Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 5, 2019 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:20:48

"We Have to Protect Israel" | America First Ep. 324

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:11:00

Appearances

Clips

donald j trump

00:22

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		music
		music
		music music
		music music music music music music music music music music music
		I love you.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		wall.
unidentified		We'll be right back.
		We'll be right back.
		We'll be right back.
		We'll be right back.
		We'll be right back.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo. - It's going to be only America first.
unidentified		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
		America First!
		Good evening, everybody. everybody.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be back with you this week.
		We have a big week ahead of us.
		Lots of important things to cover.
		A big show tonight.
		Lots to discuss tonight.
		And then, of course, tomorrow we have the State of the Union Address.
		Very big.
		We'll be doing a big show about that tomorrow.
		Live coverage.
		Live analysis as soon as it's over.
		And it was a big weekend this weekend also.
		I guess there was a football game or something going on.
		Super Bowl was yesterday.
		Better known as the Bubble Bowl, I guess.
		Almost known as the Bubble Bowl.
		Hang on one sec.
		I think I'm a little bit...
		Okay, I'm a little bit low there.
		Alright, um, but yeah, so we had the Super Bowl yesterday, big football game.
		Yeah, I watched it.
		I watched the football game, okay?
		It was the big one, the big one in the year, and I watched it, and it was kind of boring, not gonna lie.
		I don't know if all football games are like that.
		I guess other football fans were not happy about the football game, so I wasn't alone in that.
		It wasn't just me, in other words.
		Because, you know, I watch every football game, and
		You know they do the play and then they're just walking around and then it's just everybody's walking around and they get the reaction shot you got some guy in the sideline with the headset like you know looking around and you know then you got some guy just running up and down the fields boring and then they cut to commercials for five minutes so I don't know people are like man that was such a boring game yesterday that was the lowest scoring uh Super Bowl in NFL history what a boring game and I'm thinking
		Oh, what, like all the other ones are really exciting?
unidentified		Oh, this time they really threw the ball down the field.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		The score went up like crazy on that one.
		It's all the same to me.
		But anyway, so that was over the weekend.
		We've got some big things to talk about tonight.
		We'll be talking about the Super Bowl.
		That's what it represents.
		Always about the representations on the show.
		It's never enough to look at things in themselves.
		We have to look at the big victors, the Patriots!
		Hey, the New England Patriots!
		See, I know.
		13-3 was the final score.
		I know that.
		Quarterback, Tom Brady.
		See?
		And he's a great guy.
		He's a MAGA supporter.
		The coach of the team is a MAGA supporter.
		We'll go into a little bit of the history of that.
		Why that's a big deal, why that.
		Makes left-wing people upset aside from the surface-level politics of the game.
		We'll be talking about the Halftime Show from a Zoomer perspective.
		We'll be looking at some of the commercials, particularly the Washington Post commercial, the president's pre-Super Bowl interview.
		Then we'll be talking about the State of the Union Address, what we can expect, what will be good things that we can see, what will be not so good things that we'll see, some of the rumors about what will be presented tomorrow, also what I'll be doing in terms of coverage of the event, and then lastly we will talk about Governor Northrum, based in Redpill, Governor Northrum, the baby killer himself, but he's actually, but he's actually Redpill.
		So I'll be talking about him who refuses to step down.
		Look, he's evil, alright?
		Anybody who talks about killing babies is not a good person, so I don't want anybody to get confused about our unironic position.
		However, he's been there for 72 hours, he refuses to step down, everybody's given him the business.
		I kind of admire it.
		I kind of respect that he's sticking to his guns.
		I also like that he admitted, if you guys have been following this, this is the Virginia governor.
		It was exposed after his comments about infanticide, which we covered last week.
		It was revealed after that, that he was in a racist yearbook photograph in 1984, where I guess there are two people, one wearing blackface makeup, the other wearing a Ku Klux Klan robe.
		What I find so charming is that he admitted he was in the picture, and then within, and he apologized for it, and then within 24 hours he said, actually, no, that's not me.
		And then he said, how did that even make it better?
		I love when people just do the diametric flip.
		They just complete 180, yeah, I just wasn't in it.
		But then even better than that, which I so love, is they ask him at the press conference, can you still do the moonwalk?
		He was about to do it.
		So we'll get into all of that.
		Maybe you're not really following it as closely, but we'll get into all of that.
		We'll have a lot of laughs, a lot of good coverage, and it should be a great show.
		Should be a jam-packed show.
		Before we get into everything, I gotta say for my premium people, this week's episode is on the way.
		Part of the reason why it's a little bit A little bit late.
		My fault.
		I was planning on recording the show last night and then I realized on Sunday morning, you know, my parents are waking me up.
		Hey, we're about to go to the Super Bowl party.
		I'm like, oh, that's today?
		I know it's no excuse, but that's that's why we're a little bit behind.
		So that'll be up...
		By the end of the evening, tonight.
		So, that's on the way.
		I know a few people were asking, wondering where it's coming.
		That's my bad.
		That's my fault.
		I take responsibility, but that's why it's late.
		So, it'll be published tonight.
		But, with that out of the way, we will launch right into the show.
		Lots to discuss.
		So, we have to get to it.
		We have to get down to business.
		So, we'll start off talking about the Super Bowl.
		The big game over the weekend.
	Of course, it was the L.A.
	Rams versus the New England Patriots.
	Why were they in Atlanta though?
	I guess the actual event was being held in Atlanta.
	But why?
	I don't know how it works.
	I know all the football people are gonna be in the comments and live stream.
	Actually, it's because... Like, why don't they have it in Boston?
	Why don't they have it in L.A.?
	Wouldn't that make sense?
	Maybe they don't have a... I don't... I don't know how it works.
	All right.
	But I guess they had it in Atlanta.
	The Patriots won, obviously, as I alluded to earlier in the show.
	Very boring game.
	I guess nobody scored a touchdown until, like, the third quarter or something like that.
	It ended up being 13-3.
	The Patriots won.
	This is... I don't know.
	They won a lot of them.
	I don't know the whole record.
	Look, I'm not a sports person.
	You're not gonna get the football analysis from me, but I guess they won a lot of them.
	Tom Brady, I guess, has won six Super Bowls.
	This was his Seventh or this is the sixth?
	I don't really know, but it's a big deal.
	And it's a big deal because as was the case in 2016, I believe it was the Patriots versus the team from Atlanta.
	Was that the Falcons?
	I don't know.
	But if you remember in 2016, it was sort of a similar political subtext to the events as there always tends to be, you know, particularly in America.
	It's sort of interesting how No matter what sports event you're looking at, whether it's baseball, boxing, football, there always seems to be a political context to it.
	I don't know if that's been the case for as long as we've been doing sports as a civilization, you know, because we've obviously had...
	The Olympics forever and all kinds of other sporting competitions.
	I don't know if that's always been the case, but certainly at least in American history, in particular in America, there's always a racial undertone there.
	If you look at Muhammad Ali versus Joe Frazier, if you look at some of the racial things going on in baseball and I guess in football even.
	I don't know if this has always been the case or in recent history and contemporary history, but in 2016 we knew that everybody was looking at the big game as a political event after you had the election of Donald Trump, you had the Brexit, some other things going on, special elections in particular.
	Then you had what appeared to be, I guess, the blackest team.
	you know, the Falcons, or the team from the Blackest City, which was Atlanta.
	And I'm not saying that, this is not me saying this, understand, I'm not coming on the show to say, that's the team of the blacks, you know, I'm not saying that, that was what all the mainstream media was saying, that was what all the left-wing media was saying, that isn't it so fitting, a showdown between Atlanta, which is this diverse city, which can be seen a showdown between Atlanta, which is this diverse city, which can be seen as representative of the future of the country, demographically, politically, socially, up against the New
	Of course, you have Tom Brady, who is a white, conservative, Christian character.
	He's a friend of Donald Trump, a MAGA supporter.
	The coach is the same way.
	They're from New England, which doesn't have a whole lot of racial diversity.
	So, in 2016, it was sort of the same Atmosphere was the Patriots the white team of conservatism of Donald Trump versus Atlanta And then I think you saw the same thing basically on display with this one not so much with the Rams I don't know if they were as representative, but whenever you have the Patriots in the game You see the same thing and I the only reason I know this is because I pay attended I pay attention to the politics not to the Football.
