Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 12, 2019 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:54:10

The Truth About the Israel Lobby | America First Ep. 329

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:34:31

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		music
		music
		music Wall music
		music music
		music music music
		music music music
		music music music music music music music music music music music
		music music music music music music music
		Thank you.
		Wall. Wall.
		Wall.
		Wall.
		Thank you.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
		America First!
		America First!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you this evening.
		Very excited to be back with you this week.
		What a great start to the week.
		Also, you know, it was very similar this weekend to many other weekends.
		I'm thinking, okay.
		What am I going to cover on the show this week?
		What am I going to cover on the show on Monday night?
		There's not a lot of news happening.
		Well, there's a rally in El Paso.
		Should I wait until after that?
		And then we receive a great gift.
		Ilhan Omar...
		She's the MVP.
		MVP of the week, MVP of the month.
		She has given us... Wow, what a really special gift she has given us.
		She is going off the goop on Twitter.
		I guess she's done going off now.
		She's already apologized.
		So the goop is back on.
		But last night she was naming them pretty strongly.
		Pretty courageously.
		So of course we'll be talking about that tonight.
		What a great opportunity to discuss the Israel lobby.
		No better time than now to discuss the power, to discuss the modus operandi of America's most powerful foreign influence lobby.
		And it is a relevant subject given the debate that was sparked yesterday.
		So we're going to go into that.
		We will discuss what she said.
		We'll discuss some of the responses from the Democrats, from the Republicans.
		We'll look at this from a few different angles that I know a lot of people have been thinking about, and then ultimately this will conclude in just a real hard truth about the Israel lobby in the country.
		You know, there's a lot of circumstantial things we can look at, obviously.
		I mean, To me, what's so transparent about it is she goes out there and she talks about Israeli money in politics.
		Talking about how Israel's money is influencing American politics and that's totally bad.
		That's adverse to America's interests.
		And in less than 24 hours, the entire political establishment from both sides, from the right and the left, politicians, pundits, you name it, they're at her throat and they force her to apologize less than 24 hours later.
		Doesn't that kind of tell you something?
		Now, I'll give you an example.
		If I come on America First, okay, if I come on the number one political talk show on planet Earth, millions of people watching and You know, I'm nervous, palms are sweaty, and I come on the show and I say, you wanna know who really runs the government?
		Uh, yeah, it's the Illuminati.
		Or if I came on the show and said, hey, you wanna know who really runs the show around here?
		Yeah, it's Armenians.
		Now, do you think that within 24 hours there would be huge outrage, right-wing watch, writing up a big report?
		Do you think the ADL, SPLC, would be coming after me?
		Do you think the Armenian equivalent, the Illuminati equivalent of the ADL and the SPLC are coming after me?
		They're publishing my name and my details and what I said and they're contacting my family?
		Oh no, of course not.
		Why?
		Well, because Armenians don't run the government.
unidentified		Hello?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So uh so to me that's the most obvious thing but look you know I think at this point my position I've debated The Israel question many, many times now, and you can go back into the archives for a diverse range of information on the subject and several different encounters, several different focuses.
		I've debated this issue with Aaron Bandler, first and foremost of the Daily Wire.
		I debated Jacob Wohl about our support for Israel.
		I debated Will Chamberlain not once but twice.
		I debated Halsey on Internet Bloodsports, probably Around a year ago, just about a year ago, I debated Arthur Schopper on the channel with the Red Elephants.
		So this is a subject which we have gone down many times.
		We've talked about this a lot from a variety of different angles, but it's probably the most important thing.
		I don't think you could understand American foreign policy without it.
		So we're going to jump right in here.
		We're not going to waste any time.
		You know, there's some other things going on.
		We'll probably save that for tomorrow.
		I'd like to talk about The Jussie Smollett hoax, which is now coming apart even more tomorrow.
		So, I mean, we will get to that.
		We'll talk about the government shutdown, which will be happening on Friday, if there's no deal.
		Absent some major announcement tonight, perhaps.
		We'll see.
		But tonight we have to focus on this big issue and we'll jump right into it.
		So, what exactly was said that started all of this?
		I'm not sure how much people are aware of this because it's surprising, well I guess it's interesting, how concentrated these little scandals are on Twitter these days.
		I feel like in the past, when there's a big controversy, when there's something like this, it's in press conferences, it's done on television interviews, but now it's almost totally Self-contained on Twitter.
		For example, I haven't seen so far any public statements, any videos, but it's a lot of tweets, it's a lot of press releases and the like, so I'm actually interested how many people who consume almost exclusively traditional legacy media even really heard about this.
		Like, if you're only watching Fox, if you're only watching television, I wonder How much this actually penetrated into the news cycle.
		It was all the rage on Twitter last night.
		AIPAC was trending.
		Ilhan Omar was trending.
		All these different characters were trending.
		And so this freshman congresswoman, Ilhan Omar, and we've talked about her at length during the midterm coverage.
		She is from Minnesota.
		She's a freshman Congresswoman from Minnesota.
		She was elected in 2018 alongside this whole class of female and far-left, people-of-color Congresswomen.
		So she's been palling around with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and that other Congresswoman, Flaib, from Michigan, the Native Americans, that black Congresswoman from Massachusetts.
		So they've all been sort of part of the same clique.
		And I'll say at the outset, I'll preface it by saying this, she is not our friend.
		So she says some things which really got an important debate and conversation started, and something which I think is very profound.
		I think a very important moment for the country.
		A big moment of truth.
		But that said, she is not our friend, so don't be misled.
		When I talk about this issue, I'm not saying, oh, you know, she's on our side, what a hero.
		You know, a lot of people, and I've critiqued a lot of people on our side who do this sort of thing with Tulsi Gabbard.
		Tulsi Gabbard is...
		A congresswoman from Hawaii who talks about our involvement in Syria, and she's a very strident non-interventionist, very outspoken against the influence of Saudi Arabia.
		Still part of the Council on Foreign Relations, by the way, but very outspoken on Saudi Arabia, on the issue of Syria.
		And a lot of people I think make the mistake of, you know, instead of just supporting what she says, And seeing where that goes and what conversations that leads to, they're saying like, oh, we're going to vote for her in 2020.
		Yeah, well, she's also for amnesty and gay marriage and abortion and gun control.
		So and the same is true with Ilhan Omar.
		I mean, she's an enemy of the country.
		She wants to destroy traditional America, you know, whether she critiques Israel or not.
		And probably her critiques of Israel come from the wrong place, because she's one of these Arab Muslims or rather she's Somali, but she's one of these Somali You know, Middle East, North African Muslims, who probably sees Israel not in the same way we do, that we don't really care for our relationship with Israel because it tends to be one-sided.
		But rather, I think to her, Israel represents colonialism, broad, you know, Christendom, Jewry domination of the third world, this sort of Marxist idea.
		So she's not our friend.
		I'll get that out of the way first.
		But she was out there and she tweeted last night, In response to a tweet by Glenn Greenwald.
		Glenn Greenwald is this homosexual journalist.
		He's actually been pretty solid for the past couple of years.
		I mean, generally he's a liberal sort of a guy and lives a pretty liberal lifestyle.
		But he's said some pretty good things the past couple of years.
		He tweeted last night, quote, GOP leader Kevin McCarthy threatens punishment for Ilhan, Minnesota and Rashida Tlaib.
		Yeah, very true.
		Very good point.
		It really does make you think.
		Because Ilhan Omar and Tlaib as Muslims have been outspoken against Israel.
		Like I said, not for the same reasons as we are.
		even if it means attacking free speech rights of Americans.
	Yeah, very true.
	Very good point.
	It really does make you think.
	Because Ilhan Omar and Talib, as Muslims, have been outspoken against Israel.
	Like I said, not for the same reasons as we are.
	But they're exercising their free speech and so on.
	And Kevin McCarthy is talking about how he has to act swiftly to shut all this anti-Semitic rhetoric down and everything.
	and And Glenn Greenwald rightly points out that it's sort of curious, it's sort of interesting why our representatives seem to be so fixated on protecting one country from criticism.
	They did this just last week.
	They passed a bill that made it so that if you have a contract with the federal government, you cannot participate in the boycott, divest, sanction movement against Israel, which says that we don't want to invest in Israel.
	We're doing this sort of economic embargo of Israel because we're protesting their treatment of Palestinians.
	Or I guess people participate for other reasons.
	But it's a good question.
	You know, why is that?
	That our representatives are so concerned about passing bills like that and condemning people that speak out against other countries.
	And Ilhan Omar, she quote tweeted that and she wrote, quote, It's all about the Benjamins, baby.
	And you know, and that's the that's a rap lyric, obviously saying, well, it's all about the money.
	A lot of people read a lot more into that than what was there.
	I think what she was saying there was, well, why is it that Kevin McCarthy?
	Why is it that our US representatives?
	Are so eager, you know, why are they so zealous in trying to defend a foreign nation?
	Well, because they're getting paid by a foreign influence lobby.
	It's all about the money.
	Why are they doing that?
	Well, it's about money.
	Benjamin's being money.
	It's pretty simple, right?
	And I shouldn't have to explain that, but, I mean, you'll see why.
	Maybe you can imagine some of the kvetching that went on because she mentioned money and Jewish people in the same sentence.
	You know, God forbid.
	Then there was a second tweet, uh, this woman, I hate this so much.
	We have so many non-white people in the country that we have to, we have to contend every day with all these goofy, goobledoo names from, you know, the third world.
	So this woman named Bhatia Ungar Sargon, like, why can't you just be named Sally?
unidentified		Right?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Why can't she just be named Sally or Patty or something?
		So Bhatia Ungar Sargon, She tweeted out, quote, Would love to know what Ilhan thinks is paying American politicians to be pro-Israel, although I think I can guess.
		Bad form, Congresswoman.
		That's the second anti-Semitic trope you've tweeted.
		Uh-oh.
		Better be careful.
		Glam.
		That's the second strike, right?
		And Ilhan Omar quote-tweeted in reply to this question, which is, I'm wondering who you think is paying politicians to be pro-Israel.
		I don't know, maybe that was intended to be a rhetorical question.
		Not a very good one, though, because there's a very straightforward answer, which Ilhan Omar quote-tweets, and she says, APAC.
		Well, yeah, APAC, of course.
		Gee, I wonder who Ilhan Omar thinks is paying off all the politicians in Washington D.C.
		to be pro-Israel.
		Yeah, I wonder who she thinks is doing that.
		Well, gee, could it be the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee?
		Which is in charge of a network of close to 30 political action committees.
		One of the second, or rather the second most powerful lobby in Washington, D.C.
		You know, maybe it's that organization.
		Maybe it's the one coordinating millions upon millions of dollars in campaign contributions to people based on their support for Israel.
		Could it be that?
		Could it be that institution?
