All Episodes
Previous Next
May 4, 2023 - The Lindell Report - Mike Lindell
01:03:09
The Lindell Report (5-4-23)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
It's going to give you the exact individual support you need from your head to your bed.
And now here's where it gets even better.
We've all experienced those temperature-related sleep interruptions where you get too hot, you toss and turn, you flip your pillow over to the cool side.
Well, all that's gone with my brand new MyPillow 2.0 Cooling Fabric that's made with temperature regulating thread.
The best sleep just got even better.
Whether you have a MyPillow or not, you need to get the brand new MyPillow 2.0.
Call or go to MyPillow.com now.
Use your promo code and for a limited time when you buy one, you'll get a second one absolutely free.
You're sleeping even better.
And cooler too.
And you're looking good.
Feeling good.
I knew you would.
Visit MyPillow.com Hello, I'm Mike Lindell.
And as you know, my passion is to help each and every one of you get the best sleep of your life.
That's why I created my new Giza Dreams bed sheets.
I started by using the world's best cotton called Giza.
It's only grown in a region between the Sahara Desert, the Mediterranean Sea, and the Nile River.
It's ultra soft and breathable, but extremely durable.
I guarantee you they'll be the most comfortable sheets you'll ever own.
I do not like my sheets.
I love my quesadilla cheese.
Call or go to MyPillow.com right now to take advantage of Mike's limited time offer.
Use the promo code on the screen and when you buy one set of Giza Dream Sheets, Mike will send you another set absolutely free!
That's right, buy one set of Giza Dream Sheets and get another set absolutely free!
Choose from a variety of colors in solid, stripes, and new flannel sheets.
Order now!
For the best night's sleep in the whole wide world, this is MyPillow!
Hello, I'm Mike Lindell and I'm excited to announce my new product, My Coffee.
I get products all the time from entrepreneurs from my new platform, mystore.com.
And when I tried My Coffee for the first time, I was blown away.
It is the best coffee I've ever had in my life.
I spent the last four months doing my due diligence and this family-owned business micromanages every step from the fields to the cup to ensure the best quality coffee you're ever going to have.
It starts with the beans that are grown in Honduras.
Honduras' volcanic soil and humid climate make the perfect growing conditions for coffee plants.
Which produced the best beans ever.
Then each batch is tested for its aroma, taste and other aspects to meet the highest standards in the coffee industry.
And after that it goes into production which is all done right here in the USA.
It's like you're getting that small batch specialty coffee but delivered right to your front door.
So go to mystore.com or call the number on your screen.
Use the promo code and you'll get your very own My Coffee for 25% off.
You guys all know that I've traveled the country for the past year and a half.
I've stayed in hundreds of hotels.
I've tried every coffee out there.
Well, some of the coffees have that terrible aftertaste, some that leave me jittery or I get an upset stomach.
Well, my coffee is different.
It's the richest, smoothest, best coffee I've ever had.
My coffee comes in a variety of flavors.
You get them ground or whole bean, plus it's certified organic and non-GMO.
I guarantee it'll be the best coffee you've ever had.
So go to mystore.com or call the number on your screen.
Use your promo code and you'll get my coffee for 25% off.
And I'm going to give you deep discounts on all my store products.
That's mystore.com.
It's my new platform for USA entrepreneurs.
Please order now!
This is a video of the process of making a 3D model. Please enjoy it!
Please enjoy this video!
in defending and preserving faith and freedom.
And now, here is your host, Mike Lindell.
All right, good evening.
Welcome to the program.
Glad you are with us.
Brennan House in for Mike Lindell.
As many of you know, Mike Lindell's father passed away last week, and services will be tomorrow and Saturday.
So be praying for Mike and his family during this time.
And Mike looks forward to being back with us on Monday.
I talked to him a couple times today.
He'll be back Monday, hitting the ground hard, and he's gonna Endeavor to be here consistently starting Monday for a little bit because he has a very, very big campaign to announce and to, well, really get going on what we've been talking about with Jeff O'Donnell in this big report, which is just volume one, volume one.
I am going to be joined tonight by Jeff O'Donnell, MAGA Raccoon as many know him, as Jimmy Kimmel knows him as that as well, and we'll be joined by Dr. Walter Daugherty.
Both of those gentlemen are going to join us tonight to talk about how we got where we are today with the MESA report.
There was a couple of those reports and this of course then led to the big report that just came out the other day That we have been making available to you.
We'll show you where you can find it and share it.
It's 282 pages and it's just volume 1.
There's more to come.
So for all those people who say, where is the evidence of the voter fraud?
Where is the evidence?
Well, there's a lot of evidence being released and it's hard evidence.
It's scientific evidence.
It's mathematical.
Evidence.
It's, you know, follow the science, trust the science, they say.
Well, this is hard math.
This is hard data.
This is like, again, they said the other day, flipping a coin 4,000 times and getting the same side every time.
What are the odds of that, right?
Or as Dr. Frank says, this ain't natural, buddy.
All right, joining me now is MAGA Raccoon Jeff O'Donnell and Dr. Walter Doherty.
Gentlemen, welcome to the broadcast.
Thanks for joining us.
Good to be with you.
Great to be here as usual.
Great to see both of you again.
