All Episodes
Previous Next
May 5, 2023 - The Lindell Report - Mike Lindell
01:01:39
The Lindell Report (5-5-23)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And now here's where it gets even better.
We've all experienced those temperature-related sleep interruptions where you get too hot, you toss and turn, you flip your pillow over to the cool side.
Well, all that's gone with my brand new MyPillow 2.0 Cooling Fabric that's made with temperature-regulating thread.
The best sleep just got even better.
Whether you have a MyPillow or not, you need to get the brand new MyPillow 2.0.
Call or go to MyPillow.com now.
Use your promo code and for a limited time when you buy one, you'll get a second one absolutely free.
You're sleeping even better.
And cooler too.
And you're looking good.
Feeling good.
I knew you would.
Visit MyPillow.com Hello, I'm Mike Lindell, and I'm excited to announce my new product, my coffee.
I get products all the time from entrepreneurs, from my new platform, mystore.com.
And when I tried my coffee for the first time, I was blown away.
It is the best coffee I've ever had in my life.
I spent the last four months doing my due diligence, and this family-owned business micromanages every step from the fields to the cup to ensure the best quality coffee you're ever going to have.
It starts with the beans that are grown in Honduras.
Honduras' volcanic soil and humid climate make the perfect growing conditions for coffee plants.
Which produced the best beans ever.
Then each batch is tested for its aroma, taste and other aspects to meet the highest standards in the coffee industry.
And after that it goes into production which is all done right here in the USA.
It's like you're getting that small batch specialty coffee but delivered right to your front door.
So go to mystore.com or call the number on your screen.
Use the promo code and you'll get your very own My Coffee for 25% off.
You guys all know that I've traveled the country for the past year and a half.
I've stayed in hundreds of hotels.
I've tried every coffee out there.
Well, some of the coffees have that terrible aftertaste, some that leave me jittery or I get an upset stomach.
Well, my coffee is different.
It's the richest, smoothest, best coffee I've ever had.
My coffee comes in a variety of flavors.
You get them ground or whole bean, plus it's certified organic and non-GMO.
I guarantee it'll be the best coffee you've ever had.
So go to mystore.com or call the number on your screen.
Use your promo code and you'll get my coffee for 25% off.
And I'm going to give you deep discounts on all my store products.
That's mystore.com.
It's my new platform for USA entrepreneurs.
Please order now.
This is the Lindell Report, bringing you news combined with hope by offering practical
and achievable action points to assist you in defending and preserving faith and freedoms.
And now, here is your host, Mike Lindell.
All right, Brandon House in for Mike Lindell.
Remind you that please pray for Mike and his family.
I think there is a service tonight and tomorrow.
The family commemorating the life of Mike Lindell's father who passed away sadly last week.
So that is taking place today and tomorrow.
So Mike is planning on being back and continuing on with the mission at hand next week.
So pray for his family this weekend if you would, please.
Joining me tonight is going to be Roger Stone.
Is Michelle Obama about to run for president?
Is the deep state turning on Biden?
Is this their time to be done with him and enter Michelle Obama running for president?
How about any new news on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy?
Did you know there was a Secret Service agent, a black Secret Service agent, he reportedly overheard something being said in the Oval Office between the Kennedys, Bobby and President Kennedy, and Lyndon Baines Johnson.
What did he possibly hear that might give us a little insight into why Lyndon Baines Johnson, according to many, was involved in taking out President John F. Kennedy?
That's the name of the book, The Man Who Killed Kennedy, book by Roger Stone.
We'll then be joined by Garland Federico and Dan Eastman talking about a piece of legislation being introduced That would stop non-government organizations from receiving federal funds to register people to vote and be involved in other things where there's been a lot of shenanigans going on.
We'll tell you about that piece of legislation.
They'll give a briefing to us on that.
I brought that to their attention today and asked them if they would please look into that and then brief us on that bill.
And then Susan Swift will join us, National Right to Life.
She'll join us because Well, there is talk that one of the greatest threats, according to many of the pro-abortionists, the greatest threats to liberty and freedom and their whole movement is, wait for it, Christians!
The Christians that are opposing the abortion pill, which is right now being considered by the Supreme Court, at least that's coming up, and so that in itself is an interesting article that's out today.
I sent that over to Susan and said, can you please comment on this?
Because we know, as we've talked about here so many times, people who make up the cultural Marxist agenda, largely the Frankfurt School who came to America in 1933, Particularly Herbert Marcuse, who coined the phrase, make love not war.
You guys all know that phrase, make love not war.
That was brought to us by a guy, a cultural Marxist, by the name of Herbert Marcuse.
And he put together a coalition of victims.
People, he said, are the victims of who?
The Christians and the capitalists.
Who are your oppressors?
What is the source of all suffering and oppression?
It's Christians, Christianity, and capitalism, don't you know?
So he created a coalition of victims.
And, well, that's exactly what's happening today.
Christians are being, again, marginalized, characterized, terrorized, and now they're going to legalize the terrorizing of Christians, of conservatives, of patriots.
And declare that they are the source of all suffering and oppression.
Well, a new article out seems to be a gaslighting that narrative.
We'll talk about that and other things along the way.
Don't forget we are brought to you by you, so please consider going to mypillow.com and using that promo code L77.
Sheets, towels, blankets, pet beds, slippers, sandals, mattresses, mattress toppers, robes.
There's a sale of the luxurious Giza Dream Sheets going on right now, as well
as slippers, slides, and sandals all going on right now at mypillow.com. Please use that promo code L77,
support the Lindell Report, the work of Mike Lindell and Lindell TV. Joining me now is a broadcaster
here on Lindell TV, none other than Roger Stone of the Stone Zone. Roger, welcome back to the
broadcast. Thank you for making time for force tonight. Brandon, great to be with you. You too, my
friend. I...