		Would love to know who she thinks is paying American politicians to be pro-Israel.
		Oh, you know, maybe it's the entity That's paying American politicians to be pro-Israel.
		You know, maybe it's that one.
		So she tweets out APAC.
		And these two tweets, they set off a firestorm.
		Now to me, I read the tweets and I don't know, I mean is that really so far-fetched?
		Is what she said really...
		Does that constitute an anti-semitic canard?
		Does that constitute a Jew-hating attack?
		You know, when I think of anti-semitism, I think of like, you know, saying, hey, we don't like Jews, or hey, Jew, go home, we don't like you, or Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world.
		You know, when I think of anti-semitism, I think of something like that.
		I don't think of Somebody rightly pointing out that there's an obvious foreign influence lobby operating in plain sight, which by the way is no secret.
		If you go into Israeli media, and it doesn't matter what publication, if you look at Haaretz, if you look at Jerusalem Post, if you look at The Forward, all these different Israeli media outlets, they're reporting on this.
		I saw one article today in Haaretz Which said, Jews shouldn't be ashamed of the power AIPAC wields, they should be proud of it.
		Okay, so what's the disconnect here?
		I mean, clearly, and you've got all these off-the-record sources, a lot of on-the-record sources talking about, again, this foreign influence lobby.
		And it's this large network of political activists, donors, campaigns, pundits, all kinds of different things.
		It's there and everybody knows about it.
		So what did she say?
		What is the extent of what she said?
		It's all about the Benjamins, meaning, oh, the reason politicians defend Israel is because, well, they're getting paid by a foreign lobby.
		And, well, who exactly is doing this foreign lobbying?
		Well the foreign influence lobby, AIPAC.
		Okay now that should be pretty straightforward and simple and all the more reason because isn't the Democrats whole crusade for the past 10 years since Citizens United been about big money and politics?
		How many times do we hear about The Koch brothers.
		They control Congress.
		The Koch brothers, they've got the shadowy influence network.
		They're lobbying politicians to deregulate the economy.
		How many times have we heard about the oil and gas lobby?
		Fossil fuels?
		Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was doing that just yesterday.
		She went on this anti-oil screed.
		This hateful anti-oil screed.
		In Congress talking about, she was doing this barrage of questioning saying, oh well, a big oil lobby can give money to a politician and then that politician can write legislation that affects the oil industry.
		Wow!
		This is unbelievable!
		Now did anybody paint that as like an anti-oil canard?
		Anti-oil conspiracy?
		How about Russia?
		What have the Democrats been talking about for the past three years?
		They think that Vladimir Putin and Russia and Russians are responsible for everything from, like, Tom Brady winning the Super Bowl to Republicans winning the Senate, Donald Trump becoming the president.
		They think he's responsible for, like, the Oscars getting bad ratings.
	They think Trump has been in the- he's literally been in the Russian mafia for 40 years.
	40 years.
	They believe that Roger Stone, all these characters are just secret Russian agents.
	They think I'm a Russian agent.
	So it's just very interesting to me.
	What is the disconnect with the logic here?
	So obviously, you know, it's not wrong to point out like lobbying, political lobbying, which is based upon money.
	You know, an interest group, gee, peddling their interests among politicians with money.
	It's not out of bounds to talk about an ethnic-based lobbying on the part of Russia or another foreign country.
	Maybe on China.
	That's talked about less, but that's talked about.
	Or Saudi Arabia.
	Or Qatar.
	I mean, there's many countries that do this.
	For some reason you talk about Israel and you get this response.
	So the Democrats, they, whoa man, they threw her right under the bus.
	And they loved Ilhan Omar.
	You know, think about all the stuff you've seen in the past couple of weeks or couple of months.
	About these freshman congresswomen like Cortez and Ilhan Omar, how excited they are about these young people of color women getting into Congress and kicking ass.
	And look at how quickly and how brutally they just throw her under the bus at the first sign of defection.
	This is the letter that they wrote.
	And this was signed off by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, Majority Whip James Clyburn, Assistant Speaker Ben Ray Lujan, Caucus Chairman Hakeem Jeffries, and Caucus Vice Chair Katherine Clark.
	So, you've got all of the Democrat, literally all of the House Democrat leadership, they all co-signed this letter which says, quote, anti-Semitism must be called out.
	Confronted and condemned whenever it is encountered without exception.
	We are and will always be strong supporters of Israel in Congress because we understand that our support is based on shared values and strategic interests.
	Legitimate criticism of Israel's policies is protected by the values of free speech and democratic debate that the United States and Israel share.
	But Congresswoman Omar's use of anti-Semitic tropes and prejudicial accusations about Israel's supporters is deeply offensive.
	We condemn these remarks and we call upon Congresswoman Omar to immediately apologize for these hurtful comments.
	As Democrats and as Americans, the entire Congress must be fully engaged in denouncing and rejecting all forms of hatred, racism, prejudice, and discrimination wherever they are encountered.
	What?
	Did we read the same tweets?
	What did she say?
	She said a total of... seven words?
	It's all about the Benjamins, baby.
	AIPAC.
	We must condemn.
	We must be fully engaged in denouncing and rejecting all forms of hatred, racism, prejudice, discrimination.
	What are you talking about?
	What are you talking about, retard?
	There's no discrimination.
	If anything, it's actually quite the opposite.
	If you're willing to call out and criticize every other foreign interest group, Every other privileged group of people or race except for one.
	I think that's, well, that's discrimination, but I think it's discrimination in the other direction.
	That's prejudice, but I think in the other direction.
	I think it may be a good direction if you're talking about Israel.
	So it's just fascinating to me.
	And then within the statement I also love is legitimate criticism of Israel's policies is protected.
	Well, what constitutes legitimate criticism of Israel then?
	If talking about foreign lobbying, you know, if that's off-limits, what's on-limits?
	What's the legitimate criticism?
	Oh, Bibi Netanyahu's hair looks bad today?
	Oh, Israel, they're not defending their interests strongly enough today.
	They should have killed more Palestinians.
	Like, I don't know, is that maybe what they mean by legitimate criticism?
	So that's the Democrats completely just throwing her under the bus.
	You know, they love people of color.
	They love women.
	They love young people.
	And they encourage them to speak out.
	Until they speak out about Israel, then they have to be crushed.
	There is no place for that.
	They are going to be silenced.
	Because the Democratic Party, they stand with Israel.
	Chelsea Clinton is out there condemning her.
	On the Republican side, it's almost just...
	Beyond parody, Ted Cruz tweeted out, quote, Why is a member of Congress launching anti-Semitic slurs on Twitter?
	What?
	Caricaturing support for Israel as purchased by Jewish money, quote, about the Benjamins is an old slander.
	Do other Dems agree?
	Will media ask them?
	As more Dems support BDS anti-Semitism becoming far too common.
	Rubio tweeted, quote, one of the oldest anti-semitic conspiracies is about Jewish money as an instrument of global domination.
	See the fake anti-semitic Protocols of Zion.
	She might as well have tweeted, quote, in our hands is the greatest power of our day, gold, which is, I guess, a quote from Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
	A little bit heavy-handed, don't you think?
	So again, if you're hearing me correctly, because she acknowledged that AIPAC funnels millions upon millions of, you know, U.S.
	dollars, probably denominated in $100 bills, otherwise known as Benjamins, because she said that in sort of a tongue-in-cheek way, something which is totally happening, which nobody disputes, which is not a conspiracy theory, I mean, it's wide open.
	It's about as legitimate, it's about as transparent as You know, going to McDonald's and paying $5 for a Big Mac.
	I mean, it's out there.
	So because she acknowledged that AIPAC is paying politicians to support Israel, well, what she really meant by that was that it's those sneaky Jews again, those sneaky, money-hungry, powerful Jewish people controlling the country through these shadowy influence networks with money.
	Wait, wait a minute.
	Actually, I don't know.
	That kind of sounds accurate.
	And that's kind of the grand irony of it all, is, well, doesn't it sort of beg the question, if she's talking about money influencing politics, Israeli money influencing politics, buying people's support, and you've got in the case of Marco Rubio, somebody who spoke at the AIPAC conference last year in support of Israel, where the average contribution to all attendees was $36,000, of which 400 congresspeople were there,
	You gotta wonder, doesn't it beg the question why he would be tweeting something like that?
	Gee, why are you vociferously defending Israel?
	Why are you white knighting on Israel's behalf against somebody saying they're paying off politicians when you yourself are paid off by the very group that is being condemned for such behavior?
	I don't know, man.
	I guess it's a mystery.
	I guess you must just be... I guess we're all anti-semitic.
	I guess we're all... we didn't even know it.
	But we all are against Jewish people, so she was forced to apologize.
	Like I said, within 24 hours, she offered a very sincere apology.
	She wrote, quote, Anti-Semitism is real, and I am grateful for Jewish allies and colleagues who are educating me on the painful history of anti-Semitic tropes.
	My intention is never to offend my constituents or Jewish Americans.
	As a whole, we have to always be willing to step back and think through criticism, just as I expect people to hear me when others attack me for my identity.
	This is why I unequivocally apologize.
	At the same time, I reaffirm the problematic role of lobbyists in our politics.
	Whether it be AIPAC or the fossil fuel industry, it's gone on for too long and we must be willing to address it.
	So, I don't know, I mean, I guess in the end...
	She's kind of standing by what she said, but the apology couldn't be more preposterous, more absurd.
	And I think everybody just kind of sees what happens.
	I mean, you criticize Jewish money, Jewish money gets an ad, they send out their politicians to crush the person critiquing Jewish money, and the person critiquing Jewish money says, I'm so sorry for offending everyone by talking about Jewish money.
	That was wrong and deeply... I would never want to offend Jewish money.
	Please accept my apology.
	Please, please, please.
	I mean, isn't it just so obvious what's happening here?
	And there was one tweet in particular, which to me was so egregious.
	This was a tweet by the Republican Jewish caucus leader, Matt Brooks.
	He tweeted yesterday, quote, at Speaker Pelosi, at Leader Hoyer.
	What do you have to say about this?
	Leader Hoyer, you've led many AIPAC trips to Israel.
	Will you speak out against this?
	So, at a certain point, you gotta wonder, who is walking the dog here, right?
	I mean, who's really in control here?
	If you've got the leader of the Jewish Caucus, Spear Pelosi, you have led so many trips to my country, to Israel.
	What are you going to do about this?
	Well, who's really in control of the country?
	You know, and for people that, you know, a lot of this is obviously circumstantial.
	Maybe you don't buy it.
	Maybe you're saying, oh well, Nick.
unidentified		Actually, Ilhan Omar is an anti-Semite.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Don't you know this, Nick?
		She has made anti-Semitic statements in the past, and when she talks about it being all about the Benjamins with AIPAC and the Jewish lobby, that is absolutely a dog whistle.