	But every time they have the Patriots in the big game, in the big playoffs, you see the writers at BuzzFeed, the writers at Vice, and all the other left-wing outlets saying, isn't this so terrible that we have a team that represents whiteness, that represents conservatism?
	I guess you had Harry Potter, or the actor who played Harry Potter, saying that he's rooting for the Rams because Tom Brady has a MAGA hat in his locker or something.
	And I think this goes back to something we were saying on Friday.
	I'm not going to spend too much time on this because I don't like to say, oh, sports is political or whatever.
	You know, sometimes a game is just a game.
	I understand that.
	And I'm not trying to read too much into it.
	However, this does tie in, I think, very nicely with what I was saying on Friday.
	A caller came in the show on Friday and asked why the left is the way that they are.
	I forget the exact wording of the question, but it was something to the effect that why is the left so against white people?
	Why are they against Western civilization?
	And the answer that I gave is actually that Ted Kaczynski was basically correct about this.
	If you read his essay, Industrial Society and Its Future, which was published in the 1990s, he said that modern leftism originates basically from two things, over-socialization, but more predominantly feelings of inferiority.
	In other words, left-wing people hate themselves.
	They have self-loathing because of early childhood development issues, because of the sort of nature of our culture.
	They have these feelings of shame.
	They have feelings of, again, self-loathing.
	And so they tend to relate to lesser peoples, unsuccessful peoples.
	And that's also sort of the bigotry of low expectations.
	I know that's sort of a boomer cliche, but they do regard non-whites, other civilizations, as inferior.
	They'll never tell you that, but that's why they relate to them so strongly.
	They feel weak, sad, miserable on the inside.
	They relate to people who they project that onto who are weak, unsuccessful, sad, unfortunate people.
	And so when you see so many people rooting against Tom Brady, the New England Patriots, a team of winners, a team of great champions who are very good at football.
	You know, I'm not totally familiar with the You know, all the technical aspects of it, but obviously, you know, they win the games, they win the championships, they must be doing something right.
	The quarterback is a handsome, successful person with a great life.
	They come from a place which is nice, which is historical Americana.
	And so you begin to understand I think the deep-seated things going on inside of our opposition when they are so stridently against and they project a political narrative onto something as innocuous as a football game.
	Why they're so bent out of shape about the New England Patriots playing in the game again or winning.
	You know, I don't relate to the underdogs.
	I have to tell you, as much as I am sort of apathetic about football, I'm rooting for the Patriots because I like winners!
	I relate to people who win.
	I relate to people... I want them to win more.
	You know, people who have money, people who are successful.
	We should be relating to that.
	We should be emulating that.
	We should look up to that.
	Not sympathize with the weak, the downtrodden, the sad, all that other stuff.
	So, that's the way that I saw it.
	I think that's why a lot of other people saw it the same way.
	But some other things going on with the game.
	I guess you had this halftime show, which I watched.
	Big disappointment.
	The only reason I was really watching, because I was on my phone, you know, most of the time.
	I don't really care.
	But really the big reason I was sort of watching, sort of engaged, was because the rumor was...
	That they were going to play the song Sweet Victory at the halftime show.
	Which, this is Zoomer culture.
	You know, non-Zoomers maybe mute the show, turn off the show or something.
	But as you may know, there was an iconic episode of SpongeBob.
	When SpongeBob and the gang, they go to the Bubble Bowl, they play the Sweet Victory song.
	It's a classic for the Zoomers, and I guess there was some petition going around that garnered over a million signatures in support of Maroon 5, who was the main, you know, the headlining act there, that they would play that song.
	It was a tease!
	They played, like, a five-second clip from the show, and then they played Sicko Mode.
	Very disappointing.
	You know, that was the one thing I was looking forward to.
	That and the PewDiePie advertisement.
	Neither of them happened.
	They had Maroon 5, which was, I mean, it was okay.
	They had Travis Scott singing Sicko Mode, also okay.
	They had Big Boi, who was singing The Way You Move, an old Outkast song.
	For me, it was a very nostalgic experience.
	I thought it was very epic.
	You know, aside from the whole Spongebob thing, you had so many good elements there.
	You had all the old Maroon 5 songs from their album Songs About Jane, which was my childhood, which I grew up with as a
	late rather as an early zoomer you know when i was growing up and i'm talking very early you know five or six years old i was listening to that to that album so all those songs were a bit of a throwback they had the spongebob show again from the childhood they had the old outcast song and then sicko mode a little bit of new in there so i thought it was very good as a zoomer as a early zoomer it was very nostalgic really hit home for me
	And then the last two things we'll talk about before I move on because, you know, honestly, I don't really... I feel weird talking about the Super Bowl because that's not really what the show's about.
	It's not about sports.
	But, you know, I guess there are things going on which are, you know, sort of relevant.
	The next thing we're going to talk about is this commercial, this Washington Post commercial, which I didn't actually watch it when it was on.
	I mean, I don't really care for... I know a lot of people are like, oh, I watch the Super Bowl for the commercials.
	The commercials are so funny.
	The commercials are so funny and so cool.
	I was never on board with that.
	I think that's all kind of stupid.
	You know, big corporations paying all this money to like, I don't know.
	That one was real.
	Oh, I really like that one.
	That one really made me think.
	That one was really funny.
	I think that's a very stupid like womanish Sort of a phenomenon, but anyway.
	So I didn't catch this ad when it was on, but everybody's talking about it on Twitter.
	The Washington Post bought out $10 million for a one-minute advertisement, and the advertisement depicts it's Tom Hanks voicing over all these events in American history.
	The Civil Rights March, the moon landing, various wars, the Iraq War, World War II, all these events.
	And the gist of the ad, I'm not going to play it for you, I'm not going to read out the whole thing, but the gist of it is journalists are out there on the front lines, they're covering all of history, they're gathering the facts, they're helping you make informed decisions, and that keeps us free.
	Democracy dies in darkness.
	This is from the Washington Post, of course, owned by Jeff Bezos, and I think that just goes to show there's not really anything revolutionary to say about it.
	I know a lot of people are very upset.
	The number one thing people are upset about is the fact that they're just laying off journalists left and right.
	What did they just cut?
	Like 2,000 journalist jobs in January alone or something like that?
	Or BuzzFeed, they cut a bunch of people.
	Vice, they cut a bunch of people.
	Huffington Post, they cut a bunch of people.
	All these big conglomerates are making massive layoffs.
	And then, in spite of that, you got people dying, you got people getting laid off, which is epic, by the way.
	Then you got Jeff Bezos spending $10 million on this sort of self-righteous political ad in the Super Bowl.
	Kind of speaks to how tone-deaf these people are, how tone-deaf the people who run it are, the people that are involved in it are.
	Even had people that work for the Washington Post going on Twitter and saying, hey, can we like...
	Get our pensions unfrozen maybe instead of buying a 10 million dollar advertisement?
	But again, it just goes to show how arrogant and out of touch the press is in general.
	This idea that they're really out there, they're really making a difference protecting democracy.
	I like how they think of it as their fighting power.
	You know, they're really changing the game.
	They're really helping you make an informed decision about who you're electing for government.
	This is coming from the richest man on the planet.
	Do people understand that?
	They watch an advertisement that's Oh, it's so powerful.
	It really speaks to freedom and democracy and the little guy.
	This advertisement was bought and paid for by a man who has a hundred and fifty billion dollars.
	A hundred and fifty billion dollars.
	He is richer than probably the vast majority of nations.
	Buying an advertisement telling you we really have to support the free and independent press.
	Oh really?
	Free and independent?
	How could you live in a free and independent country when you have somebody who has $150 billion and you have $100,000?
	How much equity does the average person have?
	I think the average person has negative money.
	The average person has more debt than assets.
	So how do you live in a free country when you have less than nothing and one person has $150 billion?
	They have more than the GDP of most of the American states.
	Every state put together.
	Or every economic asset in a given state put together.
	How is that a free and fair country?
	Democracy dying in darkness?
	I think democracy dies when you have people that are so rich They could buy the entire government and have money left over.
	I think that's when democracy dies.
	Not when you don't have a complete and total monopoly on information.
	But, I don't know.
	That's not really new.
	That's not really anything we haven't seen or heard before.
	Journalists are arrogant.
	They think they're really making a difference.
	What else is new?