I called you up today because I was looking at an article.
I'll try to see if I can find it real quick.
I put it on my aggregated news site worldviewreport.com and over there the article was about Uh, maybe what was being set up here was a run for the White House by none other than Michelle Obama.
What do you make of all that's come out this week?
Not been a good week for the Bidens.
Is the deep state about to throw him overboard for Michelle Obama?
Well, uh, Brandon, to begin with, I thought that his, uh, the nature of Joe Biden's announcement, a video, uh, no live rally, no live event, no tell a town hall.
No events around the country, no fundraising events.
It looked to me more like a holding action than it did an announcement of candidacy.
The polls show us that Less than a third of Democrats think he should run for re-election.
There are new allegations against him coming out of the House Oversight Committee.
We remain to see how that plays out.
But a specific allegation of bribery, which of course he could be impeached for if there was in fact evidence of that, that remains to be seen.
I have thought for some time that ultimately the Democratic Party Uh, would not nominate Joe Biden that Joe Biden would either, uh, elect not to run, uh, for reasons of his health or if he refuses.
Conceivably be removed under the 25th Amendment of the Constitution, which merely requires a majority of the cabinet and the vice president, who clearly has a self interest in that particular maneuver.
And I think as he looks increasingly weak as a general election candidate, the odds are overwhelming that he will be replaced.
Now the question becomes, who did they replace him with?
Uh, the same Democrats, you know, Joe Biden is an inherently weak candidate for reelection.
Realize that Kamala Harris is an equally weak candidate for election, perhaps even weaker than Joe Biden, since she's completely incoherent.
Uh, and therefore the only way I think within the confines of the modern day Democratic Party that you could replace a woman of color, uh, who, uh, had a seated to the presidency is with another far more popular, uh, woman of color.
And that would be Michelle Obama.
She is out doing a book tour.
She's out doing another voter registration drive.
The fact that she says repeatedly she's not interested and she's not running, well, there's proof right now that she is interested and she's probably running.
That's how politics works.
They have just declared Chicago, her hometown, as the site of the convention.
How convenient.
And the Democrats have actually changed their historical primary and caucus selection process to eliminate Iowa's historic first-in-the-nation caucuses and New Hampshire's first-in-the-nation primary to move those behind South Carolina, if at all.
And South Carolina is of course the state that Michelle Obama claims is her native state because
her grandparents came from there. And it is also a state where African Americans are about 50% of the
normal Democratic primary vote. So it's a perfect state for her to launch her late candidacy.
She could raise $100 million in two weeks, no problem whatsoever. I don't think anyone in the
Democratic Party would have the gumption to challenge her.
Perhaps she takes Gavin Newsom for Vice President. Gag me with a spoon. So yeah, I think
this is a very real possibility.
I've had Joel Gilbert, the documentary filmmaker, on my show a couple of times.
I think you have as well.
He's done an excellent book entitled Michelle Obama 2024.
There's a companion documentary that's even better than the book, Michelle Obama 2024.
Very easy to find.
He makes a very, very strong case.
Well, you make a very strong case.
I mean, the fact that they're going to have the Democratic National Convention in Chicago, where she spent a lot of time.
You mentioned trying to move up the primary in South Carolina to that date, where she claims that as her home state.
I mean, wow, all of it starts to, the book deal that she's put out there.
Now she's out there doing voter drives.
I mean, everything, everything would say she's running.
I mean, the odds of all those things happening are not real great if she wasn't, right?
I think that's true.
I also think we have to be honest.
She'd be a very, very formidable candidate.
Anyone who thinks she would be easy to beat is kidding themselves.
She'd be extraordinarily formidable.
She, of course, has never held public office, so she has no record to attack.
It would be, in essence, the third term for her husband.
Or maybe it would be the fourth term for her husband.
I'm not sure about that.
One of the factors here, of course, depends on how things play out for Joe Biden.
Uh, based on what we have already seen, uh, in terms of the revelations by the New York Post, uh, regarding Hunter Biden's laptop, uh, given these new revelations this week by Chairman Comer, uh, of the House Committee, uh, who claims that a whistleblower has come forward, uh, with very solid evidence that Joe Biden was bribed as vice president.
These are very serious allegations.
Now, could they disappear overnight?
They could.
Could the FBI claim that they don't have any such evidence or that such evidence no longer exists?
They could.
We really don't know where this goes.
I continue to see it reported that Hunter Biden may be charged with minor tax infractions and in lying on a form that was involved in purchasing a firearm.
It's amazing to me that he has clearly lobbied for various foreign nations without filing a Foreign Agents Registration Act registration.
Something that Paul Manafort did hard time for.
Doesn't appear he's going to be charged with that.
At least doesn't appear that way today.
Taking massive payments from the Chinese.
I think this has been documented.
I think to the point of treason, whether he's going to be prosecuted at all will be a factor.
How serious that prosecution is, if it ever happens, will be a factor.
Now you combine to that Joe Biden's inability to perform on the stump.
I mean, some days he has good days, some days he has bad days.
His delivery at the White House correspondence dinner, his delivery, not his content, but his delivery was, I think, quite good.
But the very next day, He doesn't appear to know where he is and doesn't seem, he couldn't remember when the last time he traveled abroad, yet he was in Ireland, uh, only days ago.
So, um, I think his performance, uh, gives professional Democrats a real pause as to whether he is their strongest candidate.
Uh, and, uh, it increasingly appears to me, I still believe this, that, uh, former president Donald Trump is highly likely to be the Republican nominee.
And I think they seriously question whether Biden can beat him.
And how do you think debates between President Trump and Michelle Obama would go down?
That boggles the mind.
That's even hard to figure out.
