't win.
	And that's just where we're at.
	So anyway, the black hair thing is the epitome of that.
	So anyway, that was one of the complaints, is that the white employees were particularly told not to touch a black people's hair.
	I mean, like we're the underclass, like we're peasants or something.
	According to the lawsuit, no admonishments were given to the black employees, nor did the training direct black employees on how they should conduct themselves around other races.
	Netzel also noted that the company's intention to fill the company's leadership with more African Americans was open.
	Netzel alleged in his complaint that his female manager, who was black, would "aggressively harass and berate white employees, overworking them and retaliating with poor performance reviews." He also claims that Amex was aware of her behavior and that she was one of the executives who received financial incentives to reduce the number of white people in her department.
	Which all sounds very believable to me.
	The lawsuit's claims echo previous allegations of discrimination Amex has faced.
	In 2021, five current and former employees told Fox Business on condition of anonymity that the company engaged in reverse discrimination against white employees, barring them from promotions and steeping the workplace in the tenets of critical race theory.
	According to internal documents reviewed by Christopher Ruffo, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, Amex executives subjected employees to a CRT-based training program.
	During which they were made to map their own intersectional identities and privilege based on race, sex orientation, body type, religion, disability status, age, gender identity, and citizenship.
	They were then reportedly expected to adjust their behavior in the workplace based on their position in the intersectional hierarchy.
	So this is, again, this is not going on in like a San Francisco bookstore.
	This is not going on in a humanities department at a liberal university in Boston.
	This is going on an American Express, okay?
	American Express, a major US credit card company, you've got a systemic anti-white bias, which is significant.
	You know, notice these allegations.
	It's not saying that the employees are liberal.
	It's not saying that the executives have a left-wing disposition or donate to Democratic candidates or something.
	It's saying that white people are being discriminated against in meaningful ways.
	Based on their race.
	Not for their political views.
	They're being passed over for promotions for being white.
	There are quotas that are based on race.
	Again, not based on some other thing.
	There are financial incentives given to departments about how they could diversify their staff.
	And I said this two years ago when this was going on.
	Racial quotas can be categorized in no other way than as a license to discriminate against white people.
	That's what it is.
	And some people look at it and say, well, people should have representation.
	You know, everybody, all these institutions should be representative of the population of America.
	Which, when you think about it, really makes no sense on its face.
	You know, why should the board of a major company ...reflect the demographic proportions of the country.
	If a company is located in a city which has its own demographic makeup, or if a company is located in a neighborhood, and if a board is pulling from a specialized workforce of people with a specialized knowledge of the company or specialized skill set, why would the board of that company, why should that board of that company,
	Reflect in its demographic composition the racial composition of the United States of America.
	Is that not completely arbitrary?
	Should it reflect the global proportions?
	Should it reflect the global proportions of black and white people?
	Why not?
	We all live on planet Earth.
	Should it reflect the national, the city-wide, the neighborhood?
	It doesn't make any sense.
	When people talk about representation, that in itself makes no sense to me.
	People talk about a person is going to have their own unique set of experiences which gives them a unique perspective.
	If their perspective was so unique and valuable, then they would get hired.
	A company wants to make money.
	If a person's unique experiences growing up in Harlem or whatever, growing up in Harlem or a historically black university, if that was really so valuable, had such a monetary value, to a business, then a business would hire them.
	It wouldn't need a quota.
	The purpose of the quota is simply this.
	It is to give license, or in some cases mandate, that companies pass over qualified white people for less qualified not-white people.
	That's by definition what it is.
	Because if the non-white people were as or more qualified, they would be hired.
	If a company is looking to fill board positions or vice president positions or something, if the black people or the other non-white people were as qualified or more qualified, they would get hired.
	There would be no need for a quota.
	The quota is to say, if you've got 10 highly qualified white people and 10 positions, well, you've got to pass over some of those white people and find less qualified people.
	Less qualified non-white people.
	And that happens at every level.
	That's what's happening in the universities where there's a finite number of spots.
	That happens with scholarships where there's a finite number of scholarships to give out.
	That is what happens in recruiting at the lowest levels of a company.
	Our promotions, our mentorship.
	Everything that you can say where there's a finite number of things, resources, positions, whatever, where you've got affirmative action or racial quotas, it can be conceived of in no other way other than discrimination against white people.
	You've got to pass over some amount of white people to fill them up with non-white people.
	And when we talk about these things in very broad terms, people might say there's a social good in that.
	There's a social value.
	There is some social good in increasing the diversity by putting in place these mandates, mandating that a company has so many people from a particular racial background or something.
	But the real world effect is that individual people are being hurt by this.
	Individual, you know, white middle and working class people are not going to get the scholarships.
	They're not going to get the spots in the universities.
	They're not going to get the jobs.
	They're not going to get the promotions.
	How is that fair?
	How is that right?
	Those are real people.
	By the way, if you happen to be white, that affects you.
	So a lot of white people love to be down with the real racial justice agenda until you're the one that's not going to get a job, until you're the one that is not going to get into college, you're the one that's not going to get the promotion, or better yet, your kids.
	You know, and I think that's where White people in particular need to listen up because maybe white people and people in general care less about sacrificing their own lot in life, but people care very deeply about the prospects that their children will be successful.