	And the last thing with the Super Bowl was this interview that the President did.
	And it wasn't really a groundbreaking interview.
	There wasn't really anything new that was said.
	And honestly, I watched the interview.
	This is, I guess, a yearly tradition that the President sits down with the news outlet, whichever channel is hosting the Super Bowl.
	The President sits down with one of their interviewers before the Super Bowl to give an interview.
	Obama did this, I believe.
	George W. Bush did this.
	Trump has done this, I believe, in the last couple of years.
	And so, he sat down with some woman from CBS, who is terrible!
	For an 80-minute interview, I think it was, and the interview was just so rude.
	And it's interesting to contrast with the Barack Obama interviews, because I remember watching those.
	Even when it was Fox News, Bill O'Reilly used to interview Barack Obama for the pre-Super Bowl interviews, and he was tough.
	He would ask questions, but it was always very respectful, it was always pretty congenial.
	The president was allowed to respond to the questions, think about it, digest it, respond adequately.
	This woman's so rude, wholly uninterested in anything the president had to say, but just trying to obviously elicit some kind of reaction, trying to do some sort of a gotcha.
	So that was the first thing that struck me.
	The other thing about this interview, if you watched it, is that...
	The president's getting a little bit tired.
	You can see it.
	You know, I've talked to a lot of people that are close to the president, that are, you know, surrounding the White House, and they say that one of the biggest things which is underrated, which isn't talked about so much, is the component of exhaustion.
	The idea that you can never really rule out that maybe Trump isn't doing something, or he's not totally there, because he's tired.
	Because being the president, especially being this president, is a taxing job.
	It is taxing on A person physically, mentally, emotionally.
	And so I look at this interview, I've looked at, you know, recent interviews and I think, I don't know how he's gonna make it for another six years if he's gonna win re-election because, you know, you can see some weeks he's very good, some weeks he's very high energy and he brings it, but you can see that the job is definitely beginning to take a toll.
	That exhaustion is setting in.
	And this happens with everybody.
	You could see this happen to Barack Obama, When he came in in 2008, obviously very young, very energetic.
	By the end, he was a mess, in my opinion.
	I don't, well I guess we know why people weren't talking about this in the media, but I guess for normal people, we could see that he began to hit the wall pretty early on.
	So, I'm starting to notice a little bit of physical exhaustion.
	Beyond that, Pretty uneventful interview.
	I will say there was one quote, one little exchange, which I thought was pretty interesting.
	They started to talk about Syria.
	And this is something which is interesting how the press has suddenly turned against non-intervention.
	You know, for years, the press, which is totally liberal, was against George W. Bush, was against the endless wars, the war on terror.
	I mean, if you lived through the 2000s, you remember this.
	People like Michael Moore, Bill Maher, Family Guy.
	All the parody, all the hate that was directed towards the White House, directed towards people like Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld because of endless, reckless wars, mission fatigue in the Middle East, and all the rest.
	And it's fascinating to see how that's totally turned on a dime.
	Now you've got this female interviewer from CBS grilling the President on why he's pulling out!
	Saying, well, aren't you worried about this?
	How can you trust the Taliban?
	Aren't you worried about this precipitous withdrawal from the region and everything else?
	So I was interested by that.
	And then you saw the president, you remember a month ago, or I guess a little bit over a month ago now, The president said, we're pulling out of Syria completely in a month.
	And then it was four months and the rest is history, obviously.
	Now it's just, there's no timetable for that.
	He said, and he's sort of walking this tightrope here, where on the one hand, you can see that he wants to get us out of there.
	His answers are, look, we've been in there for 20 years.
	We should have never been in there.
	I really love, there was one exchange where she said, you don't trust your intelligence people on Iran.
	They say Iran isn't developing a nuclear weapon.
	You don't trust them.
	And Trump responded, well, our intelligence people also said there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and that was obviously totally wrong.
	So that was very good.
	That was very epic.
	So on the one hand, he's got all this rhetoric, which is so good, saying, look, I'm not in favor of endless war.
	We're not the policemen of the world.
	we're never going to fix this.
	We basically lost it in Syria and Afghanistan.
	She said, you know, well, you criticized Obama for pulling out of Iraq.
	He said, well, that's a good point, but Iraq was won.
	Syria, we never even came close to winning.
	Afghanistan, we're losing, so we're getting out of there.
	So it's interesting that on the one hand, all the rhetoric shows that I think Donald Trump is deeply offended and disturbed by what's happening with foreign wars.
	He said, I visit the people in the hospital who have their legs blown off, their arms blown off, whatever, and basically it's got to stop.
	But then there's always this equivocating throughout the interview of, well we're going to get out, but we've got to protect some things, we've got to protect some people, and We're gonna do it eventually.
	In particular, I found this quote very interesting.
	If you don't, you know, if you think I'm crazy, if you haven't, if you don't believe me by now that what I'm saying is legit and I'm not just some crank or some hater.
	Very interesting quote from the horse's mouth, from the man himself.
	She asked him basically, so what are you doing in Syria?
	What's going on with this withdrawal?
	And he responded, quote, we're going to be there and we're going to be staying.
	We have to protect Israel!
	We're going to be there.
	We are going to be staying.
	We have to protect Israel.
	We have to protect other things we have, but we're, yeah, they'll be coming back in a matter of time.
	So, she's asking about these 2,000 troops remaining in Syria, and after this whole long rant about endless wars, it never ends, our Americans are dying over there, it's not working, there's no weapons of mass destruction, we should have never been in the Middle East, blah blah blah.
	And then how do we equivocate?
	What are the practical considerations there?
	Is it, well, we have to do this for Americans.
	We have to... Even oil!
	If it was oil, I would be so much more generous.
	I would understand that.
	We have to protect oil.
	Look, America runs on oil.
	The world economy runs on oil.
	If we were in the Middle East for the naked self-interest of protecting oil, protecting our economic interest, okay, I can understand that.
	But why are we staying there?
	Well, we're going to be there.
	We're going to be staying because we have to protect Israel.
	Oh, so basically what I've been saying for two years.
	And I've been told by everybody in the mainstream conservative establishment, I've been told by people on the alt-right.
	I've been told by so-called truth-tellers, really fringe, out-there, politically incorrect people on the alt-right.
	People like Mike Cernovich and others.
	You shouldn't worry too much about Israel.
	Israel's our closest ally.
	That's really interesting.
	I was told by everybody, every stripe, from the Daily Wire crowd, to the Fox News crowd, to the CRTV crowd, to even the Alt-Lite.
	There's nothing going on with that.
	You're taking that too far.
	You'll never get anywhere with that mentality.
	But why are we in Syria?
	Oh, we're there to protect Israel.
	Basically what I've been saying all along.
	And you can go back.
	Just about every show we've done about Syria.
	What have we said for years?
	And this isn't just me, by the way.
	People have been saying this for 50 years.
	People have been saying this for a long time.
	People have been saying this since the 1940s.
	And we were giving so much support to the Zionists when we recognized the State of Israel under Harry Truman, under pressure from the Zionist lobby.
	People were talking about this for almost 100 years.
	Why are we in Syria?
	Every show I said, well, we're in there because of a little ditty called the Clean Break Memo in 1996, which lays out pretty clearly why we've been in the Middle East for 20 years.
	Because we have to protect Israel's northern border, because they send all kinds of supplies and troops and other things through Syria to get to Lebanon, and from Lebanon they use that as a forward base to launch attacks against Israel.
	Well, I understand that.
	By all means, Israel's got a big problem on their hands with Lebanon and Syria.
	What does that have to do with me?
	What does that have to do with anybody who goes over to Syria and dies?
	Anybody who goes over to Syria and gets injured?
	What does that have to do with the American taxpayers footing the bill for this operation?
	What does that have to do with America?
	We have to protect Israel.
	Why?
	We can't protect our own country.
	They just announced, actually, in fact, which I find the timing to be so perfect, Bibi Netanyahu announced this weekend that Israel is actually now building a new border wall along the Gaza Strip.
	That's interesting.
	So, let me get this straight.
	Israel can protect Israel with border walls, with missiles, with illegal chemical agents.
	They can protect themselves any way, shape, or form.
	In fact, it's in their official foreign policy doctrine that if they believe they are under a serious existential threat, they can nuke the whole world.
	It's called the Samson Option.
	Look it up.
	Very disturbing stuff.