Let's start out with a little introduction.
I met both of you kind of really together.
I mean, in that sense, I think where we got to know each of you was as a team that was working on the MESA report.
Do I have that right, Dr. Daugherty?
That's right.
And what was the purpose of the MESA report?
Jeff, you want to take that?
Sure.
Uh, it was to figure out what was on the image that was preserved, uh, for Mesa County after the, after the, uh, actually after the 2020 and 2021 municipal elections in, uh, in Mesa.
Uh, so that, that report, uh, along with the other Mesa reports, uh, outline what was found in there and three, uh, Mesa three, Alright, so that brings us to where we're at today with your report.
that occurred as a whole timeline.
And that's where MESA 3 is.
All right, so that brings us to where we're at today with your report.
I mean, help our audience understand your MESA report and now the 282-page report you've released,
how they fit together.
One, the one that just came out would not exist without the MESA report.
It was the fact that we had the internal data actually from the election server and we also had the cast vote record.
I said I didn't even know how right I was when I made the early statement that the that the Mesa server was the Rosetta Stone of quite a bit of these.
Dr. Walter Doherty, have you had the chance to look at this latest report that Jeff has put out?
Yes, I have.
So, as Jeff said, when he first discovered the manipulation inside the Mesa County machines, and I should point out that, to my knowledge, this is the first time Anybody has ever gotten to look inside a machine was when Tina Peters made a backup, the county clerk and recorder in Mesa County, Colorado.
And of course has been, I can't think of any other word than persecuted for making a backup, which is just prudent business practice.
I mean, you wouldn't want to put your money in a bank that didn't make backups.
Exactly.
They might lose it.
Manipulation that Jeff discovered and that I confirmed and verified in Mesa County dovetailed with information from cast vote records from a number of other counties across the country.
The very first one that I analyzed was Pima County, Arizona.
And that's where I first observed an extremely unnatural progression of votes.
So one point that needs to be made is that a recount or a risk limiting audit only looks at the final count at the end of everything.
It doesn't look at the progression of the count.
And so the kind of manipulation that's visible from analyzing the cast vote record lets you see the progression of the count and not just the final result.
And what this enabled us to detect was basically a new type of manipulation that we didn't expect, but it turned out to be there.
And more incredibly turned out to be there in different counties, different states, different level of race, federal versus a county race, and Many of them have a recognizably similar unnatural curve.
And that progression is what Jeff has compiled in this new report.
And you can go through it and see how similar the manipulation is.
In different states and different counties.
Absolutely.
Yeah, let's do that.
We're going to go through this report here in just a second.
Jeff, is it also available on your website, magaraccoon.com, this report?
Yes, yes.
Altogether, everything now eventually goes through the site fingerprintsoffraud.com.
But there are links on magaraccoon.com, on the votedatabase.com, where people can do their own analysis of the 2020 election cast vote records.
I'd like to add to what Walter said in that it is actually predictive, meaning the pattern is not only similar, it is so similar that you can predict the end from the middle of these things, which of course is not anything that would happen naturally.
And as Walter was talking, it reminded me that Pima was really the second one I'd seen, thanks to WALBRD.
And noticed right away there, really the other one that we're talking probably the end of 2021, I was talking with somebody in California who said, hey, you know, they did a public records request of a bunch of stuff and I got something called a cast vote record where I could see it.
And I recall that on New Year's Eve 2021 going into 2022 is when I actually received that.
And then suddenly there were three that I was looking at that were the same.
And if you want to know when the aha moment was for me, that was probably at New Year's Eve 2021.
Wow.
All right.
Where on MAGA Raccoon where they find this report if folks are looking?
Because I just went to fingerprintsoffraud.com.
Nothing came up.
But where would they find it on Magga Raccoon?
It's a banner at the very top.
They click on that.
It should take them there.
OK.
So here I am.
Let's show his website real quick, guys.
Show me his website.
Show us where I should find your report.
Go to the very top?
I can't see the top.
Top's cut off.
At the very top, it says, welcome Jimmy Kimmel.
I think that's not showing the most current version of the website for some reason.
MaggaRaccoon.com?
Yes, sir.
That's very odd.
In that particular case, could you just refresh the page for me, just for fun?
Yep, just did.
That's very odd.
You said nothing comes up on fingerprints of fraud, all one word?
No, sir.
Fingerprintsoffraud.com.
As it comes up I will as soon as we are off the air here I will make sure it's possible something has happened to my to the server there because I'm constantly fighting off
attacks.
Yeah, well that's what I was getting at too.
That's kind of why I was bringing up here.
Five minutes ago it was there.
Yeah, well that's why I was bringing up here on the air.
Something seems to have happened and it's very odd.
Wow, okay, I'll tell you what we're going to do.
We're going to take a quick break and I'm going to go into a Dropbox file I have
and I'm going to pull the file up on Dropbox and then we'll show that one on the air.
Go through it and we'll continue to talk to these two gentlemen and we'll endeavor to take some of your phone calls today as well.
My guests, Dr. Walter Daugherty and Jeff O'Donnell.
We'll be right back after this break.
Thanks for watching.
Okay, Logan.
Logan.
Looks like you've been sleeping well.
Megan!
He's back!
The MyPillow guy!