	And this is what our future is going to be.
	In a society where we're endlessly trying to correct disparities which are innate through affirmative action policies, we're always going to be setting white people further and further and further and further back to account for things, again, which are intrinsic.
	And that is going to least of all affect the people that are alive and working for those spots in college and in business today.
	It is going to affect, with each successive generation, white people that are not born more and more as time goes on.
	Our kids will be discriminated against more than we were, and our grandkids will be discriminated against more than our children will be.
	And I don't know why any of us would be in favor of that.
	That's not good for us.
	That's not good for our people, our families, our descendants, our children.
	It's not right.
	It's not fair.
	It's not what this country was built on.
	And this is going on in major companies.
	If this is going on in American Express, you can bet this is going on in probably every major corporation.
	Like I said, this is not like a tiny left-wing company, and it's not like these are even partisan things.
	It's not even like there's a political bias.
	We're talking about what the left complains about, which is this is nothing other than systemic anti-white racism.
	And I don't even like the word racism because racism as a term is very ambiguous.
	It's discrimination.
	It's discrimination.
	It's prejudice.
	In some cases, it's outright hatred.
	And you can see that.
	The guy's not just complaining about promotions.
	He's saying people are being berated.
	They're being treated like second-class citizens.
	And, you know, here's the thing.
	I don't believe in human equality.
	I think that every individual is born unequal.
	Everybody attacks me because I say that there's racial differences in IQ.
	And they say, doesn't that mean that you think white people are better than black people?
	And I say, no.
	And they say, well, how can that be?
	Aren't you saying that, on average, white people are smarter than black people?
	And I'm saying, well, that's not quite what that means.
	But here's the thing.
	Everybody has a different IQ.
	Everybody has a different height, and a different weight, and a different complexion, and a different fingerprint, and a different... And I know this is all obvious, you know.
	Pardon me if this sounds simple.
	It is simple.
	That's just it.
	Human equality is a myth.
	We should not expect that groups of people would be equal, because individuals are not equal.
	You know, if you have siblings... People that come from the same parents are not equal.
	People that... Twins are not equal.
	Identical twins are not equal.
	Identical twins that have the same DNA.
	We'll come out looking slightly different and having slightly different characteristics and different interests and different intellect.
	If identical twins are not equal, and if siblings are not equal, and if parents and children are not equal, and if neighbors are not equal, and if people of the same Ethnicity or tribe or village or race are not equal.
	Why would we expect these massive groups of people to be equal?
	Why would it equal out the farther that you go out?
	If you can line up 30 people in a kindergarten classroom and find all kinds of disparities, why would that not be the case in general terms, in group terms?
	It just doesn't... Equality has no basis in reality.
	It's an abstraction.
	That being said, All people should be treated equally.
	All people should be given a fair chance.
	And all people should be treated with dignity.
	All people should be treated with respect.
	People should be treated fairly.
	And, you know, that is where I diverge with liberals.
	Liberals will say that we've got to sort of force equality in the world.
	There is no equality in the world, but we've got to force it.
	We've got to force equality between men and women.
	We've got to force equality between blacks and whites.
	We've got to force equality between the young and the old, and every other, you know, Muslims and Christians and everything.
	You can't do that.
	That's where I disagree.
	But as far as how you treat people, now that I will agree with liberals.
	And by the way, I think that's actually a Christian belief.
	You know, when it says in the gospel, neither Jew nor Gentile and all that, people take that to mean that, oh, we just should be blind to difference in the world.
	That's not what that means.
	It means that we're all children of God.
	It means that we're all created in the image of God and people should act accordingly, which I support.
	This is a very clear example of how the left is not in favor of this.
	They hate white people.
	And I've been saying this for a long time.
	They're not trying to create a society that has dignity and respect and humanity for everybody and equal opportunity and fairness.
	They're not trying to create that.
	What many left-wing people are trying to do is exact a revenge.
	They're trying to exact a racial revenge against white people.
	They play into that.
	I think they play into that for political reasons.
	A lot of them just believe that a lot of it is an extension of ideology.
	For some people it flows from their identity.
	But that's what they're after.
	They want to replace what they perceive in their mind as the white oppression of all people, white atrocities perpetrated against other people, and they want to take the shoe and put it on the other foot.
	And they want to take a wrong and they want to answer it with an equal wrong.
	They want to take the historical, again perceived, historical wrongdoings of white people and they want to visit those wrongdoings upon white people now by non-white people.
	That's what they want to do.
	That's what reparations are about.
	That's what affirmative action is about.
	That's what immigration is about.
	Think about the immigration conversation.
	When we talk about how Native Americans, when I say Native Americans, America didn't exist when the Indians were here.
	When I say Native Americans, I'm talking about people that were born in America.
	I'm talking about US Americans, not Indians.
	People say Native Americans.
	Oh, those were the Indians.
	The Indians didn't live in America.
	The Indians lived in teepees.
	Okay, the Indians lived in grass huts and teepees and they rode on, well after the Europeans got here, they rode on horses and they killed buffalo and They put feathers on their head and they danced around the fire.
	They did not live in America.
	They were not Native Americans.