One of the things that is interesting is I have been very interested, just from a political science point of view, in the candidacy of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
First of all, he's not a close friend of mine.
He's an acquaintance.
No, I'm not running his campaign, nor am I advising his campaign, nor am I involved in
any way of his campaign.
I did have a picture taken of him one time when I met him.
General Flynn was there.
Such a picture proves nothing whatsoever.
Our views on a number of issues, such as abortion or gun control, are quite different.
But in terms of his world view, in terms of his view of the corporate government cabal
that has driven this country to the brink of World War III, something that I think both
his father and his uncle were murdered over, I think is very interesting and very compelling.
It is interesting to me the extent to which they will not give him a debate.
There will be no Democratic Party debates.
He'll never be allowed in a debate.
Whether they let him even get on the ballot in some states and caucuses remains to be seen.
ABC News does an extensive interview with him, leaves 80% of the interview on the cutting room floor because they decided that his views were misinformation.
In other words, they're not letting their viewers decide about his views.
That's extraordinary in itself.
When he announced his candidacy five minutes into his announcement speech, Facebook Live
kills the feed.
Why did they fear the truth so much?
Why will they not let him openly and fairly compete?
Just let the people, let the voters decide whether they believe him, whether they like his views.
In a strange way, I saw a poll today that had him at 21, which is more than respectable considering the level of censorship and cancellation.
I suspect this is one of those instances where the people really like what they can't have.
Where it makes people more curious that they can't hear Robert Kennedy, so they're more anxious to find a platform like Twitter, for example, where they can hear what he has to say.
What about a Donald Trump RFK Jr.
ticket?
What are your thoughts of that?
Yeah, that somebody was me.
I think I may have been the first person.
I wrote a substack on it several weeks ago.
I was gratified to see Steve Bannon parroting it about two weeks later, but it's a free country.
You can grab a good idea if you want.
This isn't outside the box thought though.
My thesis was that if he was kneecapped Bernie Sanders style in the Democratic Party, not allowed to fairly compete for that nomination, but raised a number of serious issues, that there would be a large number of disaffected Democrats.
Uh, and that perhaps given the divisions in the country, it's time for a bipartisan unity ticket.
And Donald Trump would have to convince the Republican National Convention to nominate Robert Kennedy.
Robert Kennedy would have to be willing to accept that nomination.
There are a number of legal obstacles.
There are some states that have what is known as a sore loser law, meaning that if you competed for a major party nomination on the ballot in that state, you're ineligible to be on the general election ballot for office.
There are also some states Where in order to be the nominee of the Republican Party for Vice President, one would have to be a registered Republican.
So there's a number of legal and political obstacles, none of which I think are completely insurmountable.
We do know, for example, that John McCain seriously considered having Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman as his running mate.
They did a lot of legal research.
It would have been plausible at the last minute.
McCain changed his mind.
If ever there was a time in which you could unite the America First Republicans, solve the issue of some voters' unhappiness with President Trump over his COVID-19 vaccination record, Trump could pledge to appoint Robert Kennedy to a Blue Ribbon Commission to get to the bottom of what happened in the COVID-19 pandemic.
How about to get to the bottom of who killed his father and uncle?
I would not be opposed to that either, although the last time we did this, the House Select Committee on Assassinations got stonewalled by the CIA and the FBI got no assistance whatsoever.
Folks who want to know that story can go to my book, The Man Who Killed Kennedy, The Case Against LBJ.
It's the book that I'm proudest of.
It's a New York Times bestseller.
You can go to stonezone.com in the shop and get a signed copy or you can give your money to Jeff Bezos who hates your guts and buy it on Amazon, but it is available there.
OK, let's talk about a little bit about the Kennedy assassination before we let you go.
There was a Secret Service agent.
I think he was one of the first black Secret Service agents, if I remember correctly.
And you told me an interesting story about him.
Tell our audience.
Story this week.
Um, that Abraham Bolden, uh, who was, I think the, actually the first African-American secret service agent, uh, who wouldn't go along with the Kennedy assassination narrative.
I think who was set up, uh, for prosecution by the FBI, who was ultimately pardoned by president Joe Biden.
Great credit for Joe Biden for an act of justice in this case.
Um, I wrote to president Trump, uh, imploring him to, Pardon Bolden when he was president, he elected not to do so.
But Bolden says that at a time when Vice President Lyndon Johnson was under investigation because of his involvement with a Texas Wheeler dealer named Billy Sal Estes, who had received these federal cotton government contracts, which Johnson was allegedly skimming off of, That Bolden, who was guarding JFK that day, overheard a fight in the Oval Office between Vice President Lyndon Johnson, President Kennedy, and Attorney General Robert Kennedy, in which he said to Johnson, he heard Johnson say, you want to send me to prison over some GD cotton deal?
Give me a break!
That would indicate that, as my book claims and many others claim, and as Bolden himself now, I'm told, claims, it provides the motive for Lyndon Johnson.
In fact, LBJ was under active investigation in two major scandals that would have sent him to prison, certainly would have cost him the vice presidency.
The Billy Sal Estes scandal.
Billy Sal Estes was a major, major story.
He had Lyndon Johnson's largesse, these enormous agricultural commissions, non-existent fertilizer tanks, and so on.
It's interesting in Robert Caro's biography, multi-volume biography, which is considered the authoritative work on LBJ, Billy Solstice's name never appears, not even once.
Solstice, after going to prison and coming out of prison, and after Johnson's death, insisted that he was in the room and overheard the plot to murder President John F. Kennedy.
Perhaps that's why Mr. Caro does not include Solstice in his book.
Johnson was also under investigation in the Bobby Baker scandal.
Bobby Baker was the Secretary of the U.S.
Senate.
He was essentially Johnson's right-hand man.
