Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Feb. 13, 2019 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:52:19

The Great Immigration BETRAYAL | America First Ep. 330

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:29:43

Appearances

Clips

alex jones

00:32

donald j trump

00:04

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		music
		music
		music music music music music
		music music music
		music music music music music music music music music music music music music
		Thank you.
		Bye.
		Thank you.
		Wall.
		Thank you.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Thank you. Thank you.
unidentified		Thank you.
		Wall. Wall.
		Wall.
		Thank you.
		outro music Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
		America First!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Good evening, everybody.
		You're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be back with you tonight for another epic and based and red-pilled show.
		We are very excited.
		There's a lot to talk about.
		And we are energized from the rally last night.
		Wow, what a great rally.
		And perhaps, maybe, some of the people who were a little bit less pessimistic about what we saw last week at the State of the Union, perhaps those voices were vindicated last night because we saw some very good things on immigration, or heard some very good things.
		In terms of what we're seeing, well, leave something to be desired.
		We're not thrilled.
		As the president said.
		So there is much to discuss with regard to this immigration deal.
		As you guys know, the government shutdown will commence on Friday if no deal is reached to fund a third of the government.
		But it looks like they have some sort of a framework deal that has been put together.
		So we will be reviewing what is in that deal.
		We'll be talking about the Trump rally last night in El Paso, Texas.
		We'll be looking at what the likelihood is, what the probability is that the president will sign the deal, and if so, what that means for immigration, what options we have.
		If that happens, we'll go over what people are saying about it, people who are excited about it, people who are less than happy about it.
		I'm probably in the latter category.
		And then we will talk about this Esquire article.
		I don't know if you guys have seen this, but yet another opportunity to go off I guess they did some sort of a profile on a young American boy, 17 year old high school senior.
		by the name of Ryan Morgan in the magazine Esquire.
		I don't really know who reads magazines anymore, to be honest.
		People barely read the news online, let alone they get the print, let alone they get an actual printed publication, but they did this feature on this young kid and, of course, what is the reaction from our new friends, from the immigrants and from our old friends, the blacks?
		What do we hear?
		Nothing but nastiness, nothing but negativity.
		And we'll go over all of that.
		I'm sure that'll provide some good content for us.
		And then if we have time at the end of the show, we will talk about Jussie Smollett, who may have just been caught red-handed in a big lie.
		There was a big story over the weekend from the New York Post which said that they interviewed his neighbors since the attack.
		And if you remember this, this was the black homosexual actor from the show Empire.
		Who allegedly got off a train in Chicago at 2 a.m.
		on a Tuesday night and was attacked, assaulted, there was a simulated lynching done on him by two MAGA supporters wearing MAGA hats in Chicago at 3 a.m.
		on a Tuesday, okay?
		And so rightly a lot of people, including myself, pointed out this is probably not true, but they did this New York Post article yesterday saying they interviewed all his neighbors Nobody believes him.
		And there was a report that came out just today, only a few hours ago, that said that the Chicago police have obtained his phone records and they say that they got his cell phone and they looked through all his data and what they found on the phone does not actually corroborate his story with what he said a couple of weeks ago.
		So if we have time we'll go into that.
		I don't expect that we will though, so we might have to save that for tomorrow.
		But it's going to be a fun show!
		It's going to be a good show.
		There's much to I know last night's show was very exciting.
		Whenever we get to talk about the Israel lobby, you know I'm there for it.
		You know I am here for it when we are talking about Israeli influence in the government.
		And it's just been delicious watching all the reaction over the past 24 to 48 hours from these people just exposing themselves.
		Because you know, I've been saying this for years.
		I turned down a career in Republican politics for this reason.
		You know, I turned down the trip to Israel.
		I could have had a very nice cushy job alongside my old friend and mentor Cassie Dillon at the Daily Wire.
		I could have been getting paid good money to live in LA and get flown all over the place and have producers and, you know, all that stuff.
		Working at the Daily Wire under Ben Shapiro, but I would have had to go along with this scandal, which is Israeli foreign influence.
		And that's what it was.
		You know, I'm not going to go into my whole story, but so it's always a great thing when two years out, it seems to me like it's becoming more mainstream.
		It's becoming more acceptable to talk about this.
		Because you guys know, for people that are longtime viewers of the show, for like 30 years, probably for longer than that, since the state of Israel is created, and in some cases even before that, this is totally taboo, this is totally radioactive, you can't touch it.
		But now that we have a sitting U.S.
		Congresswoman, regrettable, unfortunate phrase, but a U.S.
		Congresswoman speaking out against it, even if she did apologize, it was very exciting yesterday, so I'm glad, I'm glad we got to do that.
		And then I also love, you know, I sacrifice Life and limb to talk about Israel.
		You know, I'm looking over my shoulder.
		I'm looking out for, you know, people with curly black hair and weak chins.
		I'm looking around to see, you know, is there somebody in the backseat of my car?
		Am I locking all the doors and windows at night?
	Because I don't know, maybe they're gonna pay me a visit and they're gonna say, hey, oy vey, you gotta stop talking about that.
	So I love... I'm risking life and limb out here, alright?
	I've practically got the Mossad breathing down my neck and I do a whole show about this and what are people freaking out about in the comments?
	Some passing remark I made at the end of the show last night about the Confederacy, so...
	You gotta love that.
	You gotta love the tragedy of the commons, right?
	I mean, why do we even bother to save America if this is the treatment?
	And because of that, I want to take the time before we get into the news to wish...
	A very happy 210th birthday to Abraham Lincoln.
	God bless you, Abraham Lincoln, possibly one of the greatest U.S.
	Presidents, most conservative, smartest, most powerful, and we crushed the South.
	And so, for all those people in the comments giving me a hard time when I'm out there risking my rear end against the Mossad, that's what I have to say to you.
	Hail Lincoln!
	Anyway, but we have to get into our news.
	I know that's divisive.
	I know that's divisive.
	I know we have a lot of Southerners who watch the show who are not antagonizing me and those people I love and respect.
	And by all means, you know, God bless you.
	God bless your rebel hearts.
	But we got to get into the news.
	What is going on with my hair today?
	Oh, it's just such a mess.
	I don't know.
	I got out of the shower.
	I guess I waited too long to comb it or something.
	I just keep looking over at the screen and noticing it's just all over the place.
	Anyway, but enough about the grooming.
	We have to get into the news here.
	We're gonna start out with the immigration deal.
	This is what you all came to see.
	This is what you came to hear about.
	This is the moment of truth, really, what has defined the second half of the Trump administration so far since the midterms has been this battle on immigration.
	We remember the midterms was defined by the immigration issue.
	In the lead up to the midterms you had the caravan, you had the president declaring himself a nationalist, talking about executive orders which are far more wide-reaching than we had anticipated.
	Even when he was running, talking about taking back birthright citizenship, talking about ending catch and release.
	A lot, a lot of action was promised.
	Not so much follow-through.
	And we were harshly critical of that in the immediate aftermath, but then we saw that in December, December 21st to be exact, we had the initiation of the longest government shutdown in history to get money for the border wall.
	Remember, it was only a third of the government that was shut down, but this was still quite substantial.
	It was over a month that it lasted close to five weeks, I believe it was, before he caved, finally, in late January.
	And we covered that at length.
	We covered that every day of the shutdown.
	And remember, the setup for this, the framing for this, is that the deal was made to reopen the government nearly three weeks ago with the intention that this continuing resolution would be passed, would fund the government for exactly three weeks.
	And during this time, there would be negotiation, possibly there would be some kind of a compromise made in the Congress to get the adequate money for a border wall.
	The president was asking for 5.7 billion out of 17 to 25.
	17 for the wall, 25 for the broader immigration project.
	And people are asking me, where do you get those numbers?
	I see this a lot on Twitter.
	The 17 and 25 numbers.
	This comes from a blueprint that was released by the White House last January when we were in the same situation, actually.
	We were in the middle of an immigration negotiation during a government shutdown.
	This was, I think, the second week of January 18.
	And the week prior to that, the White House released a blueprint saying that the wall, they laid out how many miles of wall there would be, what material would be used, and they estimated it would cost about $17 billion.
	But the total package they were asking for at the time was $25 billion.
	$25 billion, which includes ICE agents, Border Patrol, judge teams to expedite the backlog of legal and illegal immigrants to get that all sorted out.
	And so that was the total package.
	And again, the president was asking for less than a third, basically less than a third of what the wall would cost overall, $5.7 billion.
	And we reopened the government.
	The three weeks transpired, and it looked like no progress had been made as of last week.
	And I talked about this at length, I think, on a few different shows.
	As of last week, there was still no progress.
	And this is obviously a very difficult issue.
	They are mutually exclusive, the positions of the two parties, of the two chambers.
	The House of Representatives led by the Democrats with Speaker Pelosi, they said we will not give a single dollar for a border wall.
	And the Senate led by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and the Republicans said, well, we have to have some money for the border wall and we'd like to have $5.7 billion.
	So the reason it's been so difficult is because, you know, the Democrats, it's not even like they had even a moderate position from the beginning.
	I think people are forgetting this and we're going to get into the deal pretty quickly here.
	Before we get into that, I think it's important to acknowledge that the initial Democrat position before the government shutdown, the reason the government shut down in the first place was because several offers were floated out to the Democrats to give maybe $2 billion for all or $1.5 billion for border security or something like that. the reason the government shut down in the first place And they said, no, we want no money at all for any kind of physical barrier.
	So they have come down substantially from that.
	Republicans have come down substantially from their position of money for the wall, particularly the $5.7 billion figure.
	And they've reached an agreement in principle.
	So they don't have an actual bill put together just yet.
	They're still hashing all the details out in committee.
	But as of yesterday, they reached a, quote, deal in principle, an agreement in principle.
	And so they sort of laid out what provisions they would each be willing to compromise on.
	And so the deal goes as follows.
	uh, This is from the Examiner.
	It says, quote, the deal in question reportedly contains $1.375 billion in funding for a physical border barrier.
	So not a wall, but a physical border barrier, which is obviously short of the $5.7 billion that Trump was asking for.
	And according to earlier reports, I'm not really sure the veracity of this because some reports have said that this is still in the bill.
	The Daily Caller says that as recently as an hour ago this is in the bill.
	Other sources say it was struck from the bill in committee that they decided they were not going to include this, but I'll talk about it briefly just for the sake of getting it all out there.