	They're indigenous to this continent.
	We are the Native Americans.
	Now when we talk about how Native Americans are being displaced by immigrants and how American culture is being erased by mass immigration from all kinds of countries in the past 30 years, what liberals will say is, well isn't that what you did to the Indians?
	Isn't that what you did to the indigenous Americans?
	Now how do you like it?
	And when they say that, to borrow a phrase, they're saying the quiet part out loud, which I hate that expression, but that's what they're doing.
	It sort of gives it away, which is to say, you know, they'll go out there and say it was wrong what the Europeans did to the indigenous Americans.
	It was wrong what whites did to blacks.
	It was wrong what white people did, or Europeans did, or Christians did, or so on.
	But then when they say things like, oh well we're gonna do to you what you did to us, that's a very different premise.
	Because the first premise is that genocide and colonialism and slavery is wrong.
	But when they go and say we're gonna do it to you now, it's a subtle change which says those things were wrong when they were done to us.
	Not they're wrong, they were wrong when they were done to us.
	Discrimination was wrong when it was done to us.
	Slavery was wrong when it was done to us.
	Colonialism was wrong when it was done to us.
	It's not wrong.
	It's wrong when it's done to us.
	It's particular.
	It's not universal.
	And when they go out there and say, well now we're gonna discriminate against you.
	How do you like it?
	And now you're gonna be a minority in America.
	How do you like it?
	And now we're gonna do what you did to the Indians.
	How do you like it?
	And you're gonna work and pay reparations.
	You're gonna work for no money and give it to us.
	Slavery.
	How do you like it?
	That tells you what they're all about.
	They're about revenge.
	And it's about hatred.
	And it's about the same tribal prejudice that they accuse white people of exclusively perpetrating in the world.
	That's what's going on here.
	And, you know, white people have got to grow a pair and be done with this.
	This is intolerable.
	I don't want to live in a society that hates white people.
	It's unacceptable.
	It's non-negotiable that we live in an anti-white society.
	That is not up for debate.
	I don't accept that.
	I do not accept reparations.
	I will never accept... Can you imagine your white children working and the fruits of their labor go to black people?
	As a reparation for slavery?
	Because the thought of that to me is unconscionable.
	And I would never tolerate that.
	I don't care if the law mandated that.
	I will never pay reparations to black people.
	And my children will never pay reparations to black people.
	Unacceptable.
	That is slavery.
	And you know, we're already doing that, by the way.
	I mean, what do you think welfare is?
	Who are the recipients of welfare?
	What group is a net negative on the government in terms of wealth and cash transfer?
	In-kind transfer of wealth.
	Who's a net negative and who's a net positive?
	I mean, that's what all these programs are.
	But the minute that they start to say, well, we're gonna exact money from white people to give to black people, it's reverse slavery.
	We're getting reverse discrimination.
	We're getting reverse racism.
	We're getting reverse slavery.
	We're gonna get reverse genocide.
	And the reverse is key because they're saying, well you did this to us, now we're going to turn it around on you and do it to the white man.
	And it's not okay.
	Nobody should be okay with this.
	White people should not be okay with this.
	And nobody in good conscience should be okay with this.
	It's not okay when it's done to anybody.
	I don't support discrimination.
	I don't support affirmative action.
	I don't support these things against anybody.
	It's not right.
	And that's happening at the highest levels.
	And you wonder what kind of country we're going to get when white people are discriminated against.
	You're gonna get a country, you're gonna get an apartheid state like South Africa.
	Open your eyes and pay attention to what's happening.
	And don't get me wrong, I'm a Christian nationalist.
	I think that the one thing that's gonna bring the country together, if it's possible, is Christianity.
	And it's a big part of it.
	But the racial dimension is absolutely real and essential to consider.
	Because white people will become a minority in America.
	Soon, if nothing changes.
	And we are going to find ourselves within this century, at the end of this century, in a country that's maybe 25% white.
	The vast majority of people will be non-white.
	And that's a problem in itself.
	For a lot of reasons, which is beyond the scope of this show.
	But it is a particular problem when this is the kind of culture that's being promoted by the private and public sector at the highest levels.
	White people may not think anything of reverse discrimination and reverse prejudice and reverse racism when we're comfortably in the majority.
	But that majority is slipping every day, and it's going to slip into the minority, and it's going to keep going beyond that.
	We're going to become a minority, it's expected, in the next decade, in the 2030s.
	And it doesn't stop there.
	The immigration keeps going up.
	5 million illegals apprehended at the border since Biden took office a year and a half ago.
	5 million people apprehended.
	Probably 50% of that number got through the border without being apprehended.
	So immigration is historically high and it's going up and the rate at which whites are being replaced by non-whites is accelerating.
	The day, and especially after COVID too because of the impact on fertility rates, the day when whites become a minority is approaching and it's the date that when that happens is getting closer and closer not just because time is going forward because that date is moving earlier.
	And what happens in a few generations when your grandkids wake up and they're in an all non-white neighborhood and they're going to an all non-white school and the school's run by non-whites and the universities are run by non-whites and the companies are run by non-whites and what chance are they gonna have to have any kind of prosperity or mobility in a country that is run by non-white people that hate white people?