		That is not correct.
		Totally obvious observation about the state of American politics based on what the Israeli media themselves say.
		No, no, but you don't understand.
		That really was hateful.
		Well, okay, if you don't believe all that circumstantial stuff, hey, maybe it's true.
		Maybe the reason that our congresspeople are so supportive of Israel, why America has unconditional support for Israel.
		I mean, think about it.
		They have been the number one recipient of U.S.
		foreign aid since the 1970s.
		Number one out of every other country.
		Number one in foreign aid since the 1970s.
		We recently in 2016 green-lighted another 10-year deal which was preceded by another 10-year deal.
		The 10-year deal which preceded that one which expired in 2016 had us giving them 3.5 billion dollars per year for 10 years.
		So in 2016 we renewed it and we re-upped actually giving them now 3.8 billion dollars per year for the next 10 years until 26.
		So we've done that.
		We've unequivocally supported them in the United Nations.
		We have unequivocally and unconditionally supported them in conflict in the Middle East, even though Americans and the elites overwhelmingly say in polls that our support for Israel actually hurts our relationships with other countries.
		So, you know, you have all this unconditional support, but hey, you know, maybe she's attacking this and she really does have bad intentions.
		Well, let me just lay out a couple of facts for you.
		About AIPAC in particular.
		Of course, AIPAC is the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee.
		Just to give you an idea of some of their activities, every year they host the AIPAC Conference.
		They have an annual conference in Washington, D.C.
		It's one of the biggest political events of the year.
		You might have never heard about it before.
		I'm sure there's a reason for that.
		Maybe if you read a lot of conservative media, you might be interested to find out that the editor-in-chief of Breitbart, Andrew Pollack, was a keynote speaker there last year at AIPAC.
		You know, also a strong Zionist, so that's a bright part.
		You may know that The Daily Wire, another strong conservative publication run by Ben Shapiro, hardcore Jewish Zionist.
		CRTV, another huge online media outlet run by Mark Levin, or in tandem with Mark Levin.
		Hardcore Jewish Zionist, Rupert Murdoch and his sons.
		Now, they're not Jewish, but they are hardcore Zionists.
		They receive big money from those kinds of people.
		So, you know, maybe you would be forgiven if you haven't heard about this before, but AIPAC does this big conference every year, every year, Two-thirds, two-thirds of the U.S.
		Congress goes to this conference.
		Two-thirds of all sitting representatives and senators attends this conference.
		66%!
		Including last year, these were speakers at the conference, so not even in attendance.
		Two-thirds attends.
		These are the speakers.
		They included Democratic leader, the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader, Chuck Schumer, Republican Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell, and Marco Rubio.
		So again, the speakers at the conference, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, so they're the two heads of the Democrat chambers in the House of Representatives and the Senate, and you've got Mitch McConnell, The Senate Majority Leader, and you've got Marco Rubio, who's a big deal in the Senate, and you've also got Nikki Haley.
		The year prior to that you had Mike Pence.
		So you've got two-thirds of Congress every year going to AIPAC, which again AIPAC is a foreign influence lobby.
		Their job, their stated mission, is to organize money, political campaign contributions, on behalf of Israel.
		A lot of it is done through money laundering.
		Now some of it is, most of it is done through American Jewry who raise the money themselves, but historically there is a role for the Israeli government.
		So, two-thirds of Congress, the leaders of both major parties speaking at an event that is lobbying on behalf of a foreign government, okay?
		Just last week, the Senate passed the Combating BDS Act, which was sponsored by APEC.
		77 Senators voted for that.
		Now think of that.
		We can't get 60 Senators to vote for Kate's Law.
		We can't get 60 Senators to vote for a border wall, to agree to reopen the government given some reasonable border security compromise.
		But in the midst of all that controversy, in the past three weeks, they were able to push out a bill, the Combating BDS Act, with 77 votes.
		Well, that's a pretty substantial supermajority, to make it illegal for, again, and I talked about this at the top of the show, to make it illegal for companies that have contracts with the U.S.
		government to boycott Israel.
		So it really makes you think.
		You've got two-thirds of Congress, both of the heads of the major parties speaking there, and they're passing legislation with supermajorities passed by this Organization.
		The task of APAC is that they lead a network of 30 pro-Israel PACs.
		So a lot of disinformation has been given out about this on Twitter.
		All day long I've been seeing a lot of Jewish people who are very supportive of Israel.
		Maybe that's just convenience.
	We're saying, oh well, AIPAC only gave a few million dollars in campaign contributions in the last year.
	That pales in comparison to what Planned Parenthood gives.
	That's because AIPAC doesn't actually give the money directly.
	AIPAC can't give the money directly.
	What AIPAC does is they organize the activities of, again, close to 30 pro-Israel.
	They call this Israel Affinity Organizations.
	That's what they call them.
	That's the proper name in D.C.
	They organize all these different lobbying groups to give money separately and sort of individually so they can sort of break the rules a little bit.
	So AIPAC's job is not to actually dish out all the money that is paid by Israel.
	If they're saying, oh, well, they only dished out $3 million, well, that's not really what they're designed to do.
	Their job is to link up politicians with campaign contributors.
	Obviously that's not the case.
	Obviously it's not the case that their influence is not limited by the scope of the three or four million dollars in expenditures that a lot of these people are talking about.
	If that were the case, do you think you would have two-thirds of Congress showing up to their conference?
	Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Mitch McConnell, Mark Rubio, all these people showing up to the conference for a paltry four million dollars?
	Of course not.
	It goes far beyond that.
	It also includes For example, they not only have all these other PACs that give money, they also have these specialized organizations.
	For example, in that tweet that I read out earlier by the Republican Jewish Caucus leader saying, Oh, Leader Hora, you led so many AIPAC trips to Israel.
	Well, what exactly does that mean?
	What is an AIPAC trip to Israel?
	Well, there's an organization which is a subsidiary of AIPAC called the American Israeli Education Foundation.
	And just to give you an idea of their activities, this is from This website called If Americans Knew.
	Very fantastic resource.
	It says, quote, in August 2011, 81 members of Congress from both parties took trips to Israel with the AIEF.
	Its annual budget is over 26 million dollars.
	So think about that.
	They say, oh, it's only 3 to 4 million for AIPAC.
	Well, sure, that's because AIPAC has 30 subsidiaries and all these other specialty organizations, one of which, their budget is 26 million dollars a year.
	It's executive director Richard Fishman is officially, quote, not compensated, but he receives $395,000 annually from affiliates.
	Oh, so, you know, more of these little money-moving tricks.
	Roll Call reports that in 2012 the American Israel Education Foundation spent more than $650,000.
	Have you heard about this with any other country on earth?
	I see it all the time.
	I see it with pundits.
	I see it with congressmen.
	of Jerusalem, seminars on Israeli politics, and discussions of asymmetric warfare according to congressional travel filings.
	So that's sort of interesting.
	Have you heard about this with any other country on earth?
	I see it all the time.
	I see it with pundits.
	I see it with congressmen.
	They're always hanging out in Israel.
	They're always hanging out in Jerusalem.
	They're always in Tel Aviv.
	They're always in Haifa.
	They're always talking about organizing field trips for new pundits, new politicians.
	I was offered the trip to Israel.
	I talk about this a lot.
	When I was in Boston University, and I was sort of discovered, and I met Cassie Dillon.
	I'm not going to get into the whole story behind it, but the first thing Cassie Dillon said, and the interview is still out there.
	She took it off of her periscope, but I'm sure it's still out there somewhere.
	In the interview, immediately following my whole debate and the reason she was there, she asked me if I would take a trip to Israel.
	She said, oh, I could hook you up and they've got these really great people, they sponsor you, it doesn't cost anything.
	That was the first thing I was offered when they wanted to sort of inculcate me into the Republican circles and the GOP circles.
	The trip to Israel.
	Why do you think that is?
	So that's the American Israel Education Foundation where they're sending people there for this brainwashing trip about what's happening there.
	The ADL also happens to be a subsidiary of AIPAC.
	Have you ever heard of the ADL?
	This is again from the same website, quote, it has also been involved in a large spying operation against American citizens who oppose the policies of Israel and the apartheid regime in South Africa.
	It is an architect of, quote, hate crimes legislation that may effectively criminalize criticism of Israeli policies, which they did with that bill last week criminalizing support for BDS.
	The ADL is a member of the Council of Presidents, which is sort of like this board of executives of people who are in all these different subsidiaries, with revenues of around $60 million and assets of over $115 million.
	Abe Foxman, its national director, makes $688,280 per year.
	For $115 million, Abe Foxman, its national director, makes $688,280 per year.
	Wow.
	So that's just a little slivery.
	You've got AIPAC, you've got this annual conference, two-thirds of Congress, all these people go.
	You've got the AIEF, where 81 Congress people go in one year to visit Israel.
	All expenses paid trip.
	Yeah, you know, that's totally legitimate.
	And the ADL, which again is responsible for criminalizing and launching all these attacks, branding every criticism of the country as anti-semitic.
	To me, my favorite piece of evidence, however.
	My favorite thing in the world, because this is just so insulting to Americans.
	I don't know, again, how many people were aware of this, because it sort of just got memory hold.
	Nobody talks about this anymore, but to me it sort of stuck out as somebody who believes in America first.
	I love my country.
	I love the people in my country.
	I love what my country stands for.
	So to see this, it really bothered me.
	In 2015.
	This was, I think, the third time, second or third time this happened.
	Bibi Netanyahu was the Prime Minister of Israel.
	He spoke before a joint session of Congress.
	So he came all the way from Israel to give a little speech in front of our House of Representatives and our Senate.
	A joint session of Congress.
	Sort of like the President does in the State of the Union.
	That's what the State of the Union does.
	It's a session, it's a joint session of Congress that he's addressing.
	So the President of Israel comes all the way over here in English and gives a speech about Iran's nuclear program.
	He spoke for 39 minutes and he got a total of 27 standing ovations.
	27 standing ovations in 39 minutes.
	That's almost one standing ovation every minute.
	Our representatives, our senators, slavishly Standing up and applauding every minute on the minute the head of state of a foreign country.
	By the way, a head of state of a foreign country which dragged us into not one, not two, but probably three, if you're willing to be generous, three foreign wars which we had no business in.
	Which is taking money with both hands every year.
	3.8 million dollars and done in the most shady accounting practices so that they get the most out of it.
	They squeeze every last drop.
	The same country, by the way, which attacked the USS Liberty in 1967.
	They destroyed an entire ship and they apologized and they paid but they did it deliberately.
	The same country which stole our nuclear material, stole our nuclear blueprints and infrastructure.
	You know, we hit Iran for doing that.
	We hit North Korea for doing that.
	Israel has had an illegal nuclear program for close to 50 years.
	The same country which buys our military technology and sells it to China.