	The Democrats wanted a provision in the bill which would have capped the number of detention beds maintained by ICE at 40,000.
	So what this does, in effect, if this is a part of the final deal, and I believe it is not, I believe the latest and most accurate sources say that this was struck from the deal in committee, so I don't believe it's in there.
	But what this would have done, what the Democrats were asking for, and this is outrageous, it got a terrible reception, maybe that's why they struck it, But what this does when they institute a cap of 40,000 detention beds is it effectively limits the amount of people that ICE can detain because we know that when we talk about catch and release and when Trump talks about the laws having to be changed in order to stop caravans, what he's talking about is the fact that when illegal immigrants come into the country, we have to process them.
	It's not as simple as we apprehend them and when we take them back and we just say, okay, you go on your merry way back into Mexico or wherever you came from.
	If they get into the country, we actually have to detain them.
	And if we don't have the space or the facilities or the resources to detain them, then we just let them go into the country.
	And we say, come back on your court date in a number of months or years or whatever, and then we'll decide your fate in the country.
	And, of course, people don't come back.
	The president talked about this at his rally last night, and he talks about it at a lot of rallies.
	So what the Democrats wanted to do effectively is say, yeah, we want more illegal immigrants released into the country.
	Even though we have a lot of beds, we're going to cap the amount of beds so that we can have the bare minimum amount of illegal immigrants detained.
	And what they intended to do with that is force the Trump administration to prioritize housing, High-value illegal immigrants, so actual violent criminals and people who have committed crimes in addition to illegal entry into the country, and what this does in effect is allow anybody who doesn't have a serious crime, you know, they just get to come into the country.
	It's open borders.
	So they struck that out, which is good.
	And they said that even if it was in there, ICE could probably just move money around and get additional beds anyway.
	But so far the deal stands that it would fully fund this one-third of the government, which includes Homeland Security, until September.
	So similar to the Omnibus Bill.
	If you remember, the Omnibus Bill passed last March, and that funded the government through to September 30th.
	So this bill would fund that remaining third of the government.
	We actually funded the other two-thirds of the government back in September of 2018 for the whole year.
	And it was only the one-third that was funded for a few months so that we could have this border wall battle after the midterm.
	So the provisions of the bill is it would fund the government completely until September.
	And also it would include $1.375 billion for the physical barrier.
	And then Senator Shelby, who put this thing together, he told the president, this is according to inside sources, Shelby said that the agreement would provide more than $22 billion in border security, which I'm not really sure what that means.
	I'm a little confused by this.
	And the president reiterated that number in a few tweets about a couple of hours ago.
	He tweeted out quote, was just presented the concept and parameters of the border security deal by hard-working Senator Richard Shelby looking over all aspects knowing that this will be hooked up with lots of money from other sources.
	We'll be getting almost 23 billion dollars for border security regardless of wall money it is being built as we speak.
	Now, I don't really know how I feel about this.
	To me, this is a little bit shady, because we've heard that before.
	They allocated, what was it, $1.6 billion for so-called border security in the Omnibus Spending Bill.
	Or maybe it was $3.6?
	I actually forget the figure for last year's bill, but regardless, it was a paltry sum, nothing close to what the President was asking for for a while, and it was for border security.
	This was the Omnibus Bill last year.
	And the language in the omnibus bill, which was the original disaster, this is the original sin, why we're here in the first place, because we didn't get the wall funded then when we had the House and the Senate.
	The language was specific and said we can have nothing resembling A border barrier, a physical structure on the border that resembles Trump's border wall.
	That was the Republican Congress which did this, and it was $1.6 billion.
	So this time around, they're giving us $1.375 billion, not for a wall, but for a physical barrier, for some degree of physical barrier.
	And the Democrat whip in the House last week said, okay, we'll be open to some kind of physical barrier, but it can't be a wall.
	So that represents that compromise.
	But it's a small figure.
	And then it remains to be seen if they're allocating $22 billion in border security, what does that mean?
	Because there is not a bill in front of us, we can't really read what is the language of the bill.
	Does it say that can be allocated or directed towards a wall?
	Is the president talking about other funds?
	Because his acting chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, said on Sunday, he said, quote, there are certain funds that Trump can get to without declaring a national emergency and other funds that he can only get to after declaring a national emergency.
	So, Mulvaney is implying that this bill is a down payment.
	That's how Shelby pitched it.
	That's how Mulvaney pitched it.
	That's how McConnell pitched it.
	That's how a lot of people pitched this compromise bill, this deal.
	Was they said don't look at the 1.375 billion dollars as all the money for the wall.
	Look at that as simply a down payment and you'll be able to get the funds eventually from Congress over several years or you're gonna have to find the money yourself.
	Mitch McConnell actually said quote first of all I hope he signs the bill and second I think you ought to free you ought to feel free to use whatever tools he can legally use to enhance his effort to secure the border.
	So it's a little bit shady.
	I'm not comfortable with this.
	A lot of people have been saying, oh look, actually this is a great thing because Trump, you know, he kind of cucked in the State of the Union but he came out strong on Monday with this speech on border security and now we get a down payment and now he declares a national emergency.
	Well, not so fast.
	Not so fast.
	Because if you're looking at precedent, precedent shows us that every time we are promised money, either from the Congress or in the form of an executive order, it doesn't happen.
	You know, we've heard a lot of promises.
	What did we hear before the midterms?
	I'm preparing an executive order right now that will repeal birthright citizenship.
	I'm preparing an executive order right now that will end catch and release.
	So we got a lot of promises on things that we're doing with immigration, on other things.
	Now last night the president, and this triggers me so much, the president goes to El Paso and you've got all these signs behind him, finish the wall.
	Oh that's weird, I don't remember the wall ever being started.
	So I guess the way they're trying to pitch this to the president, and in a de facto indirect way trying to pitch it at Trump's base, Which is furious!
	People like Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity, all the voices that pressured the president into shutting down the government and keeping it shut down in the first place.
	They are trying to sort of patronize us.
	They are trying to sort of, what is the word, placate us by saying, no, this shitty terrible deal, which is worse than the deal we got last year, and no money went to a border wall last year.
	Remember last year 1.6 and no border wall.
	Now they're telling us, oh, we're going to give you 1.375.
	But don't worry about it.
	It's a down payment.
	And anyway, the president could just supplement that with other money, or he could declare a state of emergency, or there's money that he doesn't even need to declare a state of emergency to access.
	Maybe that's DHS funds, DOD funds, and there's 22 billion dollars for border security.
	I'm not really buying it.
	I'm not buying it.
	I really am not pleased with what we're seeing.
	We've made a lot of, uh, we have made a lot of accommodations for the presidents over the past two and a half years.
	We have seen the opposition that he's gone up against in the courts, in his own party, with the Democrats in the House.
	I mean, we've seen that it's obviously been challenging institutionally and otherwise to get these things through.
	And I hope, I hope that it works out.
	If this is the course that he chooses, I really hope it works out the way that they're saying it will.
	I hope that the 1.375 actually goes towards the construction of an 18-foot steel bollard fence, and I hope that the president is able to find money elsewhere and maybe use some of that 22 billion dollars in border security money, or I hope we see a state of emergency, but At this point in time I can't say that I'm satisfied, I can't say that I'm thrilled, I can't say that I'm optimistic about the prospects that any of that is going to happen.
	Now maybe it will, it's certainly a possibility, and I don't doubt that the president wants to get the wall built, but at this point we have to look at precedent.
	This is what I do on the show, and it's funny because I had people, maybe three months ago, We're telling me I'm Bill Mitchell Jr.
	That was the old line.
	All the overly critical people were telling me, you're Bill Mitchell Jr.
	You will rationalize everything that the Trump administration does.
	Now this week, in the last week, I've got, and you wouldn't believe this, but I could show you the tweets, I've got people saying, oh Nick is Coulter Jr.
	Now Nick is just like Ann Coulter.
	Now the people that are overly optimistic, overly rationalizing, are telling me I'm Minnie Ann Coulter because I will just give no allowances to this president.
	And what this just demonstrates is that I have a consistent method here.
	I look at the precedent.
	The precedent that I see is this.
	The president is in a tough situation.
	I think he knows.
	That he over-promised on the wall.
	And you never in politics over-promise and under-deliver.
	So what he has attempted to do is sort of squirm and wiggle his way out of this by manipulating and softening definitions, saying, oh, actually, wall is a steel fence.
	Now, originally, he meant a concrete 30-foot wall.
	I'm not going to say that I'm going to be so particular about if it's concrete or if it's steel, if it's 18 feet, if it's 30 feet.
	You know, a steel bollard 18-foot fence.
	That's good enough for me to be called a wall.
	But he says, I never said it'd be concrete.
	He did say that.
	So he massages that definition.
	Oh, I never said it was concrete.
	Well, you kind of did.
	So it's an 18-foot steel bollard fence.
	Oh, I'm willing to concede that.
	Well, then he tells us last year, I will never sign another bill like this again.
	The Omnibus Spending Bill.
	Well, then he signed another bill exactly like that in September.
	And then he signed another bill exactly like that on December 7th.
	And then he signed another bill exactly like that in January, three weeks ago.
	And it's looking like he'll sign another bill exactly like that in February.
	So, can we really take him at his word?
	I don't know about that.
	After the 1.6 billion dollars from the omnibus last year, he tried to tell us that that money, which went towards repairing existing fencing, was wall.
	And now he's trying to spin it as, oh, repairing existing fencing is building the wall.
	That's why we have to finish the wall.
	That's not really true.
	I was willing to make some allowances.
	I was willing to make some... I was willing to be charitable in our definitions of these things.
	Because we understand the political reality.
	But don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining.
	I think there's a big difference between the two.
	We would be willing to accept if the steel bollard fence was 18 foot tall and it was 1,250 miles instead of 2,000 and instead of a concrete 30 foot wall.
	I'd be willing to say okay.
	But now he's telling us we're going to accept 1.37 billion dollars for 55 miles of fencing and that's if we're lucky 55 miles out of a thousand 55 out of 1000?
	That's 5%!
	And this is a bill that's going to fund the government until September.
	So you're 75% of the way through your presidency.
	You're almost a third of the way done with your, or rather three quarters of the way done with your presidency at that point, virtually speaking.
	And we've got 5% of the wall built?
	And that's, again, only what we've committed to.
	He said, oh, well, we'll build with an executive order.
	We will build with some money from the outside.
