Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
It feels like such a long time. | ||
It really wasn't that long. | ||
I was just doing the math on my head. | ||
It's been 10 days since I've done a show, which is not that long at all. | ||
But I feel like I'm just starting a new year at school or something. | ||
It's totally fresh. | ||
Well, we got a great show for you tonight. | ||
It's good to be back. | ||
A lot to get into, lots to talk about tonight. | ||
Our featured story is about Andrew Tate. | ||
And it's kind of old news, actually, at this point. | ||
I know this happened, what, last Thursday or last Wednesday? | ||
But I want to weigh in, and I want to give my take. | ||
Well, we have really two big stories tonight. | ||
Our featured story is about Andrew Tate, who has been banned from everything. | ||
And if you haven't been on TikTok, you probably don't know what's going on. | ||
But in the past few months, this kickboxer who is actually kind of known in the scene for a little while. | ||
We used to be mutuals on Twitter. | ||
I had seen him before on social media. | ||
But this personality Andrew Tate is blown up on social media. | ||
You probably haven't been able to miss him in the past few months talking about women and politics and basically everything. | ||
And just in the past week he's been banned all at the same time from everything. | ||
He was the biggest thing in the world, most searched person on Google, 15 plus billion views on TikTok. | ||
Everywhere! | ||
YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Twitter. | ||
And in the course of one week he's been banned from all of them. | ||
Banned from every social media. | ||
And so last week he went on the Tucker Carlson Show on Fox News to talk about that. | ||
He went on the daytime show and they aired a portion of that at night. | ||
And he's also now on Rumble. | ||
unidentified
|
Damn it! | |
He's on Rumble! | ||
He's on the other alternative streaming platform. | ||
Not Cozy, which is fine. | ||
So he's on Rumble over there and he did a stream last week with 100,000 plus concurrent viewers. | ||
I mean honestly we probably couldn't even I don't even think we have the capability to do a stream like that here anyway. | ||
But now he's on Alternative Tech trying to stay alive. | ||
And I want to talk all about that because it's a very interesting subject. | ||
Here's a guy who's not even really political. | ||
I mean he talks about politics, but that's not really even what he does. | ||
He's really just more like a general celebrity. | ||
Not like a political guy or like a niche political streamer, but really more in the category of like Jake and Logan Paul or the Nelk Boys or something like that. | ||
And he has gotten the same level of censorship as a guy like me! | ||
Or something like that. | ||
More so than a regular celebrity. | ||
And I want to talk about that, and I want to talk about his response, because it's very interesting. | ||
In my mind, something has been lost here. | ||
Because he was a real phenom. | ||
He was like nothing like that has really ever happened where he's a guy that didn't he kind of came from nowhere and became the king of social media and everybody's fascinated by this everybody's talking about this and so he was sort of this phenom for a long time and there was a sort of magic unprecedented unconventional nature of what's been happening and when I saw him go on Tucker Here's the thing, and I'm gonna say a lot of nice things. | ||
I think his effect has been overwhelmingly positive. | ||
That's why they banned him, and I sympathize. | ||
But I'm gonna be honest with you, and I'll explain what I mean later. | ||
When I see him on Tucker on Fox News talking about censorship, in my mind, I'm like, okay, something's been lost here. | ||
It's over. | ||
It was one thing, and then when I see him on Tucker talking about censorship, I'm like, Yeah, this is something else now. | ||
unidentified
|
And I'll explain what I mean by that. | |
He was doing something that was totally new and novel and different and far-reaching and he got banned. | ||
And this is like a death sentence really for anybody. | ||
And it's a question, what do you do after that? | ||
What does a guy with the spotlight on him in that moment Because there is, there's sort of this, there's this window that opens up when you get banned where even they call this the Streisand effect. | ||
A very famous person will get banned and there's a sort of sliver between before being banned and after being banned, having access to the platforms and then this attrition of losing attention, losing notoriety, being banned on the platforms. | ||
There's a sliver between them where you get a little bit more attention because of the banning, and it's like, okay, so he's this unprecedented phenom. | ||
He's just been dealt the blow that everybody in this scene has experienced. | ||
What does he do? | ||
And you see him on Tucker, and it's like, oh, I've seen that before. | ||
He goes on alt-tac. | ||
Oh, we've seen that before. | ||
He does this thing. | ||
He does an apology, or something like an apology, and then he goes on alt-tac to say, I'm... this is fine. | ||
I'm doing fine. | ||
We've seen all that before. | ||
It became conventional. | ||
He came to Earth. | ||
Something has been lost. | ||
So I'll elaborate more on that later tonight. | ||
That's our main story. | ||
We'll also be talking tonight about the Hunter Biden laptop scandal. | ||
And trust me, I freaking hate talking about Hunter Biden because it's so boring to me. | ||
But, really important development. | ||
In case you missed it, this week we heard two things. | ||
We heard from Senator Ron Johnson in Wisconsin. | ||
Whistleblower at the FBI said that the FBI suppressed the Hunter Biden laptop story. | ||
Now we basically knew that before, now it's confirmed. | ||
At the same time this week, we also heard from Mark Zuckerberg, the head of Meta, or Facebook. | ||
He went on Joe Rogan and inadvertently admitted That the FBI came to Facebook and told them to squash the Hunter Biden story. | ||
I'm talking about back during the 2020 election. | ||
And if you don't know, during the 2020 election, during the campaign, there was this mysterious laptop dropped off at an FBI office purported to be the laptop of Hunter Biden, which had all this evidence of quid pro quo between foreign governments and the Biden which had all this evidence of quid pro quo between foreign governments and the Biden family, as well as sex and drug It was totally censored at the time. | ||
The story was quite literally censored and buried in the media. | ||
And here we are years after the fact. | ||
And it's come out that it was all real and was suppressed for political reasons. | ||
And we have evidence now from the FBI and from big tech. | ||
Not only is this hard primary evidence that this happened, and it happened the way that we suspected it did, but also evidence of collusion. | ||
And this is what... | ||
This is... | ||
This is the thing that I've been talking about for five years. | ||
This is the main thing. | ||
This is the most important thing. | ||
Well, the most important thing is you go to church. | ||
But this is maybe the most important political thing, which I have tried to wake people up on for the longest time, which is this. | ||
I don't care if you're right-wing. | ||
I don't care if you like Trump. | ||
I don't care if you're politically conservative. | ||
The thing that matters the most is this. | ||
You need to understand that all the powerful institutions in the country are working together and they're aligned to everybody. | ||
That is the most important big idea. | ||
That's the premise of this entire deal. | ||
That's when America first Was created in contradistinction against? | ||
That's what it's all about. | ||
It's that we're not talking about the Democrats, we're not talking about the government or the state, we're talking about a nearly all-powerful regime, which is a constellation of public and private institutions, which is not just the government and not just partisans in the government, it's the state, it's elements of the national security apparatus, It's all the parts of the permanent bureaucracy in DC. | ||
It is private entities like the media or the banks, big tech, Silicon Valley, Wall Street. | ||
They're all working together, they're all colluding, and they work together towards an agenda Which benefits the people that are working in that constellation, and that benefit comes at the expense of the people. | ||
And what comes with this is a conspiratorial, calculated, willful deception about all the facts of American life. | ||
That's the most important premise! | ||
And as far as Hunter Biden is concerned, it's really not that important. | ||
The President's son was smoking crack. | ||
Who cares? | ||
What's important is that this is a real, tangible, provable, inignorable, conclusive piece of evidence that all of what I have just described is happening. | ||
That they can do it. | ||
They are doing it. | ||
Here's the hard proof. | ||
And if there's this kind of collusion, and this kind of deception, and this kind of quid pro quo, and this sort of parasitism, if that's going on with Hunter Biden, then what else is it going on with? | ||
Probably it's going on with the six trillion dollar wars in the Middle East for 20 years. | ||
Probably it's going on with the trillions and trillions of dollars in trade deficits and trade deals and free trade. | ||
Probably it's going on with the massive wealth transfer that occurs when you bring in 30 million immigrants in 30 years. | ||
Probably every aspect of public policy is like this. | ||
It involves a large-scale deception, collusion, and conspiracy. | ||
So anyway, so that's why we're talking about it. | ||
So that's gonna be our show. | ||
It's gonna be a good show. | ||
Excited to be back. | ||
Wow, I have so much to say. | ||
Finally, I'm back. | ||
And we get to do the show. | ||
I bet you missed me. | ||
Honestly, I haven't really missed you that much at all, if I'm being perfectly honest. | ||
I enjoyed... Now look, I was working all throughout the past week. | ||
I was in Florida, and I was celebrating my birthday. | ||
Happy birthday to me. | ||
Thank you very much. | ||
I turned 24. | ||
Getting older all the time. | ||
It's over. | ||
Basically I'm just gonna end it because I'm gonna die soon anyway because I'm, you know, I'm elderly. | ||
But I was in Florida celebrating my birthday with some friends, but also I had a lot of work to do down there. | ||
I was hanging out with my friend Destiny, and I met up with some other business people, and of course I had to drive up to the villages to be with Laurel Loomer for election night. | ||
So it's been a busy week, a lot of work, but it was nice taking a little time away from the show because it gets a little bit, honestly, it gets a little stale over time. | ||
I know some people watch my show every night and some people are like, oh, you know, we're sick of the news. | ||
Well, you're just watching it. | ||
I have to do it every night. | ||
So how do you think I feel? | ||
People watch the show passively, and they're like, oh, you know, the news is getting a little stale. | ||
Yeah, tell me about it. | ||
I have to prepare this dumbass stuff every night and tell you about freaking Nancy Pelosi and whatever else. | ||
So it was actually a little refreshing. | ||
I don't remember the last time I took time away from the show like that. | ||
So we're back. | ||
Before we get into the show, we have some other things to update you on. | ||
Before we get into the show, just a reminder to smash the follow button. | ||
Why am I... am I low here? | ||
Is the desk high? | ||
unidentified
|
Desk is a little high. | |
Okay. | ||
Okay. | ||
Now it's too low. | ||
You know what is fine before. | ||
I was just slouching. | ||
Before we get into the show, a reminder to smash the follow button here. | ||
