All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 1, 2022 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
01:17:58
TRUMP TO BE ARRESTED??? FBI Claims Trump "OBSTRUCTED" Investigation | America First Ep. 1052TRUMP TO BE ARRESTED??? FBI Claims Trump "OBSTRUCTED" Investigation | America First Ep. 1052
Participants
Main voices
n
nick fuentes
01:14:19
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
American people will come first once again.
With respect, the respect that we deserve.
From this day forward, it's going to be only America First America.
America first.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Good evening, everybody.
You're watching America First.
My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
We have a great show for you tonight.
Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Wednesday.
We have a lot to talk about tonight.
Lots to get into.
Big featured story.
Kind of a black pill.
Little bit of a black pill.
Indictment incoming against Donald Trump.
Not even maybe for the alleged stealing of records from the White House, but now for obstruction of justice.
And so our featured story tonight is about a new statement that we have from the Department of Justice.
It's an update on what we heard about the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago a couple weeks ago.
And it looks like not good.
And this is what they do.
This is how it goes.
We covered this a couple weeks ago when the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago took place.
And you remember, I think it was three weeks ago at this point, you know, initially everybody thought it was about January 6th.
And they thought the FBI was raiding Trump because of What was going on in the hearings and everything that came out through the January 6th Select Committee.
And then it turned out that evening we read in a press release from Trump a statement that actually had to do with the National Archives.
And that they were alleging that Trump had improperly taken documents from the White House and took them to Mar-a-Lago.
And we heard a little bit about that over the preceding weeks.
And we heard that Trump and his team were actually in contact with the National Archives and trying to deliver the documents that apparently the FBI made a trip out there back in June.
And they examined the documents and where they were and installed a lock and all this kind of stuff.
And now we have a brand new update from the Department of Justice which says that now they're looking into him not for January 6th, although they are actually, but not in connection with this.
They're maybe not considering a charge with the records, which were improperly taken from the White House, but now they're saying that they're considering charging him for obstruction of justice.
And they're saying that they tried to get these records.
Trump did have confidential classified materials at Mar-a-Lago.
But the criminal action is that Trump took measures to hide the classified documents and prevent the FBI from getting them when they made the trip out back in June.
And this is how they get you even if you do nothing wrong, even if there's nothing criminal on January 6th, even if there's nothing criminal since January 6th, even if there's nothing criminal...
About having the documents.
They're going to say that he obstructed justice when they tried to get the documents that maybe were not even criminally or improperly transferred from the White House to Mar-a-Lago.
So that's a new thing.
Now they're talking about not even the three statutes that they said.
You remember we went over, I think it was the search warrant.
And they had three charges laid out all pertaining to improper transfer and storage and disposal of classified materials.
It's not even gonna be that.
It's obstruction of justice is what they're going for.
And when I say that this is what they do, this is what I mean.
And we talked about this when this all went down back then.
They're looking to hit Trump, as you know, with anything that will stick.
They can't get him, potentially, for January 6th, so they just go on a fishing expedition and they go to his house.
They can't get him on a charge for improperly transferring because the act of transferring from the White House to Mar-a-Lago declassifies the documents.
Cannot happen.
The President cannot illicitly take classified documents because the act of removing them declassifies them.
So this is what they do.
They go out there, they find classified materials that they didn't see in June, and they say, well, you were obstructing our investigation.
And if you recall, this is the exact same way that the Mueller investigation played out five years ago, four years ago.
So we'll talk all about that.
It's a lot of crap.
And they're not going to charge him until after the midterms.
At the earliest.
And you know why that is.
These are the games they play.
So we'll talk more about that.
That'll be our featured story.
We'll also be talking tonight about Governor Greg Abbott of Texas.
Who is now busing illegals.
To my home city of Chicago.
And in case you haven't heard about this, this has been going on now for I think a few months.
And I don't know how any conservative convinces themselves that this is based.
I remember when this first started happening and I didn't see too many people complaining about it.
A lot of people said, this is hilarious, this is a great idea.
You know, the Biden administration is basically undoing everything that Trump did to prevent illegals from coming into America and staying in America.
And it took him four years to build up this legal regime.
And I think, what is it, Title 19 or something like that?
All kinds of different emergency measures and executive orders were put in place because what happened before under the Obama administration is that illegals would show up at the border, surrender themselves We would not be able to detain them long enough to process their asylum requests or other legal proceedings, and so they would just be released into the country.
That's catch and release.
We would catch them, they would be apprehended at the border, caught, detain them for a short time, and then unable to detain the hundreds of thousands or millions that came in in a short amount of time, we would say, you're free to go, we would release them into America, and called them back for a court date where they were supposed to be deported.
And surprisingly, none of them showed back up to court or to the detention facility to be deported back to Mexico or wherever.
And so over the course of four years, Trump built up this legal regime where we were able to catch people and immediately turn them around and send them home.
Biden is undoing that.
Massive crisis at the border, particularly in Texas.
And Greg Abbott has been trying to come up with ways within his jurisdiction as the governor to shut down the border.
But there just isn't too much that can be done.
Immigration is under the jurisdiction of the federal government.
So what Greg Abbott has been doing this year is taking all the illegals that come in through Texas, rounding them up, putting them in charter buses, and sending them to Washington DC, New York City, and now the third city, Chicago, is where he's starting to send them.
And a lot of people think this is funny.
This is the new development as Chicago is the latest city.
And people think this is tongue-in-cheek.
Greg Abbott is taking the illegals and he's making them the Democrat mayor's problems.
You want illegals in the country?
We'll make them the problem of Joe Biden in D.C.
or Eric Adams in New York or Lori Lightfoot in Chicago.
And a lot of conservatives say, huh, that'll show them.
But there's just one problem.
There's already illegals coming to all these cities.
They're already coming to Chicago.
They're already coming to New York.
They want more illegals in these cities.
They want more illegals in DC.
They want more illegals.
They're sanctuary cities!
How is that an own?
Greg Abbott's rounding them up and sending them to cities that are sanctuary.
Where they want immigrants, where they want illegals, where they say we won't deport illegals.
unidentified
And Greg Abbott is saying, huh, now they're your problem.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
And all the Democrats in these cities are like, hey, more for us.
More votes, more thugs, more shock troops.
And here's the best part.
They're being pushed further into America.
They were at the border.
Now they're on Lake Michigan.
This is the genius of conservatives.
They're just off the charts.
So that's the other big story.
We'll be talking about that tonight as well.
I'm obviously not happy about it.
What the heck is that?
They drop them off at Union Station downtown.
You know, Chicago honestly is not that bad as far as homeless people are concerned.
There's really not a lot of homeless.
If you live in Chicago, you know this.
Because I travel all over the country and it's really bad in DC.
And it's bad everywhere in Florida.
And it's bad in Texas.
And it's bad in all over California.
It's horrible in Phoenix.
It's not that bad in Chicago.
Chicago is the third biggest city.