	The reason I'm not inclined to believe that is because if it were really that easy, if that were the case, why didn't you do it on January 20, 2017?
	Why didn't you do that on December 20th, 2018?
	Why did you do that before you shut down the government?
	Why did you do that after you shut down the government?
	Right?
	I mean, if it was really so simple as, well, I will just declare a state of emergency and I'll find the money elsewhere, I think that would have happened already.
	So it's very disappointing.
	I am not happy with the deal.
	I'm not happy with the fact that he seems to already be trying to... that he's already been trying to sell us this.
	You know, the Republicans are the ones who are betraying us on this.
	Mitch McConnell is the traitor here.
	Because Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan, they promised the President, they said, look...
	If you give us health care, if you give us the tax cuts, we will give you immigration eventually.
	Well, they didn't give it to him in the omnibus, they didn't give it to him in September or in December, and they're not giving it to him now.
	And Mitch McConnell, previously, at least with the few compromises that were floated during the government shutdown, he would always go to the president first.
	If there was any kind of a deal, any kind of a compromise, he would go to the White House first and say, does the President approve of this bill?
	And he wouldn't introduce it on the floor otherwise.
	He wouldn't get any feelers out there from any other senators before he did that.
	He wouldn't take it to the media before he did that.
	Well now, who's running the show?
	Now Mitch McConnell is introducing it.
	He's trying to push it to the floor as quickly as possible to avert a government shutdown.
	And he's saying, look, Mr. President, you're either with us or you're not.
	And if you're not with us, you can veto it, but we'll just pass it with the two-thirds majority.
	Okay, I get that.
	Yes, Mitch McConnell is betraying us.
	Yes, the Republican Party is probably at fault for this.
	They could have jammed it through last year.
	I'm sure they could have.
	They jammed through tax cuts without a supermajority in the Senate.
	They could have done that with the border wall, but they didn't.
	So that's the Republicans that are doing this.
	That's the Republicans that are hurting the administration, they're embarrassing and humiliating the administration, people in his own White House.
	Okay, fine.
	Well then put Mitch McConnell on blast.
	Veto the bill.
	Let them override your veto.
	Dare them to override the veto then.
	You know, everybody talked about that during the Omnibus Bill, and I accepted the excuse that was made at the time.
	You know, people said, why didn't he just veto the omnibus bill and force them to put wall money in there?
	And everybody said, well, you know, they would probably override the veto.
	And anyway, it's not a good time to bring it up because it's an election year and so on and so forth.
	I said, OK, you know, maybe that's legitimate.
	Maybe we'll just wait until September 30th and we'll pass it right before the midterms.
	Well, that didn't happen.
	Oh, well, maybe we'll just have to wait until December.
	We could still do it in the lame duck session.
	Yeah, well, that didn't happen.
	So I think it's time to veto and then dare the Republican senators and congressmen.
	OK, you know, if you're really if you're really feeling lucky, if you really are serious about going up against the president who has a 90 percent approval rating.
	among the party, and the country is with Republicans on immigration.
	There was just a new poll done, reported by The Hill, this morning, which said that more Americans support Republicans on immigration than Democrats, which means the wall.
	So maybe the State of the Union actually worked.
	And Republicans support the wall by like 8 to 1.
	So then Derevich McConnell, if he really wants to cause this coup against the party and avert another shutdown, let him do that, and then blame him.
	But instead he's going to be the sucker and he's going to make us the suckers in order to do that, right?
	Because he's not going to get the wall, now he's going to try and sell us and say, oh this is a wall all along and he's going to keep shying us on about the state of emergency and so on.
	I have to tell you, from what I've seen, I'm not thrilled.
	You know, the President said that this morning about the bill.
	He said, I'm not thrilled.
	And I'm actually surprised, because what we've been seeing over the last week is, has been pretty good.
	With the exception of the State of the Union, he's been pushing on immigration very hard on Twitter, in several public statements.
	He did that rally on Monday.
	This is what a lot of people said.
	They said, maybe he'll do the State of the Union, and that'll be the unifying speech.
	He'll appeal to the people in the middle and some people on the left.
	And then he'll do a rally of some sort.
	And I said, yeah, well, maybe that'll happen.
	Well, it turned out it did.
	And then on Monday, last night, he struck a much harsher, stronger tone on immigration, really appealing to the base, really hitting the immigration issue hard for the whole evening, and in the strongest of terms, even bringing up chain migration again, which I thought was huge.
	And so it came as a big surprise to me to hear all week all this stuff about illegal immigration and the wall, and then you have this big blowout rally to campaign on the wall.
	And then today, it sounds like, I mean, what it sounds like, and a lot of unnamed sources are saying he's getting ready to sign this bill, which gives us 55 miles of wall, physical barrier.
	And they're saying, oh, well, but there's all this other money for border security.
	Well, that has never worked out before.
	I'm surprised.
	I'm shocked.
	I'm very disappointed.
	And that's on the president to turn this around.
	I don't doubt that he could turn this around.
	Like I said, you know, I'm not black.
	I always love the people in the comments.
	It's either you're white-pilling or you're black-pilling.
	You're either you believe that Trump is going to fix everything or you believe that, you know, Trump is just this shill and he's not going to fix anything.
	Well, look, as it stands right now, what the information we have right now is this.
	It's a shitty deal.
	There's some promises about a state of emergency or executive action.
	The President does not support the idea that that is going to be viable.
unidentified		Okay?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And I just went through all the reasons for why that is.
		The President is rumored to be willing to sign this bill in order to avert a government shutdown on Friday.
		With the information that we have, this is very disappointing.
		We have no reason to believe that we're going to get anything substantial on the wall anytime soon.
		Now, it's a possibility that after this bill is passed, perhaps it is a down payment on the wall.
		And perhaps the president does pull money from other agencies and he does do a state of emergency and he's able to get money and he starts building the wall.
		That's a possibility.
		If he does that, he'll win me back.
		And I'll say, well, the precedent has been proven wrong.
		And this is a turning point in the Trump administration.
		This is when he got serious about immigration.
		But until that point, I am not happy.
		Nobody should be happy.
		This is a betrayal of what we voted for.
		And to me, the biggest betrayal is, you know, this argument about Trump not being able to get things done.
		It only works if he got nothing done.
		But he didn't get nothing done.
		He got a lot of things done.
		He got tax cuts.
		He got the individual mandate.
		He got drilling.
		He got the embassy moved.
		He got the Iran deal.
		So there's a lot of things going on in the administration.
		There's a lot of things happening there.
		And so this excuse of, oh, well, there's a lot of opposition.
		I get that.
		I've been making that argument all along.
		But at a certain point, he has to put his foot down and fight everybody that's working against him, including the Republicans.
		He's got to say, okay, Mitch McConnell, you're not going to give me money for the wall.
		I'm campaigning against you now.
		And I'm campaigning against every other rhino, every other fake conservative that doesn't want a border wall.
		And that's what I'm saying.
		Now I'm putting all of you on blast, and I am shutting down the government.
		And if you want to override that, by all means, good luck in 2018.
		Or rather, good luck in 2020.
		But that's what has to happen at this point.
		Because it is a shame that we are made out to be the suckers instead of these losers in Congress.
		Mitch McConnell should be the one being humiliated, not us.
		Mitch McConnell should be the one being exposed as a fraud, not us and Donald Trump.
		That's what should be happening at this point.
		You know, I was willing to give a lot of accommodations and all that.
		Two years ago, when he first got into office, because I said, okay, maybe he'll build up goodwill and political capital and he'll consolidate the party.
		Once all that has happened, then he'll be able to get the more difficult things, the more controversial things, which are immigration, trade, foreign policy.
		Obviously, that hasn't happened.
		I think he's realizing that.
		I think maybe that was the play from the beginning, but he's quickly realizing, oh yeah, I did try to do that.
		I did try and consolidate the party.
		I did try and build political capital.
		But now these people are not playing fair.
		Now these people have burned me.
		And they need to be made the suckers, not us.
		So that's my take on the wall.
		Fortunately, we've got some people speaking out on this.
		People like Mark Meadows, an immigration hawk in Congress.
		He said, quote, this conference agreement is hardly a serious attempt to secure our border or stop the flow of illegal immigration.
		It kicks the can down the road yet again, failing to address the critical priorities, excuse me, outlined by border patrol chiefs.
		Congress is not doing its job.
		He tweeted later on, quote, I expect Trump to follow up with some kind of executive action, whether that's a national emergency or some other tools in his toolbox.
		Well, yeah, that has to happen.
		Sean Hannity said, quote, that's not even a wall.
		That's a barrier.
		I'm going to tell you this tonight.
		We will get back into this tomorrow.
	Any Republican that supports this garbage compromise, you will have to explain it.
	I agree.
	I agree.
	If the president comes out this week, and says, I'm signing the bill, and I'm also signing today a state of emergency, and that's a possibility, I'll say, okay, fine, we will take this compromise.
	If he says, and I will sign this right now, today.
	But, you know, like Mark Meadows said, I think he sort of backtracked on that, saying, well, I expect there to be something else.
	But he said it, I think, perfectly clear in the first tweet.
	It's kicking the can down the road.
	We're always able to sign the compromise today, but we're never able to sign the action on immigration today.
	That's always, I'll do an executive order.
	Well, I'll do a state of emergency down the road.
	Enough is enough.
	You know, and I said, after the midterms, I said, there's two things that we can look out for by the end of 2018, which will determine if Trump is serious about immigration.
	I said, He can switch his personnel in the White House and have better, more hawkish people in there, more conservative people.
	And Mick Mulvaney was a horrible choice!
	He replaced Kelly with Mick Mulvaney as his Chief of Staff.
	He's the acting Chief of Staff.
	Mick Mulvaney is a total Koch brothers shill.
	Totally pro-amnesty.
	Horrible choice.
	And I said as much.
	I said, that's not looking good.
	I said, the other thing you can do is shut down the government over immigration.
	Well, that happened, and that happened for a long time.
	Now, when he reopened the government, I said, this is a loss.
	It didn't work.
	Now we have to look out for is by the 15th, is there a state of emergency or is there a compromise that funds the wall?
	If those things don't happen, if one or the other does not happen, we're not going to have a fun time in the next two years.
	So look, we've got until Friday.
	We've got until Friday.
	If he signs the compromise, but there's nothing else, I'm going to say we're in for a rough two years.
	If he signs the compromise and there's a state of emergency that day, this week, then I'll say we're in good shape.