Follow me on Cozy to get a push notification whenever I go live. | ||
Follow me here on the site to get a push notification on Telegram when I start the show. | ||
Also, follow me on Gab Telegram and Truth Social. | ||
Links are down below. | ||
Also, our Super Chat system is fixed. | ||
Apparently it was broken for a long time. | ||
Thanks for telling me. | ||
Nobody told me that. | ||
But apparently our Super Chat website, people weren't able to sign up for it. | ||
And I was wondering what's going on. | ||
I'm like, you know, super chats are kind of light lately. | ||
You know, you guys aren't really pulling your weight. | ||
I'm showing up here every night doing my show. | ||
And then I'm looking at the super chats and I'm like, you know, it's a little bit light lately. | ||
What's the story with that? | ||
Well, it turns out that for like three months, this website's been broken and people can't sign up. | ||
And I brought this up on Thursday. | ||
Somebody complained and said, oh, I'm having trouble. | ||
And I said, is that an issue? | ||
And everybody's like, yeah, I can't sign up. | ||
I can't sign up. | ||
So I think that's fixed Apparently if you make a new account it will send you Login confirmation or whatever and sometimes it goes to your spam folder so if you make a new account to super chat you have to go to the site make an account and It will send you an email like confirming or making your account or whatever and for a lot of people goes to your spam So check your spam folder on your email | ||
I know I hate talking about this stuff because to me it's so gay to be like, hey, check your spam folder. | ||
But this is what happens when you talk about the Jews, okay? | ||
If I talked about anything else, I could be on Patreon and use a credit card processor and all that. | ||
But we talk about the Jews and so now I'm banned from the banking system and this is just how we have to roll now. | ||
This is how we have to operate. | ||
So, uh... So anyway, so... What's going on with my hair? | ||
Is my hair okay? | ||
So anyway, so that's how that is. | ||
I hope that if it wasn't working for people before, hopefully it works for people now. | ||
So check that out. | ||
And then our other big announcement. | ||
I unfortunately wasn't here to announce this last week, but the America First documentary is now available. | ||
It's now streaming. | ||
So I told you that we put together a really exciting deal with a site called My Movies Plus. Movies Plus. | ||
The site is MyMoviesPlus.com. | ||
MyMoviesPlus.com. | ||
MyMovies. | ||
P-L-U-S. Plus. | ||
And that is where the America First documentary is streaming. | ||
It's a subscription service. | ||
It's super cheap. | ||
It's like six bucks. | ||
Six bucks! | ||
And you get to watch the entire America First documentary. | ||
We did a big screening for it last month in Las Vegas. | ||
And we were kind of weighing how we wanted to release it, if we're gonna post it somewhere. | ||
But it's now streaming on this cool website. | ||
They have a few other big movies like the feel one, No GF, if you remember that one. | ||
That's that girl director. | ||
She just did the Alex Jones movie. | ||
If you remember, that was that incel movie. | ||
That's on there as well. | ||
And so we're streaming on MyMoviesPlus. | ||
Very exciting. | ||
Everybody loves the site. | ||
They have an app on the App Store. | ||
Super convenient. | ||
Six bucks. | ||
Sign up. | ||
Watch the movie. | ||
Watch it. | ||
Send it to your friends. | ||
Post it other places. | ||
Everybody's really been loving it. | ||
I've seen nothing but positive reviews. | ||
And if you can, leave a review on IMDB. | ||
Paul is pushing me to tell you to review it on IMDB. | ||
I don't even know, like... I don't check IMDB, but... | ||
But Paul, the director, he texted me today. | ||
He's like, oh and tell them to review it on IMDb. | ||
I'm like, you know, it's kind of like a tall order. | ||
It's like, okay, go to this website, buy the film, watch the film, now you got to go review the film. | ||
But listen, you got to help me out here, alright? | ||
I've given up my life to do this. | ||
I was the one on the no-fly list. | ||
If I drove 30 freaking hours across this country because I was put on no-fly list for trying to save America from Joe Biden, you know, you can pay the six bucks and watch the freaking movie about it and you can leave a little review on IMDB. | ||
That's not too much to ask. | ||
That's not too much to ask at all. | ||
That's very simple and easy. | ||
You get to fly on planes and go to your job and everything. | ||
Not all of us have that luxury. | ||
So, check that out. | ||
MyMoviesPlus.com streaming now. | ||
It's like a 47-48 minute movie. | ||
It's a pretty good length documentary, so check that out. | ||
Okay, I think that's all our announcements. | ||
That's a lot. | ||
That's everything. | ||
But yeah, it's good to be back doing my own show. | ||
I've been collaborating a lot with Destiny, and it feels weird. | ||
Like, in my consciousness, I feel more like a character in Destiny's universe because I've just been collaborating with him for the past week and not doing my own show. | ||
So for the past week I felt like I felt like a like a member of the cast in the Destiny universe as opposed to the main character in the America First universe. | ||
So it's good to be back on my own, in my own program, my own show, my own desk, my own site, as opposed to being in Crazyville with all these swingers and freaks and histrionic Jews and women and everything. | ||
I go on a stream the other day and there's some Jewish guy saying that Nick Fuentes is gonna kill my family when he gets to power. | ||
And it's like these people are living on another planet. | ||
And, uh, And of course I went to Destiny's Condo in Miami and I forget that these people are like not normal. | ||
I forget that these people are not like us. | ||
Because you know I play out there and I'm hanging out with my friends and I thought it'd be fun to go visit my best friend Stephen Bunnell. | ||
He corrected me on that by the way. | ||
It's Bunnell. | ||
Well, we went out to get dinner and ice cream. | ||
We finished the stream and we're walking back to his car. | ||
And I forget, I said something like, Stephen Bonnell! | ||
And he stops in the middle of the street, turns around and goes, it's Bonnell. | ||
And then he keeps walking. | ||
unidentified
|
I was like, whoa, okay, damn, alright. | |
Steven Bunnell. | ||
Anyway, what was I saying? | ||
Oh, so, so, you know, I'm out there and I'm hanging out with them and I'm my best friend, my bestest friend in the whole world, Steven Bunnell, who doesn't think I'm a Nazi. | ||
Big shout out. | ||
I think he is a Nazi. | ||
Full disclosure. | ||
You know, I've gotten a lot of heat in my community for dining with him. | ||
People say, how can you hang out with a Nazi like Stephen the Swastika? | ||
I said, look, we've got to be willing to talk to the other side. | ||
I know he's an extremist. | ||
I know he's a menace. | ||
I know he's got abhorrent views. | ||
But he's a human being. | ||
And we believe in redemption. | ||
So, I've gotten a lot of heat in my community. | ||
People have been unhappy with me. | ||
They say, you know, according to a certain definition, if a man sits down to eat with a Nazi at the dinner table, there's two Nazis eating at the dinner table. | ||
Well, I reject that. | ||
I think that's nonsense. | ||
Stephen Bunnell is a human being. | ||
And I'll eat chicken and waffles with him and his wife. | ||
His wife. | ||
Anyway, so I'm out there. | ||
I'm hanging out with my bestest friend in the whole world, Stephen Bunnell, and, you know, nice guy. | ||
Well, he's kind of nice enough, I guess. | ||
We're hanging out, and I'm like, these people are just like... | ||
They're like in a different universe than us. | ||
I like him. | ||
I like talking to him. | ||
I think it's funny when we talk. | ||
But we're sitting down at the table and they're talking about how they want to have a three-way with some girl, and they're swingers, and they're having sex with different people, and it's like... What the fuck? | ||
These people are just different. | ||
Full judgment, by the way. | ||
I'm not gonna say no judgment. | ||
No, I'm very judgmental about that. | ||
He realized that these people are out there, man. | ||
Nice guy. | ||
Nice enough. | ||
He's nice to me. | ||
We have a good time. | ||
We have laughs. | ||
But you know, then I go back, then I go back to my home where, you know, like my parents are married and that means something. | ||
And I go back to my home where we're like Christian and normal and decent and, you know, he goes back to his condo where there's like some kind of sexual drug-addled freak show going on from morning until night. | ||
You know, his wife, his wife posted on Twitter, she said, the meaning of life is sex, drugs, and travel. | ||
And it's like, I don't know about you guys, but that whole, like, nihilistic, hedonistic way of being is just, like, totally skeeves me out. | ||
I think it's, I just get completely skeeved, is like the word I would use. | ||
Sounds fun? | ||
Don't get me wrong. | ||
Sounds fun. | ||
That's why it's tempting. | ||
That's why, you know, sin is tempting for a reason. | ||
Sounds good. | ||
Sounds fun. | ||
Sex, drugs, and travel. | ||
I mean, you know, I'm not gonna lie. | ||
That sounds fun. | ||
But when you really consider what kind of life that looks like, it's like a death cult. | ||
That kind of stuff is nothing but trouble. | ||
You know. | ||
It's one thing to be living like a normal life governed by morality and, you know, sometimes you take a vacation. | ||
It's another thing when your life is about sex, drugs, and rock and roll like that. | ||
It's like, what kind of people can really live like that all the time? | ||
Not healthy, not good. | ||
And so I was over there and it was just a little bit like seeing how the other half lives. | ||
But anyway, but it was fun. | ||
But it was funny. | ||
Good conversation. | ||
Interesting for sure, but definitely I'm just sort of passing through. | ||
I'm just definitely a guest and a visitor. | ||
I don't know how long I'd like to stay in omniliberal land where they're just, I don't know, it's such a big freaking free-for-all. | ||
So anyway, so that was my weekend. | ||
That was my trip to Miami hanging out with the Bonnells. | ||
With the Bonnells. | ||
Weekend with the Bonnells. | ||
And uh all right I guess we'll just get into the show because we have so much to talk about tonight and we could get into uh if you want to hear more about the destiny stuff you could ask me in the super chats I guess but we have a lot of news to talk about so our first story I want to get into this Hunter Biden laptop thing and you know a lot of it is um I'm gonna be honest I mean a lot of it is ground that we've tread before but in the in the context of everything that | ||
I've been talking about with Sneeko and Destiny lately. | ||
This is very important. | ||
Because I've been having this dialogue with other people from other communities lately. | ||
You know, we brought Sneeko onto the show a few times. | ||
I've been on Destiny Stream and we're talking about fun conspiracy stuff like 9-11 or the Jews or whatever and for some people it's a little bit tongue-in-cheek some people take it deadly seriously I'm a little bit in the middle I think it's funny but I also take it very seriously And this story is very important in the context of that conversation. | ||
Because at the end of the day, I do believe that 9-11 was fake. | ||
And I do believe that so much, almost everything of what we are told | ||
in the media by the media is not just dishonest but part of a calculated coordinated deception and that's sort of a big claim that's like a tall that's a tall thing to say it's a big thing to say and there are a lot of people that are skeptical people like destiny and and everyone else rushes in to debunk that and challenge that and scrutinize that | ||