And you're looking good!
Still feeling good!
Well, just when you thought it couldn't get any better, we've got the best pillow ever!
MyPillow 2.0!
Wow, it's so soft and smooth.
It's cool to the touch.
How did you do that?
Well, we took MyPillow's patented bill and combined it with this new technology that we didn't have back then when I invented MyPillow to bring you the best pillow in history, MyPillow 2.0.
Just like all of you, I never imagined that my pillow could get any better.
That's why I haven't changed it in nearly 20 years.
Then I heard about a revolutionary new technology and I knew I had to bring it to you all.
MyPillow 2.0 is truly the next generation of my pillow.
The MyPillow 2.0 is cooler and softer than the last MyPillow.
It is so comfortable to sleep on at night.
I look forward to going to bed and I wake up well rested in the morning.
Sleep is all about temperature and height.
MyPillow 2.0's patented adjustable fill is going to give you the exact individual support you need from your head to your bed.
And now here's where it gets even better.
We've all experienced those temperature-related sleep interruptions where you get too hot, you toss and turn, you flip your pillow over to the cool side.
Well, all that's gone with my brand-new MyPillow 2.0 cooling fabric that's made with temperature-regulating thread.
The best sleep just got even better.
Whether you have a MyPillow or not, you need to get the brand-new MyPillow 2.0.
Call or go to MyPillow.com now.
Use your promo code, and for a limited time, when you buy one, you'll get a second one absolutely free.
You're sleeping even better!
And cooler too!
And you're looking good!
Feeling good!
I knew you would!
Alright, welcome back.
Glad you are with us.
We got it and we got it working.
Fingerprintsoffraud.com is now working.
We got that to work.
We got it here.
Fingerprintsoffraud.com.
We also are working to get it back at frankspeech.com.
We had it on frankspeech.com.
There was a computer update done and it got misplaced and we're working right now to get it back up there.
So here, very soon, we should have it in the next few minutes back at frankspeech.com as a banner toward the top of the page.
But in the meantime, fingerprintsoffraud.com.
Alright, let's go to this report here by Jeff.
We went through it the other night.
I don't know, you know, I don't want to repeat too much of what we went through the other night.
I mean, it is 282 pages, so it's not like we covered it all in 20 minutes.
What particularly would you, Dr. Walter Daugherty, like to highlight about the report?
Because we know Jeff has been involved in this.
I don't know if you were involved in this report or not, but what did you see in this report that caught your eye that you'd like to talk about?
Well, the point that Jeff made that a fair election is not predictable and a predictable election is not fair is kind of a thread that runs all the way through this report.
So if you, I don't have the page number, but if you can find one of the cones like Mesa County, Colorado was one of the first ones in the report.
When you have limits of statistical limits of what the expected value is, then you can assign a probability of something being inside those limits or being outside the limits.
So we see this every summer on the hurricane tracking.
So you look at the weather and they say right now the hurricane is here and that is 100% certain.
24 hours from now, it's going to be between here and here.
Well, that's a range.
And 48 hours from now, it's going to be between here and here.
And two weeks from now, it's going to be somewhere between Maine and Florida.
So, what we're looking at in the cone graphs, which are at the beginning of his report, some of the first graphs, is The statistical limits for a cumulative random sample.
And this is why polling works.
This is why quality control works.
Is that if you take a random sample that's representative of the whole, then whatever measurements you make on that random sample.
Will be the same as if you had actually counted everything.
So if you want to know how 100,000 voters are likely to vote, then you pick 1,000 of them at random and call them up and ask your questions.
and if 32% of them say I'm in favor of candidate A, then you say well the whole 100,000 are going
to be about 32% in favor of candidate A. It might be 33, it might be 34, but we're 95% sure or
whatever the margin of error on the poll is that it'll be around 32%.
Quality control.
Frito-Lay makes 10,000 bags of potato chips.
They do not inspect every chip in every bag.
They take a random sample of a hundred bags and they look at every single chip in those hundred bags.
If 5% of them were burned, they say, well, 5% of the rest of the batch is probably burned.
Throw it away.
But if that sample is good, then they say the lot is good, ship it.
So the curve that we ought to see when there is a random return on mail-in votes, and this is true in most states, there are a few states that sort the mail-in votes by precinct.
And so what we're talking about now doesn't apply to those.
And so throughout Jeff's report, He points out the counties and states that don't satisfy the conditions for applying this type of analysis.
But when there is a random return from mail-in ballots, then after a small percentage of the votes are counted, certainly by the time you counted 10% of the votes, you should have a very clear percentage Of what each candidate's final vote tally is going to be.
And then you can, by computing a completely random input, you can say plus or minus some percentage.
And that's what gives rise to the cone of say, this is where a random, a cumulative random sample ought to lie.
Hmm.
So, can you put up the Mesa County graph and we can continue talking about it?
Absolutely.
Let me just show folks real quick.
We just got notified it is back on FrankSpeech.com.
Take a look at the homepage here, folks.
Go to FrankSpeech.com, scroll down just a little bit, and there you see it.
The Fingerprints of Fraud.
Click that.
You'll be able to have access to this 282-page report that we are talking about right now.
I will go to Mesa unless you want to start with Maricopa County.
Is that all right to go there?