	When every company and school and government bureaucracy is run by the people like at American Express that don't want your white daughters touching the black girl's hair and are lecturing them about it and don't want the white boys to take the the scholarships and the Ivy League positions away from the blacks and the promotions and the recruitment and so on and the government benefits the UBI at that point and whatever else
	It is not an exaggeration to say that's where we're going.
	If you told people 60 years ago when they just started this business of civil rights and integration and all that, if you told people 60 years ago that this would be happening today, they wouldn't believe you.
	If you told people 60 years ago when MLK was a rabble rouser and all this, if you told An average person 60 years ago that the credit card companies would be running this way and that there would be massive riots all over the country because a black drug dealer got killed by a cop and that they're abolishing the police and crime is out of control and people are stealing cars at an unprecedented rate and the cops don't even chase them and on and on and on.
	People wouldn't believe you.
	If you went back 60 years ago and said that by 2100 this country would be 20% white, people wouldn't believe you.
	I'm telling you now, and it sounds like an exaggeration, that your kids are going to grow up in that kind of world.
	Some people may roll their eyes, but that's where it's headed.
	That's where we're all going.
	The signs are all there.
	That's a logical conclusion.
	You may look at the past and say, based on the past, that's not where we're going.
	Take a look at the trajectory.
	Take a look at what's happening now.
	Take a look at where things were before versus where they are today in the differential and project that 5, 10, 50, 100 years into the future.
	We don't stand a chance if white people don't get hip.
	Because guess what?
	The Jews are not gonna come help us.
	You know, we're so nice to the Jews, and we're so nice to black people, and we're so nice.
	Nobody's gonna come and give a rat's ass about our plight in the future.
	You think any of these people care about your beautiful white kids?
	I don't think so.
	You know, we're bending over backwards to accommodate and make sure that all these other people feel comfortable in America.
	Do you think that in a hundred years when whites are in the minority, and you have a blonde-haired, blue-eyed daughter who's beautiful, do you think that black people are going to go out of their way to make sure that she's getting treated fairly when we're 20% of the country?
	Do you think the Jews are going to do that?
	Or do you think that they're gonna be doing this and saying, ha ha ha ha, we suffered all this time and now it looks like, now it looks like you're in the minority, huh?
	I think that's what it's gonna go.
	I think that's how it's gonna go.
	I think if anything we're gonna get sympathy from Asians and maybe Hispanics, but that's it.
	So anyway, so that's that.
	That's American Express.
	We're going to move on.
unidentified		I want to talk about our featured story, which is about true social.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's true!
		It's true.
		You think Ben Shapiro is going to stick up for you?
		Do you think that Ben Shapiro is going to stick up for white people?
		Because I don't.
		He won't even say white.
		Ben Shapiro will not be sticking up for white people.
		Newsflash.
		Nate Hockman, Gay Cockman, as I like to call him, he will not be sticking up for white people.
		And neither will R.C.
		Maxwell or Tim Scott or any of these people.
		They are not going to be sticking up for you.
		They are not going to be sticking up for your grandkids.
		And we're going to be told endlessly, it's a voting rights issue.
		This is not a freaking voting rights issue, okay?
		When I imagine the descendants of people like me in the future Living in a, living in the ghetto, living in a place like LA or like the south side of Chicago or Baltimore, what comes to mind is not a voting, it's not a voting rights issue, okay?
		It's not a voting rights issue.
		It's not, I don't want a freaking colorblind meritocracy.
		I want a normal country.
		I want to make America great again, okay?
		Colorblind meritocracy.
		I hear this from Blake Masters the other day.
		I like Blake Masters, but he goes out there and says, Affirmative action is terrible.
		We want the best people doing the best job.
		And to an extent I agree with that, but this colorblind meritocracy stuff has got to stop.
		We're not a meritocracy.
		We're a nation, okay?
		Yeah, I think we should have a meritocracy, but we've got to have a nation first.
		Because colorblind meritocracy, that's another way of saying boarding house.
		That's another way of saying polyglot boarding house.
		Colorblind meritocracy is a euphemism for polyglot boarding house.
		That's the Lazarus poem interpreted by Claremont.
		Instead of saying, give us your tired, your poor, it's give us your high IQ, give us your Indian programmers, give us your Chinese engineers, give us your... No!
unidentified		No!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		No!
		We don't want anymore.
		We're good.
		We're full.
		We have enough.
		We've had enough.
		We can be the source of our own greatness.
		We're a great people.
		This is a great civilization.
		We don't need your poor.
		We don't need your rich.
		We don't need your dumb.
		We don't need your smart.
		We don't need you.
		We want to be America.
		And you go and you can be China, and you can be India, and you could be Lagos, and you could be whatever.
		We want to be America.
		For better or for worse.
		And within America we can have a meritocracy and it can be fair and have equal opportunity for every kind of person.
		But sometimes I see, you know, like I saw Darren today, and I like Darren a lot, but Darren Beatty said today, he goes, you know, he says, controversial opinion, getting rid of affirmative action is better than an immigration moratorium.
		No, it's not!
		The immigration is what's driving the displacement of whites in America.
		If you shut down immigration, maybe whites never become a minority.