Also Johnson's bag man, no major piece of federal legislation moved without a payoff to Lyndon Johnson.
Indeed, Drew Pearson, the singer best known and probably most influential syndicated columnist of his day, had already written a column for November 23rd, accusing Lyndon Johnson of taking a payoff For a contract, a defense contract with General Dynamics.
That column got spiked, of course, when President John F. Kennedy was killed.
So this new report by Bolden is very interesting.
I think it gives greater credence that Lyndon Johnson, not acting alone, and I'm not saying that, never have, but Lyndon Johnson acting in concert with the Central Intelligence Agency with organized crime, With Big Texas Oil, with the Secret Service, and with the Pentagon, and I think with the international bankers in terms of financing, was involved in, I hate to say it, yes, a conspiracy to kill John F. Kennedy.
Cui Bono as they say in Latin.
Who benefits?
Who stood to benefit the most?
You can read my book, The Man Who Killed Kennedy, The Case Against LBJ.
I think I make a very compelling case using eyewitness evidence, fingerprint evidence, and deep Texas politics to make a compelling case.
Have you ever interviewed Mr. Bolden?
Uh, I had an exchange of correspondence with Abraham Bolden.
He thanked me when he ultimately got his pardon, even though his pardon came under President Biden.
Again, I salute President Biden for that act of justice.
Okay.
Do you think, would he ever be willing to do an interview with you?
I mean, I'd love to see that on the Stone Zone.
That's an excellent idea.
I do, we do have mutual friends.
I will have somebody reach out to him and see if he's available.
That's a terrific idea.
I would love to see that interview, particularly because we're about to come up on, what is it, what anniversary of the killing of President Kennedy is this, this November?
What year would that be?
Number?
1963, so I'm terrible at math, you tell me.
Well, let's see.
Let me do the math on that.
Because you and I talked about the fact that we were going to do a special this fall on it because of the date.
See, we're in 2023, subtract 1963.
That means the 60th.
The 60th anniversary is this November.
So you and I talked about doing a couple special broadcasts with some experts.
But yeah, that would be a great thing for you to capture and have that exchange between the two of you.
That'd be a historic interview.
Well, as you point out, the Stone Zone can be seen every day at 5 o'clock right here on FrankSpeech.com at LyndellTV2 or just go to StoneZone.live.
We're going to look into that.
That's a great idea.
StoneZone.com, StoneZone.com.
You're being picked up on all kinds of outlets and redistributed on all kinds of platforms.
The show's really grown, hasn't it?
It's doing extraordinarily well.
I'm still very, very grateful to Mike Lindell for giving us this home base, this home platform.
But yeah, you can watch us on Rumble, you can watch us on Twitter, you can watch us
on Telegram, you can watch us on Twitch, you can watch us on Odyssey, you can watch us
at Cozy.tv.
Many, many options for where you can watch The Stone Zone or you can come right here
to FranksBeach.com and then scroll down to LindellTV2 or if you go to StoneZone.live
That will also take you directly, as one of several options, to FrankSpeech.com.
We're very grateful to Mike Lindell for this platform.
He's been a great supporter and a great friend.
Indeed, indeed.
And we appreciate you, Roger.
StoneZone.com.
StoneZone.com.
And folks, if you want to read a great book for the summer, The man who killed Kennedy.
This would be the year to read it.
I have studied the Kennedy assassination for 30 years or so.
Nowhere near what Roger's done.
But as a little bit of an armchair hobby, that has been the study of that murder of a sitting president.
And I think Roger Stone has nailed it in his book.
I've said that many times on air.
Being the 60th anniversary of that tragic murder in broad daylight this coming November, this would be a book to add to your summer reading.
The Man Who Killed Kennedy.
You can get it at StoneZone.com.
StoneZone.com.
Roger, I hope you have a great weekend.
Thanks for having me, Brandon.
God bless you.
Yesterday was National Prayer Day.
It was a great day.
And together, let's pray.
For our nation.
Indeed.
Indeed.
Roger, one more question real quick.
Who do you think President Trump will pick as his VP candidate?
Terry Lake or who?
I think that's an impossible question to answer.
Until you see how the nomination process unfolds, you don't know, other than someone who's qualified, obviously, who you need, what kind of person you need.
You don't know if you need a woman, a man, somebody from the Midwest, an evangelical Christian.
It's unclear politically.
I love Carrie Lake.
I think she'd be a great vice president.
I think someday she could be a great president, but it's just very premature to say politically what goes into this.
Obviously, whoever the president selects has to be prepared and qualified from day one in terms of experience and judgment and qualifications to be president.
But right now it would just be idle speculation.
There's a lot of people I like.
I like Elise Stefanik, the congresswoman from upstate New York.
I like Josh Hawley, the senator from Missouri.
I like Carrie Lake, as I said earlier.
Just way too early to say.
Is the candidacy of Ron DeSantis dead on arrival?
It growingly appears that way.
Now, you can never count out a guy who has $300 million and who is able to extort special interests for more.
I mean, he got $9.5 million from Florida Power and Light and their subsidiaries, and we got the highest increase in our electric bills in Florida state history.
So, the fulcrum of the governorship is very important in terms of his ability to command huge
sums of money.
I don't think it has gone well for him in terms of his performance on the stump, his
lack of a rationale for his candidacy.
You can't say, well, you have to nominate me because Trump can't win when the polls
show Trump beating Biden.
I saw this in 1968.
Nixon can't win.
We need to nominate Nelson Rockefeller.
How did that work out?
I find it interesting that President Trump is going to New Hampshire next week to St.
Anselm's College, which is the same college where Nixon launched his historic comeback when they made the same false argument against him.