And shill for the government or the Pentagon or whatever and say, you know, Lockheed Martin isn't really that big of a company or, you know, other assorted nonsense. | ||
But you see stories like this, like what we're about to talk about, and the evidence is just overwhelming if you're looking for it. | ||
If you're open to it, if you're open to the idea, and then it's a tough pill to swallow. | ||
They call it the red pill, like from the movie The Matrix. | ||
And it's a tough pill to swallow. | ||
It's difficult, it's uncomfortable for people, I think, to go there and be willing to accept the conclusion that everything that they've been told is a lie. | ||
That almost all their assumptions, all their preconceived notions about the world are wrong. | ||
And it's actually scary because the implications that come from that, which you don't need to spend a long time thinking about it to get to a scary place, just following that through to its logical conclusion, if things are being lied about in this area, perhaps things are being lied about in this other area. | ||
If things are, you know, where does it end? | ||
And if things are being lied about across the spectrum, Well, who's really running the show and what's really going on? | ||
And how do we know anything for that matter? | ||
Where does the deception begin and where does it end? | ||
Who is telling the truth and about what? | ||
It's a very dark and uncomfortable line of inquiry to pursue. | ||
But if you are open to it and if you're looking for that you're gonna find instances like this everywhere and this is one of them. | ||
And so we've covered the Hunter Biden thing not as much as like Fox News and and other partisans. | ||
We've talked about it in the context of this this big idea and so if you're not familiar back in 2020 during the presidential election This laptop was turned over to federal law enforcement, which was purported to be the laptop owned by Hunter Biden. | ||
And on it was all kinds of evidence of personal scandals, drug abuse, weird incest sex relationships, prostitution, a lot of unsavory personal stuff, nude photographs, videos, but also evidence of abuse of power and quid pro quo. | ||
That Joe Biden's capacity as Vice President was allowing his son Hunter Biden to sell that political clout to foreign governments. | ||
That companies owned by Hunter Biden were being given big contracts in China or in Ukraine. | ||
And these contracts were given in exchange, presumably, for favoritism from Hunter Biden's father. | ||
And this is what, that's sort of the essence of government corruption. | ||
That's sort of how it works. | ||
People in government don't make that much money. | ||
You know, the president's salary is $450,000 per year. | ||
That's the biggest top salary. | ||
And, you know, that's a lot of money. | ||
But for the head of state of a country with a 20 trillion dollar GDP, it's actually not that much money. | ||
And so you get people in government who have all this influence over the military and over State Department and foreign embassies and consulates and the American economy and tax base. | ||
And what do they do? | ||
They and their families sell their influence over the government to corporations and to governments. | ||
That's the essence of corruption if you don't know that already. | ||
And so on this laptop you had evidence not just of this weird sex stuff, sex tapes and scandal, but also evidence that Hunter Biden is coordinating with his dad, who's sitting vice president under Obama, while he's doing business overseas. | ||
And it's like, at the minimum, it's an obvious conflict of interest. | ||
It's obviously unethical. | ||
It's the appearance of impropriety. | ||
There's evidence that there is actual impropriety. | ||
And so all of this came out during the presidential election. | ||
The laptop was dropped off to federal law enforcement, and then it hit the Internet. | ||
It was published by the New York Post. | ||
They were the ones that broke the story. | ||
And so if you remember, back in 2020, the story was buried. | ||
And this is not my opinion— You know, a lot of times you'll say, oh, so-and-so was censored, or such a thing was covered up, and people can kind of quibble with that. | ||
This is an instance where quite literally the story was forcefully, actively, explicitly buried. | ||
Like, Twitter banned people from posting it. | ||
Literally. | ||
This story about this, which is so relevant and so important. | ||
It's like a guy is running for president. | ||
Joe Biden is running for president. | ||
There is evidence that he was involved in abuse of power. | ||
He was involved in this big conflict of interest quid pro quo with his son and foreign governments. | ||
It was especially relevant because Trump At that point in time was being impeached for like the same thing. | ||
You know, Trump was being impeached at the time because he leaned on the government of Ukraine to produce evidence of this and you know, so Joe Biden's about to be elected or he's the nominee for president. | ||
Trump's being impeached for something similar. | ||
The laptop comes out, is published by the New York Post. | ||
In other words, this is a story that's relevant. | ||
It's in the public interest that it gets out. | ||
It's extremely relevant because of the election that's ongoing, and it's factual. | ||
We've now found out years after the fact that everything in there was legitimate. | ||
We saw recently, last month, it was all over the internet, materials from the laptop, videos of Hunter Biden in rehab, text messages, all kinds of things. | ||
And things like that have been coming out since 2020, since the original story was published. | ||
So the story was published in the New York Post and should have been everywhere. | ||
That's a big scandal. | ||
Again, public interest, relevant, it should have been all over legacy media, TV, print, radio, and even if they didn't want to cover it, it should have been shared on social media. | ||
But Twitter quite literally banned the story from being shared. | ||
They banned the link. | ||
People were posting the link to the New York Post website story and Twitter banned people from posting that. | ||
And if you were there, you know, it's now two years later. | ||
Sort of a long time has passed. | ||
But if you were there back then when when this was all going down, you could not put the link in a tweet and publish it. | ||
It would prevent you from publishing a tweet if it had the New York Post link. | ||
And people were getting banned for trying to get around that and trying to post around that. | ||
Facebook suppressed the story. | ||
Twitter suppressed the story algorithmically as well as banned people from posting it. | ||
Facebook algorithmically suppressed the story from being shared. | ||
And all the big tech companies and all of the legacy media went out and ran damage control for Biden and said that it was a fake story. | ||
They buried it, they censored it, and then they ran a counter-narrative and said it's a fake story. | ||
They said it was Russian disinformation. | ||
That was the pretext. | ||
We're censoring it, we're suppressing it, we're burying it because it's not legitimate and it's a result of foreign interference. | ||
That's the narrative they went with. | ||
And they buried it months before the election. | ||
The election goes on. | ||
Stop the Steal goes on. | ||
January 6th happens. | ||
Biden's inaugurated. | ||
And we find out in the years since that the story was completely true. | ||
The laptop was real. | ||
The contents of the laptop were real. | ||
The abuse of power was real. | ||
It was all real. | ||
And they knew it was real then. | ||
And the developments, the reason why we're talking about it tonight is because now we have confirmation, two forms of confirmation that prove two different things. | ||
We have a story from Senator Ron Johnson. | ||
An FBI whistleblower came to a Republican senator and said that the FBI buried the story. | ||
Federal law enforcement, U.S. | ||
intelligence agency, buried this partisan story during an election. | ||
And we know exactly why that is. | ||
We know why that happened. | ||
And then we also have, at the same time this week, Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO or the leader of Meta, which is Facebook, he goes on Joe Rogan and says that the FBI came to Facebook. | ||
And they didn't say it explicitly, but they implied it that they need to bury the story because it was Russian disinformation. | ||
Bury the Hunter Biden story. | ||
And that proves two things. | ||
It proves that this was censored for political reasons. | ||
It also proves that there's a collusion going on. | ||
And so this is a story about the whistleblower. | ||
It says, quote, FBI officials told agents not to investigate Hunter Biden's so-called laptop from hell for months due to concerns about influencing the 2020 presidential election, according to whistleblowers who spoke to Senator Ron Johnson. | ||
According to Johnson, individuals with knowledge of the Hunter Biden case told his office that the investigation was intentionally slowed on orders from local FBI leadership. | ||
Johnson claimed in a letter to the Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, "While I understand your hesitation to investigate a matter that may be related to an ongoing investigation, it is clear to me, based on numerous credible whistleblower disclosures, that the FBI cannot be trusted with the handling based on numerous credible whistleblower disclosures, that the FBI cannot be trusted with the According to the whistleblowers, FBI officials told employees, "You will not look at the Hunter Biden laptop. | ||
Johnson said these new allegations provide even more evidence of FBI corruption and renew calls to take immediate steps to investigate the FBI's actions regarding the laptop. | ||
That's the FBI. | ||
And this is the Facebook story. | ||
This is also from the New York Post. | ||
It says, quote, Zuckerberg opened up about the controversial media suppression after the host pressed him to explain his views on how tech platforms should handle content moderation on sensitive subjects. | ||
Rogan asked Zuckerberg, quote, when something like that turns out to be real, is there regret for not having it evenly distributed and for throttling the distribution of that story? | ||
Zuckerberg said, yeah, it sucks. | ||
It turned out after the fact. | ||
The fact checkers looked into it. | ||
No one was able to say it was false. | ||
I think it sucks though, in the same way that probably having to go through a criminal trial, but being proven innocent in the end sucks. | ||
He said the platform opted to limit sharing on the story, but not halt it entirely after the FBI told Meta employees to be wary of Russian propaganda ahead of the election. | ||
Rogan asked, referring to the Post's article, quote, Did the FBI specifically say you need to be on guard about that story? | ||
Zuckerberg said, No, I don't remember if it was that specifically, but it basically fit the pattern. | ||
He said, The FBI basically came to us Saying, hey, you should be on high alert. | ||
We thought there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election. | ||
We have it on notice that there is about to be some kind of a dump that is similar to that. | ||
So just be vigilant. | ||
More than 50 former senior intelligence officials signed on to a letter that claimed the laptop story has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation. | ||
Okay. | ||
And it's pretty rich because Zuckerberg is going to come out all these years later, two years later, and say, damn that sucked. | ||
We suppressed. | ||
The fact checkers were wrong. | ||
The fact checkers. | ||
Is this not just the most unbelievable The fact-checkers. | ||
We're supposed to believe that when it comes to COVID and when it comes to Black Lives Matter and election integrity, we're being told that we have to trust the fact-checkers. | ||