Because I'm very intrigued by and I think a lot of folks are very intrigued by Maricopa County because this is where apparently the largest county in Arizona.
There's a lot of shenanigans going on that stole the election from our friend Kerry Lake.
Do you want to use Maricopa as our teaching moment or do you want to go to Mesa?
Jeff, why don't you explain this on the basis of what we just talked about?
Sure.
Absolutely.
Yeah, that is Maricopa.
The red at the top is what Walter is referring to as the cone.
It's referred to a lot in the report.
The calculations for the cone was only done to 500,000 boats.
After that, it's just going to get closer and closer and closer together.
So that gives you the idea.
So that's why it's only showing a partial cone.
But what you see is, this is really the classic Mesa pattern.
You see that there's a lot of variability in the beginning.
It goes down almost like the front end of a checkmark.
And then suddenly it hits a point where we are go for liftoff.
And it just continues to rise at a very linear pace in votes that are more favorable to Donald Trump.
And what we take from that, from all of the The only thing that would cause this is that the initial votes are simply too pro-Biden in this particular one.
They are simply too pro-Biden to have possibly gotten to the final percentage that is at the top.
That's really what that's saying.
When you look at these graphs, of which there are 202 different counties, well, at least 161 that show the Mesa pattern, you will see sometimes they're a long way from the cone, sometimes they're a little way from the cone, and that really tends to do with how many votes there were, and it has to do with how it was programmed as far as where it was supposed to go, how it was reacting to real-world votes coming in.
Uh, if you, if you go down to the next, to the, to the little red, uh, uh, nest there, this is, this is really the proof in the pudding of a computer algorithm.
Uh, each one of those dots is the next, uh, I believe thousand, yeah, thousand votes.
So these are each thousand votes in sequence and simply plotting what, um, what percent, what percent of those thousand votes did, uh, the president Trump get?
And you can.
Easily see the pattern here.
This isn't like the beginning was real low and the end was real high.
No, you see a nice gradual swoop up, which isn't very much a hallmark of what you get with a computerized control algorithm.
And you'll see that there are 100, 160 or so in there that show more or less the same thing.
The interesting thing about Maricopa is that this is almost a a completely linear rise in that there there are no there's nothing there it looks like there had to be a correction uh we use we use the uh cruise control uh metaphor a lot for this that that that you know your cruise control set at 70 mile an hour and then you hit uh start going up a hill you're going to drop below suddenly the uh cruise control has to give it more gas
Uh, you know, you're going down a hill, suddenly it has to break, and that's when you see these, these, you know, another county shall see that there are fairly small but definite little corrections.
Maricopa just took off like a rocket and never looked back.
So it is really one of the poster children for this effect.
Now, you're mentioning Trump.
Are you saying that there was... Explain to the audience why you're highlighting Trump, because it says, "...plotting the percentages of votes for President Trump of every district, 1,000 mail-in votes clearly shows the gradual rise as the counting proceeds with a dip at the end.
Given the very close election in 2020, the dip is significant."
So are you are you saying that they were even manipulating votes for on the Donald Trump side
to try to cover their their algorithm or what what are you saying there?
Uh what I'm saying is that it whatever the...
Did we just lose him?
I think we did.
Dr. Daugherty, are you there?
You want to pick up?
What is he saying?
Help us lay people understand this.
Well, why don't you go to page 41?
I pulled up the report here so I can refer to that page.
Okay.
This is what a fair election would be expected to be.
The red line.
The red line here?
Are you on page 41?
Yes.
Where it says Glynn County?
41 is Fresno County, but let me see how many pages we're off.
All right, go to Glynn County.
Glynn County, let's see here.
Humboldt.
You passed it, I think.
I think it's up.
I think they're alphabetical.
That's humble.
That's glint.
There you go.
That's the one.
That's page 42 for those following at home.
Okay.
All right.
Uh, pages got, got, got renumbered.
Um, so take a look at this.
You've got the red cone, which says that as we are counting votes, it should get closer and closer to halfway between the red lines.
So halfway between the red lines represents the final percentage that the candidate got.
So we expect some fluctuation, but the fluctuation should not be outside the red lines.
So this particular county, Glynn County, California, does not show the extreme manipulation that we see in the graphs for the other counties.
Does that mean there was no manipulation in Glynn County or was there very little?
Well, you can never say there was no manipulation.
For example, in Maricopa County in 2020 there were 5,470 dead people who voted.
So we don't know how many dead people voted in Glynn County.
Jeff?
Yeah, as I point out in the Report, uh, I'm not saying that this is the only type of manipulation that you will find.
This is one particular, very specific, uh, kind with a male imbalance, uh, in these counties.
And, uh, you know, they, they, we all have heard and know of others, uh, you know, that can and do occur.
Uh, this is, this is just one.
What about plotting this from Maricopa County for Carrie Lake's election?
Have you been able to do that yet, Jeff?
We've done some work on the Carrie Lake election.
I think I've said before that I think that based upon what we found, 2020 shows some different patterns.
And that will come out in the future.
Does it look normal?
No.
But things got changed up a bit in how they made the pattern look, which I guess isn't terribly surprising given how much noise we were making about this in early 2022.
Go ahead, Dr. Norty.