They don't have too many homeless.
But now that's going to change very soon.
Because where the hell are these people going to go?
So, they're going to wind up on the streets.
So we'll talk about that.
Should be a pretty good show.
Before we get into all of that, just a reminder to smash the follow button here on Cozy.
Make sure to follow me to get a push notification whenever my show goes live.
And we just did a huge milestone.
We're at 20,000 followers.
So thanks everybody for that.
Let's get to the next milestone.
A million followers.
We're about 2% of the way.
Right?
Yes 2% so we're closing in on a million let's just keep make sure you smash the follow button excuse me because we're so close 20,000 pretty big pretty big milestone for the site you know we're building back it sucks you know we were on YouTube I got up to 70 some thousand and I was on YouTube for years I was on DLive.
I got up to 60,000.
I was on there for like 10 months or something.
Now we're here on Cozy.
We're building it back up.
So, just make sure to keep following if you're not following already.
Smash it to get the notification.
Also, follow me on Gab Telegram.
True Social.
Links are down below.
Make sure to check that out.
Other updates.
Reminder, the America First Mini Documentary is now airing live.
I guess it's not live, but it's uh, but the America vs Mini documentary is streaming on mymoviesplus.com.
Very exciting.
The reviews are pouring in and they're all positive.
170 reviews on IMDb.
If you haven't reviewed it already, make sure you do that.
And it's got like a 9.7 out of 10 weighted rating, which is very good.
So everybody loves it.
Universal acclaim.
We have our mini documentary.
I believe it's close to 50 minutes.
And you've probably seen the first two episodes.
The third episode premiered last month in Las Vegas.
So make sure to check that out.
Six bucks to get a subscription and you can watch it.
And that's MyMoviesPlus.com.
Make sure to tell everybody you know about it.
It's a very important story.
This is a very, maybe the most important story of our time.
Because I am a man who simply refuses to compromise.
I tell the truth.
I'm such a hero.
I tell the truth about the Jews.
I tell the truth about race, 9-11, the Big H, all of that that went on all those years ago.
I tell the truth about Sandy Hook and all of it.
And just simply for saying the truth and being handsome and funny and influential and charming and rich, they've put me on a no-fly list, they've taken my money, investigated me, subpoenaed me, censored me, debanked me, and this is the state of free speech in America.
I'm the living proof of it.
So make sure to check that out.
MyMoviesPlus.com I actually today just had to move all my money over to a new bank.
I don't know if you guys know that.
I think I talked about this last week or maybe before I left for Florida.
You know, I was at Bank of America and I had a ton of money in my checking account.
And this is even after, this is after the Feds froze my account.
I still had tons of money in there.
They closed my checking account, banned me from Bank of America, and I had another checking account after the Feds froze my money back in January 21.
And so I've been at this other bank.
It's called Inland Bank.
It's a local bank in Chicago.
I had to move all my money over there.
This is back a year and a half ago.
And I've been there.
Again, it's a small, local bank.
It's a small bank, I believe.
I don't think they have branches outside Chicago.
And this is way after everything.
This is like after the dust has settled with J6.
This is after the subpoena.
This is after everything.
This is like last month.
I get a letter in the mail.
It says, we're closing your accounts.
I had several accounts there.
We're closing your accounts.
You have until August 31st.
And so I just went to the bank today, and I picked up my balance, my checking account balance, and I had to open another bank.
So this is an ongoing thing, and so understand, this is just a brief aside, and then we'll roll on with the show, but I just want people to understand, because this is my day-to-day.
This is like a rolling thing.
I got banned from Bank of America, and the Feds took my money.
Understand, both of those things happen.
Like, just like I got put on the no-fly list, and then I got off of it, and then I got banned from the airlines on top of it.
Like, I got off the no-fly list, and then I booked a flight with American Airlines, and they told me I was banned from the airline!
So, it's public and private.
It's government and it's business.
The government, the DHS, put me on the do not board list for a year and a half, and then when I got off of that, Delta and American Airlines banned me from flying on their airplanes, on their airline.
And then the same thing with the Feds.
The Feds froze my account balance at Bank of America, and then while that was going on, Bank of America banned me from the bank.
And I have many businesses and I have, of course, my personal stuff.
And so I had a business account at U.S.
Bank and they closed it within months.
And I tried to open a business account at Chase.
They wouldn't even let me open an account at Chase Bank.
And these are like the biggest banks that there are.
And then I open a personal checking account at a regional bank.
Close my checking account.
And so and then on top of that and then there's the other level of I'm on the match list.
The match list is a Visa and MasterCard blacklist.
This is like the do not fly list or the no fly list.
The match list is a secretive list maintained by the credit card companies, and what it is is they could put you on there for a variety of reasons, but you're banned from processing credit cards for five years.
I am banned, me, from processing credit cards for five years.
That's not the banks, that's the credit cards.
So even if there was a bank that wanted to do business with me, Visa and MasterCard wouldn't allow them.
So I'm banned from... So think of it.
On the no-fly list, banned from the airlines.
Feds froze my money, banned from the banks.
On the match list, banned by Visa and MasterCard from processing payments.
Also banned from the payment processors, PayPal, Stripe, Epic Pay, etc.
Also, many of the banks will not even underwrite the payment processing.
So this is what This is what it looks like to be the most cancelled man in America.
People, and I'm trying to be like precise about it here because people imagine like, oh he's like banned from PayPal and Twitter.
It's like no, I am quite literally, it's like if you were to look at a control panel of being able to access banking and commercial services, it's all red, okay?
It's all red.
It's all red.
It's all off switch.
It's all frowny face, thumbs down.
Even if I was off the match list, I'd be banned from the payment processors.
Even if I was off the match list and allowed by the payment processors, I'd be banned by the banks.
So there's levels to this.
And even if I was unbanned from the banks to process payments, I'm banned from opening a personal checking account, a savings account.
I just had to move to another bank.
And then I went to another regional bank in Florida when I was down there in Miami.
This is one of the business things I was doing because I'm going to move to Florida and I'm getting everything ready for that.
And I went down to Florida to meet with a banker who's like one of the top guys at a local bank whose meeting was set up by a friend of mine.
And I said, hey listen, I need to open a checking account.
And you know what he told me?
I'll let you know.
Okay?
I fly to the other side of the country to meet with the head of a small bank, and I say, so listen man, I got hundreds of thousands of dollars, I need to put in a checking account, can you make me a checking account at your bank?
He goes, I'll let you know.
I'll let you know later.
He goes, no guarantees.
No guarantees?
unidentified
I want to open a checking account!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I'm gonna have to just... what am I gonna do?
Put it all in my mattress, I guess?
Move it to the Cayman Islands or something?
unidentified
Maybe I'll just move to Russia.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
So anyway.
So that's... and the movie touches on things like that, but that's... and that's also just a little taste of my life.
Speaking of the most cancelled man in America, I just had to go to the bank today to take care of that.