We're in a disinformation crisis. | ||
We're in a post-truth age where hucksters and grifters are competing with our democratic institutions and democracy dies in darkness. | ||
They're competing against the Washington Post and the New York Times and the sacred institutions. | ||
Over the truth and the hearts and minds of the public and so on. | ||
And we've got to put our trust in the fact-checkers, the experts, to tell us right from wrong. | ||
And the fact-checkers and the ADL are supposed to get together and tell us what is really happening in the world. | ||
They've got that authority. | ||
And they're supposed to go to Twitter and Facebook and they're supposed to create the content moderation policies And create censorship programs based on their authority to dictate what the truth is. | ||
Except that they got it wrong. | ||
They got it wrong. | ||
The conspiracy theorists Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes and Andrew Anglin and all of them got it right. | ||
And the fact checkers got it wrong. | ||
The grifters and hucksters and charlatans and snake oil salesmen and so on. | ||
Yeah, they got it right in 2020. | ||
The Hunter Biden laptop story was real. | ||
And the FBI and the Washington Post and the ADL and the fact-checkers got it wrong. | ||
And the fact-checkers were in charge during the election of controlling the algorithms of social media. | ||
They were in control of censorship programs on social media. | ||
They also happen to be in control not just of policies pertaining to that particular story, but also stories about election integrity after the election. | ||
And the legitimacy of the mail-in ballots, or the integrity of the mail-in ballots, and of Dominion, and of Stop the Steal, and January 6th, and all the rest. | ||
Doesn't this tell you the whole story here? | ||
Here we are two years after the fact, now Mark Zuckerberg says about all that, oh that sucks, we got it wrong. | ||
Well guess what? | ||
That's exactly the problem. | ||
If you're going to anoint yourself the fact checkers, the fact checkers working with Silicon Valley, working with Big Tech, which controls the platforms that billions use for their information, which 95% of under 35s get all their information, | ||
If you're the FBI relying on the fact-checkers, if you're DHS relying on the fact-checkers and the hate watchers and so on to create your bulletins about terror threats, and that is helping you create policy for surveillance, you can't be wrong. | ||
Sorry, if you're a fact-checker and your responsibility and authority is to mediate what is real in the world, you can't get that wrong. | ||
You're not allowed that. | ||
You can't get a bombshell partisan story during a highly contentious presidential election two months before it happens wrong, and then two years later say, oh oops, oopsies, oopsies, it came out that we were wrong about that. | ||
Because that shows you the problem with that system. | ||
The reason that you have independent media, the reason that you have citizen journalists, the reason that you have people like me, or InfoWars, or whatever else, It's because the fact-checkers are sometimes wrong. | ||
And Facebook and the FBI are sometimes wrong. | ||
And actually, it's not just that they're sometimes wrong. | ||
It's not just that sometimes they don't quite get it right because of incompetence or something else. | ||
Actually, there's more to it. | ||
It's deeper. | ||
It's not just that the fact-checkers can probabilistically get it wrong sometimes like anyone could get it wrong. | ||
It's that they have a They wield power. | ||
The introduction of power and influence fundamentally changes the dynamic. | ||
Probabilistically speaking, me and the FBI are not gonna get it wrong in the same way. | ||
Because the FBI has power and I don't. | ||
And so Well, a person in the FBI, an individual in the FBI, an FBI agent might have a similar faculty as I do to understand and interpret the news and use intuition and facts to create a value judgment about the news. | ||
Well, that may be similar. | ||
The FBI has power. | ||
And so the FBI as an institution, when it controls information, has a completely different incentive structure. | ||
Behaves in a way that's completely different because of the way that power changes people. | ||
Because of the incentives and the kinds of judgments that people are making in positions of authority and responsibility. | ||
That's why you don't have censorship. | ||
That's why you don't have fact checkers. | ||
That's why people cannot, that's why the masses cannot appoint the ADL, cannot appoint Nate Silver or Facebook or whatever to determine the truth for them. | ||
Because ordinary people can get it wrong. | ||
All things being equal, anybody can get things wrong. | ||
But especially people in power, especially the world's top five biggest companies, which are the big tech companies, can't get it wrong more, are more prone to getting it wrong because they're in power. | ||
And the same is true of the FBI, and the same is true of the government, and the same is true of the intelligence agencies. | ||
And this is the proof. | ||
They didn't get this. | ||
When Mark Zuckerberg gets on the show and says, oh, that sucks. | ||
unidentified
|
Oops. | |
It's very easy to say that two years after the fact. | ||
Well, he fessed up to it. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
After it's already irrelevant. | ||
After the election has happened and the outcome has been decided. | ||
After they got away with it. | ||
They buried it, they succeeded, they got the result that they wanted out of that, and now two years later they say, oh whoops, well see, in the interest of transparency, we'd like to say we messed up. | ||
They didn't mess up. | ||
They buried the story so that they could get the political result that they wanted. | ||
And again, there's levels to this. | ||
It's not just that the FBI and Facebook got it wrong, it's that they got it wrong together. | ||
What do these revelations tell us? | ||
It tells us that Hunter and Joe Biden, being in the same family, being the Democrat nominee for president, Joe Biden was spared and saved by Big Tech and the FBI talking to each other and working together. | ||
And what that tells you is that everything is not as it seems. | ||
We do not live in a media environment where stories that are in the public interest are being told. | ||
We do not live in a competitive media environment where people are working for the media, looking for the stories to tell the truth for the public, so that the public can make decisions about who should run the country and what policies they should have. | ||
Which is what it seems to be, but that's not what it's like, really. | ||
Because if the law enforcement is talking to the media And they're working together to change the narrative to benefit one particular side that tells us that what is on TV is not the result of a competitive media environment working in the public interest. | ||
And the people that are running and winning for office are not the people that everybody selected based on as much information is available at the time. | ||
The pertinent information that is available at the time. | ||
It tells us that to a very great extent, to maybe an unknowable extent, we can assume at the minimum, to a significant extent, the people and the policies are being selected by the people that are already in power. | ||
And it's not the government, it's not strictly speaking about the state, it's people that wield capital, it's people that wield the levers of media and propaganda control, technological control, and it's people that are working in the government Between and throughout different offices and different administrations, they are the ones selecting the people, selecting the policies for their benefit. | ||
For the benefit and the perpetuity of their influence and privilege. | ||
That's what it tells us. | ||
That's what this entire... Those are the conclusions you have to draw. | ||
Because you see a story like this, and what are the facts? | ||
Law enforcement and big tech are communicating and buried a highly relevant story in a very contentious election. | ||
Now there's two ways that you can interpret that and one way to interpret that, the naive fool's way, is to say something like, oh it's all just a big fluke. | ||
The FBI just got it wrong. | ||
They thought it was Russian misinformation because it fit this pattern and they made the wrong call and they called Facebook and Facebook also got the wrong call | ||
Okay, so either you believe that these things that happen seemingly frequently, these kinds of flukes, the fact-checkers and Facebook and law enforcement are getting it wrong, stumbling into a status quo victory, or you believe, or you follow this through to its logical conclusion which is, you know, what's the relevant detail here? | ||
Intelligence and law enforcement are communicating with Wall Street and Big Tech. | ||
They're communicating about matters that are in the public interest. | ||
They're communicating about civilian government. | ||
They're communicating about transfer of power. | ||
And the consequence of their communication, of their collusion, was to assist the status quo candidate. | ||
Who we know is supported by law enforcement and we know is supported by Facebook. | ||
Not only did Facebook communicate with the FBI about this, but the Zuckerberg Chan Foundation, which is Zuckerberg's personal business, put 300 million dollars in to get out the vote in swing states. | ||
And it's like, again, follow it through to its logical conclusion and you find That if this is going on, you cannot trust anything. | ||
You cannot give them the benefit of the doubt that everything is humming along and working properly as we're told it does, in the manner that we're told it does, which is to say the Washington Post is a legitimate company full of legitimate journalists reporting on real news for you. | ||
No, that's not happening. | ||
The Washington Post is owned by Jeff Bezos. | ||
The Washington Post is owned by a giant media conglomerate and the decisions that are made on a daily basis are guided by political considerations of the people that own the company. | ||
And as a consequence what they put out and then what's put on and and same thing goes with Facebook. | ||
Word to Facebook is this digital global village where everybody gets on and posts and shares information? | ||
No. | ||
Facebook is an environment where information is curated and given to people, and the curation is tightly controlled by God only knows who. | ||
It's one of the world's biggest companies. | ||
Meta is one of the world's biggest companies, and they're in constant communication with law enforcement, and it's run by partisans. | ||
And it's like, so once you begin to unravel where the information is coming from, where our presuppositions are coming from, where this information saturated universe comes from. | ||
It comes from capital. | ||
It comes from billionaires. | ||
It comes from interested parties. | ||
You realize nothing is as it seems. | ||
And if that's the case, then if this is going on with the Hunter Biden laptop story, where is it going on where we don't see it? | ||
Where are the Hunter Biden laptops that we never heard of? | ||
Where there was never a bombshell in the New York Post? | ||
Where it was never a scandal that Zuckerberg had to comment on. | ||
There was never a scandal where there was an FBI whistleblower. | ||
For every Edward Snowden, for every Julian Assange, for every Hunter Biden laptop, for everything like that, what are the stories where there isn't an Edward Snowden blowing the whistle on massive NSA surveillance? | ||
You know, what is it? | ||
We don't know. | ||
It's unknowable. | ||
It's a variable. | ||
But we're being told by Our liberal counterparts, we're being told by the people with the Ukraine flags and the people with their vaccinated status and so on, we're being told... | ||