Yes.
The other thing that happened is that In 2022, when citizens requested the cast vote record, which by the way is a public record.
So the ballots and voters identity are secret.
We have a secret ballot system, but once the ballot is cast, there is no way to identify the voter.
And so that means that the information on the ballot is public.
So we cast our votes.
In private, but we count them in public.
However, there are a lot of states and counties that have refused to supply the cast vote records for 2022.
So in the or in the case of Maricopa County, they did give us the cast vote record for 2022, but they deleted the sequence number column, the record ID.
And what that means is that They destroyed the information about the order.
So the question I always ask when someone hides something is why are they hiding it?
Yeah, so I'll make sure our audience understands.
They gave us in 2020 that they refused to give us in 2022 and lacking that information Makes it impossible to determine, or makes it more difficult to determine what the sequence was to look for the same pattern.
There you go.
There you go.
So you're saying that after they figured out what you guys were doing with the Castboat Records, they went in and when people started requesting Castboat Records, they eliminated some of the data to see when the record was counted, or cast.
Correct?
That's what you just said, right?
Yes, that's right.
So, they would have had to have done that, like, I mean, that wouldn't have been a natural thing they would just do.
Someone did that knowing what it is you guys are doing and plotting, and they were trying to throw you off the trail.
They're covering their tracks, correct?
I mean, why else would you go to the trouble to do that, Jeff?
It would lead one to believe that, wouldn't it?
Because, looking at it this way, Uh, they had to do something special in 2022 that they didn't do in 2020.
So they made more work for themselves in 2022 to give us, uh, that, that same cast out record that gets printed out the same way, or it gets, you know, copied to a file in the same way.
So they actually took the trouble of doing an extra step.
In order to obfuscate the sequence of the ballots.
And so wouldn't that be where, Dr. Walter Daugherty, wouldn't that be where somebody would go in and find that county where that is done, where it had not been done previous elections, and then subpoena that person and put them under oath, whoever's in charge of that information, and ask them, why did you do this?
Why this change?
I do not know for sure, but I suspect that that's Part of the subpoenas that Carrie Lake's suit either has issued is going to be issuing for the, they call it a redacted CVR.
And all redacted means is they black something out.
In this case, they blacked out the sequence column.
So the request will be made for an unredacted CVR.
I'm sure.
As her case proceeds.
The other case that's important in Arizona is the Attorney General's race.
So Abe Hamadeh was down by, I think, 500-something votes.
And then it was discovered that 8,000 provisional ballots had not been counted.
So even assuming that he got a similar percentage of the votes that weren't counted from the ones that he did count, that
could easily overturn that Attorney General election. Let me ask you, Dr. Daugherty,
and we'll take some phone calls here in just a second. Let me ask you the same question I
asked Jeff O'Donnell the other night.
As I'm going through this report, which is now at FingerprintsOfFraud.com, it's also linked on at FrankSpeech.com, just look for the banner that says FingerprintsOfFraud, you'll find it.
But as I'm scrolling through this 282 page report, and I'm looking at all these different counties, I'm looking at the vendor, and the names of the Voting machine companies are, you know, changing.
It's not the same voting machine company every time.
It's a different one.
There's, you know, there's a few voting machine companies mentioned here.
And the question I had for Jeff O'Donnell the other night was, how is it that this is all occurring with all of the different machines?
I mean, if you've got a glitch with one machine, or shenanigans going on with one company, okay, but how do you keep seeing this same pattern with all the voting machine companies?
Does that not denote that there is a master algorithm running that has tapped all the machines?
Well, or at least an equivalent one, and that they may have shared software codes So if you look at the history of voting machine companies over the last 20 something years, there's been a series of mergers, splits, spinoffs, employees who leave one company and go to work for another one.
But all of the major companies, so Dominion and ES&S are the two largest, and then Hart InterCivic, ClearBallot, Unison, a handful of others.
But the big three in terms of whether you count it by number of states or number of voters who use their machines would be Dominion, ES&S, and Hart InterCivic.
And they, as I understand it, all base their software on an earlier voting system called Gems.
And so the heart of the software Apparently was the same in all of these companies and essentially what they did was to add their own graphical user interface on top of it.
I mean, if you think about what a voting machine should do, it should read a ballot, look at the first race, decide whether the voter voted for A or B. If they voted for A, add one to A's count.
If they voted for B, add one to B's count.
That program is going to be the same in every voting machine.
Otherwise, it's not counting votes.
But now there are a lot more complexities added onto that to handle things like write-in votes or ambiguous votes or stray marks and so forth.
But the heart of the software has to be the same just to do the job.
So if you were writing software for a bank, you'd have to say, Take the balance, add the checks that are deposited and subtract the checks that have been paid out and that's your new balance.
Well, it doesn't matter what bank it is or what company they bought their computer software from, that's what it's going to say is that new balance equals old balance plus deposits minus withdrawals.
So the heart of the software has to be the same.
Now, when you get to something like this cruise control type of Progression.
That is a rather sophisticated algorithm.
It's easy to understand because the cruise control says you set it at 55 and the cruise control doesn't know there's a hill ahead.
But when you head up the hill, your car slows down and the cruise control says, Hey, you're going less than 55.
Give it some more gas.