	But what we're sick of, every week it's another excuse, right?
	And the omnibus bill is, oh, we have to wait until September.
	You know, this was just too complicated.
	I will never sign something else like this again.
	In September, the excuse is we have to wait until after the midterms, okay?
	In December, the excuse is we have to wait until George Bush's funeral is over, okay?
	December 21st, well, we shut the government down, then we reopen it.
	Oh, well, we have to have a compromise.
	They're not giving me the wall money.
	Okay, well enough is enough now.
	It's time to put up or shut up.
	So, that's my take on the immigration deal.
	We'll see how it goes, but that's that.
	The second story, which we don't have much time on this, we got about 10 minutes, but this is important.
	This is more of the same, more of our awesome country.
	This is what the country is going to look like.
	If you think, you know, the border wall, immigration, if you think that's not having an effect on your life, you're about to see how it is.
	Today there was this article in Esquire, Esquire Magazine, I don't know anything about Esquire Magazine, but they did a cover story about a boy named Ryan Morgan who is a high school senior from West Bend, Wisconsin.
	And apparently this is part of a whole series on the American youth.
	And they're talking about what it means to be a part of all these different groups.
	You know, what it means to be a white guy and a white woman and a black guy and a gay guy and an Hispanic.
	What that all means is a young person growing up in Trump's America.
	And it's supposed to spotlight different kids, basically.
	And wouldn't you know it, because you have on the front page of a magazine a white teenager.
	Just a normal white teenager.
	The story is not offensive.
	It's about a right leaning guy who collects sneakers and he plays video games.
	And he works hard and you know he's just kind of confused.
	And there's a lot of fighting in school because of politics.
	If you read the article, it's pretty boring, okay?
	It's pretty standard.
	But you would not believe the kind of vitriol that you see for such a mundane, boring profile of what should just be a standard, normative American youth, which is a white male.
	That should be the standard.
	And what the reaction was, you've got all kinds of outlets, you've got The Independent, you've got Compound, you've got everybody saying, this is horrible, this is a tragedy.
	People are up in arms online because how dare Esquire put a white person on the cover of their magazine during Black History Month?
	And in defense of the magazine cover, their editor-in-chief, Jay Fielding, Said that the piece was inspired by an experience his son relayed to him about a school exercise.
	And so this is a quote by the editor-in-chief.
	He says, quote, Eric Sullivan, one of our senior editors, helpfully recalled a classic Esquire profile pointing to a 1992 piece by Susan Orlin on the daily life of a 10-year-old boy.
	He goes on, quote, 26 years later, we decided to follow that model, but to enlarge it into a series on growing up now, white, black, LGBTQ, female, that will continue to appear in coming issues.
	So again, he says, well, this is just the first one and a whole string of issues, but that wasn't enough.
	I'll read you just a few quotes here in response to this.
	All these people are check marks.
	All these people are journalists.
	These are all legitimate voices.
	You've got Caramo Brown who says, quote, really, Esquire?
	What it's like growing up white, middle class, and male?
	How idiotic!
	It's the same as it's always been.
	Full of privilege that women, people of color, gay people, and immigrants don't have.
	I'm done.
	Ferrari Shepherd writes, Yeah, this is what the world needs.
	More perspectives from American white men.
	Imani Gandhi says, am I getting this right?
	Esquire put a random white kid on the cover and wrote a story about him?
	In the middle of Black History Month?
	In all capital letters, diversify your newsrooms and publications.
	Diversify, of course, the operative word meaning make it less white.
	Have more blacks, have more Hispanics, have more non-whites.
	We want to see less white people.
	Sarah Weinman.
	This is maybe my favorite.
	Sarah Weinman.
	That sounds like a white name, I guess, right?
	Weinman?
	That's, you know, people like Weinman.
	All they do is whine, right?
	All they do is just whine.
	They come into our country that we built, and all they do is complain.
	All they do is whine.
	It's sort of interesting.
	Weinman says, quote, I could read that Esquire story, or I could read this again.
	And then she links an article titled, A Most American Terrorist, The Making of Dylan Roof.
	So she sees an article that says an American boy about a young 17-year-old innocuous person.
	She says, well, I could read that story or I could read this again.
	The Making of Dylan Roof.
	So she sees a white male and she conflates it with Dylan Roof.
	Yeah, that's interesting.
	Oliver Willis writes, quote, Esquire making a straight white boy the default, quote, American teen in a country with millions of black, Latino, and Asian men and women is pretty much the problem.
	And finally, Jamil Because you know what we don't discuss nearly enough?
	The white male experience.
	And my first reaction to this, to me, and I think this should be the reaction of all white people, this is our country.
	It is our country.
	Who founded the United States of America?
	Anybody?
	It wasn't people named Jamil.
	Sorry.
	It wasn't people named Imani.
	Sorry.
	It was people named George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson.
	The country was founded by white men.
	Okay?
	The country was 90% white until 1965.
	So everything that you see here today, for the most part, up until very recently, it was only in the past 20 to 25 years that the white majority has been decreased so substantially, still 63% white today.
	So just about everything you see in this country, whether it be the laws, the buildings, the inventions, the technology, the infrastructure, everything that you see, the safe neighborhoods, the good schools, everything created by white people, okay?
	This is our country.
	We fought in the wars, we built the buildings, we industrialized the country, we settled the West.
	This is our country.
	Now these people, with the exception of blacks who are imported here, with the exception of blacks, all these Latinos and Asians and everybody else, Who come here, they come into our country, and what?
	They find it offensive that we profile American people as white people?
	They come over here and they're offended that white people are represented in American publications and movies?
	Well, maybe that makes sense.
	We're the majority of the country.
	Up until recently, we were almost 100% of the country.
	Gee, you know, Jameel Hill.
	Hey, Jameel.
	You know, I think I know of a place where you'll see nothing but blacks.
	I think I know of a place.
	I've heard of such a place.
	Where they have nothing but blacks on their televisions, on their magazines, you know, if they have televisions, in the movies, everywhere, in music.
	You know where that place is called?
	It's called Africa.
	There's a whole continent.
	It's like three times the size of the United States.
	Maybe you should try there if you have such a problem with white representation.
	Asians, Latinos, hey, hey, I've got a great idea.
	You want to see Asian representation?
	There's a whole continent.
	It's called Asia.
	And all they've got there is Asians.
	They've got like a trillion of them.
	Hey, Latinos!
	Anywhere south of this river, the Rio Grande, you've got nothing but Hispanics in all different gradients, from tan all the way to black.
	You've got them everywhere.
	They're the presidents, they're on television, they're on magazines.
	But of course, that's not good enough.
	Everybody wants to come here.
	Everybody wants to come here, into a country that white people built, okay?
	And they're welcomed and open arms by white people, and is there a gratitude?
	Are they kissing the ground like our white ancestors were?
	That's what my ancestors were doing.
	You know, my ancestors didn't come here from the beginning, no.
	But you know what they did when they got here?
	When my Italian ancestors got here and they came to Ellis Island, they kissed the ground when they arrived here.
	Do you see a whole lot of kissing of the ground by these Latinos and Asians and anybody else?
	You know, when they plop down an anchor baby or whatever and they come over here, do you see a whole lot of kissing the ground?
	Is that really happening?
	Overwhelmed with gratitude and appreciation for America?
	I don't see it.
	If it's happening, hey, I don't see it.
	I've never heard of it.
	I see a lot of complaining.
	I see a lot of whining.
	I see a lot of nagging.
	And I see just outright and explicit hatred for the people that welcomed you in in the first place.
	And of course the reason that they come here and they complain and they don't bear the conditions in their own countries but have representation is because their countries don't have nice stuff.
	That's what it comes down to.
	All these black people who have had political equality since the 1960s, they will never go back to Africa.
	That will never happen.
	And people might think that's really, oh...
	It's a faux pas to say that, to even bring that up, but really think about it.
	All these people do, at least at a political national level, the black community, all we ever hear is racism is so terrible, oh white people are pushing us around, oh it's terrible for a young black man in America, and by the way, how many of the problems are self-inflicted, right?
	You listen to a rap song, what are the problems?
	Black shootings, black schools, black fathers, okay?
	So nearly all the problems are self-inflicted, but they're blaming them on us.
	Oh hey, Well, there's a really great solution for that.
	If it's really... Wow, I hear you, man.
	That sucks.
	It's really terrible that, you know, somebody called you the n-word one time.
	I get called the spick every day, you know, and I think I'm okay, right?
	But that's, that's such a shame.
unidentified		Wow.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You know, one time somebody called you black in the wrong context or something.
		I hear you, man.
		I really sympathize.
		Well, I will pay for a one way plane ticket.
		You never have to look back.
		You can pack your bags tomorrow and you can go where white people will just not be a problem for you anymore.
		White people will not oppress you.
		White people will not call you names.
		They won't make fun of you.
		They won't like manipulate the money or the, whatever, you know, whatever the excuses are now.
		And you could go there and you can never look back, right?
		But nobody will do that.
		And the same is true with all these other immigrant groups.
		I guess blacks are the exception.
		Blacks I'll have the most tolerance for.
		But all these other groups, they come over here and it's just nothing but hatred.
		It's nothing but complaints.
		It's nothing but whining.
		Why don't you show a little respect?
		How about that?
		How about a little bit of a thank You know, you're welcome.
		People pouring into the country, and what do they get when they walk into the country?
		They get free money, they get an SSI, they get a driver's license, they get a free education, right?
		And they get free healthcare, they get the emergency rooms.
		And they get to live in a country that isn't, you know, drug dealers and horrible things happening every day.
		They're bringing that, but you know, at least until they arrived it wasn't happening.
		And all they've got is nasty things to say.
		All they've got is hatred for the people that came here.
		This guy...
unidentified		Who is this?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		What's his name?
		Ryan Morgan, who was profiled in Esquire.
		He's in, uh, what is he in?
		West Bend, Wisconsin.
		People like this are the people that built the country.
		I imagine his parents have been here for generations.
		So you're insulting this child saying, well, him having primacy in this series, him being spotlighted in this series, this is offensive to us because we have to tell our stories.
		I disagree.
		I think we should tell our stories.
		It's America.
		An American boy is a white boy, sorry to say.
		You know, you're the ones that want to identify as something else, right?
		These are the people bringing over their culture.
		What even is an American?
		You know, there was one comment that was saying, this was somebody who wasn't verified, but this was one tweet and it was echoing the sentiments of a lot of people.