And I moved all my money to another bank, and this is the game that we play.
This is what it's like.
But anyway.
So that's that.
MyMoviesPlus.com.
Also, Super Chats are working again, just so you know.
I'm only going to talk about it this week.
Next week I'm not going to mention it.
But just so you know, our Super Chat website was broken for a long time.
Had a lot of problems.
And I didn't know that until I left for Florida.
Right before I left somebody super chatted and said hey, I can't make a login I said, really?
Is everyone having that problem?
And like the whole live chat was like, yes, we can't make a new account.
So we reached out to the developers and they fixed it.
So it's all good.
You can make a new account.
It may send your account confirmation to your spam folder.
It's gonna come from Rachel and it may go to your spam folder.
So if you make a new account on the Super Chat site and you're not seeing confirmation email, it may have gone to your spam.
But Yeah, how's that?
Like, apparently it's been broken for months.
I had no idea.
So that's fixed, just so you know.
Just putting that out there.
So anyway, so that's that.
We're gonna dive into the show.
Lot to discuss.
Big, big news.
Yeah, I had a pretty good day today.
Pretty productive day.
Beautiful day in Chicago.
Went out, went to the bank.
I got ice cream.
Ransom errands.
Went to the store.
I saw two women get in a fight at the store.
Very funny.
Yeah, I had some coffee.
Yummy.
I went to this restaurant, and they gave me a free piece of cake.
I went to one of my favorite restaurants with my mom, actually, and...
And I got dinner, and it took a little bit too long for them to... I don't know.
It took longer than usual.
And the lady comes by and she goes, Oh, I'm so sorry it's taking so long.
I'm gonna give you a free dessert on me.
I was like... I was like, Bog?!
I was like, well, what do you have?
She's like, we have cake, ice cream.
I said, I'll have a piece of chocolate cake.
Cake, coffee...
Pretty good day.
My tummy kind of hurts so I have like a little cramp.
Right here.
Right here.
Anyway, so that was my day.
How was your day?
You have a good day?
Anyway, we're gonna move on.
We're gonna dive into the news.
Ow!
I do.
I have like a cramp right here.
What is that?
I'm eating garbage all the time.
That's why.
It's my organs shutting down.
unidentified
It's my organs in revolt.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
They're telling me something.
I got a new vacuum.
I vacuumed the studio a little bit.
Anyway, alright, alright.
Let's move on.
Let's get into the show.
First story we're talking about, Greg Abbott.
This is just a joke, man.
Honestly, I cannot stand conservatives anymore.
Here's the thing.
I am not a Republican.
I am not a conservative.
I am a nationalist.
I am a Catholic.
I am a reactionary.
I'm like a monarchist or something.
But I'm not a Republican.
Donald Trump came along and changed everything.
I'm a Trump guy.
I'm a Trumpist first.
And then after that I'm like nothing.
I'm just not affiliated.
And the reason why I say that is because Trump comes in in 2016 and is truly different.
He gets out there and says, we're going to build a wall between America and Mexico, and then we're going to round up these illegals and send them back.
And we're going to ban Muslims from coming here.
And we're going to build roads and bridges and highways and airports and...
And we're gonna make Mexico pay for the wall, and we're gonna beat China, and we're gonna end the wars and be friends with Russia.
And I'm like, yeah, sign me up, I'll die for this man.
And I will!
And I will!
And I campaigned for him in 16, and I campaigned for him in 20.
We showed up at Stop the Steal dutifully, like good soldiers.
We showed up at every state capitol.
We showed up on 1-6.
For our guy, okay?
For our leader, because that's our leader.
This is our guy.
He refused to concede.
He's the one.
He's the one.
And he's the greatest man, and it's every man's obligation to work for him.
That's how I see the world.
The generations, the civilization produces a great man, and then we all have to work for that man.
It's what it is.
It's Trump.
You may not like what he says, it doesn't matter.
He's the greatest man.
He's the greatest man alive right now.
We all have to be his soldiers.
And we have to salute, and we have to be with him, and I believe that.
Here's the problem now.
So Trump is out of office, and now Republicans are trying to divert what I just said back into the Republican Party.
And here's the thing.
I hate the Republican Party.
I hate Greg Abbott.
I hate him.
He doesn't represent me.
Lest we forget, he sat in his little wheelchair in front of the Israel flag, a country which did 9-11 and blew up our ship in 1967 and caused all these wars.
He sat in front of this flag and said that Gab, which is a great website, is anti-Semitic.
And it's like, you know, what does that even mean?
Like, you're sitting in front of an Israel flag?
This is America, man.
You're the governor of Texas.
Anti-Semitic?
It's like, well, here's the thing.
I don't think Jews should run our country.
Does that make me anti-Semitic?
So you really have nothing to do with me.
Greg Abbott's got nothing to do with what I've got going on here.
I'm a Catholic nationalist reactionary.
I don't want all this Jewish influence.
I don't want Israel controlling our politics and all the rest.
Anyway, to arrive at my point, these are the kinds of hijinks which I just despise.
Greg Abbott is overseeing as the governor of Texas this immigration crisis.
Immigration, in case you don't know, is worse now than ever.
It has never been worse.
Not exaggerating.
Not hyperbole.
Immigration has never been worse in the history of the United States.
That is a factual statement.
That is by the numbers.
Since Joe Biden got in office, Border control has apprehended 5 million people at the southern border.
5 million in, what is that, 19 months.
5 million!
Okay, that's like the size, that's half the size of the metropolitan Chicago area.
That's half the size of the third largest city in the United States in less than two years has been apprehended at the border.
And you know what that means?
A lot of those people stayed.
And it also means that probably 50% of that number, 50% meaning 2.5 million, got through without being apprehended.
At least, at the minimum.
So we're talking about at the minimum 5 million illegal immigrants have gotten through, either apprehended and released or were never apprehended and are now residents in America.
And there are no more deportations.
The Biden administration has stopped deporting illegals.
So you've got the problem working in multiple ways.
The number of illegals is not going down because deportations are not occurring.
They have ceased deporting people that are not doing additional crimes or particularly violent felonies.
And millions of people are pouring across the border now every month.
It's getting to the point now where it's a quarter of a million, it seems, every single month.
So immigration has never been that bad.
We've never been apprehending that level of people at the border on a month-to-month basis.
We've never been not deporting people in the way that we are now.
It's totally unprecedented.
And anyway, so you've got a Republican governor in Texas, and this is the majority of our southern border is in Texas, or a large, I don't think it's a majority, but a large swath And we have a Republican state legislature in Texas and a Republican governor in Texas.
And the Republican governor, Greg Abbott, is essentially overseeing this.
Now granted, immigration is an issue which is under the jurisdiction of the federal government.
And it's the federal government which is unwinding the Trump-era immigration policies that suspended catch-and-release and stopped the flow of illegals.
But that being said, Greg Abbott is still the governor of Texas, and still wields the power of the National Guard, and Greg Abbott still has state law enforcement, and the governor still has a lot of menu items that he can use to abate this crisis.