	This is the country.
	This is the guy.
	Comes to the American Congress, gives a speech, 27 standing ovations.
	Now, I don't know, folks.
	You tell me.
	Do you think that our Congress people, do you think they go to AIPAC every year and they give speeches?
	I think they take their trips to Israel.
	You think they vote 77 out of 100 for a bill criminalizing opposition to Israel, criminalizing support for the BDS movement?
	You think they give 27 standing ovations to Bibi Netanyahu?
	You think they do all that because they're just being really good representatives of the will of the people?
	That's what they say.
	They say that, oh, it's not about the Benjamins, folks.
	It's not about the foreign influence lobby.
	It's not about the money.
	The reason American politicians do all of that is because Americans love Israel.
unidentified		Really?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Because I feel like Americans want a lot of things.
		Americans love a lot of things.
		Americans love cheap health care.
		Americans love infrastructure.
		Americans love border security.
		Americans love a lot of things that you'll never see.
		You will never see in the country.
		So do you think that because Our congresspeople go to AIPAC and all the rest.
		You think they do that just because they're being really good stewards?
		They're being really good representatives of what the American people are all about?
		Which is, man, you know, we could care less about the border, but as long as we're giving the due respect and support to the closest ally, to Israel, do you think that's the reason?
		Or do you think there's something else going on?
		So it's just totally rich.
		I think you get the idea.
		And of course, to me, the most insulting thing of all is the Republican double standard.
		Which is, maybe we expect this from the left, because the left is controlled by lobbies and so on.
		You know, and it's funny too, because whenever I talk about Jewish power on the show, invariably, I always get, and it's so rich, the chutzpah, I always get some Jewish guy who will comment on the video or DM me or email me and say, Nick, I demand that you differentiate between those left-wing Jews and us right-wing Jews who are patriots.
		Yeah, well, I don't know.
		I mean, it's different flavors, but it's sort of the same thing, right?
		I mean, on the left-wing side, you've got people that are advocating and agitating for liberalism, mass immigration, abortion.
		That's your left-wing Jewry, so they're advocating for Jewish interests in that way.
		And on the right-wing side, yeah, sure, I guess they're a little bit more conservative, but they're buying and selling our Congress, putting us in foreign wars.
		So, I don't know, man.
		I guess it's different flavors, but same shoes, different socks.
		Am I right?
		So I find it pretty rich that they'll talk about this kind of stuff on the left, but on the right, they're so quick with this Ilhan Omar to say, oh, it's anti-Semitic, we disavow this hatred, and so on.
		When have you ever heard a congressperson?
		on either side stand up against anti-christian rhetoric?
		When have you heard anybody on either side stand up against anti-white rhetoric, anti-American rhetoric?
		When's the last time you heard anybody say, this is un-American or this is anti-American?
		You know, Will Chamberlain, he accused me of being anti-Semitic because I beat him in a debate basically and embarrassed him and because I'm America first.
		I'm actually perfectly fine with being accused of being anti-Semitic.
		I I'm fine with that.
		The one thing I care about is being accused of being un-American or anti-American.
		To me, that's my focus at the end of the day.
		But in Congress, that seems to not be the focus.
		It seems to be much more egregious to be anti-Semitic or racist or sexist or homophobic than it is to betray your own country, to betray the people you represent, to betray the people that founded the country.
		To me, that's the gravest sin of all.
		Sure, there's influence in Washington, D.C.
		all day long.
		But I guess what adds insult to injury is that you see that within 24 hours, these people are out there, they're condemning the left harder than they've ever done it before, more forcefully than you've ever seen.
		Pundits, politicians, when have you seen somebody like Marco Rubio come at the left with such a heavy-handed criticism?
		Oh, it's just like the protocols of Elders of Zion.
		Do they speak out when they're taking down our monuments?
		When they're kneeling for the flag?
		When they do any of that other stuff?
		I don't think so.
		I don't see it.
		So that's, to me, the greatest scandal.
		They care more about the other country than they care about our own country.
		Yeah, call me anti-Semitic.
		Call Ilhan Omar anti-Semitic.
		You know, Ilhan Omar happens to be un-American, but at least from our perspective, from our side, that's what's fundamental.
		That's what I care about at the end of the day, is are you serving this country, not the other country?
		I don't really care if I offend those people.
		And now the last thing I'll close with is this guy, because it's just so obvious, Joel Pollack.
		He's my favorite.
		I saw one of his tweets last night.
		This is probably my favorite one of the whole evening.
		So, Ilhan Omar, she retweeted this tweet by Adam Jentleson, which said, So we're going to pretend Sheldon Adelson doesn't exist and that Kevin McCarthy is trying to punish Ilhan Omar out of sincere commitment to the well-being of us Jews?
		Oh, that's very cool.
		And Joel Pollack, in response to that retweet, writes, As many suspected, it's not just about AIPAC.
		For Ilhan Omar.
		Sheldon Adelson is not AIPAC.
	Ilhan Omar is now just attacking Jews.
	Well, I thought that was kind of silly.
	Because of course, that's kind of missing the point.
	Sheldon Adelson has $28 billion and he buys our Congress just like AIPAC does.
	To the same effect, in the same way.
	So, like, what difference does it make?
	Oh, she's just attacking Jews.
	Well, she's attacking people that buy our government.
	Kind of, uh, tells you something, right?
	But then I do a little research and it turns out, oh yeah, Joel Pollack, who's the editor-in-chief of Breitbart who wrote that.
	Sheldon Adelson is not AIPAC.
	Ilhan Omar is now just attacking Jews.
	Yeah, he spoke at AIPAC last year.
	He spoke at the conference.
	Am I a bad guy?
	Am I an anti-Semite?
	Am I some Jew-hater?
	Maybe a little bit of a conflict of interest, but who am I to judge?
	But we're running out of time here.
	We're going to move on to our stream labs and super chats, and we'll see what all you guys have to say about this.
	Am I a bad guy?
	Am I an anti-Semite?
	Am I some Jew hater?
	I don't think so.
	And I'll say again, Yohan Omar is not our friend.
	She's not our ally.
	You know, she is somebody who peddles a lot of this revolutionary anti-white stuff that I've been talking about for weeks.
	So just because she brings up a valid point, that doesn't make her our best good friend all of a sudden.
	It doesn't matter though.
	It doesn't matter.
	She is bringing up a point which is critical.
	And take a look at who rushes to the defense of AIPAC and Jews and who rushes to the defense of America.
	Take note of who did what this weekend because that tells you everything you need to know about them.
	There are a lot of people who I'm friendly with or whatever, And what was their first instinct?
	It was to condemn her for being anti-semitic.
	Oh, she's so anti-semitic and she's subversive and she's un-American.
	To me the scandal is not that somebody offended Jews or Israel.
	The scandal is that our government is being bought and paid for.
	You have 4,000 dead Americans in Iraq because of this.
	But people are still willing to keep up with the lie, even when they get an opportunity to do the right thing.
	Even when they get cover, even when there is a big opportunity to do the right thing, talk about what's going on, they cower and they rush to the defense of people that are wrecking the country.
	It says a lot.
	It says a lot about people's character.
	So that offends me when people do that.
	You know, that, as an American, that offends me.
	Talking about Israelis getting offended.
	I think it offends Americans when we're still in wars that we shouldn't be in.
	Anyway, let's see.
	We've got a stream lab here from our lady of Fatima who says have you ever read the important book?
	Tragedy and hope by Carol Quigley.
	If so, what is your taking must read for all knickers?
	No, I haven't read that one So I can't give you a take but you reminded me I was gonna share this speaking of books Speaking of books that you should read forget protocols forget all that other stuff pick yourself up a copy of the Israel Lobby if you think I'm making this up If you think I'm just some hater, if you think I'm some nasty guy.
	I know a lot of GOP people.
	They're so brainwashed.
	They legitimately can't get over it.
	I was like that too when I was in high school.
	And my conservative media diet consisted of PragerU and Ben Shapiro and Andrew Clavin and all that stuff.
	Look, there was nothing else out there at the time.
	You're talking about 2013, 2014.
	What else could I have been exposed to?
	Maybe if I went on 4chan or something.
	But if you're talking about mainstream, You know, what I was exposed to was just Dennis Prager.
	You know, all these Jewish people, kind of weird.
	Dennis Prager, Ben Shapiro, Andrew Clavin, just all... Charles Krauthammer.
	For some reason, they all had that in common.
	So, for a long time, I was totally brainwashed.
	Anybody who suggested criticism of Israel, I said, oh, well, you know, you're just anti-Semitic or whatever.
	If you think I'm like that, if you're one of those people...
	Yo, this is the book for you.
	It's written by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt.
	Mearsheimer is like one of the most respected international relations scholars in the world, maybe alive right now.
	He's an offensive realist from the University of Chicago.
	He wrote On the Tragedy of Great Power Politics, which is like a seminal classic.
	One of the four most important post-Cold War treatises on foreign policy.
	So he's, I mean, he's a big deal.
	He went to UChicago.
	It's not like he's some, you know, fringe guy.
	So he wrote this.
	It was co-written by Stephen Walt, who's another very important international relations scholar from Harvard.
	So, it's not like this is a, you know, check out my website, you know, it's called IHateIsrael.biz.
	It's called, you know, IsraelConspiracy.USA.
	Obviously, it's pretty legitimate.
	And the book is actually surprisingly moderate.
	You know, it lays out what should be considered anti-Semitic and why it doesn't qualify as that and so on.
	Talks about the Iraq war, talks about the structure of the Israel lobby in a way that I can't get into just for the sake of time on my show given the format that we're here talking about Iran, talking about a lot of other things.
	So this is the one to check out.
	It's been around for a long time, caused a big controversy, but I mean, it's the book on this question.
	Very courageous people.
	So, it's not out there to talk about this.
	You see a lot of people talking more and more about this.
	That's because the AIPAC lobby is waning.
	They're going down in influence.
	The reason Ilhan Omar was even able to say that, and because BDS is gaining traction and everything, that's because AIPAC is Is ebbing.
	Their influence is decreasing.
	That's why they're lashing out like this, because they know it.
	They can sense that.
	Good.
	Good.
	Be a part of the solution, not a part of the problem, right?
	Be a part of the group of people that is trying to get this foreign influence out of our government.
	You know, you see that this foreign influence lobby is weakened and people are like, oh, we have to rush to the defense because they're still holding on to power.
	No, no.
	You have to be a part of the change.
	You have to be a part of, you know, the difference makers.
	So that's how I see it happening.
	But anyway, let's see.
	We've got one from Black Swan who says, Nick, did you hear about RFID being integrated into clothing?
	Where do you draw the line on human slash tech integration?
	Do you see this integration as a way to deny our salvation?
	Our only edge against ascendant transhumanism is Jesus.