		This guy Anthony said quote the cover for Esquire is upsetting to me because who at the editorial board meeting thought this is a fresh new or needed perspective in any way.
		Imagine the impact featuring a black or Latino boy on the cover with the same headline would have.
		In other words having a black or Latino boy and saying an American boy.
		Well, why should that be the case?
		At every opportunity, every step of the way, these people take, they differentiate themselves from Anglo-America.
		You know, you look at blacks, you look at Hispanics, you look at Asians, every step of the way, they are trying to harbor, they are trying to keep, they are trying to preserve the places where they came from.
		Look at Hispanics, they don't even bother to learn the language in a lot of circumstances.
		Why should we call you an American boy?
		There was research done on this.
		For years, by Pew, by Gallup, Hispanics don't even identify as American.
		They identify as Latino, Hispanic, or their country of origin.
		Even by the third generation, it's modest compared to past immigrant groups.
		How many of them identify as Americans?
		The same is true with blacks.
		What do they do every year at the State of the Union?
		In Congress, they wear some funky African garb to remind everybody, no, no, we're not like you.
		We're African American.
		We're exotic.
		You know, we're special.
		We're color.
		We're rich, right?
		You know?
		And so I don't really understand what this double standard is.
		At once, they hate America, they want to subvert and destroy all our institutions, and at the same time, you know, they want to be a part of it, this redefinition.
		And it goes back to what I was saying last week.
		This is a revolutionary struggle.
		I'm the part of this non-white coalition against white America.
		That's what it is.
		And it's assault on everything that we know to be traditionally American.
		It's an assault on our history.
		It's an assault on us demographically.
		It's an assault on our culture, on our customs, on our media, on everything.
		America's been fundamentally transformed over the last 50 years.
		You know, boomers like to talk about when Barack Obama said that.
		It was the favorite tagline of the boomers.
		Barack Obama says he's going to fundamentally transform the country.
		Boomers love that line.
		When boomers heard that, they thought what he meant by that was he was going to make the country socialist.
		That's not what he talked about.
		What he was talking about was subverting the racial homogeneity of the nation.
		He was right.
		You know, you look at all these people.
		I think there was somebody from the ADL or the SPLC.
		They posted a picture from their office.
		They had a little note hung up on the wall which had year by year the percentage of non-Hispanic whites going down every year from 90 to 70 to 60 where it is now to the future where it's going to be like 25.
		It was someone from the SPLC.
		It's a war.
		That's why they're taking down the monuments.
		And they're taking down the monuments.
	Why?
	Because the people who founded the country were racist.
	You know, they were terrible.
	They're taking down the legal framework of the country.
	All these people who say America's creedal, it's about freedom and everything.
	Take a look at what percentage these people support the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, anything like that.
	The majority of minorities support hate speech legislation.
	The majority of minorities support gun control and repealing the Second Amendment.
	So they don't even believe in a creedal nation.
	They're reforming everything.
	They're coming in here, they're destroying everything that was traditional about America.
	And that makes sense.
	You swap out the people, you get different people, you get a different country.
	People are not interchangeable.
	The rhetoric was, oh, well, it's only skin deep.
	What difference does it make if they're coming here and, oh, well, they're black instead of white?
	Sure, well, if the differences stop there, maybe you'd be right.
	But, of course, it's not interchangeable.
	It's not that simple.
	Race is deeper.
	History is deeper.
	Culture is deeper.
	These people come here and they have baggage.
	You know, they're different.
	And when you get different constituent pieces, you get a different whole.
	You get a different nation.
	So that's why we have to build the wall.
	That's why we have to end legal immigration.
	I'm sick of it.
	Look, I'm sick of it.
	I'm a white guy in this country, and I had white ancestors here, who were very great people.
	They served in World War II.
	They served in Vietnam.
	I've had people serving and working and doing things in this country for a hundred years, and these people roll up on our shores.
	They're one or two generations in.
	I've got nothing but nasty things to say.
	You know, our, oh, our ancestors were actually evil because we mistreated them and, yeah, they're bad.
	We have to throw out everything that they did.
	Yeah, I'm getting real sick and tired of that.
	But, anywho, we're gonna take a look, right?
	I mean, that's, that's just another day.
	Another day, another Shekel here in, uh...
	Here in our new country.
	We're going to take a look at our stream labs and super chats and we'll see what people are saying.
	I want to see if everybody else is as outraged as I am.
	Is that controversial?
	I know a lot of people, if you talk like that, a lot of people get weird.
	When you bring up the racial components, a lot of people get, ooh, you can't really talk about white people.
	You can't really talk about anti-white hatred.
	I'm sick of it.
	It's not right.
	It's not acceptable.
	Even by left-wing standards, it shouldn't be acceptable, right?
	That there's this just vitriolic anti-white hatred.
	Would that fly with any other group?
	If a black teen was featured on the cover of a magazine, would that fly if people were talking about him in that way?
	If people were saying, oh, you put a random black kid on the cover and wrote a story about him?
	Diversify your newsrooms.
	We need less black people in newsrooms.
	Could you imagine?
	I mean, would anybody even conceive of saying something like that, let alone tweeting it out?
	Karama, whatever the name is, whatever this goofy name is, he writes, what it's like growing up white middle class and male.
	How idiotic.
	What if he said instead, what it's like growing up black and poor.
	How idiotic.
	You know, or do we really need something like that?
	Jameel Hill, because you know what we don't discuss nearly enough?
	The white male experience.
	What if we said, because you know what we don't need to discuss nearly enough?
	The black male experience.
	Yeah, I'm frankly, I'm sick of hearing about it.
	Oh, I was poor in the ghetto, and you know, but mama was there, and daddy wasn't, and the schools were bad, but I had this one teacher who believed in me.
	Yeah, I'm pretty sick of that story.
	Could you imagine anybody saying something like that and getting away with it?
	Of course not.
	But these are mainstream tastemakers.
	And they're projecting all their hatred of white people onto white people themselves.
	White people hate themselves.
	They feel bad.
	You know, if you talk about white people, you talk about pride in our heritage or anything like that, people like get funny about that.
	They don't like that.
	But I like being white.
	I think it's more than okay to be white.
	I think it's actually good to be white.
	I'm proud to be white.
	I mean, white people are awesome.
	We get a whole month talking about how epic black people are, and white people, it's like we have to be ashamed.
	We have to apologize.
	We have to talk about our sins.
	What about the awesome things white people have done?
	White people are pretty great.
	You know, I'm not saying, oh, they're better or worse or worse superior.
	I'm saying they're pretty good.
	I think everybody has a right to have esteem in their own people.
	That's fine.
	And I'd like to see our people doing well.
	You know, our politicians go around saying, Oh, the black community is doing so good.
	Hispanics are doing so good.
	Why can't a president come out and say, Hey, white people are really doing good in this country.
	You know, we're going to be a minority pretty soon.
	So anyway, but we'll take a look here.
	My stream labs is taking a long time to load.
	That's awesome.
	In the meantime, we'll take a look at our super chats.
	We'll hope that that resolves itself.
	The technology, man.
	Ted Kaczynski?
	Bad guy?
	Yes.
	I mean, sure.
	He blew up a lot of people.
	That's no good.
	But was he right?
	Was the fundamental point, was that correct?
	But was it factual?
	But was it facts, though?
	I think it was.
	You know, a Streamlabs application every week.
	Oh, we've got another update.
	We've got cool.
	Just make it work.
	How about we focus on that?
	It's like Microsoft.
	Microsoft, you got Bill Gates in Africa.
	We're going to fix AIDS forever.
	We're going to fix malaria.
	All these Africans, we're going to lift them out of poverty.
	How about we make an operating system that works first?
	How about we make an operating system that doesn't crash every time it's updated?
	Let's start with that.
	Thomas O'Malley says, Trump is your boomer uncle who posts low-resolution memes making fun of Democrats.
	That's very true.
	Autism Unstoppable says, I believe in you, Nick.
	Thanks, bro.
	Unarchive says, Hey Nick, the weirdest thing happened yesterday.
	I went to look up the Belloc book you talked about and Google just suddenly asks for permission to track my location.
	Wacky stuff, Nick.
	I don't know if the two are related, but big if true.
	I prefer Asian women says Liam Neeson was in Chicago on the day of the attack.
	Oh, really makes you think.
	Maybe that's why I came forward.
	He's trying to get out ahead of the story.
	Cyrus says, I don't want CNN to be more honest.
	I want people who run CNN to be arrested and deported or hanged.
	No, I don't want that.
	I don't want that.
	What a horrible thing to say.
	I'll never live that one down.
	If you guys don't recognize, when I was in RSVN, I did a show, and look, if it was in context, it made a lot of sense.
	I said, look, CNN is just straight up lying to the American people, and they're committing treason.
	I said, look, if you're committing treason, I don't really care if you're more honest, I want you hanged.
	Because when you commit treason, you get hanged.
	That was the context of the clip.
	But a little friend of ours, my friend and mentor, a certain pro-Israel shiksa friend of mine, friend and mentor, took that clip because she was watching my show every night to see if I slipped off and called my boss and everything, and she took that clip and she sent it actually to CNN, and CNN called RSBN and it made its way to Media Matters and everything else, and it was all right-side host says, I want CNN people to be hanged, and there's a call for violence suddenly.
	And in the whole show I was like, I'm not calling for violence, I'm just saying you're committing treason.
	And then now all these people are falsely reporting, oh, Nick got kicked out of RSBN because he said that.
	I wasn't, that's not why I was kicked out of RSBN.
	I was kicked out of RSBN for Charlottesville.
	But anyway, EcoFash says, help me dox the Knickers Shekel boy.
	No, I will not do that.
	Ecofascists, you asked for this attack with your anti-South divide and conquer.
	It wasn't anti-South and that's the funny thing is you know Southerners really like to pride themselves on you know people not being able to get a rise out of them or something.
unidentified		What?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I made a passing remark in a 90-minute show where I said, hey, I don't disrespect southerners.
		You know, it's their way of life.
		It's not for me.
		And then I did a tongue-in-cheek.
		I did a couple of jokes.
		You got all these snowflakes, all these southern snowflakes melting in the comments.
unidentified		Yeah, okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Why don't you come complain to me when you've created one good major city?
		You know, tell me.
		Maybe you could come to the north and you can flex when you've got one great city.
		One great industrial city.
unidentified		But, you know, I don't really...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Eh, and they're all libertarians anyway.