What does he choose to do?
Instead of doing anything to meaningfully Change the crisis.
He comes up with this clever publicity stunt and in this year Greg Abbott is rounding up some of the illegals, putting them on charter buses that the taxpayers pay for, and then sending the buses to Washington DC, New York, and as of this month now Chicago.
That's the move.
Worst immigration crisis in history.
Republican governor of Texas, what does he do?
Shut down the border?
Sue the federal government?
Send the police there?
Deport him himself?
He pays for buses to ship the illegals further into America.
Further into the interior of the country.
And think about it.
You ship them to D.C.
And DC is a very small city.
People don't realize because it's got this cottage industry of politics.
In terms of land and people, it's a very small city.
Where are these people winding up?
They're winding up in Virginia, man.
These people are gonna wind up in Virginia.
And what do you think they're gonna do?
They're gonna vote.
They're gonna have kids.
And they're gonna vote, and their kids are gonna vote.
And Virginia's a state that's really like purple.
You know, it's changing blue over time because of internal and external immigration.
People from outside America are moving to Virginia, and Democrats, liberals from D.C.
are moving into northern Virginia.
But they just elected a Republican governor.
So what are you doing when you send these illegals to D.C.?
What you're really doing is sending them to Virginia.
You're sending them further into America, where it's just like, these people are never gonna leave.
They're not gonna leave, their kids are never gonna leave.
And sending them to New York.
Now, New York, you know, they'll probably stay in New York.
I don't know.
Maybe they'll go to Pennsylvania or New Jersey.
They're being sent to Chicago.
Right on the border, by the way, of Wisconsin and Michigan and Indiana and Ohio.
And this is the story.
This is from Fox News.
It says, quote, Two buses carrying migrants from Texas arrived in Chicago on Wednesday night.
The buses arrived at Chicago's Union Station at around 7.30 p.m., carrying migrants who crossed the southern border illegally.
An estimated 80 to 100 people were on the buses, which include 20 to 30 small children.
Many of the migrants said that they're from Venezuela.
Chicago is the latest city where migrants have been bused to from Texas, following New York City and Washington D.C., all of which have Democrat mayors.
Republican Texas Governor Greg Abbott said in a statement that he looks forward to seeing Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot welcome the migrants since Chicago is a sanctuary city.
He said quote President Biden's inaction at our southern border continues putting the lives of Texans and Americans at risk and is overwhelming our communities.
To continue providing much-needed relief to our small overrun border towns, Chicago will join fellow sanctuary cities Washington DC and New York as an additional drop-off location.
Mayor Lightfoot loves to tout the responsibility of her city to welcome all regardless of legal status, and I look forward to seeing this responsibility in action as these migrants receive resources from a sanctuary city with the capacity to serve them.
And, like, now, it's not a lot of immigrants, okay?
A hundred people is not a lot of people.
There's 10 million people in the Chicago metro area, and we're talking about a hundred people.
Nevertheless, this is a publicity stunt, and it's lame, and it's gay.
And as long as you're putting these people in buses, why not send them back to Mexico?
And, you know, people might say, well, they can't.
Okay, you're the governor.
Do it anyway.
What do you mean you can't?
Who's gonna stop you?
You're the governor.
Send them back.
They're on buses.
You're putting them on buses.
You're telling the bus driver where to go.
Instead of sending them to Chicago, across America, send them to Mexico!
And instead of sending a hundred at a time, get a thousand of them and send them... You know, but this is the problem.
Nobody is willing to do anything.
Nobody's willing to say anything.
Nobody's willing to do anything.
The year is 2022.
Okay?
In case anybody forgot, the year is 2022.
Immigration needed to have been solved 30 years ago.
Okay?
Realistically, we needed to shut down the border yesterday.
We needed to shut down the border a generation ago.
It's 2022.
Six years have transpired since Trump won the election and then got sabotaged in his first term.
Big Tech is totally censoring.
They're working with the FBI.
The FBI is totally corrupt.
We have a mental retard in office.
Inflation is 10%.
We're at war with Russia.
5 million people have been apprehended at the border in the last 19 months.
What do people need to see to get the hint?
What do people need to see happen before there's any semblance of urgency?
There's any semblance of crisis?
Point being, when is the governor going to say, you know what?
I'm activating the National Guard.
We're shutting down the border.
The Supreme Court can have a problem with that.
The courts can quibble about the legality.
The federal government can do what they're going to do.
I don't care.
We're locking down the border.
We're deporting people.
We're sending them back.
When is a mainstream pundit going to go out there and say, you know what?
We don't need all of these invaders coming into America.
It's not a voting rights issue.
It's not about jobs.
We don't want America to look like Africa.
That's what I don't understand.
We're constantly told, year after year after year, since before I've been born, Since before I was born I should say.
We've been told for decades, well we just gotta play the game.
We gotta live, I hear this expression, we gotta live to fight another day.
I hear that one a lot.
We have to live to fight another day.
I heard that one.
I don't want to say who.
Someone I'm fond of actually.
But I'll just say this, you know, the Groypers, America First, we have relationships with politicians, some public, some private.
And, you know, a lot of politicians are reluctant to associate and, you know, they try to be somewhat discreet about it because of what we represent and the kinds of things I say and the media attention it attracts.
And I remember one time we kind of got let down by somebody, and it's someone I like, it's someone I like, it's someone I respect, and someone who's, I think, a real patriot.
But he said to me, hey listen, you understand, right?
We gotta live to fight another day.
And he kind of made me look like a jackass.
But he said, you know, hey, we gotta live to fight another day.
Gotta live to fight another day.
Gotta live to fight another day.
And if there's any takeaway from the show, it's this.
We have to fucking fight, okay?
Sorry for the language, but everybody wants to fight some other day.
Everybody wants to fight tomorrow.
And tomorrow, they want to fight the day after tomorrow.
And the day after tomorrow, they want to fight next week.
And they want to fight some other time in the future.
When are we just gonna fight?
And when I say fight, I don't mean go to war.
I don't mean, like, physically.
I don't mean, like, lock horns and get the guns.
I'm not talking about that.
I'm saying, when are we actually just gonna... when are we actually just gonna say what's going on?
And when are the people with influence just gonna do something ballsy?
Just do something bold?
Because we ran out of time a long time ago.
And things are worse than ever.
And there's no sign that they're going to get better.
There's not a lot of white pills left out there.
And I heard that... And this is sort of what my show has been about for the longest time.
It's about lighting a fire under the ass of all these people and saying, we need to fight today.
We don't need to live to fight another day.
People need to start fighting now.
And if they die and can't fight another day, then so be it.
And I mean that metaphorically, of course.
I don't mean literally die.
But I mean to say, we need to just start fighting.
And if there's collateral damage, if there's casualties, again, I'm not talking about lives, I'm talking about if people get attacked by the media, if people lose their jobs, if there's adverse consequences from engaging on a real level, then so be it, that's what a fight is.