And then it gets back up to 55 and then you crest the hill and start back down the other side.
And now all of a sudden you're going faster than 55.
Well, the cruise control didn't know you were going to be going downhill, but it can tell that you're going too fast and says, okay, let off the gas a little.
So the basic idea is simple, but the implementation and particularly what we call tuning the parameters is rather complex.
So I took the data from Pima County, Arizona, and actually implemented my own BID controller, which is what it's called a proportional integral derivative.
And it, I had a terrible time getting it to converge because what would happen is it would say, all right, we're trying to, let's say, increase the number of Biden votes.
So put an extra 12,000 Biden votes in the next block of 10,000.
Well, you can't do that because there are only 10,000 votes in the next block.
And so I had to adjust the parameters to crank it down a little bit.
And, uh, so it, it was a, uh, in my opinion, a sophisticated engineering task to tune the controller, to achieve the results that we observed.
Otherwise, it wouldn't have converged at all.
And it was the same regardless of the machine company.
That is the remarkable thing, and it shows that either they are using the same software at the heart, or they have copied the idea from each other.
As I said before, through the Employees moving from one company to another and mergers and acquisitions and spinoffs is that the software has ended up producing similar results and that means the software is performing a similar function.
But wouldn't someone have to go in and change or update the software based on the results they want based on the amount of people voting on election day for instance in
other words if if you're trying to overcome the algorithm people assume there's an
algorithm that's what I was saying vote on election day vote on election day
overcome the algorithm dr. Frank another saying that right wouldn't they
have to be able to go in and adjust accordingly in real time so doesn't that
denote it's not just a piece of software that's been put in all the systems
independently and running independently and on their own per their
programming but something that's been put in that can be accessed and changed
accordingly to what's happening in real time
Jeff?
I think the algorithm was smart enough to deal with most issues.
I think it was a set-and-forget system to a large degree.
Uh, I believe so.
I, from everything I've seen, what it looks like is that, uh, that they had a, a room full of, uh, of incredibly good, uh, election experts, uh, who determined, uh, as precisely as they could, what the actual, uh, what the actual voter intent was going to be in all of these places.
Determined how many votes would be needed.
Uh, extra votes would be needed to, to get them where they wanted to go to counteract, uh, that.
Uh, and, and I think that in a lot of cases, they, they guessed pretty, pretty correctly.
Um, and, and if that were the case, I will, I will highlight, uh, uh, Wisconsin and Michigan in the 2020 election.
Uh, if you recall in both of those states, they had to panic.
And start using the old-fashioned vote dumps in the middle of the night in those states.
If they had total control of the computer to change that, I suspect they would have rather have done that.
Then, you know, this whole algorithm looks like it was designed to look natural, to not give any big jumps or dips.
If you notice, that's what you do when you have a nice linear rise.
You don't have that many.
But then in Michigan and Wisconsin, they had those huge middle-of-the-night vote dumps, which caused the F-curves, as we call them, and huge, huge changes in the middle of the night.
uh...
it dot that that was definitely something that was out of their control
least from the uh...
computer over here the algorithm was not robust handle the kind of changes that they'd made
make uh... or uh... again it was it was something that that once it was
set it was going to uh... was going to keep going
what what are your thoughts doctor dory uh... well
we don't know for sure what happened What we can do is look at the results and say, what are the plausible mechanisms for achieving this result?
And as you and Jeff referred to, the three obvious ways of changing the results in a computer are to pre-program it.
So the program is just chugging along, doing its thing to have a Local operator modifying it, someone who's sitting down at the terminal in the county election center and typing commands in to change, or to have remote access.
So those are the three.
But the second one would require someone in every county and precinct in the nation doing this.
That doesn't even seem plausible to me.
Does it to you?
No.
I agree.
It's the least likely of the three in my opinion.
So really the only two viable are it was programmed, as Jeff said, program and let it run, or one person or one central location is going in and doing what needs to be done to control the algorithm.
Well, now let me add one more wrinkle to this.
We've talked before about the Edison Zero event.
So the states report their totals to Clarity, which bought out Seidel, who then reports them to Edison Research.
Edison Research also gets input from, sorry, and then Edison Research sends it to the New York Times to post on their server.
New York Times also gets input from Associated Press.
So these results then end up on a New York Times server, which is then distributed to all of the TV channels, news media, and so forth.
But as we look at the reports that were being produced, shortly after midnight, one by one, all 50 states plus the District of Columbia had their totals go to zero.
Now, this is just not possible.
I mean, if you're counting along and you have 1,000 votes for one candidate and 1,200 votes for another candidate and you count more votes, one of those or both of those numbers has to go up.
They might stay the same.
They can never go down and they certainly can't go down to zero.
But every single state went to zero.
Some of them came back to a non-zero value very quickly, just a few minutes.
Tennessee, I think, was five and a half days.
The count stayed at zero before it came back.
And that was in a particular precinct?
This is nationwide.
The one in Tennessee, though, was a specific precinct that went down to zero and stayed that way for like five days?
The whole state total.
The whole state total?
For five days, five and a half days.
I've got a chart for it.
And by the way, I live in Tennessee and I should know the answer.
Sorry, I don't know.
machine company through the whole state? Sorry I don't know.