That we have to believe the media, trust the fact checkers, give over the power to mediate information, our power of discretion, our power of judgment, give that over to partisan Jews who work at Facebook or work for law enforcement. | ||
You can't trust that. | ||
That's what this proves. | ||
So I don't, you know, and here's the thing. | ||
I am fundamentally uninterested in the particulars. | ||
The Hunter Biden story, Fox News and Republicans and conservative partisans, they talk about this stuff all the time for partisan reasons. | ||
I'm uninterested in like attacking Joe Biden as like a guy or whatever. | ||
I'm interested in what is what's the bigger picture here and the bigger picture is you need to look at this as A profound blow against the credibility of the establishment, the political establishment. | ||
That's all that you can look at it as. | ||
And you need to begin to spell out, people need to begin to spell out the implications. | ||
People say, the FBI's corrupt! | ||
It's like, okay, but let's map it out, let's spell it out. | ||
The FBI is in bed with Facebook. | ||
The FBI is in bed with Big Tech. | ||
Big Tech controls all the information. | ||
They're all in bed with each other. | ||
They all go to the same schools. | ||
They all work at the same companies. | ||
They're all owned by the same conglomerates. | ||
There's a bigger, scarier story to be told here than just Joe Biden is corrupt, is my point. | ||
So that's the Hunter Biden laptop story. | ||
We knew that. | ||
Again, the reason I like to spill all this out is because I will go on a stream with a guy like Destiny, where you talk to these liberals, And they're gonna go out there and say, no no, like the FBI's legit, oh no, pish posh, this is all just kookery, this is all quackery. | ||
Whenever you talk about conspiracies, oh, what am I gonna trust, some guy on YouTube? | ||
No, you're right. | ||
I trust the Jewish fucking billionaire that owns everything and has every incentive to lie. | ||
It's just like beyond me. | ||
And then stuff like this comes out and people find every conceivable reason to hand wave it away and say, oh, well, that really wasn't a big deal. | ||
Oh, well, if that's true, then it'd be problematic. | ||
It's like it is real. | ||
It happens all the time. | ||
They lie all the time. | ||
They're willing to. | ||
They can. | ||
And when you find evidence of it, people say that the evidence has come out is evidence that there's no conspiracy. | ||
Well, if people don't believe the 9-11 story, then that shows that, you know, they didn't get away with it. | ||
Anyway. | ||
So that's that. | ||
But I want to move on. | ||
I want to get into this Andrew Tate story and talk a little bit about this. | ||
Because Andra Bynum stuff we've kind of covered before, and the conspiracy stuff we cover all the time. | ||
But I want to get into this Andrew Tate story, because I've got kind of an interesting take on this, I think. | ||
Because, as always with these kinds of things, it's something that we've seen before. | ||
So, you'll see Andrew Tate gets banned on social media, and my initial response is sort of like, well, you know, more of the same. | ||
That's the world we live in. | ||
Andrew Tate. | ||
Controversial guy. | ||
Not obviously toeing the party line. | ||
He doesn't agree with the liberal consensus. | ||
And so he gets banned on all social media. | ||
Gets the same treatment that we all do. | ||
Okay, what else is new right guy gets banned on social media for being funny and awesome and based and You know, it's a day that ends in wine So I'll just briefly go over I'm sure everybody already knows about this It's like the biggest thing in the world if you haven't been following it Andrew Tate's been on social media He's actually been around for a long time But just really blew up in the past few months this year and has become like the biggest thing on the internet. | ||
And if you go on Google search trends, he's like right up there with like Trump and Biden. | ||
Like he's one of the most searched people all over TikTok, all over Instagram, all over YouTube. | ||
And he's an interesting figure because he's a guy who's out there and people in my community don't like him actually or criticize him. | ||
But that's because we're in this insular thing. | ||
You know, people compare Andrew Tate to me, and they're like, oh, well, he's not like a base trad Catholic reactionary. | ||
It's like, okay, but compare him to other mainstream figures. | ||
He's out there talking about how if a woman came at him with a machete, he would beat the fuck out of her. | ||
Sorry for the language, but that, you know, that kind of thing. | ||
He talks about how like, you know, women should be owned by men and all this kind of stuff. | ||
And So controversial even within our community for different reasons, but he's out there as one of the most famous people in the world adored by young people, adored by kids on TikTok. | ||
TikTok's a very young platform and he's going viral among middle schoolers and high schoolers as basically a male chauvinist. | ||
And not only that, but somebody who's even branching out further into more red pill topics. | ||
I don't know if you guys follow very closely. | ||
Maybe you know broadly he talks about women and dating and sex and things like that, but if you also watch a lot of it, he gets into political subjects and he talks about how conspiracies are real and talks about how anti-white hatred is happening and talks about You know all kinds of things that even go beyond you could say what would be like standard fare for a conservative leaning e-celebrity. | ||
So anyways, he's out there and for these reasons he gets banned. | ||
He's one of the biggest guys on the internet and kids love him. | ||
And he's pushing this message which you could say is anti-woke, anti-liberal, anti-feminist. | ||
And by the way, when I use these terms, I'm using them in a very different way than most people. | ||
When I say anti-liberal, I don't mean like anti-leftist. | ||
I mean anti-liberal. | ||
Illiberal. | ||
And like because he supports hierarchy and tradition and these kinds of things. | ||
And when I say anti-feminist, I don't mean like anti-crazy blue haired. | ||
I mean like he thinks that men and women are different and men should be the leaders and women should be the followers. | ||
We should have a patriarchal society. | ||
He's like a fundamentally fundamentally opposed to feminism. | ||
Which is all very good, and it's very good that young people, even if it's not ideal, it's much better than the alternative. | ||
And certainly, directionally, it's the right message. | ||
And he gets banned for this. | ||
You know, no doubt that's the reason. | ||
And they all ban him all at once. | ||
And I'll read you, this is a story here, I think, I don't know what publication this is from, but it's this quote. | ||
And it's totally loaded. | ||
It says, uh, famous misogynist Andrew Tate in the past week has been kicked off several major internet services including Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, and Twitch for violating their policies. | ||
Oh, is that why? | ||
In an interview with Tucker Carlson on Fox Nation, released Thursday, Tate claimed the tech platform barred him for flaunting what he said were his traditional masculine values. | ||
He said, quote, they banned me simply because I had large swaths of the population agreeing to very traditional masculine values. | ||
I live a very traditionally masculine life. | ||
I have fast cars, a big house, a lot of money, a beautiful girlfriend, and they thought this was threatening. | ||
And for some reason, they decided that it's better they annihilate me from the internet and replace me with somebody who is more aligned with whatever they're trying to propose. | ||
Promote would be better, probably. | ||
And he's totally right about that. | ||
They will always do this where they say, nobody is being banned from the platforms for breaking the Terms of Service, okay? | ||
The Terms of Service and anybody who is on any platform knows this. | ||
The Terms of Service, the Community Guidelines on any platform are enforced at the discretion of partisan people that work at these companies. | ||
They are not enforced consistently. | ||
There is typically not a really strong pattern about what violates the policies and what does not violate the policies. | ||
The Community Guidelines and the Terms of Service are there to give a cover to what is a very arbitrary censorship program. | ||
That's what it is. | ||
And what I mean by that is you look at the TikTok Community Guidelines and what gets banned and what is allowed on the platform has very little to do with what the stated Community Guidelines or Terms of Service are. | ||
What it really is is that the community guidelines are there so that they could ban whoever they like. | ||
Almost everybody runs afoul. | ||
If you read the guidelines to their letter, almost everybody is violating them. | ||
Most creators, the most successful creators, are violating them. | ||
They are not in compliance. | ||
You can come up with an argument to the letter of the TOS that they're transgressing against them. | ||
They are there so they can ban who they like, and when they ban them say, well, it was a violation. | ||
They could ban anybody, but they only ban some people, and that's what the TOS is there for. | ||
To give them broad cover to take out who they don't like. | ||
And so, of course, Andrew Tate is right. | ||
Everybody's been censored. | ||
It's the same story. | ||
Anybody that is independent, influential, and not agreeing to the consensus, not agreeing to the liberal consensus, these are the people that are banned. | ||
It's not people that are racist. | ||
It's not people that are offensive. | ||
It's not people that are provocative. | ||
It's not anything that they say. | ||
It's people that are independent, influential, and going against the consensus. | ||
Every time, those are the people being banned. | ||
And sometimes they're liberal, actually. | ||
Rarely, but sometimes. | ||
Most often they're conservative. | ||
Sometimes they're very out there. | ||
Sometimes they're very mainstream. | ||
Andrew Tate is a guy who goes on these platforms and really doesn't violate the TOS. | ||
He just doesn't agree with the liberal consensus. | ||
But he got too big, too influential, and this is the pattern that always happens. | ||
A guy like this will come on the scene, push a right-wing position. | ||
And, you know, some people push a right-wing position and don't get very famous. | ||
He got very famous, too famous. | ||
And this is the process. | ||
Blows up overnight. | ||
He's a fascination. | ||
People are hungry and have an appetite for common sense. | ||
And this is what fuels his popularity. | ||
And people bring them on and they say, wow, you're so offensive. | ||
You're so outrageous. | ||
Explain your views. | ||
And it's provocative and it's thought-provoking. | ||
It's different. | ||
It's novel. | ||
We hear the same drumbeat about feminism and so on every day. | ||
And whenever somehow a person is able to break through and break the algorithm, get on the For You page or the front page or the trending on Twitter, whatever, And say it in a shocking or interesting way, people are interested. | ||
It's a change of pace. | ||
And then the young people start saying it, people start sharing it, people start agreeing, there's this appearance of like a thoughtful, legitimate opposition, there's liberalism, and then there's something else. | ||
And then they start writing the articles. | ||
You know, then the media catches on. | ||
The millennials that run the media catch on, you get the article in the Guardian about My middle school boys watch Andrew Tate and I'm appalled. | ||
Then you get a Reddit post. | ||
I'm a teacher at some school and all the boys are bullying the girls. | ||