And again, I'm not saying go out there and kill and be killed, I'm not saying that.
I'm saying engaging obviously in the realm of politics.
This is like what Trump did.
You know, when Trump first ran, he was not beloved like he is now after he proved that he was the answer.
When he first started running, they all conspired against him.
Fox News, Roger Ailes, the GOP, all the candidates, the Democrats, the FBI, you name it.
And do you remember, at the first Republican debate, the Fox News debate in August 2015, he said that if he didn't get the nomination, he would run as an independent.
And the first question they asked at the debate was, Was it Bret Baier, I think?
Bret Baier said, out of all the candidates on the stage, if you plan to run as an independent, or they said something like, you know, if you don't take the pledge to drop out of the race and support the Republican nominee, raise your hand.
And Trump was the only one who raised his hand.
And Brett Barrett goes, well you know, just so we're clear, you're saying that if you don't get the nomination, you're not going to pledge to support the nominee, ensuring Hillary Clinton will win the race.
And Trump goes, I understand, I understand the question.
He goes, I'd like to run as the Republican, but if I don't, I'll run as an Independent.
And I'll doom the Republican ticket.
And that was revolutionary.
Because that's the kind of thinking that says, okay, it's my way or the highway.
I'm gonna fight.
I'm gonna fight in an unconventional way.
And if there's collateral damage, so be it.
If other people have to get hurt, so be it.
Meaning, if the Republicans have to lose, if the Republicans have to forfeit the White House, if they have to pay a price, so be it.
And people couldn't comprehend that.
People, I mean, like, the people loved it, but people in the establishment could not comprehend that.
They said, what?
That's suicide.
You're gonna split the ticket.
You're gonna be a spoiler.
You're gonna make Hillary Clinton win.
And he said, I don't care.
Because, you know, it's either gonna be me, and I'm gonna win, and I'm gonna make America great again, or honestly, it doesn't matter anyway.
And that was the kind of thinking, that was the kind of mindset that he brought to the table.
That's why he won the primary.
Newsflash.
That's why he won the election.
That's how he became the phenomenon that he is now, which is a sorry shell of itself, of its former self.
Where's that kind of thinking today?
Instead, everybody is hedging their bets, doing stupid stunts, and clever turns of phrases, and all this duplicitous crap.
Greg Abbott, instead of just shutting down the border, is going to box them up and send them to Chicago and say, hee hee hee.
Lori Lightfoot wants them.
Yeah, she does.
She doesn't care.
So I absolutely hate Republicans because you know what you get with them?
There is a 0% chance that anything's ever going to change.
Here's the dynamic.
Greg Abbott What he's doing right now, sending people to Chicago and D.C.
and New York, it's a gimmick.
It doesn't change anything.
It's gonna just guarantee.
It's something that Republicans think is funny or whatever.
They think that's tongue-in-cheek.
But it basically just passively ensures that the status quo will continue.
It's not real resistance.
It's not really putting up a fight.
So, nothing's gonna change.
And the same thing with DeSantis.
DeSantis can write all these executive orders and they all get gummed up in the courts and, you know, so it doesn't really matter.
He can write as many of these dumbass executive orders as he wants and most of them just gets held up in the courts and stopped in the courts, dead in their tracks.
Big whip!
Now, if you go and do something maybe like shut down the border against the Supreme Court or against the federal government, yeah, maybe the federal government will come in and arrest Greg Abbott.
Or maybe they won't.
If it fails, we lose.
But if it succeeds, we win.
And you're introducing a paradigm.
You're introducing a dynamic where things can get better.
As opposed to the current dynamic where things cannot get better.
If we're all afraid to say the truth, if we're all afraid to take action, if we're all afraid to do anything gutsy so that we can just survive, all we're ever going to do is survive.
All we're ever going to do is survive and hold the line while we get pushed back inch by inch by inch until we fall off the cliff.
That's what we've been doing.
We've been told constantly, hold the line, keep electing us, well we're fighting, well we just gotta keep going, we just gotta... And it's not working!
It's not working!
It's worse than ever!
It's getting worse all the time!
And it's gonna be worse in four years, and it's gonna be worse than it is in four years, in eight years?
And people say, hey, just a little bit more, we just...
No, eventually people will see you start throwing grenades.
And yeah, if you get blown up, then you get blown up.
And maybe you do some- and yeah.
I'm not saying that literally.
And when I say I'm not saying that literally, I'm not saying that tongue-in-cheek.
I'm not talking about violence.
I'm talking about real political guts.
I'm talking about a real political will.
To say, you know what?
F it.
I'm going in.
You know?
You know what?
F it.
I'm gonna say a thing like, the illegals are bringing drugs crime and we want them out.
As opposed to saying, what we need is comprehensive immigration reform I hope that Trump can bring that energy back.
I hope that some people can bring that energy back, but there's just no guts.
I've been doing this for five years, which is not a long time.
But I've witnessed for five years people shine me on like that and tell me, well, you know, we've just got to be smart, we've just got to be careful, and we've just got to do this and that.
And, you know, it's like, is that really making a huge difference?
I don't think so.
The man who has made the most difference, by far, the most important guy in the world, in this movement, is Donald Trump.
Did he go in there and bide his time and play it clever and funny and coy and all that?
And trudge his way through the institutions and do it?
Or did he just say, I'm running for president to build a freaking wall!
And he changed the world.
And that's the kind of mentality that we need.
unidentified
This kind of stuff is just, it's just ridiculous.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
It's just, uh, it's a grift.
It's a gimmick.
It's a grift.
Nothing's gonna change with this kind of silly, silly business, you know?
And, and there, and by the way, To moderate that a little bit.
We've got to be smart.
We've got to be prudent.
There's a fine line between boldness and foolishness.
There's a fine line between doing something bold and ballsy and doing something foolish and impulsive and suicidal.
And I recognize that.
So I'm not saying, it's not to say that there should never be strategic considerations, but it is to say that people need to start taking some risks.
People need to start, the politicians and the pundits and the people with real influence and power need to start taking some risks.
And here's why.
The value proposition has just simply changed.
Riskiness is warranted because There is really no benefit to playing it conservatively.
What I mean by that is, you know, 20 years ago, to do something really risky might not make sense because, you know, things are still pretty good in the country and there's still kind of like a prospect for reform and, you know, there's benefits to being more To being more cautious.
At this point in time, because of the state of affairs, because there is such a crisis, because it's so urgent, because it's so overwhelming, and because we're not really even going to have anything resembling sovereignty, freedom, the franchise, anything like that in 10, 15 years.
And I think that's even being charitable.
I think that's even being conservative when I say it's 15 years out.
In terms of what you're losing by taking a risk, it's much lower than it was before.
What are people trying so hard to protect?
I think about some of these politicians that are in purple states where redistricting is hurting them.
And they're playing it safe, and it's like, why?
We don't really have a political future.