Okay Jeff is that one machine company through the whole state?
Do they all use one machine company?
Yeah.
Tennessee, I'm trying to remember.
I believe they're entirely a Dominion state, correct?
I'll have to check.
So, I guess what I was getting at is if you had two or three machine companies and they all went to zero and stayed there for five days, well then we start to get some real answers because I'll again, but we already see a pattern that seems consistent to kind of come to the conclusions we're coming to.
Yeah, no, this is not the report from the individual election management servers.
This is the report from the Secretary of State at each state.
Okay.
Which goes to Clarity, which goes to Edison Research, which goes to New York Times, which goes to all the TV stations.
Now, the reason I brought this up... Yeah, because you said this is another little wrinkle you're adding.
The reason you brought it up is because... The reason I brought it up because...
In the case of a PID controller, there is a parameter called K sub I, which refers to the integral, which says, remember the yet as yet uncorrected error to correct it later.
So this is like, let me change metaphors from cruise control to you're trying to drive down the center of the lane on the highway.
And you realize you're a foot to the left of the center.
And so you turn the wheel to the right, but then you cross the center and now you're too far to the right.
So a careful driver will turn the wheel, but not hard enough to get all the way to center before turning it, before turning the wheel back.
But as you get closer to center, then gradually straighten out the wheel So that you just approach the center line and don't go over it or don't go over it too far.
So during that period of time from where you realized you were a foot to the left and you actually got back to the center, as you are making the correction, you're making less than the necessary correction.
Because the necessary correction would be jerk to the right.
I'm on the center, jerk back to center.
And that will produce a very unstable system.
So.
One possibility, just a possibility, that if a PID controller was used, it might have been listening for the state total to be set to zero to say, clear the integral accumulator, basically restart the election.
So we've gotten too far off track to correct.
So just set everything to zero.
Forget any uncorrected error so far.
Start the election over after it comes back from non-zero.
So that's a possible reason for speculating there might have been an internet connection that was listening for a signal to do the reset.
I don't know.
Would that mean the manipulation wasn't on the individual voting machines but on the software of the Secretaries of State?
Well, it was on the county machine.
It could be on both.
I think that it would have to be in both places, frankly, from everything that we've seen.
And I think it's important to point out that these Edison Zero events occurred shortly after Florida was called for President Trump, which many of us who are doing this research believe that that was a surprise.
Uh, it was not supposed to go that way.
Uh, and, uh, it was, it was, I believe, a half an hour, I believe, of that.
Suddenly all these Edison Zero events began.
Okay, wait a minute.
Let's stop there.
I was going to take calls, but we're not going to have time because this is too fascinating what we've gotten into here.
You're saying they were not planning for President Trump to even win his home state of Florida.
If you look at the polls for three solid weeks before the election, Every single day except one, the polls show Biden ahead.
So were those legitimate polls, or was that the programming narrative?
Or both.
Don't know.
Yeah, some of one, some of another.
And people have dug into Florida.
I found an article today, in fact, for a document that I'm writing.
The Hispanic and minority vote in Florida was completely unexpected.
There was easily an eight-point swing in what was expected to what actually happened, an eight-point swing in favor of President Trump, which was plenty to have thrown a wrench.
So what you're saying is if they were not counting on President Trump winning Florida, but he did, Then that that goes into the Electoral College total for Trump.
The Electoral College votes in Florida go into his column.
That means all of a sudden we've got to make sure he's winning some other... that Biden wins other states to put Biden up to make up for the loss of electoral votes in Florida.
So this goes back to the analogy by Dr. Walter Doherty, which is you've got to have a massive correction coming in very quickly to fix a very severe unexpected problem.
Yes, and this is a good example of the phrase you referred to before of overwhelming the algorithm by voting on election day.
So as Jeff said, the Hispanic or Latino community turnout, especially in Florida, Far exceeded the expectations, and it's easy to understand why, because if you have parents or grandparents that fled Cuba or Venezuela or some other socialist or communist country, they know all too well, we don't want that here.
And so, that I think was a factor in leading more of them to turn out.
The way that would have illustrated overwhelming the algorithm is that the expectation was there would be so many votes processed in mail-in and then the election day turnout would be this much and it would be in favor of President Trump, but we would have enough in the preceding mail-in votes to compensate for it.
And now all of a sudden there's a higher turnout than expected.
And that means there aren't enough non-voting voters left to even make up ballots without going over a hundred percent.
Because if you get to the end of the election and you have more votes than voters, That's case closed.
That's what we would think, but that's what happened in Pennsylvania.
They had more votes than voters and nobody blinked an eye against state law that said you can't certify an election with more votes than voters, but they did it anyway in Pennsylvania.
Well, it's mathematically impossible to have a fair election with more votes than voters.
Indeed it is.
So what you're saying, Dr. Daugherty, is very intriguing, and Jeff, because what it denotes... So here would be the obvious question.
When this happened and Trump wins Florida, which they weren't expecting, and they've got to overcorrect, and you say they've got to basically start the election over, that's why everything went to zero.
Because you can't end up with more votes than voters, so they had to put everything to zero.
True or false?
True?
That was part of it.
Okay.
Go ahead, Jeff.
No, that is definitely a possibility.