		No exaggeration.
		Now maybe that's changed because of the COVID pandemic, which has reduced fertility across the board.
		But if you have no immigration, the population replacement grinds to a halt.
		Okay?
		We do not become, if we become 50%, we're barely below 50% without immigration.
		Indefinitely!
		I talked to a buddy of mine.
		I don't want to dox him, but he's qualified on this.
		PhD.
		I don't want to get more details on that, but this is his business, okay?
		This is his area of expertise is this topic in particular.
		And he told me, If immigration is shut down, there is no majority-minority.
		Now, you are going to have a larger proportion of non-whites in the future than you do now, but it almost never happens.
		The full-on majority-minority situation, it's basically ground to a halt after a certain amount of time.
		Because the fertility rates of all the people go down once they get in America.
		And so the point being is, you know, we got to have a country first.
		I don't know how we got on this tangent, but I saw that and I disagree with that opinion.
		I agree that affirmative action is very destructive, but it's one of these things where it's like, you know, what are we trying to do here?
		I want a nation.
		I'm America first.
		I don't want to, I don't necessarily want a pro-immigration, open society, but it's just about having a high IQ.
		I want a nation.
		I want a country.
		Anyway, so that's Amex, but I want to move on.
		I want to get into True Social here because we've been at it now for a long time.
		When did I start this show?
		It's been an hour and 20 minutes!
		I've been doing this for an hour and 20 minutes already.
		We're not even on our... We're not even on our last story of the night.
		Haven't even started yet.
		Alright, but we'll get into this.
		Okay.
		So our featured story is about True Social.
		Which, it's been announced this week that they are banned from the Google Play Store.
		You know, it's really, it's not anything you haven't heard probably, but we're gonna get into it anyway.
		This is something that we all saw coming.
		Everybody thinks that censorship is getting banned on Twitter, but it's not.
		It goes way deeper than that.
		It's not about a platform with a set of policies.
		It's about the fact that there is a regime and they tightly control public opinion.
		That's what it's about.
	People think it's a matter of, uh, Jack Dorsey doesn't want you to say this!
	It's not, it's not about that.
	Okay?
	It's not about the platforms.
	It's not about the company.
	It's about the fact that America is controlled by a regime, which includes the state.
	And the state's a big part of it, but it's not just the state.
	It's the state, and it's major conglomerates, and it's Wall Street, and it's the banks, and it's Silicon Valley.
	And all of these organs constitute the regime that runs America.
	And they control the political conversation.
	They're the tastemakers, they're the opinion makers.
	The fact checkers, and they have made, since the 2016 election, a major effort to crack down on freedom of conscience, and freedom of thought, and freedom of speech.
	Banning people on Twitter is one of the ways that they do it.
	But of course, people get banned on Twitter, they get banned on Facebook, and they go and they create their own website.
	They try to create their own platform.
	Or they take their information and they start their own website.
	And if it was just a company problem, well that would be the solution.
	But it's not a company problem.
	It's a regime problem.
	Because people leave the platform and they make their own platform and then what happens?
	This happens.
	And this has been happening.
	I got banned first from Patreon, which is not Twitter.
	Patreon's a way that creators monetize their content, make money off of their content.
	So they made it difficult or impossible for me to make money doing what I do.
	Then I got banned from PayPal.
	Then I got banned from Stripe.
	And they made it extremely difficult.
	I eventually got banned from almost all the payment processors.
	I was put on the match list, which look that up.
	I was put on the match list.
	I'm banned from processing online Visa and MasterCard.
	Can't make money online.
	Made it impossible for me to make money doing this.
	I got banned on all the platforms.
	Twitter, Facebook, etc.
	Then they banned me even further.
	They banned my name from appearing in the search algorithm.
	They curate the search results when you search my name on YouTube.
	They banned outright my name on TikTok.
	You can't search my name.
	Banned hashtags.
	They banned people associated with me.
	They banned people that publish my content.
	They banned the particular things that I say like conspiracies or election or whatever.
	Then you go on another website and they ban you from hosting your website.
	They ban you from domain registrar services.
	They ban you from DDoS protection.
	They ban you from putting your site on the App Store.
	This is the real censorship regime which people don't see.
	Which now people are finding out about.
	And so True Social is another example of this.
	Donald Trump was banned on Twitter a year and a half ago, and he went to work on making his own platform with free speech.
	And if you make your own platform, you can allow free speech.
	But the problem is, where are people gonna get the software?
	Well, they gotta get it from the App Store.
	People are going to access your site, they're going to access it on their phones, and they're going to access the software through the App Store.
	Well, you may start your own platform with its own rules, but your platform has got to still work through the hardware.
	And it's got to work through the App Store.
	And the App Store has its rules.
	And there's also all kinds of other things going on too.
	We saw Parler was another platform.
	Parler came around at the same time.
	Parler got banned from Amazon hosting.
	After Trump got banned on Twitter.
	And so their whole website, which was on Amazon servers, was banned from Amazon.
	Even though they have their own website, and these are the things that happen.
	You can make your own site with its own rules, but it turns out the App Store has rules, and the servers have rules, and Cloudflare has rules, and the banks have rules, and the payment processors have rules, and eventually get into a monopoly that controls all the phones in America, and a monopoly that controls all the credit cards in America.