I actually think at this point Donald Trump is our strongest candidate because he can reach certain independents, certain blue-collar Democrats, disaffected Democrats that nominees like Mitt Romney, like John McCain, like Ron DeSantis would be unable to attract.
Roger Stone.
Roger Stone's website, folks, stonezone.com.
You can see him here on Lyndell TV, frankspeech.com.
Roger, thanks again for being with us.
Thank you.
Have a great weekend, Brandon.
You too.
I could shoot questions at Roger all night because he's smart.
He's a historian.
He's smart.
He's a great guest.
He's an easy guest to interview.
All right.
Joining me now before we go to Susan Swift is going to be Garland Favorito.
We're hoping we can add in Dan Eastman here.
Garland, welcome back to the broadcast.
Thank you for joining us.
Thank you, Brian.
It's always a pleasure to be with you.
Even on Cinco de Mayo.
Oh, yes, it is.
I should get some good Mexican food for dinner, should I not?
I canceled my plans just for you.
Are you serious?
Now you're making me feel bad.
Don't feel too bad.
What plans did you have that you canceled?
Oh, you gotta go party, you know.
You got some excuse to party.
Well, okay.
I feel bad.
We'll make the interview short so you can go and take care of that.
That's okay.
I partied yesterday, really, to tell you the truth.
Okay.
Well, it's very hard to find guests on Friday night because everybody has a life other than the host who's live on Friday nights.
Friday nights is one of the most challenging nights to find a guest.
Hey, you want to come on tonight and talk about this?
Oh, I'd love to.
I'm going to a birthday party.
No, I'd love to.
I'm taking my wife to dinner.
Everybody's got something they want to do on a Friday night other than apparently appear with me, and then those who do have to cancel their plans like you just did, so I am so sorry.
But anyway.
Well, actually, I was taking my wife to dinner, and I did have to cancel that.
Okay, so just keep adding it on.
Making me feel bad.
But I apologize to her for me.
I won't keep you long.
But I did want you to respond to this article that I sent you.
There's a bill coming out of, well, it's being introduced in Congress.
Did you have a chance to look at that article from The Federalist?
I did.
I'm fully loaded for you, Brandon.
Okay.
So what do you make of this bill?
Do you think it's a good bill?
Well, yeah, it's actually two bills.
One of the bills is H.R.
8461, which was introduced by Claudia Tinney.
And then the other bill, what we call the sister bill in the Senate, was Senator Ted Budd out of North Carolina, and that's S. 4997.
And both of the bills are in response to Joe Biden's executive order, which was 14019, and that was issued all the way back on March 7, 2021.
And Joe Biden called this executive order on promoting access to voting, which is not the responsibility of the of the federal government.
Uh, and, um, but let, maybe we should start with the executive order.
So, um, and I think Logan has that, uh, if he wants to, uh, uh, pop it up on the screen there.
Pop that executive order up there?
Sure, Logan can do that.
So, folks, yeah, um, so this was actually two years ago, and the Republicans did not have control of, of Congress at that time, or at least the House, and they couldn't, they couldn't necessarily, uh, respond to it.
Do anything about it.
But yeah, but one of the interesting things that this bill says, and there it is, I'm gonna flip down to section two, Logan, which I think where I have the biggest issue with, and it says, there you go, right there, let's see, it is the policy of the federal government, To expand access to an education about voter registration and election information and to combat misinformation.
Yeah, right.
In order to enable all eligible Americans to participate in our democracy.
So basically what this was, was we're going to use federal tax dollars to basically tell agencies they need to have to support partisan get-out-to-vote efforts.
So in Section 3 there, I think you can see it says, agencies shall consider ways to expand citizens' opportunities to register to vote and to obtain information about and participate in the electoral process.
Well, so as you know, Brandon, Article 1, Section 4 of the Constitution says that the time, places, and manners of holding elections shall be basically reserved for the states.
So Biden, back there two years ago, basically was putting in a bill that was to use taxpayer monies to direct federal agencies under his control in the executive branch to try to conduct partisan get-out-the-vote efforts that would help get Democrats elected.
So, I mean, it's really absurd and insane, actually, as to why the president has no concern about real election integrity, and he's just simply concerned about winning the next election.
But that was the essence of the executive order that was created, and that in itself is borderline unconstitutional.
We were probably thinking that a A bill, you know, probably a piece of litigation would ensue that would challenge that, but nothing ever happened.
And now that fast forward to this week, as you said, Brandon, that's when we actually had two bills introduced.
Claudia Tinney, they both are called Promoting Free and Fair Elections Act.
Claudia Tinney's H.R.
8461, and then Ted Budd in the Senate has a corresponding bill 4997 and they basically are defunding that.
Let's bring in Dan Eastman.
Attorney Dan Eastman with Garland Favorito here.
Garland is with VoterGA.org.
And that's kind of the nutshell.
Let's bring in Dan Eastman, attorney Dan Eastman with Garland Favorito here.
Garland is with voterGA.org, voterGA.org.
Dan Eastman is an attorney and someone who's been handling as an attorney a lot of these
election cases.
Dan, I know you're traveling on the road tonight.
Thanks for joining us by phone.
Uh, have you been hearing what Garland has been saying, and what are your thoughts of this, on these, uh, couple bills?
Here's a screenshot, by the way, of the, uh, article at The Federalist.
Republicans move to curb Biden's federal interference elections.
Uh, again, this piece of legislation introduced by Representative Tinney of New York.
Hi Brennan, thanks for having me on.
seeks to defame Biden's March 2021 executive order that required federal
agencies to interfere in the electoral process by using taxpayer money to boost
voter registration and get out to vote activities, which largely I think have
been done in Democrat places. I think that's what you experienced in Wisconsin,
is it not, Dan?
Hi, Brennan, thanks for having me on. Yeah, it's a real complicated problem that we have.