Then you get the Media Matters, and then you get the Right Wing Watch, and then you get the Huffington Post, and the Slate, and the Salon, and you get a viral tweet, and then you get the New York Times and Washington Post. | ||
This is a big problem. | ||
Shut it down. | ||
And then, and this is what happened this week. | ||
All the big tech companies get together at the same time. | ||
It wasn't like what because and again keep in mind when I say they're they're banning whoever they like on their discretion you know this is supported by exactly how this plays out. | ||
Andrew Tate was on these platforms for a long time even before he blew up he was on these platforms for a long time and then he blew up and then he was the biggest thing on TikTok for months and he was the biggest thing on Instagram for months and he was All over, everywhere, for a time. | ||
But what happens? | ||
It's like I just described before. | ||
Things are not as they seem. | ||
It's about a small group of connected people in this constellation of institutions that make these decisions. | ||
Excuse me. | ||
And they launder their discretionary, partisan decisions through process. | ||
So-and-so raises the alarm bell on Reddit. | ||
A thing goes viral here. | ||
Media Matters and the hate researchers, they publish their study, and then the Guardian picks it up, or the New York Times picks it up, and then the ADL tells the trusted flagger program at YouTube, and then, okay, and then YouTube calls Facebook, and they all ban them all at the same time. | ||
And the decision that was made a long time ago, which is Tait must go, is laundered through this process and what do they say at the end of the week? | ||
Oh well, he got banned because he broke the Terms of Service. | ||
unidentified
|
Really? | |
All the platforms all decided at the same time this week that he broke their TOS. | ||
Really? | ||
It just so happened he was fine. | ||
He was on all the platforms for months, the biggest thing in the world, and then it was a two-week period where the media found out, the media wrote their hit pieces, they applied the pressure, and then all the big tech companies banned all at once. | ||
And you're telling me that all of that was a coincidence? | ||
Yeah. | ||
YouTube just decided on the same week that TikTok and Instagram and Facebook and Twitter, they all just came to at the same time, oh we just realized this guy that's been blowing up for months and been on the platforms for years, we all just coincidentally decided the same week he's just breaking the rules. | ||
And it just so happens that we all came to that decision the same week that all the media hit pieces came and the pressure came. | ||
Really? | ||
So he's right. | ||
It's because of what he was saying. | ||
He flew too close to the sun. | ||
Because they'll tolerate, to some extent, opposition, but you have to bend the knee and kiss the ring. | ||
You gotta do what Logan Paul did. | ||
When the BLM riots were happening, Logan Paul came on his show and said, I have white privilege, and I realize that systemic racism is real, and I need to dismantle white supremacy. | ||
Okay? | ||
He had to bend the knee and kiss the ring. | ||
And everybody's got to do this. | ||
To some extent. | ||
Everybody that enjoys any kind of mainstream massive success... | ||
Everybody, general celebrities, not political people, everybody is at some point got to bend the knee, kiss the ring, and say, yeah, I'm totally down with homosexuality. | ||
Yeah, I'm totally down with feminism. | ||
Yeah, I'm not like a crazy Trump supporter, but etc, etc. | ||
They've all got to do it. | ||
Nobody can be a full rebel. | ||
Nobody can be fully independent and enjoy major influence. | ||
Again, it's those things. | ||
Independent, influential, against the consensus. | ||
Everybody who fits that bill, persistently, will be wiped out in exactly this manner. | ||
And they'll come up with the reason. | ||
They'll come up with the procedural, technical, legalistic reason. | ||
They broke the TOS. | ||
They did this. | ||
They did that. | ||
We have a reason. | ||
You could cancel anybody you wanted to. | ||
But the only people that get canceled are those people that do those three things. | ||
So that's true. | ||
And the article itself, the article reporting on the censorship confirms this. | ||
The article goes on and talks about, builds this case. | ||
It says, Last week, Meta said it had permanently suspended Tait's accounts on Facebook and Instagram for violating the company's policies on dangerous organizations and individuals. | ||
Similarly, YouTube banned Tait's channels, including Tait's speech, Citing multiple violations of the platform's community guidelines in terms of service, including hate speech, Tate, who is 35, has repeatedly made hateful and occasionally violent comments about women. | ||
Over the years, the British-American kickboxer has compared women to dogs, said women shouldn't be allowed to drive. | ||
And argued that women should bear responsibility for being raped. | ||
Wait. | ||
He said that? | ||
That's terrible. | ||
That's so rude. | ||
You can't say that. | ||
That's so offensive. | ||
What? | ||
That's not a normal thing to think. | ||
That's not a correct opinion. | ||
You gotta kill this guy. | ||
I can't believe a person could ever say that. | ||
This fucking country is so gay. | ||
I hate this country. | ||
Seriously. | ||
Because this is what they do. | ||
Anybody that disagrees with the system, this is what they do. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, well, did you know he said that women bear responsibility for being raped? | |
Oh, I didn't know that. | ||
Yeah, we never need to hear from him again because a person said a thing one time. | ||
In this completely biased article written by a faggot liberal. | ||
A faggot liberal wrote this article. | ||
Some faggot feminist liberal, probably Jewish, wrote this article and, you know, was rubbing their little hands together and saying Andrew Tate is a misogynistic racist piece of garbage and You know, our entire country is run by people like this, okay? | ||
Facebook is run with people like this creating the algorithm, and the government is run like this, and this foreign policy is run like this, and... and so on and so forth. | ||
And everybody's just like, oh, he's... Andrew Tait said that? | ||
According to this completely biased article written by a fag liberal? | ||
Oh, well in that case, we don't need to hear dissenting opinions. | ||
Oh wait, that guy that's saying dissenting opinions? | ||
Some biased liberal has a negative opinion of him and is taking every bad thing he said out of context? | ||
Oh, well in that case, I don't need to hear other opinions. | ||
I just need to hear faggot liberal Jews on TV. | ||
That's literally what our country is. | ||
Oh, the person disagreeing with liberalism according to faggot liberal Jews and media is a bad guy? | ||
Oh, why didn't you say that? | ||
We never need to hear a contrary opinion ever again. | ||
We just need to trust TV. | ||
Everything the TV says is true. | ||
Everything that the Internet, everything that Google says is true. | ||
Everything that BlackRock and Wall Street and the Jewish World Congress says is true. | ||
Because everyone that disagrees, according to a faggot liberal Jew online, is a scumbag who said a bad thing at some point in their life. | ||
Really? | ||
That's what cancel culture amounts to. | ||
That's what they do to everybody. | ||
Every interesting, funny, entertaining, different person offering a contrary opinion, which may or may not be correct, but sometimes is correct, they're going to be excised, ostracized from society because a libtard is going to write a little article and say, we've compiled their worst hits. | ||
So, did you know how offensive they are? | ||
Yeah, that's what I thought. | ||
No one needs to hear opposition. | ||
No one needs to hear the contrary. | ||
Just like, I can't live like this because here's the thing. | ||
I'm a free thinker. | ||
I'm a real human being. | ||
Yeah, I'm gonna say things that sound crazy. | ||
Like, you know, I go on the Destiny stream and he's like, wait a minute, Nick. | ||
Do you think the dinosaurs are real? | ||
And I'm like, no. | ||
unidentified
|
And they're like, Fuck you! | |
It's ludicrous! | ||
Ridiculous! | ||
unidentified
|
Okay? | |
Well, I can't go on a show and say it's a little bit... Really? | ||
Giant lizards? | ||
I'm a little bit skeptical. | ||
I'm not an archaeologist, okay? | ||
I'm not a paleontologist. | ||
I don't know. | ||
But I come on my show and sometimes joking or sometimes serious will say, yeah, I don't know, maybe dinosaurs aren't real. | ||
Have you ever thought about that? | ||
And you get these like, you get these smarmy little, little, uh, bitches. | ||
Sorry for all the language, but it just makes me livid. | ||
Because it's about freedom. | ||
And they're gonna come on and say, they're gonna make this face. | ||
unidentified
|
You don't believe in di- what do you think, women shouldn't vote? | |
Fuck you! | ||
No, women should not vote. | ||
You wanna know why? | ||
Because if you've ever met a woman, they can't even drive. | ||
That's not even... I mean, that's just real. | ||
And then you'll get another personality of the liberal blob who's gonna come out and say, Actually, studies say that men get more car accidents. | ||
Fuck off! | ||
Women can't drive. | ||
Shut up. | ||
No, let's all just be like Minecraft Steve and just go to work every day. | ||
Yeah, let's never think anything different, even for fun, even for entertainment, even for curiosity's sake. | ||
Let's just believe everything that the Jewish media tells us, la la la. | ||
And anyone who disagrees is a horrible person. | ||
That's what this is about. | ||
That's what this article... He said that women bear responsibility for being raped. | ||
You said that he said that one time? | ||
Oh, good thing he was banned. | ||
Good thing all of big tech banned him at the same time. | ||
That's not terrifying. | ||
Good thing that all of big tech, which is the biggest companies in the world, they're the biggest companies in the world that control information. | ||
Good thing they all got together and colluded and banned some guy, because according to this liberal journalist, he said something once that offended me. | ||
That's how they want people to think. | ||
It says... | ||
It goes on to list more things. | ||
Tate tweeted in 2017, if you put yourself in a position to be raped, you must bear some responsibility. | ||
I'm not saying it's okay you got raped. | ||
No one should, women should be abused regardless. | ||
However, with sexual assault, they want to put zero blame on the victim whatsoever. | ||
I mean, they're gonna like, five years ago, he posted this on Twitter. | ||
So what? | ||
Well, they gotta poison the well. | ||
They gotta poison the well. | ||
Before you think about big tech banning a guy, let me character assassinate him and poison the well so that you're okay with it. | ||
Tate has graphically detailed how he would assault a woman if she accused him of cheating on an episode of Pomp Podcast this month. | ||
He recounted hitting a woman and breaking her jaw during a bar flight after being charged with causing bodily harm. | ||
He, quote, got away with it in the end. | ||
Tate has also explained that he would rather date 18 or 19 year olds rather than women in their mid-20s because he can make an imprint on teenagers who have been through less dick. | ||
Pardon the language. | ||
Earlier this month, The Guardian reported that Tate is being investigated for human trafficking on Barstool Sports. | ||
He was asked about his past comments about women being property. | ||
He said, I'm not saying they're property, but they're given to the man and belong to the man. | ||
In 2016, he was kicked off a TV show after a video surfaced of him hitting a woman with a belt. | ||