	And if you're in the business of monetizing content that you put on people's phones, and the phone business is controlled by a monopoly, and the credit card business is controlled by a monopoly, and they ban you, there is no way around it.
	If you're trying to, you know, these tech companies are not profitable when they can run credit cards.
	DoorDash is not a profitable company.
	Now imagine you're in the business of accessing people through mobile phones and showing them content and your business, it's a business, you're trying to monetize that and you can't run credit cards.
	Credit cards are a cartel.
	The app stores are a cartel.
	If you're trying to do a business that relies on making money online with credit cards on the app store, you're just done.
	And that's because of the way the whole system is set up.
	And this is a story about True Social.
	It says, quote, Former US President Donald Trump's social media platform has been barred from Google Play.
	Google says the platform violates its policies on prohibiting content like physical threats and incitement to violence.
	The move makes it difficult for users with Android phones to download the app.
	TruSocial launched on Apple's App Store in February, although the rollout was beset by problems.
	However, the app isn't available on Google Play, where the vast majority of apps are downloaded on Android phones.
	And Android phones are 42% of the phones.
	Okay?
	So Android is 42%, Apple is something like 50%.
	That's all the phones.
	Okay?
	All the phones in America controlled by two app stores.
	It says, last week, TruSocial's CEO said the decision on whether the app would be available was up to the Google Play Store.
	But Google says it's down to TruSocial to comply with its rules.
	A Google spokesperson told the BBC, quote, on August 19th, we notified True Social of several violations of standard policies.
	Having effective systems of moderation for user-generated content is a condition of our terms of service for any app to go live on Google Play.
	Google says it has offered True Social advice on how to fix the problems.
	True Social did not respond to the BBC's request for comment.
	And so, You really have to think about this set of facts here to understand what's going on.
	Okay?
	We have a... This is gonna be... I'm trying to think of how to organize this.
	We live in a representative form of government.
	It's based on democracy.
	Which means that people are fighting, candidates and political parties are fighting for the hearts and minds of the voters to lend their vote to elect them.
	That's how we achieve political change, right?
	State wields the most power.
	The state is the most powerful institution in the country.
	It has a lawmaking power.
	It has the monopoly on force, the military, the police, legitimacy, tradition, convention, law enforcement, interpretation.
	infrastructure.
	It's the richest entity because it has the exclusive right to tax.
	And so it is able to tax all the businesses and the people.
	So it makes $4 trillion per year.
	It mints the money.
	It creates the money.
	It's able to borrow money.
	It's able to lend money around the world.
	Okay, so the state is the most powerful institution in the country.
	And how do we control the state?
	Who wields the power of the state?
	Well, in a representative form of government, it's the voters.
	We live in a Republican form of government, which means that the sovereignty resides in the people.
	And the people delegate their authority to the state through the Constitution.
	And the Constitution sets in place these procedures, which allow, and it's procedural, it's about this process, which allows people to pick candidates, pick representatives, on a federal and a state level to make their laws and make the rules and wield on a federal and a state level to make their laws and make the rules and wield this power in the interest of the No.
	Now, then we get into the business of the elections, which is the process of vote-getting.
	And how do you do that?
	Well, the elections are really a game of selling and media.
	It's really about media.
	It's about getting your name out there, getting your message out there, convincing people that your ideas, your policies are the right ones.
	Okay.
	So the free press and the free speech, based on all of that, are essential, essential to people having meaningful sovereignty.
	Because if the state is so powerful, and if the people control the state, if the state, if the people are truly sovereign and are sort of lending their sovereignty to the state through these constitutional procedures, and the procedures are based on elections and vote getting, which are based on Massive information sharing, then the information sharing is actually critical.
	It's critical to how power works in America.
	That's a critical link in the people being sovereign over their government and truly self-governing.
	Right?
	Because if the government is not sovereign, if it is the people that are in fact sovereign, But power and authorities conferred upon the government through procedure established by law, through the Constitution.
	And the procedure is this vote-getting, electioneering kind of thing.
	And the information process is, as we know, critical to that.
	People need to know.
	They need to know what's going on.
	They need to know the issues.
	They need to be informed.
	They need to be educated.
	They need to know who's running and etc.
	etc.
	Then the distribution of information The freedom of the press, the freedom of speech, of assembly, and religion, these things are all essential.
	Essential meaning necessary.
	Not like important, they're necessary.
	They're intrinsically part of a self-governing Republican country.
	Republican, not capital R, but lowercase r, Republican country.
	Now obviously we begin to see some problems here, which is to say that If the President of the United States is a major, major political player, if he's deplatformed on everything, and then he goes and makes a website, and they deplatform him from the App Store, and if he tries to go on Parler, and Amazon deplatforms him from the hosting, and so on and so forth.
	That link is being broken.
	That distribution of information, in controlling that, in not meaningfully having a freedom of press and freedom of speech, it means that the people are not meaningfully in charge.
	It means that people are not really self-governing.
	It means that people are not sovereign.
	And this procedure that's established has basically been hijacked.
	And now the government is sovereign.
	Now the state is sovereign.
	And who is the state?