I think Garland, good to hear from you Garland, it's always nice to talk with you.
It is not a federal role to basically create voter rolls.
If you think about how we vote, we're electors in a ward or a precinct, and that is defined by statute.
If you're over 18 and you're not in jail and you're alive and you meet the criteria, you have a right to vote in that precinct.
And then you have an obligation or perhaps a duty to register to vote.
In order to actually go in and cast a ballot, you have to register.
And that's the scope of what a voter is.
And what this stuff is all about is getting as many people registered into the voter roll as possible.
And as Garland pointed out, this is really the work and the duty of local governments and state governments to decide who their electors are and how they get their name on the voter roll.
So by Biden expanding this into every federal agency, interfering with the state's process is just plain wrong.
There's nothing in the federal constitution that requires the federal government to do any such thing at all.
And frankly, if they were that concerned, they could do some sort of a block grant to the states to assist the states in properly registering voters, but they don't do that.
They're using the power of the administrative state to the federal agencies to do the work that very much should be done at the local level.
And some of this is partisan.
If you look at, there's two things, getting people on the registration rolls, and then there's the get-out-the-vote effort.
Well, the get-out-the-vote effort is just pure party politics.
That's what parties exist to do.
So when you see federal dollars flowing into this idea of creating this massive, large, giant voter roll It's all done because they know very well that all the millions of new names going in, all the left is tracking them on Facebook and Google and all these social media things.
They know how those new registration names vote or tend to vote.
So that once they get these populated into the database, then it's nothing but a relentless emails and texts and a bombardment to get these people out to vote.
And you don't want the federal government stepping into that.
Yeah, absolutely.
So, Eric, let's say that that electronic registration system, Eric, have they received?
Are they one of the non-government organizations that's received federal money to develop their voter rolls?
I don't I'm not aware of that, but I do know one thing in Wisconsin, we have the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty.
Will has brought a suit against the Wisconsin Elections Commission for assisting these non-governmental organizations in using illegal registration forms in Wisconsin.
And they're registering hundreds of thousands of people.
Basically, they're asking things on the registration form that are illegal, like your gender and your racial background.
And in Wisconsin, we don't ask people their race and their gender because it's not important to voting.
But our state government works directly with these NGOs To flood the state with these fake registration statements.
And it was amazing, because the Wisconsin Election Commission staff actually set up a dropbox with a false address, because they know they weren't supposed to be doing this, but they did it anyway.
And all of those things being mailed in, it says, elections commission, and then a P.O.
box, and then the wrong zip code.
Wow.
Wow.
These things are all being delivered across town in Madison and nobody found out, well
we found out about it through some citizen researchers, but this is the level that the
Dems are going to get names into that database.
This is their game and this is what they do.
Wow.
Garland, you want to comment in closing?
Well, yeah, just a couple of quick things.
I wanted to see if Logan could put up Representative Tenney's bill real quickly.
But to get to your point about Eric, they didn't need federal funds because they got funds from George Soros.
So that's pretty much where they came into being, along with David Becker, who is a notorious George Soros operative.
Um, but the bill was very here it is.
Here's the bill right here.
I got a copy here 118 there it is And if you just scroll down to about line six there, uh, it it's uh, just a little bit further And you can see uh, I think it was interesting for the audience to see a bill and there you have it uh, they are going to make sure that none of the funds made available So it's pretty easy.
expensive wages can be used to solicit or enter into an agreement with a
non-governmental organization like Eric to conduct voter registration or voter
mobilization activities and so on and so on and so on. So it's pretty easy, that's
how simple it is to outlaw this stuff and of course it's another issue to get
it passed but this bill should sail through the House with the Republican
I would think it's a slim majority, and then it might probably have some issues in the Senate.
Yeah.
But my understanding is there may be some actual, some Democrat support for this particular bill, so we'll have to wait and see how it goes.
Yeah, we'll definitely keep you posted.
Closing comment, Dan?
Well, it's good to keep an eye on that.
And I think with technology, we can scour these databases, these voter roll databases.
But you know, the sad thing is, the Democrats are very, very good at getting names in and then getting those people to the polls.
And I think we really have to be looking at forensic audits of these databases these state voter rolls
and a lot more Visibility with respect to the way that technology operates.
Absolutely Garland is with Georgia VA org Georgia, Georgia
voter GA Sorry
Yeah voter GA org voter GA org and Dan has a daily show over on my channel at
wwtv.com www.cwtv.com, a 30-minute daily show.
Attorney Dan Eastman, who's also a professor of economics, breaking down what's happening in America and in our economy and our banking, And all of these things, in layman terms, you can catch it every day, the Eastman Financial Report, the Dan Eastman Financial Report, at www.tv.com.
Gentlemen, thank you both of us for being with us tonight on the Lindell Report.
Have a great weekend.
You as well, thank you.
Dan and Garland checking in.
Joining me now is Susan Swift.
Susan, welcome back to the broadcast.
Thank you for joining us here tonight on the Lindell Report.
Good to be with you again, Brannon.
Thank you.
You as well.
I saw an article tonight on Wired, and that's, it was, you know, not a website I go to very often.
I just happened to go by there today to see what was going on.
One of the websites I occasionally check to see what's going on with technology.
I was a little shocked to find this headline.
Here it is.
Doctors, and how do you say the name of this bill, this pill again, this medication, this abortion pill?
Myth-A-Prestone.
Myth-A-Prestone, okay.
Doctors Behind Myth-A-Prestone band called Christians a top threat.
I was kind of shocked to find that article there on the website that normally deals with technology, but there it is, and I immediately sent it to you.
What are your thoughts tonight on this, Susan?
Tell, first of all, our folks, the organization you're with, and then tell us your thoughts on this article.