If things keep going the way that we're going, we don't have a political future.
We don't really have much of any kind of a future.
We have a future of eating bugs cooked into hamburgers and canned beans and, you know, driving shitty electric cars and rolling brownouts.
And if you're too far right, you get investigated by the FBI.
So the value proposition, this decision, has fundamentally changed because of the nature of our situation.
People are so risk-averse.
I think why?
Risk-averse in caution for a future that it doesn't exist.
There is no political future the way things are going.
There's no any future the way things are going.
So what are we trying so hard not to lose here?
We need to stop playing not to lose.
We don't have much to lose at this point.
What do we have to lose?
Donald Trump is the presumptive nominee, most popular president in history, most popular politician in the country now, biggest vote-getter in American history, and federal law enforcement is going to prevent him from running?
With some trumped-up, no pun intended, obstruction charge.
And Fox, and the GOP, and all the pundits are gonna let it happen.
They don't even want him to run.
So it's like, if that's the state of politics right now, if that's the state of affairs, what is the political future that we're trying so hard not to lose, that we're hanging on to?
Oh, we can't say this because then the media's gonna say this, or you know, censorship, or What are the consequences we're afraid of?
Oh, well, we can't do this because then the government might do what?
Get a FISA warrant and spy in your campaign headquarters?
Send the FBI to raid your personal residence?
Appoint a special counsel to look into a dossier that was created by the opposing campaign?
Things like that that already happened?
What is there to lose here?
And it's not to say there's nothing to lose.
It's not to say we should not think strategically.
We must think strategically.
But we need to start taking more risks.
And I'm talking about the responsible people.
I'm talking about the influential people.
I'm talking about the donors, the politicians, the pundits, the Charlie Kirk's of the world, the Greg Abbott's of the world.
They need to see the writing on the wall here, the urgency, the severity.
Time to do something bold.
Time to do something different than what we've been doing.
It's not working and it's all going away.
It's a certainty.
So why not take a chance at this stage?
That's how I feel about it.
That's what this whole show has been about.
I looked at the situation five years ago and came to the same conclusion.
Five years ago.
Five years ago said we don't have time.
We don't have time.
We're out of time.
We were out of time yesterday.
So I'm just going to do this show and talk about and tell the truth.
Like we want to play these games in the hopes that in 10 years we could tell the truth and 20 years we could do something effective?
No, we got to get behind Trump.
We got to start, you know, the Democrats are pushing.
The Democrats are doing everything they can.
Let's start playing our cards.
Let's start playing our hand.
We have 25 Republican governors.
Let's make a move, man.
Let's do something.
And again, not a call to violence is not a call to that.
I'm saying, let's come up with some kind of a play that isn't just some stupid gimmicky crap like, we're gonna send 100 illegals to Chicago.
Yeah, that's a cute story, but...
It doesn't change the facts on the ground.
Worst immigration crisis ever, and you're the governor, and we have 25 Republican governors, and you're just letting it happen.
And it's 22, and you're just letting it happen.
And they're gonna let it happen in 23 and 24, and it's like, at what point in 2050, when it's Mogadishu, are you gonna say, oh, well now we're gonna... Too late!
Too late.
We lost.
Game over.
So, this is the kind of game theory that people need to start thinking about.
All right, so that's Greg Abbott, but I want to move on.
I want to get into the Trump indictments.
You know, we've been talking about it a little bit here.
So this is the featured story, and this has to do with the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago.
It's an update today on the FBI raid.
So you remember back in August, seems like everybody's kind of forgotten about it already, the FBI raided Mar-a-Lago in Florida, which is Trump's personal residence.
And, as you know, it is completely unprecedented.
That's never happened before.
Law enforcement has never raided the residence of a former president.
It's the first time in history.
It's not the first time in history that a federal government employee has taken classified documents, which is what the search warrant was about.
You know, initially everybody thought it was about 1-6.
It turned out that the Trump team was in contact with the National Archives, and the National Archives was concerned about confidential or classified documents that were being stored at Mar-a-Lago, and all this culminated in the National Archives going to the DOJ.
The FBI and the DOJ going to a judge and getting a search warrant and sending out a hundred FBI agents to lock down the residents and search the bedroom, the office, and an additional room.
Turn off the cameras and everything and take boxes and boxes of documents out of the residence, throw them in a truck and take them back to D.C.
And we didn't even know that this happened in the middle of the night.
We didn't even find out about it from the government.
We found out about it from Trump.
Trump himself released a press release that evening and said that's what happened and that was the reasoning.
And there was outrage even from the left.
People were asking questions.
Later in that week they released the search warrant and it showed that they were interested in three statutes pertaining to the improper transfer, storage, and disposal of classified documents from the White House.
And basically what happened is Trump leaves the White House, takes some documents, National Archives calls him up in January and says, hey, you didn't turn over some things.
And the Trump team says, well, whatever you need, we've got it.
And they sent over some documents.
National Archives calls back in June and says, we need to install a special lock and we need to know what's going on.
And they said, okay, yeah, whatever you need.
Lock it up.
And I guess then they were led to believe, based on spying perhaps, that the Trump team is not being forthcoming, and so they go to the judge, they get the warrant.
That's what we found out from the warrant, the affidavit, and now additional documentation.
And what we've learned today, the update about this, is that now the Department of Justice is interested in something else.
We were told again when the raid happened that they were interested in these three particular statutes about the documents.
He took the documents, he stored the documents, he may have gotten rid of them, and that was improper and that was criminal.
Well now, the update today is that the DOJ says they're interested in a charge about obstruction.
That the crime was not the taking of the documents or the storage of the documents.
The crime was obstruction because when the National Archives and the FBI tried to get them, they claim that based on what they found in the raid, the Trump team tried to hide the documents.
So the crime isn't even the crime itself.
It was this alleged attempt to cover up a crime that doesn't exist.
And so this is the story.
This is from BBC.
It says, quote, Documents stored at former President Trump's Florida home were likely concealed as part of an effort to obstruct an FBI investigation, according to the Department of Justice.
In a court filing, the department said, quote, efforts were likely taken to obstruct the investigation into Mr. Trump's handling of classified material.
Upon leaving office, U.S. President, Presidents must transfer all of their documents and emails to the National Archives.
The FBI is investigating whether Mr. Trump improperly handled records by taking them from the White House to Mar-a-Lago after he left office.
In the filing released on Tuesday, the Justice Department's counterintelligence chief gave the clearest picture so far of the department's attempts to retrieve documents from the former president.
Those attempts led to a National Archives team visiting Mar-a-Lago in January and retrieving 15 boxes of records that contained highly classified reports, some of which were intermixed with other records and even contained Mr. Trump's handwritten notes.
Which, by the way, If there's a crime here, why wasn't he charged in January?
If the National Archives comes out in January and takes back 15 boxes, if that's a crime, why didn't they charge him in January?
It just doesn't even make any sense.