In his recent interview with Carlson, Tate complained his comments are taken out of context. | ||
He said, what happens is when I say these things, they ignore 95% of what I say. | ||
They ignore me saying that you need to avoid low quality men and blah blah blah blah blah. | ||
Okay, so that's the article. | ||
And, honestly, it just goes to show the whole thing is rigged. | ||
Okay? | ||
Everybody's told me my entire career You know, I don't even like calling it that. | ||
I'm an artist, okay? | ||
We're all on a journey together, okay? | ||
We're all having an experience together. | ||
Career. | ||
My career. | ||
But throughout my time doing this, people have always told me, you know, you should have not said this, or you should have said something else, because then you would still be on a platform, or then so-and-so would associate with you, or then, and it's like, that's tantamount to victim blaming. | ||
If you are telling the truth, you will be cancelled. | ||
Simple as that. | ||
If you are independent, influential, telling the truth, this will happen to you. | ||
It doesn't matter who you are, it doesn't matter how you say it, what you say it, this is what happens to you. | ||
This is what happens to you. | ||
You get banned, you get ridiculed, you get ostracized, this is what happens. | ||
And People need to realize that that's the society we're living in. | ||
It's a societal force. | ||
And what needs to change is that the government needs to come in and break that. | ||
We need to put people in the government to break that, because where is it coming from? | ||
It's not coming from, like, I don't even know what people think it is. | ||
When people say, we're going to just create alternatives or something, it's like, at the end of the day, it's Visa and MasterCard. | ||
It's the banks. | ||
It's the Federal Reserve. | ||
It goes all the way to the top. | ||
A guy like Andrew Tate is never, never gonna go mainstream and be allowed to advance his message without obstacles put in his way by the powers that be. | ||
People go, you gotta start a Rumble channel, you gotta start a whatever, you gotta go and complain about censorship, we just need to... | ||
The problem is that we're fighting against people in power that want to hold their power. | ||
And they use propaganda and technology to keep control over the population. | ||
That's what this is. | ||
At the end of the day. | ||
And people go, well, without changing that fundamental dynamic, we're going to do something like go on an alternative. | ||
We're going to do something like this or that. | ||
That dynamic must be addressed. | ||
Now, I want to talk about this first, and then we'll get into the Tate response in a second, because I have an interesting take on that as well. | ||
But, and I've been talking about this for a long time, you know, if a guy like Andrew Tate, who's the most famous guy in the world, can get cut down by all of them, and by the way, in a few months, I'm a strong believer that in a few months, a year, It's gonna be done, man. | ||
If it's not already done. | ||
Andrew Tate, and I'm rooting for him, I don't want this to be the case, but censorship cuts off the oxygen. | ||
Completely cuts off the oxygen of anybody. | ||
It doesn't matter who you are. | ||
They did it to Trump. | ||
Trump, before January 6th, was the most famous man in the world. | ||
January 6th happened, he got banned from everything, and now look at Truth Social. | ||
Truth Social is a website. | ||
It's the only website where Trump posts. | ||
And it gets fewer than 10 million visits per month. | ||
The most famous man in the world, 80 million followers on Twitter, billions of impressions on one platform prior to January 6th, got banned on Twitter. | ||
Sitting President of the United States, banned on all the platforms. | ||
A year later, here we are in 2022, he made his own platform. | ||
It's available on the App Store. | ||
Fewer than 10 million visits on the entire site per month. | ||
It's the only place where he's posting. | ||
Why? | ||
They suck the oxygen out. | ||
The platforms are where the people are. | ||
And I said this on Telegram when Tate got banned. | ||
Here's why the alternatives never work. | ||
Here's why, short of fundamentally changing the power, that's a question of power. | ||
It's not a question of technology or moderation. | ||
Technology and moderation are the tools of the powerful. | ||
That's why the power's gotta change. | ||
People are not watching Trump on Twitter. | ||
They're watching Twitter. | ||
People are not watching Tate on TikTok. | ||
They're watching TikTok. | ||
What I mean by that is, when people are going on TikTok and they're going through their For You page and they see Andrew Tate, Andrew Tate is a channel. | ||
He's like a channel or a program on a channel on TV. | ||
What people are watching is TV. | ||
What people are watching is TikTok. | ||
If Andrew Tate is not a channel on TikTok, if he's not a program on TikTok, if he's not on TikTok, people are going to go and watch the Andrew Tate Show on some other thing. | ||
Maybe they will in the first week. | ||
Did your Andrew Tate got banned? | ||
No, really? | ||
Yeah, he's streaming on Rumble right now about it. | ||
Oh, I'll download the app real quick. | ||
But over time, over the course of attrition, people aren't tuning in week after week for the Andrew Tate Show, the Andrew Tate Podcast. | ||
They're tuning into the medium, to the platform. | ||
The medium's the message. | ||
The platform is the content. | ||
The platform itself, not the content on the platform, the platform itself is the content. | ||
When Trump got banned on Twitter, how many people left Twitter to follow Trump? | ||
He had 80 million followers on Twitter. | ||
Did 80 million people follow him to True Social? | ||
Not even 8 million people even visit that website in a month. | ||
And that's not even unique visitors. | ||
There's not even 8 million visits on his site per month. | ||
80 million followers on Twitter though. | ||
That's because Trump was a part of the platform. | ||
Trump was on Twitter. | ||
When Trump was off of Twitter, people watched him for a minute, but then they resumed watching Twitter. | ||
And when Andrew Tate is banned on TikTok, this is my prediction, and I don't want this to happen, but this is what it is. | ||
People go and they... some people will follow Andrew Tate, certainly, but a fraction. | ||
Nowhere near the volume. | ||
People go back to watching TikTok. | ||
And that's why these kinds of, these other strategies that don't involve changing the regime. | ||
Without regime change, it doesn't matter. | ||
As long as the regime controls the technology, as long as the regime controls the platform, They will control what is on the platform, they will control what gets popular, and they could very easily flip the switch. | ||
I mean, Rumble, as an example. | ||
True Social, as an example. | ||
Even these platforms are permitted, to the extent that they have any influence, they're even permitted that paltry existence off the platforms. | ||
Because they're permitted to use these by the App Store. | ||
They're permitted to use services like Cloudflare. | ||
They're permitted to use Visa and MasterCard to process payments to make these lucrative financial ventures. | ||
If they truly became revolutionary, if they are truly revolutionary, they'll be deplatformed. | ||
Who knows how long True Social will last on the App Store? | ||
Right now they're having a crisis where they owe their servers they're hosting millions of dollars because they can't monetize the platform. | ||
And so the point is censorship is really a problem which is downstream from the problem which is the number one problem which is the regime. | ||
They're not going to let people use speech. | ||
They're not going to let people, independent people, going against them to gain influence through the technology and the platforms which they control because they're sovereign. | ||
That's why in order for us to have interesting, eclectic, different, oppositional content, we're going to need to have a completely different regime. | ||
Anything that doesn't involve that is a fail. | ||
It's just, it's completely It's a non-starter. | ||
It's doomed from the beginning. | ||
And so I look at Andrew Tate, he's banned on everything. | ||
You look at Trump, banned on everything. | ||
Alex Jones, Anglin. | ||
People are not going to be, and don't get me wrong, we try and we fight and we're doing what we can, but I recognize that over a thousand years, it wouldn't work in this dynamic. | ||
We're fighting with what we have, adapting to a changing situation, To get somebody across the finish line to change the government. | ||
What I mean by that is we're on Cozy, we're doing our thing, we're adapting, we're on TikTok posting clips, and we're doing a guerrilla warfare. | ||
We're adapting to a changing environment. | ||
To get that one in a hundred, one in a million chance that Trump gets in and changes the guidelines and does a proper regime change and allows us something with some kind of longevity. | ||
Because doing this for the longer that this goes on, the odds that we are successful goes down to zero. | ||
If we're doing this for ten years, it goes down to one percent. | ||
If we're doing this for a hundred years, it goes down to zero percent. | ||
If we're doing this a thousand years, it's like less than zero percent. | ||
So anything that doesn't involve regime change, forget about it. | ||
This is an extension, this is an arm of controlling power, like we just talked about with Hunter Biden. | ||
And then, so as far as Andrew Tate is concerned, I have to say I'm a little bit disappointed because, you know, he and everybody had to have expected that this would happen. | ||
You know, I'm surprised it took this long, frankly, that he was allowed to be on these platforms for as long as he did. | ||
Him getting banned was the inevitable, foreseeable result. | ||
And I'm surprised that when this happened, the playbook is, do an apology video, go on Tucker Carlson, complain about tech censorship, sign up with Rumble. | ||
I mean, it's a positive development, don't get me wrong. | ||
It's a good thing, it's a good thing that bigger people are being banned, because it increases the pool of, like, untouchables that are not on the platforms, and it brings more people into this sort of ghetto, away from the main internet, right? | ||
So, I mean, it's sort of a good development in a sense, but I was a little bit disappointed because, you know, you would think that after so many big people got banned, somebody would have maybe like a different, like an unconventional, unorthodox, different thing to do when they got banned to keep the momentum up. | ||
I don't know what. | ||
I don't know what it would be. | ||
But it's like, Donald Trump gets banned, and what did he do? | ||
unidentified
|
Nothing! | |
He got banned from everything after 1-6, and he got caught with his pants around his ankles, and he was like, hey, you can't do that! | ||
And it's like, yeah, they can. | ||
They did. | ||
They just did, and totally bitched out, and he let it happen, and now it's like over, right? | ||
And you'd think people would see that, and other big people would say, oh, well, I'm gonna meet the same fate, I'll do something else. | ||
And you think a guy like Andrew Tate of all people, phenom, that he got to this level of notoriety that he did, maybe he'd have an unconventional, different way to respond. | ||
Because it's like we know that the playbook which has been established doesn't work. | ||
Nobody gets banned from all the platforms, complains about tech censorship, and maintains or exceeds their notoriety from before. | ||
Influence. | ||
So you would expect something novel. | ||
Because if what's conventional hasn't worked and hasn't proven to be successful, trying something new has a chance at doing that. | ||