Sure.
I'm with the Right to Life League.
Which is America's first pro-life organization.
We were founded in 1967 and we're based in Southern California.
So that's what we do.
Excellent.
And you've got a cat!
I do.
I'm up here visiting in a super secret location.
And Pumpkin the Cat is stalking me.
Well, not a problem.
Delta is off on her MyPillow pet peddling over there.
So, you know, dogs and cats are welcome to be a part of the broadcast.
So what are your thoughts on this?
I mean, the Christians, you know, I was saying earlier tonight, Herbert Marcuse of the Frankfurt School, he's the one that coined that phrase, make love, not war.
He put together a coalition of victims and he grabbed the sexual minorities and the immigrants and the poor and all of them.
And he said, now, who's your oppressor?
And he told them who their oppressor was.
Oh, your problems are all related to the Christians and the capitalists.
The source of all suffering and oppression is Christianity and capitalism.
It seems as though that's exactly what's going on here.
All of our problems are the Christians, the people of faith.
Yes, this is a Marxist commie plot to divide us based on religion.
And yeah, what this article actually did was it kind of crawled up into the American College of Pediatricians, which is an entity, it's a corporate entity, it is not a religious organization, but it is a collection of devout Christian pediatricians and its supporters.
And it's no surprise that the American College of Pediatricians is one of the plaintiffs in this lawsuit seeking to ban Mifepristone, which is the chemical abortion drug that starves babies to death before they're aborted into a toilet.
And that case is right now pending before the Fifth Circuit.
So what this organization WIRED is doing is trying to gin up anti-Christian bias.
And they're suggesting that somehow the American College of Pediatricians is somehow hiding its very nature as a Christian organization.
There is no crime being Christian.
Last I checked.
There is no crime being a Christian organization.
In fact, we have laws that say you can incorporate as a public benefit corporation or as a religious organization if you so choose.
But what this article is trying to do is gin up anti-Christian hate and bias in advance of this very key decision by the Fifth Circuit.
Because what they're going to do, the Fifth Circuit is reviewing a district court opinion That would ban Mifepristone, the chemical abortion drug.
The reason why the district court in Amarillo decided that it should ban the drug is because the FDA has not followed its own rules.
So if you back up a little bit and get out of the pro-abortion, pro-life weeds, if you look at this and you say, well wait a minute.
The FDA is an executive branch creature, and it should be controlled by our laws.
It, in fact, has its own requirements at the FDA, how they're supposed to approve certain drugs for use by the public, because its goal is to make sure that all of the things that it says are safe are truly safe.
Well, the FDA hasn't followed its own rules with respect to mifepristone.
The plaintiffs, and that would be including American College of Pediatricians and Pro-Life Doctors, have alleged that the FDA was pressured way back in 2000 by the Bill Clinton administration in collaboration with the Rockefeller Population Council.
Together, they made sure that Mifepristone got fast-tracked, got approved using a subpart H.
and that these certain restrictions were put in place, but that they have been removed.
And that the FDA has never followed the proper protocol and its own procedures in approving
this very dangerous drug, which is one of the two parts of the chemical abortion drug
protocol.
Wow.
Wow And I also noticed in this article, of course, they have to go after conversion therapy as well.
The group also sought advice on how it's on its continued efforts to promote conversion therapy.
And I know that many, many counties and city councils and states have gone after that, which means that if someone You know says I want to take my child who's now be confused by pop culture in schools and propaganda brainwashing that my little boy now thinks he's a little girl.
I'm going to take him to my pastor.
I'm going to take him to my priest.
I'm going to take him to my local, you know, Family counselor and that family counselor starts working with them on that issue, trying to convince them otherwise.
That in some places has been a crime.
We dealt with that with legislation or a city ordinance in La Crosse, Wisconsin where they were doing that.
And we even had some former mayor, I think it was La Crosse, as well as some former city council members who were coming on my show regularly screaming and hollering about this because the way the ordinance was written in La Crosse, Wisconsin that we covered last year, any person, that means any person, that means a parent, that means a pastor, that means a counselor of anyone under 18.
Well, any person, anyone under 18 can mean the parent.
And their own child!
So, isn't it interesting they also want to go after this conversion therapy, which is really partly at the heart, too, of what they're going for, which is removing parents from any decision in the life of their child.
Absolutely.
This is an assault on parental rights.
And also, it's an assault on the child, him or herself.
Because abortion kills one child at a time.
But gender mutilation and sterilization affects the entire genetic line for the rest of that
individual's life. So when a child chooses to transition and goes through mutilation therapy
and drug therapy and things, that person may never be able to reproduce.
And that fits in line with this entire very sick idea that we should control fertility to the point where we shouldn't be reproducing at all.
It's a very dangerous idea.
And yes, I think in California there are laws that interfere with an ability of a psychologist to be able to counsel a child who identifies as a boy and wants to remain a boy, right?
Or maybe wants to be a girl, but you're not allowed to say that?
I mean, we can't as parents talk to our own children and say, hi honey, you're not a boy.
You can want to be a boy, but you're not.
That's just, that's biological truth.
And that is reality.
And we are, we are in, we are in the struggle right now.
This is, this is good and evil.
I think it is evil personally to try to convince a child under the age of 18, a child that they should, they should experiment at being a different sex, a different gender.
That goes against natural law, that goes against science, that goes against everything that we know.
And yet we have, this is the radical ideology that also fuels abortion, which is all about population control, the control of your ability to even reproduce.
That's why the lie of reproductive freedom is being tossed around.
It's actually the opposite.
When you say reproductive freedom, that's actually a dog whistle that means you want to make sure you don't reproduce.
Wow, and look at this, speaking of California, you're being in California, and an attorney in California.