	They say that if Israel is about to fall, their last deterrent is they say that, okay, we'll just use our nuclear arsenal to just destroy the whole world.
	That way nobody will ever even attempt to get that far.
	So that's, you know, Israel can protect Israel.
	They're fine and well, and we give them money to do that.
	We can protect Israel.
	So Israel can protect Israel.
	We can protect Israel.
	We can give them money for their border wall.
	We can give them money for their missiles, their defense, their nuclear program.
	We can send our troops to protect Israel.
	But we can't protect America.
	America can't protect America.
	Nobody else wants to protect America.
	It's a one-way street how that works.
	Israel, carte blanche.
	You can do whatever you want.
	And we're gonna help you protect yourselves.
	If you can't pay for the fence, or even if you can, hey, we'll help you out.
	But we can't protect our own country.
	Border wall for America?
	Forget about it.
	Doing any kind of military excursion for American interests?
	Oh, forget about that.
	Doing any kind of military realignment based on the kind of money we're spending abroad in NATO and other countries.
	Forget about that.
	We exist to serve at the pleasure of the world.
	At the pleasure of the world economy, of the bankers, of Europe who doesn't want to spend money on military.
	of South Korea who, God forbid, Seoul ever got attacked, right?
	And I find that all to be very interesting.
	I guess I'm some sort of a bad guy, right?
	I guess I'm some sort of anti-Semite for saying that.
	I guess I'm a real bad guy for saying that maybe protecting Israel isn't really our problem.
	Maybe that's not our concern.
	Maybe they're our ally, and it stops there.
	And it stops just right there.
	I've got a lot of friends I don't know that I'd die for them.
	I don't know if I'd send my children, my sons, my brothers, you know, all my family to give their lives to protect them.
	I don't know if I'd give my fortune to protect them.
	I think we'd just be friends.
	I think it would just be mutual.
	There'd be some degree of equality.
	There'd be some degree of equity.
	Some degree of reciprocity, perhaps.
	But it seems to me that it only goes one way.
	You know what that's called in the wild?
	You know what that's called in nature?
	That's called a parasite.
	When you have two organisms working together, you could call that a pack, if they're of the same species.
	If they're of the same tribe, perhaps.
	If they're working together on a microscopic level, you could call that symbiosis.
	Symbiosis, meaning that it's life working together.
	Those are the Latin roots of those words, you know.
	A microscopic organism attaching to a bigger organism.
	And the microscopic organism gets nutrients, whatever, and the bigger thing, I don't know, they get some sort of a benefit when it only goes one way.
	You know what they call that?
	Easy.
	Very clinical.
	This is the dictionary definition.
	It's called a parasite when it only goes in one direction.
	Use that kind of language and I guess you're some sort of a hater.
	I guess that makes you a real bigot.
	But you know, I feel the same way about any other country.
	It's just that no other country offends the degree to which Israel does.
	I would say the same thing about any country in the world.
	I'd say that about Mexico.
	I've got Mexican ancestry.
	I'd say that about Italy.
	I've got Italian ancestry.
	I'd say that about Ireland.
	But here's the thing.
	We don't have 2,000 troops inside occupying the enemies of Mexico, Italy, or Ireland.
	We don't give $3.8 billion a year to Mexico, Italy, or Ireland.
	We don't do any of that.
	Italy, Mexico, and Ireland don't spy on us.
	They don't steal our military secrets.
	None of them have nuclear weapons.
	And if they did?
	No, they don't.
	But if they did, they didn't get them by stealing their nuclear secrets or materials from us.
	None of the same can be said about Israel.
	Italy, Mexico, Ireland don't believe they ever blew up one of our ships, right?
	So, that's all very interesting to me.
	From the horse's mouth.
	I'm not, you know, I'm not just some guy out there making stuff up.
	We're in Syria because of Israel.
	Is that a conspiracy theory?
	The President of the United States said it explicitly on national television.
	We're going to be there, we're going to be staying, we have to protect Israel.
	Oh, well that's very nice.
	Glad to hear it.
	Well, when we finally wrap up in the Middle East, when we finally make the Middle East safe for Israel, maybe then we could get around to protecting America, right?
	Maybe then, once we've figured out this 1,300 year war of religions in the Middle East in the desert, once we solve that, beyond a reasonable doubt, and ISIS and Al Qaeda will never rise again, when that happens, don't hold your breath, maybe then we can get around to Securing our own border.
	Protecting our own interests.
	Wouldn't that be nice, right?
	So, I thought that was just a nice, interesting little Bubble Bowl tidbit there.
	A little Super Bowl tidbit.
	It's all out there.
	I just love when they say it explicitly because how can anybody refute that?
	You go into a debate with any of these people, Will Chamberlain, Jacob Wool, Aaron Bandler, whoever, and it's so simple.
	The President of the United States says, we are in Syria to protect Israel.
	I don't really care about Israel.
	Newsflash.
	Look, I'm not Jewish.
	I'm not an Israeli.
	I don't really care what happens to Israel.
	I don't care what happens to anybody.
	I care what happens to people in my area.
	I care what happens to my neighbors.
	I care what happens to my family.
	I care what happens to my friends in Arizona, in California, in Virginia, in Massachusetts.
	I care what happens to people in America.
	I don't care what happens to France, Russia, China, or Israel, for that matter.
	I just simply don't care.
	Oh, they're the only Western democracy there.
	They're in a bad neighborhood.
	But don't you remember the Holocaust?
	Yeah, big whip!
	How about Armenia?
	Armenia had a pretty bad genocide.
	Have you heard anything about Nagorno-Karabakh?
	Yeah, that's a pretty esoteric one.
	Why don't you look that up?
	You ever even heard of that?
	Armenians had a pretty terrible genocide.
	They've got land disputes.
	They've got large powers trying to intercede in their affairs.
	Trying to influence their elections, their politics.
	People try to genocide them.
	That's the only place you're going to find Armenians.
	Is there an existential threat to Armenians, which is the number one priority of our foreign policy apparatus?
	No, of course not!
	Isn't Nagorno-Karabakh in the media the same way that the Gaza Strip and the West Bank is?
	No way!
	That's because Armenians don't have a large super PAC controlling Congress.
	That's what it comes down to.
	Armenians don't control the media.
	That's what it comes down to.
	You don't have anybody working in the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal who wrote for the Armenian Post like Bret Stephens writing for the Jerusalem Post.
	That's why you don't see it.
	The Armenians don't have a very complicated intelligence service that'll literally kill you or intimidate you if you talk about it.
	There's a lot of countries that have been subject to genocide, persecution, How about the gypsies?
	You know, how about any one of them?
	So anyway, I don't wanna... We're just, we're just... Now it's just turned into a screed, alright?
	A little news update turns into a screed very quickly, but I think you understand my feelings on it.
	It's all very ridiculous.
	It's all very unjust, unfair, not right.
	America first.
	So that's a little tidbit.
	We have to move on.
	I could probably spend three hours going off about that subject, but I'm gonna have to stop myself so we can move on.
	So that's the interview.
	So it was a nice little interview.
	It was a great game.
	You know, white people won in the Super Bowl.
	That's how I see it.
	The white team won, MAGA team won, and that's great.
	Great victory for the winners.
	And Trump says stuff about Israel.
	But we're going to get into the State of the Union here very briefly and then we'll get into Governor Northrum.
	We're running out of time.
	I wish I had more time here.
	So the State of the Union.
	I'll go over this briefly.
	So the State of the Union is tomorrow.
	It's at, I believe, 7 or 8 o'clock.
	I forget if it was Eastern or Central time, so that's why I'm not sure on the exact hour.
	But what we'll be doing tomorrow is the speech will come on.
	I'll come on immediately after the speech is done, and I'll give live coverage.
	Same thing like I did with the televised address earlier in January.
	So tomorrow the State of the Union will be on.
	I think it's about an hour, right?
	Or a little bit longer.
	And then I'll come on immediately after with the live analysis and everything which you guys crave, which you love so much.
	But some things we can expect tomorrow.
	The big rumors about the speech is that he'll announce the second Kim Jong-un North Korea summit.
	The early speculation is that it will probably be in late February and in Vietnam.
	That's where it'll take place.
	But he will announce the specifics, he said, either very shortly before the speech or during the speech.
	So we'll look for that.
	The other big rumor is, of course, about immigration.