		I mean, the whole basis of Dixie, of the South, is we don't want the government coming in.
		So all these people watch my show like, what are you, not conservative?
		What are you, not right-wing?
		We want to be, we're going to secede.
		That's about the most liberal thing you can do.
unidentified		Really?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		The Confederacy would have the wall when they would have what, a 50% black population?
		Yeah, good luck with that.
		Really?
		The Confederacy would have the wall when they would have, what, a 50% black population?
		Yeah, good luck with that.
		Simon Scolas says, how familiar are you with Varg?
		Not familiar at all.
		Based God, he's just a dumb pagan.
		Based God says 3.1 billion of our money the country that requires DNA testing for citizenship and has a wall, 1.3 billion for the peasant Americans border because we're racist, right?
		Actually it's 3.8 billion dollars per year now.
		So no, not 3.1 for Israel, 3.8 billion for Israel and 1.3 for us.
		So no, not 3.1 for Israel, 3.8 billion for Israel and 1.3 for us.
		Isn't that nice?
		Joshua Larson says, This is Brett Weinstein's hot new tweet, which reads, Culture is biological.
		That can be difficult to accept.
		By doing so, one assumes less and explains more.
		Why do I feel like he doesn't get what that really implies?
		Yeah well and that's really the the missing piece for all these people and Ben Shapiro says it has nothing to do with race and everything to do with culture.
		I regrettably used that line in Boston University quite a few times.
		I was hiding my power level okay Uh, but yeah, Ben Shapiro popularized that line.
		It has nothing to do with race and everything to do with culture.
		Well, what do you think culture, where do you think culture proceeds from?
		Proceeds from race, of course.
		It's not hard to understand why.
		I mean, really, it takes a lot of conditioning.
		To unlearn what we would intuitively observe otherwise.
		Take Africa for example.
		If it was all about culture, why is it that Africa's conditions are basically uniform from the Sahara all the way down to Cape Town?
		Why is that the case?
		You know, shouldn't there be a whole lot of diversity in terms of outcomes and situations when you have French occupation in the West and British occupation in the South and German occupation in the South?
		In the South-East, and you've got the Mali Empire in the West, and you've got the Zulus in the South.
		I mean, you've got pre-colonial, colonial cultural differences.
		Why is it uniformly bad everywhere, and bad in the same ways?
		Doesn't that tell you something?
		Same is true with Latin America.
		You know, Latin America, you've got Simone Bolivar in some places.
		You've got Portuguese versus Spanish.
		You've got different kind of colonial arrangements in all the different countries.
		They gain their independence at different times.
		Okay, well, why is it that basically everywhere south of America has relatively the same conditions, and the only times that there's difference is when you have a large European population, as in Argentina, or in Brazil in some cases.
		You know, we have a lot of Italians in Argentina, historically, in Buenos Aires.
		And the same is true with Europe.
		Why is it that all the white countries are kind of like uniform, based on race for the most part?
		And the same is true with Asia.
		Why is East Asia generally, you know, very similar attributes for all those different societies?
		Now, culture plays a part, but in a large way, culture proceeds from biological difference.
		Everybody knows that.
		Everybody knows that.
		This is why stereotypes exist.
		So, yeah, but he doesn't really get it.
		If he got it, he wouldn't be a civic nationalist.
		Garrett says, edgy joke incoming.
		Interviewed David Duke.
		So funny.
		Ah, yes.
		So, it's come full circle.
		A123 says, I found your answer yesterday to be insufficient.
		Why won't you debate Southern Israelite?
		He has very strong arguments against Christianity because it's stupid.
		Excuse me.
		All these different religious denominations who want to debate flat earth, debate, you know, the moon landing, debate southern Israelites or whatever.
		No, just unserious.
		I have no interest in doing that.
		And moreover, I'm not, you know, I'm not a Christian apologist.
	I'm not a, I mean, I am in the sense that I'm a Christian.
	I defend Christianity, but I'm not an expert in Christianity.
	People are like, oh, you're Christian?
	Debate Christianity with somebody else.
	You know, and I'm not an expert in Christianity.
	To get classical theists to debate Southern Israelite, get Jay Dyer to debate Southern Israelite, all these people.
	Well, I'm not an expert in that.
	I'm not an expert in health care.
	I wouldn't debate somebody on health care.
	I don't know everything about health care.
	I would debate somebody on international relations.
	I would debate someone on immigration.
	I would debate somebody on the economy.
	I would debate somebody where I've got expertise.
	But in terms of Christianity, You know, I've done a few of those debates and a lot of Catholics always get on my case.
	A lot of Catholics on the sidelines in the PINA gallery.
	Oh, Nick wasn't a good defender.
	I think I do good anyway, but I'm trying to make the focus more politics, if you haven't noticed.
	Douchebags says Trump veto, Republicans override.
	Trump used bully pulpit to attack Republicans.
	Democrats worked in 2016.
	I don't know how much longer Trump base can handle losing.
	Exactly!
	You could have done that very easily.
	Why is anyone surprised a magazine called Esquire interviewed a white kid?
	Esquire is the whitest name ever.
	Might as well call it playing badminton after eating a cheese and mayonnaise sandwich, all the while staying out of jail.
	Isn't that such a great thing though?
	I love when white people get hit for these stereotypes, which are all just like pleasant, you know?
	Like being nice, being polite, being orderly, showing up on time.
	It's like, oh, those white people and being totally pleasant.
	Yeah, what a shame, right?
	But true, also true.
	As if black people are reading Esquire, right?
	El Sapo says, when are you having a podcast on industrial society and its future by Ted Kaczynski?
	I did a premium show that went into that pretty heavily.
	So you can check out, I think it was, I forget which episode, but we went into that maybe on the Steve Bannon episode?
	I forget, but it was one of the premium shows I did on Ted Kaczynski.
	Zirconium says save us Z fighters.
	I will.
	I will.
	And cynical says Ted K was the best boomer.
	Yeah, very true.
	I prefer Asian women says Hispanics were never oppressed in America.
	In fact, Americans were not allowed to own land in Mexico until a hundred plus years ago.
	Thoughts on New Orleans lynchings in 1891?
	I don't know what the New Orleans 1891 lynchings are.
	Yeah, I believe.
	I'm not sure how much of his story is out there, how much he wants me to share, but I believe he was left-leaning or something like that before the election.
	friend mustache matt used to be a progressive activist at his college did you ever ask him how he got red pilled uh yeah i believe i'm not i'm not sure how much of his story is out there how much he wants me to share but i believe he was left-leaning or something like that uh before the election i'm not totally sure and then i believe he was a bernie bro or something I'm not sure if he was a Bernie bro, but I know that he came around during like the election.
	I forget his red-pilling story, but I know he he might have flirted with the left in his past.
	But yeah, I'm a big fan of Millennial Matt, good friend of mine.
	Let's see, finally our Streamlabs is loaded up here.
	We've got Lamonkey who says, attention all Chinese viewers of Nick Fuentes, please make sure the volume is turned way up.
	The 1989 Tiananmen Square protests, commonly known in mainland China as the June 4th incident, were student demonstrations in Beijing.
	That's a good joke.
	Broseph says, new idea for Survivor Show.
	We put all the Democrats running in 2020, including Pat Little and Spencer in LucasRoom, and locked the door for 48 hours.
	Good idea.
	Maybe lock them in there for 48 years.
	Patrick says, hey Nick, can you do me a favor and Google the name Malvin Weisberg and just look at the first result?
	Eh, sure, why not?
	Let's pull it up.
	Malvin Weisberg.
	Oh wow, Los Angeles fetus disposal scandal.
	Interesting.
	Yeah, well maybe we'll have to do a show on that eventually.
	Tom G says, I know you've made fun of people saying they'll vote for Tulsi Gabbard, but Mike Enoch had a good point.
	I can't wait to hear a great point from Michael Enoch.
	If you live in a blue state, vote for her in the primaries because a Republican vote would be useless.
	This would help ensure an anti-war candidate.
	Thoughts?
	True.
	Uh, true.
	Well, but by the same token, not true, because Tulsi Gabbard could probably challenge Trump.
	And Trump is an anti-war candidate, right?
	I mean, Tulsi Gabbard is in the Council on Foreign Relations, so all these stupid alt-righters were like, Tulsi Gabbard is based!
	No, I don't want Tulsi Gabbard in the running.
	I want somebody who can lose in the running.
	I want Kamala Harris to be the nominee.
	Or I want somebody far left, you know, maybe a darker racial minority to be in the running.
	Somebody who would alienate the white working class.
	Why have Tulsi Gabbard run?
	I would have somebody competitive run.
	We really want Tulsi Gabbard in the race.
	Maybe.
	But generally I don't support that.
	It would make sense to vote in the primary strategically, but I don't know if that's the best use of the vote.
	So, Tulsi Gabbard, uh, not, not based in Redpill.
	She's not, she's not even anti-war.
	Maybe she's anti-Syria, but she's also a woman.
	And if you think Donald Trump can't get the military-industrial complex to back down, you think a woman senator from Hawaii's gonna do it?
	Please.
	NotAnNPC says, Nick, you said you like rap because it's masculine, so why don't you listen to metal?
	Also, have you heard of this guy, Jesse... Oh, man, I just...
	What am I doing here?
	What are we, what are we doing here?
	You should have them on sometime, haha.
	Also, I have a work trip to Chicago soon.
	Do you want to meet up?
	Hail victory.
	Yeah, great one.
	Truth in Politics says, Hi Nick.
	A quote from Libertas Metapolitics I saw on Twitter.
	In the U.S., the left claims to be nativist, accusing Europeans of invading land which wasn't theirs.
	In Europe, they claim to be anti-nativist, accusing Europeans of bigotry for not welcome.
	For not welcoming them, I assume.
	Yeah, that's interesting.
	Uh, Tungsten says, no love for my Nick Fuentes Pepe hug artwork?
	It's like you're trying to hurt my feelings.
	Uh, I don't know what you're talking about.
	Tom G says, or I read that one, actually.
	Some Brit Bonks says, good evening, Nick!
	When can we expect the next gaming stream?
	Watching you name them to kids on Twitch mode made my sides ache especially or especially rather especially oh no no i hate what people say especially the only reason i i think i said it there is because i said ache and then especially too close together but that's trust me that's a pet peeve of mine especially when they are just trying to play gang beasts or fortnite but they're force-fed red pills keep up the good work big guy I don't know, man.