The Washington Free Beacon's reporting tonight, California bill would require books on all gender expressions in every elementary school.
I'm gonna be very careful scrolling down the page here, because I have to, I know there was, okay, we're good.
There was some graphics, and isn't that sad, folks?
There's graphics We're in an article today that led us to this article and the graphic were cartoons in these books that are for like 8, 9, 10 year olds and I was just trying to be careful to make sure that what those images weren't on this page because I don't want them coming over the television because they show children engage in sexual acts and
Children of the same sex engaged in sex acts with each other.
And I didn't want that going over the screen.
Now think about that, Susan.
I don't want that going over the screen because I don't want to see it unless I have to when it pops up on these websites where I'm doing research.
And even then, some of them have it scrambled, but you can tell what's going on.
But I don't really want to put that out there because then I think we could become as guilty as the people putting it out there.
But isn't that sad that we don't want this going over the airwaves, but this is what's going to kids.
And now California wants to put these books, all gender expressions, in every elementary school.
That's sick.
We shouldn't have child pornography in our schools.
That's crazy talk.
And when all of these different groups accuse people of wanting to ban books, that's another lie.
We just don't want pornographic material in our public schools for children Under the age of 18.
You want to do that kind of stuff?
Go out when you're 18, when you're in college or something else.
Leave our children alone.
No one ever screamed when you would go into a drugstore as a kid, and you would see the pornographic magazine on the top row, and oftentimes in a wrapper, No, I don't know any parents.
I don't even know any leftists, Democrats or leftists, that went around screaming, that's censorship.
That's the equivalent of book burning.
Put those down on the bottom level and open them up where the kids can flip through them.
I don't know when I was, you know, I graduated high school in 1988.
I don't know any parent, regardless of political persuasion, that was saying that's book, the equivalent of book burning and censorship to have them up on the top shelf.
Wrapped and with, you know, solid covers so you can't even see the cover.
Do you know of anyone, any parents who were screaming and hollering?
But now, today, we want to literally give what is deemed offensive, not just offensive, the legal term is, when you put it on television, there's a legal term.
If I were to be on a FCC regulated channel, Obscenity!
That's the word I'm looking for.
The legal term obscenity.
If you were to show some of these images that are in cartoon form in these books, if you were to show them on television, terrestrial TV regulated by the FCC, you could be charged under federal law for obscenity, broadcasting obscenity, but this is in our kids' schools.
But it's okay for kids to see it in our schools.
For schools, obscene material is okay now because there is some sort of radical agenda to sexualize our children.
That doesn't make sense at all.
You're absolutely 100% right.
And what we all have to do is we have to get engaged with our school boards, with our local school governments, everywhere, with our teachers individually.
Show them this material and say, This is obscene.
This is pornography.
It is unacceptable in our schools.
Because what it does is it sexualizes children, and it confuses them, and then it leads them into this transgender mutilation kind of ideology, which is what they want them to have.
But how is it?
How is Planned Parenthood, how is Planned Parenthood and these other groups going to make money on abortions when they're pushing same-sex relationships?
Because, I mean, have they forgotten how a baby's made?
So, I guess what I'm trying to say is, doesn't this hurt their bottom line?
Wouldn't they be the ones that should be out there promoting heterosexual, you know, male and female sex and all kinds of stuff?
I mean, isn't the whole LGBTQ thing going to hurt their bottom line because people aren't getting pregnant when they're having sex with the same sex?
Sadly, that would make sense, but sadly that is not really what the agenda of Planned Parenthood is.
They're actually involved in gender transitioning.
So they're going to make up their bottom line with that?
Yes, because you see their market share has been restricted thanks to the Dobbs decision, and they are now investing in gender transitioning therapy.
So they're changing their business model?
Yes, absolutely, because their business model is population control.
That's what their business model is.
And abortion is part of it, and so is gender transitioning.
Just think about that for a minute.
Their business model is now changing, and they're going to get into the transition.
I guess hormone blockers, puberty blockers, testosterone, estrogen, whoever.
That's where the big money is.
Remember, we've seen reports where hospitals are now engaging in gender mutilations.
In Tennessee!
We had the video last year.
The lady with the hospital here in Tennessee was talking about how much big money there is in that, remember?
Absolutely.
And look, Planned Parenthood and the other abortion providers, they don't want to miss out on the big money because their markets share in abortion, especially chemical abortion drugs.
Mifepristone.
That makes up more than half of their business, but it's being restricted.
So they're going into other drugs.
They're partnering with Big Pharma to be able to sell and provide these gender mutilation drugs.
It is all about the money.
Follow the money.
What's your website, Susan?
It's righttolifeleague.org.
Righttolifeleague.org.
And thanks very much.
No, thank you, Susan.
Righttolifeleague.org.
As always, thank you, Susan, for being with us.
Hope you have a great weekend.
And God bless America.
Thank you, Brandon.
Amen.
Thank you.
Susan Swift checking in, folks.
And if you appreciate what we're doing and what we're covering.
And again, where are you going to get guests like this and topics like this, right?
If you appreciate it, we need your support.
We are supported by you.
A lot of things coming up.
Mother's Day, Father's Day, graduation, weddings, housewarming gifts.
You can do a lot of shopping at MyPillow.com.
Sheets, towels, blankets, pet beds, slippers, sandals, mattresses, mattress toppers, robes, and more!
Use that promo code L77.
L77.
And remember, Say a few special prayers this weekend for the Lindell family as tomorrow is the funeral service for Mike Lindell's father who passed away last week.
Mike intends to be back next week right here.
Thanks for watching.
Take care.
You're watching Lindell TV.
Looks like you've been sleeping well.
Megan!
He's back!
The MyPillow guy!
And you're looking good!
Still feeling good!
▲
Export Selection