	Big advantage.
	I don't know what RFID is.
	I guess that's what like when they put computers in the clothes.
	I don't know.
	I don't really have a strong opinion on that kind of stuff.
	I'm generally skeptical of that kind of technology.
	You know, the other day I was watching a YouTube video and I was in bed.
	And I realized like there's a camera just staring back at you and people tend to forget that because it's sort of uh it's sort of discreet you know maybe that's that way by design but imagine if it was like a big bulbous like a kind of camera that you would see in a store you know like those big orbs staring back at you all the time every time you're on your phone and uh you know in that moment I was like this is a little bit Off-putting, right?
	So, the proliferation of technology, the ubiquity of technology, I'm generally skeptical, I'm generally opposed, but I don't know, I mean, by the same token, there are some benefits.
	It just, there has to be regulation, right?
	Sirison Slammer says, WTF?
	I love Muslim socialists now.
	Yeah, we don't, I don't love Ilhan Omar, but I mean, look, it was the right thing.
	It was the right thing for her to do.
	It was a good thing.
	Let's see.
	FeelsLikeAWheel says, Can't enjoy Trump's cheeky Twitter negs towards his opponents anymore.
	They were fun when we had the upper hand, but it's been so blackmailing recently that I don't care.
	Haha, wow, so funny, big guy.
	Hey, by the way, could you maybe just build the wall?
	Like, build the wall?
	Yeah, I don't know.
	I mean...
	I get that perspective, but you gotta just lighten up and enjoy.
	I saw a lot of people, you know, I was tweeting the other day, and again it was just a joke, that, you know, Trump sort of insinuated that he was making a joke about the Trail of Tears when he was slamming Elizabeth Warren, and I said, oh, you know, just when I think Trump is disappointing me, he makes a joke about the Trail of Tears.
	I can never be mad at him.
	And it was just a tongue-in-cheek, you just have to sort of laugh sometimes, and I get all these butthurt people, that would be really funny, but
	What is you just build the wall like I don't know can people just lighten up from time to time we have to have a little bit of levity we have to be a little bit human about something so yeah I look you watch the show you've seen the show for the past couple of weeks I haven't exactly been ecstatic about what's been going on right I mean so I know I have this reputation as I will rationalize everything but you've seen the show ever since the midterms it's been a totally different tone and I've explained why that's the case But when it's on Twitter, you see a joke.
	I mean, I don't know at a certain point You got to realize we're up against big forces and the guy in the White House is just clowning around to me That's that's the funny part is all these people.
	Oh, you know, they're so serious and blah blah He's Hitler and you got this guy just firing off tweets at 5 a.m.
	He's probably munching on a I had an Egg McMuffin in bed, and he's, oh, I'm gonna beat her on the campaign trail, lol.
	I mean, it's just funny.
	Lighten up a little bit, right?
	Things are bad enough, right?
	Matt Forney, my guy, says DJ Audit the Fed won Terror House Magazine's January Best of the Month Award for his short story, Japanese GF, and he's asked me to donate his prize money to you, Nick.
	Enjoy a couple of Big Macs on me, Big Guy, and read DJ's story.
	Terror House, Matt, well thank you!
	Much appreciated.
	Thanks to Matt.
	Thanks to DJ Audit the Fed.
	Yeah, everybody go check that out.
	Terror House, very fine publication.
	Matt Forney, a fine man.
	And I appreciate it.
	I will enjoy the Big Macs.
	Maybe I'll get a couple of bacon this time.
	Based One says, I think you missed my older chat, but I wanted to ask you what are the chances we get a Teddy Roosevelt type of president that will go after big tech and put a stop to cronyism?
	I know it sounds like a fantasy, But I think Republicans should tackle this.
	That's a good question.
	Yeah, I must have missed that one.
unidentified		I don't know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It sounds sort of familiar, though.
		So I don't know.
		It all kinds of blends together for me, right?
		But with Teddy Roosevelt, you know, I guess what I'm hearing in your question is, are you going to see the return of a genuine nationalist, a genuine populist?
		I don't know.
		Spengler talked about the rise of a new Caesarism.
		He predicted this in Decline of the West, I think, which was published in the 1920s, talking about how the financial interests would just so corrupt and destroy and just own democracy that eventually what you would get...
		of politics, not of money, but of blood.
		You would get somebody, a new Caesar, who is of the people, who serves the people, who subordinates the financial stuff to the national interest.
		And he said that that would prolong the survival of the West in this autumn of our civilization in the same way that the Roman Empire succeeded the Roman Republic.
		I don't know.
		I don't know what the likelihood of that is.
		The problem is, is that if you look at the mechanisms by which a character like that would arise through the ranks, you know, and get money and get recognition and get media and get the kind of political backing you would need, just think about all the institutional obstacles to that at every step of the way, to anybody who bucks just think about all the institutional obstacles to that at every step of the way, to anybody who bucks the It's hard to imagine how somebody could rise up and do that.
		I don't think it's impossible.
		I think actually it's increasingly more possible.
		I think since Donald Trump, it's become more possible.
		But hey, I'll believe it when I see it.
		These sorts of, these sort of civilizational transformations, I don't think you can really...
		Anticipate them.
		I think they sort of happen, you know, and maybe that sounds a little bit Maybe that sounds Sort of silly but I think you understand what I mean in the sense that you look at a lot of great historical events like Collapses for example like the Soviet Union I don't think people knew the day before the Soviet Union collapsed that like within a week the the Soviet Union wouldn't exist anymore, right?
		I mean it just it happened very slowly and then very quickly is what they say about that kind of thing and So with regard to that, it's sort of like the same thing with Donald Trump.
		I mean, would anybody have predicted in 2014 that when Obama was sort of this lame duck president and sad and obviously there was this appetite for Republican revanchism, did anybody believe that it would come in the form of Donald Trump and he would When the election on a platform of non-intervention and I'm gonna take care of everybody and we're gonna build a wall on the southern border?
		Nobody could have anticipated that.
		So it'll... I think the stars will basically align and then it'll happen if it's destined to.
		And probably it's becoming more likely, but I don't know.
		I don't think it's... I wouldn't be holding out hope.
		Let's see.
		Esoteric Peter Griffin says, I don't understand what makes foot fetishists tick.
		It's just a foot.
		Now armpits are where it's at.
		Okay.
		So that's an interesting one.
		We go from, uh, what is going on with the stream labs?
		I don't understand.
		It's, it's one day, one day I get annoyed by Jesse Lee Peterson, right?
		And, uh, and E. Michael Jones.
		And then the next day I get annoyed by people complaining about that or religious questions.
		And then, and then people just, you know, they hit something from out of right field with, Armpits are where it's at.
		Okay, man.
		Tangysweat says, Nick, you are the best at what you do.
		Keep it up.
		KnifeMan, can you please invite E. Michael Jones on?
		There it is.
		Why did I even say it?
		Best of luck.
		May God protect you always.
		Amen.
		It's true.
		I am the best at what I do.
		So true.
		Finally, the recognition I deserve.
		Yeah, I will definitely.
		I've been watching a lot of E. Michael Jones lately, but the problem is just the bad optics.
		He's very... I don't know.
		I mean, is it the worst?
		The problem is not necessarily what he says, but where he says it.
		You know, he's on the gas station.
		He's on the Richard Spencer show.
		He's talking about how he tried to convert David Duke to Catholicism when he was in Mexico.
		I'm like, you're not helping me, man.
		I love your stuff, you know.
		I don't agree with him on everything, but, you know, I love what he has to say.
		He's very fiery, very knowledgeable.
		He's obviously protected by God, but, you know, he's going to Iran to talk about all this stuff, and I'm like, bro, please, please, just, just, you know, make it easier for me.
	But thanks, man.
	I hope God protects me also, because I'm in the fight of my life here.
	BasedWants says, since coming over to the right, I've heard many justifiable criticism about black people.
	I've come to accept race and IQ as being legitimate, but these neocons won't even let you say a word about Israel or else you are anti-Semitic.
	It is a double standard.
	So true.
	Well, and here's the thing.
	When we talk about these issues, it's not motivated by a place of hate.
	You know, I didn't roll out of bed one day I'd say to myself, you know what?
	I really don't like people that don't look like me.
	That did not happen.
	There was never a moment where I said, hey, I don't like these people anymore.
	I grew up in a 90-some percent white...
	Suburb, but you can ask anybody grew up with me.
	My first best friend in kindergarten was black, you know, we remained friends for years My my other were actually my first best friend was actually a Muslim Palestinian Still friends to this day the next best friend I was a black guy, you know, and so on and so forth I had a lot of different friends and I know that's sort of a corny thing but
	What I mean to say by that is, obviously, if you're able to, at that level, be friends with somebody of another race, these kinds of views that I'm espousing, they don't come from this, like, weird place, like, oh, like, my family was hateful or I was bred with hate or something.
	Like, I grew up in a normal home.
	I grew up in a normal community.
	My parents are two normal boomers, you know, and they're about as liberal as, you know, conservative boomers come on these kinds of things.
	You know, and I had friends who were of different races, and even up until very recently I was a libertarian.
	But then I started and noticed in like 2016, 2017, hey, there's some very pertinent facts which explain what's going on in the country, what problems are happening.
	And if true, and they are true, We're in for a lot of trouble.
	Everybody's in for a lot of problems in the coming years.
	And we have to talk about those things if we want to avert those problems.
	I come at it from a very simple way.
	You know, you think I like, and I think about this a lot, you think I like being a social outcast.
	You think I like the idea that I go up to people that I used to know and I don't know if they hate me or something because I've been slandered in the Chicago Tribune as a white supremacist or a Nazi.
	You know, You think that's a fun thing to be going through as an adolescent?
	No, it's terrible.
	But every time I think about it, I think, well, but what is the alternative?
	The alternative is if you say nothing, if you do nothing, and it is incumbent on us, each of us, to act.
	We have very, very bad things in our future.
	When you understand and you have a clear view, you have the courage of your convictions to say, here are the facts, here is what is inevitable, and it's terrible, and you have that clarity of vision, then you understand that there's no choice.
	There's no choice.
	We have to tell the truth.
	It's not about hating anybody.
	It's not about resenting anybody.
	And we get frustrated because of how over the top and widespread the lies are.
	But it comes from that good place.
	And that's why I broke off from the alt-right.
	People say, oh, what are your disagreements with the alt-right?
	Well, there's a lot of them.
	But I think chief amongst them is these are not healthy, good people.
	These are people who come from broken homes.
	These are people who have profound things wrong inside of them.
	That's not me.
	That ain't me.
	My parents have been married for 30 years.
	I was like the student council president.
	I gave a speech at graduation.
	I'm a normal guy.
	Normal guy with, obviously, very normal desires for what my country should look like.
	And that's what the movement should be comprised of.