	I'll do a stream when I get around to it.
	We'll see.
	We'll have to do one soon because I found some good material for the next stream.
	Yeah, it's like every night.
	Nick, when's the next gaming stream?
unidentified		Nick!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Oh man.
		You can ask my mom.
		My biggest, what agitates me more than anything else in planet earth is when people tell me the same thing twice.
		You can ask her.
		You can ask her.
		Maybe we'll do a show with her one day and she can attest to this but I mean you say something twice or ask me something twice and I'm not saying like you're a bad person if you do that but just for some reason maybe I'm neurotic maybe it's something with me but Then that happens and I lose my cool.
		I can't handle it.
		I just malfunction.
		Maybe I'm autistic.
		I don't know.
		But I hear the same thing every day.
		I kind of have a desire to strike the wall.
		Nick's strangler hands.
		Hey, what the heck?
		I don't have strangler hands.
		How can lobbying be made a bigger issue on the right?
		The left takes the issue rightfully, seriously, but the right just parrots the free speech defense.
		They don't care how corrupting bribery is on politics.
		Just look at the recent AIPAC situation.
		Neither does the left, to be honest.
		The left does it...
		In a way where it's safe.
		You know, they talk about campaign contributions, but they never do anything about it.
		Barack Obama didn't do anything about it.
		So, I don't know if there's really a way to do it.
		You just gotta make the Republican Party a populist party, an anti-elite party.
		I think that's the gateway to get that through.
		Trump did it in a big way.
		You know, during the debates, he said, I'm not taking anybody's money.
		I've got my own money.
		I loved during the, I think it was the South Carolina debate, or maybe it was the Maybe it's the debate at the Reagan Airport or whatever, or the Reagan Museum.
		I loved, he said, people were booing him.
		I forget what he said.
		He said something to Jeb Bush where he like shushed him or something and everyone was booing.
		He said, oh, and the only reason they're not loving me is because the only people who got the tickets I'm talking about to the live audience were donors.
		That's what they said, and people are booing.
		He's like, I don't have any donors.
		And this is the most endearing moment of the whole The whole speech, because of the image in my head, he says, I've got my son, and I've got my son, Barron, and my wife, you know, that's all I've got.
		And just, it was such a perfect image, because you imagine you've got Jeb Bush and all these ten different candidates on that stage, and the whole audience is big-moneyed donors and everything, and then you've got Donald Trump, just a good man, he's just there with Barron, he's just there with his son, he's just there with his wife, it's just a total family operation.
		You know, all these people came with their legions of supporters and everything, And you've just got Donald Trump.
		I've just got Barron and blah blah blah.
		So epic.
		One of the best moments of the election, hands down.
		But let's see, we've got some other ones.
		That's why we love Trump, you know.
		He's a part of our experience.
		I don't understand.
		I cannot trust people who won 80 on Trump like this.
		No loyalty.
		These people have no loyalty.
		You know, in many cases they were red-pilled by Trump.
		They were brought into the fold by Trump.
		They were awakened by him.
		He led us to victory.
		It was a great victory.
		And then people are able to turn 180 and say, oh, I hate him now.
		I'm going to vote against him and I'm going to block him and all.
		Oh, I don't trust people like that.
		Very disloyal.
		You know, people out there always talking about we need a leader who is strong and who is the ubermensch and everything.
		We've got a six-foot-three billionaire.
		He's got his name on skyscrapers in every city in the country.
		He's the president, like, he's a celebrity, and they're, oh, no, but that's not good enough.
		We need this gay intellectual.
	We need this gay-sounding intellectual who runs around with Matt Heimbach.
	Right?
	No, no.
	We need this posh, over-educated intellectual who sounds like a gay man.
	He is the ubermensch.
	Not this billionaire, 6'3", celebrity who's the president.
	No, forget him.
	He's a cuck.
	He's a boomer.
	No, no.
	We need this Gen X faggot instead.
	Oh, okay.
	So, I don't get people who can do that so quickly.
	Based Catboy says, hey there, big guy.
	Shout out to this person from last night's show.
	Important question though, where do you stand on the lolly question?
	Can they replace degenerate modern western women?
	Disavowed!
	I think this is a Fed who posted this.
	Eddie Cade says, Nick, do you have any thoughts, criticism, etc.
	about Steve Jobs?
	Have you read his autobiography or seen his biopic?
	Do you think he's a good guy or a bad guy?
	Let me know.
	I don't really know that much about him.
	Yeah, I don't really know.
	I mean, I know he invented the iPhone and he invented the iPad and he made Apple very big and he invented Pixar.
	I don't know, I guess he's an innovator and a commercial tech titan.
	So I respect those qualities, but has it been a great thing for the country that the iPhone has been brought around?
	That's dubious, but is he ultimately responsible for that?
	I don't know if that's necessarily the case.
	So I generally respect him, but that said I don't really know enough about him.
	I don't like people who say like, oh Steve Jobs is bad because he was a real jerk.
	Well you have to be a jerk.
	I get called a jerk all day long.
	You have to be a jerk.
	You know, if you want to tell the truth, if you want to get things done right, if you want to get things done your way, you have to be a jerk.
	I'd rather be a jerk than a loser or some fag complaining about other people being mean online.
	You know, and that's all I get from these other people.
	Nick was really mean to me.
	He called me a name.
unidentified		Nick attacked me and I didn't even say anything bad about him.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Nick blocked me.
		Nick is really arrogant.
		He's a real jerk.
		Well, you kind of have to have those qualities.
		So in all these people, even if I disagree with them across the board, I have to respect those attributes of, you know, of being creative, of being a leader, an innovator, all that stuff.
		And being a jerk is actually an admirable quality in that context.
		Sir Harkin says, hey there big guy, really don't like women because they are gross, but I don't like guys either.
		Am I gay or nah?
		If not, should I get a GF?
		Well, I mean, in what context?
		Do you not like women because they're obnoxious and annoying?
		Because if that's the case, hey, get in line, right?
		But if you're like, nah, if you don't find them appealing, but if you don't like men, I don't know.
		I mean, I guess that's sort of... To me, I think there's a lot of this in the West.
		There's a lot of people who probably are, you know, they find women appealing.
		They would probably be straight, you know, and chasing women in a different time.
		But you see a lot of this, there's a lot of studies done about this, that young men aren't having sex anymore.
		They say they don't have time for it or they're playing video games instead.
		And it sort of makes sense because you look at the way it is and in many cases women just simply aren't worth the hassle.
		Or at least that's the mindset.
		I'm not going to say that's true because, you know, we have to have kids, we have to have families and all that.
		However, we look at what obstacles have been put in our path to achieving that kind of a lifestyle, financial, the social risks and costs associated with it.
		I don't blame people for just wanting to sit around and play Grand Theft Auto.
		What's the alternative?
		You go to a bar and you look at women or you go on a dating app and the prospects for getting a match on Tinder or the like are morbid.
		If you look at any of the studies, So it's difficult to even get a date when you do.
		I mean these people are just like vile and repulsive.
		I'm not going to say everybody.
		You know, there's a lot of great women out there.
		But for the most part, I mean, they're like growing out their armpit hair.
		And they're like dyeing their hair on their head.
		And they're like, I'm a whore.
		And, you know, they're fat.
		And I think the average weight of a woman is like overweight.
		I'm pretty sure.
		So you look at the way things are, the rape stuff and all this.
		It's just too much.
		I get it.
		Look, I get it.
		I'm right there with you.
		But I don't know if that, I guess that just makes you, I don't know.
		I think that's a sign of the times more than anything, right?
		As long as you're not like uh, you know, as long as you're not going around like uh, doing other stuff.
		But yeah, you should try and get a girlfriend.
		You just got to find, I guess, the right person.
		Find someone you're compatible with.
		I don't know.
		I'm not really the person to ask about relationship advice.
		People know I have a different focus on my life, but that's sort of my perspective on it.
		I think it makes sense why people are not, you know, really going cuckoo bananas about women these days.
		They're not really putting out a great product.
		It's sort of like the iPhone.
		You stop buying them because it's like, ah, it's the same shit, and it doesn't really work the way they say it does.
		So maybe we're just gonna take a pass.
		Maybe we're just gonna do a hard pass on that one this year.
		Eddie Kates says, I'm getting really annoyed by NWS nibbas with sponsors.
		I start the video and think, finally a video that doesn't get interrupted two minutes in by some VPN ad.
		Then it happens, I hear, but first are you concerned about your online privacy?
		I like those ads because you can skip them.
		Like on YouTube you just double tap Excuse me on your phone, but I get it, I guess.
		Based once says, True.
		So, Somebody says, Big Something Nick says, Nick, you should invite Jason Cohn, a.k.a.
		No White Guilt, on the show.
		He's high IQ, not a wignet, and shows his face.
	He's friends with Jared Taylor, follows you on Twitter, and shares many of your views about optics and being smart.
	He'd make a great guest.
	Isn't he a regular on The Richard Spencer Show?
	So I don't know, maybe I'll give him a follow back.
	I'll check him out.
	I admit, I'm not really totally aware of his content.
	That's not like a flex or anything.
	I just... I'm not really into the whole YouTuber scene, so I don't really know who's who, but I'll check him out.
	It's just that I have seen him pretty frequently.
	Or I'm sorry, no, not on the Spencer Show, on the JF Show.
	That's where I've seen him, on the public space.
	So, I don't know, I'll look into it.
	Based One says, I actually talked to one of my SJW friends about this and I asked him if whites become a minority, do you think these other groups that come into power would look after us?
	The Africans come in, don't even care about us and they hate us.
	True, yeah, that's the right question.
	David S. says, the fight against our enemy is in large part racial.
	People must accept this.
	Have a great Valentine's Day this year.
	It's tough for a lot of us to feel when no GF, guys, but it's gotten easier since I've been going to Mass and knowing that God is always with me.
	Yeah, happy Valentine's Day.
	Don't be one of these people who's like, oh, the feel when no GF or whatever.
	I don't know.
	I find it to be very obnoxious.
	I'm alone on Valentine's Day.
	I don't know.
	I mean, in one sense, I get it, but on the other hand, like, I'm living in the hermit kingdom over here, so it's like, get over it, right?
	Like, get over yourself.
	Be a man.
	Who cares, right?
	Deal with it.
	I'm giving you the boomer advice.
	Pull yourselves up by your bootstraps, for crying out loud.