	Now, it's been a little bit...
	There have been a lot of conflicting stories about what's going to be said tomorrow.
	The president has said that it's going to be very exciting, that everyone should pay attention.
	There have been senior advisors who hinted at the fact that he could be more hawkish on this, that he could be declaring a state of emergency or alluding to that.
	Or there have been other aides and people close to the president anonymously who have said that he'll strike a more conciliatory tone, try to unite the nation and so on.
	And really those are the big two things to look for.
	There are some other things going on.
	Hopefully he'll address infrastructure.
	Hopefully he'll address opioids.
	Perhaps, they say, he'll announce a meeting with Xi Jinping of China.
	Of course, the negotiations which started in December at the G8 summit.
	They are set to expire in March.
	Very early on in March.
	That's when sanctions will begin to increase once again.
	So...
	The President has been talking to a few different delegations from China in recent weeks.
	He said that he won't seal the deal until he meets with Xi Jinping and really makes a comprehensive deal.
	The President of China.
	So, perhaps I'll announce that.
	Those are the big things that I'm watching for and we'll see.
	This is make or break.
	You know, we said when the government reopened back in late January that this is really what it comes down to.
	If over the course of this time period between the reopening of the government and February 15th, when it's set to close again, if we see a big strong push, you know, he regroups, he comes back stronger with a big State of the Union with some other actions, then we can be encouraged about our prospects for the wall in the next two years.
	But if that doesn't happen, we're totally screwed, at least on that front.
	So, we'll see.
	It really comes down to what he's going to say.
	I don't know what he's going to say.
	I don't know what he's got up his sleeve, what he's got in mind for how this may play out in the next 10 days.
	Or the next 11 days.
	But we'd like to hear at once an approach that is conciliatory in the sense that he makes the case to both sides, at least of the American people, for why there ought to be a wall.
	Because you look at the opinion polling, I don't trust it totally because opinion polling is high stakes.
	It makes sense for them to fake it.
	It makes sense for them to fudge the numbers as they did in 2016.
	If they're producing a poll that says, oh, 60 some percent of people oppose the border wall, well, that's going to have an effect on policy.
	And when the people who are producing the polls have a vested interest in the policy, you can't trust it.
	But regardless of that, we'd like to see him make the case.
	We'd like to see him try to convince people in the middle, on the left, because he's got the base about the border wall.
	That's where the, you know, comity, conciliation approach comes in.
	But on the other hand, there has to be a very strong, firm, specific plan for what the next 10 days is going to look like.
	Are you going to declare a state of emergency if there isn't a deal made by the 15th?
	Are you going to shut down the government if a deal isn't made?
	At what point are you going to say, we're not working with Congress, we're just going to do it?
	We have to hear some specifics on that.
	We'd like to hear some specifics on that.
	Some plan of action for how this is going to unfold.
	So that's what I'll be looking for.
	That's probably, you know, going to be the big newsworthy two pieces is immigration in North Korea.
	North Korea will be good only because, you know, these little things that are sort of going on behind the scenes will serve, I think, to sort of hedge our bets before 2020 in the sense that The immigration thing is a slog.
	It's a big fight.
	But if you have other successes going on, on a back burner, behind the scenes, like North Korea, like trade, like infrastructure, that are helping your numbers among other people who maybe don't totally agree with you on immigration or they're upset with you about immigration, that's something that can make the president more buoyant.
	That can help him a lot over the next two years if he's delivering wins in other areas.
	And we said this a little bit about Venezuela.
	Maybe you do something in Venezuela It's short-term.
	It's not a big deal.
	Proportionally, it's very small, but it makes public opinion go up.
	It brings a lot of political capital and clout, and then you're able to get something done with immigration.
	So, that's how I view North Korea.
	It's good in and of itself, but you know, of course, immigration is bigger.
	So, that's the State of the Union.
	The big story for today that I really want to get into, we only have like four or five minutes, but We have to cover this because we didn't really get proper time to talk about it on Thursday.
	We only talked about the components of the abortion comments, not so much the racist photographs.
	So you remember we did cover this on Thursday.
	This was on the heels of the Virginia abortion bill, which I didn't, I don't even think got out of committee.
	But one of the Virginia state delegates was proposing the bill Or she was being questioned about the bill and she said that, well, yeah, the bill would allow for a baby to be aborted basically while a mother was in labor.
	You know, is that even an abortion at that point?
	But this Virginia delegate was saying basically that, yeah, if a baby is about to be born, like within a day or two or maybe even in a matter of hours, it can still be aborted under this legislation.
	And this prompted a huge backlash.
	This was right after a New York bill passed, which was similarly controversial.
	And then their governor made some questionable comments in defense of the bill.
	He said basically, he insinuated, I'm not going to read the whole quote because it's sort of long, but he insinuated that a baby could be born, could be delivered from the womb, and then doctors and a mother would make a decision about whether or not they would they would allow the baby to live, if they would leave it to die or kill it or something.
	but actually killing a baby who's been delivered as opposed to even a third trimester abortion, which is gruesome enough, but then they say a determination will be made after the baby's delivered.
	So there was a big outcry.
	We covered that on Thursday.
	Not long after that, and the timing is conspicuous, within 24 hours then, a photograph surfaced from his old yearbook, from his medical school yearbook in 1984, which showed a guy in blackface makeup and a guy in a Ku Klux Klan robe, and they say that he was in the picture which showed a guy in blackface makeup and a guy in a Ku Klux Klan robe, and they say that he was in the picture or he was on the same page as the picture, and immediately it was pretty spectacular how across the board, Democrats
	Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, all kinds of people saying he's got to go.
	Lieutenant Governor very called, you know, very short of him He was just shy of calling for the governor to resign.
	That's what I'm trying to say there.
	So even his own subordinates are saying this guy's got to go, basically.
	But he refused to resign.
	And as I said at the top of the show, initially he apologized.
	He got on television or he made a public statement on the internet and he said, you know what?
	I'm sorry.
	This does not represent who I am.
	That was a long time ago.
	And in fairness, he was in his 20s when the photo was produced.
	And it was a different time, true.
	But he said, I'm not resigning.
	And then 24 hours later, he said, you know what, actually, that wasn't me in the picture.
	I did nothing wrong, basically.
	And I'm going to serve out my term as governor.
	72 hours later, still hasn't resigned.
	Everybody's calling on him to step down.
	And my two observations from this episode, number one, and I tweeted about this, are so infanticide, that was fine.
	That was OK.
	Everyone was fine with that.
	But the blackface, that was too far.
	You call for a baby basically to be killed after it's delivered, which is satanic, which is demonic.
	This is just morally wrong.
	I can't imagine saying something like that, being okay with something like that.
	You'll deliver a baby and then a decision will be made, a conversation will be had about whether it's going to live or not.
	I guess that was no big deal.
	No real national coverage of that.
	At least no big outrage from any politicians on either side, the left or the right.
	That was okay.
	24 hours later, what, 40 years ago, he was in a picture which might have offended black people.
	Oh God forbid.
	Now everybody's on his case.
	He's got to step down.
	He's a terrible person.
	That just kind of goes to show you how upside down the morals are in our country.
	That so-called racism.
	Is it really even that big of a deal?
	It's a costume.
	Who cares?
	Do you understand how offensive people are to white people every day?
	The things they say that are just explicitly, overtly racial hatred.
	You know, white people are boring.
	Well, that's kind of a nasty thing to say.
	Yeah, white people are boring.
	You know, you dress up in a costume, which might be a little bit offensive, but it's obviously a joke.
	That's over the line.
	It was 40 years ago.
	But you say, oh, white people are evil, and white people are boring, and white people should be genocided.
	You know, that's fine.
	So I find that to be very interesting, the way that that works.
	Call for a baby to be killed.
	You know, that's fine and well, but you offend black people.
	You know, now they're marching in the streets.
	Really?
	Number two is the timing.
	Very conspicuous.
	It's my belief that the Democrats did this because the Republicans did not have this photograph.
	They were offered to buy this photograph, I guess, in the last governor's election.
	They turned it down.
	They wouldn't buy it as opposition research.
	So this was done by the Democrats probably.
	I'm sure they saw that his comments on abortion would be Like, political cancer to their cause for a pro-choice.
	If pro-choice came to be associated with somebody who was calling literally for infanticide, that would be the death knell probably legally for Roe v. Wade and also politically for pro-choice.