The Edison Zero effects have always looked to me like it was the result of pushing a panic button, going to a Plan B. Okay.
Where in here, then, did the halting of all the votes occur?
Where everything stopped in those five states.
Where in this narrative did that occur?
During the Edison Zero events.
Ah.
And why would they need then to stop all the counting and hold everything while there is this resetting everything like that?
Why would they need to halt it?
Because they've got to stop the software?
Got to reset the software?
No, as you and Jeff both alluded to, if Florida's large number of electoral votes is not going to go to Biden, then you have to take some other swing states that They had put in the probably Trump column.
So if you look at polls, they give the definitely Trump, probably Trump, probably Biden, definitely Biden.
And then there's just a tiny number of states right in the middle of toss up.
And so when they had Florida move from the likely Biden to the definitely Trump side of the balance, then they had to Say, okay, what toss up states can we push over the line to compensate for that?
That's just a theory, but that's how anybody plans a campaign.
The way they can't plan a campaign, whether it's for a, for governor, they look at the counties around the state and say, okay, which counties are definitely going to vote for me, which are definitely going to vote against me.
Which will probably vote for me, which will probably vote against me, and then which are really a toss-up, and then I'll spend my campaign resources and my visits on the ones that I can influence to push them my way.
Except here the influence was, I think, malign.
And real quickly, as for why they stopped, I mean, many of us have to budget.
We know how much money we're getting in in the month, and we know how we're going to spend it.
And in the middle of the month, you lose the transmission on your car.
Do you immediately know exactly what to do?
No.
You go back, and you look at everything, and you come up with a new plan.
It's the same thing. So they so what you're saying then Jeff is they had to stop everything
look at the data and see how do we adjust that will be not over correcting like Dr. Doherty was
saying a while ago where you try to correct your car after it's gone off to the right side and
you're on the warning track we all you know we hear but you're like whoa and but you don't
over correct the other the other way, you've got to figure out how am I going to
correct gradually.
So they had to stop everything, take a look at these so-called swing states, and say,
okay, now here's what we're going to have to do to make this look legit.
Is that what you're saying, Jeff?
In essence, exactly.
I've been doing this for- They had to figure out what they had to work
with.
They had to figure out what they had to work with, what they could frankly get away with
at that point.
So yeah, there was some indigestion that night, definitely.
And there's enough computer red flags in all of this to show you it wasn't from a natural process, correct?
In all these states.
Correct.
This is only one of them in this report.
This is only one.
And I don't know about you guys, Because I'm not a mathematician, okay?
I'm not a computer expert.
But as a reporter and a talk show host...
The last 20-25 minutes have been some of the most fascinating analysis I have seen in the last two years.
What we just did in the last 20 minutes was, maybe it's just me, maybe you guys are so immersed in it, but the way we just broke this down and the analogies and the way you're describing it for us lay people, you know, some of it's like, oh my head's are spinning, you know, my head's spinning, but What we just did in the last 20-25 minutes in bringing in the example of Florida, which I guess I was not aware of the fact that they weren't counting on Trump winning Florida, and so it explains why they had to overcorrect.
It explains now these states going to zero.
What we just did in the last 20-25 minutes, I think the average person could watch it and go, okay, wait a minute.
These are all details that make a lot of sense, much of it I did not know, and warrants a much, much bigger investigation.
I mean, I don't know how any layperson could look at what we just did in the last 20-25 minutes in layman terms and not say, we got a problem!
Closing comments from both of you?
We do have a problem, and we're going to keep working to fix it.
Jeff?
Absolutely, and when I did this report, I did the report to establish More than enough probable cause for serious, serious investigations and getting to the light of what happened so that we can prevent it from happening again and fully bring to light what happened in 2020.
Dr. Dougherty, what's your website?
I occasionally post on Telegram at drdpresents, dr underscore d underscore presents.
And yours, Jeff?
Magaraccoon.com.
That's endorsed by Jimmy Kimmel.
And look at the screen here, folks!
We now have two banners, so surely you can't miss it at FrankSpeech.com, RaccoonArmyPresents, and then FingerprintsOfFraud, now at FrankSpeech.com.
Thank you to both of my esteemed guests and smart mathematicians, and hopefully your host broke it down for you in layman terms that we can understand, because these guys are brilliant, and I think we did.
Thank you so much for being with us.
I'm Brandon House in for Mike Lindell.
Continue to pray for his family as they have the memorial service for Mike's father on Friday and Saturday.
Mike will be back next week.
Again, support what Mike is doing.
MikePillow.com.
Use the promo code L77.
Look, you got Mother's Day, Father's Day, graduation gifts, weddings, housewarming gifts.
There's plenty of reasons to be buying gifts this time of the year.
And why would you not want to get quality products for them?
Particularly those who just graduate from high school.
Get them a good few gifts at MyPill.com to take off to college.
Right now we have a sale on the luxurious Giza Dream Sheets and more.
And a sale on slippers, slides, and sandals.
Check it all out at MyPill.com.
Use that promo code L77.
Get a great product for a family or friend or yourself.
And support the work of Mike Lindell and this broadcast on Lindell TV.
Everybody wins.
MyPillow.com, promo code L77.
Thanks for watching.
Take care.
▲
Export Selection