	We don't even know!
	We don't even know.
	Is it the President?
	Maybe.
	Is it the NSA?
	Certainly.
	Part of it.
	Is the FBI?
	To what extent?
	What percentage?
	What are the names?
	We don't know.
	It's totally opaque.
	It's not transparent.
	The procedure's been hijacked.
	My Powerful Institutions.
	And they've broken that link.
	And now the people are not in charge.
	But, you know, take it a step further, okay?
	I'm a guy.
	I'm a guy that is not a politician.
	I'm just a guy out here.
	And I've done a show on YouTube where I say my views and I've been banned on YouTube.
	And, you know, I'm the most cancelled guy ever.
	I'm banned on every platform.
	People are banned from talking about me.
	I'm banned from even the alternative tech, with a few exceptions.
	I'm banned from the payment processors.
	Okay.
	And if I even wanted to try to get my message out there without relying on like so-called private companies, I can't because I can't create my own credit card processor.
	I can't create my own bank.
	There's legal regulations that enshrine and protect their monopoly status.
	If I even wanted to go out and create a phone or a social media, again, there are certain things in place that protect the existing infrastructure.
	It's rigged.
	And the whole system is set up, basically, what I'm saying is, it's not a fluke that Trump is getting banned on Twitter and it's this cat and mouse thing.
	He will not be allowed the freedom to access millions or hundreds of millions of people.
	Because if he did, again, that would disrupt The fact that the state now wields the power and the sovereignty.
	And this is like a tricky, nuanced thing.
	What I'm trying to say is, most people think that Republicans are being treated unfairly.
	And that Republicans are being banned.
	And they're just being given kind of like a hard time.
	But really they just need to wisen up and become clever and, you know, create their own website or not break the rules or something like that.
	But that's not it.
	It's not that Republicans or Conservatives are breaking the rules.
	It's not that they're being treated unfairly.
	It's not that they just need to wisen up and figure out the alternative.
	It's not about Conservatives.
	It's not about TOS and Republicans.
	It's about power.
	And it's not that some people are arbitrarily being treated unfairly.
	It's that nobody, nobody who is oppositional will be permitted to create any kind of meaningful base of support to launch a challenge against the regime.
	That's what this is about.
	And you see that.
	You might have thought seven years ago, oh so-and-so got banned on Twitter.
	Tough luck.
	But now here we are seven years later and you see a guy like Andrew Anglin is banned from all social media platforms, banned from all banks, banned from Cloudflare.
	He's the only man alive banned from Cloudflare.
	Cannot protect his website from DDoS.
	He has to go to other countries to get a domain registrar to even have a website that's not on the dark web.
	If an American citizen ...cannot have a website and make a living off of it.
	Think of it.
	This is a guy that can't get a job anywhere, would get fired from anywhere, and then is essentially banned from making money, banned from the banking process.
	I'm banned also from the banking process.
	I can't get a checking account.
	Because of his opinions, then it's not enough to say this guy just broke all the rules or this guy just needs to wisen up.
	It means the system is rigged to prevent people like that from being able to do what they do, which is persistently and successfully create opposition to the government.
	And what that tells us is that we are not self-governing anymore.
	We do not have sovereignty.
	Opposition is not possible.
	People think that opposition is not successful on a case-by-case basis.
	It's not that the opposition is sometimes or frequently unsuccessful.
	It's that successful opposition is made impossible by a rigged system.
	And that is what has happened to Donald Trump.
	He was a guy who came out there to a system which was unprepared for this kind of threat to their power.
	He came out there and used the tools that existed, used Twitter, used media, used his media savvy, his celebrity, his name, name recognition, and went out there and ran for president, which is what you're supposed to be able to do.
	And they threw all their conventional tools at him.
	Call him a racist, call him a sexist, rig the debates, give the questions in advance to Donna Brazile, have an unfair bias moderator, have a phony scandal, spy on his campaign with the FISA warrant, etc.
	But he won because they still count the votes.
	And he still has a Twitter and so on.
	And then what did they do in the succeeding four years?
	Deep State was in revolt constantly, sabotaging the administration.
	The party leadership was in opposition, revolting constantly.
	The media lied.
	They opened up an investigation to distract.
	Special Counsel with Mueller, which was based on a false pretense.
	This Steele dossier, which was completely convoluted.
	A fake impeachment with Ukraine.
	Finally, then, with the COVID lockdown, they had 50% of the ballots sent in by mail, a total fluke.
	Five states.
	At the least, with elections where there are major questions about interference, major efforts launched to investigate that, and a major counter-effort to thwart it.
	And then, after that, a false flag on the Capitol where he had no fewer than 50 FBI informants on the ground there, preceded by a very similar conspiracy in Michigan.
	And then, the biggest DOJ investigation in history to create shock and awe against his supporters, ban on social media and from the banks, and a year and a half later, When he sets up to run for president again like you're supposed to be able to do or make his own website build your own website like you're supposed to be able to do what do they do?
	Raid his house on a fishing expedition to look for things to indict him for and prevent him from running and ban his own website from the App Store over which there is a monopoly.
	So is Trump a guy that just broke the rules and oh it's a private company and oh you just should have did it differently and he got a bad shake?