	Let's see, we've got a few more super chats.
	Zachary Francis says, hi, what is this?
	It's America First.
	Robert Foy says, I'm a huge fan and showing my friends your content.
	I've tried to call in to have a discussion with you about this, but never got picked.
	I'm very disappointed to hear your take on the Confederacy.
	Well, that's a shame.
	Uh, but glad to hear that you enjoy the show.
	I love when people, it's, I'm a big fan, but I really am disappointed in your takes.
	Like, I'll, sorry, I'll do the show where I just say everything and you agree with everything.
	Is that, is that fair?
	I'll just do the show where I will never, you know, I'll, I will not be disagreeable.
	I will just tell you things that you individually agree with.
	You know, that sounds like a reasonable premise for the show.
	I have people all the time emailing me, well, Nick, you're wrong about this.
	I hate to break it to you, but you're wrong about that.
	Like, go away.
	Go away.
	Start your own show.
	Okay, you save the white race then.
	I'll just play Fortnite.
	You save the white race, right?
	That's not you, but I do get these emails where people are like, Nick, I love the show, but you know, you're wrong about this and you're wrong about that.
	You should do more of this.
	It's like, Wow, perfect.
	More unsolicited advice.
	Just what I needed.
	El Campion says, are you pilled on the Pitbull question?
	Yeah, yeah, pretty old news actually.
	I prefer Asian women says, why does your sister look non-white compared to you?
	I don't think that's true, but...
	If it is, uh, she takes after my father.
	I think she has more of my father's features.
	Of course, my father's half Mexican.
	I take off, or rather, I take after my mother, who's 100% Italian.
	So, if that's the case, uh, that's probably why.
	I, I think she probably does have more, you know, her features are a bit more ethnic, but I don't think she looks non-white.
	Uh, maybe relatively, but only if you're a Wignap.
	Umph Love says, here's some shekels to cheer you up, big guy.
	Oh, thanks.
	Robert Foyce is without Southerners.
	No nation to be a nationalist for.
	Wrote the Declaration of Independence.
	Finished the Revolutionary War.
	The Constitution and maintained hegemony on the government for decades.
	Yeah, no, I'm not... I'm not anti-South.
	I'm anti-the Confederacy.
	Right?
	I said, I said very explicitly, I don't disrespect the South.
	I said that several times on the show, but people must have grits in their ears or something.
	People must have square dancing in their ears.
	I said, I don't disrespect Southerners.
	I may make a couple of jokes, but it's, you know, it's not, I don't mean that to, it's a hateful thing.
	You know, it's just a joke.
	I don't disrespect the South, but I'm against the Confederacy.
	So that all may well be fine and true, but the Confederacy I am against.
	EcoFash says, looking at 16 Pepe memes slash debates, sad nostalgia.
	So true.
	Robert Foy says, Southerners are still overrepresented in the military and fight for a country that subjugated and ridicules them.
	Again, same thing as I said before, Robert Voices.
	Did you know Abraham Lincoln was a pen pal of Karl Marx?
	Do you take your position on this topic for optics, big guy?
	No, no.
	Abraham Lincoln was just one of the most conservative statesmen that America has ever produced.
	You cannot be conservative and believe in secession.
	You cannot be conservative and believe in the right of constituent entities within a nation to secede from that nation.
	You can't be conservative and believe that a country can Split in half on its own accord.
	That is not conservative.
	There's nothing right-wing about that, you know.
	And I'm not saying that as like a boomer.
	I'm not saying that like, oh, true conservative.
	I'm saying that in the real right-wing sense.
	You know, if we value the right-wing as order and tradition, there is nothing more disorderly, there's nothing more revolutionary than secession, than civil war, which is what the South did.
	And over what?
	The right of them to have black people do all the work?
	They have imported labor as opposed to the labor of their countrymen.
	They have this tremendous economic inequality.
	You know, you have people at once who will say, oh, economic inequality is a bad thing.
	I'm nauseable.
	And then they defend the South.
	The South is more unequal than the North.
	And anyway, what characterized the South was basically being libertarian.
	You know, if you look at the Founding Fathers, talk about the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson versus Alexander Hamilton versus John Adams.
	John Adams and Hamilton were actually right-wing.
	If anybody was holding back the excesses of classical liberalism, it was the North.
	It was New England.
	And Thomas Jefferson was this classical liberal who was reading Montesquieu and Rousseau and all these other people.
	So what are you really championing?
	You're championing foreign labor.
	You're championing revolution, secession, disorderly tendencies, or disorder as opposed to order.
	You're championing libertarianism as opposed to strong central government.
	I don't know, big guy.
	It's not about optics.
	It's about what your ideology is.
	So, yeah, and I'm not against Southerners.
	I'm not against the South.
	I'm not against Dixie or the culture.
	It's alien to me.
	It's not my culture, but I'm not against it, right?
	I mean, everybody's entitled to their own traditions, and that's all I said.
	But if you're talking about the Confederacy, that's what the original question was about.
	You cannot be a nationalist and defend the Confederacy.
	How could you be a nationalist and defend an anti-nationalist movement, right?
	a regionalist movement.
	What a joke.
	What an absolute joke.
	So people come in here.
	Oh, actually, have you considered all of this?
	No, I think you've not seen the bigger picture there.
	Shoko says, my Mexican acquaintances always conflate Italians with Mexicans.
	I grew up in New Jersey.
	My ancestors were British New York City settlers.
	I like what Italians contributed to the Northeast.
	Hispanics have been disappointed.
	Yeah, Italians have been great contributors.
	Great people.
	You know, they're like what Paul Ryan thinks Hispanics are.
	They're swarthy, they're natural conservatives, they're like Americans, but they just have better food.
	Italians are the real Mexicans when you think about it in that way, if you're thinking about it in terms of those arguments.
	Because Italians are Catholic and all.
	What a great people.
	I truly, if I'm a supremacist in anything, it's Italian.
	What a great people.
	You know, all these Nordcucks come around.
	Oh, Nick, this and that and the other.
	What about Germany?
	What about Norway?
	Yeah, well, not going so hot for those people.
	Or the old WASP elite.
	Not really going so hot for them.
unidentified		Let's see.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Do we have any more Streamlabs?
		Or have I bullied them all away?
		Let's see.
		sure uh the the ones to emulate kevin mccomer says send lauren rose a valentine's day card disavow the chief says hey ahoya as a native american thank you let's see do we have any more stream labs or have i bullied them all away uh let's see oh we've got a few more uh david s or yeah he has one more here david s or yeah he has one more here david s or yeah he has one more here David S. says, I believe he talked about Ted Kaczynski on the eighth premium episode rebutting sticks on Libertarians.
		You're right, that's the one.
		Nick's hands are three meters wide.
		Says, Nick, you should go on Owen Peterson's show.
		He had E. Michael Benjamin on the other day and they discussed how to red pill your entire family.
		Also, here's 20 suggestions for your channel because I, the unwashed masses viewer, know better than you.
		Okay, this was a good one.
unidentified		This is a good one.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You made me laugh.
		That's a solid one.
		Eddie Cates is okay, Nick.
		I have to tell you about what happened.
		A roaming millennial.
		Sorry, Lauren Chen.
		I recognized her in the mall yesterday with her mom.
		Or I assume was her mom.
		She met up with some alpha ripped Chad.
		And when are you going on Jesse Lee Peterson?
		I don't even know what that one means.
		I might as well just start the show every day.
		Good evening, you're watching... Good evening, you are watching E. Michael Jones.
		I am E. Michael Jones, and tonight we've got a great guest, E. Michael Jones.
		We will be discussing E. Michael Jones.
		I mean, might as well.
		Phil says, have you thought about getting Tucker Carlson or Eric Trump on your show?
		They would make good guests.
		No, I haven't considered it.
		I'll have to give him a call this weekend.
		All right, I think that's everything.
		That's all our Streamlabs and Superchats.
		Wow, what a fantastic show.
		But that's gonna do it for us.
		Remember to check us out on nicolasjfuentas.com membership.
		Five bucks a month if you like what I do, if you support the show, if you support the North.
		It's a joke, everybody!
		Everybody relax.
		I thought on this show I could joke with you guys.
		I could bust your chops a little bit.
		I make a couple of Jokes at the expense of the South and I get people in here I get all these people walking in with their cowboy boots and their cowboy hats and you know, they're just eating grits and You know, they're they're driving in a hundred miles an hour on their pickup trucks guitar in tow And they're like you cannot make jokes take that back.
		How dare you make a joke?
		Are you gonna make jokes about Chicago culture people do it all the time?
		People make fun of meds.
		People make fun of Mexicans.
		It's part of it.
		It's part of it.
		Relax, everybody.
		It's fun.
		We love Southerners.
		Some of my best friends are Southerners.
		I love the South.
		The South is our closest ally.
		Alright?
		Are you happy?
		You won't catch me square dancing anytime soon.
		You won't catch me playing the banjo anytime soon.
		Okay, uh, you won't, you won't catch me talking with a slow drawl anytime soon.
		All right?
		But, uh, you'll see me in Cracker Barrel from time to time.
		I will, uh, I will visit, but we, we don't hate ya.
		We don't hate ya.
		We respect ya, but just not, not my cup of tea.
		All right?
		But that's gonna do it for us.
		Remember to check us out.
		NicholasJFuentes.com slash membership.
		Five bucks a month if you like the show, you want to Support what we're doing.
		Hey, we can't do it without money.
		We have to have shekels, okay?
		Cough up the shekels, Goyim!
		Let's see it!
		All right?
		I eat, and you work.
	That's how it works, all right?
	That's how it works here, okay?
	But five bucks a month to keep the show going.
	You get the premium membership.
	You get one additional show every week, every Sunday.
	You get a show as opposed to just Monday through Friday for everybody else.
	Everybody says it's their favorite show, so be sure to check that out.
	Merch is also available.
	Remember to subscribe to the channel.
	Give me a big thumbs up, leave a comment below, click the notification bell to get notified every time I go live.
	We're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m.
	Central, 8 p.m.
	Eastern Standard Time.
	I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.
	As always, thank you guys for watching.
	Thanks to our Streamlabbers, Superchatters, Premium Members, everybody who watches the show, we love you folks.
	Southerners, too.
	And Northerners, but Northerners a little bit more.
	A little bit of a special place.
	That's jokes!
	And we'll see you tomorrow.
	Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
unidentified		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		America First!

▲