	Normal people and it's totally normal to have these views.
	Not some weirdos.
unidentified		I'm gonna shave my head and get a tattoo and SIG Heil!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Nobody's about that, right?
		Anyway, that's a long answer.
		That's how I feel.
		Saracen... I read that one, actually.
		Based1 says, The hypocrisy runs so deep with this guy.
		And the lies are so thick.
		Even if you agree with Ben Shapiro on some things, you cannot abide him because he is a liar.
		Israel Boycott Act, which is a clear violation of free speech, seems to me that we need to reevaluate our relationship with them.
		Well, that's, the hypocrisy runs so deep with this guy.
		It's, and the lies are so thick.
		Even if you agree with Ben Shapiro on some things, you cannot abide him because he is a liar.
		He will lie to your face.
		You know, somebody asked him, how can you support Israel, which is a, it's an ethnic nationalist country.
		It's the Jewish state.
		And especially since their nation state law, which says the Jews get special privileges in Israel.
		Of course, their conception of national identity is based on ethnicity.
		Jewish is an ethnicity, not just a religion.
		What else would a secular Jew be but an ethnic Jew, right?
		And so somebody asked him, well, how could you support Israel, which has this ethnic nationalism, but you say that white nationalism is wrong?
		How can you support Jewish ethnic nationalism, but not white ethnic nationalism?
		And Shapiro said, oh no, no, no, you have it all wrong, actually.
		Jewish is an idea system.
		So actually, Israel is not ethnic nationalist.
		When they say that you are prioritized if you speak Hebrew, if you're ethnically Jewish, if you practice Judaism, etc., and Jewish law says that you're only Jewish if your mother is Jewish, so it's ancestral and therefore genetic and therefore ethnic, well, even in spite of all that, Jewish is, of course, a religion, therefore a belief Jewish is, of course, a religion, therefore a belief system.
		It's ideas.
		So anybody can become Jewish, and so in that way Israel is a civic nationalist country, just like America.
		It is a creedal nation, except whereas America's creed is the Constitution, Israel's creed is the Talmud and the Torah.
		Oof!
		That is such a lie, and he knows that.
		Somebody asked him about the USS Liberty, which is, again, when Israel blew up our ship, and then they sent torpedo boats to finish the job, and it was reported by everybody on board the ship, and all kinds of people, the CIA director, the Secretary of State, I mean, people of the highest level said, oh yeah, that was Israel, they did that deliberately.
		This was during the 67 war, it was an intelligence ship off the coast of...
		I think Egypt or Israel and basically what Israel is doing is they were genociding Egyptians Because they had to move their forces up north to combat people in Lebanon And I think it was Lebanon people that were coming through from Lebanon, so they were ethnically cleansing all these Egyptians They were just like killing POWs so that they could expedite the transfer of their troops up north to fight other people and And this U.S.
		intelligence ship, which was right off the coast, they would have seen this whole operation.
		So Israel, in order to sort of sweep that under the rug, they blew up the intelligence ship so they would be incapable of detecting what was going on.
		And then they said, oh, we didn't know.
		Oh, we thought that was an Egyptian ship.
		But everybody will tell you that the USS Liberty looked nothing like any Egyptian ship which was in service at the time.
		The USS Liberty was flying a massive American flag.
		They were radioing to the Israeli fighter jets.
		This is an American vessel, blah blah blah.
		Even after they should have been able to see it, they sent torpedo boats to go in and finish the job.
		Everybody who survived attests to this.
		And again, you got people in the government.
		And so, somebody asked Ben Shapiro about this.
		What do you think of, like, the USS Liberty?
		And Shapiro said, oh, well, the government says that it was an accident.
		And I believe the government.
		Yeah, I believe the government on this.
		Oh, really?
		So when the government says the climate change is happening, when the government says, oh, Russia meddled in the election, and blah, blah, blah, all this other stuff, well, then we have to look at facts and logic.
		But hey, if the government absolves Israel of all wrongdoing, hey, who am I to judge, right?
		Who am I to question the government?
		It's the U.S.
		government said it, right?
		Oh, please.
		So the guy's just scum.
		The guy's absolute scum.
		Nick's PayPig says, Hey Nick, don't know if you've gone into this before or even aware of it, but what are your thoughts on the ideas of PleasureMan on MyPostingCareer.com, i.e.
		that scale is a driving force behind Clown World.
		Is this being properly addressed?
		I'm familiar with PleasureMan on My Posting Career.
		I had an account there until they started demanding tribute.
		I was on there for a long time.
		It was recommended to me by a good friend.
	And I I just sort of lurked there I didn't really want to make a post because the whole community is like if you make bad posts We're gonna shame you and kick you off the websites.
	I was like, oh I better not post But I was on there and I sort of lurked for a while.
	I kind of got off of it I think I got rid of it from my bookmarks or something So I forgot to check it and then I checked back in recently and they're like Oh, you have to pay like 20 bucks to pick up the big 20 bucks to read our post now I was like, I'm not paying 20 bucks for this So, uh, but yeah, I'm familiar with him.
	I don't know what you mean by scale.
	I read a few of his articles on, like, culture of critique and managerialism and other things like that, but I haven't read the one about scale.
	So I'm not sure.
	I can't really respond to that.
	Well, in the case of Chamberlain, the guy's Jewish.
	Please go off on the new right cucks that constantly shill for Israel.
	Posobiec, Chamberlain, Cernovich, etc.
	These idiots don't understand that you can be against both Omar and Israel's influence on our foreign policy.
	Well, in the case of Chamberlain, the guy's Jewish.
	I mean, that much is obvious why he supports Israel.
	Gee, that's so weird why a half Jewish guy would slavishly support Israel at the expense of American interests.
	He would have this dubious rationalization for why he supports Israel against all reason.
	Yeah, I wonder why.
	In the case of Cernovich and Posobiec, I mean, these guys are just shills.
	It's as simple as that.
	They know that, you know, they work with a lot of Jewish people, and if they want to have a career in politics and the media, they have to be friendly with the Zionists.
	It's as simple as that.
	Enough said.
	So it's tough to say all these people can be patriots when that's their, uh, that's their deal.
unidentified		Right?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I mean, their whole shtick is, oh, we're American, we love America, blah blah blah.
		Well, I mean, even if you believe in America as a creedal identity and you're on your knees for Israel, like, what is even worth preserving there?
		So it's very pathetic.
		Harold says, hey Nick, Joe the Boomer here.
		Insane rambly tangent that goes nowhere.
		When will you get Owen Benjamin on the Jesse B. Peterson show?
		Seriously though, big guy.
		Could you explain Ted's idea of over socialization?
		Not sure if I get it.
		So I guess the last question is unironic.
		The idea is basically that people have gotten so far away from, and I don't know if I'm doing this justice, it's been a long time since I read Industrial Society, but he said that the two pathologies which define modern leftism are feelings of inferiority and over-socialization.
		They say that feelings of inferiority stem from over-socialization.
		And they say that basically society has become so sterilized, so developed...
		I mean, we are so derivative from what our original situation was, in the sense that, you know, mankind evolved in a primitive atmosphere, you know, where we had to fight predators, and there was threats, there was animals, and other tribes, and, you know, we had, even up until very recently, when we were farmers, like 200 years ago, we were on, you know, still hadn't hit the Industrial Revolution yet.
		We had to work every day and everything.
		Because society's become sort of so, I don't know what the word would be, but everything's so developed and we're so sheltered, basically, we've become over socialized to the point where we don't really know how to be in touch with these more primordial natures.
		You know, you look at people who are raised from cradle to grave in a situation where they don't really face stress, they don't really face any kind of real threats or anything like that, and that breeds a lot of like anti-human tendencies.
		He talks about this in the context of the power process, in the sense that what it means for a person to actualize themselves is to have goals, to use effort to achieve those goals, ultimately attain those goals, and have some degree of autonomy in completing that process, which is accomplished in the wild by, you know, and have some degree of autonomy in completing that process, which is accomplished in the wild by, you know, like foraging for your own food or hunting your own And when you're in a society, I guess over-socialization comes from the idea that there's just too much of society...
		It's too specialized to the point where, you know, you're not really autonomous.
		You're not really exerting effort.
		You're just sort of, you know, this sort of useless cog in the machine.
		And this makes you, this leads to depression, this leads to anxiety, this leads to neuroticism.
		You see there's a lot of high schoolers Who are a little bit more affluent these days, who always complain about, oh, I'm anxious, I'm depressed, I'm sad, I'm whatever, all the time.
		Well, that's because their whole lives is just like completing menial tasks.
		Their whole lives is just sort of, you know, doing that kind of thing.
		I don't know if that does him total justice.
		I'm sure people in the comments, no, no, that's not actually what he meant.
		But as far as I can remember, that was the point being made there.
		King of All Trades says, or I'm sorry, I read that one already.
		Bicyclops says, did the Confederate States of America do anything wrong besides losing the war?
		Yeah, they seceded from the Union.
		You know, I am against the Confederacy.
		I'm very stridently pro-Union, pro-Yank, pro-the North.
		People have asked me, oh, were your ancestors even here during the time of the Civil War?
		No, but that doesn't really matter.
		You know, my ancestors came here and they were a part of the great spirit of the industrial North.
		You know, in the great urban cities, so...
		Yeah, I'm against the Confederacy in every way, shape, and form.
		Traitors, seceders, they have no place.
		We stand the Union, not the Confederacy.
		So I know there's a lot of Southerners who are like, oh, we love the South!
		The South will rise again!
		Yeah, not on our watch.
		We annihilated you one time, we will annihilate you again.
		I don't care if all the Yanks are controlled and they've got minorities and everything.
		It doesn't matter.
		It doesn't matter.
		Chicago, New York City, Boston, all these great cities are better than what you have going on down in the South.
		I remember I went to the South one time and I went to a restaurant.
		And I paid money for something called nachos and it was a bag of Doritos with like shredded cheddar melted onto it in the microwave.
		I paid money for that at a restaurant and they called it nachos.
		This, uh, this black woman literally opened a bag of Doritos, poured into a little tray, sprinkled shredded store-bought cheese on it, popped in the microwave.
unidentified		Boom!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Here's your side of nachos.
		Yeah.
		Oh, that's, that's fine.
		Fine Southern dining there.
		Look, I get a lot of people love the South.
		I'm not gonna disrespect your culture, okay?
		But it's just not for me.
		Okay, all these Southern people, every time I talk about that, they want to come around, smack me around, they want to put on their cowboy hats and their 10-gallon boots.
		Hey, I hear you've been talking trash about the South.
		I'm gonna run you over in my pickup truck.
		Yeah, okay, bro.
		So, we're not really about that.
		Yanks give us a lot of crap, so... I'm gonna give it right back.
		Let's see, whoops.
		I accidentally clicked off of my Streamlabs.