	No.
	This is the powerful system learning.
	They were challenged in a novel way and caught off guard and they learned and they've adapted and they've healed and they've launched a counter-attack.
	And it demonstrates that the entire system, private and public, the government and the big private companies, they work together, they collude, they're in charge, we're not.
	They have hijacked the electoral, constitutional, procedural process.
	It is set up there as a sham to give us the illusion that we're self-governing, to give us the illusion that we're selecting and choosing and the sovereignty resides with our choice and the casting of our vote.
	When in reality, the sovereignty resides in the people that control everything around that process.
	They control the news, they control the algorithm, they control the app store, and the hosting, and the phones, and the platforms, and the banks, and the money, and the credit cards, and the law enforcement, and the intelligence agencies.
	And it's rigged.
	Now I'm not saying that it's impossible, but that's what we're up against.
	It's a cheating system.
	I don't think it's impossible to repeat what Trump did.
	We've got to be honest and say it's not just about go and build your own website.
	We've got to get in power and change how all of this works.
	That's why anything short of getting in power and breaking the back of Visa and MasterCard and of Apple and Google.
	Anything short of that will not work.
	You've got to get in the government and you've got to force Google and you've got to force Apple by law To have free speech and have a free press.
	You've got to get in there and force Twitter and Facebook and TikTok.
	You've got to force the banks.
	You've got to force the credit card processors to have free speech.
	Short of that, you're wasting your time.
	Because if they can do it to Trump, they're going to do it to anybody else that's going to do anything like Trump would do.
	Trump, Alex Jones, Anglin, Tucker, me.
	This is just the class of people that is opposing right now.
	The next class, they'll do the same thing to them.
	The next generation, iteration, they'll do the same thing.
	That's why it's imperative you get in there and the system has got to be changed.
	The system has got to change.
	Because right now, it's just not even a fair ballgame.
	I mean, you know that.
	But people have got to get smart.
	This is a screw job.
	I mean, think about it.
	Trump gets banned on all the platforms.
unidentified		Well, they're private companies.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Okay, I'll make my own private company.
		I'll raise a billion dollars in investment, and I'll start my own media conglomerate, and I'll start my own app, and my own this, my own that.
		Oh, well, the two companies that own all the phones and the software on all those phones?
		Well, we're banning you.
		Okay, really?
		So what are we gonna do?
		Make our own phone?
		Make our own bank?
		Make our own credit card?
		We can't do that.
		And not like it's not feasible, I mean you can't do that.
		Banking regulations are extremely tight.
		And as far as the rest of it, who are the biggest customers of Google and Apple?
		The federal government.
		So the idea that you're going to compete with Google, good luck!
		Good luck!
		Google's biggest customer is the government.
		So that's a free and fair system?
		I don't think so.
		People say, oh just build another Google.
		Yeah well Google has the benefit of getting billions of dollars from the biggest financial entity in the world which is the U.S.
		government.
		Which is not exactly like a marketplace, you know.
		I'm gonna go, hey FBI, do you want to buy my website?
		Like, really?
		So, the big tech companies are in bed with the intelligence agencies, are in bed with the Ivy League universities.
		Okay, and the laws are written by the staffers, and the staffers come from the universities, and the universities and the Capitol Hill staffers and the lobbyists and think tanks are all in a vicious... Okay, all of these things are connected in these ways.
		We have this illusion of there's people doing these separate functions.
		They're all the same people.
		They all go to the same schools.
		They all know each other.
		They all have They all work in these places at various times in their lives.
		And the idea that anybody, like, is getting a fair shake.
		You just look no further than Trump.
		They conspired against him.
		Peter Strzok and Lisa Page and Mueller conspired against him.
		And they conspired against him at Google when they said, after the election, we're gonna make sure this never happens again.
		And the FBI calls up Facebook and says, sit on the Hunter Biden laptop story.
		They're all working together.
		Donna Brazile gives the questions to Hillary Clinton, then she becomes a contributor in the news.
		James Clapper lies to Congress about NSA spying, and then he's a contributor on the news.
		Okay, I mean, it just goes around and around and around like that.
		And people think it's like, oh, better luck next time.
		Well, he just shouldn't have done it this way.
		It's like, no.
		They're making opposition impossible.
		And people, you know, I think we can beat it if we are smart here.
		We've got to be honest about what's being done and what we're up against.
		It's not just bad luck and it's not just, you know, people aren't clever enough.
		It's that the system is constantly out there rigging it because they understand that the narrative is a powerful thing.
		They have achieved total information control.
		So anyway, so that's that.
		But I want to move on.
		I want to get into our Super Chats.
		I think you guys understand all of that.
		What do they expect?
		What do they expect would happen?
		Honestly, what do they expect?
		The next thing that's going to happen, they're going to get banned on Apple.
		They're going to get banned on the App Store.
		Okay?
		And then lots of luck.
		So that's that.
		But I want to move on.
	Let's take a look at our Super Chats.
	We'll see what you guys have to say about all this.
	Let me get my water bottle here.
	Let me get my headset and we'll see what we got here.
	Let's see, $27 worth of Super Chats from Spinefish.
	Awesome!
	All right, let's get it started.

▲