If this is a real criminal act, which it's impossible, by definition it's impossible, the President is the final authority on the classification schedule.
Because he's the Commander-in-Chief.
And the President leaves the White House on January 20th when he stops being the President.
So if the President takes documents from the White House, he's taking them prior to January 20th, meaning he's taking them as acting President.
Meaning he's taking them with the full authority to classify or declassify at whim.
The act of taking them, and necessarily when he took them, necessitates that by that act he's declassifying them.
For him to take them out of the White House and bring them to Mar-a-Lago, he had to do that as President, and if he did that as President, he's declassifying them effectively.
That's his authority to take them, store them, and they say, well those documents belong to the United States.
Certainly.
But as far as their classification status, which is what is the interest here, that is the authority of the President.
You know, the National Archives are saying, well, you know, those records that Trump has as residents, well, they belong to us.
They belong to the government, not Mr. Trump.
Fine.
But the statute says, the statute says, the statute doesn't say Trump took government property, the statute says improperly handled classified materials.
Well, as far as the classification schedule, that is Trump's discretionary authority.
And the act of Trump taking them declassifies them.
So the National Archives can come and say, we want our records back, and Trump can give them back.
But to use the statute and say, well, this constitutes an illicit transfer based on the classification schedule, it is impossible for that to happen.
It is by definition impossible for that to happen.
unidentified
And so how does that make sense?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
If they're alleging that he is holding these illegally, Well, the National Archives came out eight months ago and took documents with full cooperation from the President.
Wouldn't it have been an illegal act for them to be at Mar-a-Lago when they showed up and said, hey, we know they're there, we're coming to get them, and we took them?
And they know that, and they know that the DOJ knows that, which is why now they're doing this, and I'll get into it here.
It says, Mr. Trump responded to the filing on Wednesday claiming that FBI agents threw documents haphazardly all over the floor, perhaps pretending that it was me that did that, then started taking pictures of them for the public to see.
Basically like framing him like he's just got classified documents all over his bedroom.
After discovering the 15 seized boxes contained highly classified reports, The Justice Department and the FBI began investigations which found evidence that dozens of additional boxes likely containing classified information still remained at Mar-a-Lago.
On June 3rd, three FBI agents and a Justice Department lawyer arrived at Mar-a-Lago to collect materials.
According to Mr. Trump's lawyers, he told them, whatever you need, just let us know.
But agents were, quote, explicitly prohibited by his representatives from searching any boxes inside a storage room in Mr. Trump's property.
Mr. Bratt from the Justice Department said this gave no opportunity for the government to confirm that no classified documents remained at the property.
Evidence was also found that the records were likely concealed and removed from the storage and that efforts were likely taken, likely, likely concealed, likely taken to obstruct the investigation.
It's a lot of assumptions.
Following the June visit, FBI teams searched Mr. Trump's property in August where they found more than 100 classified documents.
This was twice as many documents found in a matter of hours than by the diligent search that Mr. Trump's team claimed they had previously carried out.
Mr. Bratz said, quote, this casts doubt on the extent of cooperation in this matter.
Some agents conducting the review even, quote, required additional clearances before they were permitted to review certain documents.
At the time, Mr. Trump rejected reports he had mishandled records as fake news.
He is suing for a detailed list of exactly what was taken from his estate and is asking for the government to return any item which was not within the scope of the search warrant.
So, if you follow that, the National Archives comes out in January and takes all these boxes.
The FBI comes out in June based on what was taken in January and says, hey, we want all the classified documents.
And the Trump team says, hey, whatever you need.
Well, the Trump team said, well, you can't go in this room.
So they get this ridiculous search warrant, they come back in August and they raid everything, and they find all these documents and they say, well, because we found additional documents, we assumed that you were hiding them, we assumed that you weren't trying to cooperate, and probably you did this to obstruct the investigation.
And now that's the charge they're going with.
So they're not going to charge him for improperly handling the documents, because like I said, that would be impossible.
Now they're talking about charging him for obstructing the FBI's investigation into whether he improperly handled the documents.
So that would be like if the FBI thought I committed a murder, but I didn't, and then the FBI charged me anyway with obstructing their investigation into the murder that I didn't commit.
And it's exactly like I said back in August.
It's not about the documents.
They know that's BS.
They know that they can't get him for this.
Obama's got records at his house in Hyde Park.
Hillary Clinton had an entire private email server, okay?
This has happened many times, and in the few cases where there's been charges, it's like a misdemeanor.
People pay a fine or something, they do community service, it's no big deal.
And anyway, like I said, the President has the final power of classification.
So, And it's a very subtle distinction.
They could say, well, we own those documents, but the statute is the classification.
If Trump has them, they're not classified.
They can go and say, well, we want them back, and Trump can say, okay, but to say, well, it was wrong for you to have them from the beginning because of their classification, that just will not hold up.
That just simply would not hold up in court.
I don't think they charge him with that.
They wouldn't charge him with that unless they knew they could get a conviction, and that would not be a slam-dunk case.
But as always, they're not even interested in what they say they're interested in.
That was the pretext.
Just like the FISA warrant back in 16, just like the special counsel, they now are interested in charging him because of some impropriety while he obstructed their investigation.
What does that really even mean?
Because there were some... He was the President of the United States.
He took some documents.
They were mixed up.
Well, we found a hundred papers.
So he obstructed an FBI investigation into a crime that he couldn't possibly commit?
And by the way, this is the same playbook that they did with the Russia hoax.
When the special counsel was appointed back in 2016 or 2017 to investigate Russian collusion in the election, that investigation went on for over a year.
Something like two years.
And when all was said and done and Robert Mueller delivered his final report, They had nothing.
All they could say was that they believed that Trump obstructed the investigation.
That was it.
That's all they could come up with.
And they looked through all... And this is old news, I know, so a lot of you people probably don't even remember.
But even when they charged all these other people, they charged Paul Manafort and they charged Roger Stone, when they were charging these people it was similar.
Paul Manafort, who was supposed to be one of the key people in the Russian collusion conspiracy and this giant special counsel which sucked up who knows how many resources in the White House to sabotage the Trump administration, What they wound up charging him for was some financial crime that he had committed years before the election, which they just basically stumbled upon in the course of their investigation.
Investigating him for Russian collusion, and they found some financial impropriety from years before, years prior, that had nothing to do with it.
And they charge him with that.
And then the same thing goes with the Ukrainian phone call in the impeachment.
When they issued the articles of impeachment against Trump for the phone call with Ukraine, it was about obstruction.
They charge him with abuse of power, and they charge him with obstruction.
This is what they do.
There's no wrongdoing.
There's no wrongdoing in the Russian deal.
There's no wrongdoing in the Ukraine phone call.
There's no wrongdoing on January 6th.
There's no wrongdoing with the national records.
So they just say, oh, it was obstruction.
Which is classic.
They find the broadest possible statute.
If they can't find a criminal wrongdoing, then they hit you with obstruction, conspiracy, something like that.