		So no disrespect, but no, we're not really about the Confederacy.
		We are about the Union.
		We are about the Great North.
		But let's see, the Streamlabs is taking a sec to load, so I'll take a look at our Super Chats then.
		Have you seen Ben Shapiro's tweets about Ilhan Omar?
		Jesse Lee Peterson show.
		I think it would be a great platform, and he would definitely have you on.
		Same question, but about Richard Spencer.
		Awesome.
		Thanks.
		Just keep him coming, guys.
		Hans Landa says, have you seen Ben Shapiro's tweets about Ilhan Omar?
		Someone needs to let Ben Shapiro know that we conservatives don't care about the Browning of America.
		Yeah, very obnoxious.
		It's obviously, it's what you would expect.
		A123 says, uh, niggle me this Batman.
		What accounts for as little as 13% but also for half?
		I saw that tweet and I was, I was laughing.
		I was, unironically, I was literally lmao-ing.
		I was lmao-ing.
		What an excellent tweet.
		What accounts for as little as 13% of an all-summer app?
		So true, so true.
		This is the kind of content that only the irony bros can create.
		Northwest, you know, if you want fast wave, like, red in the face, autistic screeching about, you know, whatever, then you can watch the other stuff.
		Northwest says my cousin uh something okay really and i are gen x knickers we love you like a jew love subversion hey i disavow what a nasty thing to say thanks for all the content and much love from your russian orthodox knickers hey thanks bro Much appreciated.
		Barbara Eubanks says, but I disavow about subversion.
		Jewish people are the greatest patriots.
		Barbara Eubanks says, how is it going big guy?
		I just want to say I got you a fellow based Hispanic man to join the Knickers a week ago.
		We grow stronger as we diversify.
		So true.
		Every day we grow stronger.
		Cyrus says all Muslim Congress now.
		Yeah, well that'd be certainly preferable in some ways, right?
		Timed out says I guess this is one good thing about Somalis in Minnesota.
		So true.
		So true.
		We've got one from EK.
		Ayo, hold up.
		So you'd be saying that her woman POC Muslim refugee cards got trumped by a single card from another more powerful yet oppressed group?
		Damn.
		Yeah, I can't wait for the rude awakening when all these minority groups realize, oh yeah, like, Jews kind of run the show here.
		You know, all these women and Muslims and blacks and Hispanics.
		I can't wait until they realize, oh, we've just been patronized this whole time.
		Yeah, when it comes to a conflict of interest between literally any other group and Zionists, we're going to lose hard.
		That must be a rude awakening for them.
		You know, I see a lot of, um, You know, some people in my family are a little bit more left-wing.
		I'll say that much.
	And I love this sort of realization that, oh, wait a minute.
	Wait a second.
	Maybe Nick was right about some of these things.
	I thought Nick was crazy when I came home and he was talking about, you know, who runs the media and stuff.
	But now my girl who I stan, Ilhan Omar, is getting thrown under the bus because of her criticism of Israel.
	Maybe there's something to what he was saying.
	Yeah, maybe.
	God's Plan says, did anyone catch that Benjamin's was a reference to Netanyahu?
	Was the cut speech worth it for 50% approval?
	Sounds like vindicationation.
	I don't know what you're talking about with that.
	A123 says, if you're saying Well, like the State of the Union was worth it for, and you're saying, oh, I wasn't vindicated or something.
	I disavowed the speech, so I don't know what you mean by that.
	A123 says, would you ever debate Southern Israelite on a call-in show?
	He is a Messianic Jew who interprets the Bible as explicitly revealing a flat-earth cosmology and a God that is both physical and finite.
	Uh, no.
	No, I would never do that.
	Uh, Bratman says, would you rather marry a Jewish or a Muslim woman?
	Uh, neither.
	Neither.
	I would rather be chased for the rest of my life.
	Um, and then we have some GDL retard who I'm just gonna ignore.
	Uh, Level Best says, well said, big fella.
	Thanks.
	Syrian Asada says, much love from Syria to you, big guy.
	Thanks.
	We love Syria.
	David Sperner says, Hey, what's the name of the book about the Jews?
	Belloc that talks about Jewish and Catholic differences and the importance of recognizing those differences.
	Great show.
	It's just called The Jews.
	Hey, what's the name of the book about the Jews?
	Oh, well, you know, the title is just The Jews.
	But, you know, Belloc is a Catholic.
	And actually, people would be surprised because you read that book and there's a whole chapter about why anti-Semitism is wrong.
	The whole book is about this historical conflict between Jews and Christians, but there's a whole chapter saying, well, here's what we're not.
	We're not anti-Semites.
	We're not saying, well, they're all bad or they're all evil or, you know, there is this global, you know, he's acknowledging the limits of, you know, what he's describing in the book.
	The limits of the explanatory power of this conflict, which is necessary.
	A lot of people say, oh, that's cucking or that's, you know, that's whatever.
	But I think that's just accurate.
	You know, when you're trying to talk about anything, you want to narrow the scope of what you're talking about, right?
	You want to narrow the scope in terms of what is actually going on.
	It doesn't help your case to exaggerate, to be hyperbolic, to say something so preposterous that it's almost cartoonish.
	And then delegitimizes what you're saying.
	Right?
	So Belloc lays that out pretty nicely.
	Mr. Johnson says, now you can call me Ray, or you can call me Jay, or you can call me Junior, um, but don't call me, but you doesn't have to call me Johnson.
	I don't know what that is.
	Joshua Larson says, drive safe, Nick.
	Yeah, right.
	Remember, I am a safe driver.
	I have no heart conditions.
	You know, this ticker, very strong.
	I'm eating healthy.
	Hey, I'm eating really healthy lately.
	My mom made me a Caesar salad for lunch today.
	I'm eating healthy.
	I'm doing good.
	Okay, I've been sleeping.
	I've been getting 2,000 calories a day.
	I don't partake in any high-risk activities.
	So, I'm good.
	If anything were to happen to me, it would be pretty weird.
	You'd probably have to ask a lot of questions about that.
	Well, they don't really see it that way.
	Allowing Democrat voting immigrants into the USA for decades has resulted in Omar types getting elected.
	AIPAC interests are MAGA interests?
	Close the border.
	Well, they don't really see it that way.
	They don't really see it that way.
	In some sense, they do.
	But in another sense, I mean, what they care about at the end of the day is the money.
	And the money for Israel, that is.
	And, you know, Ilhan Omar, people like that will always be the exception, in my opinion, because you have the Christian Zionists, unfortunately.
	They've got the Vatican in their pocket.
	They've got the Protestants and Evangelicals in their pocket.
	Who's going to resist them?
	Right?
	I mean, the Muslims, what are they, 1% of the population?
	Give me a break!
	So that'll never happen.
	And anyway, the liberal Jewish people, they love the open borders, so I don't think the right-wing people ever overpower them for the domestic interests of the country.
	It just won't happen, so I doubt it.
	King of all trades is slap a piece of duct tape over your webcam and stick a broken headphone jack in.
	Yeah, good tips, good tips.
	JP says, when is E. Michael Jones coming on?
	Love the show.
	That joke is still funny.
	Thanks.
	Tyler Dernan says, hey Nick, you ever listen to Jesse Lee Peterson?
	You should go on his show.
	Also, can anyone in the chat send me Jake Tapper's address?
	Disavow.
	Another hilarious joke.
	You guys are just keeping me in stitches tonight.
	Abrah says, how do I find a trad GF?
	I've been going to church, but no luck.
	I don't know, man.
	You just gotta be persistent.
	Nick, find me a GF.
	Just keep looking.
	Go to church, go, you know, other places.
	Honestly, though, you don't really want to, I don't know, you want a trad GF, I guess, but you also want a normal GF.
	I don't mean to counter-signal our trad girls, but, you know, there are some girls in here who, you know, I don't know.
	It kind of says something if you're a girl and you're hanging around these areas, right?
	Not all, but there are some to be wary of.
	So you just want somebody normal, right?
	Howie rides his Chick-fil-A sandwich greater than Big Mac.
	That's just patently untrue.
	And it's just incorrect.
	James says, have you ever tried getting Kurt Doolittle on your show?
	No.
	God's Plan, what are your thoughts on Dr. EMJ saying Europeans were converted to whites and sent to suburbs to destroy their identity after World War II?
	He destroyed Spencer.
	Yeah, I agree.
	Well, yeah, and when you get a real scholar like that on, it just goes to show how he outclasses all of them.
	You know, these goofy, anonymous shit posters are just like children, you know.
	What are the people's names like?
	Alex Jones and Joe Keem or something.
	You know, all these different people.
	It just goes to show how low IQ they are when they're up against a serious academic.
	And even with Spencer, you know, totally outclassed.
	He looks petty and sort of smarmy.
	Very superficial knowledge.
	So I think EMJ's right on the money when he says that.
	And yeah, it was pretty obvious for everyone to see.
	Syrian Asada says, I wonder what the motives behind Omar's tweets are.
	Probably just being impulsive.
	Garrett Dalton says, Justin Bieber waited till marriage to have sex.
	Justin Bieber is based in Redpill.
	I don't, did he do that?
	I don't think that's true.
	Thomas Howard says, hey Nick, hola hermano, I'm super pissed about your ethno bro Ted Cruz's latest semidophilia.
	Why don't you get him on the show and straighten him out?
	Yeah, I will do that.
unidentified		Bratman... Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Bratman says, isn't it kind of funny how Jews can become citizens of all Western countries?
unidentified		Oh, man!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Whoo, man!
		We got a lot of comedians on the show tonight, man!
		We got a lot of comedians on the show.
		I gotta start taking interviews for, you know, comedians to be on my network.
		That man says, isn't it kind of funny how Jews can become citizens of all Western countries, but we're not allowed to become citizens of Israel?
		Funny how that works.
		Yeah, it's almost like, I don't know, It seems to me like they're at home everywhere, but also nowhere.
		You know, isn't that kind of true about them?
		They're sort of international, like truly international.
		Some people can be said to be international, but I mean they truly are the only international people.
		You know, they say that they conduct their business everywhere.
		Some people say that, I guess.
		You know, in Israel, and Paris, and London, and Brussels, and New York, Los Angeles.
		So I don't know.
		It's kind of interesting.
		There's like this rootless quality.
		I don't know.
		But I think they're fundamentally good people.
		I really respect them.
		I respect their work ethic, their high IQ.
		And truly, they are God's chosen people.
		So who are we to criticize double standards?
		Connor Scully says, my not-so-based-and-red-pilled sister says, you look like a vampire.
		I told her she's dumb, so you don't have to.
		Take it easy, big guy.
		If by vampire you mean handsome and psychotic looking, hey I'll take it.
		I'm just pale I guess because I didn't sleep last night.
		So maybe that's why?