	Because you understand, when it comes to those hot button issues, you really have to avoid appearing like you're a part of the extremes.
	You know, like when that Republican said, I think maybe a decade ago that rape was a gift from God or something, you know, with regard to aborting a child that was a result of rape.
	If you, if the pro-life side got associated with rhetoric like that, it'd be very toxic for independents and for left-wing people if you're trying to convince them.
	The same is true of the left.
	So I imagine they heard that rhetoric, they said, this is too much of a liability, we gotta kill this guy, basically, politically speaking.
	We gotta cleave this guy from the herd.
	He can't be associated with us.
	We will bury his political career.
	Nobody will associate his rhetoric with us.
	So that's what I think happened.
	That's my second observation.
	My third observation is that I don't really care about the picture.
	Who cares?
	Now, that's different than it being a good or a bad thing politically for us.
	It's a good thing that people are calling on him to step down and people think he's racist.
	That's all good.
	That's all fine and well.
	If Dinesh D'Souza finally has his day in the sun and people think, oh, maybe Democrats are racist, that's fine and well.
	However, as a Republican, as a conservative, I honestly don't really care.
	I think that's totally fine.
	You know, the same standard I believe holds true with Brett Kavanaugh on this guy.
	Look, it was a long time ago.
	You can't really prove he was in it.
	Nobody made a big stink about it for years, so obviously nobody cared.
	Like, what difference does it make?
	He was in this picture 40 years ago, and how does that affect anybody today?
	Obviously nobody even cared about it for 40 years, that it was never published, nobody, right?
	So that's my position, at least ideologically, that's my personal position, that, you know, it's actually a good thing that he'll, if he survives this, or if he refuses to step down, that'll set a good precedent that, like, yeah, you know, you can offend people, you can kind of do whatever you want, unless it's actually bad, you'll be okay.
	Now, on the other hand, I do think we should hold the Democrats to their standards.
	They tried to destroy Kavanaugh over something far less and so he should be destroyed.
	But if he isn't destroyed, if they try to, that's good.
	That's epic.
	It shows that they're actually bad people also.
	But then by the same token, if they don't succeed, it's also good.
	So this is white pills all the way around.
	Democrat looks like a baby killer.
	Democrats are trying to destroy each other.
	Epic.
	Democrats look racist.
	Epic.
	Democrats try and fail to get their guy out.
	You know, he lives on as a representative of infanticide and racism in the Democratic Party.
	It's all good.
	That's all good.
	It's all very epic.
	So, the Governor Northam thing is very good politics by the Republicans.
	Uh, so yeah, I know a lot of people are upset about Republicans saying, oh, he should step down because of the racial photograph.
	I don't really mind that.
	You know, again, personally, I think it's silly, but politically, I think there's nothing wrong with that.
	Make them play by their own rules.
	You know, a lot of people are like, oh, You know, we should be saying the problem was not the picture, it was the infanticide.
	Why not both?
	Why not both?
	Say, yeah, this guy's a baby killer.
	Oh, and he's a racist.
	Look at the Democrats.
	They're the real racists.
	Doesn't hurt.
	It literally doesn't hurt.
	The idea that people, like, can entertain these complicated political paradigms in their head and they're looking at all these inconsistencies of...
	Oh, well, you know the Republicans are calling for this guy to step down But you know, aren't they supposed to be white identitarians like they're those connections are not being made That's the thing.
	I remember even on Nationalist Review and I would talk to James Alsup and you know, we're cool now But I I disagreed with him in a big way about this about this concept, you know we were looking at I think the Gainesville rally or Charlottesville 3.0 or something.
	I think it was Charlottesville 3.0, which was not the one last summer, but there was one shortly after the big Charlottesville event and James said something to the effect that, oh well, this Charlottesville rally was a big success because nobody got hurt and it proves that if people got hurt at the last one, but nobody got hurt at this one, That, oh, well, then it wasn't us who caused the violence, it was the other people.
	And people understand that.
	They'll look at Charlottesville, the one where the girl got hit by the car, and then they look at the peaceful one, and they'll say, oh, wait a minute, well, the common denominator here was that the alt-right was peaceful, and when there was violence, it was because of the... And I'm thinking, like, nobody is thinking that way.
	Nobody is, like, trying to be consistent.
	Nobody's looking at past events and juxtaposing and comparing and contrasting and saying, Hmm, well, you know, it was one way here, but not this way, and I wonder why that nobody's... The news cycle is 24 hours, or 72 hours, or a week.
	Nobody's thinking about that.
	So Republicans, and particularly dissonant right people, are very goofy about this, and they project onto the unthinking, unblinking masses this idea that, oh, they're really gonna hold us to these principles, or consistency, or anything.
unidentified		No!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Just call them a racist.
		It works.
		It works today.
		It works, you know?
		So, anyway.
		But that's the governor we're running out of time here.
		So we really have to move on to our stream labs and super chats So let me take a look at these But all in all pretty good week.
		We got the big State of the Union we won the big Super Bowl game as a white race and And we'll see hopefully State of the Union's good tomorrow We're gonna take a look now.
		Our stream labs is having a little trouble loading.
		I love when that happens Okay, here we go So let's see, we've got one from Doc Daniel.
		He says, Nick, you need to discuss our flag memes on the show.
		I don't know, what is there to say?
		I mean, yeah, I guess a lot of people are making these memes of the title screen for the show and swapping out different flags and languages and logo.
		What is there to say, you know?
		Nick, talk about this retarded stuff happening on the internet.
		Oh, yeah.
		Zoomer Nationalist says you haven't really been keeping up with those premium shows, big guy.
		I told you, I told you.
		It's coming out tonight, but relax.
		Teflon Dom says I analyze the subjects of every, you know, and that's the other thing.
		The show goes, the show has never ended on time in probably three months.
		Every night the show goes over a half hour and you always get these little complaints.
		Oh Nick, the show's, the show's three minutes late.
		What a big deal.
		Oh Nick, the premium show's a few hours late.
		This is a disaster.
		Every night and that look and I understand I'm not I'm not look I'm not saying anything more than I am all I'm saying is it seems to be very One way that seems to be interesting how people operate, you know, cuz the show's 60 minutes.
		That's how long it's supposed to be Oh, you know 90 minutes 120 minutes sometimes every night.
		Nobody seems odd Nick.
		We should really we should really not You know give this guy a hard time Not a whole lot of consideration the other way, right?
		Two minutes late.
		Oh, late, late.
		The show's terrible.
		Blah, blah.
		I'm there, you know, at 830.
		I'm there at 845.
		I'm there at 9 o'clock.
		And it's, oh, I'll just keep on.
		We'll just keep doing more super chats.
		Oh, Nick, you missed my super chat, even though it's 840, you know?
		So I just find it to be interesting.
		I know, I know.
		It's supposed to be on time.
		It's no excuse, but just saying a little interesting how that works.
		Based One says, I live in the DMV, and I find the Ralph Northam situation hilarious.
		During the election, he called Ed Gillespie a racist and blamed him for Charlottesville.
		He even sponsored an ad where a guy in a truck was rounding up minorities.
		Talk about karma.
		Yeah, exactly, exactly.
		And that's why it works.
		You know, for all the people saying, oh, this... we shouldn't be hitting him for the racist thing.
		It's not a big deal.
		No.
		You have to make the enemy play by their own rules.
		Like, imagine just giving up...
		Such a powerful arsenal that the enemy has built up for us in the sense that they've made it so that any sort of racial insensitivity, anything from the past is fair game.
		And you say, we're not going to use that.
		We're totally giving that up.
		We're surrendering that completely to the other side.
		What a stupid thing to do.
		So yeah, I agree.
		Teflon Dom says, I analyzed the subjects of every Super Bowl ad.
		Black men were overrepresented by 118% compared to the population.
		I couldn't find a single Hispanic featured.
	Why no pandering towards them?
	Yeah, that's sort of interesting.
	I don't know if that's true or not, but yeah, it's sort of weird how they pander much more to them as opposed to Hispanics.
	Reminder says quote rationalism is the toadstool that flourishes in its dark shades and with rationalism does such a journalist identify himself thus placing himself in the ranks of the enemies of Jesus Christ and this is from father Felix Sarda from liberalism is a sin very Very based and red-pilled quote.