And we all know what this is about.
They don't care about the records.
Now every liberal that you know, just like every liberal that was flying a Ukraine flag on their front porch and every liberal was triple vaccinated and had their masks on and had their I Resist freaking bumper sticker, now every liberal is going to pretend like they took classified documents.
This is really important and the biggest thing in the world.
It's BS.
It's not a real crime.
If anything, it's just like a stupid clerical error at the most.
But now every MSNBC host and every CNN host and every faggot liberal in America is gonna say Trump's a crook because he took classified documents and I take that very seriously.
I know how much that matters.
Oh really?
Please.
It's about taking Trump down.
It always has been.
That's what the Ukraine phone call was about.
That's what Russian collusion was about.
And what's amazing...
How it comes full circle with all of this, everything that they accused Trump of doing and every accusation is the worst, biggest thing in the world.
You know, when they thought Russia interfered in the election, it was the worst, biggest thing in the world.
All the liberals were election experts.
They were all intelligence experts.
They were all geniuses.
And they all knew all the details about Kislyak and the Trump Tower meeting and sessions and all this.
And then when the Ukraine phone call happened, they were all experts, etc., etc.
But everything that they accused Trump of doing, they themselves did.
You know, like back in 2016 when they say that Russia rigged the election, they said, oh well, you know, the election was hacked, it was a stolen election, it was totally rigged, and Trump is not the rightful president, and Hillary should be president, here's how she could still win, and we gotta get the electors, and we gotta investigate.
And then they steal the election in 2020, and when we say, hey, you stole the election, they go, elections are never faked!
Oh, please.
The election can't be faked.
It's the most secure election ever.
Oh, really?
So, you know, 13 Russians can buy $10,000 worth of Facebook ads in Michigan, and it's the end of the world.
We need a recount.
Half the ballots are mail-in ballots in 2020.
Nothing to see here.
Totally fine.
And then with the Ukraine phone call.
So Trump calls, who was the president?
Poroshenko or was it Zelensky or the intervening guy?
I don't remember who the president was at the time.
But Trump can call the Ukrainian president and say, hey man, we need you to lean on Hunter Biden.
Again, worst thing ever.
Impeachment.
He's a crook.
He's the worst.
He's a crime boss masquerading as a president.
Then we get this Hunter Biden laptop where they're talking about the big man and Hunter Biden is getting Millions and millions of dollars from a firm that's contracted out by the Chinese and Ukrainian government while Biden was vice president.
Nothing to see here.
That's Russian misinformation.
That's all a hoax.
And then you get something like this.
This is the cherry on top.
Hillary Clinton had her private email server when she's When she's corresponding with foreign ministries and foreign heads of state as the US Secretary of State, without the power to classify or declassify, by the way, without that privilege,
She's got all that information, all those communications, classified correspondence, classified information on a private email server in her house and she keeps it there when she's out of office.
Then when Congress subpoenas her on her penalty of obstruction, by the way, she conveniently deletes and loses and acid washes all the emails.
And remember, they said, oh that's no big deal, nothing to see there, that happens all the time, who cares, I'm sick of hearing about her damn emails.
But now that Trump, now that they found 100 documents in the former president's residence, which the president has the authority to declassify, and they're gonna charge him not even with that, but with obstruction, now they're all, watch, oh he's a crook, he stole documents from the White House,
I just can't, and I know, I mean a lot of that's very basic, but it just goes to show the extent to which people can just be easily manipulated and controlled.
And they'll say it, they'll go out there and say like it's the gospel truth, I hate Trump because he's a crook, and he's a crook because of DOJ, and the DOJ are good people, and this is a very serious offense.
Oh really?
Oh it's so serious?
This happens in every, Obama did the same thing.
They all do this.
And if you look into the letter of the law, there's not even a wrongdoing here.
But then they're gonna get him with obstruction, and they're gonna wait until after the midterms even to charge him, because the real endgame in all of this is just to prevent him from becoming president again.
That's it.
They don't care about the National Archives.
Who had ever even heard of the National Archives?
Now it's the biggest, it's the Holy Grail, right?
It's the sacred, just like the Capitol and all the rest.
The sacred National Archives.
40-minute Rachel Maddow monologue about how this is the biggest thing in the world.
And they're gonna wait until after the midterms to charge him.
They timed it all out.
Because they don't want to activate Trump's base to give the House to the Republicans, but they do want to charge him before he announces he's running in 23.
Because they want to throw a wrench into his campaign and maybe prevent him from running at all.
That's what this is about.
That's what that tells me.
When they say they're going for obstruction, really?
That's what all these little investigations are about.
They open investigation into him in New York.
Oh, they didn't want to do that when he was president?
unidentified
Why?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
They didn't want to do that before he was president.
Why?
Now they're really interested in the Trump Tower and the Trump Organization.
Same thing in Georgia.
They're going to go into him because he called the governor.
They're going to go into him over January 6th.
And for what?
unidentified
Fake.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Fake.
And I think that if there's going to be an indictment, it's going to happen a month after the midterms.
They're going to wait.
They're gonna wait for Republicans to have a disappointing result, right?
You know, they forgive the student loans, they release the strategic oil reserve, they bring the gas prices down, all of that, just in time for the midterms, they get the result they want, and then they go on and die Trump, and they throw a wrench into the 24 campaign.
That's how I think it's going to play out.
And here's the thing, the only way that Trump stands a chance is if the party stands behind him, but I don't know that they will.
I think that they're all getting ready to betray Trump like Julius Caesar style and have DeSantis be the nominee.
If they could have done it in 2016, they would have done it.
They're doing it in 2024.
Because you see, they're all turning on him.
Ben Shapiro's out there shilling against him.
Ann Coulter's shilling against him.
Laura Ingraham's shilling against him.
Even, sad to say, Alex Jones.
They're all going against him.
And mark my words, if he gets indicted, they're all going to throw him under the bus.
They're not going to have him on Fox News.
They're not going to let him call in.
I don't think McCarthy's going to have his back, McConnell won't have his back, none of them are going to have his back, and he's just going to be screwed.
He's going to have no social media, no media outlet, they're going to ban him from the App Store on True Social, he's going to be indicted in multiple jurisdictions, and the Jews are going to throw their support behind DeSantis, and that's just what it's going to be.
And I hope that he can get that support.
I hope that he can pull on those guys and go to war against the establishment so they can help him.
But that's what it's shaping up to be in 23.
So we'll see what happens.
But that's that.
I want to move on.
I want to get on into our Super Chats.
See what you guys have to say about all this.
Somewhat blackpilling, I'm not going to lie.
It's a little bit disappointing how this is turning out.
unidentified
But this is what they do.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Like I said yesterday, they cheat, they rig.
This is just how it goes now.
But let's take a look.
We'll see what you guys have to say about all this.
Let me get my water out, my headset.
Alright.
unidentified
Okay, let's see.
Gail Bra sent $20.
▲
Export Selection