		Let me see, let me pull up, yeah I guess I do kind of look a little vampiric.
		Well, I'm pale!
		I didn't sleep, alright?
		I'm not feeling well.
		I haven't been eating.
		I haven't been sleeping.
		I haven't been doing so hot, alright?
		Nibba's always asking me, what's going on, big guy?
		And then never asking me, how's it going, big guy?
		Maybe that's... maybe that's the right question, right?
		But that's okay.
		That's okay, I'll take it.
		Well, I'll take these slings and arrows.
		Bratman says, you're the only ethod I give money to.
		Slay, Queen.
		Oh, thank you.
		Jessica M. says, what would you say are the tenets of U.S.
		civic nationalism?
		Maybe it's time for the founding sons to draft a document to shape this nation's path forward.
		The tenets of civic nationalism?
		Well, it's just the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.
		It's the American Creed.
		You can read a lot about this in Who Are We by Sam Huntington.
		He goes into pretty great detail about what the civic nationalist conception is, what the creedal identity is, but generally the agreed upon principles are pluralism of both the political and religious variety, equality, some degree of liberty, you know, equality before the law, obviously, this sort of Anglo-Saxon tradition of law, that kind of thing.
		So, independence, self-reliance, individualism, free enterprise, this is generally the accepted agreement of the American Creed.
		Some of the other things have been a little bit more fungible, like the Second Amendment and the First Amendment, but those are, I guess, generally the agreed-upon principles.
		But it's not enough, because, of course, the people coming here don't believe in any of that.
		Okay, I'm not going to read that one.
		I don't know, that's a good question.
		I'm sure it's welfare.
		No, I never have.
		She says, why do 13% of the knickers make up 52% of people who neg?
		I don't know.
		That's a good question.
		I'm sure it's welfare.
		Rob Tillian Horace says, here, have some shekels.
	You ever listen to John B.
	Wells?
	Love your channel.
	Keep up the good work.
	No, I never have.
	Weeb says, you're scared to debate Southern Israelite.
	Yeah, I'm just terrified.
	LoIQ says, get big today, Asian GF, and breed.
	No, dude.
	None of that, bro.
	So, Let's see, we've got a few more Streamlabs here.
	Jose Antonio says, wigger me this like goy.
	Who is the most powerful foreign lobby?
	Who gets millions a year?
	Who gets to sacrifice US lives?
	Who runs the news media?
	Who runs our government?
	Who's wall Americans rather support?
	Very true.
	Really Good Comics says, question if there was a guy who froze a homeless man and kicked him, shattering him in pieces, but he also helped a couple get their car out of a ditch.
	Is he a villain or a hero?
	I would say hero based one says white Christians Have the Steve Urkel complex with Israel no matter how much Steve professed his love for Laura Winslow Time and time again.
	She showed him contempt.
	It makes no sense.
	Is anyone feeling the benefits of our support?
	I don't think so so relatable so true what a what a profound family matters reference and And who would be Carl Winslow then?
	Carl Winslow would be maybe Iran?
	Because they hate America, but they're like, you know, maybe one day they'll come around, right?
	Yeah, that's very true.
	Based once is white, or I just read that one.
	Jacob Kay says, do rights come from God?
unidentified		Oh my God!
unidentified		Was this sent?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Okay, so this was sent still during the show.
		Jacob Cage.
		Rights come from God.
		I love how, what are we, an hour and a half into the show and Nimbus be asking if rights come from God.
		And also, how can we combine the ideas of race realism with biblical scripture, most notably Genesis?
		Yeah, rights come from God.
		You know, this is Thomism and natural rights doctrine comes from the medieval scholastics.
		Also, how can we combine the ideas of race realism with biblical scripture, most notably Genesis?
		Well, they don't actually conflict because God created the nations in Genesis.
		So, what do you mean combining them?
		I mean, it's in there.
		He separated all the nations.
		When they try to unify and become one group and create a tower to pierce the heavens, what did he do?
		He destroyed the tower.
		He scattered the people.
		And then they were all different, and then they were all speaking different languages.
		Maybe this is the 10,000-year explosion.
		Who knows?
		But I think it's pretty clear in the Bible that there is difference.
		Even in the Cain and Abel story, this could be interpreted on a tribal level.
		You know, you've even got these tribal differences from the beginning.
		You know, what was the first act in the book of Leviticus?
		You know, God ordered one tribe to kill everybody else, so...
		You know, there's a very strong theme throughout the Bible of nationalism, of ethnic groups, of tribes.
		I mean, that's, the whole book of Genesis is about tribes, you know, going out, a nation going out and being fruitful and multiplying and all the rest.
		So, I don't think that you need to combine that.
		I think it's in there.
		Shekelsburg says, you should look up Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro to see a Jewish person that is actually based on Israel.
		Oh, I'm sure.
		Eddie Cates as I seen where David Duke backed Ilhan Omar.
		Great optics.
		Nick, what the hell is wrong with these alt-right retards?
		Don't get me wrong, they provide a lot of entertainment, but the Wignats and these dysfunctional dumbasses have loose screws.
		Am I wrong?
		No, they do have loose screws and they are dysfunctional, but it's actually good when David Duke supports Democrats.
		He's doing us a big favor by supporting Tulsi Gabbard and Ilhan Omar.
		He's doing us a great job.
		Because even though the Democrat, like, they're the real racist line, even though it's obviously not true, it's rhetorically helpful.
		And, uh, you know, you just want to use as many arguments as possible against the left.
		And so if, hey, if enough people believe that Democrats are racist and don't vote for them, or they think, you know, Nazis are actually leftists, hey, uh, if that wins us votes, then great, then that's a good thing.
		So, I'm actually glad.
		Patrick Little running as a Democrat?
		What a blessing.
		Fred says, it was great seeing you at the KKK rally last week, Nick.
		Yeah, thanks.
		Thank you, Fred the Fed.
		Linguini says, Nick, what can we do to get the right to adopt environmentalism?
		How have they not already?
		Because they're owned by the energy lobby, obviously.
		But we'll just have to do it in a more grassroots way, I guess.
		JL Fish says, are you a pale-o conservative XD?
		I guess you could call me that.
		I guess you could call me a pale-o conservative.
		I don't get paid enough to do this, man.
		I don't... One of these days... One of these days... Stop joking!
		I'm joking!
		I'm joking!
		I do not have suicidal thoughts.
		I am in a great mental condition.
		After criticizing Israel for an hour and a half straight, I am in perfect mental health.
		I have high self-esteem and self-worth, and I have a lot to look forward to in life.
		Code Geist has thoughts on the Potato Farmer JF.
		I don't know what you mean by that, but I still like Jeff.
		I think he's a little bit out there these days, but I you know...
	I'm not gonna go on the attack.
	He hasn't really said anything nasty about me.
	Interdimensional Harmony says, got a haircut.
	I don't know how you normies handle the lack of nice, uh, pili?
	What is that?
	Gently stroking the side of your head as you head nod to classically trained 808s?
	I don't know what any of that means.
	Lord Akira says, speaking of Tulsi Gabbard, what is the Wrights' fascination with her?
	I know a good bit of my friends want to burn their MAGA hats and throw their support behind her in a fit of, uh, tarred rage.
	Well, that's exactly what it is.
	It's just coping.
	It's, uh, I'll show you, Donald Trump!
	I'll show you, Dad!
	I'm gonna go live with Mom!
	That's what it is, basically.
	Donald Trump, you betrayed me!
unidentified		Well, I'll just support Tulsi2020!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And it's very pathetic.
		It's very weak.
		Very sad.
		And imprudent, you know?
		Obviously, Donald Trump, is he everything we hoped he'd be and more?
		It's never the case in politics.
		the case no matter who you look at that's not that's not a four-dimensional chess excuse it's a reality every politician has to deal with practical political consideration so it never lives up to the promise um certainly he's fallen short of some of the promises he's made but does that mean that he's he's evil he's bad he's the way some people say well because he hasn't completed everything he set out to do well i hate him
		now i'm going to block him and it's just pathetic very emotional very feminine energy you know tulsi gabbard she supported amnesty So these people, on the one hand, they're like, what?
		Donald Trump didn't build the wall?
		I heard that Donald Trump might support amnesty in the future?
		I'm burning my mug hat and supporting somebody that explicitly has supported amnesty for years.
		Oh yeah, that makes a lot of sense.
		Donald Amnesty done!
		Guess what?
		Tulsi Gabbard 2020!
		Yeah, well, you know, Donald Trump actually ended DACA, ended DAPA, the other program.
		He's deported illegal immigrants.
		He's changed the rules on catch-and-release and other things.
		Yeah, but, you know, support the pro-amnesty candidate.
		That makes a lot of sense.
		EWG says, would you ever support secession?
		Seems mature, to be honest.
		Secession is mature?
		No.
		Maybe eventually.
		Maybe in like 50 years or something.
		But in the context of the Civil War, I'm against it.
		Interdimensional Harmony says it means I am embracing good optics.
		Yeah, I hope so.
		But it looks like that's everything, finally.
		People sending in Super Chats at 840 because they have just simply no consideration.
		But that's alright.
		That's our show.
		Remember to check us out at nicholasjfuences.com slash membership to get your America First Premium Membership.
		If you like the show, if you love what I do, if you support what I do... Look, I don't have Israeli money, okay?
		I don't get Jewish money.
		To do the show.
		So you have to support me.
		If you want to see more America First, there's not a billionaire or a Sheldon Adelson who's going to give me money to do it.
		You have to.
		You have to do it.
		So if you like the show, if you want to see more, you want to support the show.
		And it's your obligation, basically.
		You got to go to NicholasJFluentes.com slash membership and sign up for America First Premium.
		The premium program is only $5 a month to subscribe and you get one additional show every week.
		We do another show on Sunday exclusively for our premium members.
		We did one last night about a few different things.
		Last night's show was about marijuana, which we talked about a length.
		We talked about the negotiations over the border wall.
		We talked about the Grammys.
		Very fine show.
		Already people are saying they loved it.
		So be sure to check that out.
		And you get the whole backlog too.
		So if you sign up, you get all of the content that's been created so far.
		Like 14, 15 hours of content.
		So, check that out.
		Our mug is also still available.
		NicholasJFuentes.com.
		Be sure to subscribe to the channel.
		Give me a big thumbs up.
		Leave a comment below.
		Click the notification bell to get notified every time I go live.
		Remember, we are on the air every Monday through Friday, 7 p.m.
	Central, 8 p.m.
	Eastern Standard Time.
	I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.
	This is America first, not Israel first.
	I'm...did I say I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes as always?
	I don't know man, I didn't sleep, so it's all just sort of a blur at this point.
	But thanks so much to our Streamlabbers, Superchatters, Premium Members, we love you folks, and we will see you tomorrow!
	Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo!
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America.
		America first!

▲