	Eddie Cade says, I'm in the middle of reading some sodomite textbook for indoctrination camp, aka college, and I see America First Streaming now flash across my stream.
	Sorry doctor, what's your face?
	But this assignment has to wait for about a half, for about an hour and a half.
	God bless.
	Yeah, God bless big guy.
	Yeah, college is terrible.
	I never realized until I got in just how real the indoctrination is.
	Jose says world peace can only be achieved if every nation had their own knicker president arguing and fighting for their own interests.
	True.
	True.
	Deplorable Mike's is great show tonight, Nick.
	What's your response to so-called right-wingers who advocate voting for Democrats, specifically Tulsi Gabbard, solely because of her stance on foreign policy like anti-interventionism and even though she fully supported Sanders?
	Yeah, well, I've talked about this a lot on the show.
	Just, it's fool's gold.
	It's a total Total red herring.
	The idea that because a candidate is based on one issue or woke on one issue on the left that, oh, we should really vote for them.
	That constitutes a sound, holistic choice for who should run the country.
	What a stupid thing to say.
	And I know a lot of alt-right people are really jumping on that bandwagon.
	You know, Trump is talking, literally talking about South Africa, saying we're nationalists, talking about what's happening in Europe, he wants to build a border wall, all this other stuff, and people are like, yeah, well, um, he hasn't been that successful at it yet, so I hate him, he's actually the worst ever, and I'm gonna block him on Twitter, and I'm gonna vote Democrat.
	Yeah, that'll show.
	I'm like, these people are faggots.
	These people are...
	They're literal and figurative children in a certain capacity.
	This idea that somebody who is 99% good for our interests, but because, you know, the rhetoric isn't all the way there sometimes, or the follow-through hasn't been what we hoped for, he's actually, oh, I'm gonna block him, I'm gonna go in the corner, and I'm gonna cry, and I'm gonna slam my fists on the ground, and I'm gonna hit my head on the wall, and I'll just vote for a Democrat.
	Like, you're a little baby.
	You're a little baby.
	We have to grow up Make sound, practical decisions.
	Which is to say that Tulsi Gabbard, yeah okay.
	I was really based off her.
	She said that Trump was Saudi Arabia's bitch.
	Whoa!
	That's so red-pilled.
	Yeah, well, she's also a woman.
	She's also a foreigner.
	She's from Hawaii.
	She's a left-winger.
	She wants to take your guns.
	She wants to take away your health care.
	I imagine she's probably for amnesty.
	I imagine she's probably for immigration.
	So, the idea that we would accept some left-wing person, some left-wing foreigner woman as the president, we would vote for and endorse that.
	Oh, because she's really red-pilled on Saudi Arabia?
	Not even Israel?
	Give me a break.
	People are so... Honestly, it's just very low IQ, high time preference behavior.
	Punished Beef Guy says, Hey Nick, how are you doing tonight, big guy?
	Just wanted to pop up in here to say that the way you make your argument on why the US blindly supports Israel is very red-pilling and one of the best I've ever heard.
	P.S.
	So sick of this clown world.
	T. Clown Pepe.
	So true.
	So true.
	Yeah, well, thanks.
	It's been, um...
	I've been talking about the Israel thing for two years, you know, learning information and honing, excuse me, the rhetoric.
	And, you know, you've seen all the debates probably.
	Will Chamberlain, Wohl, Bandler, all these different characters.
	And that is the real red pill.
	I think that's the gateway to understand some of the bigger questions about what's going on in the country.
	It starts with Israel.
	That's when people start to say, huh, maybe there's something going on there.
	Because the thing about Israel is, Israel is another nation.
	Israel is another nation.
	And it's very simple for people to understand that concept when they see it as another nation, as a nation-state.
	You know, when they see Israel as a separate nation, I think that really helps them to fully understand that premise, fully understand that concept.
	When you see the abuses, when you see clearly the relationship there, I think it's easier to sort of say, oh, well, maybe look at some other things that are happening.
	So, uh, you know, like with Saudi Arabia, right?
	You know, things like that.
	So, yeah, very red-pilling, very important argument to make.
	Uh, but let's see.
	We'll take a look at our Super Chats now.
	We'll see what people are saying here.
	Uh, Acid Rains' thoughts on the Sam Hyde documentary Blacklisted.
	I watched, like, half of it.
	It's not really... I don't know.
	I mean, it was good, but it was kind of just, like, a PowerPoint presentation, right?
	I mean, it wasn't, like, a true, like, documentary.
	I mean, it's not like they had interviews with anybody, really, or, like...
unidentified		I don't know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It was good.
		I'll say maybe I'm just sort of nitpicking, but it just seemed like a retelling of the story and... Did they have an interview with Sam Hyde?
		I forget.
		But, uh... It was okay.
		I says, Britt here, what does the Hunchback do in... What?
		Okay, this guy's just...
		Did these people even speak English?
		Yeah, I used to follow him, but he never followed me back, so I unfollowed him.
		Maybe.
		I guess I would have him on.
		If he would come on, I would have him on.
		with michael malice i think it'd be very interesting to hear you two discussing politics and current events yeah i used to follow him but he never followed me back so i unfollowed him maybe i guess i would have him on if he would come on i would have him on but a lot of these people just kind of ignore me and i'm insulted by that so uh so i don't know Maybe.
		If he wanted to come on the show, I would have him.
		EcoFash says, I saw Harry Potter with a shaved head.
		Ah, very cool.
		EcoFash says, Nick, for your own sake, ease up on the Uncle Ted saying this as a friend.
		This is coming from an unironic EcoFashist.
		Bad optics.
		Uh, no.
		Uh, no.
unidentified		I love when people, oh, Nick, just stop this.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm saying this as a friend.
		My favorite thing is people coming up to me.
		This happens at the Super Bowl party, too.
		I'm the politics guy, so naturally people want to come up to me and tell me just what they think of politics, just what they think I should do.
		I love that.
		You know, I talk to people who are in it.
		Obviously, it's my livelihood, so I think about it more than anybody.
		And then everybody always wants to come in.
		No, I know better.
		You know, I watch the show.
		I know you do the show.
		I know the show is your life.
		I know you know people, you know, who know about the stuff, but I know better.
		I'm gonna tell you how to run your show.
		You know, this whole thing you're doing, that's great and all, but you know, you should do it the way that I think you should do it.
		Never gets old.
		It never gets old.
		I think I know how to handle myself with regards to the optics question.
		I won the optics war basically by myself, and there was help.
		You know, there was the Irony Bros, there was Patrick Casey, there were others, but let's get real.
		Who is the one pushing optics?
		Who is the one taking the brunt of the heat, of the attacks, of everything else?
		You know, thinking of optics, come on.
unidentified		So, but Nick is an eco-fascist.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I also like, you know, I'm concerned about optics, but I'm gonna openly call myself an eco-fascist and declare myself as a supporter and a friend of the show.
		Yeah, that makes sense.
		Comic Yoong says, Dacerite Nica deport all journalists.
		Yeah, so true.
		Eco-fascist says, journalists got our soldiers killed in Vietnam, spit on the ones that lived.
		A vet I met tossed a grenade in one's tent and nothing of value is lost.
		So true, so true.
		I've not read that one yet.
		I gotta check that one out.
		A lot of people have recommended that one to me, so I'll have to get on that.
		that one yet.
		I gotta check that one out.
		A lot of people have recommended that one to me, so I'll have to get on that.
		Kevin McCalmer says, is Aaron Clary or let Aaron Clary advertise on your show?
		No, I don't do advertisements.
		Laura DeCura says, Nick, should I go see Dennis Prager tomorrow night and troll him epic style on the Israel issue It's $18, unfortunately.
		Uh, yeah, do it.
		It'd be pretty funny.
		I'd just make sure to film it, but, I don't know, $18 isn't really that steep.
		Chad Amir says, Civ 5 today, the UK proposed a vote to make Protestantism the official world religion.
		Voted a fat nay, leading to full nuclear war and me losing the game.
		At least I saved others from going to hell.
		Well, that's the way to look at it, right?
		Slovo Tave says, really got my knicker noggin jogging during the That One Car Super Bowl commercial.
		The white guy escapes towards heaven from his desk job only for him to be saved from choking by a black woman.
		Yeah, isn't that... I'm sure that's totally accidental, right?
		I'm sure that's totally...