So to see him have a novel come up, and he gains all this notoriety in a totally new way, gets banned, which everyone could have seen coming, which has happened to other people in the same position, and then for him to go and just sort of fall back on... Go on Fox. | ||
Put out a video saying, Oh, I'm not sexist. | ||
Oh, I'm not a misogynist. | ||
And go on Rumble. | ||
Go on Ultec. | ||
I'll be bigger than ever on Rumble. | ||
Will you? | ||
It's like a little bit disappointing because you would have hoped that a guy like that would be like, I'm gonna march on, you know, I'm gonna go to New York. | ||
I'm gonna go and do a rally. | ||
I'm gonna go do something different! | ||
Do something different! | ||
Do something that hasn't been done! | ||
And there's a sliver here. | ||
He's at the peak of his notoriety. | ||
The censorship elevates him even further for a time with a very short expiration date. | ||
He's the biggest thing in the world. | ||
Him being banned is the biggest thing in the world. | ||
Makes him even bigger for a time for an instant. | ||
And there's a moment where you can take that and use it and do something never been done before. | ||
I don't know what. | ||
I don't know what you would do. | ||
Something totally different. | ||
The RumbleStream, like that was okay, but it's like going to a RumbleStream and just say, ha ha ha, you can't get me, I'm fine. | ||
It's been it's people have been doing that since Milo, you know and And that's not a diss by the way But everybody does this kind of proud thing where they go. | ||
I got banned. | ||
It's just made me stronger No, it hasn't censorship does not make anybody stronger censorship does not help you censorship. | ||
It's like just the dumbest Dumbest stupidest thing ever and it's such a cope and it's so transparent I hate it when people do that people go I got banned, but that just made me more the Streisand effect I hear Normie say that they go destroy. | ||
Have you heard of the Streisand? | ||
Yeah, you fucking idiot I've heard of it. | ||
Everyone's heard of the Streisand effect and it's not real It's real for two seconds and then you're buried under a hundred layers of garbage Well, there's billions of people on tik-tok and you know, you get isolated somewhere else so to do this Oh Fox, apology video, alt text stream, I'm bigger than ever. | ||
It was this conventional playbook. | ||
It brought him back down to earth. | ||
It's a playbook that's never worked. | ||
Nobody has ever been censored, done that little routine, and then been the same or better off. | ||
So it was a little bit disappointing. | ||
And it's just another reminder, and it's through no fault of his own. | ||
It is what it is. | ||
No individual can beat it. | ||
Trump can't beat it. | ||
Tate can't beat it. | ||
The censorship is bigger. | ||
The platforms are bigger. | ||
They're too big. | ||
TikTok is bigger than Andrew Tate. | ||
Everybody that thinks they're bigger than TikTok, they're not. | ||
TikTok, YouTube, Twitter, they are bigger than all their biggest creators. | ||
YouTube is bigger than PewDiePie. | ||
Twitter is bigger than Donald Trump. | ||
TikTok is bigger than Andrew Tate. | ||
Getting banned from them does not make you stronger. | ||
You're not going to beat them. | ||
You're not going to take even a fraction with you somewhere else. | ||
The platform's got to be beaten. | ||
And the only thing bigger than the biggest companies, the only thing bigger than the platforms that collude with the government, is the government, is the state. | ||
It's the only thing. | ||
And people need to get serious about this. | ||
It's like people are just kind of messing around. | ||
People are like playing around. | ||
Our society is being hollowed out. | ||
Nothing of any value is being created anymore. | ||
There is no interesting thought happening. | ||
Basically everything is a lie. | ||
What is being produced intellectually is just a load of garbage. | ||
And we're all being impoverished by this. | ||
We're all being impoverished in terms of our knowledge of the world and In terms of our appreciation for human ingenuity and creativity, we're being impoverished. | ||
Saturday Night Live is terrible. | ||
Star Wars is terrible. | ||
TikTok is terrible. | ||
YouTube is terrible. | ||
You know what flies on YouTube? | ||
Slime tutorials, and unboxing videos, people opening products, and arts and crafts, and weird MKUltra mind programming for kids, like We're being spiritually and mentally impoverished by this oppressive censorship regime combined with cancel culture and wokeness. | ||
And whenever this kind of stuff happens, people just take the most pedestrian approach to it and say, Well, you know Streisand effect you go you will just go somewhere else. | ||
No, no one ever does that take a look at telegram every Telegram blew up after one six and it's been like this ever since Everybody joined telegram after one six and everybody's been leaving ever since these people are going back to Twitter and You know, so people have got to get, they've got to get behind revolution. | ||
I don't mean like overthrow the government revolution. | ||
I mean they've got to get behind a truly revolutionary political movement that is the antithesis of what exists. | ||
It doesn't even need to be for anything necessarily, although it should be in some respects, but it just must necessarily be against what is there. | ||
It's the only thing that's going to change the dynamic. | ||
Okay, the state, strictly speaking, the state is the only institution more powerful than the forces that are pushing in this direction in society. | ||
All the combined forces of the big business, and the advertisers, and the NATO State Department, Intel community, and the big tech, and Wall Street. | ||
The only thing more powerful than all those, and world Jewry obviously, the only thing more powerful than all those interests pushing in this direction is a truly revolutionary nationalist government. | ||
It's the only answer. | ||
It's the only answer to these problems. | ||
All tech not going to happen. | ||
It's built on Amazon servers and protected by Cloudflare and it's monetized by Visa and Mastercard. | ||
The only solution is a total regime change by real nationalists. | ||
That's it. | ||
Otherwise everyone will suffer the same fate. | ||
You'll have these little sort of flash in the pan. | ||
People come and go. | ||
They blow up for a month. | ||
They say some edgy things. | ||
People get a little bit hopeful and then they're snuffed out and they're gone. | ||
Happens every time. | ||
When will somebody mount the true, persistent revolution? | ||
That's the only thing that's going to change it. | ||
So I was disappointed. | ||
I was deeply disappointed. | ||
Not that Tate would be that guy, because he's not really an ideologue. | ||
I think that, you know, he's an interesting character. | ||
But, you know, he's not a Christian. | ||
He's not a nationalist. | ||
He's a guy. | ||
unidentified
|
He's a guy. | |
He's a mensch. | ||
He's just a guy. | ||
You know, and I know Tate is controversial in these circles. | ||
Certainly he's not perfect. | ||
He's like a degenerate. | ||
He pushes degeneracy and materialism and all this. | ||
But obviously, compared to what else, he's just like the best thing ever. | ||
Compared to what else is out there, he's the best. | ||
But like all the rest of them, any independent, influential person against the status quo is gonna get the same fate until you fundamentally change things. | ||
And you just get all these completely unserious efforts of people saying, you know, well, we just gotta, we gotta maneuver around the terms of service. | ||
We have to maneuver around being called a Nazi or whatever. | ||
We have to maneuver around being associated with certain canceled people and personal grudges. | ||
All that stuff has to go, man. | ||
People have to get behind the movement that's going to punch the regime in the face and put them on the ground and change. | ||
Real change. | ||
That's it. | ||
Otherwise, we're doomed. | ||
Like everybody that gets censored. | ||
So anyway, so that's that. | ||
That's that. | ||
That's Andrew Tate. | ||
I want to move on. | ||
I want to take a look at our Super Chats and we'll see what you guys have to say. | ||
Let me just get my water. | ||
my throat's dry all right Let me get my head set. | ||
Let's take a look. | ||
Let's see what you guys have to say. | ||
It's been a long time since I've heard any superchats. | ||
But we're back tonight. | ||
unidentified
|
So this is gonna be great. | |
This is gonna be great. | ||
Okay, hope that was a good show. | ||
I feel a little rusty. | ||
I haven't been doing this in a long time, so I don't know. | ||
How's my driving? | ||
How was my show tonight? | ||
Hope it was a good show. | ||
Because it's been a minute. | ||
It has been a minute. | ||
Okay. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's see. | |
Let me just pull up my Super Chats. | ||
We'll see what we got. | ||
Okay, it's just... | ||
I'm just skimming these and this is already just gonna suck. | ||
It's already gonna be the worst ever. | ||
It's too hot. | ||
It's like a hundred degrees in here. | ||
I forgot to turn my fan on and it's we're two hours in and these super chats are already crap. | ||
So here goes nothing. | ||
Alright, let's take a look. | ||
What do we got? | ||
Pretty underscore fly underscore white underscore guy sent $3.82. | ||
Good to have you back, friend. | ||
I've started researching before the show to make sure everything presented checks out with the official narrative. | ||
Yeah, right. | ||
unidentified
|
Gotta love that. | |
I had to research, like, I just can't even. | ||
I can't even anymore. | ||
I feel, you know, I'm just so fatigued with people not getting it. | ||
When I hear that kind of stuff, like when Destiny's like, I'm not gonna watch this 9-11 documentary until I've, I've read, uh... I've read all the arguments against it, I'm gonna watch it, I'm gonna go through it, and it's like... Yeah. | ||
Open-minded, by the way. | ||
- Bye. - Epical underscore doge sent $3. | ||
Five. | ||
Hi, we missed you. | ||
Hope work wasn't too bad in Florida. - Hey, yeah, I missed you too. - Epical underscore doge sent $3. | ||
unidentified
|
Thanos perfectly balanced as all things should be meme but it's PPP's IQ and BMI. | |
Justin sent $5. | ||
Good to see you back. | ||
Hope the vacation was nice. | ||
It really is content renaissance. | ||
Some YouTuber with 220k subs named Ruslan Katie wanted to debate you about IQ but Bibble schooled him. | ||
Holla! | ||
unidentified
|
Holla! | |
Hey, what's going on buddy? | ||
Yeah, great to be back! | ||
Howla! | ||
What's up, bro? | ||
We love Justin. | ||
Maxiebro sent $50. | ||
Happy belated birthday! | ||
Hey, thanks a lot, buddy! | ||
I appreciate it. | ||
Thank you, Maxiebro. | ||
Marziesel sent $3. | ||
Thoughts on Donda a year on? | ||
I like it. | ||
I like it more now than I did a year ago, I'll say. | ||
But still not as best. | ||
I like Donda 2. | ||
I really like the direction Donda 2 is going in. | ||
But it just hasn't come out yet. | ||
We just need it to come out. | ||
So here we go. - Jews stay killing Christ sent $8. | ||
You're a Kang my Nika. | ||
Can you take a multiple part super chat succession about Kang Wangling and my drunken China Jew sperm thievery conversation? | ||
Neater opinion. | ||
First Wangling is smarter than me. | ||
unidentified
|
I think Jews stay stealing sperm and control China. - Yeah, it's just like, tell me you're a millennial without telling me you're an unfunny, cringe millennial. | |
You're a Kang, my nigga. | ||
Funny, funny stuff. | ||
Thank you for that. | ||
I don't even know any of that garbage. | ||
Thanks a lot, man. | ||
I appreciate it. | ||
Big shout out. | ||
Thank you, OhioGroper. | ||
Big shout out. | ||
I appreciate it. | ||
Thanks a lot, buddy. | ||
Okay, I'm just... I'm sorry. | ||
I don't want to read any of these, dude. | ||
unidentified
|
Alright, well he gave me like 30 bucks. |