		Coincidental.
		Josh Sayre says, Great work lately, Nick.
		Keep doing good things.
		Hopefully the State of the Union isn't gay.
		What is the best worst case for State of the Union?
		Well, thank you.
		Best case scenario, I don't really want to look at it that way only because I have no idea what the play is here.
		I don't know if he's going to do what he said he would through the White House last week where he's going to declare a state of emergency if they don't come up with a bill by the 15th.
		I don't know if he'll try to renew efforts for compromise.
		I simply don't know.
		And I can't really give you a best or worst case because we would have to.
		Whatever the pitch is, there's a lot of different components to it.
		There's the shutdown, there's the state of emergency, there's bipartisan.
		I mean, there's a lot of ways you could go about this.
		So...
		I don't know.
		Probably worst case scenario is that, and I don't think this will happen, but worst case scenario is that he takes State of Emergency off the table.
		I guess that would probably be worst case.
		Best case scenario is that it's just a very concrete, workable plan that has State of Emergency at the end of the tunnel, at the end, you know, at the 15th.
		So I, you know, if I had to speculate, I would say that's best and worst, but I don't think we'll really get an idea of what it's going to look like until he makes the pitch, makes the case, you know, because he hasn't really showed his hand since the end of the government shutdown.
		He sort of kept a little bit low key.
		So I don't really know what to expect with that.
		Got to be honest.
		Bratman says, oi Nick, can I be a paleo-conservative, non-degenerate, trad-nationalist Christian while also fulfilling my brat fantasies?
		What does the Bible say?
		I'm pretty sure the Bible has a resounding no on that one, but I don't know.
		You have to take it up with your priest.
		Kevin McComer says, if abortion is murder, should we do whatever we can to stop it?
		Maybe even terrorism?
		No, I don't think so.
		I don't think that's a great thing to say.
		Also, that's a federal agent thing to say.
		I'm against all violence.
		So, definitely not.
		Why do people... Just the super chats on the show this past week, am I just not nagging you hard enough?
		I mean, people calling into the show, people super chatting.
		Nick, is terrorism okay?
	Well, Nick, you know, in 1930s Germany, like what?
	Are you using your head?
	Oh, Nick, by the way, you got doxxed on this website.
	Everybody go check that out.
	What's the thought process?
	It's like I said, it's Patrick Starr with the plank on his head trying to walk through the door.
	That's the super chat sometimes.
	Orchid says, I would like to take a moment to shill a good right-wing self-reliance and self-improvement discord.
	Stop complaining, Nick.
	I gave you money.
	P.S.
	What's the beef between you and the distributist?
	I have no... Well, here's the thing.
	I'm a successful person, I'm a smart person, I'm a handsome person.
	When you're somebody like me, I guess a lot of people feel bad about themselves and they want to lash out.
	So these very small people, and I don't say small in terms of stature or in terms of clout, I say it in terms of moral character.
	People like the Distributist, people like Borzoi, people like, who's that other one?
	What's his name?
	Mauritania?
	Mauritius?
	Struggle or something?
	You know, these kinds of people, I'm sure we agree on 99% of issues, but they feel threatened.
	They feel insecure.
	And these people attack me for no reason.
	Attack me for no reason.
	They're nasty.
	And of course, they never confront.
	Of course, they never tag me on Twitter.
	Of course, they will never call into the show.
	I have beef.
	I want to debate you.
	They'll do these snide, gay little comments that people send to me.
	Oh, this person's talking trash about you.
	I don't know what any of these people are.
	I don't know Distributist.
	I don't know Borzoi.
	I don't know Mauritius.
	I don't watch their content.
	I never heard of most of these people until some people send me or relay a message and they say, oh, this person wants you to unblock them, like what happened yesterday.
	Or, oh, this person was talking trash about you on a stream or whatever.
	And so I don't I don't have beef with any of them but they get nasty for no reason they don't even know me and like I said we have all this confluence or congruence on the issues and it's uh it's very nasty very very uh blackpilling on on people's behavior so people who do that I just can't respect and I I don't care for so that's my beef.
	Kang says, Nick keep fighting.
	Fast food on me.
	My or for my thoughts are not your thoughts.
	Neither are your ways my ways.
	So true.
	Well, thank you, brother.
	Ecofash says, Nick you should have Trump on tomorrow before the State of the Union.
	Well, at least he got a sense of humor about it.
	True.
	Heiman says, hey Nick, do you advocate for killing random black people like Liam Neeson?
	Can you talk about this cool book I found?
	Can we make it without violence?
	So we got some high IQ.
	Okay, I take it back.
	Superchatters are all right today.
	Superchatters are based in Redfield again.
	They're my best friends again.
	The Liam Neeson thing was honestly pretty funny.
	Liam, in case you missed it, Liam Neeson said today that he knew somebody who was raped by a black person.
	So his initial thought was that he was going to go out and just kill a random black person as retribution, as racial retribution.
	I'm not making this up.
	This was in some interview he admitted.
	He said, oh well, you know, back some years ago, I think it was a sister or somebody in his family or a friend, Got raped and he was like, well, what race were they and black?
	And so he said he was hoping that he would get into a confrontation with a black person so he could kill them What the hell?
	Oh, I disavow.
	I disavow thinking like that thinking like that is wrong Uh eco-fascist nick.
	What is your favorite form of political violence?
	Yeah, exactly basically Beamer says, IE released its Chicago action video just now.
	Very high action.
	Yeah, I saw that.
	I'm wondering when they're gonna release my speech.
	I need to make my Instagram post already.
	But yeah, I'll have to check that out.
	Based Ones has gotta say, bro, thanks for red-pilling me on Israel to think last year I was subscribed to Daily Wire and CRTV is probably worse than when I was a Democrat.
	We really need the rest of the nation to wake up and realize that the brackets aren't helping us.
	So true!
	Finally, right?
	Yeah, but people just don't get it.
	I think slowly but surely, look, it's the truth.
	As long as we present our arguments persuasively and we are not a liability because of the way we look or the way we sound, the arguments will do the work for us.
	But you have to, you can't be a liability to the argument.
	That's, I guess, the slogan.
	You cannot allow yourself to be a liability to the argument or to the cause.
	And that means your appearance is inoffensive, your rhetoric is inoffensive, you know, everything about you.
	It's not going to deter the spread of the argument in the agenda.
	You do everything in your power to make the argument look good by looking professional, looking normal, sounding professional, sounding normal, sounding reasonable.
	And I know a lot of people misunderstand that and they come in the show and they say, oh, well, Nick, but you come on the show and you're a little bit silly sometimes.
	Or, you know, you're a little bit exaggerated sometimes.
	You fly off the handle sometimes.
	I'm an entertainer.
	I do a show.
	I try to get people to watch the show.
	That's part of it.
	But in any serious conversation that I have, you'll find that the rhetoric is always compelling.
	The look is always on point.
	That's the way it has to be, right?
	So, Kevin McComer says, TPUSA against identity but black and Latino summits.
	Yeah, good point.
	Very true.
	Bratman says, I have to ask my priest about my brat fetish.
	I think that's the way you're gonna have to do it unless you're okay with just abstaining, right?
	What a show, right?
	The Bratman himself coming in.
	Coming in hot.
	But I think that's everything.
	That's all our Streamlabs and Super Chats.
	On that note, on the wrap note, I think that's going to do it for us.
	Remember to check us out.
	NicholasJFuentes.com slash membership to get you our premium membership.
	Remember, only five bucks a month to get one additional show every week.
	Like I said, I know, I know, everybody's getting on my case today.
	Oh, Nick, where's the show?
	Where's the show?
	I know, I know, it should have came out last night, but...
	You know, things happen.
	I hope you understand, but it'll be up there.
	It'll be up there tonight, but be sure to check that out.
	The link is down below.
	Remember to subscribe to the channel.
	Give me a big thumbs up.
	Leave a comment below.
	Click the notification bell to get notified every time I go live.
	We're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m.
	Central, 8 p.m.
	Eastern Standard Time.
	I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.
	As always, this is America First.
	Thank you guys for watching.
	Thanks to our Streamlabbers, Superchatters, Premium members, everybody who watches the show.
	We love you folks.
	And we'll see you tomorrow for the State of the Union.
	Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		It's going to be only America first.
unidentified		America first.
unidentified		The American people will come first once again.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		America first!

▲